Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Body shaming

Body shaming is the act of criticizing or mocking an individual for their physical appearance, particularly body size, shape, or weight, through unsolicited negative comments or judgments that express disapproval of deviations from perceived societal norms. It manifests in interpersonal interactions, media portrayals, and especially online environments, where it often targets those perceived as or , amplifying through repeated exposure. Empirical research links body shaming to heightened psychological distress, including elevated risks of anxiety, , low , and eating disorders, as victims internalize bias leading to self-perpetuating cycles. Physiologically, body shaming triggers stress responses such as increased production, which correlate with behavioral changes like , reduced , and avoidance of healthcare settings, ultimately contributing to rather than loss. Studies consistently find no evidence that shaming motivates sustained improvements; instead, it exacerbates metabolic dysfunction and chronic disease risks in affected individuals. A key controversy surrounds its relation to , a condition independently associated with severe complications like and : proponents of confrontational approaches argue shaming could spur behavioral change, yet longitudinal data refute this, showing stigma as a barrier to effective interventions like and exercise adherence. This disconnect highlights tensions between imperatives to address rising rates and evidence-based understandings of stigma's counterproductive effects.

Definition and Scope

Core Definition

Body shaming refers to the expression of unsolicited, predominantly negative opinions or comments directed at an individual's body size, shape, or physical features, often with intent to criticize or humiliate. This typically manifests as overt verbal or nonverbal acts that highlight perceived deviations from cultural norms of bodily appearance, such as excess weight, thinness, or specific anatomical traits. Unlike internalized , body shaming involves interpersonal dynamics where the perpetrator targets another person, though it may contribute to the recipient's adoption of similar negative self-perceptions over time. Distinguished from weight stigma—which encompasses broader societal biases, stereotypes, and discriminatory practices based on body weight—body shaming emphasizes discrete, often public instances of ridicule or judgment. Peer-reviewed analyses classify it as a form of social aggression that can occur in offline settings like or families, as well as environments where amplifies its reach. Empirical reviews document its prevalence among adolescents, with surveys indicating that up to 40% of experience such comments from peers, frequently linked to platforms like or as of 2021 data. The concept emerged in psychological discourse around the mid-2010s, building on earlier research into appearance-based , but lacks a universally standardized definition due to its colloquial origins. Sources from emphasize its distinction from constructive feedback on , framing it instead as non-evidence-based aesthetic critique that ignores physiological context.

Types and Manifestations

Body shaming primarily targets attributes related to body size, shape, and proportions, with weight-based criticisms being the most documented forms. Fat shaming involves derogatory remarks or actions directed at individuals perceived as overweight or obese, often framing excess weight as a moral failing or source of ridicule, as evidenced in studies linking it to internalized weight bias and disordered eating precursors among adolescents. Thin shaming, conversely, criticizes those deemed underweight or slender, with negative comments highlighting perceived frailty or unattractiveness, a form noted in classifications of body shaming acts alongside fat-targeted insults. Other manifestations extend to height and muscularity discrepancies. Height shaming occurs through mockery of stature, such as labeling short individuals as inadequate or tall ones as awkward, with respondent surveys indicating body weight-height disharmony as a shaming trigger contributing to emotional distress. Muscle shaming, more prevalent in male-targeted instances, involves derision of insufficient or excessive muscular , correlating with body dissatisfaction rates where 10-30% of men report desiring changes in muscularity, though empirical links to shaming behaviors remain less quantified than weight . Manifestations appear in interpersonal, mediated, and internalized forms. Interpersonal shaming includes verbal (e.g., weight comparisons by peers, reported in 66.7% of adolescent cases), (53.2%), and behavioral judgments, often sourced from (30%) or peers (29.7%). Mediated instances proliferate via , where anonymous amplifies body critiques, fostering weight stigma through algorithmic promotion of idealized images. Internalized manifestations involve self-directed , such as adopting negative self-talk after external exposure, which studies associate with heightened stress ( ρ=0.404, p<0.01) and precursors to eating disorders. These patterns underscore shaming's relational dynamics, with empirical data from adolescent cohorts revealing media (20.6%) as a key amplifier beyond direct interactions.

Historical Context

Pre-Modern and Cultural Variations

In ancient Greece, excess body fat was stigmatized as a consequence of idleness and intemperance, with medical and philosophical texts emphasizing physical discipline as a virtue. Hippocrates (c. 460–370 BCE) described obesity as arising from sedentary habits and overconsumption, prescribing rigorous exercise, one daily meal, and emetics to counteract it, reflecting a broader cultural valuation of lean, athletic physiques among citizens. Spartan training regimens explicitly incorporated shaming tactics, as Plutarch recounts in his Life of Lycurgus (c. 100 CE), where girls performed naked dances and exercises before young men to instill shame against fatness or weakness, reinforcing communal ideals of bodily fitness. Roman attitudes echoed Greek disdain, associating obesity with slaves, barbarians, or moral laxity rather than elite virtue, as evidenced in medical treatises by Galen (129–c. 216 CE) that pathologized fat accumulation and advocated purgatives, gymnastics, and dietary restraint. Literary depictions, such as in satires by Juvenal (late 1st–early 2nd century CE), mocked gluttonous figures for their corpulence, linking it to vice and effeminacy, though ridicule targeted men more frequently than women, with fuller female forms occasionally idealized in art for fertility. In contrast, ancient Egyptian medical texts like the Ebers Papyrus (c. 1550 BCE) recognized obesity (sḥd.t) as a disorder treatable with laxatives and massages, yet elite tomb art often portrayed fuller bodies positively as symbols of abundance and divine favor, suggesting less uniform shaming than in Hellenic contexts. Cultural variations extended to non-Western pre-modern societies, where plumpness frequently signified prosperity amid food scarcity, inverting Western stigmas. In ancient India, the Sushruta Samhita (c. 600 BCE) classified obesity (medoroga) as a kapha imbalance requiring purgation and exercise, viewing it negatively as impairing vitality, yet fuller figures appeared in fertility icons without evident derision. Among some African pastoralists, such as the Nuer (pre-20th century), ethnographic records indicate that emaciation was shamed as weakness or famine's mark, while moderate fatness denoted successful herding and status. Polynesian and Mauritanian traditions prized corpulent women for beauty and reproductive capacity, with practices like ritual fattening documented in oral histories and early colonial accounts, where thinness invited social reproach as unappealing or infertile. These divergences highlight how body shaming aligned with ecological and economic realities, targeting deviations from locally adaptive ideals rather than fatness universally.

