Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Torture

![The custody of a criminal does not require torture, by Francisco Goya][float-right] Torture is defined in international law as any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for purposes including obtaining information or a confession, punishing for an act committed or suspected, intimidating or coercing the victim or a third party, or based on discrimination, when such acts are perpetrated by or with the acquiescence of public officials or persons acting in an official capacity. This excludes pain inherent to lawful sanctions. The practice distinguishes from other forms of violence by its deliberate intent to break the subject's will through extreme duress, often employing methods like waterboarding, electrocution, or prolonged stress positions. Historically, torture served as a of judicial systems in ancient civilizations and medieval , where it was routinely applied to extract confessions under evidentiary rules requiring full proof for serious crimes, only declining with the rise of forensic methods and abolition in the 19th century. Its use extended to inquisitorial processes, wartime interrogations, and punitive measures by states across democratic and authoritarian regimes alike. Under contemporary international law, torture is absolutely prohibited as a jus cogens norm, binding all states without derogation even in emergencies, enshrined in treaties like the UN Convention Against Torture, which mandates criminalization and universal jurisdiction. Despite this, documented instances continue in conflicts and detentions, fueling debates over its purported intelligence value—empirical assessments indicate it frequently yields unreliable information due to victims' fabrication to end suffering—versus its role in deterrence or retribution.

Definitions

Legal and International Definitions

The United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 10, 1984, and entering into force on June 26, 1987, establishes the cornerstone international legal definition of torture in Article 1. This provision defines torture as "any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity." It explicitly excludes pain or suffering "arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions." The definition requires four core elements: severity of harm, intentionality, prohibited purposes, and state or official involvement, distinguishing torture from lesser forms of mistreatment. Under , reflected in instruments like the of , torture is absolutely prohibited without exceptions, including during conflicts. Common Article 3 of the bans "cruel treatment and torture" against persons not actively participating in hostilities, while the of the () in Article 7(2)(e) defines it as "the intentional infliction of severe or , whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the of the ," excluding only inherent to lawful sanctions but not requiring purposes or . These definitions align closely with CAT but apply in distinct contexts: humanitarian law emphasizes protection in war, while the ICC focuses on individual criminal liability for crimes against humanity. The prohibition is non-derogable, meaning no circumstances, including national emergencies or counterterrorism, justify it. Nationally, many states incorporate CAT's definition into domestic legislation, though variations exist; for instance, the codified a similar standard in 18 U.S.C. §§ 2340–2340A (enacted 1994), defining torture as an act "committed by a acting under the " specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental or , but with reservations upon ratifying CAT in 1994 limiting its to officials and excluding certain defensive actions. As of 2023, CAT has been ratified or acceded to by 173 states parties, obligating them to criminalize torture and establish jurisdiction over offenses. Discrepancies arise in interpreting "severe" , with some jurisdictions requiring objective medical evidence of harm, while others rely on subjective victim testimony.

Functional and Psychological Definitions

Torture functions as a coercive by deliberately inflicting severe physical or mental to override an individual's volition, compelling actions such as confessions or through the disruption of integrated neurocognitive processes. This operational dynamic exploits the brain's response to , which impairs , rational , and , often yielding unreliable outcomes to confabulation or suppression of accurate under duress. From a psychological standpoint, torture entails targeted assaults on mental faculties to engender intense suffering, encompassing techniques like , enforced isolation, or threats that foster helplessness and perceptual distortion without necessitating bodily injury. These methods, frequently classified as "" or "no-touch" torture, prioritize of the victim's psychological by amplifying responses and undermining , with effects persisting as . Psychological evaluations define it as the application of cognitive, emotional, or sensory manipulations directed at to provoke equivalent to physical torment, distinguishable by its emphasis on intangible yet verifiable mental sequelae. Clinical observations of survivors reveal that psychological torture triggers elevated incidences of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) at rates exceeding 50% in some cohorts, alongside depression and somatic complaints, evidencing causal pathways from acute coercion to enduring neural alterations in stress-regulation circuits. Neuroimaging correlates include reduced hippocampal volume and prefrontal dysregulation, mechanisms that parallel those in prolonged trauma models, confirming the functional equivalence of mental and physical pain in eliciting breakdown.

Historical Context

Ancient and Classical Eras

In ancient Mesopotamia, particularly under the Assyrians from the 9th to 7th centuries BCE, torture was systematically employed as a tool of warfare, retribution, and psychological terror to subdue enemies and deter rebellion. Assyrian inscriptions and palace reliefs from kings like Ashurnasirpal II (r. 883–859 BCE) and Ashurbanipal (r. 668–627 BCE) detail practices such as flaying captives alive, impaling bodies on stakes, decapitating and piling severed heads into towers, and burning entire villages while impaling survivors. These methods were not merely punitive but served to instill fear, as evidenced by Ashurnasirpal's banquet inscription boasting of draping city walls with flayed skins and filling plains with impaled corpses to coerce submission from neighboring states. Earlier Mesopotamian codes, such as the (c. 1750 BCE), prescribed punishments including of limbs or for specific crimes like or , reflecting a retributive framework where physical mirrored the offense's , though systematic under torture was less emphasized than in later . In ancient , torture featured in judicial and punitive contexts from the (c. 2686–2181 BCE) onward, with methods including beatings with rods, limb-twisting, by cutting off noses or ears, impalement, and burning for crimes against the state or . records, such as the (c. 2350 BCE), document investigations involving flogging to elicit confessions from suspects in tomb robberies, indicating torture's role in truth extraction under scribal oversight, though free elites were often exempt. Biblical accounts corroborate Near Eastern practices, describing tortures like and during conquests of and in the 8th–7th centuries BCE, as in the sieges of (722 BCE) and Lachish (701 BCE), where reliefs show heaps of mutilated bodies to terrorize populations. In (c. 5th–4th centuries BCE), torture (basanos) was legally restricted primarily to slaves and foreigners for extracting testimony in courts, as free male citizens were deemed above such coercion to preserve civic ; ' plays and orators like reference its use on or metics, involving whipping or the , but philosophical critiques by and questioned its reliability for truth. Ancient Rome institutionalized torture (quaestio) from the (c. 509–27 BCE), mandating it for slaves' testimony to presumed unreliability without pain, escalating under the to include free provincials and lower classes via tools like the , hot irons, or scourging; , reserved for non-citizens and , combined prolonged agony with , as in the execution of 6,000 slaves after ' revolt in 71 BCE. jurists like (d. 223 CE) noted its fallibility, yet emperors like and expanded it for political interrogations, often yielding coerced confessions rather than accurate .

Medieval to Enlightenment Periods

Judicial torture emerged in medieval Europe as a mechanism to secure confessions in inquisitorial criminal trials, particularly after the Fourth Lateran Council of 1215 prohibited clerical participation in trial by ordeal, necessitating alternative proofs for serious crimes like felony where testimony alone was insufficient. This practice, influenced by revived Roman and canon law, required "half-proof" such as strong suspicion or circumstantial evidence before torture could be applied, with the goal of eliciting full confessions to meet evidentiary thresholds for conviction. Regulations limited sessions to one per accused initially, though repeats occurred under repeated suspicions, and torture was not to cause permanent injury or death, reflecting a procedural rather than purely punitive intent. In the context of ecclesiastical courts, the medieval Inquisition, established to combat heresy, employed torture sparingly and skeptically after papal authorization in 1252 by Innocent IV's bull Ad extirpanda, which permitted it for obstinate suspects but emphasized corroboration beyond tortured confessions. Historical records from the Spanish Inquisition, active from 1478, indicate that while methods like the water torture (garrote) or strappado were used, inquisitors often discounted unreliable statements obtained under duress, with torture applied in fewer than 2% of cases based on archival evidence, countering exaggerated narratives of systemic brutality. Secular courts across continental Europe, including France and the Holy Roman Empire, integrated similar procedures by the 13th century, using devices such as the rack or thumbscrews to extract admissions, though efficacy was debated even then due to risks of false confessions from pain-induced fabrication. By the late medieval and early periods, evidentiary advancements like witness corroboration and forensic developments began eroding reliance on torture, with largely abandoning it by the 17th century except in exceptional treason cases, as common law favored trials over inquisitorial methods. The accelerated this shift through philosophical critiques; Cesare Beccaria's 1764 treatise On Crimes and Punishments argued that torture fails to distinguish guilty from innocent, as the weak confess falsely while the strong endure, rendering it causally ineffective for truth-finding and morally arbitrary. Voltaire echoed these views, decrying torture in works like his campaigns against judicial errors, such as the Calas (1762), where he highlighted how coerced confessions perpetuated miscarriages of under arbitrary sovereign . These ideas influenced legal reforms, leading to abolition in Prussia (1754), (1722 earlier), and during the Revolution (1789), as rationalist principles prioritized proportionate over confessional , though informal or punitive torture lingered in some penal practices into the 19th century. Empirical assessments of torture's outcomes, informed by trial , revealed high rates of recantation post-torture and inconsistencies, underscoring its unreliability absent independent , a realization that aligned with broader emphasis on evidence-based over absolutist traditions.

Modern Era: Industrial Age to World Wars

In the 19th century, judicial torture was formally abolished across much of and , a process accelerated by critiques emphasizing its ineffectiveness for eliciting reliable confessions and its moral incompatibility with emerging penal reforms. Cesare Beccaria's 1764 treatise influentially argued that torture produced false admissions under duress and violated principles of in , contributing to bans in nations like (abolished 1789, reaffirmed post-Revolution) and (judicial torture ended 1640s but corporal forms lingered). Despite these reforms, penal systems shifted toward institutional punishments that inflicted severe physical and psychological , often blurring into torture. In , the treadmill—introduced in 1817 as a "reformative" labor device—forced prisoners to step on a rotating wheel for hours daily, causing muscle fatigue, joint damage, and deaths from exhaustion in facilities like London's Coldbath Fields Prison, where over 12 hours of use was standard until its decline by the 1890s. United States prisons adopted similar mechanisms, with solitary confinement at Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia from 1829 intended as moral rehabilitation but resulting in documented insanity and self-harm among inmates isolated for 23 hours daily without sensory stimulation, a practice later criticized as psychologically destructive. Corporal punishments like flogging persisted in military and naval contexts; the U.S. Navy authorized up to 39 lashes until 1850, while chain gangs in Southern states compelled convicts—disproportionately Black laborers post-Civil War—to perform forced labor under threat of whipping, with annual reports from Georgia's convict lease system in the 1880s recording hundreds of lashings for minor infractions. Colonial empires extended harsher practices abroad: British forces in India employed strappado (suspension by wrists) and bastinado (foot whipping) against rebels during the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny, while American troops in the Philippine-American War (1899–1902) routinely applied the "water cure"—forcing water down suspects' throats to simulate drowning—on over 2,000 insurgents, as testified by U.S. officers like Major Edwin Glenn, who justified 100+ applications in a single operation to extract intelligence. These methods, often rationalized as necessary for pacification, highlighted a disconnect between metropolitan abolition and imperial coercion, where empirical accounts from colonial records indicate higher tolerance for pain-infliction to maintain control over subject populations. The World Wars marked a resurgence of systematic torture in military and intelligence operations, driven by demands for and . During , both sides committed atrocities involving torture; forces tortured intellectuals in 1915–1916 with beatings, nail-pulling, and before mass deportations, while troops in occupied used electrical shocks and on suspected saboteurs, as documented in reports from 1919. Interwar periods saw precursors in authoritarian regimes: Soviet from 1937 extracted confessions via , beatings, and "conveyor" —relentless by rotating teams—resulting in over 600,000 fabricated admissions during the Great Purge, per declassified archives. World War II escalated torture to industrial scale, particularly under Axis powers. Nazi Germany's Gestapo and SS operated over 1,000 interrogation centers by 1942, employing methods like standing in stress positions for days, submersion in ice water, and phalange crushing, with Auschwitz camp records from 1943–1945 detailing 20–50 daily floggings and "post" punishments (arms bound behind back and hoisted), applied to prisoners for alleged infractions. Japanese military police (Kempeitai) tortured Allied POWs and civilians with waterboarding, bamboo slivers under nails, and vivisection, as in the 1942–1945 Burma-Thailand railway camps where 12,000 Allied prisoners died amid routine brutality, including forced labor under threat of bayoneting. In Poland, German occupation forces tortured on an unprecedented scale, with Gestapo chambers in Warsaw processing thousands via electrocution and bone-breaking, contributing to estimates of 3 million non-Jewish Polish deaths from systematic violence. Allied forces largely adhered to Geneva Conventions, though isolated cases occurred, such as Soviet NKVD's continued use of medieval-derived techniques on German captives; U.S. and British intelligence occasionally authorized stress positions but avoided extremes, reflecting doctrinal emphasis on Geneva compliance amid empirical evidence of torture's unreliability for accurate intelligence. These practices underscored torture's role in terrorizing populations and coercing compliance, often yielding coerced but low-value information, as post-war trials like Nuremberg (1945–1946) established through victim testimonies and perpetrator confessions.

Post-World War II Developments

The , comprising four treaties ratified by 196 states as of , explicitly prohibit torture and cruel in and non- conflicts, building on the Convention's protections for prisoners of . bans to and , including torture, while specific conventions safeguards against inhumane interrogations. These developments responded to atrocities, including systematic torture by , with the and trials (1945-1948) prosecuting such acts as and , establishing under . Postwar human rights frameworks further codified bans, with Article 7 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights declaring no one shall be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman treatment, ratified by 173 states. Amnesty International's 1973 global campaign documented torture in over 50 countries, including beatings, electric shocks, and psychological coercion, galvanizing UN action; its 1975 report evidenced systematic use by governments for confessions and suppression. This pressure culminated in the 1975 UN Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Torture and the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture (CAT), ratified by 173 parties, obliging states to criminalize torture, prevent it in custody, and enable universal jurisdiction for prosecution. Despite these norms, state practices persisted during the Cold War. The CIA's MKUltra program (1953-1973) conducted over 150 subprojects involving non-consensual LSD administration, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, and electroshock on unwitting subjects, including prisoners and mental patients, to develop mind-control techniques amid fears of Soviet brainwashing; declassified documents reveal at least one death and long-term psychological harm. In the Vietnam War (1955-1975), North Vietnamese forces systematically tortured approximately 600 U.S. POWs at sites like the "Hanoi Hilton," employing rope restraints ("stocks"), beatings, and prolonged solitary confinement to extract propaganda statements, with some prisoners enduring over 12 sessions. U.S. forces also applied coercive methods, such as waterboarding and stress positions, against Viet Cong suspects, often overlooking allied South Vietnamese abuses. In the post-9/11 era, the U.S. implemented "enhanced interrogation techniques" authorized by Justice Department memos in 2002, including waterboarding (applied 183 times to one detainee), sleep deprivation up to 180 hours, and confinement in small boxes at CIA black sites and Guantanamo Bay, which opened in January 2002 for 779 detainees; a 2014 Senate report concluded these methods yielded no unique intelligence and constituted torture under international definitions. The 2003-2004 Abu Ghraib abuses involved U.S. military personnel subjecting Iraqi detainees to sexual humiliation, dog attacks, electrocution threats, and pyramid stacking, documented in leaked photographs published in April 2004, leading to 11 convictions but no high-level prosecutions; a Taguba Report identified 44 abuse instances, some equating to torture. These events, amid conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, underscored enforcement gaps, with CAT committees repeatedly criticizing non-compliant states, though compliance varies due to sovereignty and security claims.

