Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced modality that enhances the diagnostic capabilities of conventional by administering intravenous microbubble contrast agents, enabling real-time visualization of blood flow, microvascular , and without or nephrotoxic effects. These gas-filled microbubbles, typically encapsulated in or protein shells and smaller than red blood cells, oscillate in response to low-mechanical-index waves, producing echoes that significantly improve —up to 30 dB greater than unenhanced —allowing for precise differentiation of benign and malignant lesions based on enhancement patterns. CEUS originated from serendipitous observations in the and has evolved through the development of stable microbubble agents since the . The technique operates on principles of nonlinear acoustic resonance, where microbubbles generate strong harmonic signals at frequencies distinct from the transmitted , facilitating side-by-side comparison with B-mode for comprehensive . CEUS is particularly valuable in various clinical settings, including abdominal for characterizing focal liver lesions and vascular evaluations for detecting abnormalities like and endoleaks, with diagnostic accuracy often comparable to or MRI. Emerging therapeutic applications include and monitoring of ablation therapies. CEUS offers several advantages over traditional contrast-enhanced or MRI, including cost-effectiveness, immediate bedside availability, and safety—with serious adverse reaction rates below 0.01% in large cohorts and no contraindications for renal impairment, though generally considered safe in but off-label with use guided by risk-benefit assessment. Guidelines from organizations like the European Federation of Societies for in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) endorse its routine use in liver and vascular evaluations, with expanding applications in and . Limitations include operator dependency and reduced efficacy in obese patients or deep-seated structures due to ultrasound .

Fundamentals

Definition and History

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced imaging modality that employs intravenous microbubble contrast agents to enhance the visualization of blood flow, vascular structures, and in , offering a non-invasive alternative to traditional without the use of . These gas-filled microbubbles, typically 1-10 micrometers in diameter, circulate within the bloodstream and provide strong echogenic signals due to differences, enabling detailed assessment of organ and characterization across various medical fields. Unlike conventional B-mode , CEUS improves diagnostic accuracy by highlighting microvascular dynamics that are otherwise obscured by artifacts. The origins of CEUS trace back to the late 1960s, when early experiments with agitated saline solutions first demonstrated contrast enhancement in ultrasound imaging. In , Gramiak and Shah reported the incidental observation of strong backscattered echoes during after injecting agitated indocyanine green into the , marking the initial recognition of microbubbles as effective contrast enhancers for visualizing cardiac structures and detecting intracardiac shunts. Early contrast agents, such as hand-agitated saline, produced transient macro-bubbles that were limited by short persistence and poor stability, restricting their use primarily to opacification of the right heart chambers. Significant advancements occurred in the with the development of first-generation stabilized, air-filled microbubble agents encapsulated in protein or lipid shells, such as Albunex (approved 1994), which allowed transit through the for left-heart opacification and prolonged windows. This era also saw the introduction of nonlinear techniques in the late , which exploited the harmonic oscillations of microbubbles under insonation to selectively detect contrast signals amid tissue echoes, overcoming limitations of linear backscattering. Key regulatory milestones followed: Optison (perflutren protein-type A microspheres) received FDA approval in 1997 for in adults with suboptimal images, while Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres) was approved by the FDA in 2001 for similar indications. In , SonoVue ( microbubbles) gained approval in 2001 for and macrovascular , with to characterization of focal liver lesions in the early 2000s. These developments, rooted in , facilitated CEUS's into a versatile tool for real-time assessment. More recently, in May 2025, the FDA approved a pediatric indication for Optison, expanding its use in children for .

