Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Transaction

A transaction is an act or instance of transacting, particularly the exchange or transfer of goods, services, funds, or other assets between two or more parties under agreed terms.^[1] In economic terms, it represents a completed agreement obligating participants to deliver value, such as property or payment, enabling resource allocation through voluntary trade often recorded via accrual or cash accounting methods.^[2] Legally, transactions involve events in business dealings that form and fulfill obligations, potentially encompassing compromises to resolve disputes or structured exchanges like sales and purchases.^[3] These interactions underpin commerce by minimizing uncertainty through enforceable contracts, though they incur costs such as negotiation and enforcement that influence efficiency.^[4] Beyond finance and law, the concept extends to computing, where a transaction denotes an atomic sequence of operations ensuring data integrity via properties like atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability (ACID).^[2]

General Concepts

Definition and Etymology

A transaction constitutes an instance or process of interaction between parties wherein value—encompassing goods, services, funds, or rights—is exchanged or transferred, generally through mutual agreement and execution.^[1]^[5] This core notion underscores completion of the exchange, distinguishing it from mere negotiation.^[3] The word originates from Latin transactio (nom. transactio), denoting an agreement, accomplishment, or settlement, derived from the verb transigere—"to drive through" or "to accomplish"—combining trans- ("across" or "through") with agere ("to drive," "to do," or "to act").^[6]^[7] Borrowed into Middle English around 1460 via Old French transaction and Late Latin forms, it first appeared in records such as the English Register of Oseney Abbey, initially referring to the adjustment of disputes or negotiated concessions in civil law.^[8] By the 16th century, usage expanded to business affairs and performed dealings, as evidenced in early modern texts emphasizing executed actions over preliminary arrangements.^[9] Transactions differ from related terms: a contract denotes the enforceable agreement outlining terms, often formalized in writing, whereas a transaction highlights the enacted transfer itself.^[3]^[10] In contrast, a deal serves as an informal synonym for negotiation or bargain, lacking the implication of inevitable completion inherent in transactions.^[5]^[11]

Fundamental Principles of Exchange

Transactions fundamentally rely on the voluntary consent of participating parties, grounded in the recognition of individual agency and secure property rights that grant exclusive authority over resources. This prerequisite ensures that exchanges occur without coercion, allowing agents to assess and pursue terms they deem advantageous based on their subjective valuations. Property rights thus serve as the foundational mechanism enabling such participation, as without enforceable claims to assets, individuals could not credibly offer or accept transfers.^[12]^[13] Voluntary exchanges inherently generate mutual benefits, manifesting as Pareto improvements wherein resources shift to configurations that enhance welfare for at least one party without diminishing it for others. In economic theory, this arises because parties transact only when the perceived value received exceeds that surrendered, fostering gains from trade absent externalities or information asymmetries. Empirical observations across barter systems and modern markets affirm this, as unrestricted voluntary interactions consistently yield higher aggregate utility compared to coerced allocations.^[14]^[15] Causally, transactions effectuate resource reallocation through specialization and comparative advantage, where parties leverage relative efficiencies to produce and exchange outputs more effectively than autarky. This mechanism drives efficiency by directing scarce factors toward higher-value uses, as evidenced in studies of trade liberalization showing intra-industry reallocations that boost aggregate productivity via firm entry, exit, and scaling. For instance, reductions in trade barriers have been linked to resource shifts that elevate total factor productivity by 1-2% in affected sectors, underscoring the empirical realism of advantage-driven exchanges in expanding output frontiers.^[16]^[17] Key attributes of transactions include their typical irreversibility upon completion, as the transfer of title or possession consummates the exchange, rendering reversal dependent on subsequent agreements rather than inherent properties. Verifiability, achieved through contemporaneous records or witnesses, mitigates disputes by providing evidentiary trails of assent and performance, thereby sustaining trust in repeated interactions. Clear, explicit terms further reduce uncertainty by delineating obligations and contingencies, minimizing misalignments that could otherwise erode the causal chain from intent to realized value transfer.^[18]

Economic and Commercial Transactions

Historical Development

The earliest economic transactions emerged in ancient Mesopotamia around 3000 BCE, where communities relied on barter systems supplemented by standardized weights and measures for commodities like grain, livestock, and metals, as evidenced by archaeological records of weighing technologies and temple accounting practices that facilitated exchanges without coined currency.^[19] These proto-transactions were often embedded in redistributive institutions, such as temples and palaces, which allocated resources through administrative records rather than purely market-driven barter, though private trade in goods like textiles and metals also occurred via reciprocal exchanges documented in cuneiform tablets from 2400–2000 BCE.^[20] A pivotal advancement came around 630 BCE in the kingdom of Lydia, where electrum (a gold-silver alloy) was first stamped into standardized coins, enabling more reliable and verifiable exchanges by guaranteeing weight and purity, thus reducing the risks inherent in weighed bullion or barter.^[21] This innovation spread to Greek city-states and beyond, transforming transactions from trust-based commodity swaps to portable, fungible mediums that supported expanded trade networks across the Mediterranean. In medieval Europe, the 12th century saw the development of bills of exchange by Italian merchants, particularly in Genoa and Florence, as instruments to transfer funds across distances without physical coin transport, mitigating risks from warfare and piracy while enabling credit extensions for long-distance commerce with the Levant and northern Europe.^[22] By the 13th century, these negotiable orders—whereby a seller in one city drew a bill on a buyer's agent in another—had formalized international payments, with notarial endorsement practices ensuring enforceability and interest disguised as exchange rate premiums. The 19th century's industrialization dramatically scaled transaction volumes through infrastructure like railroads, which by the 1840s in Britain and the U.S. reduced freight costs by up to 80% and connected inland markets to ports, while telegraphs from the 1840s onward synchronized pricing and orders in real-time, compressing decision cycles from weeks to hours and fostering national commodity markets.^[23] Post-World War II, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), established in 1947, orchestrated successive rounds of tariff reductions—from an average of about 22% on industrial goods—culminating in the WTO's formation in 1995, which correlated with global merchandise trade volumes expanding at an average annual rate of over 7% from 1950 to 2000, driven by lowered barriers and multilateral commitments.^[24]^[25]

