Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Cockchafer

The cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), also known as the May bug, is a large scarab beetle species (Scarabaeidae family) endemic to Europe, distinguished by its adult form's clumsy, nocturnal swarming flights and its C-shaped larvae that feed voraciously on plant roots in soil. Adults typically span 20–30 mm in length, with a reddish-brown exoskeleton, clubbed antennae adapted for pheromone detection, and a brief lifespan of about six weeks dedicated primarily to reproduction after emerging in late spring. The life cycle spans three to four years, dominated by larval development underground where grubs damage turf, crops, and forest undergrowth by consuming organic matter and roots, often synchronizing population cycles that amplify periodic outbreaks as agricultural pests. These outbreaks have historically prompted interventions like soil treatments and biological controls targeting larvae, underscoring the beetle's ecological role in nutrient cycling alongside its economic impacts on grassland and arable farming.

Taxonomy and Systematics

Principal Species and Variants

The genus , within the family , encompasses around 20 species of commonly referred to as cockchafers, though the term principally denotes the European species Melolontha melolontha (common cockchafer) and Melolontha hippocastani (forest cockchafer). These two represent the primary species of economic and ecological significance in due to their larval root-feeding habits that can damage forests and . M. melolontha is characterized by a body length of 20-30 mm, light brown coloration, and a slender pygidium, distinguishing it from M. hippocastani, which has a shorter, knob-shaped pygidium. M. melolontha, described by Linnaeus in 1758, is the archetypal cockchafer, widespread across temperate where it emerges in May and June, feeding on tree foliage as adults. Its larvae, known as white grubs, develop over 3-4 years in , consuming and roots. In contrast, M. hippocastani, named by Fabricius in 1801, has a similar but prefers forest habitats and is noted for outbreaks damaging broadleaf trees. A third European species, Melolontha pectoralis, exists but is less commonly associated with the cockchafer designation and has restricted distribution. No subspecies are recognized for M. melolontha, with morphological variation limited to regional color and size differences attributable to environmental factors rather than . Recent taxonomic additions, such as Melolontha arunachalensis and Melolontha lachungensis described in 2023 from , expand the genus but do not alter the focus on European principals for cockchafer references.

Morphology

Adult Form

The adult cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha, measures 20-34 mm in length, exhibiting a robust, body with a heavy-set appearance. The head is dark, often black, and the pronotum is shiny black, covered in short, closely set hairs. The elytra are reddish-brown or dull brown, ribbed, and the abdomen is blackish dorsally. Legs are reddish, adapted for walking, while the antennae are lamellate, forming a fan-like structure with males possessing seven terminal segments (lamellae) and females six, aiding in pheromone detection during mating. Ventrally, the body features fine, short pubescence, denser on the sides and . The overall coloration and pubescence provide among foliage where adults aggregate.

Larval Form

The larvae of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), commonly called grubs, exhibit a characteristic C-shaped posture typical of scarab beetle larvae. They possess a soft, creamy-white to dull white body, a hardened brown head capsule equipped with strong mandibles for root feeding, and three pairs of well-developed thoracic legs that are often yellowish and hairy. The body lacks prolegs, and the raster (anal plate) features two rows of short spines arranged in a V-pattern, aiding identification from similar species. Development proceeds through three instars over 3 to 4 years in the , with first-instar larvae hatching at approximately 5-6 mm in length after a 4- to 6-week stage. Subsequent molts occur in late summer or autumn, with second- and third-instar grubs growing progressively larger, reaching 40-45 mm by maturity; third instars dominate the damage phase due to their size and feeding intensity. Overwintering happens 2-3 times, with grubs burrowing deeper (up to 1 meter) in colder periods to avoid freezing, resuming activity in spring when temperatures rise above 10°C. Grubs primarily feed on decaying organic matter and live roots in the upper soil layers (0-20 cm initially, deeper later), targeting grasses, clover, cereals, and crop seedlings, which can lead to turf wilting and plant death at high densities (e.g., >20 grubs per square meter). Early instars detect roots via carbon dioxide gradients, preferring fine feeder roots, while later stages consume coarser structures, contributing to agricultural losses estimated at significant pasture degradation in outbreak years. Prior to pupation in late summer of the final year, mature grubs cease feeding and form an earthen cell at 20-50 cm depth.

Distribution and Habitat Preferences

Geographic Range

The common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) is native to Europe, where it occurs widely across temperate regions suitable for its soil-dwelling larvae. Its distribution spans from the British Isles and Iberian Peninsula in the west to the Ural Mountains in the east, and from southern Scandinavia southward to the northern Mediterranean basin, including countries such as France, Germany, Austria, Poland, and Turkey. This range aligns with Palaearctic patterns for the genus Melolontha, though M. melolontha predominates in European arable and forested landscapes. Populations exhibit synchronized outbreaks in , with documented infestations tied to historical agricultural monitoring since the 19th century, reflecting stable endemic presence rather than recent expansions. No verified established populations exist outside , despite occasional misidentifications with similar scarab beetles like North American June bugs (Phyllophaga spp.). The species' range limits are influenced by climatic factors, with absences in extreme northern or arid southern zones due to unsuitable overwintering conditions for larvae at depths of 20–100 cm.

Environmental Conditions

The common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) inhabits temperate regions characterized by mild climatic conditions, particularly valley floors where are favorable for development. Larvae develop in soft, shaded soils with adequate moisture, often in agricultural grasslands or edges, where supports burrowing and root access. Adults emerge from the soil in , typically after the cumulative mean daily air temperature exceeds 355 degree-days, signaling warming conditions above approximately 10–15°C. Soil pH influences abundance, with populations observed in acidic conditions ( 4.5–5.0) and a positive correlation between higher values (measured in water or CaCl₂) and in some stands. Preferred soils are typically loamy or sandy, providing while retaining essential for larval survival and oviposition; dense layers reduce egg cluster by limiting access. Optimal larval growth occurs at soil temperatures of 20–25°C, with development slowing below 15°C. Humidity and proximity to open spaces also affect occurrence, with enhancing presence in habitats.

