Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Dallas Grand Prix

The Dallas Grand Prix was a World Championship race held on July 8, 1984, at a temporary 2.424-mile constructed around in , . Finnish driver won the event driving a Williams-Honda FW09B, marking his only victory of the 1984 season and the sole ever staged in . The race, the eighth round of the championship, featured 26 entrants but saw only five cars complete the full 67 laps amid extreme heat exceeding 100°F (38°C), which caused the asphalt to disintegrate, engines to overheat, and prompted threats of a drivers' boycott before emergency track repairs with quick-drying cement allowed it to proceed. Rosberg's victory came at an average speed barely over 80 mph, underscoring the grueling conditions that led to 21 retirements, including high-profile crashes like Nigel Mansell's dramatic barrel-roll into tire barriers. The event's organizational and environmental challenges, rather than sporting excellence, defined its legacy, preventing any return of to the venue despite later attempts at other series like Trans-Am racing in 1988 on a shortened layout.

Background and Circuit

Origins and Initial Planning

In early 1983, entertainment promoter Jarrett "Buddy" Boren approached construction magnate Larry Waldrop with a proposal to host a in , inspired by Boren's experiences attending European races and aiming to position the city as a global destination. Boren, along with partners Don Walker and Waldrop, established Dallas Grand Prix of Texas Inc. to pursue the venture, pooling resources to negotiate with authorities amid the series' expanding presence in the United States during the early 1980s. The group selected Fair Park, a historic site east of downtown encompassing the Cotton Bowl Stadium and state fairgrounds, for its central urban location that promised high visibility and accessibility without relying on outlying roads, thereby maximizing spectacle for spectators and media. This choice aligned with broader ambitions to leverage the event for economic gains, including projected influxes from tourism, sponsorships, and local business exposure, as local oil and construction interests sought to elevate Dallas's profile comparable to established racing hosts like Monaco. By securing a contract with the (FOCA), the organizers locked in the event for July 8, 1984, as a non-championship precursor to potential annual races, with FOCA president playing a key role in approving the calendar slot to capitalize on growing American interest in the sport. Initial logistical planning focused on temporary adaptations within the park's confines to contain noise and traffic disruptions, reflecting a calculated balance between feasibility and promotional impact.

Fair Park Layout and Technical Specifications

The Fair Park circuit for the Dallas Grand Prix was a temporary street course laid out within the Texas State Fairgrounds, utilizing existing roads and perimeter areas adjacent to landmarks such as the Cotton Bowl. Measuring 2.424 miles (3.901 km) in total length, the layout emphasized a mix of high-speed straights and tight corners to challenge vehicles while integrating the urban fairground environment for spectator proximity. Engineering features included asphalt surfacing applied over concrete bases to form the , with the track width meeting FIA standards for single-seater racing. barriers lined the entire circuit, augmented by , which restricted runoff zones and created blind entry points into several turns, heightening the demands on driver precision inherent to configurations. The prioritized visual spectacle and capacity, accommodating grandstands for substantial crowds by leveraging Fair Park's expansive grounds, though the temporary setup limited modifications for safety margins compared to permanent venues. In contrast to other American circuits like Long Beach, which featured more forgiving layouts with oceanfront moderation, Dallas's inland positioning necessitated considerations for elevated ambient temperatures, including provisioned shaded enclosures for team areas.

1984 Formula One Event

Organization and Preparations

The 1984 Dallas Grand Prix was organized by Dallas Grand Prix of Texas Inc., a private entity led by real estate developer Don Walker and co-promoter Larry Waldrop, who secured a contract with the Formula One Constructors' Association to host the event at Fair Park. The operation involved a 45-person staff under Carol Walker, focusing on transforming the urban park's streets into a temporary 2.42-mile circuit compliant with FIA standards. Local authorities, including Mayor A. Starke Taylor Jr., provided endorsement and logistical support to position the race as a symbol of Dallas's international ambitions, though some neighborhood opposition arose over noise and disruption. Financial commitments totaled approximately $6 million, with $2.5 million allocated to circuit modifications such as asphalt resurfacing, concrete barriers, and temporary grandstands seating up to 50,000 spectators. Corporate sponsorships, led by title sponsor , covered significant portions alongside private funding from Walker and Waldrop, who aimed for break-even in 1984 and profitability in subsequent years. Promotional efforts emphasized glamour, including high-end suites priced at $25,000 and social events like charity balls, marketing the event as a rival to established U.S. races in Long Beach and Detroit to attract elite crowds and media attention. All major teams committed to the event per FOCA agreements, fielding 26 entries including McLaren-TAG with and , Williams-Honda with and , and Ferrari with and ; debutants like Toleman-Hart featured and . Pre-race preparations in June and early July included circuit setup and limited testing, though organizers anticipated but underestimated resurfacing durability under heat, where July averages exceeded 95°F (35°C). Safety protocols adhered to FIA requirements, incorporating concrete Armco barriers, runoff areas where feasible in the street-like layout, and on-site medical facilities staffed for high-speed incidents; tire suppliers like and selected heat-resistant compounds, yet local environmental factors such as sustained 100°F (38°C) temperatures strained preparations beyond standard European circuit norms. No preliminary non-championship races were held to test the venue, relying instead on approval from FISA inspectors despite early concerns over the asphalt's integrity.

