Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

BitLicense

The BitLicense, formally designated as the Virtual Currency Business Activity License, is a regulatory authorization issued by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) to entities engaging in specified virtual currency activities, including receiving or transmitting virtual currency, storing it for others, buying or selling it as a business, performing exchange services, or controlling, administering, or issuing it.
Developed under Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky starting in 2013 with public hearings in 2014, the framework was finalized and took effect in June 2015 as the first comprehensive state-level licensing regime for virtual currency businesses in the United States, aimed at mitigating risks such as money laundering, illicit finance, and cybersecurity threats while enabling regulated access to these services for New York residents.
Applicants must submit comprehensive documentation via the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System, demonstrate adequate capitalization tailored to their business model, maintain a surety bond or equivalent trust account of at least $500,000, and establish policies for anti-money laundering compliance, customer asset segregation, cybersecurity programs, and chief compliance officer oversight.
While the BitLicense has been obtained by prominent firms such as PayPal (via conditional approval in 2020) and continues to be pursued by institutional players into 2025, it has drawn sharp criticism for imposing prohibitively high compliance costs, invasive data retention mandates, and ongoing supervisory burdens that effectively barred many early-stage cryptocurrency ventures from operating in New York, resulting in a notable exodus of startups and accusations of regulatory overreach that prioritized caution over fostering innovation.

Definition and Scope

Licensing Requirements

Entities seeking to engage in virtual currency business activities in New York must obtain either a Virtual Currency Business Activity License, commonly known as the BitLicense, or a limited purpose trust company charter under New York Banking Law, as regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS). The BitLicense authorizes specific activities such as receiving, transmitting, storing, or exchanging virtual currency for fiat or other virtual currencies, while the trust company charter provides broader fiduciary powers without necessitating a separate activity license. Applications for the BitLicense are submitted through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS) and must include a comprehensive set of documents outlined in the NYDFS application , such as a detailed five-year , biographical information on principals and key personnel, organizational charts, and demonstrating viability. Applicants are required to designate a qualified individual as , responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining an effective compliance program, including oversight of anti-money laundering (AML) and measures. The AML program must comply with applicable requirements, incorporating risk-based policies, internal controls, ongoing training for personnel, and periodic independent testing. Licensees must adhere to capital requirements established by the NYDFS superintendent under 23 NYCRR § 200.8, maintaining sufficient capital at all times to ensure financial integrity, with levels determined case-by-case based on factors including the licensee's , exposure, needs, and operational scale. For consumer protection, licensees are obligated to secure a surety bond, trust account, or similar instrument under 23 NYCRR § 200.9, with a minimum value of $500,000 that the superintendent may increase according to the nature and volume of activities. Cybersecurity policies form a core obligation, requiring alignment with 23 NYCRR Part 500, encompassing assessments, , of nonpublic , incident within 72 hours of events, and annual of by a senior officer.

Regulated Activities and Exemptions

The BitLicense regulates entities engaging in virtual currency business activity, defined under 23 NYCRR § 200.2(q) as any of the following activities involving or a resident: receiving for transmission or transmitting (except for non-financial purposes involving nominal amounts); storing, holding, or maintaining custody or control of on behalf of others; buying or selling as a business; performing services; or controlling, administering, or issuing .) These activities trigger licensure specifically within jurisdiction, distinct from broader federal licensing under FinCEN, which applies to interstate transmission but does not preempt state-specific virtual currency oversight for activities touching residents or locations. Exemptions from the BitLicense requirement, per 23 NYCRR § 200.3(c), include merchants and consumers utilizing solely for purchasing or selling goods or services, without engaging in , custody, , or issuance services.) Additional exemptions apply to consumers holding purely for investment; charitable organizations merely accepting donations; virtual currency miners conducting non-commercial, private sales of self-mined coins; developers providing software solely as a technical, non-custodial service; and advisors offering non-transactional guidance on purchases or sales. These carve-outs narrow the regime to custodial and intermediary functions, excluding end-user or incidental involvement.

Regulatory Framework

Application Process

Applicants seeking a BitLicense must submit their application electronically through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (NMLS) online portal, as designated by the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS). Prior to formal submission, prospective applicants are encouraged to review the NY Virtual Currency Business Activity License New Application Checklist, which specifies required documentation including a detailed business plan, financial statements audited by a certified public accountant, descriptions of anti-money laundering (AML) and cybersecurity programs, organizational charts, and fingerprint-based background checks for all principals and key personnel. The application fee is $5,000, payable upon submission, with additional costs potentially incurred for third-party audits, legal reviews, and compliance preparations. NYDFS conducts a rigorous evaluation of the submission, assessing the applicant's fitness, financial responsibility, and ability to comply with regulatory requirements such as consumer protection and financial crime prevention measures. Under 23 NYCRR § 200.6, the Superintendent has 90 days to approve, deny, or issue a notice of hearing on the application, though this period may be extended for good cause, often resulting in review timelines extending several months due to the complexity of virtual currency operations. Conditional approvals may be granted where an applicant demonstrates substantial but requires remediation of identified deficiencies, such as enhanced cybersecurity protocols or additional reserves, with full licensure contingent on satisfactory resolution within specified deadlines. Upon approval, licensees must adhere to initial post-licensure reporting, including submission of quarterly and prompt notification of material changes or incidents, though ongoing obligations like annual audits fall under separate frameworks.