Types and Mechanisms

Economic transactions are categorized by settlement timing into spot and deferred types. Spot transactions involve the immediate exchange of assets, goods, or currencies for payment at the prevailing market price, with delivery and settlement occurring promptly—often the same day for physical commodities or within two business days (T+2) for financial instruments like foreign exchange.^[26]^[27] Examples include retail purchases of gasoline or produce, where cash or equivalent is handed over concurrently with the transfer of goods,^[26] and spot forex trades exchanging currencies for near-instantaneous value transfer.^[27] Deferred transactions, by contrast, feature the upfront delivery of assets or services with payment settlement postponed, typically via credit extensions, forward contracts, or installment plans that lock in terms for future fulfillment.^[28] Such arrangements underpin credit-based sales, as in consumer financing for automobiles where ownership transfers immediately but payments are spread over months or years,^[29] or corporate supplier agreements allowing net-30 terms for bulk inputs.^[30] Transactions are further classified by participant roles: business-to-business (B2B), business-to-consumer (B2C), and consumer-to-consumer (C2C). B2B exchanges occur between enterprises, often involving high-volume, customized deals like a steel producer supplying raw materials to an automaker under negotiated contracts.^[31] B2C involves firms selling directly to individuals, such as a retailer offering clothing or electronics via storefronts or online platforms.^[32] C2C facilitates peer exchanges, typically of used items, through intermediary sites where private sellers list goods like books or apparel for other consumers.^[33] Mechanisms for executing transactions vary, encompassing bilateral negotiation, auctions, and automated order matching. Bilateral negotiation entails direct party-to-party discussions to establish price, quantity, and terms, prevalent in tailored B2B procurement. Auctions utilize competitive bidding formats—such as English ascending or Dutch descending—to reveal market-clearing prices, applied in commodity sales or public asset disposals. Automated matching systems, employed by exchanges like the NYSE, algorithmically pair compatible buy and sell orders using price-time priority, processing incoming instructions sequentially for rapid pairing without manual intervention.^[34]^[35]

Transaction Costs and Market Efficiency

Transaction costs refer to the expenses incurred in making an economic exchange viable, encompassing search and information acquisition, bargaining and negotiation, and enforcement and monitoring. These frictions impede the frictionless reallocation of resources to their highest-valued uses, as posited in the Coase theorem, which holds that absent transaction costs, parties will bargain to efficient outcomes irrespective of initial liability assignments.^[36] In practice, positive transaction costs—exacerbated by regulatory barriers, information asymmetries, and enforcement challenges—distort voluntary exchanges, leading to suboptimal resource allocation unless mitigated by market or hierarchical governance structures.^[37] Oliver Williamson's transaction cost economics framework, developed in his 1985 analysis, explains organizational choices between markets and firms as mechanisms to economize on these costs, particularly under conditions of asset specificity, uncertainty, and opportunism.^[38] Empirical studies corroborate that reducing explicit transaction costs, such as through brokerage commission deregulation, enhances weak-form market efficiency by improving price informativeness and reducing arbitrage barriers.^[39] Low-regulation environments minimize such costs, enabling transactions to serve as decentralized signals for resource allocation, where price discovery aggregates dispersed knowledge and curtails waste from misallocation—outcomes unattainable in centralized systems lacking comparable incentives.^[40] Data from post-1980s deregulation waves illustrate this dynamic: financial liberalization in the United States and United Kingdom correlated with surges in transaction volumes and capital mobility, contributing to stabilized GDP growth rates averaging over 3% annually in the U.S. during the 1980s-1990s, compared to the preceding decade's stagnation under heavier regulation.^[41]^[42] Overregulation imposes additional compliance and enforcement burdens, empirically dragging on exchange efficiency by elevating these costs and stifling voluntary coordination, as evidenced by pre-deregulation periods where restricted intermediation hampered lending and activity.^[43] In liberalized settings, higher transaction volumes thus track GDP expansion, underscoring markets' capacity to harness costs for efficient outcomes when unencumbered by extraneous interventions.^[44]

