Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Confederate Home Guard

The Confederate Home Guard encompassed the state-level militias formed across the Confederate States of America during the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865, consisting mainly of white males exempt from regular army conscription due to age extremes, physical limitations, or essential civilian roles. These units served as a reserve force for localized defense against Union advances, enforcement of draft laws, apprehension of deserters and draft evaders, surveillance of potential Unionists and abolitionists, and prevention of slave unrest through patrols akin to prewar slave patrols. Organized under gubernatorial authority rather than centralized Confederate command, companies and regiments operated with minimal formal training, equipment often limited to personal arms, and leadership from local captains or colonels, functioning more as than combat troops. In states like and , they bridged gaps in military structure by monitoring troop movements, guarding such as bridges and railroads, and confiscating resources like for the , thereby sustaining internal order amid widespread desertions that reached two-thirds of troops by in some areas. While rarely deployed in pitched battles—serving instead in skirmishes like those during or Prairie Grove—their persistent enforcement of Confederate policies prevented immediate societal breakdown from guerrilla activities, Unionist sabotage, and , though units sometimes disbanded or shifted to postwar irregular groups. Controversies marked their operations, including accusations of excessive , , and plunder against deserters—often poor whites harboring resentment toward elite —and favoritism in exemptions that exacerbated class divides. In , for instance, units under figures like J.J. Finley faced criticism in Confederate newspapers for cattle rustling and harboring their own deserters, while guards executed fugitives without , fueling civilian backlash and between guards and evaders. These defining traits underscored the Home Guard's dual role as enforcers of a strained war machine and symbols of internal coercion, ultimately yielding to occupation by 1865 without achieving decisive military triumphs.

Formation and Legal Framework

Origins in Confederate Conscription Laws

The Confederate Congress enacted the first Conscription Act on April 16, 1862, mandating for all able-bodied males aged 18 to 35 for a term of three years, marking the initial national draft in American history and rapidly depleting the ranks of preexisting state militias that had formed the backbone of local defense since . This law exempted specific categories, including state officials, railroad workers, teachers, ministers, and owners of 20 or more slaves under the subsequent Twenty-Slave Law passed on October 11, 1862, creating a pool of non-conscripted men who could be mobilized for internal security without conflicting with federal army demands. The exemptions reflected the Confederacy's prioritization of agricultural production and infrastructure over universal conscription, as slaveholders argued that their oversight of labor was essential to the , though this provision fueled class resentments among non-exempt yeomen farmers who bore disproportionate burdens. Subsequent legislation expanded conscription's scope, with the Second Conscription Act of September 27, 1862, extending liability to men aged 35 to 45 and reinforcing exemptions while authorizing states to organize "reserve" forces from those not subject to service. These acts inadvertently necessitated the evolution of state militias into formalized units, as governors invoked their authority under Confederate law to conscript exempt males—typically those over 45, under 18, or in protected occupations—for localized duties such as guarding against raids, enforcing drafts, and suppressing slave unrest or deserter bands. By late 1862, states like and had activated s comprising an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 men across the , drawing directly from the conscription-exempt population to address the security vacuum left by the transfer of prime-age militiamen to field armies. The 1864 expansions under the Third Conscription Act further refined this framework by creating distinct "Senior Reserves" (ages 45-50) and "Junior Reserves" (ages 17-18), yet states retained flexibility to integrate these into structures for non-frontline roles, underscoring how conscription's selective enforcement preserved a dual military system: a national army for offensive operations and state guards for defensive homeostasis. This origin in conscription laws highlighted tensions between central authority and , as governors like of resisted federal overreach by using Home Guards to enforce local priorities, including the apprehension of draft evaders, which comprised up to 10% of eligible men in some regions by 1863. The system's design prioritized causal efficacy in sustaining the war effort through divided labor, though it often exacerbated internal divisions by arming privileged exempts while poorer conscripts faced frontline hazards.

