Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Category

A category, derived from the Greek katēgoria signifying "statement" or "accusation", denotes in philosophy a supreme genus or fundamental mode of predication by which attributes are asserted of subjects, as systematized by Aristotle in his treatise Categories.^[1] Aristotle identifies ten such categories—substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, state, action, and passion—serving as irreducible classes for classifying beings and avoiding equivocation in discourse.^[2] This framework underpins ontological analysis by distinguishing primary substances (individual entities like "this man") from accidents (non-essential attributes), influencing subsequent metaphysics from medieval scholasticism to modern analytic philosophy. In mathematics, category theory reframes these classificatory principles abstractly, defining a category as a collection of objects connected by morphisms (structure-preserving maps) obeying axioms of composition, identity, and associativity, thereby unifying diverse fields like algebra, topology, and logic since its inception in the 1940s.^[3] While philosophical categories emphasize causal essences and empirical distinctions in reality, mathematical categories prioritize relational structures, highlighting a tension between substantive being and formal abstraction in truth-seeking inquiry.

Etymology and Historical Development

Ancient Origins

The term category originates from the Ancient Greek katēgoría, derived from katēgoreîn meaning "to speak against" or "to accuse," reflecting its initial forensic usage in public assemblies or courts for asserting charges. Aristotle adapted this notion around 350 BCE in his logical treatise Categories, transforming it into a philosophical concept denoting the highest genera or fundamental predicates by which substances are described and reality structured.^[4] He enumerated ten such categories—substance (ousia), quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, state or condition, action, and affection (passion)—as irreducible ways predicates apply to subjects, emphasizing empirical distinctions over mythical or poetic explanations of being.^[5] This classification aimed to clarify logical predication, preventing equivocation by grouping terms that signify similar ontological roles, such as "two feet long" under quantity rather than substance.^[6] Aristotle's categories functioned as a foundational schema in metaphysics and logic, privileging observable attributes and causal relations inherent in entities over speculative hierarchies, thereby enabling systematic analysis of change, essence, and predication in works like Physics and Metaphysics.^[5] Unlike Platonic forms, which posited transcendent ideals, Aristotle's approach rooted categories in concrete particulars, treating substance as primary (e.g., individual humans or horses) with accidents inhering in it, a distinction that underscored his hylomorphic theory of matter and form.^[5] The framework's transmission to Roman and early post-Hellenistic thought occurred via Neoplatonist intermediaries, notably Porphyry's Isagoge (Introduction), composed circa 268–270 CE as a preface to Aristotle's Categories.^[7] Porphyry clarified predicables like genus, species, difference, property, and accident, bridging Aristotelian logic with Platonic universals while deferring deeper metaphysical questions (e.g., whether genera exist separately or in sensibles) to foster dialectical rigor.^[7] This text influenced Latin adaptations, including Marius Victorinus's 4th-century CE translations, embedding categories in Roman rhetorical and philosophical education as tools for categorizing virtues, rhetorical figures, and natural kinds.^[8]

Medieval and Early Modern Evolution

In the thirteenth century, medieval scholastics, particularly Thomas Aquinas, adapted Aristotelian categories to Christian metaphysics by affirming the reality of essences as intrinsic principles that causally determine the natures and behaviors of substances, countering nominalist tendencies that reduced universals to mere linguistic conventions.^[9] Aquinas retained Aristotle's ten categories—substance, quantity, relation, quality, and others—as frameworks for predication but subordinated them to the distinction between essence (what a thing is) and existence (its act of being), arguing that created beings participate in divine being while possessing real, form-based essences that explain their causal powers and classifications.^[10] This realist synthesis emphasized that categories reflect objective structures in reality, grounded in efficient and formal causes rather than arbitrary names, thereby supporting theological claims about God's creation of ordered kinds.^[11] Nominalist critiques, emerging in the late medieval period with figures like William of Ockham, challenged this by denying real universals and prioritizing observable individuals, but scholastics like Aquinas defended causal realism by insisting that essences enable predictive knowledge of natural operations, such as a thing's capacity to act according to its form.^[12] This approach influenced early scientific thought by linking classifications to verifiable causal regularities, prefiguring empirical methods while rejecting purely verbal groupings. The early modern period witnessed a pivot away from scholastic essences toward mechanistic categories, as exemplified by René Descartes in the seventeenth century, who dismissed substantial forms as explanatory fictions and proposed instead a ontology of extended matter in motion, categorized by size, shape, and local motion as the primary causes of phenomena.^[13] In works like Principles of Philosophy (1644), Descartes argued that natural changes arise from contact and efficient causation among corpuscles, rendering teleological or formal causes superfluous and aligning classifications with mathematically describable mechanisms observable via reason.^[14] This rejection preserved causal realism but redirected it toward reductive, non-qualitative explanations, influencing the mechanistic worldview that prioritized empirical verifiability over metaphysical substances. John Locke, in An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), furthered nominalist inclinations by distinguishing real essences—the unknown internal constitutions causing observed properties—from nominal essences, which are human-made abstract ideas used to classify sorts based on resemblances in secondary qualities.^[15] While acknowledging that real essences exist and ground causal powers, Locke contended that practical categorization relies on nominal groupings derived from sensory experience, serving as precursors to later constructivist epistemologies yet tempered by commitments to discovering approximate natural kinds through empirical sorting.^[16] This empiricist nominalism critiqued scholastic overreach but maintained that effective categories must track causal realities, albeit indirectly via observable patterns rather than innate or a priori forms.

19th-20th Century Shifts

In the early 19th century, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel reconceived categories as inherently dialectical processes in his Science of Logic (1812–1816), where concepts such as being, nothingness, and becoming unfold through internal contradictions, progressing from abstract immediacy to concrete universality via thesis-antithesis-synthesis dynamics.^[17] This framework positioned categories not as static classifications but as stages in the self-development of absolute spirit, prioritizing logical immanence over empirical contingencies.^[18] Critics, including Ludwig Feuerbach in his 1839 Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy, contended that such idealism subordinates observable reality to speculative reason, rendering the empirical world a mere projection of thought detached from causal verification.^[19] By the late 19th century, Charles Sanders Peirce shifted toward a pragmatic ontology of categories, delineating three irreducible elements—firstness (monadic qualities or possibilities), secondness (dyadic reactions or brute facts), and thirdness (triadic laws or habits)—as foundational to experience and inference.^[20] These categories intertwined with Peirce's semiotics, where signs mediate inquiry by linking interpretants to objects through testable consequences, emphasizing fallible experimentation over a priori deduction.^[21] Unlike Hegel's totalizing dialectics, Peirce's approach favored hypotheses grounded in observable patterns and community-based validation, aligning categories with scientific realism amid evolving empirical methods.^[22] The 20th-century analytic tradition marked a turn to descriptive metaphysics, exemplified by P.F. Strawson's Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics (1959), which analyzed basic categories like particulars (spatio-temporal individuals) and universals as constitutive of ordinary thought's structure, without revising them to fit theoretical ideals.^[23] Strawson contrasted this with revisionary metaphysics, including idealist constructs, advocating instead for elucidating pre-analytic commitments to entities like material bodies and persons, thereby sustaining causal realist commitments against pure constructivism.^[24] These developments underscored ongoing tensions between dynamic conceptual evolution and empirical anchoring, paving pathways for subsequent formalizations while resisting unsubstantiated abstraction.^[25]

General and Everyday Uses

Classification in Daily Life

People routinely classify objects and experiences in everyday activities to navigate their surroundings efficiently, often by grouping based on shared attributes or functions that correlate with predictable outcomes. For example, sorting laundry by color prevents dye bleeding during washing, while separating perishable foods like dairy from non-perishables in storage minimizes spoilage risks through empirical observation of decay patterns.^[26] These intuitive classifications prioritize causal regularities—such as material properties influencing durability—over arbitrary or fluid labels, enabling practical adaptations like tool organization by task (e.g., cutting implements versus measuring devices) that enhance productivity without formal analysis.^[27] Such categorization underpins survival-oriented decision-making by allowing rapid pattern recognition amid uncertainty. In assessing threats, individuals categorize stimuli into risk classes, such as distinguishing fast-moving shadows as potential predators based on motion and size correlations, which historically favored those who responded to empirically reliable danger signals over speculative interpretations.^[28] This process favors hierarchical structures where superordinate categories (e.g., "edible") branch into subordinates (e.g., "fruits" versus "vegetables"), balancing informational economy with predictive accuracy to inform choices like foraging or evasion, as evidenced by faster reaction times to prototypical exemplars in controlled tasks.^[29] Empirical research in cognitive psychology reveals these folk categories as fuzzy yet structured around prototypes, with central members evoking quicker identifications than marginal ones. Eleanor Rosch's 1973 experiments on natural categories demonstrated that participants judged similarity and membership via family resemblances—overlapping features rather than strict definitions—with basic-level terms like "chair" outperforming global or subordinate labels in naming speed and cuing efficiency across 4,000+ object instances.^[30] Follow-up 1975 studies confirmed hierarchical organization, where superordinate categories (e.g., "furniture") showed less internal coherence than basic levels, supported by verification times and feature-listing data from diverse participants, underscoring categorization's reliance on perceptual and functional correlations for everyday reliability.^[31]^[29]

