Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Delilah


Delilah is a figure in the Hebrew Bible's , chapter 16, depicted as a resident of the Valley of Sorek who engaged in a romantic relationship with the Israelite judge and betrayed him to the by extracting and disclosing the source of his extraordinary strength. The Valley of Sorek, situated on the border between Philistine and Israelite territories, provided a contested frontier context for their encounter. The Philistine lords approached Delilah with a bribe totaling 5,500 shekels of silver—1,100 shekels from each of five rulers—to compel her to discover the reason Samson could not be overpowered despite repeated military failures against him. Through persistent questioning over multiple instances, during which Samson provided false information leading to demonstrations of vulnerability followed by recovery, Delilah finally elicited the truth: his strength stemmed from unshorn hair, tied to his Nazirite vow dedicating him to divine service from birth. She then lulled him to sleep, severed his locks, summoned the Philistines, and enabled his capture, after which he was blinded and imprisoned in , marking the pivotal downfall in his narrative of feats against Philistine oppression. Her Hebrew name and the biblical portrayal emphasize personal agency driven by financial inducement in a tale underscoring themes of , , and the consequences of divulging sacred commitments, without explicit indication of ethnic affiliation beyond her locale.

Biblical Account

Narrative in Judges 16

The narrative in Judges 16 describes Delilah as a dwelling in the Valley of Sorek, whom fell in love with after leaving his previous wife. The five lords of the approached Delilah and urged her to discover the secret of 's extraordinary strength, promising to pay her 1,100 shekels of silver each if she could deliver him into their hands. This offer totaled 5,500 shekels, a substantial sum reflecting the lords' determination to subdue , who had previously inflicted heavy losses on their forces. Delilah first pressed Samson to reveal his strength's source, leading him to deceive her by claiming fresh bowstrings—unused and pliable—would bind him. She summoned the Philistines with the bowstrings, but Samson snapped them as easily as flax burned in fire, revealing the ruse. Undeterred, Delilah accused him of mocking her and persisted until he proposed new ropes, never before used for binding, as the means. Again, she called the Philistines, who brought the ropes, yet Samson broke them from his arms like a thread. In the third attempt, Samson instructed Delilah to weave his seven locks of hair into the web of a using a pin, claiming this would weaken him. She did so while he slept and awakened him, but he pulled away the and pin with the fabric intact. Delilah's repeated complaints that he had lied eroded his resolve, as she pressed him daily until his grew vexed to death. Finally, confided the truth: he was a from birth, dedicated to , and no had ever touched his head, for cutting his hair would cause 's to depart and render him as weak as any other man. Delilah recognized his sincerity this time and summoned the Philistine lords, instructing them to bring the money while she made Samson sleep upon her knees. She called a man to shave off the seven locks of his head, after which the Philistines seized him, as the Lord had departed from him and his strength was gone. They gouged out his eyes, bound him with bronze fetters, and set him to grinding grain in the prison at .

Relationship with Samson

According to the biblical narrative in Judges 16, develops a romantic attachment to Delilah, a woman residing in the Valley of Sorek, and frequently lodges in her house, establishing her as his lover or intimate companion. This relationship forms the context for Philistine lords approaching Delilah on multiple occasions, offering her financial incentives—1,100 pieces of silver each from the five rulers—to extract the secret of 's extraordinary strength, which they seek to exploit against him. Delilah's cooperation with these lords, without explicit indication in the text of her own Philistine , underscores a dynamic where interpersonal intimacy intersects with external pressures, as she repeatedly presses for the information despite his initial deceptions. The interpersonal exchanges reveal Samson's misplaced trust and Delilah's coercive persistence. On three separate occasions, Delilah implores Samson to disclose his strength's source, framing her pleas within expressions of love; he responds with partial lies—first claiming fresh bowstrings would weaken him, then new ropes, and finally that weaving his hair into a web would suffice—each time breaking free when she summons the , yet returning to her abode. This pattern highlights Samson's vulnerability, as his repeated stays despite these betrayals indicate emotional attachment overriding caution. Delilah's nagging intensifies, leading her to challenge his sincerity: "How can you say, 'I love you,' when your heart is not with me? This is the third time you have made a fool of me and have not told me the secret of your great strength." The text portrays her words as wearing down his resolve through sustained emotional manipulation, culminating in his full disclosure of his vow and uncut hair as the source of his power. Causally, Delilah's actions directly precipitate Samson's downfall: upon his revelation, she lulls him to sleep, summons a man to shave his head, and alerts the , resulting in his immediate capture and loss of strength when he attempts to rise as before. This sequence demonstrates how her persistence, leveraging their professed affection, serves as the mechanism enabling Philistine strategy against , the Israelite tasked with delivering his people from during a period of subjugation. The narrative emphasizes the relational trust Samson extends, contrasted with Delilah's instrumental role, without detailing her personal motives beyond the textual implication of coercion through repetition and feigned relational grievance.

