Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Clactonian

The Clactonian is a Lower Palaeolithic stone-tool industry from , defined by its core-and-flake technology that produced unstandardized flakes and chopper-cores from flint nodules, notably lacking the bifacial handaxes typical of the contemporaneous tradition. Named after the at in , , where it was first identified in the 1920s and 1930s, the industry reflects a simple, expedient approach to focused on creating sharp cutting edges for basic tasks. Dated to the Hoxnian Interglacial (Marine Isotope Stage 11, approximately 420,000–380,000 years ago), it is primarily known from southern English sites near rivers and estuaries where raw flint was abundant. Associated with Homo heidelbergensis, the makers of the Clactonian likely exploited wetland and riparian environments during a warm period, as evidenced by the fossil-rich deposits at Clacton that include , mollusks, and vertebrates indicating a temperate oak woodland setting. Key assemblages feature thick, irregular flakes struck using direct percussion, often with bone or antler soft-hammers—the earliest known examples associated with a core-and-flake industry—alongside rare but significant organic artifacts like a finely worked yew wood point, suggesting versatile tool use beyond stone. The Clacton site itself spans cliffs, foreshore, and inland areas, yielding thousands of artifacts from ancient channel-fill sediments and serving as a Geological Conservation Review (GCR) site and (SSSI) for its palaeoenvironmental and archaeological value. Debates persist on whether the Clactonian represents a distinct cultural entity, a regional variant of broader flake-based technologies, or simply the result of raw material constraints in , but it underscores the technological diversity among Middle Pleistocene hominins in northwest . Other notable sites, such as Barnham in , demonstrate contemporaneity with handaxe industries, highlighting potential behavioral variability within the same populations.

Overview

Definition and Characteristics

The Clactonian is a lithic industry primarily known from , defined as a flake and core technology that emerged during the early Hoxnian , distinguished by its reliance on simple, unrefined stone tools without bifacial handaxes. This industry emphasizes the production of thick, irregular flakes detached from flint cores through basic percussion techniques, resulting in tools that prioritize functionality over symmetry or elaboration. Key characteristics include choppers fashioned from flint pebbles, where one or more edges are to create a cutting surface, alongside the irregular flakes themselves used as knives or scrapers. Rare notched tools, featuring deliberate indentations along an edge, suggest possible adaptations for or specialized gripping, though such forms are not dominant. The overall technology reflects unifacial —working only one face of the core or flake—lacking the bilateral refinement seen in contemporaneous industries. An iconic non-lithic artifact associated with the Clactonian is the Clacton Spear, a pointed yew-wood implement approximately 400,000 years old, which demonstrates early evidence of and use. Likely crafted by , the probable makers of Clactonian tools, this spear tip highlights a broader technological repertoire beyond stoneworking, including organic material manipulation for hunting or processing.

Chronology and Distribution

The Clactonian industry dates to approximately 420,000–380,000 years ago, corresponding to Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 and the Hoxnian , with assemblages from the early part of this period. This temporal placement aligns with the warmer climatic conditions following the Anglian glaciation, marking a period of reoccupation in . Sites associated with the industry are stratigraphically positioned in early Hoxnian pollen zones, such as Ho I and early Ho II, confirming this chronology through pollen analysis, , and other methods. The primary distribution of the Clactonian is concentrated in , particularly , where it is documented at multiple locations along ancient river systems. Related flake-tool assemblages extend to parts of across the , suggesting broader regional presence during this . The industry correlates with temperate interglacial conditions of the Hoxnian, characterized by forest-steppe mosaics that supported diverse , including straight-tusked elephants and hippopotamuses. Artefacts are preserved in stratigraphic contexts such as brickearth deposits and river terrace gravels, reflecting preferences for fluvial and coastal environments conducive to procurement and occupation. These settings indicate repeated use of riverine landscapes during the stable, warm phases of MIS 11.