20th and 21st Century Evolution

In the early 20th century, Western societal ideals shifted toward slimmer body types, departing from earlier preferences for fuller figures associated with wealth, as industrialization, medical advancements, and emerging fashion media emphasized health and aesthetics linked to thinness. By the 1920s, Hollywood films and advertising promoted the "flapper" silhouette—slender and boyish—reinforcing these standards through visual media that marginalized heavier bodies. This trend intensified post-World War II; while the 1950s briefly favored curvier figures exemplified by icons like , mass media depictions in magazines began favoring progressively thinner models by the late 1950s, correlating with rising body dissatisfaction among women exposed to such images. The 1960s and 1970s saw further entrenchment of the "thin ideal" through fashion icons like Twiggy and the rise of diet culture, as print media and television portrayed slimness as synonymous with discipline and attractiveness, implicitly shaming deviations via omission or caricature. Concurrently, adult obesity rates in the United States climbed from approximately 13% in the early 1960s to over 30% by the 1990s, prompting public health responses that highlighted obesity's links to comorbidities like diabetes and cardiovascular disease, which some interpret as amplifying anti-fat attitudes rooted in causal health concerns rather than mere aesthetics. The 1980s fitness boom, fueled by aerobics videos and muscular-lean ideals in media, further stigmatized excess weight by associating it with laziness, though empirical reviews indicate weight bias persisted across eras without clear evidence of overall decline. Countering these pressures, the fat acceptance movement emerged in 1969 with the founding of the (NAAFA) by Bill Fabrey, inspired by a 1967 Saturday Evening Post article advocating tolerance for larger bodies and aiming to combat discrimination in employment and healthcare. This activism challenged shaming by framing fatness as neutral or immutable, gaining traction amid rising obesity prevalence, yet it faced criticism for potentially underemphasizing evidence-based health risks. Into the 1990s, media's "heroin chic" aesthetic—ultra-thin models in grunge fashion—exacerbated shaming of both overweight and underweight bodies, with studies linking exposure to such ideals with increased internalized stigma and disordered eating. In the 21st century, social media platforms amplified body shaming through viral memes and filtered images upholding thin standards, while also birthing the body positivity movement, an evolution of fat acceptance that by the 2010s promoted diverse representations to reduce stigma. However, as obesity rates exceeded 40% among U.S. adults by 2020, debates intensified: proponents of acceptance argue stigma exacerbates weight gain via stress and avoidance of care, yet peer-reviewed analyses reveal persistent anti-fat bias in healthcare and media, often clashing with public health imperatives to address obesity's causal role in morbidity without endorsing normalization that overlooks empirical data on metabolic harms. This tension reflects a broader evolution from overt aesthetic shaming to contested discourses balancing individual autonomy against population-level health realities.

Causes and Drivers

Psychological and Social Mechanisms

Psychological mechanisms of body shaming often stem from cognitive attributions linking body weight to controllable personal failings, such as low self-discipline or moral laxity. Research demonstrates that individuals stigmatize obesity primarily through inferences of substandard psychological character—perceiving overweight people as lazy, undisciplined, or lacking willpower—more so than mere aesthetic dislike of physical form. This character-based judgment aligns with just-world beliefs, where observers assume obesity results from voluntary overeating rather than genetic or environmental factors, fostering a punitive response to enforce perceived responsibility. Evolutionary psychology posits that such biases may originate from adaptive aversions, including disgust mechanisms originally tied to pathogen avoidance or sexual selection. In ancestral contexts, excess fat could signal poor foraging efficiency or vulnerability to famine, prompting social exclusion to preserve group resources; modern equivalents manifest as moral disgust toward gluttony, viewing it as a breach of self-regulatory norms essential for survival and reproduction. Empirical models link lower social status to higher obesity risk via evolved strategies for caloric conservation, but in affluent environments, this flips to stigma against those failing to override such impulses, signaling low mate value or cooperative unreliability. Social mechanisms operate through group-level norm enforcement, where body shaming functions as a tool for maintaining collective standards of health and productivity. Moral foundations theory reveals that "binding" values—emphasizing loyalty, authority, and purity—predict stronger anti-fat attitudes, as deviations from thin ideals threaten group cohesion and purity norms. In hierarchical societies, thinness signals status and resource management skill, leading peers and superiors to shame outliers to deter emulation and uphold signaling fidelity; cross-cultural data show this intensifies in contexts valuing self-control, such as competitive workplaces or communities with shared fitness ideals. These processes intersect in interpersonal dynamics, where perpetrators may project insecurities or conform to ambient biases, amplifying shaming via social proof. For example, implicit weight biases, measurable via reaction-time tasks, drive spontaneous negative evaluations, perpetuated when groups normalize character attributions to justify resource allocation or mating preferences. While some studies frame stigma as maladaptive, its persistence suggests a causal role in motivating adherence to empirically health-promoting behaviors, though outcomes vary by individual resilience.

Media, Technology, and Environmental Factors

Media portrayals have historically reinforced narrow ideals of thinness and fitness, contributing to attitudes that stigmatize larger bodies as symbols of laziness or moral failing. Experimental studies demonstrate that exposure to weight-stigmatizing content in traditional media, such as negative depictions of overweight individuals in advertisements or news, increases anti-fat bias among viewers, with effects mediated by personal body dissatisfaction and social consensus perceptions. For instance, framing obesity in media as a result of personal irresponsibility rather than multifaceted causes amplifies fat phobia, as shown in analyses of news coverage where such narratives correlate with heightened prejudice. Technological platforms, especially social media, exacerbate body shaming by enabling rapid dissemination of comparative imagery and anonymous commentary. Peer-reviewed research links frequent social media use to elevated body surveillance and dissatisfaction, where users engage in upward social comparisons with filtered or idealized posts, often resulting in shaming behaviors toward those perceived as non-conforming. Algorithms on sites like Instagram and TikTok prioritize visually striking content, including "fitspiration" that implicitly or explicitly derides larger bodies, with studies finding increased body shame after exposure to such material among adolescents and young adults. Cyber-shaming incidents, such as viral memes or comment threads targeting celebrities for weight gain, further normalize public ridicule, with qualitative data indicating parallels to offline stigma in eroding self-perception. Environmental factors, including obesogenic settings with abundant ultra-processed foods and sedentary infrastructure, indirectly drive body shaming by elevating obesity prevalence, which heightens visibility of body size deviations and prompts normative enforcement through stigma. Cultural environments emphasizing personal agency over weight—often overlooking environmental contributors like food marketing and urban design—foster blame-based attitudes, as evidenced in surveys where higher neighborhood obesity rates correlate with intensified weight bias absent counter-narratives on systemic drivers. In institutional settings like schools or workplaces, peer dynamics amplified by shared physical spaces contribute to shaming, with empirical models identifying social cohesion deficits and visibility of body differences as triggers for discriminatory comments. These factors interact with media and technology, creating feedback loops where environmental realities shape and are shaped by shaming norms.

Individual Impacts

Psychological Consequences

Body shaming, particularly in the form of weight stigma, is associated with elevated levels of depression and anxiety among affected individuals. A meta-analysis of 30 studies encompassing over 12,000 participants found that perceived correlates moderately with increased psychological distress, including depressive symptoms (r = 0.28) and anxiety (r = 0.25), with effects persisting after controlling for (BMI). Longitudinal data from U.S. adults indicate that experiences of weight discrimination predict a 2.5-fold increase in the odds of developing depressive disorders over four years, independent of baseline mental health and sociodemographic factors. These associations are stronger in individuals with higher BMI, where stigma exacerbates internalized self-devaluation, amplifying emotional burden. Low self-esteem and diminished well-being represent core psychological sequelae of body shaming. Internalized weight bias, a process where individuals endorse negative stereotypes about their own bodies, mediates links to reduced self-esteem (effect size d = 0.62 in meta-analytic reviews) and overall life satisfaction. In youth populations, systematic reviews of 54 studies report consistent cross-sectional and prospective ties between weight-based teasing and lowered self-worth, with early adolescents showing heightened vulnerability due to identity formation stages. Such internalization fosters chronic shame, which prospectively heightens risks for body dissatisfaction and maladaptive coping, as evidenced in cohort studies tracking adolescents into adulthood. Body shaming contributes to disordered eating patterns and suicidal ideation through heightened psychological distress. Perceived stigma predicts binge eating and restrictive behaviors via pathways of emotional dysregulation, with meta-analyses confirming positive associations (r = 0.20-0.30) even after adjusting for BMI and gender. Among youth, weight stigma exposure correlates with doubled odds of suicidal thoughts, mediated by depressive symptoms in longitudinal analyses spanning multiple years. These outcomes underscore causal pathways where repeated shaming erodes resilience, though reverse causation—such as depression prompting weight gain and subsequent stigma—requires disentangling in bidirectional models. Overall, empirical evidence from diverse samples highlights weight stigma's role in perpetuating a cycle of mental health impairment, with internalized bias as a pivotal amplifier.

