Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lorentz transformation

The Lorentz transformation is a linear transformation between the space and time coordinates of two inertial reference frames moving at a constant velocity relative to each other, ensuring the invariance of the spacetime interval in special relativity.^[1] It generalizes the classical Galilean transformation by incorporating the relativistic effects arising from the constancy of the speed of light c, expressed as \gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}, where v is the relative velocity and \gamma is the Lorentz factor.^[2] For frames aligned along the x-axis, the core equations are x' = \gamma (x - vt), t' = \gamma (t - vx/c^2), y' = y, and z' = z, with the inverse obtained by replacing v with -v.^[2] These transformations preserve the Minkowski metric g_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1), forming the Lorentz group O(3,1), whose proper orthochronous subgroup SO^+(3,1) includes boosts (for relative motion) and rotations.^[1] Derived from Albert Einstein's 1905 postulates of special relativity—that the laws of physics are identical in all inertial frames and the speed of light is constant—the Lorentz transformation resolves inconsistencies between classical mechanics and electromagnetism, such as those in Maxwell's equations.^[3] It predicts fundamental phenomena like time dilation, where a time interval \Delta t' in the moving frame appears as \Delta t = \gamma \Delta t' in the stationary frame, and length contraction, where a length L' along the motion direction contracts to L = L' / \gamma in the stationary frame.^[2] Although originally proposed by Hendrik Lorentz in 1904 to explain the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment, Einstein's interpretation elevated it to a cornerstone of relativistic kinematics, applicable to particles approaching light speed and foundational in quantum field theory and general relativity.^[1] The transformation's matrix form \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu satisfies \Lambda^T g \Lambda = g, ensuring the causal structure of spacetime remains intact across frames.^[1]

Historical Development

Early Concepts in Electromagnetism

In the 19th century, physicists posited the existence of a luminiferous ether as an invisible, all-pervading medium necessary for the propagation of light waves, analogous to how air serves as a medium for sound waves.^[4] This hypothesis gained prominence following Augustin-Jean Fresnel's early 19th-century work on the wave theory of light, which replaced Isaac Newton's corpuscular model, and was further solidified by James Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic theory in the 1860s, which unified optics and electromagnetism by describing light as electromagnetic disturbances traveling through the ether.^[4] The ether was conceived as stationary relative to absolute space, providing a fixed reference frame for electromagnetic phenomena, and its properties—such as rigidity to support transverse waves—were invoked to explain observations like refraction and dispersion.^[4] To test the ether hypothesis, Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley conducted a pivotal experiment in 1887 using an interferometer designed to detect the Earth's motion through this supposed stationary medium.^[5] The setup split a light beam into two perpendicular paths using partially silvered mirrors, with each path reflecting back to recombine and produce interference fringes; one arm was aligned parallel to the Earth's orbital velocity (approximately 30 km/s), and the other perpendicular, expecting a shift in fringes due to an "ether wind" analogous to the differing speeds of light against and with the flow.^[5] However, the experiment yielded a null result: no detectable fringe shift was observed, indicating that the speed of light remained isotropic regardless of direction or the Earth's motion, with sensitivity to effects on the order of v²/c² where v is the Earth's speed and c is the speed of light.^[5] The null result posed a profound challenge to the ether theory, as it contradicted expectations of relative motion between the Earth and the ether, prompting ad hoc explanations to preserve the framework.^[5] In 1887, Woldemar Voigt derived transformation equations within the framework of an elastic ether theory, predicting the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Voigt's approach accounted for Doppler effects due to the motion relative to the light source, incorporating a scaling factor (often denoted as "q") on the transverse y' and z' axes that adjusts wave timing and spacing, thereby skewing the transverse measurements without invoking velocity drag. This derivation, detailed in his paper "Ueber das Dopplersche Princip," ensured the covariance of the wave equation in the moving medium.^[6] Voigt's work, based on an elastic ether model, is also discussed in Max Born's "Einstein's Theory of Relativity" (p. 188).^[7] In 1889, George FitzGerald proposed that objects moving through the ether undergo a contraction in length along the direction of motion, proportional to the square of the velocity ratio to the speed of light, such that the interferometer's parallel arm would shorten to nullify the expected time difference.^[8] This idea, suggested in a brief letter to Science, lacked a detailed mechanism but drew inspiration from electromagnetic influences on molecular forces, as explored by Oliver Heaviside.^[8] Hendrik Lorentz independently developed a similar hypothesis in 1892, formalizing length contraction as a second-order effect (approximately v²/2c²) in his paper "The Relative Motion of the Earth and the Ether," where he also considered possible transverse expansions but emphasized the longitudinal deformation to reconcile the experiment with Maxwell's equations.^[8] Both proposals were viewed as provisional fixes, artificially adjusting material properties to fit the data without altering the underlying ether model.^[8] Lorentz advanced these ideas further in his 1895 treatise Versuch einer Theorie der electrischen und optischen Erscheinungen in bewegten Körpern, where he elaborated an electron theory positing charged particles (electrons) as the constituents of matter interacting with the ether to produce electromagnetic effects. In this framework, length contraction emerged as a dynamical consequence of electromagnetic forces binding electrons, ensuring the invariance of electromagnetic laws for moving bodies relative to the stationary ether. To handle transformations between frames, Lorentz introduced the concept of "local time," defined as t' = t - (v/c²)x for observers moving at velocity v, serving as a mathematical auxiliary to approximate the synchronization of clocks in moving systems to first order in v/c, thereby explaining optical phenomena's apparent independence from the Earth's motion through the ether. This local time was not interpreted as a fundamental physical reality but as a tool within the electron theory to align observations with ether-based electrodynamics.

Formulation by Lorentz and Einstein

The origins of the Lorentz transformation can be traced to Woldemar Voigt's 1887 paper "Ueber das Dopplersche Princip," in which he derived transformations that preserved the invariance of the wave equation under a change of reference frame, introducing a form of "local time" t' = t - \frac{v}{c^2} x in the context of the Doppler effect. Lorentz corresponded with Voigt in 1888 regarding calculations related to the Michelson-Morley experiment. Later, in his book The Theory of Electrons (1909, with an added note in the 1913 second edition, p. 198), Lorentz explicitly acknowledged Voigt's priority for these transformation equations and the local time concept.^[9]^[10] Hendrik Lorentz first introduced key elements of what would become the Lorentz transformation in his 1895 paper, where he proposed length contraction to explain the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment while preserving the invariance of Maxwell's equations under motion relative to the luminiferous ether. Over the following years, Lorentz refined these ideas in subsequent works, culminating in his 1904 paper, in which he fully formulated the transformation equations for both coordinates and electromagnetic fields, ensuring the apparent invariance of Maxwell's equations for systems moving at velocities less than that of light.^[11] In 1905, Henri Poincaré built upon Lorentz's transformations by recognizing their mathematical structure as a group and articulating the principle of relativity, which posits that physical laws are identical in all inertial frames, extending the transformations' applicability beyond mere electromagnetic phenomena.^[12] Poincaré's contributions from 1900 to 1906, including his discussions at the 1900 International Congress of Physics and later memoirs, emphasized the transformations' role in unifying mechanics and electrodynamics while still retaining a vestige of the ether concept.) Albert Einstein, in his seminal 1905 paper "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies," independently derived the Lorentz transformations from two fundamental postulates—the principle of relativity and the constancy of the speed of light—thereby eliminating the need for the ether and establishing the transformations as the cornerstone of special relativity, where space and time are interdependent.^[13] This derivation shifted the transformations from an ad hoc tool for electromagnetic invariance to a universal framework for all physical laws in inertial frames. These developments marked a pivotal evolution, with physical effects such as time dilation emerging directly from the transformations' application to moving clocks.^[13] A brief timeline of these refinements includes Voigt's 1887 proposal of precursor transformations, Lorentz's foundational papers from 1895 to 1904, Poincaré's elucidations between 1900 and 1906, Einstein's 1905 synthesis, and Hermann Minkowski's 1908 interpretation of the transformations within a unified four-dimensional spacetime continuum, which provided a geometric foundation for relativity.^[14]

