Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

First-order

First-order logic, also known as first-order predicate calculus or predicate logic, is a formal deductive system used in , , , and to express statements about objects and their relations. It employs a syntax comprising constants, variables, predicates, functions, logical connectives, and quantifiers restricted to ranging over individual objects (first-order), excluding quantification over predicates or sets of individuals, which distinguishes it from higher-order logics. This restriction enables key metatheoretic results, including , which establishes that every logically valid formula is provable within the system, and the , affirming that a set of sentences has a model if every finite does. First-order logic underpins much of modern mathematical foundations, , and database query languages, though its expressive limitations—such as the inability to fully capture truths via Löwenheim–Skolem theorems leading to non-standard models—highlight ongoing debates in logic regarding expressive power versus decidability.

Mathematics

Differential equations

A first-order is an containing an unknown and its first but no higher-order derivatives. In the case of equations, the general form is dy/dt = f(t, y), where y = y(t) is the unknown and f is a given of t and y. More generally, it can be expressed as F(t, y, dy/dt) = 0, where F is a incorporating the derivative. First-order equations are classified as linear or nonlinear. A linear first-order (ODE) has the standard form dy/dt + P(t)y = Q(t), where P(t) and Q(t) are continuous functions of t; here, the dependent variable y and its first appear to the first power with no products or nonlinear functions of y. Nonlinear equations include forms like dy/dt = y^2 or dy/dt = t (y), which do not fit the linear structure. Unlike higher-order equations, first-order ODEs lack a universal closed-form solution formula; solutions depend on the specific type and require tailored methods. Common solution techniques for first-order ODEs include , applicable when the equation can be rewritten as g(y) dy = h(t) dt for . For instance, integrating both sides yields the implicit solution ∫ g(y) dy = ∫ h(t) dt + C, where C is the constant of . Linear equations are solved using an μ(t) = exp(∫ P(t) dt), which, when multiplied through the equation, renders the left side exact: d/dt [μ(t) y] = μ(t) Q(t), integrable to y(t) = (1/μ(t)) [∫ μ(t) Q(t) dt + C]. Exact equations, of the form M(t, y) + N(t, y) dy/dt = 0 where ∂M/∂y = ∂N/∂t, integrate directly to a potential function whose total derivative matches the equation. Homogeneous equations, where f(t, y) = g(y/t), substitute v = y/t to reduce to separable form dv/dt = (g(v) - v)/t. Bernoulli equations, dy/dt + P(t)y = Q(t) y^n with n ≠ 0,1, transform via u = y^{1-n} to linear form. Existence and uniqueness of solutions, under Lipschitz continuity of f in y, follow from the Picard-Lindelöf theorem, ensuring a unique solution in some interval around an initial condition y(t_0) = y_0. Applications span modeling exponential growth (dy/dt = ky, solved as y = y_0 e^{kt}) and decay processes, with solutions verified by substitution into the original equation. Numerical methods like Euler's are used when analytical solutions fail, approximating y(t + h) ≈ y(t) + h f(t, y(t)) iteratively.

