Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Climate risk

Climate risk refers to the potential for adverse consequences to human societies, economies, and ecosystems stemming from physical changes in climate patterns and variability, as well as from policy-driven transitions toward lower-carbon systems. Physical risks arise from acute events such as storms, floods, and heatwaves, alongside chronic shifts including rising temperatures and sea-level changes, while transition risks emerge from regulatory, technological, and market adjustments aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These risks are assessed through probabilistic frameworks that integrate climate model projections with socioeconomic scenarios, though substantial uncertainties persist in forecasting their magnitude and timing due to limitations in modeling complex Earth systems and human responses. Empirical analyses of historical climate impacts reveal patterns of localized damages from , yet global trends indicate declining mortality rates from such events owing to improved , , and adaptive measures, underscoring human amid variability. Recent peer-reviewed studies have refined estimates of future economic costs, often challenging earlier integrated models by incorporating granular data on sectors like and , where adaptive strategies can mitigate projected losses. In financial contexts, climate risk has prompted disclosures under frameworks like those from the on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, highlighting vulnerabilities in asset values and supply chains, though debates persist over the overemphasis on tail-risk scenarios versus evidenced gradual changes. Key controversies surround the attribution of observed extremes to forcing versus natural variability, the net benefits of warming in certain regions (such as enhanced productivity from CO2 fertilization), and the trade-offs between aggressive policies—which carry transition costs—and investments in that leverage of successful adaptations. Assessments informed by first-principles prioritize verifiable data over alarmist narratives, noting systemic biases in institutional projections that may inflate risks to justify interventions, while credible sources emphasize the need for robust to inform proportionate responses.

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Scope

Climate risk refers to the potential for adverse impacts on socioeconomic and ecological systems resulting from changes in the Earth's , including shifts in average conditions, variability, and frequency or intensity of extreme , often linked to anthropogenic . These risks are categorized into physical risks, which arise directly from climatic changes such as acute (e.g., hurricanes, floods, and heatwaves) and chronic effects (e.g., sea-level rise, intensification, and ), and transition risks, which stem from societal and policy responses to mitigate , including regulatory shifts, technological disruptions, and market changes toward lower emissions. Physical risks can manifest over short to long timescales, with acute risks causing immediate damages estimated at trillions of dollars globally in recent years from like the 2023 wildfires and floods, while chronic risks accumulate gradually, affecting sectors such as and coastal . The scope of climate risk extends beyond isolated events to encompass systemic interactions, where climate-driven hazards intersect with human exposure and , potentially amplifying cascading effects like supply chain disruptions or . Assessments typically evaluate risks across temporal horizons—from near-term (next decade) to long-term (to and beyond)—and spatial scales, from local assets to global economies, incorporating probabilistic modeling of hazard likelihood and . In financial contexts, climate risk integrates into broader frameworks like , , and operational risks, with regulators such as Canada's Office of the Superintendent of mandating evaluations since 2024 to ensure institutions account for non-linear and tail-end scenarios. This scope emphasizes empirical quantification, drawing on observed data like the increasing frequency of billion-dollar disasters in the U.S., which totaled 28 events in 2023 costing over $92 billion, though attribution to forcing remains debated due to variability influences. While opportunities may arise from (e.g., resilient investments), the focus on risks prioritizes vulnerabilities in high-exposure regions, such as low-lying islands facing 0.3–1 meter sea-level rise by 2100 under moderate emissions scenarios, and sectors reliant on stable like , where premiums have risen amid claims exceeding $100 billion annually in recent years. Effective scoping requires distinguishing natural climate variability from projected changes, avoiding over-reliance on models with historical discrepancies in event predictions.

Distinction from Weather Risks and Natural Variability

refers to the long-term average of patterns over periods typically spanning at least 30 years, as defined by the , encompassing statistical descriptions of temperature, precipitation, wind, and other variables in a given . In contrast, describes short-term atmospheric conditions, varying over hours to days, such as individual storms, heatwaves, or cold snaps. This temporal distinction is fundamental: weather events are transient manifestations of atmospheric dynamics, while represents the envelope of expected conditions derived from historical aggregates. Weather risks arise from these immediate, localized events, which can be forecasted with varying lead times using numerical models and pose acute threats to life, property, and —examples include hurricanes damaging coastal areas or floods disrupting , often quantifiable for and response. risks, however, stem from sustained shifts in these averages or their variability, such as gradual sea-level rise eroding shorelines or altered regimes affecting over decades. The key differentiation lies in predictability and scope: weather risks are episodic and reversible within natural cycles, amenable to , whereas risks involve structural changes to the baseline environment, complicating traditional by altering the frequency, intensity, or distribution of extremes without necessarily causing them directly. Natural variability introduces further nuance, comprising internal oscillations like the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) or Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), which drive multi-year to decadal fluctuations in global temperatures and precipitation independent of human influence, alongside external forcings such as solar irradiance variations or volcanic eruptions. These modes can produce regional warming or cooling trends that rival or exceed early signals, as evidenced by 20th-century temperature reconstructions showing natural decadal variations comparable to effects on subcontinental scales. Distinguishing climate risk from such variability requires robust attribution studies, yet low signal-to-noise ratios—where natural fluctuations dominate short-term records—persist into the mid-21st century in many regions, per modeling analyses, underscoring uncertainties in isolating human-driven risks from inherent climate dynamism. Empirical detection challenges arise because natural processes, like ENSO-driven droughts, have historically caused extreme events without elevated CO2 levels, necessitating careful separation via statistical methods like optimal fingerprinting to avoid conflating variability with forced change.

Risk Assessment Frameworks

Climate risk assessment frameworks typically conceptualize risk as a of climate-related , the of assets or populations to those hazards, and the of those assets or populations to harm. This formulation, often expressed as Risk = Hazard × Exposure × Vulnerability, originates from principles and has been adapted for climate contexts to quantify potential impacts from both acute events like floods and chronic changes like rising temperatures. Frameworks emphasize iterative processes involving identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment of risks, drawing from standards such as ISO 31000. The (IPCC) employs a risk-centered framework in its Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), defining climate risk as the potential for adverse outcomes resulting from dynamic interactions between climate-related hazards and the and of societies and ecosystems. This approach integrates biophysical data on hazards—such as projected increases in frequency—with socioeconomic factors like and , using expert judgment to evaluate risk levels from low to very high based on evidence from observations, models, and case studies. The IPCC framework highlights "key risks" that could become severe or irreversible beyond certain thresholds, such as 1.5°C or 2°C, though it acknowledges uncertainties in attribution and projections. In financial and policy contexts, frameworks like the Financial Stability Board's (FSB) analytical toolkit trace transmission channels of physical risks (e.g., direct damages from storms) and transition risks (e.g., shifts affecting asset values) through the . Released in January 2025, it uses metrics for vulnerability monitoring, such as sectoral exposures and amplification via interconnected markets, to support macroprudential oversight. Similarly, regional assessments, such as the European Climate Risk Assessment (EUCRA), apply standardized methodologies to harmonize evaluations across sectors, incorporating probabilistic modeling of hazards and scenario-based vulnerability scoring. Critiques of these frameworks note challenges in data quality, model uncertainties, and potential biases in hazard projections, which can lead to divergent risk estimates across providers. For instance, reliance on historical data struggles with non-stationary climate patterns, while integrated assessments often underrepresent cascading effects or socioeconomic feedbacks. Context-aware approaches, proposed in recent literature, advocate iterative stages incorporating local knowledge to mitigate framing biases that favor certain risk narratives over empirical variability. Despite these limitations, frameworks facilitate prioritization of adaptation investments by linking risks to measurable outcomes, such as economic losses estimated at 1-5% of global GDP under high-emission scenarios by 2100 in some models.

Scientific Underpinnings

Observed Climate Trends and Empirical Data

Global surface air temperatures have increased by approximately 1.1°C since the late , with the 2024 annual average reaching 1.28°C above the 1951–1980 baseline according to data. NOAA records indicate that the global land and ocean temperature anomaly for 2025 was 1.07°C above the 20th-century average, ranking as the fourth-warmest August in the 176-year record. Satellite-based measurements from the (UAH) dataset show a lower tropospheric warming trend of about 0.14°C per decade since , highlighting discrepancies between surface and records that arise from differences in measurement methodologies and coverage. These trends are derived from networks, buoys, and , though effects and station siting issues have been noted to potentially inflate surface readings in some analyses. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations have risen from pre-industrial levels of around 280 ppm to 425.48 ppm as measured at in August 2025, with the 2024 annual average at 424.61 ppm. Methane levels have also increased, contributing to the enhanced , though —the most abundant —shows regional variations tied to temperature feedbacks. Empirical satellite data from MODIS instruments reveal a greening trend, with (NDVI) values indicating increased leaf area and over the past four decades, largely attributed to CO2 fertilization effects enhancing . This greening spans 65–70% of vegetated land areas, countering narratives of uniform ecological decline. Global mean has risen by 21–24 cm since 1880, with altimetry since 1993 recording an additional 91 mm (3.6 inches) and recent rates accelerating to 4.5 mm per year from 2014–2024. sea ice extent has declined, with September minima shrinking at 12.2% per decade relative to the 1981–2010 average, reaching the sixth-lowest on record in 2024 at about 785,000 square miles below the historical mean. Antarctic shows more variability, with extents occasionally below average but no consistent long-term decline matching trends. has increased, absorbing over 90% of excess energy, as measured by floats and ship-based profiles. Regarding , empirical data indicate increases in the frequency of heatwaves and warm nights globally since the , scaling with overall warming. However, peer-reviewed analyses find no significant global trends in the frequency or intensity of tropical cyclones, droughts, or s over the instrumental record, with U.S.-specific data showing stable or declining normalized losses from such events when adjusted for and . River discharge and records globally exhibit regional variability rather than a universal uptick, challenging claims of widespread intensification driven solely by . These observations underscore that while thermodynamic principles predict shifts in some extremes, detection amid natural variability requires robust statistical thresholds, often unmet in short-term datasets.

Climate Model Projections and Discrepancies

Climate models, primarily general circulation models (GCMs) aggregated in (CMIP) ensembles such as CMIP5 and CMIP6, simulate future climate responses to and other forcings. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's ( (AR6), released in 2021, relies on these models to project global mean surface air temperature increases of 1.1°C to 1.7°C by 2081–2100 under low-emission scenarios like Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) 1-2.6, escalating to 3.3°C to 5.7°C under high-emission SSP5-8.5, relative to 1850–1900 pre-industrial levels. These projections encompass not only global temperatures but also regional patterns of precipitation changes, (0.28–0.55 meters under SSP1-2.6 by 2100), and amplified extremes like heatwaves and heavy rainfall events. Evaluations of model performance against historical observations, however, indicate consistent overestimations of warming trends. Over the 1970–2020 period, the ensemble average of 38 CMIP6 models projected a global surface warming rate exceeding observed satellite and radiosonde measurements by approximately 0.2°C per decade in many cases, with observed rates closer to 0.14°C per decade. This discrepancy is particularly pronounced in the troposphere: all CMIP6 models overpredict warming in the lower troposphere (surface to 8 km) and mid-troposphere (8–12 km) layers, both globally and in the tropics, where models simulate 1.5–2 times the observed amplification of warming with altitude. Such biases persist even after accounting for natural variability like El Niño-Southern Oscillation events, as evidenced by trend analyses from 1979–2020 using datasets from the University of Alabama in Huntsville and Remote Sensing Systems. Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS)—the expected global temperature rise from a doubling of atmospheric CO₂—further underscores these issues. IPCC AR6 assesses ECS as likely between 2.5°C and 4.0°C, drawing from model-derived estimates, yet instrumental records of Earth's energy budget since 1971 constrain ECS to 2.5–2.7°C, inconsistent with the upper half of the model range. A subset of CMIP6 models with ECS exceeding 4.5°C—about 10 out of 55—deviates sharply from paleoclimate and observational data, leading to exaggerated projections of impacts like sea level rise and ecosystem disruption; excluding these "hot" models aligns projections more closely with observations but reduces projected warming under high-emission scenarios by up to 0.5°C by 2100. Global assessments as of 2025 reveal ongoing mismatches, including in trends and regional patterns, where models overestimate variability in dry regions and underperform in simulating observed sea ice decline rates in the despite warming. These discrepancies arise partly from uncertainties in feedbacks and effects, which amplify model spread, and have prompted recommendations for observational constraints to weight models by historical fidelity rather than treating ensembles as equally probable. While some analyses defend model skill by emphasizing post-2000 alignment during accelerated warming phases, independent verifications highlight that unadjusted historical simulations systematically exceed observations over multi-decadal scales, suggesting potential over-reliance on tuned parameters that inflate sensitivity.