Fundamental Principles

Postulates of Special Relativity

The Lorentz transformation arises from the foundational framework of special relativity, which Albert Einstein introduced in his 1905 paper to resolve fundamental inconsistencies in classical electrodynamics. These inconsistencies stemmed from the hypothesis of a stationary luminiferous ether as a medium for light propagation, which led to asymmetries when applying Maxwell's equations to moving bodies and contradicted the observed isotropy of electromagnetic phenomena.^[15] By dispensing with the ether and proposing two key postulates, Einstein established a consistent theory applicable to all inertial observers.^[15] As noted by Max Planck in 1909, the elimination of the ether enabled the principle of relativity but left open the possibility of mutually contradictory time specifications between observers, leading to concepts like time dilation in the Lorentz transformations.^[16] The first postulate, known as the principle of relativity, asserts that the laws of physics take the same form in all inertial systems of reference, regardless of their uniform relative motion.^[15] Formally stated by Einstein, it declares: "The laws by which the states of physical systems undergo change are not affected, whether these changes of state be referred to the one or the other of two systems of co-ordinates in uniform translatory motion."^[15] This extends the classical Galilean principle of relativity—originally applied only to mechanics—to encompass all physical laws, including electrodynamics, ensuring no experiment can distinguish one inertial frame from another.^[17] The second postulate specifies the constancy of the speed of light: any ray of light in vacuum propagates with the fixed speed c as measured in any inertial frame, independent of the motion of the source or observer.^[15] Einstein articulated this as: "light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body."^[15] Together, these postulates replace the Galilean framework, which assumes absolute time and classical velocity addition valid only at speeds much below c, by requiring modifications at relativistic speeds to preserve invariance.^[18] These axioms have profound implications for fundamental physical concepts. The invariance of c establishes it as the universal speed limit for causal influences, preventing paradoxes like information traveling backward in time and thereby preserving causality across frames.^[17] Additionally, the postulates imply the isotropy of space, as the speed of light must be the same in all directions for every observer, eliminating any preferred frame or direction.^[19] In essence, they lead to a pseudo-Euclidean geometry of spacetime, generalizing classical notions of space and time.^[20]

Spacetime Interval Invariance

In special relativity, spacetime is described by Minkowski spacetime, a four-dimensional manifold combining three spatial dimensions and one time dimension, equipped with a pseudo-Euclidean metric of signature (+,−,−,−) or equivalently (−,+,+,+).^[14] This structure treats time and space as unified coordinates rather than separate entities, enabling a geometric interpretation of relativistic effects.^[21] To handle coordinates in this framework, events are represented using four-vectors, which are objects with four components transforming under Lorentz transformations to preserve their inner product.^[22] In contravariant notation, a position four-vector is denoted as x^\mu = (ct, x, y, z), where \mu = 0, 1, 2, 3, c is the speed of light, and the metric raises or lowers indices to form covariant versions, such as x_\mu = (ct, -x, -y, -z) in the (+,−,−,−) convention. The inner product of two four-vectors A^\mu and B_\mu is A^\mu B_\mu = A^0 B_0 + A^1 B_1 + A^2 B_2 + A^3 B_3, which remains invariant under Lorentz transformations.^[23] The fundamental invariant in Minkowski spacetime is the spacetime interval between two events, defined as

ds^2 = c^2 dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2

for infinitesimal displacements, or more generally ds^2 = \eta_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu using the metric tensor \eta_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1).^[14] This interval is preserved under Lorentz transformations, meaning its value is the same in all inertial frames, providing a measure of separation that is independent of the observer's motion.^[24] Hermann Minkowski introduced this concept in his 1908 lecture, emphasizing its role in unifying space and time into a single "world" geometry where physical laws exhibit invariance.^[14] Spacetime intervals are classified based on the sign of ds^2: timelike if ds^2 > 0 (time separation dominates, allowing causal influence between events for massive particles), spacelike if ds^2 < 0 (space separation dominates, implying no causal connection as it exceeds light speed), and lightlike (or null) if ds^2 = 0 (events connected by light signals, forming the boundary of causality)./06%3A_Regions_of_Spacetime/6.02%3A_Relation_Between_Events-_Timelike_Spacelike_or_Lightlike) This classification has profound causal significance: timelike intervals permit information transfer within the light cone, while spacelike intervals lie outside it, enforcing the principle that effects cannot precede causes faster than light.

Derivation and Properties

Derivation from Relativity Postulates

The Lorentz transformation arises directly from the two postulates of special relativity: the principle of relativity, which asserts that the laws of physics take the same form in all inertial reference frames, and the invariance of the speed of light, which states that the speed of light in vacuum is constant and independent of the motion of the source or observer.^[25] These postulates necessitate a coordinate transformation between frames that preserves the invariance of light propagation.^[26] Consider two inertial frames, S and S', with S' moving at constant velocity v along the positive x-axis relative to S, and their origins coinciding at t = t' = 0. The homogeneity of space and time implies that the transformation relating coordinates (x, y, z, t) in S to (x', y', z', t') in S' must be linear.^[27] By the principle of relativity, the form of the transformation from S to S' should mirror that from S' to S with v reversed in sign, suggesting the inverse relations

x = \gamma (x' + v t'), \quad y = y', \quad z = z', \quad t = \gamma \left( t' + \frac{v x'}{c^2} \right),

where \gamma is a velocity-dependent factor and c is the speed of light.^[28] The transverse coordinates remain unchanged due to the motion being purely longitudinal: y' = y, z' = z. To determine \gamma, invoke the light invariance postulate. In frame S, a spherical wavefront expanding from the origin at t = 0 satisfies

x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = c^2 t^2.

Substituting the inverse transformations into this equation and requiring the result to take the identical form

x'^2 + y'^2 + z'^2 = c^2 t'^2

in S' yields, after expansion and simplification,

\gamma^2 (1 - \beta^2) = 1,

where \beta = v/c. Thus,

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}.