Life Cycle

Developmental Phases

The cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) exhibits holometabolous development, progressing through , , , and stages over a 3- to 4-year cycle synchronized across populations in infested areas. Approximately 98% of the occurs underground as , larva, or pupa. Egg stage. Females deposit 60-80 oval eggs (initially 2 mm long, swelling to 3 mm via water absorption) in soil batches of 10-30 at depths of 5-20 cm, primarily in May to June. Eggs hatch after 4-6 weeks into first-instar larvae, with embryonic development influenced by soil temperature and moisture. Larval stage. Hatched larvae (L1 instar) are C-shaped, whitish grubs 5-10 mm long with brown heads and strong mandibles, initially feeding on soil organic matter before targeting plant roots. Three instars occur over 3-4 years: L1 grows to 10-20 mm by first autumn; L2 to 30-35 mm by second autumn; L3 reaches 40-46 mm by third spring, burrowing deeper (up to 1 m) and causing root damage. Larvae overwinter 2-3 times, resuming activity in spring when soil warms above 10°C. Pupal stage. In late spring or early summer of the final year, third-instar larvae form earthen cells 20-30 cm deep and te; the measures 25-35 mm, initially whitish turning reddish-brown. This stage lasts 1.5-2 months under optimal conditions (soil temperature 15-20°C), though it may extend to 10 months during or cold. Pupae remain immobile and vulnerable to soil disturbance. Adult stage. New adults (25-30 mm long) eclose in summer but remain in pupal cells until the following (April-May), emerging en masse when reaches 12-15°C for swarming flights. Adults live 4-8 weeks, feeding minimally on foliage while prioritizing ; post-oviposition, they die, completing the cycle.

Reproductive Processes

Adult Melolontha melolontha engage in mating shortly after emergence in late April to May, with peak activity in late May to early June. Males undertake swarming flights in the evening, orienting toward females in the tree canopy via detection of sex pheromones emitted by females and synergized with green leaf volatiles (such as (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol) released from foliage damaged by female feeding. These cues enable males' large antennae to locate receptive females, facilitating copulation primarily among branches. occurs during this period, after which males cease flying and die within weeks, while females persist briefly for oviposition. Post-mating, gravid females descend at to suitable ground sites, burrowing 10-20 cm into soft, moist soils—preferentially sandy or loamy with adequate —to deposit eggs. Eggs, pearly white and spherical at 2-3 diameter, are laid in batches of 12-30, often in clusters within a small that the female then covers. Oviposition typically spans one or two phases separated by about two weeks, influenced by conditions and female endocrine responses to environmental factors like and . Each female produces 40-100 eggs total across depositions, though actual varies with habitat quality. occurs after 4-6 weeks under favorable conditions ( 10-15°C), yielding C-shaped larvae that initiate the subterranean phase.

Feeding Ecology

Larval Feeding

The larvae of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), commonly referred to as white grubs, are C-shaped, subterranean feeders that primarily consume live plant roots rather than decaying organic matter. They exhibit polyphagous and largely indiscriminate feeding, gnawing on small fibrous roots of grasses, grains, beets, trees, clover, dandelions, meadow herbs, fruit trees, forest trees, and vines. Younger instars (10-20 mm in length) initially target finer roots during the first autumn after hatching, while larger second- and third-instar grubs (up to 40-46 mm) progress to thicker roots, escalating consumption intensity. Feeding occurs actively from mid-April to in the second year of the larval stage, with grubs burrowing through at depths of 0-20 cm during the and up to 60 cm during winter ; they can relocate up to 30 cm per day while foraging on rootlets. Juveniles acquire symbiotic gut for cellulose digestion by ingesting parental excrement shortly after hatching, enabling efficient breakdown of root tissues. This prolonged root herbivory, spanning 3-4 years across three instars, severs vascular tissues, impairs water and nutrient uptake, and causes retarded growth, , or death in affected , with peak damage often manifesting in the year following adult swarming. In agricultural contexts, dense populations can devastate grasslands, cereals, and orchards by depleting systems, weakening trees, and leading to crop failure.

Adult Consumption

Adult cockchafers (Melolontha melolontha) primarily feed on the leaves and flowers of trees and shrubs during their brief adult phase in . Preferred host plants include (Quercus spp.), (Fagus sylvatica), (Acer spp.), sweet (Castanea sativa), (Prunus domestica), (Juglans spp.), and other fruit trees, with occasional consumption of (Larix spp.) needles and leaves. Feeding behavior involves chewing irregular holes or skeletonizing leaves, typically at or night, though damage remains limited compared to larval feeding due to the adults' short lifespan of 4-6 weeks and relatively low population densities. In regions like the , adult defoliation rarely reaches destructive levels, affecting canopy but not threatening tree health. Experimental studies indicate that food source quality influences adult survival, weight gain, and fecundity; and leaves support higher relative weight gains and longer lifespans than lower-quality options like needles, with females showing greater sensitivity to diet variations. For instance, adults fed European needles exhibited intermediate weight gains relative to those on foliage.

Behavioral Patterns

Swarming and Mating

Adult cockchafers (Melolontha melolontha) emerge from the soil in spring, typically from late April to early June in , initiating a brief lasting 4–6 weeks focused on . Males exhibit pronounced swarming , forming aggregations and engaging in mass flights primarily at , often near edges, tree canopies, and open meadows, with activity peaking in calm, warm conditions above 15°C.00835-5) These flights can extend up to 2–3 km from emergence sites, driven by orientation toward host plants rather than random dispersal. Swarming is male-biased, with females remaining largely stationary on foliage to feed on , , and other leaves, minimizing their flight activity post-emergence. Male attraction relies on a multimodal cue system: feeding by females induces emission of green leaf volatiles (GLVs) from damaged foliage, such as (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, functioning as a that simulates host plant signals and draws swarming males. Toluquinone, a compound potentially released from female defensive glands, further enhances this as a sex-specific attractant, eliciting oriented landings and upwind flight in field assays. While some observations suggest supplementary female pheromones during feeding, prioritizes plant-derived volatiles over volatile pheromones for primary mate location.00835-5) Upon arrival at aggregation sites, males perform displays, including wing fanning and tactile interactions, before copulation on leaves or branches; mating duration is typically short, lasting minutes, after which males may seek additional partners. Females, having mated once or multiply, cease feeding soon after and descend to for oviposition, depositing 20–30 eggs in clusters 5–20 cm deep in moist, humus-rich substrates, though this marks the from to egg-laying. Swarming intensity correlates with , with historical outbreaks in documenting flights numbering thousands per , amplifying defoliation risks during peak activity.