State-Level Implementation and Variations

The Confederate Home Guard was organized at the state level rather than as a uniform national entity, with each seceded state enacting its own legislation to enroll exempt white males for local defense and internal order, supplementing Confederate laws that left gaps in manpower. These units typically included men aged 17 to 50 unfit or exempted from service due to , age, or , but specifics varied by , reflecting governors' and local priorities. State laws often empowered governors to muster, arm, and deploy these forces within borders, prioritizing suppression of deserters, slave patrols, and protection against raids over field combat. In , the General Assembly passed an act on July 7, 1863, formalizing the as a state-supervised force of able-bodied white males aged 18 to 50 exempt from Confederate , excluding officials like the and judges; units were organized locally into companies and later consolidated into approximately 76 battalions under brigades redefined by 1861 legislation. This structure emphasized emergency policing amid rising desertions, with subsequent 1864 amendments granting authority to pursue and apprehend evaders beyond state lines if needed. Georgia's implementation highlighted tensions, as Governor expanded prewar into state guards and home defense units—derisively called "Joe Brown's Pets" by critics—retaining them under state control for arresting draft dodgers, confiscating resources, and local patrols rather than yielding fully to Confederate command; these included safety committees in upland counties to counter Unionist threats, with organization varying from county-level companies to broader calls in 1864. South Carolina divided reserves into categories under 1864 legislation, mustering males aged 17 to 50 for state service in battalions like the 1st Reserves (formed February 1864) and senior/junior units for those over 45 or under 18, attaching them to state troops for coastal and internal defense; this built on earlier acts, with over 20 reserve battalions active by war's end, focusing on fortifications and slave control. Virginia's approach emphasized urban and departmental defense, organizing Local Defense Troops into specialized battalions and regiments, such as the 1st Battalion (six companies from Richmond's ordnance workers, mustered 1861-1862) and 2nd/3rd Infantry Regiments (merged September 1864 from departmental units), tasked with guarding facilities rather than general enrollment. In , state troops and localized home guards, like Killough's Wheelock Company, were raised under 1862-1864 militia laws for frontier patrols against Native American raids and , with 23 state troop regiments formed in 1864 enrolling exempt males; these operated semi-independently, prioritizing vast border defense over enforcement._-_Confederate) These variations stemmed from geographic needs—coastal states like focused on reserves for fixed defenses, while frontier emphasized mobile troops—and political dynamics, such as resistance to central authority in , underscoring the Confederacy's decentralized structure where state governors wielded significant discretion in mustering and deploying second-line forces.

Composition and Organization

Eligibility and Exemptions

The Confederate Home Guard primarily enrolled white males exempt from or ineligible for into the regular Confederate Army, focusing on those whose service was restricted to state boundaries for local defense. Eligibility centered on age limits outside the prime range, initially encompassing boys under 18 years and men over 45 years, who were organized into units such as senior and junior reserves to supplement frontline forces depleted by national drafts. As Confederate manpower needs intensified, states adjusted thresholds; by February 1864, designated males aged 17-18 and 45-50 for reserve formations, with service confined to defensive roles within their home states. Exemptions from army conscription—stemming from the April 1862 Conscription Act and subsequent amendments—extended to essential occupations and conditions, channeling such men into duties rather than releasing them entirely. overseeing 20 or more enslaved individuals, government officials, railroad employees, miners, and manufacturers of war materials qualified for exemptions, often detailed to local s to maintain economic and infrastructural support for the war effort. In , white males aged 18-50 holding such exemptions faced automatic enrollment in units, ensuring their labor remained productive while fulfilling militia obligations. Physical disabilities or family dependencies, like sole support for dependents, provided further grounds for exemption from field service, though these individuals could still be mustered for home defense if capable. State variations reflected local priorities; South Carolina's Reserves, formed post-1862 , similarly prioritized non-deployable men for coastal and , exempting them from extended campaigns while mandating in defensive battalions. Enforcement relied on boards assessing claims, with substitutes or commutation fees occasionally available early in the war, though these options diminished as desperation grew. This structure preserved societal functions amid demands, though it strained communities by blurring lines between exempt status and compulsory local service.

Structure, Command, and Resources

The Confederate Home Guard lacked a centralized national structure, operating instead as decentralized militias tailored to local needs under gubernatorial authority. Organization typically occurred at the level, forming of 50 to 100 men each, commanded by elected or appointed captains who were often local leaders or exempt veterans. These companies were grouped into battalions under majors, with larger formations occasionally assembling into regiments led by colonels, though the exact varied by and availability of personnel. Command rested with state executives as commanders-in-chief, who delegated oversight to adjutants general or commanders for coordination. In , for example, the included structured units such as the 1st under William J. Hoke and Leventhorpe's Command, comprising multiple battalions and regiments drawn from county companies. Officers were generally selected from the ranks or community elites, emphasizing loyalty and administrative experience over combat prowess, with minimal formal military training beyond basic drills. Georgia's Reserves followed a similar model, organizing into numbered regiments like the 1st Georgia Infantry Reserves under colonels such as Pleasant J. Fannin, mustered for state defense. Resources were severely constrained, relying on state arsenals depleted by regular army demands, leading to widespread use of privately owned weapons such as hunting rifles, shotguns, and fowling pieces. Uniforms were often absent or improvised from civilian clothing, with no standardized issue; equipment included basic accoutrements like knapsacks when available, supplemented by agricultural tools such as pitchforks in emergencies. Funding derived from state appropriations and local levies, but shortages in pay, provisions, and ammunition were common, with many serving as unpaid volunteers motivated by duty rather than compensation. In Louisiana, an estimated 10,000 men cycled through home guard units over the war, underscoring the ad hoc nature of resourcing amid broader Confederate logistical strains.