Physical Principles

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) relies on the interaction between waves and gas-filled microbubbles, which exhibit unique oscillatory behavior due to the high of their gas core compared to surrounding . When exposed to an acoustic wave, microbubbles expand during the phase and contract during the phase, resulting in volumetric oscillations that scatter signals more efficiently than blood or . At low acoustic pressures (e.g., < 0.1), these oscillations are nearly linear and symmetric; however, at higher pressures (e.g., 100–300 kPa), the response becomes nonlinear, characterized by greater expansion than contraction and rapid collapse, generating harmonic frequencies (multiples of the fundamental frequency) and subharmonics. This nonlinear scattering, primarily from the gas core's polytropic and , enables selective imaging of microbubbles while minimizing signals. The dynamics of microbubble oscillation are governed by the Rayleigh-Plesset equation, a fundamental model derived from Navier-Stokes equations for spherical bubbles in an incompressible fluid, extended for encapsulated microbubbles. The simplified form for a gas bubble under acoustic driving is: \rho \left( R \ddot{R} + \frac{3}{2} \dot{R}^2 \right) = \left( P_0 + \frac{2\sigma}{R} - P_g \right) - 4\mu \frac{\dot{R}}{R} - P_a \sin(\omega t) Here, \rho is the density of the surrounding liquid (typically ~1000 kg/m³ for water or blood), R is the instantaneous bubble radius, \dot{R} and \ddot{R} are the radial velocity and acceleration, P_0 is the ambient hydrostatic pressure (~101 kPa at 1 atm), \sigma is the surface tension at the bubble-liquid interface (~0.07 N/m for lipid shells), P_g is the gas pressure inside the bubble (governed by the polytropic law P_g = P_{g0} (R_0 / R)^{3\kappa}, where R_0 is equilibrium radius and \kappa \approx 1.07 for perfluorocarbon gases), \mu is the liquid viscosity (~0.001 Pa·s), P_a is the amplitude of the acoustic pressure, \omega = 2\pi f is the angular frequency (e.g., 1–5 MHz for diagnostic ultrasound), and t is time. The left side represents inertial effects, while the right side accounts for pressure differences driving the motion, including viscous damping and surface tension; shell viscoelasticity can be incorporated via additional terms for more accurate modeling of commercial agents. This equation predicts resonance frequencies (typically 1–4 MHz for 1–5 μm bubbles) where scattering is maximized, and nonlinear behavior emerges from large-amplitude deviations, such as asymmetric oscillation shapes. To exploit the nonlinear response for imaging, CEUS employs contrast-specific modes that suppress linear tissue echoes and enhance microbubble harmonics. Pulse inversion transmits two identical pulses separated by a 180° phase shift; the summed echoes cancel fundamental-frequency tissue signals but retain even harmonics from microbubbles. Amplitude modulation sends pulses of varying amplitude (e.g., full and half); subtracting the lower-amplitude echo from the higher isolates nonlinear components in the fundamental band. Power modulation, a variant, transmits pulses at different power levels (e.g., one at full power, another phase-inverted at half); combining them further discriminates microbubble signals by emphasizing amplitude-dependent nonlinearities. These techniques, implemented via dedicated software algorithms, filter out >90% of tissue clutter, achieving high contrast-to-tissue ratios (e.g., 20–30 dB). For perfusion quantification, high-intensity pulses ( >0.8) induce microbubble destruction through inertial or fragmentation, followed by a replenishment where inflow of fresh microbubbles from arterial supply is monitored over seconds, yielding blood flow indices like volume via time-intensity curves.

Contrast Agents

Microbubble Composition and Properties

Microbubbles used in contrast-enhanced (CEUS) consist of a gas core encapsulated by a stabilizing shell, designed to enhance while remaining biocompatible for intravascular administration. The gas core is typically filled with high-molecular-weight, inert gases such as perfluorocarbons (e.g., ) or , which exhibit low in to minimize and prolong within the bloodstream. These gases provide a compressible interior that allows the microbubble to oscillate under exposure, generating strong nonlinear echoes due to the significant mismatch between the gas (low impedance) and surrounding or (high impedance). The encapsulating shell is commonly composed of biocompatible materials like phospholipids, proteins (e.g., ), or polymers, forming a thin or bilayer that prevents premature gas and rupture while ensuring elasticity for . Microbubbles are engineered to have diameters ranging from 1 to 10 micrometers, with most in the 2-6 micrometer range, allowing them to pass freely through capillaries similar in size to red blood cells without into the . This size distribution ensures they remain confined to the vascular compartment, acting as blood pool tracers for imaging. is influenced by shell elasticity, which determines the microbubble's resonance frequency and response to pressure waves; more elastic shells (e.g., lipid-based) enable greater and , enhancing nonlinear , while stiffer shells (e.g., polymer-based) provide robustness but may reduce . , microbubbles exhibit a circulation of approximately 5-10 minutes, limited by gradual gas dissolution, acoustic destruction from imaging pulses, and pulmonary clearance, after which the inert gases are exhaled via the lungs and the shell components are metabolized into harmless byproducts like fatty acids or without renal involvement. These agents are non-toxic and biocompatible, with rare adverse events (incidence <0.01%) primarily limited to mild hypersensitivity reactions, and they have been approved by regulatory bodies such as the and for intravenous use in diagnostic imaging across various patient populations, including those with renal impairment due to their pulmonary elimination pathway.