History of Research

Discovery and Naming

The initial discovery of Pleistocene deposits at Clacton-on-Sea, Essex, occurred in the 1830s when local amateur geologist John Brown collected mammalian fossils from eroding channel sediments exposed in the West Cliff and foreshore areas. These early finds drew attention to the site's rich fossil record, and by the late 19th century, flint artifacts began to be recognized among the collections from the same deposits, marking the beginning of interest in potential human activity at the location. Systematic investigations in the early were led by archaeologist Samuel Hazzledine Warren, who conducted excavations at multiple localities around starting in 1909, including the foreshore and areas. Warren's work uncovered substantial assemblages of flint tools and flakes, notably from waterlogged contexts that preserved organic remains alongside the lithics. In , he first highlighted the distinctive character of these artifacts, particularly their production through direct percussion on cores without the bifacial shaping typical of handaxes. Warren formally named the "Clactonian" industry in , establishing it as a distinct Lower Palaeolithic entity based on the Clacton assemblages, which he described as a parallel but earlier tradition to the , characterized by the absence of handaxes and an emphasis on large flake tools. This classification positioned the Clactonian as a pre- culture in , reflecting a technological stage focused on core-and-flake reduction rather than biface production. Warren's excavations and publications provided the foundational evidence for this interpretation, integrating stratigraphic and typological data from the site's ancient river channel deposits. Contemporary researchers, including J. Reid Moir, an influential East Anglian archaeologist known for his studies of pre-Crag flint industries, supported and promoted the recognition of the Clactonian as a separate tradition through their broader work on regional sequences and tool classifications. Moir's emphasis on distinct evolutionary stages in lithic development complemented Warren's findings, helping to embed the Clactonian within early 20th-century frameworks of cultural succession.

Major Excavations and Sites

The Clactonian industry is best exemplified by the type site at in , , where excavations began in the early amid gravel quarrying operations. S. Hazzledine Warren conducted initial digs between 1911 and 1932, recovering artifacts from red gravel deposits within the Clacton Channel, a freshwater estuarine sequence. These efforts uncovered over 1,000 flint flakes, along with cores and minimal retouched tools, providing evidence of on-site knapping through refitted material. A notable discovery was the Clacton Spear, a wood lance point approximately 1.3 meters long, found in 1911 and interpreted as a thrusting based on its pointed form and lack of barbs. Later excavations at the nearby Golf Course site in 1969–1970 by Wymer and Singer employed systematic stratigraphic methods, confirming Clactonian assemblages in the basal gravels, dated to Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 around 400,000 years ago. At Barnfield Pit in , , multiple excavation phases have revealed Clactonian layers interstratified with deposits, highlighting repeated occupations. Early work in the 1910s by Smith and Dewey, followed by Chandler's campaigns from 1928 to 1935, documented artifacts in the Lower Loam and Lower Gravels during . Systematic excavations from 1968 to 1972, led by Waechter and continued by Conway, McNabb, and Ashton in the , utilized stratigraphic profiling and controlled recovery, yielding 1,105 lithics from the Lower Gravels, including large flakes, simple cores, and evidence of floors with 11 refit groups. These layers, lacking handaxes except for rare instances, overlie and underlie Acheulean-bearing strata, with the site dated to MIS 11. Further analysis in the confirmed on-site flake production through fresh, minimally retouched pieces. Rickson’s Pit, also in the area of , represents another key locality for Clactonian material, exposed during quarrying in . Excavations by Dewey in the early 1930s and Leakey in focused on basal gravels equivalent to those at Barnfield Pit, employing stratigraphic section recording to isolate non-biface assemblages. Key recoveries included cores and medium-to-large flakes with minimal retouch, consistent with Clactonian technology and absent handaxes, from fluvial deposits dated to MIS 11. These findings parallel the Barnfield Pit sequence, underscoring regional patterns of flake-based industries in the Thames-Medway valley. In , the Barnham site has contributed significantly to Clactonian evidence through excavations revealing mixed but distinct assemblages. Initial work by Paterson in at East Brickyard recovered flakes and choppers from glacial and fluvial deposits. Renewed efforts in 1989–1994 by the team under Ashton employed open-pit stratigraphic analysis, identifying in situ Clactonian horizons with hard-hammer flakes from alternate and parallel cores, alongside few retouched tools like flaked flakes. Over 77 lithics were documented in primary contexts, with evidence of expedient and no handaxes in certain layers, though adjacent areas showed biface production; the site is dated to MIS 11. These discoveries highlight localized variability in early Middle Pleistocene tool manufacture.

