Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bispinor

A bispinor, also known as a , is a four-component complex mathematical object in that describes fundamental fermions, such as electrons, quarks, and other elementary particles, under relativistic conditions. It combines two two-component Weyl spinors of opposite —a left-handed and a right-handed —into a single entity that transforms according to the spinor representation of the , ensuring invariance under rotations, boosts, and transformations. Introduced by in 1928 as part of his relativistic , the bispinor provides a framework for incorporating both and , resolving issues like the densities in the Klein-Gordon equation. The , (iγ^μ ∂_μ - m)ψ = 0, where ψ is the bispinor field and γ^μ are the Dirac matrices, governs its behavior and predicts the existence of , such as positrons, as distinct particles with positive energy. In the standard representation, the bispinor ψ can be decomposed as ψ = (φ_R, χ_L)^T, where φ_R and χ_L are the right- and left-chiral components, each with two complex entries, yielding eight real that correspond to particle and states after quantization. Under Lorentz transformations, bispinors transform via 4×4 matrices S(Λ) derived from the double cover SL(2,ℂ) of the Lorentz group, such that a 2π rotation yields ψ → -ψ, requiring a 4π rotation for the identity—a hallmark of spinorial double-valuedness. This structure ensures the bispinor encodes both the four-momentum and four-spin of the particle, with observables like the four-velocity U_μ = ψ† γ^0 γ^μ ψ and four-spin W_μ proportional to the particle's mass and spin properties. In quantum field theory, bispinor fields are quantized to create fermionic creation and annihilation operators, forming the basis for the Standard Model's description of weak and electromagnetic interactions involving chiral projections. Despite their abstract nature, bispinors have been experimentally validated through phenomena like electron spin-orbit coupling and the discovery of antimatter in 1932.

Fundamentals

Definition

A bispinor, also known as a , is a four-component in that transforms under the reducible representation (1/2, 0) \oplus (0, 1/2) of the SL(2,ℂ). This representation combines the two fundamental representations of the , allowing the bispinor to encode both left- and right-handed for particles. The bispinor can be understood as the direct sum of a left-handed Weyl spinor, transforming in the (1/2, 0) representation, and a right-handed Weyl spinor, transforming in the (0, 1/2) representation. In standard notation, it is expressed as \psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix}, where \psi_L and \psi_R are two-component complex spinors representing the left- and right-chiral components, respectively. This structure arises naturally in the chiral basis, where the projectors P_L = (1 - \gamma_5)/2 and P_R = (1 + \gamma_5)/2 isolate \psi_L = P_L \psi and \psi_R = P_R \psi. In physical contexts, bispinors play a central in describing massive fermions, such as electrons and quarks, in four-dimensional Minkowski , accommodating both chiralities to enable Lorentz-invariant mass terms like m \bar{\psi} \psi. This formulation is essential for the , which governs the relativistic dynamics of these particles.

Relation to Spinors and Clifford Algebras

The concept of spinors originated with the need to describe the intrinsic angular momentum, or , of particles like the in non-relativistic . In 1927, introduced two-component spinors, known as Pauli spinors, to represent the spin-1/2 degree of freedom, transforming under the SU(2) double cover of the rotation group SO(3). These spinors provided a faithful representation of spin operators via the but were inadequate for relativistic contexts due to the lack of Lorentz invariance. This construction was motivated by Paul Dirac's 1928 quest for a relativistic that yielded positive-definite probabilities, avoiding the negative probability densities arising in the second-order Klein-Gordon equation for spin-0 particles. Dirac's linear naturally required four components—the bispinor—to satisfy both the form and , resolving the interpretational issues of the Klein-Gordon theory. Bispinors combine a left-handed Weyl with a right-handed Weyl into a four-component object, allowing the Dirac mass term to couple these chiralities dynamically. To address certain issues in the massive case, proposed in two-component spinors, called Weyl spinors, which transform under the (1/2, 0) or (0, 1/2) representations of the SL(2,ℂ). These chiral spinors describe left- or right-handed states for massless particles, where the two components correspond to distinct irreps of the Lorentz algebra. Algebraically, bispinors find their rigorous foundation in , specifically the real Clifford algebra Cl(1,3) associated with Minkowski of (1,3), which has dimension 2^{1+3} = 16. This algebra is generated by vectors satisfying the anticommutation relations {γ^μ, γ^ν} = 2η^{μν}, and the even subalgebra contains the bivectors that generate the Lorentz algebra, with the —a double cover of the —acting on the bispinors via 4×4 complex matrices in the spinor representation. Equivalently, the complexified Cl_4(ℂ) underpins the , ensuring the 16-dimensional structure accommodates both spin and .