Historical and Linguistic Analysis

Etymology and Possible Meanings

The name Delilah (Hebrew: דְּלִילָה, dəlīlāh) derives from the Hebrew root דלל (d-l-l), associated with the verb dalal, which conveys meanings such as "to weaken," "to languish," or "to be slender/delicate." This etymology aligns with philological analysis of roots, where dalal appears in to describe states of diminishment or frailty, as in Proverbs 10:4 referring to the hand of the diligent making one rich, contrasting the dal (poor or weak). Scholars note a potential paronomasia () between dəlīlāh and laylāh (לַיְלָה), the Hebrew term for "night," which may evoke themes of or nocturnal intrigue in the narrative context, though this remains interpretive rather than definitive due to phonetic and morphological differences. Such plays on sound are common in Hebrew biblical texts for thematic emphasis, but the primary derivation favors the dalal over unsubstantiated symbolic overlays. Despite the Philistine associations in the biblical setting, dəlīlāh follows a characteristically Hebrew feminine form ending in -āh, atypical for attested Philistine , which often reflect Aegean or non-Semitic influences without such terminations. The Bible occasionally renders foreign names in Hebrew equivalents, leaving Delilah's ethnic-linguistic origins ambiguous and unresolved by extra-biblical parallels from ancient Near Eastern records.

Geographical and Ethnic Context

The Valley of Sorek, the location associated with Delilah in Judges 16:4, extends through the lowlands, forming a fertile corridor between the Philistine coastal plain to the west and the Israelite hill country to the east. This geographic feature, characterized by open terrain suitable for agriculture and viticulture, positioned it as a frontier zone prone to cross-cultural exchanges and conflicts during the early . Sites such as on the western flank (Philistine-controlled) and Beth Shemesh on the eastern (Israelite-associated) yield archaeological strata with hybrid material culture, including Philistine bichrome decorated pottery alongside and collared-rim storage jars indicative of shared economic and settlement patterns around 1200–1000 BCE. This period aligns with the transition from the to I (c. 1200–1000 BCE), when Philistine groups—likely migrants from Aegean or Anatolian regions as part of the —established dominance in the pentapolis of , , , , and Gath. The Sorek Valley's liminal status amplified its role in ethnic intermingling, as evidenced by fluctuating alliances and material discontinuities in excavations, reflecting Philistine expansion inland against nascent Israelite tribal entities. Delilah's ethnic background remains unspecified in the biblical account, distinguishing her from explicitly named Philistine women in Samson's interactions, yet scholarly analysis infers a probable identity based on the valley's predominant Philistine influence and her reported engagements with the "lords of the Philistines." The omission may underscore narrative ambiguities in border regions, where substrates persisted amid Philistine and Israelite pressures, though no direct textual parallels from contemporaneous or corpora describe analogous female intermediaries.

Religious Interpretations

Traditional Jewish Views

In classical , Delilah is depicted as an archetype of betrayal and temptation, representing the perils of intimacy with non-Jewish women who seduce away from their covenantal obligations. The Babylonian Talmud in Sotah 9b derives her name from the Hebrew root d-l-h, interpreting it as "dildelah" to signify that she attenuated Samson's physical strength, weakened his inner resolve, diminished his righteous actions, and occasioned the departure of the —the Divine Presence—from him. This etymological underscores her role in eroding not merely his Nazarite prowess but his spiritual integrity, portraying her persistence in extracting his secret as a calculated erosion of his fidelity to God. Rabbinic aggadah accentuates Delilah's deceitful tenacity, likening her relentless questioning of Samson—day after day until "his soul was impatient to death" (Judges 16:16)—to the unyielding methods of the or the in pursuing their commissions. Midrashim classify her among paradigmatic figures of women who embody moral subversion, such as and Naamah, whose names were divinely bestowed to mark their pernicious influence on the righteous. This view frames her actions as emblematic of broader rabbinic caution against intermarriage, where foreign women exploit vulnerability to provoke violations of prohibitions, as Samson contravened the injunction against marrying Canaanites (Deuteronomy 7:3). Traditional places primary causal responsibility on Samson's lapses—his in lustful attachments to Philistine women and his of sacred truths despite prior —as precipitating , with Delilah functioning as the proximate agent of judgment rather than its originator. This aligns with the ' pattern of Israel's through foreign entanglements, oppression by enemies like the , and redemption via flawed deliverers; Samson's downfall thus exemplifies how personal sin invites national peril, yet his final repentance enables partial restoration. Medieval commentators, such as on Judges 16, reinforce this by noting Samson's willful blindness to her betrayals as self-inflicted, stemming from unchecked desire that blinded him to evident treachery.