Commercially Available Agents

Several microbubble contrast agents are commercially available for use in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), primarily approved for echocardiography and, in some cases, abdominal imaging. These agents consist of gas-filled microbubbles stabilized by a shell, designed to enhance vascular visualization without ionizing radiation. The most widely used agents in clinical practice are Optison, Definity, and Lumason (known as SonoVue outside the United States). Optison (GE Healthcare) features an albumin shell encapsulating octafluoropropane (perflutren) gas, with a microbubble concentration of approximately 5.2 × 10^8 per mL. It received initial U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 1997 for opacifying the left ventricle and delineating endocardial borders in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms, with a typical intravenous dose of 0.5 to 2 mL. In May 2025, the FDA expanded its approval to include pediatric patients aged 9 years and older for the same echocardiographic indications. Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging) utilizes a lipid shell surrounding octafluoropropane gas, providing a shelf-stable formulation that does not require agitation prior to use. Approved by the FDA in 2001, it is indicated for left ventricular opacification and endocardial border enhancement in adult echocardiography, with a standard dose of 10 microliters per kilogram (maximum 2 mL). In March 2024, FDA approval was extended to pediatric patients for similar echocardiographic applications, broadening its utility in younger populations. Lumason (Bracco Diagnostics), the U.S. brand of SonoVue, employs a phospholipid shell with sulfur hexafluoride gas, offering high stability and biocompatibility for both vascular and parenchymal imaging. SonoVue gained European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval in 2001, while Lumason received FDA approval in 2014 for echocardiography, followed by expansion in 2016 to characterize focal liver lesions in adults and, subsequently, pediatric use for echocardiography, liver, and urinary tract applications. The typical dose is 2 mL intravenously for adults in echocardiography or liver imaging. It is the most commonly used agent for abdominal CEUS worldwide due to its versatility. The following table compares key characteristics of these agents:
AgentShell MaterialGas TypePrimary IndicationsAvailability and Notes
OptisonAlbuminOctafluoropropaneEchocardiography (adults and pediatrics ≥9 years)FDA-approved; requires refrigeration
DefinityLipidOctafluoropropaneEchocardiography (adults and pediatrics)FDA-approved; shelf-stable, no activation needed
Lumason/SonoVuePhospholipidSulfur hexafluorideEchocardiography, liver lesions, urinary tract (adults and pediatrics)FDA/EMA-approved; widely used for abdominal CEUS
As of 2025, no major new microbubble agents have received broad regulatory approvals, though ongoing expansions for pediatric applications continue to enhance accessibility.

Targeted Microbubbles

Targeted microbubbles represent an advanced class of ultrasound contrast agents engineered for molecular imaging in (CEUS) by incorporating specific ligands onto the microbubble shell. These agents build upon the core structure of standard microbubbles, which feature a gas-filled core (typically perfluorocarbon gases such as C₃F₈ or SF₆) encapsulated by a stabilizing shell of phospholipids, proteins, or polymers, but are modified to enable selective binding to disease-associated biomarkers. The design involves conjugating targeting ligands—such as monoclonal antibodies, peptides, or aptamers—to the outer shell via covalent linkages (e.g., maleimide-thiol chemistry) or non-covalent methods (e.g., avidin-biotin interactions), often with polyethylene glycol (PEG) spacers to optimize accessibility and reduce steric hindrance. Common ligands include anti-VEGFR2 antibodies that bind vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) to target angiogenesis in tumors, and RGD peptides or anti-integrin antibodies that recognize αvβ3 integrins overexpressed in inflammatory or atherosclerotic endothelium. This ligand functionalization allows the microbubbles to interact specifically with molecular targets on vascular surfaces, distinguishing pathological from normal tissue. Binding mechanisms rely on affinity-driven adhesion to endothelial receptors, where the microbubbles circulate freely until encountering upregulated biomarkers, facilitating attachment under physiological conditions. This process supports dual-mode CEUS imaging, simultaneously evaluating microvascular perfusion dynamics and molecular expression levels through techniques like high-frame-rate nonlinear detection. However, blood flow-induced shear stress significantly impairs adhesion, resulting in low binding efficiency of approximately 10-20% in preclinical flow chamber and animal models, which can be partially mitigated by ultrasound radiation force to direct microbubbles toward vessel walls. As of 2025, targeted microbubbles are predominantly in preclinical stages, with extensive validation in animal models for detecting tumor angiogenesis—such as enhanced VEGFR2 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma xenografts—and atherosclerosis plaque inflammation via integrin or VCAM-1 targeting, enabling earlier identification of vulnerable lesions compared to anatomical imaging alone. Studies have demonstrated up to fivefold contrast enhancement in targeted regions post-injection, though clinical translation remains limited by challenges in ligand stability and regulatory hurdles. Relative to untargeted microbubbles, these agents provide superior specificity for molecular alterations in early disease states, potentially improving diagnostic sensitivity for conditions like neovascularization before macroscopic changes occur. Furthermore, their modular design supports theranostic capabilities, such as encapsulating chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., doxorubicin) within or on the shell for ultrasound-triggered release at targeted sites, combining imaging with localized therapy in preclinical tumor and vascular models.

Imaging Techniques

Nontargeted CEUS

Nontargeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) involves the intravenous administration of microbubble contrast agents to assess tissue perfusion and vascularity without the use of targeting ligands. The standard protocol begins with a rapid intravenous bolus injection of the contrast agent, typically 1.2–2.4 mL of (sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles), followed by a 5–10 mL saline flush to ensure complete delivery. Infusion administration is an alternative for prolonged observation or quantitative perfusion studies, though bolus is preferred for routine imaging due to its simplicity and reproducibility. Scanning is performed using low mechanical index settings, generally below 0.1–0.2, to minimize microbubble destruction and allow continuous real-time imaging of enhancement dynamics. Standard ultrasound machines equipped with contrast-specific nonlinear imaging modes, such as phase inversion or amplitude modulation, are utilized to detect harmonic signals from the oscillating microbubbles while suppressing tissue echoes. A dual-screen display is recommended, showing the conventional B-mode image alongside the contrast-enhanced view for anatomical correlation during the examination. The examination captures distinct enhancement phases: the arterial phase (10–45 seconds post-injection), characterized by initial hyperenhancement in arterial-supplied structures; the portal venous phase (30–120 seconds), reflecting combined arterial and portal inflow; and the late phase (beyond 120 seconds, up to 4–6 minutes), where washout patterns become evident. Perfusion quantification relies on time-intensity curves derived from regions of interest, analyzing parameters such as peak enhancement intensity, wash-in slope (rate of uptake), and wash-out rate to evaluate microvascular blood flow and volume. These microbubbles respond to ultrasound waves by oscillating and producing nonlinear echoes, enabling sensitive detection of perfusion changes. Current guidelines from the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB), updated in 2020, emphasize standardized reporting for lesion characterization, including documentation of lesion size, location, enhancement patterns (hyper-, iso-, or hypoenhancement) across all phases, and the timing of washout relative to adjacent parenchyma. This structured approach ensures consistency in interpreting nontargeted CEUS findings and supports integration with other imaging modalities.