Organizational Systems

The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), devised by Melvil Dewey and first published in 1876, employs a hierarchical structure of ten main classes subdivided decimally to organize library collections by subject matter, enabling efficient information retrieval through numerical call numbers that reflect disciplinary relationships.^[32] Similarly, the Library of Congress Classification (LCC), initiated in 1897 with its first outline released in 1904, uses an alphanumeric scheme with 21 broad classes to catalog materials, prioritizing adaptability for expanding scholarly domains while maintaining subject-based hierarchies for systematic access.^[33] These systems underscore categorization's role in knowledge management by imposing logical, predefined structures that reduce ambiguity in locating resources, contrasting with ad hoc arrangements.^[34] Linnaean taxonomy, formalized by Carl Linnaeus in the tenth edition of Systema Naturae in 1758, exemplifies non-arbitrary organizational principles through nested hierarchies (kingdom, class, order, genus, species) grounded in observable shared traits, such as morphology, to group organisms without reliance on subjective whim.^[35] This approach influenced subsequent taxonomies by emphasizing empirical resemblances as proxies for underlying causal affinities, providing a scalable model for databases beyond biology, where categories derive stability from trait-based clustering rather than consensus alone.^[36] In contemporary extensions, folksonomies—user-generated tagging systems popularized in the mid-2000s via platforms like Delicious—involve collaborative, bottom-up labeling of content, offering flexibility for diverse contexts but inviting criticism for inconsistencies, polysemy, and over-relativism, as tags often lack enforced relations or causal grounding, potentially degrading retrieval precision in large-scale information systems.^[37] Ontologies, by contrast, formalize categories as interconnected schemas with explicit classes, properties, and axioms (e.g., in OWL for the semantic web), supporting automated inference and interoperability while anchoring descriptions to domain-specific realities, thus mitigating the fragmentation seen in purely user-driven tags.^[38] This tension highlights categorization's trade-off between adaptability and reliability, with structured ontologies preserving utility for causal-realist retrieval over folksonomic pluralism.^[39]

Philosophical Conceptions

Aristotelian Framework

Aristotle's Categories establishes a foundational ontological schema by enumerating ten irreducible predicates that exhaustively classify what can be truly asserted about entities without linguistic combination. These categories—substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, state (or having), action, and passion (or being affected)—derive from an analysis of simple expressions signifying being, serving as the highest genera for predication.^[5]^[40] Substance holds primacy as the underlying subject incapable of inhering in another, while the remaining nine function as accidents that inhere in substances, dependent for their existence.^[5]^[41] This framework embodies ontological realism by positing that the categories delineate the actual modes of existence and predication in reality, rather than mere linguistic conventions, thereby providing a structure for discerning essential natures amid change.^[5] Substances, as primary bearers, persist through alterations in their accidents, which facilitates causal explanations of transformation: a substance retains identity while qualities or relations vary.^[42] For instance, the continuity of a material object amid positional or qualitative shifts underscores substance's role in unifying diverse predicates.^[5] Aristotle grounds this classification in empirical observation of the world, integrating sensory data into categorical distinctions. Observations of natural phenomena, such as the innate downward locomotion of earth toward the center and upward motion of fire, exemplify predicates under categories like place and action, revealing teleological tendencies inherent in bodies.^[43]^[44] These patterns inform a realist ontology where categories align with observable causal regularities, prioritizing substances as the loci of such processes over abstract universals.^[45]

Kantian and Post-Kantian Views

Immanuel Kant, in his Critique of Pure Reason published in 1781, argued that the mind structures sensory data through a set of 12 a priori categories of understanding, which are not derived from experience but imposed by the faculty of understanding to make synthetic judgments possible. These categories are organized into four headings: quantity (unity, plurality, and totality), quality (reality, negation, and limitation), relation (inherence and subsistence, causality and dependence, and community), and modality (possibility–impossibility, existence–nonexistence, and necessity–contingency).^[4] ^[46] Kant maintained that these pure concepts provide the necessary conditions for objective experience, enabling the phenomenal world to appear as ordered and law-governed, while the noumenal realm—things-in-themselves—remains unknowable beyond these subjective forms.^[47] This framework privileges the mind's constructive role over empirical derivation, positing categories as transcendental conditions rather than reflections of independent reality. Post-Kantian German idealists extended this subjective constitution by emphasizing active self-positing. Johann Gottlieb Fichte, in works like the Wissenschaftslehre of 1794, radicalized Kant's categories into an absolute I that posits itself and its non-I (the world) through practical self-determination, deriving relational structures like causality from the ego's free activity rather than static logical forms.^[48] Fichte critiqued Kant for insufficiently grounding categories in the subject's moral autonomy, arguing that theoretical reason alone fails to explain their necessity without the I's self-legislation.^[49] This shift intensifies the mind-dependence of categories, treating them as products of dialectical opposition within consciousness, which has drawn criticism for subordinating external causal mechanisms—such as verifiable physical interactions—to introspective acts, potentially undermining empirical accountability.^[48] Neo-Kantian developments, particularly Ernst Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms (1923–1929), reframed categories as dynamic symbolic functions mediating human culture and science. Cassirer posited that diverse forms—language, myth, religion, and art—embody Kantian invariants, transforming raw intuition into meaningful configurations while preserving a priori universality across symbolic systems.^[50] Unlike Fichte's solipsistic emphasis, Cassirer's approach integrates subjective constitution with objective scientific invariants, such as mathematical and physical laws, but links categories to cultural relativities, suggesting their application varies by symbolic domain yet rests on cognitive universals.^[51] This evolution maintains the a priori shaping of experience but contrasts with realist ontologies, which derive categories from mind-independent causal structures rather than anthropocentric impositions.^[4]

Essentialism, Realism, and Anti-Realist Critiques

Essentialism posits that categories correspond to mind-independent real essences—underlying causal structures that unify members and explain their shared properties—distinct from nominal essences, which are merely human-constructed abstract ideas for classification. John Locke articulated this distinction, arguing that real essences constitute the internal microstructure responsible for observable qualities, while nominal essences serve practical sorting but often obscure the former due to human epistemic limits.^[52]^[53] Empirical support for essentialism emerges from natural kind theories, where observed property clustering, as in homeostatic property cluster (HPC) accounts, arises from shared causal mechanisms rather than arbitrary impositions, enabling reliable inductive generalizations.^[54]^[55] Realist conceptions, echoing Aristotelian frameworks, maintain that categories carve the world at its causal joints, reflecting objective divisions grounded in essences that support counterfactual predictions and explanatory unification.^[56] Anti-realist critiques, such as Willard Van Orman Quine's ontological relativity from the 1960s, challenge this by asserting that category commitments are theory-relative, with no absolute ontology independent of a conceptual scheme's variables and translations, rendering essences inscrutable.^[57] However, Quine's position faces rebuttals for inconsistency with empirical physics, where rigid categories yield precise predictions unattainable under relativistic flux, as predictive success correlates with partial truth approximation in mature theories.^[58]^[59] In applied domains like identity categories, social constructivism—often normalized in academic discourse despite systemic biases favoring interpretive over causal explanations—insists on fluid, observer-dependent boundaries, dismissing biological clustering as illusory.^[60] Yet, causal realism prevails through evidence of heritable trait clusters with predictive validity in health and behavior, where denying mind-independent structures undermines inductive reliability, as rigid essentialist categories outperform constructivist alternatives in forecasting outcomes.^[61] This prioritization of causal data over constructivist denial aligns with first-principles inference from observed regularities, critiquing overly relativistic views for eroding empirical accountability.^[60]

Mathematical Formalizations

Foundations of Category Theory

Category theory originated in 1945 with the collaboration of mathematicians Samuel Eilenberg and Saunders Mac Lane, who developed it to provide a rigorous framework for functors and natural transformations arising in algebraic topology.^[62] Their paper, "General Theory of Natural Equivalences," published in the Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, abstracted diverse mathematical structures—such as groups, topological spaces, and rings—into a common ontology of objects (representing these structures) and morphisms (arrows denoting structure-preserving maps between them).^[62] This approach emphasized relational properties over elemental decompositions, marking a departure from the element-centric perspective dominant in set theory. Formally, a category is defined by a collection of objects Ob(C) and, for each ordered pair of objects A and B, a set Hom_C(A, B) of morphisms from A to B, together with a composition operation satisfying associativity—(f ∘ g) ∘ h = f ∘ (g ∘ h)—and the existence of identity morphisms id_A such that id_A ∘ f = f = f ∘ id_A for any morphism f with appropriate domain and codomain.^[62] ^[63] To address size-related paradoxes analogous to those in naive set theory, such as the potential for a category to contain itself as an object leading to inconsistencies, categories are classified as small if both the class of objects and the collection of all morphisms form sets, or large otherwise, where objects or morphisms may constitute proper classes.^[64] This foundational setup positions category theory as an alternative to set-theoretic foundations, prioritizing morphisms as the primary primitives to capture invariant structural features across mathematical domains, rather than reducing all entities to sets and their elements via membership relations.^[63] By focusing on arrows and their compositions, it enables the study of universal constructions and equivalences independently of specific set-based implementations, though it typically presupposes some underlying set-like theory for its own articulation.^[64]