Logic

First-order logic, also termed first-order predicate logic or predicate calculus, formalizes reasoning about objects within a domain through predicates, functions, and quantifiers restricted to individual variables, distinguishing it from higher-order logics that quantify over predicates or sets. Its syntax comprises an alphabet of logical symbols (e.g., connectives ¬, ∧, ∨, →, ↔; quantifiers ∀, ∃; variables), non-logical symbols (constants, function symbols, predicate symbols of specified arities), and formation rules yielding terms (variables, constants, or f(t1,...,tn) where f is n-ary) and well-formed formulas (atomic predicates P(t1,...,tn), negated formulas ¬φ, conjoined/disjoined/implicated/equated φ ψ, or quantified ∀x φ, ∃x φ with x a variable). Free and bound variable occurrences are defined recursively, with sentences as formulas lacking free variables, enabling precise expression of mathematical statements like "for all natural numbers x, there exists y such that y = x + 1." Semantically, first-order logic employs structures or models consisting of a non-empty domain D and interpretations assigning constants to domain elements, n-ary functions to domain-to-domain mappings, and n-ary predicates to subsets of D^n (or equivalently, relations). Satisfaction is defined inductively via variable assignments σ: for atomic P(t1,...,tn), true if interpretations yield true; extended to connectives (e.g., ¬φ true if φ false; φ ∧ ψ true if both true) and quantifiers (∀x φ true if φ true under all σ' agreeing with σ except possibly on x; ∃x φ true if true under some such σ'). A sentence φ is valid if satisfied in every structure, satisfiable if in some, and a theory T (set of sentences) is consistent if no contradiction is derivable, with models as structures satisfying all of T; validity equates to unsatisfiability of negation. Key metatheorems underpin its foundations: (1930) establishes that every consistent set of first-order has a model, and semantic entailment (φ follows from Γ if every model of Γ satisfies φ) coincides with syntactic provability in standard Hilbert-style or sequent calculi, yielding and . Compactness follows, stating infinite theories are satisfiable if every finite subset is. However, (1936) and Turing (1936) proved the entailment problem undecidable: no exists to determine, for arbitrary , whether one follows from others or if a is valid, linking to the via reductions showing captures Turing-complete computation when including arithmetic. Subclasses like monadic logic or (first-order theory of addition) are decidable, but full over Peano arithmetic encodes undecidable Diophantine problems. In , axiomatizes theories like Zermelo-Fraenkel (ZFC), enabling proofs of relative consistency (e.g., Gödel's constructible universe models ZFC) and independence (e.g., via Cohen forcing), though expressiveness limits capture only "first-order" properties, excluding full second-order concepts like infinity or choice directly. Löwenheim-Skolem theorems imply countable models for countable theories, with reducing quantifiers for , while Herbrand's theorem supports resolution-based theorem proving by grounding to Herbrand universes. These properties affirm 's balance of expressivity for formalizing much of against undecidability, contrasting decidable fragments like propositional logic.

Physical sciences

Chemical kinetics

Chemical kinetics is the branch of that quantifies the rates of chemical reactions and elucidates the factors influencing those rates. It distinguishes itself from by focusing on the dynamics of how reactions proceed over time, rather than merely whether they are feasible. The field emerged in the with foundational experiments by chemists such as Ludwig Wilhelmy, who in 1850 measured the of and derived a rate proportional to sugar concentration. The of a is defined as the change in concentration of a reactant or product per unit time, often expressed as -\frac{d[\ce{A}]}{dt} for a reactant A disappearing. For stoichiometric consistency in reactions like \ce{aA + bB -> products}, the is \frac{1}{a}\frac{d[\ce{A}]}{dt} = \frac{1}{b}\frac{d[\ce{B}]}{dt}. Instantaneous rates capture variability over short intervals, while average rates approximate over longer periods; initial rates, measured at t=0, minimize product interference and are common in experiments. Rate laws mathematically relate to reactant concentrations, typically in the form rate = k[\ce{A}]^m[\ce{B}]^n, where is the constant, and , are reflecting concentration dependencies. The overall is m + n, determined experimentally via methods like or , not from . Zero- reactions ( independent of concentration) occur in saturated ; first- () in unimolecular decompositions; higher indicate multi-step mechanisms. Molecularity describes elementary step involvement (unimolecular, bimolecular), contrasting with empirical . Integrated rate laws derive from differential forms for concentration-time profiles: for first-order, [\ce{A}] = [\ce{A}]_0 e^{-kt}; half-life t_{1/2} = \frac{\ln 2}{k}, independent of initial concentration. Second-order (e.g., \ce{2A -> products}) yields \frac{1}{[\ce{A}]} = \frac{1}{[\ce{A}]_0} + kt, with concentration-dependent half-life. These enable order determination by linearity in plots like ln[A] vs. t or 1/[A] vs. t. Factors influencing rates include reactant concentration (per rate law exponents), physical state (gaseous or phases react faster than solids due to mobility), and surface area (finer particles increase heterogeneous rates). Catalysts accelerate via alternative low-energy pathways without net consumption, as in following Michaelis-Menten models. Chemical nature dictates intrinsic reactivity, with ionic reactions often faster than covalent in . Temperature profoundly affects rates, typically doubling every 10°C rise for many reactions. The , k = A e^{-E_a / RT}, quantifies this, where A is the (collision frequency proxy), E_a (minimum for reaction), R , T absolute temperature. Plotting ln k vs. 1/T yields straight line with slope -E_a / R; experimentally, E_a ranges from near-zero (diffusion-limited) to over 100 kJ/mol. Collision theory posits reactions require effective collisions with sufficient energy (> E_a) and proper orientation, predicting A ≈ collision frequency times steric factor. refines this, viewing the as a fleeting high-energy at the maximum; rate = \frac{kT}{h} e^{\Delta S^\ddagger / R} e^{-\Delta H^\ddagger / RT}, linking to activation entropy \Delta S^\ddagger and enthalpy \Delta H^\ddagger. This theory better accommodates complex mechanisms, underpinning enzyme and surface catalysis models. Experimental methods include for concentration tracking, stopped-flow for fast reactions (<1 ms), and flash photolysis for transients. Applications span combustion modeling (e.g., ignition delays in engines), pharmacokinetics (drug decay rates), and atmospheric chemistry (ozone depletion via Cl• + O3 rates). Mechanisms are inferred by rate law matching to elementary steps, with steady-state approximations for intermediates.

