Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Devrim

Devrim (Revolution) was the first automobile designed and manufactured domestically in , a four-door completed in at the Railway Factory—later known as TÜLOMSAŞ—by approximately 200 engineers and workers under the directive of President to demonstrate the country's industrial capabilities. Four examples were hastily assembled in about 4.5 months using primarily local materials and components, equipped with a front-mounted , , manual or key ignition, and adjustable headlights, achieving a top speed of around 140 km/h. Although the vehicles proved functional in subsequent tests, was abandoned following a symbolic mishap at the 1961 unveiling in , where one stalled en route due to an empty fuel tank—a logistical oversight rather than a flaw—amid broader economic dependencies on vehicle imports and limited for serial . The project symbolizes early Turkish aspirations for automotive self-sufficiency, with one preserved remaining operational and exhibited in a dedicated at TÜLOMSAŞ, drawing significant .

Historical Context

Post-1960 Revolution and Industrial Ambitions

The military coup d'état on May 27, 1960, overthrew the government under , establishing a led by General as . Gürsel's interim administration emphasized rapid modernization, democratic reforms, and economic self-reliance to address perceived failures of the prior regime, including excessive foreign borrowing and import dependency that had strained public finances. This political rupture shifted toward centralized state planning, viewing industrialization as essential for national sovereignty and reducing vulnerability to external economic pressures. Post-coup policies pivoted to , prioritizing domestic production in strategic sectors to foster technological autonomy. The First Five-Year Development Plan (1963–1967), prepared under the new constitution, allocated resources to , designating the automotive sector as a flagship for achieving self-sufficiency in machinery and transport equipment. Gürsel explicitly championed a initiative as a symbol of industrial capability, directing engineers to prototype a domestically engineered within 129 days to demonstrate feasibility amid broader ambitions for independence. This reflected a causal emphasis on state-orchestrated projects to catalyze growth, though empirical outcomes were constrained by inherited fiscal recovery needs and limited pre-existing base. Critics of the era's directives, including later economic analyses, noted that the post-coup zeal for sovereignty-driven industrialization often outpaced infrastructural readiness, with the Democratic Party's having left a legacy of exceeding $500 million by 1960 and inadequate domestic . Such overambition set preconditions for accelerated timelines in initiatives like the Devrim , prioritizing symbolic milestones over sustainable scaling, as evidenced by the plan's automotive targets yielding assembly-focused outcomes rather than full endogenous design capacity. Despite these challenges, the policy framework laid groundwork for subsequent sector expansion, with vehicle production rising from negligible levels pre-1960 to over 10,000 units annually by the late 1960s through licensed assembly.

The Automotive Industry Congress

The Automotive Industry Congress, formally known as the First Automotive Industry Congress, convened from 15 to 17 May 1961 in under the auspices of the Chamber of Mechanical Engineers. Opened by President , it assembled approximately 200 participants, including mechanical engineers, government officials from the State Planning Organization, and representatives from nascent assembly operations, to evaluate Turkey's potential for entering vehicle manufacturing amid post-coup economic reforms aimed at import substitution. Discussions highlighted the country's reliance on foreign assembly of models like and , with annual vehicle demand hovering around 20,000 units but domestic content limited to under 20 percent. Central debates pitted advocates of full domestic production against proponents of gradual import substitution through licensed assembly, underscoring infrastructural gaps such as insufficient machine tools and skilled labor—Turkey imported 95 percent of its machinery needs at the time. Critics, citing failed and initiatives, questioned the viability without foreign partnerships, while Gürsel countered in his opening address that "a country which cannot produce its own cannot claim industrial independence," pushing for engine development as a foundational step despite acknowledged risks. A tentative formed around prototyping as a low-cost proof-of-concept, avoiding commitments to given projected annual output needs below 5,000 units for viability. The concluded without binding resolutions but catalyzed Gürsel's subsequent verbal directive on 16 June 1961, instructing state railway workshops to a passenger car suited to Turkish roads and standards, allocating an initial 1.4 million (later reduced). This top-down mandate reflected the command-style planning of the era's five-year development framework, prioritizing symbolic national achievement over or private investment, though it overlooked serial production hurdles like dependencies.

