Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Bruce effect

The Bruce effect is a form of male-mediated pregnancy disruption in mammals, most prominently observed in rodents, in which a recently inseminated or pregnant female terminates her reproductive state upon sensory exposure—primarily olfactory—to an unfamiliar male, thereby returning to estrus and enabling mating with the new male.^[1]^[2] This phenomenon, first documented in 1959 by British zoologist Hilda M. Bruce in laboratory mice (Mus musculus), involves the failure of implantation or early pregnancy loss without physical aggression from the male, distinguishing it from other forms of reproductive interference.^[1]^[2] The underlying mechanism relies on chemosensory cues, particularly nonvolatile pheromones in the male's urine, which are detected by the female's vomeronasal organ and processed through neural pathways involving the accessory olfactory system.^[2] These signals trigger neuroendocrine changes, such as elevated hypothalamic dopamine or stress-induced estradiol surges, which suppress progesterone production essential for maintaining pregnancy, leading to implantation failure typically within a critical window of 24–48 hours post-mating.^[2] In mice, the effect's efficacy depends on olfactory memory: females become resistant to disruption by their original sire's pheromones but remain sensitive to novel males, ensuring selective termination only for non-sire exposures.^[2] While initially studied in mice, the Bruce effect has been confirmed in at least 28 mammalian species across 17 genera, including other rodents like deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus), as well as non-rodents such as horses, dogs, and primates like geladas (Theropithecus gelada) and olive baboons (Papio anubis).^[2] Evolutionarily, it is hypothesized to benefit females by preempting infanticide from incoming males— who may kill unrelated offspring to accelerate female fertility—thus allowing re-mating with a potentially protective sire and enhancing overall reproductive success in polygynous or unstable social systems.^[2] For males, it shortens interbirth intervals, increasing their paternity opportunities, though the effect's adaptive value remains debated in species with low infanticide rates.^[2]

Overview

Definition

The Bruce effect, also known as pregnancy block, is a reproductive phenomenon in which newly pregnant female mammals, primarily rodents, terminate their pregnancy upon exposure to pheromones emitted by an unfamiliar male shortly after mating. This disruption typically occurs within the first few days post-mating and results in the failure of embryo implantation or spontaneous abortion, mediated by olfactory cues from the male's urine or other exocrine secretions.^[3] The effect was first described in laboratory mice but has since been characterized as an innate sensory response conserved across several rodent species.^[4] This phenomenon is predominantly observed in both laboratory and wild populations of rodents, including house mice (Mus musculus), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus), and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), where exposure to a novel male's scent during the critical post-copulatory period leads to pregnancy failure.^[5] In these contexts, the Bruce effect manifests as a rapid neuroendocrine response that resets the female's reproductive cycle, often allowing remating within days.^[6] While most extensively studied in murid and cricetid rodents, the Bruce effect has also been confirmed in several non-rodent mammals.^[2] The Bruce effect is distinct from other male pheromone-mediated reproductive phenomena in rodents, such as the Whitten effect, which synchronizes estrus cycles among groups of females exposed to the same male's odors, and the Vandenbergh effect, which accelerates puberty onset in juvenile females upon detection of adult male pheromones. Unlike these, the Bruce effect specifically targets early pregnancy maintenance and requires the female to be in a post-mating state for induction.^[7]

Basic Process

The Bruce effect in house mice (Mus musculus) begins when a female mates with a male, successfully becoming pregnant following copulation.^[1] Within a critical window of the first 4-6 days post-coitum, exposure to the urinary pheromones of an unfamiliar male triggers the disruption of this early pregnancy.^[8] This exposure leads to pregnancy termination primarily through failure of embryo implantation or, if slightly later, embryonic resorption, with effect rates reaching 70-100% in experimental settings.^[8] Following termination, the female rapidly returns to estrus, typically within 3-6 days, allowing for potential remating with the novel male and resumption of reproductive cycling.^[1] Observable outcomes include measurable pregnancy loss, evidenced by a significant reduction in litter sizes or complete failure to produce pups, alongside behavioral indicators such as heightened investigative activity toward the unfamiliar male.^[9]

