Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Torah

The Torah, from the Hebrew root meaning "" or "," is the foundational divine revelation given by God to the Israelites, comprising the Pentateuch, the first five books of the —Genesis (Bereshit), (Shemot), Leviticus (Vayikra), Numbers (Bamidbar), and Deuteronomy (Devarim)—which form the core sacred scripture of . In Jewish , these texts record God's direct to at , encompassing foundational narratives of , the patriarchs Abraham, , and , the ' enslavement in , their Exodus from Egypt, and the covenantal constitution of Israel: the (mitzvot) that define the binding halachic, ethical, ritual, and civil obligations that shape Jewish life and national identity. The Torah serves as the constitutional basis for Jewish life, studied daily in homes, yeshivot, and synagogues, publicly read in weekly portions (parashot), and made operative through the embodied in the Mishnah, Talmud, and subsequent halachic traditions, which elucidates its application. Empirical evidence from ancient manuscripts, such as fragments among the Dead Sea Scrolls dating to the 3rd–1st centuries BCE, demonstrates remarkable textual stability over millennia, supporting the traditional Jewish claim of rigorous transmission and deliberate preservation by generations of soferim despite minor variations in transmission. A central dispute concerns the Torah’s authorship: traditional Jewish scholarship upholds the divine revelation of the Torah to Moses circa 1312 BCE, constituting a unified divine text, whereas dominant academic , rooted in 19th-century higher criticism and often skeptical of elements, advances the hypothesis positing composite authorship from multiple sources (J, E, P, D) redacted between the 10th and 5th centuries BCE, though this model lacks direct archaeological corroboration and faces challenges from conservative scholars emphasizing unified composition.

Terminology and Names

Etymologies and Designations

The Hebrew term Torah (תּוֹרָה) derives from the root ירה (y-r-h or ), a connoting "to instruct," "to teach," or "to guide," with metaphorical extensions from "to throw" or "to shoot" as in directing an toward a target. This root emphasizes purposeful direction, aligning with the text's role as divine instruction for ethical and conduct. In Jewish tradition, the Torah designates the Pentateuch—the five books of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—also called the Chumash (חֻמָּשׁ), from the Hebrew/Aramaic for "five," referring to its division into five scrolls or volumes. These books bear Hebrew names drawn from their opening words: Bereshit (In the beginning, Genesis), Shemot (Names, Exodus), Vayikra (And He called, Leviticus), Bamidbar (In the wilderness, Numbers), and Devarim (Words, Deuteronomy). The Greek designation Pentateuch (πεντάτευχος, pentateukhos), meaning "five scrolls" or "five cases," emerged in the Hellenistic era, with its earliest attested use in a epistle from the mid-second century , reflecting the physical format of separate scrolls in ancient Jewish and early Christian libraries. English translations often render it as the "Five Books of ," attributing authorship to Moses per traditional Jewish and biblical accounts, though this ascription pertains more to composition than nomenclature. In non-Jewish contexts, particularly Christian and academic usage, "Torah" sometimes broadly denotes the entire Hebrew Bible or Jewish law (halakha), but this extension deviates from its primary Jewish sense limited to the written Pentateuch, distinct from the Oral Torah or later rabbinic interpretations. The Latin-derived "Law" (from Greek nomos) has historically emphasized legal aspects, occasionally leading to misinterpretations of the text's narrative and covenantal dimensions.

Scope in Jewish and Broader Contexts

In Jewish tradition, the term Torah primarily denotes the Written Torah (Torah she-bi-khtav), comprising the five books attributed to , , Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—which outline creation, patriarchal histories, , wilderness wanderings, and core legal stipulations including the (mitzvot). the Torah, totaling approximately 79,000 Hebrew words, form the unadorned scriptural foundation, with ambiguities intentionally left unresolved to necessitate interpretive guidance. The concept expands in to encompass the (Torah she-be-al peh), a parallel tradition of rabbinic exegesis, ethical teachings, and halakhic (legal) elaborations believed to have been revealed to at alongside the Written Torah but transmitted verbally to prevent of the text and allow adaptive application. Codified post-70 CE destruction of the Second Temple, it includes the (c. 200 CE), forming the (c. 500 CE for Babylonian, 400 CE for Jerusalem), and subsequent commentaries like ' Mishneh Torah (12th century), comprising interpretive layers that detail observance of the mitzvot—such as precise rituals for or dietary laws—rendering the Oral Torah volumetrically far larger and distinctive to by excluding it from claims by other faiths on the Written Torah alone. In Christianity, the Torah's scope aligns with the Pentateuch as the initial segment of the , providing covenantal history and moral precepts preparatory to the , though its ritual laws are deemed typological or abrogated post-Christ, emphasizing ethical continuity over strict adherence. In Islam, the Tawrat signifies the original revelation to for Israelite guidance, equated to the Pentateuch's content but regarded as partially corrupted () through human alteration, with the (revealed 610–632 CE) affirming its monotheistic essence while superseding it as the uncorrupted final scripture. Beyond , secular scholarship delimits the Torah to the Written Pentateuch as an ancient corpus, analyzed for its composite authorship, / contexts, and influences on and , independent of revelatory claims.

Canonical Contents

Overview of the Pentateuch

The Pentateuch, derived from the Greek term meaning "five scrolls" or "five books," constitutes the foundational core of the Torah, encompassing , , Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy as the initial five books of the . In Jewish tradition, these texts are collectively termed the Torah, from the Hebrew root yarah implying "instruction" or "teaching," rather than strictly "," emphasizing their role in guiding ethical, ritual, and communal life. The Pentateuch forms a unified narrative arc, progressing from cosmic origins to the formation of as a covenant nation poised for inheritance of the land of , with an emphasis on divine election, revelation, and covenantal obligations. Genesis (Bereshit in Hebrew, "In the Beginning") opens with the account of in six days, the fall of humanity, the flood, and the dispersion of nations, followed by the patriarchal narratives detailing God's promises to Abraham ( of land, seed, and blessing in Genesis 12:1-3), the lives of , (renamed ), and , whose story leads to the family's migration to amid famine. (Shemot, "Names") shifts to the oppression of the in (spanning approximately 430 years per Exodus 12:40), ' call at the burning bush, the ten plagues culminating in the , the crossing, and the theophany at where the Decalogue and instructions are given. Leviticus (Vayikra, "And He Called") centers on sacrificial systems, purity regulations, the Day of rites (Leviticus 16), and the (Leviticus 17-26), prescribing priestly (kohanim) duties and ethical imperatives for holiness among the people. Numbers (Bamidbar, "In the Wilderness") documents two censuses (totaling over 600,000 adult males in Numbers 1 and 26), episodes of rebellion such as the spies' report and Korah's revolt, and forty years of desert sojourns marked by divine provision (e.g., and water from the rock). Deuteronomy (Devarim, "Words") comprises ' recapitulation of the , covenant renewal, blessings and curses, and his death at age 120, without entering the land (Deuteronomy 34). Spanning roughly 2,300 verses of intertwined with over 600 commandments, the Pentateuch establishes the theological framework of , responsibility, and Israel's unique vocation, with internal claims attributing much content to direct divine speech to .

Book of Genesis

The , titled Bereshit ("In the beginning") in Hebrew, forms the opening segment of the Torah, spanning 50 chapters that recount the creation of the cosmos, the early development of society, and the foundational lineage of the through the patriarchs. It establishes core theological motifs, including divine sovereignty over creation, the entry of into the , recurring patterns of failure met with God's covenantal interventions, and the of a specific line amid broader ancient Near Eastern contexts. The employs genealogies (toledot) to segment history, tracing descent from through to , and subsequently to Abraham, structuring the text as a unified account of origins rather than isolated myths. Genesis divides into primeval history (chapters 1–11), which addresses universal origins and humanity's primal estrangement from God, and patriarchal history (chapters 12–50), which narrows to the promises extended to Abraham's descendants. Chapters 1–2 depict God forming the universe in six sequential acts—light, sky, land and seas, vegetation, celestial bodies, sea creatures and birds, land animals and humans—pronouncing each "good" and instituting the seventh day as rest, countering ancient cosmogonies like the Babylonian Enuma Elish by emphasizing orderly speech-act creation without conflict among deities. Subsequent accounts detail Adam and Eve's disobedience in Eden, introducing mortality and toil (Genesis 3); Cain's murder of Abel and the spread of violence (Genesis 4); escalating corruption prompting the Flood, where Noah preserves life via ark amid global deluge (Genesis 6–9, with precise ark dimensions of 300x50x30 cubits and provisions for paired animals); and the Babel dispersion due to unified rebellion against divine limits (Genesis 11). These episodes culminate in the Noahic covenant, prohibiting blood consumption and murder while promising no future total flood, evidenced by the rainbow sign. The patriarchal section shifts to God's unilateral call of Abram from (Genesis 12:1–3), initiating covenants promising progeny as numerous as stars, land possession, and global blessing, reiterated amid trials like famine in , Hagar's son , and Sodom's destruction (Genesis 15–19). Isaac's birth to aged fulfills barrenness reversal ( 21), followed by his near-sacrifice test ( 22) and marriage to Rebekah ( 24). Jacob supplants via deception, flees, wrestles for renaming as , and sires twelve sons through , , and concubines, including Joseph's dreams precipitating fraternal betrayal ( 25–37). The finale details Joseph's enslavement, , and ascent to vizier under , interpreting dreams of seven abundant then lean years, enabling grain storage that sustains his family during famine and relocates them to ( 39–50). Joseph's orchestration averts starvation for Jacob's household of 70 souls, setting preconditions for later events, with his dying charge to bury bones in underscoring enduring ties to . While primeval accounts lack direct extrabiblical corroboration and align more with theological than verifiable annals, patriarchal narratives intersect with archaeological contexts like Middle nomadic patterns and Egyptian administrative practices, though specific figures like Abraham remain unattested in nonbiblical records. The text's internal coherence, such as consistent motifs and genealogical spans totaling approximately 2,000 years from to , supports its composition as intentional ancient rather than late redaction, prioritizing causal sequences of promise, failure, and preservation. Bereshit establishes the theological and historical framework upon which the rest of the Torah builds.

Book of Exodus

The , titled Shemot ("Names") in Hebrew, constitutes the second book of the and recounts the transformation of the from a family into a through , commencing with their oppression in and culminating in the receipt of and instructions for worship at . It spans 40 chapters, bridging the patriarchal narratives of with the wilderness wanderings in subsequent books, emphasizing themes of , , and . Chapters 1–15 detail the ' multiplication in to approximately 600,000 adult males, followed by enslavement under a new who feared their numbers and ordered the killing of Hebrew male infants. , born during this decree, is hidden by his mother, adopted by Pharaoh's daughter, raised in the court, and later flees to after slaying an Egyptian taskmaster, where he marries and encounters at the burning bush, receiving the commission to liberate the Israelites. Returning to Egypt with his brother , demands their release; Pharaoh refuses, hardening his heart, leading to ten plagues—blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts, darkness, and the death of firstborn sons—that culminate in the institution and the hasty departure from , pursued by Pharaoh's army. The narrative shifts in chapters 15:22–18 to the wilderness journey, where God parts the for the ' escape while drowning the Egyptian pursuers, followed by provision of bitter sweetened at Marah, and in the desert, from a rock at , and victory over Amalekites through Joshua's battle under ' raised hands. Jethro, ' father-in-law, advises establishing judges to delegate authority amid growing disputes. Chapters 19–40 center on the at , where descends in thunder, smoke, and earthquakes, delivering the Ten Commandments (Exodus 20) and the Book of the Covenant (chapters 21–23), outlining civil, moral, and sacrificial laws. The people affirm the , but while ascends for further tablets, they construct a idol, prompting divine wrath and ' intercession; subsequent chapters provide detailed blueprints for the , priesthood, and , which the construct precisely as commanded, culminating in 's glory filling the . These elements underscore the book's portrayal of liberation as a foundation for structured communal life under .

Book of Leviticus

The comprises divine instructions relayed through to the at , focusing on rituals for , priestly duties, and codes of conduct to maintain holiness in the . It spans 27 chapters and underscores the necessity of separating the sacred from the profane to enable 's dwelling among His people, with repeated imperatives such as "You shall be holy, for I the your God am holy." The text integrates narrative elements, like the ordination of priests and incidents of , with prescriptive laws, forming a cohesive framework for covenantal worship post-Exodus tabernacle construction. Chapters 1–7 detail the sacrificial system, outlining five primary offerings: the burnt offering (olah), symbolizing total devotion; the grain offering (minchah), for dedication without blood; the peace offering (shelamim), expressing fellowship; the sin offering (chatat), addressing unintentional sins; and the guilt offering (asham), for restitution of specific offenses. These rituals specify procedures, including animal selection (e.g., unblemished bulls, sheep, or doves based on affluence), slaughter, blood application on the altar, and priestly portions, emphasizing blood's role in expiation as "the life of the flesh is in the blood." Instructions alternate between general rules and priestly perspectives, ensuring orderly temple service. Chapters 8–10 narrate the consecration of Aaron and his sons as priests, involving seven-day rituals with anointing oil, sacrificial blood, and holy garments, followed by the inaugural offerings and divine fire acceptance. This section culminates in the deaths of Aaron's sons Nadab and Abihu for offering "unauthorized fire," reinforcing strict adherence to divine commands and Aaron's subsequent mourning restrictions. Priestly qualifications exclude physical defects, mandating moral integrity to mediate between God and Israel. Purity laws in chapters 11–15 classify clean and unclean animals (e.g., permitting ruminants with split hooves that chew , prohibiting and ), addressing dietary restrictions, and extend to skin diseases (traditionally termed ""), mold in dwellings, and bodily emissions, requiring , inspection by , and purification rites like or offerings upon cleansing. These statutes aim to symbolize moral and , preventing communal defilement of the . Chapter 16 prescribes the annual Day of (), where the , after personal atonement, performs rituals for national purification: sacrificing a for himself, selecting two goats—one slain for sins, the other () bearing Israel's iniquities into the wilderness—and sprinkling blood in the . This central rite, observed on the tenth day of the seventh month, underscores collective forgiveness through blood sacrifice and expulsion of . Chapters 17–26, known as the , expand to ethical imperatives, prohibiting idolatry, blood consumption, and incestuous relations (e.g., barring unions with close kin or same-sex acts), while mandating love for neighbors, honest weights, and observance of festivals like , Weeks, and Tabernacles. Agricultural laws include sabbatical years (every seventh year leaving fallow) and the (every 50th year, restoring property and freeing slaves), promoting rooted in God's ownership of the . The section concludes with blessings for obedience (e.g., , ) and curses for disobedience (e.g., disease, exile), framing fidelity. Chapter 27 addresses vows and tithes, regulating redemptions (e.g., valuing persons by and for dedication equivalents) and dedicating firstborn animals or produce to , ensuring voluntary commitments align with support without coercion. Overall, Leviticus integrates and spheres, positing holiness as both cultic practice and ethical living to sustain Israel's distinct amid .