Core Structures and Abstractions

In category theory, the primitive structures revolve around categories, defined as consisting of a collection of objects, a collection of morphisms (arrows) between objects, composition of compatible morphisms that is associative, and identity morphisms for each object. Morphisms, denoted f: A \to B, encode relational mappings or transformations between objects A and B, with composition g \circ f for g: B \to C satisfying (h \circ g) \circ f = h \circ (g \circ f).^[65] These elements form the foundational abstraction for reasoning about structures via arrows rather than internal properties of objects.^[66] Building on categories, functors provide mappings F: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} between categories that preserve objects, morphisms, composition, and identities, thus translating structure holistically. Natural transformations \eta: F \Rightarrow G between parallel functors F, G: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} consist of components \eta_C: F(C) \to G(C) for each object C, satisfying commutativity \eta_D \circ F(f) = G(f) \circ \eta_C for morphisms f: C \to D, ensuring coherence across the category. Universality emerges through limits and colimits, where a limit (e.g., product or equalizer) is an object L with projections such that any other object mapping compatibly to the diagram factors uniquely through L, and dually for colimits (e.g., coproduct or coequalizer). These constructions define objects up to isomorphism via mapping properties, emphasizing relational uniqueness over explicit construction.^[65]^[67] Specialized categories include monoidal categories, which augment a category with a bifunctor \otimes: \mathcal{C} \times \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C}, a unit object I, and natural isomorphisms for associativity (\alpha_{A,B,C}: (A \otimes B) \otimes C \to A \otimes (B \otimes C)) and unit laws, enabling tensor-like operations with coherence. Abelian categories refine additive categories (where Hom-sets are abelian groups and biproducts exist) by requiring every monomorphism as a kernel, every epimorphism as a cokernel, and that every morphism factors as image followed by coimage, facilitating exact sequences and homological computations. Adjunctions pair functors F: \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D}, G: \mathcal{D} \to \mathcal{C} as left and right adjoints F \dashv G, characterized by a natural bijection \mathrm{Hom}_\mathcal{D}(F(C), D) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_\mathcal{C}(C, G(D)), with unit \eta: 1_\mathcal{C} \to G F and counit \epsilon: F G \to 1_\mathcal{D} satisfying triangle identities; they model dualities like free-forgetful, where F generates "free" structures adjoint to G's restriction.^[65]^[68] Higher categories, or n-categories, extend this framework iteratively: a 2-category has objects, 1-morphisms (categories), and 2-morphisms (functors between them), with horizontal and vertical compositions, while strict n-categories enforce associativity and interchange strictly, though weak versions relax to equivalences for coherence. These structures support abstractions over abstractions, with k-morphisms as (k-1)-categories, enabling modeling of hierarchies in composition and transformation. Models like Segal categories approximate weak n-categories via simplicial spaces satisfying Segal conditions for composition, facilitating homotopy-theoretic interpretations.^[69]^[70]

Applications Across Mathematics

Category theory unifies diverse mathematical fields by emphasizing morphisms and universal properties over individual elements, facilitating abstractions that reveal structural similarities. In topology, it underpins homotopy theory by categorifying spaces and continuous maps, enabling the study of deformations through functors and natural transformations that preserve homotopical invariants, such as in model categories where weak equivalences model homotopy equivalences.^[71]^[72] In algebra, representable functors—those naturally isomorphic to hom-functors Hom(C, -)—encode universal properties via the Yoneda lemma, allowing algebraic structures like groups or rings to be characterized by their actions on other objects rather than internal operations alone.^[73]^[74] Grothendieck's introduction of topos theory in the early 1960s generalized sheaf theory from algebraic geometry to a framework where categories behave like generalized spaces, supporting internal logic akin to intuitionistic set theory and bridging geometry with proof theory.^[75] This abstraction unifies disparate areas by providing sites for cohomology computations and logical interpretations, where subobject classifiers model truth values beyond classical booleans. Developments in ∞-categories since the 2010s extend these ideas to higher-dimensional homotopy, incorporating coherences of higher morphisms to link stable homotopy theory with derived algebraic geometry.^[76] Homotopy type theory (HoTT), formalized in a 2013 monograph, interprets types as spaces and identities as paths, enabling machine-checked proofs in assistants like Coq and Agda by functorially mapping constructive type theory to homotopy invariants.^[77]^[78] In dynamical systems, functorial semantics outperform element-wise descriptions by preserving relational structures across state transitions, as in categories of flows where objects are systems and morphisms are conjugacies, simplifying analysis of chaos and ergodicity in complex regimes.^[79]^[80] This approach reveals causal invariances, such as entropy preservation, that set-based views obscure under high dimensionality.

Criticisms and Philosophical Implications

Critics of category theory contend that its emphasis on abstraction often impedes practical computations in domains requiring explicit element-wise manipulations, such as real analysis, where set theory enables direct handling of sequences, limits, and measures without the indirection of functors and natural transformations. For example, analysts have historically favored Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZFC) for its concrete foundational apparatus, viewing categorical formulations as overly general and detached from the specific pathologies of infinite sets and convergence that demand tailored proofs rather than universal diagrams. This preference persists into the 2010s, with discussions noting that category theory's "abstract nonsense" can obscure algorithmic details essential for numerical implementation or rigorous error bounds in applied contexts.^[81]^[82] A related limitation arises from category theory's frequent reliance on non-constructive existence proofs, which assert the presence of limits, colimits, or adjoints without specifying constructions, thereby restricting its utility in constructive mathematics or computability theory where explicit algorithms are paramount. Such proofs, often derived via Yoneda lemma embeddings or adjoint functor theorems, leverage impredicative definitions that presuppose global properties of the category, contrasting with set theory's capacity for explicit enumerations or inductive builds even under axioms like choice. This non-constructivity has drawn scrutiny in foundational debates, as it aligns category theory more with classical logic than intuitionistic variants, potentially undermining claims of universality in proof automation or type theory applications.^[83]^[67] Ontologically, category theory sparks debate over its status relative to set theory: proponents like F. William Lawvere argued in his 1964 dissertation and subsequent Elementary Theory of the Category of Sets (ETCS) that categories could supplant sets as mathematics' foundation by prioritizing morphisms over elements, treating sets as discrete categories with identities and thus capturing structural essence without primitive membership. Critics counter that categories remain parasitic on set-theoretic ontology, as objects typically require set-like indexing for coherence, and attempts to axiomatize pure categories (e.g., via structural set theories) either regress to set-like primitives or fail to recover full ZFC expressivity, such as impredicative comprehension or well-ordering. This tension underscores a philosophical shift toward relational realism—privileging invariant relations over intrinsic properties—but highlights category theory's dependence on ambient set-theoretic assumptions for small/large category distinctions.^[84]^[85]^[86] Philosophically, while category theory debunks naive platonism by reframing mathematics as invariant-preserving transformations across structures, it invites skepticism toward hyperbolic claims of universality, as structural focus falters in domains like Diophantine number theory where arithmetic specifics (e.g., prime distributions) resist pure categorical abstraction without ad hoc embeddings. Empirical evidence from theorem-proving systems shows categorical methods excelling in algebraic generality but yielding to set-based tactics for elementary proofs, suggesting limits to its foundational ambitions rather than a panacea for mathematical discourse. This realism tempers ontological enthusiasm, positioning categories as a powerful meta-language for unification yet subordinate to concrete theories in causal, detail-oriented inquiries.^[87]^[88]

Scientific Categorizations

Natural Kinds in Empirical Inquiry

Natural kinds in empirical inquiry refer to groupings of entities that exhibit stable, projectible properties enabling reliable inductive generalizations and law-like predictions, grounded in underlying causal structures rather than arbitrary human conventions. John Stuart Mill, in his 1843 A System of Logic, distinguished real kinds—those reflecting objective connections in nature—from merely nominal classifications, arguing that the former support strong inductive inferences because properties within them covary due to causal necessities rather than chance or artificial boundaries.^[89] This view posits natural kinds as discoverable clusters where membership correlates with shared causal powers, allowing scientists to extrapolate observed regularities to unobserved cases.^[90] Ian Hacking, building on this tradition in works from the 1990s, refined natural kinds as "projectible classes" that facilitate scientific stability and generalization, emphasizing their role in enabling predictions that hold across contexts without constant revision.^[91] Richard Boyd's homeostatic property cluster (HPC) theory, developed in the 1990s, further elaborates this by proposing that natural kinds are defined by clusters of properties whose co-occurrence is sustained by causal homeostatic mechanisms, which need not be uniform or essential but produce approximate boundaries conducive to empirical reliability.^[92] These mechanisms ensure that kinds like chemical elements demonstrate predictive success, as seen in the periodic table's ability to forecast undiscovered elements' properties based on atomic number and valence electrons, validating the clusters' causal grounding.^[93] Empirical inquiry prioritizes such data-driven delineations over constructivist approaches that dissolve fixed kinds into relativistic impositions. Paul Feyerabend's epistemological anarchism, articulated in Against Method (1975) and later metaphysical pluralism, rejects rigid natural kinds in favor of proliferating traditions and constructs, arguing that scientific progress thrives without universal categories or realist commitments to objective boundaries.^[94] This stance undermines projectibility by prioritizing contextual multiplicity, yet it falters against evidence from predictive validations, where causal homeostasis in kinds yields falsifiable laws rather than ad hoc accommodations.^[95] Thus, natural kinds remain anchored in verifiable causal realism, privileging boundaries that withstand empirical testing over those derived from theoretical fiat.