Transformations and Properties

Lorentz Transformations

Bispinors transform under the SO(1,3) through its universal cover SL(2,\mathbb{C}), providing a faithful representation of spacetime symmetries in for particles. The transformation law for a bispinor \psi under a \Lambda is given by \psi'(x') = S(\Lambda) \psi(\Lambda^{-1} x'), where x' = \Lambda x and S(\Lambda) is a $4 \times 4 in the bispinor space that preserves the Dirac equation's . This representation realizes the double cover of the proper orthochronous SO^+(1,3), ensuring that rotations by $4\pi (rather than $2\pi) return the spinor to itself, a hallmark of half-integer spin. The general form of the transformation operator is S(\Lambda) = \exp\left(-\frac{i}{4} \omega_{\mu\nu} \sigma^{\mu\nu}\right), where \omega_{\mu\nu} are the antisymmetric Lorentz transformation parameters and \sigma^{\mu\nu} = \frac{i}{2} [\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu] with \gamma^\mu the Dirac gamma matrices. For infinitesimal transformations, this expands to S(\Lambda) \approx I - \frac{i}{4} \omega_{\mu\nu} \sigma^{\mu\nu}, where I is the identity matrix. The \sigma^{\mu\nu} act as the infinitesimal generators of the Lorentz transformations, spanning the Lie algebra \mathfrak{so}(1,3) in the four-dimensional bispinor space and satisfying the commutation relations [\sigma^{\mu\nu}, \sigma^{\rho\sigma}] = i (\eta^{\nu\rho} \sigma^{\mu\sigma} - \eta^{\mu\rho} \sigma^{\nu\sigma} - \eta^{\nu\sigma} \sigma^{\mu\rho} + \eta^{\mu\sigma} \sigma^{\nu\rho}), with \eta^{\mu\nu} the Minkowski metric. Lorentz transformations decompose into rotations and boosts. A spatial rotation by angle \theta around unit axis \mathbf{n} is represented by S(R) = \exp\left(-i \frac{\theta}{2} \mathbf{n} \cdot \boldsymbol{\sigma}\right), where \boldsymbol{\sigma} are the embedded in the bispinor structure. A pure boost with \phi along direction \mathbf{n} has the explicit form S(B) = \cosh\left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right) I - \sinh\left(\frac{\phi}{2}\right) (\boldsymbol{\alpha} \cdot \mathbf{n}), where \boldsymbol{\alpha}^i = \gamma^0 \gamma^i are the Dirac alpha matrices; this hyperbolic structure arises from exponentiating the boost generators and ensures for massive particles. Under the proper orthochronous , bispinors admit a chiral into left- and right-handed components, \psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_L \\ \psi_R \end{pmatrix}, where \psi_{L/R} = \frac{1 \mp \gamma^5}{2} \psi with \gamma^5 = i \gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3. The left-handed part \psi_L transforms under the fundamental (1/2, 0) of SL(2,\mathbb{C}), while the right-handed \psi_R transforms under the conjugate (0, 1/2) , decoupling the transformations for massless limits but mixing under massive conditions. This structure underscores the bispinor's role as the of these two irreducible representations of the Lorentz algebra.