Targeted CEUS

Targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) utilizes microbubbles functionalized with ligands to bind specific molecular markers on endothelial cells or other targets, enabling visualization at the molecular level beyond vascular perfusion assessment. Following intravenous injection, imaging begins with low mechanical index (MI) pulses to observe initial microbubble circulation and perfusion dynamics, allowing unbound agents to distribute throughout the vasculature. A critical step involves switching to higher MI pulses (typically >0.1, up to the FDA limit of 1.9) post-injection to disrupt circulating and loosely adherent microbubbles, thereby assessing the persistence of bound agents through residual acoustic signals. imaging techniques then isolate the signal from bound microbubbles by digitally subtracting post-destruction images (representing only attached agents) from pre-destruction frames (including both circulating and bound), enhancing specificity for . Quantification in targeted CEUS relies on videodensitometry, where time-intensity curves within a measure signal enhancement to compute a binding score, reflecting the degree of molecular . Dual-contrast further refines this by simultaneously evaluating (from circulating microbubbles) and (from bound targeted ones), often using co-injected control nontargeted agents to differentiate specific from nonspecific accumulation. These methods provide quantitative metrics for expression, such as elevated video intensity post-binding compared to baseline. As of 2025, clinical translation of targeted CEUS remains limited by regulatory hurdles, including the need for FDA approval of specialized targeted agents and standardized protocols to ensure safety and reproducibility. However, progress includes the FDA granting Fast Track Designation to BR55, a VEGFR2-targeted microbubble, in February 2025 for in . Preclinical trials demonstrate robust performance, with targeted microbubbles yielding 2-3 times higher signal intensity than controls in tumor models, enabling detection of angiogenic markers in lesions as small as 3 mm. Challenges also include low binding efficiency (1-2%) and artifacts from motion, necessitating advanced . Emerging protocols integrate targeted CEUS with MRI for multimodal validation in , combining ultrasound's molecular specificity with MRI's anatomical detail to improve tumor and . This hybrid approach has shown promise in preclinical models for assessing and vascular targeting, with co-registered data enhancing diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical Applications

Cardiovascular Applications

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) plays a pivotal role in by enhancing left ventricular opacification and endocardial border delineation, particularly in patients with suboptimal acoustic windows due to or lung disease. This technique utilizes microbubble ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) to provide real-time of cardiac structures, improving the assessment of left ventricular function and volumes. Studies have demonstrated that CEUS increases the of left ventricular segments from approximately 11.6 to 16.8 out of 17, significantly enhancing diagnostic . The 2018 American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines recommend routine use of UEAs in such cases to improve the accuracy of measurements, which correlates closely with cardiac and reduces the need for additional imaging modalities. This application is especially valuable in routine transthoracic , where it aids in precise quantification of systolic function without invasive procedures. Beyond structural enhancement, CEUS enables myocardial perfusion assessment during stress echocardiography to detect ischemia, particularly in patients with suspected . By employing low imaging and flash replenishment techniques, CEUS visualizes microvascular blood flow in the myocardium, identifying defects that indicate ischemia. Multicenter studies confirm its safety and efficacy in over 5,000 stress examinations, where it outperforms non-contrast methods in detecting wall motion abnormalities and mismatches. The European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and ASE endorse this approach for evaluating stable , highlighting its role in risk stratification for . A precursor to modern CEUS in is the agitated saline bubble study, used primarily for detecting intracardiac shunts such as patent foramen ovale (PFO). This method involves injecting agitated saline to create microbubbles that opacify the right heart; their appearance in the left heart during indicates right-to-left shunting. Though not involving commercial UEAs, it serves as a foundational for shunt , with high when combined with provocative maneuvers. In vascular applications, CEUS assesses carotid plaque , a marker of plaque vulnerability and risk. Microbubbles highlight intraplaque microvessels through qualitative grading (e.g., absent, moderate, or extensive enhancement), correlating strongly with histological vascular density (sensitivity 94%, positive predictive value 87%). This non-invasive imaging predicts cerebrovascular events, such as transient ischemic attacks, by identifying unstable plaques before symptoms manifest. For peripheral arteries, CEUS evaluates tissue following interventions like stenting in , quantifying microvascular flow improvements post-endovascular therapy. It detects restenosis and deficits with high , aiding in treatment monitoring and reducing reliance on .

