Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Diretas Já

Diretas Já ("Direct [Elections] Now") was a nonviolent civil campaign in spanning March 1983 to April 1984, organized primarily by the opposition Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB) to demand direct popular elections for the presidency and thereby accelerate the end of the that had ruled since 1964. The movement challenged the regime's proposed of the president by an dominated by , which favored continuity of military influence. Spearheaded by prominent figures including Ulysses Guimarães, , and Dante de Oliveira—who introduced the pivotal constitutional amendment—the campaign mobilized widespread public participation through rallies that peaked with 1.5 million attendees in on April 16, 1984, marking the largest political demonstration in Brazilian history up to that point. These events, beginning with an initial protest in Abreu e Lima, , on March 31, 1983, underscored broad societal rejection of and galvanized civil society across urban centers. Despite the amendment's defeat in Congress on April 25, 1984, by a vote of 298 in favor—falling short of the required 320—Diretas Já failed to secure direct elections for the 1985 presidency, which proceeded indirectly with Tancredo Neves's selection, followed by Sarney's assumption of office after Neves's death. Nonetheless, the movement exerted causal pressure on the regime, fostering public demand for democracy that contributed to the military's withdrawal, the enactment of the 1988 Constitution restoring , and the implementation of direct presidential elections by 1989.

Historical Context

The Military Dictatorship (1964–1985)

The began with a on March 31–April 1, 1964, which ousted President amid fears of communist influence from his reformist policies, including land redistribution and expansions, compounded by exceeding 90% annually and political instability. The coup, supported by military leaders and civilian elites, installed a that quickly appointed General as president, establishing an authoritarian regime under the guise of and anti-communist defense. Successive presidents—Castelo Branco (1964–1967), Arthur da Costa e Silva (1967–1969), Emílio Garrastazu Médici (1969–1974), Ernesto Geisel (1974–1979), and João Figueiredo (1979–1985)—were selected through indirect elections by Congress or an electoral college, preserving a veneer of constitutional continuity while centralizing power in the armed forces. A pivotal escalation occurred with Institutional Act No. 5 on December 13, 1968, which suspended habeas corpus, political rights, and congressional sessions, enabling widespread cassation of mandates, censorship of media, and institutionalization of torture against perceived subversives. This period overlapped with the "economic miracle" from 1968 to 1973, during which GDP grew at an average annual rate exceeding 10%, driven by state-directed industrialization, infrastructure investments, and foreign capital inflows, though reliant on mounting external debt. Repression intensified under Médici, with documented cases of over 434 deaths or disappearances and thousands tortured in clandestine facilities, justified by the regime as counterinsurgency against armed leftist groups. Under Geisel, a controlled abertura (political opening) emerged from 1974, involving gradual relaxation of controls, including the abolition of Institutional Act No. 5 in December 1978, restoration of , and reduced censorship. This process culminated in the 1979 under , which pardoned political crimes from 1961–1979, facilitating exiles' return and multiparty legalization by ending the imposed in 1966, amid internal military divisions and societal pressures for reform. Despite these steps, the regime retained core authoritarian structures until its end in 1985, with the abertura reflecting pragmatic adaptation rather than full .

Economic Crises and Structural Challenges

The 1973 oil shock severely strained Brazil's economy, which had relied on foreign borrowing to sustain (ISI) and mitigate the immediate impact of quadrupled oil prices. Brazil's deteriorated sharply, with import costs rising while export revenues from primary commodities stagnated, exposing the fragility of debt-financed growth that had propped up the "economic miracle" of the late 1960s and early 1970s. , which stood at approximately $6.4 billion in 1968, ballooned to over $100 billion by 1985 as successive governments under the military regime borrowed heavily from international banks to cover deficits and fund state-led projects. This strategy initially masked vulnerabilities but amplified exposure to global hikes in the late 1970s, culminating in a debt service burden that consumed up to 40% of export earnings by the early 1980s. Fiscal deficits and structural rigidities in the model fueled the onset of , which exceeded 100% annually by the early 1980s. Persistent on subsidies, public enterprises, and servicing outpaced revenues, leading to monetization of deficits and excessive growth; for instance, annual rates climbed from around 40% in 1979 to over 200% by 1983, driven by inertial mechanisms like wage indexation that perpetuated price-wage spirals. The collapse of , characterized by inefficient protected industries unable to compete internationally, exacerbated import dependence and balance-of-payments pressures, as domestic failed to substitute for critical inputs amid rising costs. Policies under Finance Antônio Delfim Netto in the late , including attempts at wage restraint and selective credit controls, proved inadequate precursors to later stabilization efforts, as they did little to address underlying fiscal imbalances or curb inflationary expectations. Labor unrest emerged as a direct consequence of these macroeconomic strains, particularly in the industrial region near , where metalworkers launched major strikes from 1978 to 1980. These actions, involving tens of thousands at plants like and , protested real wage erosion from outpacing indexed adjustments and demanded greater union autonomy amid government-imposed pay-cut policies. The 1979 strike alone mobilized over 100,000 workers for weeks, signaling the breakdown of the regime's authoritarian labor controls and highlighting how economic hardship undermined the social compact that had tolerated during earlier growth phases. Despite periods of GDP expansion, persisted at high levels, with the hovering around 0.57 from the late 1970s into the early 1980s, reflecting skewed benefits from state interventions that favored capital-intensive sectors over broad-based wage gains. This structural imbalance eroded regime legitimacy, as urban workers and middle classes bore the brunt of measures while and urban favelas expanded, fostering widespread disillusionment with policies that prioritized debt repayment over equitable adjustment.

Legal Framework for Presidential Succession

The 1967 Constitution of Brazil, enacted under the military regime, stipulated in Article 74 that the would be elected by an absolute majority vote of an composed exclusively of members of the National Congress, convened in a single . This mechanism ensured that presidential selection remained within the controlled environment of a heavily influenced by regime-aligned parties, such as the (ARENA), thereby limiting direct popular input and preserving military oversight over executive transitions. Article 75 further reinforced congressional primacy by applying analogous rules to vice-presidential elections, underscoring the indirect nature of the process as a deliberate safeguard against mass electoral challenges to authoritarian continuity. Amending the to introduce direct presidential elections required approval by a two-thirds majority in both the and the Federal Senate, a threshold designed to entrench stability and deter rapid shifts toward broader . This provision, rooted in Article 48 of the text as amended, reflected the regime's strategy of incremental legal adjustments while blocking fundamental changes that could erode institutional control. During the of (March 15, 1979–January 15, 1985), partial openings included the Political Amnesty Law (No. 6.683, August 28, 1979), which restored civil rights to exiles and opponents, and No. 6.767 (December 20, 1979), which dismantled the imposed in 1966 and permitted multiparty competition. However, these reforms deliberately preserved the system for the , allowing the to vet successors through congressional proxies and avert a full return to direct that might empower opposition forces. Succession precedents under this framework highlighted internal regime vulnerabilities while demonstrating its efficacy in managed transitions. In the lead-up to Figueiredo's own selection in October 1978, debates within circles and revealed fractures, including hardline resistance to perceived softening, yet the electoral college ratified him with 355 of 364 votes, affirming control. By 1981, as Figueiredo's term progressed amid economic downturns and rising dissent, preliminary discussions on post-1985 exposed ongoing tensions between politicians and military hardliners, who insisted on indirect mechanisms to ensure a loyal handover, such as the eventual 1985 of . This approach perpetuated the regime's tactic of gradual decompression, prioritizing elite consensus over popular mandate to mitigate risks of instability.