History and Discovery

Original Observation

The Bruce effect was first observed in 1959 by Hilda Margaret Bruce, a British reproductive biologist working at the National Institute for Medical Research in London, during studies on laboratory mice (Mus musculus).^[1] Bruce noted that pregnant females exposed to unfamiliar males shortly after mating often failed to maintain their pregnancies, a phenomenon initially termed an "exteroceptive block to pregnancy."^[1] In her pioneering experiments, Bruce mated female mice and, within 24 hours, introduced caged unfamiliar males into their enclosures to allow olfactory exposure without physical contact. Of 50 such females, 41 (82%) failed to become pregnant or aborted early, as evidenced by their return to estrus within days.^[10] In contrast, control groups of 50 females exposed only to their familiar stud males or housed alone showed just 2 (4%) pregnancy failures, confirming the specificity of the response to novel males.^[10] These results demonstrated that the effect occurred via airborne cues, likely pheromones, rather than direct interaction or stress from handling.^[10] Bruce's findings were first briefly reported in Nature in July 1959, highlighting the rapid disruption of pseudopregnancy or early gestation.^[1] A more comprehensive account appeared in the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility in 1960, solidifying the observation as a pheromonal mechanism and naming it after its discoverer in subsequent literature.^[10] This work laid the experimental foundation for understanding male-induced pregnancy termination in rodents.

Key Developments

Following the initial discovery in house mice, research in the 1960s and 1970s extended confirmation of the Bruce effect to other rodent species, such as the field vole (Microtus agrestis) and deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus).^[11]^[12] Studies by researchers including C.J. Dominic and A.S. Parkes demonstrated that exposure to unfamiliar males induced pregnancy block in these species, with experimental designs isolating olfactory cues to assess behavioral responses. A key advance during this period was the identification of urinary volatiles as the primary signals mediating the effect, as shown in experiments where soiled bedding or urine extracts from strange males alone triggered implantation failure without physical contact. These findings refined methodological approaches, emphasizing chemosensory isolation to distinguish pheromonal from social influences. In the 1980s and 2000s, genetic investigations linked major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes to the mate recognition process in the Bruce effect, with the pregnancy-blocking response being stronger when the novel male has an MHC genotype dissimilar from that of the stud male, facilitating discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar sires.^[13] Concurrent field observations in wild house mice populations documented the phenomenon under natural conditions, highlighting its role in population dynamics amid male turnover. Post-2010 research expanded the scope beyond rodents, with a 2012 study by Beehner et al. providing the first direct evidence of a strong Bruce effect in wild gelada monkeys (Theropithecus gelada), where 80% of pregnancies terminated shortly after a dominant male takeover. A 2017 analysis by Eccard et al. evaluated the adaptive value in cyclic rodent populations, using experimental enclosures to show that pregnancy termination enhances female reproductive success at low densities following male replacement. In 2021, researchers proposed redefining the Bruce effect by its functional outcome—pregnancy termination upon non-sire male exposure—rather than specific mechanisms, broadening its applicability across mammals.^[14] More recently, a 2022 study in Cell Reports by Yoles-Frenkel et al. elucidated neural mechanisms of memory formation for mate recognition, demonstrating stable pheromone representations in the female mouse accessory olfactory bulb that prevent repeated blocking by the familiar sire.^[15]