Uncertainties in Attribution and Sensitivity

Attributing specific events to involves probabilistic assessments that compare observed events to counterfactual scenarios without human-induced forcing, yet substantial uncertainties persist due to limitations in climate models, incomplete representation of internal variability, and challenges in quantifying dynamic influences like . For instance, attribution studies for events such as Australia's 2020–2021 bushfires highlight difficulties arising from dominant internal variability, which can mask or mimic signals, leading to inconclusive or overstated claims of influence. These methods often rely on ensembles of general circulation models (GCMs), which exhibit biases in simulating regional phenomena, such as extremes, potentially inflating the detected human fingerprint while underestimating natural drivers like ocean-atmosphere oscillations. Further compounding attribution challenges is the sensitivity to model choice and forcing assumptions; studies indicate that dynamic uncertainties, including unresolved effects and land-use changes, can lead to divergent probability ratios across model ensembles, with some analyses showing overestimation of contributions in heavy rainfall events. Academies reports emphasize the need for improved , noting data limitations in sparse regions and the propagation of structural model errors into attribution statements. Despite advances in rapid attribution frameworks, such as those used post-event, the inherent stochasticity of and gaps in paleoclimate analogs prevent definitive causal linkages, often resulting in confidence intervals that span orders of magnitude for multipliers. Equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), defined as the long-term global response to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, remains a core uncertainty in projections, with recent assessments maintaining a likely range of 2.0–5.0°C and no clear on narrowing it further despite and paleoclimate constraints. budget-derived estimates, drawing from observed historical warming and , frequently yield lower ECS values around 1.5–2.5°C, contrasting with GCM-derived medians near 3°C, highlighting potential overestimation in process-based models due to unresolved cloud feedbacks and pattern effects. For example, analyses of sea-surface temperature patterns indicate that transient cooling influences have slowed observed warming relative to equilibrium expectations, suggesting that high-sensitivity models overestimate recent trends by failing to capture these transient dynamics accurately. Model biases further exacerbate uncertainties, as CMIP6 simulations exhibit a toward higher ECS values (often exceeding in newer generations), which correlate with excessive simulated historical warming when compared to and surface observations, implying structural deficiencies in representing low-cloud responses and tropospheric adjustments. Empirical approaches, such as those regressing global temperature against forcing histories, reveal persistent discrepancies, with low-ECS inferences challenged by trends in Earth's imbalance but supported by multi-decadal data on outgoing . These divergences underscore the limitations of tuning models to achieve realistic simulations, potentially embedding optimistic assumptions about amplification, and necessitate causal realism in interpreting for risk assessments rather than relying solely on ensemble means.

Methodologies for Evaluation

Probabilistic and Statistical Approaches

Probabilistic approaches to risk evaluation quantify uncertainties in future states and impacts by constructing probability density functions (PDFs) from multi-model ensembles or Bayesian frameworks, enabling estimates of event likelihoods such as exceeding thresholds or extremes. These methods propagate uncertainties from sources including internal variability, structural model differences, and socioeconomic scenarios, often via simulations that sample parameter distributions to generate thousands of realizations. For example, perturbed physics ensembles perturb model parameters to explore , revealing that projected global mean increases under high-emissions pathways span 1.5–4.5°C by 2100 with 90% confidence intervals reflecting irreducible model spread. Such techniques facilitate metrics like value-at-risk analogs for climate hazards, prioritizing risks over central tendencies. Statistical methods underpin these by inferring risk from empirical data, employing analysis for trend detection and attribution, where models isolate anthropogenic signals from natural variability using optimal fingerprinting techniques. Extreme value theory (EVT) specifically addresses tail risks, fitting Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distributions to annual maxima or Generalized Pareto Distributions (GPD) to exceedances over thresholds, yielding return level estimates—for instance, projecting a 20–50% increase in magnitudes in parts of under warming scenarios based on fitted parameters from historical records. Peaks-over-threshold methods further refine this by modeling cluster occurrences, though non-stationarity from climate trends violates traditional independence assumptions, necessitating time-dependent covariates in fits. Despite advancements, these approaches grapple with deep uncertainties; model ensembles often underestimate historical variability in extremes, leading to overconfident low-probability event forecasts, while assumptions amplify projection spreads beyond empirical constraints. Bayesian hierarchical models integrate priors from paleoclimate data to narrow sensitivity ranges, yet structural biases in physics representations persist, as evidenced by discrepancies between simulated and observed frequencies. Empirical validation remains critical, with statistical tests like block bootstrap resampling quantifying confidence in trend extrapolations, but causal attribution challenges—such as disentangling aerosol forcing from greenhouse gases—limit probabilistic reliability for decadal-scale risks. Overall, while enabling decision-relevant probabilities, these methods underscore the need for adaptive strategies acknowledging persistent epistemic gaps rather than deterministic forecasts.

Scenario Analysis and Integrated Assessments

Scenario analysis evaluates climate risks by simulating a range of plausible future conditions, including variations in , technological advancements, policy interventions, and socioeconomic trajectories, to assess potential physical impacts like flooding or heatwaves and transition risks such as stranded assets from carbon pricing. This approach, recommended by frameworks like the on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), contrasts with historical data analysis by forward-projecting non-linear dynamics that standard statistical models often fail to capture, such as tipping points in ice sheets or thaw. Common scenarios draw from IPCC constructs, including Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) specifying levels—e.g., RCP4.5 stabilizing at 4.5 W/m² by 2100 under moderate mitigation—and (SSPs) incorporating narratives like SSP1 () or SSP3 (regional rivalry) to link human development with emissions outcomes. Physical risk assessments under these scenarios quantify exposures, for instance, estimating U.S. coastal property losses at $106 billion annually by 2050 under higher RCPs without adaptation. Integrated assessment models (IAMs) extend scenario analysis by coupling climate system simulations with economic and energy sector modules to evaluate trade-offs in mitigation costs, adaptation benefits, and damage functions across global scales. Prominent IAMs include DICE, which optimizes abatement paths based on a quadratic damage function tied to temperature anomalies, projecting social costs of carbon (SCC) around $40 per ton CO₂ in base cases as of 2020 updates, and FUND, which disaggregates impacts by region and sector to yield lower SCC estimates averaging $5-10 per ton due to inclusion of market adaptations like agricultural shifts. These models inform policy via cost-benefit analyses, such as IAM-derived estimates in IPCC AR6 suggesting that limiting warming to 1.5°C could avert damages equivalent to 10-20% of global GDP by 2100 under high-emission baselines, though reliant on assumptions of perfect foresight and elastic substitution in production functions. IAMs have shaped summaries for policymakers, with their outputs overrepresented in IPCC SPMs relative to physical science chapters, amplifying economic framing despite limited validation against empirical post-1990 outcomes. Critiques highlight ' oversimplifications, such as linear extrapolation of damages ignoring biophysical feedbacks like amplifying declines, leading to systemic underestimation of tail risks beyond 3°C warming. analyses often privilege orderly transitions, underweighting abrupt shifts from policy reversals or technological failures, as evidenced by NGFS scenarios' variance in GDP impacts ranging from -1% to -10% by 2050 across pathways without robust sensitivity testing to (ECS) values, which peer-reviewed syntheses place at 2.0-5.1°C but with recent observational constraints suggesting 1.5-3°C medians. Integrated assessments rarely incorporate empirical learning from past projections—e.g., overpredicted sea-level accelerations in early RCPs—nor adequately model heterogeneous regional vulnerabilities, prompting calls for hybrid approaches blending with agent-based or models to better reflect causal chains from emissions to . Despite these limitations, -integrated tools remain central to stress tests, with the 's 2022 exercise revealing median shortfalls of 1.3% under adverse scenarios.

Critiques of Modeling Limitations

Climate models employed in assessing climate risks rely on parameterizations for unresolved sub-grid-scale processes, such as formation, interactions, and , which introduce substantial uncertainties in simulating key feedbacks like and lapse-rate effects. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) highlights that these structural limitations contribute to wider ranges in global surface air (GSAT) projections in the Phase 6 (CMIP6) compared to CMIP5, with model response uncertainty dominating long-term projections under scenarios like SSP5-8.5, exacerbated by higher equilibrium (ECS) estimates in some models. A specific limitation arises from the inclusion of "hot" models in CMIP6 ensembles, where several simulations exhibit ECS values exceeding the AR6-assessed likely range of 2.5–4.0°C, up to 5.6°C or higher, leading to overstated warming when ensembles are unweighted. Constraining ensembles to align with observational estimates of transient response (TCR) or ECS—such as excluding models outside TCR 1.4–2.2°C—reduces projected end-of-century warming by 2–3°C and by 20–40% in regional assessments, for instance in high-emission scenarios over , underscoring how unadjusted ensembles inflate risk projections for impacts like extremes. Comparisons of CMIP6 simulations with observational datasets reveal persistent biases, particularly in the tropical upper troposphere, where models overestimate warming rates relative to satellite records from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) dataset over 1979–2014, with trends approximately double those observed due to inadequate representation of internal variability and convective processes. Independent analyses confirm this discrepancy extends to surface trends in regions like the U.S., where CMIP6 model averages exceed observed 1979–2023 warming by 42%, highlighting limitations in capturing regional forcings and natural variability. Uncertainties in aerosol-cloud interactions further compound modeling challenges, as divergent representations of indirect effects—such as response to aerosols—persist across CMIP6 models, contributing to unreliable quantification of and transient climate response. Recent evaluations indicate that these gaps hinder accurate projection of precipitation extremes and regional s, with structural errors in microphysics amplifying in near-term forecasts. Overall, while multi-model means align broadly with global observations, the reliance on assumptions and incomplete process physics limits the fidelity of risk assessments, particularly for causal attribution of localized hazards.

Sectoral Impacts and Vulnerabilities

Ecosystems and Biodiversity

Climate change has induced observable shifts in dynamics, including altered distributions and phenological timings, as documented in long-term monitoring data from temperate and forests where green-up advanced by 2-3 days per from 1982 to 2015 due to warming temperatures. Marine s have experienced recurrent heatwaves, leading to events; for instance, the 2014-2017 global bleaching event affected over 70% of reefs, causing widespread mortality in shallow-water corals primarily through exceeding 1°C above seasonal norms. Terrestrial systems show mixed responses, with drought-induced dieback in forests during the 2005 and 2010 events linked to reduced precipitation and higher temperatures, though recovery occurred in many areas post-disturbance. Attribution of biodiversity loss to climate change remains limited by confounding factors such as habitat destruction and invasive species, which empirical analyses identify as primary drivers; a 2021 review concluded that traditional threats like land-use change account for the majority of observed declines, dwarfing direct climate impacts across biomes. Verified cases of species extinction solely attributable to climate change are rare; the Bramble Cay melomys, a rodent endemic to a Great Barrier Reef island, represents one documented instance, with populations vanishing by 2016 due to inundation from sea-level rise and storm surges exacerbated by warming. Similarly, the golden toad in Costa Rica's Monteverde cloud forest declined sharply in the 1980s, correlated with altered precipitation patterns, though chytrid fungus emergence confounded causality. Broader surveys indicate that, of recent U.S. extinctions, fewer than 10% are confidently linked to climate variability alone, with most tied to habitat fragmentation. Projections of future biodiversity loss often emphasize climate-driven extinctions, estimating 15-37% of at risk under high-emissions scenarios by 2100, but these rely on models incorporating equilibrium assumptions that overlook and ; historical paleoclimate records reveal ecosystems endured rapid shifts, such as during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition, with dominating post-change without mass collapses. Empirical critiques highlight overestimation, as climate ranks fourth among terrestrial threats and second in oceans, behind and , per global assessments; for example, a 2022 analysis argued that framing climate as the principal driver prematurely diverts resources from , where interventions yield higher returns. Ecosystem resilience mitigates risks, with higher correlating to reduced sensitivity to variability; a global study across biomes found that diverse plant communities maintained stability during 1982-2016 fluctuations, buffering against extremes through functional redundancy. Fossil and proxy data underscore this, showing forests and grasslands adapted to variability exceeding current rates, such as expansions of temperate species without widespread extinctions. In contemporary contexts, protected areas demonstrate recovery post-heatwaves, as in woodlands where tree mortality from 2018 droughts was offset by subsequent regeneration, indicating thresholds for tipping points remain unbreached in most systems. Nonetheless, compounded stressors—warming plus fragmentation—elevate vulnerability in isolated habitats, necessitating integrated management over singular climate attribution.

Human Health and Mortality

Globally, temperature-related mortality is dominated by extremes, with empirical analyses estimating approximately nine to ten cold-related deaths for every heat-related . A 2022 study of data from 2000 to 2019 across 750 locations worldwide found that warming contributed to a net reduction in excess temperature-related deaths, primarily through a larger decline in cold-attributable mortality outweighing increases in heat-attributable deaths. , heat-related rates as the underlying cause remained stable between 0.5 and 2 deaths per million from to 2022, despite rising average temperatures. Heatwave mortality trends show mixed patterns, with some regions experiencing declines in per-event fatality rates due to improved measures such as early warning systems and mitigation. A 2025 analysis of U.S. data from 1999 to 2023 recorded 21,518 heat-related deaths (underlying or contributing cause), yielding an age-adjusted of 0.26 per 100,000 annually, though rates rose in recent hotter years like 2023 with at least 2,325 deaths. Globally, a decadal study indicated a substantial decline in heat-attributed excess burden, with years of life lost per death decreasing from 1.00 in earlier periods to lower values by the 2020s, attributed to physiological and responses. Projections under scenarios often anticipate net mortality changes where cold-related decreases partially offset heat-related increases, with one model estimating a 0.03-0.04% rise from heat versus a 0.10% decline from by . Vector-borne diseases, such as and dengue, are influenced by and , but direct attribution to remains limited by confounding factors including , , and human mobility. A review of evidence found that only about one-third of studies on climate-disease links concluded definitive impacts, with many highlighting potential rather than observed shifts in incidence. While warming has enabled range expansions for some vectors, empirical data from 1950-2019 show no consistent global increase in malaria burden tied to temperature alone, as interventions have driven declines despite environmental changes. Peer-reviewed syntheses emphasize that non-climatic drivers predominate in recent trends, cautioning against over-attributing disease shifts to warming without isolating causal effects. Other climate-linked health risks, including exacerbation of respiratory and cardiovascular conditions via , contribute to mortality but lack robust empirical quantification beyond temperature extremes. Systematic reviews indicate associations with worse outcomes, yet —evident in declining during heat events—mitigates much of the projected burden, underscoring that historical improvements in and preparedness have outpaced climate-driven hazards in many contexts.