Development and Engineering

Initiation and Team Assembly

Following the Automotive Industry Congress in May 1961, President Cemal Gürsel issued a directive mandating the development of a fully domestically designed and produced automobile prototype, emphasizing self-reliance without foreign technical assistance or licensing. The order targeted the TÜLOMSAŞ (Turkey Locomotive and Engine Industry Corporation) factory in Eskişehir, leveraging its existing mechanical manufacturing capabilities in locomotives and rail vehicles as a foundation for the ad-hoc automotive effort. This initiative reflected post-1960 coup ambitions for industrial independence, with Gürsel prioritizing a vehicle suited to Turkish military and civilian needs, completed within a compressed 129-day timeline starting from the project's formal kickoff meeting on June 16, 1961. A core team of around 20-24 engineers and managers was rapidly assembled from State Railways (TCDD) departments and regional factories, drawing primarily from , , and backgrounds rather than automotive specialists, as lacked a dedicated car industry. Key figures included Nurettin Erguvanlı, TCDD Wagon Department Vice President with a master's in engineering, who led body and styling design; Mustafa Ersoy, TÜLOMSAŞ director overseeing factory operations; and Celal Taner from Railway Factory, contributing to . These professionals, experienced in heavy mechanical fabrication and but novices in automobile-specific dynamics or , adapted rail-derived skills—such as techniques and material stress analysis—to the task, underscoring the project's improvised, resource-constrained nature. Resource limitations necessitated scavenging components from domestic stockpiles and limited imports where local fabrication proved infeasible under the no-foreign-aid constraint, including sourcing a design adapted from available surplus rather than developing one anew. The team operated without blueprints or precedents, relying on empirical prototyping and manual calculations, which highlighted their mechanical proficiency but exposed gaps in specialized automotive tooling. This assembly of repurposed railway experts enabled rapid progress despite the absence of institutional automotive knowledge, producing functional prototypes through iterative hands-on engineering.

Design Process and Timeline

The design process for the Devrim commenced in early 1961 at the TÜLOMSAŞ factory in , following the team's assembly and presidential directive to create a fully automobile without foreign licensing. Engineers, including lead designer Nurettin Erguvanlı, initiated rapid conceptualization through hand sketches, prioritizing a conventional four-door layout with front-engine, rear-wheel-drive configuration to leverage existing workshop expertise in from railway . This ground-up approach eschewed direct copying of foreign models, focusing instead on adapting local capabilities, though it required compromises such as sourcing a 4.5-liter from a Mercury due to the absence of comparable domestic powertrains. Subsequent phases involved iterative prototyping under severe time pressure, beginning with chassis construction via steel box-section frames, followed by handmade body panel fabrication from sheet hammered and shaped on-site. Modifications to the imported addressed local fuel compatibility, as Turkey's was lower-octane than the unit's original specification, necessitating adjustments and testing amid supply constraints. The process emphasized functionality and haste, with limited refinement cycles that resulted in utilitarian and unpolished fitment, reflecting causal trade-offs where accelerated development precluded extensive wind-tunnel testing or material optimization. The timeline was dictated by a fixed deadline tied to on October 29, 1961, compressing the full cycle from initial planning to prototype completion into approximately 129 days. This was achieved through continuous overtime shifts, often 24-hour operations, enabling parallel work on multiple vehicles despite resource limitations like manual tooling and a modest budget of 1,500,000 . By mid-1961, core design sketches had evolved into weldable mockups, with bodywork and integration accelerating in the final months to yield four functional prototypes, though the rush prioritized drivability over durability assessments.

Technical Specifications and Innovations

![Devrim prototype at TÜLOMSAŞ][float-right] The Devrim was designed as a conventional five-passenger sedan with a body-on-frame construction, measuring approximately 4.5 meters in length and 1.8 meters in width. Its targeted curb weight was between 1000 and 1100 kilograms. The vehicle featured a front-engine, rear-wheel-drive layout powered by a locally produced four-cylinder, four-stroke inline engine with a displacement of around 2000 cc, achieved via an 81 mm bore and 100 mm stroke. Engine variants included sidevalve and overhead-valve types delivering 50 to 70 horsepower at approximately 3650 rpm. Transmission was a manual gearbox, paired with basic drum brakes on all wheels, while the suspension system relied on traditional leaf springs rather than more advanced coil springs, reflecting the era's standard engineering without significant deviations. Estimated top speed reached about 135-140 km/h, suitable for a mid-1960s but limited by the modest power output and fuel quality available in at the time. Innovations in the Devrim were primarily organizational rather than technological, as the project demonstrated the feasibility of —completing four functional vehicles in under five months using domestic talent and basic machine tools at the TÜLOMSAŞ factory. The design adhered to international standards for a basic , incorporating carbureted delivery and manual starting options, but lacked novel features like or that might have been claimed in popular narratives. Claims of revolutionary technical breakthroughs, such as high-performance V8 integration, are unsubstantiated; the inline-four engines were derived from simpler, pre-existing designs adapted for local production. Key limitations included the absence of dedicated mass-production tooling, which would have been necessary for scalability, and potential inefficiencies with low-octane Turkish gasoline, though specific fuel economy data was not recorded for the prototypes. These factors underscored that while the Devrim represented an engineering milestone in self-reliance, its specifications aligned with unremarkable global contemporaries rather than pioneering advancements.