Race Execution and Conditions

The race began at 3:00 p.m. local time on July 8, 1984, amid sweltering conditions with air temperatures at 38°C (100°F) and track surface temperatures surpassing 60°C (140°F), exacerbating tire blistering and across the field. led from in his Lotus-Renault, but fading tires on the bumpy, disintegrating asphalt allowed in the Williams-Honda to pressure him closely; Rosberg capitalized on lap 19, squeezing past Mansell exiting the stadium section after the latter was baulked slightly, assuming the lead as Mansell dropped to fifth. , starting third in his McLaren-TAG, inherited the lead shortly thereafter when Rosberg pitted for tires, but Prost's engine expired on lap 36 due to overheating, returning Rosberg to the front. Rosberg's endurance was aided by a water-cooled skull cap under his , which circulated fluid to mitigate and heat stress—unlike most drivers who suffered exhaustion, including Mansell, who later collapsed after pushing his damaged car across the line for fifth. The punishing environment triggered widespread failures: turbocharged engines in over 20 cars overheated and seized, while the track's bumps and heat-induced expansion caused to shift, contributing to 14 wall impacts among the 20 retirements from 26 starters. Notable incidents included spinning into a barrier on lap 8, crashing two laps later, and debutant , running strongly in his Toleman-Hart until lap 47, colliding with a buckled section that had expanded outward due to thermal stress—later verified by officials, vindicating his initial claim of a "moving ." Rosberg maintained a cautious pace to preserve his machinery, fending off René Arnoux's late charge in the Ferrari while the track crumbled further, crossing the line after 67 laps in 2:01:22.617—over 80 seconds ahead of Arnoux, with only six cars classified as finishers amid the attrition. Strategies emphasized survival over aggression, with teams prioritizing cooling systems and tire conservation, though most turbo units succumbed to the heat regardless, underscoring the era's technological vulnerabilities in extreme conditions.

Results and Immediate Aftermath

secured victory for the Williams-Honda team, completing 67 laps in a time of 2 hours, 1 minute, and 22.617 seconds. finished second for Ferrari, 26.804 seconds behind, while took third place in the Lotus-, trailing by 1 minute and 1.176 seconds. (Williams-Honda) placed fourth, one lap down, followed by () in fifth and (Brabham-BMW) in sixth, both also one lap adrift. No other drivers classified as finishers, with 21 retirements primarily attributed to collisions, engine failures, and tire degradation amid temperatures exceeding 100°F (38°C) and a crumbling asphalt surface.
PositionDriverTeamLapsTime/Gap
1Williams-Honda672:01:22.617
2Ferrari67+26.804s
3Lotus-67+1:01.176
4Williams-Honda66+1 lap
566+1 lap
6Brabham-BMW66+1 lap
World Championship points were awarded under the 1984 system: received 9 points, Arnoux 6, de Angelis 4, Laffite 3, Tambay 2, and Patrese 1, contributing to Williams' constructors' lead at that stage. The FIA ratified the results without formal protests challenging the outcome, though pre-race concerns over track integrity had prompted driver discussions of a , ultimately overruled to proceed. Post-race, drivers highlighted the physical toll and chaotic conditions. , retiring early with engine trouble, labeled the event "madness" due to the heat and surface breakup, echoing his pre-race boycott advocacy alongside . , who suffered and gearbox failure, required IV fluids and later recounted the ordeal as nearly unbearable, with Laffite providing him and Lauda a lift back to the pits atop his car—a moment capturing the weekend's disarray. Initial media reports noted attendance of approximately 35,000—below projections—with coverage emphasizing damaged barriers, overheated machinery, and driver exhaustion over promotional hype. Rosberg, the victor, expressed relief at survival rather than triumph, tempering any immediate optimism about the venue's viability.