Abdominal Imaging

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has become a cornerstone in abdominal imaging, particularly for evaluating the liver and kidneys, offering real-time assessment of vascularity and perfusion without ionizing radiation. In the liver, CEUS excels at characterizing focal lesions by analyzing enhancement patterns during arterial, portal venous, and late phases, distinguishing malignant from benign tumors based on hyperenhancement followed by washout. For instance, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) typically shows arterial hyperenhancement and rapid washout in the portal phase, contrasting with hemangiomas that exhibit peripheral nodular enhancement with centripetal fill-in and sustained enhancement. This pattern-based differentiation achieves high diagnostic accuracy, with CEUS demonstrating sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90% for HCC in high-risk patients. Post-ablation monitoring represents another key application in hepatic , where CEUS detects residual or recurrent tumors by identifying non-enhancing areas within the zone during the arterial phase, often within hours of the procedure to guide immediate re-intervention. In patients with , CEUS quantifies perfusion alterations, such as reduced flow and compensatory hepatic artery buffering, using time-intensity curves to assess disease severity and predict complications like . Quantification techniques, including replenishment kinetics after microbubble destruction, measure flow metrics like time to peak enhancement and area under the curve, providing objective data on microvascular . For the kidneys, CEUS aids in differentiating renal masses by evaluating their vascular behavior; clear cell renal cell carcinomas often show early arterial hyperenhancement and washout, while oncocytomas display homogeneous enhancement without washout, helping avoid unnecessary biopsies. In renal transplant , CEUS assesses graft viability by mapping defects or delayed enhancement, which can indicate acute rejection or vascular complications, with around 88% for detecting parenchymal abnormalities compared to Doppler . Recent advances include the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) 2020 guidelines (updated by WFUMB in cooperation with EFSUMB), which endorse CEUS as a first-line tool for liver lesion characterization in non-invasive diagnostics, emphasizing its role in cirrhotic patients to reduce gadolinium-based contrast needs. The 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines also recommend CEUS for diagnosing HCC in high-risk patients. The CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) standardizes oncology reporting, categorizing s for HCC risk stratification. Overall, CEUS maintains high sensitivity (approximately 90-95%) for detecting focal liver lesions, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary protocols.

Other Applications

In pediatric applications, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), particularly contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography (ceVUS), serves as a radiation-free alternative to voiding cystourethrography for grading vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children, achieving high diagnostic agreement with traditional methods (Kendall's Tau-b > 0.9) and enabling clear visualization of ureteral and renal morphology. For thyroid nodule assessment, CEUS combined with shear wave elastography provides safe, feasible evaluation in pediatric patients, correlating well with biopsy results and avoiding ionizing radiation, with studies reporting no adverse events in initial cohorts. Overall, CEUS in pediatrics demonstrates excellent safety, with 2025 multicenter data indicating adverse event rates below 1% across applications, facilitating its broader adoption for vulnerable populations. In musculoskeletal imaging, CEUS enhances the assessment of tumor by quantifying microvascular dynamics in soft- masses, distinguishing benign from malignant lesions through characteristic enhancement patterns such as hypervascularity in sarcomas. It also supports post-surgical of tissue transfers and flaps by evaluating viability in real time, detecting early complications like with sensitivity exceeding 90% compared to contrast-enhanced MRI. Emerging applications in 2025 include breast lesion evaluation, where CEUS integrates with classification to refine risk stratification for category 4 lesions, improving diagnostic specificity by up to 25% and reducing unnecessary biopsies through analysis of microvascular architecture. Additionally, nanobubble-based contrast agents are under preclinical investigation for , offering prolonged circulation times (over 30 minutes versus 5-10 for microbubbles) and targeted imaging of prostate tumors via prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands, with enhanced signal-to-noise ratios in rabbit models. Interventional uses of CEUS extend to guidance for biopsies, improving targeting accuracy in challenging lesions by highlighting vascular landmarks and reducing procedure time by 20-30%. Theranostic potential arises from drug-loaded microbubbles, which enable ultrasound-triggered release of therapeutics at tumor sites, enhancing drug penetration and efficacy in models while combining diagnostic imaging with localized treatment.