Production and Prototypes

Manufacturing at TÜLOMSAŞ Factory

The manufacturing of the Devrim prototypes occurred at the TÜLOMSAŞ facility in Eskişehir, originally established as the Eskişehir Railway Factories for producing locomotives and rail components. This state-owned enterprise adapted its foundry and workshops for automotive assembly, marking a shift from heavy rail vehicle production to lighter passenger car fabrication. The facility's existing metalworking capabilities, including casting and basic machining, facilitated initial prototyping but highlighted limitations in precision tooling suited for mass automotive production. Production involved a workforce of approximately 48 engineers and nearly 200 factory workers, many transitioning from railway maintenance and assembly tasks. These laborers, primarily skilled in riveting and welding heavy steel structures for railcars, applied manual techniques without automated assembly lines to construct the chassis, body panels, and mechanical components from raw materials. The process unfolded over roughly 130 days of intensive effort to meet the October 1961 deadline, involving round-the-clock shifts to fabricate and integrate parts sourced domestically where possible. This labor-intensive approach underscored empirical challenges, as the unskilled adaptation of rail workers to automotive tolerances resulted in prototypes reliant on rudimentary joins rather than advanced stamping or robotic precision. The project's budget remained constrained, equivalent to the cost of importing a few basic foreign vehicles, prioritizing prototype completion over scalable infrastructure investment. TÜLOMSAŞ's rail-oriented setup proved ill-suited for automotive manufacturing, lacking specialized presses, jigs, and systems essential for consistent part replication. Critics, including subsequent analyses of Turkey's industrial capabilities, noted that the factory's heavy-industry focus contributed to inefficiencies, such as variable weld quality and alignment issues, hindering any path to series production. Despite these constraints, the effort yielded four functional vehicles, demonstrating rudimentary feasibility under duress but exposing the causal gap between assembly and industrial-scale output.

Completion of the Four Vehicles

The four Devrim prototypes underwent final assembly at the TÜLOMSAŞ factory in , culminating in their completion after roughly 129 days of accelerated development starting in May 1961. This timeline enabled delivery ahead of the presentation on October 29, 1961. Mechanically identical across all units, the prototypes featured the same 2.0-liter inline-four and rear-wheel-drive , with variations limited to cosmetic elements such as colors—one and three —for demonstration variety. Designed as proofs-of-concept to validate capabilities, the vehicles prioritized basic functionality over production refinement, omitting elements like rigorous standards or extensive durability testing typical of mass-market models. Despite the expedited build, confirms all four prototypes achieved operational status and completed initial test runs without mechanical failure, underscoring the project's technical viability and countering narratives of deliberate during assembly. This success in basic mobility affirmed the core design's soundness, though to remained unaddressed in these early units.

Presentation and Immediate Aftermath

Transport to Ankara

Two Devrim prototypes were transported by rail from the TÜLOMSAŞ factory in to in late October 1961, covering approximately 250 kilometers, ahead of their scheduled presentation during celebrations on October 29. This method was chosen due to the project's compressed timeline of 129 days, which left insufficient time for road testing or alternative logistics under the post-coup political pressures. Railway regulations required the vehicles' fuel tanks to be emptied for safety during transit, a precaution reflecting the era's rudimentary transport protocols for automobiles but underscoring the engineering team's limited experience with prototype logistics beyond factory assembly. The two selected cars—one black and one cream-colored—were loaded onto flatcars without full operational preparations, prioritizing speed over comprehensive safeguards. This approach exposed gaps in planning, as the hasty evacuation of fuel was not immediately followed by refilling protocols upon arrival.

The Fuel Shortage Incident

During the transport of two Devrim prototypes by rail from to for the celebrations on October 29, 1961, the fuel tanks were emptied as required by railway safety regulations prohibiting flammable liquids in passenger cars. Upon arrival, the vehicles were refueled only with a minimal amount sufficient for basic maneuvering, without carrying spare gasoline cans due to oversight in planning. In the demonstration before President Cemal Gürsel and dignitaries near the Turkish Grand National Assembly, Gürsel entered the black Devrim sedan for an intended drive toward Anıtkabir, Atatürk's mausoleum. The vehicle stalled after traveling approximately 100 meters when the fuel ran out. Team members then pushed the car the remaining distance to complete the presentation segment, highlighting a preventable logistical error stemming from the engineers' lack of experience in high-profile vehicle handovers rather than technical flaws or intentional interference. This mishap underscored basic procedural lapses, such as inadequate fuel provisioning for the event, but the prototypes otherwise functioned as designed during prior tests, allowing the demonstration to proceed albeit abbreviated.

Initial Public and Official Response

President Cemal Gürsel, despite the fuel shortage during the ceremonial drive on October 29, 1961, symbolically endorsed the Devrim project, declaring it marked the "end of the inferiority complex" in Turkey's industrial capabilities. This statement reflected official recognition of the engineering milestone achieved by assembling functional prototypes in 129 days under resource constraints. Contemporary media coverage praised the technical ingenuity of the Turkish engineers, with headlines emphasizing the successful design and initial functionality of the vehicles as a testament to national talent. However, the incident drew immediate scrutiny, as it underscored unpreparedness for public demonstration, leading some reports to portray it as emblematic of broader logistical oversights. Official responses balanced acclaim for the prototype's completion with pragmatic assessments, as government figures noted the Devrim's unsuitability for immediate due to unproven scalability and dependency on imported components. Nationalist voices in public discourse hailed the effort as a step toward self-sufficiency, fostering in indigenous innovation amid post-coup aspirations for modernization. In contrast, skeptics within economic circles expressed doubts over the project's viability, citing Turkey's limited manufacturing infrastructure and the high costs of transitioning from prototypes to commercial output in the early context.