Phase transitions

First-order phase transitions occur when a system passes between two thermodynamic phases with discontinuities in the first derivatives of the Gibbs free energy G with respect to temperature and pressure, specifically entropy S = -\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}\right)_P and volume V = \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial P}\right)_T. This classification, proposed by Paul Ehrenfest in 1933, distinguishes them from higher-order transitions where higher derivatives are discontinuous. At the transition point, the two phases coexist with equal Gibbs free energies, but exhibit abrupt changes in density, specific heat capacity, and other extensive properties. A hallmark of first-order transitions is the release or absorption of latent heat \Lambda, the enthalpy difference required to complete the phase change at constant temperature and pressure without altering the system's temperature. This is quantified as \Lambda = T(S_2 - S_1), where T is the transition temperature and S_2, S_1 are the entropies of the respective phases. The phase boundary in the pressure-temperature plane follows the Clausius-Clapeyron equation: \frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{\Lambda}{T(V_2 - V_1)}, linking the boundary slope to the volume change \Delta V = V_2 - V_1. Below the critical point, mechanical instability arises, with \left(\frac{\partial P}{\partial V}\right)_T > 0 in metastable regions, resolved by the Maxwell equal-area rule for equilibrium: \int (P - P_0(T)) dV = 0. Common examples include the solid-liquid transition for water at its triple point of 273.16 K and 0.612 kPa, where ice, liquid water, and vapor coexist. The melting of ice at 1 atm absorbs a latent heat of fusion of approximately 6.0 kJ/mol, while boiling water at 373.15 K and 1 atm requires 44 kJ/mol for vaporization. Sublimation of dry ice (solid CO₂) to gas at 1 atm also exemplifies this, bypassing the liquid phase. In the van der Waals equation of state, the liquid-gas transition below the critical temperature models these discontinuities, with phase coexistence enforced by equal chemical potentials. These transitions typically proceed via and growth, where a new phase forms seeds in the parent phase, potentially leading to (e.g., below freezing point) or due to kinetic barriers and lack of nucleation sites. can occur, with the transition path depending on the direction of change, reflecting metastable states. In finite systems or under rapid , the sharpness of the discontinuity may blur, but macroscopic systems exhibit the characteristic jumps.

