Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Carantanians


The Carantanians were a South people who formed an early medieval tribal known as in the , encompassing territories in present-day southern and northeastern , emerging around 658 AD in the wake of Samo's short-lived Slavic empire. Regarded as the progenitors of the modern , they established one of the first documented states with a structured political hierarchy featuring hereditary princes such as Borut (c. 745–750), his son Gorazd (750–752), and nephew Hotimir (752–769).
Carantania initially maintained independence before accepting Bavarian overlordship in 745, marked by Prince Borut's conversion to Christianity under missionary influence, and was fully subsumed into the following the defeat of the in 788. Despite Frankish domination, Carantanian societal customs endured, including a distinctive enthronement for dukes conducted on the Prince's Stone by local freemen in the language—a democratic element that persisted in modified form until the , symbolizing retained local sovereignty within imperial structures. Primary historical records, such as the 9th-century Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum, document their governance and , underscoring their role in early amid pressures from Germanic powers.

Origins and Early History

Migration and Settlement Patterns

The Carantanians, a South population ancestral to modern , emerged through into the during the 6th and 7th centuries CE, coinciding with the weakening of dominance following the invasion of in 568 CE and subsequent expansions from the north and east. These movements involved multiple waves, with initial smaller settlements possibly predating the 6th century but accelerating after circa 500 CE as advanced southward from regions including the basin and , intermixing with residual Romanized and indigenous groups. Archaeological data from the Zbiva database, encompassing over 1,100 sites, reveal two primary pulses: an early one along the upstream Mura and river valleys after circa 500 CE, followed by a second along the river before circa 700 CE, supported by space-time pattern analysis indicating emerging settlement hot spots in previously underpopulated areas. Settlement patterns transitioned from peripheral, hilltop fortifications inherited from to lowland agricultural communities adapted to local soils, with early sites like Nova tabla in radiocarbon-dated to the early and expansion into fertile, water-retentive areas suitable for cultivation by the 7th century. In regions such as the Plain and Leibnitzer Feld (modern and ), initially occupied dry, sandy slopes before adopting advanced plough technologies for clayey lowlands, reflecting acculturation with pre-existing populations and leading to bicultural material assemblages. Genetic evidence corroborates these patterns, showing mixed South and West ancestry in modern Alpine populations, with elevated haplogroup frequencies along the Mura and , consistent with founder effects from heterogeneous migrant groups establishing as the earliest documented stable polity after 650 . Historical texts, including the Fredegarii Chronicon referencing Prince Valuk around 630 and the Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum ( 870 ) describing as a tribe in Minor and Lower , affirm post-migration consolidation amid overlordship and subsequent Frankish interactions. This process involved subjugation and assimilation of Romano-Celtic remnants, evidenced by linguistic hybrids and archaeological continuity in sites like Celeia () persisting to 680 .

Emergence from Samo's Empire and Initial Consolidation

Following the death of in 658, his tribal union fragmented amid renewed pressures and Frankish incursions, allowing Slavic groups in the —settled since the late —to reorganize into a distinct polity known as , achieving independence around 660. These Alpine , part of the broader West Slavic migrations, occupied territories encompassing modern southern (, , parts of and ) and northeastern , differentiating themselves through localized tribal structures resistant to full Avar subjugation. Early consolidation occurred under indigenous leaders, with Walluch (or ), likely a Carantanian of Wendish , emerging as a successor figure who maintained cohesion against eastern threats post-Samo; he is attested in Frankish annals as negotiating with Bavarian forces around 700, indicating nascent diplomatic autonomy. This period saw the Carantanians defend their alpine strongholds, leveraging terrain advantages to repel raids, while internal tribal assemblies laid groundwork for elective ducal leadership, preserving customs amid polyethnic influences from residual Romanized populations. By circa 740, Duke Boruth (also Borut), the first explicitly named ruler, solidified the duchy by appealing to Bavarian Duke Odilo for military aid against persistent Avar incursions from the east, accepting nominal Bavarian overlordship and dispatching hostages—including his son Carast (Gorazd) and nephew Cheitmar—to Bavaria as guarantees. This alliance enabled Carantanian forces to stabilize frontiers, fostering initial administrative centralization, though Boruth's conversion to Christianity under Bavarian auspices introduced external ecclesiastical ties without immediate erasure of pagan traditions; his reign until approximately 750 marked a pivotal shift from isolation to buffered semi-independence, averting outright conquest.