Physical Health Correlations

Weight stigma, a form of body shaming targeting individuals with higher body weight, has been associated with elevated cortisol levels, a physiological stress response that contributes to oxidative stress and heightened cardiovascular reactivity. Experimental studies demonstrate that acute exposure to weight stigma triggers inflammatory responses, including increased markers like interleukin-6, which are linked to cardiometabolic risks independent of body mass index. Meta-analytic evidence from 105 studies involving over 59,000 participants indicates that perceived correlates with reduced engagement in healthy behaviors, such as physical activity and balanced nutrition, while promoting unhealthy ones like emotional eating and sedentary lifestyles. This behavioral pattern is mediated by internalized , which leads to avoidance of exercise settings to evade further stigmatization, thereby diminishing overall energy expenditure and muscle maintenance. Longitudinal models propose a feedback loop where stigma-induced stress fosters weight gain through cortisol-driven fat storage and appetite dysregulation, exacerbating obesity-related comorbidities like hypertension and dyslipidemia. Cardiovascular consequences extend to altered autonomic responses, with stigmatized individuals showing greater blood pressure reactivity during stress tasks, a predictor of long-term endothelial dysfunction. While most evidence derives from cross-sectional and experimental designs, these correlations persist after controlling for BMI, suggesting stigma operates as an independent risk factor rather than merely reflecting obesity's effects. However, causal pathways require further prospective validation, as self-reported stigma perceptions may confound objective health measures in observational data.

Societal and Cultural Dimensions

Influence on Norms and Behaviors

Body shaming contributes to the reinforcement of societal norms that equate slimness with moral virtue, discipline, and health, while associating larger body sizes with laziness or lack of control. This dynamic is evident in cultural artifacts and interpersonal interactions, where criticism of body size upholds the "thin ideal" as a benchmark for social acceptability, influencing collective expectations around appearance and lifestyle. Such norms emerge from repeated social signaling, including media portrayals and peer feedback, that stigmatize obesity to deter deviations from perceived healthy standards. Empirical evidence indicates that exposure to body shaming alters individual behaviors in ways that often undermine health goals, despite the intent to enforce normative pressures toward thinness. A meta-analysis of studies involving thousands of participants found weight stigma positively associated with unhealthy eating patterns, such as binge eating and avoidance of fruits/vegetables, and negatively linked to physical activity levels. Similarly, daily experiences of stigma, tracked via ecological momentary assessment, correlate with reduced motivation for exercise and increased caloric intake due to stress responses. These effects create a feedback loop: shaming heightens body shame, which prompts cortisol-driven overeating and sedentary avoidance to evade further judgment, exacerbating weight gain and norm non-conformity. While body shaming may theoretically bolster anti-obesity norms by signaling disapproval, research reveals countervailing dynamics where it diminishes perceived self-efficacy for change, leading to lower engagement in weight management efforts. For instance, individuals internalizing stigma report heightened motivation for weight loss in abstract terms but experience daily discouragement that hampers sustained behaviors like dieting adherence or gym attendance. Population-level data further show weight stigma erecting barriers to preventive health actions, such as medical consultations for obesity, as affected individuals anticipate discriminatory treatment. In social networks, these norms can cluster obesity through avoidance of norm-enforcing environments, rather than promoting widespread behavioral shifts toward leanness. Overall, the influence skews toward maladaptive responses, with limited evidence of net positive behavioral enforcement.

Role in Obesity Epidemic Debates

In discussions surrounding the obesity epidemic, which has seen U.S. adult obesity rates rise from 30.5% in 1999-2000 to 41.9% in 2017-2020 according to CDC data, the potential role of body shaming or weight stigma remains highly debated. Proponents of anti-stigma approaches, drawing from psychological research, argue that social disapproval of excess weight contributes to the epidemic by triggering stress responses that promote physiological changes, such as elevated cortisol levels and emotional eating, ultimately leading to further weight gain independent of baseline body mass index. Longitudinal studies, including one tracking over 6,000 participants, have reported that perceived weight discrimination predicts subsequent increases in BMI and waist circumference, with affected individuals showing 2.5 times higher odds of becoming obese over four years. These findings, often from fields like public health and psychology, suggest that stigma undermines motivation for healthy behaviors and discourages healthcare engagement, thereby perpetuating obesity cycles. Critics of this view, however, contend that correlational evidence linking stigma to weight gain suffers from reverse causality—wherein obesity itself elicits discrimination rather than stigma causing adiposity—and overlooks how societal normalization of obesity, partly through anti-shaming campaigns, may erode personal accountability and cultural norms discouraging overconsumption. Cross-cultural comparisons highlight this tension: nations like and , with obesity rates under 5% as of 2020 WHO data and stronger social disapproval of excess weight, maintain lower prevalence compared to higher-stigma-tolerant Western societies, suggesting that stigma might reinforce behavioral discipline in calorie-abundant environments rather than exacerbate the problem.-(-)) Empirical critiques note that while stigma correlates with avoidance of physical activity in some self-reported surveys, no randomized controlled trials demonstrate it as a direct driver of population-level obesity, and historical precedents like anti-smoking stigma—linked to a decline from 42% U.S. adult smoking in 1965 to 12.5% in 2020—indicate social pressure can effectively curb harmful habits without proven rebound effects. Public health messaging reflects these divides, with initiatives like the UK's "Change4Life" campaign avoiding explicit shaming to prevent backlash, yet facing accusations of diluting urgency amid rising obesity; conversely, advocates for responsibility-oriented approaches argue that downplaying stigma risks framing obesity as immutable, reducing incentives for interventions like diet and exercise, which epidemiological data confirm as primary causal factors via sustained calorie deficits. This debate underscores a causal realism challenge: while individual-level studies emphasize stigma's harms, potentially amplified by academic biases favoring empathy over enforcement, aggregate trends imply that unchecked acceptance correlates with epidemic persistence, prioritizing empirical outcomes like Japan's low rates over psychological self-reports.

Responses and Movements

Body Positivity and Acceptance Campaigns

The body positivity movement traces its roots to the fat acceptance initiatives of the 1960s, culminating in the founding of the (NAAFA) in 1969 by engineer Bill Fabrey, who sought to address discrimination faced by his wife and others with larger bodies through advocacy for civil rights and improved quality of life for fat individuals. This early framework emphasized rejecting weight-based stigma, evolving by the 2000s into broader acceptance campaigns amplified by social media platforms like Tumblr and Instagram, where hashtags such as proliferated from around 2012 onward to promote visibility and self-worth across body sizes, particularly among marginalized groups including fat, queer, and Black women. Major campaigns have included corporate-led efforts like Dove's "Campaign for Real Beauty," initiated in 2004, which depicted unretouched images of women varying in age, size, and ethnicity to critique narrow beauty ideals and foster self-esteem; the initiative reportedly drove Dove's global sales from $2.5 billion to $4 billion within its first decade, though primarily through enhanced brand loyalty rather than measurable shifts in population-level body composition or health metrics. Similarly, public health-oriented drives such as Sport England's "This Girl Can" launched in 2015 targeted women with messaging encouraging exercise for enjoyment over aesthetics, reaching over 3.9 million views in its initial ad and correlating with a 144% uptick in female gym memberships among 30- to 40-year-olds, yet without evidence of net reductions in obesity prevalence. Associated paradigms like Health at Every Size (HAES), formalized in the early 2000s as an alternative to weight-centric interventions, prioritize intuitive eating, joyful movement, and stigma reduction to cultivate health behaviors independent of scale readings; meta-analyses of HAES-based programs indicate short-term gains in psychological outcomes such as reduced depression and improved cholesterol profiles, but these effects are generally equivalent to those from calorie-restricted diets on cardiometabolic indicators, with minimal or no sustained weight loss and persistent obesity-related risks. While exposure to body-positive content has demonstrated transient benefits in lowering body dissatisfaction and weight bias in experimental settings—such as decreased negative mood after viewing acceptance-focused imagery—longer-term data reveal no causal reversal of obesity trajectories, with U.S. adult obesity rates climbing from 30.5% in 1999-2000 to 41.9% by 2017-2018 despite escalating positivity messaging. Medical analyses contend that such campaigns risk conflating emotional acceptance with physical health neutrality, as epidemiological evidence consistently ties elevated body mass index to heightened incidences of comorbidities including type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 7.2 for BMI >35 ) and cardiovascular events, potentially eroding behavioral incentives for modifiable risk factors amid institutional emphases on destigmatization over causal interventions.