Dispersal Mechanisms


The primary dispersal mechanism of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) is active flight by adults, which emerge from pupal chambers in spring and take to the air primarily during evening hours to seek mates, foliage for feeding, and suitable oviposition sites. Flight occurs in swarms, producing a distinctive loud buzzing from rapid beats, facilitating aggregation along edges or open areas. This enables short-range relocation, with adults typically covering distances of up to 2-3 kilometers from points before settling.
Larval stages exhibit negligible active dispersal, limited to crawling within the upper layers over distances of mere centimeters to meters during feeding or vertical for overwintering. Eggs are laid in clusters near adult aggregation sites, relying on parental mobility rather than independent larval spread. Passive transport via movement or activity occurs rarely and does not significantly contribute to expansion. Genetic analyses reveal moderate across populations, implying occasional dispersal events exceeding typical flight ranges, possibly aided by wind or human-mediated soil translocation, though direct evidence remains sparse. Overall, the ' limited restricts outbreak to local scales, with synchronized life cycles amplifying densities in favorable habitats without widespread .

Natural Enemies

Predatory Interactions

The larvae of Melolontha melolontha, known as white grubs, are a primary target for soil-dwelling predators, including moles (Talpa europaea) that tunnel through turf to consume them, often leading to visible surface damage from their foraging. (Meles meles), foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and other mammals such as hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) and martens excavate grubs from the upper soil layers, particularly in grasslands and agricultural fields where larval densities peak. These mammalian predators can exacerbate lawn and crop damage during outbreaks, as their digging disrupts roots while targeting the grubs, with reports noting severe turf disruption from badger activity in infested areas. Avian predators play a significant role in controlling both larval and adult stages; rooks (Corvus frugilegus) and other corvids probe the soil for grubs, while woodpeckers, sparrows, and cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) consume emerging adults during swarming periods in spring. Ground beetles (Carabidae family) and predatory wasps prey on smaller larvae and eggs, contributing to natural population regulation in meadows and woodlands. Bats opportunistically feed on flying adults at dusk, attracted to their erratic flight patterns. Tachinid flies () parasitize adult cockchafers by laying eggs on their bodies, with larvae developing internally and emerging to pupate, thus reducing adult populations in outbreak years; this interaction is documented in field studies as a density-dependent control mechanism. While these predators collectively limit cockchafer numbers, their efficacy varies with and use, which can diminish predator abundance and allow larval persistence in for 3–4 years.

Parasitic and Pathogenic Controls

Parasitic nematodes, particularly species in the genera Heterorhabditis and Steinernema, serve as natural enemies of cockchafer larvae (Melolontha melolontha) by invading the host's body and releasing symbiotic bacteria that cause septicemia and death. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora targets soil-dwelling grubs effectively under moist conditions, with field applications demonstrating up to 70-90% mortality in third-instar larvae when applied at rates of 2-5 million infective juveniles per square meter. Similarly, Heterorhabditis megidis has been documented to parasitize cockchafer grubs, reducing populations in agricultural soils through targeted inundative releases. A native species, Neoaplectana melolonthae (now classified under Steinernema), was identified parasitizing larvae in Central Europe, indicating endemic parasitic pressure that contributes to natural population regulation. Entomopathogenic fungi represent key pathogenic controls, with Beauveria brongniartii exhibiting high virulence against M. melolontha larvae and adults in European grasslands and orchards. This fungus infects via cuticle penetration, leading to mycosis; clonal populations of B. brongniartii have been isolated from infected cockchafers, supporting its role in epizootics that can suppress outbreaks when humidity exceeds 80%. Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana also demonstrate pathogenicity, with conidial applications achieving 50-80% larval mortality in laboratory bioassays, though field efficacy varies with soil type and temperature (optimal at 15-25°C). These fungi are deployed in biocontrol formulations, often combined with nematodes for synergistic effects, as chemical fungicides can reduce their persistence. Bacterial pathogens, such as those symbionts of nematodes (e.g., Xenorhabdus spp. with Heterorhabditis), indirectly control cockchafers by disseminating within the host , though direct bacterial entomopathogens like Bacillus thuringiensis show limited efficacy against scarab larvae due to interference. Research indicates cockchafer bacteria can confer resistance to some pathogens, complicating control, but no widespread viral pathogens have been established for M. melolontha management as of 2024. Overall, these biological agents prioritize larval stages, exploiting the cockchafer's 3-4 year subterranean cycle for long-term suppression without broad environmental disruption.

Pest Dynamics

Agricultural and Economic Impacts

The larvae of Melolontha melolontha, known as white grubs, primarily damage agricultural crops by feeding on root systems, particularly those of grasses, cereals, potatoes, , fruit trees, and vines, which retards plant growth, causes withering, and can lead to complete crop failure in heavily infested fields. Adult beetles contribute to agricultural losses through on leaves of orchards and field crops, exacerbating yield reductions during emergence periods. In regions like , these impacts are most pronounced in permanent grasslands and horticultural areas, where grub densities can destroy extensive root networks over 3-4 year larval development cycles. In , adult cockchafers cause defoliation of species such as , , and , as well as like , with mass swarms potentially stripping entire canopies and leading to dieback or clear-cutting equivalents in severe outbreaks. Larval feeding further weakens young trees and seedlings, resulting in high mortality rates in plantations, as observed in forests where extensive losses have been documented despite declining beetle abundances. Such damage has historically prompted interventions in countries like and , where cockchafers are classified as major forest pests capable of altering stand composition. Economic consequences arise from cyclical outbreaks synchronized every 3-4 years, with historical mass events in the late 1940s to early 1950s across Europe causing substantial yield losses in agriculture and forestry, necessitating costly control efforts like soil treatments and manual collections. In Germany, these outbreaks have inflicted "huge damages" on croplands and woodlands, while in Czechoslovakia's 1956-1968 outbreak, grubs inflicted peak destruction on orchards and vineyards, underscoring ongoing threats to productivity in affected regions. Although precise monetary valuations vary by outbreak scale, the pest's role in driving control expenditures and reducing harvestable biomass highlights its persistent economic burden in European agrosystems.