Ongoing Compliance and Enforcement

Licensees under the BitLicense regime are required to maintain robust anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) programs, including ongoing monitoring for suspicious activities and transaction reporting to relevant authorities. These programs must incorporate risk assessments tailored to operations, with failures in implementation directly contributing to heightened vulnerability to illicit finance risks. Additionally, licensees must adhere to stringent cybersecurity standards, such as implementing for privileged accounts, conducting annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments, and maintaining for sensitive data in transit and at rest. measures further mandate segregation of customer and assets from the licensee's proprietary holdings to prevent and ensure recoverability in scenarios. The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) enforces compliance through periodic on-site examinations and off-site reviews, evaluating adherence across operational, financial, and domains. These assessments culminate in supervisory ratings that reflect the overall safety and soundness of the licensee, with lower ratings triggering intensified oversight or corrective actions. Violations identified during examinations—such as inadequate internal controls or delayed remediation—causally lead to enforcement actions, including civil monetary penalties, mandated program enhancements, or license revocation in severe cases. Notable enforcement examples illustrate the direct consequences of compliance shortfalls. In May 2023, NYDFS imposed a $1.2 million penalty on bitFlyer USA, Inc., for cybersecurity deficiencies, including failure to submit timely reports and implement as required, which compromised the firm's risk management framework. Similarly, in August 2022, Robinhood Crypto, LLC faced a $30 million fine for violations encompassing AML program gaps that allowed unmonitored high-risk s, inadequate cybersecurity testing exposing customer data, and insufficient consumer disclosures on trading risks. In January 2023, Coinbase, Inc. settled BSA/AML violations with NYDFS, agreeing to enhanced monitoring protocols after findings revealed deficiencies in surveillance. These cases demonstrate how specific lapses in mandated safeguards precipitate measurable penalties, reinforcing the causal chain from non-compliance to regulatory intervention.

Historical Development

Origins and Proposal (2014)

The New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), led by Superintendent Benjamin M. Lawsky, initiated regulatory scrutiny of virtual currencies in early 2014 to address vulnerabilities exposed by the nascent industry's structure, including susceptibility to , , , and operational . These concerns were starkly illustrated by the February 28, 2014, collapse of , the dominant exchange handling over 70% of global trading volume, which disclosed the loss of approximately 850,000 bitcoins—equivalent to about $473 million at prevailing prices—primarily attributed to theft and mismanagement. The incident highlighted the absence of robust oversight, prompting NYDFS to apply established financial regulatory principles—such as licensing money transmitters and enforcing anti-money laundering (AML) controls—to activities without federal guidance in place. To inform its framework, NYDFS held public hearings on January 28 and 29, 2014, in New York City, gathering testimony from industry participants, including executives from bitcoin firms, financial institutions, and advocacy groups, on risks, best practices, and potential licensing models. These sessions revealed consensus on the need to curb illicit finance and consumer harm but divergent views on implementation, with stakeholders like the Bitcoin Foundation emphasizing the importance of innovation-friendly rules. On March 11, 2014, NYDFS issued a public order advancing the review process by inviting applications for limited-purpose trust company charters from virtual currency exchanges, signaling intent to integrate them into the state's banking supervision regime. The culmination of this phase occurred on July 17, 2014, when Lawsky released the proposed BitLicense regulations for public comment, marking the first comprehensive state-level licensing scheme for businesses. The draft mandated licenses for entities receiving, transmitting, storing, or controlling virtual currencies on behalf of residents or in the state, incorporating tailored requirements for capital reserves, cybersecurity protocols, AML programs, and consumer disclosures to safeguard assets and prevent abuse. Lawsky framed the proposal as striking a balance between protecting consumers from "theft, , and disruption" and enabling lawful growth, yet it immediately provoked industry contention over compliance costs and perceived .

Finalization and Implementation (2015)

On June 3, 2015, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) adopted the final BitLicense regulation following a period of public comments on prior drafts, establishing comprehensive licensing requirements for virtual currency business activities in the state. The regulation incorporated modifications such as limited exemptions for certain merchants and clarified definitions for virtual currency transmission, aiming to balance consumer protection with industry input. The final rule took effect on August 8, 2015, after publication in the New York State Register, triggering a 45-day grace period for existing virtual currency businesses to submit license applications or cease regulated activities in New York. This grace period, ending around August 10, compelled firms to either comply with the new framework or exit the market, underscoring the regulation's immediate enforcement mechanism. Implementation began promptly, with the NYDFS receiving initial applications during the ; however, the approval process proved rigorous, involving detailed reviews of cybersecurity, anti-money laundering controls, and capital reserves. The first BitLicense was issued on September 22, 2015, to Circle Internet Financial, a Boston-based firm, marking the operational start of the regime and validating its applicability to entities handling fiat-to-virtual currency exchanges. By late 2015, while several applications remained under review, the high compliance burdens— including annual fees of $5,000 to $100,000 based on transaction volume—highlighted from the outset.