Later Racing Events

Trans-Am Series in 1988

The 1988 event at marked a revival of racing at the venue four years after the , utilizing a modified layout of the original . Organized by Jarrett "Buddy" Boren as a non-profit endeavor, the race secured permission from local authorities by committing portions of proceeds to charity, shifting focus from international spectacle to domestic . Held on May 1, 1988, as the second round of the SCCA , it featured production-based GT cars on a shortened 1.2-mile (1.93 km) course confined to the northeast section of the former 2.4-mile layout, reducing complexity while retaining the bumpy concrete surfaces characteristic of . Unlike the high-strung open-wheel Formula One machinery that suffered from extreme heat and track degradation in 1984, the Trans-Am field of silhouette and tube-frame GT cars—such as Audis, Nissans, and Corvettes—emphasized durability and road-racing adaptations suited to American muscle car traditions. The May timing avoided peak summer temperatures, and the series' sprint format limited endurance strains, resulting in fewer mechanical failures tied to thermal stress. Entrants included notable figures like Paul Newman and Scott Pruett, with Newman Sharp Racing fielding a Nissan 300ZX that encountered suspension issues but highlighted the event's draw for celebrity drivers. Sponsorship leaned toward local and automotive interests, contrasting the global corporate backing of prior F1 efforts. Hurley Haywood claimed victory in an Audi 200 quattro, marking a significant achievement for all-wheel-drive technology in the series and contributing to Audi's dominant 1988 campaign. The win underscored the quattro system's traction advantages on the irregular pavement, where Haywood led after early stints by teammate Walter Röhrl. This sole Trans-Am appearance at Fair Park produced milestones, including early successes for emerging teams and drivers, reinforcing the venue's viability for regional high-performance racing over exotic international formulas. Race results reflected reliability, with top finishers completing the distance without the retirements plaguing the 1984 event.

Other Post-1984 Attempts

Following the 1988 Trans-Am event, no further major racing series returned to due to persistent promoter challenges and venue limitations. The , which had briefly utilized a shortened 1.2-mile layout of the original circuit, shifted operations away from the site amid organizational difficulties. By 1993, the series had relocated to nearby Heart O' Texas Speedway in the Dallas area, marking the end of events at itself and highlighting the absence of sustained efforts to revive Grand Prix-style racing there. Subsequent decades saw no documented proposals for or high-profile returns to Fair Park remnants or adjacent venues aimed at recapturing the 1984 concept, as the site's history of surface degradation and logistical failures deterred investment. Local exhibitions or club-level activities remained limited, failing to elevate the location to prior aspirational status.

Controversies and Failures

Track Surface and Environmental Challenges

The surface for the was laid hastily over uncured base layers at , exacerbating degradation under extreme heat. Ambient temperatures surpassed 100°F (38°C) on race day, , with track surface temperatures climbing to approximately 120°F (49°C), causing the to soften and break into chunks, particularly in high-brake zones where post-qualifying inspections revealed up to several inches of material and loose . This crumbling led to inconsistent grip, with rubber buildup from qualifying further compounding sliding risks as fragments detached under load. The intense heat directly contributed to mechanical failures, accounting for over 75% of the 20 retirements from the 26-car field, primarily through engine overheating and delamination as surface temperatures exceeded component tolerances. Teams reported boiling and bushings melting, with the thermal delta between ambient air (around 105°F or 40°C) and track exacerbating airflow limitations on the turbocharged engines of the era. By the 1988 Trans-Am Series event on May 1, cooler spring conditions—averaging in the 70s°F (20s°C)—mitigated surface breakdown, yielding improved grip and fewer heat-induced retirements compared to 1984. However, the inherited concrete barriers lining much of the shortened Fair Park layout amplified environmental hazards, as minor off-line excursions onto degrading edges risked high-impact collisions without runoff areas, underscoring the circuit's unforgiving thermal and structural interplay.