Algebraic Properties

A bispinor, or , is an element of the four-dimensional \mathbb{C}^4, providing a representation space for the (1/2, 0) ⊕ (0, 1/2) of the SL(2, \mathbb{C}). This structure allows bispinors to encode both left- and right-handed chiral components, essential for describing relativistic fermions. The inner product on this space is defined by the Dirac conjugate, \bar{\psi} = \psi^\dagger \gamma^0, yielding the invariant scalar \bar{\psi} \psi = \psi^\dagger \gamma^0 \psi, which is Hermitian and preserves the positive-definite norm for physical states. This ensures unitarity in quantum mechanical interpretations and facilitates the construction of observables. Bispinors give rise to Lorentz-covariant bilinears, which transform as tensors under the . The scalar bilinear \bar{\psi} \psi is invariant, the pseudoscalar \bar{\psi} i \gamma^5 \psi changes sign under , the vector current \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \psi transforms as a , the axial vector \bar{\psi} \gamma^\mu \gamma^5 \psi as an axial , the antisymmetric tensor \bar{\psi} \sigma^{\mu\nu} \psi (with \sigma^{\mu\nu} = \frac{i}{2} [\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu]) as a rank-2 tensor, and the pseudoscalar counterpart \bar{\psi} i \sigma^{\mu\nu} \gamma^5 \psi accordingly. These bilinears satisfy Fierz identities, such as relations among their squares and products, reflecting the algebraic closure of the Clifford algebra underlying the \gamma-matrices. Under parity transformation, the bispinor transforms as P \psi(t, \mathbf{x}) P^{-1} = \gamma^0 \psi(t, -\mathbf{x}), mapping the upper and lower components while inverting spatial coordinates to preserve the Dirac equation's form. For charge conjugation, relevant to Majorana-like conditions where the particle is its own , the operation is C \psi = i \gamma^2 \psi^*, which exchanges particle and antiparticle components and satisfies C^\dagger = -C with C \gamma^\mu C^{-1} = -(\gamma^\mu)^T. The algebraic structure includes a completeness relation for the basis states, where the sum over the four orthonormal bispinors \{\psi_i\} (spanning \mathbb{C}^4) resolves the identity via \sum_i \psi_i \bar{\psi}_i = I, ensuring a complete basis; in the context of field expansions, this extends to momentum-space relations yielding \delta^4(p_i - p_j) for plane-wave modes.

Derivation of Representations

Gamma Matrices

The gamma matrices, denoted \gamma^\mu for \mu = 0, 1, 2, 3, form the core algebraic structure for bispinors in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, enabling the representation of Lorentz-invariant fermionic fields. They are 4×4 complex matrices satisfying the defining anticommutation relations \{ \gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu \} = \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu = 2 g^{\mu\nu} I_4, where g^{\mu\nu} = \mathrm{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1) is the Minkowski metric tensor in the (+---) signature and I_4 denotes the 4×4 identity matrix. These relations ensure that (\gamma^0)^2 = I_4 and (\gamma^k)^2 = -I_4 for the spatial indices k = 1, 2, 3, reflecting the signature's distinction between time and space components. The Hermitian conjugation properties of the are crucial for preserving probability currents in the : (\gamma^0)^\dagger = \gamma^0 for the Hermitian time component, and (\gamma^k)^\dagger = -\gamma^k for the anti-Hermitian spatial components. These ensure that the combination \gamma^\mu aligns with the requirements of a under Lorentz transformations. A key derived object is the chiral projector \gamma^5, defined by \gamma^5 = i \gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3. It satisfies (\gamma^5)^2 = I_4 and anticommutes with every \gamma^\mu, i.e., \{ \gamma^5, \gamma^\mu \} = 0, allowing the decomposition of bispinors into left- and right-handed chiral components via the projectors P_L = \frac{1 - \gamma^5}{2} and P_R = \frac{1 + \gamma^5}{2}. In the Hermitian sense, (\gamma^5)^\dagger = \gamma^5. The explicit construction in the standard Weyl (or chiral) basis highlights the bispinor structure as a of two-component Weyl spinors: \gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_2 \\ I_2 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix}, where I_2 is the 2×2 identity and \sigma^k (k=1,2,3) are the \sigma^1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \sigma^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -i \\ i & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \sigma^3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}. In this basis, \gamma^5 = \begin{pmatrix} -I_2 & 0 \\ 0 & I_2 \end{pmatrix}, which is diagonal and separates the chiral sectors. These matrices generate the Cl(1,3) associated with the , providing the algebraic foundation for bispinor transformations.