Outbreak Patterns

Cockchafers (Melolontha melolontha) display outbreak patterns characterized by periodic mass emergences of adults, synchronized with their 3- to 4-year , during which larvae develop underground before pupating and emerging to defoliate vegetation en masse. These cycles arise from overlapping but phased larval cohorts, with full in localized populations leading to outbreaks every 3 years in regions like , as evidenced by defoliation-induced narrow tree rings in . Outbreaks typically peak in to , with adults swarming in densities sufficient to strip leaves from trees and crops over several weeks, followed by oviposition that replenishes larval populations. Longer-term dynamics reveal superimposed multi-decadal cycles, with historical records indicating 30- to 40-year intervals between major outbreak phases lasting up to 10 years, potentially influenced by climatic factors such as warming temperatures that enhance larval survival and population buildup. In subfossil tree trunks from sites like Tovacov, Czech Republic, dendrochronological analysis confirms recurring 3- to 5-year outbreak cycles dating back centuries, marked by growth suppressions from larval root feeding and adult defoliation. Regional variations occur; for instance, in the Vosges Mountains of northeastern France, populations reached epidemic levels starting in 2007, persisting due to favorable soil and forest edge conditions that promote high larval densities exceeding economic thresholds. Genetic structuring within populations contributes to outbreak resilience, with low between subpopulations allowing localized booms despite natural enemies, though asynchronous cohorts in some areas mitigate severity by preventing total . Outbreaks are more pronounced in mixed forests and grasslands with open-forest boundaries, where facilitate higher occurrence, amplifying damage to regeneration phases in . These patterns underscore the ' capacity for eruptive dynamics, driven primarily by intrinsic life-history traits rather than external perturbations alone.

Control Measures

Historical Interventions

Manual collection of adult cockchafers during their swarming phase constituted a primary historical intervention across Europe, involving shaking beetles from trees onto sheets or using nets to capture them en masse, followed by destruction through burning or crushing. This method was labor-intensive and targeted peak flight periods in spring, often organized at community or governmental levels during outbreaks to mitigate crop defoliation. Effectiveness depended on population density and participation scale, with records from Germany indicating such efforts reduced local swarms but failed to prevent larval establishment in soil. For larval stages, of infested fields exposed white grubs to sunlight, , and predation by or other , a practice documented in agricultural treatises from the onward. In the , historical overviews trace interventions back to 1786, where plowing combined with manual grub removal from turned soil addressed outbreaks in arable lands, though grubs' deep burrowing limited success rates to partial reductions in infestation. These cultural methods disrupted life cycles without chemicals but required repeated annual applications over the 3-4 year larval period, often supplemented by fallow periods or to starve populations. Early chemical interventions emerged in the late 19th and early 20th centuries with inorganic poisons like (copper acetoarsenite) applied to foliage against adults or soil for grubs, marking a shift from mechanical reliance in regions like and amid severe plagues. Such treatments, while more potent, proved indiscriminate, harming beneficial and , and were gradually supplanted by organochlorines post-World War II. Historical efficacy varied, with pre-chemical eras seeing recurrent outbreaks due to incomplete eradication, underscoring the pests' resilience tied to 4-year cycles and soil longevity.

Modern Biological and Chemical Strategies

Modern biological control strategies for cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) primarily target the soil-dwelling larval stage, known as white grubs, which cause the majority of agricultural damage by feeding on plant roots. Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), such as species from the genera Heterorhabditis and Steinernema, have been tested for inundative application against grubs, with laboratory and pot experiments demonstrating mortality rates varying by nematode concentration (e.g., 500–2000 infective juveniles per ) and , achieving up to 80–100% control in controlled settings but lower field efficacy due to factors like and . These nematodes enter grubs via openings, releasing symbiotic bacteria (Xenorhabdus or Photorhabdus spp.) that cause septicemia, offering a targeted alternative to broad-spectrum chemicals with minimal impact on non-target organisms when applied in moist conditions during early larval instars. Entomopathogenic fungi, particularly Beauveria brongniartii, represent another key biological approach, with commercial formulations like Beauveria–Schweizer® (strain BIPESCO 4, introduced in 1990) and Melocont® Pilzgerste (strain BIPESCO 2, since 2000) applied as soil inoculants or baits to infect s and adults. Field studies in regions show these fungi persisting in soil at densities of 10³–10⁴ colony-forming units per gram dry weight, yielding prevalences of 4.5–42.9% and reducing populations over multiple seasons through among insects. Similarly, brunneum has shown promise in granular soil applications against related scarab larvae, though efficacy against M. grubs remains variable (50–80% mortality in lab trials), influenced by fungal strain clonality and environmental persistence. These fungal agents integrate well into IPM frameworks, as their and site-specific dispersal limit unintended spread while exploiting for contact . Chemical strategies have shifted toward selective insecticides due to regulatory restrictions in , such as the 2018 outdoor ban on neonicotinoids like , which previously targeted adult swarms or early grubs via soil drenches but posed risks to pollinators. For grub control, anthranilic diamides like (e.g., in Acelepryn formulations) provide preventive and curative action by disrupting muscle function in feeding larvae, achieving 70–90% efficacy against white grubs when applied pre-infestation in turf or crops, though specific trials on M. melolontha indicate reduced performance in heavy soils or against later instars. Adult control relies on foliar sprays of (e.g., Mospilan 20 SP at 0.4 kg/ha), registered in some regions for reducing egg-laying, with field reductions of 60–80% in emerging when timed to peak flight in . Overall, modern IPM combines these with cultural practices like to expose grubs to natural enemies, prioritizing biological agents to minimize resistance and ecological disruption, as chemical reliance has historically led to inconsistent long-term suppression.