Book of Numbers

The , designated in Hebrew as Bəmidbar (בְּמִדְבַּר), meaning "In the Wilderness," constitutes the fourth book of the Torah and details the ' encampment and migrations in the wilderness after departing , extending from the second month of the second year post-Exodus to the fortieth year. The English title originates from the two comprehensive censuses of the population recorded within it, emphasizing organizational and military preparations for entering . Comprising 36 chapters and 1,288 verses in the , the book interweaves narrative accounts of divine instructions, communal organization, rebellions, and itinerary summaries with legislative material on ritual purity, inheritance, and warfare. The opening section (chapters 1–10) focuses on structuring the Israelite camp around the . A in chapter 1 enumerates 603,550 males aged twenty and older capable of bearing arms, distributed across the tribes excluding , with leading at 74,600 and Manasseh lowest at 32,200; the Levites, numbering 22,000 males from one month old, are separately appointed for service to substitute for the . Chapters 5–8 address purity laws, including for skin diseases and suspicious jealousies resolved by ordeal, the vow for temporary consecration, and the consecration of Levites via substitutionary offerings. Levitical duties are delineated by clan: Gershonites for fabrics (4,500 counted), Kohathites for holy vessels (8,600), and Merarites for structural components (6,200). Preparations culminate in chapter 10 with the fabrication of silver trumpets for signaling and the camp's departure from , marked by cloud-guided movements and the Ark's vanguard role. Subsequent narrative (chapters 11–21) chronicles recurrent discontent and divine responses during wanderings. In chapters 11–12, complaints over prompt provision followed by , while and challenge Moses' authority, resulting in Miriam's temporary and humbled rebuke. The pivotal spy mission in chapters 13–14 sees twelve tribal representatives scout for forty days, returning with fortified city reports and giant inhabitants; ten spies incite fear, leading to a quelled by Moses and 's advocacy, but divine decree imposes forty years of wilderness wandering until that generation perishes, sparing and Joshua. Korah's in chapters 16–17, involving 250 princes disputing priestly hierarchy, ends in earthquake-swallowed insurgents and fire-consumed offerings, affirmed by Aaron's staff budding almonds. Chapter 19 legislates the ritual for corpse impurity purification. Later events include water miracles at Kadesh (chapter 20), Aaron's death on , and victories over Arad, Sihon, and amid bronze serpent remedy for snakebites (chapter 21). Chapters 22–36 shift to preparations for . Balak, Moab's king, hires to curse , but Balaam thrice blesses them under divine compulsion via angelic intervention and donkey speech, prophesying Israel's triumph and messianic star. Immorality at Baal Peor (chapter 25) incurs plague halted by ' zealotry. A second (chapter 26) yields 601,730 fighting men, with Levites at 23,000, reflecting minimal net loss despite judgments. Legislative interpolations cover for daughters (chapter 27, Zelophehad's case), daily offerings (chapter 28), festivals, vows (chapters 29–30), and Midianite war (chapter 31), where 12,000 slay foes, sparing virgin women but executing males and non-virgins per divine order, yielding spoils divided with Levites. , Gad, and half-Manasseh request Transjordan settlement (chapters 32), granted after livestock and pledges. Concluding chapters (33–36) list forty-two stations, allocate borders, designate Levitical cities (48 total, including 6 refuge cities for unintentional killers), and regulate and laws to prevent blood feuds. Thematically, Numbers underscores covenant fidelity amid testing, portraying wilderness trials as formative discipline rather than mere punishment, with persistent divine provision despite infidelity; censuses frame the narrative, bracketing losses with generational renewal to affirm enduring . Traditional Jewish views these events as historical, instructive for , while noting numerical consistency between censuses as evidence of targeted judgments on rebels rather than mass attrition.

Book of Deuteronomy

The Book of Deuteronomy records a series of addresses delivered by Moses to the Israelites encamped in the plains of Moab, east of the Jordan River, in the 40th year after the Exodus from Egypt, just before their conquest of Canaan under Joshua's leadership. Spanning 34 chapters, it functions as a covenantal treaty renewal, recapitulating Israel's wilderness experiences, reaffirming the Sinai legislation from Exodus, Leviticus, and Numbers, and adapting laws for settled life in the land. The narrative frame positions these speeches as occurring in the month of the 11th year of Moses' leadership, following the defeat of Sihon and Og, with the text concluding Moses' life and ministry. Structurally, Deuteronomy divides into Moses' three primary discourses. The first (chapters 1–4) surveys Israel's history from (Horeb) onward, highlighting divine guidance, the spies' rebellion leading to the 40-year wandering, and victories over Transjordanian kings, while urging fidelity to God's statutes. The second discourse (chapters 5–11) restates the Decalogue, emphasizes loving with all one's heart as the basis for obedience, prohibits intermarriage with Canaanites to avoid , and promises land blessings contingent on keeping. The third and longest section (chapters 12–28) forms a detailed legal code, mandating centralized worship at the site chooses (interpreted traditionally as ), regulations for tithes, Sabbatical years, debt remission, festivals, judicial appointments, warfare ethics (including exemptions for newlyweds and fearful soldiers), , and protections for widows, orphans, and resident aliens, all framed by blessings for compliance (28:1–14) and curses for violation (28:15–68). Subsequent chapters (29–34) enact covenant ratification through oaths, with chapter 30 offering as a path to restoration after exile. Moses commissions (31:1–8), deposits the law in the , and recites the (32:1–52), a poetic of Israel's future , divine judgment via foreign invaders, and ultimate vindication through Yahweh's . Chapter 33 delivers tribal blessings akin to in 49, praising as Israel's eternal king from . The book closes with Moses viewing from and his death at age 120, buried by in an unknown Moabite location, succeeded by as of comparable stature (34:1–12). Central themes underscore Yahweh's uniqueness as the covenant deity who delivered from , demanding exclusive allegiance and prohibiting images or with local deities. Obedience yields prosperity, fertility, and military success, while disobedience invites , defeat, and dispersal, reflecting a reciprocal dynamic modeled on ancient Near Eastern suzerain-vassal treaties but rooted in Israel's . The text stresses parental instruction in the (e.g., it as frontlets), annual readings, and prophetic warnings against kings accumulating wealth or horses, promoting a theocratic over . These elements position Deuteronomy as a foundational exhortation for Israel's , influencing subsequent biblical and .

Authorship, Composition, and Dating

Traditional Mosaic Authorship

The traditional attribution of the Torah's authorship to Moses posits that the prophet Moses composed the Pentateuch—Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—circa 1446–1406 BCE, during the Exodus from Egypt and the subsequent wilderness period, under direct divine instruction from God. This view, rooted in ancient Jewish and early Christian exegesis, maintains that Moses recorded the narratives, laws, and covenants as revealed by God, with the text serving as the foundational constitution for Israelite religious and civil life. The composition is seen as a unified work reflecting Moses' firsthand knowledge of events, including the patriarchal histories transmitted orally or via earlier records, the Egyptian sojourn, and the Sinai theophany. Internal textual evidence within the Pentateuch supports this attribution through repeated statements of Moses' writing activity. Specific commands and actions include God's directive in Exodus 17:14 for Moses to "write this as a memorial in a book" regarding the Amalekites; Exodus 24:4, where "Moses wrote all the words of the Lord"; Numbers 33:2, stating "Moses wrote their starting places, their stages by the command of the Lord"; and Deuteronomy 31:9 and 31:24, affirming that "Moses wrote this law" and "all the words of this law in a book." Additional references encompass Moses composing songs and blessings, such as the Song of the Sea in Exodus 15 and the prophetic song in Deuteronomy 32–33, reinforcing authorial unity. Jewish rabbinic tradition, codified in the Talmud (Bava Batra 14b–15a), specifies that Moses authored the entirety except the final eight verses of Deuteronomy 34 detailing his death and burial, which Joshua appended. This enjoyed near-universal acceptance among Jewish scholars, prophets, and communities, as well as early Christian writers, from antiquity through the medieval period and into the early modern era, with challenges remaining marginal until the mid-17th century. External corroboration appears in subsequent biblical books, such as 1:7–8 and 8:31–32 referencing " of ," and in attestations where and the apostles cite as the writer (e.g., John 1:45, 5:46–47; Romans 10:5). The Samaritan Pentateuch and translation (circa 3rd–2nd century BCE) also presuppose Mosaic origin, aligning with textual variants datable to pre-exilic times. This longstanding consensus underscores the tradition's role in preserving the Torah's authority as eyewitness testimony rather than later fabrication.

Empirical Evidence Supporting Early Origins

The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls, discovered in a burial cave near Jerusalem and dated paleographically and stratigraphically to the late 7th or early 6th century BCE, contain inscriptions paralleling the priestly blessing in Numbers 6:24–26, providing the oldest extant textual evidence of Torah content. These amulets, inscribed in paleo-Hebrew script, demonstrate that portions of the priestly material circulated in written form prior to the Babylonian exile, challenging theories positing an exilic or post-exilic composition for such texts. Linguistic analysis identifies Archaic Biblical Hebrew features in Pentateuchal poetry, such as the (Exodus 15) and Song of Deborah (Judges 5, with parallels in Pentateuchal allusions), including verbal syntax, vocabulary, and archaisms absent in later Standard Biblical Hebrew. These elements, corroborated by comparisons with early Hebrew inscriptions like the (10th century BCE), suggest composition in the pre-monarchic or early monarchic period, as Late Biblical Hebrew traits—such as Persian loanwords or shifted syntax—appear only in undisputed post-exilic texts. Scholars like Ian Young argue that such archaic layers predate the BCE, supporting an Iron Age I–II origin for core narrative and poetic strata. Archaeological parallels from the further bolster pre-exilic dating, as Pentateuchal covenant structures mirror 2nd-millennium BCE treaties (e.g., Hittite suzerain-vassal forms) rather than Neo-Assyrian or later models, per Egyptologist Kitchen's comparative analysis. Kitchen contends that legal and narrative motifs, including descriptions akin to Ramesside Egyptian shrines (ca. 13th century BCE), align with practices, not innovations, rendering post-exilic fabrication implausible given the absence of anachronistic Hellenistic or Achaemenid elements. Early Hebrew literacy, evidenced by ostraca and seals from the 8th–7th centuries BCE, indicates scribal capacity for extended compositions like the Pentateuch during the Judahite . These data points—textual fragments, linguistic archaisms, and cultural analogs—collectively indicate that significant Torah material originated before the 6th-century BCE , though scholarly consensus remains divided due to presuppositions favoring fragmented over unified early authorship.

Source-Critical Theories and Their Assumptions

Source-critical theories in Pentateuchal studies posit that the Torah comprises multiple pre-existing documents woven together by later redactors, rather than originating as a unified composition from Moses. The most influential model, the Documentary Hypothesis, was systematically articulated by Julius Wellhausen in his 1883 Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels. This hypothesis identifies four primary sources: the Yahwist (J), characterized by anthropomorphic depictions of God and use of the name Yahweh, dated hypothetically to the 10th century BCE in the southern Kingdom of Judah; the Elohist (E), employing Elohim and emphasizing northern traditions, around the 9th century BCE; the Deuteronomist (D), linked to the Book of Deuteronomy and Josiah's 622 BCE reforms; and the Priestly (P), focusing on ritual and genealogy, assigned to the 6th–5th centuries BCE during or after the Babylonian Exile. These sources are delineated through criteria such as varying divine nomenclature, duplicate narratives (e.g., dual creation accounts or flood stories), stylistic variances, and theological divergences, presumed to reflect distinct authorship and editorial layers. The assumes a redactional process culminating in the BCE, with Priestly material framing earlier strands. Underlying assumptions include an evolutionary progression of Israelite religion from primitive or toward , mirroring 19th-century Hegelian and Darwinian influences, which prioritize naturalistic explanations over traditional claims of divine . Source critics presuppose the Pentateuch's composite nature, seeking disunity in perceived contradictions while attributing literary unity to hypothetical editors, often under methodological that discounts authorship. Datings rely on internal criteria like anachronisms or legal codes presumed to postdate events they describe, without evidence for separate sources, rendering the model speculative and circular in validation. Additionally, Wellhausen's framework incorporated contemporary anti-Jewish sentiments, viewing Priestly elements as reflective of a "decadent" post-exilic .

Critiques and Alternative Explanations

Scholars have leveled several methodological critiques against source-critical theories like the Documentary Hypothesis (DH), which posits the Torah's composition from discrete sources (J, E, D, P) redacted centuries after . A primary objection is the subjective nature of source identification, relying on variations in vocabulary, style, and divine nomenclature, criteria that fail to account for natural authorial flexibility observed in other ancient Near Eastern texts or even single-authored modern works. Umberto Cassuto, in his analysis, dismantled five foundational pillars of the DH: the alternation of divine names (e.g., YHWH vs. ) reflects contextual or theological emphasis rather than distinct authors; apparent doublets or parallels (e.g., accounts) stem from literary techniques like recapitulation, not conflicting sources; inconsistencies in narrative are resolvable through unified thematic intent; claims of stylistic dissimilarity overlook Hebrew's poetic variability; and the absence of pre-exilic manuscript fragments of purported sources undermines the theory's evolutionary model. These critiques highlight how DH proponents often presuppose late composition (post-exilic, ca. 6th-5th centuries BCE) to align with a naturalistic that discounts direct divine , a prevalent in 19th- and 20th-century biblical scholarship influenced by and higher criticism's aversion to elements. Further scrutiny reveals circular reasoning in DH: contradictions are assumed to indicate multiple sources, yet source divisions are drawn precisely to explain those contradictions, without independent verification. R. N. Whybray, in The Making of the Pentateuch (1987), argued that the theory lacks empirical rigor, as criteria for dissecting sources are inconsistent and ideologically driven, with no positive evidence—such as ancient citations or artifacts—attesting to J, E, D, or P as independent documents prior to their supposed redaction around 400 BCE. Linguistic studies reinforce claims of Torah unity, showing a coherent classical Hebrew profile consistent with 2nd-millennium BCE origins, rather than the anachronistic layers DH requires, which would exhibit diachronic shifts absent in the text. Quantitative analyses of vocabulary distribution and narrative coherence similarly fail to support rigid source separation, suggesting instead a holistic composition amenable to minor scribal updates rather than wholesale fabrication. Alternative explanations emphasize compositional unity with incremental development. The proposes an original core text—potentially , dated to ca. 1400-1200 BCE—expanded through prophetic or scribal additions (e.g., explanatory glosses or updates like place names), preserving overall coherence without invoking disparate authors or late . This model aligns with ancient traditions of attested in 1:7-8 (ca. 13th century BCE) and extrabiblical references, such as (19th century BCE) implying early Israelite literacy. The Fragmentary Hypothesis, conversely, views the Torah as assembled from shorter units or "tablets" (e.g., genealogical blocks) within a single tradition, akin to ANE archival practices, avoiding DH's fragmentation into ideologically opposed schools (e.g., pro- vs. anti-monarchic). These alternatives prioritize textual and archaeological data over speculative reconstruction, critiquing DH's dominance in academia—where naturalistic assumptions often eclipse evidence for early provenance—as reflective of institutional preferences for evolutionary narratives over integrated historical authorship.

