Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Core business

The core business of an organization refers to its primary product or service category, which serves as the foundation of its operations and generates the majority of its revenue.^[1] This central activity typically represents the largest business unit or regional segment, often accounting for around 60% of a company's overall revenues, as observed in analyses of major U.S. firms from 2007 to 2011.^[2] It encompasses the essential processes and capabilities that deliver the most value to customers and stakeholders, distinguishing it from ancillary or non-core activities.^[2] Identifying the core business involves evaluating revenue sources, competitive advantages, and strategic priorities, often through frameworks that assess operational efficiency and market positioning.^[3] For instance, executives prioritize it as the main source of profits and the original purpose for which the company was established.^[4] Maintaining a strong core is critical for long-term sustainability, as companies with robust core growth achieve shareholder returns more than twice as high as those relying solely on peripheral expansions.^[2] However, challenges such as market saturation can necessitate reinvention through business model innovations, like shifting from product sales to service-based outcomes.^[2] In strategic management, the core business guides resource allocation and decision-making, influencing diversification efforts where about 75% of companies, as of a 2014 survey, have pursued growth beyond it over the prior five years to access new profit pools.^[1] Success in these expansions depends on integrating adjacent opportunities that leverage existing strengths, while only one-third of firms report significant revenue gains from such moves.^[1] Emerging-market companies often derive greater value from growth beyond the core compared to their developed-market counterparts, highlighting the need for tailored approaches.^[1]

Conceptual Foundations

Definition and Scope

The core business of a company refers to its primary revenue-generating activities that form the foundation of its value proposition and leverage its unique expertise. These activities are central to the organization's strategic identity, encompassing the products, services, or processes that deliver the most significant customer value and differentiate the firm in the marketplace. For instance, a company's core business is often described as its value proposition grounded in strategy, supported by people, processes, and technology.^[5] Key characteristics of a core business include its potential for high profitability, close alignment with the firm's core competencies—such as specialized skills or capabilities that provide a competitive edge—and its role in ensuring long-term sustainability. These elements make the core business resilient and scalable, as it builds on irreplaceable strengths that competitors cannot easily duplicate. A strong core business is essential for driving profitable growth, with companies that achieve robust core growth realizing shareholder returns more than twice as high as those relying solely on peripheral expansions.^[2] In contrast, non-core activities lie outside the main revenue sources and typically involve support functions or occasional ventures that do not directly contribute to the central value proposition. Core activities are irreplaceable to the company's operations, such as manufacturing for an automaker, where vehicle production represents the foundational competency. Non-core elements, like administrative support services or one-off projects, can often be outsourced without undermining the firm's strategic position. For a technology company like Apple, the core business centers on the integration of hardware and software to create innovative devices.^[6]^[7]^[8]

Historical Evolution

The concept of core business began to take shape in the late 1970s and 1980s through portfolio management theories, particularly the Boston Consulting Group's (BCG) Growth-Share Matrix, introduced by BCG founder Bruce Henderson in 1970 and widely adopted in strategic planning during the subsequent decade. This framework categorized business units into "stars," "cash cows," "question marks," and "dogs" based on market growth and relative market share, urging companies to prioritize investments in high-growth, high-share areas to optimize resource allocation and sustain long-term profitability. By emphasizing divestment from low-performing segments and focus on promising ones, the matrix laid foundational principles for identifying and concentrating on what would later be termed core business activities.^[9] A pivotal advancement occurred in 1985 with Michael Porter's publication of Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, which introduced the value chain framework to dissect a firm's activities into primary and support categories that generate value for customers. Porter argued that competitive advantage stems from performing these activities more efficiently or effectively than rivals, with certain value-creating processes—such as inbound logistics, operations, and marketing—emerging as central to a company's differentiation strategy. This model shifted managerial attention toward analyzing internal operations to pinpoint those essential for competitive positioning, influencing the evolution of core business as the subset of activities that drive superior performance.^[10] The 1990s marked a significant conceptual refinement through C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel's introduction of the "core competencies" model in their 1990 Harvard Business Review article, "The Core Competence of the Corporation." They defined core competencies as collective learning and skills that are valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate, enabling firms to deliver fundamental customer benefits and access diverse markets—thus linking core business directly to an organization's unique, integrated strengths rather than isolated products or functions. This perspective encouraged companies to build strategies around these competencies, viewing core business as the strategic anchor for innovation and growth in increasingly complex corporate portfolios.^[11] Post-2000 adaptations reflected responses to globalization and technological shifts, exemplified by IBM's strategic pivot from hardware manufacturing to integrated services and software under CEOs Lou Gerstner and Samuel Palmisano. Facing declining hardware margins amid global competition from low-cost producers, IBM divested non-core assets like its PC division to Lenovo in 2005, redirecting focus to high-value services that accounted for over half of its revenue by the mid-2000s and enabled scalable global delivery. This transformation underscored how core business definitions evolve in dynamic environments, prioritizing adaptable, knowledge-based activities over traditional product-centric models.^[12]^[13]