Lithic Technology

Tool Types and Assemblages

Clactonian assemblages feature a range of tools, most prominently choppers fashioned from flint pebbles or nodules. These are typically unifacial, with 2–3 flake removals concentrated along one margin to create a working edge, and are morphologically classified as discoidal or plano-convex forms. In certain examples, choppers display limited bifacial flaking on small nodules or pebbles, enhancing the edge while maintaining a -like morphology. Shapes vary from irregular and rounded to globular or flat configurations, often reflecting the raw material's natural form. Flake tools form another key component, comprising irregular and thick flakes subjected to minimal retouch. Retouch is often abrupt or semi-abrupt, particularly at the proximal end, enabling functions such as scraping or cutting; common subtypes include side-scrapers, end-scrapers, denticulates, and simple points. Notched flakes represent a notable variation, with semi-circular removals that may indicate for or specific gripping. Pebble tools, resembling choppers in their unrefined, unifacial edges, also occur and echo forms seen in Asian traditions, though adapted to local flint sources. Overall assemblage composition emphasizes , with waste flakes and primary cores dominating collections to suggest on-site activities; utilized pieces like retouched scrapers or points remain rare, comprising less than 10–15% of totals in documented sites. Flakes typically measure 5–7 in length on average, exhibiting thick profiles and bulbs of percussion indicative of hard use. A hallmark of Clactonian assemblages is the consistent absence of handaxes, distinguishing them from contemporaneous biface industries.
Tool CategoryKey CharacteristicsExamples/Subtypes
Core Tools (Choppers)Unifacial or limited bifacial edges; 2–3 removals; discoidal/plano-convex shapesIrregular/rounded forms; pebble-based variants
Flake ToolsThick, irregular blanks; minimal abrupt retouchScrapers (side/end); denticulates; notched flakes; points
/Utilized PiecesWaste flakes dominant; rare retouched elementsPrimary flakes (5–7 cm avg.); occasional hafting-adapted notches

Manufacturing Techniques

The primary manufacturing technique in the Clactonian industry involved direct percussion using hard stone hammerstones, typically made of flint or , to detach flakes from cores by striking in alternating directions around the core's perimeter. This method produced irregular flakes without predetermined shapes, emphasizing expedient production over standardized forms. Core preparation was minimal, with little to no or intentional shaping; cores were often simply natural nodules or cobbles from which flakes were removed until exhaustion, resulting in irregular, multi-platform forms after only a few strikes. Such opportunistic reduction reflected adaptation to available raw materials rather than formalized strategies. Raw materials consisted predominantly of locally sourced flint nodules obtained from river gravels or chalk beds, with occasional incorporation of or chert when flint was scarce or flawed. These materials were selected for their accessibility near site locations, such as estuarine or fluvial contexts, influencing the scale and quality of flake production. Waste patterns in Clactonian assemblages feature a high proportion of cortical flakes, indicating the initial reduction of unmodified nodules with limited further trimming. This composition underscores an economical approach, where cores were abandoned once usable flakes—such as those later retooled into simple edges—were obtained. Recent analyses of tools from the Clacton type-site provide evidence of innovation through soft percussion, using modified long bones to achieve finer control in flake detachment compared to hard stone methods. These organic percussors, identified via taphonomic traces like battering and polish, suggest selective application for more precise in certain production stages.