Categories in Physics and Biology

In physics, fundamental categories of matter particles are structured by the Standard Model, which organizes quarks and leptons into three generations of fermions, alongside gauge bosons mediating interactions.^[96] This framework emerged in the 1970s, building on quark models from the 1960s and electroweak unification verified experimentally, enabling precise predictions of particle decays and scattering processes.^[97] Reductionist in nature, it reduces diverse phenomena to interactions among a limited set of elementary entities, with empirical validation through accelerators like those at CERN confirming categories such as up/down quarks (first generation) and their heavier counterparts.^[98] Spacetime categories in general relativity, published by Einstein on November 25, 1915, conceptualize the universe as a dynamic four-dimensional pseudo-Riemannian manifold where geometry encodes gravitational causation.^[99] Events and worldlines form the basic ontological units, with curvature tensors distinguishing inertial from accelerated frames, underpinning predictions like black hole horizons and gravitational waves detected in 2015.^[100] More exotic quantum categories, such as anyons, introduce emergent statistics in two-dimensional systems, obeying fractional exchange phases intermediate between bosons and fermions, as theorized by Wilczek in 1982 for fractional quantum Hall effects.^[101] In biology, species categories function as natural kinds via Ernst Mayr's 1942 biological species concept, delimiting populations by actual or potential interbreeding and reproductive isolation, prioritizing causal reproductive barriers over mere morphological similarity.^[102] Cladistics, formalized by Willi Hennig in 1950, refines these by insisting on monophyletic clades—groups sharing a common ancestor and all descendants—using synapomorphies to trace phylogenetic branching, thus favoring ancestry-based hierarchies over phenetic clustering prone to convergence.^[103] Genomic analyses sustain such categories through sequence clustering, where algorithms identify distinct genetic clusters corresponding to species despite polymorphism and hybridization, as evidenced in multilocus datasets resolving boundaries in taxa like birds and insects.^[104] This approach highlights emergent biological individuality arising from genetic cohesion, even as reduction to molecular variation reveals continuous traits.^[105]

Debates on Causal Structure and Reductionism

In the philosophy of science, debates on causal structure and reductionism center on whether higher-level scientific categories possess objective reality grounded in underlying physical mechanisms or merely serve instrumental roles in prediction. Reductionists argue that categories such as chemical kinds are causally anchored in microphysical properties, enabling explanatory unification across levels of description. For instance, Hilary Putnam's 1975 analysis posits that the term "water" rigidly designates the substance whose underlying microstructure—H₂O—determines its causal powers, like solvency and liquidity, rather than superficial appearances.^[106] This view supports realism by treating categories as picking out causally homogeneous classes, where empirical laws derive from micro-causal interactions, as evidenced in successes like quantum chemistry explaining molecular behaviors.^[107] Anti-reductionist positions, prominently advanced by Jerry Fodor in 1974, invoke multiple realizability to contend that higher-level properties—such as biological functions—can be instantiated by diverse physical bases, precluding strict type-type identities with fundamental physics.^[108] This challenges reductionism by suggesting categories at emergent levels operate via autonomous causal patterns not fully derivable from lower ones, potentially rendering inter-level explanations incomplete. However, critics like Jaegwon Kim counter that multiple realizability does not entail irreducibility, as supervenience ensures higher properties depend nomologically on physical realizers; reductions can proceed via disjunctive or functional formulations, preserving causal efficacy within hierarchical structures aligned with empirical laws.^[109] Kim's supervenience-based arguments, developed in works from the 1990s onward, emphasize that without such dependency, higher-level causation risks overdetermination or epiphenomenalism, favoring realist accounts where categories reflect nested causal necessities rather than isolated abstractions.^[110] These debates underscore a commitment to causal realism over instrumentalism, which treats categories as pragmatic tools devoid of truth-tracking commitments to unobservable structures. Instrumentalist approaches, by prioritizing predictive utility without ontological depth, falter against evidence from fields where causal mechanisms—such as molecular interactions yielding macroscopic laws—enable novel predictions unachievable by higher-level heuristics alone.^[111] Relativist variants, often critiqued for embedding social or ideological priors (e.g., constructivist denials of objective kinds in environmental contexts), undermine this by subordinating empirical causal tests to normative agendas, eroding the predictive reliability of science; for example, analyses show such views correlate with weakened adherence to falsifiable models in policy-influenced domains.^[112] Empirical hierarchies in scientific practice, where categories nest via part-whole relations and obey derivable laws, bolster reductionist realism, as biological phenomena increasingly yield to microphysical explanations without invoking irreducible autonomies.^[113]

Linguistic Dimensions

Grammatical and Syntactic Categories

Grammatical categories classify words according to their syntactic roles and morphological markings, with core distinctions including nouns, which typically denote entities, and verbs, which express actions or states.^[114] These categories form the foundational units for syntactic combination, enabling phrase structure rules that generate well-formed sentences across languages.^[115] In formal terms, such categories are defined by distributional properties, such as nouns serving as arguments to verbs and verbs projecting tense projections in syntactic trees.^[116] Early systematic treatment appears in Pāṇini's Aṣṭādhyāyī, composed circa 500 BCE, which delineates categories like nāman (nouns/substantives) and kriyā (verbs), using rewrite rules to generate Sanskrit forms from roots and affixes.^[117] This framework anticipated modern generative approaches by specifying categorical oppositions, such as verbal roots inflected for person and number. Twentieth-century formalization advanced with Noam Chomsky's Syntactic Structures (1957), which posited a universal set of syntactic categories (e.g., Noun, Verb) within a transformational-generative model, where categories determine phrase structure and movement operations.^[118] Chomsky's system emphasized binary branching hierarchies, with categories like Determiner and Auxiliary enabling recursive syntax independent of semantic content.^[115] Syntactic categories extend beyond lexical classes to functional projections, such as Tense Phrase (TP) and Case Phrase (KP), which encode relational oppositions in sentence structure. Inflectional categories, marked on verbs and nouns, include tense (e.g., past vs. non-past, as in English walked vs. walks), realized through affixation or auxiliaries to indicate temporal anchoring.^[119] Case categories, such as nominative for subjects and accusative for objects, govern argument licensing via structural positions, with morphological realization in languages like Latin (e.g., puella nominative vs. puellam accusative). Number oppositions (singular vs. plural) apply to nouns, as in English -s suffixing, ensuring agreement with verbs in finite clauses. These categorical features enforce selectional restrictions, preventing illicit combinations like verbs without tense projections.^[120] Cross-linguistic typology provides empirical grounding for these categories' universality, as Joseph Greenberg's 1963 analysis of 30 languages identified 45 implicational universals, such as the correlation between verb-object order and adjective-noun order (Universal 5: if adjectives follow nouns, the language is postpositional).^[121] These patterns, derived from diverse language families, hold with few exceptions and predict syntactic behaviors, like genitive constructions following noun order (Universal 2). Such regularities, absent in arbitrary cultural constructs, indicate underlying parametric constraints on grammar variation rather than unconstrained convention, supported by database compilations showing near-universal presence of nominal and verbal categories.^[122] For instance, Greenberg's data reveal that languages lacking adpositions universally exhibit verb-final order, constraining possible syntactic architectures.^[123] This empirical distribution favors models positing innate categorical primitives, as random drift across isolates would yield greater divergence.^[124]

Lexical and Semantic Categorization

Lexical categorization partitions vocabulary into classes grounded in semantic roles, such as nouns denoting entities with referential stability tied to observable properties, rather than arbitrary conventions. Semantic categorization further structures meanings around stable references to world features, where terms like "water" or "gold" rigidly designate kinds via underlying causal mechanisms, as opposed to purely descriptive bundles that risk referential drift. This approach privileges empirical boundaries over fluid interpretations, ensuring categories align with discontinuities in causal powers, such as chemical composition enabling predictive stability.^[125] A prominent empirical illustration arises in basic color terms, where Berlin and Kay's 1969 cross-linguistic analysis of 98 languages revealed a universal hierarchy of acquisition: stage I features terms for black and white; stage II adds red; stage III incorporates either green or yellow; stage IV both; stage V blue; stage VI brown; and stage VII the remainder (purple, pink, orange, gray).^[126] This sequence, corroborated by later surveys like the World Color Survey involving 110 unwritten languages, indicates biological constraints from human cone cell sensitivities and neural processing, limiting viable categories to focal points in color space rather than infinite cultural inventions.^[127] While critiqued for overlooking dialectal variations, the pattern's predictive power across diverse societies underscores innate perceptual anchors over relativistic invention.^[128] Prototypical semantics, advanced by Eleanor Rosch in the 1970s through experiments on category structure (e.g., "bird" prototyped by robin over penguin), posits graded membership via family resemblances akin to Wittgenstein's 1953 notion of overlapping similarities without necessary or sufficient conditions.^[129] Such models capture fuzzy extensions in everyday lexicon but invite critique for vagueness, as they blur boundaries absent in empirical data; for instance, reaction times and verification judgments reveal sharper internal structures tied to core exemplars, yet fail to enforce referential precision against causal realities like distinct molecular behaviors.^[130] Truth-seeking semantics thus favors supplementing prototypes with causal grounding to mitigate indeterminacy, prioritizing categories that track verifiable discontinuities over elastic resemblances. Causal realism in lexical semantics posits that stable reference emerges from historical chains linking terms to real-world kinds, as in Saul Kripke's 1980 framework where "gold" denotes atomic number 79 via initial dubbing and transmission, immune to superficial redescription.^[131] This manifests in categories delineating causal joints, such as distinguishing "bird" from "bat": both achieve powered flight via flapping, but birds (Aves clade) exhibit discontinuities in causal history—feathered wings evolved from theropod dinosaurs, enabling efficient gliding with high-aspect-ratio structures and uncinate processes for respiratory efficiency—contrasting bats' (Chiroptera) mammalian membrane wings, which generate more turbulent wakes suited to echolocation-aided maneuvering.^[132] Empirical aerodynamics confirms bats' superior slow-speed agility via flexible wing camber, yet birds' dominance in endurance flight stems from distinct power-to-weight causal profiles, underscoring why lexical terms preserve biological essences over phenotypic convergence for predictive utility.^[133] Such alignments ensure semantic categories reflect mind-independent structures, enhancing referential fidelity.