Embedding of Lorentz Algebra

The embedding of the Lorentz Lie algebra \mathfrak{so}(1,3) into the Clifford algebra \mathrm{Cl}(1,3) is realized through bilinear combinations of the \gamma^\mu, which serve as the fundamental generators of the algebra satisfying \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2 g^{\mu\nu} I. The six generators of \mathfrak{so}(1,3) are given by J^{\mu\nu} = \frac{i}{4} [\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu], where the ensures antisymmetry in \mu,\nu, and the factor of i aligns with the standard Hermitian form in the representation. These J^{\mu\nu} act on the bispinor space and faithfully represent the infinitesimal Lorentz transformations. The generators satisfy the defining commutation relations of the Lorentz Lie algebra: [J^{\mu\nu}, J^{\rho\sigma}] = i \left( g^{\mu\rho} J^{\nu\sigma} + g^{\nu\sigma} J^{\mu\rho} - g^{\mu\sigma} J^{\nu\rho} - g^{\nu\rho} J^{\mu\sigma} \right), which follow directly from the anticommutation properties of the \gamma^\mu and confirm the embedding within the Clifford structure. This closure under commutation demonstrates that the Lorentz algebra is a subalgebra of the even-grade elements in \mathrm{Cl}(1,3). The rotation subgroup \mathfrak{so}(3) \subset \mathfrak{so}(1,3), corresponding to spatial indices i,j=1,2,3, is generated by J^{ij}. These can be recast in vector form as J^{ij} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{ijk} \Sigma^k, where the spin operators are \Sigma^k = \frac{i}{2} [\gamma^l, \gamma^m] with \{l,m,k\} a of \{1,2,3\}, establishing the \mathfrak{so}(3) \cong \mathfrak{su}(2) in the bispinor representation. The boost generators, which mix time and , are the mixed components K^i = J^{0i} = \frac{i}{2} \gamma^0 \gamma^i, arising from the anticommutation \{\gamma^0, \gamma^i\}=0 that distinguishes the Lorentz metric. This representation is faithful and irreducible on the 4-dimensional bispinor space, reflecting the \mathfrak{so}(1,3) \cong \mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C}), with the generators embedded as $4 \times 4 matrices from the \mathrm{Cl}(1,3;\mathbb{R}) \otimes \mathbb{C} \cong \mathrm{Cl}_4(\mathbb{C}) \cong M_4(\mathbb{C}).