Ecological Consequences

Soil and Plant Interactions

The larvae of the cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha), known as grubs, primarily inhabit the upper layers of in grasslands, forests, and agricultural fields, where they spend 3 to 4 years in development before pupating. These C-shaped larvae through the and feed voraciously on the roots of grasses, herbaceous , and occasionally tree seedlings, consuming fine lateral roots and . This root-feeding behavior disrupts plant anchorage and vascular systems, often leading to , reduced , and die-back in affected vegetation, particularly during dry periods when water uptake is impaired. Ecologically, cockchafer larval activity influences plant-soil feedback loops by inducing chemical changes in root exudates and volatiles; for instance, damage to roots by M. melolontha grubs alters belowground volatile profiles, potentially signaling neighboring plants or attracting natural enemies, while aboveground emissions shift to attract parasitoids. In mixed communities, larval performance improves when feeding near plants with pre-damaged roots from conspecifics or competitors, such as Taraxacum officinale alongside Centaurea stoebe, mediated by root volatile interactions that enhance nutrient availability or reduce plant defenses. This selective herbivory can alter plant community composition, favoring resilient species with robust root defenses like increased production or mycorrhizal associations. Regarding soil dynamics, the burrowing of large grubs (up to 5 cm long) aerates compacted soils and incorporates deeper into profiles, potentially enhancing microbial activity and nutrient cycling akin to other scarabid larvae that process in their guts. However, high densities during outbreaks—exceeding 100 grubs per square meter—predominantly degrade by severing root networks, reducing organic input from aboveground litter and promoting in grasslands. Entomopathogenic fungi applied for control further interact with soil microbiota, indirectly affecting larval gut communities and rates, underscoring the grubs' role in belowground trophic webs.

Broader Ecosystem Effects

The larvae and adults of Melolontha melolontha play a key role as prey in terrestrial food webs, supporting populations of , mammalian, and predators. Ground-dwelling larvae are consumed by moles, rooks, woodpeckers, sparrows, and cuckoos, as well as predatory beetles (Carabidae and Staphylinidae) and flies (). Adult cockchafers are targeted by bats and various birds, providing a pulsed resource during emergence swarms that synchronizes with predator breeding cycles. Swarm years of adult cockchafers positively influence chiropteran demographics, as evidenced by a 31-year study of greater horseshoe s (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in Italy's , where cockchafer flight abundance correlated with an 81.58% increase in maternity colony size (from 76 to 138 individuals, 2001–2022) and higher pup production (0.56 pups per adult in flight years versus 0.47 in non-flight years), advancing birth timing by five days. This predator-prey linkage underscores cockchafers' contribution to , with researchers advocating limits on chemical controls to sustain prey availability. High larval densities during outbreaks can attract opportunistic mammals such as wild boars and feral pigs, which root extensively for grubs, exacerbating disturbance and potentially altering structure for ground-nesting species or vegetation. Conversely, sustained cockchafer presence enhances overall invertebrate-mediated energy transfer, bolstering in grasslands and woodlands where alternative prey is scarce.

Historical and Cultural Context

Etymological Origins

The English term "cockchafer" emerged in the late , with the earliest recorded use dating to in a translation by Hartman, combining "cock" in the sense of denoting large size or vigor—similar to its application in ""—with "chafer," an archaic word for . This compound reflects the insect's substantial adult size, reaching up to 3 cm in length, distinguishing it from smaller . The element "chafer" derives from Old English ceafor or cefer, traceable to Proto-Germanic *kabraz-, connoting a "gnawer" due to the beetle's habit of damaging roots and foliage as both and adult. Cognates appear in related , such as Dutch kever (), underscoring a shared Indo-European emphasizing the insect's masticating mandibles and herbivorous impact. By the 1690s, "cockchafer" had become the standard name in English for Melolontha melolontha, the common European species, supplanting earlier descriptive terms like "May-beetle" tied to its spring emergence. Alternative etymological speculations, such as a link between the beetle's feathery antennae and a rooster's coxcomb, lack primary textual support and appear in later conjectures without attestation in usage records. The name's persistence aligns with nomenclature prioritizing observable traits like size and destructive gnawing over morphological analogies.

Representations in Culture

The cockchafer occupies a notable place in European children's and games, with records of play dating to , where boys tied threads to the beetles' legs to observe their flight. This tradition continued in , where the insect, called the Maikäfer, was similarly captured and manipulated for amusement during its May emergence. In 19th-century German literature, Wilhelm Busch depicted cockchafers in his 1865 satirical children's book Max and Moritz: A Story of Innocents Whom the Rope Did Not Hang, where the titular boys shake the beetles from a tree and scatter them into Uncle Fritz's bed as a prank, leading to comedic chaos. A prominent cultural element is the German children's song "Maikäfer flieg" (May beetle, fly), documented as early as 1800 in Volkssagen von Ottmar and appearing in songbooks by 1843. Sung while holding a thread-attached beetle, its lyrics—"Maikäfer flieg, dein Vater ist im Krieg, deine Mutter ist in Pommernland, Pommernland ist abgebrannt" (May beetle fly, your father is at war, your mother is in Pomerania, Pomerania has burned down)—employ the melody of Johann Friedrich Reichardt's 1781 lullaby "Schlaf, Kindlein, schlaf" and may allude to wartime devastation, with some interpretations linking it to the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648). The insect's familiarity extended to military nomenclature, as evidenced by the British Royal Navy's Insect-class Cockchafer, ordered on February 9, 1915, launched December 17, 1915, and active in operations on the and rivers before further service in until scrapped in 1949. Early 20th-century postcards from and frequently illustrated the Maikäfer in contexts of rural life and seasonal festivities, underscoring its role in cultural as a of renewal amid its pest reputation.