Purposes and Applications

Retribution and Punishment

Retributive theories posit that is morally obligatory because offenders deserve to suffer proportionate to the wrong they have committed, independent of any deterrent or rehabilitative effects. In this , torture functions as an form of such retribution by deliberately inflicting severe physical or mental agony to mirror the suffering caused by the , thereby satisfying the principle of and restoring equilibrium disrupted by the offense. Philosophers like argued that punishment must equate to the crime's intrinsic wrongness, potentially endorsing equivalent suffering—though modern retributivists typically limit this to non-torturous penalties like , viewing torture as disproportionate or degrading to . Historically, torture was codified as retributive in numerous legal systems, often from lex talionis, which prescribed retaliatory such as or execution by ordeal to avenge and affirm societal norms. In ancient and medieval contexts, it targeted serious offenses like or , with methods including floggings, breaking on the , or and designed to prolong agony as visible recompense, thereby channeling communal . Such practices peaked in before the 18th century, when spectacles of tortured executions served dual roles of and exemplification, though they were gradually abolished by the mid-19th century amid shifts toward evidentiary reforms and perceptions of torture as unreliable or counterproductive. Empirical assessments of torture's retributive reveal mixed outcomes: while it may provide psychological for or publics seeking "just deserts," as evidenced by heightened for harsh measures following atrocities, it often fails to achieve lasting and can perpetuate cycles of rather than . indicates retributive motives endorsement of torture-like punishments even absent , yet historical show frequent false confessions under duress undermined judicial legitimacy, contributing to its decline in favor of proportionate, non-degrading sanctions. Critics from consequentialist perspectives argue that such methods and invite excess, as unchecked risks devolving into disproportionate to the original .

Deterrence Against Crime or Rebellion

Historically, torture has been utilized as an exemplary punishment to deter crime by publicly demonstrating severe consequences and instilling widespread fear among potential offenders. In medieval Europe, authorities frequently subjected criminals to prolonged torture—such as drawing and quartering or breaking on the wheel—prior to execution, with the spectacle intended to reinforce social order and discourage recidivism or imitation. As urban crime rates escalated in the later Middle Ages, responses included expanding capital offenses amenable to torture, from theft to vagrancy, reflecting a belief in severity's deterrent power despite no observable decline in offenses. Eighteenth-century reformers like critiqued this approach, arguing that torture's unreliability in ascertaining guilt undermined its punitive credibility and that milder, certain penalties better deterred through rational calculation of risks rather than . Empirical historical patterns support this: despite intensified torturous punishments, crime persisted or increased in regions like and from the 13th to 18th centuries, prompting shifts toward over spectacle by the 19th century as torture's deterrent proved illusory. Modern criminological analyses, drawing on , affirm that punishment severity correlates weakly with crime when certainty of apprehension remains low, a exacerbated by torture's or perceived illegitimacy in post-Enlightenment legal systems. Regarding rebellion, authoritarian regimes have applied torture to captured to signal resolve and discourage sympathizers, as in Roman crucifixions of Spartacus's followers in 71 BCE, which aimed to prevent slave revolts through deterrence. Proponents like have extended this to contemporary terrorism, positing judicially sanctioned torture as a deterrent against attacks by punishing plotters harshly. However, quantitative studies of civil wars and insurgencies, examining from over 100 conflicts between 1989 and 2010, find no statistically significant in rebel-perpetrated killings following torture; instead, it correlates with heightened , likely due to radicalization, revenge cycles, and eroded regime legitimacy. Cross-national evidence reinforces inefficacy: countries ratifying anti-torture treaties like the Convention Against Torture experienced no surge in domestic rebellions, while torture's deployment in counterinsurgencies—such as during the (–)—failed to suppress FLN resistance and prolonged . Causal mechanisms suggest torture undermines deterrence by fostering narratives of martyrdom among rebels, boosting , and alienating populations whose hinges more on perceived fairness than brutality. Thus, while invoked historically for both and rebellion control, torture's deterrent effects lack empirical substantiation and often yield counterproductive escalation.

Eliciting Confessions

Torture employed historically to compel confessions in judicial proceedings, particularly in systems where evidentiary standards prioritized over external proof. In , codified under emperors like in the 4th century , torture was permitted for slaves and lower classes to extract admissions in capital cases, with confessions required to be voluntary upon repetition without duress to mitigate falsity, though was inconsistent. During the witch hunts of the 15th to 17th centuries, inquisitorial procedures routinely incorporated torture devices such as the , thumbscrews, and to elicit admissions of pact with the , resulting in thousands of confessions that fueled executions; for instance, in the Würzburg trials of 1626–1629, over 900 individuals confessed under torment, many implicating in a cascading effect of fabricated networks. Psychologically, torture induces false confessions through mechanisms of compliance and cognitive overload rather than truthful recall. Acute pain and fear activate the brain's stress response, impairing prefrontal cortex functions responsible for accurate memory retrieval and executive control, leading subjects to produce whatever narrative terminates the suffering—often aligning with interrogators' expectations or suggestions. Peer-reviewed analyses indicate that this yields high rates of fabricated admissions; for example, studies of coerced interrogations show that physical agony prioritizes short-term relief over veracity, with victims internalizing suggested guilt to escape further harm, as evidenced in historical recantations post-torture and modern experimental analogs using stress induction. Empirical evaluations consistently demonstrate torture's unreliability for verifiable confessions. A review of interrogation outcomes across contexts, including U.S. programs, finds no robust link between coercive methods and accurate self-incriminations, with false positives predominating due to the ease of inventing compliant stories over genuine admissions, which require sustained volition absent duress. Historical precedents, such as the Spanish Inquisition's 1492–1834 records, reveal voluminous confessions under torture but frequent later disavowals or inconsistencies upon independent verification, underscoring systemic over-reliance on coerced that propagated errors like mass accusations. Neuroscientific critiques, drawing on of states, affirm that torture degrades informational , producing "confessions" more akin to survival-driven fabrications than factual disclosures. While proponents historically claimed utility in closing cases without witnesses, causal analysis reveals such successes as artifacts of , where unverified admissions were accepted despite incentives for deceit.

Intelligence Extraction and Interrogation

Torture has been applied in interrogations to compel disclosure of strategic, operational, or tactical from captured adversaries, combatants, or suspected informants. This posits that inflicting severe physical or overrides , prompting of concealed . Historically, such methods to ancient , where legions reportedly used scourging and crucifixion threats on prisoners to extract battlefield plans, though verifiable outcomes remain scarce. In modern contexts, interrogational torture distinguishes from punitive or confessional aims by targeting actionable , often under time-sensitive scenarios like operations. During the post-9/11 era, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) implemented an enhanced interrogation program authorized in August 2002, applying techniques including waterboarding, sleep deprivation exceeding 180 hours, and stress positions to at least 119 detainees held in secret facilities. Proponents, including CIA officials, asserted these yielded critical leads, such as information from detainee Abu Zubaydah purportedly facilitating the capture of Jose Padilla and Ramzi bin al-Shibh. However, the 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report, drawing from over 6 million pages of CIA documents, determined that key intelligence attributed to torture was obtained prior to its application or through non-coercive means, with no unique actionable intelligence derived solely from enhanced techniques. Empirical assessments torture's unreliability for . indicates that acute from torture disrupts hippocampal , impairing accurate retrieval while elevating suggestibility and fabrication to terminate , thus inflating false positives over verifiable data. A meta-analysis of interrogation found coercive methods, including torture, lower validity rates compared to rapport-building approaches, with coerced yielding at rates below 20% accuracy in controlled analogs. Military studies, such as those from U.S. training, corroborate that tortured captives prioritize compliance over truth, often reciting fabricated that consume investigative resources without advancing objectives. Counterproductive effects further diminish . Declassified assessments reveal torture correlates with increased rather than , as alienated populations radicalize in response, per econometric analyses of post-invasion Iraq data showing a 15-30% in attacks following reported abuses. Institutional biases in and reporting may understate occasional tactical gains claimed by practitioners, yet peer-reviewed syntheses consistently affirm no causal between torture and sustained breakthroughs. Alternatives like the U.S. Manual's non-coercive protocols, emphasizing psychological and , demonstrate higher yields in historical cases, such as FBI interrogations yielding 80% of post-9/11 convictions without physical .

Coercive Control and Terror

Torture serves as a mechanism of coercive control when wielded by states or groups to dominate populations through systematic infliction of fear, compelling submission without direct confrontation. By targeting individuals publicly or through widespread knowledge of atrocities, perpetrators amplify psychological terror, fostering self-censorship, denunciations, and compliance to avert personal victimization. This application transcends interrogation, aiming at societal-level deterrence where the mere threat suffices to erode collective resistance, as regimes exploit human aversion to extreme suffering to enforce ideological or political hegemony. In Stalin's Soviet Union, torture underpinned the Great Terror of 1936–1938, where the NKVD extracted coerced confessions via beatings, sleep deprivation, and threats to families, purging an estimated 1.5 million perceived enemies including party officials, intellectuals, and ordinary citizens. This terror apparatus, formalized under Article 58 of the penal code, resulted in roughly 700,000 executions and millions dispatched to Gulag labor camps, engendering pervasive paranoia that stifled dissent and bolstered Stalin's absolute rule by incentivizing informants to preemptively betray others. The regime's internal memos, later declassified, reveal torture's role not merely in evidence-gathering but in manufacturing narratives of conspiracy to justify mass repression, sustaining control through a cycle of fear where citizens policed themselves to avoid arbitrary arrest. Nazi Germany's and SS mirrored this strategy, employing torture in sites like Prinz-Albrecht-Straße prisons to dismantle opposition networks, with techniques including whipping, , and designed to break prisoners while publicizing fates to terrorize the populace into . By , over Germans had been detained in "protective custody," many tortured to extract names, fueling a state that deterred resistance movements through anticipated reprisals against kin. This coercive terror extended to occupied territories, where exemplary punishments like mass hangings amplified dread, temporarily quelling uprisings but sowing seeds of unified postwar backlash. Historical analyses indicate such methods yielded short-term acquiescence by exploiting survival instincts, yet empirical patterns from regime collapses suggest they eroded legitimacy, as suppressed grievances fueled insurgencies absent the terror's sustaining apparatus. In contemporary authoritarian contexts, such as under , torture in facilities like has functioned similarly, with documenting over ,000 hangings and routine floggings from 2011 onward to coerce amid , perpetuating via familial and societal . While these tactics demonstrably suppress overt —evidenced by opposition advances—they often provoke asymmetric responses, as transmutes into when proves , underscoring torture's brittle for enduring . Peer-reviewed examinations of totalitarian affirm that terror-induced hinges on unchecked , faltering under external pressures or internal defections, as ' coerced testimonies frequently fabricated threats that destabilized even the torturers' hierarchies.

Methods and Techniques

Physical Infliction

Physical infliction refers to torture techniques that directly apply mechanical force, pressure, or trauma to the body, aiming to cause acute pain, tissue damage, and long-term injury through verifiable physiological mechanisms such as muscle tears, fractures, or nerve compression. These methods predate modern conventions and persist globally despite prohibitions under the 1984 UN Convention Against Torture. Beatings with blunt objects like batons, fists, or rods represent the most common physical method, documented in 208 studies across countries involving 103,604 survivors, with a mean prevalence of 62.4% (95% : 57.7%-67.1%). Such often the head, , or limbs, leading to contusions, fractures, and ; empirical forensic analyses confirm these as primary causes of morbidity in detained populations. Falanga, or bastinado, involves repeated strikes to the soles of the feet using rods or cables, reported in 65 studies from 23 countries at 12.6% frequency (95% CI: 11.6%-13.6%). This technique damages plantar fascia and nerves, resulting in chronic hyperpigmentation, neuropathy, and gait impairment persisting 9 months to 10 years post-infliction, as observed in clinical examinations of 10 survivors. Suspension by limbs, including variants where are bound behind the back and hoisted via ropes—sometimes with sudden drops or weights—occurs in 75 studies across 21 at 11.0% (95% : 8.3%-13.7%). Mechanically, it hyperextends shoulders, causing dislocations and rotator cuff tears; historical from judicial practices detail its use to extract confessions through shoulder joint stress. Stretching devices like the , which secure ankles and wrists to rollers that are cranked to elongate the , induce vertebral separation and rupture. Employed in 16th-century for high-profile interrogations, such as those under , the method's parallel modern traction injuries, with risks of . Waterboarding applies and water flow over a bound victim's covered face on an inclined board, forcing involuntary inhalation and simulating drowning via laryngospasm and hypoxia. Documented in conflicts including the Vietnam War, it produces measurable physiological effects like elevated cortisol and bradycardia, distinct from mere psychological fear. Electrical application to genitals or mucosa, using low-voltage devices, generates neuromuscular contractions and burns, prevalent in 114 studies from 28 countries at 17.2% (95% CI: 15.0%-19.4%). Tissue pathology reveals charring and scarring, with higher incidence in Middle Eastern and Latin American cases.

Sensory and Psychological Manipulation

Sensory and psychological manipulation refers to torture techniques that inflict severe mental pain or suffering, as delineated in the United Nations Convention Against Torture, which defines torture as any intentional act causing such effects, whether physical or mental, for purposes including obtaining information or confessions. These methods target the victim's perceptual and emotional faculties to induce disorientation, dependency, and breakdown without primary reliance on physical injury. Key sensory techniques encompass deprivation, such as prolonged in darkened, sound-isolated cells or hooding to block , which can precipitate anxiety, hallucinations, and within 24 to 48 hours due to disrupted . Conversely, sensory overload employs incessant loud noises—often at 90-100 decibels—or glaring lights to prevent rest and heighten , compounding effects like and exhaustion. , frequently integrated via enforced standing or noise, induces psychosis-like symptoms after 72 hours, as evidenced in judicial precedents like Ashcraft Tennessee (1944). Psychological manipulation includes threats against members, executions, sexual , and enforced witnessing of abuses to exploit and shame, eroding the subject's resistance and . The CIA's 1963 KUBARK Counterintelligence manual systematized such approaches under "," fostering debility through , via controlled interactions, and via unpredictable threats, from behavioral to facilitate . Notable historical instances feature the military's 1971 application of the "five techniques" on 14 detainees in —hooding, subjection to disorienting , positions, , and reduced —intended to precede deeper interrogations and rooted in psychophysiological disruption. The in Ireland v. (1978) deemed these inhuman and degrading but stopped short of torture , a determination later challenged by survivors and bodies citing enduring trauma. Similar tactics influenced U.S. post-9/11 "enhanced interrogations," incorporating and auditory assault, as documented in declassified reviews.