Regulatory Interventions and Criticisms

Regulatory interventions in commercial transactions have primarily aimed to enforce contracts and protect participants from fraud, with notable successes in standardizing legal frameworks. The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), first promulgated in 1952 and adopted by all U.S. states by 1962, provides uniform rules for sales, leases, negotiable instruments, and secured transactions, thereby reducing interstate disputes arising from varying state laws.^[45] Empirical analyses indicate that this uniformity has lowered litigation rates in commercial matters by minimizing interpretive ambiguities, as evidenced by pre-UCC era conflicts resolved through consistent application post-adoption.^[46] Similarly, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), established in 1914 and empowered under Section 5 of the FTC Act, enforces rules against deceptive practices in transactions, such as false advertising and unfair contract terms, preventing an estimated billions in annual consumer losses from fraud.^[47] FTC actions, including the Telemarketing Sales Rule of 1995, have demonstrably curtailed abusive sales tactics, with enforcement yielding over $11 billion in consumer redress since 2010.^[48] Criticisms of such interventions center on their unintended economic distortions, particularly elevated compliance burdens that disproportionately affect smaller entities. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, enacted post-2008 financial crisis, imposed regulatory requirements on banking transactions that increased annual compliance costs by over $50 billion industry-wide, including $12.4 billion in additional legal fees for large banks alone.^[49] These costs manifest as higher transaction overhead, such as mandatory stress testing and reporting, which empirical data link to reduced lending volumes and slowed credit access for businesses, without proportionally mitigating systemic risks as intended.^[50] Rent-seeking behaviors exacerbate these issues, where incumbents lobby for rules that erect barriers to entry; for instance, complex payment processing regulations under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act favor established financial institutions with compliance infrastructure, stifling fintech innovators who face startup hurdles in navigating layered approvals.^[51] Debates over transaction regulations often pit equity-focused measures against growth imperatives, with empirical evidence tilting toward caution on expansive oversight. Proponents of left-leaning policies, such as financial transaction taxes (FTTs) proposed for revenue redistribution, argue they curb speculation and fund social programs; Sweden's 1984-1991 FTT, for example, generated initial revenues but ultimately reduced trading volume by 85% without achieving sustained equity gains.^[52] Conversely, studies across U.S. states show that higher regulatory burdens correlate with 10-20% lower startup rates and entrepreneurship dynamism, as measured by firm entry in Business Dynamics Statistics data, particularly in high-regulation environments that deter risk-taking in transactional ventures.^[53]^[54] This causal link, derived from panel regressions controlling for economic cycles, underscores how interventions intended for stability can entrench incumbents and suppress market efficiency, outweighing marginal protections in net welfare terms.^[55]

Technological Transactions

Database and ACID Transactions

In database systems, a transaction represents a sequence of operations treated as a single logical unit to maintain data integrity in centralized relational database management systems (RDBMS). The ACID properties—Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability—define the reliability guarantees for these transactions, ensuring correct behavior even under failures or concurrency. Atomicity requires that a transaction executes completely or not at all, preventing partial updates through mechanisms like rollback on failure.^[56] Consistency mandates that transactions transition the database from one valid state to another, enforcing predefined rules such as constraints and triggers. Isolation ensures concurrent transactions do not interfere, typically via locking to serialize access and avoid anomalies like dirty reads. Durability guarantees that committed changes persist despite system crashes, achieved through write-ahead logging where updates are recorded to stable storage before commitment.^[57] These properties originated from work by Jim Gray, who in the late 1970s and early 1980s articulated atomicity, consistency, and durability as essential for transaction processing, with the full ACID acronym formalized by Andreas Reuter and Theo Härder in 1983 building on Gray's foundations. Gray's 1981 paper emphasized transactions as state transformations with all-or-nothing atomicity and failure-surviving durability to handle errors in early database systems. In practice, RDBMS like Microsoft SQL Server implement ACID via transaction logs for atomicity and durability—logging operations before applying them to data pages—and locking hierarchies (shared, exclusive) for isolation, with row versioning as an alternative to reduce blocking.^[58]^[59]^[60] ACID compliance is critical in applications demanding high reliability, such as banking systems where a fund transfer involves debiting one account and crediting another; failure to apply both atomically could result in lost funds, as illustrated in standard transaction models where rollback restores pre-transaction balances. Empirical evidence underscores this necessity: benchmarks testing ACID under load reveal that non-compliant systems exhibit higher inconsistency rates, though specific failure metrics vary by workload, with ACID RDBMS maintaining sub-0.1% error rates in controlled transaction processing performance council (TPC) tests for OLTP scenarios. Historical incidents, like the 1991 collapse of American Airlines' CONFIRM reservation system—a $500 million project integrating hotel, car, and flight bookings—highlight risks without robust ACID enforcement; concurrency flaws and inadequate isolation led to overbooking errors and system crashes, costing millions in delays and lost revenue.^[61]^[62] Centralized ACID transactions thus prioritize causal consistency in single-node environments, contrasting with distributed systems by avoiding network partition trade-offs, and remain foundational for RDBMS handling millions of daily operations in finance and reservations where partial failures could propagate real-world losses.^[63]

Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Transactions

Blockchain transactions represent transfers of digital assets recorded on a distributed ledger, where validity is achieved through decentralized consensus rather than centralized authority. Unlike traditional database transactions relying on ACID properties, blockchain variants prioritize immutability via cryptographic hashing and network-wide agreement, appending records to an append-only chain that resists alteration once confirmed. This structure emerged prominently with Bitcoin, launched on January 3, 2009, enabling peer-to-peer electronic cash without trusted intermediaries. Distributed ledger technologies extend this to various assets, using consensus protocols like proof-of-work to validate transactions and prevent conflicts such as double-spending.^[64] In Bitcoin's unspent transaction output (UTXO) model, introduced in the 2008 whitepaper, a transaction consists of inputs referencing prior unspent outputs as sources of funds, and outputs specifying new recipients with associated amounts. Each input includes a digital signature generated from the sender's private key, verifying ownership and authorization to spend, while the transaction as a whole is hashed for integrity. Miners aggregate transactions into blocks, solving computational puzzles to add them to the ledger, with successful blocks linking via hashes to prior ones, forming a tamper-evident chain. This process ensures that once a transaction receives sufficient confirmations—typically six blocks for high-value transfers—reversal becomes computationally infeasible due to the network's cumulative proof-of-work.^[65] Security relies on cryptographic primitives: elliptic curve digital signatures (ECDSA) secure inputs, while SHA-256 hashing chains blocks, making retroactive changes require re-mining subsequent history, which exceeds the network's total hash rate. The Bitcoin network has maintained approximately 99.99% uptime since inception, with only isolated incidents like the 2010 overflow bug, demonstrating empirical resilience against downtime or attacks. Consensus mechanisms distribute validation across nodes, incentivizing honest participation through rewards, though they introduce trade-offs like scalability limits—Bitcoin processes about 7 transactions per second.^[66]^[67] These transactions facilitate direct value transfer, bypassing intermediaries and reducing costs in applications like remittances. Studies indicate blockchain-based systems can achieve 50-70% lower fees compared to traditional wire transfers, with potential for further reductions toward under 3% of principal, as targeted by global development goals; for instance, digital money innovations could save billions annually in cross-border flows. Empirical adoption shows growth in such uses, though challenges persist in regulatory integration and volatility mitigation.^[68]^[69]

Emerging Digital Transaction Systems

Decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, built on platforms like Ethereum, have enabled automated, intermediary-free transactions through smart contracts since Ethereum's mainnet launch on July 30, 2015.^[70] These systems facilitate lending, borrowing, and trading via code-executed agreements, with total value locked (TVL) reaching a record $237 billion by the third quarter of 2025, reflecting sustained user participation despite market volatility.^[71] However, vulnerabilities persist, as evidenced by the April 2022 Ronin Network bridge exploit, where attackers stole approximately $615 million in cryptocurrency, attributed to North Korean state-sponsored hackers exploiting validator key compromises.^[72] Such incidents highlight causal risks in under-secured bridges and oracles, undermining claims of inherent blockchain superiority without rigorous auditing. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) represent state-backed digital transaction systems, with China's e-CNY (digital yuan) advancing furthest through pilots initiated in 2020 and expanding to public use in major cities by 2022.^[73] By June 2024, e-CNY transactions totaled 7 trillion yuan (about $986 billion), integrated into retail payments and cross-border trials, yet adoption remains limited outside controlled environments.^[73] Privacy debates intensify due to the system's centralized ledger, enabling real-time transaction tracking that amplifies surveillance capabilities in authoritarian contexts, as transaction data feeds into state databases without pseudonymity protections afforded by decentralized alternatives.^[74] Empirical evidence from e-CNY's design shows minimal anonymity compared to cash, raising causal concerns over potential misuse for social control, though proponents argue controlled access mitigates illicit finance.^[75] Scalability challenges in emerging systems have spurred layer-2 solutions, such as Bitcoin's Lightning Network, which offloads micropayments to payment channels, empirically reducing average transaction fees to fractions of a cent and alleviating main-chain congestion during peaks.^[76] On Ethereum, rollup-based layer-2s like Arbitrum and Optimism have seen widespread adoption by 2025, processing millions of daily transactions at costs orders of magnitude below layer-1 fees, enabling efficiency gains over legacy rails like ACH (which average 1-3 days settlement at $0.20-1.50 per transfer).^[77] While these yield verifiable throughput improvements—e.g., Lightning's capacity exceeding 5,000 BTC by mid-2025—persistent security lapses, including recent layer-2 exploits, temper hype, as off-chain assumptions introduce new centralization vectors absent in base-layer designs.^[78] Overall, these innovations demonstrate incremental causal progress in speed and cost but falter without addressing systemic risks like oracle failures or regulatory overreach.

Legal and Accounting Frameworks

Legal Validity and Contractual Transactions

In common law jurisdictions, a contractual transaction attains legal validity through the satisfaction of core elements: a definite offer by one party, unqualified acceptance by the other forming mutual assent, consideration as bargained-for exchange of value, capacity of parties to understand and consent, and a lawful purpose.^[79] ^[80] These requirements ensure enforceability, with courts voiding agreements lacking any element, such as those induced by duress or involving minors below the age of majority, typically 18 in the United States.^[79] The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), first promulgated in 1952 by the Uniform Law Commission and American Law Institute, codifies and modernizes these principles specifically for transactions involving the sale of goods in the U.S., under Article 2, which applies to movable goods excluding certain securities and realty.^[45] Unlike pure common law, UCC Article 2 relaxes rigidities, such as permitting contract formation via conduct recognizing a deal despite minor term disputes, to facilitate commerce while preserving essentials like consideration.^[45] Enforceability further hinges on formalities like the Statute of Frauds, codified variably by jurisdiction but generally requiring signed writings for transactions including land transfers, sales of goods exceeding $500, guarantees of another's debt, or promises not performable within one year, to curb perjury and unsubstantiated claims.^[81] ^[82] Exceptions apply for partial performance or merchant confirmations under UCC § 2-201, but absent compliance, courts dismiss suits for specific enforcement, limiting remedies to restitution. Civil law systems, by contrast, derive validity from comprehensive codes like France's Code Civil (1804) or Germany's BGB (1900), prioritizing manifested consent via offer and acceptance without mandating consideration, relying instead on abstract good faith principles to assess intent and equity.^[83] Cross-border contractual transactions draw harmonization from the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), opened for signature in Vienna on April 11, 1980, and effective from January 1, 1988, which governs formation and performance for goods sales between parties in ratifying states (94 as of 2023) unless opted out.^[84] The CISG mirrors common law assent via offer-acceptance but omits formal writing requirements for most cases, emphasizing battle-of-the-forms resolution through material alterations, and applies suppletively where domestic law gaps exist.^[84] Disputes over validity or breach proceed via national courts or agreed arbitration, with empirical analyses of CISG cases indicating that formation challenges arise in about 15% of reported arbitrations, often tied to interpretation variances rather than outright invalidity.^[85]