Political Development and Decline

Formation of the Principality

Following the disintegration of Samo's tribal upon his death in 658 AD, the Carantanians consolidated into an independent polity known as the of Carantania, encompassing territories in the corresponding to modern-day southern and northeastern . This emergence marked a transition from loose tribal alliances under influence to a more structured entity, with the polity's name first attested in historical records shortly after 660 AD, reflecting proto- origins possibly linked to regional geography or social organization. Early governance likely relied on communal entities called župas (districts led by local elders), without a centralized until the mid-8th century. Duke Boruth, the first historically named ruler, played a pivotal role in formalizing the principality's leadership around 740 AD by organizing a rebellion against lingering Avar overlordship and securing Bavarian military support. This alliance not only ensured military autonomy but also introduced Christian missionaries from Bavaria, initiating the polity's Christianization and shifting from charismatic "big man" leadership—characterized by figures like the 7th-century Wallucus, who wielded economic influence—to institutionalized chiefly rule. Boruth's efforts faced internal resistance, as evidenced by references to assemblies (carmula) that constrained monarchical ambitions, yet they established a ducal model that persisted until Frankish subjugation. The Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum (c. 828 AD), a key ecclesiastical source, retroactively frames this period as the foundation of Carantanian princely authority, though its Bavarian provenance suggests potential bias toward emphasizing Christian and Frankish ties. By the late , functioned as a semi-autonomous under Bavarian protection, with its formation enabling resistance to external pressures while preserving customs, such as elective elements in ducal selection. This consolidation laid the groundwork for interactions with neighboring powers, though the lack of contemporary non-ecclesiastical records limits precise delineation of administrative boundaries or population estimates, estimated at several tens of thousands based on archaeological settlement patterns.

Interactions with Avars, Bavarians, and Franks

The Carantanians encountered significant pressure from the Khaganate during the 7th and early 8th centuries, following the disintegration of Samo's Slavic realm around 658 . raids intensified, threatening Slavic settlements in the . Circa 740–742 , Boruth organized resistance against incursions, repelling an attack in 742 . To secure further defense, Boruth appealed to Odilo for , marking a pivotal shift from Avar subjugation toward alliance with neighboring Germanic powers. Relations with the evolved into a arrangement by 743 , with functioning as a Bavarian . In exchange for protection against , Boruth submitted to Bavarian overlordship, facilitating the introduction of among the Carantanians through Bavarian missionaries, as recorded in the 8th-century Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum. Bavarian exerted influence over Carantanian leadership selection, yet preserved local customs, notably the ritual at the Prince's Stone (Knežji kamen) near or at Zollfeld. In this ceremony, a representing the Carantanian populace interrogated the prospective —initially local princes, later Bavarian rulers—on his commitment to defend the land and judge justly, symbolizing conditional legitimacy derived from the people's consent rather than imperial fiat alone. This practice underscored the semi-autonomous status of Carantania under Bavarian tutelage, blending Slavic traditions with Frankish-Bavarian governance models. The Frankish conquest of in 788 CE, following Charlemagne's deposition of Tassilo III, extended direct Carolingian control over as a frontier march. Carantanian leaders initially submitted to Frankish authority, contributing contingents against the during Charlemagne's campaigns of 791–796 CE, which dismantled the Avar Khaganate. However, tensions arose; local princes faced deposition in the early amid broader unrest, including the led by Ljudevit Posavski in adjacent regions from 819–822 CE, which prompted Frankish military interventions to suppress potential Carantanian involvement. By 828 CE, was formally organized as the under Frankish margraves, eroding native princely autonomy while retaining vestiges of the custom until the 15th century in modified form. Archaeological evidence from sites like Krnsko corroborates fortified settlements reflecting these defensive interactions, though written sources remain sparse and primarily Frankish in origin, potentially biasing portrayals of agency.