^[28] This condition ensures the light cone is preserved, as the postulates demand. The forward Lorentz boost transformations are then obtained by inverting the above relations, giving \begin{align*} x' &= \gamma (x - v t), \ y' &= y, \ z' &= z, \ t' &= \gamma \left( t - \frac{v x}{c^2} \right), \end{align*} with the same \gamma.^[28] The inverse transformations exhibit symmetry under interchange of primed and unprimed coordinates with v \to -v, underscoring the equivalence of the frames per the relativity principle. This derivation yields the unique linear transformation satisfying the postulates for a one-dimensional boost along the direction of relative motion.^[26]

Group Structure of Lorentz Transformations

The Lorentz group consists of all invertible linear transformations \Lambda on four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime \mathbb{R}^{3,1} that preserve the Minkowski metric \eta = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1), satisfying the defining relation \Lambda^T \eta \Lambda = \eta.^[29] This group, denoted O(3,1), encompasses transformations that maintain the spacetime interval invariant and includes both proper (determinant +1) and improper (determinant -1) elements, as well as orthochronous (preserving time orientation) and non-orthochronous components. The proper orthochronous subgroup SO^+(3,1) forms the connected component containing the identity matrix, comprising orientation-preserving transformations that do not reverse the time direction and serve as the physically relevant symmetry group in special relativity.^[29] Under matrix multiplication, Lorentz transformations compose to yield another Lorentz transformation, endowing the set with a group structure that is non-Abelian. Rotations and boosts, the primary generators of the group, do not generally commute; for instance, the composition of two non-collinear boosts results in an overall boost accompanied by a spatial rotation, termed the Thomas rotation, which arises due to the hyperbolic geometry of velocity space.^[30] This effect underscores the group's Lie structure and has implications for the parallel transport of spatial frames in relativity. Henri Poincaré first articulated the group-theoretic nature of these transformations in his 1905 analysis.^[31] Boosts admit a useful parameterization in terms of the rapidity \phi, a hyperbolic angle related to the relative velocity v by \beta = v/c = \tanh \phi, with \gamma = \cosh \phi and \beta \gamma = \sinh \phi. For a boost along the positive x-direction, the corresponding matrix is

\begin{pmatrix} \cosh \phi & -\sinh \phi & 0 & 0 \\ -\sinh \phi & \cosh \phi & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

which simplifies addition of collinear rapidities under composition and aligns with the group's hyperbolic parametrization.^[1] Finite elements of the Lorentz group near the identity can be generated via the exponential map from its Lie algebra, where infinitesimal generators represent small rotations (angular displacements) and boosts (velocity increments). Specifically, a group element \Lambda = \exp(X) arises from an algebra element X satisfying X^T \eta + \eta X = 0, providing a pathway to parameterize transformations through series expansion for small parameters.^[32]

One-Dimensional Lorentz Boost

Coordinate Transformation Formulas

The Lorentz boost in one dimension, which relates the coordinates of two inertial frames moving at constant relative velocity v along the x-axis, is expressed using the Lorentz factor \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}, where c is the speed of light. The transformation matrix \Lambda in the standard configuration for the four-vector (ct, x) takes the form

\Lambda = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma & -\frac{\gamma v}{c} \\ -\frac{\gamma v}{c} & \gamma \end{pmatrix}.

This matrix was derived from the principles of special relativity to ensure the invariance of the spacetime interval.^[13] The primed coordinates (ct', x') in the moving frame are obtained by applying this matrix to the unprimed four-position vector X = (ct, x)^T, yielding X' = \Lambda X. Explicitly, this gives ct' = \gamma (ct - \frac{v}{c} x) and x' = \gamma (x - v t), preserving the Minkowski metric \eta = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1).^[26] In the geometry of Minkowski space, a Lorentz boost can be interpreted as a hyperbolic rotation, analogous to an ordinary rotation in Euclidean space but using hyperbolic functions instead of trigonometric ones. The parameter \phi related to the boost velocity by \tanh \phi = v/c parameterizes the transformation, such that \gamma = \cosh \phi and \gamma v/c = \sinh \phi, emphasizing the rotational structure in the indefinite metric of spacetime. This perspective highlights how boosts "rotate" the time and space axes while keeping the light cone invariant.^[14] For a concrete illustration, consider two frames where the relative velocity is v = 0.8c, so \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - 0.64} = 5/3 \approx 1.667. The boost matrix becomes

\Lambda = \begin{pmatrix} 1.667 & -1.333 \\ -1.333 & 1.667 \end{pmatrix},

since \gamma v/c = (5/3)(0.8) = 4/3 \approx 1.333. Applying this to an event at (ct = 3c \cdot \mathrm{s}, x = 4c \cdot \mathrm{s}) yields ct' \approx -0.333c \cdot \mathrm{s} and x' \approx 2.667c \cdot \mathrm{s}, demonstrating the mixing of time and space coordinates.^[1]

Physical Effects of Boosts

One of the key physical effects of a one-dimensional Lorentz boost is time dilation, where the duration between two events is observed to be longer in a frame relative to which the events' spatial separation is nonzero, compared to the proper time measured in the frame where the events occur at the same location. The relationship is given by

\Delta t = \gamma \Delta \tau,

where \Delta \tau is the proper time interval, \Delta t is the dilated time interval in the observer's frame, v is the relative speed, c is the speed of light, and \gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} is the Lorentz factor.^[13] This effect implies that moving clocks tick slower from the perspective of a stationary observer.^[13] An early experimental confirmation came from observations of cosmic-ray muons, which decay rapidly with a proper lifetime of about 2.2 microseconds, insufficient under classical physics to reach sea level from the upper atmosphere. In 1941, Bruno Rossi and David B. Hall measured the decay rates of these particles (then called mesotrons) at different momenta atop Mount Washington, finding that faster muons decayed more slowly in the laboratory frame, consistent with time dilation predictions to within experimental error.^[33] Subsequent high-precision tests in particle accelerators, such as the 1977 CERN muon storage ring experiment, accelerated muons to \gamma \approx 29.3 and measured their lifetimes as \tau^+ = 64.419 \pm 0.058 ns and \tau^- = 64.398 \pm 0.057 ns, agreeing with relativistic predictions to better than 0.1%.^[34] Length contraction complements time dilation as another consequence of the boost, affecting measurements only in the direction parallel to the relative motion. The proper length L of an object in its rest frame appears contracted to L' = L / \gamma when viewed from a frame moving at speed v along that direction.^[13] This effect is illustrated by a thought experiment: Consider a rod of proper length L at rest in frame S. In frame S', moving at velocity v parallel to the rod, two observers at the rod's ends in S' must measure its endpoints simultaneously in S' to determine L'; due to the transformation, this simultaneity condition yields the contracted length.^[13] Direct verification of length contraction is challenging for macroscopic objects but is inferred from the reciprocity with time dilation in particle experiments, where the observed muon fluxes imply contraction of the Earth's atmosphere from the muons' perspective.^[34] The relativity of simultaneity further underscores the departure from classical intuition, asserting that two spatially separated events deemed simultaneous in one inertial frame are generally not simultaneous in another frame boosted relative to the first.^[13] Einstein demonstrated this through a gedankenexperiment involving a moving train and lightning strikes: In the platform frame, strikes at the train's front and rear are simultaneous for an observer midway on the platform, as light from both reaches them concurrently. However, for an observer midway on the train, moving toward the front strike and away from the rear, the front light arrives first, rendering the events non-simultaneous.^[13] These effects have been corroborated by macroscopic experiments, such as the 1971 Hafele-Keating test, where cesium atomic clocks flown eastward and westward around the Earth on commercial jets showed time gains and losses of 59 ± 10 ns and 273 ± 7 ns, respectively, after accounting for gravitational effects, matching kinematic time dilation to within measurement uncertainty.^[35] Particle accelerator data, including the CERN results, provide ongoing verification at relativistic speeds.^[34] In contrast to Galilean transformations, which treat time as absolute and lengths invariant, Lorentz boosts incorporate these phenomena to preserve the constancy of light speed across frames.^[13]