Strategic Importance

Role in Business Strategy

The core business serves as the foundational anchor for an organization's mission and vision statements, ensuring that long-term goals are rooted in the primary activities that drive sustainable value creation. By aligning strategic objectives with these core operations, companies can maintain focus amid evolving market demands, as purpose—closely tied to core business functions—has been shown to unify organizational efforts and enhance stakeholder engagement when embedded in mission and vision frameworks.^[14] This integration prevents mission drift, allowing leaders to prioritize initiatives that reinforce the company's fundamental purpose rather than pursuing tangential ventures.^[15] In strategic planning tools such as SWOT analysis, the core business plays a pivotal role by informing the identification of internal strengths that can be leveraged to capitalize on external opportunities. For instance, strengths derived from core operations—like proprietary expertise or operational efficiencies—are matched against market opportunities to develop targeted strategies that amplify competitive positioning.^[16] This approach ensures that planning processes are grounded in verifiable organizational capabilities, guiding decisions on resource deployment and growth trajectories.^[17] Decision-making frameworks for mergers, acquisitions, or expansions emphasize evaluating potential synergies with the core business to avoid diluting focus and value. Companies assess whether proposed deals enhance or complement primary operations, using criteria such as operational alignment and revenue impact to determine viability. A notable example is Google's 2015 restructuring into Alphabet Inc., which isolated its core search and advertising businesses under Google while separating experimental ventures like Life Sciences into independent units, thereby sharpening strategic focus and enabling independent scaling of non-core initiatives.^[18] This structure facilitated clearer decision-making on expansions by promoting accountability and transparency in financial reporting for core versus exploratory activities.^[19] Alignment with corporate governance further reinforces the core business's role, as boards oversee strategic initiatives to ensure they bolster rather than undermine primary operations. Through regular reviews of capital allocation and strategic plans, boards apply dynamic oversight—such as balanced scorecards tracking return on invested capital and customer metrics—to verify that investments align with core focus and long-term value.^[20] This governance practice mitigates risks from misaligned pursuits, with boards posing targeted questions about strategy execution to safeguard the integrity of core business priorities.^[21]