Economic and Infrastructure Exposure

Global economic exposure to climate risks encompasses potential damages to capital stocks, disruptions to supply chains, and losses from events such as floods, storms, and heatwaves, as well as slower-onset changes like sea-level rise and shifting patterns. Empirical estimates vary widely due to differences in modeling assumptions, but recent econometric studies project that under a 2°C warming scenario, annual global GDP losses from physical risks could range from 1-3% by mid-century, escalating to 5-10% or more by 2100 without substantial , primarily affecting coastal and agricultural regions that account for roughly 10-15% of current global output. These figures derive from regressions linking historical weather variations to economic outcomes across countries, though critiques highlight that such models often extrapolate beyond observed data and undervalue human , with meta-analyses showing inconsistent signs on temperature-growth relationships. Infrastructure exposure amplifies economic vulnerabilities, as critical systems like transportation, grids, and urban utilities are concentrated in hazard-prone areas. In the United States, from 1980 to , 403 weather and climate events exceeding $1 billion in damages (CPI-adjusted to dollars) have inflicted over $2.8 trillion in total costs, with sectors—roads, bridges, rail, and power—bearing 20-30% of these losses through , , and . Globally, coastal assets valued at $10-20 trillion face risks from projected sea-level rise of 0.3-1 meter by 2100 under 1.5-2°C scenarios, potentially leading to annual damages of $1-5 trillion if unmitigated, though these estimates assume limited diking or relocation and are drawn from integrated assessment models critiqued for optimistic baseline growth assumptions. Key vulnerabilities include port facilities handling 80% of global trade by volume, which could see operational disruptions from intensified storms, and lines susceptible to wildfires and storms, as evidenced by events like the 2021 Texas grid failure costing $195 billion amid cold snaps not directly attributable to warming trends. Empirical critiques note that rising raw damage figures often reflect increased asset density in exposed areas rather than unequivocal climate-driven intensification, with normalized loss trends showing no statistically significant upward trajectory when adjusted for and . measures, such as elevating structures or hardening grids, have historically reduced exposure rates by 50-80% in case studies, underscoring that potential impacts hinge on responses rather than inexorable trends.

Agriculture, Water, and Food Security

Global crop yields have risen substantially over the past six decades, with yields increasing by approximately 150% from 1961 to 2020, by 120%, and by 100%, driven primarily by technological advancements including varieties, fertilizers, and rather than climatic factors alone. Despite a global temperature rise of about 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, empirical analyses indicate that trends have had mixed effects on yields, with small positive impacts on (up to 3.5%) offsetting declines in and soybeans (around 4-13% lower than counterfactual without warming). The , whereby elevated atmospheric CO2 enhances and water-use efficiency in C3 crops like and , has contributed to observed yield gains, with site-level measurements confirming a detectable boost in gross primary productivity across ecosystems. However, heat stress during critical growth stages has reduced yields in tropical regions, with each 1°C increase linked to 3-7% declines in major staples like and soybeans based on from multiple independent studies. Projections of future yields under scenarios incorporate these dynamics but reveal significant uncertainties, particularly in modeling variability and extreme events. models predict global yield reductions of 3-25% by late century under high-emissions paths without , though inclusion of CO2 fertilization mitigates losses to near-zero or positive in some cases for temperate crops. Empirical-statistical approaches, correlating historical weather and yields, often yield less pessimistic outcomes than process-based simulations, highlighting model sensitivities to assumptions about and limitations. In higher latitudes, warmer temperatures may extend growing seasons, potentially increasing yields for crops like by 10-20% under moderate warming, counterbalancing tropical vulnerabilities. productivity faces risks from heat stress, which reduces feed intake and reproduction rates, though global data show through breed selection and management practices. Water resources exhibit regional divergences under observed warming, with empirical evidence showing increased rates amplifying in arid zones despite variable trends. Global frequency has not uniformly risen; paleoclimate records and instrumental data indicate multidecadal variability often dominates short-term attribution, with human factors like over-extraction contributing more to than temperature alone in many basins. Compound droughts—simultaneous deficits in supply and elevated demand—have emerged as risks, with projections indicating heightened probability in 35-40% of land areas by mid-century under forcing, particularly affecting irrigation-dependent in and . via improved storage and efficient use has historically buffered impacts, as seen in California's response to multiyear droughts without . Food security, measured by per capita calorie availability, has improved markedly, rising from around 2,200 kcal/day in 1961 to over 2,900 kcal/day by 2020, enabling a decline in undernourishment from 37% of the global population in 2000 to about 9% in 2023 despite population growth. Climate-related disruptions, such as the 2022 European heatwaves exacerbating yield variance in maize and sorghum, pose localized threats but have not reversed the upward trajectory in global production, which outpaced demand through yield intensification. Vulnerabilities persist in low-income regions reliant on rain-fed agriculture, where projected water deficits could reduce caloric output by 5-14% without interventions, though trade networks and storage mitigate propagation to global scales. Historical precedents, including the Green Revolution's tripling of yields in developing countries amid 20th-century warming, underscore that technological and policy responses often outweigh climatic risks in sustaining security.

Adaptation and Resilience

Historical Examples of Climate Adaptation

During the transition from the (circa 950–1250 CE) to the (approximately 1300–1850 CE), European societies adapted to cooler temperatures, shorter growing seasons, and heightened storm activity through agricultural and infrastructural innovations that sustained productivity and population levels. In northern regions such as and , pastoral communities expanded small-scale cereal cultivation into upland areas previously marginal for farming, cultivating hardier crops like and that tolerated frost and poor soils better than . This shift, documented via records and archaeological settlement data, compensated for reduced lowland yields and supported livestock fodder production amid wetter, cooler conditions. In the Netherlands, intensified storm surges and river flooding during the Little Ice Age prompted advancements in water management, including the reinforcement and expansion of dike networks and the widespread use of windmills for land drainage in polder systems. These measures, refined through iterative engineering from the 14th to 17th centuries, reclaimed thousands of hectares of arable land from the sea and rivers, mitigating inundation risks and enabling commercial agriculture and urban growth in a low-lying delta prone to submersion. Historical records indicate that by the 17th century, Dutch whaling operations in the Arctic—facilitated by ice-adapted ships with reinforced hulls—further diversified the economy, providing oil and byproducts that offset domestic agricultural strains from climatic variability. Earlier, in the during the (circa 536–660 CE), a period of volcanic-induced cooling and increased winter under Roman administration, societies enhanced via infrastructure investments like dams and cisterns for and storage, alongside market-oriented cereal farming and regional networks. analyses and archaeological surveys reveal resultant rises in settlement density and cultivated area, demonstrating how opportunistic exploitation of wetter conditions—rather than contraction—bolstered . These adaptations underscore a pattern of human flexibility, where localized technological and economic responses to multi-decadal climate shifts preserved societal continuity without reliance on uniform strategies.

Contemporary Strategies and Successes

Contemporary strategies for climate adaptation emphasize a combination of engineered infrastructure, , and agricultural innovations to enhance against hazards such as flooding, , and . In the , the Flood Protection Programme, initiated in the and ongoing through 2050, involves reinforcing approximately 1,500 kilometers of dikes and 500 civil- structures to withstand projected sea-level rise and extreme , building on post-1953 flood lessons to prevent breaches and reduce flood risks nationwide. This approach has maintained zero major flood events in protected areas since major upgrades, demonstrating effective risk reduction through iterative engineering and public involvement in planning. Nature-based solutions, such as , have shown quantifiable coastal protection benefits in multiple regions. In , community-led mangrove planting efforts from 2008 to 2022 achieved an average regeneration success rate of over 80%, enhancing shoreline stability, reducing by trapping sediments, and mitigating impacts during cyclones. Similarly, a 2022 analysis identified cost-effective mangrove restoration opportunities across 20 countries, including and the , where restored forests provided flood protection returns exceeding investment costs by absorbing wave energy equivalent to artificial barriers at lower long-term maintenance expenses. In , the adoption of drought-tolerant varieties in has delivered empirical productivity gains. A study across multiple countries found that farmers using these varieties, developed through conventional breeding and released since 2013, experienced average yield increases of 15% under water-stressed conditions and a 30% reduction in crop failure probability compared to traditional . The Drought Tolerant for Africa initiative, supported by international consortia, has distributed over 100 million tons of since 2006, enabling smallholders to sustain harvests amid recurrent droughts in regions like and . These adaptations prioritize scalable, farmer-accessible technologies over unproven , yielding direct resilience without relying on uncertain emission reductions elsewhere.

Economic Analyses of Adaptation Costs vs. Benefits

Economic analyses of climate adaptation typically employ cost-benefit analysis (CBA) frameworks to compare upfront investment costs—such as infrastructure hardening, early warning systems, and agricultural innovations—with benefits including reduced damages from extreme weather, avoided health costs, and co-benefits like enhanced economic productivity. These assessments often reveal positive net benefits for targeted measures, though global aggregation faces challenges from uncertain damage baselines and non-market valuations. For instance, the World Bank estimated global adaptation costs at $70–100 billion annually by 2050 under a 2°C warming scenario, representing roughly 0.1–1% of projected global GDP, while yielding benefits through minimized residual damages estimated at up to 50% reduction in some sectors. Sector-specific studies frequently report benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) exceeding 1, indicating economic viability. In the UK, proactive to major risks, such as flooding and heatwaves, is projected to cost £5–10 billion annually this , with BCRs ranging from 2:1 to 10:1, factoring in co-benefits like improved and services that amplify returns beyond direct damage avoidance. Similarly, investments in developing countries, such as $1 billion in resilience measures, have been modeled to generate $4–36 billion in benefits, particularly in and coastal protection, where vulnerabilities are acute. These ratios hold across diverse interventions, including in , which boosted farmer incomes by enabling riskier, higher-yield planting. Despite these findings, methodological limitations temper confidence in scaled-up projections. Uncertainties in attributing damages to climate signals versus variability, coupled with difficulties valuing intangible losses like , often lead to wide error bands; for example, adaptation costs vary from $5–50 billion annually depending on assumptions. Residual damages persist post- due to biophysical constraints, such as limits on labor , underscoring that full elimination is infeasible. Moreover, distributional inequities arise, as low-income regions bear disproportionate uninsured losses—around 99% in some cases—highlighting the need for supplementary metrics beyond pure economics, like equity-adjusted BCRs. Overall, while empirical case studies support 's cost-effectiveness for near-term risks, broader economic justification hinges on refining data amid these gaps.

Mitigation Debates

Core Mitigation Proposals

The primary core proposals for mitigating climate risk focus on curtailing , particularly from use, which constitutes the bulk of contributions. These strategies emphasize transforming the energy sector—responsible for approximately 35% of global energy-related CO2 emissions in —through low-carbon alternatives, efficiency gains, and economic incentives. Key approaches include scaling renewables like and , expanding for baseload electricity, deploying (CCS) on remaining fossil infrastructure, and enhancing in , buildings, and . Empirical assessments indicate that combining these can achieve substantial reductions, though intermittency in renewables necessitates complementary dispatchable sources. Renewable energy deployment, via policies such as feed-in tariffs and subsidies, aims to displace fossil generation; for instance, a 10% increase in renewable share has been associated with a 1.6% drop in per capita carbon emissions in some econometric analyses. However, real-world impacts vary due to grid integration challenges, with global renewable additions reaching 510 GW in 2023 yet failing to offset rising demand, resulting in only modest net emission declines in many regions. Proponents argue for accelerated buildout to 3-5 times current capacity by 2050, supported by falling costs—solar levelized costs dropped to $0.049/kWh globally in 2023—but critics note high material demands and land requirements limit scalability without storage advancements. Nuclear power expansion is proposed as a reliable, low-emission baseload option, with lifecycle emissions of 12 gCO2/kWh compared to 490 gCO2/kWh for . The IPCC AR6 highlights its role in pathways limiting warming to 2°C, potentially providing 10-20% of global electricity by mid-century if small modular reactors (SMRs) and existing fleet life extensions are prioritized; France's fleet, for example, has sustained emissions at 50-60 gCO2/kWh since the . Deployment hurdles include regulatory delays and waste management, yet recent projects like Vogtle Units 3 and 4 in the U.S. demonstrate feasibility for new builds. Carbon pricing mechanisms, such as taxes or cap-and-trade systems, seek to internalize emissions costs, with evidence from the EU System showing a 35% reduction in covered sectors' emissions from 2005-2022 at costs under €25/tonne. These incentivize shifts to low-carbon tech without sector-specific mandates, though coverage gaps persist; expanding to 90% of global emissions could cut 20-30 GtCO2 annually by 2030 per modeling. Efficiency measures, like LED lighting and industrial process optimizations, offer near-term gains, yielding 1-2% annual global emission reductions at negative marginal costs in many cases. , capturing 90%+ of emissions from point sources, is integral for hard-to-abate sectors, with 43 commercial facilities operational as of 2024, though scaling to gigatonne levels requires policy support. Sectoral electrification, powered by low-carbon grids, targets (28% of energy-related emissions) via electric vehicles and heat pumps, potentially reducing light-duty vehicle emissions by 70% per vehicle compared to equivalents. Integrated pathways combining these proposals, per IPCC scenarios, project 40-70% global emission cuts by 2050, contingent on rapid technology diffusion and investment exceeding $4 trillion annually. Debates persist on feasibility, given historical underperformance of aggressive targets, but empirical successes underscore the value of market-driven incentives over mandates.