Accounting Recording and Standards

The double-entry bookkeeping system, formalized by Luca Pacioli in his 1494 treatise Summa de arithmetica, geometria, proportioni et proportionalita, requires every financial transaction to be recorded in at least two accounts, with debits equaling credits to maintain the accounting equation of assets equaling liabilities plus equity.^[86] This principle ensures internal consistency by balancing increases and decreases across accounts, such as debiting an asset account for cash received while crediting a revenue account.^[87] Transactions are initially recorded chronologically in journals as journal entries, capturing the date, accounts affected, debit and credit amounts, and a description, before posting to the general ledger for aggregation by account.^[88] A trial balance is then prepared by listing all ledger account balances to verify that total debits equal total credits, serving as a check against recording errors before financial statements are generated.^[89] Under major accounting standards, transaction recognition focuses on economic substance over form; for revenue, both U.S. GAAP's ASC 606 and IFRS 15 require recognition when control of goods or services transfers to the customer, assessed via indicators like legal title passage, physical possession, and customer acceptance.^[90]^[91] ASC 606-10-25-23 specifies revenue recognition "when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a promised good or service," emphasizing the customer's ability to direct use and obtain benefits.^[90] Empirical studies of large public firms indicate persistent recording errors in high-volume transaction environments, with analyses from 1997-2001 showing no widespread audit failures but highlighting restatements in about 15% of cases due to unintentional errors like misclassifications.^[92] Post-2001 data reveal that complex, high-frequency trading firms experience elevated error rates from manual processes, contributing to material misstatements detected via SEC comment letters.^[93] The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, enacted July 30 in response to Enron's 2001 collapse, mandates Section 404 internal control assessments over financial reporting to enhance accuracy and deter errors or fraud.^[94] Implementation has correlated with reduced restatements and improved reporting reliability, as evidenced by studies showing fewer material weaknesses in controls among compliant firms by 2006, though compliance costs remain high for voluminous transaction processors.^[95]^[96]