Contribution to Competitive Advantage

Focusing on core business activities enables companies to develop specialized expertise that creates significant barriers to entry for competitors. By concentrating resources on high-value competencies, firms cultivate proprietary knowledge and processes that are difficult for newcomers to replicate, thereby protecting market share. For instance, large enterprises leverage specialized capabilities to deter potential entrants, as these require substantial time and investment to match.^[22] Additionally, economies of scale in core operations reduce unit costs and enhance efficiency, further solidifying a firm's position. Structural advantages like scale economies explain why leading firms maintain dominance, as they allow for lower pricing or higher margins that smaller rivals cannot sustain.^[23] A core business emphasis also fosters enhanced innovation through deeper investments in research and development (R&D), positioning companies as leaders in their product categories. This focused approach allocates capital more effectively toward breakthrough advancements, rather than diluting efforts across unrelated areas. For example, The Coca-Cola Company has maintained its global dominance by treating branding as a core activity, which drives continuous innovation in product experiences and marketing, serving as a key competitive advantage.^[24]^[25] Deeper R&D commitment in core areas enables firms to achieve product leadership, as seen in Coca-Cola's strategic exploration of consumer-engaging innovations that reinforce its market position.^[26] From a financial perspective, core business operations typically yield higher return on invested capital (ROIC), reflecting efficient use of resources to generate superior profitability. Sustainably high ROIC signals a competitive advantage, as it demonstrates the ability to create value above the cost of capital through optimized core activities.^[27] Studies indicate that refocusing announcements are often met with positive market reactions, such as significant abnormal returns, though post-refocusing operating performance can vary.^[28] Additionally, core-aligned adjacency expansions can boost operating profits substantially; for example, General Mills' acquisition of Pillsbury increased profits by approximately 70%.^[29] Aligning core business practices with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles further enhances long-term viability and competitive edge. By integrating sustainability into core operations, companies mitigate risks and build resilience, attracting investors and customers who prioritize ethical practices. This alignment promotes enduring value creation, as ESG-focused strategies support profitable growth while addressing societal demands, ultimately strengthening market position.^[30]^[31] Porter's framework on competitive advantage underscores this by highlighting how core activities, when leveraged for differentiation or cost leadership, sustain superior performance in dynamic markets.^[32]

Identification and Management

Methods for Identifying Core Activities

Value chain analysis, introduced by Michael Porter in his 1985 book Competitive Advantage, is a foundational method for identifying core business activities by dissecting a company's operations into primary and support categories to pinpoint those that generate the most customer value and profit.^[33] Primary activities include inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service, while support activities encompass procurement, technology development, human resource management, and firm infrastructure.^[34] The process involves mapping these activities, evaluating their costs and contributions to value creation, and highlighting those that provide a competitive edge, such as efficient supply chain management in manufacturing firms.^[33] For instance, companies apply this analysis to isolate high-margin activities like product design or distribution that differentiate them from competitors.^[34] Financial assessment employs key metrics to evaluate which business segments or activities form the core revenue streams, focusing on profitability and dependency levels. Contribution margin, calculated as sales revenue minus variable costs, reveals the profitability of specific products or services, helping firms prioritize those with the highest margins as core offerings.^[35] Revenue concentration, often measured via the Revenue Concentration Index (RCI), quantifies reliance on particular streams or customers; a high RCI indicates vulnerability if those streams falter, guiding leaders to reinforce or divest non-core areas.^[36] This quantitative approach ensures decisions are data-driven. Stakeholder input through surveys and workshops validates potential core activities by incorporating perspectives from employees, customers, and partners, ensuring alignment with perceived strengths. Surveys gauge opinions on critical capabilities, such as operational efficiency or innovation, while workshops facilitate collaborative discussions to prioritize elements that drive customer satisfaction and internal expertise.^[37] For example, organizations conduct these sessions to align on key skills, drafting taxonomies that highlight core competencies like agile project management.^[38] This method fosters buy-in and uncovers qualitative insights overlooked in purely analytical approaches.^[37] Benchmarking against industry peers compares a company's activity portfolio to competitors' to isolate unique strengths that qualify as core. This involves measuring performance metrics like cost efficiency or delivery speed against sector leaders, identifying differentiators such as proprietary technologies or processes.^[39] Such comparisons, rooted in strategic frameworks, help firms focus on inimitable advantages for sustained market position.^[39]