Advanced and Technological Approaches

Electrical methods represent a significant advancement in torture techniques, utilizing controlled application of electric current to induce pain without necessarily causing visible external injuries. Devices such as the picana eléctrica, originating in Argentina during the 1950s and involving electrodes attached to sensitive body areas, deliver variable shocks to elicit compliance or information. Modern iterations include stun guns and tasers, which proliferated globally from the 1970s onward, often marketed as non-lethal but documented in torture by regimes in over 20 countries by the 1990s.30017-8/abstract) These portable devices allow precise dosing of electricity, typically 50,000 volts at low amperage, targeting muscles to cause involuntary contractions and severe discomfort. The graduated electronic decelerator (GED), developed in the early 2000s for behavioral modification in facilities like the Judge Rotenberg Center, exemplifies institutional use, administering escalating shocks up to 90 milliamps for perceived misbehavior. Pharmacological approaches involve administering psychoactive to impair and extract statements, often termed "truth serums" despite . Barbiturates like sodium amytal and benzodiazepines such as Versed were by the CIA in the mid-20th century under programs like MKUltra, aiming to lower inhibitions and induce . , the explored drugs like Versed for interrogations, documenting administration to detainees in to facilitate disclosures, though internal reviews noted risks of false confessions and physical including . , historically used in since the early , causes disorientation and , with reports of its injection during interrogations leading to coerced admissions without . These methods rely on intravenous or oral , calibrated to achieve without , but peer-reviewed analyses indicate they more reliably produce through than verifiable truth. Technological enhancements to sensory and psychological manipulation include apparatus for prolonged deprivation, such as hoods blocking and earphones delivering continuous at 100-110 decibels. Employed in "five techniques" during the 1970s Northern Ireland , these combined with stress positions to induce hallucinations within 48 hours. CIA programs post-2001 integrated similar , using darkened cells with constant auditory stimuli and extremes controlled via HVAC systems to exacerbate disorientation. Emerging neurotechnologies, including devices explored in military since the 2010s, aim to disrupt cognitive functions remotely, though documented applications remain limited to experimental contexts with ethical constraints. These approaches leverage electronics for sustained, invisible coercion, minimizing physical traces while targeting neural pathways for maximal psychological impact.

Efficacy Evaluation

Empirical Studies on Interrogation Outcomes

Empirical research from indicates that torture-induced severely impairs retrieval and cognitive , rendering obtained unreliable. High levels of and other disrupt hippocampal , leading to deficits in recall and an elevated of false or fabricated statements as confabulate to alleviate . A 2015 analysis of psychological and neuroscientific literature concluded that no supports torture's to produce veridical , as coercive methods systematically degrade the neural required for accurate . Meta-analytic reviews of human intelligence gathering techniques, encompassing over 60 studies, demonstrate that rapport-based approaches yield superior outcomes in both information quantity and quality compared to coercive methods. Rapport-building exhibits small positive effects on information volume (r = 0.20, based on 22 studies, N=2,624) and accuracy (r = 0.17, based on 6 studies, N=720), while confrontational and competitive tactics show no significant benefits (r ≈ 0.07 for quantity; r = -0.04 for quality). Physical coercion and torture, excluded from such taxonomies due to ethical constraints, lack methodological validation in controlled research and are associated with flawed anecdotal claims prone to confirmation bias. Experimental investigations using mock suspect paradigms further reveal coercive interrogation's drawbacks. A systematic review of 29 studies (1996–2023) found that accusatorial methods, characterized by confrontation and pressure, triple the odds of false confessions relative to neutral questioning (OR = 3.03, 95% CI 1.83–5.02) and quadruple them versus information-gathering approaches (OR = 4.41, 95% CI 1.77–10.97). In contrast, rapport-oriented information-gathering elevates true confession rates (OR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.29–4.59) by promoting cooperation without inducing compliance-driven errors. Field-based empirical work with high-stakes populations corroborates these patterns. of 181 interviews with convicted terrorist suspects showed that rapport-based techniques, including and , significantly reduced counter-interrogation tactics—such as or evasion—and increased rates compared to coercive styles. The Observing Rapport-Based Interpersonal Techniques () , applied to these cases, prioritized interpersonal over dominance, yielding higher volumes of actionable while minimizing . A comprehensive 2016 review by the U.S. synthesized over 100 studies, affirming rapport-building's across cultural contexts, including terrorism-related interrogations. Techniques like the Scharff method (feigned with friendly ) elicited more from resistant than direct or coercive , with meta-analyses showing enhanced (e.g., truth-teller ratios of 0.57 vs. 0.49 for deceivers). Coercive alternatives, by contrast, provoked defensiveness and false positives, as evidenced in studies of accusatorial paradigms reducing deceit cues and reliability. Overall, these findings underscore torture's causal inefficacy: it incentivizes short-term over truthful , often amplifying in without verifiable gains over ethical alternatives.

Historical Instances of Apparent Successes

In the Gunpowder Plot of 1605, Guy Fawkes, a key conspirator aiming to assassinate I by blowing up the Houses of , was arrested on and subjected to torture, including the , starting . After enduring the device, which stretched his , Fawkes confessed on , providing details of the , co-conspirators' names, and locations of gunpowder stores, which facilitated the capture of remaining plotters like Robert Catesby and Thomas Percy by . Contemporary records, including Fawkes' own signed statements preserved in British archives, indicate the confession aligned with independently verified evidence such as the discovery of 36 barrels of gunpowder, suggesting the torture prompted disclosure of accurate operational details rather than fabrication. During the Algerian War of Independence (1954–1962), French forces under officers like General Paul Aussaresses employed systematic torture, including electrocution and simulated drownings, against captured FLN insurgents. Aussaresses later documented in his memoir that such methods elicited immediate identifications of bomb-making sites and ambush plans, enabling preemptive raids that reportedly neutralized several attacks in Algiers in 1957, including the disruption of a plot targeting French paratroopers. French military logs from the period, declassified in part, corroborate instances where tortured detainees' revelations led to verifiable arrests and seizures of explosives within hours, though broader strategic outcomes remained contested due to the war's ultimate failure. In the U.S. CIA's post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program, officials asserted that waterboarding Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the architect of the , 183 times between 2003 and early 2004, yielded intelligence on al-Qaeda networks. CIA Director and interrogator claimed this broke KSM's resistance, leading to disclosures about the Jose Padilla "dirty bomb" plot (arrested May 2002, with details allegedly confirmed post-torture) and the Heathrow liquid explosives scheme (foiled 2006). Internal CIA cables from 2003 described KSM providing "high-value" leads on figures like , whose subsequent capture Tenet attributed partly to this information, though subsequent Senate investigations disputed the techniques' unique causality, attributing much data to prior non-coercive sources. These claims, echoed in Bush administration briefings, represented perceived operational successes at the time, influencing decisions to expand the program.

Documented Failures and Counterproductive Effects

The 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on the CIA's and concluded that , including and positions, failed to that disrupted specific plots or aided in capturing high-value like , despite claims to the contrary. Internal CIA assessments post-2004 acknowledged these methods as "counterproductive" and yielding "ineffective" results, with detainees providing fabricated under duress rather than actionable . corroborates this unreliability, demonstrating that coercive induces through and fabrication, leading to false confessions that contaminate investigations; for instance, empirical analyses of show prioritize ending immediate over , resulting in a high of erroneous . Beyond inaccuracy, torture has provoked backlash that undermines strategic objectives. The 2004 Abu Ghraib scandal, where U.S. personnel subjected Iraqi detainees to sexual , beatings, and —documented in photographs released that April—spurred a in insurgent attacks, with coalition forces heightened and recruitment for groups like Al-Qaeda in Iraq following global . U.S. interrogators, such as Air Force Matthew , who oversaw 1,300 interrogations in Iraq without , testified that at facilities like Abu Ghraib alienated local populations and provided propaganda victories to adversaries, fostering radicalization rather than cooperation. Historical precedents echo these effects; during the Vietnam War's Phoenix Program (1967–1972), CIA-backed torture of suspected Viet Cong yielded widespread false accusations, inflating civilian casualties—estimated at over 20,000 targeted individuals—and eroding South Vietnamese support, contributing to operational setbacks amid fabricated intelligence. Institutionally, reliance on torture has led to resource misallocation and legal vulnerabilities. The CIA program, costing $40 million annually by , diverted assets from non-coercive methods proven more effective, such as rapport-building, while exposing personnel to prosecution risks under ; no prosecutions ensued for false intelligence dissemination, but the practices breached U.S. treaty obligations, prompting diplomatic . Studies on interrogation , including those by the , affirm that adversarial approaches harden and yield , with subjects withholding critical post-abuse due to . These patterns indicate torture not only fails causally to extract veridical but amplifies adversarial resolve through perceived , perpetuating cycles of .

Impacts and Consequences

Effects on Victims

Torture inflicts profound and often irreversible physical harm on victims, including chronic musculoskeletal pain, fractures, nerve damage, and sensory impairments such as hearing loss or vision deficits from methods like beatings or electrical shocks. Over 80% of torture survivors experience persistent pain, leading to restricted mobility and long-term disability that impairs daily functioning. Neurological sequelae are common, encompassing headaches, vertigo, dizziness, and episodes of loss of consciousness persisting beyond the acute phase. Psychological consequences dominate survivor outcomes, with (PTSD), depression, and generalized anxiety affecting a substantial , often co-occurring and resistant to treatment. Empirical assessments of torture-exposed populations reveal PTSD prevalence rates around 10-30%, depression up to 28%, and anxiety up to 23%, alongside symptoms like nightmares, , hypervigilance, dissociation, and profound disruptions in sense of agency and self-perception. These effects stem from the overwhelming response, which suppresses adaptive coping and embeds traumatic memories, frequently resulting in elevated suicide risk and social withdrawal. Neurological alterations underpin many enduring impacts, including structural changes in the and reduced functional in regions governing and . Functional neuroimaging of survivors shows impaired neural processing of and , correlating with persistent cognitive deficits like concentration difficulties and . Such brain-level disruptions explain the high of with disorders, where physical symptoms exacerbate psychological distress in a bidirectional . Long-term is hindered by these intertwined effects, with many survivors facing lifelong on and rehabilitative support.

Ramifications for Perpetrators and Institutions

Perpetrators of torture, particularly low-ranking military or intelligence personnel, have faced legal accountability primarily through domestic military courts-martial or civilian trials, though convictions and sentences are often limited and disproportionately target subordinates rather than commanders or policymakers. In the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, which surfaced in April 2004, eleven U.S. soldiers from the 372nd Military Police Company were charged with abuses including beatings, sexual humiliation, and mock executions of Iraqi detainees; Specialist Jeremy Sivits received the maximum one-year sentence in a May 2004 court-martial for dereliction of duty and maltreatment, while Private Lynndie England was convicted in 2005 on charges of conspiracy and maltreatment, resulting in a three-year sentence reduced to 1,287 days served. Higher-ranking officers, such as Lieutenant Colonel Steven Jordan, saw convictions overturned or avoided, with the U.S. Army rejecting a court-martial recommendation for the facility commander in January 2008, highlighting a pattern of scapegoating enlisted personnel. In the CIA's post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program, initiated in 2002 and involving techniques like waterboarding on at least 119 detainees across black sites, individual accountability has been minimal despite internal reviews documenting overstepping legal boundaries; no CIA officers or contractors faced criminal prosecution under the Obama administration, which in 2009 declined referrals from a special prosecutor citing potential harm to intelligence operations, though psychologists James Mitchell and , who designed the methods, settled a 2017 civil lawsuit for $5 million without admitting liability. The program's architects, including senior Bush administration officials, evaded charges, underscoring prosecutorial reluctance in cases tied to national security claims, even as a 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee report detailed false efficacy claims and ethical violations by agency leadership. Internationally, the United Nations Convention Against Torture (ratified by over 160 states since 1984) mandates criminalization of torture and prosecution or extradition of perpetrators, yet enforcement remains inconsistent, with rare successful cases against state agents from powerful nations; for instance, while Pinochet faced arrest attempts in 1998 under universal jurisdiction principles, U.S. personnel from Iraq and CIA programs have not been extradited or tried abroad, reflecting geopolitical immunities. Non-state or mid-level actors in weaker regimes, such as Argentine junta members convicted in the 1985 Trial of the Juntas for systematic torture during 1976-1983, demonstrate higher accountability when domestic political shifts enable it, but even then, amnesties often follow. For institutions, exposure of torture programs triggers internal investigations, policy reforms, and reputational costs that can undermine operational legitimacy and strategic goals. The U.S. of Defense's 2004 Taguba on Abu Ghraib recommended disciplinary actions and procedural overhauls, contributing to the of the facility in 2006 and revised detainee doctrines, while the CIA program prompted 13491 in January 2009, banning enhanced techniques and establishing the for non-coercive methods compliant with . These changes, however, have not eradicated practices, as evidenced by ongoing allegations in allied programs, and institutional fallout includes eroded —polls post-2004 showed a 20-point drop in U.S. global favorability—and boosted insurgent recruitment, with al-Qaeda citing abuses to garner over 3,000 foreign fighters in Iraq by 2006. Broader ramifications involve professional complicity risks, as seen in lawsuits against medical personnel enabling CIA interrogations, fostering internal resistance and ethical reforms in agencies like the American Psychological Association, which in 2015 banned member involvement in national security interrogations.

Broader Societal and Strategic Outcomes

The of in state-sponsored programs, such as the CIA's from to , incurred significant financial and operational costs exceeding $ million paid to contractors James Mitchell and , while yielding no actionable that advanced efforts, according to the U.S. Select on 's of over CIA documents. Strategically, these programs complicated diplomatic relations by alienating allies unwilling to share to concerns and providing adversaries with that undermined in conflicts like the . The 2004 Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal, involving documented humiliations and physical mistreatment of Iraqi detainees by U.S. military personnel, directly energized the Iraqi insurgency by fueling anti-American sentiment and eroding domestic and international support for U.S. operations, as evidenced by subsequent spikes in attacks and recruitment for groups like al-Qaeda in Iraq. This event, amplified through leaked photographs, demonstrated how exposure of torture practices can shift battlefield dynamics, converting potential neutrals into active opponents and prolonging conflicts by validating enemy narratives of Western barbarism. On a societal level, use of torture fosters and terrorist recruitment by traumatizing populations and creating grievances that extremists exploit, as seen in cases like Ayman al-Zawahiri's hardening against regimes following his torture in prisons during the 1980s, which contributed to his in . Empirical analyses indicate that such practices generate blowback, with survivors and witnesses serving as vectors for ideological , thereby increasing the of potential rather than diminishing threats. Within perpetrator societies, revelations of institutionalized torture in security institutions and provoke legal reckonings, as illustrated by ongoing civil suits against U.S. actors from the era, which highlight persistent gaps and cultural divisions over norms. Internationally, reliance on torture diminishes a state's and invites escalations, as adversaries justify their own abuses by citing precedents like U.S. sites holding 119 detainees across multiple , which strained partnerships and facilitated narratives portraying democratic powers as hypocritical. Over the long , these outcomes perpetuate cycles of , where short-term tactical pursuits enduring strategic deficits, including heightened perceptions of vulnerability to violations as a rather than an aberration.