General Lorentz Transformations

Rotations and Boosts in 3+1 Dimensions

In 3+1-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, Lorentz transformations encompass spatial rotations, which preserve the time coordinate while mixing spatial coordinates, and boosts, which mix time and space coordinates for relative motion in arbitrary directions. A pure boost corresponds to a change of inertial frame moving with constant velocity \vec{v} = v \hat{n} relative to the original frame, where \hat{n} is the unit vector in the direction of motion, \beta = v/c, and \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - \beta^2}. The components parallel to \hat{n} undergo a hyperbolic transformation analogous to the one-dimensional case, while perpendicular components are scaled by \gamma.^[1] The explicit 4×4 matrix for such a boost, in coordinates (ct, x, y, z), takes the form

\Lambda^\mu{}_\nu = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma & -\gamma \beta n_x & -\gamma \beta n_y & -\gamma \beta n_z \\ -\gamma \beta n_x & 1 + (\gamma - 1) n_x^2 & (\gamma - 1) n_x n_y & (\gamma - 1) n_x n_z \\ -\gamma \beta n_y & (\gamma - 1) n_y n_x & 1 + (\gamma - 1) n_y^2 & (\gamma - 1) n_y n_z \\ -\gamma \beta n_z & (\gamma - 1) n_z n_x & (\gamma - 1) n_z n_y & 1 + (\gamma - 1) n_z^2 \end{pmatrix},

where the indices follow the convention \mu, \nu = 0,1,2,3 with spatial indices i,j = 1,2,3 corresponding to x,y,z. This matrix ensures that the parallel components transform with factors involving \gamma and \beta, while the perpendicular spatial components transform unchanged (with a scaling factor of 1 in the spatial submatrix).^[1] Any proper orthochronous Lorentz transformation (with determinant +1 and preserving the direction of time) can be uniquely decomposed as the composition of a pure boost followed by a spatial rotation, or vice versa, reflecting the structure of the Lorentz group. Spatial rotations are represented by 3×3 orthogonal matrices R embedded in the 4×4 Lorentz matrix as block-diagonal form with 1 in the time component, such as a rotation by angle \theta around the y-axis:

R_y(\theta) = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \cos\theta & 0 & \sin\theta \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -\sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix}.

The full transformation is then \Lambda = R \cdot B, where B is the boost matrix, though the order matters since boosts and rotations generally do not commute.^[1]^[36] These transformations preserve the invariance of the Minkowski metric \eta_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1) in 3+1 coordinates, satisfying \Lambda^\rho{}_\mu \eta_{\rho\sigma} \Lambda^\sigma{}_\nu = \eta_{\mu\nu}, which ensures the spacetime interval ds^2 = \eta_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu dx^\nu remains unchanged between frames. This invariance underpins the relativistic formulation of physical laws, such as in particle kinematics where boosts describe the motion of high-energy particles in accelerators.^[1] As an illustrative example, consider a boost along the x-direction (\hat{n} = (1,0,0), \beta_x = \beta) combined with a rotation around the y-axis by \theta. The boost matrix simplifies to

B_x(\beta) = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma & -\gamma \beta & 0 & 0 \\ -\gamma \beta & \gamma & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix},

and the composite transformation \Lambda = R_y(\theta) B_x(\beta) mixes the x and z coordinates via the rotation while applying the hyperbolic boost in the x-t plane, demonstrating how arbitrary proper transformations arise from these building blocks.^[1]

Velocity Addition Formula

In special relativity, velocities do not add according to the classical Galilean rule \mathbf{w} = \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{v}, where \mathbf{u} is the velocity of an object relative to a moving frame S' and \mathbf{v} is the velocity of S' relative to the stationary frame S; instead, the relativistic velocity addition formula ensures that the speed of light c remains invariant for all observers. This formula arises directly from the Lorentz transformation by considering velocities as the ratios of differentials in position and time coordinates between frames.^[37] For collinear velocities aligned along the direction of relative motion (taken as the x-axis without loss of generality), the addition formula is derived by applying the Lorentz transformation to the differentials dx and dt in S, yielding dx' = \gamma_v (dx - v dt) and dt' = \gamma_v (dt - v dx / c^2), where \gamma_v = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}. The velocity components are then u_x = dx/dt in S and u_x' = dx'/dt' in S', leading to the parallel addition rule:

w_\parallel = \frac{u_\parallel + v}{1 + u_\parallel v / c^2},

where w_\parallel is the resulting parallel velocity component. This formula was first derived by Albert Einstein in his foundational 1905 paper on special relativity.^[37]^[38] In the general non-collinear case, the object's velocity \mathbf{u}' in S' is decomposed into components parallel (\mathbf{u}'_\parallel) and perpendicular (\mathbf{u}'_\perp) to \mathbf{v}. The resulting velocity \mathbf{w} in S has parallel and perpendicular components given by

\mathbf{w}_\parallel = \frac{\mathbf{u}'_\parallel + \mathbf{v}}{1 + \mathbf{u}' \cdot \mathbf{v} / c^2},