Resource Allocation and Focus Strategies

One key strategy for resource allocation in core business involves outsourcing non-core functions to external providers, thereby freeing up internal resources for high-value activities. This approach allows companies to concentrate efforts on strengths such as innovation and customer engagement while leveraging specialized partners for routine operations. For instance, Nike began outsourcing its manufacturing in the early 1980s by transferring production to developing Asian countries like Taiwan and South Korea, enabling the company to prioritize design, marketing, and brand development as its core competencies.^[40]^[41] Budgeting priorities further reinforce focus on core areas through methods like zero-based budgeting (ZBB), which requires justifying every expense from scratch each period rather than incrementing prior budgets. ZBB promotes rigorous evaluation to ensure funds align with strategic essentials, often directing resources toward operational core activities to sustain efficiency and growth.^[42]^[43] This technique has been adopted by firms to eliminate wasteful spending on peripheral functions and amplify investments in primary revenue drivers. Performance measurement plays a crucial role in maintaining focus by establishing key performance indicators (KPIs) customized to core business metrics, which track efficiency and output in essential operations. Examples include cycle time reduction, which quantifies the duration to complete key processes and identifies bottlenecks for optimization.^[44] In manufacturing contexts, monitoring cycle time as a core KPI has enabled companies to shorten production spans through targeted improvements, directly enhancing competitiveness.^[45]^[46] These metrics ensure ongoing alignment of resources with core priorities, providing data-driven insights for adjustments. Organizational restructuring often involves forming dedicated units for core activities to streamline decision-making and insulate them from distractions. This structural shift creates autonomous teams focused solely on high-impact areas, improving agility and resource utilization. A prominent example is Google's 2015 reorganization into Alphabet Inc., which separated its core internet services business into a dedicated unit under Google while allowing other ventures to operate independently, thereby sharpening focus on primary competencies like search and advertising.^[47]^[48] Such restructurings have helped firms like Alphabet reallocate talent and capital more effectively to core operations, boosting overall performance.^[49]

Challenges and Adaptations

Common Pitfalls and Risks

One common pitfall in managing core business is mission creep, where companies gradually expand into non-core areas, diluting their strategic focus and operational efficiency. This expansion often stems from opportunistic acquisitions or diversification efforts that stray from foundational strengths, leading to increased complexity, higher costs, and diminished competitive edge in primary markets. A prominent example is General Electric (GE), which under former CEO Jack Welch pursued aggressive diversification across sectors like finance, media, and healthcare from the 1980s onward, growing into a conglomerate but ultimately overburdening management and eroding focus on industrial roots such as aviation and power generation. In 2018, amid mounting debt and performance declines, GE announced the spin-off of its healthcare division (completed in 2023); in 2021, it announced a full breakup including the energy business as GE Vernova (spun off in 2024), to streamline operations and return to core competencies like aviation, highlighting how unchecked mission creep can precipitate financial distress and necessitate painful restructurings.^[50]^[51] Another significant risk is underinvestment in core activities, where short-term financial pressures or distractions from peripheral ventures lead firms to neglect maintenance and innovation in their primary competencies, resulting in gradual market share erosion. This occurs when resources are diverted to appease immediate shareholder demands or chase marginal opportunities, allowing competitors to gain ground through superior execution in the same domain. For instance, Eastman Kodak, once dominant in photographic film, underinvested in digital imaging technologies during the 1990s and early 2000s despite inventing the digital camera in 1975, prioritizing protection of its lucrative film business instead; this misallocation contributed to a loss of over 90% of its market share in imaging by the mid-2010s, culminating in bankruptcy in 2012. Similarly, Nokia's reluctance to adequately fund software and ecosystem development for smartphones in the late 2000s, while focusing on hardware iterations, enabled rivals like Apple and Samsung to capture the mobile market, reducing Nokia's global share from 50% in 2007 to under 3% by 2013. Such cases underscore how underinvestment can transform temporary advantages into structural vulnerabilities, often requiring drastic turnarounds or market exits.^[52]^[53] Measurement errors in classifying core versus non-core activities further exacerbate risks, as flawed assessments can lead to inefficient resource allocation and substantial profit erosion. These errors typically arise from inadequate analysis of value-adding processes, such as overemphasizing revenue-generating but low-margin units while undervaluing foundational capabilities like supply chain expertise or R&D. Studies indicate that such misclassifications contribute to operational inefficiencies. For example, when companies incorrectly deem peripheral operations as essential, they allocate disproportionate capital and talent away from high-impact areas, inflating costs and weakening overall profitability; this not only distorts strategic decision-making but also hampers responsiveness to market shifts, as seen in brief references to identification flaws that amplify these issues.^[54] Cultural resistance within organizations poses a persistent challenge to refocusing on core business, particularly when divesting non-core units encounters internal pushback from employees, managers, or stakeholders attached to legacy operations. This resistance often manifests as emotional attachment to familiar revenue streams, fear of job losses, or entrenched departmental loyalties, which delay or derail divestiture efforts and prolong inefficiencies. Executives frequently hesitate to sell off non-core assets due to concerns over shrinking reported revenues or negative market perceptions of a "smaller" company, even when such moves would sharpen focus and unlock value. In state-owned enterprises, for instance, bureaucratic inertia and political pressures amplify this resistance, leading to retained underperforming units that drain resources from core priorities. Overcoming this requires addressing cultural norms that valorize size over agility, but unaddressed, it can entrench suboptimal portfolios and hinder long-term competitiveness.^[55]