Paleoecology and Adaptation

Environmental Context

The Clactonian industry is associated with the Hoxnian Interglacial, a period of warm-temperate climate during Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11, characterized by mean July temperatures approximately 2–3°C higher than present-day values in southeast , fostering a of mixed oak forests and open grasslands. This climatic regime, with maximum summer temperatures reaching around 19°C and minimum winter temperatures near 1°C, supported diverse vegetation and contributed to the ecological stability observed in contemporary deposits. records from Hoxnian sites, such as Hoxne in , reveal pollen zones HoI–IIc dominated by temperate deciduous woodland, with prominent taxa including hazel (Corylus ) and elm (Ulmus spp.), indicative of moist, wooded lowlands interspersed with herbaceous communities. Clactonian sites are predominantly situated in river valleys, marshes, and coastal zones, where artifacts and associated sediments are preserved in brickearth, gravel beds, and estuarine silts, reflecting deposition in dynamic fluvial and intertidal environments. For instance, the type site at , , lies within ancient channel fills of the River Thames system, while other occurrences, such as at East Mersea and , occur in low-level coastal gravels influenced by tidal influences. These locations facilitated the accumulation of fine-grained overbank silts and coarser gravels during periodic flooding, enhancing the preservation of paleoenvironmental proxies. Faunal assemblages from Clactonian contexts further underscore the mild conditions, with the presence of (Palaeoloxodon antiquus), fallow deer (Dama clactoniana, an extinct relative of modern ) in contemporary layers signaling warm, humid environments with relatively mild winters unsuitable for cold-adapted species. These thermophilous mammals, alongside (Cervus elaphus) and (Stephanorhinus spp.), suggest access to lush riparian habitats and forested margins, where water availability supported large herbivores. Geologically, Clactonian deposits formed during the MIS 11 sea-level highstand, when eustatic rises to near-modern levels promoted and trapping in subsiding basins carved by prior glaciation, such as those in the Lowestoft Till (MIS 12). Lacustrine clays, peats, and fluvial sands at sites like Hoxne exemplify this process, where elevated sea levels stabilized coastal plains and enhanced the infilling of riverine depressions with organic-rich sediments conducive to biotic preservation. This highstand context, peaking around 400 ka, contrasts with preceding glacial erosion and set the stage for the ecological richness of the Hoxnian.

Subsistence and Lifestyle Evidence

Evidence from Clactonian sites indicates that hominins engaged in systematic butchery of large mammals, with cut marks and percussion fractures observed on bones of straight-tusked elephants (Palaeoloxodon antiquus) and deer species such as red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). At the Ebbsfleet site in Kent, a partial elephant skeleton was associated with approximately 100 lithic artifacts, including flakes and notched tools showing use-wear consistent with carcass dismemberment and meat removal, suggesting on-site processing of kills or scavenged remains. Similarly, at the type-site of Clacton-on-Sea in Essex, filleting cut marks on long bone shafts from deer and other ungulates point to defleshing activities using Clactonian flake tools, alongside evidence of bone tools possibly used in secondary processing. These marks imply a mix of hunting and scavenging strategies targeted at megafauna in open woodland environments. A notable wooden artifact, the Clacton Spear—a yew wood point approximately 40 cm long discovered at —provides insight into hunting technologies, likely functioning as a thrusting for close-range encounters with large such as elephants or horses. Dated to around 400,000 years ago and associated with the Clactonian industry, its pointed form and lack of evidence suggest manual use rather than throwing, indicating tactical approaches to big- procurement that may have required coordinated efforts. The possible use of , inferred from occasional charred bones at Clactonian and contemporaneous sites, remains debated, as such remains could result from natural wildfires rather than controlled , with no definitive hearths identified. Settlement patterns in Clactonian contexts reflect temporary camps situated in resource-rich and estuarine settings, such as valleys and coastal marshes, where hominins exploited episodic concentrations of fauna and raw materials. At Ebbsfleet, the clustered distribution of bones and tools over a small area (about 6x4 m) points to short-term occupations focused on kill processing rather than prolonged habitation. Assemblage sizes, often comprising hundreds of flakes and cores from multiple reduction sequences, imply group activities involving several individuals in tool manufacture and food sharing, fostering social cooperation in opportunistic resource exploitation. Dietary evidence underscores an opportunistic carnivorous focus supplemented by plant gathering in forested landscapes, with faunal remains dominated by large herbivores like , deer, and rhinoceroses providing high-calorie meat yields. and molluscan from sites like Clacton indicate temperate woodlands with abundant nuts, fruits, and tubers available for , complementing meat from butchered animals to support a flexible subsistence strategy adapted to variable conditions.