Evolution and Amendments (2016–Present)

In June 2020, marking the five-year anniversary of the BitLicense regulation, the Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) conducted a that affirmed the core licensing framework while introducing enhanced guidance and resources for applicants and licensees. This included new protocols for the adoption and listing of virtual currencies by licensees, emphasizing risk assessments for coin selection, such as evaluating the virtual currency's value stability, , and susceptibility to manipulation. The also proposed a conditional BitLicense pathway to expedite approvals for entities demonstrating strong compliance programs, alongside commitments to improve application processing efficiency. Subsequent updates focused on supervisory guidance rather than statutory amendments. In September 2023, NYDFS proposed revisions to its listing framework, introducing a "Greenlist" of pre-approved coins that licensees could adopt with reduced scrutiny, provided they met ongoing monitoring requirements; this aimed to balance innovation with . The department integrated broader regulatory priorities, such as management, into oversight of supervised entities, issuing guidance on December 21, 2023, for banking organizations—including certain BitLicense holders chartered as limited-purpose trust companies—to identify, assess, and mitigate climate-related financial and operational risks. A January 2024 audit by the New York State Comptroller's Office highlighted oversight deficiencies in the BitLicense program, including inconsistent background checks on applicants, reliance on outdated data, and an average three-year gap between required biennial examinations of licensees' financial condition and operational safety. NYDFS responded by defending its processes but committed to procedural enhancements, such as formalized checklists for applications. The framework continued to support new entrants, with NYDFS granting a BitLicense to Bullish US Operations LLC on September 17, 2025, enabling spot trading and custody services in New York and signaling ongoing viability for compliant firms despite criticisms. As of October 2025, no major formal amendments to the original 2015 regulation text have been enacted, with evolution occurring primarily through interpretive guidance and enforcement adaptations.

Economic and Industry Impact

Benefits for Consumer Protection and Market Stability

The BitLicense regime mandates licensees to segregate customer assets from proprietary operations and maintain a minimum $500,000 surety bond or equivalent trust account to compensate consumers for losses arising from , , or operational failures. These requirements causally limit systemic risks by ensuring funds are not commingled, thereby protecting users during potential insolvencies or breaches, as reinforced by NYDFS guidance on custody practices issued in response to high-profile industry bankruptcies. Enforced anti-money laundering (AML) programs and cybersecurity protocols under the framework require continuous transaction monitoring, suspicious activity reporting, and vulnerability assessments, enabling early detection and mitigation of illicit flows and cyber threats. NYDFS enforcement exemplifies this through actions like the August 2022 $30 million penalty against Robinhood Crypto for AML and cybersecurity lapses, which compelled remediation including independent audits and program overhauls to prevent recurrence and safeguard users. Similarly, updated 2024 standards for complaint handling and customer service ensure timely resolutions, further bolstering protections against unresolved disputes. The regulatory legitimacy conferred by BitLicense has drawn institutional participants, stabilizing the market via increased capital inflows and rigorous oversight of s, where approved issuers must hold 100% reserves in permitted assets with monthly independent attestations. Notable outcomes include the September 2025 approval for Bullish, enabling compliant institutional trading and custody, and the framework's role as a benchmark for regulated stablecoin issuance by entities like and . These mechanisms have supported verifiable deterrence of and , as seen in ongoing blockchain analytics mandates extended to supervised entities in 2025.

Drawbacks and Innovation Constraints

The BitLicense framework entails significant upfront and recurring compliance expenditures for businesses, with application processes frequently surpassing $100,000 in legal, , and preparatory audit fees beyond the nominal $5,000 filing charge. Annual supervisory assessments and examinations further impose costs ranging from $15,000 to over $80,000, creating prohibitive barriers for startups lacking substantial capital reserves. These financial demands have systematically discouraged nascent firms from pursuing operations in , as the investment in regulatory adherence often diverts resources from core product development and market experimentation. Despite the industry's explosive growth—marked by trillions in global since 2015—NYDFS has issued only 34 BitLicenses as of March 2024, underscoring a stark underpenetration relative to sector . This paucity of approvals evidences how elevated entry hurdles stifle entrepreneurial activity, channeling innovation away from toward less encumbered locales and limiting the state's capacity to capture derivative economic benefits like job creation in . Market data reveals comparatively subdued venture formation and transaction volumes in versus states with permissive licensing, such as or , where lighter-touch regimes have attracted disproportionate inflows of and talent. The disparity aligns with observations that BitLicense mandates, by elevating fixed overheads, erode competitive dynamism and redirect investment toward jurisdictions prioritizing speed-to-market over exhaustive pre-approval scrutiny. Such regulatory stringency inherently privileges scale-advantaged incumbents—firms with established compliance teams and revenue streams to offset ongoing burdens—over nimble challengers, thereby compressing the participant pool and amplifying concentration risks. Reduced entity diversity heightens vulnerability to correlated failures, as centralized operators wielding outsized market share propagate shocks more efficiently than a fragmented, resilient network of distributed innovators would.

Controversies and Criticisms

The "BitLicense Exodus"

Following the BitLicense's finalization and implementation in June 2015, a wave of cryptocurrency companies ceased operations or restricted services in New York State, an event dubbed the "BitLicense exodus" by industry observers due to the regime's stringent requirements, high compliance costs, and lengthy approval delays. Early high-profile exits included ShapeShift, whose CEO Erik Voorhees announced withdrawal from the state shortly after the August 2015 application deadline, citing the license's incompatibility with the firm's non-custodial exchange model. Similarly, Kraken suspended trading services for New York residents in August 2015, refusing to apply for the license amid concerns over regulatory burdens that exceeded federal standards. This migration accelerated as the 45-day grace period expired on August 10, 2015, prompting additional firms like to exit rather than pursue licensing. The exodus reshaped New York's landscape, with startups relocating to jurisdictions offering lighter oversight; by 2018, industry executives described it as a "mass exit" that deterred innovation in the state. Over time, this contributed to New York's diminished role in the sector, as pro-crypto states like and enacted over 20 blockchain-friendly laws each by 2024, attracting mining operations, exchanges, and developers through tax incentives and streamlined charters absent in New York. Industry stakeholders, including Voorhees, characterized the BitLicense as regulatory overreach that imposed "absolute failure" in balancing with , arguing it created anti-competitive barriers favoring incumbents over agile startups. In contrast, New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) officials defended the framework as a prudent measure for , mandating anti-money laundering protocols and cybersecurity standards to mitigate risks in an nascent industry prone to and hacks. This tension highlighted a core debate: while firms contended the rules drove capital and talent elsewhere—evident in Texas's energy-driven hubs and Wyoming's special purpose depository institutions for digital assets—regulators maintained that forgoing such safeguards could invite systemic vulnerabilities without empirical evidence of stifled growth outweighing protections.