Evolution in Dynamic Markets

In dynamic markets, digital transformation has compelled companies to redefine their core business through technology integration, often shifting from traditional models to innovative platforms. A prominent example is Netflix, which pivoted from its DVD rental service to streaming in 2007, recognizing the potential of broadband internet to deliver content directly to consumers and thereby transforming its core activity from physical distribution to digital content licensing and production.^[56] This adaptation not only sustained growth amid declining DVD demand but also positioned Netflix as a leader in the entertainment industry, with streaming revenue surpassing DVD by late 2011.^[57] Responses to disruptions, such as regulatory pressures and crises, further necessitate pivoting core activities to align with emerging imperatives. Post-2020, automakers like General Motors accelerated their focus on electric vehicles (EVs) in response to stringent emissions regulations, including the European Union's Green Deal and U.S. updates to Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards, announcing plans for an all-electric lineup by 2035.^[58] This shift redefined core manufacturing competencies from internal combustion engines to battery technology and electrification, enabling compliance while tapping into sustainable mobility trends.^[59] Globalization influences core business evolution by enabling international expansion of key activities while safeguarding domestic strengths, fostering a balance between global scale and local relevance. Firms often leverage foreign markets to enhance core competencies, such as accessing specialized talent or resources abroad, but maintain critical functions like research and development at home to protect intellectual property and cultural alignment.^[60] For instance, multinational corporations expand production internationally to reduce costs and enter new markets, yet reinforce domestic bases through innovation clusters, ensuring resilience against geopolitical risks.^[61] Looking ahead, artificial intelligence (AI) and sustainability are poised to reshape core business models, with projections indicating that approximately 70% of companies will adopt at least one AI technology by 2030, integrating it into decision-making and operations to drive efficiency and innovation.^[62] Simultaneously, sustainability will transition from peripheral compliance to a central value, compelling businesses to embed environmental goals into their core strategies, such as circular economy practices, to meet regulatory demands and consumer expectations by 2030.^[63] These trends underscore the need for proactive adaptation to maintain competitiveness in volatile environments.