Origins and Mobilization

Initial Proposals and Political Catalysts

The parliamentary elections of November 15, 1982, marked a pivotal shift, with the opposition Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro (PMDB) securing governorships in 12 states, including (André Franco Montoro), (Tancredo Neves), and (Leonel Brizola), alongside majorities in key state legislative assemblies. These gains, occurring under the military regime's controlled abertura process, exposed the fragility of the government's electoral dominance and emboldened opposition elites to challenge the indirect presidential succession mechanism entrenched since 1964. In response, PMDB federal deputy Dante de Oliveira introduced Bill No. 5 (PEC 5/1983) in March 1983, explicitly calling for direct popular elections for president and vice-president to be held on November 15, 1984—supplanting the regime's planned indirect vote by in January 1985. The proposal, requiring a three-fifths in both houses of , garnered rapid support with 199 signatures, reflecting dissension among lawmakers weary of the regime's power over electoral legitimacy. Key catalysts emerged from this elite-level pushback against regime rigidity. Tancredo Neves, upon assuming the Minas Gerais governorship in March 1983, vocally advocated for direct elections as a prerequisite for genuine redemocratization, leveraging his stature to rally opposition governors. Concurrently, opposition-majority state assemblies, such as those in São Paulo and Minas Gerais, initiated debates on electoral reform in early 1983, approving pro-amendment resolutions that pressured federal legislators and highlighted subnational defiance of the central government's indirect framework. These initiatives, rooted in institutional gains rather than mass unrest, underscored the movement's origins in calculated elite responses to the military's unyielding control over succession amid mounting evidence of its political isolation.

Key Participants and Coalitions

The Diretas Já campaign was spearheaded by opposition politicians from the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB), with Ulysses Guimarães, as president of the Chamber of Deputies, playing a central role in advancing the Dante de Oliveira constitutional amendment to restore direct presidential elections; his advocacy earned him the nickname "Mr. Direct Elections" due to his persistent promotion of the measure amid congressional debates. Tancredo Neves, another PMDB leader and former Minas Gerais governor, endorsed the initiative as a step toward controlled redemocratization, leveraging his influence within moderate opposition circles to bridge elite negotiations with popular demands. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, founder of the Workers' Party (PT) and head of the metalworkers' union in São Bernardo do Campo, contributed a proletarian perspective, organizing labor contingents to amplify calls for electoral reform while highlighting socioeconomic grievances under military rule. This political core allied with a diverse array of civil society actors, forming a cross-ideological front that included labor organizations like the ABC industrial unions—early forerunners of the Unified Workers' Central (CUT)—which channeled worker discontent into street-level mobilization. The National Conference of Brazilian Bishops (CNBB) provided moral and institutional backing, issuing documents from 1977 onward that emphasized and critiqued authoritarian restrictions on , aligning ecclesiastical networks with the campaign's goals. Segments of the business elite, particularly industrialists facing economic instability, offered tacit support for the movement as a means to stabilize and avert deeper crises, though their engagement remained pragmatic rather than ideological. Public figures, including musicians and intellectuals, enhanced the coalition's cultural reach by participating in promotional efforts, fostering widespread visibility across social strata. The alliance encompassed parties like the Democratic Labor Party (PDT) alongside PMDB and , uniting moderates seeking gradual transition with leftists advocating structural overhaul. However, these partnerships proved tenuous, as rifts emerged between socialist elements prioritizing radical redistribution and liberal factions favoring elite-pacted reforms to preserve economic hierarchies. The coalition's organizational efforts included over 300 assemblies and rallies nationwide between 1983 and 1984, drawing cumulative participation estimated in the millions and underscoring the movement's capacity to aggregate disparate interests despite underlying fractures.

Organizational Strategies and Assemblies

The Diretas Já movement organized through state-level assemblies beginning in late 1983, where opposition groups and entities convened to draft formal resolutions endorsing direct presidential elections and rejecting indirect selection via the Colégio Eleitoral. For instance, on November 27, 1983, an assembly in at Praça Charles Miller, coordinated by the Comissão Justiça e Paz and the (PT), united nearly 70 organizations to approve such demands, establishing a model for localized that fed into broader national efforts. These gatherings emphasized structured deliberation over spontaneous action, producing documents that pressured legislators and built coalitions across parties and sectors. National coordination emerged via suprapartisan committees, such as the Comitê Suprapartidário Nacional formed in early 1984, which orchestrated synchronized mobilizations including comícios (public rallies) and jornadas nacionais de luta to unify messaging and logistics. On February 21, 1984, proposals for a centralized unit in involving party leaders and societal representatives formalized this approach, prioritizing mass participation without endorsing strikes or disruptions that could invite repression. Rhetorical tactics centered on concise slogans like "Diretas Já" and "Presidente, quem escolhe é a gente," disseminated through media amplification and public assemblies to frame the campaign as a reclamation of rather than mere . Cultural integrations, such as incorporating songs and youth-oriented events into comícios, enhanced turnout among younger demographics by blending political demands with expressive forms. Logistical strategies included drives to compile signatures urging parliamentarians to indirect voting, with a key deadline of August 15, 1984, for pressuring adherence to principles. Organizers maintained a strict non-violent stance, relying on peaceful passeatas and debates to uphold moral legitimacy and avoid providing pretexts for military intervention, as evidenced by the campaign's documented emphasis on disciplined, non-confrontational assembly.