Historical Context and Verifiability

Ancient Near Eastern Parallels and Influences

Scholars have identified structural and thematic parallels between narratives in the Torah and contemporaneous Ancient Near Eastern () literature, including Mesopotamian epics, Babylonian cosmogonies, and Hittite diplomatic documents, dating primarily from the third to second millennia BCE. These similarities encompass motifs, accounts, legal formulations, and structures, reflecting a shared cultural and literary environment in the and . However, the Torah consistently reframes such elements within a monotheistic framework emphasizing , divine sovereignty without rivalry, and human accountability to a singular , diverging markedly from the polytheistic, anthropomorphic, and often violent depictions in ANE texts. In creation accounts, the Babylonian Enuma Elish (circa 18th–12th centuries BCE) parallels 1 in depicting an initial watery chaos from which order emerges, including the separation of upper and lower waters to form a or sky, and the sequential creation of celestial bodies, land, vegetation, animals, and humans. Both texts portray creation as imposing structure on primordial disorder, with humans formed from divine elements (clay mixed with blood in Enuma Elish, dust animated by breath in ). Yet differences underscore theological contrasts: Enuma Elish involves a of gods warring, with slaying (chaos sea goddess) to form the cosmos from her body, culminating in human creation as slaves to relieve divine labor; features a transcendent, unopposed creating by fiat ("Let there be"), declaring each stage "good," and assigning humans dominion as image-bearers in harmonious relationship. These variances suggest the account critiques and demythologizes ANE rather than derives from it. Flood narratives exhibit notable correspondences between 6–9 and the (Standard Babylonian version circa 1200 BCE, drawing from earlier Sumerian-Akkadian traditions around 2100–1800 BCE), where deities resolve to destroy humanity for corruption or via , select a favored survivor (/Atrahasis in Mesopotamian lore, in ), instruct ark construction to preserve life, release birds post-flood, and culminate in eliciting divine favor. Specific motifs include sealing the vessel with , a seven-day phase, and mountains grounding the craft. Contrasts highlight distinct etiologies: accounts attribute the to gods' annoyance with human noise, feature divine discord (e.g., Enki's rebellion), grant to the survivor, and lack a universal moral reset; ties the event to Yahweh's judgment on pervasive wickedness, emphasizes covenantal mercy and sign for no-repeat assurance, and integrates it into redemptive history without deifying the hero. Such parallels may stem from a common of cataclysmic flooding in Mesopotamian river valleys, adapted uniquely in Israelite tradition to affirm one God's justice. Legal corpora show affinities between the (Exodus 20–23) and Leviticus-Deuteronomy stipulations and the (circa 1750 BCE), such as lex talionis principles ("eye for eye"), regulations on theft restitution, false accusation penalties, and harms to pregnant women or property. Both employ casuistic ("if-then") formulations and address via proportional . Key distinctions reveal ideological divergences: Hammurabi's code enforces class-stratified punishments (harsher for offenses against elites), invokes multiple gods for enforcement, and prioritizes ; Mosaic law applies uniformly across social strata (e.g., 21:23–25), grounds penalties in divine equity and neighbor-love (Leviticus 19:18), incorporates cultic purity and economics absent in Babylonian texts, and frames laws as covenantal revelation rather than kingly decree. These elements indicate shared juridical traditions in the ANE, but the Torah elevates humanitarian and theocentric norms, critiquing hierarchical inequities. Deuteronomy's structure mirrors second-millennium BCE Hittite suzerain-vassal treaties (circa 1400–1200 BCE), comprising (Deuteronomy 1:1–5 identifying speaker), historical recounting prior relations (1:6–4:49), general stipulations of (5–11), detailed laws (12–26), witnesses (e.g., heaven-earth, 30:19; or ANE-style gods in treaties), and blessings/curses (28). This form, unlike later treaties omitting history, aligns with diplomacy, supporting an early date for Deuteronomy proximate to era. Parallels imply adapted familiar rhetoric to express Yahweh's sovereign pact, subordinating vassal kingship motifs to theocratic fidelity, without implying —rather, a elevating above pagan overlords. Critiques of overemphasized dependence note that assuming Israelite borrowing often presupposes late composition to erode biblical uniqueness, overlooking how shared forms reflect regional conventions while Torah innovations assert monotheistic exceptionalism.

Archaeological Corroborations of Narratives

Archaeological findings provide indirect support for elements of the patriarchal narratives in through parallels in ancient Near Eastern customs documented in tablets from sites like , Nuzi, and Bogazkoy. These include practices such as surrogate motherhood via handmaidens, conditional inheritance rights tied to familial , and the transfer of birthrights, which align with accounts involving figures like Abraham, , , and . Such customs, unattested in later periods but prevalent in the Middle (c. 2000–1550 BCE), suggest the narratives reflect authentic second-millennium BCE social realities rather than exilic inventions. Evidence of populations in during the proposed timeframe for the Israelite sojourn (c. 1800–1200 BCE) includes settlements at () in the , where excavations reveal Levantine-style architecture, pottery, and burials from the Middle Bronze Age onward, consistent with Asiatic immigrants including potential slaves or laborers. Hyksos-era (c. 1650–1550 BCE) remains show a strong / presence, with later New Kingdom (18th Dynasty) sites like the indicating continued activity, including possible forced labor contexts under pharaohs like Ramses II. While no direct inscription names "" or confirms mass enslavement, these findings corroborate a plausible backdrop for 46– narratives of migration and subjugation. The Merneptah Stele, erected c. 1209 BCE by Pharaoh Merneptah, contains the earliest extrabiblical reference to "Israel" as a people-group in Canaan, described as defeated but not destroyed, aligning with a post-Exodus settlement phase in the late 13th century BCE under a "low chronology" for the events (c. 1250 BCE exodus). This basalt inscription from Thebes places Israel in the hill country, matching biblical depictions of early tribal presence without urban centers, and counters claims of Israelite origins only in the Iron Age. Destruction layers at key Canaanite cities provide tentative corroboration for Numbers and Deuteronomy's prelude to conquest. At Jericho (Tell es-Sultan), excavations uncovered collapsed mudbrick walls atop a stone revetment, overlaid by burn debris with storage jars indicating spring harvest (consistent with Joshua 3–6, though timing debated between c. 1550 BCE or later), suggesting violent overthrow rather than gradual abandonment. Hazor, described in Numbers 34 and Deuteronomy 3 as a major northern kingdom, shows a massive 13th-century BCE conflagration destroying its upper city, with Mycenaean pottery and Canaanite idols shattered in situ, attributed by some excavators to Israelite forces under Joshua's campaign (Joshua 11). These align better with a 13th-century BCE incursion than earlier dates, though minimalist scholars attribute them to internal revolt or other invaders; the selective targeting of cult sites echoes biblical aniconism. Overall, while direct artifacts like the or inscriptions remain absent—likely due to nomadic phases and perishable materials—the cumulative evidence from settlements, stelae, and destruction horizons supports historical kernels in Torah narratives over pure , challenging maximalist denials in source-critical academia influenced by 19th-century rationalism.

Challenges to Historicity and Minimalist Views

Biblical minimalism, a scholarly approach prominent since the , contends that the Pentateuch's narratives of the patriarchs, , and conquest reflect ideological inventions from the or period rather than 2nd-millennium BCE history, with little to no verifiable historical kernel before the 9th century BCE. Scholars like , in works such as The Historicity of the Patriarchal Narratives (1974), argue that these stories lack external corroboration and exhibit literary patterns akin to later Mesopotamian fiction, prioritizing toward biblical claims unless independently verified by or texts. This view posits the Torah as a product of exilic or post-exilic elites crafting national amid foreign domination, dismissing traditional Mosaic origins as untenable given discrepancies with empirical data. Challenges to the patriarchal narratives in highlight apparent anachronisms suggesting composition centuries after the purported events around 2000–1500 BCE. References to in the time of Abraham and predate their archaeological arrival in circa 1200 BCE, while domesticated camels—central to Abrahamic wealth and travel—appear only from the 11th century BCE onward based on faunal remains and textual evidence. The mention of " of the s" evokes dominance from the 9th century BCE, absent in earlier contexts, and purchase prices or legal customs align more with 2nd-millennium Nuzi tablets than norms, though critics of counter that such features could reflect oral preservation rather than late redaction. The account faces scrutiny for lacking traces of a mass departure of 600,000 men (implying 2–3 million total) from circa 1446 or 1260 BCE, with no administrative records of Hebrew slaves, plagues, or catastrophe despite pharaonic propensity for monumental inscriptions. Archaeological surveys of the yield no campsites, pottery, or nomadic artifacts consistent with 40 years of sustained presence by such a group, and demographic models indicate Canaan's Late Bronze population could not absorb or reflect sudden influx without evident disruption. like Niels Peter Lemche attribute this silence to the event's fictional nature, akin to heroic epics, though methodological assumptions favoring non-biblical sources often overlook potential biases in that suppressed defeats. Conquest narratives extending from Deuteronomy and Joshua encounter archaeological mismatches, as key sites like show no occupation or destruction layers in the 13th century BCE, Ai was abandoned prior to Israelite arrival, and Hazor's burn layer lacks weapons or tactics indicative of Hebrew . Finkelstein's excavations and "low chronology" revise settlement patterns, revealing Iron I highland villages (circa 1200–1000 BCE) as emerging from local continuity—simple four-room houses, absence of pig bones—rather than foreign invaders, with population growth attributable to collapse-induced sedentarization rather than military incursion. This endogenous model undermines the Torah's portrayal of rapid, divinely aided takeover, framing it as retrospective mythologizing of gradual . Minimalist interpretations, while grounded in empirical gaps, presuppose late composition and a priori rejection of supernatural elements, potentially reflecting secular academy's systemic inclination toward over integrated historical reasoning, as evidenced by debates where positive biblical alignments (e.g., Stele's 1207 BCE "" reference) are downplayed. Proponents like extended this to viewing the entire "" of the as a post-exilic construct, yet critiques note overreliance on negative evidence amid incomplete excavation records and the challenge of detecting nomadic or low-impact migrations.

Oral Torah and Interpretive Traditions

Concept of Oral Law

The Oral Law, also known as the , comprises the interpretive traditions, legal explications, and expansions that posits as essential to understanding and applying the Written Torah's commandments. It addresses ambiguities, procedural details, and derivations not explicitly stated in the Pentateuch, such as the precise methods for observing rituals like construction or boundaries. According to traditional rabbinic sources, this body of knowledge was divinely revealed to at concurrently with the Written Torah, encompassing not only halakhic (legal) rulings but also midrashic (narrative) elaborations and ethical principles. This dual revelation is said to ensure the Written Torah's practicality, as its terse formulations alone would render observance incomplete or unfeasible. Rabbinic tradition maintains that the Oral Law was transmitted verbatim through an unbroken chain of scholars—from to , the elders, prophets, and the —preserved orally to foster interpretive flexibility, discourage textual , and adapt to changing circumstances without altering the sacred script. Proponents argue this orality allowed for dynamic application, such as deriving ' specifics from scriptural verses via hermeneutic rules like gezerah shavah (verbal analogy). However, the itself contains no explicit references to a parallel oral revelation at , and biblical figures like the prophets critique priestly or popular practices without invoking an authoritative oral corpus, suggesting the concept's doctrinal formulation postdates the canonical texts. Scholarly analyses, drawing on historical and textual , trace the Oral Law's conceptual origins to the Second Temple period (c. 516 BCE–70 ), particularly among the , who emphasized interpretive traditions against Sadducean literalism. This view posits an evolutionary development rather than a Sinaitic genesis, with early rabbinic texts retrojecting antiquity to legitimize authority amid post-Temple upheavals, including the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 . Empirical corroboration for a mass-revealed remains absent, as archaeological records and comparative ancient Near Eastern literatures show no parallels to such a claimed dual corpus, rendering the attribution a theological assertion rather than a verifiable historical event. Critiques from both academic and certain biblical literalist perspectives highlight potential inconsistencies, such as the Oral Law's expansions occasionally superseding biblical literals, which raises causal questions about interpretive innovation versus divine mandate.

Evolution into Mishnah and Talmud

The , comprising interpretive traditions and legal expositions supplementary to the Written Torah, was transmitted verbally through generations of sages from the time of until the late . This oral transmission faced increasing risks of fragmentation due to persecutions following the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 , widespread , and the natural attrition of mnemonic practices among an aging cadre of scholars. Codification into written form became imperative to safeguard these traditions against loss, as evidenced by the systematic organization of halakhic rulings drawn from earlier oral debates and baraitot (external traditions). Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi, a pivotal figure as of the in the early 3rd century , undertook the redaction of the around 200 , compiling it into six orders (sedarim) that classify legal topics such as , festivals, and . This work prioritized concise, authoritative statements attributed to earlier like Hillel and , resolving disputes where possible while excluding extraneous material to facilitate memorization and study. The redaction occurred in Hebrew, reflecting its role as a reference for ongoing oral elaboration rather than a standalone text, and it marked the transition from purely mnemonic transmission to a stabilized corpus amid political instability under Roman rule. Subsequent generations of expanded the through dialectical commentaries, leading to the : the , redacted circa 400 CE in the under scholars like Rabbi Yochanan, and the Babylonian Talmud, finalized around 500 CE by Rav Ashi and Ravina in the academies of Sura and . The Babylonian version, more expansive and analytical due to relative stability in Persia, incorporates broader aggadic material and unresolved debates, while the Jerusalem edition, shorter and more terse, reflects the pressures of Byzantine oppression. This evolution preserved causal chains of legal reasoning from biblical precedents, enabling adaptive application without altering core texts, though later medieval commentaries like Rashi's would further clarify ambiguities.

Centrality in Judaism

Divine Revelation and Inerrancy Claims

In , the Torah is held to be the verbatim of God to at circa 1312 BCE, encompassing both the Written Torah (the Five Books of ) and the transmitted alongside it. This event is described as a national revelation witnessed by approximately three million , distinguishing it from individual prophetic experiences by its public, auditory, and visual nature, with God uttering the Ten Commandments directly and dictating the remainder to over 40 years. Traditional sources assert that transcribed the text under divine instruction, with the exception of the final eight verses detailing his death, which were added by or another successor, maintaining overall . Maimonides (1138–1204 CE), in his Thirteen Principles of Faith, formalized key doctrines: the seventh principle affirms as the greatest prophet, receiving "face to face" without intermediaries; the eighth declares the entire Torah "from ," meaning divinely originated and immutable; and the ninth emphasizes its eternal validity, unaltered by any future . These principles, widely accepted in circles since the , underpin the belief that the Torah contains no human interpolation, serving as the infallible blueprint for Jewish law (), ethics, and cosmology. Inerrancy claims extend to the Torah's freedom from error in historical, scientific, moral, or theological matters, viewed as a cardinal tenet where discrepancies are resolved through interpretive traditions rather than textual emendation. , such as the , reinforces this by treating the as preserved without variant corruptions since , though textual witnesses like the Dead Sea Scrolls (dating to 3rd century BCE–1st century CE) reveal minor orthographic differences not affecting doctrinal content. Critics within modern scholarship, often influenced by source-critical assumptions, challenge these claims by citing anachronisms or stylistic variations as evidence of composite human authorship, but traditionalists counter with internal self-attestations (e.g., 24:4, Deuteronomy 31:9) and the absence of pre-Mosaic Hebrew literary parallels. Such assertions remain doctrinal, reliant on faith in the chain of transmission from , without independent archaeological verification of the revelatory event itself.

Liturgical and Educational Uses

The Torah holds a central role in Jewish through its public recitation in synagogues, a practice traced to ancient traditions mandating communal reading to reinforce covenantal obligations. On mornings, the Torah scroll is removed from the amid ritual honors, and the weekly portion, or , is chanted in Hebrew using a specialized cantillation system (ta'amim) derived from ancient Mesopotamian influences adapted for preservation. This reading divides into seven aliyot (ascents), with congregants called forward to recite blessings before and after each segment, emphasizing communal participation. The annual reading cycle encompasses 54 parshiyot, progressing sequentially from 1:1 to Deuteronomy 34:12, synchronized with the and culminating on , when the conclusion immediately precedes the restart. This structure, standardized by the , originated in Babylonian Jewish communities by the 4th-5th centuries as an annual format, differing from the triennial cycle practiced in ancient , as noted in the (Bava 82a and Megillah 29b). Readings also occur on Mondays, Thursdays, holidays, and fast days, with portions tailored to the occasion, such as 12-13 on eve, ensuring the entire Torah is encountered multiple times yearly in observant communities. In educational contexts, Torah study constitutes a foundational mitzvah, deemed equivalent in merit to performing all other commandments, as articulated in rabbinic sources like Sanhedrin 99a, fostering intellectual engagement with text, logic, and ethics. Deuteronomy 6:7 mandates parental instruction of Torah to children, establishing lifelong learning as a familial and communal duty, historically implemented through home teaching and later formalized in institutions like cheder schools by the medieval period. Yeshivas and study groups (shiurim) emphasize dialectical analysis (pilpul) of the text alongside commentaries, with daily regimens often covering the weekly parashah to align personal study with liturgical exposure, promoting causal understanding of halakhic principles over rote memorization. This dual liturgical-educational framework underscores the Torah's role in sustaining , with empirical data from surveys indicating higher observance correlates with regular participation, though institutional biases in modern academia may underreport traditional efficacy.