Organizational and Safety Shortcomings

The organizers of the scheduled the event for July 8 amid peak summer conditions, disregarding the predictable extreme heat that reached 100°F (38°C) on race day, despite prior warnings from practice sessions where track degradation was evident. This decision reflected poor foresight by promoters, including the Dallas Grand Prix Inc., who prioritized hosting a high-profile race to boost the city's image over practical , leading to cockpit temperatures exceeding 60°C and widespread driver exhaustion, such as Nigel Mansell's collapse while pushing his car post-finish. Track preparation exemplified rushed decision-making, with emergency resurfacing using quick-drying cement applied just before the race to address buckling asphalt observed in qualifying, without adequate curing time that contributed to ongoing surface failures during the event. The (FIA) approved the circuit despite these issues, overlooking insufficient safety buffers in a street layout featuring tight concrete walls and minimal runoff areas, which amplified the severity of high-speed impacts amid the disintegrating track. This oversight resulted in multiple crashes, including those exacerbated by tire failures in the banked final corner, and 20 retirements out of 26 starters, with only six cars completing the full distance. Resource allocation by organizers favored promotional spectacles, such as a performance on the grid, over rigorous reliability testing and contingency planning for heat-induced mechanical stresses, diverting attention from core operational needs. In contrast to the successful Long Beach Grand Prix, which benefited from scheduling in cooler spring weather and methodical street-circuit preparation since 1975, Dallas ignored established precedents for U.S. urban races, leading to policy failures rooted in overambitious human agency rather than unavoidable environmental factors. The event's fallout included promoter bankruptcy in March 1985 and subsequent safety-driven cancellations for planned return races.

Legacy and Impact

Economic and Promotional Consequences

The 1984 Dallas Grand Prix required an investment of approximately $6 million from its developers, with $2.5 million allocated specifically to constructing the temporary circuit at . These costs encompassed event organization, infrastructure, and payments to teams, but the race's execution—marred by extreme heat, track failures, and limited spectator appeal—yielded insufficient revenue to offset expenditures. Attendance fell short of expectations for a major international event, exacerbating financial strain amid sponsor hesitancy and operational overruns; this prompted to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 25, 1985, effectively ending plans for a contracted five-year series. The promoter's collapse highlighted the gap between anticipated promotional gains—such as elevated city visibility and ancillary spending—and the reality of unrecouped losses, with no verifiable net positive economic injection reported for . Promotional fallout extended beyond immediate finances, tarnishing Dallas's appeal to high-profile motorsport organizers; the event's notoriety for logistical shortcomings deterred returns to the Dallas-Fort Worth region, forgoing potential rotations in subsequent decades. In contrast, Austin's , operational since 2012, has delivered annual economic contributions nearing hundreds of millions through tourism, hospitality, and media exposure, underscoring Dallas's missed opportunities in a market where U.S. races now exceed $1 billion in cumulative impact.

Influence on U.S. Motorsport Development

The , marred by extreme heat exceeding 100°F (38°C) that caused the temporary track to disintegrate into gravel-like chunks with surface temperatures reaching 150°F (65°C), underscored the inherent vulnerabilities of street circuits in hot climates. This engineering failure, compounded by inadequate preparation, contributed to Formula 1's subsequent reluctance to pursue similar temporary urban layouts , where southern venues face comparable thermal stresses. Instead, F1's return to American soil from 2000 to 2007 at the permanent road course, followed by the purpose-built in Austin starting in 2012, marked a strategic shift toward facilities designed for durability, safety runoffs, and consistent racing conditions. In specifically, the absence of sustained high-profile road racing post-Dallas led to motorsport development favoring permanent ovals, exemplified by the 1997 opening of near Fort Worth, a 1.5-mile quad-oval that has hosted events drawing over 100,000 spectators per race weekend. This venue filled the regional void for major motorsport, prioritizing 's oval-dominated format—which accounted for approximately 75% of top-tier U.S. racing events by attendance in the 2000s—over risky street experiments, with no Formula 1 return to Dallas or similar Texas urban circuits. Broader U.S. evolution reflected this realism, with permanent circuits enabling superior racing dynamics—wider tracks, higher speeds, and more overtaking opportunities—compared to venues prone to uneven surfaces and logistical hazards. The Dallas debacle thus reinforced a for infrastructure grounded in technical feasibility over civic promotional ambitions, as evidenced by the scarcity of new U.S. circuits in major series; and growth emphasized ovals and dedicated road courses, sustaining annual industry revenues exceeding $5 billion by prioritizing reliability over ephemeral hype.