Conquest and Integration into the Carolingian Empire

In the mid-8th century, the Carantanians, having allied with the Bavarians under Duke Tassilo III against Avar incursions, effectively became vassals of the Frankish realm through Bavaria's subordinate position to the Carolingian kings. This political alignment facilitated Frankish influence in the region prior to direct conquest, as Carantanian leaders participated in joint military efforts that weakened Avar control over adjacent territories. The pivotal shift occurred in 788, when deposed Tassilo III following accusations of disloyalty and annexed , thereby extending direct Carolingian authority over without immediate large-scale military engagement against the themselves. appointed his brother-in-law Gerold of Vinzgouw as prefect of , tasking him with administering the southeastern marches, including Carantanian lands, and coordinating defenses against remaining threats. Gerold's oversight, from approximately 788 until his death in 799, involved fortifying frontiers and integrating local elites into Frankish structures, though specific clashes with Carantanian resistance are not well-documented in primary sources. The concurrent (788–803) further consolidated Carolingian dominance, as Frankish campaigns dismantled the Avar khaganate, eliminating external pressures on and enabling deeper administrative penetration. By the early , under and his successors, the indigenous Carantanian ducal office was abolished, with local princes replaced by Frankish counts and margraves to enforce loyalty and taxation. Full integration culminated around 828, when Carantania's internal ended, and the territory was reorganized as a Carolingian margraviate, subdivided into counties under appointees, marking the transition from semi-independent to peripheral of the East Frankish realm. This process preserved some Carantanian customs temporarily but prioritized Frankish legal and ecclesiastical reforms, including accelerated efforts.

Society, Culture, and Traditions

Social Structure and Organization

The Carantanian society was organized along tribal lines, with a core of free settlers forming the primary social stratum, engaging in , , and communal . This , often termed liberi Carantani in later descriptions of rituals, held significant and participated in assemblies for major decisions, reflecting a decentralized without rigid feudal hierarchies. Primary accounts indicate limited social differentiation in the 7th-8th centuries, where elites arose through martial achievements and personal networks rather than inherited privilege, evolving from informal "great men" reliant on influence to "big men" controlling resources and followers, such as leader who reportedly sheltered 2,000 dependents around 700. Leadership selection among the Carantanians emphasized consensus among freemen, with dukes elected from prominent families based on demonstrated capability, as seen in the mid-8th century under Boruth, who sought to institutionalize rule amid resistance from traditionalist factions like the carmula (free assemblies). The Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum (c. 870), a text, documents this elective tradition persisting into the Frankish era, portraying the populus (people, likely freemen) as key to ducal legitimacy, though its bias may exaggerate centralized authority to justify interventions. No contemporary evidence supports widespread or dependent labor in early ; instead, the heterogeneous population— core with , Germanic, and remnants—operated through kin-based and tribal bonds, with economic self-sufficiency among freemen enabling resistance to external impositions. By the late , Frankish influence introduced gradual , as Bavarian counts replaced native dukes around 820, eroding tribal and integrating Carantanian into imperial administrative units with tribute obligations. Scholarly analyses, drawing on the Conversio and charters, interpret this as a shift from fluid, achievement-based organization to dynastic models, though native customs like involvement in governance lingered until full Carolingian .