Foundations of Halakha and Ethics

, the body of , derives its primary authority from the Torah, which outlines known as mitzvot, consisting of 248 positive requirements and 365 prohibitions corresponding to the days of the solar year. These include directives on ritual observance, such as rest mandated in 20:8-11 and Leviticus 23:3, as well as civil and criminal statutes like prohibitions against ( 20:13) and ( 20:15). Rabbinic tradition holds that these mitzvot require interpretive application to derive practical rulings, employing exegetical methods to resolve textual ambiguities and extend principles to new circumstances, ensuring the Torah's laws remain operative across generations. The ethical framework of Judaism similarly originates in the Torah's interpersonal commandments, which emphasize covenantal fidelity to divine will as the basis for moral conduct, rather than autonomous human reason alone. Key principles include the pursuit of (tzedek) as commanded in Deuteronomy 16:20, the imperative of reflected in Exodus 20:16's ban on , and peace () as a foundational articulated in rabbinic expansions of Torah . These ethics prioritize obligations between humans, such as fair treatment in commerce (Leviticus 19:13) and aid to the vulnerable (Deuteronomy 15:7-11), viewing moral lapses as violations of the divine-human pact established at . Traditional sources maintain that ethical norms are inseparable from ritual ones, with the Torah integrating personal piety and societal equity to foster communal holiness. In practice, Halakha synthesizes Torah-derived ethics into binding norms through processes like legal deduction (e.g., deriving monetary restitution laws from 21:18-22), balancing strict adherence with contextual equity to avoid outcomes deemed unjust under Torah principles. This system rejects , grounding decisions in the unchanging divine text while allowing for rabbinic to address unprecedented issues, as seen in historical adaptations like agricultural laws for communities. Critics from secular perspectives argue that certain Torah penalties, such as those for violation ( 31:14), conflict with modern humanitarian standards, but Orthodox interpreters counter that ethical application involves nuanced prioritizing life preservation () over non-essential prohibitions.

Production and Preservation

Standards for Torah Scrolls

A kosher Torah scroll, or , must be meticulously handwritten by a qualified known as a sofer to meet halakhic requirements for ritual use in Jewish . The scribe must be an observant Jew trained in the precise formation of Hebrew letters according to traditional scripts, such as Ashkenazi or Sephardi styles, and must write with the explicit intention of fulfilling the of writing the Torah. Any deviation, including printing or mechanical reproduction, renders the scroll invalid, as the process embodies a sacred act traceable to biblical commandments. The scroll is produced on parchment (klaf) derived from the hides of ritually clean kosher animals, such as calves or deer, which undergoes a specific curing process to ensure purity and durability; leather from non-kosher animals or improperly prepared skins is prohibited. Typically comprising 48 to 60 sheets sewn together with sinews from kosher animals, the scroll forms a continuous roll containing exactly 304,805 letters across the Five Books of Moses. Writing employs a quill pen and ink composed of tannin-rich materials like gallnut extract, soot, and gum, applied without erasures—corrections require precise overwriting techniques to avoid invalidation. Halakhic guidelines, codified in sources like the (Yoreh De'ah 270–283), mandate that the copy from a verified model (tikun), pronouncing each word aloud before inscribing it to minimize errors and maintain fidelity. Columns number between 3 and 8 per sheet, with standard line counts varying by community—42 for Ashkenazi scrolls, 48–50 for Sephardi or Yemenite—to accommodate readability while adhering to rules that certain verses begin or end at column tops. The must ritually immerse before writing the Divine Name and ensure uniform letter sizes, with the scroll's height equaling its circumference for proper rolling. Upon completion, the scroll undergoes rigorous proofreading by at least three qualified individuals, who compare it letter-by-letter against an authoritative text; a single missing, extra, or deformed letter invalidates the entire scroll, reflecting the emphasis on textual exactitude derived from Tractate Soferim and Talmudic precedents. These standards, enforced to preserve the Torah's purported transmission, result in production times of 1–2 years and costs exceeding $50,000, underscoring their role in safeguarding scriptural integrity against transmission errors. Scrolls failing these criteria cannot be used for public reading, though defective ones may serve non-ritual study purposes after repair or retirement.

Key Historical Manuscripts

The earliest extant fragments of the Torah appear in the Dead Sea Scrolls, a collection of over 900 manuscripts discovered in caves near Qumran between 1947 and 1956, with Torah portions dating from approximately the 3rd century BCE to the 1st century CE. These fragments encompass texts from all five books of the Pentateuch—Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—such as the Great Isaiah Scroll's contemporaries including Exodus and Deuteronomy pieces, revealing a consonantal Hebrew text largely consistent with later traditions but with occasional orthographic and minor textual variants attributable to scribal practices rather than doctrinal divergence. Among medieval Masoretic manuscripts, the stands as a pivotal exemplar, completed around 930 in by the scribe Shlomo ben Buya'a under the supervision of Aaron ben Asher, whose family standardized the and accentuation systems for the . Originally containing the full Pentateuch, it served as a benchmark for textual accuracy, endorsed by in the for its fidelity to received traditions, though riots in in 1947 destroyed nearly 40% of its folios, including most Torah sections, leaving only partial Prophets and Writings intact today. The , penned in 1008 CE (or 1009 by colophon) in by Samuel ben Jacob, represents the oldest surviving complete manuscript of the entire , including an intact Torah, with 491 folios on featuring Ben Asher-style Masoretic notes that preserve precise vowel points, cantillation marks, and marginal annotations for and . Its comprehensive survival and scholarly validation have made it the foundational text for 20th-century critical editions like the , demonstrating remarkable stability in the Torah's transmission over centuries when compared to fragmentary antecedents. Additional significant Torah-specific artifacts include the , a 10th-century with illuminated carpet pages and nearly complete Pentateuch text in square script, valued for its early Sephardic vocalization and artistic provenance from the Mediterranean region. For ritual scrolls, the , dated via carbon analysis to approximately 1155–1225 and housed at the , qualifies as the oldest known complete, kosher-compliant , underscoring the tradition of producing unvocalized parchment scrolls for use under strict scribal rules codified in the to prevent textual corruption.

Translations and Linguistic Adaptations

Ancient Versions

The ancient versions of the Torah encompass early translations into and , produced to serve Jewish communities in the Hellenistic diaspora where proficiency in Hebrew had declined among Aramaic- and -speaking populations. These versions emerged between the 3rd century BCE and the 2nd century CE, reflecting both linguistic adaptation and interpretive traditions, though they sometimes diverge from the Masoretic Hebrew text in wording or underlying Vorlage, as corroborated by comparisons with fragments. The , or LXX, represents the earliest known extensive translation of the into , with the Pentateuch likely completed around 280–250 BCE in , , under Ptolemaic rule to meet the needs of Greek-speaking . Tradition attributes its origin to a commission by (r. 285–246 BCE), involving 72 Jewish scholars from , as described in the pseudepigraphic Letter of Aristeas, though modern scholarship views this as legendary embellishment on a practical communal effort. The LXX Pentateuch adheres closely to the Hebrew in many places but exhibits expansions, paraphrases, and variants—such as additional material in or differing numerical data—that suggest translation from a proto-Masoretic or related Hebrew text tradition, independent of later rabbinic standardization. Aramaic Targums, initially oral renderings recited alongside Hebrew readings in synagogues to aid comprehension amid widespread use post-Exile, were later committed to writing; for the Torah, stands as the authoritative version, characterized by a literal, non-expansive style that avoids anthropomorphic depictions of and incorporates subtle interpretive renderings aligned with early rabbinic . Attributed to (or Aquilas), a associated with the , its core composition dates to approximately 50–150 , with final redaction possibly extending to the 2nd–4th centuries , as evidenced by linguistic features and parallels to Targumic fragments like 4Q156 (Leviticus). Unlike the more paraphrastic , Onkelos prioritizes fidelity to the Hebrew, rendering it suitable for liturgical use and study, though it introduces etymological explanations for names and halakhic nuances. Subsequent Greek recensions addressed perceived inaccuracies in the LXX amid rising rabbinic influence and Christian adoption of the version. Aquila's translation, produced circa 130 CE by a Pontic Jewish convert under rabbinic oversight (possibly Rabbi Akiva), aimed for hyper-literal equivalence to the emerging proto-Masoretic text, transliterating Hebrew terms and altering LXX phrasing to eliminate ambiguities or Hellenisms. Theodotion's version, from the late 2nd century CE, revised the LXX with a more idiomatic Greek style, drawing closer to the Hebrew and gaining favor for books like Daniel, while Symmachus's rendering, around 200 CE by an Ebionite or Jewish scholar, emphasized elegance and clarity, often smoothing theological tensions. These "Three" were collated by Origen in his Hexapla (ca. 240 CE) for textual comparison, highlighting their role in preserving variant Torah readings, though fragments only survive in citations. The Peshitta's , including the , translated from rather than , dates to the 2nd–4th centuries in northern (likely ), serving Aramaic-speaking Christian and Jewish communities but reflecting a textual akin to the with occasional harmonizations. Its antiquity and independence make it valuable for textual , though less directly tied to Jewish liturgical use than the LXX or Targums.

Medieval and Contemporary Translations

In the medieval period, Jewish scholars in Islamic lands produced significant translations of the Torah into to facilitate study and among Arabic-speaking communities. (882–942 CE), a prominent Rabbanite authority, completed his , a verse-by-verse translation of the Torah into accompanied by philological and theological commentary, around 930 CE, emphasizing literal rendering while addressing Karaite challenges and incorporating rationalist interpretations. This work, preserved in Hebrew script, influenced subsequent biblical scholarship and was used for both liturgical and educational purposes in regions like and . Karaite scholars, such as those in the 10th–12th centuries, also produced independent translations, often more literal and less interpretive than Saadia's, reflecting sectarian divergences from Rabbanite tradition. In medieval Christian , full translations of the Torah into vernacular languages were rare due to halakhic preferences for Hebrew study, but glosses and partial renditions emerged. Rabbi Shlomo Yitzchaki (, 1040–1105 CE) integrated Old French explanations—known as la'azim—into his Hebrew commentary on the Torah, translating obscure terms for French-speaking , such as rendering Hebrew words for everyday objects or idioms to clarify midrashic and interpretations. These glosses, numbering over 300 in the Torah commentary, served as an ad hoc aid rather than a standalone , preserving rabbinic fidelity while bridging linguistic gaps in northern . By the late medieval period, Judeo-Romance translations into or Italian dialects appeared sporadically for communal use, though they remained marginal compared to Arabic efforts in the . Contemporary translations of the Torah, accelerating from the amid the and , prioritize accessibility in modern languages while varying by denominational emphasis on tradition versus scholarly critique. Mendelssohn's Be'ur (1780–1783), the first major Jewish translation into , rendered the Torah with a literal Hebrew-German interlinear and commentary blending rabbinic sources with , influencing subsequent European Jewish vernacular efforts. In English, the Jewish Publication Society's 1917 translation, revised as the 1985 Tanakh, adopts a formal approach based on the , balancing precision with readability for broad Jewish use across denominations. translations, such as the Chabad Tanakh (completed in the late 20th century by Rabbi A.J. ) and ArtScroll's Pentateuch series (from 1976 onward), integrate Rashi's commentary and prioritize traditional , avoiding alterations influenced by historical-critical methods. Reform and Conservative translations incorporate contemporary scholarship, sometimes adapting phrasing for inclusivity; for instance, The Contemporary Torah (2006), an update to the JPS version, employs gender-sensitive where Hebrew permits, reflecting egalitarian interpretations while retaining textual fidelity. The Living Torah by Rabbi (1981), an work, uses modern colloquial English to convey literal meaning alongside scientific and archaeological notes, aiming to demonstrate the Torah's compatibility with empirical knowledge. These translations, disseminated via print and digital platforms like , support global Jewish education but highlight tensions: traditionalists critique academic-influenced versions for potentially undermining divine inerrancy, while proponents argue they enhance accessibility without distorting core halakhic intent. Translations into other modern languages, such as , , and , follow similar patterns, often tailored to local or communities.

Adoption in Other Traditions

Samaritan Pentateuch

The Samaritan Pentateuch constitutes the sacred scripture of the Samaritan community, comprising solely the five books of Moses in a Hebrew text tradition distinct from the Jewish Masoretic Text. Samaritans, who trace their origins to the ancient Israelite tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh in the northern kingdom, regard this Pentateuch as the unaltered revelation given to Moses at Sinai, rejecting subsequent Jewish prophetic writings and emphasizing Mount Gerizim as the divinely appointed site for worship rather than Jerusalem. This textual tradition underscores Samaritan identity, serving as the foundation for their liturgy, law, and theology, with no additional canonical books accepted. Textual variants between the Samaritan Pentateuch and the number approximately 6,000, predominantly involving orthographic expansions, grammatical adjustments, and minor lexical differences that render the Samaritan version stylistically smoother in places. Substantive alterations, though fewer, carry theological weight, such as the substitution in Deuteronomy 27:4 of "" for "" as the location for building an , aligning with cultic centrality on Gerizim. An insertion following 20:17 in the text commands the construction of a exclusively on , absent in the Masoretic tradition, which scholars attribute to sectarian editing to bolster claims against Jerusalem's primacy. These changes reflect deliberate harmonizations within the Samaritan Pentateuch, such as aligning commands across and Deuteronomy for consistency, potentially indicating a later process influenced by priorities. Manuscript evidence for the Samaritan Pentateuch derives exclusively from medieval copies, with the earliest surviving exemplars dating to the 11th to 13th centuries CE, inscribed in a Samaritan script derived from Paleo-Hebrew characters that diverged from standard Jewish square script after the Babylonian exile. Approximately 150 such manuscripts exist, preserved through meticulous Samaritan scribal practices akin to those of Jewish soferim, though lacking the vowel points and accents of the Masoretic system. The absence of pre-medieval Samaritan manuscripts complicates claims of textual antiquity, yet comparisons with Dead Sea Scrolls reveal instances where Samaritan readings align against the Masoretic Text, suggesting the tradition may preserve elements of Second Temple-era diversity rather than purely post-schism innovations. European awareness of the Samaritan Pentateuch emerged in 1616 via Pietro della Valle's acquisition of a copy, prompting scholarly scrutiny that highlighted its value as an independent witness to the Pentateuch's transmission history. In practice, the Pentateuch is ritually read in synagogues on using scrolls without diacritics, with annual cycles mirroring Jewish traditions but interpreted through a lens prioritizing Gerizim's sanctity. Scholarly evaluations often view many variants as secondary expansions by Samaritan scribes to resolve perceived inconsistencies or advance doctrinal positions, yet empirical alignments with fragments challenge notions of wholesale fabrication, indicating a shared ancient textual stream modified over time. This interplay underscores the Pentateuch's role in illuminating the pluriform nature of early biblical texts prior to efforts in Jewish communities.

Christian Old Testament

The Christian incorporates the Torah as its foundational component, consisting of the five books—, , Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy—collectively termed the Pentateuch. These books are universally included in the Old Testament canons of Protestant, Catholic, and traditions, forming the initial segment before historical, prophetic, and . While Protestant Bibles align the Old Testament's 39 books with the Jewish Tanakh's content for the Pentateuch, Catholic and versions add elsewhere but retain the identical Torah texts. Early Christian communities adopted the Pentateuch from Jewish scriptures, predominantly through the , a third-century BCE Greek translation produced for Hellenistic in . This version, which rendered the Hebrew Torah into , became the primary text for Greek-speaking Christians and is quoted over 300 times in the , with many direct citations from the Pentateuch, such as Deuteronomy 6:5 in 22:37. The Septuagint's Pentateuch occasionally diverges from the later , including variant chronologies in (e.g., longer pre-flood lifespans) and textual expansions, influencing early patristic interpretations. In , the Torah represents the covenant law mediated by , establishing God's moral order, sacrificial system, and ethical imperatives for . authors, including , affirm its authority—Jesus declaring in Matthew 5:17 that he came not to abolish the law but to fulfill it—yet portray it as preparatory, exposing sinfulness and anticipating redemption through Christ ( 3:24). Mainstream interpretations distinguish enduring moral laws (e.g., ) from ceremonial and civil ordinances deemed fulfilled or obsolete post-resurrection, as in Colossians 2:16-17, though some traditions like Seventh-day Adventists retain select observances such as Sabbath-keeping. This framework underscores , where Torah narratives and rituals prefigure Christian doctrines, such as symbolizing Christ's sacrifice (1 Corinthians 5:7). Later translations, including Jerome's Latin (completed 405 CE) and Reformation-era versions like the King James (1611), drew from Hebrew manuscripts for the Pentateuch while preserving influences in quotations. Modern critical scholarship notes archaeological and textual evidence supporting the Pentateuch's historical framework, such as Egyptian influences in , but debates , with conservative scholars upholding substantial Mosaic origin based on internal claims and early attestation. Christian engagement with the Torah thus emphasizes its revelatory role in salvation history, distinct from Jewish halakhic application.