References

  1. [1]
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix | Motorsport Database - Motor Sport Magazine
    Keijo Rosberg's Williams FW09-Honda came home the winner, on a dramatically deteriorating surface, at an average speed a whisker over 80 mph.<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Keke Rosberg | Formula 1®
    ... Champion. Keke Rosberg, Williams-Honda FW09, Grand Prix of Dallas, Dallas Fair Park Rosberg celebrates victory for Williams at the 1984 Dallas Grand Prix.
  3. [3]
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix F1 Final Results - ESPN
    Race summary of the 1984 Dallas Grand Prix F1, won by Keke Rosberg of Williams from July 8, 1984 on ESPN.
  4. [4]
    F1's wildest ever race? - 9 reasons Dallas '84 will never be forgotten
    Oct 21, 2015 · On a normal weekend, with normal conditions, Keke Rosberg probably wouldn't have figured at the sharp end in Dallas. His Williams FW09 ...
  5. [5]
    1984 Dallas Formula 1 Grand Prix
    Jul 8, 1984 · F1 1984 Dallas results ... Last. Type, Driver, #Past. race, Corrado Fabi, 17. podium, Rene Arnoux, 21. Links. Formula1 1984 Dallas Grand Prix ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Dallas Fair Park - RacingCircuits.info
    The Dallas Fair Park street circuit is a former Formula One venue, notorious for hosting one of the most chaotic Grands Prix in the sport's history.
  7. [7]
    Formula One's history in U.S. plagued with problems
    Sep 1, 2012 · Boren decided to bring one of those races to Dallas. He found a pair of partners, Don Walker and Larry Waldrop. "We had three guys together ...
  8. [8]
    Remembering the 1984 Dallas Grand Prix, Formula 1's Disastrous ...
    Oct 21, 2022 · Crews rushed to patch problem spots in the track, forcing the warmup to be canceled. Drivers discussed boycotting the race. Not everyone shared ...
  9. [9]
    History - Fair Park
    1984: The Dallas Grand Prix is held on a 2.43-mile course through Fair Park during the summer. Fair Park is designated a State Archeological Landmark. 1985 ...
  10. [10]
    Formula 1's American Street Races Were Doomed To Fail From The ...
    Oct 20, 2022 · The hasty planning of races in Detroit, Phoenix, Las Vegas, and Dallas never matched the brief success of Long Beach. By Elizabeth Blackstock ...Missing: comparison | Show results with:comparison
  11. [11]
    DALLAS SEEKS GLAMOUR IN GRAND PRIX - The New York Times
    Jul 8, 1984 · Most Grand Prix events are put on by civic or business organizations, often with help from city governments. But Dallas takes its free ...Missing: commitments local
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Entries | 1984 Dallas Grand Prix - Formula1 Database
    Entries - 1984 Dallas Grand Prix ; 4, Stefan Bellof · Tyrrell ; 5, Jacques Laffite · Williams ; 6, Keke Rosberg · Williams ; 7, Alain Prost · McLaren ...
  14. [14]
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix race report - Motor Sport Magazine
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix race report. Keke Rosberg at the wheel of his Williams FW09 Honda. Keke Rosberg took a first win of the season for Williams Motorsport.
  15. [15]
    A WILD GRAND PRIX IN DALLAS - The New York Times
    Jul 9, 1984 · Near the start-finish line, some fans watched in private white tented boxes that cost up to $25,000 each. ... Because of the Grand Prix calendar, ...Missing: organizers budget
  16. [16]
    When Ayrton Senna Crashed Because the Wall Moved
    Mar 21, 2020 · Read about a very peculiar incident involving Ayrton Senna at the 1984 US GP. Senna crashed because the wall 'moved'.
  17. [17]
    RACE RESULT - 1984 DALLAS GRAND PRIX - F1
    Jul 8, 1984 · Laps, Time / Retired, Pts. 1, 6, Keke RosbergROS, Williams Honda, 67, 2:01:22.617, 9. 2, 28, Rene ArnouxARN, Ferrari, 67, +22.464s, 6. 3, 11 ...
  18. [18]
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix | Turbos and Tantrums - WordPress.com
    Jan 5, 2015 · The race went ahead, but at Bernie Ecclestone's suggestion the track was patched up with quick-drying cement on Saturday night and instead of a ...Missing: selection FOCA
  19. [19]
    1984 Dallas Formula 1 race was a disaster - Axios
    Oct 17, 2024 · Drivers passed out, engines wore out and tires melted.
  20. [20]
    “In Formula 1, it's not only the engines that whine”: the 1984 Dallas ...
    Oct 31, 2019 · Formula 1's previous Texas host is often dismissed as a fiasco on a crumbling track. But it had the potential to become one of F1's most important rounds.Missing: protests | Show results with:protests