Advantages and Limitations

Advantages

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) offers significant safety advantages over other imaging modalities, as it involves no and no nephrotoxic contrast agents like iodinated compounds or chelates. Microbubble contrast agents used in CEUS are not metabolized by the kidneys and are exhaled via the lungs, making the technique particularly suitable for patients with renal impairment. Adverse events are rare, with life-threatening anaphylactic reactions occurring at a rate of 0.001% in abdominal CEUS examinations, and no fatalities reported in large-scale reviews. CEUS is considered for pediatric use, with serious adverse events in intravenous applications reported at 0.22% across over 4,500 examinations, and limited studies in have shown no maternal or fetal adverse effects. A key benefit of CEUS is its ability to provide dynamic , allowing visualization of wash-in and wash-out phases within seconds, which captures transient vascular patterns not feasible with the static or multiphase acquisitions of or . This continuous, high-frame-rate assessment enables immediate feedback during procedures and better characterization of tissue perfusion compared to the delayed sequences in and . CEUS is cost-effective, leveraging standard equipment without requiring specialized scanners or shielding; for example, , Medicare-based estimates place CEUS exam costs at approximately $300, compared to around $650 for and over $1,100 for MRI. Studies indicate that CEUS reduces the need for downstream imaging, yielding overall cost savings of about $122 per patient by avoiding redundant tests in up to 33% of cases. The technique enhances accessibility through its portability, enabling bedside performance in intensive care units, operating rooms, or outpatient settings without patient transport to suites. Meta-analyses confirm that CEUS improves diagnostic confidence and accuracy, with often exceeding 90% for lesion characterization, outperforming conventional alone.

Limitations

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) faces several technical challenges that can impact its clinical utility. The microbubble contrast agents used in CEUS have a limited circulation time of approximately 3-6 minutes in the bloodstream, necessitating rapid and efficient scanning protocols to capture the enhancement phase before the agent dissipates. This transient nature requires precise timing and can complicate the evaluation of multiple lesions, as repeated injections are often needed. Additionally, CEUS is highly operator-dependent, relying on the expertise of the for optimal positioning, mechanical index adjustment, and real-time interpretation, which can lead to variability in diagnostic accuracy across different practitioners. Artifacts represent another key limitation, potentially degrading image quality and leading to misinterpretation. Microbubble destruction, particularly in regions of high acoustic or during high-flow vascular areas, can cause pseudowashout phenomena where apparent washout of is artifactual rather than physiological, mimicking pathological findings. Furthermore, factors such as or excessive bowel gas can attenuate ultrasound penetration, reducing the effectiveness of CEUS in deeper abdominal structures and limiting its applicability in certain body habitus. Regulatory constraints further hinder the broader adoption of CEUS modalities. As of November 2025, targeted CEUS, which involves microbubbles conjugated to ligands for , remains largely preclinical and lacks regulatory approval for routine clinical use, restricting it to research settings. Contraindications include severe , where the risk of microbubble entrapment in the may exacerbate hemodynamic instability, as well as known to the . Evidence gaps also persist, particularly regarding long-term outcomes and comparative performance. While CEUS demonstrates high sensitivity for superficial lesions, it exhibits lower sensitivity for deep-seated structures compared to computed tomography (CT), due to acoustic attenuation and limited field of view, which may necessitate complementary imaging in complex cases. Moreover, long-term safety and efficacy data remain limited, with most studies focusing on short-term applications and relying on smaller cohorts, underscoring the need for larger, prospective trials to solidify its role in diverse clinical scenarios.