Roles and Responsibilities

Enforcing Conscription and Suppressing Dissent

The Confederate Home Guard units across various states were instrumental in implementing the First Conscription Act of April 16, 1862, which mandated military service for white males aged 18 to 35 for three years, with subsequent expansions in 1863 and 1864 lowering the age to 17 and raising the upper limit to 50. These militias, drawn from exempt individuals such as older men, state officials, and those with occupational deferments, conducted patrols to identify and apprehend draft-eligible men hiding from enrollment officers, often verifying exemptions related to , , or . In practice, this enforcement relied on local knowledge, as Home Guard members collaborated with Confederate enrolling officers to remote areas, plantations, and communities suspected of harboring evaders, though resistance from families and neighbors frequently complicated operations. Suppressing dissent extended beyond initial conscription to combating , which surged after major defeats like in July 1863, with s empowered by state laws to arrest and return absentees to army units. In , for instance, a reorganized under gubernatorial control in 1863-1864 pursued Confederate deserters—estimated in the tens of thousands statewide by war's end—through mountainous regions where "outlier" bands formed self-protective groups, leading to skirmishes and summary executions in some cases. Similarly, Georgia's units, authorized as commissaries and enforcers, targeted draft evaders and deserters while confiscating resources, reflecting a dual role in loyalty enforcement amid widespread war weariness. These efforts aimed to maintain Confederate manpower but often alienated communities, as guardsmen—frequently viewed as less disciplined than regular troops—faced accusations of overreach, including property seizures under the guise of compliance. Unionist enclaves in and border areas posed additional challenges, with s clashing against sympathizers who aided deserters or resisted calls as unconstitutional infringements on . In 1863, Confederate authorities in states like and explicitly tasked local guards with enforcement, arresting suspected dissenters and disrupting networks that sheltered resisters, though effectiveness waned as invasions depleted resources and fueled further evasion. By 1864, with rates approaching 10-15% of Confederate forces overall, patrols intensified but yielded uneven results, hampered by their own members' exemptions and local sympathies.

Home Defense and Internal Security

The Confederate Home Guard fulfilled critical functions in home defense by safeguarding localities from incursions, particularly in regions removed from primary theaters of operation. State militias, such as 's, organized under legislation like the July 7, 1863, act for a "Guard for Home Defense," patrolled vulnerable frontiers, guarded bridges, railroads, and supply depots against sabotage or , and mobilized as a final barrier against invading forces. These units, comprising men exempt from regular Confederate due to age or occupation, numbered around 12,500 in alone by 1863-1864. Specific engagements included the Asheville Home Guard repelling a on April 6, 1865, and Burke County detachments clashing with two brigades at Rocky Ford near Morganton on April 17, 1865, before withdrawing under pressure. In internal security operations, forces maintained order by targeting deserters, armed outlaw s, and pockets of Unionist resistance that threatened Confederate cohesion. Duties encompassed scouting for and apprehending Confederate deserters—who formed disruptive groups in mountainous and rural areas—and quelling anti-Confederate disturbances, including guerrilla activities by pro-Union sympathizers. For example, in 1863, Cherokee County units, cooperating with Confederate cavalry, captured most members of a Unionist guerrilla led by Goldman Bryson. They also performed guard duty at facilities like Salisbury Prison in late 1864 and monitored potential slave flights to Union lines to prevent internal upheaval. These efforts, while essential for sustaining wartime control, often strained local resources and morale, as guardsmen balanced security imperatives with personal hardships. Similar roles extended to other states, where s enforced local stability amid escalating desertions estimated at over 100,000 across the by war's end.