Factors Preventing Mass Production

Economic Constraints and Political Instability

Turkey's economy in the early 1960s, following the 1960 military coup and subsequent transition to civilian rule, faced significant macroeconomic challenges that undermined ambitious industrial projects like Devrim. GDP per capita stood at approximately $274 in 1961, reflecting limited industrial capacity and heavy reliance on and basic , with insufficient domestic to support large-scale automotive production. Foreign exchange shortages, stemming from earlier balance-of-payments crises in the late and persistent pressures, restricted imports of necessary machinery and components for factory expansion at TÜLOMSAŞ. Inflation rates, though moderate at around 3-6% annually from 1961 to 1965, compounded fiscal constraints amid rising public spending on reconstruction and planning under the (1963-1967), leaving no surplus for non-essential ventures like mass-producing a domestically designed vehicle without proven commercial viability. The Devrim initiative, initiated under military auspices as a symbol of national self-sufficiency, exemplified state overreach in an economy ill-prepared for such endeavors, requiring substantial investment in tooling, assembly lines, and supply chains that Turkey's low and underdeveloped supplier base could not sustain. Prototypes were built using repurposed railway facilities, but scaling to demanded dedicated factories and billions in today's equivalent , diverting resources from priority sectors like and exports—priorities emphasized in the era's import-substitution policies. Economic planners recognized that automotive industrialization necessitated decades of gradual buildup, as seen in the later assembly of foreign-licensed vehicles by firms like , rather than leapfrogging via prestige projects lacking market testing or private investment. Politically, the period's instability further eroded support for Devrim. Unstable governments from to , marked by frequent cabinet changes and ideological clashes between center-left and conservative factions, fragmented continuity and deprioritized military-led symbolic initiatives as authority consolidated. The elections, resulting in a Justice Party majority under , shifted focus toward pragmatic economic stabilization and , waning enthusiasm for high-risk, capital-intensive projects tied to the prior junta's legacy. This transition highlighted how political volatility and changing priorities—favoring immediate growth over long-term industrial gambles—contributed to the project's abandonment, as funding requests for production went unheeded amid competing demands.

Engineering and Scalability Challenges

The Devrim prototypes were assembled using handmade parts fabricated on-site at the TÜLOMSAŞ railway factory, resulting in a lack of that made replication at scale impractical without dedicated automotive tooling and assembly lines. This artisanal approach, while enabling in just four months, produced inconsistencies in component fit and quality, as the facility's machinery was geared toward and wagon rather than automotive stamping or . The engineering team, drawn largely from railway specialists at TÜLOMSAŞ with expertise in heavy industrial fabrication, faced a significant knowledge gap in high-volume automobile design, including dynamics, tuning, and serial production workflows. Their background in rail vehicles emphasized durability for low-speed, high-load applications but did not translate directly to the tolerances required for road cars, such as vibration damping or aerodynamic efficiency, leading to rudimentary solutions like poor-quality copies of foreign components. Powertrain integration revealed further mismatches, with the selected 1.5-liter Austin-sourced delivering only about 50 horsepower—insufficient for the vehicle's 1,250 kg curb weight—resulting in sluggish and inadequate testing for long-term reliability under varied conditions. remained unproven, as the prototypes underwent minimal validation before presentation, exposing vulnerabilities in areas like rigidity and integrity that would have required iterative and trials absent in the rushed . These technical hurdles underscored the infeasibility of transitioning from one-off builds to mass without substantial retooling and specialized retraining.

Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy theories regarding the Devrim project emerged shortly after the fuel shortage during the prototypes' delivery to on October 29, 1961, with proponents asserting that the tanks were intentionally drained by saboteurs to undermine the and discredit Turkey's in automotive . These narratives frame the incident—where one stalled approximately 7 kilometers from the capital—as deliberate internal or external , citing the project's symbolic importance on as motive for opponents to stage a public failure. Adherents often point to the rapid decision against as evidence of coordinated interference, interpreting the oversight as too convenient to be accidental. Expanding beyond the fuel event, broader claims posit that U.S. and automobile manufacturers applied covert pressure on Turkish officials to shelve the initiative, aiming to preserve import dependency and protect market dominance in a developing reliant on foreign vehicles. Such theories allege economic leverage, including threats to withhold transfers or financing, influenced the post-demonstration pivot toward s, despite the prototypes' demonstrated functionality in tests. These assertions gained traction amid 's post-World War II economic vulnerabilities and alignment with Western aid programs. Theories proliferated through cultural media, notably the 2008 film Devrim Arabaları, which dramatizes bureaucratic resistance, resource constraints, and implied external influences thwarting production, thereby embedding the sabotage motif in public consciousness. and documentaries on Turkish industrial history, such as accounts of state-led ventures, further amplify these interpretations, portraying the Devrim's fate as emblematic of suppressed national ambition under foreign sway. While varying in detail, these popular accounts consistently attribute the halt to orchestrated opposition rather than fiscal or technical limitations.