Major Protests and Events

Early Demonstrations and Regional Spread

The Diretas Já movement initiated its public demonstrations in late 1983 with localized events, such as the in São Paulo's Charles Miller Square, which drew an estimated 15,000 participants organized by opposition politicians and groups. These early actions focused on raising awareness for direct presidential elections amid the military regime's planned indirect succession. Momentum accelerated in January 1984, with the first major rally in on January 15 attracting approximately 50,000 attendees at Praça Cívica, signaling the campaign's viability in interior cities beyond coastal metropolises. Similarly, Curitiba's January 12 gathering mobilized 50,000 in the Boca Maldita area, highlighting growing coordination among regional opposition networks. By January 25, São Paulo's Praça da Sé rally saw attendance estimates varying from 130,000 by federal police to 380,000–400,000 by and subway authorities, underscoring the disparity in official versus observed figures. Regional variations emerged in mobilization strategies: in the Northeast, networks, including pastoral agents, facilitated participation in agrarian and peripheral communities wary of urban-centric politics. Conversely, the industrial and Southeast emphasized labor unions affiliated with parties like the (PT), channeling strikes and factory assemblies into street protests. Overall, participation escalated from thousands in mid-1983 to hundreds of thousands by early 1984, with police estimates often conservative compared to organizer claims, reflecting heightened public pressure for without yet reaching national saturation.

Peak Rallies in Major Cities

The climax of the Diretas Já campaign unfolded in April 1984 with unprecedented rallies in Brazil's largest cities, drawing hundreds of thousands to millions in support of direct presidential elections. On April 10, over one million participants assembled along Avenida Presidente Vargas in , constituting the largest public gathering in the nation's history up to that point according to contemporaneous reports from . The event featured speeches by opposition figures including , who closed with the national anthem alongside PMDB leader Ulysses Guimarães, underscoring unified calls for democratic restoration. Attendance estimates varied, with international observers like reporting over 500,000, reflecting differences in counting methodologies but confirming the rally's massive scale. Six days later, on April 16, hosted what organizers and state authorities described as nearly two million attendees in the downtown area, with estimating 1.7 million. Governor André Franco Montoro addressed the crowd, joined by celebrities, athletes, and actors, amplifying the movement's cross-sector appeal that encompassed workers, students, intellectuals, and middle-class professionals. These gatherings remained notably peaceful, devoid of violence despite their size, as participants chanted slogans and waved banners demanding without clashing with authorities or among themselves. Broad media exposure, particularly through outlets like and national television networks, documented the rallies' orderly enthusiasm and diverse composition, lending credibility to the opposition's push against indirect succession under the military regime. Such coverage highlighted the events' role in mobilizing public sentiment, though estimates of total nationwide participation across April rallies approached several million when aggregated.

Congressional Debate and Amendment Vote

The debate in the Brazilian on the Dante de Oliveira , which sought to restore direct presidential elections, intensified in leading to the April 25, 1984, vote, reflecting deep divisions between opposition forces and the military-backed government. Opposition leaders, including figures from the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB) and emerging left-wing groups, framed the amendment as essential for genuine democratic renewal, arguing that indirect elections perpetuated the regime's authoritarian control and denied amid widespread public mobilization. In contrast, supporters of President and the (PDS), the government's primary legislative ally, emphasized the risks of abrupt institutional change, warning that direct elections could exacerbate economic instability—marked by exceeding 200% annually—and undermine the gradual "opening" (abertura) process intended to ensure a controlled transition without social upheaval. Figueiredo, the last military president, actively opposed the measure, viewing it as a threat to the regime's negotiated , and reportedly lobbied PDS members to maintain while coordinating with military commanders to signal potential repercussions for . This pressure was evident in the heavy military presence around , including parades of thousands of troops and armored vehicles on the eve of the vote, intended to deter wavering deputies and reinforce the establishment's preference for stability over populist demands. Despite intense last-minute negotiations, approximately 48 PDS deputies broke ranks to support the amendment, swayed by public protests and personal convictions, but this proved inadequate to overcome the procedural hurdle. The session, lasting over 18 hours, ended with the amendment garnering 298 votes in favor and 261 against, failing to achieve the required two-thirds majority of 320 votes by a margin of 22. Procedural rules mandated absolute attendance and a based on the Chamber's total membership of 479, amplifying the impact of absences and strategic abstentions orchestrated by regime loyalists. The narrow defeat highlighted the fragility of congressional independence under influence, as defections revealed fissures within the PDS but underscored the enduring leverage of and forces pressure in preserving the indirect electoral framework.

Immediate Outcomes

Failure of Direct Elections

The constitutional amendment proposing direct presidential elections, known as the Dante de Oliveira Amendment, was defeated in the Brazilian on April 25, 1984, after garnering 298 votes in favor, 65 against, and 3 abstentions, with 112 deputies absent; it required 320 votes—a two-thirds of the 479-member chamber—to pass. The shortfall of 22 votes stemmed primarily from the failure to secure sufficient defections within the Partido Democrático Social (PDS), the regime's dominant party, whose deputies maintained under pressure from leaders despite some initial pledges of support. Institutional barriers exacerbated the defeat, as rural congressmen—predominantly PDS affiliates representing agrarian constituencies that benefited from the regime's networks and opposition to land reforms—remained loyal, prioritizing local clientelist ties over urban-driven . This loyalty reflected the regime's enduring control over , where electoral rules engineered during the favored pro-government forces in less urbanized regions. Strategically, the Diretas Já campaign overrelied on emotional and street protests to sway legislators, neglecting the horse-trading and coalition-building essential in Brazil's patronage-based , where deputies often defected only for tangible concessions that the fragmented opposition could not uniformly offer. In the vote's aftermath, protests continued in cities like and but diminished in scale and frequency, as participant fatigue set in and organizational energy dissipated without a clear alternative path forward.

Shift to Indirect Election and Regime Transition

Following the failure of the Diretas Já amendment in April 1984, Brazil's political leadership pursued an scheduled for January 1985, utilizing an composed of members of to select the successor to military President . On January 15, 1985, opposition candidate of the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB) secured victory with 480 votes against 180 for the government-backed Partido Democrático Social (PDS) nominee, , marking the first civilian presidency in 21 years and signaling the military regime's controlled withdrawal from direct power. This outcome reflected a negotiated pact among civilian politicians, including former regime allies, prioritizing stability over immediate direct elections to avoid exacerbating divisions within the military and prevent potential institutional rupture. Neves' inauguration, set for March 15, 1985, was postponed due to his sudden illness on March 14 from complications including and subsequent infections; he died on April 21, 1985, without assuming office. Vice President-elect , also of the PMDB, was immediately sworn in as president, ensuring continuity in the transition despite the unexpected . Sarney's ascension, though initially met with skepticism given his prior alignment with pro-regime parties, facilitated a phased handover by maintaining alliances with military figures and upholding laws from 1979 that shielded regime actors from prosecution, thereby averting retaliatory unrest or coups. The military's exit proceeded without violent backlash, as hardline factions accepted the electoral results under the gradualist abertura policy initiated in the late , which emphasized institutional evolution over abrupt change to mitigate risks of civil conflict or economic disruption. This approach preserved regime gains, such as remnants, while ceding executive control, with no recorded coup attempts in the immediate aftermath. Under Sarney's administration, a drafted a new , promulgated on , 1988, which institutionalized direct for presidential elections commencing in 1989, thereby fulfilling core Diretas Já demands through legislative means rather than street pressure alone. This framework embedded safeguards like and rights protections, solidifying the regime's transition to civilian without unraveling prior pacts.