Physiological Mechanisms

Pheromone Detection

The pheromones responsible for triggering the Bruce effect in female rodents are primarily detected by specialized sensory structures in the nasal cavity, with the vomeronasal organ (VNO) serving as the main site of chemosensory perception. The VNO houses apical and basal sensory neurons that express vomeronasal receptors capable of binding to male-derived chemical cues, such as those found in urine or glandular secretions. These neurons initiate signal transduction through canonical pathways, including the involvement of TRPC2 ion channels, which facilitate calcium influx and depolarization in response to pheromone binding, enabling the conversion of chemical stimuli into electrical signals.^[16] The main olfactory epithelium (MOE) also contributes to pheromone sensing, particularly for volatile components, by activating G-protein-coupled receptors in its olfactory sensory neurons, though the VNO remains dominant for social and reproductive cues like those in the Bruce effect.^[17] Key pheromonal signals emanate from volatile and non-volatile compounds in male urine and exocrine secretions, which differ between familiar and unfamiliar males to enable recognition. Prominent volatile constituents include 2-sec-butyl-4,5-dihydrothiazole (SBT) and dehydro-exo-brevicomin (DHB), lipophilic molecules produced in higher concentrations by unfamiliar males and absent or significantly reduced in the urine of the mating male after prolonged cohabitation. These compounds are strain-specific and contribute to individual odor signatures, with their absence in familiar male cues preventing the pregnancy-blocking response. Additionally, non-volatile peptides like exocrine gland-secreting peptide 1 (ESP1), secreted in male tears and detected via specific VNO receptors such as V2Rp5, act as potent signals that reinforce the effect when females encounter unfamiliar males.^[18]^[19] Upon detection, these pheromones elicit an immediate neural response in the VNO and MOE, characterized by rapid activation of sensory neurons and propagation of signals to central brain regions without necessitating direct physical contact with the male. Exposure to contaminated bedding or airborne urinary volatiles is sufficient to induce this transduction, highlighting the sensitivity of the system to trace amounts of unfamiliar cues during the critical post-mating window. This initial sensory processing sets the stage for downstream neuroendocrine responses, though the detection itself operates independently of behavioral interactions.^[4]

Male Recognition

In the Bruce effect, female mice recognize unfamiliar males through a learned olfactory memory of the stud male's pheromones, which forms during the mating process and allows discrimination based on prior exposure.^[15] This memory enables females to terminate pregnancy only upon encountering novel male scents, preventing disruption from the familiar stud.^[15] Additionally, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes shape individual pheromone profiles in male urine, facilitating kin versus non-kin detection; females exposed to urine from male littermates of their mates exhibit reduced pregnancy block compared to unrelated novel males (13% failure rate versus 43%).^[20]^[18] MHC class I peptides in these pheromones, detected at low concentrations (10⁻¹² M), signal genetic dissimilarity and trigger the effect in non-kin contexts.^[20] A 2022 study demonstrated that this recognition involves stable representational memory in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB), where neuronal responses to stud male urine persist post-mating and show selective habituation to prolonged exposure, unlike in naive females.^[15] Noradrenergic signaling contributes to this memory formation by enhancing inhibition of mitral/tufted cells via granule cells in the AOB, promoting long-term stability of the stud's scent representation.^[15] The Bruce effect fails when females are exposed to a familiar stud male, as the established memory prevents pregnancy block, with no termination observed under such conditions.^[8] Similarly, castrated unfamiliar males do not induce the effect, lacking the necessary pheromones in their urine to trigger disruption, as confirmed by multiple experiments showing zero pregnancy blocks from their scents.^[15]^[21]

Neuroendocrine Pathway

The neuroendocrine pathway of the Bruce effect begins with chemosensory signals from the vomeronasal organ (VNO) projecting to the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB), where initial processing and discrimination of novel male pheromones occur.^[22] From the AOB, these signals are relayed via excitatory projections to the medial amygdala, which integrates the pheromonal input and forwards it to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST).^[22] The BNST then conveys the information to the medial hypothalamus, including the arcuate nucleus, where it modulates reproductive neuroendocrine functions.^[22] A key feature of this pathway involves noradrenergic neurotransmission, originating from the locus coeruleus, which induces a surge of noradrenaline in the AOB to facilitate synaptic plasticity and signal amplification upon detection of unfamiliar male cues.^[23] This noradrenergic activation enhances inhibitory transmission within the AOB's mitral-granule cell synapses, sharpening the response to novel pheromones while suppressing familiarity-based habituation.^[23] Concurrently, the pathway engages the sympathetic nervous system through noradrenergic projections, contributing to a stress-like response that amplifies hypothalamic signaling.^[24] The ultimate outcome of this cascade is the inhibition of prolactin release from the anterior pituitary, mediated by activated tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic neurons in the arcuate nucleus, which disrupts the nocturnal prolactin surges essential for maintaining the corpus luteum.^[22] This leads to reduced progesterone production by the corpus luteum, culminating in luteolysis and the regression of the corpus luteum, thereby terminating early pregnancy.^[25] Estrogen may modulate this process by influencing the sensitivity of the pathway, though its precise interactions are secondary to the primary neural signaling.^[22]