Construction of Bispinor Basis

The bispinor space, also known as the space, is a four-dimensional equipped with a basis constructed from solutions to the for free particles of definite and . In the Dirac representation of the , the basis vectors for positive-energy solutions are given by u(\mathbf{p}, s) = \sqrt{E + m} \begin{pmatrix} \chi^s \\ \frac{\vec{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{p}}{E + m} \chi^s \end{pmatrix}, where E = \sqrt{\mathbf{p}^2 + m^2} is the energy, m is the particle mass, \vec{\sigma} are the Pauli matrices, and \chi^s (s = 1, 2) are normalized two-component spinors satisfying \chi^{s\dagger} \chi^{s'} = \delta_{ss'}, such as \chi^1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} and \chi^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} for spin along the z-axis. For negative-energy solutions, corresponding to antiparticles, the basis vectors are v(\mathbf{p}, s) = \sqrt{E + m} \begin{pmatrix} \frac{\vec{\sigma} \cdot \mathbf{p}}{E + m} \chi^s \\ -\chi^s \end{pmatrix}. These forms ensure that the spinors satisfy the Dirac equation (\slash{p} - m) u(\mathbf{p}, s) = 0 for positive energy and (\slash{p} + m) v(\mathbf{p}, s) = 0 for negative energy, with the overall normalization factor \sqrt{E + m} chosen to achieve the relativistic normalization u^\dagger(\mathbf{p}, s) u(\mathbf{p}, s') = 2E \delta_{ss'}. The covariant normalization, relevant for Lorentz-invariant quantities, is \bar{u}(\mathbf{p}, s) u(\mathbf{p}, s') = 2m \delta_{ss'}, where \bar{u} = u^\dagger \gamma^0, and similarly \bar{v}(\mathbf{p}, s) v(\mathbf{p}, s') = -2m \delta_{ss'}. This normalization arises from the structure of the spinors and the properties of the Dirac matrices in the representation where \gamma^0 is diagonal. The positive- and negative-energy projectors are defined as \Lambda^+(\mathbf{p}) = \frac{\slash{p} + m}{2m} and \Lambda^-(\mathbf{p}) = \frac{m - \slash{p}}{2m}, which satisfy \Lambda^+(\mathbf{p}) u(\mathbf{p}, s) = u(\mathbf{p}, s) and \Lambda^-(\mathbf{p}) v(\mathbf{p}, s) = v(\mathbf{p}, s), projecting onto the respective eigenspaces of the . In the chiral (Weyl) basis, the bispinor \psi decomposes as \psi = \psi_L + \psi_R, where \psi_{L/R} are the left- and right-handed chiral components projected by P_{L/R} = \frac{1 \mp \gamma^5}{2}, with \gamma^5 = i \gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3. This decomposition separates the upper and lower two-components in the chiral representation, facilitating analysis of parity-violating interactions, though the basis construction remains equivalent to the Dirac representation up to a unitary transformation. The set \{u(\mathbf{p}, s), v(\mathbf{p}, s)\} for s = 1, 2 forms a complete basis for the bispinor space at fixed on-shell p^2 = m^2, satisfying the completeness relation \sum_s \left[ u(\mathbf{p}, s) \bar{u}(\mathbf{p}, s) - v(\mathbf{p}, s) \bar{v}(\mathbf{p}, s) \right] = 2m I_4. This relation, derived from the projectors, ensures that any bispinor can be expanded in this basis, with the difference reflecting the distinction between particle and contributions.

Dirac Algebra Integration

Conventions and Dirac Matrices

In the formulation of bispinors, which are four-component spinors satisfying the , the choice of representation for the Dirac matrices \gamma^\mu plays a crucial role in simplifying calculations and highlighting physical properties such as or reality conditions. The major conventions include the Dirac (standard), Weyl (chiral), and Majorana (real) representations, each providing a basis for the 4×4 \gamma^\mu matrices that satisfy the \{\gamma^\mu, \gamma^\nu\} = 2\eta^{\mu\nu} I_4, where \eta^{\mu\nu} is the Minkowski metric. These representations are related by similarity transformations and are chosen based on the context, such as emphasizing the distinction between left- and right-handed components in the Weyl basis or enabling real-valued spinors in the Majorana basis. The Dirac representation, also known as the standard or Dirac-Pauli representation, is widely used in non-relativistic limits and due to its block-diagonal structure for \gamma^0. In this convention, with the (+---), \gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} I_2 & 0 \\ 0 & -I_2 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix}, where I_2 is the 2×2 and \sigma^k (for k=1,2,3) are the . This form ensures \gamma^0 is Hermitian and \gamma^k are anti-Hermitian, preserving the hermiticity properties essential for a unitary theory. In the Weyl representation, the matrices are off-diagonal, facilitating the separation into chiral components: \gamma^0 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & I_2 \\ I_2 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \gamma^k = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \sigma^k \\ -\sigma^k & 0 \end{pmatrix}, which highlights the massless limit where left- and right-handed bispinors decouple. The Majorana representation employs purely real (or imaginary) matrices, allowing the bispinor to be self-conjugate, \psi = \psi^c, useful for theories with Majorana fermions like neutralinos. The choice of , predominantly (+---) in versus (-+++) in some contexts, influences the signs in the and the hermiticity of the \gamma^\mu. With (+---), the is i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu \psi - m \psi = 0, where \partial_\mu = (\partial_t, -\nabla) and the mass term remains positive, ensuring a stable . Switching to (-+++) requires adjusting signs, such as \gamma^0 \to i \gamma^0 in some formulations, to maintain probability conservation and positive energy solutions, though this can complicate interactions with electromagnetic fields. These metric choices affect bispinor bilinears, like the scalar \bar{\psi} \psi, by altering overall signs but preserve Lorentz invariance. Different representations are interconvertible via similarity transformations S \gamma^\mu S^{-1} = \gamma'^\mu, where S is a 4×4 ensuring the is preserved. For instance, the transformation from Dirac to Weyl basis involves S = \sqrt{i \gamma^0 \gamma^5} (up to phases), allowing seamless switching without altering physical predictions. Such equivalences underscore that bispinor properties, like parity transformation \psi \to \gamma^0 \psi, remain representation-independent.