Traditional Christian Views

In patristic writings, Delilah exemplifies the seductive power of carnal desire and avarice, deceiving through persistent enticement until he reveals the source of his strength, leading to his capture by the . highlighted how , despite his physical prowess, was overcome by a harlot's wiles, underscoring the of yielding to fleshly impulses that blind even the strongest to spiritual peril. This interpretation aligns with broader early Christian warnings against women symbolizing vice, akin to Eve's role in or Jezebel's influence, where Delilah's actions precipitate 's self-inflicted violation of his Nazarite vow by exposing his unshorn hair. Reformation-era commentators reinforced this literal reading of Judges 16 as a on lust overriding divine endowment, portraying Samson's repeated disclosures to Delilah not as mere naivety but as willful indulgence in unequal unions with unbelievers, echoing admonitions against yoking with infidels (2 Corinthians 6:14). described Samson's concessions as "excessive stupidity," driven by infatuation, allowing Delilah—motivated by Philistine bribes—to exploit his weakness for monetary gain, thus illustrating how invites divine withdrawal of strength. similarly emphasized Samson's "particular affection" for Delilah as rendering him "blind" and "foolish," transforming his God-given might into downfall through compromised fidelity to his calling. The historical Philistine oppression in the narrative served as a for spiritual adversaries, with Delilah's typifying the insidious threats posed by worldly alliances that erode loyalty. Traditional views thus stress Samson's downfall as primarily self-induced through vow-breaking , rather than external coercion alone, serving as an undisrupted scriptural exemplar of how unchecked desire forfeits divine protection and invites judgment.

Alternative and Modern Religious Readings

Some contemporary feminist interpreters within Jewish and Christian traditions have reframed Delilah as a figure coerced by Philistine overlords or driven by survival imperatives in a patriarchal context, portraying her persistence in extracting Samson's secret as a response to existential threats rather than voluntary treachery. For instance, womanist biblical scholar Wil Gafney argues in her midrashic reading that Delilah operates as an autonomous agent navigating Philistine dominance, urging focus on systemic pressures over individual culpability, with the phrase "Don't Hate the Playa, Hate the Game" emphasizing structural inequities. Similarly, certain progressive Christian analyses depict her actions as pragmatic resistance against , aligning her with broader narratives of marginalized women compelled to for security. These readings, however, encounter critiques for extrapolating beyond the biblical text, which depicts Delilah accepting a bribe of 1,100 shekels of silver from Philistine lords on multiple occasions without evident duress, culminating in her deliberate summons of the enemies after Samson's disclosure (Judges 16:18–19). Rabbinic midrashim, such as those in the and later , occasionally speculate on her Jewish origins or conversion motives but uniformly condemn her as eroding Samson's vows, intellect, and divine strength, with no textual or interpretive basis for repentance or victimhood; the itself omits any remorse, presenting her role causally as enabling Philistine subjugation of during a period of judges. Speculative empowerment narratives, which cast Delilah's betrayal as subversive agency, falter against the empirical outcome: her disclosure precipitates Samson's capture, blinding, and the temporary Philistine ascendancy, undermining Israelite autonomy without redemptive arc for her character, consistent with the Book of Judges' anti-heroic realism where individual failings precipitate national peril. Such modern revisions, often rooted in ideological lenses prevalent in academic biblical studies, prioritize sympathetic reconstruction over the narrative's causal chain of betrayal and consequence, lacking corroboration from ancient sources or archaeological context.