Computer science

Formal methods

Formal methods in computer science employ first-order logic (FOL) as a foundational tool for specifying, modeling, and verifying the behavior of software and hardware systems, enabling rigorous proofs of correctness properties such as safety and termination. FOL extends propositional logic by incorporating quantifiers (universal ∀ and existential ∃) over variables ranging over domain objects, predicates to express relations, and functions, allowing concise representation of infinite-state systems and complex invariants that propositional logic cannot capture. This capability is particularly valuable in deductive verification, where system models and desired properties are encoded as FOL formulas, and theorem provers attempt to establish entailment or refute counterexamples. In , FOL underpins for functional programs and heap-manipulating code, with techniques like and superposition enabling efficient refutation of invalid formulas in first-order settings. For instance, tools such as Z3 integrate FOL with (SMT) to discharge conditions arising from program annotations, supporting decidable fragments like linear arithmetic or arrays while approximating general cases. A key application involves translating iterative programs into FOL axioms for reasoning about loop invariants and postconditions, as demonstrated in frameworks that formalize procedural languages with discrete linear orderings to prove termination and equivalence. Similarly, in distributed systems , FOL reductions transform liveness properties (e.g., eventual ) into safety checks, facilitating of infinite-state behaviors via bounded extensions. FOL's role extends to relational modeling in tools like , which uses bounded FOL quantification to analyze system designs for errors such as deadlocks or security vulnerabilities, though scalability limits analyses to small scopes due to the logic's undecidability. In , FOL specifies circuit behaviors and proves equivalence against high-level designs, often combined with decision procedures for theories like bit-vectors. Despite these advances, practical use requires restricting to fragments with complete proof systems or heuristics, as full FOL validity is only semi-decidable, prompting hybrid approaches with higher-order logics for expressive power in complex proofs. Empirical evaluations show FOL-based provers succeeding on benchmarks from competitions, with success rates exceeding 70% for first-order problems in superposition calculi as of 2023.

Artificial intelligence applications

First-order logic serves as a foundational in for knowledge representation and , enabling the expression of complex relationships between objects through predicates, functions, and quantifiers. Unlike propositional logic, which is limited to fixed propositions, accommodates variables and quantification over domains, allowing systems to generalize facts and infer new knowledge from incomplete descriptions. This expressiveness supports applications in domains requiring symbolic manipulation of structured information, such as expert systems and planning algorithms. In knowledge representation, facilitates the encoding of domain-specific facts and rules in a compact, human-readable form that supports deductive . For instance, predicates like "CausesBreeze(Pit, Square)" can model causal relationships in environments such as the Wumpus world, where agents infer hidden states from observations. This approach underpins early systems for , where axioms define object properties and relations, enabling queries via unification and resolution. Academic implementations, such as those in languages like , demonstrate FOL's utility in representing hierarchical knowledge bases for tasks like semantic networks or ontologies. Automated theorem proving represents a core application, where formalizes conjectures as theorems to be mechanically verified or refuted using resolution-based provers. Systems like and employ saturation algorithms to explore proof spaces efficiently, achieving successes in verifying designs and software correctness; for example, has dominated annual CADE ATP System Competitions since by resolving first-order clauses through indexing and literal selection. Integration with has enhanced premise selection and heuristic guidance, as in models that learn proof strategies from large corpora, outperforming traditional methods on benchmarks like TPTP by up to 20% in proof length reduction. These tools apply to verification, where FOL encodes invariants for behaviors. In AI planning and robotics, first-order logic models state transitions and goals via action preconditions and effects, supporting domain-independent planners like STRIPS derivatives. Quantified axioms describe general rules, such as "∀x ∀y Adjacent(x,y) → PossibleMove(x,y)", enabling hierarchical task decomposition in uncertain environments. Limitations arise in scalability for large domains, prompting hybrid approaches combining FOL with probabilistic extensions, though pure first-order inference remains intractable for NP-complete unification problems in worst cases. Empirical evaluations show FOL-based planners solving blocks-world problems with thousands of objects via forward chaining, but real-world deployment often requires approximations. Natural language processing leverages for semantic parsing, translating sentences into logical forms for and inference. For example, systems convert queries like "Every dog chases some cat" into ∀x (Dog(x) → ∃y (Cat(y) ∧ Chases(x,y))), enabling entailment checks against knowledge bases. This application persists in technologies like , where first-order fragments underpin reasoning for . Despite advances in neural methods, FOL provides interpretable baselines, with hybrid neuro-symbolic models using it to ground embeddings in verifiable logic.