Cognitive and Cultural Influences

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, formulated in the 1930s by linguists Edward Sapir and Benjamin Lee Whorf, posits in its strong form that language determines thought and perception, implying that speakers of different languages inhabit fundamentally distinct cognitive worlds.^[134] Empirical studies have largely refuted this deterministic version, demonstrating that core perceptual categories exhibit universality across languages and cultures, with linguistic differences exerting at most weak influences on categorization.^[134] Cross-linguistic research on color perception provides key counterevidence. Berlin and Kay's 1969 analysis of 98 languages identified 11 basic color categories—black, white, red, green, yellow, blue, brown, purple, pink, orange, and gray—following a universal evolutionary sequence, where languages add terms in a predictable order rather than arbitrarily.^[135] Focal colors, the prototypical centers of these categories (e.g., pure red or green), align consistently with human visual physiology across societies, independent of lexical variation; for instance, the World Color Survey of 110 languages confirmed that speakers map colors to these foci with high agreement, undermining claims of language-driven perceptual divergence.^[127] Prelinguistic infants as young as 4 months exhibit categorical responses to these boundaries, habituating differently to colors within versus across categories, indicating biologically grounded universals predating language acquisition.^[136] Whorf's specific claim about the Hopi language lacking temporal concepts—portraying it as "timeless" and thus fostering a non-linear worldview—has been empirically dismantled through detailed linguistic analysis. Ekkehart Malotki's 1983 monograph, drawing on extensive Hopi texts, dictionaries, and native speaker consultations, documented over 300 terms and grammatical forms for time, including tenses, aspect markers, and spatial metaphors for past and future (e.g., "qawongway" for "yesterday" and directional suffixes indicating temporal progression).^[137] This ethnographic evidence reveals Hopi temporal cognition as richly structured and comparable to Indo-European languages, attributing Whorf's interpretation to limited data and overgeneralization rather than linguistic determinism.^[137] Neuroscience reinforces these universals by linking perceptual categories to innate neural mechanisms, such as opponent-process theory in the visual cortex, where color oppositions (red-green, blue-yellow) emerge prelinguistically and constrain categorization across individuals.^[136] Cultural and linguistic variations, such as differing lexical boundaries, thus appear superficial, modulating attention weakly atop evolutionarily conserved cognitive structures shaped by causal interactions with the physical world, rather than constructing reality anew.^[138] This aligns with causal realism, prioritizing empirical patterns over constructivist accounts that overstate relativism without sufficient evidence.^[134]

Applications in Other Disciplines

Computing and Theoretical Informatics

Category theory provides foundational models for computational structures, particularly in type systems and programming paradigms, by abstracting operations like function application and composition into morphisms and functors. In theoretical informatics, it enables precise equivalences between logical systems and computational calculi, facilitating proofs of correctness and expressiveness in algorithms.^[139] Practical integrations appear in functional programming languages, where categorical concepts underpin type inference and modularity, though adoption remains more prevalent in research than widespread engineering.^[140] A key application emerged in the 1980s with Joachim Lambek's demonstration of the structural equivalence between simply typed lambda calculi and Cartesian closed categories, where types correspond to objects and terms to morphisms, preserving beta-reduction via categorical composition.^[141] This Curry-Howard-Lambek isomorphism links proofs in intuitionistic logic to programs, influencing type-theoretic foundations of languages like ML and Haskell.^[142] In the 1990s, Philip Wadler extended monads—endofunctors with natural transformations for unit and bind—from category theory to functional programming, enabling structured handling of effects like state and I/O in pure languages without imperative mutations.^[143] Monads compose via Kleisli categories, allowing modular code reuse, as implemented in Haskell's type class system since the mid-1990s.^[140] Recent developments in applied category theory address data management and novel computing paradigms. In databases during the 2010s, sketches—finite presentations of infinite categories—facilitated schema mapping and query optimization by modeling relational structures as functors between categories of instances and schemas, supporting federated data integration without full materialization.^[144] For quantum computing, categorical quantum mechanics, developed by Samson Abramsky and Bob Coecke around 2004, represents quantum processes as morphisms in dagger compact closed categories, abstracting Hilbert spaces to compose gates and protocols diagrammatically, aiding verification of quantum algorithms like teleportation.^[145] Achievements include enhanced formal verification through toposes, which model constructive type theories for proving program properties in proof assistants, bridging synthetic domain theory with computability.^[146] Criticisms highlight practical limitations: while categorical abstractions excel in theoretical unification, they impose computational overhead in software engineering, as high-level generalizations like functors increase runtime costs and complexity compared to direct implementations, often prioritizing provability over efficiency in resource-constrained systems.^[147] Proponents counter that optimized libraries, such as Cats in Scala or applied cores in Haskell, mitigate this by compiling to low-level code, yet empirical benchmarks show slower execution for categorical effect systems versus ad-hoc alternatives in performance-critical applications.^[147] Social and psychological categorization involves the classification of individuals into groups based on perceived shared traits, often triggering biases toward in-group favoritism and out-group derogation. Henri Tajfel's minimal group paradigm experiments, conducted in the early 1970s, illustrated this by assigning participants arbitrarily to groups (e.g., based on abstract dot-estimation preferences) and observing consistent preferences for allocating rewards to in-group members over out-group ones, even absent prior interaction, competition, or personal gain.^[148] These findings underscore the ease with which humans form social categories and exhibit discriminatory tendencies under minimal conditions.^[149] Such biases trace to evolutionary pressures favoring kin detection and coalitional alliances, where in-group favoritism enhances survival through preferential cooperation with genetic relatives or perceived allies, as formalized in kin selection theory and extended models of group dynamics.^[150] Empirical simulations demonstrate that individual-level selection can produce robust in-group bias in fluid social networks, mirroring ancestral environments of small, kin-based bands.^[151] This causal foundation challenges purely cultural explanations, as neural and behavioral responses to group cues activate conserved mechanisms for threat detection and reciprocity, evident in neuroimaging studies of amygdala activation toward out-group faces.^[150] In racial categorization, constructivist perspectives emphasizing social fluidity overlook genetic evidence for structured human variation. Rosenberg et al. (2002) analyzed 377 microsatellite loci across 1,056 individuals from 52 populations, applying the STRUCTURE algorithm to infer ancestry; results consistently yielded 5-6 clusters aligning with continental origins (e.g., Africa, Europe, East Asia), with individuals assigning to clusters at probabilities exceeding 99% in many cases, affirming races as informative natural kinds despite admixture.^[152] The oft-cited Lewontin (1972) apportionment—claiming 85% of genetic variation occurs within populations—does not preclude racial clustering, as it analyzes loci univariately and ignores correlated multivariate patterns that distinguish groups, a point Edwards (2003) critiqued as Lewontin's fallacy, noting that even modest between-group differences enable accurate classification akin to distinguishing plant subspecies.^[153] Institutional emphases on constructivism, prevalent in academia, may underweight such data due to ideological priors favoring environmental determinism over heredity.^[154] Sexual categorization exemplifies biological essentialism, rooted in dimorphic reproductive biology where males produce small gametes (sperm) and females large ones (ova), yielding stark differences in anatomy, physiology, and life history strategies conserved across mammals.^[155] Constructivist claims of gender as an infinite spectrum, detached from this binary, conflict with chromosomal (XX/XY) determination and empirical outcomes like sex-specific disease susceptibilities or athletic performance gaps (e.g., male advantages in strength averaging 50% post-puberty).^[155] Critiques highlight that denying essential sex differences fosters unrealistic policies, such as ignoring safety risks in unisex spaces or medical inaccuracies in treating sex as mutable; data-driven essentialism better aligns with causal realities for equitable outcomes in domains like sports eligibility or forensic identification.^[154] While social influences modulate expression, the underlying dimorphism constitutes a natural kind indispensable for predictive accuracy.^[155]