References

[1]
Growing beyond the core business
### Definition/Explanation of Core Business
[2]
Using Business Model Innovation to Reinvent the Core
Mar 27, 2014 · A core business segment is defined as the largest business unit in 2007; a core regional segment is a home country or region. The threshold ...
[3]
How to reignite growth through adjacencies - McKinsey
Dec 18, 2023 · We define adjacencies as segments beyond a company's core business where it has a “right to win”—a long-term competitive advantage stemming ...About The Authors · Three Capability Archetypes · Making The Most Of The Right...
[4]
CORE BUSINESS definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
noun the business activity that is main source of a company's profits and success, usually the activity that the company was originally set up to carry out.
[5]
Reinventing your business by transforming the core - McKinsey
Feb 17, 2017 · Incremental adjustments or building something new outside of the core business ... Using design thinking and skills, these companies define ...
[6]
Build Core Competencies for a Competitive Edge - Investopedia
Core competencies are strategic resources and capabilities that allow a business to maintain a competitive edge and are difficult for competitors to replicate.
[7]
Non-Core Item: Overview and Examples of Peripheral Items
A non-core item is an engagement considered to be outside of business activities or operations that are the main revenue source of the business.
[8]
How the Automakers are Embracing the C.A.S.E Revolution
Mar 31, 2023 · For a start, focusing on supplementary revenue generating areas might weaken the core competency of automakers which is vehicle building.
[9]
How Apple Is Organized for Innovation
Apple is well-known for its innovations in hardware, software, and services. Thanks to them, it grew from some 8,000 employees and $7 billion in revenue in ...
[10]
BCG Classics Revisited: The Growth Share Matrix
Jun 4, 2014 · This article, the fourth in the series, examines the growth share matrix, a portfolio management tool developed by BCG founder Bruce Henderson.Missing: emergence | Show results with:emergence
[11]
Value Chain Analysis: Definition, 5 Steps, Usage, & Examples
Value Chain Analysis was popularized by Professor Michael Porter of Harvard Business School in his 1985 book, "Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[12]
The Core Competence of the Corporation
The Core Competence of the Corporation. How companies cultivate the skills and resources for growth. by C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel · From the Magazine ( ...
[13]
IBM Looks Back on 2000s, Sets Sites on Next Decade - IT Jungle
Mar 22, 2010 · IBM has undergone profound changes over the last 10 years. For example, in 2000, IBM made almost as much money selling hardware ($2.7 billion in pre-tax income ...
[14]
How IBM Became A Multinational Giant Through Multiple Business ...
Dec 5, 2022 · The company was selling fewer and fewer pieces of hardware each year while its revenues from consulting services weren't increasing as fast. The ...
[15]
Put Purpose at the Core of Your Strategy - Harvard Business Review
Put Purpose at the Core of Your Strategy. It's how successful companies redefine their businesses. by Thomas W. Malnight, Ivy Buche and Charles Dhanaraj · From ...
[16]
Vision and Mission Statements -- a Roadmap of Where You Want to ...
Once you have created statements of vision and mission, and possibly core values, you can then develop the strategies, goals, objectives and action plans needed ...
[17]
SWOT: What Is It, How It Works, and How to Perform an Analysis
A SWOT analysis is a strategic planning technique that requires a company (or similar entity) to identify its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, ...
[18]
Using a SWOT analysis to develop core business strategies - Nulab
Dec 13, 2021 · A thoughtful SWOT analysis will inform every part of your business. SWOT is an acronym that stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.
[19]
Investors - Founder's Letters - 2015 - Alphabet Inc.
Alphabet is about businesses prospering through strong leaders and independence. In general, our model is to have a strong CEO who runs each business, with ...
[20]
How Google is Managing Disruption Through Alphabet - HBS Online
Aug 13, 2015 · On Monday, Google announced the formation of a new parent company, Alphabet, which will serve as the umbrella for all of its business units.
[21]
How board oversight of capital allocation can drive strategy | EY - US
Jun 4, 2024 · Capital allocation is essential to advancing a company's strategy; its oversight is one of the board's most important and fundamental roles.
[22]
Strategic oversight: Top 10 questions boards should ask - PwC
and the right mix of people — at the ...
[23]
The roles of big businesses and institutions in entrepreneurship
The presence of big businesses can hinder the market entry of potential entrants. Highly specialized capabilities create huge barriers to entry, especially ...