Projected Benefits and Empirical Skepticism

Proponents of stringent greenhouse gas mitigation policies, as synthesized in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report, assert that global by 2050 would limit warming to around 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, thereby averting severe impacts such as accelerated sea-level rise exceeding 0.5 meters by 2100, intensified heatwaves, and in vulnerable ecosystems. This trajectory, requiring a 43% emissions cut by 2030 from 2019 levels, is projected to reduce the frequency and intensity of certain extremes, like Category 4-5 tropical cyclones, by stabilizing and avoiding overshoot beyond 1.5°C. Such benefits are modeled using coupled general circulation models (GCMs) under (SSPs), with low-emissions scenarios (e.g., SSP1-1.9) estimating end-of-century warming at 1.4°C median. Empirical scrutiny, however, casts doubt on these projections' reliability, as multiple studies document that climate models have overestimated observed warming. CMIP5 ensemble simulations projected global surface temperatures rising 16% faster than satellite and surface observations since 1970, with discrepancies attributed partly to excessive aerosol cooling in models offsetting simulated warming. Similarly, subsets of CMIP6 models exhibit "hot" biases, projecting transient climate response up to 50% higher than historical rates, prompting their partial exclusion from IPCC assessments to align with observations. Climatologist Judith Curry's analysis of model ensembles concludes that equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) values exceeding 3°C—common in projections—overstate future warming, with realistic ECS around 2°C yielding 21st-century increases of 1.0-2.0°C under moderate emissions, diminishing the differential benefits of net-zero versus business-as-usual paths. Skepticism extends to the causal linkage between and reduction, given persistent gaps between modeled harms and empirical trends. Observations show no statistically significant increase in normalized economic losses from hurricanes or floods attributable to warming through 2020, undermining claims that emissions cuts will proportionally avert disasters. Policy analyst Roger Pielke Jr. argues that vulnerability reductions through have driven declining weather-related death rates (from 500,000 annually in 1920 to under 10,000 by 2020), independent of , suggesting benefits overemphasize climate's role relative to socioeconomic factors. Moreover, hindcasting failures—such as models' inability to replicate the early-21st-century warming hiatus without adjustments—highlight uncertainties in internal variability and feedbacks, rendering long-term benefit estimates speculative and potentially overstated by factors of 1.5-2.0. These discrepancies, rooted in structural model limitations rather than transient errors, imply that 's avoided damages may be lower than , particularly when discounting future uncertainties at rates above 2%.

Opportunity Costs and Policy Trade-offs

Climate mitigation policies, particularly those targeting rapid decarbonization, impose substantial opportunity costs by reallocating scarce resources away from alternative interventions that could yield higher social returns. For instance, the Center's prioritization analyses, which evaluate global challenges using cost-benefit frameworks, consistently rank aggressive greenhouse gas mitigation below s in malnutrition reduction, clean water access, and infectious disease control, where returns can exceed 50 times the compared to mitigation's estimated 1-2 times return. These assessments draw on empirical data showing that spending trillions annually on emission cuts—projected at $1-2 trillion per year globally to achieve net-zero by 2050—diverts funds from poverty alleviation, potentially preventing millions of deaths from preventable causes while yielding minimal near-term temperature reductions, on the order of 0.17°C by century's end under stringent scenarios. Policy trade-offs further complicate mitigation efforts, as emission reduction mandates often elevate energy costs and hinder , disproportionately affecting low-income populations and developing economies. In , the EU Emissions Trading System and associated subsidies have increased household energy prices by up to 20-30% in recent years, contributing to for over 30 million citizens while global emissions continue rising due to demand growth in . Empirical studies indicate that net-zero pathways could reduce global GDP growth by 1-3% cumulatively through 2050, with sharper impacts in fossil-fuel-dependent regions, where job losses in mining and manufacturing outpace green sector gains absent compensatory measures. Critics, including economists like , argue these trade-offs are exacerbated by overemphasis on over , as the former locks in rigid technologies with uncertain efficacy, while the latter—such as resilient —addresses immediate vulnerabilities at lower cost, potentially averting damages equivalent to 2-4% of GDP from unmitigated impacts. In developing countries, the tension between net-zero ambitions and growth imperatives is acute, as stringent policies could delay industrialization and exacerbate . African nations pursuing early net-zero transitions face challenges, including higher electricity costs that slow rates, currently at 50% continent-wide, potentially locking billions into . Cost-benefit evaluations reveal that reallocating even a fraction of mitigation budgets—such as the $100 billion annual pledge—to investments could lift 100 million out of by 2030, far outweighing marginal emission reductions whose climatic benefits accrue decades later. Mainstream projections from bodies like the IPCC often understate these trade-offs by assuming seamless technological transitions, yet historical data from subsidized renewables show persistent issues and dependencies, underscoring the need for pragmatic sequencing that prioritizes economic .

Policy Responses and Governance

National and Regional Assessments

National and regional climate risk assessments systematically evaluate current and projected vulnerabilities to , identifying hazards, exposures, and adaptive capacities to guide and . These assessments typically integrate observational data, projections under various emission scenarios, and socioeconomic analyses to prioritize risks across sectors such as , , , and ecosystems. Governments mandate periodic reviews to inform strategies, though methodologies often rely on integrated assessment models that have faced criticism for assuming high-emission pathways like RCP8.5, which exceed plausible future emissions based on observed decarbonization trends. In the United States, the Fifth National Climate Assessment, released on November 14, 2023, by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, synthesizes evidence on impacts across 10 regions and key sectors including , , and forests. It documents observed changes such as increased frequency of extreme precipitation and heat events, projecting heightened risks like in the Southwest and intensified hurricanes in the Southeast under continued warming. The report highlights 28 weather and disasters exceeding $1 billion in damages each during 2023, attributing escalating costs partly to climate trends but also to population growth and development in vulnerable areas. Regional chapters emphasize adaptive opportunities, such as , while noting uncertainties in model projections beyond mid-century. The United Kingdom's third Climate Change Risk Assessment, published on January 17, 2022, evaluates 61 risks and opportunities across , , health, and business sectors, drawing on evidence reports from the . It identifies high-priority risks including flooding to homes and businesses, erosion of coastal , and mortality from extreme heat, with projections indicating significant impacts even under 1.5°C . The assessment underscores England's disproportionate exposure to heat risks compared to other UK nations, recommending enhanced monitoring and planning. Supporting evidence integrates paleoclimate data and recent observations, though it cautions that low-warming scenarios still yield costly outcomes without specifying attribution to forcings versus natural variability. Australia's inaugural National Climate Risk Assessment, released on September 15, 2025, by the Department of , , the and , conducts a qualitative "first-pass" of risks to critical systems like , , and . It projects substantial increases in heat-related deaths—up to 190% in and 126% in by mid-century under high-emission scenarios—alongside worsening coastal inundation and agricultural disruptions from droughts and floods. Economic modeling estimates annual disaster costs rising to $40.3 billion by 2049–2050, incorporating non-climate factors like asset growth, which critics argue inflates climate-attributable impacts. The assessment prioritizes 14 urgent risks for deeper evaluation, emphasizing gaps in communities and supply chains. Regionally, subnational assessments mirror national efforts but tailor to local geographies; for instance, New Zealand's National Climate Change Risk Assessment, covering impacts on natural, human, and economic systems, highlights risks to and coastal settlements from sea-level rise and storms. In , assessments like Ireland's National Climate Change Risk Assessment, summarized in June 2025, focus on sectoral vulnerabilities such as and . These reports often reveal inconsistencies, with projections sensitive to scenario choices that may overestimate risks by underweighting technological or emission reductions, as evidenced by historical overpredictions in prior assessments.

International Agreements and Frameworks

The Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), adopted on May 9, 1992, in and entering into force on March 21, 1994, provides the foundational multilateral framework for managing climate risks by aiming to stabilize atmospheric concentrations at levels preventing dangerous human interference with the climate system, within a timeframe allowing ecosystems to adapt naturally and enabling sustainable . Ratified by 198 parties, it distinguishes between Annex I countries (primarily developed nations with historical emissions responsibility) and non-Annex I countries (developing nations), imposing general commitments on all parties to report inventories and mitigate emissions while emphasizing technology transfer and financial support from developed to developing states. Annual Conferences of the Parties (COPs) under the UNFCCC have driven subsequent protocols and mechanisms, including adaptation frameworks that integrate , early warning systems, and resilience-building to address vulnerabilities from climate variability. The , adopted on December 11, 1997, as the first addition to the UNFCCC and effective from February 16, 2005, introduced binding emission reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries and the , requiring an average 5.2% cut below 1990 levels during the first commitment period (2008–2012). It employed flexible mechanisms such as , joint implementation, and the Clean Development Mechanism to incentivize reductions, but exempted developing countries, limiting coverage to approximately 18% of global emissions at inception. Empirical outcomes showed participating Annex I parties achieving reductions—such as 12.5% in CO2 emissions from 1990 to 2012 among original signatories and 22% average annual cuts in the second period (2013–2020)—yet global emissions rose 32% over 1990–2010, underscoring the protocol's inability to curb overall growth due to rapid increases in non-participating economies like and . The , adopted on December 12, 2015, at COP21 in and entering into force on November 4, 2016, marked a shift to universal participation with 195 parties committing to nationally determined contributions (NDCs) for emission reductions, targeting temperature limits well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing 1.5°C through enhanced ambition every five years. Unlike Kyoto's top-down mandates, Paris relies on bottom-up, non-binding pledges with frameworks for reporting and stocktakes, alongside provisions for adaptation planning, loss and damage mechanisms, and $100 billion annual from developed to developing countries (a target met cumulatively by 2022 but criticized for opacity in delivery). Post-adoption data reveal persistent atmospheric CO2 accumulation and emissions growth, with current NDCs projected to yield 2.4–3.5°C warming by 2100 absent stricter enforcement, highlighting reliance on aspirational goals over verifiable enforcement amid economic disincentives in high-emission developing nations. Supplementary UNFCCC frameworks address residual climate risks through and , including the 2013 Warsaw International for Loss and Damage, which promotes comprehensive via assessment, reduction, transfer (e.g., ), and retention strategies to build long-term societal against unavoidable impacts like . The 2021 and subsequent COP decisions further operationalize goals, mandating national plans and progress reviews, though implementation gaps persist due to funding shortfalls—estimated at $127–295 billion annually for developing countries—and challenges in attributing specific damages to versus natural variability. These agreements collectively prioritize to avert risks but demonstrate limited causal impact on global emission trajectories, as evidenced by continued dependence and industrial expansion, prompting debates on the realism of model-based projections versus observed data.

Insurance Mechanisms and Financial Tools

Insurance mechanisms for climate risk primarily involve transferring financial exposure from extreme weather events—such as floods, hurricanes, and droughts—to insurers and reinsurers, with payouts calibrated to mitigate economic disruptions. Traditional property and covers direct losses from these events, but escalating claims have prompted adjustments, including premium increases averaging 7-10% annually in high-risk U.S. regions like and from 2020 to 2024, driven by events like in 2022, which caused over $112 billion in insured losses. However, insurers have faced challenges, with global natural catastrophe insured losses reaching $120 billion in 2023, exceeding premiums in some lines and leading to market withdrawals in vulnerable areas. Parametric insurance represents an innovative mechanism, triggering payouts based on predefined parameters—such as magnitude above 7.0 or rainfall exceeding 200mm in 24 hours—rather than assessed damages, enabling rapid disbursements within days. Adopted widely in developing regions, examples include the African Risk Capacity's policies, which paid out $20 million to and in 2023 for parametric triggers during El Niño-induced dry spells, and the Catastrophe Risk Insurance Facility (CCRIF), which disbursed $28 million to in 2024 following Hurricane Beryl. This approach reduces basis —the mismatch between trigger and actual loss—but requires accurate indexing via satellites and , as implemented by Re's parametric solutions since 2017. Financial tools complement insurance through capital market instruments like catastrophe bonds (cat bonds), which allow insurers to securitize risks by issuing bonds where investor principal is forfeited to cover claims if predefined catastrophes occur. The market has grown from $3 billion outstanding in 2010 to over $45 billion by mid-2025, with issuances peaking after events like the , transferring risks such as U.S. hurricane exposure to diverse investors. Pricing reflects empirical return periods derived from historical data, though debates persist on whether models adequately capture tail without overattributing frequency increases to climate trends. Risk pooling facilities, such as those under the InsuResilience Global Partnership launched in 2015, aggregate sovereign across countries, providing multi-year coverage; for instance, the Pacific Risk Insurance and Finance Facility covered Fiji's losses from Yasa in 2020 with $5 million in payouts. These tools face limitations, including affordability in low-income areas—where gaps exceed 90% for climate-related events—and regulatory over , as seen in the International Association of Insurance Supervisors' 2023 guidelines mandating climate risk for insurers. Empirical analyses indicate that while payouts have risen with event frequency, long-term premium adequacy depends on accurate probabilistic modeling rather than alarmist projections, with capacity remaining robust at $700 billion globally in 2024. Public-private partnerships, such as those explored by the , integrate these mechanisms with fiscal buffers to enhance resilience without over-relying on unverified climate attribution.