References

[1]
category noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes
Word Originlate Middle English (in the philosophical sense): from French catégorie or late Latin categoria, from Greek katēgoria 'statement, accusation', from ...
[2]
Lecture on Categories - University of Washington
Nov 9, 2004 · The Ten Categories. The list (even the precise number) ... The first category - substance - is the most important in Aristotle's ontology.
[3]
[PDF] Category Theory - Cornell Mathematics
Jun 5, 2016 · Category theory, invented in the 1940s, bridges different areas of mathematics. It consists of objects, morphisms, and operations.
[4]
Categories - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 3, 2004 · A system of categories is a complete list of highest kinds or genera. Traditionally, following Aristotle, these have been thought of as highest genera of ...Category Systems · Skepticism about Category... · Category Differences
[5]
Aristotle's Categories - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 7, 2007 · Instead, he thinks that there are ten: (1) substance; (2) quantity; (3) quality; (4) relatives; (5) somewhere; (6) sometime; (7) being in a ...Aristotle's Categories
[6]
[PDF] On the Meaning of Kategoria in Aristotle's Categories
Dec 28, 1983 · the term 'category'and hence giving it the meaning of highest predicate rather than fundamental type of predication. The word kategoria occurs ...
[7]
Porphyry, Introduction (or Isagoge) to the logical Categories of ...
The doctrine of Aristotle's Categories, to know what genus, difference, species, property, and accident are, and also to the assignments of definitions.
[8]
Commentators on Aristotle - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 11, 2005 · The title Categories eventually prevailed and, along with the title, a certain interpretation of the treatise imposed itself.
[9]
Aquinas: Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aquinas's metaphysical thought follows a modified but general Aristotelian view. Primarily, for Aquinas, a thing cannot be unless it possesses an act of being, ...The Nature of Metaphysics · Essence and Existence · Participation · Matter and Form
[10]
Thomas Aquinas - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 7, 2022 · Like Dante or Michelangelo, Aquinas takes inspiration from antiquity, especially Aristotle, and builds something entirely new. Viewed through a ...
[11]
The Synthesis of Christian Doctrine and Aristotelian Metaphysics
Sep 12, 2023 · Thomas Aquinas' metaphysical system represents a profound synthesis of Aristotelian philosophy and Christian theology. His exploration of being, ...The Act Of Being: Esse 🔗 · Faith And Reason As Two... · The Nature Of God: Simple...
[12]
The Medieval Problem of Universals
Sep 10, 2000 · The medieval problem of universals is a logical, and historical, continuation of the ancient problem generated by Plato's (428–348 BCE) theory.
[13]
Descartes' Physics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 29, 2005 · The mechanical philosophy's explanation of natural phenomena, which Descartes quickly adopted, rejected the use of Scholastic substantial forms ...
[14]
René Descartes - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 3, 2008 · Although in the World and Meteorology Descartes avoided outright denial of substantial forms and real qualities, it is clear that he ...
[15]
An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
The idea of thinking, and moving a body, being as clear and distinct ideas as the ideas of extension, solidity, and being moved.
[16]
John Locke's (1632–1704) Essay Concerning Human ...
6 John Locke's (1632–1704) Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689). The Project of the Essay; Against Innate Knowledge; Ideas and their Origin; Simple ideas ...The Project of the Essay · Against Innate Knowledge · Natural kinds · BodyMissing: nominalism categories
[17]
Hegel's Dialectics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 3, 2016 · “Dialectics” is a term used to describe a method of philosophical argument that involves some sort of contradictory process between opposing sides.
[18]
The Science of Logic - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Jun 5, 2011 · The specific course which the logic follows derives from Hegel's dialectical and speculative conception of thinking and its conceptual ...
[19]
Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy by Feuerbach 1839
The Hegelian system is the absolute self-externalization of reason, a state of affairs that expresses itself, among other things, in the fact that the empirical ...
[20]
Peirce's Theory of Signs - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 13, 2006 · Peirce's Sign Theory, or Semiotic, is an account of signification, representation, reference and meaning.Basic Sign Structure · Peirce's Early Account: 1867–8. · The Final Account: 1906–10
[21]
Charles Sanders Peirce: Architectonic Philosophy
Traditionally, the systematic background to Peirce's theories of, say, pragmatism, inquiry, or the categories is ignored. This has lead to a failure to ...
[22]
Charles Sanders Peirce: The Architect of Pragmatism | Issue 43
Peirce found only three categories and, in an effort to avoid any contamination with already existing metaphysical systems, called them firstness, secondness ...
[23]
Strawson's Descriptive Metaphysics - Oxford Academic
Strawson's descriptive metaphysics was the first explicit and elaborate rehabilitation of metaphysics within the analytic tradition.The Context of Strawson's... · Descriptive Metaphysics and...
[24]
Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics - 1st Edition - Miche
Free deliveryBold in scope and ambition, it presents Strawson's now famous argument for descriptive metaphysics and his repudiation of revisionary metaphysics. Rather ...
[25]
P. F. Strawson, Individuals - PhilPapers
Since its publication in 1959, Individuals has become a modern philosophical classic ... It contains Strawson's now famous argument for descriptive metaphysics ...
[26]
Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories
According to Rosch (1975), objects in the world can be clustered together on a number of correlated attributes. For example, creatures are clearly ...
[27]
[PDF] Concepts and Categorization / 1 - Psychology - Northwestern
A concept is a mental representation that picks out a set of entities, or a category, and refers to what those categories are.
[28]
Survival circuits and risk assessment - ScienceDirect.com
Risk assessment (RA) behaviour is unusual in the context of survival circuits. An external object elicits eating, mating or fleeing.Missing: categories | Show results with:categories
[29]
(PDF) Prototype Theory in Cognitive Linguistics - ResearchGate
Rosch, Eleanor.(1973). Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology 4,328-350. Rosch, Eleanor.(1975a). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal ...
[30]
Eleanor Rosch, Natural Categories - PhilPapers
The hypothesis of the study was that the domains of color and form are structured into nonarbitrary, semantic categories which develop around perceptually ...
[31]
[PDF] Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories
Rosch (1973, 1975b) has further characterized some natural analog categories as internally structured into a prototype (clearest cases, best examples ...
[32]
DDC timeline - OCLC
Since the publication of its first edition in 1876, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system has crossed many milestones.
[33]
[PDF] Historical Notes - Library of Congress
THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CLASSIFICATION. In 1897 the decision was made to develop a new classification system for the. Library of Congress.
[34]
Library of Congress Classification
Dec 19, 2023 · The Library of Congress Classification (LCC) is a classification system that was first developed in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.Twenty-one basic classes · Classification Web · PDF Files
[35]
Carl Linnaeus - Creation Ministries International
May 22, 2017 · The tenth edition, published in 1758, had animals assigned with binomial names, and is considered the beginning of zoological nomenclature. It ...<|separator|>
[36]
Linnaeus Creates the Binomial System of Classification - EBSCO
Carolus Linnaeus designed a hierarchical taxonomic system for naming and classifying plants and animals. His system gave each organism a two-term name that was ...
[37]
[PDF] The growing acceptance of folksonomy as a complement to indexing ...
Criticisms of folksonomies are abundant, but research indicates that benefits are outweighed by flaws, and that some perceived flaws may even be virtues under ...
[38]
Taxonomies vs. Ontologies - Hedden Information Management
Feb 8, 2023 · Both taxonomies and ontologies are kinds of knowledge organization systems, which support access to information, their specific uses tend to differ.
[39]
Taxonomies Versus Ontologies: A Short Guide - Fluree
May 9, 2024 · Taxonomies are primarily used for classification and organization, whereas ontologies are used for more sophisticated knowledge modeling and reasoning.
[40]
The Internet Classics Archive | Categories by Aristotle
Expressions which are in no way composite signify substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, state, action, or affection.
[41]
Aristotle: Logic | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
They grouped Aristotle's six logical treatises into a sort of manual they called the Organon (Greek for “tool”). The Organon included the Categories, On ...
[42]
Substance - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 3, 2004 · The idea of substance has its first theoretical articulation in Aristotle's Categories, where he distinguishes between individual substances ...
[43]
[PDF] Aristotle's Physics: a Physicist's Look - PhilSci-Archive
(e) The natural motion of Earth, Water, Air and Fire is vertical, directed towards the natural place of the substance. [He 300b25]. Since elements move ...
[44]
Aristotle - Galileo and Einstein
Aristotle therefore postulated that the heavenly bodies were not made up of the four elements earth, water, air and fire, but of a fifth, different, element ...
[45]
Aristotle | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aristotle (384 B.C.E.—322 B.C.E.). Aristotle is a towering figure in ancient Greek philosophy, who made important contributions to logic, criticism, ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[46]
Immanuel Kant - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Kant argued that the moral law is a truth of reason, and hence that all rational creatures are bound by the same moral law.
[47]
Immanuel Kant - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 20, 2010 · Kant spent a decade working on the Critique of Pure Reason and published nothing else of significance between 1770 and 1781. But its ...Kant's moral philosophy · Kant's Account of Reason · Kant's Critique of MetaphysicsMissing: list | Show results with:list
[48]
Johann Gottlieb Fichte - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 30, 2001 · Instead, according to Fichte's analysis, if the I is to posit itself at all, it must simply discover itself to be limited, a discovery that ...
[49]
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The principle of the self-positing I was initially interpreted along the lines of Berkeley's idealism, and thus as claiming that the world as a whole is somehow ...
[50]
Ernst Cassirer - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 30, 2004 · Cassirer, for his part, defended his own new understanding of Kant in the philosophy of symbolic forms – against Heidegger's insistence on the ...
[51]
The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms - Book Series - Routledge
The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms is Cassirer's most important work. It was first published in German in 1923, the third and final volume appearing in 1929. In ...