References

  1. [1]
    Melolontha melolontha (white grub cockchafer) | CABI Compendium
    Body length 22-27 mm. Biology and Ecology. In general, most adults emerge in May and fly at dusk only until early July. They feed on leaves ...
  2. [2]
    Spatial and temporal patterns in the population genomics of the ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · The European cockchafer Melolontha melolontha is an agricultural pest in many European countries. Populations have a synchronized 3 or 4 years life cycle.
  3. [3]
    Cockchafer Beetle (Melolontha melolontha) - Woodland Trust
    Cockchafer beetles are large and bulky, growing up to 30mm in length. It has characteristic fanned antennae, a black body, and brown legs and wingcases.
  4. [4]
    Cockchafer (May-bug) - Insect Week
    The Cockchafer is a large scarab beetle. Adults feed on leaves, larvae on roots. Adults fly May-July, larvae live in soil for about three years.
  5. [5]
    Common cockchafer - Biocontrol, Damage and Life Cycle
    The life cycle of the common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha) has the following stages: egg, three larval instars, a pupal instar and the adult beetle.Missing: habitat | Show results with:habitat
  6. [6]
    Publication : USDA ARS
    Jan 6, 2011 · ... Melolontha melolontha, the European cockchafer. Recently, we undertook a multigene phylogenetic study of Beauveria with the intention of ...
  7. [7]
    Potato - Melolontha melolontha (Chafer grub) - Ephytia
    The adult cockchafer hibernates deep down in the soil, in its pupal shell, between 20 and 100 cm; its life cycle lasts for 3 or 4 years. High infestation of ...
  8. [8]
    Melolontha - Lucid key
    Melolontha is a small cockchafer genus comprising of around 20 species. There are two main pest species of quarantine significance: The European cockchafer M.
  9. [9]
    Not without my microbes - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
    Dec 20, 2012 · ... cockchafer (Melolontha hippocastani) is the most common species of the Melolontha genus. These insects can damage huge areas of broadleaf ...Missing: principal | Show results with:principal
  10. [10]
    Web portal DanubeForestHealth - Description of species
    Beetles of both species can be distinguished by the rear end (pygidium), which is long and slender in M. melolontha and short and knob-shaped in M. hippocastani ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    forest cockchafer (Melolontha hippocastani Fabricius, 1801)
    Taxonomic Rank ; Kingdom: Animalia ; Phylum: Arthropoda ; Subphylum: Hexapoda ; Class: Insecta ; Infraclass: Neoptera.
  12. [12]
    Cockchafer - Brickfields Country Park
    There are three species of Cockchafers in Europe – · Common Cockchafer – Melolontha melolontha. · Forest Cockchafer – Melolontha hippocastanis. · Large Cockchafer ...Missing: principal | Show results with:principal
  13. [13]
    Melolontha melolontha (common European cockchafer)
    Geographic Range. Also known as the June bug or May bug, the common cockchafer is found throughout temperate Europe and the continental United States.
  14. [14]
    [Entomology • 2023] Melolontha arunachalensis & M. lachungensis ...
    Apr 10, 2023 · Two new species, Melolontha arunachalensis Gupta, Keith, Bhunia, Das, Ghosh & Chandra, new species and Melolontha lachungensis Gupta, Keith, ...
  15. [15]
    Common Cockchafer, May-bug, May Beetle - Pests - AgroAtlas
    Morphology and biology. Common Cockchafer is quite a large beetle 22-32 mm long with a heavy-set bulging body. Its major color is black and the elytrae, ...
  16. [16]
    Common Cockchafer - NatureSpot
    The common cockchafer is a large beetle with reddish-brown wing cases, blackish head, and white grub larvae. It is found in hedgerows and gardens, and is ...Missing: cycle | Show results with:cycle
  17. [17]
    Common cockchafer - Biocontrol, Damage and Life Cycle - Koppert
    The larvae (grubs) have a whitish curved body, large head, with strong mandibles and long, hairy, well developed yellow legs. It takes three or four years for ...
  18. [18]
    Cockchafer - AGES
    Mar 26, 2025 · Cockchafers (Melolontha spp.) are beetles that feed on leaves and have larvae that feed on roots. They are part of the leaf-horned beetle ...
  19. [19]
    Melolontha - GBIF
    Jun 15, 2009 · There are three species of European cockchafers: The common cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha The forest cockchafer, Melolontha hippocastani The ...
  20. [20]
    Spatial and temporal patterns in the population genomics of the ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · M. melolontha generally occurs on valley floors, where climatic conditions are mild and favourable (Büchi et al., 1986; Faber, 1951). Therefore ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Spring phenology of cockchafers, Melolontha spp. (Coleoptera
    Decoppet (1920) predicted cockchafer emergence from the soil as soon as the temperature sum exceeds 355 degree- days when adding up the mean daily air temper-.<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Soil pH values, numbers of cockchafer grubs (Melolontha spp.), and...
    In general, very strongly acidic soils predomi- nated (pH of 4.5 to 5.0) ( Table 2). We found a positive correlation between pH ranges both in H 2 O and in CaCl ...Missing: preferred | Show results with:preferred
  23. [23]
    Oviposition preference of the forest cockchafer (Melolontha ...
    May 25, 2021 · Investigating its oviposition behavior, we observed that a dense shrub layer reduces the density of egg clusters and eggs in the soil.
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Effect of environmental factors on occurrence of cockchafers ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This study evaluated environmental factors that influence the occurrence of cockchafer grubs in forests, including location of the stand relative to open space.
  26. [26]
    Biology, control and luring of the cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha
    Melolontha melolontha have three larval instars during their development, feeding ... The length of egg stage as determined by Young (1988) was about 54 days in P ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Cockchafer - Southwick Country Park Nature Reserve
    May 25, 2021 · They live in the soil, eating plant roots, for about three years, sometimes four or five years in more northerly habitats. They especially like ...
  28. [28]
    invertebrate of month cockchafer - Habitas
    Melolontha melolontha, (Linnaeus, 1758) ». Identification. A large (20-30mm.) beetle, distinctively light brown, heavy-looking and rather ponderous.Missing: principal | Show results with:principal<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    The scent of food and defence: green leaf volatiles and toluquinone ...
    Mar 22, 2002 · Males of M. melolontha were found to be attracted by the green leaf alcohols 1-hexanol (E)-2-hexenol and (Z)-3-hexenol (Reinecke et ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Effects of food source quality on the adults of Melolontha melolontha ...