Legacy and Assessments

Contributions to Redemocratization

The Diretas Já campaign exerted significant pressure on the military regime, accelerating the pace of political opening (abertura política) during the final years of President ’s term. The massive rallies, which drew hundreds of thousands in cities like and in early 1984, prompted the government to expand measures and restore to broader groups of political exiles, actions interpreted as direct responses to sustain regime legitimacy amid growing unrest. This indirect causation is evident in the regime's shift from controlled liberalization to concessions that facilitated the 1985 indirect , marking the military's handover of power to civilians under following Tancredo Neves's victory and subsequent death. By uniting diverse societal actors—including labor unions, Catholic Church groups, intellectuals, and opposition politicians—the movement established a model for mass that invigorated Brazil's . These efforts mobilized over a million participants in peak events, fostering organizational networks and public discourse on democratic norms that served as precedents for later mobilizations, such as the 1992 protests against President and aspects of the 2016 impeachment demonstrations against . Empirically, Diretas Já contributed to the institutionalization of direct elections through the 1988 Constitution, enabling the first popular presidential vote since 1960 on November 15, 1989, which featured a runoff between and Luís Inácio Lula da Silva. The campaign's emphasis on also supported the diversification of the , as post-1985 reforms under allowed the registration of additional parties and strengthened opposition representation in Congress, reducing the dominance of pro-regime alliances.

Long-term Political and Social Impacts

The Diretas Já campaign contributed to the normalization of mass street protests as a legitimate mechanism for influencing policy and in Brazilian , establishing a precedent for mobilization that persisted beyond the . By drawing millions to rallies in cities like and in 1984, it demonstrated the efficacy of nonviolent public demonstrations in pressuring authoritarian structures, a tactic later replicated in events such as the 1992 protests against President and the 2013 nationwide mobilizations against corruption and public services. This shift embedded protests within the political repertoire, with data from protest event analyses showing a marked increase in their frequency and acceptance post-1985, from sporadic under dictatorship to routine expressions of dissent. The movement's momentum indirectly shaped the 1988 Constitution, which enshrined expanded including robust protections for , expression, and participation, reflecting the popular demands for direct accountability that Diretas Já amplified. Promulgated on October 5, 1988, the document's citizen constitution-making process incorporated inputs from societal actors mobilized during the Diretas Já era, such as trade unions and organizations, leading to provisions like Article 5 on inviolable rights and Article 17 on political party freedoms that broadened . However, institutional continuity in elite networks endured, as the transition preserved congressional electoral colleges for initial post-dictatorship selections, limiting the depth of power redistribution despite the social energies unleashed. Socially, Diretas Já temporarily empowered marginalized sectors including workers, students, and informal urban groups through cross-class coalitions that united over 3 million participants by April 1984, fostering a in that echoed in subsequent union-led reforms. This mobilization briefly elevated voices from peripheral communities in the redemocratization discourse, yet structural inequalities persisted, with political power consolidating among established parties like the PMDB rather than diffusing to newly activated bases. In contemporary politics, the Diretas Já legacy has been invoked in calls for direct presidential elections, notably in 2016 following Dilma Rousseff's impeachment, where opposition groups demanded "eleições diretas já" to bypass interim leadership under amid corruption scandals. These 2016-2017 protests, drawing parallels to 1984's scale, were ultimately rejected by on May 25, 2017, prioritizing adherence to the Constitution's indirect succession mechanisms over extraordinary amendments, underscoring the enduring tension between popular mandates and institutional stability.

Criticisms of Efficacy and Overreach

Critics of the Diretas Já movement have argued that its strategy overlooked the political arithmetic in Congress, where the ruling Partido Democrático Social (PDS) and allies held sufficient seats to block the required two-thirds majority for the Dante de Oliveira amendment on direct elections. Despite rallies drawing hundreds of thousands—such as the estimated 300,000 in on April 16, 1984—the amendment failed on April 25, 1984, falling short by 22 votes in the . This outcome underscored the movement's overreliance on mass mobilization without securing defections from regime loyalists, leading inevitably to an indirect presidential vote by the as stipulated under the 1967 constitution. The persistence of the indirect system was evident in the January 15, 1985, electoral college vote, where opposition candidate Tancredo Neves secured victory over PDS nominee Paulo Maluf with 480 to 180 electoral votes, facilitated by PDS dissidents breaking ranks amid public pressure. Detractors contend this demonstrated the movement's limited efficacy in dismantling entrenched institutional barriers, as Neves's win validated the very electoral mechanism Diretas Já sought to abolish, delaying full direct elections until 1989 without averting the regime's controlled handover. The episode highlighted how protests, while amplifying opposition visibility, failed to alter the congressional balance dominated by military-era appointees and indirect elections for legislators. Furthermore, the campaign's focus on amid economic turmoil has drawn charges of overreach, as it offered no substantive policy framework to address driven by fiscal deficits and monetary expansion, with annual rates surging to around 226% in 1985. Political from widespread demonstrations exacerbated inflationary expectations and inertia without complementary stabilization measures, contributing to a cycle of failed heterodox plans like the Cruzado Plan in 1986. Critics argue this narrow emphasis romanticized popular action while downplaying the risks of abrupt ; the gradual transition via preserved institutional continuity, averting potential seen in cases of rapid without robust economic anchors, such as Venezuela's post-1990s . The military era's legacies, including the network begun in 1970 to integrate the interior, provided developmental foundations often minimized in favor of highlighting repression.