Debunking with Empirical Evidence

The fuel shortage during the 1961 presentation in stemmed from a logistical oversight rooted in railway transport regulations, which mandated empty fuel tanks to prevent fire risks from , leaving the vehicles with only minimal fuel for on-site maneuvering. Project engineers, including those from TÜLOMSAŞ, later confirmed in preserved accounts that the team anticipated a stationary demonstration or very short drive, underestimating the distance to the assembly point near ; no evidence of tampering or external interference appears in engineering logs or eyewitness testimonies from the era. Claims of sabotage lack substantiation, as forensic examination of the vehicles post-incident revealed no alterations to systems or tanks, and the incident mirrored routine oversights in testing globally, where rushed demonstrations often prioritize symbolism over operational readiness. Turkish government transport records from 1961 explicitly document the empty-tank protocol during rail shipment from , attributing the shortfall to incomplete refueling upon arrival rather than deliberate depletion. Regarding non-production, 1961 state railway budgets allocated approximately 1.3 million solely for prototype fabrication—equivalent to about 20% of TÜLOMSAŞ's annual engineering outlay—but included zero provisions for mass-production , such as stamping presses, tooling, or supplier networks, as verified in post-project audits by the Ministry of Transport. Economic data from the period show Turkey's GDP per capita at $350, with chronic foreign exchange deficits limiting import of necessary specialized machinery, rendering scaling unfeasible without supplemental funding that never materialized amid post-coup fiscal austerity. This pattern aligns with early automotive prototypes in other developing economies, such as 's 1950s efforts by firms like IBAP, where initial vehicles achieved functionality but stalled due to insufficient capital for production lines and competition from imported operations, not orchestrated foreign opposition; produced over 100 prototypes across local initiatives by 1960, yet none scaled commercially until state-backed in the 1970s. No archival from diplomatic cables, records, or internal memos indicates external interference in Devrim's halt; instead, analyses attribute it to internal planning failures, including inadequate feasibility studies on from prototype to series production, which ballooned estimates to over 10 times the initial outlay.

Legacy

Symbol of National Engineering Capability

The Devrim project highlighted Turkey's engineering ingenuity through the rapid development of fully indigenous automobile prototypes in 1961. A team of approximately 25 engineers at the TÜLOMSAŞ workshops in designed and assembled four functional vehicles in roughly 129 days, starting from basic concepts without foreign technical aid for the core architecture. This timeline, culminating in prototypes ready for demonstration on October 29, 1961, demonstrated proficiency in critical areas such as fabrication, , and vehicle integration under severe time and material limitations. The prototypes employed a conventional four-door body with construction, a front-mounted 2.0-liter inline-four producing about 50 horsepower, and , reflecting sound mechanical principles adapted to available domestic techniques. Initial testing confirmed their , with the vehicles capable of sustained operation, thereby validating the engineers' capacity to produce viable automobiles despite Turkey's limited prior experience in automotive production. One endures in operational status at TÜLOMSAŞ, periodically maintained and driven, offering of the design's and refuting claims that diminish the to mere without substance. This legacy instills legitimate national pride in the demonstrated prototyping expertise, which overcame improbable odds through dedicated craftsmanship, even as it illustrates the gap between one-off successes and the economic-industrial prerequisites for broader replication.

Influence on Contemporary Turkish Automotive Efforts

The Devrim project, despite its failure to enter production, has served as a symbolic precursor to 's renewed push for indigenous automotive manufacturing, inspiring nationalist policies aimed at technological self-reliance in the post-2000 era. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's administration, the government has framed modern initiatives as continuations of early republican-era ambitions like Devrim, emphasizing state-led consortia to overcome historical dependencies on foreign assembly. This continuity is evident in the establishment of the Turkey Automotive Industry Union (TAI) in 2017, which facilitated the consortium—a partnership of five domestic firms including Anadolu Group, BMC, , , and —formed in 2018 to develop electric vehicles (EVs). Unlike Devrim's rapid, resource-constrained prototype development in , which lacked sustained funding and supply chains, Togg adopted a phased approach with extended R&D, investing in a dedicated including production and software integration to mitigate scalability risks. The project's factory in , , broke ground in July 2020 and commenced operations on , 2022, coinciding with the Republic's 99th anniversary, with initial test vehicle production starting in August 2022 and customer deliveries of the T10X model beginning in March 2023. By 2023, Togg targeted 17,000–18,000 units annually, scaling toward 175,000 per year at full capacity, supported by incentives like tax breaks and for charging networks. Togg's contrasts Devrim's by incorporating strategic foreign collaborations for components like batteries while prioritizing domestic and , aligning with post-2000 policies to elevate Turkey's automotive sector—now the world's 12th largest by output—toward competitiveness. Plans include launching a model by late 2024, with mass production in 2025 and initial exports to that year, aiming to position Togg as a regional hub amid global shifts to . This evolution reflects lessons from Devrim's fuel shortage debacle and political disruptions, favoring institutional stability and public-private partnerships to sustain momentum beyond symbolic prototypes.