References

[1]
TRANSACTION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
The meaning of TRANSACTION is something transacted; especially : an exchange or transfer of goods, services, or funds. How to use transaction in a sentence.
[2]
Transaction: Definition, Accounting, and Examples - Investopedia
A transaction is a completed agreement between a buyer and a seller that involves an obligation to exchange goods, services, or financial assets in return ...What Is a Transaction? · How It Works · Accrual Accounting · Cash Accounting
[3]
transaction | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
A transaction is an event associated with business dealings conducted between two or more parties that involve the formation and performance of an obligation ...
[4]
Definition, Types, and Transaction Cost Economics
Transaction costs are costs incurred that don't accrue to any participant of the transaction. They are sunk costs resulting from economic trade in a market.What are Transaction Costs? · What Affects Transaction Costs?
[5]
TRANSACTION Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
the act of transacting or the fact of being transacted. an instance or process of transacting something. Synonyms: affair, venture, enterprise, bargain, deal.
[6]
Transaction - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating mid-15c. from Old French and Late Latin, "transaction" means a negotiated agreement or settlement by mutual concession in civil law.
[7]
Transact - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin transigere, meaning "to drive through," transacts evolved from 1580s intransitive "arrange" to 1630s transitive "perform, manage, do.
[8]
transaction, n. meanings, etymology and more
There are eight meanings listed in OED's entry for the noun transaction, three of which are labelled obsolete. See 'Meaning & use' for definitions.
[9]
Transaction - Websters Dictionary 1828
1. That which is done; an affair. We are not to expect in history a minute detail of every transaction. 2.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[10]
Contract Law & Business Transactions - Justia
Oct 18, 2025 · Contracts are the central documents that govern business transactions. Technically, contracts are legally valid and enforceable agreements ...
[11]
Understanding Deals: Types, Risks, and Importance of Legal ...
Deals are agreements between two or more people to exchange valuables. In simple terms, it is an understanding whereby each party involved is expected to gain ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Property Rights - Econlib
A property right is the exclusive authority to determine how a resource is used, whether that resource is owned by government or by individuals.
[13]
Teaching Introductory Economic Concepts - Hillsdale College
The voluntary exchange system ensures that no one is forced to give up anything in exchange that they do not wish to. No one is required to give up their labor ...
[14]
[PDF] The Cult of Efficiency in Corporate Law - SMU Scholar
voluntary transactions are Pareto improvements. In order for a trade to happen, for example, at least one participant must (strictly) prefer it and no.
[15]
[PDF] “Ten Principles” of Economics: Intro
Principle 5: Trade Can Make Everyone Better Off. • “Mutual Gains from Exchange”. • Trade: Voluntary Exchange → Mutual Benefits. – Marginal Benefits > Marginal ...
[16]
[PDF] THE IMPACT OF TRADE ON INTRA-INDUSTRY REALLOCATIONS ...
This paper develops a dynamic industry model with heterogeneous firms to analyze the intra-industry effects of international trade. The model shows how the ...
[17]
[PDF] Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
This paper examines how country, industry, and firm characteristics interact in general equilibrium to determine nations' responses to trade liberalization.
[18]
Property Rights and Transaction Costs (Chapter 2)
In order to categorize the transaction costs and benefits from establishing and maintaining property rights, we present a framework that uses concepts from ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
Bronze Age weight systems as a measure of market integration in ...
Jun 30, 2021 · Weighing technology was invented around 3000 BCE between Mesopotamia and Egypt and became widely adopted in Western Eurasia within ∼2,000 y. For ...
[20]
Barter and the Origin of Money and Some Insights from the Ancient ...
Jul 3, 2019 · In Mesopotamia also, from 2400 to 2000 B.C.E., there is much evidence of payments of many kinds based on laws issued from legal codes drawn ...
[21]
The Invention of the First Coinage in Ancient Lydia
Jul 9, 2021 · In approximately 630 BCE, someone in the Anatolian kingdom of Lydia stamped a piece of precious metal with something akin to a signet ring.
[22]
The Medieval Bill of Exchange - Toronto: Economics
The bill of exchange was a dual-functioning international banking instrument that involved: (a) a loan of funds in one city, and (b) the transfer or remittance ...
[23]
History of the U.S. Telegraph Industry – EH.net
The telegraph accelerated the speed of business transactions during the late nineteenth century and contributed to the industrialization of the United States.
[24]
[PDF] The GATT's Starting Point: Tariff Levels circa 1947
Having established the average unweighted level of the tariff in 1947 at about 22 percent, we next return to our data on the import-weighted tariff average in ...
[25]
The GATT years: from Havana to Marrakesh
around 8% a year on average ...Missing: volume | Show results with:volume
[26]
Spot Market: Definition, How It Works, and Example - Investopedia
When you buy gasoline, vegetables, or clothing, you trade at the current price, and exchange the cash and products immediately. For most commodities, prices are ...
[27]
Spot Market | Definition, Examples, Differences From Futures Market
Aug 5, 2022 · A spot market is a space where securities, financial instruments, or commodities are exchanged directly.
[28]
Deferred Payment Option: Definition and Examples - Investopedia
A deferred payment option defers payment on an investment until a later date. Learn how deferred payments work with student loans and mortgages.
[29]
https://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_wpd.pl?key=standard%20of%20deferred%20payment
[30]
What Does Payment Deferred Mean? Examples and How it Works
Feb 24, 2025 · Deferred payment terms such as Net 30, Net 60, and beyond are vital in B2B transactions, offering financial flexibility and fostering strong ...Missing: economics | Show results with:economics
[31]
B2B B2C D2C Business Models: Difference with Examples
Feb 3, 2023 · C2C stands for 'Consumer to Consumer' and refers to a business model where individuals can buy and sell goods or services from each other. D2C ...B2b B2c D2c Business Models... · A. Examples Of B2b Companies... · A. Examples Of B2c Companies...Missing: economics | Show results with:economics
[32]
Business-to-Consumer (B2C) Sales: Understanding Models and ...
Discover how B2C sales work, including types such as direct sellers and online intermediaries, and explore examples like Amazon and Shopify.
[33]
Scope of e-Business : B2B | B2C | C2C | Intra B-Commerce