Oversight and Enforcement Shortcomings

A 2024 audit by the New York State Comptroller's office examined the Department of Financial Services' (DFS) oversight of BitLicense applications and licensees, covering the period from July 2015 to August 2022, and found limited assurance that DFS adequately supervised virtual currency businesses. The report identified deficiencies in background checks, including incomplete fingerprinting for major shareholders and officers in two of eight sampled applications, such as one case involving a parent company director and six stakeholders whose fingerprints were not fully processed. Tax compliance verifications were also inadequately documented, with DFS relying on a state website prone to limitations rather than systematic checks. Data management and record-keeping further revealed gaps, as DFS lacked formal policies for application completeness until June 2022—seven years after the BitLicense regime's inception—with four sampled applications missing key elements like organizational charts. Applicant histories showed overlooked red flags, such as financial losses and violations in four applications approved between 2016 and 2019, attributed to inconsistent pre-2022 documentation. Anti-money laundering risk assessments were delayed, with one approval occurring four years after the initial 2015 evaluation, exacerbating unaddressed risks. Supervision of existing licensees exhibited empirical shortcomings, including missed financial reporting requirements—two licensees submitted no quarterly or annual statements until 2021, three to five years post-approval—and prolonged examination intervals averaging three years, with five licensees unexamined for over two years and one waiting 4.5 years. Cybersecurity compliance issues persisted, as three of eight licensees failed to fully remediate non-compliance noted in 2021 self-certifications, while repeat examination findings went unresolved, such as 16 of 22 issues for one licensee lacking formal follow-up until a 2023 pilot program. Although DFS imposed enforcement fines, including a $30 million penalty on Robinhood Crypto in August 2022 for compliance failures, the audit highlighted absent formal tools for analyzing financial reports and weak remediation tracking, allowing risks like shortfalls—observed in two licensees, one lacking positive for three quarters—to linger. DFS responded to the audit by agreeing with recommendations to formalize application , ensure timely examinations, and implement follow-up procedures, citing post-2021 leadership changes that tripled Unit staffing from 18 to over 60 by August 2023 and introduced tools like a November 2022 financial template. The agency contested the report's overall lack of assurance as unwarranted and reflective only of historical issues, asserting ongoing remediation efforts. Critics, however, have argued that such state-level stringency, despite improvements, imposes undue burdens compared to lighter federal oversight, with calls from figures like Mayor in 2025 to dismantle the BitLicense entirely to foster and align with less prescriptive national frameworks.

Current Status and Future Outlook

Licensed Entities and Market Presence

As of late 2025, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) has granted BitLicenses to approximately 35 entities, reflecting a modest increase from 34 holders reported in March 2024, including unique businesses operating under the regime. These licensees engage in activities such as virtual currency transmission, exchange, custody, and control, subject to ongoing compliance with anti-money laundering protocols, cybersecurity standards, and capital requirements imposed by the NYDFS. Prominent BitLicense holders include Trust Company, LLC, which provides cryptocurrency exchange services, custody solutions, and stablecoin issuance tailored for institutional and retail users in ; , Inc., operating spot trading platforms with restricted asset listings to meet state-specific coin approval processes; and Bullish US Operations LLC, granted its license on September 17, 2025, enabling the launch of U.S.-focused spot trading following over $1.5 in prior . These firms represent a core segment of New York's regulated infrastructure, emphasizing enterprise-grade operations amid broader market participants' avoidance of the jurisdiction. New York's market presence in the U.S. ecosystem has contracted, with licensed entities capturing a reduced share of national trading volumes due to operational constraints like limited coin listings and exclusion of bridged tokens or assets below 35% circulating supply thresholds. Major platforms often geoblock residents, contributing to lower localized volumes compared to less restrictive states, as evidenced by the availability of only a subset of U.S. exchanges to NY users. Post-2020 trends indicate subdued application volumes, driven by elevated barriers including initial $5,000 fees escalating to over $100,000 in legal and expenditures, alongside approval timelines extending years for rigorous vetting of models and risk controls. The NYDFS maintains selective approval criteria, prioritizing entities demonstrating scalable frameworks over volume-driven entrants, resulting in incremental rather than expansive licensee growth.