References

  1. [1]
    The Current Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in ... - NIH
    Jul 9, 2024 · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced imaging technique that integrates conventional US with the intravenous injection of ...
  2. [2]
    General principles and overview of vascular contrast-enhanced ...
    In this paper, we will discuss the basic principles of CEUS and present an overview of its vascular applications.
  3. [3]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography: Review and Applications - PMC
    Sep 24, 2021 · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound produces enhanced images of tissue compared to B-mode ultrasound which aids in determining tissue pathology. Its ...
  4. [4]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): What It Is & Procedure
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound uses gas-filled microbubbles to look for abnormal blood flow and diagnose diseases of your organs and blood vessels.
  5. [5]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound | Radiology Reference Article
    Jun 28, 2024 · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) involves the administration of intravenous contrast agents consisting of microbubbles/nanobubbles of gas.
  6. [6]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: What Is the Evidence and What Are ...
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) involves the use of microbubble contrast agents and specialized imaging techniques to show sensitive blood flow and tissue ...
  7. [7]
    Evolution of contrast agents for ultrasound imaging and ... - NIH
    Contrast enhancement was caused by the compressible gas core of saline bubbles, enabling the bubble to backscatter the applied US wave.
  8. [8]
    Three Decades of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Review of the Past ...
    Jan 13, 2020 · Initial reports from the 1960s describing the observations of ultrasound contrast enhancement by tiny gaseous bubbles during ...
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Ultrasound Contrast Imaging: Fundamentals and Emerging ...
    Feb 16, 2022 · In this review article, we present an overview of the basic microbubble physics and bubble-specific imaging techniques that enable this modality.
  13. [13]
    Ultrasound contrast agents: microbubbles made simple for ... - PMC
    The introduction and development of stable microbubble-based ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in the early 1990s improved visualization of complex vascular ...
  14. [14]
    Microbubbles as Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Molecular Imaging
    Microbubbles larger than RBCs would be trapped in the capillaries, and submicron-size microbubbles scatter ultrasound poorly and have insufficient stability.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 3987076 This label may not be the latest approved by FDA. For ...
    Optison is an ultrasound contrast agent indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricle and to improve the ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  16. [16]
    GE HealthCare Announces FDA Approval of Pediatric Indication for ...
    May 13, 2025 · OPTISON is an ultrasound contrast agent indicated for use in adult and pediatric patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify to the left ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Definity - accessdata.fda.gov
    See full prescribing information for. DEFINITY. DEFINITY (Perflutren Lipid Microsphere) Injectable Suspension, for intravenous use. Initial U.S. Approval: 2001.
  18. [18]
    Definity (perflutren lipid microsphere) FDA Approval History
    Mar 6, 2024 · July 31, 2001 - FDA approves Definity for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve ...
  19. [19]
    Lantheus Announces the FDA Approval of DEFINITY® (Perflutren ...
    Mar 4, 2024 · Lantheus Announces the FDA Approval of DEFINITY® (Perflutren Lipid Microsphere) for Pediatric Patients. BEDFORD, Mass. , March 04, 2024 (GLOBE ...
  20. [20]
    None
    **Summary of Lumason Key Information:**
  21. [21]
    SonoVue | European Medicines Agency (EMA)
    The European Commission granted a marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union for SonoVue on 26 March 2001. For more information about treatment ...
  22. [22]
    Lumason (sulfur hexafluoride lipid microsphere) FDA Approval History
    Dec 5, 2019 · FDA Approved: Yes (First approved October 10, 2014) Brand name: Lumason Generic name: sulfur hexafluoride lipid microsphere Dosage form: Injectable SuspensionMissing: SonoVue composition EMA
  23. [23]
    Ultrasound targeted microbubbles for theranostic applications in ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Key FDA/EMA-approved microbubbles include: SonoVue® (Bracco Imaging), Definity® (Lantheus Medical Imaging), Sonazoid® (GE Healthcare), Optison® ...
  24. [24]
    Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: An Emerging ... - PMC - NIH
    Additionally, contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging can provide a more accurate measurement of tumor size and margins, even in the case of avascular tumors (eg, ...
  25. [25]
    Advances and innovations in ultrasound-based tumor management
    Aug 12, 2025 · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), utilizing microbubbles (MBs) and nanobubbles (NBs) to target vascular biomarkers, significantly ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) - Efsumb.org
    low-mechanical index real-time scanning technique with a second generation ultrasound contrast agent. Eur J Radiol 2007; 62: 114–121. [20] Atkinson NS ...Missing: nontargeted | Show results with:nontargeted
  27. [27]
    [PDF] guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast ...
    Abstract—The present, updated document describes the fourth iteration of recommendations for the hepatic use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, ...
  28. [28]
    Targeted Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Tumor Angiogenesis with Contrast Microbubbles Conjugated to Integrin-Binding Knottin Peptides
    **Summary of Preclinical Results on Signal Enhancement in Targeted vs Control Microbubbles for CEUS:**
  29. [29]
    Development of an embedded multimodality imaging platform for ...
    Feb 14, 2020 · Moreover, multimodal imaging accelerates the development of new imaging markers and improves our understanding of cancer's pathological ...
  30. [30]
    UEA in Clinical Echo: 2018 Update – ASE
    Mar 1, 2018 · The use of ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs) has become an integral component of echocardiography practice.
  31. [31]
    Echo contrast medium: How the use of contrast echocardiography ...
    Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) have been shown to drastically enhance imaging quality, particularly depicting the left ventricular endocardial borders.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Ultrasound enhancing agents in cardiovascular imaging
    Aug 8, 2024 · This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current applications of UEAs in cardiovascular imaging, particularly beyond coronary artery disease.
  33. [33]
    When and how to diagnose patent foramen ovale - PMC
    For the detection of right-to-left shunting across a PFO, agitated saline contrast medium is typically injected into a peripheral vein during the strain ...
  34. [34]
    4 Things Needed To Rule Out a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)
    It is recommended to use an echo-bubble study with Valsalva as the primary diagnostic tool for the detection of PFO in clinical practice.
  35. [35]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Feasibility in Assessing Carotid ...