Debates and Interpretations

Classification Controversies

The Clactonian industry was initially conceptualized in the 1920s and 1930s as a distinct flake-based tradition predating the , representing an indigenous British Lower Palaeolithic culture focused on simple cores and flakes without handaxes. This view, advanced by scholars such as S. Hazzledine Warren, who coined the term in 1926 to describe non-handaxe assemblages from as a parallel culture to the , emphasized typological differences and positioned it as an early, pre- phase potentially linked to the first hominin occupations of . Early proponents like (1932) and J. Reid Moir reinforced this by interpreting Clactonian tools as evolutionarily prior to bifacial handaxe technologies, drawing on sites like Hoxne to suggest a linear cultural progression. By the 1950s, this perspective persisted in works such as those by Derek Roe (1968) and John Wymer (1968), who highlighted the Clactonian's unifacial focus as evidence of a separate technological lineage adapted to local flint resources. A significant shift occurred in the mid-20th century, with P. Oakley and others proposing that the Clactonian was not an independent industry but a variant of the , where the absence of handaxes resulted from raw material constraints, functional preferences, or regional practices rather than chronological or cultural separation. Oakley's analyses, including his 1937 collaboration with on Clacton materials and his 1964 review of British Palaeolithic , argued that apparent distinctions arose from practical choices in tool production, such as using local nodules unsuitable for large bifaces, rather than implying distinct hominin groups. This interpretation gained traction through stratigraphic evidence from , where Clactonian flakes in the Lower Loam and Lower Middle Gravel (dated to Marine Isotope Stage 11) interleave with Acheulean handaxes in overlying layers, indicating potential contemporaneity and shared technological repertoires. Scholars like Nick Ashton and John McNabb (1992) further supported this by demonstrating similarities in strategies between Clactonian and Acheulean assemblages, suggesting the former as a "facies" adapted to specific contexts. Debates intensified with alternative theories framing the Clactonian as a "domestic" mode of production, geared toward expedient, unifacial tools for tasks like butchery or , contrasted against evidence of deliberate flake-focused that implied intentional technological choices. Proponents of the domestic model, including Lawrence H. Keeley (1980) via microwear analysis and Steven Mithen through , posited that during periods like MIS 11, isolated groups prioritized quick flake tools over labor-intensive handaxes due to environmental or social factors. However, counterarguments, such as those from (2000), emphasized stratigraphic and typological data from sites like Barnham showing non-handaxe layers as purposeful reductions, challenging reduction to mere expediency. Modern consensus, as articulated in syntheses by Ashton et al. (2016) and McNabb (2020), leans toward viewing the Clactonian as a regional variant or early of the Acheulean during MIS 11c, with handaxe absence reflecting localized adaptations rather than autonomy, though persistent arguments for its distinctiveness endure based on consistent unifacial patterns across British sites. This resolution draws on refined dating and excavation data, rejecting earlier evolutionary typologies while acknowledging ongoing variability in hominin technological behavior.