\mathbf{w}_\perp = \frac{\mathbf{u}'_\perp}{\gamma_v \left(1 + \mathbf{u}' \cdot \mathbf{v} / c^2 \right)},

obtained by differentiating the full Lorentz transformation for spatial coordinates and time, accounting for the frame-dependent time dilation effect on perpendicular motions. This decomposition highlights how relativity distorts transverse velocities due to the asymmetry in time measurement between frames.^[39]^[40] In the low-speed limit where u, v \ll c, the relativistic formulas reduce to the Galilean addition \mathbf{w} \approx \mathbf{u}' + \mathbf{v} via binomial expansion, recovering classical mechanics as a good approximation. For light, setting |\mathbf{u}'| = c yields |\mathbf{w}| = c, preserving the light speed postulate; this also underlies the aberration of light, where the apparent direction of a photon's propagation changes for moving observers, with the angle transformation \cos \theta = \frac{\cos \theta' + \beta}{1 + \beta \cos \theta'} (where \beta = v/c) derived from the velocity formula applied to null geodesics.^[37]^[38] A key application of the velocity addition formula is in astrophysics, particularly relativistic beaming, where high-speed jets in active galactic nuclei (moving at v \approx 0.99c) appear brighter and more compact when aligned toward the observer due to the forward-directed addition of photon velocities, enhancing observed flux by factors up to \gamma^3 for small angles. This effect is crucial for interpreting blazar emissions and superluminal motion illusions in radio astronomy.^[41]

Mathematical Representation

Lorentz Group SO(3,1)

The Lorentz group, denoted O(3,1), consists of all linear transformations in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime that preserve the metric tensor \eta_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1), satisfying \Lambda^T \eta \Lambda = \eta. This group encompasses both proper and improper transformations, including spatial rotations, Lorentz boosts, and their combinations. The subgroup SO(3,1) comprises the proper Lorentz transformations with determinant \det \Lambda = +1, while SO⁺(3,1) is the proper orthochronous subgroup, which additionally preserves the orientation of time (i.e., \Lambda^0_0 \geq 1) and forms the connected component containing the identity.^[42]^[43] The full group O(3,1) includes discrete elements that connect its components, such as the parity transformation P, which inverts spatial coordinates (x \to -x) while leaving time unchanged, and the time reversal T, which reverses the time coordinate (t \to -t) while preserving space. These elements have determinant -1 and generate improper transformations. Charge conjugation C, though not a spacetime symmetry of the Lorentz group itself, interchanges particles with antiparticles and is often considered in the broader context of discrete symmetries like the CPT theorem, where it combines with P and T to form a fundamental invariance.^[44]^[45] Topologically, O(3,1) has four connected components, distinguished by the signs of the determinant and the time orientation, with the quotient group O(3,1)/SO⁺(3,1) isomorphic to the Klein four-group \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}. The proper orthochronous subgroup SO⁺(3,1) is non-compact and six-dimensional, homeomorphic to SL(2,\mathbb{C})/\{\pm I\}. This subgroup admits a double covering by the spin group SL(2,\mathbb{C}), which provides faithful representations for half-integer spins; spinors transform under this covering group, enabling the description of fermions in quantum field theory.^[42]^[43]^[46] The Lorentz group forms the homogeneous part of the Poincaré group, which extends it by including spacetime translations via a semidirect product: ISO(3,1) = SO⁺(3,1) ⋊ \mathbb{R}^{3,1}. This structure underlies the symmetries of special relativity, classifying elementary particles through irreducible representations of the Poincaré group.^[42]^[46]

Lie Algebra and Generators

The Lie algebra of the Lorentz group SO(3,1), denoted so(3,1), is a six-dimensional real Lie algebra that encodes the infinitesimal transformations preserving the Minkowski metric. It is generated by six basis elements: three rotation generators J_i (for i=1,2,3), which form the compact so(3) subalgebra corresponding to spatial rotations, and three boost generators K_i, which generate hyperbolic rotations mixing space and time coordinates.^[47]^[48] The algebraic structure is defined by the following commutation relations (in units where \hbar = 1):

[J_i, J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k, \quad [J_i, K_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k, \quad [K_i, K_j] = -i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,

where \epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol. These relations show that the rotations act as derivations on both the rotation and boost generators, while the boosts close into rotations with a negative sign, reflecting the non-compact nature of the algebra.^[47] Over the complex numbers, so(3,1) is isomorphic to sl(2,\mathbb{C}), or equivalently to the direct sum of two su(2) algebras via the basis change J_i^\pm = \frac{1}{2}(J_i \pm i K_i), where [J_i^\pm, J_j^\pm] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k^\pm and cross terms vanish.^[48] Finite elements of the Lorentz group can be obtained via the exponential map from the Lie algebra: a general proper orthochronous transformation is \Lambda = \exp(i \boldsymbol{\theta} \cdot \mathbf{J} + i \boldsymbol{\phi} \cdot \mathbf{K}), where \boldsymbol{\theta} and \boldsymbol{\phi} are real vectors parameterizing rotations and boosts, respectively. For pure rotations, this yields \exp(i \theta \hat{n} \cdot \mathbf{J}), and for pure boosts, \exp(i \phi \hat{m} \cdot \mathbf{K}), with the latter involving hyperbolic functions due to the non-compact structure.^[47] The Casimir operators of so(3,1), which commute with all generators, label its irreducible representations. The quadratic Casimir is C_2 = \mathbf{J}^2 - \mathbf{K}^2 = \frac{1}{2} M_{\mu\nu} M^{\mu\nu}, where M_{\mu\nu} are the general generators (with M_{ij} = \epsilon_{ijk} J_k and M_{0i} = K_i). Finite-dimensional representations are labeled by two non-negative half-integers (j_+, j_-), with C_2 = -j_+(j_+ + 1) - j_-(j_- + 1); these are non-unitary but useful for tensor fields. In the context of unitary representations relevant to quantum field theory, the labels correspond to particle spin, while mass arises from the full Poincaré extension.^[49]^[48] The negative sign in [K_i, K_j] = -i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k imparts a hyperbolic character to the boosts, distinguishing so(3,1) from the compact algebra so(4) of Euclidean rotations in four dimensions, where the corresponding relation would carry a positive sign, leading to bounded elliptic orbits rather than unbounded hyperbolic ones.^[48] This non-compactness ensures that Lorentz representations used in relativistic quantum theories are typically infinite-dimensional.^[49]