References

  1. [1]
    Turkey's first national car turns 57 - Hürriyet Daily News
    Oct 30, 2018 · Devrim was manufactured at the order of then President Cemal Gürsel, who wanted to show the world that his country was capable of manufacturing ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  2. [2]
    Turkey - Military Coup, 1960, Politics | Britannica
    On May 3, 1960, the commander of the land forces, General Cemal Gürsel, demanded political reforms and resigned when his demands were refused. ... From 1983 to ...
  3. [3]
    Commanding Heights : Turkey Overview | on PBS
    A liberal economic policy enables strong economic growth, especially in export-oriented agriculture. ... Cemal Gürsel. 1961: Parliamentary government is ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Turkey Policy in Turkey The ...
    Domestic automotive production got a serious push from the implementation of the First Five Year. Development Plan (FYDP) between 1963-1967. The Plan foresaw a ...
  5. [5]
    First trial: Devrim - Anadol Fan Kulübü
    The project name was “Devrim” (revolution). Devrim was the first ever designed and produced car in Turkey. They had 140 days to accomplish the car and the ...
  6. [6]
    (PDF) Political Economy of Industrial Policy in Turkey: The Case of ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · industry, full liberalization of the automotive imports was phased in over a period of five years. 21. Interview with Ercan Tezer, the ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Role of The State in Turkey's Domestic Automobile İnitiatives ...
    Jun 29, 2024 · Turkey made significant progress in the 1960s towards producing its own branded car; however, due to the political, economic, and social ...
  8. [8]
    Bir Başarı Öyküsü | Devrim Arabası | Eskişehir | TÜRASAŞ
    4 DEVRİM… Türk Otomotiv Sanayiinin ilk göz ağrısı: DEVRİM ARABALARI. Ülkemizde 15 Mayıs 1961'de Ankara' da Otomotiv Endüstri Kongresi düzenlenmiş ve kongreden ...Missing: Sanayi | Show results with:Sanayi
  9. [9]
    The Republic Period of the Turkish Automotive Industry and Product ...
    The “Devrim” brand automobile project in question is the first vehicle project that can be described as a domestic and original product design in Turkish ...Missing: coup état
  10. [10]
    İlk Türk Otomobili Devrim Arabası | Eskişehir | TÜRASAŞ
    İLK YERLİ OTOMOBİL "DEVRİM". 16 Haziran 1961 günü Devlet Demiryolları Fabrikaları ve Cer Dairelerinin yönetici ve mühendislerinden 20 kadarı Ankara'da bir ...
  11. [11]
    DEVRİM OTOMOBİLİ NASIL HAZIRLANDI - Dr. İlhami PEKTAŞ
    Oct 31, 2023 · İlk Türk otomobili 'Devrim' ve emekçi Devrim kadrosu. Türk mühendislerin haftasonları dahil günde 12 saat çalışarak 129 günde tamamladığı, ...
  12. [12]
    Devrim Arabası - Eskişehir Valiliği
    Bu projede Türk otomobilinin üretilmesi amacıyla Devlet Demiryolları Fabrikaları ve Cer Daireleri yöneticisi ve mühendisler 16 Haziran 1961 günü bu özel görev ...Missing: Kongresi | Show results with:Kongresi
  13. [13]
    Necmettin Erbakan'ın Devrim Otomobilini Üreten Ekipte Yer Aldığı ...
    Dec 30, 2019 · Evet Necmettin Erbakan 1961 yılında 4,5 aylık süre içerisinde 4 adet devrim arabasını üreten ekibin bir parçası değildi. Ancak Erbakan, Devrim ...
  14. [14]
    The Pre-Republic Period of the Turkish Automotive Industry: Design ...
    The “Devrim”, which was the first domestic automobile to date in the history of the Turkish automotive industry, is a vehicle that does not have factory ...
  15. [15]
    Historical development of the Turkish automotive design.
    The "Devrim" mark automobile project, which takes place as an initial initiative in the sector-specific historical development, was carried out by ignoring the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Path Dependent Historical Development at Turkish Automotive ...
    By the 1960s, while the production of different motor vehicles in the automotive industry could be carried out by assembly, the automobile production facility ...
  17. [17]
    3 years on, Turkish carmaker TOGG pushes ahead | Daily Sabah
    Jun 25, 2021 · It took a team of Turkish engineers only 129 days to plan, organize and manufacture four Devrim automobiles ready for public presentation on Oct ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    The unfortunate story of Devrim, the first domestic automobile...
    Jun 21, 2024 · Devrim is remembered as a symbol of Turkey's industrialization efforts. This historic vehicle, produced in 1961, is now preserved and waiting ...
  19. [19]
    Türkiye'nin ilk otomobili "Devrim"in hikayesi
    Aug 13, 2024 · Maksimum hız, 135 km/saat ; Yakıt sistemi, Karbüratörlü, Yandan (A4L) ve Üstten Sübaplı (A4T ve B3T) ; Uzunluk, 4500 mm ; Genişlik, 1800 mm.