Scholarly Perspectives

Historical Reliability and Context

The narrative of Samson and Delilah in Judges 16 is embedded within the broader Samson cycle (Judges 13–16), which depicts intermittent Israelite resistance against Philistine hegemony in southern during the late 12th century BCE. Archaeological evidence confirms Philistine settlement and dominance in the coastal plain and adjacent regions following their arrival as part of the migration around 1200 BCE, after clashes with forces under circa 1175 BCE. Distinctive Philistine monochrome and bichrome pottery, pig consumption patterns, and Aegean-influenced architecture at sites such as , , and Gath attest to their cultural and military presence, supplanting prior oversight and pressuring highland settlements associated with early . The Egyptian Merneptah Stele, dated to approximately 1208 BCE, provides contemporaneous extrabiblical attestation of an entity called "Israel" as a seminomadic people in Canaan, aligning with the transitional Late Bronze–Iron Age I context of the Judges period, though it predates peak Philistine consolidation. No direct archaeological or epigraphic evidence identifies Samson or Delilah as historical individuals; the accounts lack corroboration beyond the Hebrew Bible, and their feats—such as feats of superhuman strength tied to uncut hair—exhibit hyperbolic traits common to ancient Near Eastern oral heroic traditions, akin to motifs of divinely empowered warriors in Mesopotamian or Greek lore. Philistine temple structures at Tell Qasile and other sites, featuring load-bearing central pillars, lend circumstantial plausibility to the Gaza temple collapse described in Judges 16:29–30, countering earlier scholarly dismissals of the architectural details as anachronistic. Scholars assess the as a folkloric encapsulation of genuine tribal skirmishes, where exaggerated elements preserve a historical kernel of Israelite-Philistine friction rather than pure , without necessitating dismissal of reported aspects absent empirical disproof. Comparative analysis with and Hittite epics reveals parallel patterns of strongman deliverers arising amid foreign oppression, suggesting the narratives reflect authentic sociopolitical dynamics of decentralized highland clans confronting organized lowland adversaries circa 1100–1000 BCE.

Analyses of Character and Motives

The biblical account in Judges 16 depicts Delilah's motives as driven by monetary incentive, with the Philistine lords collectively promising her 1,100 shekels of silver—equivalent to a substantial sum in the —to uncover the source of 's strength. This explicit bribe underscores greed as the causal factor, as Delilah proceeds to interrogate persistently across four episodes, testing each revelation by summoning the , even after their prior failures to bind him effectively. Her actions reflect calculated agency rather than passive entrapment, as she leverages 's professed love ("he loved a woman in the Valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah") to extract information, continuing despite observable harm to him on three occasions. Scholarly examinations frequently frame Delilah within the archetype, highlighting her employment of psychological pressure—such as accusatory pleas like "How can you say, 'I love you,' when your heart is not with me?"—to erode Samson's resolve until "his soul was vexed to death" and he disclosed his vow dependency on uncut hair. This manipulation exploits empirical human frailties in attachment, where repeated emotional appeals override caution, leading to ; analyses note parallels to broader biblical motifs of through intimacy, but emphasize Delilah's as the operative mechanism over innate seductiveness. Some modern feminist readings recast her as a pragmatic opportunist navigating patriarchal constraints or survival imperatives, yet these overlook the text's portrayal of her volitional choices, including post-failure persistence for personal profit, which affirm her as an active perpetrator unbound by evident duress. Delilah's ethnic affiliation remains ambiguous, complicating simplistic Philistine attributions; although the bribe originates from Philistine rulers and her residence lies in the border Valley of Sorek, the narrative omits direct identification, and her name derives from Hebrew dəlîlâ, connoting "delicate" or "languishing," suggestive of Israelite or hybrid origins in a contested region. Scholars debate this, with some arguing the Hebrew and lack of explicit foreign labeling (unlike Samson's prior Philistine paramours) indicate potential collaboration by an Israelite woman, aligning with patterns of internal in Judges rather than inherent ethnic antagonism. This ambiguity underscores how Delilah's effectiveness arose not from cultural allegiance but from interpersonal dynamics, where her probing dismantled Samson's defenses through iterative deception, culminating in his capture upon hair-shearing.