Hormonal Regulation

The Bruce effect involves a rapid decline in progesterone levels, which is essential for maintaining the corpus luteum and supporting early pregnancy in rodents. Exposure to pheromones from an unfamiliar male triggers suppression of prolactin surges via increased hypothalamic dopamine, leading to luteolysis and a subsequent drop in progesterone that prevents blastocyst implantation. This mechanism has been demonstrated in studies where exogenous administration of progesterone rescues pregnancies in females exposed to novel males, restoring implantation rates to near-normal levels.^[2] Estrogen, particularly estradiol, plays a critical role in mediating the pregnancy-terminating effects during the Bruce effect. Following exposure to novel male cues, there is an elevation in circulating estradiol levels, often derived from male excretions transferred to females, which disrupts the estradiol-to-progesterone ratio and impairs uterine receptivity. This estradiol surge enhances uterine sensitivity to oxytocin, facilitating contractions that contribute to the failure of pregnancy maintenance; experimental evidence shows that estrogen receptor antagonists, such as ICI 182,780, block this disruption, preventing pregnancy loss when administered to exposed females.^[26]^[27] The hormonal changes are regulated through feedback loops in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis. Novel male pheromones activate dopaminergic neurons, inhibiting prolactin release and disrupting corpus luteum function, leading to reduced progesterone. Neural triggers from the accessory olfactory system initiate this inhibition, as detailed in upstream neuroendocrine processes.^[28]^[26]

Temporal Dynamics

The Bruce effect in mice is highly time-sensitive, operating primarily during the pre-implantation phase of early pregnancy. The sensitive period spans the first 4 to 6 days post-coitum, when exposure to an unfamiliar male's pheromones can reliably induce pregnancy block in up to 80% of cases if initiated within the initial 48 hours after mating.^[29] This window aligns with the free-floating stage of blastocysts in the uterine lumen, allowing for disruption without physical implantation having occurred. Beyond day 6 to 7 post-coitum, the effect diminishes sharply as embryos implant into the uterine wall around day 4.5 to 5, rendering the pregnancy more stable and resistant to pheromonal interference. The duration of exposure required to trigger the effect is relatively brief, with as little as a few hours of contact or scent detection sufficient to initiate the physiological cascade leading to pregnancy failure.^[2] However, the effect's potency wanes if exposure is delayed beyond 24 to 48 hours into the sensitive period, as the window for effective pheromonal signaling narrows progressively with advancing gestation. This temporal constraint ensures the mechanism functions only early enough to prevent resource investment in potentially non-viable offspring. Hormonal shifts during this phase, such as daily prolactin surges, further modulate the responsiveness to male cues.^[5] Species variations influence the precise timing of the sensitive period, reflecting differences in reproductive physiology. In rats, the window is generally shorter, typically limited to the first 2 to 3 days post-coitum, though recent studies confirm the effect can be induced with exposure over the initial 4 days in Norway rats, albeit with lower incidence than in mice. The stage of the estrous cycle at mating also affects susceptibility, with females inseminated during peak estrus showing heightened sensitivity to the blocking pheromones.^[2]

Evolutionary Significance

Benefits to Females

The Bruce effect provides female rodents with a key adaptive advantage by enabling them to terminate pregnancies sired by unfamiliar males, thereby avoiding investment in unrelated offspring that may be vulnerable to infanticide. This mechanism allows females to rapidly return to estrus and remate, aligning reproduction with current social conditions to enhance overall reproductive success.^[30] Empirical evidence supports this benefit, particularly in low-density wild populations where male turnover is frequent. A 2017 study on bank voles (Myodes glareolus) demonstrated that pregnancy termination enhances lifetime reproductive success during population increase phases, as spring litters sired by new males yield higher fitness outcomes compared to litters from prior pregnancies. Additionally, the effect reduces the risk of infanticide by aligning paternity with the current male, thereby ensuring greater protection for future offspring in polygynous systems with high infanticide risk.^[6] While pregnancy termination incurs costs, such as energy expenditure from aborting embryos, these are typically outweighed in polygynous mating systems where the opportunity to secure protection from infanticide amplifies overall reproductive efficiency. In such contexts, the net fitness gain from optimized resource allocation to viable offspring surpasses the immediate energetic loss.^[30] However, the adaptive value of the Bruce effect remains debated in species with low infanticide rates.^[2]