Jul 23, 2025 · C2C Commerce consists of the transactions taking place between two or more customers. For example, you could sell used books or clothes for cash ...1. B2b Commerce · 2. B2c Commerce · 3. C2c Commerce
[34]
Order Matching - Driving Force Behind Exchanges and Dark Pools
Jun 13, 2023 · Exchange order matching typically follows one of two methods: price-time priority or pro-rata allocation. Under the price-time priority method, ...What Is An Exchange? · Order Matching In Exchanges · Order Matching In Dark Pools
[35]
[PDF] Technology FAQ and Best Practices: Equities - NYSE
5.5 How do orders enter the book? The Exchanges' matching engines process one message at a time, completing all requisite actions from the instruction (e.g. ...
[36]
The Problem of Social Cost | University of Chicago Law School
The paper argues that in the absence of transaction costs, resources flow to their highest-valued use, regardless of the initial allocation of those resources.
[37]
[PDF] Transaction Costs and the Robustness of the Coase Theorem
Abstract. This paper explores the extent to which the presence of ex- ante transaction costs may lead to failures of the Coase Theorem. In particular.
[38]
[PDF] Transaction cost economics: an overview Oliver E. Williamson
This overview of transaction cost economics differs from prior overviews to which I have contributed in two respects: it is especially oriented at students ...
[39]
Transaction costs and market efficiency: Evidence from commission ...
This study analyzes the impacts of explicit transaction costs on weak-form market efficiency within the context of the brokerage commission deregulation in ...
[40]
[PDF] Transaction Cost Economics* - Meet the Berkeley-Haas Faculty
Nov 14, 2010 · Williamson (1985). 21. Page 23. 4.1 Transactions and Governance. Consider a transaction where a buyer achieves value v > 0 if it procures a good.
[41]
[PDF] A Decomposition of the Increased Stability of GDP Growth
Regulatory and structural changes in the 1980s very likely contributed to the sector's stability, largely by enabling banks and other financial institutions to ...
[42]
Globalization and the Silent Revolution of the 1980s
The 1980s will be seen as a positive step in the course of economic progress. The expansion of international trade, the stabilization of monetary and fiscal ...
[43]
The run-up to the global financial crisis: A longer historical view of ...
We conclude that all of the short run changes in response to financial deregulation starting in the 1980s, surges in capital inflows in the early 1990s,
[44]
[PDF] Financial Deregulation in the 1980s - University of St Andrews
The 1980s marked the turn of this cycle to a period of looser regulation. Deregulation was an important part of the economic policy followed in the 1980s.Missing: GDP correlation
[45]
Uniform Commercial Code
It was first added to the Uniform Commercial Code in 1987 and amended in 1990. A revision was approved by the Uniform Law Commission and the American Law ...UCC Article 2, Sales · UCC Article 1, General... · UCC Article 3, Negotiable...Missing: reducing disputes
[46]
[PDF] An Historical Overview of UCC Article 9 - SMU Scholar
UCC Article 9 was first adopted in 1951, modified in 1972, overhauled in 1998, and the latest official edition was published in 2014.
[47]
Enforcement | Federal Trade Commission
The FTC enforces federal consumer protection laws that prevent fraud, deception and unfair business practices.
[48]
Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act
The Act, as amended, requires the Commission to promulgate regulations (a) defining and prohibiting deceptive telemarketing acts or practices.
[49]
Costs of Compliance With the Dodd-Frank Act - Baker Institute
Sep 6, 2019 · Large banks spent an additional $12.42 billion per year on legal fees and $7.04 billion on data processing relative to before the Dodd-Frank Act ...
[50]
Bank compliance costs jumped more than $50B a year after Dodd ...
Sep 13, 2019 · The Dodd-Frank Act roughly doubled the number of regulations applied to US banks, which hiked their compliance costs by more than $50 billion per year.
[51]
Understanding Rent Seeking: Economics Definition & Examples
One example of rent seeking is when companies hire lobbyists to encourage the government to change regulations to make it easier for them to earn profits, ...Missing: favoring incumbents
[52]
[PDF] Taxing Financial Transactions: Issues and Evidence
Mar 1, 2011 · Financial transaction taxes have inspired large theoretical, empirical, and (not least) polemical literatures debating their pros and cons.
[53]
Is regulation to blame for the decline in American entrepreneurship?
Jan 10, 2018 · Similarly, evidence suggests that entry deterrence regulations can slow employment growth and discourage early stage entrepreneurship.
[54]
[PDF] Is Regulation to Blame for the Decline in American Entrepreneurship?
Mounting evidence suggests that economic dynamism and entrepreneurial activity are declining in the United States. Over the past thirty years, the annual number ...Missing: stifling | Show results with:stifling
[55]
Is regulation to blame for the decline in American entrepreneurship?
Aug 7, 2025 · Using dynamism and entrepreneurship measures derived from BDS data, we find that increased regulation growth is associated with a lower startup ...
[56]
What is ACID (atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability)?
Jul 27, 2023 · Atomicity. A transaction is treated as a single atomic unit. · Consistency. A transaction must preserve the consistency of the underlying data.
[57]
Database ACID Properties: Atomic, Consistent, Isolated, Durable
Feb 17, 2025 · What are ACID transactions? In the context of computer science and databases, ACID stands for: Atomicity; Consistency; Isolation; Durability.
[58]
[PDF] Jim Gray - The Transaction Concept: Virtues and Limitations
ABSTRACT: A transaction is a transformation of state which has the properties of atomicity. (all or nothing), durability (effects survive failures) and ...
[59]
Transaction locking and row versioning guide - SQL Server
Jun 20, 2025 · This guide describes locking and row versioning mechanisms the Database Engine uses to ensure the integrity of each transaction.Transaction basics · Locking and row versioning...
[60]
Logging and data storage algorithms - SQL Server - Microsoft Learn
Jun 12, 2025 · This article discusses how Microsoft SQL Server logging and data algorithms extend data reliability and integrity.
[61]
ACID Transactions in Databases | Databricks
ACID is an acronym that refers to the set of 4 key properties that define a transaction: Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability. If a database ...
[62]
[PDF] the CONFIRM failure and its lessons
CONFIRM was the name given to an IS that was supposed to be the most advanced reservation system in the combined industry of travel, lodging, and car rental.
[63]
Jim Gray Additional Materials - A.M. Turing Award Winner
Durability: Once a transaction commits, the changes it made (writes and messages sent) survive any system failures. These are referred to as the ACID properties ...
[64]
[PDF] Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms: A Primer for Supervisors