Customs, Including Ducal Enthronement

The Carantanians maintained customs reflecting a participatory social structure among freemen, including where kosezi—freeholders—played a key role in confirming leadership and resolving disputes, as evidenced by the of dukes through councils comprising noblemen and these freemen. This tradition underscored the influence of the broader populace in , distinct from purely hierarchical models prevalent elsewhere in early medieval Europe. Central to Carantanian customs was the ducal enthronement ceremony, a installation of princes or that persisted into the later medieval period within the . The earliest detailed record appears in the Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum, composed around 870, which describes the process as involving local confirmation of the ruler appointed by overlords such as the or . Performed on the Prince's Stone (Knežji kamen), an inverted ancient Roman Ionic column base located at the Zollfeld plain near Karnburg (modern ), the ceremony symbolized the transfer of authority from the people to the duke. In the ritual, the incoming , attired in a grey coat, red belt, and Slovenian , arrived with an escort including nobles and led sacrificial animals—a and . A free peasant, representing the homines boni or freemen, stood upon the stone and interrogated the duke in the Slovenian regarding his mandate, typically from the or ; the duke responded affirmatively and tendered 60 denarii along with the animals and his clothing as symbolic payment. The duke then mounted the stone, brandished a sword toward the four cardinal directions, drank from the peasant's filled with from a nearby stream, and circumambulated the stone on horseback before receiving a staff of authority. The ceremony concluded with a blessing at the nearby Gospa Sveta cathedral, blending pre-Christian elements with Christian oversight. This Slovenian-language rite, unique in Europe for vesting legitimacy in a peasant delegate rather than solely in feudal or divine , endured until 1414 for the stone-based installation—last performed for Habsburg the Iron—and elements persisted until in modified forms at . Later medieval sources, such as the Schwabenspiegel (c. 1275), affirm its continuity as a customary legal practice, highlighting the Carantanians' retention of traditions amid Frankish and Habsburg integration. The ritual's emphasis on popular acclamation and oaths to , widows, and orphans reflected underlying social norms prioritizing communal .

Language, Religion, and Polyethnic Composition

The Carantanians spoke an early , a precursor to modern Slovene, characterized by its distinction from neighboring West Slavic dialects and reflecting settlement patterns in the since the 7th century. This linguistic identity is evidenced by later textual survivals, such as the 10th-century Freising Manuscripts, which preserve the oldest known sentences in Slovene and indicate continuity from Carantanian speech forms. The language featured Proto-Slavic roots evolving under local influences, distinguishing Carantanian from more western groups like . Initially, the Carantanians practiced Slavic paganism, with rituals tied to their alpine environment and pre-Christian traditions shared among early Slavs. Christianization began in the mid-8th century, marking the first large-scale conversion of Slavs from the West, driven by Frankish-Bavarian overlordship after 745. Prince Boruth (r. c. 740–750) was among the earliest rulers to convert, followed by his successors Cacatius (Gorazd) and Hotimir, who requested missionaries from Salzburg around 755. Key figures included Modestus, dispatched by Bishop Virgil of Salzburg, who evangelized the region until his death before 772, earning the title Apostle of Carantania. By 828, Christianity had largely supplanted paganism, facilitated by Aquileian and Salzburg clergy, though remnants of pre-Christian customs persisted in enthronement rites. The Carantanian population exhibited a polyethnic structure, with a core stratum comprising settlers from Samo's 7th-century empire, overlaid on assimilated pre-Slavic groups such as Romanized Noricans (Celtic-Roman remnants) and possibly residual elements from earlier nomadic dominance in the . This multiethnicity arose from layered migrations and integrations, where elites imposed language and customs but incorporated local substrates, as seen in archaeological patterns of 8th-century settlements blending and material culture. Despite this diversity, ethnic identification centered on gens traditions, reinforced by ducal institutions until Frankish diluted distinct polyethnic markers by the 9th century.