Cultural and Symbolic Impact

Representations in Art and Literature

In medieval illuminated manuscripts, Delilah is frequently depicted in the scene of betrayal from Judges 16, with Samson asleep in her lap as she or an accomplice cuts his hair, often wielding that symbolize the of male strength through female . These illustrations, such as in the 14th-century Bible Historiale (MS M.394 fol. 112r), emphasize her role as a treacherous figure to underscore moral warnings against yielding to feminine wiles, aligning with didactic Christian that viewed her actions as a of lust's consequences. Renaissance artists amplified Delilah's sensuality and the dramatic tension of Samson's downfall, portraying her as a voluptuous temptress to heighten the narrative's caution against carnal weakness. ' Samson and Delilah (c. 1609–1610), for instance, captures the moment of hair-cutting with Delilah gazing intently while attendants lurk, drawing from classical influences like to blend eroticism with impending doom, thereby reinforcing traditional interpretations of her betrayal as divinely ordained retribution for Samson's failings. Similar emphases appear in works by and , where her beauty serves didactic ends by illustrating the perils of unchecked desire. In literature, John Milton's Samson Agonistes (1671) presents Dalila (Milton's spelling) as an unrepentant tempter who visits the blinded Samson under of , only to be excoriated for her and Philistine loyalty, functioning as an for Cromwellian downfall and royalist temptations. This portrayal alters biblical ambiguity by deepening her villainy to critique political seduction, maintaining the pre-modern consistency in viewing Delilah negatively as a symbol of without redemption. Up to the , such representations uniformly amplified her seductive traits for moral instruction, eschewing sympathetic reinterpretations evident in later eras. The biblical story of Samson and Delilah has inspired notable works in music, particularly Camille Saint-Saëns' grand opera Samson et Dalila, which premiered in 1877 in Weimar, Germany. Composed to a French libretto by Ferdinand Lemaire, the three-act opera depicts Delilah as a seductive Philistine woman who extracts Samson's secret of strength through persistent enticement, leading to his capture. In film, Cecil B. DeMille's 1949 epic , produced and directed for , portrays as Delilah, a vengeful temptress who betrays () after he rejects her advances. Budgeted at $3 million, the film grossed an estimated $12 million domestically, marking it as Paramount's highest-earning release at the time. A later television adaptation aired in 1984, with Belinda Bauer as Delilah opposite Max von Sydow's , emphasizing her role in his downfall through manipulation. Delilah's character endures in as an archetype of the , embodying themes of seduction and treachery that undermine male strength. This symbolism appears in various media, where she represents rooted in erotic allure, influencing portrayals beyond direct adaptations.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Judges 16 Study Bible
    (Judges 16:4-5) 3. Delilah's Attempts to Discover Samson's Secret Delilah repeatedly asks Samson to reveal the source of his strength. Samson deceives her ...
  3. [3]
    Who was Delilah in the Bible? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · Delilah in the Bible is best known as the one who brought about the ruin of Samson. Delilah lived in the Valley of Sorek, which lay on the border between the ...Missing: figure | Show results with:figure
  4. [4]
    Deconstructing Delilah - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Nov 22, 2024 · It is often assumed that Delilah, who was from the Valley of Sorek, in Philistine territory near the border with Judah, was a Philistine, ...
  5. [5]
    Delilah: Bible | Jewish Women's Archive
    All we know is her name, which is a Hebrew name, and the place where she lives, the valley of Sorek, which lay between Israelite and Philistine territory.
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Meaning of the name Delilah
    Sep 21, 2025 · The name Delilah has Hebrew origins, deriving from the word 'delilah' (דְּלִילָה), which means 'delicate,' 'weak,' or 'languishing.
  30. [30]
    The amazing name Delilah: meaning and etymology
    May 31, 2011 · From the verb דלל (dalal), to hang or transport. Related names: • Via דלה (dala): Adalia, Delaiah. The name Delilah in the Bible.
  31. [31]
    Delilah - Jewish Virtual Library
    Delilah (Heb. דְּלִילָה) was a woman from the Valley of Sorek who was Samson's mistress and who betrayed him to his enemies (Judg. 16:4ff.). The Philistine city ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Map of the Philistine Valley of Sorek - Bible History