Controversies and Alternative Perspectives

Alarmism vs. Causal Realism

Alarmist narratives on climate risk have frequently projected imminent global catastrophes, such as widespread famines, submerged nations, and ice-free poles, based on extrapolations from early models or selective data interpretations, yet many such forecasts have not materialized as predicted. For instance, in 1969, ecologist warned of mass starvation in the 1970s and 1980s due to outstripping food production, a prediction contradicted by subsequent agricultural advancements and yield increases. Similarly, a 1989 UN environmental official claimed entire nations could be wiped out by rising seas by 2000 if trends continued, but observed sea-level rise rates of approximately 3.3 mm per year have not led to such losses, with adaptive measures like dikes mitigating impacts in vulnerable areas. Al Gore's 2006 documentary suggested the could be ice-free in summer by 2013, whereas satellite data show sea ice extent averaging around 4-5 million square kilometers in recent September minima, far from zero. These examples, drawn from public statements by prominent figures, highlight a pattern where high-end scenario assumptions amplify perceived urgency without accounting for countervailing factors like technological progress. In contrast, empirical assessments grounded in observational reveal discrepancies between projections and realized warming, underscoring the limitations of relying on unverified simulations for . Over the past 50 years, the observed rate of global surface warming has averaged about 0.13°C per , slower than the 0.2°C or higher predicted by many models from the 1970s onward. A found that s overestimated warming by a factor of 2.2 during the 1998-2014 period, attributing this to excessive assumptions in simulations. Peer-reviewed s confirm that while models capture broad trends, they diverge significantly in regional patterns and transient responses, with observed tropospheric warming rates via measurements (e.g., 0.14°C per from 1979-2023) falling below ensemble means. This divergence suggests that causal factors like natural variability, including ocean cycles and solar influences, play larger roles than models incorporate, leading to more restrained profiles when prioritizing over projections. Causal realism further emphasizes verifiable benefits and human that temper alarmist views, such as the observed global greening effect from elevated CO2 levels, which enhances plant growth and carbon sinks. satellite data from 1982-2015 indicate a 14% increase in global , with CO2 fertilization accounting for 70% of this greening, particularly in and agricultural regions, thereby boosting food production and in some ecosystems. Concurrently, deaths from climate-related disasters have declined dramatically on a basis due to improved , , and socioeconomic ; global mortality rates from such events fell by a factor of 6.5 between 1980-1989 and 2007-2016, from over 500,000 to under annually, reflecting adaptation's efficacy. Frequency of tropical cyclones has also reached historic lows, with no upward trend in global since comprehensive records began in 1970. These data-driven insights, derived from direct measurements rather than modeled extrapolations, support a view of climate risk as manageable through targeted rather than existential panic.

Political and Media Influences on Risk Perception

Media consumption patterns significantly shape public perceptions of climate risk, with exposure to outlets emphasizing warming and dire projections correlating with heightened concern. A 2023 study analyzing U.S. viewership found that regular exposure to Channel, which often critiques alarmist narratives, reduced belief in human-caused and lowered perceived urgency compared to mainstream networks. In contrast, elite newspapers and broadcast media, which provide more extensive coverage of climate issues, amplify narratives linking current weather anomalies to long-term risks, contributing to asymmetric attention in and audiences. Political party cues further polarize risk assessments, as demonstrates that individuals adjust their views to align with signals. A 2020 analysis of survey data showed that party communications on directly influence risk perceptions, with the effect intensifying in high-polarization contexts; for instance, identifiers downplayed risks when cued by conservative messaging, while Democrats elevated them under liberal framing. This dynamic is evident in U.S. trends: 2024 Yale data revealed that 83% of Democrats viewed as a serious , compared to 28% of Republicans, a gap widening since 2008 amid reinforcement. Such divides persist even when controlling for and access, suggesting affective loyalty over evidence drives perception. Mainstream media's tendency to attribute extreme weather events—such as heatwaves or floods—to without proportional context on historical variability fosters exaggerated attribution. For example, coverage spikes during anomalies often omit statistical baselines showing events within natural ranges, as documented in analyses of U.S. and reporting patterns from 2000–2006, where outweighed balanced scientific discourse. This framing, prevalent in left-leaning outlets dominant in elite , aligns with institutional biases favoring enforcement over dissenting evaluations, potentially inflating public anxiety beyond empirical projections of moderate warming impacts. Conservative media, by contrast, highlights successes and economic trade-offs, tempering perceptions but facing accusations of understating on basic mechanisms. Public polls reflect these influences, with concern levels decoupling from verifiable trends like stable or declining disaster fatalities per capita. Gallup's 2025 survey indicated a record 48% of Americans deeming a "serious ," up from prior years, coinciding with intensified campaigns post-2021 conferences—yet this exceeds assessments from integrated models projecting manageable risks under current trajectories. Political incentives, including funding flows to alarmist research and policy advocacy, sustain this , as partisan actors leverage heightened perceptions for regulatory agendas, often sidelining first-order data on and technological .

Record of Predictions and Overestimations

Numerous predictions of rapid and severe impacts have overestimated the of observed changes, particularly in high-profile alarmist scenarios that emphasized imminent tipping points. These discrepancies highlight challenges in modeling complex systems, where assumptions about emissions trajectories, feedback loops, and regional variability often led to projections exceeding empirical outcomes. While global temperatures have increased by approximately 0.18°C per decade since , many forecasts anticipated faster rates under plausible emission paths. James Hansen's 1988 testimony to the U.S. Congress projected under a business-as-usual Scenario A (continued high emissions growth) a warming of about 0.45°C per decade from the late 1980s onward, with discernible effects by the 1990s. Observed global surface temperatures, however, have warmed at roughly 0.18°C per decade over that period, more closely matching Hansen's lower-emission Scenario C, which assumed emission reductions. This overestimate in the baseline scenario contributed to perceptions of exaggerated urgency at the time. Climate models aggregated in IPCC assessments have similarly tended to run "hot" relative to observations in specific intervals. From 1998 to 2014, a period of slower warming known as the , multimodel ensembles projected approximately 2.2 times the global surface warming that occurred, with discrepancies attributed partly to unmodeled internal variability and effects. Earlier projections, such as those in IPCC's Third Assessment Report (2001), also diverged from post-2000 temperature data, prompting adjustments in subsequent reports. Arctic sea ice extent provides another case of overestimation in short-term forecasts. In the late 2000s, following record-low summer extents in 2007, several scientists and media reports predicted an ice-free Arctic Ocean in summer as early as 2013–2016, citing accelerating melt trends and extrapolations from observed declines. As of 2025, summer sea ice minimums have stabilized or slowed in decline over the past decade, with extents remaining around 4–5 million square kilometers—far from ice-free—consistent with longer-term model ranges but contradicting aggressive near-term claims. Specific regional predictions have also faltered. Al Gore's 2006 documentary stated that "within the decade, there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro," linking the glacier's retreat to . Despite continued shrinkage, perennial snowfields and ice have persisted on the mountain's summit into the , with studies attributing loss more to reduced and solar radiation than solely to temperature rises. Such instances underscore how localized factors can moderate broader climate influences beyond model expectations.
PredictionSource/DateForecastObserved Outcome
Global warming rate under business-as-usual, 1988~0.45°C/decade~0.18°C/decade (1988–present)
Model-projected warming (1998–2014)IPCC multimodel ensembles~2.2× observed rateSlower warming during hiatus period
Arctic summer ice-freeVarious extrapolations post-2007 meltBy 2013–2016Persistent ice (~4–5 million km² minima as of 2025)
Kilimanjaro snow disappearance, 2006Within ~10 yearsSnow/ice persists on summit (2020s)
These overestimations, often amplified by media and advocacy, have eroded trust in some forecasting traditions, though core projections of warming remain supported by physics-based understanding. Empirical validation continues to refine models, emphasizing the need for probabilistic ranges over deterministic alarms.