Islamic Tawrat

In Islamic theology, the Tawrat (Arabic: تَوْرَاة) denotes the divine revelation bestowed upon the prophet Musa (Moses) to serve as guidance for the Banu Isra'il (Children of Israel). The Quran references the Tawrat eighteen times, portraying it as a source of huda (guidance) and nur (light) through which earlier prophets rendered judgments among their communities. Specifically, Quran 5:44 states: "Indeed, We sent down the Torah, in which was guidance and light. The prophets who submitted [to Allah] judged by it for the Jews, as did the rabbis and scholars by that with which they were entrusted of the Scripture of Allah." This positions the Tawrat as one of four major scriptures in the Islamic chain of revelation, preceding the Zabur (Psalms) given to Dawud (David), the Injil (Gospel) to Isa (Jesus), and culminating in the Quran itself. Muslim doctrine holds that the original Tawrat comprised Mosaic laws (shari'ah), moral commandments, and historical narratives concerning creation, prophets, and divine covenants, aligning in broad outline with the Pentateuch's content but originating directly from Allah's speech to Musa on Mount Sinai. Unlike the Quran, which Muslims regard as verbatim preserved since its revelation in 610–632 CE, the Tawrat is believed to have undergone tahrif—distortion—effected by Jewish scribes and leaders through textual alterations (tahrif al-lafz) or deliberate misinterpretations (tahrif al-ma'na). Quranic verses cite instances of such changes, including twisting words from their contexts or concealing truths for worldly gain, as in 4:46: "Among the Jews are those who distort words from their [proper] usages," and 5:13: "They distort words from their [proper] places." This view, elaborated in post-Quranic exegeses like those of al-Tabari (d. 923 CE), reconciles doctrinal divergences between the Quran and Jewish texts by attributing inconsistencies to human intervention rather than divine error. Notwithstanding the doctrine of , the Quran validates the Tawrat extant during the Muhammad's era (circa 610–632 CE), urging Jews to adjudicate by it: "And let the People of the Gospel judge by what has revealed therein" parallels instructions for the Torah in 5:43, implying residual authenticity amid corruptions. Classical scholars such as (d. 1064 CE) argued for wholesale textual corruption post-Musa, while others like al-Razi (d. 1209 CE) emphasized interpretive distortion, allowing selective affirmation of Pentateuchal elements compatible with Islamic , such as monotheistic declarations and ethical prohibitions. No physical copy of the pristine Tawrat survives in Islamic tradition; hadiths occasionally reference its lost contents, like prohibitions on or observances, but Muslims rely solely on the for authoritative guidance. The Tawrat's legal prescriptions, including rituals like circumcision and dietary laws, are seen as abrogated (mansukh) by subsequent revelations, particularly the Quran, which supersedes prior scriptures in universality and finality. This abrogation underscores Islam's self-conception as the corrective culmination of Abrahamic faiths, with the Tawrat's role confined to its historical context among the Israelites. Empirical scrutiny of manuscript traditions, such as Dead Sea Scrolls dating to 250 BCE–68 CE, reveals textual stability predating Islam, challenging claims of post-Mosaic wholesale alteration, though Islamic apologetics maintain that corruptions occurred incrementally, including during the Babylonian exile (586–539 BCE). Mainstream Sunni and Shia sources uniformly uphold the Tawrat's revelatory origin while subordinating it to Quranic primacy, cautioning against uncritical reliance on extant versions due to suspected interpolations favoring anthropomorphic depictions of God or prophetic flaws absent in Islamic narratives.

Contemporary Debates

Persistence of Mosaic Authorship Views

In Orthodox Judaism, the attribution of the Torah's authorship to Moses remains a core doctrinal tenet, with the text regarded as divinely dictated to him at Sinai around the 13th century BCE, including all but the final eight verses recounting his death. This view, rooted in rabbinic tradition and upheld without significant dissent in Orthodox circles, posits that Moses transcribed the material verbatim under God's instruction, as referenced in passages like Deuteronomy 31:9 where Moses is described as writing "this torah" and delivering it to the priests. Surveys of Jewish denominational beliefs indicate near-universal adherence among Orthodox Jews, contrasting with more varied positions in Conservative and Reform branches influenced by 19th-century higher criticism. Among evangelical , Mosaic authorship persists as a defended position, often integrated into doctrines of , with proponents arguing that internal textual claims—such as ' recording of laws in 24:4 and Numbers 33:2—align with affirmations like John 5:46-47 where references ' writings. Organizations like and cite linguistic, archaeological, and historical consistencies, such as Egyptian loanwords in the text fitting a 15th-13th century BCE milieu, to counter challenges. Evangelical seminaries and publications, including those from , continue to teach this view, emphasizing that rejection of Mosaic unity often stems from presuppositional rather than conclusive empirical disproof. Contemporary Jewish scholars like Joshua Berman and the late David Zvi Hoffmann have advanced arguments against source-critical fragmentation, highlighting thematic unity and covenantal structures that cohere under single authorship, while evangelical figures such as those at Apologetics Press marshal external attestations from ancient Near Eastern parallels and early . These defenses persist amid mainstream academic consensus favoring multiple authors over centuries, which some critics attribute to methodological biases prioritizing evolutionary models over traditional testimonies, yet empirical reevaluations of textual variants and evidence sustain the Mosaic case for a substantive minority of researchers.

Impacts of Recent Scholarship and Archaeology

Recent scholarship on the Torah has increasingly emphasized its , attributing to multiple authors and redactors spanning from the monarchic period through the era, rather than single around the 13th century BCE. Linguistic analysis reveals Hebrew features consistent with (c. 1000–500 BCE) usage, including late grammatical forms and vocabulary absent in earlier texts, undermining claims of 2nd-millennium BCE origins. This view, advanced in works like those building on the Documentary Hypothesis, posits the Pentateuch as a product of Israelite scribal traditions reflecting exilic and post-exilic theological concerns, such as renewal amid national trauma. Archaeological investigations have profoundly impacted interpretations of the Torah's narratives, particularly the and wilderness accounts. Extensive surveys of the , including over 100 prospective sites from the (c. 1550–1200 BCE), have yielded no traces of large-scale migrations or encampments capable of sustaining the biblical population of 600,000 men plus families. records, abundant for labor management and Asiatic interactions, contain no references to a mass Hebrew slave or plagues disrupting the economy during Ramesses II's reign (c. 1279–1213 BCE), the traditional pharaonic backdrop. These absences have bolstered minimalist positions, viewing the as etiological myth or exaggerated folk memory of smaller upheavals, rather than verifiable . Conversely, select findings offer indirect support for early Israelite literacy and cultural elements in the Torah. The silver amulets (c. 600 BCE), inscribed with the from Numbers 6:24–26, demonstrate pre-exilic familiarity with Pentateuchal phrasing, suggesting textual traditions predating the Babylonian exile. Proto-Sinaitic inscriptions from (c. 19th–15th century BCE) indicate Semitic alphabetic writing in Egyptian contexts, compatible with Mosaic-era literacy hypotheses, though not directly linked to Hebrew law codes. The (c. 1207 BCE) attests to an entity "" in , establishing a proto-Israelite presence by the late BCE, yet without corroborating conquest motifs from integrated into the Torah's framework. These developments have reshaped Torah studies by prioritizing empirical constraints over traditional attributions, prompting maximalist scholars to invoke indirect evidences like toponyms in texts (e.g., "Yhw" in lists, c. 1400 BCE) as kernels of , while highlight Canaanite material culture continuity—evident in highland settlements (c. 1200–1000 BCE)—as evidence of endogenous rather than external invasion. The paucity of corroboration for patriarchal wanderings or events has shifted focus toward the Torah's role as a constitutional for Judahite , synthesized amid 8th–5th century BCE crises, with archaeological parallels to treaty forms underscoring its socio-political utility over literal chronicle. This evidentiary landscape fosters ongoing , where conservative defenses marshaling cumulative internal consistencies clash with source-critical deconstructions informed by stratigraphic and epigraphic data.