Rulers and Governance

Known Leaders and Their Roles

, documented as Wallucus dux Winedorum in the Chronicle of Fredegar around 631, served as an early leader of the Alpine prior to or during the upheavals of Samo's Tribal Union; his role involved commanding local forces against external threats, marking one of the earliest attestations of autonomous leadership in the region. Boruth (also Borut or Borouth), the first explicitly named of ruling circa 740–750, consolidated authority by seeking n protection against incursions around 743, submitting to Duke Odilo of and facilitating initial Christian missions; he dispatched hostages, including his son and nephew, to as pledges of loyalty, thereby transitioning the principality from suzerainty toward Frankish influence while attempting to establish dynastic rule amid decentralized tribal structures. Gorazd (Latinized as Cacatius), succeeding Boruth circa 750–752 possibly as his son, continued efforts by requesting the construction of the first in and undergoing , roles that positioned him as a bridge between pagan traditions and emerging integration under Bavarian oversight. Hotimir (also Cheitmar), flourishing 752–769 as Gorazd's cousin and successor, deepened ties with the by inviting Irish missionaries such as Modestus around 755 to evangelize his subjects, while suppressing pagan revolts and navigating Frankish-Bavarian overlordship; his leadership emphasized consolidation of Christian elites against internal resistance, as evidenced in the Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum. Later figures like Waltunc (fl. 772–788) maintained nominal princely authority under intensifying Carolingian control, handling administrative duties and enthronements, though with diminishing autonomy. (also Domislav or Tuitianus, d. circa 802), a active in the 769–772 political vacuum, exerted influence as a regional leader before transitioning to a bishopric role, aiding and administrative continuity in Carantania's fragmented governance.
LeaderApproximate ReignKey Roles and Actions
Valukc. 631Commanded Slavic forces; early autonomy against external powers.
Boruthc. 740–750Allied with Bavaria; initiated Christian missions; dynastic foundation attempts.
Gorazdc. 750–752Promoted church building and baptism; ecclesiastical alignment.
Hotimirfl. 752–769Invited missionaries; quelled pagan uprisings; stabilized under foreign suzerainty.
Waltuncfl. 772–788Managed enthronements and local administration amid Carolingian integration.
Domitianfl. late 8th centuryNobiliary leadership in transitions; later episcopal evangelization.
These leaders operated within a non-dynastic framework until Boruth's era, relying on consensus-based rituals and alliances rather than hereditary , as primary sources like Frankish reveal limited centralized power vulnerable to external .

Evolution of Leadership Models

In the initial phase of the Carantanians in the during the late 6th and early 7th centuries, leadership relied on informal networks of personal prestige and economic , resembling 'big men' models where influential figures like Wallucus maintained by supporting client groups of up to 2,000 individuals through resource control rather than hereditary or centralized power. No exists for a dynastic at this stage, with derived from alliances amid post-Avar disruptions. The mid-8th century marked a transition to more formalized chieftaincy under Boruth (r. c. 740–750), the first attested , who rebelled against around 740 and sought Bavarian protection, attempting to institutionalize monarchic rule despite resistance from traditional assemblies (carmulae). This shift toward 'chiefs' emphasized military leadership and external diplomacy, establishing the Principality of as a semi-independent entity until the Frankish invasion in 745, after which Boruth's successors, such as Hotimir (fl. 752–769), operated under Carolingian oversight while preserving local customs. Post-conquest integration evolved the model into a subordinated , where Frankish kings nominated candidates, but installation occurred via the Prince's Stone ritual on the Zollfeld plain (near modern ), involving -language oaths by freemen representatives affirming the duke's duty to protect the land and dispense justice, preceding imperial investiture and underscoring residual communal sovereignty. This ceremony, rooted in pre-Frankish traditions, blended participatory elements with feudal allegiance, continuing through the of Carinthia's formation in 976 until its final documented use in 1414 for Duke of Habsburg. By 828, however, internal autonomy eroded with full administrative incorporation into the East Frankish , transforming leadership from elective-princely to appointive-feudal under external monarchs.

Evidence and Historiography

Archaeological and Written Sources

The principal written sources documenting the Carantanians derive from Frankish and Bavarian ecclesiastical records, reflecting a shaped by and political interests in the region. The Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum, composed circa 870 by a Salzburg cleric, provides the most detailed account of their , ducal enthronement rituals on the Prince's Stone at Krnski grad, and subjugation under Bavarian and Frankish overlords following defeats in 743 and 828. This text, while propagandistic in promoting ecclesiastical authority, draws on contemporary charters and oral traditions for specifics on events from the . Earlier references to Carantanians or related groups appear in 7th-century Frankish annals, with the "" emerging post-660, denoting a in the distinct from and influences. The Manuscripts, three fragments from the late 9th or early preserved in the of , contain the oldest extant texts in an early Slovene using , including baptismal formulas and confessions that attest to linguistic continuity among the Carantanians. Archaeological evidence for Carantanian presence includes 8th-century fortified hilltop settlements in , such as those at Maria Saal and Griffen, featuring wooden palisades and strategic elevations indicative of defensive against Avar and Frankish incursions. These sites yield pottery, iron tools, and burial goods aligning with 6th- to 9th-century Alpine material culture, corroborating settlement patterns described in written records. The Prince's Stone (Knežji Kamen) at Zollfeld, a physical relic tied to the ducal installation rite, survives as a monumental artifact validating the ceremonial descriptions in the Conversio. Limited grave finds, including "founder tombs" with weapons and jewelry, suggest elite warrior strata, though ethnic attribution relies on contextual association with documented Carantanian territories rather than unambiguous markers.