Engineering and systems theory

Control systems

A first-order system in control theory consists of a single energy storage element, resulting in dynamics described by a first-order ordinary differential equation of the form \tau \frac{dy(t)}{dt} + y(t) = Ku(t), where \tau represents the time constant, K the steady-state gain, y(t) the output, and u(t) the input. This form arises in linear time-invariant systems across domains, with the time constant \tau quantifying the speed of response—specifically, the time for the output to reach 63.2% of its final value following a step change in input. The corresponding transfer function in the Laplace domain is G(s) = \frac{K}{\tau s + 1}, which captures the input-output relationship for analysis in frequency or time domains. The step response of a first-order system to a unit step input u(t) = 1 (assuming zero initial conditions) is y(t) = K(1 - e^{-t/\tau}), exhibiting monotonic exponential rise without overshoot or oscillations. Key transient specifications include rise time (approximately $2.2\tau), settling time to within 2% of steady state (about $4\tau), and no peak time due to the absence of overshoot. For impulse inputs, the response is bounded and decays exponentially, confirming inherent stability for bounded inputs in open-loop configurations. These characteristics make first-order models foundational for understanding higher-order approximations and controller design, as they highlight pure lag behavior without resonant effects. Examples of first-order systems span multiple fields. In electrical systems, a series models voltage across the with \tau = [RC](/page/RC), where R is and C . Mechanically, a m subject to viscous b follows \tau = m/[b](/page/B), as in arrangements without springs. Thermal systems, such as a heated room with , yield \tau = R_w C_r (thermal resistance times heat capacity), while fluid level control in a tank draining through a valve gives \tau = R_l C_h (flow resistance times hydraulic capacitance). In control applications, these models approximate processes like liquid level regulation or simple actuator dynamics, enabling proportional-integral-derivative (PID) tuning where integral action compensates for steady-state error in closed-loop setups. First-order approximations facilitate root locus or Bode plot analysis for stability margins in feedback systems.

Other applications

Economics and optimization

First-order logic has been employed in theoretical economics to formalize agent-based models, particularly through logicist approaches that integrate cognitive calculi with extensional first-order fragments for verifiable simulations. In such frameworks, predicates and quantifiers represent agents' beliefs, perceptions, and actions, enabling proofs of economic phenomena like the chain-store paradox, where backward induction yields "enter and acquiesce" outcomes for rational agents, and forward induction predicts deterrence after multiple stages. This method, detailed in Bringsjord et al. (2015), uses dynamic cognitive event calculus implemented via denotational proof languages to model fine-grained cognition, surpassing traditional game theory by capturing verifiable predictions in scenarios such as Ponzi schemes, where schemer intent is proven to sustain operations until collapse thresholds. Logical compactness, a property derivable in propositional extensions of , facilitates scaling economic theories from finite to domains by ensuring of formula sets if finite subsets hold, thus reproving results like the of matchings in markets (extending and Shapley, 1962) and strategy-proofness in man-optimal mechanisms. Gonczarowski, Kominers, and Shorrer (2020) apply this to trading networks, confirming Walrasian equilibria (building on Hatfield et al., 2013), and to demand rationalization under generalized axiom of (GARP) for datasets, constructing quasiconcave utilities where finite approximations suffice. These applications, while theoretical, address limitations in finiteness assumptions prevalent in empirical economic modeling. In optimization, serves as a foundation for problems (CSPs), where of quantified predicates over variables and domains encodes optimization constraints, though undecidability limits direct computation for complex cases. This interpretation, analyzed by Arias et al. (2021), treats FOL formulas as CSP instances, linking to algorithmic solvers in that exploit unification—substitution of variables to equate formula instances—for solving logical constraints akin to optimization objectives. (2023) highlights synergies in hybrid systems combining with optimization, where first-order unification aids in generating feasible solutions for problems like scheduling or , often integrated with for practical efficiency. Such uses prioritize decidable fragments, as full FOL expressiveness precludes polynomial-time optimization. Mechanized reasoning tools leveraging have been applied to verify economic models, such as bidder properties, by encoding objects (e.g., "bidder b1") and relations in theorem provers, though adoption remains niche due to ' reliance on probabilistic and calculus-based methods over pure logical deduction. Overall, while provides rigorous formalization for deductive validity in economic inferences, its direct role in mainstream optimization or empirical is constrained by computational intractability, favoring specialized numerical techniques.