Tensor and Vector Transformations

Contravariant and Covariant Vectors

In special relativity, four-vectors are fundamental objects that encapsulate physical quantities transforming consistently under Lorentz transformations, distinguishing between contravariant and covariant forms based on index position. A contravariant four-vector V^\mu, with upper index \mu = 0, 1, 2, 3, transforms from one inertial frame to another via the Lorentz matrix \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu as V'^\mu = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu V^\nu, where summation over repeated indices is implied and the prime denotes the transformed frame.^[50] This ensures that the components adjust to preserve the underlying spacetime structure, as introduced in the four-dimensional formalism of spacetime.^[14] The covariant four-vector V_\mu, with lower index, is obtained by lowering the index using the Minkowski metric tensor \eta_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1), such that V_\mu = \eta_{\mu\nu} V^\nu. Under Lorentz transformations, it transforms as V'_\mu = (\Lambda^{-1})^\nu{}_\mu V_\nu, or equivalently V'_\mu = \Lambda_\mu{}^\nu V_\nu where \Lambda_\mu{}^\nu = \eta_{\mu\sigma} \Lambda^\sigma{}_\rho \eta^{\rho\nu}.^[50] The metric tensor thus serves to raise and lower indices consistently: V^\mu = \eta^{\mu\nu} V_\nu, with \eta^{\mu\nu} sharing the same diagonal form as \eta_{\mu\nu}, maintaining the distinction between temporal and spatial components across frames.^[51] Prominent examples include the four-momentum p^\mu = (E/c, \mathbf{p}), where E is the energy, c the speed of light, and \mathbf{p} the three-momentum vector, which transforms contravariantly to account for relativistic energy-momentum relations.^[50] Similarly, the four-current density j^\mu = (\rho c, \mathbf{j}), with charge density \rho and three-current \mathbf{j}, exemplifies a conserved quantity transforming in the same manner, ensuring charge invariance in electromagnetic contexts.^[51] A key feature is the invariance of the scalar product between a contravariant and covariant four-vector, defined as V \cdot U = V^\mu U_\mu = \eta_{\mu\nu} V^\mu U^\nu, which remains unchanged under Lorentz transformations and yields the spacetime interval for position four-vectors.^[50] This dot product, often written explicitly as V^0 U_0 + V^1 U_1 + V^2 U_2 + V^3 U_3 with the metric's signature, underpins the relativistic invariance of physical laws.^[14]

Rank-2 Tensors and Electromagnetic Fields

In special relativity, a contravariant rank-2 tensor T^{\mu\nu} transforms under a Lorentz transformation \Lambda according to the rule

T'^{\mu\nu} = \Lambda^\mu{}_\alpha \Lambda^\nu{}_\beta T^{\alpha\beta},

where the indices run over spacetime coordinates and repeated indices imply summation via the Einstein convention.^[14] This ensures the tensor's components adjust consistently between inertial frames, preserving the invariance of scalar quantities formed by tensor contractions. The electromagnetic field is compactly represented by the antisymmetric rank-2 tensor F^{\mu\nu}, defined as the curl of the four-potential A^\mu = (\phi/c, \mathbf{A}):

F^{\mu\nu} = \partial^\mu A^\nu - \partial^\nu A^\mu,

where \partial^\mu denotes the spacetime derivative.^[14] In component form, this tensor encodes the electric field \mathbf{E} and magnetic field \mathbf{B} (in units where c = 1) as F^{0i} = -E^i, F^{ij} = -\epsilon^{ijk} B_k, with \epsilon^{ijk} the Levi-Civita symbol. The antisymmetry F^{\mu\nu} = -F^{\nu\mu} reflects the duality between electric and magnetic phenomena. Under a Lorentz boost along the x-direction with velocity v, the parallel components (to the boost) remain unchanged: E'_\parallel = E_\parallel and B'_\parallel = B_\parallel. The perpendicular components transform as

\mathbf{E}'_\perp = \gamma (\mathbf{E}_\perp + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}_\perp), \quad \mathbf{B}'_\perp = \gamma \left(\mathbf{B}_\perp - \frac{1}{c^2} \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{E}_\perp\right),

where \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}. These rules arise from applying the general tensor transformation to F^{\mu\nu}, demonstrating how electric and magnetic fields mix in moving frames.^[52] Maxwell's equations in vacuum take the covariant form \partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} = 0 and \partial_\mu {}^*F^{\mu\nu} = 0, where {}^*F^{\mu\nu} is the Hodge dual. Since F^{\mu\nu} transforms as a tensor and the partial derivative \partial_\mu transforms as the components of a covariant vector, the equations remain invariant under Lorentz transformations. A illustrative example is a pure electric field \mathbf{E} in the rest frame of a charge distribution. In a frame boosted perpendicular to \mathbf{E} with velocity \mathbf{v}, the transformed field acquires a magnetic component \mathbf{B}' = -\gamma \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{E}/c^2, revealing magnetism as a relativistic effect of moving charges.

Spinor and Field Transformations

Dirac Spinors

Dirac spinors provide the fundamental representation for describing spin-1/2 fermions in relativistic quantum mechanics, arising from the finite-dimensional, non-unitary representations of the Lorentz group. The proper orthochronous Lorentz group SO⁺(3,1) is locally isomorphic to SL(2,ℂ), which serves as the double cover of SO⁺(3,1), allowing for half-integer spin representations that are essential for particles obeying Fermi-Dirac statistics.^[53] In this framework, a Dirac spinor ψ is a four-component complex object transforming under a Lorentz transformation Λ as ψ'(x') = S(Λ) ψ(x), where x' = Λ x and S(Λ) is a 4×4 matrix representation preserving the Dirac equation's covariance.^[54] The transformation matrix S(Λ) for infinitesimal Lorentz transformations parameterized by ω_{μν} takes the exponential form S(Λ) = exp(-i/4 ω_{μν} σ^{μν}), where the generators σ^{μν} are defined as σ^{μν} = (i/2) [γ^μ, γ^ν] and satisfy the Lie algebra of sl(2,ℂ).^[54] The γ^μ matrices, known as Dirac matrices, are 4×4 objects satisfying the Clifford algebra anticommutation relations {γ^μ, γ^ν} = 2 η^{μν} I, with η^{μν} = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) the Minkowski metric and I the identity matrix; these relations ensure the Lorentz invariance of the Dirac Lagrangian. Explicit representations of the γ^μ, such as the Dirac basis where γ^0 is Hermitian and γ^i anti-Hermitian, facilitate computations while maintaining these algebraic properties.^[53] Dirac spinors can be decomposed into left- and right-handed Weyl spinors using the chirality projector γ^5 = i γ^0 γ^1 γ^2 γ^3, with projections ψ_L = (1 - γ^5)/2 ψ and ψ_R = (1 + γ^5)/2 ψ. These two-component Weyl spinors transform under the fundamental (1/2, 0) and conjugate (0, 1/2) representations of SL(2,ℂ), respectively, highlighting the chiral structure relevant for massless fermions or weak interactions.^[54]^[53] Lorentz-invariant bilinears constructed from Dirac spinors include the vector current \bar{ψ} γ^μ ψ, where \bar{ψ} = ψ^\dagger γ^0 is the Dirac adjoint, transforming as a four-vector under the Lorentz group and representing conserved probability or charge currents in the Dirac theory.^[54] Other bilinears, such as the scalar \bar{ψ} ψ and pseudoscalar \bar{ψ} γ^5 ψ, form the complete set of Lorentz scalars, vectors, tensors, and pseudotensors, ensuring the covariance of observables in relativistic quantum field theory.^[54]