Comparative Analysis with Other Jurisdictions

New York's BitLicense regime, established in 2015 as one of the earliest state-level frameworks for activities, imposes stringent licensing, capital, and compliance requirements on entities engaging in transmission, custody, or exchange of involving residents. In contrast, jurisdictions like have adopted lighter, innovation-focused models through Special Purpose Depository Institutions (SPDIs), authorized under 2019 legislation to enable crypto-native banking activities such as custody and asset servicing without full federal or lending privileges. By September 2020, Wyoming had issued its second SPDI charter to Avanti Bank, with the framework designed to attract firms by avoiding certain federal banking triggers while maintaining 100% reserve requirements for stability. This approach has positioned Wyoming as a leader in crypto-friendly regulation, fostering specialized institutions that support digital asset innovation without the comprehensive pre-approval scrutiny of BitLicense. Texas exemplifies a more hands-off state strategy, regulating firms primarily under existing (MSB) laws rather than bespoke licensing, with clarifications allowing state-chartered banks to provide custody services as of 2021. The Texas Department of Banking has emphasized over prohibitive barriers, enabling growth in mining and activities, which contributed to the state ranking highly in commercial power demand from data centers and crypto operations alongside and in 2024 data. Unlike BitLicense's requirement for prior DFS approval of all activities, Texas's framework permits operations under general MSB registration with FinCEN, reducing entry costs and attracting energy-intensive . California's Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL), enacted via AB 39 in 2023 and extended to take effect July 1, 2026, represents a partial mimic of New York's model by mandating licenses for business activities, including prohibitions on unlicensed operations post-effective date. However, DFAL's delayed implementation and focus on requirements reflect adjustments to balance oversight with industry input, contrasting BitLicense's earlier, more rigid rollout. Federally, BitLicense overlays requirements on oversight of crypto securities and CFTC jurisdiction over commodities and derivatives, creating dual compliance burdens without exemptions for federally regulated entities, as DFS declined to harmonize with the Commodity Exchange Act. This overlap has amplified costs for multi-jurisdictional firms, unlike streamlined state models that defer more to federal baselines. Empirical outcomes highlight disparities in efficacy: As of March 2024, New York listed approximately 28 unique BitLicense holders, with limited additions like Bullish in September 2025, amid reports of a "BitLicense exodus" deterring startups due to high barriers. In comparison, Wyoming's SPDI model, though issuing few charters, has spurred economic impacts through digital asset custody innovation and positioned the state as a blockchain hub. Texas and California show stronger crypto engagement metrics, with Texas benefiting from mining booms and California capturing 43% of U.S. Bitcoin/Ethereum web traffic in 2024 analyses, outpacing New York in investment and interest rankings. National trends indicate robust industry growth—U.S. cryptocurrency market valued at $9.8 billion in 2024 projecting to $29.8 billion by 2033—despite volatility, suggesting lighter regimes correlate with higher innovation rates without evident superior stability gains in stricter environments like New York's.