References

  1. [1]
    First-Order Logic -- from Wolfram MathWorld
    The set of terms of first-order logic (also known as first-order predicate calculus) is defined by the following rules: 1. A variable is a term.
  2. [2]
    The Emergence of First-Order Logic (Stanford Encyclopedia of ...
    Nov 17, 2018 · First-order logic has long been regarded as the “right” logic for investigations into the foundations of mathematics.
  3. [3]
    Differential Equations - First Order DE's - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Sep 8, 2020 · The most general first order differential equation can be written as, dydt=f(y,t)(1) As we will see in this chapter there is no general formula ...
  4. [4]
    17.1 First Order Differential Equations
    A first order differential equation is an equation of the form F(t,y,˙y)=0, where the first derivative of y appears.
  5. [5]
    Linear Differential Equations - Pauls Online Math Notes
    Aug 1, 2024 · A linear first order differential equation is in the form dy/dt + p(t)y = g(t), where p(t) and g(t) are continuous functions.
  6. [6]
    Solving linear ordinary differential equations using an integrating ...
    We can use an integrating factor μ(t) to solve any first order linear ODE. Recall that such an ODE is linear in the function and its first derivative. The ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] First Order Differential Equations - KSU Math
    First order differential equations include linear, separable, homogeneous, and exact types. Linear equations use integrating factors, while separable equations ...
  8. [8]
    First Order Differential Equations - College of Arts & Sciences
    To use an integrating factor to solve a differential equation, multiply it to either side and integrate the function from 0 to t .Homogeneous Differential... · Example Problem... · Integrating Factor
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 Introduction and first-order equations
    The examples given above are of first-order differential equations, i.e., those in which only the first derivative of the dependent variable occurs. These are ...
  10. [10]
    Unit I: First Order Differential Equations | Mathematics
    In Unit I, we will study ordinary differential equations (ODE's) involving only the first derivative.Differential Equations · Autonomous Equations · Conventions and Preliminary...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] First-Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics
    Feb 28, 2020 · Propositional logic assumes that the world or system being modeled can be described in terms of a fixed, known set of propositions.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] First-Order Logic - Syntax, Semantics, Resolution - Computer Science
    To give semantics to a logical system means to define a notion of truth for the formulas. The concept of truth that we will now define for first-order logic ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] First Order Logic - Syntax and Semantics - West Virginia University
    Feb 6, 2013 · Basics. (i) Predicates are used to describe properties of objects. e.g., P(x) could stand for the property that x is divisible by 3.
  14. [14]
    The completeness and compactness theorems of first-order logic
    Apr 10, 2009 · Theorem 1 (Gödel completeness theorem, informal statement) Let ... The completeness and compactness theorems are results in first-order logic.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Undecidability of First-Order Logic - Computer Science
    In [25] Turing also showed that the halting problem for Turing machines is undecidable, and as a corollary, he arrived at the undecidability of the decision.
  16. [16]
    Chemical Kinetics - Purdue University
    Chemical Kinetics · The rate of any step in a reaction is directly proportional to the concentrations of the reagents consumed in that step. · The overall rate ...Chemical Kinetics · Instantaneous Rates of... · Different Ways of Expressing...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] 1 Fundamentals of Chemical Kinetics
    Chemical kinetics is the quantitative study of chemical systems that are changing with time. (Thermodynamics, another of the major branches of physical ...
  18. [18]
    Kinetics - FSU Chemistry & Biochemistry
    Kinetics is the study of the rates of chemical processes. The rate of a reaction is defined at the change in concentration over time.
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    12.4: Rate Laws - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Oct 27, 2022 · Rate laws provide a mathematical description of how changes in the amount of a substance affect the rate of a chemical reaction.Example 12 . 4 . 1 : Writing... · Example 12 . 4 . 2... · Example 12 . 4 . 3...
  21. [21]
    Chemical Kinetics: Differential Rate Laws