    Dec 14, 2015 · European larch needles and common beech leaves represented medium quality food for the insects tested. Figure 3. Relative weight gain of males ( ...
  31. [31]
    Effects of food quality on Melolontha spp. adults - Sciendo
    Jul 20, 2018 · The paper presets the results of the study on the life span, survival, body weight and fecundity of cockchafer ( Melolontha spp.) adults feeding ...Missing: diet | Show results with:diet
  32. [32]
    green leaf volatiles and toluquinone as sex attractant mediate mate ...
    Mar 22, 2002 · ... Melolontha melolontha, has been investigated in the field. Our data suggest that mainly males show flight activity at dusk. In a landing ...
  33. [33]
    Pre‐copulatory isolation in sympatric Melolontha species ...
    Sep 13, 2006 · However, Melolontha females do not only attract males by green leaf volatiles (GLV) induced by their feeding activity, but also by the sex ...
  34. [34]
    Ecological and pest-management implications of sex differences in ...
    Apr 27, 2017 · In Central and Western Europe, adult defoliation by Melolontha melolontha (L.) and Melolontha hippocastani (F.) has led to severe defoliation on ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Biology, control and luring of the cockchafer - WUR Library
    melolontha larvae with B. brongniartii, two methods have been developed: one is spraying adults with blastospores, which they carry with them to the breeding ...
  36. [36]
    Partial ecological niche partitioning between Beauveria brongniartii ...
    Beauveria brongniartii specifically infects the insect pest Melolontha melolontha and is commonly isolated from soil and larvae.<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    The weak genetic structure of Melolontha ... - Oxford Academic
    Feb 10, 2024 · The migration rates exceed the threshold of one per generation required for gene flow and maintenance of population equilibrium, indicating ...
  38. [38]
    Spatial and temporal patterns in the population genomics of the ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · The European cockchafer Melolontha melolontha is an agricultural pest in many European countries. Populations have a synchronized 3 or 4 years life cycle.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Chafer grubs | STRI Group
    Although large numbers of feeding larvae can be a problem, predators searching for the grubs cause the most severe damage. Birds, badgers, foxes and other small ...
  40. [40]
    May Bug (Cockchafer) is not a cockroach! - Ripley Pest Management
    Predators. Birds, wild boars, hedgehogs, martens ; Habitat. Europe ; Order. Beetles ; Family. Scarabs ; Scientific name. Melolontha.
  41. [41]
    Cockchafer | Pests & Diseases - Plantix
    Conserve natural enemies like Moles, Bats, Cuckoos, woodpeckers, sparrows, ground beetles, large wasps and Tachinid flies which are natural predators. Use ...
  42. [42]
    Are Cockchafer Beetles Dangerous? Learn All About This Large ...
    Tachinid flies, bats, cuckoos, woodpeckers, and corvids prey on these beetles. You may attract predatory birds by setting up bird feeders near areas infested by ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Heterorhabditis bacteriophora nematodes for pest control - Koppert US
    Common cockchafer (Melolontha melolontha); Common garden ... Heterorhabditis bacteriophora nematodes control pests through a process called parasitism.
  44. [44]
    Bacteria from the Midgut of Common Cockchafer (Melolontha ... - MDPI
    Bacteria inhabiting the gut of insects might play a key role in insect resistance to entomopathogenic nematode pressure.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    A new nematode as a parasite of the larvae of M. melolontha in ...
    A nematode found parasitizing a few larvae of Melolontha melolontha (L.) in Czechoslovakia is described as Neoaplectana melolonthae, sp.n.
  46. [46]
    Clonal genomic population structure of Beauveria brongniartii and ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · Beauveria brongniartii is a fungal pathogen that infects the beetle Melolontha melolontha, a significant agricultural pest in Europe.
  47. [47]
    Effects of biological and chemical insect control agents on fungal ...
    In several European countries the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria brongniartii is used for specifically controlling the European cockchafer, ...
  48. [48]
    Bacteria from the Midgut of Common Cockchafer (Melolontha ...
    Jan 16, 2020 · These pests are difficult to control due to the cryptic position of larvae in the soil and the usually nocturnal activity of adults [3].
  49. [49]
    (PDF) Control of cockchafer Melolontha spp. Grubs - ResearchGate
    Aug 9, 2025 · The paper presents a review of information on control measures used to prevent damages due to cockchafer Melolon-.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Changes in the abundance of Melolontha hippocastani Fabr. and ...
    The results of evaluations of the abundance of cockchafers and the extent of damage to the plantations will be processed in a separate study. M. hippocastani ...
  51. [51]
    The European cockchafer in Germany: Beloved and hated a ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · On the other hand, huge damages caused by massive outbreaks of the field and forest cockchafer, Melolontha melolontha and M. hippocastani ...
  52. [52]
    The Spring Assessing Method of the Threat of Melolontha spp. grubs ...
    May 9, 2019 · Root-feeding Melolonthinae larvae are a forest pest species in Europe that can exert serious damage. In Poland, they are classified as the ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Occurrence and control of the field cockchafer (Melolontha ...
    MUŠKA, A., 1975a: Results of thirteen years observations of cockchafer. (Melolontha melolontha) swarming on the territory of Czechoslovakia. Sborník ÚVTI ...
  54. [54]
    Cockchafer Beetle: Identification, Life Cycle, Damage, Treatment ...
    Overwintering: The adult cockchafers overwinter in the soil, typically at depths ranging from 20 to 100 cm, and remain dormant until spring. Cyclical Patterns: ...
  55. [55]
    Regional patterns of a middle frequency signal in oak tree-ring series
    Jan 7, 2014 · In the case of the 3-year cycle of M. melolontha, the distribution of the recorded years shows three superimposed, 1-year shifted middle ...
  56. [56]
    Regional patterns of a middle frequency signal in oak tree-ring series
    Aug 10, 2025 · In the case of the 3-year cycle of M. melolontha, the distribution of the recorded years shows three superimposed, 1-year shifted middle ...
  57. [57]
    Dendrochronological evidence of cockchafer (Melolontha sp ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... Massive cockchafer outbreaks follow a 3-5-year cycle depending on the region. They occur during the early vegetation period and result in ...