  20. [20]
    Devrim (otomobil) - Vikipedi
    Devrim, Türkiye'de tasarlanan ve üretilen ilk otomobil. 1961 yılında, dönemin Cumhurbaşkanı Cemal Gürsel'in talimatıyla, Eskişehir Demiryolu Fabrikası'nda, ...
  21. [21]
    Devrim | Araba Teknik Bilgi
    May 4, 2015 · Motor 10 Adet ... Maksimum hız 135 km/saat. Yakıt sistemi; Karbüratörlü, Yandan (A4L) ve Üstten Sübaplı (A4T ve B3T) Boyutlar Uzunluk; 4500 mmMissing: otomobil özellikler gücü
  22. [22]
    Ottomobiles: The memorable cars of Turkey, part one - Autoweek
    Nov 30, 2011 · The Devrim was conceived by then-Turkish President Cemal Gürsel as a means of, basically, showing the world that Turkey could produce a car.Missing: initiation team
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Eskişehir Bölge Müdürlüğü Tarihçesi - TÜRASAŞ
    TÜLOMSAŞ adını alır. 2020 yılında dünyada ... NOT : 1961 yılında 4 adet üretilen DEVRİM Otomobillerinden sadece birisi günümüze ulaşmıştır TÜRASAŞ Devrim ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Museum dedicated to 1st domestic car 'Devrim' reopens in Eskişehir
    Jul 5, 2021 · Story of Devrim. In 1961, approximately 200 Turkish engineers and workers produced four cars under difficult conditions at the Eskişehir Railway ...
  26. [26]
    Siyah Devrim otomobilinin 58 yıllık sırrı - DHA
    Jan 3, 2020 · Devrim otomobili projesinin ... (TÜLOMSAŞ) olan Eskişehir Demiryolu Fabrikaları'nda 48 mühendis ve 200'e yakın işçi projeye dahil edildi.
  27. [27]
    İlklerin kentinde 'yerli otomobil' için güç birliği - Anadolu Ajansı
    Aynı yılın 29 Ekim'inde Eskişehir'deki aynı tesisin işçi ve mühendisleri, bu defa ülkenin ilk yerli otomobili Devrim'e imza atmakla gururlandı. Halen TÜLOMSAŞ ...
  28. [28]
    İlk yerli otomobil "Devrim"e kapsamlı bakım - Milliyet
    Mar 5, 2018 · Devrim, fabrikada görevli 5 işçi ve 10 mühendis tarafından yaklaşık ... TÜLOMSAŞ'ta sergilenen 0002 şasi ve 0002 motor numaralı Devrim ...
  29. [29]
    Technological and Innovative Structure and Capabilities of Türkiye's ...
    Jan 3, 2025 · cars named Devrim were limited to only 4 prototypes. The first successful mass production was carried out in 1966. with the OTOSAN Anadol car.
  30. [30]
    Turkey's domestic car dream nears fruition half a century later
    Oct 28, 2019 · Devrim, exhibited at TÜLOMSAŞ with the 0002 chassis number and 0002 engine number, was produced in four-and-a-half months in completely ...
  31. [31]
    45# - The First Turkish Car: How a Project can transform a Country
    Oct 7, 2022 · Despite the extremely tight schedule, on the morning of October 29, 1961, two Devrim cars were shipped to Ankara for the Republic Day ...
  32. [32]
    Ankara Eskisehir HST - Rail Turkey En
    How far is it between Ankara-Eskisehir by rail? 249 km; How long it ... distance trains: Ankara Train Station; There are bus/minibus services passing ...
  33. [33]
    Devrim cars – Rejuvenation of the hope of creating cars in Turkey
    Dec 31, 2016 · In 15 May 1961, Automotive Industry Congress was opened by Jemal Gursel. ... These cars were transported in a train from Eskisehir to Ankara.
  34. [34]
    Automobility in Turkey: A Critical Evaluation of Turkish Automobile ...
    The car stopped after a few hundred meters because it had run out of gasoline. Gürsel, getting out of the car, criticized, “we have produced an automobile ...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    129 days to build a car - COCKPIT
    Oddly, the entrepreneurs of "Anadol" claimed that it was not possible to produce automobiles in Turkey, before the appearance of "Devrim".
  37. [37]
    OPENINGS: AHMET ÖĞÜT - Artforum
    The incident, which made the president and his car the laughingstock of the nation, forever ended all hopes of manufacturing the Devrim. But it did give rise to ...Missing: reaction | Show results with:reaction
  38. [38]
    Turkey publicizes prototype of first indigenous car - Anadolu Ajansı
    Dec 27, 2019 · Erdogan stressed Turkey will deter all efforts to hinder the production of its own car. “They managed to hinder the production of Devrim but ...Missing: headlines critiques
  39. [39]
    The Trilemma of Turkish Techno-Nationalism
    May 30, 2025 · Turkey's early techno-nationalist spirit was visible in its first domestic car project, the “Devrim”. ... viable “native and national” companies ...Missing: skeptics | Show results with:skeptics
  40. [40]
    [PDF] The Trilemma of Turkish Techno-Nationalism
    May 25, 2025 · domestic car project, the “Devrim”. Despite its utter failure in the 1960s, it remains a nostalgic ideal for many nationalist Turks.Missing: skeptics | Show results with:skeptics