Benefits to Males

The Bruce effect provides significant reproductive advantages to unfamiliar males by terminating pregnancies sired by rivals, thereby assuring paternity for their own future offspring. In species where males have short tenures or face high infanticide risks, this mechanism allows intruding males to redirect female reproductive effort toward themselves, reducing the energetic and temporal costs of raising unrelated young and minimizing the likelihood of subsequent infanticide against their progeny. Theoretical evaluations indicate that this strategy enhances male fitness by increasing the probability of siring litters that survive to independence, particularly in environments with frequent male turnover. For example, computer simulations based on yellow baboon data demonstrate that inducing prenatal loss outperforms infanticide in 96.1% of scenarios, as it accelerates female fertility without the risks or delays associated with post-birth killing.^[2] Beyond direct paternity gains, the Bruce effect facilitates resource monopolization for males in territorial rodent species, enabling dominant individuals to take over breeding groups and skew reproduction in their favor. This skew is particularly pronounced in low-density populations where male access to mates is contested.^[2] Empirical evidence from wild rodents supports these male benefits, with observations showing that dominant or newly introduced males trigger pregnancy blocks in subordinates' or previous mates, leading to higher siring success for the intruder. For instance, in experimental field studies on bank voles (Myodes glareolus), male replacement in single-male-single-female enclosures resulted in 45% of litters sired by the new male, compared to lower rates in multi-male groups where such takeovers are suppressed. These findings confirm the Bruce effect's role in enhancing male reproductive skew under natural conditions.^[31]

Occurrence Beyond Rodents

In Primates

The Bruce effect has been documented in wild populations of gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada), providing the first conclusive field evidence in a nonhuman primate. In a five-year study of Ethiopian geladas, researchers observed that approximately 80% of pregnant females terminated their pregnancies within weeks following the replacement of a dominant male in their reproductive unit. This termination occurred without physical aggression from the incoming male, suggesting a sensory-mediated response to the novel male's presence, which aligns with the adaptive goal of avoiding future infanticide by siring offspring with the new male. Hormonal assays confirmed elevated progesterone levels prior to abortion, indicating a post-implantation disruption similar to the rodent phenomenon but in a natural social setting.^[32] Evidence for the Bruce effect extends to other baboon species, such as hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas), where field observations reveal increased pregnancy loss rates after male takeovers in harem groups. In one long-term study, females experienced higher rates of fetal loss shortly after exposure to unfamiliar males, correlating with shortened interbirth intervals and reduced infanticide risk. These findings support the effect's role in enhancing female reproductive success in multimale-multifemale systems prone to male turnover.^[33] However, a 2025 study in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus imitator) found no evidence of pregnancy termination following male replacements, despite high infanticide risk, suggesting the effect does not occur universally across primates.^[34] Unlike in rodents, where the Bruce effect primarily relies on olfactory pheromones from male urine, primate manifestations appear to integrate multiple sensory modalities, including visual and auditory cues from the novel male. In group-living species like geladas, social factors such as unit disruption and male aggression may amplify the effect, facilitating rapid pregnancy block without sole dependence on chemical signals. This multisensory integration likely reflects adaptations to complex social environments, where immediate exposure to intruders triggers neuroendocrine responses more holistically than scent alone.^[35]