Actors and Prevalence

Governmental and State Perpetrators

Governments and have systematically employed torture throughout to extract confessions, gather , suppress , and maintain . In , the and routinely subjected prisoners to severe physical and in concentration camps and Gestapo facilities, including beatings, electrocution, and prolonged stress positions, as documented in survivor testimonies and postwar trials. Similarly, during the Soviet Union's Great Purge from 1936 to 1938, the NKVD secret police used methods such as sleep deprivation, threats to family members, and physical beatings to coerce false confessions from millions, contributing to the execution or imprisonment of approximately 700,000 individuals. In the post-World War II era, state-sponsored torture persisted across various regimes. The Assad government in Syria operated an extensive network of detention facilities where security forces applied at least 72 documented forms of torture, including crushing detainees with heavy objects, electric shocks, and sexual violence, resulting in over 14,000 deaths in custody between 2011 and 2019 according to analysis of the "Caesar" photographs smuggled out by a military defector. Israel's Shin Bet security agency has been implicated in using "moderate physical pressure" techniques authorized by the 1989 Landau Commission, such as painful binding and hooding, during interrogations of Palestinian suspects, with subsequent reports documenting excessive applications leading to injuries or deaths in isolated cases. Contemporary examples include the United States' Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) detention and interrogation program initiated after the September 11, 2001 attacks. From 2002 to 2009, the CIA subjected at least 119 detainees to enhanced interrogation techniques, including waterboarding (applied to at least three individuals, with one session lasting 19.5 minutes), stress positions, and rectal hydration, as detailed in the declassified executive summary of the 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report. In China, authorities in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region have detained over one million Uyghurs and other Muslims in internment camps since 2017, where credible reports describe systematic torture such as beatings, electric shocks, and forced medication, potentially amounting to crimes against humanity according to the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The of 's 2024 Country Reports on Practices identifies torture by forces in numerous nations, including arbitrary killings combined with cruel treatment in , enforced disappearances and physical abuse in , and security force torture in 's , underscoring the despite prohibitions under the UN Against Torture ratified by 173 . These practices often occur in operations, , or efforts, with derived from accounts, forensic , and defectors' leaks, though assessments from sources like the may reflect geopolitical priorities in highlighting violations.

Non-State and Insurgent Groups

Non-state , including terrorist organizations, insurgent militias, and transnational criminal syndicates, have employed torture as a mechanism for extracting , enforcing , punishing , and terrorizing populations to consolidate territorial control or advance ideological goals. Unlike state perpetrators bound by treaties, these groups operate outside formal legal constraints, often amplifying torture's brutality for purposes, such as disseminating videos of executions and mutilations to demoralize opponents and attract recruits. Empirical from organizations and conflict analyses reveals patterns of systematic in and , where torture compensates for resources in gathering or deterrence. The (ISIS) exemplified industrialized torture during its self-declared from 2014 to 2019, detaining thousands in makeshift prisons across and for and ideological purification. interviewed over Sunni who described ISIS fighters subjecting them to prolonged beatings with cables, electric shocks to genitals, and forced stress positions, often to coerce confessions of or extract family payments. Children as young as nine faced similar torments, including whippings and by wrists, with judges in reporting frequent torture allegations from ISIS suspects in 2018-2019 trials. corroborated these accounts through testimonies, noting ISIS's use of , beheading, and —publicly filmed for —as both punitive measures and tools, resulting in thousands of documented executions by 2016. In Sinai, Egypt, ISIS affiliate Wilayat Sina' kidnapped and tortured locals suspected of collaboration with Egyptian forces, employing drowning in cages and explosive belt detonations from 2013 onward. Mexican drug cartels, functioning as de facto insurgent-like entities in regions of weak presence, have integrated torture into territorial since the escalation of the narcotics in 2006. Groups like and Nueva Generación routinely dismember victims alive, dissolve in (known as "stewing"), or employ the "" beheading , with over 100 such public displays recorded in 2011 alone to signal dominance over smuggling routes. In 2021, authorities uncovered 12 tortured in , bearing cartel placards informants, amid broader patterns where cartels extort and migrants—kidnapping 20,000 annually for or forced labor, often involving and . These acts, ritualized in "narcocultos" ceremonies blending with narco-saint , serve causal roles in cartel and deterrence, though they provoke retaliatory cycles exacerbating homicide rates exceeding 30,000 yearly since 2018. Other insurgent groups, such as the in , have sustained torture practices amid guerrilla campaigns and governance vacuums. From to , Taliban fighters flogged, amputated limbs, and electrocuted captives for alleged , with post-August 2021 takeover reports documenting arbitrary detentions involving beatings and summary executions in facilities like Kabul's . affiliates, including in and , mirrored these tactics, using and nail-pulling on prisoners to extract operational , as evidenced in declassified interrogations from 2002-2010 raids. Legal analyses indicate that while non-state torture evades direct Against Torture enforcement—lacking the "official " clause—these ' prevalence in 21st-century conflicts underscores gaps in norms, with over armed non-state groups implicated in systematic abuses by 2020. Such practices, while yielding short-term compliance, often backfire by alienating local support and fueling insurgencies' isolation, per conflict escalation studies.

Current Global Patterns and Hotspots

As of 2025, torture remains prevalent in state-run detention facilities, police custody, and conflict zones worldwide, often employed to extract confessions, suppress dissent, or punish perceived enemies, despite universal legal prohibitions under international law. Reports indicate systemic use by security forces in over 80 countries, with patterns including beatings, electric shocks, waterboarding, and sexual violence, frequently accompanied by impunity due to weak accountability mechanisms. The OMCT Global Torture Index, launched in June 2025, categorizes 27 countries into risk levels based on data from civil society networks, highlighting very high risks in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Belarus, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Libya, and Russia, where state agents routinely apply torture in interrogations and prisons. High-risk nations include Cameroon, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Tunisia, and Turkey, driven by police brutality and custodial deaths. In active conflict areas, torture escalates as a tool of war, with documented cases of systematic abuse against prisoners of war and civilians. In Syria, government forces continue widespread torture in detention centers, including mass deaths and enforced disappearances, as reported by UN investigators in December 2024, affecting thousands post-Islamic State defeat. Russian forces in Ukraine have perpetrated torture on a massive scale since 2022, including executions and sexual violence against POWs, with UN evidence from September 2024 confirming patterns in occupied territories. Libya and Ethiopia exhibit very high risks amid civil strife, with militias and state actors using torture to control populations. Non-state actors, such as drug cartels in Mexico and insurgents in Myanmar, also inflict torture, though state involvement predominates in reported hotspots. Authoritarian regimes feature entrenched torture practices, often targeting political opponents and minorities. North Korea maintains one of the world's most severe systems, enforcing obedience through torture and executions in political prisons, as noted in 2024 assessments. In Iran, security forces extract confessions via torture leading to executions, with hundreds affected annually. Egypt and Eritrea report ongoing state-sanctioned torture as of 2023, including in secret facilities. Emerging patterns in Asia include high risks in India from police misuse of laws like UAPA for custodial torture, and in Cambodia's scam compounds involving forced labor and beatings. These hotspots reflect a global trend where torture persists due to institutional tolerance, with the UN noting over 175 states parties to the Convention Against Torture yet persistent non-compliance.

Ethical and Normative Debates

Consequentialist Justifications

Consequentialist justifications for torture evaluate the practice based on its outcomes rather than intrinsic moral prohibitions, positing that it may be permissible if the expected benefits—such as averting mass casualties through extracted intelligence—outweigh the harms inflicted. Under utilitarianism, the moral calculus prioritizes aggregate welfare, allowing torture in scenarios where non-coercive methods fail and time-sensitive threats loom, as the suffering of one individual could prevent widespread death or destruction. This framework, advanced by philosophers like Michael Levin, argues that withholding torture from a detainee with knowledge of an impending attack equates to complicity in the ensuing harm, rendering opposition indefensible if reliable information can be obtained promptly. Proponents extend this to real-world counterterrorism, claiming that "enhanced interrogation techniques" (EIT)—including waterboarding and stress positions—yielded actionable intelligence post-9/11, such as details on networks that disrupted plots. For instance, CIA officials asserted that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's interrogation under EIT provided leads on figures like Jose Padilla, averting potential attacks, though these claims rely on agency assessments rather than independently verified outcomes. Similarly, defenders like psychologist James Mitchell, who designed CIA EIT protocols, testified that the methods broke resistant detainees, producing information unattainable through rapport-building alone, thereby justifying their use as a net positive for . Empirical scrutiny, however, reveals significant limitations to these justifications. The 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report, drawing from over 6 million pages of CIA documents, determined that EIT did not produce unique, high-value intelligence; much claimed success stemmed from prior non-coercive interrogations or foreign sources, while coercion often generated fabricated confessions that diverted resources and misled operations. Psychological studies corroborate that torture impairs memory recall and incentivizes deceit to end suffering, reducing reliability compared to evidence-based techniques like building trust, which military interrogators report as more effective for sustained cooperation. In the archetypal "—hypothetically torturing a captive to defuse an imminent —consequentialists maintain a of justification absent better alternatives, yet no documented historical cases confirm torture's decisive in such averting disasters, with analyses deeming the construct unrealistic to gaps and logistical improbabilities. While CIA internal reviews acknowledged some tactical gains from EIT, broader strategic costs—including and of international alliances—erode net utility, as evidenced by detainee mistreatment fueling insurgent recruitment in Iraq and Afghanistan. Thus, though consequentialism theoretically permits torture under stringent conditions, prevailing data indicate it frequently fails the outcome test, yielding counterproductive effects that undermine security objectives.

Absolutist Moral Objections

Absolutist objections to torture assert that is inherently immoral and impermissible under any circumstances, irrespective of potential benefits or contextual justifications such as threats. This deontological holds that torture violates by deliberately inflicting severe physical or mental to extract or coerce , treating the as a mere rather than an end in itself. In Kantian ethics, torture is absolutely prohibited because it contravenes the , which demands that individuals be treated as autonomous agents with inherent worth, not as means to utilitarian ends. Philosophers argue that even in hypothetical scenarios like the " ," where torture might avert greater , the remains wrong due to its intrinsic of the , potentially eroding moral constraints on and fostering a of brutality. Deontologists further contend that permitting exceptions undermines the absolute right against torture, as recognized in frameworks like international human rights law, where non-derogability reflects this moral intuition. Religious traditions, particularly within , reinforce by deeming torture an intrinsic evil that offends and the Dei in every person. The , in its Catechism and post-Vatican II teachings, explicitly condemns torture as gravely immoral, prohibiting it outright regardless of intentions or outcomes, as it assaults and echoes the of Christ without justification for . This stance aligns with early like Tertullian, who any Christian involvement in torture, viewing it as incompatible with discipleship, though historical deviations such as inquisitorial practices are acknowledged as aberrations from core .

Exceptional Scenarios like Ticking Bombs

The "ticking bomb" scenario posits a hypothetical situation in which authorities possess a captured suspect believed to have knowledge of an imminent terrorist attack that could kill thousands, with insufficient time for non-coercive interrogation methods to extract the necessary information. Proponents of limited torture authorization, such as legal scholar Alan Dershowitz, argue that in such extreme cases, regulated torture—potentially via judicial "torture warrants"—could be morally permissible under consequentialist ethics if it reliably prevents greater harm, emphasizing the moral asymmetry between torturing one individual versus allowing mass casualties. However, this framework assumes both the scenario's frequent occurrence and torture's efficacy in producing verifiable intelligence, assumptions undermined by empirical analysis. In reality, no verified historical instances exist where torture definitively averted a ticking bomb-style attack, rendering the scenario more a philosophical construct than a practical guide for policy. Intelligence professionals, including former interrogators of high-value al-Qaeda detainees, have testified that coercive methods yield fabricated confessions designed to end suffering rather than accurate details, often delaying actionable intelligence and complicating subsequent rapport-based questioning. A 2014 U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report, reviewing CIA enhanced interrogation techniques (which included waterboarding and stress positions), concluded that claims of thwarting specific plots—such as alleged disruptions of attacks in 2002—relied on unverified detainee statements obtained under duress, with no unique, timely information attributable solely to torture; instead, much intelligence predated or derived from non-coercive sources. From a causal , torture's physiological and psychological effects—such as heightened levels impairing and inducing through desperation—systematically reliability in time-sensitive scenarios, where distinguishing truth from lies requires cross-verification incompatible with urgency. Even in purported real-world approximations, like interrogations during the (–), anecdotal claims of thwarted attacks via torture, such as those cited by , remain contested and lack independent corroboration, with broader evidence indicating torture fueled insurgent recruitment and prolonged conflict rather than resolving acute threats. security officials, after employing "moderate physical pressure" in the –, discontinued such practices by following rulings, citing inefficacy and ethical , with no documented ticking successes attributed to . Critics, including ethicists like Bob Brecher, contend the scenario's invocation serves as a rhetorical device to erode absolute prohibitions, ignoring how institutionalizing exceptions invites abuse in non-exceptional cases, as seen in post-9/11 U.S. programs where initial "high-value" justifications expanded to lower-level detainees without imminent threats. Empirical data from global torture rehabilitation centers further reveals that coerced information rarely withstands scrutiny, often leading to miscarriages of justice or wasted resources on false leads, while non-torturous techniques—like building trust and using incentives—have proven superior for urgent extractions in documented counterterrorism operations. Thus, even granting the scenario's premise, torture's track record precludes its justification, prioritizing instead evidence-based interrogation protocols that mitigate risks without compromising veracity.

Legal Frameworks

Global Prohibitions and Treaties

The prohibition of torture is recognized as (jus cogens) , states irrespective of and permitting no , even in states of or armed conflict. This status stems from widespread state , opinio juris, and consistent in judicial decisions, rendering treaties or agreements permitting torture void ab initio. Early codifications include Article 5 of Declaration of (UDHR), adopted by the UN General Assembly on , , which states: "No one shall be subjected to torture or to or ." In the context of armed conflicts, the four of , —ratified by 196 states—explicitly ban torture across their provisions: Common Article 3 prohibits violence to life and person, including cruel treatment and torture, in non-international armed conflicts; while grave breaches under Articles 50, 51, 130, and 147 of Conventions I–IV respectively cover torture or inhuman treatment in international conflicts, obligating states to prosecute or extradite perpetrators. Additional Protocols I (1977, Article 75) and II (1977, Article 4) extend these protections, ratified by over 170 and 160 states, respectively. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted on December 16, 1966, and entering into force on March 23, 1976 with 173 state parties, reinforces the absolute ban in Article 7: "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment," interpreted by the Human Rights Committee as prohibiting distinctions based on conduct or status. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), adopted on July 17, 1998, and in force since July 1, 2002 with 124 state parties, classifies torture as a crime against humanity (Article 7(1)(f)) and war crime (Article 8(2)(a)(ii) for international conflicts and Article 8(2)(c)(i) for non-international), enabling individual prosecutions. The primary dedicated is the UN against Torture and Other or (), adopted by the UN on December 10, 1984, and entering into on June 26, 1987, following by 20 states. Ratified by 174 states as of 2024, CAT obligates parties to criminalize torture ( 4), prevent it within their ( 2), from refoulement to torture risks ( 3), and redress ( 14). Its Optional (OPCAT), adopted in 2002 and ratified by 91 states, establishes preventive and a Subcommittee on Prevention for unannounced visits to detention sites. Despite broad adherence, some ratifications include reservations, such as non-self-executing status or exceptions for superior orders, though these do not alter the underlying jus cogens prohibition.