Implications for Hominin Dispersal

The Clactonian industry provides evidence for potentially distinct waves of hominin into during the Pleistocene, particularly following the Anglian glaciation (MIS 12). Assemblages suggest an early influx of populations from , possibly the region, during the warmer Hoxnian (MIS 11), where non-handaxe flake technologies predominated before the arrival of handaxe makers. This scenario aligns with models of pulsed colonizations, where environmental openings post-glaciation facilitated repeated entries via land bridges, contrasting with later dispersals that may represent subsequent or overlapping migrations. The adoption of Clactonian flake production reflects behavioral flexibility among these early colonizers, who tailored lithic strategies to exploit abundant local flint sources in southern , such as coastal and riverine nodules. This adaptation likely enabled rapid in the post-Anglian , where hominins could efficiently produce sharp-edged tools for resources without the resource-intensive bifacial shaping seen in traditions. Such opportunism underscores how technological choices supported colonization in a dynamic island-peninsula setting, with populations responding to geographic isolation and raw material variability. Clactonian tools are associated with , a species whose dispersal across Europe during MIS 11–9 bridges African origins with later Neanderthal ancestry, as evidenced by shared morphological and genetic signals in fossils and ancient DNA analyses. This connection positions Clactonian makers within broader hominin expansions from southern and , where flake-based industries complemented emerging bifacial technologies in a connected . Correlations with contemporary Acheulean sites like Boxgrove, which yielded H. heidelbergensis fossils alongside handaxes, highlight diverse tool traditions within the same species and temporal window, suggesting rather than strict technological succession in a unified population. Modern genetic studies of and archaic human lineages further support this, indicating interbreeding and among groups employing varied lithics during MIS 11. Ongoing research emphasizes the need for refined dating techniques, such as optically stimulated luminescence, and extraction from associated faunal remains to determine whether Clactonian producers formed a discrete migratory group or represented a regional variant within the sphere. These efforts could clarify the extent of population connectivity and replacement dynamics across northwest .