References

  1. [1]
    TORAH - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    Name applied to the five books of Moses, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. The contents of the Torah as a whole are discussed.
  2. [2]
    Torah - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
    Torah can refer to the first five books of the Bible, the entire Jewish bible (Tanakh), or the whole body of Jewish law and teachings.
  3. [3]
    What Is the Torah? - Judaism's sacred scroll and teachings
    The definition of the word Torah is literally “instruction,” and when Jews say “Torah,” they're most likely speaking of the Five Books of Moses.
  4. [4]
    Judaism: The Written Law - Torah - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Torah, or Jewish Written Law, consists of the five books of the Hebrew Bible – known more commonly to non-Jews as the “Old Testament” – that were given by ...
  5. [5]
    WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "TORAH"? - Pillar Seminary
    Mar 9, 2023 · When people say “Torah,” they mean simply biblical legal texts or case laws (usually contained within the first five books of the Bible).
  6. [6]
    Torah: The Tree of Life | Reform Judaism
    Interpreting Torah​​ Throughout most of Jewish history, the Torah functioned as “the law” for Jews. Its commandments and the interpretation of them regulated ...
  7. [7]
    A Brief History of Torah Study | The Rabbinical Assembly
    The Torah became a sacred book that embodied God's word and will; from then on Jews were enjoined to study and observe its commandments.
  8. [8]
    Textual Criticism of the Torah: Ten Short Case Studies - TheTorah.com
    We will never have firm answers regarding whether there was once an original text of Hebrew Scripture and which of the known texts represents that text best.
  9. [9]
    Who Wrote the Torah? - Ideas | Institute for Advanced Study
    The tradition claims it was Moses, but the Torah itself says otherwise. Only small portions within the Torah are traced back to him, but not nearly the whole ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  10. [10]
    Text and Context: Torah and Historical Truth - TheTorah.com
    Dec 5, 2013 · Historical-critical and text-critical approaches to the Torah have a strong precedent in classical rabbinic literature. Yet Orthodox Jewish ...
  11. [11]
    Source Criticism of the Torah | My Jewish Learning
    The Torah is a compilation from several sources, different streams of literary traditions that were composed and collected over the course of the biblical ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Torah - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    From Hebrew origin, "Torah" means "instruction" or "law," referring to the Pentateuch and Mosaic law, derived from horah meaning "he taught, showed."
  13. [13]
    What is Torah? | AHRC
    The word Torah comes from the Hebrew root word ירה (Y.R.H, Strong's #3384), a verb which means "to flow or throw something".
  14. [14]
    The Written Torah - Hebrew for Christians
    The word Torah (תּוֹרָה) comes from the root word yarah meaning "to shoot an arrow" or "to hit the mark." Properly used, the word means "teaching" or "instruction.
  15. [15]
    Torah (תּוֹרָה) - A Tree of Life - Chabad.org
    Torah, the Hebrew word for the Bible, comes from the word horaah, to instruct,1 implying a more dynamic sense of contemporary relevance. Understood as such, ...
  16. [16]
    What Is the Root of the Word 'Torah'? - The Jewish Link
    Jun 6, 2019 · Hebrew has a root Y-R-H. It means to “proclaim/instruct.” This is the root of the word TORaH. (In the noun form of Y-R-H, the “yod” changes to ...
  17. [17]
    Torah: Covenant and Constitution | The Pluralism Project
    The Torah is the central Jewish scripture, meaning 'instruction' or 'guidebook', and is the constitution of the Jewish people, acting as a covenant.
  18. [18]
    Why Is the Torah Divided into Five Books? - TheTorah.com
    May 13, 2018 · The first time the Greek word “Pentateuch” is used in reference to the Torah is the middle of the second century C.E., in a Greek epistle ...
  19. [19]
    The Torah/The Pentateuch - Bible Odyssey
    Aug 26, 2020 · “Torah” is a Hebrew term deriving from the verb y-r-h, meaning “to teach, instruct.” It is generally used to denote instructions of divine ...
  20. [20]
    What Is the Torah? What Is the Pentateuch? - JW.ORG
    These are also called the Pentateuch, from a Greek word meaning “fivefold volume.” The Torah was written by Moses, so it is called “the book of the Law of Moses ...
  21. [21]
    The Written Torah and the Oral Torah | My Jewish Learning
    According to Jewish tradition, two Torahs were received on Mount Sinai -- one written, and one passed down orally for generations.
  22. [22]
    Torah - Rossing Center for Education and Dialogue
    Jewish tradition speaks of two “Torahs” the oral and the written. When used alone, the word “Torah” usually refers to the written Torah. Jewish tradition sees ...
  23. [23]
    Oral Torah vs. Written Torah
    The Written Torah, mentiones each of the Commandments, or Mitzvos, only in passing or by allusion. The Oral Law fills in the gaps.
  24. [24]
    Necessity of Oral Law - Aish.com
    Information in the written form is, by definition, secondary and limited in scope. That's why the Oral Torah is 50 times the size of the Written Torah! (In ...
  25. [25]
    The Relationship between the Written and Oral Torah - תורת הר עציון
    Dec 5, 2017 · The Written Torah is widely accessible and is claimed as sacred scripture by other religions as well. The Oral Torah, by contrast, distinguishes ...
  26. [26]
    The Torah: a Quick Overview of the Pentateuch - OverviewBible
    Aug 16, 2019 · The Torah, which comes from the Hebrew word for “law” · The Pentateuch, which comes from a means “five-book work,” or “five-fold book” · The Books ...
  27. [27]
    the tawrat in islamic thinking - Muslim Evangelism
    Muslim scholars accept that the Tawrat teaches the unity of God yet believe it falls short of the full revelation as it does not give an account of the stated ...Missing: scope | Show results with:scope
  28. [28]
    INJIL, IBN ABBAS & Al-BUKHARI - Answering Islam Blog
    Nov 15, 2024 · The Qur'anic term Tawrat is often taken to denote the Pentateuch, or the first five books, associated with Moses, though it is later used by ...
  29. [29]
    PENTATEUCH - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    The five books of Moses. The word is a Greek adaptation of the Hebrew expression "ḥamishshah ḥumshe ha-Torah" (five-fifths of the Law)
  30. [30]
    Introduction to the Pentateuch | TGCBC | T. Desmond Alexander
    The title “Pentateuch” is derived from the Greek word pentateuchos, which means “five-volume work.” This title, which goes back to the third century AD, ...
  31. [31]
    The Pentateuch, THE PENTATEUCH | USCCB - Daily Readings
    The Pentateuch (Greek for “five books”) designates the first five books of the Jewish and Christian Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy) ...
  32. [32]
    What Are the Five Books of Moses? - Chabad.org
    A Summary of the Book of Genesis ... The first book of the Torah is known in Hebrew as Bereishit (“In the Beginning”), because the opening lines describe how G‑d ...
  33. [33]
    A Summary of the Torah | My Jewish Learning
    The First of the Five Books of Moses begins with the creation of the world out of the void. It ends with the last days of Moses.
  34. [34]
    A Summary of the Book of Genesis - Sefer Bereishit - Chabad.org
    Genesis describes creation, Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, the flood, Noah, Abraham, and Joseph's story, setting the stage for the exodus.Missing: contents | Show results with:contents
  35. [35]
    Book of Genesis | Guide with Key Information and Resources
    Mar 30, 2023 · It is divided into two main parts, with chapters 1-11 telling the story of God and the whole world, and chapters 12-50 focusing in on the story ...Missing: Torah | Show results with:Torah
  36. [36]
    Ancestor Epics: Structuring Genesis
    Jan 8, 2024 · The “primeval history” is the time before the calling of Abram and the founding of the family line that would result in the nation of Israel.
  37. [37]
    The Book of Genesis: The Beginner's Guide and Summary
    Oct 5, 2018 · For 38 of Genesis' 50 chapters, the story follows Abraham's family as God begins fulfilling the first part of that promise: Abraham has eight ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Primeval & Patriarchal History
    Feb 26, 2018 · principle of Genesis 1 consciously mirrors the 7-tablet structure of Enuma. Elish. In this way Genesis 1 both “alludes to mythical concepts and.
  39. [39]
    Genesis - Chapter 1 (Parshah Bereshit) - Tanakh Online - Chabad.org
    Chapter 1 · And God saw the light that it was good, and God separated. Here too, we need the words of the Aggadah: He saw it that it was not proper for the ...
  40. [40]
    Book of Genesis Summary | Watch an Overview Video (Part 1)
    Feb 4, 2020 · In chapters 1-11, the book of Genesis recounts God's good world and humanity's repeated rebellion. How will God restore blessing to the world?<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    An Introduction and Overview of Genesis - Hills Bible Church
    Mar 6, 2014 · It is generally agreed that the book of Genesis can be divided into two parts, Primeval History (1-11) and Patriarchal History (12-50).
  42. [42]
    Genesis Is Historically True | The Institute for Creation Research
    Contrary to many academic proclamations, there is much evidence for the factual accuracy of those pre-history chapters.
  43. [43]
    The Prehistoric World Vs. Genesis | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Mar 7, 2020 · Archaeology has confirmed dozens of biblical cities, as well as the biblical events that happened within them. It has verified everything from ...6,000 Years Vs. 13,820,000... · A Really Bad Date · The Great Deluge
  44. [44]
    Archaeology and Genesis—What Does the Record Show? Part 1
    Sep 9, 1996 · In this article we take a look at some of the astounding discoveries of the last two centuries and show how physical evidence confirms ...
  45. [45]
    A Summary of the Book of Exodus - Sefer Shemot - Chabad.org
    The Book of Exodus describes the Jewish people's enslavement in Egypt, their miraculous exodus, the Mount Sinai event, and the building of the Sanctuary.Missing: perspective - - | Show results with:perspective - -
  46. [46]
    Exodus | Sefaria
    Exodus (“Shemot”) is the second book of the Torah, Judaism's foundational text. It describes the Israelites' enslavement in Egypt, their miraculous redemption.Exodus 1 · Exodus 20 · Exodus 3 · Exodus 2Missing: summary perspective - -
  47. [47]
    EXODUS, BOOK OF - JewishEncyclopedia.com
    The second book of the Torah is the organic continuation of the first book. It narrates the departure of the descendants of the Patriarchs, increased to a ...
  48. [48]
    The Book of Exodus | My Jewish Learning
    The Book of Exodus tells of Israel's liberation and birth, including enslavement, liberation, and the beginning of God's covenanted nation. It is also called " ...
  49. [49]
    Outline of Exodus - Enter the Bible
    Outline of Exodus · 1. Servitude in and Deliverance from Egypt (Exodus 1:1-15:21) · 2. Journey to Sinai (Exodus 15:22-18:27) · 3. Revelation at Sinai (Exodus 19:1- ...
  50. [50]
    Book of Leviticus | Guide with Key Information and Resources
    Mar 30, 2023 · Leviticus is the third book of the Bible, and it flows directly out of the events in the previous book of Exodus.
  51. [51]
    Summary of the Book of Leviticus - Bible Survey | GotQuestions.org
    Sep 9, 2024 · The primary theme of Leviticus is holiness. God's demand for holiness in His people is based on His own holy nature. A corresponding theme is ...
  52. [52]
    Summary of Leviticus - Enter the Bible
    Leviticus is a book of law regulating sacrifices, priest duties, and practices of the Israelites, including sexual, dietary, and economic practices.
  53. [53]
    Outline of Leviticus - Enter the Bible
    Outline of Leviticus · 1. Setting the Story (1:1) · 2. Laws Concerning Offerings and Sacrifices (1:2-7:38) · 3. Ordination, Worship, and Disobedience (8:1-10:20).
  54. [54]
    Leviticus | BibleRef.com
    Overview: This book consists of 27 chapters, covering four major themes. The first theme includes laws regarding the five major offerings God commanded the ...Leviticus chapter 1 · Leviticus chapter 19 · Leviticus chapter 16 · Leviticus chapter 10
  55. [55]
    Leviticus - Insight for Living
    The overall message of Leviticus is sanctification. The book communicates that receiving God's forgiveness and acceptance should be followed by holy living and ...
  56. [56]
    The Book of Leviticus: The Beginner's Guide and Summary
    Jul 1, 2013 · This whole book is about how the nation of Israel needs to live in order to survive living in the presence of such a powerful, holy being.
  57. [57]
    Key Themes in Leviticus - IVP Books
    Nov 30, 2021 · The message of holiness pervades the book of Leviticus. This intricate, complex, yet unmistakable theme runs through the entire book.
  58. [58]
    Theological Themes in Leviticus - Enter the Bible
    Leviticus views worship as central to the life of the community. The majority of the book (chapters 1-10, 16-17, 21-24, 27) is devoted to instructions about or ...
  59. [59]
    An Introduction to the Book of Leviticus | Covenant & Conversation
    Leviticus is a precisely structured book, divided into three parts. The first is about the holy. Specifically, it is about sacrifices, and more generally, about ...
  60. [60]
    Book of Numbers - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Book of Numbers (Heb. בְּמִדְבַּר; in the wilderness ) is the fourth book of the Pentateuch. Like the other books of the Pentateuch, its name in Hebrew is ...Missing: summary | Show results with:summary
  61. [61]
    A Summary of the Book of Numbers - Sefer Bamidbar - Chabad.org
    The Book of Numbers begins and ends with a census of Israel to show that G‐d's love for His nation remains constant, no matter what their tumultuous trip ...Missing: meaning | Show results with:meaning
  62. [62]
    Book of Numbers | Guide with Key Information and Resources
    Mar 30, 2023 · Numbers is the fourth book of the Bible, and it carries forward the story of Israel after their exodus from slavery in Egypt.
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
  66. [66]
  67. [67]
    Book of Deuteronomy | Guide with Key Information and Resources
    Mar 30, 2023 · Deuteronomy is the fifth book of the Bible and the final book of the Torah. In the preceding books, Israel had left Egypt and stayed at Mount Sinai for a year.
  68. [68]
    Summary of the Book of Deuteronomy - Bible Survey - Got Questions
    Oct 17, 2024 · Brief Summary: The Israelites are commanded to remember four things: God's faithfulness, God's holiness, God's blessings, and God's warnings.
  69. [69]
    Outline of Deuteronomy - Enter the Bible
    Chapters 12:1-16:17 are basically concerned with matters of worship; and 16:18-18:22 are generally concerned with the duties of judges, other officials, the ...
  70. [70]
    Summary of the Book of Deuteronomy - Chapter by Chapter
    Nov 14, 2023 · The book of Deuteronomy is a record of a series of speeches Moses gave to the Israelites before his death on Mount Nebo.
  71. [71]
    Key Themes in Deuteronomy - IVP Books
    Jan 11, 2022 · Key Themes in Deuteronomy · 1:1-5 Introduction · 1:6-8 The departure from Sinai · 1:9-18 The appointment of judges · 1:19-25 The 12 spies · 1:26-48 ...
  72. [72]
    Theological Themes in Deuteronomy - Enter the Bible
    Blessings and curses · victory in war (vv. 1, 7, 10) · prosperity (vv. 3-6, 8, 11-12) · becoming God's holy people (v. 9) · finding themselves only “the head,” “at ...
  73. [73]
    Evidence for Mosaic Authorship of the Torah
    ### Summary of Evidence for Mosaic Authorship of the Torah
  74. [74]
    The Mosaic Authorship of the Pentateuch by R. A. Torrey
    1. THE BURDEN OF PROOF. The Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch has until very recent times been accepted without question by both Jews and Christians.
  75. [75]
    Mosaic Authorship of the Pentateuch-Tried and True
    Jan 1, 2003 · The idea that Moses did not write the Pentateuch actually has been around for more than a millennium. However, until the mid-seventeenth century, the vast ...
  76. [76]
    Miniature Writing on Ancient Amulets - Biblical Archaeology Society
    At Ketef Hinnom, two small silver scrolls where uncovered inscribed with tiny lines of ancient Hebrew. The essay writing on the silver scrolls was clearly ...
  77. [77]
    The Three Oldest Biblical Texts - Bible Archaeology Report
    Feb 6, 2019 · The oldest biblical text is on the Hinnom Scrolls – two silver amulets that date to the seventh century B.C. These rolled-up pieces of silver ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] A REVISED DATE FOR PENTATEUCHAL TEXTS? - Tyndale Bulletin
    The trend of OT scholarship is to date Pentateuchal texts to exilic or post- exilic times. The silver amulets from Ketef Hinnom may challenge this.
  79. [79]
    [PDF] features of archaic biblical hebrew and the linguistic dating debate
    This book primarily challenges the linguistic distinction between. Classical or Standard Biblical Hebrew and Late Biblical Hebrew, which a.
  80. [80]
    Linguistic Dating of Biblical Texts | Bible Interp
    Hebrew biblical texts can, therefore, be dated on linguistic grounds because LBH was not written early, nor did EBH continue to be written after the transition ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Currents in the Historical Linguistics and Linguistic Dating of the He
    Abstract: In this essay we summarize the status quaestionis of diachronic linguistic study of. Biblical Hebrew as reflected principally in some major ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Pentateuchal Criticism and Interpretation - Biblical Studies.org.uk
    Among Jewish scholars, Y Kaufmann (The Religion of Israel, 1961) accepted the analysis but refuted the dating of the documents (esp p); entirely sceptical have ...
  83. [83]
    Archaeology, Ancient Hebrew, & A Written Pentateuch - Patheos
    Jul 31, 2021 · Summary: Archaeological evidence shows an origin of a proto-ancient Hebrew alphabet as far back as 1800 BC, and various evidences suggest the ...
  84. [84]
    The Oldest Hebrew Script and Language
    Professor Christopher Rollston examines four contenders for the oldest Hebrew inscription to explore the interplay between early Hebrew script and language.
  85. [85]
    Chapter 4: The Documentary Hypothesis | Plymouth Brethren Writings
    However, the best known, classic formulation was presented by Julius Wellhausen in 1883. This became widely accepted as “truth” in the academic and church world ...
  86. [86]
    Bible - The Documentary Hypothesis - Joe Pellegrino
    The view that is persuasive to most of the critical scholars of the Pentateuch is called the Documentary Hypothesis, or the Graf-Wellhausen Hypothesis, after ...
  87. [87]
    Graf-Wellhausen Hypothesis or JEDP Theory
    Wellhausen's Documentary Hypothesis was at its zenith during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, and the debate revolved about the dating of ...
  88. [88]