    There are two forms of a rate law for chemical kinetics: the differential rate law and the integrated rate law.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    2.1: Kinetic Rate Laws - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Aug 9, 2023 · Equation 2.1.2 is known as the rate law and the overall reaction order is determined by the sum of the orders n and m for each reactant.
  23. [23]
    14.1: Factors that Affect Reaction Rates - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Jul 7, 2023 · There are many factors that influence the reaction rates of chemical reactions include the concentration of reactants, temperature, the physical state of ...
  24. [24]
    Kinetics and Collision Theory - Harper College
    Chemical kinetics is the study of the rates of chemical reactions or how fast reactions occur. The primary requirement for a reaction to occur is that the ...
  25. [25]
    6.2.3.1: Arrhenius Equation - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Feb 13, 2024 · The exponential term in the Arrhenius equation implies that the rate constant of a reaction increases exponentially when the activation energy ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 5: Chemical Kinetics - UCSB Engineering
    We use several concepts from the subject of chemical kinetics to illustrate two key points: 1. The stoichiometry of an elementary reaction defines the ...
  27. [27]
    9.7: Theories of Reaction Rates - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Dec 14, 2018 · Transition state theory (TST) provides a more accurate alternative to the previously used Arrhenius equation and the collision theory. The ...Collision Theory · Transition-State Theory · Thermodynamics of Transition...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Chemical Kinetics
    Kinetics – how fast does a reaction proceed? Thermodynamics – does a reaction take place? Reaction speed: measured by the change in concentration with time.
  29. [29]
    Why It Matters: Kinetics – Chemistry Fundamentals - UCF Pressbooks
    The study of chemical kinetics concerns the second and third questions—that is, the rate at which a reaction yields products and the molecular-scale means by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Lecture 9: Phase Transitions
    When this happens we say the transition is of the rst order. First order phase transition: @G. @T P changes discontinuously at the phase boundary. The rst ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Chapter 6 Phase transitions
    critical point : The first-order phase boundary between gas and liquid becomes second order right at the critical point.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Formal Methods and Logic
    Formal Methods and Logic is the use of logical systems like propositional logic, first-order logic, and temporal logic to model and reason about computation.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    First-Order Logic | Baeldung on Computer Science
    Mar 18, 2024 · First-order logic, like all other systems of formal logic, is a method for formalizing natural languages into a computable format.
  35. [35]
    Complete First-Order Reasoning for Properties of Functional Programs
    Oct 16, 2023 · We describe the design, implementation and verification of an automated theorem prover for first-order logic with functions. The proof ...
  36. [36]
    Mechanical Mathematicians - Communications of the ACM
    Apr 1, 2023 · Resolution and superposition target first-order logic. First-order provers work well on first-order problems, but most proof assistants are ...
  37. [37]
    FO-Complete Program Verification for Heap Logics
    FLV generates verification conditions in first-order logic with recursive definitions, in particular in the logic 𝐿oneway, and utilizes an existing tool to do ...
  38. [38]
    A formalization of programs in first-order logic with a discrete linear ...
    We consider the problem of representing and reasoning about computer programs, and propose a translation from a core procedural iterative programming language ...
  39. [39]
    Reducing liveness to safety in first-order logic - ACM Digital Library
    We develop a new technique for verifying temporal properties of infinite-state (distributed) systems. The main idea is to reduce the temporal verification ...
  40. [40]
    Introduction into first order logic verification
    Aug 10, 2012 · The tool Alloy is one tool that allows models to be described in first-order logic (though the surface syntax is based on relationally described ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Formal Verification - Lecture 8: First Order Logic
    First Order Logic (FOL), AKA Predicate Logic is logic which has the operators ... → FOL uses variables and universal quantification ∀. → ∀x. S(x) ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Formal Verification Methods 4: Theorem Proving