    Oct 9, 2023 · This review explores CEUS's utility in detecting carotid plaque ... neovascularization and plaque surface by performing a CEUS examination [79].
  36. [36]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Assess Carotid Intraplaque ...
    CEUS is a readily available imaging modality for the assessment of patients with carotid atherosclerosis, providing information on atherosclerotic plaques.
  37. [37]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: clinical applications in patients ... - NIH
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with known or suspected atherosclerosis.
  38. [38]
    Vesicoureteral reflux by contrast ultrasound, comparison with ...
    When comparing the VUR grading between VUS and MCU the agreement between the two methods was high with a Kendall's Tau-b > 0.9. VUS failed to diagnose two grade ...
  39. [39]
    Application of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography and Shear Wave ...
    This pilot study demonstrates that SWE and CEUS is safe and technically feasible for evaluation of thyroid nodules in children. A larger cohort is needed ...
  40. [40]
    Determining the optimal contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography ...
    Apr 25, 2025 · To evaluate diagnostic combinations of imaging modalities and contrast agents for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children.
  41. [41]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Musculoskeletal Applications
    Mar 2, 2020 · This World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology position paper reviews the diagnostic potential of ultrasound contrast agents for clinical ...Uca Dynamics · Peri-Operative Diagnostics · Soft Tissue Masses
  42. [42]
    Update of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in Musculoskeletal Medicine
    Post-operative monitoring of tissue transfers: Advantages using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast enhanced MRI (ceMRI) with dynamic perfusion ...
  43. [43]
    The diagnostic value of real-time ultrasound elastography and ... - NIH
    Mar 26, 2025 · UE and CEUS have significant diagnostic value for BI-RADS 4A breast lesions. Combining these techniques improves diagnostic accuracy and can help reduce ...
  44. [44]
    Preclinical Evaluation of Molecular-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Nanobubbles for Precision Oncology: Preclinical Evaluation of Molecular-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agents in a Rabbit Model. View ORCID ...
  45. [45]
    Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Thyroid Interventional Procedures
    Jun 20, 2025 · The application of CEUS extends to benign thyroid nodules, thyroid carcinomas, parathyroid adenomas, metastatic lymph nodes, and local ...
  46. [46]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: advance and current status in ...
    In this review, we discuss the principles and types of US contrast agents and the clinical application of CEUS with a focus on abdominal imaging.<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    An Introduction to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Nephrologists
    Nov 9, 2017 · Another advantage of CEUS is the lack of nephrotoxicity or adverse effects of microbubbles in patients with CKD.
  48. [48]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has excellent diagnostic ...
    A major advantage of CEUS is its safety profile. Life-threatening anaphylactic reactions have been reported at a rate of 0.001% in abdominal CEUS, with no ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  49. [49]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a comprehensive review of safety in ...
    SonoVue has been approved for pediatric intravesical applications in Europe and China. Two other currently available second-generation UCAs, Optison (GE ...
  50. [50]
    Controversies in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): pregnancy ...
    Aug 15, 2025 · Even though the application of US in pregnancy may lead to potential harmful effects by local tissue heating, no foetal or maternal adverse ...
  51. [51]
    Benefits of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for interventional ...
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) enables physicians to dynamically assess the vascularization of tissues and vessels in a real-time manner.
  52. [52]
    Clinical applications of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in vascular ...
    By using microbubble contrast agents, CEUS enhances vascular imaging, allowing for real-time, high-resolution visualization of blood flow and microvascular ...
  53. [53]
    Contrast Ultrasound: What It's Used For, and 4 Key Advantages
    Aug 13, 2019 · Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (or CEUS) brings together two imaging tools: ultrasound and contrast agents. The combination of these two ...
  54. [54]
    Retrospective Analysis of the Safety and Cost Implications of ...
    The cost of CEUS ($94) included the cost of conventional gray-scale ultrasound and that of the contrast agent. CEUS was compared with the cost for contrast- ...
  55. [55]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the evaluation of incidental ...
    The cost of CEUS ranged between 164.19 USD and 171.82 USD, depending upon the year. The price of the non-contrast ultrasound examination and of the contrast ...
  56. [56]
    Cost Effectiveness of CEUS - International Contrast Ultrasound Society
    One recent study showed that the use of UCAs resulted in an overall cost savings of $122/patient and avoided additional redundant downstream tests in 32.8% of ...
  57. [57]
    Benefits of CEUS - International Contrast Ultrasound Society
    CEUS is often cheaper, safer, better, faster and more convenient than other forms of diagnostic imaging, and is performed without ionizing radiation.
  58. [58]
    Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Our meta-analysis indicates that CEUS is highly accurate in the diagnosis and staging for BC. Beyond its accuracy, CEUS offers the advantage of being a cost- ...
  59. [59]
    Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · This study highlights the diagnostic potential of CEUS for pediatric solid organ injuries caused by BAT.Abstract · Meta-Analysis · Subgroup Analysis
  60. [60]
    Advantages and Limitations of Focal Liver Lesion Assessment with ...
    Another main limitation of CEUS compared to cross-sectional imaging is that only one FLL can be evaluated at a time and repeated bolus administration of UCA is ...
  61. [61]
    Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US | RadioGraphics
    ### Summary of Artifacts and Technical Considerations Limiting Contrast-Enhanced US
  62. [62]
    Controversies in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)
    Aug 15, 2025 · Despite many advantages, CEUS has limitations. Its effectiveness can be reduced in patients with high body mass index or excessive bowel gas, ...
  63. [63]
    CXCR4-targeted ultrasound microbubbles for imaging and ...
    May 1, 2025 · This study pioneers ultrasound molecular imaging in liver tumor therapy using CXCR4-targeted microbubbles (MBs) conjugated with LFC131 peptides.
  64. [64]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the abdominal vasculature
    The contraindications for CEUS are limited and include known history of allergic reaction to the UCA itself, severe pulmonary hypertension and pregnancy.
  65. [65]
    Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver - Thieme Connect
    Jan 4, 2024 · Its use is contraindicated by known allergic reactions to the contrast agent, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), severe pulmonary ...