    What is source criticism? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · Source criticism is a specialized field of biblical studies that seeks to determine the sources used to develop the final form of the biblical text.<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    The Bible and Its Sources: Is the So-called Documentary Hypothesis ...
    Aug 27, 2020 · The assertion that Wellhausen's “Documentary Hypothesis” is dead–as if to imply that most mainstream biblical scholars repudiated its basic contours.
  90. [90]
    Deconstructing the Documentary Hypothesis
    Jun 16, 2022 · The core of the hypothesis is that the oldest parts of the Old Testament (J) were compiled in an alleged era of primitive Hebrew polytheism.
  91. [91]
    The Appeal of Source Criticism - Green Baggins
    Feb 17, 2016 · Fourthly, source criticism comes almost entirely from a liberal set of assumptions: the non-inerrancy of Scripture, the cultural relativity ...
  92. [92]
    Pentateuchal Studies Today - The Gospel Coalition
    Jan 20, 2020 · It was held that the earliest sources were written several centuries after Moses: J about 900 BC, E about 800 BC, Deuteronomy about 600 BC, the ...
  93. [93]
    Was the Documentary Hypothesis Tainted by Wellhausen's ...
    Feb 15, 2021 · Julius Wellhausen's analysis of the Torah is perfused with the anti-Jewish sentiment prevalent in Bismarck's Second German Reich.
  94. [94]
    Umberto Cassuto and the Documentary Hypothesis
    Sep 17, 1992 · Cassuto admitted that the Documentary Hypothesis is based on some valid observations. But he made three crucial counter-arguments. First, he ...
  95. [95]
    The Documentary Hypothesis Eight Lectures - Umberto Cassuto
    Cassuto's Conclusion: -Fifth pillar of DH crumbles. Lecture 8: Conclusion. Conclusion: -Critics suggest DH must be refined, add detail change theories slightly.
  96. [96]
    THE DOCUMENTARY HYPOTHESIS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF ...
    May 27, 2017 · The Documentary Hypothesis argues that the Pentateuch is not a message of divine revelation from God written by Moses, but a mere ancient literary work.
  97. [97]
    How the Documentary Hypothesis has been Debunked: R.N. Whybray
    Aug 24, 2009 · Whybray challenges both source-critical and tradition-historical approaches to Pentateuchal composition. What is most helpful, though, is the ...
  98. [98]
    Biblical Grammar Enters the Culture Wars - Aish.com
    Jan 5, 2025 · In his new book, Hornkohl maintains that the Torah displays the earliest linguistic profile of any of the books of the Hebrew Bible and that ...
  99. [99]
    The Yawn of JEDP - The Gospel Coalition
    Feb 23, 2021 · The time has come for scholars to recognize that the documentary hypothesis is dead. The arguments that support it have been dismantled by scholars of many ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Debunking the Documentary Hypothesis · Creation.com
    Apr 11, 2006 · The Documentary Hypothesis claimed that the books of Moses were late concoctions, not written in the time of Moses. This book documents and ...
  101. [101]
  102. [102]
    Documentary Hypothesis: Indications of Multiple Authorship
    Feb 11, 2018 · “It is very important to realize that there is absolutely no empirical textual evidence to support any aspect of the Documentary Hypothesis.
  103. [103]
    Reflections on the Documentary Hypothesis - Dialogue Journal
    The Documentary Hypothesis suggests the Pentateuch comes from four sources: Yahwist (J), Elohist (E), Deuteronomic (D), and Priestly (P), combined by a ...
  104. [104]
    Genesis & Ancient Near Eastern Stories of Creation & Flood: Part I
    A theory has long been advocated that the early chapters of Genesis contain a “doublet” of creation stories and that these stories, characterized by the ...
  105. [105]
  106. [106]
    What similarities are there between the Enuma Elish and the ...
    Mar 29, 2024 · However, the Enuma Elish has also been used by skeptics as a supposed proof that the Genesis 1 account is merely mythology or a parallel of ...
  107. [107]
    Three Ancient Near Eastern Creation Myths
    Feb 22, 2019 · ... 1:2ff. DIFFERENCES: The Enuma Elish is polytheistic; Genesis is monotheistic; The Enuma Elish is primarily the story of the elevation of the ...
  108. [108]
    The Flood of Noah and the Flood of Gilgamesh
    Mar 1, 1997 · The table below presents a comparison of the main aspects of the two accounts of the flood as presented in the Book of Genesis and in the Epic of Gilgamesh.Missing: Pentateuch | Show results with:Pentateuch
  109. [109]
    What similarities are there between the Gilgamesh flood account ...
    Aug 3, 2022 · There are many similarities between the Gilgamesh flood account and the biblical flood account (Genesis 6—8), beginning most importantly with ...
  110. [110]
    Noah's Flood and the Gilgamesh Epic · Creation.com
    Genesis is the original ... The Gilgamesh Epic has close parallels with the account of Noah's Flood. Its close similarities are due to its closeness to the real ...
  111. [111]
    Did Moses copy the Law from the Code of Hammurabi?
    Jan 4, 2022 · The Mosaic Law elevates the value of human life, and its whole tenor is more compassionate than that of the Hammurabian Code. The spiritual ...
  112. [112]
    Did Moses Plagiarize Hammurabi? | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Code of Hammurabi vs. Mosaic Law. Let's first examine some of the laws of the Code of Hammurabi and compare them with that of the Bible. Certain laws ...
  113. [113]
    Deuteronomy and the Hittite Treaties - Bible League Trust
    The theory is that Deuteronomy is patterned after Hittite treaties, with striking similarities in form and structure, and that it is a ratification of the  ...
  114. [114]
    Deuteronomy and Hittite Treaties | Bible Interp
    Deuteronomy's core elements are based on Hittite treaty forms, with its seven parts having parallels in second millennium Hittite treaties.
  115. [115]
    The Significance of Hittite Treaties for Torah and Orthodox Judaism
    Mar 4, 2014 · Particular attention was given to the structure of the Hittite treaties, which featured the following sections (even though not all are present ...
  116. [116]
    A Brief Sample of Old Testament Archaeological Corroboration
    Apr 4, 2018 · The historicity and cultural customs of the Patriarchs have been corroborated in clay tablets uncovered in the cities of Nuzi, Mari and Bogazkoy ...
  117. [117]
    Is There Archaeological Evidence for Abraham? - Cyber Penance
    Aug 12, 2019 · The customs of Patriarchal times, as described in the Bible, are endorsed by archaeological finds at such places as Ur, Mari, Boghazkoi, and ...
  118. [118]
    Evidence of the Exodus? | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    Feb 29, 2020 · Evidence shows specific immigrations into Egypt from the land of Canaan up to and during the 1700s b.c.e. These Semitic immigrants settled in ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] THE ISRAELITES IN EGYPT
    The Hyksos capitol of Avaris (or Tell el-Daba) is the richest example of Semitic presence in. Egypt from the archaeological record. The finds show an ...
  120. [120]
    Does the Merneptah Stele Contain the First Mention of Israel?
    The Merneptah Stele has long been touted as the earliest extrabiblical reference to Israel.* The ancient Egyptian inscription dates to about 1205 B.C.E. and ...
  121. [121]
    Merneptah Stele: Proving Israel's 3,200-Year Existence
    Oct 26, 2018 · The Merneptah Stele (or Israel Stele) is an engraved stone slab which describes Pharaoh Merneptah's military victories in 1207 b.c.e.
  122. [122]
    The Walls of Jericho - Associates for Biblical Research
    Jun 9, 2008 · When properly interpreted, the archaeological evidence at Jericho confirms the biblical account of Joshua's conquest, contra Kathleen ...
  123. [123]
  124. [124]
    Dating of Hazor's Destruction in Joshua 11: Biblical, Archaeological ...
    The simple, biblical, solution is that Joshua destroyed an earlier city at Hazor in 1400 BC, while Deborah and Barak brought another destruction in 1230 BC.
  125. [125]
    Top Ten Discoveries Related to Joshua and the Conquest
    Nov 12, 2021 · The Canaanite city of Hazor has two significant destruction layers: a 15th century BC destruction, which should be attributed to Joshua, and a ...
  126. [126]
    The Exodus: Fact or Fiction? - Biblical Archaeology Society
    1219 B.C.E., the Merneptah Stele is the earliest extrabiblical record of a people group called Israel. Set up by Pharaoh Merneptah to commemorate his military ...
  127. [127]
    Maximalists and Minimalists - Livius.org
    Oct 12, 2020 · Maximalist scholars assume that the Biblical story is more or less correct, unless archaeologists prove that it is not; minimalists assume that ...
  128. [128]
    Interview with Thomas L. Thompson #1 - Vridar
    Feb 8, 2020 · Minimalists saw the Bible as allegorical ... They have certainly been most influential on my views and approach to the “Old Testament”.
  129. [129]
    A (Very, Very) Short History of Minimalism: From The Chronicler to ...
    “Minimalism”1 is the supposition that the biblical text cannot rightly or honestly be mined for historical reconstructions of ancient Israel or earliest ...
  130. [130]
    The Wanderings of the Patriarchs - Kefirah of the Week
    Nov 12, 2014 · Anachronisms. One of the most glaring anachronisms in the Patriarchal stories is the presence of the Pelishtim (Philistines). Both Avraham ...Missing: narratives | Show results with:narratives
  131. [131]
    Anachronisms in the Torah that could suggest an earlier date of ...
    Jul 28, 2022 · The Torah contains many anachronisms that suggest it was written at a later date by others than what tradition claims.Is there any evidence from the 2nd Millennium BCE backing ... - RedditQuestion about Torah authorship : r/Judaism - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  132. [132]
    Searching for Biblical Mt. Sinai
    Feb 14, 2014 · Curiously, no Exodus-related archaeological remains have been recovered in the Sinai Peninsula—through which the Israelites must have traveled ...
  133. [133]
    The Rise and Fall of the 13th Century Exodus-Conquest Theory
    The 13th century exodus-conquest theory was formulated by William F. Albright in the 1930s, based largely on Palestinian archaeological evidence.
  134. [134]
    The Bible Unearthed | Bible Interp - Bible Interpretation
    Sep 16, 2022 · Authors argue no compelling archaeological evidence exists for many biblical stories. By Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman March ...
  135. [135]
    The Birth and Death of Biblical Minimalism | ArmstrongInstitute.org
    The following article, written by Hebrew University archaeologist Prof. Yosef Garfinkel, explores the topic of biblical minimalism.
  136. [136]
    The Great Minimalist Debate - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Jun 19, 2012 · Garfinkel controversially critiques Biblical minimalism as “profoundly undermined by an archaeological discovery.”
  137. [137]
    The Oral Law - Chabad.org
    The Oral Law includes all that Moses learned from G‐d by heart which he did not write down, but transmitted orally to his successors.
  138. [138]
    Judaism: The Oral Law -Talmud & Mishna - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Oral Law is a legal commentary on the Torah, explaining how its commandments are to be carried out. Common sense suggests that some sort of oral tradition ...
  139. [139]
    Faith Must Be Biblical: The Bible vs Oral Law
    May 27, 2016 · None of the biblical writers expressed any interest in or desire to know or to obey any sort of “Oral Law.” In other words, based on what is ...
  140. [140]
    What is the origin of the Oral Torah? | Israel Drazin - The Blogs
    Oct 27, 2019 · The Oral Torah was developed by the Pharisees and later rabbis. The Pharisees made these adaptations before 70 CE when the rabbinical period began.
  141. [141]
    When did the idea of 'Oral Torah' originate? : r/AcademicBiblical
    Mar 4, 2014 · I'm trying to understand the origins of the tradition of 'Oral Torah', in the sense of unwritten laws that were passed down by Moses.What is the Oral Law? : r/Judaism - RedditIs there any historical evidence of the Oral Torah truly being ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  142. [142]
    How do historians deal with the Jewish claim of mass revelation at ...
    Jul 17, 2021 · Historians have generally dealt with Torah stories, including the story of mass revelation at Mt. Sinai, by using archeological discoveries ...
  143. [143]
    A Timeline of the Transmission of Torah - Chabad.org
    A Timeline of the Transmission of Torah ; 2448, 1313 bce, Giving of the Torah, Moses, 10 / 613 Commandments. Moses begins teaching the Oral Law ; 2488, 1273 bce ...
  144. [144]
    The History of the Mishnah - Unpacked for Educators
    Dec 14, 2020 · Threats of Roman persecution also grew, and Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi feared that the Jewish community would become fragmented and any oral traditions would be lost.Missing: compilation date
  145. [145]
    Mishnah - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Mishnah supplements, complements, clarifies and systematizes the commandments of the Torah. The Torah, for example, commands: "Remember the Sabbath day" ( ...
  146. [146]
    The History of the Mishnah - Chabad.org
    Rabbi Judah HaNasi was the compiler of the Mishnah and the last of the Tannaim. Due to his great stature,he was known simply as Rabbi, or Rabbeinu HaKodosh.
  147. [147]
    Why did Rabbi Yehudah Hanasi decide to codify the Mishnah?
    Even in Rebbi's time, the Mishnah was not intended to be learned on its own, but to provide a universal reference point in the transmission of the oral Law.
  148. [148]
    Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi: Rabenu HaKadosh - Morashah
    When editing the Mishnah, Rabbi Yehudah HaNasi was ensuring the survival of Judaism. Moshé Rabênu gave us the Torah, but they wereRabbenu HaKadosh and, before ...Missing: Judah | Show results with:Judah
  149. [149]
    Talmudic Works - Ohr Somayach
    The Jerusalem Talmud was redacted in the year 350 C.E. by Rav Muna and ... The Babylonian Talmud was redacted in the year 500 C.E. by Ravina and Rav ...
  150. [150]
    Jerusalem Talmud - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Jerusalem Talmud was completed at least a century before the compilation of the Babylonian Talmud – c. 400. Its close was probably due to the situation ...
  151. [151]
    The Two Talmuds - Chabad.org
    The Jerusalem Talmud gets straight to the point and provides a clear ruling, while the Babylonian is full of questions and doubts, often without any resolution.
  152. [152]
    The Thirteen Principles of Jewish Faith - Chabad.org
    A summary of Maimonides' "Thirteen Principles," widely accepted as the authoritative articulation of the fundamentals of the Jewish Faith.Missing: heaven | Show results with:heaven
  153. [153]
    Making Sense of the Revelation at Sinai - TheTorah.com
    Mar 20, 2014 · The eighth principle is that the Torah is from Heaven. This means that we believe that the entire Torah that is in our hands today is the Torah that was given ...
  154. [154]
    Maimonides' 13 Principles of Jewish Faith
    Principle VIII. That the Torah is from heaven [God]. And this is that you believe that all of this Torah that was given by Moses our teacher, peace be upon ...
  155. [155]
    Rambam's 13 Principles - Torah Musings
    Sep 25, 2013 · Rambam's 13 Principles · 1. Rejection of afterlife · 2. Rejection of the Oral Torah · 3. Denial of God's Knowledge · 4. Mashiach and Resurrection.
  156. [156]
    Is there "Torah Inerrancy"? - Mi Yodeya - Stack Exchange
    May 12, 2011 · The dictionary defines inerrancy as "freedom from error", in which case, yes, the Torah has inerrancy. One of the cardinal beliefs of Judaism ...
  157. [157]
    Does Torah inerrancy extend to the prophets and the writings?
    Oct 6, 2011 · I believe this is generally understood to refer specifically to the five books of Moses.
  158. [158]
    Did Moses Write the Torah? A Brief Positive Case for Mosaic ...
    Dec 27, 2019 · There are at least five good lines of internal evidence suggesting that Moses (thought to have lived around the fifteenth century BC) authored the Torah.
  159. [159]
    Did God Write the Torah -- and Does it Matter? - My Jewish Learning
    The traditional Jewish position is that the Torah is all divine in origin. Yet nowhere does the broader Bible suggest that it was all written by God.
  160. [160]
    Judaism: Reading the Torah - Jewish Virtual Library
    The tradition of reading the Torah out loud in synagogue dates back to the time of Moses. The practice of "completing" the Torah reading with a passage from ...Origins · Taking Out & Putting Back the... · The Torah Blessings & Aliyot
  161. [161]
    Torah Readings - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
    Each week in synagogue, we read (or, more accurately, chant, because it is sung) a passage from the Torah. This passage is referred to as a parashah (פָּרָשָׁה), ...
  162. [162]
    Weekly Torah Portion - Parashat haShavua - Hebcal
    This week's Torah portion is Parashat Noach (read on 25 October 2025 ). Noach (“Noah”) begins as God decides to destroy mankind with a flood. At God's command, ...Shabbat Torah Readings 5785 · Bereshit · Noach · Ki Tavo
  163. [163]
    [PDF] Is there an Authentic Triennial Cycle of Torah Readings?
    4 All that we learn from the Bavli is that by the fourth or fifth century the Jews of Babylonia were reading the Torah on an annual cycle, that this cycle ...
  164. [164]
    The Torah Service - My Jewish Learning
    The Torah service begins with the chanting of a series of biblical verses, primarily from the Book of Psalms, describing God's grandeur and role as king of the ...
  165. [165]
    Why Study Torah - Aish.com
    Torah study is regarded as the most important of all mitzvahs, because it opens the door for observance of the other mitzvahs.
  166. [166]
    Judaism's Unique Approach to Education | American Jewish University
    Oct 13, 2022 · The answer lies in the educational system that the Torah constructed. First and foremost, parents had the obligation to teach the Torah to their children.
  167. [167]
    The importance of studying Torah | The Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle
    Feb 22, 2017 · The importance of studying Torah in depth and understanding its logic is paramount to the purpose of the Revelation at Mount Sinai: the integration of Gd and ...
  168. [168]
    The Importance of Torah Study - Yeshivas Bircas Hatorah
    In times of hardship, the study of Torah becomes more important than ever! Right now the world needs more merits, for the safety of civilians, soldiers and ...<|separator|>
  169. [169]
    The 613 Commandments (Mitzvot) - Chabad.org
    The Talmud tells us that there are 613 commandments in the Torah; 248 Positive Commandments (do's) and 365 Negative Commandments (do not's).
  170. [170]
    A List of the 613 Mitzvot (Commandments) - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
    Below is a list of the 613 mitzvot (commandments). It is based primarily on the list compiled by Rambam in the Mishneh Torah, but I have consulted other ...
  171. [171]
    Halakhah: The Laws of Jewish Life
    Halakhah is the “way” a Jew is directed to behave, encompassing civil, criminal and religious law.