    Validity in pure first-order logic is semi-decidable. We can write a program that will verify that a formula is valid, but it may loop indefinitely if it is not ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] 8 FIRST-ORDER LOGIC - Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach
    We begin in Section 8.1 with a discussion of representation languages in general; Section 8.2 covers the syntax and semantics of first-order logic; Sections 8.3 ...
  44. [44]
    Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence
    Aug 27, 2003 · It concentrates on the issues that arise when logic is used in understanding intelligent reasoning in mechanized reasoning systems.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Artificial Intelligence Spring 2021 Propositional and First-Order Logic
    First Order logic (FOL) is a powerful knowledge representation (KR) system. • It's used in AI systems in various ways, e.g.. • To directly represent and reason ...
  46. [46]
    Symbolic Artificial Intelligence and First Order Logic - CSULB
    Jul 23, 2010 · First Order Logic provides a method to store declarations about the world, the robot and everything it knows. There are limits to what it can ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Machine learning and automated theorem proving
    Modern machine learning has been applied to the automation of heuristic selection in a first order logic theorem prover. One objective was to find if there are ...
  48. [48]
    (PDF) Machine Learning for First-Order Theorem Proving
    Aug 7, 2025 · We applied two state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to the problem of selecting a good heuristic in a first-order theorem prover. Our ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to First-Order Logic ...
    TRAIL uses deep reinforcement learning for theorem proving, with a novel neural representation and attention-based action policy, outperforming previous ...
  50. [50]
    First-Order Logic in Artificial Intelligence - GeeksforGeeks
    Aug 22, 2025 · First-Order Logic (FOL) also known as predicate logic helps us represent knowledge, reason through problems and understand language.
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    First Order Control System: What is it? (Rise & Settling Time Formula)
    Apr 25, 2024 · A first order control system is defined as a system where the relationship between input and output, called a transfer function, involves only the first-order ...What is a First Order Control... · First Order Control System
  53. [53]
    The Unit Step Response - Swarthmore College
    To find the unit step response, multiply the transfer function by the unit step (1/s) and the inverse Laplace transform using Partial Fraction Expansion..General Solution · Step Response of a first order... · Time Constants of First Order...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Response of the First Order System - Tutorials Point
    The first order control systems are stable with impulse and step inputs because these responses have bounded output.
  55. [55]
    Introduction: System Analysis
    First-order systems are the simplest dynamic systems to analyze. Some common examples include mass-damper systems and RC circuits. The general form of the first ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] On Logicist Agent-Based Economics⋆ - Selmer Bringsjord
    In both cases, only the first-order extensional fragments of cognitive calculi in CC are needed for such theorems, and corresponding modeling and simulation.
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Scaling Economic Theories via Logical Compactness
    Working with fully fledged first-order logic (i.e., where the domain of the model corresponds, e.g., to the set of agents in the market, or more generally ...
  58. [58]
    First-order logic as a constraint satisfaction problem
    May 4, 2021 · In this paper, we discourse an analysis of classical first-order predicate logic as a constraint satisfaction problem, CSP.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Logic, optimization and constraint programming: A fruitful collaboration
    A key step in first order logic is unification, which finds variable substitutions that make two instantiations of a formula identical. This is essentially a ...
  60. [60]
    An introduction to mechanized reasoning - ScienceDirect
    Mechanized reasoning uses computers to verify proofs and to help discover new theorems. Computer scientists have applied mechanized reasoning to economic ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Application of Mathematics to Microeconomics
    Apr 26, 2021 · The Application ... predicate logic are two types of mathematics. This article focuses solely on mathematical logic's usage in microeconomics.