[24]
A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (Strategic ...
Economists usually appeal to some kind of structural cause such as entry barriers or scale and scope economies to explain why some firms get ahead. More ...Missing: specialized | Show results with:specialized
[25]
Coca-Cola CEO: Innovation is serving as a 'competitive advantage'
Feb 13, 2024 · The Coca-Cola Company's innovation across its products, packaging and processes is affording it a “competitive advantage” and driving profit growth, CEO James ...
[26]
Coca-Cola's Global Dominance - Decoding the Beverage Giant's ...
Apr 19, 2024 · This case study takes a deep dive into Coca-Cola business strategy across dimensions like functional and corporate strategy, marketing, innovation, revenue ...
[27]
The Coca-Cola Company is always innovating and exploring the ...
May 9, 2024 · Our test-learn-scale approach to innovation includes exploring new ways to engage consumers through our marketing. We create authentic, ...
[28]
Return on Invested Capital and Competitive Advantage - AnalystPrep
Jul 9, 2021 · Sustainably high ROIC is a sign of competitive advantage. To increase ROIC, a company must either increase earnings, reduce invested capital, or ...
[29]
The ten rules of growth - McKinsey
Aug 12, 2022 · Put competitive advantage first. A high return on invested capital (ROIC) indicates a business model powered by a competitive advantage.Ten Rules Of Value-Creating... · Go Global If You Can Beat... · Acquire Programmatically
[30]
How do financial analysts interpret industrial firms' corporate ...
This study investigates how analysts perceive the effect of corporate refocusing announcements on UK industrial firms' future earnings by examining ...
[31]
The 3 Pillars of Corporate Sustainability - Investopedia
Corporate sustainability is an approach to conducting business that creates sustainable, long-term shareholder, employee, consumer, and societal value.<|separator|>
[32]
Unlocking the Power of ESG Sustainability for Business Success
Aug 21, 2023 · ESG can promote sustainable business practices while mitigating long-term risks. As a result, investors can achieve more favorable outcomes ...
[33]
The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior ...
Porter, M. E. The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. NY: Free Press, 1985. (Republished with a new introduction, 1998.).
[34]
What Is a Value Chain Analysis? 3 Steps - HBS Online
Dec 3, 2020 · Value chain analysis is a means of evaluating each of the activities in a company's value chain to understand where opportunities for improvement lie.
[35]
Value Chain: Definition, Model, Analysis, and Example - Investopedia
What Are the Steps to Value Chain Analysis? · Identify primary and secondary value chain activities. · Determine the values and costs of those activities.
[36]
Contribution Margin Explained: Definition and Calculation Guide
Discover how to calculate contribution margin, a key profitability metric, by subtracting variable costs from sales revenue. Learn how it impacts businessMissing: concentration core
[37]
How To Measure Revenue Diversification KPIs
Mar 19, 2025 · Key metrics include Revenue Concentration Index (RCI), Revenue Stream Count, Growth Rate per Stream, and Customer Segment Distribution. RCI is ...<|separator|>
[38]
Why Stakeholder Surveys Are Important [Plus Example Questions]
Jun 5, 2025 · A stakeholder survey is a questionnaire used by public affairs professionals to understand the interests and relationships of stakeholders.
[39]
Using skill gap assessments to help future-proof your organization
May 23, 2022 · With these insights in hand, host workshops to align stakeholders on the most important skills and draft a skills taxonomy (exhibit 1). Seeking ...Missing: core activities
[40]
6 Tools Every Business Consultant Should Know
Jan 1, 2012 · Benchmarking is the process of comparing your company metrics to the metrics of your industry competitors or to those of innovative companies ...
[41]
Why does Amazon Succeed? Core Competencies! - LBL Strategies
Jan 29, 2021 · Amazon's core competencies are centered on providing a premier customer experience via fast delivery, superior customer service and access to a wide range of ...
[42]
[PDF] The Rise of the Corporate Citizen: Nike's Evolving Supply Chain
In the early 1980s, however, Nike transferred all of its production to developing Asian countries, in particular to Taiwan and Korea, where government ...
[43]
Nike's approach to outsourcing
Oct 14, 2021 · Nike has no manufacturing plants of its own but chooses to outsource the work to contractors in the Philippines, Vietnam, China, Indonesia, and Taiwan.
[44]
Core vs. Innovation: Budget Allocation Guide - Lucid.Now
Sep 22, 2025 · A flexible budget split can also make a difference. For example, allocating 70–80% of resources to operations, 15–20% to growth, and 5–10% to ...
[45]