Health-Focused and Responsibility-Oriented Approaches

Health-focused approaches prioritize objective physiological indicators of , such as , glycemic control, lipid profiles, and , over aesthetic or size-based acceptance, often incorporating as a pathway to these outcomes through evidence-based behavioral modifications. These strategies view as a modifiable condition influenced by energy balance, where sustained via and increased yields measurable health gains, with meta-analyses confirming that interventions achieve average weight reductions of 3-5% alongside improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors. Responsibility-oriented elements emphasize individual agency, holding participants accountable for adherence to personalized goals like tracking intake and exercise, as correlates with higher success rates in randomized trials of behavioral programs. Prominent examples include structured programs like the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), a lifestyle intervention targeting prediabetic adults through 150 minutes of weekly moderate activity and dietary counseling to limit fat and calories, resulting in a 58% reduction in incidence over 2.8 years compared to , with participants achieving approximately 5.6 kg average . Long-term follow-up through the DPP Outcomes Study (DPPOS) demonstrated persistent benefits, including a 27% lower incidence over 15 years, sustained by ongoing modest weight maintenance of about 2-4% below baseline, underscoring the efficacy of personal commitment to habit formation over time. Commercial and clinical behavioral weight loss initiatives, such as those integrating cognitive-behavioral techniques with goal-setting, report 12-month weight losses of 8-15% in adherent participants, far exceeding usual care outcomes of under 3%, with retention rates above 85% when accountability mechanisms like group support or digital tracking are employed. These approaches counter pure acceptance models by linking responsibility to causal mechanisms of , such as sedentary and overconsumption, where surveys indicate 70-80% of respondents attribute primary dietary outcomes to individual choices rather than external factors alone. While acknowledging genetic and environmental influences, proponents argue that empowering —through techniques like and relapse prevention—drives durable change, with low-certainty evidence from systematic reviews affirming behavioral interventions' superiority for when personal accountability is reinforced, though long-term maintenance succeeds in only about 20% of cases without continued support. Critics of less structured paradigms note that de-emphasizing weight as a can overlook data showing dose-dependent risk reductions from even modest losses, as in DPP cohorts where 7% weight reduction halved risk independently of other factors. Overall, these methods integrate empirical feedback loops, such as regular assessments, to foster realistic expectations and iterative adjustments, prioritizing causal interventions over attitudinal shifts alone.

Controversies and Viewpoints

Efficacy of Shaming in Behavior Change

A meta-analysis of 54 studies involving over 12,000 participants found that experiences of weight are positively associated with unhealthy eating behaviors (r = 0.16) and negatively associated with healthy eating behaviors (r = -0.11), indicating that shaming correlates with counterproductive dietary patterns rather than improvements. Similarly, the analysis revealed positive links to sedentary activity (r = 0.12) and negative links to (r = -0.09), suggesting shaming discourages exercise engagement. These associations persisted across diverse populations, including children and adults, and were moderated by factors like internalized , which amplifies avoidance of health-promoting actions due to anticipated . Longitudinal evidence further demonstrates that weight discrimination predicts over time. In a study tracking over 6,000 participants for four years, those reporting were 2.5 times more likely to become obese, independent of baseline weight or demographics, as stigma-induced stress elevates levels, promoting fat storage and . Rather than motivating loss, shaming leads to physiological responses like increased caloric intake in experimental settings, where stigmatized individuals consumed 52 more calories on average post-exposure compared to controls. This pattern holds in clinical contexts, where physician-expressed reduces patient adherence to recommendations by up to 30%, fostering avoidance of medical care altogether. Interventions replacing shaming with compassion-focused approaches yield better outcomes for behavior change. A of 12 randomized trials showed that compassion training reduced body weight shame by effect sizes of d = 0.45 to 0.72, correlating with increased for healthy eating and exercise, unlike shame-based tactics which showed no sustained efficacy. No peer-reviewed studies demonstrate net positive effects of deliberate body shaming on long-term weight reduction; instead, evidence consistently links it to heightened risks, such as prevalence rising 1.5-fold among stigmatized groups. Causal mechanisms, including impairing prefrontal control over impulses, explain why shaming undermines rather than reinforces adaptive behaviors.

Free Speech, Stigma, and Public Health Trade-offs

Proponents of employing in messaging argue that social disapproval can denormalize unhealthy behaviors, drawing parallels to anti- campaigns that contributed to a decline in U.S. prevalence from 42% in 1965 to 11.5% in 2021 by portraying use as socially unacceptable. In this view, similar pressure against —often viewed as largely controllable through diet and exercise—could enforce norms favoring leanness, potentially curbing the where rates reached 42.4% in the U.S. by 2017–2020. Such arguments posit that anti-stigma efforts risk normalizing excess weight, reducing personal responsibility and motivation for change, as evidenced by opinion pieces advocating "fat shaming" as a tool to address rising obesity-linked diseases like and cardiovascular conditions. However, empirical research consistently links experienced weight stigma to adverse outcomes, including heightened responses, , and avoidance of , which correlate with rather than loss. A of 54 studies found weight stigma positively associated with unhealthy behaviors (e.g., ) and negatively with healthy ones (e.g., exercise), independent of . Longitudinal data indicate stigmatized individuals are less likely to seek medical care, exacerbating conditions like , with no robust evidence that shaming induces sustained weight reduction. Critics of stigma-based approaches, including consensus statements, contend it entrenches cycles of and physiological , worsening metabolic over time. The tension manifests in free speech constraints, where platforms like (now X) have applied warnings or removals to content critiquing , framing it as "sensitive" or stigmatizing, as seen in 2022 when an article on obesity science received a visibility label. Anti-shaming policies in and workplaces can chill discourse on obesity's behavioral drivers, prioritizing emotional comfort over causal discussions of caloric surplus, potentially hindering evidence-based interventions. This trade-off pits unrestricted expression of health realities—essential for informing and individual agency—against stigma's documented harms, with academic sources often emphasizing the latter amid broader institutional aversion to judgment, though societal persistence suggests limits to purely empathetic strategies.