References

  1. [1]
    The Clacton-on-Sea (Essex, UK) GCR site and SSSI: New data and ...
    This paper provides an overview of the continuing importance of the Clacton GCR site and Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), summarizing recently ...
  2. [2]
    Problems and Pitfalls in Understanding the Clactonian - ResearchGate
    The Clactonian is a stone tool industry dating to MIS 11 and found in southern England. Its maker is currently thought to be Homo heidelbergensis, ...
  3. [3]
    Contemporaneity of Clactonian and Acheulian flint industries at ...
    Aug 14, 2025 · These deposits have yielded two lithic assemblages (Clactonian and Acheulian-type industries) that have generated much debate about the timing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Choppers and the Clactonian: A Reinvestigation
    Feb 18, 2014 · Choppers and chopping tools have long been associated with the Clactonian industries of Britain. They have either been dismissed as cores, ...
  6. [6]
    A previously unreported collection of Palaeolithic lithics from ...
    The Clactonian is a relatively simple essential lithic industry consisting of “flakes and cores from which they were struck, some of the flakes bearing retouch ...
  7. [7]
    The Clacton Spear: The Last One Hundred Years
    Mar 3, 2015 · At 400000 years old, the yew-wood Clacton spear is the earliest known worked wooden implement and has appeared in academic articles ever ...
  8. [8]
    (PDF) The Clacton Spear: The Last One Hundred Years
    Mar 3, 2015 · In 1911, an eminent amateur prehistorian pulled the broken end of a pointed wooden shaft from ; At 400,000 years old, the yew-wood Clacton spear ...<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    Taphonomic and technological analyses of Lower Palaeolithic bone ...
    Nov 23, 2022 · These sites date to the early part of the Hoxnian Interglacial (Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11, 424–374 kya) and were replaced by a handaxe ...
  10. [10]
    The Occurrence of Non-handaxe Assemblages Early in the Purfleet ...
    May 17, 2025 · In Britain, non-handaxe assemblages dated to the Middle Pleistocene have traditionally been classified as 'Clactonian' after the type-site of ...
  11. [11]
    New evidence for complex climate change in MIS 11 from Hoxne ...
    Together with the evidence from Hoxne of a later MIS 11 cold substage, this suggests that the Hoxnian Interglacial can be equated with the first major temperate ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The Clactonian elephant butchery site at Southfleet Road, Ebbsfleet ...
    Clactonian—but merely reflects the differential distribution across the landscape of different knapping practices by humans with a varied technological ...
  13. [13]
    Excavation of the Clactonian Industry at the Golf Course, Clacton-on ...
    May 27, 2014 · Riparian landscapes and human habitat preferences during the Hoxnian (MIS 11) Interglacial. Journal of Quaternary Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 5 ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Site and artefact studies
    Apr 6, 2016 · This peculiarity is referred to as the 'Clactonian', after. Clacton-on-Sea, where Samuel Hazzledine Warren first noted this lack (Warren 1912; ...
  15. [15]
    The Occurrence of Non-handaxe Assemblages Early in the Purfleet ...
    May 17, 2025 · Warren (1926) first used the term Clactonian in a footnote, describing the industry as a parallel culture to the Acheulean, and predecessor to ...
  16. [16]
    On the Clactonian Industry at Swanscombe | Cambridge Core
    Oct 25, 2013 · Reid Moir's opinion I have re-visited some of the glacial gravels of East Anglia (Cromer, Warren Hill and Bramford) and collected flakes, and ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Lower Palaeolithic Occupation of Britain - Wessex Archaeology
    'Clactonian Industry' and 'Acheulian Industry'.This is mainly as they suggest a separation that may not be justified, with connotations of equating with ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton
    general acceptance that an area north east of the Rhine lacks handaxes, this currently ... The history of the Clactonian has been one of shifting definitions, ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] the clactonian: british lower palaeolithic flint technology in biface ...
    The concept of the. Clactonian was generated and maintained by adherence to typological analysis, and to the powerful influence of mental templates reinforcing.
  20. [20]
    Differentiation of MIS 9 and MIS 11 in the continental record
    T max = 19 ° C, T min = 1 ° C. Thus the mean July temperatures were about 2 °C warmer than those of the present day in southeast England and mean January ...
  21. [21]
    New evidence for complex climate change in MIS 11 from Hoxne ...
    In the UK, the Hoxnian Interglacial has been considered to correlate with MIS 11. New investigations at Hoxne (Suffolk) provide an opportunity to re-evaluate ...Missing: straight- tusked hippopotamus
  22. [22]
    [PDF] GCR Series No. 7. Quaternary of the Thames: Chapter 5 (Essex)
    The Low-level East Essex. Gravel is represented in GCR sites at Clacton,. East Mersea and Southminster. Relatively little information has come from the deposits ...
  23. [23]
    Marine Isotope Stage 11: Palaeoclimates, palaeoenvironments and ...
    Both interglacials, MIS 11 and MIS 1, are characterised by high sea levels, intense warmth, low astronomical forcingdin particular low precessiondand elevated ...
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    The human occupation of Britain during the Hoxnian Interglacial
    This paper provides an overview of the MIS 11 record for Britain. The glacial history of Britain, in particular the Anglian glaciation of MIS 12, ...
  27. [27]
    Clactonian and Acheulian industries in Britain: their chronology and ...
    This paper reviews the original recognition and current status of the Clactonian industry in Britain. Recent challenges to its longstanding status as a ...
  28. [28]
    On the Significance of Acheulean Biface Variability in Southern Britain
    Feb 18, 2014 · This paper examines the combined role of several of these factors – namely raw materials, reduction intensity, and function – on biface ...
  29. [29]
    Homo heidelbergensis - Smithsonian's Human Origins
    Jan 3, 2024 · Comparison of Neanderthal and modern human DNA suggests that the two lineages diverged from a common ancestor, most likely Homo heidelbergensis, ...Missing: Clactonian | Show results with:Clactonian
  30. [30]
    Analysis: Boxgrove - how we found Europe's oldest bone tools and ...
    Aug 12, 2020 · Dr Matthew Pope (UCL Archaeology) discusses new evidence about an extinct human species found at the Boxgrove site, where Britain's oldest human remains reveal ...Missing: Clactonian DNA correlations
  31. [31]
    Twisted Handaxes in Middle Pleistocene Britain and their ...
    Jun 4, 2019 · Acheulean handaxe assemblages contain much variation but also show clear modal tendencies. Such variation is perhaps an inevitability in ...