    The Valley of Sorek is a name which probably belonged only to the open, fertile valley, well suited for vineyards, which traverses the Shephelah.
  33. [33]
    Philistines, Israelites and Canaanites in the Southern Trough Valley ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · -Distinct traits: the archaeological evidence indicates sharp discontinuities of other traits (Killebrew 2005, 99, 169, 199;Stager 1995, 348 ...
  34. [34]
    Excavating in Samson Country—Philistines and Israelites at Tel ...
    It is subdivided into Iron I, the time of the Judges from about 1200 to 1000 B.C., and Iron II, the United and Divided Monarchy, from about 1000 to 586 B.C., ...Missing: Delilah Levant
  35. [35]
    In the story of Samson and Dalylah in the Bible, was ... - Quora
    Jan 5, 2024 · Samson's incredible exploits, as related in the biblical narrative, are set during much of Israel's early, tribal period in Canaan (1200–1000 BC) ...
  36. [36]
    The Philistine Age - Archaeology Magazine - July/August 2022
    The Philistine Age Features July/August 2022 By Ilan Ben Zion Archaeologists are reconsidering the origins and history of a much-maligned ancient people.Missing: Delilah | Show results with:Delilah
  37. [37]
    6 Delilah | Comedy and Feminist Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible
    Thestory of Delilah and Samson (Judges 16:4–22) exhibits numerous comic elements, comic characterization and sexuality being among the most significant ones.<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Sotah 9b - Sefaria
    The verse states: “And it came to pass afterward, that he loved a woman in the valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah” (Judges 16:4). It is taught in a baraita ...
  39. [39]
    Delilah: Midrash and Aggadah | Jewish Women's Archive
    The midrashim on Delilah attest to the negative attitude of the Rabbis toward non-Jewish women. The Rabbis accentuated the negative aspects of the relations ...
  40. [40]
    Women in Samson's Life: Midrash and Aggadah
    The three women in Samson's life were Gentiles: the woman from Timnah, the woman from Gaza, and Delilah. In the midrash, rabbis used Samson's situation to ...
  41. [41]
    The Story of Samson and Delilah in the Bible - As told in Judges 13 ...
    Samson led the people for 20 years until he was betrayed by his wife, Delilah, and captured by the Philistines. Blinded and mocked by his captors, Samson's life ...
  42. [42]
    CHURCH FATHERS: The Paedagogus (Clement of Alexandria)
    For the feet of folly lead those who practice it to hell after death. The noble Samson was overcome by the harlot, and by another woman was shorn of his manhood ...
  43. [43]
    Early Church Fathers Scripture Index : Texts
    Did not the woman Delilah's love of money deceive Samson, the bravest man of all? So he who had torn asunder the roaring lion with his hands;[Judges 14:6] ...
  44. [44]
    Judges 16 Calvin's Commentaries - Bible Hub
    And Delilah said unto Samson, Behold, thou hast mocked me, and told me lies: now tell me, I pray thee, wherewith thou mightest be bound. Judges 16:11. And he ...
  45. [45]
    Judges 16 Matthew Henry's Commentary - Bible Hub
    And it came to pass afterward, that he loved a woman in the valley of Sorek, whose name was Delilah. 16:4-17 Samson had been more than once brought into ...
  46. [46]
    Rethinking Samson, Seeing Delilah - The Mother God Experiment
    If we see through the lens of power differences, the story of Samson and Delilah is about Samson's weaknesses and Delilah's strength as survivor.Missing: rabbinic exegesis
  47. [47]
    Rev. Dr. Wil Gafney: “A Womanist Midrash of Delilah: Don't Hate the ...
    Feb 1, 2021 · Gafney describes Delilah as “grown”: a single, independent woman who is financially secure, which is a dangerous thing for the patriarchy (65).<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    misogyny and betrayal in depictions of Delilah - Art UK
    May 9, 2024 · Rethinking a Biblical femme fatale: misogyny and betrayal in depictions of Delilah ... Delilah with Judas, the disciple who betrayed Christ.
  49. [49]
    Women in the Book of Judges: The Destruction of Men
    This photographic portrayal leaves no room for alternative readings – Delilah is a crass, calculating and unrepentant figure. In a self-styled Midrash on the ...
  50. [50]
    Delilah (Judges 16): A Seductress Who Brings Down Samson or a ...
    Dec 12, 2024 · It seeks to answer whether she is portrayed solely as a femme fatale who betrayed Samson's trust or as a wise and pragmatic woman acting in accordance with the ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  51. [51]