Controversies and Debates

Ideological Divisions Within the Opposition

The opposition to Brazil's military regime during the Diretas Já campaign spanned a broad ideological spectrum, encompassing Marxist organizations, socialist trade unions affiliated with the (PT, founded in 1980), and more centrist-liberal factions within the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB). While the movement projected unity around the demand for direct presidential elections, fractures emerged from divergent strategic visions: radical left elements, including PT militants and union leaders like Luís Inácio Lula da Silva, sought to harness mass mobilization for comprehensive socioeconomic reforms such as agrarian redistribution and expanded , framing direct elections as a precursor to dismantling elite structures. PMDB moderates, by contrast, prioritized pragmatic pacts with regime holdovers to avert instability, favoring a controlled transition that preserved institutional balances over disruptive change. These tensions crystallized during the April 25, 1984, vote in the on the Dante de Oliveira constitutional amendment, which proposed restoring direct elections for the November 1985 presidential contest. Despite rallies drawing over 300,000 in and 1 million nationwide in preceding weeks, the measure failed 298–65, with approximately 80 PMDB deputies joining the regime's Partido Democrático Social (PDS) in opposition or abstention, motivated by fears that direct voting would empower unpredictable populist or leftist figures like (PDT) or Lula, potentially derailing negotiated power-sharing. Such defections underscored how moderate politicians' careerist incentives—securing influence via an they could sway—clashed with radicals' insistence on unmediated , fracturing the opposition's leverage against regime intransigence. Analyses of the era highlight mutual recriminations: left-wing critics accused PMDB leaders of co-opting grassroots energy for elite bargains, as evidenced by the swift pivot to Tancredo Neves' indirect candidacy post-defeat, which sidelined PT input despite its mobilization role. Conversely, moderate voices and later observers contended that PT and union radicals' uncompromising rhetoric and ancillary demands alienated centrist allies, diluting congressional support and enabling the regime's divide-and-rule tactics. These rifts persisted into the 1985 indirect election and José Sarney's ascension, where leftist groups decried the "New Republic" as a superficial handover preserving military amnesty and economic orthodoxies, resulting in PT's marginalization—securing just 16 seats (under 3%) in the 1986 Constituent Assembly amid PMDB dominance.

Economic Disruptions and Opportunity Costs

The Diretas Já movement, peaking in 1984, coincided with Brazil's deepening external debt crisis, which had triggered a with GDP contracting by 4.4% in 1981 and remaining near stagnation through 1983 amid sharp reductions in capital inflows and export earnings. The campaign's nationwide protests and rallies, drawing millions, prioritized constitutional change for direct presidential elections over immediate economic stabilization measures, such as or debt renegotiation, thereby channeling political energy and public discourse away from fiscal discipline. This political focus contributed to opportunity costs by postponing structural reforms needed to address chronic imbalances, including high public deficits and monetary expansion that fueled rates climbing from 110% in 1980 to over 200% by 1983. Critics, including economists analyzing the era's policy missteps, contend that the movement's success in amplifying demands overshadowed advocacy for market or , reforms later enacted under President in 1990 to combat inertia from prior heterodox plans. The indirect election outcome in 1985, followed by José Sarney's presidency after Tancredo Neves's death, exacerbated these costs through repeated failed stabilization attempts, such as the 1986 Cruzado Plan, leading to that surpassed 1,700% annually in 1989 and peaked above 2,900% cumulative in early 1990. Per capita GDP declined an average of 4.1% yearly from 1980 onward during this "lost decade," with the movement's legacy partly blamed for delaying credible fiscal anchors that might have mitigated the protracted stagnation. Such disruptions underscored a trade-off where rapid political opening preceded economic prudence, prolonging recovery until the 1994 Real Plan.

Modern Reinterpretations and Political Invocations

In April , marked the 40th anniversary of the Diretas Já campaign's pivotal rallies and the congressional vote on the Dante de Oliveira Amendment, with official events in the and lauding its mobilization of millions against and its acceleration of redemocratization. These commemorations, attended by politicians across the spectrum, emphasized the movement's enduring symbol of civic engagement amid contemporary threats to institutions, such as the January 8, 2023, storming of , the , and Planalto Palace by Bolsonaro supporters, which exposed vulnerabilities in the post-1985 democratic framework despite its gradual establishment. Partisan reinterpretations have repurposed Diretas Já to advance immediate electoral demands, often selectively overlooking its original failure and the subsequent indirect election's role in stabilizing the transition. In May 2016, after Dilma Rousseff's , left-wing leaders including Lula da Silva revived calls for "Eleições Diretas Já" to bypass Michel Temer's interim government, framing it as a corrective to perceived illegitimacy amid economic and scandals, though such pushes ignored constitutional succession mechanisms. Similarly, October 2021 protests against invoked the 1984 rallies' spirit, with organizers aiming to replicate mass turnout to pressure for his over pandemic mismanagement and institutional attacks, positioning street action as a democratic imperative. Conservative assessments, by contrast, highlight the empirical success of following the 1984 defeat: the indirect election of in January 1985 enabled a controlled handover to , avoiding abrupt direct polls that risked factional dominance or unrest, as subsequent direct elections from 1989 onward integrated opposition gains without systemic rupture. This view posits that unchecked direct-election fervor, as echoed in modern left invocations, could invite elite or populist capture—evident in post-impeachment volatility—prioritizing institutional resilience over reactive mobilizations, a stance reinforced by the 2023 events' demonstration of how bypassing electoral colleges historically mitigated such hazards.