Domestic Regulations and Loopholes

In the , torture is prohibited under through 18 U.S.C. § 2340A, which criminalizes acts by officials under color of that inflict severe physical or mental or on persons outside U.S. , with penalties 20 years or if resulting in fatality. This implements aspects of the (), ratified by the U.S. in with reservations limiting its to acts outside U.S. jurisdiction and requiring specific intent to cause severe . Domestically, the Eighth to the bars cruel and unusual punishments, interpreted by courts to include torture, though primarily applied to convicted prisoners rather than pretrial detainees or foreign captives. Post-9/11, the U.S. (OLC) issued memos in August 2002, authored by and , that narrowed torture to require prolonged mental harm or physical pain equivalent to organ failure, death, or impairment of bodily functions, thereby authorizing CIA techniques such as , stress positions, and as non-torturous if conducted with medical oversight and without intent to cause prohibited levels of suffering. These memos, later withdrawn in 2004 by successor amid legal scrutiny, effectively created a loophole by reinterpreting statutory and constitutional prohibitions to permit "enhanced interrogation" in national security contexts, influencing operations at sites like Guantanamo Bay and CIA black sites until their partial repudiation in 2009 executive orders. Extraordinary rendition programs, expanded after 2001, exemplified another by transferring suspects to third like , , and —known for employing torture—bypassing U.S. domestic bans on coercive interrogations while avoiding under CAT Article 3's non-refoulement provision through claims of diplomatic assurances against mistreatment, assurances later documented as unreliable in cases like that of Maher Arar, renditioned to in 2002 and subjected to beatings and confinement in a tire-like apparatus. U.S. courts have invoked to dismiss related lawsuits, shielding operational details and perpetuating impunity for officials. In other democracies, domestic implementations of UNCAT similarly feature loopholes. The United Kingdom's incorporates the ' absolute torture ban (Article 3), yet intelligence guidelines have permitted techniques like and in exceptional cases, as seen in inquiries revealing persistent use despite formal prohibitions. , as of 2023, lacks a specific provision defining and punishing torture, relying on general assault and mistreatment statutes, prompting calls for explicit UNCAT-aligned legislation to close definitional gaps. Across , national security exceptions and prosecutorial discretion often undermine enforcement, with data from the Council of Europe indicating low conviction rates for official torture despite reporting mechanisms. Authoritarian states frequently enact anti-torture laws compliant with UNCAT on —such as Russia's 117 defining torture as a grave offense punishable by up to 12 years—but loopholes arise through systemic , where investigations are and convictions near zero, as reported in UN Committee Against Torture reviews citing deliberate obstruction and denial. In , the penalizes torture by officials with up to seven years imprisonment, yet favors over , with documenting thousands of cases annually evading prosecution via reclassification as "extortion" or administrative sanctions. These patterns highlight how domestic regulations, while formally prohibiting torture, often incorporate evidentiary hurdles, requirements, or jurisdictional limits that enable circumvention, particularly in and domains where of remains contested.

Challenges in Enforcement and Compliance

Enforcement of prohibitions on torture, such as those under the (UNCAT), faces significant obstacles due to the reliance on self-reporting and . As of , while 156 states had ratified UNCAT, many continued to obstruct efforts to prevent, monitor, and investigate torture through inadequate reporting or of to sites of . The UN Against Torture (CAT) depends on periodic state reviews, but backlogs—exacerbated by like the —have delayed examinations, reducing . Proving cases remains challenging in forums, where evidentiary burdens and jurisdictional limits prosecutions, particularly for extraterritorial acts. Domestic is undermined by widespread for perpetrators, especially within and apparatus. In Ethiopia, decades of unpunished torture by officials have entrenched a systemic , as to prosecute encourages repeated use during interrogations. Similarly, in Egypt as of 2011, victims rarely filed complaints to fear of reprisals, with investigations often stalled or dismissed, perpetuating a cycle of unaccountability. Recent examples include Bangladesh in 2024, where forces tortured detainees without subsequent trials for the offenders, and Ukraine in 2024, where Russian authorities conducted open torture with apparent impunity during occupation. These patterns reflect institutional weaknesses, including prosecutorial reluctance to pursue state agents and inadequate victim protections, which erode treaty obligations. State sovereignty further complicates , as lacks coercive to override over practices. Principles like non-intervention and the sovereign acts, including torture by officials, from foreign judicial , even when jus cogens elevates the to a . Reservations to treaties, such as those allowing interpretations that dilute bans during crises, enable non-compliance without formal . Political incentives, particularly in counter-terrorism contexts, prioritize short-term gains over adherence, as seen in historical U.S. marginalization of norms , underscoring how sovereignty intersects with strategic interests to frustrate .

Attitudes and Perceptions

Evolution of Public Views

Public opposition to torture in societies intensified during the and 19th century, coinciding with legal abolitions across Europe, such as in 1849 and the broader shift away from judicial torture as a routine evidentiary tool. This evolution reflected growing emphasis on and evidentiary standards derived from rational , reducing public tolerance for practices once normalized in ancient and medieval contexts where torture was endorsed for confessions or . Post-World War , revelations of systematic torture by further entrenched normative revulsion in and , fostering near-universal endorsement of bans under frameworks like the and UN Against Torture. Polls from the early indicated low baseline support; for instance, pre-9/11 surveys in the showed minimal endorsement of torture for purposes. The , attacks prompted uptick in public support for torture against suspected terrorists, rising from 36% willing to allow it for known threats in 2004 (Gallup) to peaks around 47-53% by 2007-2011 deeming it often or sometimes justified (). This shift correlated with heightened and consequentialist rationales prioritizing over absolutist prohibitions, though support remained divided along lines, with Republicans consistently more favorable. By the mid-2010s, US attitudes stabilized in a polarized , with % in accepting it under some anti-terror circumstances (Pew) and % in viewing post-9/11 CIA methods as justified despite scandals like ( Post-ABC). In , stayed lower, with only 29% in the UK in believing torture sometimes necessary (), compared to % opposing it outright in ( global poll). Globally, views exhibit persistent variation tied to contexts and cultural norms, with 2016 Pew showing medians of 45% rejecting torture of terrorists across surveyed nations, but higher in the (73% justified sometimes/often) versus stronger opposition in Europe. In regions like South or sub-Saharan , often exceeds Western levels amid ongoing insurgencies, though comprehensive longitudinal remains . No major reversals occurred in the 2020s amid declining salience in the West, with attitudes appearing anchored by episodic threats rather than secular decline.

Influences from Media and Polls

Media portrayals of torture have significantly shaped attitudes, often presenting it as an effective in high-stakes scenarios while coverage emphasizes its abuses. The series (2001–2010), which frequently depicted torture yielding critical against ticking threats, correlated with increased among viewers; experimental studies found that to such primed audiences, particularly conservatives, to endorse torture more readily than general violence depictions. media's normalization of torture as heroic—evident in and shows post-9/11—has sustained pragmatic justifications, overriding qualms by associating it with successes, though analyses caution that these fictions inflate perceived without empirical backing. In contrast, investigative journalism on real-world cases like the 2004 Abu Ghraib scandal, where U.S. military personnel abused Iraqi detainees, triggered a temporary decline in support; Gallup polls post-scandal showed only 38% of Americans deeming torture of terrorism suspects acceptable in 2005, down from higher pre-exposure levels, though support rebounded amid ongoing threats. Mainstream media's emphasis on humanitarian violations in such reporting, often aligned with institutional critiques, has amplified absolutist objections, yet partisan divides persist, with Republican-leaning outlets framing torture as necessary counterterrorism. Public polls reflect these media-driven fluctuations, with post-9/11 support peaking at 53% in a 2011 Pew survey deeming torture "often or sometimes justified" against suspected terrorists, influenced by heightened threat perceptions amplified in news cycles. By 2016, a Reuters/Ipsos poll indicated 63% believed torture justifiable for extracting terrorism information, buoyed by entertainment's efficacy narrative despite inefficacy evidence. A 2017 Pew poll showed 48% accepting it under some anti-terror circumstances, with stability into the 2020s per analyses tying enduring support to media priming rather than policy shifts. These attitudes vary by demographics—higher among men, whites, and conservatives—and wane with explicit inefficacy framings, underscoring media's role in sustaining conditional endorsement over ethical absolutes.

Cultural Variations and Shifts

In ancient and medieval societies, torture was widely as a judicial tool across diverse cultures, including , where it was used to extract testimony from slaves and lower classes, and in Islamic caliphates under , where punishments like flogging were prescribed offenses as retributive justice rather than arbitrary . Similarly, in feudal and , methods such as the "" by a thousand cuts served both punitive and deterrent roles, reflecting Confucian emphases on hierarchical and over . These practices contrasted with sporadic taboos in some indigenous cultures, such as certain Native American tribes that avoided prolonged physical suffering in warfare captives, prioritizing ritualistic or swift execution. The marked a pivotal shift in , driven by rationalist critiques of torture's unreliability and inhumanity; Cesare Beccaria's On Crimes and Punishments influenced reforms, leading to bans in Denmark (1753), Prussia (1754), and (), as absolutist monarchies yielded to emerging humanitarian ideals rooted in . This accelerated post-World War II, with the and UN Against Torture establishing absolutist norms, though lagged in non-Western contexts where colonial legacies and imperatives fostered . By , in parts of the Middle East and Africa, acceptance persisted amid decolonization conflicts, with practices like those in Saddam Hussein's Iraq (pre-2003) blending Ba'athist authoritarianism and tribal retribution norms. Contemporary variations reflect geopolitical and ideological divides: surveys from 2015-2016 across 35 showed for torture to obtain terrorist at 40%, with highs in (66%), (62%), and (54%)—attributable to prevalent insecurity and weaker rule-of-law traditions—versus lows in , such as (11%) and (25%), where post-Holocaust memory and supranational enforcement prevail. In the , hovered around 48-49% in 2017 polls, higher than peers but lower than in (36% acceptance per related ICRC ), influenced by post-9/11 framing and cultural prioritizing over . indicate Muslim-majority and societies often exhibit the lowest for torturing terrorists (under 30% in aggregated WVS ), countering , while English-speaking and Confucian cultures show middling linked to pragmatic perceptions. Shifts since 2000 highlight reactive fluctuations: Gallup polls tracked support rising from 38% in 2004 to 53% in 2006 amid Iraq War fears, then declining to 36% by 2014 following Senate Intelligence Committee revelations on enhanced interrogation inefficacy, reflecting media-driven reassessments. Globally, authoritarian regimes like and maintain institutional tolerance, with state media framing it as counter-subversion necessity, while democratic transitions in (e.g., post-dictatorship ) have entrenched opposition via truth commissions. These patterns underscore causal drivers: acceptance correlates with perceived existential threats and institutional trust deficits, eroding under empirical exposure to torture's low intelligence yield (e.g., CIA admissions of fabricated confessions).