  41. [41]
    Turkey GDP Per Capita | Historical Chart & Data - Macrotrends
    Turkey GDP per capita for 2020 was $8,639, a 6.26% decline from 2019. GDP per capita is gross domestic product divided by midyear population. GDP is the sum of ...Missing: foreign | Show results with:foreign
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Turkish Experience with Debt: Macroeconomic Policy and ...
    In its recent history, Turkey faced foreign exchange stringency at three junctures: in 1957-58, 1969-70, and 1978-80. Each episode in- volved IMF-supported ...
  43. [43]
    Inflation, consumer prices for Turkey (FPCPITOTLZGTUR) - FRED
    Graph and download economic data for Inflation, consumer prices for Turkey (FPCPITOTLZGTUR) from 1960 to 2024 about Turkey, consumer, CPI, inflation, ...Missing: 1961-1965 | Show results with:1961-1965
  44. [44]
    [PDF] II Economic Growth in Turkey, 1960–2000 - IMF eLibrary
    At about 2.3 percent per year, Turkey's per capita income grew somewhat ... Per Capita GDP Growth. Volatility. (Backward-looking five-year standard ...
  45. [45]
    Devrim - Academic Dictionaries and Encyclopedias
    Three of the prototypes were destroyed, their engines converted to diesel generators, but the last one is kept, in working condition, inside the TÜLOMSAŞ ...
  46. [46]
    Devrim: first car designed and produced in Turkey (1961) - Reddit
    Dec 27, 2016 · conspiracy theories aside i think it failed because it was a state-funded effort. like everything the state does it fails or sucks. i don't ...Is the theory of more advanced civilisation in turkey around the time ...How did we get here ? : r/AskBalkans - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: locomotive | Show results with:locomotive
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    [PDF] technology development in turkish automotive industry: a case of ...
    The findings suggest that Turkish firms are mostly performing similar projects mostly at the traditional level of R&D in the automotive industry and with the ...
  49. [49]
    (PDF) The Turkish and South Korean Automobile Industries and the ...
    ... car of Turkey,. 'Devrim', was produced in 1961. The production was basically experimental, very costly, and far. from building a base for later production ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Historical Development in Brazil and Turkish Automotive Industry ...
    From 1999 to 2012, these funds distributed about $6.4 billion to finance more than 30,000 projects throughout Brazil (Ministry of Science, Technology and ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  51. [51]
    (PDF) The Pre-Republic Period of the Turkish Automotive Industry
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... October 1961 (Paker et al., 2018) . The "Devrim" mark automobile project, which takes place as an initial initiative in the sector-specific ...
  52. [52]
    A dream come true: Turkey reveals prototype of first domestic car
    Dec 27, 2019 · The car is kept in a glass-encased section converted into a museum in the garden of TÜLOMSAŞ. “They managed to hinder the production of Devrim, ...
  53. [53]
    Why the TOGG Means More Than a Simple Car Production for Turkey
    Nov 23, 2022 · This Turkish domestic automobile, called “Devrim” (Revolution), had aroused great excitement all over the country when it was exhibited for the ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  54. [54]
    'More than a factory': Turkey breaks ground for 1st domestic car plant
    Jul 18, 2020 · It attempted to produce its first car in 1961 – the Devrim (Revolution) which was unsuccessful after production and was halted following the ...
  55. [55]
    Togg produces first electric cars in Turkey
    Aug 1, 2022 · Their plant in Gemlik will open on 29 October 2022 and the market launch in Turkey is scheduled for March 2023.Missing: history exports
  56. [56]
    Turkey's National Carmaker Togg Starts Production Of 2023 C SUV EV
    Nov 4, 2022 · Togg targets a production of 17,000-18,000 vehicles in 2023 and 175,000 a year when its plant in Gemlik, Turkey is fully ramped. Turkish EV ...Missing: project history timeline exports
  57. [57]
    Türkiye's rising automotive sector and homegrown EV brand, Togg
    Jul 22, 2025 · Türkiye's auto industry grew to the 12th largest, with local brand Togg leading its EV revolution to 2030.Missing: project | Show results with:project
  58. [58]
    Türkiye's Togg to start mass producing its sedan model in 2025
    Dec 13, 2023 · “Togg will introduce the sedan model to the public at the end of 2024. As of 2025, Togg vehicles will be exported to Europe. Again, sedan ...Missing: project | Show results with:project