References

  1. [1]
    Virtual Currency Business Licensing
    To conduct virtual currency business activity in New York State, entities can either apply for a BitLicense or for a charter under the New York Banking Law.
  2. [2]
    New York Releases Final BitLicense - CoinDesk
    Jun 3, 2015 · NYDFS superintendent Benjamin Lawsky released details of the final Bitlicense today, following a two-year inquiry by the New York regulator.
  3. [3]
    Behind the “exodus” of bitcoin startups from New York - Fortune
    Aug 14, 2015 · Critics of the BitLicense see limitations in the specific rules, such as the requirement of new licenses for every new service offered. But the ...
  4. [4]
    Beware the BitLicense: New York's Virtual Currency Regulations ...
    Oct 15, 2014 · The proposal creates expensive and vague new obligations for start-ups and infringes on the privacy rights of both Bitcoin businesses and casual ...
  5. [5]
    https://govt.westlaw.com/nycrr/Browse/Home/NewYork/NewYorkCodesRulesandRegulations?guid=I7444ce80169611e594630000845b8d3e
  6. [6]
    [PDF] BitLicense FAQs
    For example, many BitLicensees engage in the transmission of fiat currency (e.g., U.S. dollars), which requires them to hold a money transmission license under ...
  7. [7]
    Application Fees - New York State Department of Financial Services
    To calculate the licensing fee for an application to be issued for one year or less, add one-half (1/2) of the licensing fee plus the whole retaliatory fee ...
  8. [8]
    The Real Cost of Applying for a New York BitLicense - CoinDesk
    Aug 13, 2015 · The NYDFS, Santori said, has 90 days to grant or deny a BitLicense application, but the Superintendent may extend that period for a reasonable ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Department of Financial Services: Virtual Currency Licensing
    Jan 18, 2024 · Part 200 requires businesses to obtain a license (BitLicense) to engage in virtual currency business activities in New York. Businesses do not ...
  10. [10]
    https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-038-1595
  11. [11]
    What to Expect from NYDFS in 2023 - Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
    Feb 1, 2023 · NYDFS has also increased its capacity to conduct supervisory examinations of BitLicensees in the past year, and we expect more comprehensive ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] NYSDFS Internal Review of the Supervision and Closure of ...
    Apr 28, 2023 · 5 Based on the component ratings, Regulators would assign a composite rating representing the Regulators' overall assessment of the condition of ...
  13. [13]
    Enforcement Actions: Banking, Other Financial Products and Services
    2023-05-01, Department of Financial Services Issues Consent Order to bitFlyer USA, Inc. Virtual Currency. 2023-04-13, Department of Financial Services Issues ...
  14. [14]
    NYDFS Settles with Stablecoin Issuer for Alleged Compliance Failures
    Aug 12, 2025 · Companies with NYDFS authorization to conduct virtual currency businesses must conduct independent reviews of their customers' compliance ...
  15. [15]
    NYDFS Grants Charter to "Gemini" Bitcoin Exchange Founded by ...
    Oct 5, 2015 · Gox collapse, NYDFS issued a March 2014 public order initiating a process for accepting charter applications for virtual currency exchanges ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  16. [16]
    Mt. Gox Files For Bankruptcy; Nearly $500M Of Bitcoins Lost - NPR
    Feb 28, 2014 · Gox's missing 850,000 bitcoins are worth $473 million," Bloomberg News notes, "based on current prices shown on the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index ...
  17. [17]
    NYDFS Issues Public Order On Virtual Currency Exchanges
    Mar 11, 2014 · NYDFS is continuing to work on regulations – including a specially tailored "BitLicense" – for virtual currency firms operating in New York.Missing: response collapse
  18. [18]
    NYDFS Bitcoin hearing set for January 28-29th in New York City
    Jan 24, 2014 · NYDFS Bitcoin hearing set for January 28-29th in New York City ... On January 23, 2014, the New York Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  19. [19]
    NYDFS Public Hearing Regarding Virtual Currencies
    The New York State Department of Financial Services will be conducting hearings on virtual currencies today (January 28th) and tomorrow gathering some of ...Missing: stakeholders | Show results with:stakeholders
  20. [20]
    New York Proposes First State Regulations for Bitcoin - DealBook
    Jul 17, 2014 · The “BitLicense” plan, which includes rules on consumer protection, the prevention of money laundering and cybersecurity, is the first proposal ...Missing: motivations | Show results with:motivations
  21. [21]
    New York Proposes BitLicense Regulations for Virtual Currency ...
    Aug 18, 2014 · The BitLicense Framework applies DFS's requirements for money transmitters to virtual currency business activities with particular adaptations ...
  22. [22]
    Bitcoin Industry Leaders Sound Off on New York BitLicense Proposal
    Jul 17, 2014 · What do industry stakeholders think about the proposed New York Department of Financial Services BitLicense?
  23. [23]
    New York issues final virtual currency regulations
    Jun 9, 2015 · On June 3, 2015, New York became the first state in the United States to issue regulations for virtual currency licenses.Missing: motivations | Show results with:motivations
  24. [24]
    [PDF] New York State Releases Final BitLicense Regulation
    Jun 3, 2015 · Each Licensee must adopt a system of internal controls, policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with applicable anti-money.
  25. [25]
    NY DFS Reveals Final BitLicense Requirements for Digital Currency ...
    Jun 6, 2015 · On June 3, New York's departing superintendent of financial services, Benjamin Lawsky, revealed that the agency has adopted final ...
  26. [26]
    BitLicense Application Published, Questions in Tow - Goodwin
    Jul 2, 2015 · New York published the final BitLicense in its state register, which launched a 45-day period for businesses to submit a completed application ...Missing: effective | Show results with:effective
  27. [27]
    Key Date: August 8th for NYDFS BitLicense - DATA
    Jul 9, 2015 · ... August 8, 2015, following a 45 day waiting period announced on June 3, 2015. Download a copy of the regulation guidance here. Post ...Missing: grace | Show results with:grace
  28. [28]
    Bitfinex, Kraken Latest to Pull out of NY as BitLicense Grace Period ...
    Aug 11, 2015 · August 10 marks the end of a 45-day grace period for virtual currency businesses to either apply for the license or leave the state. Numerous ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  29. [29]
    BitLicense Regulations and the August 8, 2015 Deadline | JD Supra
    Aug 7, 2015 · The New York “BitLicense” regulations became effective on June 24, 2015, and businesses that are engaged in “Virtual Currency Business ...