Operations and Military Engagements

Major Activities and Skirmishes

The Confederate Home Guard's major activities centered on internal policing and localized defense, often manifesting as skirmishes with deserter bands, Unionist guerrillas, and invading forces rather than sustained conventional combat. These operations typically involved small units pursuing armed dissidents or repelling raids, with engagements characterized by ambushes, captures, and summary executions to enforce and deter disloyalty. In , for instance, Home Guard units clashed with mountain Unionists who conducted raids on Confederate supplies, leading to heightened tensions in regions. A prominent early incident occurred in January 1863 in , known as the Shelton Laurel affair. Following raids by local Union sympathizers from the Shelton Laurel community on Confederate salt stores and livestock—actions that deprived soldiers of essential provisions—the (a unit) under John B. Palmer pursued and captured about 15 suspects, including men and boys aged 13 to 72. The captives were marched 15 miles through deep snow without adequate clothing or food; 13 ultimately perished from shootings, beatings, or exposure, with reports indicating that five were executed outright and others left to die in the wilderness. This operation exemplified the Home Guard's role in quelling internal threats but drew postwar condemnation for its brutality. Later activities escalated amid widespread desertion and incursions. In October 1863, Cherokee County , cooperating with Confederate cavalry and Thomas's Legion Cherokee troops, ambushed and captured most members of a Unionist guerrilla band led by Goldman Bryson, neutralizing a persistent raiding threat in . As the war waned, units faced direct combat with regular forces; on April 6, 1865, the Asheville repelled a large detachment of cavalry during Stoneman's Raid, preventing deeper penetration into the town. Eleven days later, on April 17, 1865, approximately 80 Burke County under Colonel T. G. Walton engaged two cavalry brigades at Rocky Ford near Morganton, holding their position briefly before being outflanked and withdrawing after inflicting and suffering casualties in a defensive stand. In , detachments conducted similar pursuits against deserter groups in the north Georgia mountains, where armed bands of absconders raided plantations and supply lines, resulting in sporadic firefights and arrests rather than pitched battles. These engagements underscored the 's function as a reactive force, compensating for the depletion of frontline armies by addressing low-level insurgencies that eroded control from within. Overall, such activities captured thousands of deserters across the —estimated at over 100,000 total by war's end—but often at the cost of alienating civilians through aggressive enforcement.

Coordination with Confederate Army Units

The Confederate Home Guard units, organized at the state level for local defense, periodically coordinated with regular () elements during joint operations to repel incursions, particularly as field armies dwindled in the war's final year. This typically involved Home Guard forces supplementing army troops in hasty defenses of key and population centers, where centralized command structures allowed governors or department commanders to integrate into broader tactical responses. Such coordination was , relying on shared and local knowledge from Home Guard members to bolster regular units facing numerical disadvantages. A notable instance occurred during the Battle of Asheville on April 6, 1865, where Home Guard and local under Colonel George W. Clayton, supported by available Confederate troops, entrenched positions to confront Colonel Isaac M. Kirby's 1,100-man raid from . The defenders, including elderly "Silver Grays" from the , manned artillery on bluffs overlooking the Buncombe Turnpike, forcing Kirby's withdrawal after a five-hour standoff without casualties, thus preserving the town until later advances. This operation exemplified integration with army remnants for terrain-specific defense. During General George Stoneman's Raid into in March-April 1865, detachments coordinated with fragments, such as at the Bridge, where General Zebulon York's mixed force of approximately 1,200 men—including and reserves—delayed cavalry under Alvan Gillem, destroying supplies and contesting crossings amid Sherman's parallel advance. Similar joint efforts in Wilkes and Boone Counties saw under leaders like Harvey Bingham contesting Stoneman's columns, buying time for evacuations despite ultimate retreats due to overwhelming numbers. These actions highlighted the 's role in extending army coverage across dispersed fronts. In southwestern , companies, such as Philip Thurmond's unit, directly joined battlefield lines to halt probes, coordinating maneuvers like ambushes and patrols with regular to disrupt supply lines and guerrilla counterparts. This pattern of operational synergy, while effective locally, was constrained by the 's limited training and armament compared to professional units, often resulting in defensive rather than offensive contributions.

Controversies and Criticisms

Alleged Abuses and Internal Conflicts

The Confederate Home Guard was frequently accused of abusing its authority in enforcing and suppressing internal dissent, including summary executions of deserters and mistreatment of their families and sympathizers. In , Home Guard units hanged sons of deserters and captured outliers without , contributing to widespread resentment among war-weary civilians. For instance, during February 1864 operations around Kinston, local assisted in the roundup and execution of over 20 deserters under military orders, though Home Guard independently conducted similar harsh measures in remote counties. Reserve forces functioning as Home Guard were implicated in the Shelton Laurel Massacre of January 1863, where Colonel Lawrence Allen's 64th Regiment—comprising state troops and local guards—executed 13 Unionist men and boys after they raided supplies amid shortages, burning homes and displacing families in the region. This incident exemplified broader patterns of retaliatory violence against perceived outliers, with victims including non-combatants driven by hunger rather than ideological opposition. Internal conflicts arose from clashes between Home Guard detachments and armed deserter bands, fostering guerrilla-style warfare in mountainous areas. In , Home Guard patrols pursued "outliers" hiding in the Chattahoochee Basin, facing ambushes and retaliatory killings that escalated local feuds. Tensions also simmered with regular Confederate army units over jurisdictional overlaps in arresting draft evaders, while civilian complaints highlighted instances of arbitrary and theft by under-supervised guardsmen. Such abuses stemmed from the Guard's composition of exempt older men and boys, often lacking discipline, leading to perceptions of overreach in maintaining order.