Spinor Construction Examples

In the Dirac representation, a concrete example of bispinor construction is the positive-energy solution for an at rest with up along the z-axis. This spinor takes the form u(0, \uparrow) = \sqrt{2m} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, where m is the , ensuring normalization \bar{u} u = 2m. This form arises from solving the at zero , where the upper two components correspond to the large Pauli for up, and the lower components vanish. To construct a bispinor for a boosted electron, the rest-frame spinor is transformed using the Lorentz boost operator D(\Lambda), which for a boost along the z-direction with momentum \mathbf{p} = (0, 0, p_z) and energy E = \sqrt{m^2 + p_z^2} yields u(p, \uparrow) = \sqrt{E + m} \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ \frac{p_z}{E + m} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. This explicit application preserves the spin orientation in the rest frame while accounting for relativistic effects, such as the mixing between upper and lower components. The boost operator is D(p) = \sqrt{\frac{E + m}{2m}} \begin{pmatrix} I_2 & \frac{\mathbf{p} \cdot \sigma}{E + m} \\ \frac{\mathbf{p} \cdot \sigma}{E + m} & I_2 \end{pmatrix}, applied to the rest-frame form. Charge conjugation provides another construction method, transforming an bispinor into a state via the operator C = i \gamma^2 \gamma^0. For the rest-frame spinor above, the conjugated spinor is v(0, \uparrow) = C \bar{u}(0, \uparrow)^T = \sqrt{2m} \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ -1 \end{pmatrix} (up to conventions), effectively flipping the charge while reversing the from positive to negative in the interpretation. This operation satisfies C \gamma^\mu C^{-1} = -(\gamma^\mu)^T, ensuring the invariance under charge reversal. Helicity eigenstates for bispinors, particularly in the ultra-relativistic or massless limit where aligns with , are constructed using the projectors involving \gamma^5. The state with h = +1/2 (right-handed) is \psi_{+1/2} = \frac{1 + \gamma^5}{2} \psi, and for h = -1/2 (left-handed), \psi_{-1/2} = \frac{1 - \gamma^5}{2} \psi, where \psi is a general and \gamma^5 = i \gamma^0 \gamma^1 \gamma^2 \gamma^3. These projectors yield Weyl spinors as eigenstates of the operator \frac{1}{2} \hat{\mathbf{p}} \cdot \boldsymbol{\Sigma} with eigenvalues \pm 1/2.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Spinors - Physics Department, Oxford University
    Spinors are mathematical entities somewhat like tensors, that allow a more general treatment of the notion of invariance under rotation and Lorentz boosts.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] 4. The Dirac Equation
    (Strictly speaking, the spinor is a representation of the double cover of the Lorentz group SL(2, C)). 4.4.1 The Weyl Equation. Let's see what becomes of the ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    [PDF] An introduction to spinors
    Spinors began to find a more extensive role in physics when it was discovered that electrons and other parti- cles have an intrinsic form of angular momentum ...
  6. [6]
    Chiral oscillations in the non-relativistic regime
    May 11, 2021 · Any Dirac bispinor has left and right-chirality components which are dynamically coupled by the mass term of the Dirac equation. Since a ...
  7. [7]
    The quantum theory of the electron - Journals
    Dirac Paul Adrien Maurice. 1928The quantum theory of the electronProc. R. Soc. Lond. A117610–624http://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1928.0023. Section. You have access ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The genesis of dirac's relativistic theory of electrons - Research
    As to the second point, the one of the negative energies, matters are more complex. In his classic paper of 1928, DIRAC was much aware of this difficulty.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Spin and Clifford algebras, an introduction - HAL