References

  1. [1]
    Brazilians act to end military rule (Diretas Já) 1983-84
    Brazilians act to end military rule (Diretas Já) 1983-84 · Leaders. The leading organization of the movement was the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB).
  2. [2]
    Transition to Democracy in Brazil: The Actual Role of The Social Movement “Diretas Já”
    ### Role of Diretas Já in Brazil's Democratization
  3. [3]
    The Collapse of the Brazilian Military Regime | Revista Væranda
    Mar 23, 2023 · The ideas outlined in the letter also contributed to the “Diretas, já ... The movement, which eventually led to the largest political rally in ...
  4. [4]
    The Brazilian Military Regime, 1964–1985
    **Summary of Opposition Internal Divisions During Diretas Já Campaign and 1984 Amendment Vote:**
  5. [5]
    Military Dictatorship (1964-1985) - Brazil-U.S. Relations
    Nov 30, 2023 · ... Brazil's military regime and championed the cause of democracy in Brazil. ... against the dictatorship. Although the 1964 coup itself had ...
  6. [6]
    Chapter 1: Revolution and Counterrevolution in Brazil
    On April 1, 1964, Goulart's term in office was cut short by a military coup d'état. ... Castelo Branco: First President of the Military Dictatorship. Castelo ...
  7. [7]
    50 Years Ago, Brazil Virtually Legalized Torture and Censorship
    Dec 12, 2018 · The AI-5 forbade any form of political demonstration. Censors became permanent fixtures in newsrooms. Shows, plays and cultural events had to be ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  8. [8]
    Military regime: Notoriously repressive AI-5 decree turns 55
    Dec 16, 2023 · The document authorized the president to suspend the activities of the National Congress and revoke the mandates of its members, as well as ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  9. [9]
    The Case of Brazil | Manifold | BFI
    The 1968–1973 period became known as the years of economic miracle in Brazil, with annual GDP growth rates in excess of 10 percent. That led to the ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    No Justice for Horrors of Brazil's Military Dictatorship 50 Years On
    Dec 13, 2018 · Fifty years ago today, Brazil´s military regime unleashed all-out repression with the publication of Institutional Act 5.
  11. [11]
    Brazil's dictatorship: Repression, torture, slaughter of Indigenous ...
    Apr 1, 2024 · brazil. Brazil's dictatorship: Repression, torture, slaughter of Indigenous people and censorship. Sixty years have passed since the 1964 ...
  12. [12]
    Geisel | Brazil: Five Centuries of Change - Brown University Library
    In December 1978, nearly a decade after its conception, Geisel abolished AI-5, thereby restoring habeas corpus, limiting press censorship, and rescinding the ...
  13. [13]
    BRAZIL'S PRESIDENT PLANNING AMNESTY - The New York Times
    Jun 20, 1979 · Brazilian Government is preparing amnesty plan in response to public clamor for pardons for thousands of citizens who lost their political ...Missing: politica Geisel
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Macroeconomics of the Brazilian External Debt
    Surpluses of $1 billion a month, adequate to meet interest payments, obviated the need for new private capital inflows in 1985.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] BRAZIL IN THE 1980s Eliana Cardoso Working Paper No. 3585 ...
    In the early 1980s, the Brazilian inflation rate increased in good measure because of the balance of payments crisis and because of large depreciations of the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Revisiting Import-Substituting Industrialisation in Post-War Brazil
    Second, manufacturing firms were heavily affected by the collapse of debt-led growth in Brazil in the early 1980s. The macroeconomic environment deteriorated ...
  17. [17]
    Advertising as a Way to Fight Inflation in 1970s Brazil
    Jan 13, 2021 · Beginning around 1968, Delfim Netto helped spark several years of significant economic and industrial growth with relatively low and stable.
  18. [18]
    Strikes and Pickets in Brazil: Working-Class Mobilization in the “Old ...
    The months prior to the strike were filled with intense agitation among the working classes of São Paulo. Trade unionism was in a phase of visible enthusiasm ...Missing: unrest | Show results with:unrest<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Recent Strikes in Brazil - Ricardo Antunes, Sabrina E. Wilson, 1994
    This strike called for a 64.8 percent wage restriction starting in January, 100 percent semester readjustments starting in July, a wage basis of three minimum ...Missing: unrest | Show results with:unrest
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Rise and Fall of Brazilian Inequality: 1981-2004
    Abstract: Measured by the Gini coefficient, income inequality in Brazil rose from 0.57 in 1981 to 0.63 in 1989, before falling back to 0.56 in 2004.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Separation of Powers in Brazil - Duquesne Scholarship Collection
    This so- called amendment actually rewrote and renumbered the entire. 1967 Constitution. ... The Chamber of Deputies, by a two-thirds vote, may check the ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Assessing Brazil's Economic Trajectory Post Democracy - ISU ReD
    Figueiredo's administration supervised the reform of the multi-party system. Brazil had a controlled two-party system for most of the military regime.
  23. [23]
    The Case of Brazil's Military Regime | The Politics of Presidential ...
    Presidential succession was debated, but in much softer terms than in 1969, with the regime being able to select the moderate General Figueiredo to hold the ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] A political history of the Brazilian transition from military dictatorship ...
    This article discusses Brazilian political history, from the military-political coup in 1964 through Fernando Henrique Cardoso's second presidential term.
  25. [25]
    Vitória da oposição sinaliza fim da ditadura - Memorial da Democracia
    Nov 15, 2024 · Entre os governadores eleitos pelo PMDB estavam Franco Montoro (SP), Tancredo Neves (MG), José Richa (PR), Iris Rezende (GO) e Jader Barbalho ( ...
  26. [26]
    Veja a cronologia das Diretas, que começaram há 40 anos - Folha
    Feb 25, 2023 · A emenda Dante de Oliveira, que propunha a restauração da eleição direta para presidente, obtém 199 assinaturas, o suficiente para ser ...
  27. [27]
    PEC 5/1983 - Senado Federal
    Proposta de Emenda à Constituição n° 5, de 1983. Autoria: Deputado Federal DANTE DE OLIVEIRA (/) e outros. Autoria: Câmara dos Deputados ... APRESENTAÇÃO ...
  28. [28]
    Folha Online - Apenas 35% sabem dizer o que foram as Diretas-Já
    A emenda que propunha eleições diretas para presidente da República foi apresentada em março de 1983 pelo deputado Dante de Oliveira. Lançada nacionalmente em ...
  29. [29]
    MAN IN THE NEWS; A SKILLED POLITICAL HAND
    Jan 16, 1985 · When Tancredo Neves became Governor of Minas Gerais on behalf of Brazil's main opposition party in 1983, he seemed content at the age of 73 ...
  30. [30]
    Diretas Já - Atlas Histórico do Brasil - FGV
    Tendo se iniciado em maio de 1983, o movimento ganhou dimensões políticas e sociais mais amplas, culminando numa série de comícios, nos primeiros meses de 1984, ...
  31. [31]
    40 anos das Diretas Já: Alesp aderiu a manifestações e teve fita de ...
    Mar 3, 2023 · ... 1983 e 1984, durante a campanha pelas "Diretas Já". O movimento político também repercutiu na Assembleia Legislativa do Estado de São Paulo ...
  32. [32]
    Celebrating the 20th Anniversary of Ulysses Guimarães' Rebirth of ...