Social Media Amplification (2010s-2020s)

The proliferation of social media platforms such as , (now X), and during the and facilitated the rapid amplification of body shaming through , algorithmic recommendations favoring high-engagement posts, and features enabling mass commenting and sharing. incidents targeting appearance, including fat shaming and critiques of body size, became prevalent, with studies reporting victimization rates among adolescents ranging from 8% to 57.5% globally. In the United States, body shaming constituted 41.68% of reported behaviors among adolescent girls, often manifesting as direct insults, memes, or comparative posts that gained traction via viral dissemination. Viral incidents underscored this amplification, as platforms' mechanics propelled shaming content to millions of viewers. For instance, in May 2025, a video of a ranting against individuals in a class amassed widespread attention, leading to her dismissal from her studio and job after backlash, illustrating how shaming could publicly while initially spreading unchecked. Similarly, in 2022, a influencer documenting by beachgoers mocking her size highlighted real-time shaming amplified by video-sharing, with commenters piling on to extend the ridicule. Peer-reviewed analyses confirm that such exposure correlates with heightened body dissatisfaction, as heavy platform use—averaging several hours daily for teens—fosters upward comparisons to idealized or edited images, exacerbating . Empirical data links this amplification to measurable psychological outcomes, including increased body and tendencies. A experimental study found that reducing engagement by 50% for several weeks significantly improved adolescents' perceptions of their weight and appearance, suggesting causal influence from prolonged exposure to shaming-laden feeds. Among young women, 61% reported based on in surveys from 2025, with platforms like intensifying this through visual filters and "fitspiration" trends that implicitly or explicitly shame non-conforming bodies. While some content aimed at "motivation" blurred into shaming, the net effect was a democratized arena for , outpacing traditional media's reach and contributing to a documented rise in appearance-related distress from 2010 onward.

Shifts with Weight-Loss Interventions (2023-2025)

The introduction of agonists (GLP-1 RAs) such as (marketed as Ozempic and Wegovy) and (Mounjaro) from 2023 onward prompted discussions on reframing as a treatable medical condition, potentially diminishing traditional body shaming by shifting blame from personal moral failings to biological factors amenable to . Clinical trials demonstrated average weight reductions of 10-20% in participants, fueling public narratives that effective interventions could normalize without relying solely on willpower or changes. This perspective, articulated in analyses from early 2025, posited that destigmatizing through might reduce societal , as evidenced by surveys indicating heightened public awareness of pharmacological options correlating with views of as less volitional. However, empirical data revealed persistent or evolving forms of rather than uniform decline. A February 2025 review highlighted that while GLP-1 RAs could theoretically alleviate weight by emphasizing over character, real-world outcomes included "Ozempic shaming," where users faced ridicule for bypassing and exercise in favor of injections, often labeled as "cheating" or evading responsibility. Concurrently, studies from April 2025 found that individuals with elevated body shame were disproportionately interested in these drugs, suggesting shaming's motivational role persisted, driving uptake despite side effects like and muscle loss. polls from mid-2023 onward showed mixed shifts, with awareness of the drugs high (over 80% among older adults) but enduring, as coverage amplified both endorsement of solutions and criticism of fatness biases. The body positivity movement encountered internal tensions, with plus-size influencers and advocates reporting unease over members adopting GLP-1 RAs, which some viewed as undermining principles. By early 2025, reports from fashion and media sectors noted a reversion to slimmer ideals in , attributed to widespread drug use among celebrities, eroding gains in inclusivity and reigniting debates on whether pharmacological reinforced thin over holistic acceptance. A September 2025 psychological analysis cautioned that while drugs facilitated body satisfaction for users, broader societal fat phobia remained unaddressed, with shaming adapting to critique non-users or those reliant on medications long-term. Overall, these interventions correlated with nuanced discourse evolution—medical framing reduced some interpersonal shaming but introduced new stigmas around dependency and authenticity, without resolving underlying causal drivers of like metabolic dysregulation.