References

  1. [1]
    Climate Risks and Opportunities Defined | US EPA
    Mar 3, 2025 · Climate risks include transition risks (related to lower-carbon economy) and physical risks (related to climate change impacts). Opportunities ...
  2. [2]
    What Is Climate Risk? | IBM
    Climate risk refers to the potential negative effects of climate change on various aspects of the environment, businesses, and society.What is climate risk? · Why is understanding climate...
  3. [3]
    Physical vs transition climate risk: what's the difference? - EarthScan
    Jun 19, 2024 · Physical climate risk is damage from extreme weather, while transition risk is from moving away from fossil fuels and related costs.What is climate risk? · What is physical climate risk · What is transition climate risk?
  4. [4]
    Quantifying uncertainty in aggregated climate change risk ... - NIH
    Dec 8, 2021 · Here we propose a methodology to transparently assess these uncertainties within the 'Reasons for Concern' framework, using extreme heat as a case study.
  5. [5]
    Navigating climate change complexity and deep uncertainty - Frontiers
    Apr 14, 2024 · In this study, we introduce a four-step qualitative Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) approach in the context of Climate Change Impact Assessments ...
  6. [6]
    Empirical modeling of agricultural climate risk - PNAS
    Apr 8, 2024 · Climate change can affect agriculture across levels–from plants to farms to institutions–but these impacts are difficult to measure and ...
  7. [7]
    The Global Economic Impact of Climate Change: An Empirical ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Recent empirical analyses have tested theoretical ideas, challenged prior estimates, and revealed important and unexpected impacts. Further, the ...
  8. [8]
    Climate risks - Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions
    Jan 18, 2024 · Climate risks include physical risks from climate events and transition risks from low-emission policies, which can lead to liability risks.
  9. [9]
    An uncertainty-based risk management framework for climate ...
    Sep 5, 2023 · Climate risks are systemic risks and may be clustered according to so-called volatilities, uncertainties, complexities, and ambiguities ...
  10. [10]
    New Potential to Reduce Uncertainty in Regional Climate ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · For example, total uncertainty in temperature projections over Central Europe for 2050 is reduced by ∼50%, with the relative importance of ...
  11. [11]
    What is climate risk and what does it mean for your organization
    Jun 5, 2024 · Climate risk is the potential for climate change to create adverse consequences for human or ecological systems. This includes impacts on lives, ...What is climate risk? · What is physical climate risk? · Climate risk disclosure
  12. [12]
    Climate change impacts, risks and adaptation | In-depth topics
    Jun 10, 2025 · Heatwaves, droughts, floods and increasing wildfires were the top extreme weather events reported by national authorities in 2023.
  13. [13]
    Advances in complex climate change risk assessment for adaptation
    Aug 8, 2025 · Policy and practice require clearer insights into the scope of complex climate risk and its integration into adaptation and risk management ...
  14. [14]
    Step 2.1 Defining the core elements of your climate risk assessment
    May 8, 2024 · Climate risk assessments aim to identify the biggest climate risks facing your area now and in the future. This involves analysing changes ...
  15. [15]
    Climate Risk Management - Office of the Superintendent of Financial ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · Physical and transition risks can also lead to liability risks, such as the risk of climate-related claims under liability policies, as well as ...Climate Risk Management · Ii. Risk Management · Iii. Climate Scenario...
  16. [16]
    Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters | Risk and Vulnerability
    This mapping tool is intended to provide US communities with information and guidance on their susceptibility to weather and climate hazards.
  17. [17]
    Climate-related Risks - Financial Stability Board
    Climate-related risks may be non-linear, and their effects on the financial system subject to substantial uncertainty and tail-risk. The effects are spread over ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Climate risk: how can we be more resilient? - Swiss Re
    The risks from climate change are becoming visible. Wildfires, storms, floods and weather extremes are exacerbated by the warming planet and putting more people ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Climate Risks: Scenario Analysis – Objectives and Scope
    Climate risks can only be reduced by a smooth and immediate transition to a low-carbon economy, where global warming is limited to a range of 1.5 – 2.0° Celsius ...
  20. [20]
    Climate vs. Weather - NOAA
    Jun 13, 2023 · Climate and weather both describe phenomena in the Earth's atmosphere, but the basic difference between them is time.
  21. [21]
    Climate Change Risk Management - American Meteorological Society
    Climate change risk management includes mitigation (reducing emissions), adaptation (coping with changes), geoengineering (manipulating the earth system), and ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  22. [22]
    What is climate risk and why does it matter? - Brookings Institution
    Sep 1, 2022 · Climate disasters cost the U.S. $95 billion in damages in 2020. Sanjay Patnaik digs into the economics and risks of climate change.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  23. [23]
    Extreme Weather and Climate Change: Population Health and ...
    We review (a) the current impacts and projected risks of climate change on the health of populations and health systems from extreme weather and climate events ...
  24. [24]
    Role of Natural Climate Variability in the Detection of Anthropogenic ...
    Nonetheless, natural climate variability can impede the detection of the anthropogenic climate change signal until the middle to late century in many parts of ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Distinguishing the roles of natural and anthropogenically forced ...
    Capsule: In decadal forecasts, the magnitude of natural decadal variations may rival that of anthropogenically forced climate change on regional scales.
  26. [26]
    Causes of Climate Change | US EPA
    Aug 25, 2025 · Natural processes are always influencing the earth's climate and can explain climate changes prior to the Industrial Revolution in the 1700s.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The concept of risk in the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report
    Feb 15, 2021 · The concept of risk is the foundation of the so-called 'reasons for concern', which are focused on high-level, severely adverse consequences.
  28. [28]
    Figure AR6 WG2 | Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and ...
    (a) An explicit risk framing emerged in the IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] ESCI Climate Risk Assessment Framework - User Guide
    The ESCI climate risk assessment framework follows the International Standard. ISO 31000 for Risk Management, starting with understanding the context, then.
  30. [30]
    Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
    CCP2 assesses climate change impacts and risks to coastal cities and settlements, their vulnerability as well as enabling conditions and options for adaptation.Chapter 16: Key Risks across... · Summary for Policymakers · Fact Sheets · Explore
  31. [31]
    Climate change risks illustrated by the Intergovernmental Panel on ...
    Jan 31, 2025 · The IPCC has developed a synthetic representation of how risks increase with global warming, with risk levels reflected by the colours used, including shades ...
  32. [32]
    FSB develops analytical framework and toolkit to assess climate ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · The analytical framework traces how physical and transition climate risks can be transmitted and amplified within the global financial system. A ...
  33. [33]
    Assessment of Climate-related Vulnerabilities: Analytical framework ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · The FSB's framework traces how climate risks are transmitted and amplified, using metrics to monitor vulnerabilities and a toolkit to monitor ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] The Challenge of Climate Risk Modelling in Financial Institutions
    Dec 8, 2023 · This paper discusses the various general issues with climate risk mod- elling in financial institutions, including data availability and quality ...
  35. [35]
    Climate risk companies don't always agree - CarbonPlan
    Aug 9, 2024 · Given the uncertainty inherent in climate and hazard modeling, it's not surprising that different companies produce different estimates of risk.
  36. [36]
    A framework for context-aware climate risk assessments
    We introduce a framework for conducting “context-aware” climate risk assessments, consisting of an iterative six-stage process.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Summary for Policymakers
    This summary presents key findings on the current climate, its changes, human influence, climate futures, and limiting human-induced climate change.
  38. [38]
    IPCC AR6 Working Group 1: Technical Summary
    This section introduces the assessment of the physical science basis of climate change in the AR6 and presents the climate context in which this assessment ...
  39. [39]
    Global Warming: Observations vs. Climate Models
    Jan 24, 2024 · The observed rate of global warming over the past 50 years has been weaker than that predicted by almost all computerized climate models.
  40. [40]
    Pervasive Warming Bias in CMIP6 Tropospheric Layers - 2020
    Jul 15, 2020 · Every model overpredicts warming in both the LT and MT layers, in the tropics, and globally. On average the discrepancies are statistically ...
  41. [41]
    Comparison Update 2024 - RealClimate
    Jan 27, 2025 · The comparisons cover surface air temperatures, sea surface temperatures, tropospheric atmospheric temperatures (TLT, TMT), stratospheric temperatures, and a ...
  42. [42]
    Chapter 7: The Earth's Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and ...
    The equilibrium climate sensitivity, ECS (units: °C), is defined as the equilibrium value of ΔT in response to a sustained doubling of atmospheric CO 2 ...
  43. [43]
    Revisiting a Constraint on Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity From a ...
    Oct 26, 2023 · Observational constraints suggest a central ECS estimate of 2.5–2.7 K, consistent with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's consensus ...
  44. [44]
    Use of 'too hot' climate models exaggerates impacts of global warming
    May 4, 2022 · But for the 2019 CMIP6 round, 10 out of 55 of the models had sensitivities higher than 5°C—a stark departure. The results were also at odds with ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  45. [45]
    Confronting climate models with observations: a global assessment ...
    Mar 25, 2025 · The findings, published in Science Advances, highlight persistent discrepancies between observed data and model projections, especially in ...
  46. [46]
    Confronting climate models with observations: a global assessment ...
    Mar 21, 2025 · The study outlines practical steps for improving how scientists evaluate climate models and use them to make more reliable projections, ...
  47. [47]
    Coming Soon: A Preview of Berkeley Earth's Climate Model Synthesis
    Dec 9, 2024 · By identifying and correcting systematic differences between models and observations, we can significantly improve the accuracy of climate ...Missing: discrepancies | Show results with:discrepancies
  48. [48]
    Quantifying statistical uncertainty in the attribution of human ...
    Event attribution in the context of climate change seeks to understand the role of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions on extreme weather events, ...
  49. [49]
    Overstating the effects of anthropogenic climate change? A critical ...
    Feb 8, 2023 · Imagine the attribution of a heavy rainfall event in the presence of strong dynamic uncertainties. Some models may, for the considered ...
  50. [50]
    On the Attribution of Weather Events to Climate Change Using ...
    We find, for example, that an attribution of Australia's 2020–21 bushfires to ACC is difficult due to the effects of internal variability. For the 2019–21 ...
  51. [51]
    Is That Climate Change? The Science of Extreme Event Attribution
    Jun 1, 2023 · The uncertainties inherent within climate models themselves have been recognized as a challenge in climate change studies.Overview of Climate Change... · Extreme Event Attribution
  52. [52]
    Attribution of Extreme Weather and Climate Events and their Impacts
    Identify research priorities for improving extreme event attribution methods and modeling, including uncertainty quantification and overcoming data limitations.
  53. [53]
    Incorporating extreme event attribution into climate change ...
    This paper overviews the methods for extreme event attribution (EEA) and discusses the new insights that EEA provides for infrastructure adaptation.
  54. [54]
    Opinion: Can uncertainty in climate sensitivity be narrowed further?
    Feb 29, 2024 · While current climate sensitivity distributions are valid, further narrowing is possible through better understanding of climate processes and ...
  55. [55]
    Detection, attribution, and modeling of climate change: Key open ...
    May 13, 2025 · The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) to radiative forcing could be lower than commonly assumed; empirical findings suggest ECS values lower ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Sea-surface temperature pattern effects have slowed global ... - PNAS
    The results reinforce recent findings that the unique pattern of observed warming has slowed global-mean warming over recent decades.
  57. [57]
    Observed trend in Earth energy imbalance may provide a ... - Science
    Jun 12, 2025 · We show that low climate sensitivity models fail to reproduce the trend in Earth energy imbalance, particularly in the individual longwave and shortwave ...
  58. [58]
    A New Framework for Estimating and Decomposing the Uncertainty ...
    These climate projections, however, are subject to large and multisource uncertainties, making it hard to identify the actual climate change signals amidst the ...
  59. [59]
    Integrating climate model projections into environmental risk ...
    Dec 11, 2023 · Moreover, probabilistic approaches are needed to combine the propagation of uncertainty in climate projections, weather stochasticity, and ...
  60. [60]
    Advances in extreme value analysis and application to natural hazards
    May 10, 2021 · Extreme value analysis (EVA) refers to efforts to characterize a hazard by estimating the intensity and the frequency of occurrence of the event ...
  61. [61]
    Extreme value analysis dilemma for climate change impact ...
    Extreme value theory (EVT; Coles, 2001) identifies extreme events, characterized by either very small or very large values. EVT consists of two fundamental ...
  62. [62]
    Assessing uncertainty for decision‐making in climate adaptation and ...
    Jan 3, 2021 · The relative impact of the different sources of uncertainty depends on the climate projection length, with model-induced ones becoming dominant ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Quantifying uncertainty and sensitivity in climate risk assessments
    This framework assesses risk based on a climate model ensemble and uses statistical modelling techniques to provide a richer quantification of the climate model ...
  64. [64]
    Climate risks: scenario analysis – Executive Summary
    May 31, 2023 · Scenario analysis is a key tool to assess financial risks arising from climate change, as standard risk modelling cannot adequately capture ...
  65. [65]
    Climate Scenario Analysis 101 - Resources for the Future
    Apr 10, 2023 · Climate scenario analyses are designed for regulators and banks to gauge the significance of climate risks on the financial health of both ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Climate Risk Assessment and Scenario Analysis - SOA
    Climate Risk Assessment and Scenario Analysis ... We describe a step-by-step process that entities can follow to build their climate risk assessment function.
  67. [67]
    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Transparency and ...
    Jul 8, 2021 · Integrated assessment models (IAMs) connect trends in future socioeconomic and technological development with impacts on the environment, ...
  68. [68]
    A Review of Criticisms of Integrated Assessment Models and ... - MDPI
    This paper reviews the many criticisms that Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs)—the bedrock of mitigation analysis—have received in recent years.
  69. [69]
    Past peak prominence: The changing role of integrated assessment ...
    Oct 19, 2024 · We show that integrated assessment modeling (IAM) research was influential in all six assessments, and overrepresented in the Summary for Policymakers (SPM).
  70. [70]
    The failure of Integrated Assessment Models as a response to ...
    Dec 14, 2020 · Conclusions from IAMs about the impact of a warming scenario are unreliable, misleading, and founded on oversimplifying assumptions. Although ...
  71. [71]
    Why integrated assessment models alone are insufficient to ...
    Mar 17, 2023 · Although IAMs have enabled us to better grasp the climate crisis and map mitigation pathways, they are arguably inadequately equipped to take ...
  72. [72]
    IPCC emission scenarios: How did critiques affect their quality and ...