Evaluations of Effectiveness and Ethical Justifications

The Confederate Home Guard's effectiveness in fulfilling its mandates has been assessed by historians as generally limited, particularly in broader military contributions, though it achieved localized successes in policing and deterrence. Irregular units, including Home Guard formations, demonstrated efficacy in guerrilla-style operations and suppressing minor threats, such as isolated deserter bands or Unionist , but lacked the training and resources for sustained combat roles. For example, efforts to apprehend deserters occasionally resulted in captures—such as 60-70 in specific operations—but these pursuits proved of negligible value in curbing the overall crisis, which exceeded 100,000 cases by 1864 and eroded Confederate manpower. The Guard's minimal formal drill and organization further constrained its performance, reducing it primarily to functions like pass inspections and plantation patrols rather than decisive field engagements. Ethical justifications for the Home Guard's formation and actions centered on pragmatic necessities of wartime survival, including the defense of civilian populations against invasion, the prevention of slave revolts amid advances, and the maintenance of to sustain field armies. Confederate authorities, facing acute shortages of regular troops after , viewed the Guard as essential for preserving in rear areas, where threats from deserters, Unionists, and potential insurrections—exacerbated by events like the of enslaved laborers for fortifications—demanded localized . This rationale aligned with first-principles of in a , where failure to enforce discipline could cascade into collapse, as evidenced by rising dissent tied to economic hardships and battlefield setbacks rather than inherent ideological opposition. However, contemporary and postwar critiques, including accounts of arbitrary arrests and property seizures, have questioned the of these measures, attributing abuses to uneven command and local power imbalances rather than systemic flaws. Defenders counter that such actions, while harsh, mirrored practices like in border states and were causally tied to the dynamics initiated by federal forces, rendering them defensible as countermeasures in an existential conflict.

Dissolution and Historical Legacy

Wind-Down During Late War Period

As Confederate military fortunes deteriorated in early , Home Guard units increasingly shifted from active enforcement to defensive postures or informal dissolution, reflecting the broader collapse of organized resistance. Following General Robert E. Lee's surrender of the at Appomattox Court House on April 9, , news spread rapidly through the Confederacy, prompting many state-level formations to disband without formal orders, as members sought to avoid prosecution as guerrillas under occupation policies. In regions like and the Georgia upcountry, units that had pursued deserters or guarded supplies melted into civilian populations, depositing or concealing arms to facilitate a return to pre-war livelihoods amid widespread food shortages and advances. The capitulation of General Joseph E. Johnston's forces to Major General William T. Sherman at near , on April 26, 1865, formalized the end for remaining elements in the , as surrender terms mandated the disbandment of Confederate armies and militias, with troops to proceed to state capitals for parole. In , where approximately 12,000 men served in eight regiments by late war, Zebulon B. Vance's administration, facing imminent control, ceased directing the militia's operations; Vance himself was arrested on , 1865, rendering any centralized wind-down impossible. Scattered engagements persisted briefly, such as skirmishes against cavalry under General near Mocksville on April 11, 1865, but these marked the final gasps of activity before dispersal. In other states, dissolution mirrored this pattern of ad hoc cessation tied to local surrenders. Home Guard detachments, depleted by conscription into regular forces, participated in rear-guard actions during Sherman's but effectively dissolved with Johnston's army, their members paroled alongside regular troops without distinct muster-out ceremonies. units, similarly strained, had begun informal disbandments as early as late in Union-threatened areas, prioritizing survival over continued service amid resource exhaustion. Former guardsmen often applied for federal amnesty under President Andrew Johnson's May 29, 1865, proclamation, citing roles in petitions to affirm loyalty shifts and secure property rights during . This decentralized wind-down underscored the Home Guard's reliance on state authority, which evaporated with the Confederacy's defeat, leaving no unified legacy of formal deactivation.