  30. [30]
    New York State Issues First BitLicense (Sept. 22, 2015)
    Sep 22, 2015 · The state agency has issued its first regulatory license, the so-called BitLicense, to Boston-based mobile payment company Circle Internet Financial.Missing: rejections | Show results with:rejections
  31. [31]
    New York's bitcoin hub dreams fade with licensing backlog - CNBC
    Oct 31, 2016 · Since then, DFS has issued just two BitLicenses. Another 15 applications are still pending, with four others withdrawn and four denied, a ...
  32. [32]
    Guidance Regarding Adoption or Listing of Virtual Currencies
    Jun 24, 2020 · In the five years since DFS began authorizing BitLicensees and virtual currency trust companies (collectively, “VC Entities”), some of these ...
  33. [33]
    New York Publishes New Guidance and Proposed Changes to ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · New York Publishes New Guidance and Proposed Changes to BitLicense on Five-Year Anniversary ... BitLicense application review process,” DFS ...
  34. [34]
    Proposed Updates to Guidance Regarding Listing of Virtual ...
    Sep 18, 2023 · The new General Framework for Greenlisted Coins and an updated list of Greenlisted coins are available on the NYDFS website.
  35. [35]
    Climate Change - New York State Department of Financial Services
    On December 21, 2023, DFS issued Guidance for New York State Regulated Banking and Mortgage Institutions Relating to Management of Material Financial and ...Missing: BitLicense | Show results with:BitLicense
  36. [36]
    Virtual Currency Licensing | Office of the New York State Comptroller
    Jan 2, 2024 · On average, we found a 3-year gap between biennial examinations to determine licensees' financial condition and the safety and soundness of ...
  37. [37]
    NY Comptroller Criticizes State Financial Regulator's Crypto ...
    Jan 8, 2024 · The regulator also called “unwarranted” the report's comment about there being a lack of assurance on oversight of the BitLicense program. — ...
  38. [38]
    Bullish secures New York BitLicense from the NYDFS, paving way ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · The license, officially defined as a 'Virtual Currency Business Activity License' by the NYDFS, allows Bullish to provide institutions and ...
  39. [39]
    Crypto Platform Bullish Wins New York BitLicense, Clearing Path for ...
    The NYDFS granted Bullish US Operations LLC a Virtual Currency Business Activity License, enabling it to offer spot trading and custody ...Missing: September | Show results with:September
  40. [40]
    Crypto Compliance Matters: NYDFS Fines Robinhood $30M for ...
    Aug 11, 2022 · On August 2, 2022, NYDFS announced that it entered a Consent Order penalizing RHC $30 million for alleged AML, cybersecurity and consumer ...
  41. [41]
    DFS Superintendent Adrienne A. Harris Issues New Guidance ...
    May 30, 2024 · New Complaint Handling and Customer Service Standards Strengthen the Department's Nation-Leading Consumer Protections for Virtual Currencies.
  42. [42]
    https://www.dfs.ny.gov/industry_guidance/industry_letters/il20230918_gen_framework_greenlisted_coins
  43. [43]
    Crypto Exchange Bullish Secures New York BitLicense, Can Now ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Crypto exchange Bullish secures New York BitLicense to serve US institutions after $1.15B record stablecoin IPO and European MiCAR license ...
  44. [44]
    State of Stablecoins, Part 3: The U.S. Regulatory Shift - Bastion
    Apr 3, 2025 · For institutions, NYDFS has become the benchmark for what a “regulated stablecoin” looks like in practice. Its framework has also shaped ...
  45. [45]
    NYDFS Extends Blockchain Analytics Expectations to NY-Regulated ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · NYDFS now expects NY-regulated banks to use blockchain analytics for crypto risk. Here's what the guidance says—and how to meet it.
  46. [46]
    NY Wants Crypto Startups To Pay 5 Times Per Year for BitLicense
    Dec 2, 2022 · Costs associated with a successful application, such as compliance and legal fees, have been pegged to cost more than $100,000, per Capital ...
  47. [47]
    The Real Cost of a New York BitLicense: What Crypto Founders ...
    For most startups, these assessments translate to $15,000 to $80,000+ per year in direct regulatory fees—before accounting for the costs of audits, legal ...
  48. [48]
    New York's BitLicense Program Evolves Over Time, But More ...
    Oct 8, 2024 · This process involves providing biographical information, fingerprints, photographs, business history, insurance policies, banking information, ...
  49. [49]
    Is crypto dead in New York?
    Jan 23, 2023 · ... BitLicense,” which argued that the BitLicense had prevented innovative cryptocurrency startups from flourishing in New York. Industry ...
  50. [50]
    New York's Relaxed BitLicense Could Still Take Lessons From ...
    Jul 27, 2020 · The BitLicense was intended to safeguard the public, but its greatest impact has been creating a regulatory burden that makes it cost ...
  51. [51]
    New York (More) Open for (Crypto) Business: NYDFS Proposes ...
    Jul 13, 2020 · This underscores how the BitLicense regulatory framework has been a barrier to entry for a vast majority of the cryptocurrency industry. As ...Missing: favoring incumbents startups centralization
  52. [52]
    'BitLicense Refugees': ShapeShift, Kraken Talk Escape from New York
    May 16, 2018 · Jesse Powell and Erik Voorhees delivered red-meat rhetoric but also made subtler points about New York's cryptocurrency regulations at Consensus 2018.Missing: exit | Show results with:exit
  53. [53]
    Mass Exodus of Bitcoin Exchanges from New York State Triggered ...
    The August 10 deadline marks the end of a 45-day grace period following the publication of the BitLicense in June. At the end of that period, any person or ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  54. [54]
    The 'Great Bitcoin Exodus' has totally changed New York's bitcoin ...
    Aug 12, 2015 · The best-known company to publicly acknowledge leaving New York is ShapeShift.IO, founded by Erik Voorhees, whose SatoshiDice became the first ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Kraken Joins Exchanges Refusing To Apply For A BitLicense ...
    San Francisco-based bitcoin exchange Kraken has announced the dismissal of its service in New York due to the state's BitLicense and strict regulations for ...Missing: ShapeShift | Show results with:ShapeShift
  56. [56]
    BitLicense hostility to Bitcoin buisness leads Bitfinex and Kraken to ...
    Aug 9, 2015 · In the wake of the final draft of BitLicense two major Bitcoin exchange have announced their exit from New York and will not do business with ...
  57. [57]
    Bitfinex, Kraken Latest to Pull out of NY as BitLicense Grace Period ...
    August 10 marks the end of a 45-day grace period for virtual currency businesses to either apply for the license or leave the state. Numerous smaller virtual ...Missing: exit | Show results with:exit