Zero-based budgeting: Zero or hero? | Deloitte | Strategy & Operations
Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) is a budgeting process that allocates funding based on program efficiency and necessity rather than budget history.Missing: 70-80% | Show results with:70-80%
[46]
40+ Manufacturing KPIs & Metrics for 2025 - insightsoftware
Jul 25, 2025 · Our guide takes you through the 40 most important manufacturing KPIs & metrics, how they are calculated, and how you can streamline your ...
[47]
Cycle Time: The metric all businesses should use to drive ... - Celonis
Cycle time: What it is, how it's calculated and how process mining can improve cycle time to help business boost productivity and capture hidden value.
[48]
Cycle Time Reduction - KPI Depot
Sep 17, 2025 · Cycle Time Reduction is a critical KPI that measures the efficiency of processes, directly impacting operational efficiency and financial health ...
[49]
What Is Corporate Restructuring? Process, Examples & More - Prosci
Oct 17, 2025 · Define the main objectives for business restructuring or your reason for change. Examples include reducing debt, cutting operating costs, or ...
[50]
7 Key Organizational Restructuring Strategies for Success - KanBo
It involves reorganizing the internal hierarchy, redefining job roles, merging or divesting business units, and altering core workflows to improve performance ...Why This Matters · Key Benefits · Challenges To Watch For
[51]
The Art of Capital Allocation | BCG
Nov 2, 2023 · A business potential-based approach to capital budgeting helped IBM, for example, reorient its portfolio from hardware to cloud-based services.Missing: majority competencies
[52]
Three Strategy Lessons from GE's Decline | Chicago Booth Review
Aug 14, 2019 · This new strategy has exposed the weaknesses of the traditional buy-and-hold mentality that saw GE cling to divisions that were more of a ...
[53]
The Rise and Fall of General Electric (GE) - Investopedia
Apr 28, 2024 · Jack Welch transformed GE into a diversified stock market winner while, critics said, instilling a focus on short-term performance and financial ...Missing: refocus pitfalls
[54]
(PDF) A Case Study of "KODAK: Failure to Embrace Digital Innovation"
Mar 30, 2025 · Despite developing digital camera, this company was reluctant to adopt and pursue digital innovation because of fears of damaging its profitable business film.Missing: underinvestment | Show results with:underinvestment<|separator|>
[55]
A Comparative Case Study of Nokia and Kodak - ResearchGate
Sep 10, 2025 · Kodak has experienced a nearly 80% decline in its workforce, loss of market share, a tumbling stock price, and significant internal turmoil ...
[56]
How Inefficient Processes Are Hurting Your Company - Entrepreneur
Dec 8, 2016 · According to market research firm IDC, companies lose 20 to 30 percent in revenue every year due to inefficiencies. ... inefficient or siloed ...
[57]
[PDF] Exploring divestitures: Studies on motivation factors and tools
Apr 14, 2024 · inefficient assets or non-core businesses, leading to inefficiencies and resistance to divestiture. In addition, SOEs may lack market ...
[58]
Netflix's history: From DVD rentals to streaming success - BBC
Jan 23, 2018 · From 700,000 Netflix subscribers in 2002 to 3.6m in 2005, there was clearly a demand for DVD rental. Two years later, in 2007, America saw the ...
[59]
Case Study: Netflix's Transition from DVD Rental to Streaming
Nov 24, 2024 · Netflix transitioned from a DVD rental service to a streaming platform, launching a hybrid model in 2007, and later shifting to streaming-only, ...Background · Phase 1: Recognizing the Shift... · Phase 2: Launching the...
[60]
GM to go all-electric by 2035, phase out gas and diesel engines
Jan 28, 2021 · General Motors plans to completely phase out vehicles using internal combustion engines by 2035.
[61]
Why the automotive future is electric - McKinsey
Sep 7, 2021 · New regulatory targets in the European Union and the United States now aim for an EV share of at least 50 percent by 2030, and several countries ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[62]
The Competitive Advantage of Nations - Harvard Business Review
“The Competitive Advantage of Nations” reports on Porter's four-year, 10-nation study of more National prosperity is created, not inherited.
[63]
Globalization: A Brief Overview - International Monetary Fund
May 30, 2008 · International Trade A core element of globalization is the expansion of world trade through the elimination or reduction of trade barriers, ...
[64]
50% of Firms to Shift to AI by 2030, WEF Warns of Digital Risks
Jan 31, 2025 · Half of employers plan to reorient their business around AI, two-thirds aim to hire AI-specific talent, while 40% anticipate workforce reductions in ...
[65]
2030's Tech Revolution: Reshaping Business for a New Decade
Dec 4, 2024 · By 2030, sustainability will have evolved from a compliance issue to a core business value and a key driver of innovation and competitive ...