Post-War Assessments and Modern Interpretations

Following the Confederate surrender in April 1865, contemporary accounts from Southern soldiers and civilians often depicted the as a desperate expedient of waning resources, with units disbanding rapidly to evade forces or integrate into civilian life amid fears of reprisal. Historian John D. Winters noted that Louisiana's , comprising approximately 10,000 men and boys by war's end, primarily functioned in non-combat roles like guarding , yet contributed to the Confederacy's internal cohesion by pursuing an estimated tens of thousands of nationwide, a phenomenon driven by manpower shortages that saw desertion rates exceed 10% annually after 1863. Early 20th-century historians, such as in his 1924 analysis of , evaluated the 's enforcement role as exacerbating class tensions, with exemptions for wealthy planters fueling resentment among yeoman farmers, though emphasized its causal necessity in sustaining field armies amid widespread evasion—over 21,000 conscripts processed in alone between 1862 and 1865. Assessments highlighted variable effectiveness: while poorly equipped and trained units faltered in formal engagements, localized successes occurred, as in October 1863 when County's repelled incursions despite comprising mostly exempt males aged 18-50 with low morale. Criticisms centered on abuses, including harsh treatment of suspected ists and deserters, which attributed to decentralized state control rather than inherent malice, contrasting with later portrayals in popular media like Charles Frazier's 2003 novel Cold Mountain, where figures symbolize unchecked local tyranny. Modern scholarship, informed by reevaluations since the 2010s, interprets the as emblematic of the Confederacy's internal fractures, where its structure—drawing from elderly men, youths, and detailed workers—reflected adaptive but brittle responses to prolonged , yet often devolved into vigilante excesses amid eroded central authority. Lorien Foote's 2017 essay reframes such units within broader civilian-military entanglements, arguing against narratives of inevitable collapse by underscoring their role in policing dissent in regions like , where Unionist enclaves prompted retaliatory skirmishes, though Foote cautions that academic emphasis on abuses may overstate systemic failure relative to empirical data on sustained Confederate resistance until material exhaustion in 1865. Recent analyses, wary of politicized reinterpretations tying Home Guard actions to post-war white supremacist legacies, prioritize causal factors like high (peaking at 103,000 absentees by ) necessitating localized enforcement, evaluating overall efficacy as marginal in conventional defense but pivotal in delaying societal breakdown. This view counters earlier Lost Cause idealizations by grounding assessments in primary records, revealing a force neither heroic nor uniformly villainous, but pragmatically flawed under existential strain.