  172. [172]
    Social Ethics and the Torah - BJE
    Rabbi Simeon Ben Gamaliel stated that, “the world rests on three things, justice, truth, and peace”. This statement underpins Jewish social ethics.
  173. [173]
    Ethics in Business - Jewish Theological Seminary
    The phrase “do not wrong one another” appears twice (vs. 14,17). In accord with their underlying philosophy that there is no idle repetition in the Torah, they ...<|separator|>
  174. [174]
    Halakhah: Jewish Law - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
    Halakhah comes from three sources: from the Torah, from laws instituted by the rabbis and from long-standing customs.
  175. [175]
    Risky Treatments: A Jewish Medical Ethics Perspective - PMC - NIH
    JEWISH ETHICAL PRINCIPLES. The basis, validity, and source of Jewish ethics are rooted in the belief in God and His Torah (Bible), whereas the basis of ...
  176. [176]
    Sofer: The Torah Scribe - Chabad.org
    A sofer (Hebrew for “scribe”) is the specially trained craftsman who writes the holy texts onto parchment using the traditional form of Hebrew calligraphy.
  177. [177]
    Writing a Sefer Torah | Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff | Beit Midrash
    One of the rules for writing a Sefer Torah is that the scribe must have another Sefer Torah or a tikun in front of him that has all the words of the Torah ...
  178. [178]
    Tractate Soferim 1 - Sefaria
    It is an oral prescription delivered to Moses at Sinai that [all these] shall be written on the skins of ritually clean cattle or ritually clean wild animals, ...Missing: Masechet | Show results with:Masechet
  179. [179]
    Sefer Torah - THE SOFER CENTER
    Written entirely in Hebrew, a Sefer Torah contains 304,805 letters, all of which must be duplicated precisely by a trained sofer (“scribe”), an effort which may ...
  180. [180]
    The activities of the sofer (Jewish scribe)
    A sofer is a Jewish scribe who writes and restores the kitvey hakodesh (holy writing) using quills and parchment and special ink, following detailed sets of ...
  181. [181]
    Chapter 22 - THE TORAH SCROLL - Torah.org
    The height of the scroll should be equal to its circumference (272:1) and the lines of writing should be 30 characters long (272:2). Each sheet of skin should ...Missing: standards | Show results with:standards
  182. [182]
    The Torah Scroll: How the Copying Process Became Sacred
    Feb 22, 2023 · <Finally,> Israel selected the Assyrian script and the Hebrew language, leaving the Hebrew characters and Aramaic language for the ordinary ...
  183. [183]
    Sifrei Torah according to Halacha | Order a Torah Scroll - Torah scrolls
    The scroll must be written according to the highest standards of Jewish law. A Torah scroll that is only 99% kosher is 100% invalid.Missing: halakhic | Show results with:halakhic
  184. [184]
    02 - The Torah Scroll - Peninei Halakha - פניני הלכה
    The Torah must be read from a kosher scroll. This means that it must be a Torah scroll written for the sake of Heaven, with ink on parchment, just as the ...Missing: standards | Show results with:standards
  185. [185]
    Featured Scrolls - The Dead Sea Scrolls
    The Dead Sea Scrolls include biblical fragments, non-biblical religious writings, and administrative/personal documents from the Second Temple period.
  186. [186]
    The Aleppo Codex - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Jul 21, 2015 · The codex, also known as the Crown of Aleppo, was written by scribes called Masoretes in Tiberias, Israel, around 930 C.E. The Aleppo Codex is ...
  187. [187]
    The Aleppo Codex | The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
    The Codex was written in Tiberias in the early tenth century, looted and transferred to Egypt at the end of the eleventh century, and deposited with the Jewish ...
  188. [188]
    Jewish Holy Scriptures: The Leningrad Codex
    The Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete manuscript of the Tanakh, the 39 books of the Bible. Written in Cairo on parchment in the year 1009.
  189. [189]
    Biblical Manuscripts - West Semitic Research Project - USC Dornsife
    The Leningrad Codex, or Leningradensis, is the oldest complete Hebrew Bible still preserved. Dating to the year 1010 C.E., the manuscript contains the whole ...<|separator|>
  190. [190]
    A Sefer Torah in the Bologna Library May Be the Oldest Known ...
    May 30, 2013 · The Sefer Torah is the oldest known complete Torah scroll; however, it is not the oldest extant Torah. The Aleppo and Leningrad Codices ...
  191. [191]
    What Are the Earliest Versions and Translations of the Bible?
    Dec 14, 2022 · At first, just the Torah was translated, in the third century B.C.E.; the rest of the biblical books were translated later. The whole Hebrew ...
  192. [192]
    The Englishing of Targum Onkelos and Septuagint Pentateuch - BLT
    Jan 27, 2012 · Septuagint Pentateuch was originally a Jewish translation, but with the demise of Alexandrian Jewish community (and its subsequent vilification ...
  193. [193]
    When and Where was the Septuagint Written?
    Oct 1, 2019 · On the basis of numerous historical and linguistic factors, the LXX Pentateuch was likely translated ca. 280–250 B.C. in Alexandria, Egypt. No ...
  194. [194]
    A Brief History of the Septuagint - Associates for Biblical Research
    This, the so-called Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible into Greek, is traditionally dated to the reign of Ptolemy II Philadelphus of Egypt (285-246 BC).
  195. [195]
    What Is the Septuagint? - The Gospel Coalition
    Aug 12, 2018 · It tells us that an Egyptian king, Ptolemy Philadelphus (reigned from 285-246 BCE), commissioned a translation of the Hebrew Bible for his ...
  196. [196]
    Biblical literature - Early Versions, Translations, Canon | Britannica
    There are several Targums (translations) of the Pentateuch. The Babylonian Targum is known as “Onkelos,” named after its reputed author.
  197. [197]
    Targum Onkelos and the Translation of Place Names - TheTorah.com
    Jul 13, 2020 · This original work was likely composed between 50–150 C.E., as implied by the links between the Targum and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Later, this ...
  198. [198]
    The History and Dating of Onkelos - The Seforim Blog
    Aug 27, 2015 · It states that an individual named Onkelos composed the translation in the first third of the second century CE.
  199. [199]
    The Legacy of the First Revised Bible Translations
    Dec 6, 2022 · Most famous among them are “the Three”: Theodotion (post 30 AD ), Aquila (ca. 130 AD ), and Symmachus (ca. 200 AD ). We will return to them.<|separator|>
  200. [200]
  201. [201]
    How closely does the Peshitta follow the original Old and New ...
    Oct 11, 2024 · The Old Testament of the Peshitta was probably translated from Hebrew in the 3rd-early 4th centuries, at Edessa or Arbela, in northern Syria.
  202. [202]
    Tafsir Rasag - Sefaria
    Translation and commentary on the Torah by Saadia Gaon. ("Tafsir" is an Arabic term meaning 'Biblical commentary'). Although we have it in Judeo-Arabic form ...
  203. [203]
    Torah in Modern Literary Arabic - Rabbinic Translation - AskNoah.org
    The Tafsir, as this book is called in the original Arabic, is the famous work of Saadia Gaon: an exegesis of the Hebrew Bible written in the Torah tradition.
  204. [204]
    Jewish Biblical Exegesis from Islamic Lands: The Medieval Period
    Medieval Judeo-Arabic translations of the Hebrew Bible and their commentaries provide a rich source for understanding a formative period in the intellectual, ...
  205. [205]
    Rashi's Use of French in his Commentary to the Torah - jstor
    Rashi used French as an integral, not external, interpretive tool, as a last resort for defining enigmatic terms, and as a medium for the text to pass into the ...
  206. [206]
    Otzar La'azei Rashi - Sefaria
    Otzar La'azei Rashi | Sefaria. A complete dictionary of all the Old French words and expressions used by Rashi in his commentaries on the Talmud and the Tanakh.
  207. [207]
    Early Judeo‐Arabic Biblical Translations - Tobi - 2012 - Compass Hub
    Apr 11, 2012 · They were produced and used for teaching the Torah (Pentateuch) ... The Translation of Proper Names in Medieval Judeo-Arabic Translation ...
  208. [208]
    Moses Mendelssohn's Be'ur: Translating the Torah in the Age of ...
    Jan 24, 2017 · Moses Mendelssohn's translation of the Pentateuch (1780-83) is best known as the first Jewish translation of the Torah into standard German.<|separator|>
  209. [209]
    The Contemporary Torah - The Jewish Publication Society
    Oct 20, 2008 · This volume merits a place alongside the earlier NJPS and other English-language versions of the highest caliber and most abiding value. – ...
  210. [210]
    The Complete Tanakh (Tanach) - Hebrew Bible - Chabad.org
    English translation of the entire Tanakh (Tanach) with Rashi's commentary. This Hebrew Bible was edited by esteemed translator and scholar, Rabbi AJ Rosenberg.
  211. [211]
    The Contemporary Torah: A Gender-Sensitive Adaptation of the ...
    Rating 4.6 (17) The Contemporary Torah: A Gender-Sensitive Adaptation of the Original JPS Translation: david-e-s-stein: 9780827607965: Books - Amazon.ca.
  212. [212]
    Tanakh - Sefaria
    The Tanakh, or Hebrew Bible, is Judaism's foundational text. “Tanakh” is an acronym for the three sections of the canon, the Torah (the Five Books of Moses) ...
  213. [213]
    Contemporary Translations of Torah Portions Now Available Online ...
    Jul 14, 2016 · The URJ now provides ReformJudaism.org users with access to the most thorough, pluralistic, and egalitarian English translations of every weekly Torah portion.Missing: languages | Show results with:languages
  214. [214]
    The Samaritan and Jewish Versions of the Pentateuch: A Survey
    Feb 12, 2020 · The Samaritan canon consists only of the Five Books of Moses, which is the Torah (Law) and by scholars called the Samaritan Pentateuch (SP).
  215. [215]
    The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) Bible manuscript: Oldest and only ...
    The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP) is the oldest Paleo-Hebrew Bible manuscript in the world. Although the extant copy is 1065 AD the Samaritans acquired it from ...<|separator|>
  216. [216]
    [PDF] Variants in the Samaritan Pentateuch of the Hebrew Bible as ...
    The Samaritan Pentateuch is one such text, with an ancient history of competition with the Jewish Masoretic Text. It contains many similarities to the.
  217. [217]
    Samaritan & Masoretic Texts Differences - Tablet Magazine
    May 13, 2013 · “The Samaritan Torah and Masoretic Torah used to be studied side by side. The Masoretic text wasn't always the authoritative version. They were ...
  218. [218]
    The Samaritan Pentateuch
    May 7, 2008 · The Samaritan version is often grammatically neater (and stylistically somewhat later in the development of the language) than the Masoretic ...
  219. [219]
    A comparison of the Samaritan text with the Masoretic text
    May 11, 2022 · The purpose of this Thesis is to endeavour to evaluate the textual variants of the Samaritan Hebrew Pentateuch and, if possible, indicate lines upon which the ...
  220. [220]
    When was the Samaritan Pentateuch written? - Quora
    Jun 8, 2021 · The oldest extant manuscript for the Samaritan Pentateuch dates, from memory, from the 12th century AD. The preserved text itself, however, is much older than ...
  221. [221]
    How We Got the Bible Part 3: The Samaritan Pentateuch ... - YouTube
    Jun 9, 2020 · About 150 ancient manuscripts of the Samaritan Pentateuch exist today. ... Therefore, the Samaritan Pentateuch may preserve some older ...Missing: age | Show results with:age
  222. [222]
    [PDF] 1 The Samaritan Pentateuch and the Scribal ... - KU ScholarWorks
    Abstract: The Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), along with its Qumran forebears, has deservedly been regarded as a key source of information for understanding the ...
  223. [223]
    The Bible of the Woman at the Well - Text & Canon Institute
    Sep 22, 2023 · The Samaritan Pentateuch ( SP ) was first “discovered” by westerners in 1616 when an Italian traveler named Pietro della Valle (1586–1652) ...
  224. [224]
    The Textual Superiority of the Masoretic Text of Genesis 5 and 11
    Apr 30, 2025 · Critically, the Samaritan Pentateuch gives a third textual tradition that helps reconstruct the textual history of the Genesis 5 and 11 ...
  225. [225]
    The Samaritan Text: An Exhaustive Evangelical Textual Study ...
    The Samaritan Pentateuch is a crucial, independent Old Testament witness, preserving ancient texts with significant variants compared to the Masoretic ...
  226. [226]
    What is the Pentateuch? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · The Law or Torah consists of the first five books of Scripture that contain the historical background of creation and God's choosing of ...
  227. [227]
    What is the Pentateuch? First 5 Books of the OT | Christianity.com
    The Pentateuch, attributed to Moses, are the first five books of the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. It means 'five books'.Summary Of The Pentateuch · Genesis · Exodus<|separator|>
  228. [228]
    The Septuagint - History of the Early Church
    The Septuagint was the first translation made of the Hebrew Old Testament into Greek. It was begun over two hundred years before the birth of Jesus Christ.<|control11|><|separator|>
  229. [229]
    Septuagint - Desiring God
    Oct 27, 2021 · The Septuagint today was a collection of varied Greek translations of the Hebrew Old Testament that circulated among Jews and Christians in antiquity.
  230. [230]
    What Is the Pentateuch? The 5 Books of Moses - Learn Religions
    Sep 23, 2024 · The Pentateuch refers to the first five books of the Bible (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy).
  231. [231]
    Jesus Fulfilled the Torah: What Does That Mean? - David Wilber
    Dec 13, 2021 · In Matthew 5:17-20, Jesus affirmed the Torah's enduring validity by emphasizing its immutability and admonishing his followers to live out its commandments ...
  232. [232]
    What is the Torah? | GotQuestions.org
    Jan 4, 2022 · Christians, however, see Jesus Christ as the fulfillment of the Messianic prophecies and believe the Law was fulfilled in Christ.Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  233. [233]
    Jesus and The Torah - The Bible Project
    The Torah is a story about God's plan to partner with humans in ruling the world. And when humans ruin that partnership through stupidity and violence, God ...
  234. [234]
    What Is the Pentateuch in the Bible? - Bible Study Tools
    The Pentateuch, also known as Torah, refers to the first five books of the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
  235. [235]
    Pentateuch Overview & History - Lesson - Study.com
    The Pentateuch is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
  236. [236]
    Tahrif and the Torah: The views of the early Muslim Writers and ...
    According to al-Ma'sudi's account of the Torah - which echoes that of al-Ya'qubi - the text of the Torah was not corrupted; no new laws were introduced; the old ...
  237. [237]
    Have the Torah and Gospel Been Changed? - Islam Question ...
    May 25, 1998 · Question: 2001. What sura in the Quran is related or mentions about the corruption of the Torah and Gospel? Summary of answer.
  238. [238]
    Evidence That Islam Teaches That There Was Textual Corruption of ...
    ... view that the Bible was not textually corrupted. At the same time ... Islam directly and indirectly teaches the textual corruption of the Torah and Gospel.
  239. [239]
    Are the Torah, Gospel and Zabur Truly the Words of Allah?
    Dec 25, 2023 · Nothing of the words of Allah is created. He spoke the Torah, the Gospel, the Quran and the Zabur in a real sense. Similarly, not a single letter of the Quran ...<|separator|>
  240. [240]
    Different Perspectives on the Authorship of the Torah
    Literary, historical, and theological perspectives on whether the Torah is divine, human, or something in between.
  241. [241]
    How the Concept of Mosaic Authorship Developed - TheTorah.com
    May 17, 2018 · The Pentateuch never claims divine origin or Mosaic authorship. While exactly how this became the authoritative view in rabbinic Judaism and ...
  242. [242]
    Mosaic Authorship | Reformed Bible Studies & Devotionals at ...
    Spend some time reviewing a good, evangelical source that affirms the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch. For Further Study. deuteronomy 31:9–13malachi 4:4 ...
  243. [243]
    Are there any serious scholars who defend Mosaic authorship of the ...
    Nov 2, 2024 · I know the late David Zvi Hoffmann and Joshua Berman are both incredibly recognized scholars who have put forth excellent works against the DH ...Do Christian Biblical scholars still hold to any Mosaic authorship of ...Where does the idea of the Mosaic authorship come from ... - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  244. [244]
    Mosaic Authorship Controversy: Who Really Wrote the First Five ...
    Aug 22, 2024 · Traditionally, Moses has been recognized as the author of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. This belief, rooted in both ...
  245. [245]
    [PDF] the mosaic authorship of the pentateuch . . . duane l. christensen ...
    One might rephrase the original proposi- tion and say, "Moses is still the author of the Pentateuch.” Much of Scripture as we know it was probably performed and ...
  246. [246]
    New Historicism, Historical Criticism, and Reading the Pentateuch
    Mar 12, 2014 · This article surveys the development of Pentateuchal scholarship, from the emergence of historical criticism in the 19th century as a tool ...
  247. [247]
    The "Late" Origins of Judaism - The Archaeological Evidence - Vridar
    Nov 17, 2022 · A new book by an Israeli archaeologist makes the stunning claim that common Jewish practices emerged only a century or so before Jesus.
  248. [248]
    Evidence for Moses and Exodus? Is it impossible to find enough ...
    Feb 28, 2021 · It is true that there is no material (i.e. archeological) evidence for an Exodus from Egypt. For some people, that's the answer, full stop.
  249. [249]
    Top Ten Discoveries Related to Moses and the Exodus
    Sep 24, 2021 · The Merneptah Stele is evidence that the Exodus from Egypt, led by Moses, took place in the 15th century BC, as the biblical data indicates.
  250. [250]
    Is the Old Testament Historically Accurate? - Smithsonian Magazine
    An Archaeological Dig Reignites the Debate Over the Old Testament's Historical Accuracy. Beneath a desert in Israel, a scholar and his team are unearthing ...
  251. [251]
    The Archaeology of "Daily Life" in the Torah - Sinai and Synapses
    Mar 30, 2023 · Dr. Kristine Henriksen Garroway researches how archaeology can help illuminate the Torah, and at an event at Pasadena Jewish Temple and Center, she discussed ...
  252. [252]
    Recent Archaeological Finds Support the Biblical Record
    Jun 29, 2023 · Archaeological discoveries are regularly made that relate to the Bible. Here is an annotated list of recent reports of such finds.<|separator|>
  253. [253]
    Book of Genesis Guide
    Overview of the Book of Genesis, emphasizing its foundational role in the Torah.