    This article reviews the evolution of emission scenarios, since 1990, by focusing on scenario critiques and responses as published in the literature.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near-term ...
    contribution of the climate model response uncertainty to the total uncertainty is larger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5 whereas the relative contribution of ...
  74. [74]
    The Impact of “Hot Models” on a CMIP6 Ensemble Used by Climate ...
    CMIP6 includes several “hot” climate models whose sensitivity to greenhouse gas forcings exceeds the likely range inferred from multiple lines of evidence.Introduction · Climate data · Model weighting · Summary and conclusions
  75. [75]
    New confirmation that climate models overstate atmospheric warming
    Aug 25, 2020 · ... McKitrick. Two new peer-reviewed papers from independent teams confirm that climate models overstate atmospheric warming and the problem has ...
  76. [76]
    U.S.A. Temperature Trends, 1979-2023: Models vs. Observations
    Feb 2, 2024 · The model trends average 42% warmer than the observed temperature trends. As I allude to in the graph, there is evidence that the NOAA ...
  77. [77]
    https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/13393/2025/
  78. [78]
    Ten new insights in climate science 2024 - ScienceDirect.com
    Jun 20, 2025 · Persistent ACI uncertainty limits our understanding of both the total influence of aerosols on surface temperature and the transient climate ...
  79. [79]
    A global overview of marine heatwaves in a changing climate - Nature
    Nov 20, 2024 · Marine heatwaves have profoundly impacted marine ecosystems over large areas of the world oceans, calling for improved understanding of their dynamics and ...
  80. [80]
    Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system - Nature
    Feb 14, 2024 · Large parts of the Amazon forest, however, are projected to experience mass mortality events due to climatic and land use-related disturbances ...
  81. [81]
    Biodiversity loss due to more than climate change - Science
    Nov 4, 2021 · Losses of biodiversity are increasingly corrosive, and they are driven by traditional threats that dwarf the potential impacts of climate change.
  82. [82]
    first mammal species wiped out by human-induced climate change
    Jun 15, 2016 · A report in 2015 found one sixth of the world's species face extinction due to climate change, and scientists have warned that the world is ...Missing: observed verified
  83. [83]
    Recent responses to climate change reveal the drivers of species ...
    Feb 10, 2020 · Our results show the importance of maximum temperatures for causing species extinction and niche shifts for allowing their survival.
  84. [84]
    https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/programs/biodiversity/elements_of_biodiversity/extinction_crisis/21-extinct-species-of-2023.html
  85. [85]
    Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity - PMC - NIH
    Issues and challenges for climate change driven biodiversity loss. Examples of each are presented and discussed in the main text. The issues are in the ...
  86. [86]
    Climate change is not the principal driver of biodiversity loss
    Jan 20, 2022 · The current perception that climate change is the principal threat to biodiversity is at best premature. Although highly relevant, it detracts focus and effort.
  87. [87]
    How are climate change and biodiversity loss linked?
    Dec 7, 2022 · Climate change is currently the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss in the ocean and the fourth biggest cause on land, though it's likely ...
  88. [88]
    Biodiversity mediates ecosystem sensitivity to climate variability
    Jun 27, 2022 · We show that, across multiple biomes, regions of greater plant diversity exhibit lower sensitivity (more stable over time) to temperature variability.
  89. [89]
    Review Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems ...
    Sep 1, 2020 · For example, fossil records have shown that ecosystems respond similarly to past climate change events by becoming dominated with generalist ...Review · 2. Individuals, Populations... · 6. Implications For Natural...<|control11|><|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Reduced resilience of terrestrial ecosystems locally is not reflected ...
    May 13, 2021 · On a local scale we find that climate change reduced the resilience of ecosystems in 64.5% of the global terrestrial vegetated area.Results · Ecosystem Resilience And... · Effects Of Climate Change...
  91. [91]
    How many people die from extreme temperatures, and how this ...
    globally, at a ratio of around nine to one.
  92. [92]
    Estimating future heat-related and cold-related mortality under ...
    Jan 27, 2025 · Estimates generally report that there are roughly ten cold-related deaths for each heat-related death; some studies suggested that temperature- ...
  93. [93]
    Human Deaths from Hot and Cold… - The Breakthrough Institute
    Dec 1, 2022 · It has been estimated that warming from 2000 to 2019 has resulted in a net decline in excess deaths globally (a larger decrease in cold deaths ...
  94. [94]
    Climate Change Indicators: Heat-Related Deaths | US EPA
    Between 1979 and 2022, the death rate as a direct result of exposure to heat (underlying cause of death) generally hovered between 0.5 and 2 deaths per million ...
  95. [95]
    Trends of Heat-Related Deaths in the US, 1999-2023 - JAMA Network
    Aug 26, 2024 · From 1999 to 2023, 21 518 deaths were recorded as heat-related underlying or contributing cause of death, with an AAMR of 0.26 per 100 000 ...
  96. [96]
    Heat Deaths Have Doubled in the U.S. in Recent Decades, Study ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · While 2023 was the hottest year on record and led to at least 2,325 heat-related deaths in the U.S., more than 21,518 people have died from heat ...
  97. [97]
    Decadal Decline in Heat-Attributed Excess Mortality and Evolving ...
    Oct 2, 2025 · Our results revealed a substantial decline in heat-attributed mortality burden over the decade. YLL per death decreased from 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85, ...
  98. [98]
    Projections of Heat- and Cold-Related Mortality Under Climate ...
    The impact of extreme heat is expected to result in a mortality increase of 0.03% to 0.04%, while extreme cold is expected to decrease mortality by −0.10%.<|separator|>
  99. [99]
    Climate change and infectious disease: a review of evidence and ...
    May 16, 2023 · The review revealed that 32.7% of the articles concluded that climate change could “possibly” or “potentially” impact the disease system being ...
  100. [100]
    Climate change and vector-borne diseases: what are the ... - NIH
    Vector-borne diseases are among the most well studied of the diseases associated with climate change, owing to their large disease burden, widespread occurrence ...
  101. [101]
    Climate Change and Vectorborne Diseases
    Nov 23, 2022 · Warming temperatures and changes in precipitation associated with climate change are affecting the occurrence of vectorborne diseases.
  102. [102]
    Health effects of climate change: an overview of systematic reviews
    Most systematic reviews suggest that climate change is associated with worse human health. This study provides a comprehensive higher order summary of research.
  103. [103]
    Mortality Risk during Heat Waves and Effect Modification by Heat ...
    Mortality increased 5.04% (95% PI, 3.06–7.06%) during the first heat wave of the summer versus 2.65% (95% PI, 1.14–4.18%) during later heat waves, compared with ...
  104. [104]
    The economic commitment of climate change | Nature
    Apr 17, 2024 · In projecting the future economic damages from climate change, we make use of recent advances in climate econometrics that provide evidence for ...
  105. [105]
    A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change
    A meta-analysis of the impact of weather shocks reveals that studies, which relate economic growth to temperature levels, cannot agree on the sign of the impact ...
  106. [106]
    The Economic Impacts of Climate Change
    Current estimates indicate that climate change will likely have a limited impact on the economy and human welfare in the twenty-first century.Introduction · The Total Economic Impact of... · Development and Climate...
  107. [107]
    Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters
    The US sustained 403 weather and climate disasters from 1980–2024 where overall damages/costs reached or exceeded $1 billion (including CPI adjustment to 2024).Events · Summary Stats · Time Series · Disaster Mapping
  108. [108]
    The Risks of Climate Change to the United States in the 21st Century
    Dec 19, 2024 · A rise of about 2 feet would cause losses of $250 billion. Those losses would mostly be borne by property owners, mortgage lenders, insurance ...
  109. [109]
    Flood damage costs under the sea level rise with warming of 1.5 °C ...
    Failing to achieve the global mean temperature targets of 1.5 °C or 2 °C will lead to greater damage and higher levels of coastal flood risk worldwide.
  110. [110]
    Climate effects on US infrastructure: the economics of adaptation for ...
    Aug 19, 2021 · This paper estimates impacts to railroad, roads, and coastal properties under three infrastructure management response scenarios.
  111. [111]
    2022 U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in historical ...
    Jan 10, 2023 · The U.S. billion-dollar disaster damage costs over the last 10-years (2013-2022) were also historically large: at least $1.1 trillion from 152 ...
  112. [112]
    Estimating future costs for Alaska public infrastructure at risk from ...
    We conclude that climate change could add $3.6–$6.1 billion (+10% to +20% above normal wear and tear) to future costs for public infrastructure from now to 2030 ...
  113. [113]
    Crop yields have increased dramatically in recent decades, but ...
    Sep 30, 2024 · Climate change has slowed the productivity of key crops such as maize and soybeans, but might have had small positive impacts on wheat.
  114. [114]
    Climate change has likely already affected global food production
    May 31, 2019 · We find that the impact of global climate change on yields of different crops from climate trends ranged from -13.4% (oil palm) to 3.5% (soybean).
  115. [115]
    CO2 fertilization of terrestrial photosynthesis inferred from site to ...
    Mar 1, 2022 · We provide robust observationally inferred evidence that a strong CO 2 fertilization effect is detectable in globally distributed eddy covariance networks.
  116. [116]
    Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four ...
    Aug 15, 2017 · Each degree-Celsius increase in global mean temperature would, on average, reduce global yields of wheat by 6.0%, rice by 3.2%, maize by 7.4%, and soybean by 3 ...
  117. [117]
    Global vulnerability of crop yields to climate change - ScienceDirect
    The climate change could reduce global crop yields by 3–12% by mid-century and 11–25% by century's end, under a vigorous warming scenario.
  118. [118]
    A method review of the climate change impact on crop yield - Frontiers
    Jul 5, 2023 · Empirical statistical models evaluate and predict crop yields by establishing a correlation between climate factors and historical yields, ...
  119. [119]
    Climate change impacts on crop yields across temperature rise ...
    Jul 2, 2025 · This study quantifies the projected impacts of climate change on crop yields across temperature rise regimes and climatic zones.
  120. [120]
    A Global Review of the Impacts of Climate Change and Variability ...
    May 14, 2025 · This review highlights the widespread negative effects of climate change and variability on crop yields and livestock productivity across continents.
  121. [121]
    Drought assessment has been outpaced by climate change - NIH
    May 17, 2022 · We assert that non-stationarity in climate must be accounted for in contemporary assessments to more accurately portray present drought risk.
  122. [122]
    Attribution and Risk Projections of Hydrological Drought Over Water ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · These increasing droughts are exacerbated by higher anthropogenic emissions, posing high-level risks to 39.01% of land area and 35.9% of human ...
  123. [123]
    The first emergence of unprecedented global water scarcity ... - Nature
    Sep 23, 2025 · Here, water scarcity arises when freshwater demand exceeds the available supply, including reservoir storage, under compound drought conditions.
  124. [124]
    Water crisis, drought, and climate change in the southeast United ...
    This is the first study to the authors' knowledge to demonstrate the impact of actual drought conditions on individual perceptions about water security.
  125. [125]
    Food Supply - Our World in Data
    Over the decades since 1961, there has been a consistent global uptrend in the per capita calorie supply, reflecting changes and advancements in food production ...
  126. [126]
    Hunger and Undernourishment - Our World in Data
    On this page, you can find our data, visualizations, and writing on hunger and undernourishment. It looks at how many people are undernourished, where they are, ...
  127. [127]
    Climate change increases the interannual variance of summer crop ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · Here, we provide the first global quantification of climate change impacts on maize, soybean, and sorghum yield variance due to changes in ...
  128. [128]
    Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting ... - Nature
    Jun 18, 2025 · Here we develop a unified empirical approach to measure the effect of climate change on staple crop production, accounting for the costs, ...
  129. [129]
    The Influence of Climate Change on Global Crop Productivity - PMC
    Global Trends in Crop Productivity​​ Yields of most major crops have increased markedly over the past half century, largely due to greater use of irrigation, ...
  130. [130]
    Full article: Adapting to the Little Ice Age in pastoral regions
    Jan 31, 2023 · This paper uses interdisciplinary methods to investigate responses to the Little Ice Age in regions where livestock farming was dominant.
  131. [131]
    The Little Ice Age is a history of resilience and surprises | Aeon Essays
    Nov 11, 2019 · Powerful storms, a feature of the Little Ice Age in northwestern Europe, repeatedly broke through Dutch dikes and sluices, drowning thousands.
  132. [132]
    Positive Societal Response to Past Climate Variability Sets an ...
    Mar 24, 2021 · Humans' response to climate variability is not all doom and gloom. Past societies have found ways to thrive and innovate under climatic ...
  133. [133]
    The archaeology of climate change: The case for cultural diversity
    Jul 22, 2021 · The archaeology of climate change offers opportunities to identify the factors that promoted human resilience in the past and apply the knowledge gained to the ...
  134. [134]
    The Dutch Flood Protection Programme: Taking Innovations to the ...
    The Dutch regional water authorities face an enormous task: the strengthening of about 1500 km of dikes and 500 civil-engineering structures before 2050.
  135. [135]
    Why The Netherlands Includes The Public In Its Climate Resilience ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · The Dutch government has prioritised actions to address waterlogging, heat stress, drought and flooding by 2050.
  136. [136]
    Pakistan's Mangroves Are a Coastal Conservation Marvel
    Aug 5, 2022 · The average success rate of mangrove regeneration efforts during that time was 80 percent or more, according to estimates by WWF Pakistan and ...
  137. [137]
    Mangroves and coral reefs: Two natural and cost-effective solutions ...
    Jun 24, 2022 · The researchers found mangrove restoration opportunities that were cost-effective in 20 countries and territories, with Cuba, the U.S. and the ...
  138. [138]
    Impacts of drought-tolerant maize varieties on productivity, risk, and ...
    We find that the adoption of drought-tolerant maize varieties increased yield by 15% and reduced the probability of crop failure by 30%.Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  139. [139]
    Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa (DTMA) - CIMMYT
    The Drought Tolerant Maize for Africa project aims to mitigate drought and other constraints to maize production in sub-Saharan Africa.
  140. [140]
    [PDF] 17 — Economics of Adaptation
    The desirability of investments with upfront costs and persistent benefits increases when the benefits are long lasting or when climate change damages ...
  141. [141]
    [PDF] The Economics of Climate Adaptation: An Assessment - arXiv
    Nov 26, 2024 · This paper assesses the economic value of climate adaptation, finding skepticism about cost estimates due to complexities and lack of data, and ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] The Costs of Adaptation, and the Economic Costs and Benefits of ...
    The benefit-cost ratios typically range from 2:1 to 10:1. The analysis also found that adaptation also often leads to important co-benefits, so as well as.
  143. [143]
    Chapter 6: Energy systems
    The global energy system is the largest source of CO2 emissions (Chapter 2). Reducing energy sector emissions is therefore essential to limit warming. The ...
  144. [144]
    GHG Reduction Programs & Strategies | US EPA
    Jan 21, 2025 · A wide range of strategies are available to help reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and meet emissions targets. Below are a list of resources and guides.Energy Efficiency · Renewable Energy · Supply Chain · Waste Reduction and...
  145. [145]
    Nuclear Energy and Climate Change Mitigation - Every CRS Report