[52]
Essence | Locke's Metaphysics - Oxford Academic
Locke draws a distinction between real and nominal essences. A real essence is the inner constitution responsible for a thing's observable features; a ...
[53]
Essay Concerning Human Understanding: Real and Nominal Essence
Locke calls the essence that is responsible for sorting individuals into classes the nominal essence. The nominal essence, again, is just the abstract general ...
[54]
Natural kinds, mind-independence, and unification principles
Apr 15, 2022 · According to the HPC theory, the clustering of properties is explained by a shared causal structure among the members of a natural kind; each ...<|separator|>
[55]
Natural Kinds - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 17, 2008 · This article divides philosophical discussions of natural kinds into four areas: metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science, and philosophy of language.
[56]
Constructivism in Metaphysics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Constructivism has historically been developed in opposition to Realism; and examining the tension between Constructivism and Realism can help us further ...
[57]
Willard Van Orman Quine - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 9, 2010 · (Quine uses the terms “ontological relativity” and “inscrutability of reference”, as well as “indeterminacy of reference”. Some philosophers ...Quine's life and work · Quine's Naturalism and its... · Metaphysics Naturalized
[58]
On Why Quine's Ontological Relativity Requires Reconsideration
Nov 2, 2022 · This new perspective enables exposing the shortcomings of Quine's position and suggests a possible reformulation of the original position.
[59]
[PDF] Predictive success, partial truth and skeptical realism - PhilSci-Archive
Aug 2, 2014 · Realists argue that mature theories enjoying predictive success are approximately and partially true, and that the parts of the theory necessary ...
[60]
Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? - ResearchGate
Aug 5, 2025 · Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race; I argue that the two ...
[61]
[PDF] Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Author(s) - Joel Velasco
BR: Races are biologically real. SC: Races are social constructs. I: Biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about race.
[62]
GENERAL THEORY OF NATURAL EQUIVALENCES
homology theory (Eilenberg and MacLane, Group extensions and homology, Ann. of Math, vol. 43 (1942) pp. 757-831, especially, p. 777 and p. 815). (6) H ...
[63]
Category Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 6, 1996 · Categories are algebraic structures with many complementary natures, e.g., geometric, logical, computational, combinatorial, just as groups are ...
[64]
[PDF] categorical algebra and set-theoretic - Princeton University
Now the compre- hension axiom of Gödel-Bernays set theory allows one to form the large category of all small groups, in which the class of objects is the class ...
[65]
[PDF] maclane-categories.pdf - MIT Mathematics
Theory. 43 GILLMAN/JERISON. Rings of Continuous. 11 CONWAY. Functions of One ... Category theory has developed rapidly. This book aims to present those.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[66]
[PDF] Basic Concepts in category theory
The composition is associative and has identities so we have a category [C, D] of functors C→D and natural transformations between them. ... Limits and colimits, ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[67]
[PDF] Category Theory in Context Emily Riehl
Mar 1, 2014 · ... category-theoretic notion of limits or colimits, a characterization that makes it easy to define transformations to or from the objects so ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
[68]
Monoidal categories
As usual in category theory, to categorify the definition of a monoid, we should replace the equalities in the definition of a monoid (namely, the associativity ...
[69]
[1001.4071] Homotopy theory of higher categories - arXiv
Jan 22, 2010 · This is the first draft of a book about higher categories approached by iterating Segal's method, as in Tamsamani's definition of n-nerve and Pelissier's ...<|separator|>
[70]
[1707.01868] Segal-type models of higher categories - arXiv
Jul 6, 2017 · Higher category theory is an exceedingly active area of research, whose rapid growth has been driven by its penetration into a diverse range of ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
[71]
[PDF] From Categories to Homotopy Theory Birgit Richter
Introduction. Category theory has at least two important features. The first one is that it allows us to structure our mathematical world.
[72]
[PDF] Categories via Algebraic Topology
May 5, 2024 · Category theory provides a formalism for the study of this behaviour by representing mathematical systems as diagrams of arrows - which ...
[73]
representable functor in nLab
Jun 27, 2025 · Representability is one of the most fundamental concepts of category theory, with close ties to the notion of adjoint functor and to the Yoneda lemma.Idea · In ordinary category theory · In enriched category theory · Examples
[74]
Representable Functors - Bartosz Milewski's Programming Cafe
Jul 29, 2015 · A representable functor is a functor naturally isomorphic to the hom-functor, representing objects and morphisms of a category as sets and ...
[75]
[PDF] An introduction to Grothendieck toposes - Olivia Caramello
Mar 13, 2020 · Toposes were originally introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in the early 1960s, in order to provide a mathematical underpinning for the ' ...
[76]
[PDF] INFINITY CATEGORY THEORY FROM SCRATCH
To understand this, we will now explain how to define homotopy. 2-categories whose objects are, respectively, quasi-categories, complete Segal spaces, Segal.Missing: logic | Show results with:logic
[77]
The HoTT Book | Homotopy Type Theory
Homotopy type theory is a new branch of mathematics that combines aspects of several different fields in a surprising way.
[78]
[PDF] Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics
Homotopy Type Theory is a new style of informal type theory, tied to a foundation of mathematics that can be implemented in a computer proof assistant.
[79]
254A, Lecture 2: Three categories of dynamical systems - Terence Tao
Jan 10, 2008 · One of the basic insights of category theory is that a mathematical objects in a given class (such as dynamical systems) are best studied not in ...Missing: wise | Show results with:wise
[80]
[PDF] Categorical foundations of discrete dynamical systems - arXiv
Jun 5, 2025 · By employing the framework of category theory to study discrete dynamical systems, we can canonically understand the underlying structure, ...
[81]
The failures of category theory - Joshua Tan
May 4, 2018 · In the second session, we focused more closely on (3) above, and thought about how / why category theory has failed to address the needs of scientists.
[82]
why haven't certain well-researched classes of mathematical object ...
Apr 23, 2010 · But there are mathematical objects that aren't thought of in a category-theoretic fashion, at least the extant literature doesn't tend to treat ...Missing: criticisms abstractness
[83]
[PDF] Automating Proofs in Category Theory - Cornell: Computer Science
A semi-automated proof system uses a first-order sequent calculus and proof tactics to automate proof search in category theory, implemented in Nuprl.
[84]
[PDF] AN ELEMENTARY THEORY OF THE CATEGORY OF SETS (LONG ...
May 23, 2005 · These axioms were writ- ten soon after Lawvere's dissertation sketched the category of categories as a foundation, CCAF, (Lawvere 1963b).
[85]
[PDF] Against Set Theory - Buffalo Ontology Site
Some mathematicians and philosophers have claimed that category theory makes a better and more mathematically suitable or powerful foundation than set theory.
[86]
[PDF] categorical ontology i - PhilSci-Archive
Abstract. The present paper approaches ontology and metaontology through mathematics, and more precisely through category theory. We exploit the theory of ...<|separator|>
[87]
Category Free Category Theory and Its Philosophical Implications
Feb 4, 2016 · Category theory seems to be the correct mathematical theory for clarifying conceptual possibilities in this respect.
[88]
[PDF] limits in category theory - UChicago Math
Aug 17, 2007 · The basic element of category theory is a category. Definition 1.1. A category C consists of three components: (1) A collection1 of objects ...
[89]
[PDF] John Stuart Mill - A System of Logic - Early Modern Texts
all nature, and what kinds have been found to vary with difference of time ... those that are elements of the system of nature considered as a whole ...
[90]
A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive
This two-volume work, first published in 1843, was John Stuart Mill's first major book. It reinvented the modern study of logic and laid the foundations for ...
[91]
[PDF] A Tradition of Natural Kinds
Oct 28, 2018 · A Tradition of Natural Kinds. Author(s): Ian Hacking. Source: Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic.Missing: projectible | Show results with:projectible
[92]
Homeostasis, Higher Taxa, and Monophyly - jstor
I have argued (Boyd 1989, 1991, 1993, 1999a) that bi- ological species are homeostatic property cluster (HPC) natural kinds, as have others (Kornblith 1993; ...
[93]
Natural Kinds | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Philosophy refers to such categories as natural kinds. Standard examples of such kinds include fundamental physical particles, chemical elements, and biological ...
[94]
Paul Feyerabend - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Aug 26, 1997 · In this respect, Feyerabend's work can be thought of as aligned with social constructivism. Feyerabend also published a surprisingly large ...
[95]
[PDF] Feyerabend's Metaphysical Turn and the Stanford School of Pluralism
Specifically, Feyerabend outlines five tenets of abundance realism: (1) Kantian constructivism: Being is unknowable. Rather, we come to know 'manifest realities ...
[96]
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2004 - Popular information
The Standard Model describes quarks, leptons and force-carrying particles. Quarks build, for instance, the protons and neutrons of the atomic nucleus.
[97]
[PDF] GLASHOW Lecture - Nobel Prize
Today we have what has been called a “standard theory” of elementary particle physics in which strong, weak, and electro- magnetic interactions all arise from a ...
[98]
[PDF] Leon M. Lederman - Nobel Lecture
This model describes the 12 basic fermion particles, six quarks and six leptons, arranged in three gen- erations and subject to the forces of nature carried by ...
[99]
100 Years of General Relativity | NASA Blueshift
Nov 25, 2015 · The General Relativity Publication. Einstein's general relativity equations were first published on November 25, 1915 in the Proceedings of the ...
[100]
Einstein's general relativity revealed a violent universe - Science News
Einstein presented his general theory of relativity at the end of 1915 in a series of lectures in Berlin. But it wasn't until a solar eclipse in 1919 that ...Missing: categories | Show results with:categories<|separator|>
[101]
(PDF) Fractional Statistics: Quantum Possibilities in Two Dimensions
Aug 10, 2025 · Anyons, predicted in the 1980s, are quantum particles or excitations with exchange statistics that are intermediate between bosons and ...
[102]
Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species - PNAS
Apr 25, 2005 · Ernst Mayr played a central role in the establishment of the general concept of species as metapopulation lineages.
[103]
When phylogenetics met biogeography: Willi Hennig, Lars Brundin ...
Oct 19, 2022 · For these monophyletic groups, Hennig (1950, 1966b) showed how phylogenetic trees may be used to infer dispersal, applying the “progression rule ...
[104]
Toward accurate molecular identification of species in complex ...