Scholarly Interpretations and Debates

Scholars interpret the Carantanians as a West Slavic group that established a dux-led polity in the Eastern Alps following the collapse of Avar hegemony in the late 7th century, with their territory encompassing modern-day southern Austria, eastern Slovenia, and parts of northern Italy. Primary evidence derives from sparse Frankish and Bavarian charters, such as the 811 Carolingian donation, and the 9th-century Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum, which portrays them as a distinct gens subject to gradual Christianization and integration into the Frankish realm by the mid-9th century. Historians like Peter Štih emphasize that Carantania functioned as a peripheral march under Bavarian margraves after 743, retaining limited internal autonomy through local Slavic leaders rather than full sovereignty. Debates center on the polity's organizational complexity, with earlier Slovenian historians such as Bogo Grafenauer positing it as an early Slavic state exhibiting proto-democratic traits, evidenced by the ritual enthronement of dukes on the Prince's Stone at Knežje near Kranj. Contemporary scholars, including Štih, counter that such views project modern notions of statehood onto a tribal confederation characterized by decentralized leadership akin to "big men" or chieftains, supported by archaeological paucity of centralized administrative structures and reliance on oral traditions over written governance. This interpretation aligns with broader early medieval patterns of Slavic ethnogenesis, where polities like Carantania emerged via accommodation with incoming Germans rather than independent consolidation. Ethnic continuity to modern remains contested; while linguistic evidence links Carantanian speech to proto-Slovene dialects, critics argue the group's was fluid, potentially incorporating pre- Alpine remnants, and that "Slovene" ethnonymy crystallized later under ecclesiastical influence. Nationalist historiography in 19th-century romanticized as the "first Slovenian state" to foster amid Habsburg rule, a revived post-1991 but critiqued for and selective sourcing, as Slovenian academic traditions have occasionally prioritized cultural continuity over empirical fragmentation evident in sources like the manuscripts. Štih and others highlight systemic biases in regional scholarship, where Slovenian interpretations emphasize autonomy to counter Austrian claims, yet underexplore polyethnic integration documented in Carolingian annals. Archaeological debates further underscore evidential limits, with sites yielding pottery but no unambiguous markers of state-level hierarchy, prompting calls for interdisciplinary caution against over-reliance on 19th-century philological reconstructions.

Nationalist Claims and Critiques

Slovenian nationalists, particularly from the onward, have depicted the Carantanian principality of the 7th–8th centuries as the inaugural Slovenian state, highlighting its leadership and customs like the peasant-led ducal enthronement on the Prince's Stone as precursors to democratic and national sovereignty. This portrayal serves to establish a of ancient territorial continuity in the , predating Habsburg or Yugoslav frameworks, and has influenced symbolic proposals, such as adopting the —evident in 8th-century artifacts—as a replacement for the modern Slovenian to evoke pre-Carolingian independence. Right-wing political movements have prominently featured these elements, including the in flags and pins, to assert ethnic primacy and critique post-communist identity dilutions. Historians such as Peter Štih contend that Carantanians represented a tribal aggregate rather than a cohesive proto-Slovene , with self-identification tied to broader South or regional affiliations absent in primary sources like the Manuscripts (ca. ). Štih argues the equation of Carantanians with emerged only in 19th-century , retrofitting medieval polities to serve awakening amid multiethnic empires. Archaeological data from sites in modern reveal polyethnic settlements, incorporating pre-Slavic , , and later Germanic elements, undermining claims of ethnic purity or direct descent. Critiques further emphasize : the rite, while distinctive, reflected Frankish administrative adaptations post-748 conquest rather than inherent "," as evidenced by its discontinuation after Bavarian in 889. Scholars like Oto Luthar highlight how such myths, amplified in post-1991 , foster exclusionary narratives, ignoring as a fluid, elite-constructed process influenced by 19th-century linguistic standardization over empirical continuity. These interpretations prioritize ideological cohesion over source-based analysis, with Carantania's "statehood" better understood as a semi-autonomous under external , not a foundational entity.