    United Monarchy: The Philistines Enter Canaan
    The Philistines' invasion of Canaan in the 12th century BC replaced Egyptian dominance in the area; they were not mercenaries or military vassals of Egypt.Missing: BCE | Show results with:BCE
  52. [52]
    Who Were the Philistines, and Where Did They Come From?
    Mar 23, 2022 · New archaeological and DNA evidence—alongside biblical accounts—trace the Philistines' origins to the Aegean world, including Crete.
  53. [53]
    Does the Merneptah Stele Contain the First Mention of Israel?
    The Merneptah Stele has long been touted as the earliest extrabiblical reference to Israel.* The ancient Egyptian inscription dates to about 1205 B.C.E. and ...
  54. [54]
    God, Science and the Bible: Archaeology supports story of Samson ...
    Feb 2, 2007 · Archaeology has been found to support yet another biblical story—the account of mighty Samson and his death in a Philistine temple.
  55. [55]
    Archaeology Topples Objection to Biblical Samson Account
    May 1, 2017 · It doesn't prove the Sampson story as true, but it definitely removes the claim that the two pillars are a fictitious invention of the author of Judges.
  56. [56]
    The 'Samson' Seal | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Aug 12, 2019 · A growing amount of archaeological evidence is showing that incredible biblical stories such as Samson's can no longer be wholly dismissed as “ ...
  57. [57]
    Top Ten Discoveries Related to the Book of Judges
    Jun 10, 2022 · The book of Judges largely records Israel's early history in Canaan after the initial Conquest victories. It has been called an “Intermediate ...
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    Femmes Fatales in the Bible - Bible Odyssey
    Jun 13, 2016 · The femme fatale (French for “deadly woman”) epitomizes the male fantasy of predatory female sexuality. Irresistible, she entices men through ...
  60. [60]
    Re-Imagining Delilah's Afterlives as a Femme Fatale | Bible Interp
    The biblical narrative is riddled with gaps and ambiguities around Delilah's character – we are told nothing about her social status or ethnicity, ...
  61. [61]
    Delilah - Etymology, Origin & Meaning of the Name
    Temptress originates from Hebrew Delilah (1590s), meaning "delicate, languishing, amorous," linked to the Semitic root d-l-l "to hang down, to languish."Missing: ethnic analysis
  62. [62]
    (DOC) Samson's Delilah may have been an Israelite - Academia.edu
    "First, unlike the other two women in Samson's life, the biblical text never identifies Delilah as a Philistine. All it says is that she was “in the Valley ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    Bible Historiale, MS M.394 fol. 112r
    Medieval & Renaissance Manuscripts ... Samson: with Delilah -- Samson, seated on floor, sleeps with head in lap of Delilah, wearing headdress, seated on stool, ...
  65. [65]
    Rubens' Samson and Delilah
    Brawny Samson derives from antique sculpture and from Michelangelo; Delilah's pose is that of Michelangelo's Leda and Night in reverse. In Delilah's breast band ...
  66. [66]
    Samson and Delilah | VCS - The Visual Commentary on Scripture
    Exhibition: Samson and Delilah (Judges 16:1–22). Featuring works of art by Anthony van Dyck, Rembrandt van Rijn and Solomon Joseph Solomon.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] DALILA'S ROLE IN MILTON'S “SAMSON AGONISTES”
    Dalila is the "tempter" who helps Samson understand his weakness, and her encounter is key to the tragedy's middle, and she is a complex character.
  68. [68]
    Samson and Delilah - The Kennedy Center
    Samson and Delilah is a biblical opera by Camille Saint-Saëns, about Samson's conflict with the Philistines, and his capture by Dalila. It ends with Samson ...
  69. [69]
    Samson et Dalila | Metropolitan Opera
    An opera in three acts, sung in French. Music by Camille Saint-Saëns; libretto by Ferdinand Lemaire, based on the biblical story of Samson and Delilah.
  70. [70]
    Samson and Delilah (1950) - Turner Classic Movies - TCM
    Epic re-telling of the story of the Biblical strongman laid low by love.
  71. [71]
    Samson and Delilah (TV Movie 1984) - IMDb
    Rating 5.5/10 (295) The long haired biblical strongman Samson falls in love with beautiful temptress Delilah in Philistine.
  72. [72]
    From Tom Jones to Rembrandt: The First Femme Fatale in the Bible
    Jan 12, 2023 · Wurtzel defines Delilah as “the first femme fatale,” “the lethal woman” – namely, the archetype of the dangerous and deceitful woman who, as we ...