References

  1. [1]
    Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading ...
    Article 4. 1. Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit torture ...
  2. [2]
    5 The Legal History of Torture - Oxford Academic
    Oct 31, 2023 · Investigation under torture was a routine part of criminal procedure in late medieval and early modern times. The jurists and judges who ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Fall and Rise of Torture: A Comparative and Historical Analysis*
    Torture was formally abolished by European governments in the 19th century, and the actual practice of torture decreased as well during that period.
  4. [4]
    The prohibition against torture and its pragmatic effects
    Jun 9, 2023 · As a jus cogens norm, the prohibition on torture is considered to be a fundamental principle of international law from which no derogation is ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] CTI-UNCAT-ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE-1.pdf
    The definition of torture in Article 1 of UNCAT has four elements: o Severe pain or suffering (physical or mental); o Intentional infliction; o For a ...
  6. [6]
    Torture and Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment - IHL Databases
    Torture, cruel or inhuman treatment and outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment, are prohibited.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Prohibition and punishment of torture and other forms of ill-treatment
    Torture is absolutely banned under IHL and IHRL. It involves severe pain, intentional infliction, and is a grave breach of the Geneva Conventions.
  8. [8]
    https://www.justice.gov/file/145681/dl?inline=
  9. [9]
    https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
  10. [10]
    Definition of Torture | Oxford Law Pro
    Torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    captive brain: torture and the neuroscience of humane interrogation
    Coercive interrogation causes severe, repeated, and prolonged stress, compromising brain structures supporting integrated neurocognitive function. Because these ...
  12. [12]
    Psychological factors in exceptional, extreme and torturous ...
    Jun 1, 2016 · Torture comprises three main elements [5]: (i) the infliction of severe mental or physical pain or suffering; (ii) the intentional or deliberate ...
  13. [13]
    Psychological torture: definitions, clinical sequelae and treatment ...
    Aug 2, 2023 · Psychological torture, in its broadest sense, is the intentional infliction of suffering without resorting to direct physical violence, ...
  14. [14]
    Psychological torture: Definition, evaluation and measurement.
    Citation. Pérez-Sales, P. (2017). Psychological torture: Definition, evaluation and measurement. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Abstract.
  15. [15]
    The psychological impact of torture - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Other than post-traumatic stress symptoms, torture survivors have elevated rates of anxiety, depression, and adjustment problems, including outbreaks of anger ...
  16. [16]
    Torture exposure and the functional brain: investigating disruptions ...
    Jan 26, 2022 · This study provides a critical step in mapping the neural signature of torture exposure to guide treatment development and selection.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The worst scars are in the mind: psychological torture - ICRC
    which defines as torture any act that consists of the intentional infliction of ''severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental'', involving a public ...
  18. [18]
    Grisly Assyrian Record of Torture and Death - The BAS Library
    Grisly Assyrian Record of Torture and Death. By Erika Bleibtreu. Assyrian national history, as it has been preserved for us in inscriptions and pictures ...
  19. [19]
    4 Assyrian Tactics That Ensured the Loyalty of Their Subjects
    Sep 14, 2025 · Common features of Assyrian torture after a battle included the piling of deceased bodies, the impalement of bodies, the displaying of severed ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Grisly Assyrian Record of Torture and Death
    Biblical Archaeology Society. Grisly Assyrian Record of Torture and Death. By Erika Belibtreu. Scroll down to sidebar: The Black Obelisk. Assyrian national ...
  21. [21]
    Law Enforcement in Ancient Egypt: Police, Investigations ...
    Sanctioned Violence in Ancient Egypt; Executions in Ancient Egypt; Crimes Worthy of ...POLICE AND LAW... · Punishments and Torture in... · Beatings and Mutilations...
  22. [22]
    8.7 Crime and punishment - Oxford Lifelong Learning
    ... torture. Crimes against the state had harsh penalties, including beatings, the twisting of limbs, mutilation, burning and impalement. Prisons existed but ...
  23. [23]
    Ancient Torture - Bible History
    The sketch is from a wall relief depicting the Assyrians torturing their captives. The ancient Assyrian were among the most ruthless of all ancient warriors.
  24. [24]
    Torture used by ancient Romans - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    According to Roman law, the testimony of a slave was considered true only under torture. It was believed that they could not be trusted and had to be ...
  25. [25]
    Torture Has Never Been An Effective Means Of Information Gathering
    Jan 28, 2017 · Roman legal opinions on torture tactics illustrate not only how inhumane such practices are, but also how unreliable.
  26. [26]
    The Fragility of Evidence: Torture in Ancient Rome
    Legal texts from the Roman world mention torture only sporadically, but their evidence offers striking confirmation of the details that can be pieced together ...Reflections of torture in literary... · Torture in Roman law
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Seeing and Knowing in Late Medieval Criminal Case Records
    In his extensive work on the history of judicial torture in premodern. Europe, Langbein finds its roots in the shift from trial by ordeal to criminal trials ...Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Torture and Plea Bargaining - Chicago Unbound
    Judicial torture survived the centuries not because its defects had been concealed, but in spite of their having been long revealed. The two-eyewitness rule had ...Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Medieval Torture: A Brief History and Common Methods
    Nov 24, 2012 · The accused was only supposed to be tortured once, often though people would be tortured second and third times and those sessions were.Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
  30. [30]
    [PDF] The Cost of Torture: Evidence from the Spanish Inquisition - Gwern
    Nonetheless, inquisitors treated the results of interrogations in the torture chamber with skepticism. This bureaucratized tor- ture stands in stark contrast to ...
  31. [31]
    The Cost of Torture: Evidence from the Spanish Inquisition
    May 13, 2020 · The study of interrogational torture has made significant strides in recent years.1 Access to reliable data continues to pose a formidable ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] The Death of Legal Torture
    After judicial torture had been abolished, legal proof continued to live only a phantom life in nearly abandoned statutes. In practice free evaluation of ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Torture Under English Law
    On the refusal to plead, an order was made for torture. In earlier times the order provided that the prisoner be returned to the prison, stripped naked, placed ...
  34. [34]
    On Crimes and Punishments and Beccaria - Ex Urbe
    Sep 14, 2013 · Beccaria asked people to ask themselves why we use torture, and the reading public did just that. Judges examined the questions, jurists, even ...
  35. [35]
    Penal Enlightenment in Voltaire's Philosophy | Cairn.info
    Dec 19, 2016 · By imposing torture, the death penalty and discipline, the royal justice system, is, by its very nature, opposed to Voltaire's modernity ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] The Prohibition of Torture - International Review of the Red Cross
    In the civilised countries of Europe judicial torture was abolished towards the end of the 18th century. Other forms of torture seemed to have disappeared ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Death of Legal Torture
    Not only were legal proof and judicial torture born together, but they were also both fatally wounded before the eighteenth century in the evidentiary ...
  38. [38]
    Cesare Beccaria - Internet History Sourcebooks: Modern History
    The torture of a criminal during the course of his trial is a cruelty ... The Sourcebook is a collection of public domain and copy-permitted texts for ...
  39. [39]
    10 Ghastly Prison Practices Of The 19th Century - Listverse
    Apr 22, 2019 · The treadmill, now better known as the most boring exercise machine in any gym, once put that mind-numbing effect to use for torture. The first ...
  40. [40]
    Were Early American Prisons Similar to Today's? - JSTOR Daily
    Jan 19, 2022 · A correctional officer's history of 19th century prisons and modern-day parallels. From Sing Sing to suicide watch, torture treads a fine line.
  41. [41]
    DISCIPLINE AND PUNISH - THE BIRTH OF THE PRISON
    THE 18TH AND 19TH CENTURY NOTIONS OF PHYSICAL TORTURE AS PUNISHMENT ARE REVIEWED, AND THE CHANGE IN PENAL ATTITUDE THAT RESULTED IN A LESS PHYSICALLY ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The First Wartime Water Torture by Americans
    we review the history of water torture during the Philippine-American War and whether there was full disclosure of that history.26 Second, we examine the ...
  43. [43]
    War crimes in World War I - Wikipedia
    This includes the use of indiscriminate violence and massacres against civilians, torture, sexual violence, forced deportation and population transfer.
  44. [44]
    History of torture - The Lancet
    writing on torture in his own country states: “During World War II torture in Poland reached a scale never known before in history”. That assessment can be ...
  45. [45]
    Punishments and executions / History / Auschwitz-Birkenau
    The most frequent punishments were flogging, confinement in block 11 in the main camp, “the post” (strappado or “hanging torture”), or assignment to the penal ...Block 11 · Executions · Other punishments · Flogging
  46. [46]
    Treatment of prisoners - Anzac Portal - DVA
    Mar 13, 2025 · Cruelty could take different forms, from extreme violence and torture to minor acts of physical punishment, humiliation and neglect.
  47. [47]
    POWs in American History: A Synopsis - National Park Service
    Oct 25, 2022 · Unlike previous wars, the length of time as a POW was extensive for many, with some being imprisoned for more than seven years. Torture was ...
  48. [48]
    US Torture of Prisoners of War in Historical Perspective
    This chapter looks at US willingness to use torture as a means of combat, and the conditions under which its leaders and soldiers have thought torture ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Crimes Against Humanity and the Development of International Law
    Sep 15, 2021 · ... throughout World War II. It was also certain that Nazi crimes ... torture, rape, or other inhumane acts committed against any civilian ...
  50. [50]
    Torture - T.M.C. Asser Instituut
    Early development. After the atrocities of World War II, which included forms of medical torture, international human rights law developed. As a result, the ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Efforts to eliminate torture through international law
    Article. 7 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that "no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] 1975 Amnesty International Report on Torture
    Amnesty International continues to receive information to indicate that torture is a truly world-wide phenomenon that.
  53. [53]
    'Poisoner In Chief' Details The CIA's Secret Quest For Mind Control
    Sep 9, 2019 · During the early period of the Cold War, the CIA ... Many of his unwitting subjects endured psychological torture ranging from electroshock to ...
  54. [54]
    Brutality and Endurance > National Museum of the United States Air ...
    ... torture, injury or disease. Torture was Common North Vietnamese brutally and systematically tortured American prisoners to force them to confess to war ...
  55. [55]
    The Roots and Rationalizations of U.S. Torture in Vietnam
    While much of the torture consisted of turning a blind eye to their South Vietnamese partners' interrogation methods, exasperated American soldiers on difficult ...Torture in the Vietnam War... · Evidence · The Cheaters Win Belief...
  56. [56]
    Architect of CIA's 'enhanced interrogation' testifies at Guantánamo ...
    Jan 21, 2020 · Dr Mitchell and fellow psychologist Bruce Jessen developed the controversial interrogation methods, which included waterboarding. Five men held ...
  57. [57]
    Torture at Abu Ghraib | The New Yorker
    May 10, 2004 · Abu Ghraib, twenty miles west of Baghdad, was one of the world's most notorious prisons, with torture, weekly executions, and vile living conditions.
  58. [58]
    Iraq Prison Abuse Scandal Fast Facts - CNN
    Oct 30, 2013 · ... 2003 - A detainee dies during an interrogation at Abu Ghraib ... Ghraib scandal finds 44 instances of abuse, some of which amounted to torture.
  59. [59]
    FACTSHEET: Torture at Guantánamo Bay Detention Camp
    Jul 19, 2020 · A majority of those imprisoned at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp were subjected to various forms of physical and psychological ...
  60. [60]
    Retributive Justice (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
    ### Summary of Retributive Justice and Punishment Methods
  61. [61]
    How can punishment be justified? On Kant's Retributivism
    This kind of theory is also known as retributivism, because it characterizes punishment as deserved retribution for a moral wrong.
  62. [62]
    Lex talionis - Oxford Reference
    “The law of retaliation.” A law requiring punishment of a crime no ... tortured would, upon discovery, subject the accuser to torture himself or herself.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] The History of Punishment: What Works for State Crime?
    Apr 4, 2015 · Foucault (1977) suggests that this form of punishment was most utilized prior to the 18th century when torture and executions were public and ...
  64. [64]
    Retributive Support for International Punishment and Torture
    Jun 6, 2012 · Carlsmith Kevin M., Darley John M. 2008. “Psychological Aspects of Retributive Justice.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 41:193–236.
  65. [65]
    Retributive Support for International Punishment and Torture
    retributive justice. Although retributive punishment may incidentally affect security or conformity, it is defined as an end in itself—''just deserts ...
  66. [66]
    Punishment and Prevention of Crime | Office of Justice Programs
    ... use of torture, brandings, mutilations, and executions in an attempt to deter crime. As crime increased, the number of capital offenses increased, reaching ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Punishment and Sociocultural Development in the Later Middle Ages
    Michel Foucault, in his infamous work Discipline and Punish, similarly suggests that public execution and torture acted as a means of deterrence, although ...
  68. [68]
    On Crimes and Punishments - Office of Justice Programs
    ... deterrence. Beccaria opposes capital punishment except under very restricted circumstances, and he argues that torture should never be used against an ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Capital Punishment: For or Against
    First, he claims that "the pri- mary purpose of legal punishment is to deter from crime" (p. 53). By deterrence he means here "general deterrence"; norms of ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    [PDF] 1 Does Torture Work? A Socio-Legal Assessment of the Practice in ...
    The Roman jurisprudence of torture evolved as a result of the expanding spectrum of crimes and changes in criminal procedure. Judicial interrogation (quaestio) ...
  71. [71]
    The Study of Torture: Why It Persists, Why Perceptions of It ... - MDPI
    Interrogational justifications presuppose that the individual being tortured possesses information, and that this information will only be divulged via torture ...
  72. [72]
    The (in)effectiveness of torture for combating insurgency - jstor
    Based on this evidence the study concludes that torture is ineffective for reducing insurgent perpetrated killings. Keywords civil war, human rights ...
  73. [73]
    Does torture work? The research says, "No"
    Jan 26, 2017 · The theoretical arguments contend that torture is ineffective for reducing killings perpetrated by insurgents both because it fails to reduce ...Missing: rebellion | Show results with:rebellion
  74. [74]
    Does Criminalizing Torture Deter Police Torture? - SSRN
    Jun 15, 2020 · Keywords: torture, human rights, police, deterrence, international law, criminal law, Convention against Torture, internalization, domestication.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  75. [75]
    The World Bewitch'd - Exhibition > "Due Process" > Torture
    Many ended up confessing to crimes they had not committed rather than submit again. And those who did not recant their confessions were afforded the small mercy ...
  76. [76]
    Torture in Witch Hunts: Extracting Confessions and Justice
    Oct 17, 2024 · Common Medieval Torture Devices · Torture Methods for Extracting False Confessions · The Role of Torture in the Salem Witch Trials.
  77. [77]
    The wrongs, harms, and ineffectiveness of torture: A moral ...
    Oct 2, 2022 · In contrast, those arguing for the wrongness of torture typically appeal to the notion of human dignity. In this paper, I make the case that ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] the effects of psychological torture - UC Berkeley Law
    Jun 1, 2010 · Scholarly surveys of torture survivors demonstrate that threats to the victim or victim's family or friends can induce extreme fear and loss ...
  79. [79]
    Shane O'Mara's Why Torture Doesn't Work - PubMed Central - NIH
    Shane O'Mara's new book casts morality aside to examine whether torture produces reliable information. He reviews existing research in psychology and ...Missing: true confessions empirical
  80. [80]
    Full article: “And if it doesn't work they deserve it anyway”
    Most credible empirical research into torture's “effectiveness” already suggests that the physical agonies and rights violations of torture are highly ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  81. [81]
    Validity and effectiveness of interrogation techniques: A meta ... - NIH
    Mar 20, 2024 · Previous discussions on the topic of interrogation are about the effectiveness of torture or at least coercion. While coercion has ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] The Efficacy of Coercive Interrogation - James P. Pfiffner
    Scientific investigations of the efficacy of torture as an effective tool of interrogation have found no evidence that it is effective (Intelligence Science ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Report of the Special Task Force on Interrogation and Transfer ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · Experienced intelligence and law enforcement interrogators do not rely solely on particular interrogation techniques but instead develop lawful.