Transformation of Quantum Fields

In quantum field theory, quantum fields transform under the Poincaré group, which combines Lorentz transformations \Lambda with spacetime translations a^\mu, via unitary operators U(\Lambda, a) acting on the Hilbert space.^[55] For a general field operator \phi(x), the transformed field is given by \phi'(x') = U(\Lambda, a) \phi(x) U(\Lambda, a)^\dagger, where x'^\mu = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu x^\nu + a^\mu.^[55] This unitary representation ensures that physical observables, such as scattering amplitudes, remain invariant under these transformations, preserving the causal structure and relativistic invariance of the theory.^[55] For bosonic fields, which include scalars and vectors, the transformation follows the appropriate tensor representation of the Lorentz group. A scalar field \phi(x) transforms as \phi'(x') = \phi(\Lambda^{-1} (x' - a)), meaning it is unchanged in form but evaluated at the transformed coordinate.^[55] In operator notation, this is U(\Lambda, a)^{-1} \phi(x) U(\Lambda, a) = \phi(\Lambda^{-1} (x - a)).^[55] A vector field A^\mu(x), such as the electromagnetic potential, transforms as A'^\mu(x') = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu A^\nu(\Lambda^{-1} (x' - a)), reflecting its contravariant index.^[55] In operator form, U(\Lambda, a)^{-1} A^\rho(x) U(\Lambda, a) = \Lambda^\mu{}_\rho A_\mu(\Lambda^{-1} (x - a)).^[55] These transformations ensure that the field strengths, like the electromagnetic tensor F^{\mu\nu}, remain invariant in their tensorial properties under Lorentz boosts and rotations.^[55] Fermionic fields, such as Dirac spinors \psi(x), obey anticommutation relations \{\psi_\alpha(x), \psi^\dagger_\beta(y)\} = \delta_{\alpha\beta} \delta^3(x - y) at equal times, distinguishing them from bosonic commutators.^[55] Their transformation under the Poincaré group uses the spinor representation S(\Lambda) of the Lorentz group, given by U(\Lambda, a)^{-1} \psi(x) U(\Lambda, a) = S(\Lambda) \psi(\Lambda^{-1} (x - a)), where S(\Lambda) is a $4 \times 4 matrix satisfying S(\Lambda) \gamma^\mu S(\Lambda)^{-1} = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu \gamma^\nu for the Dirac matrices \gamma^\mu.^[55] This spinorial transformation accounts for the half-integer spin of fermions, ensuring consistency with the double-valued representations of the Lorentz group.^[55] Lorentz invariance in quantum field theory manifests in the S-matrix elements, which are unchanged under Poincaré transformations, \langle f | S | i \rangle = \langle f' | S | i' \rangle, where primed states are transformed.^[55] Similarly, the Lagrangians for free fields are scalars under Lorentz transformations, guaranteeing that interaction terms preserve relativistic symmetry when constructed appropriately.^[55] For example, the Klein-Gordon Lagrangian \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} \partial^\mu \phi \partial_\mu \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 for a massive scalar field is invariant, as the transformation \phi'(x') = \phi(\Lambda^{-1} x') leaves the action \int d^4x \mathcal{L} unchanged up to the Jacobian determinant, which equals 1 for proper Lorentz transformations.^[55] This invariance underpins the derivation of conserved currents via Noether's theorem and the consistency of perturbation theory in interacting theories.^[55]