    Apr 1, 2025 · Nuclear energy can play a role in GHG emissions reduction in the electricity sector by providing a source of low-carbon electricity. Nuclear ...
  146. [146]
    Does renewable energy reduce per capita carbon emissions and ...
    They found that for every 10% increase in renewable energy, carbon emissions reduced by 1.6%.
  147. [147]
    Effectiveness of 1,500 global climate policies ranked for first time
    Aug 23, 2024 · New research has revealed the 63 instances where climate policies achieved major emissions reductions, showing the way forward to meet the Paris ...Missing: core | Show results with:core<|separator|>
  148. [148]
    [PDF] Nuclear Energy and Climate Change Mitigation - Congress.gov
    Apr 1, 2025 · This report examines the potential for nuclear energy to play a role in achieving climate goals by providing low greenhouse gas (GHG) ...
  149. [149]
    https://www.world-nuclear.org/news-and-media/press-statements/response-to-the-ipcc-working-group-iii-ar6-report
  150. [150]
    Market-Based Strategies - Center for Climate and Energy ... - C2ES
    At-a-glance. Market-based approaches, like a carbon tax or cap-and-trade program, help reduce emissions at the lowest possible cost.
  151. [151]
    The True Cost of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions – IMF F&D
    There are certainly inexpensive measures that can be implemented today, including energy conservation, efficiency nudges, and the replacement of retiring fossil ...
  152. [152]
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524001587
  153. [153]
    Chapter 3: Mitigation pathways compatible with long-term goals
    Emissions-reduction potentials assumed in the pathways become largely exhausted when limiting warming to 2°C (>50%). N2O emissions are reduced too, but similar ...
  154. [154]
    AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023
    Climate Change 2023 · Summary for. Policymakers · Longer Report · SYR (Full volume) · Figures · Headline Statements · Annexes and Index · Press Release · Presentation ...
  155. [155]
    the time for action is now. We can halve emissions by 2030. — IPCC
    Apr 4, 2022 · Limiting warming to around 1.5°C (2.7°F) requires global greenhouse gas emissions to peak before 2025 at the latest, and be reduced by 43% by 2030.
  156. [156]
    [PDF] SYNTHESIS REPORT OF THE IPCC SIXTH ASSESSMENT ...
    In the very low GHG emissions scenario (SSP1-1.9), CO2 emissions reach net zero around 2050 and the best-estimate end-of-century warming is 1.4°C, after a ...<|separator|>
  157. [157]
    Analysis: How well have climate models projected global warming?
    Oct 5, 2017 · Carbon Brief has collected prominent climate model projections since 1973 to see how well they project both past and future global temperatures.
  158. [158]
    Revisiting the hot model problem - The Climate Brink
    Jan 31, 2024 · In this article we'll explain a bit of the background of the hot model problem in CMIP6, how the community dealt with it in the IPCC 6th Assessment Report.
  159. [159]
    Realistic Global Warming Projections for the 21st Century
    Dec 29, 2023 · My new paper demonstrates that realistic emissions scenarios and climate sensitivity values & scenarios of natural climate variability produce more realistic, ...
  160. [160]
    Jaws of the Snake - by Roger Pielke Jr. - The Honest Broker
    Nov 13, 2023 · A jaws of the snake figure illustrating the implications of different types of uncertainty when comparing low and high emissions scenarios.<|separator|>
  161. [161]
    Are Climate Models Overstating Warming?
    Sep 26, 2017 · A number of authors, including the IPCC, have argued that climate models have systematically overstated the rate of global warming in recent ...
  162. [162]
    Why models run hot: results from an irreducibly simple climate model
    An irreducibly simple climate-sensitivity model is designed to empower even non-specialists to research the question how much global warming we may cause.<|separator|>
  163. [163]
    The cost of mitigation revisited | Nature Climate Change
    Nov 11, 2021 · We synthesize key factors influencing mitigation cost estimates to guide interpretation of estimates, for example from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ...
  164. [164]
    Early net-zero action in Africa brings big climate gains—and ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · The paper highlights the potential social and economic trade-offs of early action. The sooner Africa aims for net-zero emissions, the greater ...
  165. [165]
    The Costs of 'Costless' Climate Mitigation | Columbia Business School
    Dec 4, 2023 · Across all sectors, the IPCC estimates the potential for a 32% reduction in GHG emissions in 2030 for activities costing $20 or less per tCO2-eq ...
  166. [166]
    [PDF] National Climate Risk Assessment - First pass assessment report
    This report is Australia's first National Climate Risk Assessment, aiming to help prepare for, adapt to, and mitigate climate risks. It identifies, analyzes, ...
  167. [167]
    [PDF] UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2022 - GOV.UK
    Jan 17, 2022 · This has presented strong evidence that even under low warming scenarios the UK will be subject to a range of significant and costly impacts.
  168. [168]
    FACT SHEET: Fifth National Climate Assessment Details Impacts of ...
    Nov 9, 2023 · The Fifth National Climate Assessment includes ten regional chapters that assess climate risks and describe challenges, opportunities, and ...
  169. [169]
    Unpacking the Fifth National Climate Assessment | Briefing | EESI
    Jan 18, 2024 · In 2023, the United States experienced 28 weather and climate disasters that each caused losses of $1 billion or more. Nature-based ...
  170. [170]
    UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2022 - GOV.UK
    Jan 17, 2022 · This report outlines the UK government and devolved administrations' position on the key climate change risks and opportunities that the UK faces today.Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  171. [171]
    UK Climate Change Risk Assessment
    The third UK climate change risk assessment, together with its supporting evidence report, was published in January 2022. The Climate Change Committee prepared ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  172. [172]
    What is the UK's Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA)? - LSE
    Sep 14, 2022 · It outlines the latest understanding of current and future climate change in the UK and an assessment of 61 risks and opportunities across several main areas.
  173. [173]
    Assessing Australia's climate risks - DCCEEW
    Sep 15, 2025 · The National Climate Risk Assessment is Australia's first nationally comprehensive look at how climate change could affect the systems we rely ...
  174. [174]
    More Problems with Australia's National Climate Risk Assessment
    Sep 24, 2025 · The 2049-50 cost of $40.3 billion considers the anticipated underlying growth in the impact of natural disasters due to factors including ...
  175. [175]
    [PDF] National Climate Change Risk Assessment - Main Report
    This is a National Climate Change Risk Assessment for New Zealand, covering climate change impacts, risks, and opportunities, including natural, human, economy ...
  176. [176]
    [PDF] National Climate Change Risk Assessment
    The outputs of the risk assessment are contained in three reports: • The NCCRA Summary Report for Policymakers (this report), which provides a concise.
  177. [177]
    New National Climate Risk Assessment – more omission than ...
    Aug 2, 2025 · Will it describe the full spectrum of climate risks Australians will face in the future, or be marred by a poor approach to risk analysis, ...
  178. [178]
    Global Climate Agreements: Successes and Failures
    These negotiations have produced several important accords, including the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. Governments generally agree on the science ...Introduction · What are the most important... · What progress have countries...
  179. [179]
    Adaptation and resilience - UNFCCC
    The purpose of the framework is to guide the achievement of the global goal on adaptation and the review of overall progress in achieving it with a view to ...
  180. [180]
    The Kyoto Protocol | UNFCCC
    Overall, these targets add up to an average 5 per cent emission reduction compared to 1990 levels over the five year period 2008–2012 (the first commitment ...
  181. [181]
    The Kyoto Protocol - Climate Action - European Commission
    However, because many major emitters were not signatories, the Kyoto Protocol only covered about 18% of global emissions. The Kyoto Protocol's top decision ...<|separator|>
  182. [182]
    The Kyoto Protocol: Climate Change Success or Global Warming ...
    Feb 4, 2015 · The headline results tell us that between 1990 and 2012 the original Kyoto Protocol parties reduced their CO2 emissions by 12.5%, which is well beyond the 2012 ...
  183. [183]
    Emission Reductions under the Kyoto Protocol Pave the Way for ...
    Jul 19, 2024 · Developed countries participating in the Kyoto Protocol's second commitment period (2013–2020) achieved an average annual emissions reduction of 22% compared ...
  184. [184]
    Success or failure? The Kyoto Protocol's troubled legacy - Foresight
    Dec 8, 2022 · The Kyoto Protocol had failed to stem the flow of global emissions. Still further, the Kyoto Protocol failed to equate emissions reductions ...
  185. [185]
    The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC
    The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 195 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) ...
  186. [186]
    Compendium on comprehensive risk management approaches
    Feb 27, 2025 · The Compendium describes the main components of the comprehensive risk and response management framework, namely pre-emptive action, contingency ...
  187. [187]
    Climate risk - International Association of Insurance Supervisors
    Climate change is a source of financial risk, impacting the resilience of individual insurers as well as global financial stability.
  188. [188]
    4 Principles for Addressing Climate Risks in the Insurance Industry
    Mar 13, 2024 · Many insurers have responded to climate-related financial risks by withdrawing their services from highly exposed markets, raising premiums, and gutting ...
  189. [189]
    [PDF] Understanding climate risk insurance
    Climate risk insurance describes a suite of instruments for financial risk transfer that provides protection against risks arising from extreme weather events ...
  190. [190]
    How parametric insurance is building climate resilience
    Jan 8, 2025 · Parametric insurance uses event triggers to provide swift, flexible payouts, leveraging AI and satellites to address climate risks and boost ...
  191. [191]
    Parametric Solutions | Munich Re
    Parametric insurance is based on a simple principle – predetermined triggers and payout schemes facilitate swift claims settlements These triggers are ...
  192. [192]
    What role do catastrophe bonds play in managing the physical risks ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · A catastrophe bond is a financial instrument that transfers financial risk connected with exposure to natural disasters to capital market investors.
  193. [193]
    Is the Climate-Linked CAT Bond Market Efficiently Priced? A Risk ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · CAT bonds are an alternative risk transfer product to reduce insurance coverage gap. •. This study verifies if CAT bonds are appropriately ...
  194. [194]
    [PDF] can parametric insurance help bridge NatCat protection gaps?
    CAT bonds help insurers secure large capital amounts for extreme natural catastrophe events, offering an alternative to traditional reinsurance by transferring ...
  195. [195]
    Parametric insurance, cat bonds & P3 critical for closing the ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · “Through expanded access to financial tools such as parametric insurance, catastrophe bonds and public-private financing solutions, as well as ...
  196. [196]
    Quantifying climate risk in insurance - KPMG International
    Regardless of lines of business offered, insurers must demonstrate that they have assessed the physical and transition risks of climate change and, if these are ...
  197. [197]
    Better Understanding Insurance Mechanism in Dealing with Climate ...
    Mar 15, 2021 · This paper summarizes the international practice of using the insurance mechanism to deal with climate change risk from ten different aspects.<|separator|>
  198. [198]
    [PDF] Download here - United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF)
    Oct 13, 2025 · Through parametric insurance, catastrophe bonds, risk pooling, and social protection-linked instruments, we can create a financial safety net ...
  199. [199]
    Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
    Sep 18, 2019 · None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in ...
  200. [200]
    18 Spectacularly Wrong Predictions Were Made Around the Time of ...
    Apr 21, 2022 · Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started.
  201. [201]
    Flawed Climate Models - Hoover Institution
    Apr 5, 2017 · "Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists ...
  202. [202]
    CO2 is making Earth greener—for now - NASA Science
    Apr 26, 2016 · Results showed that carbon dioxide fertilization explains 70 percent of the greening effect, said co-author Ranga Myneni, a professor in the ...
  203. [203]
    Empirical evidence of declining global vulnerability to climate ... - NIH
    Global average mortality and loss rates from climate hazards have decreased by 6.5 and nearly 5 times, respectively, from 1980-1989 to 2007-2016.
  204. [204]
    [PDF] Refuting 12 Claims Made by Climate Alarmists
    Global frequency of tropical cyclones has reached a historic low. Alarmist Claim #10: Global warming is leading to an increased number of droughts. FACT ...
  205. [205]
    Media Bias and Climate Change Skepticism
    Nov 30, 2023 · This study examines the impact on climate change attitudes of exposure to Fox News Channel (FNC), the top-rated U.S. cable television ...
  206. [206]
    The growing divide in media coverage of climate change | Brookings
    Jul 24, 2024 · On any given day in 2011, there was a 30% chance that heartland news outlets would cover climate change more than elite newspapers.
  207. [207]
    The Politicization of Risk: Party Cues, Polarization, and Public ...
    Jun 11, 2020 · In this article, I investigate how public perceptions of climate change risk are affected by communications from political parties and the degree of ...
  208. [208]
    Yale Climate Opinion Maps 2024
    Aug 28, 2025 · This version of the Yale Climate Opinion Maps is based on survey data from 2008 through fall 2024. Public opinion about global warming is an ...
  209. [209]
    Polarisation of Climate and Environmental Attitudes in the United ...
    Jan 10, 2024 · We find that contemporary attitudes are polarised symmetrically, with Democrats (higher) and Republicans (lower) attitudes are equidistant from the median.
  210. [210]
    Signals and noise. Mass-media coverage of climate change in the ...
    It is therefore instructive to analyse the intersecting and diverging factors that influence media coverage of climate science in the USA and the UK.
  211. [211]
    Is there a climate change reporting bias? A case study of English ...
    Sep 22, 2022 · Research demonstrates that the bias in reporting hazards and climate change leads to deficits in attention and material resources (i.e. not ...
  212. [212]
    The Politicization of Climate Science: Media Consumption ...
    May 26, 2024 · This study examined associations between Americans' media exposure and climate change-related dependent variables, including reported beliefs in ...
  213. [213]
    Record-High 48% Call Global Warming a Serious Threat
    Apr 16, 2025 · The percentage of Americans who believe the effects of global warming have already begun, now 63%, is up from 59% in 2024. This effectively ...
  214. [214]
    Climate change in news media across the globe - ScienceDirect.com
    To understand how and how much news media cover climate change, this study compares coverage in ten countries from the Global North and the Global South ...
  215. [215]
    Thirty Years On, How Well Do Global Warming Predictions Stand Up?
    Jun 21, 2018 · James Hansen issued dire warnings in the summer of 1988. Today earth is only modestly warmer. Thirty years of data have been collected since Mr.
  216. [216]
    Hansen et al. 1988: Global climate changes as forecast ... - NASA GISS
    Oct 23, 2024 · (2) The greenhouse warming should be clearly identifiable in the 1990s; the global warming within the next several years is predicted to reach ...
  217. [217]
    Climate Data vs. Climate Models - Cato Institute
    The second and third assessments suffer from discrepancies between model predictions and actual temperatures. This discrepancy may be an indication that the ...Climate Data Vs. Climate... · 2000 Assessment · 2009 Assessment
  218. [218]
    RealClimate: “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 ...
    Sep 21, 2025 · Almost two decades ago, some scientists predicted that Arctic summer sea ice would 'soon' disappear. These predictions were mentioned by Al ...
  219. [219]
    Al Gore's 30 Years of Climate Errors: Snow Job
    Feb 13, 2023 · “Within the decade there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro,” he said to the audience in An Inconvenient Truth. This occurred moments before ...
  220. [220]
    What 'An Inconvenient Truth' Got Right (And Wrong) About Climate ...
    Gore also predicted in the film that "within a decade, there will be no more snows of Kilimanjaro." University of Massachusetts scientist Doug Hardy, who was a ...Weather and Climate · Global Warming: What's... · Effects of Global Warming: Sea...