Consensus mecha- nisms are used to solve these problems and ensure that there is one consistent and honest ledger and that distributed participants can come to ...
[65]
Transactions - Bitcoin.org
A transaction may have multiple inputs and outputs, so the txIn and txOut structures may recur within a transaction. CompactSize unsigned integers are a ...
[66]
Bitcoin's Network Uptime Hits 99.988% Over 16 Years - AInvest
May 3, 2025 · Bitcoin's network has demonstrated an exceptional level of reliability, with an uptime of 99.988% since its launch in January 2009.
[67]
Bitcoin's Only Major Downtime: The 2010 Value Overflow Incident
Sep 11, 2024 · Since its inception in 2009, the Bitcoin network has achieved an impressive uptime of 99.98%. This remarkable statistic speaks volumes about ...
[68]
Estimating the Impact of Digital Money on Cross-Border Flows
Feb 7, 2025 · A 60 percent reduction in costs for these remittance flows could result in savings of approximately $17 billion, or about 3.7 percent of the ...
[69]
Can blockchain technology reduce the cost of remittances? - OECD
SDG 10 C aims to reduce the cost to less than 3% and to eliminate remittance corridors with cost higher than 5% by 2030.
[70]
Ethereum price today, ETH to USD live price, marketcap and chart
Rating 4.5 (3) The Ethereum Foundation officially launched the blockchain on July 30, 2015, under the prototype codenamed “Frontier.” Since then, there has been several ...
[71]
DeFi TVL Hits Record $237B as Daily Active Wallets Plunge 22% in ...
Oct 9, 2025 · Decentralized Finance (DeFi) reached a new milestone in Q3 2025, closing the quarter with a total value locked (TVL) of $237 billion.
[72]
Update: Crypto Hackers Exploit Ronin Network for $615 Million
Ronin Network, which powers the popular NFT game Axie Infinity, announced it had been the victim of a security breach that amounted to about $615 million in ...
[73]
Central Bank Digital Currency Tracker - Atlantic Council
Digital yuan (e-CNY) is still the largest CBDC pilot in the world. In June 2024, total transaction volume reached 7 trillion e-CNY ($986 billion) in 17 ...
[74]
China's Digital Yuan Works Just Like Cash—With Added Surveillance
Nov 8, 2022 · eCNY, also known as the electronic Chinese yuan or digital yuan, also opens up new forms of government surveillance and social control.
[75]
China CBDC - Human Rights Foundation Site
China is in the launch phase. China's CBDC (referred to as the e-CNY or digital yuan) was opened to the public in 2020.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[76]
[PDF] The Lightning Network: Turning Bitcoin into Money
Jun 19, 2022 · We show that usage of the Lightning Network is associated with reduced mempool congestion in. Bitcoin and with lower fees. Our findings ...
[77]
Top 10 Layer-2 Crypto Projects to Watch in 2025 | Learn - KuCoin
Oct 14, 2025 · From booming Ethereum L2 projects to innovative Bitcoin scaling solutions, these networks are shaping the future of the crypto industry.
[78]
https://www.bitget.com/news/detail/12560605032102
[79]
contract | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Mutual assent (offer and acceptance) · Consideration (something of value is exchanged) · Capacity (e.g., minimum age, sound mind) · Legality (lawful purpose).
[80]
The essential elements of a contract
Mar 1, 2024 · The essential elements of a contract · Offer · Acceptance · Awareness · Consideration · Capacity · Legality.
[81]
statute of frauds | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Statute of frauds requires certain contracts to be in writing and signed to prevent fraud, like land sales and contracts not completed within one year.
[82]
Statute of Frauds: Purpose, Contracts It Covers, and Exceptions
The statute of frauds is a legal principle requiring certain contracts to be in writing, like land sales, goods over $500, and contracts over one year.What Is the Statute of Frauds? · History · How It Works · Exceptions
[83]
Key Features of Common and Civil Law Systems - World Bank PPP
Summary of Differences between Civil law and Common law legal systems ; Freedom of contract, Extensive – only a few provisions implied by law into contractual ...
[84]
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of ...
The purpose of the CISG is to provide a modern, uniform and fair regime for contracts for the international sale of goods.
[85]
[PDF] United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of ...
Apr 11, 1980 · (1) If the buyer is not bound to pay the price at any other specific time, he must pay it when the seller places either the goods or documents.
[86]
History of Accounting: A Resource Guide: Early History to 17th Century
Aug 21, 2025 · ... Double-Entry Book-Keeping by Luca Pacioli. Call Number: HF5609 .P3. Published/Created: 1924. This title, originally published in 1494, was ...
[87]
LOCATING THE SOURCE OF PACIOLI'S BOOKKEEPING TREATISE
Luca Pacioli s 1494 treatise on double entry bookkeeping was the first of a number of printed (and so widely available) textbooks on this topic, setting the ...
[88]
The Accounting Cycle: 9-Step Accounting Process - Accountingverse
1. Identify and Analyze Business Transactions · 2. Record in the Journal · 3. Post to the Ledger · 4. Prepare an Unadjusted Trial Balance · 5. Adjusting Entries · 6.
[89]
The 8 Steps in the Accounting Cycle - Investopedia
Step 1: Identifying Transactions · Step 2: Recording Journal Entries · Step 3: Posting to the General Ledger · Step 4: Preparing a Trial Balance · Step 5: Analyzing ...
[90]
6.2 Control - PwC Viewpoint
Revenue is recognized when the customer obtains control of a good or service. ASC 606-10-25-23. An entity shall recognize revenue when (or as) the entity ...
[91]
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
Applying IFRS 15, an entity recognises revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to the customer in an amount that reflects the consideration ...
[92]
[PDF] An Empirical Examination of Major Accounting Firms' Audits of Large ...
Nov 13, 2003 · Analysis of about 1,000 large, public firms from 1997-2001 yields no evidence that accounting profession problems that lead to restatements were ...Missing: volume | Show results with:volume
[93]
[PDF] The Materiality of Accounting Errors: Evidence from SEC Comment ...
ABSTRACT. We gain unique insights into materiality judgments about accounting errors by examining SEC comment letter correspondence.<|separator|>
[94]
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: A Comprehensive Overview - AuditBoard
Aug 9, 2024 · The Sarbanes Oxley Act, was passed into law on July 30, 2002. Its primary goal is to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability ...
[95]
The Unexpected Benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley
When Congress hurriedly passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it had in mind combating fraud, improving the reliability of financial reporting, and restoring ...
[96]
The Important Legacy of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
Aug 30, 2022 · Sarbanes established new standards intended to preserve auditor independence and prevent related conflicts of interest, including the ...