References

[1]
[PDF] Lorentz Transformations in Special Relativity
In the following we will reverse this sequence of concepts, and define a Lorentz transformation as any linear transformation that satisfies Eq. (3). This has ...
[2]
[PDF] Special Relativity
This write-up summarizes the derivation and use of the Lorentz transformation to relate two inertial frames. The main results are. Lorentz length contraction ...
[3]
Lorentz Transformation - HyperPhysics
The Galilean transformation gives the coordinates of the point as measured from the fixed frame in terms of its location in the moving reference frame.Missing: special | Show results with:special
[4]
The Lorentz Transformations - Galileo
Once we accept the basic postulate of special relativity, however, that the laws of physics, including Maxwell's equations, are the same in all inertial frames ...
[5]
Origins of Special Relativity - University of Pittsburgh
The wave theory of light of the 19th century depended upon this ether. It ... So now the luminiferous ether was also the ether that carried these fields.
[6]
[PDF] The Michelson-Morley Experiment(s) - Physics
Early Experimentation: By the 1870s, the luminiferous ether was an accepted feature of contemporary physics. Double slit experiments early in the 1800s had ...
[7]
[PDF] The origins of length contraction: I. The FitzGerald-Lorentz ...
The FitzGerald-Lorentz hypothesis was a deformation effect, not strict contraction, to reconcile the Michelson-Morley experiment with the ether theory.
[8]
[PDF] Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity ...
H.A. Lorentz, Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity smaller than that of light, in: KNAW, Proceedings, 6, 1903-1904, Amsterdam, 1904, ...
[9]
[PDF] On the Dynamics of the Electron
Henri Poincaré. 1905. Exported from Wikisource on April 17, 2023. Page 2 ... To go further we must look for the invariants of the LORENTZ group.
[10]
[PDF] ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
It is known that Maxwell's electrodynamics—as usually understood at the present time—when applied to moving bodies, leads to asymmetries which do.
[11]
[PDF] Space and Time - UCSD Math
It was Hermann Minkowski (Einstein's mathematics professor) who announced the new four- dimensional (spacetime) view of the world in 1908, which he deduced from ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[12]
Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper - Einstein - Wiley Online Library
First published: 1905. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp ... Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues.
[13]
10.1 Postulates of Special Relativity - Physics | OpenStax
Mar 26, 2020 · Relativity is not new. Way back around the year 1600, Galileo explained that motion is relative. Wherever you happen to be, it seems like you ...Missing: Galilean | Show results with:Galilean
[14]
15 The Special Theory of Relativity - Feynman Lectures
This chapter is concerned with the Special Theory of Relativity, which dates from 1905. In 1915 Einstein published an additional theory, called the General ...
[15]
[PDF] Introduction to Special Relativity
– It is impossible to prove that the light moves the same speed in both directions. That is an assumption, based on the apparent isotropy of space, and the.
[16]
Postulates of Special Relativity - JILA
The postulate that spacetime forms a 4-dimensional continuum is a generalization of the classical Galilean concept that space and time form separate 3 and 1 ...
[17]
The origin of Minkowski spacetime - arXiv
Sep 28, 2024 · The four dimensional spacetime continuum, as first conceived by Minkowski, has become the dominant framework within which to describe physical laws.
[18]
Four-vectors in Relativity
They are defined so that the length of a four-vector is invariant under a coordinate transformation. This invariance is associated with physical ideas.
[19]
[PDF] Lorentz Invariance and the 4-vector Dot Product
The 4-vector is a powerful tool because the dot product of two 4-vectors is. Lorentz Invariant. In other words, the 4-vector dot product will have the.
[20]
[PDF] Minkowski space
Mar 21, 2013 · The spacetime interval between two events in Minkowski space is either: space-like,. 1. light-like ('null') or. 2. time-like.Missing: primary source
[21]
[PDF] ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES - Fourmilab
This edition of Einstein's On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies is based on the English translation of his original 1905 German-language paper. (published as ...
[22]
5.5 The Lorentz Transformation - University Physics Volume 3
Sep 29, 2016 · We can gain further insight into how the postulates of relativity change the Newtonian view of time and space by examining the transformation ...
[23]
[PDF] Special Relativity and Maxwell's Equations 1 The Lorentz ...
The next thing to notice is that the transformation equations are linear. This is a result of space being homogeneous. To put this very loosely, “things here ...
[24]
https://www.impan.pl/~pmh/teach/algebra/additional/minkowski.pdf
[25]
[PDF] Introduction to General Relativity - Colorado School of Mines
Nov 8, 2019 · group of transformations is called the proper orthochronous Lorentz group denoted by SO(1,3)↑. ... Because ΛT η Λ = η, one can conclude ΛT 6= Λ−1.
[26]
[PDF] Thomas-Wigner rotation and Thomas precession: actualized approach
In this section we analyze TWR (subsection 2.1) and TP (sub-section 2.2) on the basis of well known properties of the Lorentz group and disclose a number of ...
[27]
Poincare and relativity: the logic of the 1905 Palermo Memoir - arXiv
Jan 23, 2010 · Abstract: We highlight four points which have been ignored or underestimated before and which allow a better understanding of "Sur la ...
[28]
[PDF] Explicit Form for the Most General Lorentz Transformation Revisited
Sep 4, 2024 · Hence, the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group, henceforth denoted by so(1, 3), consists of all 4 × 4 real matrices A such that GA is an ...
[29]
[PDF] 4. The Dirac Equation - DAMTP
also two discrete symmetries which are part of the Lorentz group. They are. Time Reversal T : x0 ! x0 ; xi ! xi. Parity P : x0 ! x0 ; xi ! xi. (4.73). We won't ...
[30]
[PDF] Variation of the Rate of Decay of Mesotrons with Momentum
a rateabout three times faster than the more penetrating group, in agreement with the theo- retical predictions based on the relativity changein rate of a ...
[31]
Measurements of relativistic time dilatation for positive and negative ...
Jul 28, 1977 · The lifetimes of both positive and negative relativistic (γ = 29.33) muons have been measured in the CERN Muon Storage Ring with the results τ + = 64.419 (58) ...
[32]
Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains
Abstract. During October 1971, four cesium beam atomic clocks were flown on regularly scheduled commercial jet flights around the world twice, once eastward and ...
[33]
[PDF] Explicit form for the most general Lorentz transformation revisited
Sep 17, 2024 · ... Minkowski spacetime metric. One can also define the Lorentz transformation Λ as a symmetry transformation of a four-vector, x′ = Λx, that ...
[34]
[PDF] on the electrodynamics of - moving bodies
EINSTEIN. Translated from "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper,". Annalen der Physik, 17, 1905. Page 2. I. ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING. BODIES. By A.
[35]
[PDF] The Lorentz Transformation - UCSB Physics
To derive the Lorentz Transformations, we will again consider two inertial observers, moving with respect to each other at a velocity v. This is illustrated in ...
[36]
[PDF] Topics
Oct 17, 2006 · ... Relativistic ... perpendicular velocity addition. Here's an alternative derivation of velocity addition that easily. • gives the non-parallel ...
[37]
[PDF] Lecture 12 Notes, Electromagnetic Theory II
Parallel Velocity Addition Formula for Special Relativity. - Now we need to derive how the perpendicular velocity component transforms. - We may be tempted ...
[38]
5 Synchrotron Radiation‣ Essential Radio Astronomy
Relativistic photon beaming follows directly from the relativistic velocity addition equations (Equations C.22 through C.26) that relate the photon velocity ...
[39]
[PDF] Representations of the Symmetry Group of Spacetime - cs.wisc.edu
Mar 11, 2009 · The group O(1,3) is known as the Lorentz group, and elements of this group are Lorentz transformations. It has four connected components.
[40]
[PDF] 1 The spin homomorphism SL2(C) → SO1,3(R)
This is the identity component of the Lorentz group: SO+(1,3) = O(1,3)◦. The component group O(1,3)/ SO+(1,3) is isomorphic to Z/2Z × Z/2Z, i.e., the Klein ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
[PDF] Useful Notes for the Lorentz Group
This set contains pure rotations, pure Lorentz boosts, i.e., changes of observers, moving with distinct velocities, and also products of such transformations.
[42]
[PDF] Charge Conjugation Symmetry - UT Physics
The parity or space reflection symmetry is a discrete Lorentz symmetry which inverts ... the time reversal, the space reversal, and the charge reversal, all at ...
[43]
[PDF] The Lorentz and Poincaré groups & Quantum Field Theory
Jun 8, 2011 · The Poincaré group is the semidirect product of the group of translations and the Lorentz group. •Any relativistic field is in a representation ...
[44]
[PDF] Physics 221AB Spring 1997 Notes 36 Lorentz Transformations in ...
Thus, the Lorentz transformations form a group, sometimes denoted O(3,1), to indicate matrices which are orthgogonal with respect to a metric with one time-like ...
[45]
[PDF] 9 Lorentz Group and Special Relativity - Xie Chen
The infinitesimal generators are related to those in D(1,0) by T0 a = −T∗ a and the group elements are related by complex conjugation. 4. D(1,1). This ...
[46]
[PDF] Lorentz Symmetry of Particles and Fields - UT Physics
The continuous Lorentz symmetry group SO+(3, 1) comprises Lorentz boosts in all di- rections, space rotations around all axes, and all combinations of ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[47]
[PDF] 5. Electromagnetism and Relativity - DAMTP
where E = mc2 is the energy of the particle and p = mu is the 3-momentum in special relativity. The importance of U and P is that they too are 4-vectors.
[48]
[PDF] LECTURE NOTES 16 - High Energy Physics
The nature/composition of the Lorentz transformation matrix Λ (a rank-two, 4 x 4 = 16 component tensor) defines the space-time structure of our universe, i.e.
[49]
[PDF] electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving with any velocity ...
1. Fz ➡ Dz + ¹vHy + ¹(uzHy – uyHz). § 4. We shall further transform these formulæ by a change of variables. Putting. 02.
[50]
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/em/el4.pdf
[51]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory - UCSB Physics
Page 1. Quantum Field Theory. Mark Srednicki. University of California, Santa ... Lorentz transformation matrix and aµ is a translation vector. Both Λµ ν ...
[52]
Ueber das Dopplersche Princip
Woldemar Voigt's 1887 paper in Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, deriving transformation equations for the elastic ether theory and predicting the Michelson-Morley null result.
[53]
Einstein's Theory of Relativity
Max Born's 1920 book discussing Voigt's elastic ether-based transformation math in the context of relativity precursors (p. 188).
[54]
The Theory of Electrons by Hendrik Lorentz (1913 edition)
Primary source where Lorentz acknowledges Voigt's priority on page 198.
[55]
Voigt's transformations in the beginning of the relativistic era
Scholarly paper discussing Voigt's 1887 work, the correspondence with Lorentz, and historical context.
[56]
Eight Lectures on Theoretical Physics
Delivered at Columbia University in 1909 by Max Planck. Lecture VIII discusses the elimination of the ether and its implications for relativity, p. 119.