References

  1. [1]
    Kingdoms of Central Europe - Khorushka / Carantania
    Situated in the south of Austria, on the frontier with modern Slovenia, the medieval region of Carinthia was home to various Celtic tribes from the third ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] On the Origin of Alpine Slovenes
    The main historical source of knowledge about the conditions in Carantania in the Early Middle Ages is the Conversio Bagoariorum et Carantanorum, a manuscript ...
  3. [3]
    None
    Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://brill.com/display/book/9789004187702/Bej.9789004185913.i-463_009.pdf) requires JavaScript to access, and the page only displays a message prompting users to enable JavaScript and reload. No information about the Carantanians' language, religion, ethnic composition, or polyethnic roots is available from the content provided.
  4. [4]
    Migration of Alpine Slavs and machine learning: Space-time pattern ...
    Sep 19, 2022 · The study examines the spread of Slavic in the Eastern Alps around 500-1000 CE. It argues that archaeological, linguistic and genetic evidence ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    The Conversion of the Bavarians and Carantanians, 8th-9th Century
    Mar 4, 2023 · And so when the carmula was settled Bishop Virgil sent again the priest Madalhohus and after him the priest Warmannus. But on the death of ...
  7. [7]
    Carantania - 15 Years of Slovenian State
    Carantania was the oldest known independent Slavonic state, formed in 658, and later became the duchy of Great Carantania in 976.Missing: Principality | Show results with:Principality
  8. [8]
    20 The Merovingians, the Avars, and the Slavs - Oxford Academic
    Walluch, the ruler of the Wends, was most likely a leader of the Carantanians, who were probably initially followers of Samo. After Samo's death, Walluch ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Carantania - Encyclopedia - The Free Dictionary
    Carantania was formed as an independent state after the collapse of the state of Samo (658). In about the year 745, it came under the protection of the duke ...
  10. [10]
    'Great Men', 'Big Men' and 'Chiefs' in Carantania? On the Formation ...
    This article is aimed at discussing a model, or models, of the political development of Carantania from the late 6 th to the early 9 th c., methodically and ...
  11. [11]
    Avars - Livius.org
    Aug 10, 2020 · 562/63 First Turkish embassy in Constantinople warns against alliance with the Avars; 562 Sigibert I, king of the Franks, repels an Avar ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Frontier practices in the early Carolingian Period
    In 788, when the Franks removed. Tassilo III and took direct control of Bavaria, there were clashes between. Franks and Avars, who also raided in Friuli but ...
  14. [14]
    TASSILO III AND BAVARIA, 781-8
    Firmer integration of Italy into the Frankish kingdom and the security of both from A var and Slav attacks via the Danube made the control of Bavaria ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE CARINTHIAN SLOVENES
    In the period of their greatest expansion, from the 7th till the 10th century, compact Slo vene settlements in the west reached the line running from the brook.
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    The Installation of the Dukes of Carantania - page 1 of 1 - eRepublik
    In 745 the Carantanian`s duke Boruth received support against the Avars from the Bavarians, already christianized by that time, and therefore he also decided ...
  20. [20]
    File:Arms of Windic March.svg - Wikimedia Commons
    May 29, 2022 · In 1414, he arrived in Carinthia. There, he let install himself at the acient Princes Stone (Knežji kamen) put near the Castle of Karnburg, and ...
  21. [21]
    Carantanian Language (Principia Moderni III Map Game)
    Carantanian is a reconstructed Western South Slavic language, heavily based on the Freising manuscripts, the earliest known writings of the region.Missing: Carantanians | Show results with:Carantanians
  22. [22]
    658–828 ad Carantania, also known as Carentania (Slovene ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · The name Carantania itself begins to appear in historical sources soon after 660. The name Carantania is of proto-Slavic origin.
  23. [23]