References

  1. [1]
    An in depth review of body shaming phenomenon among adolescent
    Body shaming, defined as the act of criticising someone's physical appearance, can have severe psychological repercussions, including stress, anxiety, ...
  2. [2]
    (PDF) Body Shaming: an Exploratory Study on its Definition and ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · Body shaming is a form of verbal abuse that is prevalent among teenagers, both in person and on social media (Schlüter et al., 2023) . This ...
  3. [3]
    Body shaming and internalized weight bias as potential precursors ...
    Recently, it has been described as an unrepeated act in which a person expresses unsolicited, mostly negative comments about an individual's body. The targeted ...
  4. [4]
    Body shaming and internalized weight bias as potential precursors ...
    Feb 5, 2024 · Preliminary evidence suggests that BS and weight stigma have negative effects on psychological health both in the short and long term. In ...
  5. [5]
    Fat shaming is making people sicker and heavier - PMC - NIH
    Studies show that exposure to weight bias triggers physiological and behavioural changes linked to poor metabolic health and increased weight gain. “You ...
  6. [6]
    Fat Shaming Linked to Greater Health Risks - UPenn Almanac
    Feb 7, 2017 · When people feel shamed because of their weight, they are more likely to avoid exercise and consume more calories to cope with this stress. In ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    “Fat Shaming” Won't Solve Obesity. Science Might.
    Sep 17, 2019 · A round up of 15 research papers and articles from Michigan Medicine proving why the treatment for obesity can't adopt a “one size fits all” approach.
  8. [8]
    The Harmful Effects of Fat Shaming - Healthline
    Weight discrimination can cause depression, eating disorders, reduced self-esteem, and an increased risk of various other mental and physical problems.Overview · Causes · Obesity risk · Harmful psychological effects
  9. [9]
    Weight stigma: As harmful as obesity itself? - Harvard Health
    Jun 2, 2022 · Weight stigma is discrimination based on a person's weight, and it can lead to poor health and increased weight gain.
  10. [10]
    Fat shaming in the doctor's office can be mentally and physically ...
    Aug 3, 2017 · Research demonstrates that weight stigma leads to psychological stress, which can lead to poor physical and psychological health outcomes for obese people.
  11. [11]
    Ending the obesity shame game | American Medical Association
    Mar 3, 2020 · People with obesity are often their own worst critics. Using derogatory names and poking fun at themselves allows them to cope with their ...
  12. [12]
    Body Shaming: an Exploratory Study on its Definition and ...
    Nov 9, 2021 · Body shaming (BS) is a popular term for a type of negative social interaction, which frequently occurs in social media.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  13. [13]
    Review Pervasiveness, impact and implications of weight stigma
    Weight stigma refers to negative attitudes and beliefs that devalue people based on their weight status that may include bias, discrimination, stereotyping, ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Phenomenon of Body Shaming and Speech Ethics Shifts ...
    Jan 25, 2023 · The types of body shaming include fat shaming, skinny/thin shaming, body hair/hairy body, and skin color. Fredricson and Robert suggest that ...
  15. [15]
    (PDF) Body Shaming: Ramifications on an Individual - ResearchGate
    (2022) studies show that respondents agreed that being fat, being skinny, and having a body weight that is not in harmony with their height are the reasons why ...
  16. [16]
    Body Image | Risks, Eating Disorders & Resources - NEDA
    Indeed, studies have found that 69-84% of women experience body dissatisfaction, desiring to be a lower weight than they currently are, and 10% to 30% of men ...
  17. [17]
    Weight Stigma and Social Media: Evidence and Public Health ...
    Social media serves as both a platform fostering weight stigma and body shaming, as well as a safe haven for communities to find support and body positivity ...
  18. [18]
    SHORT HISTORY OF OBESITY - PMC - NIH
    Jan 18, 2025 · In the ancient Greek population obesity was scarce. Hippocrates recommends one meal a day and hard work for those who wished to reduce weight.
  19. [19]
    Greco-Roman and Byzantine Views on Obesity - PubMed
    The Greco-Roman and Byzantine writers continue the long tradition of treating obesity and set the foundations for modern methods of treatment.
  20. [20]
    The Distant Origins of “Fat Shaming” or why the People of Antiquity ...
    The phenomenon of “fat shaming” (in particular with its aspect of the especially harsh criticism of the corpulence in young adult women) seems nearly ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    (PDF) Cultural Influences on Body Size Ideals - ResearchGate
    Oct 13, 2015 · Evidence is presented to indicate that the largest differences in body size ideals are no longer found between Western and non-Western cultures, ...
  23. [23]
    Cultural Differences in Body Image: A Systematic Review - MDPI
    Our findings showed a strong influence of culture on body image, highlighting the impact of societal expectations on individuals' mental well-being.
  24. [24]
    What Historical Ideals of Women's Shapes Teach Us About ...
    A graphic memoir that explores cultural and social factors that influence women's body image and restrict their decisions about their bodies.
  25. [25]
    How the 'ideal' woman's body shape has changed throughout history
    Mar 9, 2018 · We explore how this “ideal” is ever-changing, forming a complex history throughout art and fashion – with damaging impacts on women who try to conform in each ...
  26. [26]
    Eating Disorders and the Role of the Media - PMC - NIH
    In conclusion, the mass media surrounds us with images of the “thin ideal” for females, an ideal that has become increasingly thin since the 1950's and thus ...
  27. [27]
    Fashion magazines' depictions of ideal female beauty from 1959 to ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The print media's depiction of the ideal of feminine beauty as presented to American women was examined for the years 1959-1999.
  28. [28]
    US obesity rates have tripled over the last 60 years - USAFacts
    US obesity rates have tripled over the last 60 years. Severe obesity, also known as morbid obesity, has risen tenfold.Missing: societal attitudes
  29. [29]
    Obesity Stigma: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions
    However, historical evidence suggests that as countries develop economically, the burden of obesity shifts towards the poorest people [51]. Unabated, these ...Missing: 1900-2000 | Show results with:1900-2000
  30. [30]
    [PDF] A Historical Analysis of Women's Body Image Depicted in Popular ...
    Idealized Images, Body Shame, and Appearance Anxiety” said that media- portrayed idealized images detrimentally affect the body image of young women.
  31. [31]
    NAAFA's Origin Story & Fat Activism History
    Oct 15, 2021 · It all started when in 1969, a young engineer in New York named Bill Fabrey was very angry about the way the world was treating his fat wife, Joyce.Missing: rise | Show results with:rise
  32. [32]
    History of the Health At Every Size® Movement, Part 1 - ASDAH
    Oct 15, 2020 · An article called “More People Should Be Fat!” appeared in a major national magazine, The Saturday Evening Post. Its author was Lew Louderback, ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    The Evolution of Female Body Image Ideals - Dietetically Speaking
    Jul 19, 2021 · Heroin Chic (1990s) ... The 1990s went one step further than the supermodel era in fetishizing thinness, which was eerily dubbed as 'heroin chic'.
  34. [34]
    Fat liberation vs body positivity: How brands and influencers are ...
    May 30, 2025 · With the rise of social media in the 2000s, the concept of body positivity, which drew on the ideals of the fat liberation movement, began to ...
  35. [35]
    Change in weight-based bias over a decade - NIH
    Apr 11, 2022 · Such individuals have been shown to experience bias and stigma in their everyday life. While some prior research suggests that there has been an ...
  36. [36]
    How and why weight stigma drives the obesity 'epidemic' and harms ...
    Aug 15, 2018 · We define weight stigma as the social rejection and devaluation that accrues to those who do not comply with prevailing social norms of adequate ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Global, regional, and national prevalence of adult overweight and ...
    Mar 3, 2025 · In this study, we examine the historical trends of the global, regional, and national prevalence of adult overweight and obesity from 1990 to 2021 and forecast ...
  38. [38]
    Is Obesity Stigma Based on Perceptions of Appearance or Character ...
    Aug 17, 2015 · Obesity stigma involves both inferences of substandard psychological character and perceptions of substandard physical appearance.
  39. [39]
    Obesity Stigma: Causes, Consequences, and Potential Solutions
    Feb 14, 2023 · Obesity stigma is prejudiced views fueled by inaccurate ideas about causes, stemming from a perception of personal responsibility, despite ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Evolutionary Considerations on Social Status, Eating Behavior ... - NIH
    Lower social status is linked to higher obesity risk, possibly due to adaptive strategies to protect against food scarcity, as seen in animal models.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] OBESITY STIGMA & DISGUST THE EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS OF ...
    Jun 6, 2023 · Obesity stigma may stem from evolutionary mechanisms like moral, pathogen, and sexual disgust, alongside social and cultural factors.
  42. [42]
    Moral Foundations and Obesity: The Role of Binding vs ...
    Additionally, we found a positive association between the moralization of obesity and all subscales of anti-fat attitudes and discrimination against people with ...Study 1 · Regression Analyses · Study 2
  43. [43]
    Influence and effects of weight stigmatisation in media: A systematic
    For example, one study showed that participants' anti-fat attitudes measured after exposure to stigmatising content were mediated by their body satisfaction and ...
  44. [44]