May 13, 2015 · Despite the variation ... species reflects increased sequence variation either produced by genuine biological variation or sequencing artifacts.<|control11|><|separator|>
[105]
Comparison of gene clustering criteria reveals intrinsic uncertainty in ...
Oct 30, 2023 · A key step for comparative genomics is to group open reading frames into functionally and evolutionarily meaningful gene clusters.
[106]
[PDF] Hilary Putnam - Assets - Cambridge University Press
The most important example in this context is the externalist conception of meaning developed in “The Meaning of 'Meaning'” (1975b, 12). Although exter- nalism ...
[107]
(PDF) Natural kinds - ResearchGate
Dec 2, 2024 · Putnam, H. (1975) 'The Meaning of “Meaning”', in Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical. Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University ...
[108]
The Multiple Realizability Argument Against Reductionism
Apr 1, 2022 · The present paper criticizes the argument and identifies a reductionistic thesis that follows from one of the argument's premises. Information.
[109]
Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction (Chapter 16)
Jan 28, 2010 · At any rate, it is this claim, that MR proves the physical irreducibility of the mental, that will be the starting point of my discussion.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[110]
Multiple Realizability - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 18, 2020 · The multiple realizability thesis contends that a single mental kind (property, state, event) can be realized by many distinct physical kinds.
[111]
Special Sciences: still a flawed argument after all these years
Jerry Fodor has argued that the multiple realizability argument, as discussed in his original “Special Sciences” article, “refutes psychophysical reductionism ...
[112]
Social constructionism and climate science denial
Aug 29, 2020 · Many STS scholars used it as an allegedly clear example of claims by natural scientists that should be treated as mere social constructions.
[113]
Reductionism in Biology - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 27, 2008 · Reductionism encompasses a set of ontological, epistemological, and methodological claims about the relations between different scientific domains.
[114]
Parts of Speech (Chapter 9) - Exploring Linguistic Science
Feb 26, 2018 · The traditional parts of speech are: noun, adjective, verb, adverb, pronoun, preposition, conjunction, and interjection.
[115]
[PDF] Chomsky-1957.pdf - Stanford University
One can identify three phases in work on generative grammar. The first phase, initiated by Syntactic Structures and continuing through. Aspects of the theory of ...
[116]
[PDF] Noam Chomsky Syntactic Structures - Tal Linzen
One can identify three phases in work on generative grammar. The first phase, initiated by Syntactic Structures and continuing through. Aspects of the theory of ...
[117]
Pāṇini: Catching the Ocean in a Cow's Hoofprint - Granthika Blog
Jan 27, 2019 · The Indian linguist Pāṇini created the world's first generative grammar circa 500 BCE, a complete formal description of the Sanskrit ...
[118]
Noam Chomsky publishes his groundbreaking book "Syntactic ...
Oct 26, 2023 · Syntactic Structures laid out Chomsky's theory of transformational-generative grammar. Chomsky proposed that grammar was a mathematical ...
[119]
6.3 Inflectional Morphology – Essentials of Linguistics
Bound morphemes can do one of two different jobs. Inflectional morphology conveys grammatical information, such as number, tense, agreement or case.
[120]
5.7 Inflectional morphology – Essentials of Linguistics, 2nd edition
5.7 Inflectional morphology · Number · Person · Case · Agreement · Tense and Aspect · Negation · Other inflectional distinctions.
[121]
Reference Greenberg 1963 - WALS Online
1963. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Greenberg, Joseph H. (ed.), Universals of Human Language, 73- ...
[122]
[PDF] Syntactic Categories, Cross-Linguistic Variation and Universal ...
2009. Linguistic typology studies the various ways in which languages map ... This paper presents empirical evidence for a theory of syntactic categories ...
[123]
[PDF] Universals of language - Internet Archive
... UNIVERSALS of LANGUAGE. EDITED BY JOSEPH H. GREENBERG. PROFESSOR OF ANTHROPOLOGY. STANFORD UNIVERSITY. REPORT OF A CONFERENCE HELD AT. DOBBS FERRY, NEW YORK.
[124]
[PDF] The Universal Structure of Categories - Georgetown University
In essence, this new theory shows that language-specific categories are built from a small set of universal categories and language-specific units of language.
[125]
Kuhn on Essentialism and the Causal Theory of Reference
Jan 1, 2022 · The causal theory of reference is often taken to provide a solution to the problems, such as incomparability and referential discontinuity, ...
[126]
Basic Color Terms&Categories
The entire sequence comprises seven stages and eleven basic color terms. Berlin and Kay interpreted these as stages in an evolutionary sequence, and it is this ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[127]
[PDF] World Color Survey - ICSI
Oct 14, 2012 · The original universal evolutionary sequence of color term development postulated by B&K is shown in Figure 2. It has subsequently been ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[128]
Communication efficiency of color naming across languages ... - NIH
A widely accepted theory proposes that languages evolve, acquiring color terms in a stereotyped sequence. This theory, by Berlin and Kay (BK), is supported by ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
[129]
[PDF] Chapter 4 Prototype theory Prospects and problems of prototype ...
The theory originated in the mid 1970s with Eleanor Rosch's research into the internal structure of categories. (Overviews may be found in Rosch 1978, 1988,.
[130]
[PDF] Prototype Theory: an evaluation
This paper discusses prototype theory and aims to evaluate the proposal that prototype structures can serve as word meanings. It has been proposed that ...Missing: vagueness | Show results with:vagueness
[131]
(PDF) The causal theory of reference - ResearchGate
Jan 20, 2020 · Causal theories of reference describe how terms acquire specific references (especially logical terms, proper names, and natural terms) based on evidence.Missing: lexical discontinuities
[132]
(PDF) Bird or bat: Comparing airframe design and flight performance
Aug 6, 2025 · In this paper we highlight similarities and differences with respect to flight characteristics, including morphology, flight kinematics, aerodynamics, ...Missing: categorization | Show results with:categorization
[133]
Bird or bat: comparing airframe design and flight performance
Mar 4, 2009 · Aerodynamically, bats appear to generate a more complex wake than birds. Bats may be more closely adapted for slow maneuvering flight than birds ...Missing: mechanics causal links philosophy
[134]
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
When researchers first turned their attention to the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, memory for color was considered to be an ideal domain for study (see Brown, 1976).
[135]
Resolving the question of color naming universals - PNAS
In 1969 Berlin and Kay (BK) (1) advanced the hypothesis that “a total universal inventory of exactly 11 basic color categories exists from which the 11 or fewer ...
[136]
Biological origins of color categorization - PNAS
May 8, 2017 · Converging evidence suggests that prelinguistic infants as young as 4-mo-old respond categorically to color. Many of the infant studies have ...
[137]
The Whorf hypothesis - Oxford Academic - Oxford University Press
In fact, Malotki (1983)—a book of 677 pages—contains a crushing amount of data showing that Whorf's statement (Whorf 1956 : 57–8) 'After long and careful ...
[138]
Language is not necessary for color categories - PubMed
Some researchers argue that color categories are linguistically constructed, while others claim they have a pre-linguistic, and possibly even innate, basis.Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
[139]
Cartesian closed categories and typed λ-calculi - SpringerLink
Jun 5, 2005 · Lambek, J. (1986). Cartesian closed categories and typed λ-calculi. In: Cousineau, G., Curien, PL., Robinet, B. (eds) Combinators and Functional Programming ...<|separator|>
[140]
[PDF] Monads for functional programming - The University of Edinburgh
Abstract. The use of monads to structure functional programs is de- scribed. Monads provide a convenient framework for simulating effects.
[141]
[PDF] Cartesian Closed Categories and Lambda-Calculus - Inria
The purpose of these notes is to propose an equational framework for the formalization, and ultimately the mechanization, of categorical reasoning. This ...
[142]
Cartesian closed categories and the λ-calculus - UCR Math
In 1980, Lambek made a great discovery: Joachim Lambek, From lambda calculus to Cartesian closed categories, in To H. B. Curry: Essays on Combinatory Logic, ...
[143]
Monads for functional programming | SpringerLink
The use of monads to structure functional programs is described. Monads provide a convenient framework for simulating effects found in other languages, ...
[144]
[1104.4899] Data Base Mappings and Theory of Sketches - arXiv
Apr 26, 2011 · In this paper we will present the two basic operations for database schemas used in database mapping systems (separation and Data Federation), ...Missing: applied 2010s
[145]
[PDF] Categorical Quantum Mechanics
In providing an understanding of the way physical systems interact, category theory draws closely on mathematics and computer science as well as physics. The ...
[146]
[PDF] Formal mathematics, dependent type theory, and the Topos Institute
Nov 4, 2021 · Interactive proof assistants can offer: • formal specification of a complex problem or model. • a gateway to the use of external tools like ...
[147]
[PDF] Principles and pitfalls of software design for applied category theory
Feb 14, 2022 · Category theory offers very general abstractions for modeling. • Abstraction can often cause performance overhead. • But, with the right ...
[148]
[PDF] Key study: Tajfel (1970) Minimal group paradigm
The aim of Tajfel's research was to investigate if intergroup discrimination would take place based on being put into different groups with consequent ...
[149]
The origins of the minimal group paradigm. - APA PsycNet
The minimal group paradigm, published by Henri Tajfel and his colleagues in the early 1970s, is a widely used experimental technique for studying intergroup ...
[150]
Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism - PMC - PubMed Central
Mar 3, 2015 · In-group favoritism is the tendency for individuals to cooperate with in-group members more strongly than with out-group members.
[151]
Evolution of in-group favoritism | Scientific Reports - Nature
Jun 21, 2012 · We have demonstrated how individual-level selection can favor the emergence of in-group bias in a world of dynamic social ties and group ...
[152]
Genetic Structure of Human Populations - Science
Each individual is represented by a thin vertical line, which is partitioned into K colored segments that represent the individual's estimated membership ...
[153]
Human genetic diversity: Lewontin's fallacy - Edwards - 2003
Jul 18, 2003 · It is often stated that about 85% of the total genetical variation is due to individual differences within populations and only 15% to differences between ...
[154]
Has social constructionism about race outlived its usefulness ...
Nov 8, 2022 · I argue that the various versions of social constructionism about race are either false, overly broad, or better described as anti-realism about biological ...
[155]
Essentialism vs. social constructionism in the study of human sexuality
We conclude that, although there may be theories and research that conjoin biological and social influences, there can be no true conjoining of essentialism ...