  58. [58]
    (PDF) Outbreaks of cockchafers – how do genetic population ...
    Cockchafers Melolontha spp. are polyphagous root pests and outbreak species of considerable economic importance to forestry in Europe. Knowledge of genetic ...
  59. [59]
    A spatially-explicit count data regression for modeling the density of ...
    Oct 8, 2014 · In this paper, a regression model for predicting the spatial distribution of forest cockchafer larvae in the Hessian Ried region (Germany) ...
  60. [60]
    Dendrochronological evidence of cockchafer (Melolontha sp ...
    We found clear growth patterns with cyclic narrow rings every 4 years. This allowed us to create an artificial curve expressing the recurring cycles of ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Control of cockchafer Melolontha spp. grubs – a review of methods
    The paper presents a review of information on control measures used to prevent damages due to cockchafer Melolon- tha spp. grubs in European countries ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Vorkommen und Bekämpfung der Maikäfer in Deutschland
    Occurrence and control of cockchafers in Germany: A historical survey. Introduction of the second meeting on biological control from November 4-5, 2003, at ...Missing: Maikäferplage | Show results with:Maikäferplage
  63. [63]
    Long‐term monitoring of a population of greater horseshoe bat ... - NIH
    Sep 29, 2024 · For centuries, attempts to control cockchafers have involved collecting and killing adult beetles. ... Manual collection continued ...
  64. [64]
    Isolation and identification of entomopathogenic nematodes ...
    The efficacy of all isolates was tested on Melolontha melolontha larvae in plastic boxes and pot experiments. Different concentrations of nematodes at 0, 500, ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  65. [65]
    A Review of Crop Protection against Insect Root Herbivores - PMC
    Nov 29, 2016 · In addition, the efficacy of EPNs for the biological control of root pests may be enhanced by co-encapsulation of EPNs with other ingredients ...
  66. [66]
    Clonal genomic population structure of Beauveria brongniartii and ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · Beauveria brongniartii is a fungal pathogen that infects the beetle Melolontha melolontha, a significant agricultural pest in Europe.
  67. [67]
    How to control nasty scarabs? Effectiveness of the generalist ...
    Applying Metarhizium brunneum to the soil as granules is effective. •. Metarhizium brunneum shows variable control effect on garden chafer larvae. •. Naturally ...
  68. [68]
    Current Insecticide Approaches for White Grub Control : Turf
    There are several insecticides currently on the market that can be very effective against white grubs. Most of them need to be applied before a grub problem ...Missing: methods cockchafer
  69. [69]
    Control of adult cockchafers Melolontha spp. with Mospilan 20 SP
    Aug 9, 2025 · Mospilan 20 SP at a dose of 0.4 l per 1 ha is registered insecticide to control cockchafer adults. (Głowacka and Sierpińska 2012) . In general, ...
  70. [70]
  71. [71]
    Root damage to apple plants by cockchafer larvae induces a ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · In this study, we investigated whether the feeding activity of M. melolontha larvae (1) alters the volatile profile of apple roots, (2) induces ...
  72. [72]
    Root volatiles in plant–plant interactions II - NIH
    The M. melolontha larvae grew significantly better on T. officinale plants in the presence of C. stoebe, an effect that was found to be mediated through changes ...
  73. [73]
    Neighbourhood effects determine plant–herbivore interactions ...
    May 4, 2017 · 002). Melolontha melolontha larvae grew better when the roots of the neighbouring plants were damaged than when those without damage (Figure 4) ...
  74. [74]
    Structure and Topology of Microbial Communities in the Major Gut ...
    Soil macroinvertebrates play an essential role in the cycling of organic matter (55). Numerous coleopteran larvae, particularly those of the Scarabaeidae, feed ...
  75. [75]
    Chafer grubs in garden borders - RHS
    Most do not cause problems, some feed on decomposing vegetable matter and help nutrient cycling. ... Chafer grubs found in compost heaps and organic rich soil ...Chafer Grubs In Garden... · Jump To · What Are Chafer Grubs?Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  76. [76]
    Biocontrol of Melolontha spp. Grubs in Organic Strawberry ...
    Feb 2, 2021 · The study provides a complex view of the effects of bioinocula to plant protection and soil biodiversity, taking into consideration the ...
  77. [77]
    cockchafer, n. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English ...
    The earliest known use of the noun cockchafer is in the mid 1600s. OED's earliest evidence for cockchafer is from 1668, in a translation by George Hartman.
  78. [78]
    Cockchafer - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Origin and history of cockchafer​​ popular name of a common European beetle, the May-beetle, 1690s, from cock (n. 1), in reference to its size, + chafer "beetle."
  79. [79]
    Chafer - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from Old English ceafor, from Proto-Germanic *kabraz- meaning "gnawer," this word refers to a beetle, especially one harmful to plants.
  80. [80]
    The May Bug or Common Cockchafer. - Cleankill Pest Control
    May 26, 2016 · The problem of crop damage still remains, however, and currently there are no pesticides licensed for Cockchafer management. Instead they use ...
  81. [81]
    The Maikäfer (May Bug) in Germany and German Culture
    Jun 22, 2025 · The Maikäferbund (May Beetle Association or Union) was a literary circle founded on June 29, 1840 in Bonn by writer and composer Johanna Mockel ...Missing: Maikäferplage | Show results with:Maikäferplage
  82. [82]
    Maikäfer flieg (?) - Feldgrau Forum
    May 7, 2006 · This song was published in 1800 as: Volkssagen von Ottmar (Nachtigal). Bremen 1800. S. 46. Thank you, Rudi! And also for the nice translation ...
  83. [83]
    Maykäfer, flieg! - Germany - Mama Lisa's World
    This rhyme can be found in Liederbuch des deutschen Volkes (1843) by Breitkopf und Härtel. It can also be found in Erk und Irmer, Die Deutschen Volkslieder, ...
  84. [84]
    German Nursery Rhymes and Songs that we all Love
    Maikäfer Flieg​​ How about this sweet little song about a Maybug? It's believed to be a song about the Thirty Years War.
  85. [85]
    HMS Cockchafer, British River Gunboat, WW2 - Naval-History.Net
    INSECT-Class River Gunboat ordered from Barclay Curie and launched on 17th December 1915 as the 5th RN ship to carry this name introduced in 1795 for a Gun ...
  86. [86]
    Cultural Entomology from the Golden Age of Postcards
    Mar 31, 2022 · The Maikäfer or cockchafer [Melolontha melolontha (L.)] figures prominently in these postcards from Switzerland and Austria. Open in new tab ...