References

  1. [1]
    Armies of last resort - HistoryNet
    Jul 2, 2012 · The home guard was meant as a stopgap, temporary force to keep things running back home for a short time. Home defense and police work were part ...
  2. [2]
    Confederates stalking Confederates
    Aug 9, 2015 · The Confederate Home Guard was part of the woof and warp of civil and military authority in the slave South, and that part of our history should not be lost to ...
  3. [3]
    The Georgia Confederate Home Guard - North Georgia History
    Feb 24, 2024 · The Georgia Confederate Home Guard were allegedly pro-Confederate militia, authorized to gather resources and arrest deserters, but also a ...
  4. [4]
    The Twenty Negro Law | American Battlefield Trust
    Oct 14, 2020 · In April 1862, the Confederate Congress passed the First Conscription Act in order to increase manpower in the Confederate armies, ...
  5. [5]
    Was the Home Guard really that bad?
    Sep 4, 2014 · In April 1862, the Confederate government passed a Conscription Act requiring all white males, unless exempt, to enlist in the army.
  6. [6]
    Twenty-Slave Law - Encyclopedia Virginia
    The first Conscription Act, passed by the Confederate Congress on April 16, 1862, made all white males between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five eligible ...
  7. [7]
    Home Guard | NCpedia
    The Home Guard included all able-bodied white males between the ages of 18 and 50 who were exempt from Confederate service, excepting only the governor, judges ...
  8. [8]
    The Home Guard & Captain James West - Piedmont Trails
    Oct 29, 2022 · Effective April 16th, 1862, the Confederate States required all males between 18 and 35 to serve three years in the Confederate Army. Anyone ...
  9. [9]
    Conscription (Civil War) - Encyclopedia of Arkansas
    Jan 19, 2022 · The Confederacy was the first to enact compulsory military service. A draft was necessary due to the poor planning on the part of the ...
  10. [10]
    North Carolina in the American Civil War - The Home Guard
    The new Home Guard was fully under the control of the governor and it was now legal for them to go after Confederate deserters. 76 Battalions of Home Guard were ...Missing: level implementation
  11. [11]
    The Home Guard, Peace Keepers During the Civil War - NC DNCR
    Jul 7, 2016 · The Home Guard was created to provide an emergency police force. White men between the ages of 18 to 50 who were exempted from the conscription laws were ...Missing: level variations
  12. [12]
    ACWS Historical Articles - Griswoldville - The Gettysburg of Georgia
    They were known as "Joe Brown`s Pets" after Governor Brown who had formed the Georgia State Militia as a Home Guard.
  13. [13]
    Overview of SC Military ... - South Carolina in the American Civil War
    The Junior Reserves consisted of 16-year old white males. Before this call-up, the SC Militia was a strictly local force, on duty as home guards and other ...
  14. [14]
    1st Virginia Battalion Local Defense Troops - The Civil War in the East
    Organized at Richmond six companies of men from the Ordnance Department under the command of Majors Thomas H. Ayres, William S. Downer and Charles H. Ford.
  15. [15]
    2nd Regiment, Virginia Infantry, Local Defense - Confederate
    Jul 25, 2023 · During September,1864 it merged into the 2nd Infantry Regiment Local Defense Troops. The field officers were Lieutenant Colonels John W. Carter,
  16. [16]
    Confederate Home Guards, Local Defense Forces, State Troops ...
    Dec 3, 2022 · archieclement said: Is Confederate home guard different then Union home guard? Union home guard seems same thing as local defense units.Any photos of Confederate Home Guard out there? - Civil War TalkWhy no Civil War spontoons or halberds? | Edged WeaponsMore results from civilwartalk.com
  17. [17]
    Primary Source: The Home Guard - NCpedia
    The Home Guard was a collection of small units organized on a local level. The Home Guard's activities were supervised by the state government.Missing: implementation | Show results with:implementation
  18. [18]
    SC Reserves 1862-1863 - 90 Day Men - Carolana
    The Confederate Conscription Act of April 16, 1862 required active duty service of all white males 18-35 years old. This Act caused a significant depletion ...Missing: eligibility | Show results with:eligibility
  19. [19]
    What age were men drafted into the Civil War and when? - Quora
    May 22, 2017 · The manpower-starved Confederates accepted boys of seventeen years of age and men between forty-six and fifty as local defense forces or as ...At what age were young men drafted into the Civil War back ... - QuoraWere there very many substitutes during the Civil War (i.e. men who ...More results from www.quora.com
  20. [20]
    Conscription - NCpedia
    A growing list of exemptions spared many citizens from service, and those not exempted could hire a substitute or pay a commutation fee. Following the war and a ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] North Carolina in the Civil War, Home Guard Organization - Carolana
    The North Carolina Home Guard included the 1st NC Brigade, Leventhorpe's Command, 1st NC Regiment (3 organizations), and 2nd NC Regiment (1 organization).
  22. [22]
    Georgia 1st Infantry Regiment Reserves - Fannin's - Research OnLine
    Fannin organized Company B of the 60th Georgia Regiment but did not enter service with it. He later organized and commanded the 1st Georgia Reserves. These ...
  23. [23]
    Civil War Conscription Laws | In Custodia Legis
    Nov 15, 2012 · The Confederacy adopted a law that provided for support of the army by extending the terms of enlistment of currently enrolled soldiers to three years.
  24. [24]
    Desertion, Cowardice and Punishment - Essential Civil War ...
    In the South Confederate soldiers also faced the added risk of being punished by Home Guards who patrolled counties unoccupied by the Union and would summarily ...
  25. [25]
    Wartime North Carolina | NC Historic Sites
    Later in the war, he relaxed his standards of exempting state officials and also agreed to allow the Home Guard to serve outside of North Carolina's borders in ...
  26. [26]