Potential Human Parallels

Research has proposed potential parallels to the Bruce effect in humans through stress-induced mechanisms that may selectively terminate less viable pregnancies. A 2016 study examining Norwegian birth records following the 2011 Oslo massacre observed a temporary shift in twinning rates, with a 33-31% reduction in male twins and a 29% increase in female twins in subsequent months, attributed to population-wide stress elevating the threshold for fetal fitness and prompting spontaneous abortions of lower-fitness male twin gestations. This autonomic stress response, triggered by a traumatic event, mirrors the pregnancy-disrupting effects seen in non-human species, suggesting humans may autonomically adjust reproductive investment under duress to favor higher-viability outcomes.^[36] Olfactory cues have also been investigated as potential mediators of Bruce effect-like phenomena in human pregnancy maintenance. A 2020 study of women with unexplained repeated pregnancy loss (uRPL) revealed heightened perceptual accuracy (57% vs. 28% in controls) in identifying partner body odors and increased hypothalamic activation when exposed to unfamiliar male scents, indicating altered brain responses that could disrupt pregnancy stability. These findings suggest that exposure to non-partner male odors might elevate stress responses, potentially contributing to miscarriage rates following partner changes by mimicking sire recognition failures. This olfactory dimension was highlighted in a 2023 discussion between neuroscientists Andrew Huberman and Noam Sobel, who linked such mechanisms to broader influences of smell on hormonal regulation and reproductive outcomes in humans.^[37]^[38] Despite these observations, no direct causation for a Bruce effect has been proven in humans, with evidence limited to correlational data. Human pregnancy exhibits lower plasticity compared to rodents, featuring extended gestation periods and diminished reliance on pheromonal signals due to the absence of a functional vomeronasal organ and accessory olfactory structures.^[37] Ethical constraints further hinder progress, as controlled experiments exposing pregnant women to unfamiliar male scents to induce pregnancy block would violate research standards on harm and consent, confining studies to indirect analyses of natural stressors or clinical cohorts. While analogous olfactory sensitivities appear in some primates, human parallels remain speculative and require cautious interpretation.^[2]