    Do media portrayals and social consensus information impact anti ...
    Mechanisms underlying weight status and healthcare avoidance in women: a study of weight stigma, body-related shame and guilt, and healthcare stress. Body Image.Missing: traditional | Show results with:traditional
  45. [45]
    Representations of Fatness by Experts and the Media and How This ...
    A growing body of research has used experimental methods to test this underlying assumption, finding that exposure to different fat frames shapes people's ...Methods · News Media Sampling · Key Findings<|control11|><|separator|>
  46. [46]
    The Link Between Social Media and Body Image Issues Among ...
    May 16, 2024 · Social media has a pervasive impact on body image in the United States, influencing one's mental, physical, and social health.
  47. [47]
    Social Media Effects Regarding Eating Disorders and Body Image in ...
    Apr 21, 2024 · On websites like Instagram and TikTok, exposure to deliberately selected photographs of "ideal" body types encourages body dissatisfaction and ...
  48. [48]
    Influence of TikTok on Body Satisfaction Among Generation Z in ...
    Sep 6, 2024 · This study examines how TikTok impacts body image satisfaction among Gen Z in Indonesia, finding that the desire to resemble celebrities on ...
  49. [49]
    Exploring the Negative Consequences of Online Body Shaming
    Mar 20, 2025 · These findings suggest that online body shaming can have similarly detrimental effects on mental health, social functioning, and self-perception as ...
  50. [50]
    Social, cultural and ethnic determinants of obesity - ScienceDirect.com
    Obesity is closely linked to the social and built environment, including factors such as safety, violence, social cohesion, disorder, and neighborhood-level SES ...
  51. [51]
    The association between weight stigma and mental health: A meta ...
    Sep 10, 2019 · Negative coefficients indicated lower mental health with higher levels of perceived weight stigma: decreased self-esteem, well-being, quality of ...INTRODUCTION · METHOD · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
  52. [52]
    Associations Between Perceived Weight Discrimination and ... - NIH
    Perceived weight discrimination is associated with substantial psychiatric morbidity and comorbidity. These results remained significant after adjusting for a ...
  53. [53]
    The association between weight stigma and mental health - PubMed
    Body weight was a significant moderator, indicating a stronger association between weight stigma and diminished mental health with increasing body mass index.
  54. [54]
    Pervasiveness, impact and implications of weight stigma - PMC - NIH
    Internalised weight bias has a strong, negative impact on mental health such as depression, anxiety and lowered self-esteem. Internalised weight bias may also ...
  55. [55]
    Weight Stigma and Mental Health in Youth: A Systematic Review ...
    Nov 13, 2021 · Weight stigma in youth has been related to increased risk for developing numerous psychological and emotional problems, such as depression, ...
  56. [56]
    A meta-analysis of weight stigma and health behaviors. - APA PsycNet
    The results showed that weight stigma was positively related to unhealthy behaviors and negatively related to healthy behaviors.
  57. [57]
    Discrimination, Depression, and Anxiety Among US Adults
    Mar 28, 2025 · Longitudinal studies reveal that discrimination is associated with increased risk of developing depressive symptoms and anxiety over time ...
  58. [58]
    Weight stigma and mental health symptoms: mediation by perceived ...
    A recent meta-analysis of 30 studies reported similar findings, with weight stigma being moderately associated with greater psychological distress (5). These ...
  59. [59]
    Associations of Weight Stigma With Cortisol and Oxidative Stress ...
    Weight stigma is associated with higher cardiovascular reactivity ... Secondly, stigma processes may affect disease risk factors in addition to cortisol.
  60. [60]
    The acute inflammatory effects of weight stigma: An experimental ...
    Jul 7, 2023 · Weight stigma is a chronic stressor and may contribute to cardiometabolic health risk. This pilot study tests an experimental protocol ...
  61. [61]
    Emotion in Motion: Weight Bias Internalization, Exercise Avoidance ...
    May 7, 2024 · Research has already established that weight bias internalization is associated with lower motivation for and enjoyment of exercise and physical ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] The effects of an acute weight stigma exposure on cardiovascular ...
    Dec 21, 2022 · Objective: Weight stigma induces cardiovascular health consequences for people with obesity. How stigma affects.
  63. [63]
    How and why weight stigma drives the obesity 'epidemic' and harms ...
    Aug 15, 2018 · In this Opinion article, we review compelling evidence that weight stigma is harmful to health, over and above objective body mass index.
  64. [64]
    Internalised weight stigma as a mediator of the relationship between ...
    Oct 9, 2021 · Meta-analytic evidence shows that internalised weight stigma is associated with poor mental health outcomes (e.g., depression, body image ...
  65. [65]
    Not a Fan of Fat Shaming? Stop Thin Praising.
    Jul 18, 2017 · Both punishment (shaming) and positive reinforcement (praising) reinforce beauty norms that value thin, flawless, usually white or light ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  66. [66]
    Opening Pandora's Box: Exploring Body Image Perceptions and ...
    This thin ideal is propagated and reinforced through various socio ... Body shaming by romantic partners may lead to unhealthy practices by women ...
  67. [67]
    Influence and effects of weight stigmatisation in media: A systematic ...
    Weight stigma was prevalent across media types, with the dominant discourse viewing overweight and obesity as an individual responsibility and overlooking ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Experiences of weight stigma in everyday life: Implications for health ...
    The present study used ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to assess the motivational consequences of weight stigma in people's everyday lives.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF WEIGHT STIGMA ON HEALTH
    We propose that weight stigma has bi- directional effects and review research showing that perceived weight stigmatization can create a positive feedback loop ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] The Countervailing Effects of Weight Stigma on Weight-Loss ...
    Jan 2, 2020 · Another study using ecological momentary assessment to track daily experiences with weight stigma found that people reported decreased.
  71. [71]
    Obesity stigma and its impact on health: A narrative review
    Overall, recent evidence shows that weight stigma can contribute to worsening obesity-related problems and creating additional barriers to effective obesity ...
  72. [72]
    Shared Norms and Their Explanation for the Social Clustering of ...
    Nov 28, 2011 · Objectives. We aimed to test the hypothesized role of shared body size norms in the social contagion of body size and obesity. Methods.
  73. [73]
    The burden of weight stigma - American Psychological Association
    Mar 1, 2022 · Weight stigma, also called sizeism, leads to suffering and psychological distress. Sizeism increases a person's risk for mental health problems.
  74. [74]
    Weight stigma and health behaviors: evidence from the Eating in ...
    May 1, 2021 · ... risk for further stigmatization. Individuals encountering weight ... effects of weight stigma exposure increase as weight increases [42].<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Obesity Stigma: Important Considerations for Public Health | AJPH
    Sep 20, 2011 · In contrast, one study found that higher initial BMI, more stigmatizing experiences, lower body dissatisfaction, and greater fear of fat were ...
  76. [76]
    Body Norms and Fat Stigma in Global Perspective
    We test for cultural variation in how people conceptualize and stigmatize excess weight and obesity. Using consensus analysis of belief statements about obese ...
  77. [77]
    The weight of culture: Societal individualism and flexibility explain ...
    This study tests whether two national cultural traits can explain these differences. Individualism is associated with higher obesity rates in men but not in ...
  78. [78]
    #BodyPositive? A critical exploration of the body positive movement ...
    Oct 10, 2022 · In general, fat activism is an unapologetic embrace and acceptance of fatness as a political identity and culture, seeking to challenge unjust ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    Dove: A Spotless Approach to Digital Marketing
    Oct 4, 2024 · As a result of the Real Beauty campaign, sales for Dove jumped from $2.5 to $4 billion in the campaign's first ten years. Dove bars became the ...
  81. [81]
    Meet the brands leading the way for body positivity
    Beach body? Have a body - go to the beach. · 1. Sport England: 'This Girl Can' · 2. Dove Campaign for Real Beauty · 3. Monki: Honest Swimwear Campaign · 4. Nike: ...
  82. [82]
    The Health at Every Size Paradigm and Obesity - NIH
    A Health at Every Size (HAES) approach has been proposed to address weight bias and stigma in individuals living with obesity.
  83. [83]
    Effects of health at every size based interventions on health-related ...
    Oct 8, 2024 · Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported that HAES interventions can lead to improvements in both total and LDL cholesterol levels ...
  84. [84]
    Revisiting the impact of Health at Every Size® interventions on ...
    Apr 2, 2024 · Health at Every Size® interventions had similar results compared with weight-based interventions on anthropometric outcomes and cardiometabolic outcomes.INTRODUCTION · METHODS · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
  85. [85]
    Risks and benefits of social media trends - ScienceDirect.com
    The results revealed that body dissatisfaction increased after viewing “fitspiration” images and decreased after viewing “body positivity” and text-based “body ...
  86. [86]
    The impact of body diversity vs thin-idealistic media messaging on ...
    Dec 7, 2020 · Findings demonstrated that those exposed to body diversity imagery showed significantly lower levels of weight bias post-intervention compared ...