  58. [58]
    Does NYC Have What it Takes to Become a Blockchain Hub?
    May 24, 2018 · The 'BitLicense Exodus', of course, referring to the mass exit of blockchain startups from New York following BitLicense's confirmation as law.Missing: leaving | Show results with:leaving
  59. [59]
    Which Are The Most Crypto Friendly States? - Koinly
    Top 8 crypto friendly states. 1. Wyoming. Wyoming leads the way for crypto friendly states for both investors and businesses. The state has passed more than a ...Missing: firms | Show results with:firms
  60. [60]
    Top Crypto-Friendly States for Investors & Businesses in 2025
    May 15, 2025 · Wyoming leads the nation with a strong regulatory framework supporting blockchain innovation. It has passed over 20 pro-crypto laws, including ...
  61. [61]
    Inside New York's BitLicense Bottleneck: An 'Absolute Failure?'
    May 25, 2018 · Since the agency's last disclosure, though, an unknown number of other applicants have been rejected. Other companies have dropped out of ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
  62. [62]
    The BitLicense: Regulatory Overreach or Prudent Response?
    Mar 26, 2018 · As cryptocurrencies have grown to be increasingly popular, calls to amend or repeal the BitLicense have increased.[26] At a recent roundtable ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  63. [63]
    BitLicense - Blockchain and the Law
    On January 24, 2019 the New York Department of Financial Services (the “DFS”) announced that it had granted BitLicenses to Robinhood Crypto, LLC and Moon Inc. ( ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Most Crypto-Friendly States of the US in 2025 - Vezgo
    Feb 26, 2025 · Texas has positioned itself as a leader in the crypto industry by fostering a favorable regulatory environment and leveraging its energy ...
  65. [65]
    What's the Best State to Launch a Crypto Startup in USA 2024?
    Jul 25, 2024 · Like Texas, Wyoming does not impose a state income tax, making it financially attractive for crypto startups. Additionally, Wyoming offers ...
  66. [66]
    New York's Crypto BitLicense Oversight Criticized by State's ...
    Jan 9, 2024 · DiNapoli's office found that the regulator has relied on spotty, outdated and sometimes totally missing data on the backgrounds of its virtual ...
  67. [67]
    Eric Adams and Crypto Whales Call to Dismantle BitLicense
    Jul 16, 2025 · The effort to eliminate BitLicense reflects a broader trend—jurisdictions are balancing innovation incentives against risk controls. Firms ...
  68. [68]
    Bullish secures New York BitLicense from the NYDFS, paving way ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · The license, officially defined as a 'Virtual Currency Business Activity License' by the NYDFS, allows Bullish to provide institutions and ...
  69. [69]
    Bullish Launches U.S. Spot Crypto Trading Following ... - CoinDesk
    Oct 1, 2025 · The platform has processed over $1.5 trillion in global trading volume and went public on the NYSE in August. Bullish's U.S. debut comes as ...
  70. [70]
    What Crypto Exchanges Are Available to NY Residents in 2025?
    The state has also banned bridged tokens and cryptocurrencies with less than 35% circulating supply, further limiting available trading options. These ...Bitlicense And Trust Charter... · Top Crypto Exchanges For Ny... · How To Buy Crypto In New...Missing: share | Show results with:share
  71. [71]
    2019 - hb0074 - Wyoming Legislature
    An act relating to banking; making legislative findings; creating special purpose depository institutions as a new financial institution.
  72. [72]
    Wyoming Issues Second Crypto Bank Charter
    Nov 10, 2020 · Wyoming recently awarded its second special-purpose depository institution (SPDI) charter to Avanti Bank.
  73. [73]
    Texas Department of Banking Clarifies Authority of State Banks to ...
    Jun 14, 2021 · Texas has taken a deliberated approach towards evaluating virtual currency activity under the state's financial services regulatory framework.
  74. [74]
    Virtual Currency Guidance | Texas Department of Banking
    The purpose of the model guidance is to provide state regulators with a tool to support consumer education and outreach on virtual currency. The document is ...
  75. [75]
    Data center, crypto operations in 10 states drive all US commercial ...
    Jul 16, 2024 · Virginia, Texas, South Carolina and Arizona led the way with the highest demand growth while Pennsylvania, New York, Illinois and New Jersey ...<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    SB 1705 - 89th Legislature - Texas Policy Research
    SB 1705 seeks to regulate the operation of virtual currency kiosks (also known as cryptocurrency ATMs) in Texas.
  77. [77]
    Digital Financial Assets Law Frequently Asked Questions - DFPI
    On September 29, 2024, AB 1934 extended the license date from July 1, 2025 to July 1, 2026. Chapters 1 through 8 of DFAL contain the text of AB 39, which ...
  78. [78]
    California Extends Compliance Deadline for Digital Financial Asset ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · Originally set for July 1, 2025, the new deadline is now July 1, 2026. This extension grants digital financial asset businesses an additional ...
  79. [79]
    Potential Pitfalls of the BitLicense - Yahoo Finance
    May 18, 2018 · §2(a)(1)(A)). Ultimately, DFS declined to exempt those subject to the CEA, leaving a potential overlap of state and federal regulation. A few ...
  80. [80]
    US Crypto Regulation: Federal and State Guidelines
    Jan 10, 2025 · Money Service Business (MSB) Registration: Crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and similar businesses must register as MSBs and adhere to ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Promoting State Financial Innovation - Wyoming Legislature
    Apr 2, 2024 · The establishment of SPDI banks in Wyoming holds the potential to significantly impact the state's economy and the broader digital asset ...
  82. [82]
    Cryptocurrency Market Research Report in the United States
    Apr 18, 2024 · California Surpasses All States, Holding 43% of the Total Web Traffic for Bitcoin and Ethereum on CoinGecko in the United States, indicating the ...
  83. [83]
    Which States in the US have the Highest Crypto Investment? – Inspire
    California, Florida, Texas, and Nevada are the top states for crypto investment, with California leading, and Florida having no state income tax.
  84. [84]
    United States Cryptocurrency Market Size & Forecast 2033
    The United States cryptocurrency market size was valued at USD 9.8 Billion in 2024 and grow at a CAGR of 11.83% to reach USD 29.8 Billion by 2033.
  85. [85]
    Blockchain 2025 - USA - New York | Global Practice Guides
    Jul 25, 2025 · Strong board governance around crypto decisions can attract institutional investors who value robust oversight. Even the documentation ...