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Pre-Modern, Totalitarian and Liberal-Democratic Torture - media/rep
    Therefore, I will restrict myself to the use of torture in the early days of the Soviet Union, in the Moscow show trials and the Great Terror, though these ...
  85. [85]
    Stalin's Terror - JohnDClare.net
    When Stalin came to power c.1928, Russia already had one of the most centralised governments in the world, backed up with violence and terror. What you are ...
  86. [86]
    Totalitarian Regime - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    ... torture can be attributed to the brutal socialization techniques of totalitarian regimes. ... Laws enabled the direct repression of Stalin's Great Terror, ...
  87. [87]
    Communism's Legacy: Tyranny, Terror, and Torture - FEE.org
    Mar 9, 2017 · Indeed, in Mauthausen were the same steps and stages of arrest, psychological terror, interrogation and torture, murder through a trapdoor ...
  88. [88]
    Stop Trying to Convince Americans that Torture Doesn't Work
    Mar 28, 2022 · Critics of US torture policy offer two kinds of arguments against torture. Some emphasize the immorality of torture, its cruel and dehumanizing ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Coercive Control, Displaced Syrians and the Failure to Act Joanne ...
    Jan 1, 2023 · cites the massacre at Hama as being a tool of coercion not just because of the fear of ... examples of strategies of fear, rooted in coercive ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Toward a Science of Torture? - Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
    May 3, 2017 · Intelligence extracted from torture victims can be ascribed to torture methods, whether or not it might have been acquired by other means.
  91. [91]
    Reported Methods, Distributions, and Frequencies of Torture Globally
    Oct 3, 2023 · Excluded studies were not peer reviewed, lacked an independent sample population, or did not specify torture methods. Articles were chosen for ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Foot Torture (Falanga): Ten Victims with Chronic Plantar ...
    Plantar hyperpigmentation was present in all cases 9 months to 10 years after suffering falanga. This physical sign can support victims' legal requests for ...
  93. [93]
    Instruments of Judicial Torture
    The method of strappado involved tying the suspect's hand behind her/his back, then suspending the victim in the air by means of a rope tied to the wrists.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  94. [94]
    7 Famous Torture Devices, Real and Mythical - History.com
    Jun 16, 2023 · Some instruments of torture, like the rack, were real. Others were likely made up to help perpetuate the myth of the medieval 'Dark Ages.'
  95. [95]
    What is Waterboarding? | Freedom from Torture
    Jan 16, 2025 · Waterboarding is a form of torture prohibited under international law. Learn its definition, history, and why Freedom from Torture stands ...
  96. [96]
    Waterboarding: A Mental and Physical Trauma | TIME
    Apr 20, 2009 · In Chile, they called it submarino, a form of simulated drowning that has much the same effect as what we call waterboarding.<|control11|><|separator|>
  97. [97]
    [PDF] INTERPRETATION OF TORTURE IN THE LIGHT OF THE ... - ohchr
    “For the purposes of this Convention the term 'torture' means any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    [PDF] DIGNITY Fact Sheet Collection HEALTH #19 Sensory Deprivation
    Nov 23, 2022 · Science in Dachau's shadow: HEBB, Beecher, and the development of CIA psychological torture and modern medical ethics. J Hist Behav Sci. 2007;43 ...Missing: manipulation | Show results with:manipulation
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Break Them Down: Systematic Use of Psychological Torture by US ...
    May 7, 2005 · Since 1986, PHR members have worked to stop torture, disappearances, and political killings by governments and opposition groups and to ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Prisoner Abuse: Patterns from the Past - The National Security Archive
    CIA interrogation manuals written in the 1960s and 1980s described coercive techniques such as those used to mistreat detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in ...
  101. [101]
    The Ulster depth interrogation techniques and their relation to ...
    The psychophysiological methods used by the British in Ulster to precede depth interrogation are discussed. The techniques include hooding, masking noise, ...
  102. [102]
    The Five Techniques | EachOther
    They were dark years for the United Kingdom, a period known as 'the Troubles' in Northern Ireland. Between 1971 and 1975, over 3,000 people were arrested, ...
  103. [103]
    UK/Ireland: Landmark 'hooded men' torture case should be re-opened
    Nov 24, 2014 · The organization is urging the Irish government to request a re-opening of the landmark 1978 Ireland v UK judgment involving the torture and ill-treatment of ...
  104. [104]
    Electricity: The global history of a torture technology - Reed College
    Since the dynamo and magneto, the car battery and field telephone, were already available by World War I, why was electric torture not used more frequently?Missing: revolution | Show results with:revolution
  105. [105]
    Weapons Of Torture - April 6, 1998 - CNN
    Apr 6, 1998 · A TIME investigation turns up evidence of loose controls and U.S. companies' shipping stun guns to countries that practice torture. By Douglas ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Electrical Injury: Accidental and Torture-related - EthnoMed
    electric chair as a mode of capital punishment http://gskrocki.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/sparky.jpg. Page 8. Brief History of Electrical Torture. • 1930s ...
  107. [107]
    What is “Truth Serum?” | Office for Science and Society
    Mar 20, 2017 · Truth serum” refers to various drugs that have been used in attempts to extract truthful statements from people. Wine was the basic method ...
  108. [108]
    CIA explored using potential truth serum drug for post 9/11 ... - CNN
    Nov 13, 2018 · The CIA explored using a drug it believed could act like a truth serum to interrogate prisoners about possible terror attacks in the immediate aftermath of 9/ ...
  109. [109]
    Stranger Than Fiction - Science History Institute
    Dec 3, 2015 · Driven by panics over Cold War espionage and violent crime, physicians, spies, and cops repeatedly heralded would-be truth serums and mind- ...
  110. [110]
    Of ethically compromising positions and blatant lies about 'truth serum'
    For ethical reasons the psychiatrist is advised against performing narcoanalysis when the examination is requested as an aid to criminal investigation”. Nothing ...
  111. [111]
    How the CIA tortured its detainees - The Guardian
    Dec 9, 2014 · ... torture,” preferring euphemisms like “enhanced interrogation techniques” and “rendition, detention and interrogation program”. Many of the ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] The future is here: Mind control and torture in the digital era
    Keywords: Torture, Non-Lethal weapons,. Neuro-warfare, Nanotechnologies, Mind control. Surveillance Methods, Neuro-ethics,. Cognitive Liberty. Working with ...
  113. [113]
    The future is here: Mind control and torture in the digital era
    Aug 6, 2025 · The author reviews the implications of modern technology for the contemporary fight against torture and some of the emerging civil society initiatives that aim ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
  114. [114]
    Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true ... - NIH
    Oct 10, 2024 · Our objective was to assess the effects of interrogation approach on the rates of true and false confessions for criminal (mock) suspects.
  115. [115]
    [PDF] INTERROGATION: A REVIEW OF THE SCIENCE - FBI
    This report provides a comprehensive review of HIG-funded research and other science relevant to interrogations: assessing cooperation and countering resistance ...
  116. [116]
    https://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/12/11/agent.tapes/
  117. [117]
    https://www.congress.gov/113/crpt/srpt288/CRPT-113srpt288.pdf
  118. [118]
    [PDF] REPORT SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE ...
    Dec 9, 2014 · ... CIA's Detention and Interrogation Program to the President for declassification and subsequent public release. This action marked the ...
  119. [119]
    False Confessions: Causes, Consequences, and Implications
    In this article, empirical research on the causes and correlates of false confessions ... reliability back: false confessions and legal safeguards in the twenty- ...
  120. [120]
    Blowback: How Torture Fuels Terrorism Rather Than Reduces It
    Feb 12, 2018 · Key figures in Al Qaeda were tortured before turning to violent extremism. Even U.S. military officials admit that torture is ...
  121. [121]
    Torture is Counterproductive - Human Rights First
    Dec 31, 2011 · History shows a poor record of success for those who use torture. Popular wisdom holds that the Germans (during WWII), the Egyptians, the ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  122. [122]
    The CIA's Phoenix Program: Mercy of the Wicked - Grey Dynamics
    ... torture techniques derived from MKULTRA findings and Nazi methods from World War II. ... failures of using torture as a tool of governance. Advance Your ...
  123. [123]
    US: Senate Report Slams CIA Torture, Lies - Human Rights Watch
    Dec 10, 2014 · (Washington, DC) – The US Senate Intelligence Committee's report summary on the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) detention and interrogation ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Principles on Effective Interviewing for Investigations and ...
    Research has proven that unreliable information and false confessions arising from abusive practices are a frequent and foreseeable consequence of poor ...
  125. [125]
    The Physical and Psychological Sequelae of Torture - JAMA Network
    We present a review of the international literature on the medical and psychological effects of torture. Our review reveals that certain tortures and.Missing: long- | Show results with:long-
  126. [126]
    Torture-survivors' experiences of healthcare services for pain
    Physical consequences include restricted function and disability, with persistent (or chronic) pain present in over 80% of torture-survivors. Psychological ...
  127. [127]
    Torture and its neurological sequelae - PubMed
    Victims of torture commonly experience neurological symptoms such as headaches, vertigo, loss of consciousness and dizziness during and after torture.
  128. [128]
    Psychiatric assessment and treatment of survivors of torture
    Jan 2, 2018 · The physical, psychological and social effects of torture are wide-reaching and long-standing. Anxiety, PTSD and depression are all greatly ...
  129. [129]
    Psychological, social, and welfare interventions for torture survivors
    Sep 24, 2019 · Psychological effects are well documented; predominantly post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, and phobias [4,5]. Physical effects are ...<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    The Long-Term Mental Health Consequences of Torture, Loss, and ...
    It was found that 28, 23, and 10% of the sample met the symptom criteria for depression, anxiety and PTSD respectively (39). The differences in prevalence rates ...
  131. [131]
    “After torture, everything changed”: the unpacking of trauma from ...
    Mar 9, 2025 · Torture profoundly disrupted the survivors' sense of agency, leaving them feeling powerless and confined within their own bodies. This ...
  132. [132]
    Torture exposure and the functional brain: investigating disruptions ...
    Jan 26, 2022 · The prefrontal cortex may be particularly affected by torture exposure, both structurally [22, 23] and functionally [24, 26]. While these ...
  133. [133]
    Brain Structural Abnormalities and Mental Health Sequelae in South ...
    Other studies of torture survivors and survivors of mass violence have linked psychiatric symptoms, neurologic impairment, and THI. Despite the presumptive ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  134. [134]
    Torture Survivors and Asylum: Legal, Medical, and Psychological ...
    Nov 8, 2022 · Specific torture methods can cause characteristic long-term sequelae. Painful somatic disorders of mind-body interaction and psychological ...
  135. [135]
    [PDF] The Physical and Psychological Sequelae in Adult Refugees Or ...
    While torture survivors often experience similar physical and psychological sequelae, signs and symptoms of torture can also vary depending on factors such as ...
  136. [136]
    Court-Martial of Spc. Jeremy Sivits | PBS News
    May 19, 2004 · A court-martial sentenced Spc. Jeremy Sivits to the maximum penalty today for charges in connection with the abuse of prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in ...Missing: punishments | Show results with:punishments
  137. [137]
    US army rejects court martial of Abu Ghraib commander | World news
    Jan 11, 2008 · The US army has thrown out the conviction of the only officer court martialled in the Abu Ghraib scandal, ending the four-year investigation.
  138. [138]
    Accountability for Torture | American Civil Liberties Union
    Many hundreds of people were tortured and abused by the CIA and Department of Defense, primarily in Afghanistan, Guantánamo, and Iraq.
  139. [139]
    No More Excuses: A Roadmap to Justice for CIA Torture | HRW
    Dec 1, 2015 · They were also in charge of carrying out the program and, in part, with evaluating its success. ... [296] Human Rights Watch, “USA and Torture: A ...
  140. [140]
    [PDF] Torture and Institutional Design - The Yale Law Journal
    Oct 26, 2020 · The Obama Administration created the HIG to utilize noncoercive interrogation methods that comply with international-law norms against torture ...
  141. [141]
    Legacy of U.S. Torture
    Jun 27, 2025 · The torture program had profound consequences for its victims, for U.S. national security, and for the United States' reputation in the world.
  142. [142]
    American Torture and Institutional Corruption: Psychology, Law, and ...
    Mar 7, 2016 · American Torture and Institutional Corruption: Psychology, Law, and the Power of Professional Complicity and Resistance. Photo of author.Missing: ramifications | Show results with:ramifications
  143. [143]
    The Strategic Costs of Torture - Foreign Affairs
    Jan 1, 2016 · It has been more than seven years since US President Barack Obama issued Executive Order 13491, banning the US government's use of torture.
  144. [144]
    [PDF] Lessons of Abu Ghraib - NDU Press - National Defense University
    Nov 1, 2008 · use of torture and coercive interrogation techniques at Abu Ghraib and other locations, including the U.S. prison facility at Guantanamo ...Missing: counterproductive | Show results with:counterproductive
  145. [145]
    Learning from Abu Ghraib: The Joint Commander and Force Discipline
    The highly-publicized reports of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal2 energized the Iraqi insurgency and eroded vital domestic and coalition support. Most ...
  146. [146]
    [PDF] Examining International Efforts to Address Violent Extremism
    For example, the systematic torture endured by Ayman al-. Zawahiri and others plays a significant role in the. 18. TRANSFORMING TERRORISTS. Page 23. jihadists' ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  147. [147]
    The Abu Ghraib abuse scandal 20 years on: What redress for victims?
    Apr 27, 2024 · Two decades since images of Iraqi men being abused by US soldiers shocked the world, victims are still seeking justice through civil actions against military ...Missing: strategic | Show results with:strategic
  148. [148]
    15 Facts about the CIA Torture Program
    Nov 27, 2023 · The CIA built a torture program. Between 2002 and 2008, it held at least 119 Muslim men captive in secret “black site” prisons around the world.Missing: success | Show results with:success
  149. [149]
    Afterword: The Corrosive Strategic Legacy of Torture
    That record is one of failure. There is no evidence of any nation having used torture to achieve a strategic success, and many instances where the use of ...
  150. [150]
    Nazi Camps | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    May 28, 2025 · Nazi camps were sites of cruelty, torture, deprivation, unchecked disease, grueling forced labor, and extreme violence.
  151. [151]
    What interrogation methods were employed by the KGB ... - Reddit
    Aug 24, 2021 · They're still using sleep deprivation in Russia and some former soviet republics. Also another softer torture method is to tie down a person to ...<|separator|>
  152. [152]
    Syrian regime inflicts 72 forms of torture on prisoners, report finds
    Oct 23, 2019 · More than 14000 people thought to have been tortured to death by regime during war.
  153. [153]
    Syria: Stories Behind Photos of Killed Detainees
    Dec 16, 2015 · Most of the 6,786 victims shown in the Caesar photographs were detained by just five intelligence agency branches in Damascus, and their bodies ...
  154. [154]
    [PDF] TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT Israel's Interrogation of ...
    11 Palestine Human Rights Information Center, Israel's Use of Electric Shock Torture ... " (Initial Report of Israel to the U.N. Committee against Torture,. CAT/C ...
  155. [155]
    CIA interrogation report: The 20 key findings - BBC News
    Dec 9, 2014 · The US Senate Intelligence Committee has released a summary of a report into the CIA interrogation program established by US spy chiefs after the terror ...
  156. [156]
    [PDF] OHCHR Assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang ...
    Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. 31 August 2022. Page 2. 2. Contents. Page. I. Introduction .
  157. [157]
    China (Includes Hong Kong, Macau, and Tibet) - State Department
    Significant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings; disappearances; torture or cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment ...
  158. [158]
    2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - State Department
    Aug 12, 2025 · These include, for example, reports of extrajudicial killing, torture, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and evidence of acts that may ...
  159. [159]
    2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Indonesia
    HRM reported 12 cases of torture attributable to government security forces in the Papua region during the first half of the year. On September 4, relatives ...
  160. [160]
    Iraq: Sunni Women Tell of ISIS Detention, Torture
    Feb 20, 2017 · Iraq: Sunni Women Tell of ISIS Detention, Torture ... (Baghdad) – Fighters from the Islamic State (also known as ISIS) are arbitrarily detaining, ...
  161. [161]
    “Everyone Must Confess”: Abuses against Children Suspected of ...
    Mar 6, 2019 · ... tortured” to extract confessions. One Nineveh judge told Human Rights Watch that “many” ISIS suspects alleged torture in his courtroom. A ...
  162. [162]
    If You Are Afraid for Your Lives, Leave Sinai! - Human Rights Watch
    May 28, 2019 · For their part, hundreds of fighters with the ISIS-affiliate group Wilayat Sina', or Sinai Province, have kidnapped, tortured, and murdered ...
  163. [163]
    Torture, Beheadings, and Narcocultos - Scholarship @ Claremont