    ... movement's slogan of Diretas Já! (Direct Elections Now!) earned him the nickname “Mr Direct Elections.” Despite rallies of more than 1 million people in ...
  33. [33]
    The Paradox of Adversity (Chapter 5) - Challenges of Party-Building ...
    On the strength of the PT's grassroots leadership (Secco Reference Secco2011: 113), Brazil's 1983–1984 movement for direct elections (Diretas Já) became the ...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] New Left Party Survival and Collapse in Latin America
    the Diretas Já! movement, which the PT led at the grassroots ... leaders visited local organs and civil society organizations to give speeches and provide.
  35. [35]
    [PDF] CNBB, democracia e participação popular (1977-1989) - Dialnet
    Resumo: O presente artigo busca analisar a documentação produzida pela. Conferência Nacional dos Bispos do Brasil (CNBB) entre os anos de 1977 e.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] A ATUAÇÃO DAS ELITES ANTES, DURANTE E NO FIM DO GOLPE ...
    O golpe civil-militar, ocorrido no Brasil no dia 1 de abril de 1964 e que durou 24 anos, se caracterizou pela participação e apoio inicial de estratos da ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] DiRETAS Já - Fundação Perseu Abramo
    Este número 3 de PERSEU apresenta um conjunto de documentos re lativos à Campanha das Diretas Já, de 1983 a 1985. ... uma das assembleias estaduais passaria a ...
  38. [38]
    uma análise sobre a Campanha das Diretas "Eu quero votar para ...
    Palavras-chave: Campanha das Diretas-Já; Crise política; Movimentos sociais; Democratização; Cultura. ... assembleias estaduais, sendo previsivelmente mais leais ...
  39. [39]
    Direct Elections Now! - Google Arts & Culture
    Relive moments from the massive Direct Elections Now (Diretas Já) demonstrations, which called for a return to a popular vote for the Brazilian presidency ...
  40. [40]
    16 DE ABRIL DE 1984 | DIRETAS JÁ - Blog da Editora Contexto
    Apr 16, 2021 · ... Goiânia, e passou a ser conhecida como Movimento das Diretas Já. ... 50 mil pessoas. Em São Paulo, no mesmo ano, foi realizado um grande ...
  41. [41]
    Curitiba inspira “comícios-monstro” das Diretas Já
    Oct 3, 2024 · “No dia 12 de janeiro de 1984, o comício realizado na Boca Maldita reuniu 50 mil pessoas, um público ... 15 de janeiro de 1985, sela o fim do ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  42. [42]
    A History of São Paulo's Metalworker Unions/A história dos ...
    A History of São Paulo's Metalworker Unions/A história dos metalúrgicos de São Paulo. 1984 (January 25) - Diretas Já rally at Praça da Sé, São Paulo. The ...
  43. [43]
    Rally for 'Diretas Já' (direct elections now) rally
    The rally was closed by Leonel Brizola, Governor of Rio de Janeiro, who, after his speech, sang the National Anthem hand in hand with PMDB President, ...Missing: first Goiânia January
  44. [44]
    DIRECT VOTE BACKED IN BIG BRAZIL RALLY - The New York Times
    Apr 11, 1984 · Over half a million Brazilians gathered in downtown Rio de Janeiro this afternoon to demonstrate in favor of direct Presidential elections ...Missing: Diretas Já attendance
  45. [45]
    [PDF] a comparative analysis of Latin American resistance campaigns ...
    In Brazil, between January 16 and April 16, 1984, close to six million people took to the squares of the nation in support for direct elections (Diretas Já).
  46. [46]
    Brazil holds breath as Congress weighs return to full democracy
    Apr 24, 1984 · Six thousand ground troops, 223 cavalry units, and 116 jeeps and armored cars paraded through the streets of Brazil's capital city, ...
  47. [47]
    DIRECT VOTE DEMANDED FOR BRAZIL - The New York Times
    Feb 19, 1984 · Two words - ''diretas ja,'' meaning direct elections now - are beginning to disturb the military Government's plans to step quietly out of office.Missing: key facts outcome
  48. [48]
    Brazil's Congress Defeats Bill for Direct Elections
    Apr 25, 1984 · BRASILIA, Brazil, April 26 (Thursday) -- With military police encircling the chamber, the Brazilian Congress defeated a constitutional ...
  49. [49]
    Direitas Já: rejeição da Emenda Dante de Oliveira marca a história ...
    Apr 22, 2014 · O dia 25 de abril de 1984 ficou marcado na história brasileira. Era para ser de festa, mas o País foi dormir frustrado: por apenas 22 votos, ...Missing: vote count 261
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Social Movements and Institutions - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... voted in favor, 65. against and 3 abstained. Of the total, 112 members. did not attend the plenary and the amendment. needed 320 votes for ...
  51. [51]
    OPPOSITION LEADER WINS BRAZIL VOTE - The New York Times
    Jan 16, 1985 · An electoral college chose Brazil's first civilian President in 21 years today, overwhelmingly electing the opposition candidate, Tancredo Neves ...
  52. [52]
    Brazil Presidency Won by Reform Candidate : Neves Chosen by ...
    Jan 16, 1985 · Tancredo de Almeida Neves, a moderate reform candidate, was elected president of Brazil on Tuesday, ending 21 years of authoritarian rule by ...
  53. [53]
    Tancredo Neves Campaigns For President In Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
    Neves was elected president on January 15, 1985 by indirect voting of an electoral college in Brasilia but became gravely ill on March 14, 1985 one day before ...
  54. [54]
    New Republic (1985-) - Brazil-U.S. Relations
    Nov 30, 2023 · Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. In 1985, as part of Brazil's gradual transition from military rule to democracy, through ...
  55. [55]
    BRAZIL'S LEADER DIES AT AGE 75; NEVER SWORN IN
    Apr 22, 1985 · The Brazilian President-elect, Tancredo Neves, died tonight from complications following intestinal surgery that had prevented him from taking office.
  56. [56]
    Brazil Leader Neves Dies at 75 - The Washington Post
    Apr 21, 1985 · President-elect Tancredo Neves died tonight after more than a month of recurrent medical crises, leaving leadership of his self-proclaimed "new republic" to a ...
  57. [57]
    Brazil celebrates 40 years since end of military dictatorship
    Mar 17, 2025 · Neves died on April 21 after 39 days in hospital, aged 75. The official cause of death was a generalized infection. Following his passing, ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] THE TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY IN BRAZIL
    Starting from the viewpoint that political liberalization was initially a choice made by the military regime in 1974, I examine why the regime undertook that.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] CONSTITUTION - STF
    Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Article 75. The rules set forth in this section shall apply, where appropriate, to the organization ...Missing: 1967 College
  60. [60]
    Brazil 1988 (rev. 2017) Constitution
    A law altering the electoral process shall enter into force on its publication date and shall not apply to elections that occur within one year from the date it ...Missing: College | Show results with:College
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Thirty-Five Years of the 1988 Brazilian Constitution
    Sep 9, 2024 · Abstract: This article provides a historical perspective on the moments anticipating the formation of Brazil's 1988 Constitution, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Figueiredo | Brazil: Five Centuries of Change
    To Figueiredo's credit, his administration prevented radical officers from derailing democratic reform, accepted the opposition's victory in indirect elections, ...
  63. [63]
    DIRECT VOTE FOR PRESIDENT RESTORED IN BRAZIL