    Jul 13, 2010 · The space-time algebra Cℓ(IM) = Cℓ(1,3) is the real Clifford algebra of Minkowski vector space M ≡ IR1,3. It has a (real) dimension 16.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Dirac Algebra and Equation - MS Researchers
    Nov 28, 2019 · Cl1,3(C) is called the Dirac algebra and it too is generated by the Gamma matrices. Everything we have done so far goes over to the Dirac ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] IIA - Purdue Physics
    the Lorentz group, the ψ are called Weyl spinors. Similarly, we can use S† and. (S†. ) −1 to define two more different Weyl spinors, the complex conjugates of.Missing: bispinor evolution
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors - UT Physics
    its LHS transforms exactly like the spinor field itself. Proof ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 5 Lorentz Covariance of the Dirac Equation
    when we make a Lorentz transformation. Consider a frame F with an observer O ... a Lorentz boost,. S = I cosh η. 2+ α · n sinh η. 2 . (119). Using the ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  14. [14]
    [PDF] 9 Lorentz Group and Special Relativity - Xie Chen
    SL(2,C) is a covering group of the SO(3,1) group as 2π spatial rotation ... In quantum field theory, the direct sum of the j1 = 1/2, j2 = 0 representation and the ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Lecture note on Clifford algebra - arXiv
    May 18, 2022 · This lecture note surveys the gamma matrices in general dimensions with arbitrary signa- tures, the study of which is essential to understand ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Exponentiating the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group Howard E. Haber
    That is, we have shown that the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group consists of all real 4 × 4 matrices with the property that GA is antisymmetric. To construct a ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Lecture 4 - Dirac Spinors
    In 1928 Dirac tried to understand negative energy solutions by taking the “square-root” of the Klein-Gordon equation. (iγ0 δ δt. + i~γ ·. ~. ∇ − m)ψ = 0.
  18. [18]
    Dirac, Majorana, and Weyl fermions | American Journal of Physics
    May 1, 2011 · We discuss the Dirac, Majorana, and Weyl fermion fields. The definitions and motivations for introducing each kind of field is discussed, ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Dirac, Weyl and Majorana Representations of the Gamma Matrices
    Abstract: We consider the - matrices in the Standard, Chiral and Majorana representations, and the corresponding transformation of the Dirac spinor under ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Representation-independent manipulations with Dirac matrices and ...
    May 14, 2015 · The two theorems show that the Dirac matrices are defined only up to a similarity transformation with a unitary matrix. To obtain the defining ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Dirac, Majorana and Weyl fermions - arXiv
    Oct 12, 2010 · Abstract. This is a pedagogical article which discusses various kinds of fermion fields: Dirac, Majorana and Weyl.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 1 The 4-Spinor Dirac Equation - Kirk T. McDonald
    Mar 3, 2021 · In 1928, Dirac [1] sought a relativistic wave equation for spin-1/2 particles that would be a first-order differential equation, ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Solutions of the Dirac Equation and Their Properties
    A geometrical interpretation may be given of the manner in which the spinors u(p, s) and v(p, s) are parameterized. This takes place in 4-dimensional momentum ...
  25. [25]
    Charge Conjugation
    it transforms the Dirac equation for an electron into the same equation for a positron and is called the charge conjugation transformation $\mathcal{C}$ .