    Confederate Control (Chapter 2) - Rebels against the Confederacy
    This chapter addresses the culture of conflict and the Confederate military's role in loyalty enforcement ... In 1863, Confederate home guards arrested Simmons ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Desertion (Confederate) during the Civil War - Encyclopedia Virginia
    Confederate Virginians fled military service at a rate of between 10 and 15 percent, more or less comparable to the desertion rate among Union troops.
  28. [28]
    Primary Source: A Civil War at Home: Treatment of Unionists
    He was captured by the Home Guard and returned to the front lines. In 1863 ... The Shelton Laurel Massacre · The Lowry War. Places. Ashe County. Artifacts.
  29. [29]
    The Murder of Joel Holcombe, Home Guard Officer
    Apr 10, 2016 · Revenge killings continued for several years after the war's end because of this feud. Joe Shelton was arrested on Sept. 27, 1870 in Burnsville ...Missing: Massacre | Show results with:Massacre
  30. [30]
    Guerrilla Warfare during the Civil War - New Georgia Encyclopedia
    These same counties also responded to local disturbances by forming safety committees and home guard companies to protect them from “tories,” or Unionists.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Unique Hell in Southwestern Virginia: Confederate Guerrillas and ...
    Aug 22, 2016 · However, in other cases, home guard units joined the Confederate Army on the battlefield to halt ... Philip Thurmond's company coordinated with ...
  32. [32]
    Visiting Our Past: The Battle of Asheville deserves historic status
    Jan 6, 2024 · George Wesley Clayton, in charge of Confederate troops in Asheville ... Asheville's Home Guard. One member of the Silver Grays was Capt ...Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
  33. [33]
    Battle of Asheville (PPP-1) - NC DNCR
    Jan 23, 2024 · On April 3, 1865, Union Col. Isaac M. Kirby left East Tenn. with 1100 men on a raid against Asheville. On April 6, Kirby's force was defeated by local militia.Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
  34. [34]
    Stoneman's Raid: Salisbury and the Yadkin River Bridge
    "General [Zebulon] York of Louisiana, with ten or twelve hundred men - Home Guards and 'Galvanized' Irish - defended the bridge."65 "York was getting well up in ...
  35. [35]
    Divided county raided 160 years ago | Opinion | journalpatriot.com
    Mar 4, 2025 · Before arriving in Wilkes on March 29, 1865, Stoneman encountered resistance from Confederate home guard under Major Harvey Bingham in Boone the ...
  36. [36]
    Response to Desertion - Civil War Era NC
    These militia patrols were called the Home Guard in North Carolina, and they were used to round up deserters and either hang them or hand them over to the ...
  37. [37]
    The Kinston Hangings (Part 2): A General's Fatal Anger | Our State
    Jul 2, 2012 · “War Crime or Justice? General George Pickett and the Mass Execution of Deserters in Civil War Kinston, North Carolina,” by Dr. Donald E.
  38. [38]
    North Carolina: Confederate Deserters Executed
    Feb 15, 2024 · North Carolina: Confederate Deserters Executed. February 15, 2024 ... North Carolina Home Guard. They had served in J.H. Nethercutt's ...
  39. [39]
    Documents on the Shelton Laurel Massacre from the North Carolina ...
    Apr 13, 2009 · There was quite an argument and Tweed ended up shooting and killing Merrill in the street that day. Tweed was arrested and jailed for killing ...
  40. [40]
    Outrunning a North Georgia Home Guard - Appalachian History
    Feb 11, 2016 · The Confederate Home Guard (1861–1865) worked in coordination with the Confederate Army, and was tasked with helping track down and capture ...
  41. [41]
    The Home Guard | Civil War Potpourri
    Aug 14, 2012 · The early Home Guard troops mostly enlisted in subsequent union militia or regular army units.<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] "Young bloods of the South:" The Confederate use and efficacy of ...
    Though often neglected by historians, many of these irregulars proved effective. This study evaluates the different types of irregular combatant found in the.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] the effects of confederate deserters on the - VTechWorks
    home guard members were killed and 60-70 runaway Confederate soldiers were captured.90 However, apprehending deserters was sometimes of negligible value in ...Missing: evaluation | Show results with:evaluation
  44. [44]
    Peace and Dissent in the South (Chapter 25)
    This view accepted that dissent increased but primarily because of the terrible burdens endured by Confederate civilians and soldiers during the war, not ...
  45. [45]
    Ending the Bloodshed | National Archives
    The last Confederate surrender occurred on November 6, 1865, when the Shenandoah arrived in Liverpool. The only Confederate vessel to circumnavigate the globe ...Missing: Guard | Show results with:Guard
  46. [46]
    April 18, 1865 Agreement | NC Historic Sites
    The Confederate armies now in existence to be disbanded and conducted to their several State capitals, there to deposit their arms and public property in the ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The Civil War Ends, 1865 - U.S. Army Center of Military History
    Apr 2, 2025 · After a few brushes with Confederate home guard units at. Shallow Ford and Mocksville on 11 April, Stoneman reached. Salisbury early on the ...
  48. [48]
    Amnesty Petition of William A. Lash, July 22, 1865 - Civil War Era NC
    Lash was a member of the Confederate home guard, a group charged with guarding the home front, being the last defense against Union soldiers, and tracking ...
  49. [49]
    Conscription and Conflict in the Confederacy : Albert Burton Moore
    Dec 22, 2022 · Conscription and Conflict in the Confederacy. by: Albert Burton Moore. Publication date: 1924. Collection: internetarchivebooks. Contributor ...Missing: home guard
  50. [50]
    review essay Rethinking the Confederate Home Front - jstor
    Because chattel slavery was the South's central economic and social institution, historians who considered the Confederate home front inter- wove slavery and ...