    This essay provides an overview of those incidents of torture and beheadings linked to the Mexican cartels and their mercenary and gang affiliates.Missing: documented | Show results with:documented
  164. [164]
    12 bodies bearing signs of torture found with cartel messages in ...
    all bearing signs of torture and left with messages by cartels — were found on Thursday in the central Mexican state of ...
  165. [165]
    These are the cartels that capture, extort and torture migrants in 8 ...
    Oct 1, 2021 · Cartels in Mexico have been increasingly targeting migrants for kidnapping and extortion as the number of Central Americans traveling north ...
  166. [166]
    Afghanistan's Security Challenges under the Taliban
    Aug 12, 2022 · Foreign Militant Groups. Conflict between the aforementioned groups and the Taliban ... Extrajudicial killings and torture. During the Taliban ...
  167. [167]
    [PDF] Closing a Gap in Protection Under the Convention Against Torture
    The rise of non-state actors like gangs and cartels challenges the Convention Against Torture, as the definition of "other person acting in an official ...
  168. [168]
    Triggers of Escalations in Violence Against Civilians by Non-State ...
    Oct 4, 2021 · This article seeks to identify the events that trigger spikes in violence against civilians committed by non-state actors.
  169. [169]
    Global Torture Index - OMCT
    Global Torture Index · Afghanistan · Argentina · Bahrain · Belarus · Cameroon · Colombia · Democratic Republic of Congo · El SalvadorMissing: current hotspots 2024
  170. [170]
    OMCT Global Torture Index: Alarming Patterns of Police…
    Jun 30, 2025 · Geneva, 25 June 2025: On the eve of the United Nations Day for Victims of Torture, the World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) launches ...
  171. [171]
    Report exposes systematic torture in Syrian detention facilities
    Dec 6, 2024 · The UN General Assembly-mandated team investigating serious crimes in Syria released a new report on Friday, documenting systematic torture and abuse across ...
  172. [172]
    UN Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine finds additional evidence of ...
    Sep 23, 2024 · The Commission's further investigation into cases of torture provides evidence that Russian authorities committed torture in the Ukrainian ...
  173. [173]
    The Worst in the World? | Human Rights Watch
    Apr 24, 2024 · Third-generation dictator Kim Jong Un runs the country ... The government forces extreme obedience through torture, executions, brutal ...
  174. [174]
    2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Iran
    The government executed hundreds of prisoners, including many who confessed under torture and faced unfair trials. There were new cases of violent enforcement ...
  175. [175]
    Countries Where Torture Is Legal 2025 - World Population Review
    Data table lists countries where incidents of state-sanctioned torture have been reported and the most recent year in which such acts are reported to have taken ...
  176. [176]
    https://abcnews.go.com/International/psychologist-devised-enhanced-interrogation-technique-cia-testifies-911/story?id=68445973
  177. [177]
    Psychologist who devised 'enhanced interrogation' technique for ...
    Psychologist who devised 'enhanced interrogation' technique for CIA testifies at 9/11 trial hearing. James Mitchell defended his work for the CIA during the war ...
  178. [178]
    US report on 'enhanced interrogation' concludes: torture doesn't work
    Dec 9, 2014 · Report says that CIA detainees subjected to 'enhanced interrogation techniques' produced either faulty intelligence or no intelligence at ...Missing: verified | Show results with:verified
  179. [179]
    Report: CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques 'brutal' and ... - PBS
    Dec 9, 2014 · The Central Intelligence Agency's use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” was “not an effective means of acquiring intelligence or gaining cooperation from ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  180. [180]
    Does torture work? Donald Trump and the CIA - PubMed Central - NIH
    President Trump says that 'torture works', His office has released a draft order stating an intention to make 'modifications and additions' to the policies ...
  181. [181]
    Torture: The 'ticking bomb' problem - Ethics - BBC
    The problems of torture can be illustrated with the 'ticking bomb' scenario: is it acceptable to torture someone if it results in saving thousands of lives?
  182. [182]
    The Fallacy of the Ticking Time Bomb | Freedom from Torture
    May 27, 2008 · The "ticking time bomb" argument excusing torture as a necessary means to an end was once the preserve of philosophers and theorists.
  183. [183]
    [PDF] Torture and the Human Mind - USAWC Press
    Based on his experience and observations, he believes walling and sleep deprivation to be the most effective techniques (237). In Why Torture Doesn't Work: The ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  184. [184]
    The Kantian Case Against Torture | Philosophy | Cambridge Core
    Jun 8, 2015 · There is a decided consensus that Kantian ethics yields an absolutist case against torture – that torture is morally wrong and absolutely so.
  185. [185]
    [PDF] The Immorality of Torture. A Deontological Approach
    The most common argument, when we see a justification for acts of torture, is the ticking bomb argument. It presents us with a difficult situation, in which we ...
  186. [186]
    Torture is an Intrinsic Evil: A Catholic Study Guide for a One-Session ...
    “I was tortured with the electric prod. In Argentina they call it the 'picana' and it is a very, very severe form of torture. You get a sensation of blackouts ...
  187. [187]
    Statements Against Torture - International Bridges to Justice
    Since 1965 The church condemns and the Second Vatican Council all actions violating human integrity, including mutilation, physical or mental torture. The Code ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  188. [188]
    Torture and Corporal Punishment as a Problem in Catholic Theology
    In Tertullian's judgment, any complicity in torture – either ordering it or personally applying it – is definitely ruled out for a disciple of Jesus.
  189. [189]
    2 - The ticking bomb scenario: origins, usages and the contemporary ...
    The number of individuals tortured as well as the various analyses of its systematic practice in Algeria demonstrate that torture was routinely used both for ...
  190. [190]
    Torture during interrogations – Illegal, immoral and ineffective - ohchr
    Oct 11, 2017 · Research shows that the use of torture is ineffective and counterproductive. At a UN high-level event, interrogators of high-value terror ...
  191. [191]
    [PDF] Examining the Effectiveness of Torture - NYU Arts & Science
    7 Empirical studies show that although the CIA claimed torture was effective in yielding information about terrorist's plots and/or terrorist groups, CIA ...
  192. [192]
    [PDF] Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario - Why we must say No ... - | APT
    Dr Jose Quiroga, Vice-President, International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT). Dr Lawrence Rockwood, former military counter-intelligence ...
  193. [193]
    The “Ticking Bomb” Scenario : PsycCRITIQUES - Ovid
    Reviews the book, Torture and the ticking bomb by Bob Brecher (see record 2007-13833-000). I opened Brecher's 120-page small-print volume ...<|separator|>
  194. [194]
    [PDF] Chapter V: Peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens)
    the prohibition of torture was a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens) on the basis of, inter alia, the extensiveness of the prohibition ...
  195. [195]
    Torture, Prohibition of - Oxford Public International Law
    4 Provisions prohibiting torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment appear in the international and regional human rights treaties ...
  196. [196]
    UN experts call for States to uphold absolute prohibition of torture in ...
    Jun 26, 2023 · The prohibition against torture is a jus cogens norm of international law, a fundamental principle that applies at all times and in all ...
  197. [197]
    IHL Treaties - Geneva Convention (IV) on Civilians, 1949 - Article 32
    Article 32 - Prohibition of murder, torture, corporal punishment and other measures of brutality. The High Contracting Parties specifically agree that each of ...
  198. [198]
    9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or ... - UNTC
    ... torture' in Article 1, paragraph1 of the Convention means torture as defined in both national law and international law.' The Government of the United ...
  199. [199]
    View the ratification status by country or by treaty
    Ratification Status for CAT-OP - Optional Protocol of the Convention against Torture. Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture. COUNTRY, COUNTRY, Treaty, Treaty ...
  200. [200]
    20. Torture (18 U.S.C. 2340A) | United States Department of Justice
    Section 2340A of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits torture committed by public officials under color of law against persons within the public ...
  201. [201]
    [PDF] Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading ...
    Feb 9, 2000 · Prohibition of torture. 100. Every act of torture within the meaning of the Convention is illegal under existing federal and state law, and ...Missing: loopholes | Show results with:loopholes
  202. [202]
    [PDF] Torture and Cruel Treatment: Prohibitions Under Domestic Law and ...
    This document sets out the prohibitions on torture and other cruel treatment under U.S. domestic law and the United States' international legal obligations.
  203. [203]
    [PDF] Memorandum Regarding Interrogation of al Qaeda Operative
    Aug 5, 2010 · You have asked for this Office's views on whether certain proposed conduct would violate the prohibition against torture found at Section 2340A ...Missing: Yoo | Show results with:Yoo<|separator|>
  204. [204]
    Torturing Democracy - Key Documents - The National Security Archive
    ... Torture. 9. Memo from John Yoo to Jim Haynes DATE: January 9, 2002. SUBJECT: "Application of Treaties and Laws to Al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees" AUTHOR ...
  205. [205]
    The Exploitation of Legal Loopholes in the Name of National Security
    The Exploitation of Legal Loopholes in the Name of National Security: A Case Study on Extraordinary Rendition. Authors. Michael V. Sage. Recommended Citation.
  206. [206]
    'Extraordinary Rendition': A Challenge for the Rule of Law
    'Extraordinary rendition' is among the most systematic, complex, and shocking human rights violations1 in the so-called 'war on terror'.2 As used here, the ...
  207. [207]
    Torture and intelligence gathering in Western democracies
    The use of torture during interrogations is one of the most controversial aspects of the so-called global 'war on terror'. Following the terrorist attacks on ...
  208. [208]
    https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2410&context=law_and_economics
  209. [209]
    [PDF] The Inefficacy of Constitutional Torture Prohibitions
    Jan 1, 2015 · One thing we did establish that also in democratic countries, constitutional torture prohibitions failed to constrain. Yet there are many ...Missing: loopholes | Show results with:loopholes
  210. [210]
    Committee against Torture | OHCHR
    The Committee against Torture (CAT) is the body of 10 independent experts that monitors implementation of the Convention against Torture.
  211. [211]
    Lack of Accountability for Torture Worldwide Due to Systemic Denial ...
    Oct 12, 2021 · There is a persistent accountability gap for torture and ill treatment worldwide, caused in part by the systemic denial, deliberate obstruction and purposeful ...
  212. [212]
    30 years of torture convention - states still failing on obligations
    Dec 9, 2014 · While 156 states have ratified the Convention, a host of nations are still carrying out torture and are obstructing efforts to prevent, monitor, ...
  213. [213]
    “The international community is facing one of the most… | OMCT
    Jun 15, 2022 · The biggest challenge for the Committee against Torture (CAT) is recovering from the backlog due to the circumstances where for almost two years ...
  214. [214]
    [PDF] Panel IV: Challenges to Proving Cases of Torture before the ...
    In addition, signatories and parties to the UN Convention against. Torture are obligated by the absolute prohibition on torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading ...
  215. [215]
    Ethiopia: Decades of impunity for perpetrators have created a torture ...
    Jul 29, 2021 · “By failing to punish torture perpetrators and to rehabilitate victims, the State encourages law enforcement officials to use torture when they ...
  216. [216]
    “Work on Him Until He Confesses”: Impunity for Torture in Egypt | HRW
    Jan 30, 2011 · They found that "[i]n the majority of cases, [torture victims] prefer not to file lawsuits either due to fear of the perpetrators or to their ...
  217. [217]
    End impunity for torture and uphold victims' right to reparation
    Jun 26, 2024 · Authorities in Bangladesh must end impunity for torture and other ill-treatment by police and security forces, hold perpetrators to account and ensure ...
  218. [218]
    Ukraine: Torture by Russian authorities amounts to crimes against ...
    Oct 29, 2024 · Additional cases of torture against Ukrainian ... Many of these officials perpetrated torture openly, with an apparent sense of impunity.
  219. [219]
    Torture and State Immunity: Deflecting Impunity, Distorting Sovereignty
    As such, judicial decisions in which a state pleads immunity against allegations of torture result in an inevitable clash between the principles of 1648 and ...Missing: anti- | Show results with:anti-
  220. [220]
    [PDF] How U.S. Marginalization of International Human Rights Law Led to ...
    If U.S. citizens want to prevent the fur- ther use of torture by their government, they must adopt legal reforms that include, but go beyond, the domestic ...
  221. [221]
    [PDF] Oona A. Hathaway The Promise and Limits of the International Law ...
    All of the nations mentioned earlier, except Iraq and Syria, have ratified the Convention against. Torture and thereby made an international legal commitment ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
  222. [222]
    Press Office - World citizens reject torture, global poll suggests - BBC
    Oct 19, 2006 · Italians (81%) are the most opposed to the use of torture in all circumstances in the poll and the British are among the highest with 72% ...
  223. [223]
    U.S. Public Opinion on Torture, 2001–2009 | PS: Political Science ...
    Jun 30, 2010 · Many journalists and politicians believe that during the Bush administration, a majority of Americans supported torture if they were assured ...
  224. [224]
    Terrorism | Gallup Historical Trends
    How about -- torture known terrorists if they know details about future terrorist attacks in the U.S.? Willing, Not willing, No opinion. %, %, % ...
  225. [225]
    Americans have mixed views on use of torture in fighting terrorism
    Dec 9, 2014 · In August 2011, 53% of Americans said the use of torture to question suspected terrorists could be often or sometimes justified, ...
  226. [226]
    [PDF] What Shapes Public Support for Torture, and Among Whom?
    In particular, men, Caucasians,. Conservatives and Republicans become more likely to support torture when the target is described as Arab, Muslim or terrorist, ...
  227. [227]
    Americans divided in views of use of torture in U.S. anti-terror efforts
    Jan 26, 2017 · Overall, 48% of Americans say there are some circumstances under which the use of torture is acceptable in U.S. anti-terrorism efforts.<|separator|>
  228. [228]
    New poll finds majority of Americans think torture was justified after 9 ...
    Dec 16, 2014 · In a Post-ABC poll, 49 percent said the CIA's treatment of suspected terrorists amounted to torture.
  229. [229]
    Amnesty poll finds 29% say torture can be justified - BBC News
    May 13, 2014 · At 29%, the belief that torture is sometimes necessary to protect the public was more prevalent in the UK than in Russia, Brazil or Argentina.
  230. [230]
    Global opinion varies widely on use of torture against suspected ...
    Feb 9, 2016 · Public opinion is divided about whether government-sponsored torture can ever be justified as part of efforts to prevent terrorist attacks.
  231. [231]
    [PDF] “If Torture Is Wrong, What About 24?” Torture and the Hollywood Effect
    Nov 28, 2017 · Although many of these studies assess attitudes about torture, scholars have rarely addressed how media influence perceptions on torture ...
  232. [232]
    Even If Torture Doesn't Work In The Real World, TV Has Us ... - NPR
    Dec 12, 2014 · But has its surefire success in shows like 24 influenced how and when real-life interrogators employ torture? National Security. Even If Torture ...
  233. [233]
    Examining the Impact of Torture Scenes in Popular Films on Public ...
    Entertainment media regularly depict torture as effective. Indeed, most popular films contain torture—often outside of counterterrorism-specific plotlines.Missing: attitudes | Show results with:attitudes
  234. [234]
    [PDF] How entertainment media affects the public perception of torture
    There have been countless movies and television shows that depict graphic torture scenes, and yet the audience feels empathy towards the torturer. Since people ...
  235. [235]
    A Retrospective Look at How Americans View Torture - Gallup News
    Dec 10, 2014 · Gallup began asking if Americans were willing to allow torture of "known terrorists if they know details about future attacks in the U.S." in ...
  236. [236]
    Americans have no idea what they really think about torture
    Dec 10, 2014 · Back in 2005, after the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal, a Gallup poll asked Americans whether they would be willing to use torture if ...
  237. [237]
    Media and the Public Opinion of Torture
    Sep 2, 2020 · In her new book Tortured Logic, Kearns and her coauthor, American University professor Joseph Young, explore why people support torture, and how ...
  238. [238]
    Most Americans support torture against terror suspects - Reuters
    Mar 30, 2016 · Nearly two-thirds of Americans believe torture can be justified to extract information from suspected terrorists, according to a ...
  239. [239]
    https://ethnomed.org/wp-content/uploads/2005/01/westjmed00085-0091.pdf
  240. [240]
    [PDF] Cross-cultural Medicine - EthnoMed
    Torture techniques are similar, with some cultural variations as to how these meth- ods are applied.33 This is true of all forms of torture but is most ...
  241. [241]
    [PDF] Cultural logics of emotion: Implications for understanding torture and ...
    This paper explores the significance of cultural variations in emotion for the meaning and impact of torture, focusing on the dynamics of shame, humiliation,.
  242. [242]
    Is There a Culture or Religion of Torture? International Support for ...
    Among world cultures, Muslim/African cultures are most opposed to the torture of terrorists, while Confucian, English-speaking, and South Asian cultures are the ...Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  243. [243]
    Interactive Timeline: The Public Debate Over Torture - Retro Report
    Jan 27, 2022 · The repeated use of torture in the series leads to public condemnation by a host of human rights activists, law enforcement officials and ...