  87. [87]
    Body positivity movement: Benefits, drawbacks, vs. body neutrality
    Apr 29, 2022 · Health concerns​​ However, critics argue that the body positivity movement ignores the health risks associated with carrying excess body weight. ...
  88. [88]
    Obesity Acceptance: Body Positivity and Clinical Risk Factors
    Yet, how can we continue our public health campaign of reducing obesity while avoiding what members of the fat acceptance movement label as “fat shaming”? Is ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
  89. [89]
    Lifestyle Modification Approaches for the Treatment of Obesity ... - NIH
    Adding weight loss medication to high-intensity lifestyle modification substantially increases initial weight reduction, compared with lifestyle counseling ...
  90. [90]
  91. [91]
    Patterns and Predictors of Engagement With Digital Self-Monitoring ...
    Jul 18, 2023 · Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers. Patient Prefer Adherence. Nov ...
  92. [92]
    10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the ...
    In the 2·8 years of the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) randomised clinical trial, diabetes incidence in high-risk adults was reduced by 58% with ...
  93. [93]
    The Diabetes Prevention Program and Its Outcomes Study: NIDDK's ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · Compared with placebo, the lifestyle intervention had reduced body weight by ∼4 kg and diabetes development by 58%. Adherence to metformin was ∼ ...
  94. [94]
    Effectiveness of profile by Sanford behavioral weight loss program ...
    Patients lost greater body weight (15.3%) over 12 months with a behavioral weight management program vs. standard care (2.3%).
  95. [95]
    Efficacy of a Commercial Weight Management Program Compared ...
    Aug 16, 2022 · At 12 months, retention rates were 88.8% (166 of 187) for the commercial weight management program group and 95.7% (178 of 186) for the DIY ...
  96. [96]
    Responsibility of Individuals and Stakeholders for Obesity ... - Frontiers
    Jul 2, 2020 · This German survey showed that the majority of participants indicated that the responsibility for a healthy diet lies with the individual.Abstract · Introduction · Methods · Discussion
  97. [97]
    Behavior‐change lifestyle interventions for the treatment of obesity ...
    Dec 23, 2024 · The authors concluded that there is low-certainty evidence that lifestyle and behavioral interventions are effective for obesity management ...Missing: personal | Show results with:personal
  98. [98]
    Effect of Weight Loss With Lifestyle Intervention on Risk of Diabetes
    The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) reported a 58% reduction ... Achieving weight and activity goals among diabetes prevention program lifestyle participants.
  99. [99]
    Does fat shaming help people lose weight? - NCBI - NIH
    Our results indicate that rather than encouraging people to lose weight, weight discrimination promotes weight gain and the onset of obesity.
  100. [100]
    A systematic review of compassion-based interventions for ...
    Conclusion: Overall, compassion-based interventions were found to reduce body weight shame and improve levels of compassion. However, the impact of compassion- ...
  101. [101]
    A systematic review of weight stigma and disordered eating ...
    A narrative review found a consistent relationship between greater weight stigma and more disordered eating cognitions and behaviors.
  102. [102]
    Pervasiveness, impact and implications of weight stigma - The Lancet
    Apr 21, 2022 · Thus, empirical evidence demonstrates that the belief that weight stigma can be an effective tool to encourage weight loss amongst people living ...The 'obesity Strategy' · Weight Stigma In Healthcare... · Conclusions<|separator|>
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Fat Rights, Public Health Oppression and Prejudice, and the ...
    The pervasiveness, frequency, and intensity of fat shaming, bullying, and harassment experienced by fat people is well- documented, and three quarters of ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Shame, Blame, and the Emerging Law of Obesity Control
    This. Article describes the resulting emergence of “obesity control law” and argues for a radical reorientation of it from a “denormalization” strategy based on ...
  105. [105]
    Joint international consensus statement for ending stigma of obesity
    Mar 4, 2020 · Research indicates that weight stigma can cause physical and psychological harm, and that affected individuals are less likely to receive adequate care.
  106. [106]
    Censorship? Twitter Puts A 'Warning' on ACSH Obesity Article
    Sep 22, 2022 · Twitter put a "warning" on one of our recent tweets "so people who don't want to see sensitive content can avoid it." This protects nobody, but it denies the ...
  107. [107]
    Appearance-related cyberbullying and its association with the desire ...
    Aug 30, 2024 · Research indicates that cyberbullying incident rates among adolescence range from 5.6–46.3% for perpetrators, 8.0–57.5% for victims and 62.3–75% ...
  108. [108]
    Body Image Distress and Cyberbullying Among Adolescent Girls in ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · Among cyberbullying behaviors, body shaming dominated responses (41.68%), followed by insults (24.78%) and teasing (21.26%), while comparison ...
  109. [109]
    Woman gets fired after her 'fat' pilates rant goes viral on TikTok
    May 15, 2025 · The trend prompted fierce backlash from some users, who branded it “fat-shaming and body-shaming.” “Literally when did we start body shaming ...
  110. [110]
    TikTok Influencer Gets Horribly Fat Shamed By Beachgoers
    May 19, 2022 · In Case You Thought Anti-Fat Bias Wasn't A Thing, This Influencer Just Proved It's Very Real By Sharing The Harassment She Faced Making A ...
  111. [111]
    The association between use of social media and the development ...
    Mar 8, 2024 · This study reveals that heavy use of these platforms is associated with negative appraisals about one's physical appearance, and it fosters one's tendency ...
  112. [112]
    Social Media Use and Body Image Disorders - PubMed Central - NIH
    Mar 11, 2021 · Several studies have suggested that social media exposure could foster body dissatisfaction and result in risky eating behaviors by ...
  113. [113]
    Reducing social media use significantly improves body image in ...
    Feb 23, 2023 · Teens and young adults who reduced their social media use by 50% for just a few weeks saw significant improvement in how they felt about both their weight and ...
  114. [114]
    Cyberbullying Statistics 2025: Teens, Adults, and Gender Impacts
    Oct 7, 2025 · 61% of female respondents noted being harassed based on appearance or body image in 2025. 19% of males were cyberbullied through online gaming ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] The Ozempic Era Could Shift Blame for Obesity From Individuals to ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · Trials suggest patients taking these medicines lose around 10–20% of their body weight, though numbers vary considerably across trials and ...Missing: shaming
  116. [116]
    The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · The new medications for obesity may have the potential to reduce obesity stigma by reframing it as a medical condition rather than a moral failing.Missing: discourse | Show results with:discourse
  117. [117]
    Views Among the General Public on New Anti‐Obesity Medications ...
    Apr 22, 2025 · Increased public awareness that obesity can be effectively treated through medication may lead to a reduction in obesity stigma. On this view, ...
  118. [118]
    The societal implications of using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · Some people think that as these novel pharmacological treatments become more normalized, weight stigma will subside. This may occur if obesity ...Missing: opinion | Show results with:opinion
  119. [119]
    How 'Ozempic shaming' illuminates complexities of treating weight ...
    Feb 5, 2024 · Called “Ozempic shaming,” many users face stigma and negative comments online and in person for taking these medications instead of relying on diet and ...Missing: shifts 2023-2025
  120. [120]
    Body image concerns drive interest in GLP-1 weight loss drugs ...
    Apr 23, 2025 · New research reveals that young adults with higher body shame and weight concerns are more likely to consider GLP-1 medications, despite significant side ...Missing: shifts | Show results with:shifts
  121. [121]
    KFF Health Tracking Poll July 2023: The Public's Views Of New ...
    Aug 4, 2023 · Awareness of the new weight loss drugs is high among all groups, but older adults are some of the most aware with at least eight in ten adults ...Missing: stigma | Show results with:stigma
  122. [122]
    Popularity of Weight Loss Drugs Soars, but Weight Stigma Persists
    Apr 3, 2023 · The media frenzy surrounding weight loss drugs has had both positive and negative impacts, says Judith Korner, MD, PhD, professor of medicine at ...Missing: opinion | Show results with:opinion
  123. [123]
    Exclusive | Hollywood's Ozempic craze has 'changed the narrative ...
    Feb 24, 2025 · Celebrities are reverting back to unrealistic body standards thanks to the Ozempic trend sweeping Hollywood, according to Dr. Charlotte ...Missing: movement | Show results with:movement
  124. [124]
    'Ozempic arrived and everything changed': plus-size models on the ...
    Apr 15, 2025 · The fashion industry seemed to be inching towards a new era of inclusivity. Then came a wave of weight-loss drugs and the demonisation of 'wokeness'.
  125. [125]
    Body Image in the Ozempic Era | Psychology Today
    Sep 9, 2025 · This is an important insight: Increasing body appreciation may reduce people's interest in pursuing weight loss solely for appearance-based ...
  126. [126]
    My patients think Ozempic is a wonder drug. But it can't fix fat phobia
    Mar 23, 2024 · Yes, as Oprah enthused, the drugs help people shrink their bodies. But the psychological damage of weight stigma can't be so easily cured, ...Missing: shifts semaglutide
  127. [127]
    Body image and interest in GLP-1 weight loss medications
    Past research reveals strong associations between body size and body image, which may lead some users of GLP-1s to expect an increase in body satisfaction.