  21. [21]
    GRAND PRIX '88 - D Magazine
    Apr 1, 1988 · Actor/racer Paul Newman is expected to contest the Trans-Am race along with former Olympian Bruce Jenner, 1987 Trans-Am champion Scott Pruett, ...
  22. [22]
    Race Results - Trans-Am Dallas 1988 - Racing Sports Cars
    Date: 1.5.1988. Track: Dallas (United States), 1.931 kms, Organiser: unknown. Trans-Am Dallas · SCCA Escort Trans-Am Championship (round 2). (Race Results). Pos ...Missing: Grand | Show results with:Grand
  23. [23]
    On This Day in Trans Am History: May 1, 1988
    May 1, 2020 · The Trans Am Series presented by Pirelli raced for the only time at Dallas Fair Park in 1988, an event that produced several memorable firsts.
  24. [24]
    Trans-Am Dallas 1988 - Racing Sports Cars
    Winners: Overall: 44, Audi 200 quattro, Hurley Haywood. Leaders: laps 1-4: 14, Audi 200 quattro, Röhrl. lap 28: 14, Audi 200 quattro, Röhrl.Missing: Grand | Show results with:Grand
  25. [25]
    Fair Park map, history and latest races - Motorsport Database
    Explore the Fair Park racing circuit with circuit diagram, lap times, race history & many more details from the motorsport database.
  26. [26]
    When F1 Couldn't Stand the Heat — 1984 Dallas Grand Prix
    Oct 17, 2025 · The plan for Dallas was to organise a race through the city's Fair Park ... There was no shortage of heated debates, drama and controversy ...
  27. [27]
    Top Gear's Top 9: Formula One track fails
    Only run in 1984, the Dallas GP was one of F1's many false starts in ... safety concerns about tyre failures in the banked high-speed final corner.
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    The First Race In Texas Was A Hot Mess - Jalopnik
    Oct 24, 2021 · According to the New York Times, the race organizers spent $6 million arranging the F1 round with $2.5 million of that amount going to circuit ...
  30. [30]
    GRAND PRIX, GRAND SCAM-GRAND JURY? - D Magazine
    Jul 1, 1985 · Walker ran off Dallas oilman and Grand Prix partner Jarrett “Buddy” Boren, grabbed the public limelight from co-founder Larry Waldrop and ...
  31. [31]
    Formula One 'injects nearly $1BILLION into the US economy with ...
    Oct 21, 2022 · The track would ultimately lose its hold on the F1 schedule in 1981 over an $800,000 debt to teams. By that time, though, races had sprung up in ...
  32. [32]
    1984 Dallas Grand Prix: Against All Odds - F1 BLAST
    May 29, 2024 · ... Prost and Niki Lauda discussed a boycott. Ultimately the race went ahead, but the drivers were left with a frightening challenge – survive ...Missing: reactions aftermath
  33. [33]
    the story of the first time F1 came to Texas | Formula 1
    Oct 11, 2024 · F1 Hall of Fame journalist David Tremayne looks back at the first time the Grand Prix circus put on a show in the Lone Star State, back in 1984.
  34. [34]
    History Of F1 Racing In The USA: From Sebring To 2024's US Grand ...
    Nov 21, 2024 · After a hiatus, F1 returned to the US in 2012 with the Circuit of the Americas (COTA) in Austin, Texas. This purpose-built track, with its ...
  35. [35]
    Circuit of the Americas Formula for F1 success | Global Highways
    In November 2012, the new Circuit of the Americas (COTA) in Austin, Texas, hosted the first ever Formula 1 US Grand Prix on a purpose-built track.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Texas Motor Speedway - Wikipedia
    In the early 1990s, the newly incorporated and rising Speedway Motorsports and its founder, Bruton Smith, sought to build a major racetrack west of the ...Texas World Speedway · IndyCar Series at Texas Motor...
  37. [37]
    Ranked: Every circuit F1 visited in the United States - Motorsport.com
    Oct 17, 2024 · Although the layout changed multiple times across F1's time at Long Beach, with several changes to the entry and exit onto Shoreline Drive, the ...
  38. [38]
    F1 street races vs permanent circuits: Which is better for fans?
    Sep 3, 2025 · The racing is almost always better. These circuits are wider, faster, and have more overtaking zones, making for a more thrilling spectacle.
  39. [39]
    Street Circuits vs. Race Tracks - The F1 Friend
    Aug 17, 2025 · Race tracks tend to have: Higher speeds. More opportunities for passing. Better racing. Smoother roads. F1 Race Tracks.
  40. [40]
    Has F1 become overly reliant on street tracks, and do they hurt the ...
    Aug 22, 2023 · Street tracks have arguably been held overly responsible. But F1's over-reliance on city layouts has left them exposed to this criticism.