    Were people in Carantania pagans for a long time or did they ...
    May 26, 2013 · Carantania was Christianized in the second half of the 8th century by missionaries from Aquileia and Salzburg. Especially after 745 when it ...When were European pagan religions completely supplanted by ...Understanding the Christianization of Europe : r/AskHistory - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: Carantanians | Show results with:Carantanians
  24. [24]
    Modestus (Apostle of Carantania)
    Upon the request of Prince Cheitmar or Hotimir of Carantania to evangelize his people, Modestus was dispatched around the year 755 by bishop Vergilius of ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    (DOC) The Conversion of the Bavarians and Carantanians.docx
    The text is an important witness not so much to the actual historical processes of missionizing and conversion as such, but to how conversion was remembered ...
  26. [26]
    (PDF) Archaeology, Ethnicity and the structures of identification: The ...
    The paper examines the relationship between archaeological findings and ethnic identification, focusing on the Avars, Carantanians, and Moravians in the 8th ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    00.05.07, Pohl, Strategies of Distinction: The construction of Ethnic ...
    All four studies see a transition from some kind of separation between Romans and Visigoths, whether on the basis of language, religion, attire, or marital ...Missing: 7th | Show results with:7th
  28. [28]
    [PDF] carantania - University of Washington
    The present note is, therefore, intended to register the fundamental historical facts about Caran- tania, based upon primary sources, for their inclusion in.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  29. [29]
    Domitian of Carantania, the Prince Who Became a Saint
    Jun 19, 2024 · Carantania was a Slavic principality in the Eastern Alps during the early medieval period. It encompassed parts of modern-day Slovenia and ...Missing: Carantanians | Show results with:Carantanians<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    The Freising Manuscripts - a Crucial Part of Shared Slavic Heritage
    Jul 20, 2024 · The Freising manuscripts, also known as the Freising folia, are a collection of Latin and Old Slovenian religious texts dating back to the late 9th or early 10 ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] EARLY MEDIEVAL FORTIFICATIONS IN CARINTHIA/AUSTRIA ...
    ABSTRACT - For the 8th c. there is some first evidence for fortified hilltop settlements used by the Slavic Carantanians for military purposes.
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    [PDF] The Middle Ages between the Eastern Alps and the Northern Adriatic
    The Middle Ages between the eastern Alps and the northern Adriatic : select papers on. Slovene historiography and medieval history / by Peter Stih.
  34. [34]
    CHAPTER 5 Slovenian Identity and the Early Medieval Past
    ### Summary of Slovenian Identity and Carantania, Nationalist Uses, and Historiographical Debates
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Myths of nationhood: Slovenians, Caranthania and the Venetic theory
    Aug 6, 2025 · This article contends that both the top-down and bottom-up activities of so-called national elites work on constructing and elevating one ...Missing: Carantanians models
  37. [37]
    [PDF] REGIONAL DIFFERENCES, SLOVENE NATIONAL IDENTITY, AND ...
    Štih further claims that the Carantanians were first made into Slovenes only at the time of Linhart (the term Slovenes was first mentioned in Trubar's.
  38. [38]
    Ethnic Identity, National Consciousness and Archaeology The Case ...
    He argued that archaeological phenomena were to be identified with specific peoples and tribes, and his focus was on the identification of “Proto-Germans.” ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] SLOVENIANS, CARANTHANIA AND THE VENETIC THEORY
    This paper stems from a theoretical reflection on the concepts of multiculturalism, transculturality and national identity within the perspective of studies ...
  40. [40]
    Slovenia: Use of Carantanian Panther flags by nationalist parties ...
    Dec 4, 2010 · Of all the symbols that distinguish Slovenian ultra-rightist youth, the most popular is certainly the so-called Carantanian Panther; ...Missing: Carantanians | Show results with:Carantanians