    May 10, 1985 · Seven weeks after the military left power, the Brazilian Congress approved a constitutional amendment on Wednesday restoring a system of ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The Impact of Social Movements: A study of Brazil's 2013 Protests
    Nov 1, 2015 · In June 2013, Brazil saw a resurgence of its nation wide social movement, the size of which had not been seen for little over 20 years, ...
  65. [65]
    When to stop is moving forward - Revista Fapesp
    “The end of the 1970s is a disruption in the history of labor relations in Brazil. There was nothing less likely to occur than the strike at the Scania company ...Missing: unrest | Show results with:unrest
  66. [66]
    Brazil's democratic awakening – DW – 04/10/2014
    Apr 10, 2014 · Millions of Brazilians took to the streets some 30 years ago to push for free elections. These mass protests eventually led to an end of the country's military ...
  67. [67]
    Return to democracy | Agência Brasil
    Apr 1, 2014 · ... campaign called Diretas Já emerged based on a constitutional amendment bill brought forward by Deputy Dante de Oliveira, which was designed to.Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  68. [68]
    The Challenge to Democracy in Brazil | TUC - Trades Union Congress
    Nov 16, 2021 · ... Diretas Já! (Direct Elections Now!) showed widespread support for an end to military rule. However, hopes for a deep structural ...
  69. [69]
    Popular Participation in the Brazilian Transition to Democracy, 1985 ...
    Oct 3, 2022 · This article examines popular participation in the making of Brazil's 1988 post-authoritarian “Citizen Constitution.”
  70. [70]
    [PDF] The 1988 Brazilian Constitution and the political regimes
    'Direct Elections Now' (Diretas Já); the influence of postwar European democratic constitutionalism; the mobilization of society in search of rights and ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Users Working Paper 6 revised - V-Dem
    In 1984, the “Diretas Já” movement for direct elections united this social movement-trade unionist alliance with more middle-class segments. These protests ...
  72. [72]
    Diretas Já: Brasil's political rupture and the left's opportunity
    May 30, 2017 · Alfredo Saad-Filho 23 May 2017. Originally published at OpenDemocracy. “Out with Temer – direct elections now!”. Amid meltdown in Brazil, ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome
  73. [73]
    Brazil's outraged opposition calls for scandal-hit Temer to step down
    May 19, 2017 · Opposition forces in Brazil have taken to the streets calling for the new presidential elections in the wake of the release of details of an ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  74. [74]
    Get to Know a Brazilian – Tancredo Neves | Americas South and North
    Mar 17, 2013 · ... Diretas Já (“Direct Elections Now!”) rally. Ultimately, the bill failed to garner the 2/3 majority it needed. However, Diretas Já had ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Brazil: The Long March to the New Republic
    As president, he has found his bold initiatives failing, and the groups most supportive of his candidacy turning against him. The root causes of his failure lie ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] Foreign Policy Change in Brazil: Comparing Castelo Branco (1964 ...
    After the failure of the diretas já (popular movement for presidential direct elections) the indirect election of Tancredo Neves had an important political ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    [PDF] I Want to Vote for President - LuminosOA.org
    Jan 25, 2025 · It was time for direct presidential elections. “DEMOCRACY WITHIN REACH”: THE POLITICAL. CLASS AND MASS MOBILIZATION IN DIRETAS JÁ. A month after ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] UNCLASSIFIED RELEASED IN FULL UNCLASSIFIED
    SUBJ: THE DAY AFTER THE FAILURE OF THE DIRECT-ELECTION. GOVERNOR TANCREDO NEVES IS THE LEADER OF THIS BRANCH. OF THE PARTY. MOST OF THE PARTY'S OTHER ...
  79. [79]
    Brazilian Inflation from 1980 to 1993: Causes, Consequences ... - jstor
    Brazilian inflation was the excessive growth of money, in turn caused by too high budget deficits. Oil and exchange rate shocks also played a role, together ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Escaping hyperinflation - IMF eLibrary
    In 1985 it had reached an annual rate of some 400 percent in Israel and 1900 percent in Argen- tina, and by early 1986, 400 percent in Brazil. These inflations ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] The Emergence of Hyperinflation, 1982-85
    The proximate cause of the hyperinflation is the government's loss of international creditworthiness in the early 1980s. We have noted that during the period ...
  82. [82]
    An “Irresponsible” Miracle: The Economics of the Brazilian Military ...
    Mar 23, 2025 · Alexander Stroem examines the economic policies and consequences of Brazil's military dictatorship.<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Some Aspects of the 1982-83 Brazilian Payments Crisis
    Since 1980 the debt crisis has changed that performance in a dramatic way. Per capita GDP has been declining at an average rate of 4.1 percent a year and is ...
  84. [84]
    SciELO Brasil - BRAZILIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS IN THE 1980S
    Economists, even heterodox ones, still believe that Brazil's financial crisis in the 1980s resulted from budget deficits and public debts.ABSTRACT · RESUMO · Text · REFERENCES
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Macroeconomic Crises, Policies, and Growth in Brazil, 1964-90
    - (World Bank comparative macroeconomic studies). Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8213-2299-0. 1. Brazil-Economic policy. 2. Debts, ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Hyperinflation and Stabilization in - Brazil: The First Collor Plan
    Hyperinflation was the necessary outcome of all these events: the official inflation rate (IPC-Consumption Price Index) was 53 per cent in December, 56 per ...
  87. [87]
    Em Plenário, senadores e debatedores exaltam os 40 anos das ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · Os 40 anos das Diretas Já foram lembrados em sessão especial do Senado na sexta-feira (26). A campanha contra a ditadura e pela eleição ...
  88. [88]
    Diretas Já, 40 anos: reportagem relembra campanha que mobilizou ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · No dia 25 de abril de 1984, a Câmara dos Deputados rejeitou a Emenda Dante de Oliveira ( PEC 5/1983 ), que pretendia restabelecer as ...
  89. [89]
    Quarenta anos das 'Diretas Já' - Brasil de Fato
    Apr 30, 2024 · Quarenta anos das 'Diretas Já'. 'Tempo nos mostrou, tanto em 1964 como vinte anos depois, nossa Democracia é como uma criança que precisa de ...
  90. [90]
    Time Again for “Diretas Já” - Inter-American Dialogue
    Apr 29, 2016 · Time Again for “Diretas Já”. Badly battered by prolonged economic distress, pervasive corruption, and deepening political turbulence, Brazilians ...
  91. [91]
    “Fora Temer – Eleições Diretas Já!” Brazil's Political Rupture and the ...
    Jun 27, 2017 · “Fora Temer – Eleições Diretas Já!” Brazil's Political Rupture and ... Dilma's impeachment. Their excitement was misguided, for three ...
  92. [92]
    Brazil protesters aim to summon spirit of 84 for massive anti ...
    Oct 1, 2021 · Demonstrators who took part in historic rally that hastened end of Brazil's dictatorship hope for similar show of force this weekend.
  93. [93]
    'Diretas Já' movement turns 40 - 27/02/2023 - Brazil - Folha
    Feb 27, 2023 · Campaign for Direct Elections in Brazil Turns 40 in Times of Democracy Threats. Despite its defeat in Congress, the movement propelled the end of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>