References

[1]
An Exteroceptive Block to Pregnancy in the Mouse - Nature
An Exteroceptive Block to Pregnancy in the Mouse. HILDA M. BRUCE. Nature volume 184, page 105 (1959)Cite this article.Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
[2]
Male-mediated prenatal loss: functions and mechanisms - PMC - NIH
Apr 6, 2019 · The Bruce effect occurs when females terminate pregnancies after some form of sensory exposure (olfactory, visual, auditory, or tactile) to non- ...
[3]
BLOCK TO PREGNANCY IN THE MOUSE CAUSED BY PROXIMITY ...
A BLOCK TO PREGNANCY IN THE MOUSE CAUSED BY PROXIMITY OF STRANGE MALES. H. M. BRUCE.
[4]
The Bruce effect: Representational stability and memory formation in ...
In the Bruce effect, a mated female mouse becomes resistant to the pregnancy-blocking effect of the stud. Various lines of evidence suggest that this form ...
[5]
Female behaviour plays a critical role in controlling murine ...
Feb 25, 2009 · The ability to control the Bruce effect through behaviour during brief sensitivity just before dusk, when females are likely to be in nest sites ...
[6]
The Bruce effect revisited: is pregnancy termination in female ...
Aug 9, 2017 · Taken together, our results suggest that the Bruce effect may be an adaptive breeding strategy for rodent females in cyclic populations ...Missing: discovery | Show results with:discovery
[7]
The Bruce effect should be defined by function, not mechanism ...
Mar 23, 2021 · For example, in addition to the Bruce effect, rodents also display the Vandenbergh effect, a phenomenon first described in house mice in ...
[8]
Chemical Studies of the Primer Mouse Pheromones - SpringerLink
These include the Whitten, Bruce, Vandenbergh, and Lee-Boot effects. The first three phenomena are associated with the effect of male mouse urine on females. In ...
[9]
A BLOCK TO PREGNANCY IN THE MOUSE CAUSED BY ...
A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of strange males in Reproduction. Author: HM BRUCE.
[10]
Bruce Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The Bruce effect is a phenomenon where a pregnant female will lose the pregnancy if she is exposed to a different male within 24 h of impregnation.
[11]
A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of ... - PubMed
A block to pregnancy in the mouse caused by proximity of strange males. J Reprod Fertil. 1960 Feb:1:96-103. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0010096. Author. H M BRUCE. PMID ...Missing: Hilda Time relations
[12]
Pregnancy-block in Microtus agrestis and Induced Ovulator | Nature
A DECREASE in the incidence of pregnancy is caused by exposing recently inseminated female mice to the presence of strange males1. This “Bruce effect” has been ...
[13]
Pregnancy blockage following multiple-male copulation or exposure ...
Pregnancy blockage resulting from multiple-male copulation or exposure around the time of mating was studied in three experiments on deer mice, Peromyscus.<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
Genetic Basis for MHC‐Dependent Mate Choice - ScienceDirect.com
Mouse Mating Preferences. Thomas (1975) was the first to suggest that MHC genes might be involved in individual recognition. ... Bruce effect (Bruce, 1960). If a ...Abstract · Familial Imprinting... · Mhc‐dependent Mating...
[15]
Pheromonal recognition memory induced by TRPC2‐independent ...
Jun 19, 2006 · Normal Bruce effect in TRPC2–/– mice. We first examined the pregnancy failure that occurs when recently mated females are exposed to the urine ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[16]
In vivo vomeronasal stimulation reveals sensory encoding of ... - PNAS
One hint that the vomeronasal system can provide finer discrimination among individuals emerges from its role in the Bruce effect (4), in which a gestating ...
[17]
Male Kinship Reduces the Bruce Effect in Female Mice, Mus musculus
The scent of a novel male can elicit pregnancy block in recently mated female mice (Mus musculus), a phenomenon known as the Bruce effect.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[18]
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068673
[19]
MHC signaling during social communication - PMC - PubMed Central
It has been suggested that the Bruce effect functions to prevent infanticide from males who have recently displaced the dominant, territorial male4,65.Mhc-Based Social Signaling · Mhc As A Signal In... · Mhc As A Signal In Kin...
[20]
Strange-male-induced pregnancy disruption in mice
Inseminated females were housed below castrated males, separated by a wire-mesh grid. Castrated males did not disrupt pregnancy, whereas those given daily ...
[21]
The Interplay between Reproductive Social Stimuli and Adult ...
Jul 22, 2014 · This male chemosensory-induced block of pregnancy is known as the Bruce effect (see the text for details). The Bruce effect does not occur if ...
[22]
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2014/497657
[23]
Amygdala but not hippocampal lesions impair olfactory memory for ...
Exposure to soiled bedding of unfamiliar males alone is sufficient to produce the Bruce effect in mice (4, 10). ... Brains were removed, postfixed, and ...
[24]
Female behaviour plays a critical role in controlling murine ...
Feb 25, 2009 · Exposure of recently mated female rodents to unfamiliar male scents during daily prolactin surges results in pregnancy failure (the 'Bruce effect').
[25]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2660991/
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.003
[27]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.08.005
[28]
TIME RELATIONS IN THE PREGNANCY-BLOCK INDUCED IN ...
TIME RELATIONS IN THE PREGNANCY-BLOCK INDUCED IN MICE BY STRANGE MALES H. M. BRUCE Division of Experimental Biology, National Institute for Medical Research ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[29]
Pregnancy Blocking in Rodents: Adaptive Advantages for Females
In an experiment which tested Hrdy's hypothesis about the inhibitory role of mating on infanticidal behavior, Labov. (1980) found that wild male house mice ...
[30]
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/283828
[31]
A Bruce Effect in Wild Geladas - Science
We report a strong Bruce effect in a wild primate, the gelada (Theropithecus gelada). Female geladas terminate 80% of pregnancies in the weeks after a dominant ...
[32]
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1213600
[33]
Twinning in Norway Following the Oslo Massacre: Evidence of a ...
Jul 25, 2016 · Emerging theory and empirical work suggest that the 'Bruce Effect', or the increase in spontaneous abortion observed in non-human species ...
[34]
Unexplained repeated pregnancy loss is associated with altered ...
Sep 29, 2020 · In the Bruce effect, an exposure to the odor of a non-sire male frequently leads to implantation failure in females (Bruce, 1959). Such an ...
[35]
Dr. Noam Sobel: How Smells Influence Our Hormones, Health ...
May 1, 2023 · Dr. Sobel explains his lab's research on the biological mechanisms of smell (“olfaction”) and how sensing odorants and chemicals in our environment impacts ...