Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Suffrage

Suffrage is the right to vote in political elections and referendums, a fundamental element of representative government that determines participation in selecting officials and influencing . The term derives from the Latin suffragium, denoting a vote or expression of support, distinct from connotations of . Initially restricted to property-owning adult males in early democracies like ancient and post-revolutionary systems, suffrage expanded through legal reforms driven by egalitarian principles, social pressures, and pragmatic needs for governmental legitimacy amid industrialization and mass mobilization. Key expansions included the removal of property qualifications in the , granting broader male participation; the 15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1870 prohibiting racial disenfranchisement; , first nationally in in 1893 and in the United States via the 19th Amendment in 1920 after decades of advocacy and ; and lowering the to 18 in many nations, including the U.S. 26th Amendment in 1971. Opposition to these changes persisted, with anti-suffrage groups—comprising both men and women—arguing that expansions would destabilize social structures, dilute voter quality, or invite unqualified participants, delaying reforms and highlighting causal tensions between tradition and . Today, universal adult suffrage prevails in most sovereign states for citizens aged 18 or older, though exceptions for felons, mental incapacity, or non-residents remain, and full implementation varies due to enforcement barriers, cultural factors, or authoritarian restrictions. Ongoing debates center on further inclusions like or non-citizen , felon , and safeguards against fraud, reflecting persistent questions about the causal links between broad enfranchisement, , and outcomes.

Definition and Conceptual Foundations

Etymology and Terminology

The term suffrage derives from the Latin suffragium, which originally denoted "support" or "assistance," evolving to signify a vote cast in an or the right to vote by the classical period. In , suffragium shifted toward meanings related to intercessory or pleas on behalf of others, reflecting a connotation of or backing. This ecclesiastical sense entered as sofrage or souffrage around the 13th century, denoting a or intercession, before passing into in the late primarily as "" or "intercessory ." By the , the term regained its classical political connotation in English, referring explicitly to "a vote" or "the right to vote," aligning with its roots in electoral contexts such as tablets or decisions. In political terminology, suffrage specifically denotes the legal right to vote in public elections or referendums, often used interchangeably with franchise, which emphasizes the granted privilege or qualification to participate in the electoral process. While franchise can extend to broader entitlements like commercial or property rights, in democratic theory it aligns closely with suffrage as the mechanism for citizen input into governance. Voting rights, by contrast, encompasses not only the affirmative right to cast a ballot but also protections against disenfranchisement, such as prohibitions on discrimination by race, sex, or other traits, as codified in instruments like the U.S. Voting Rights Act of 1965. Distinctions arise in comparative contexts: for instance, universal suffrage implies eligibility extended to all adult citizens without qualifiers like property ownership, whereas restricted forms (e.g., censitary suffrage) limit it to specific groups. These terms underscore suffrage's role as a foundational element of representative government, distinct from mere participation, which requires active exercise of the right.

Core Principles of Franchise Allocation

The allocation of the in democratic systems rests on principles aimed at ensuring that voters possess sufficient cognitive capacity, personal stake in societal outcomes, and to the , thereby promoting decisions that reflect rational judgment and rather than or external . These criteria derive from the understanding that entails wielding coercive power over others through law, necessitating restrictions to mitigate risks of incompetent or uncommitted participation; historical expansions beyond such bounds, as in unrestricted , have often prioritized inclusivity over efficacy, leading to critiques of diminished electoral quality. A primary is the minimum age threshold, typically set at 18 years in most democracies, serving as a for the development of like impulse control and long-term foresight, which neuroscientific evidence links to prefrontal cortex maturation occurring predominantly after . This cutoff balances inclusion with competence, as younger individuals exhibit higher susceptibility to and lower predictive accuracy in political outcomes, justifying exclusion to safeguard collective decision-making; proposals to lower it to 16, while advanced in some locales like parts of since 2007, overlook empirical gaps in adolescents' abilities compared to adults. Similarly, exclusions for mental incapacity—such as guardianship due to severe —uphold the competence standard, preventing votes cast without comprehension of their implications, as affirmed in electoral laws worldwide. Citizenship requirements ensure franchise limited to those bound by the jurisdiction's laws and bearing direct fiscal or social costs of governance, embodying a stake-in-the-game rationale rooted in classical republican thought that non-citizens lack equivalent accountability or loyalty. In the United States, federal law mandates citizenship for national elections, with states verifying via documentation to exclude non-citizens, who comprise less than 1% of purported illegal votes per audits but pose integrity risks if unbarred. Disenfranchisement of felons, applied in varying degrees across jurisdictions—permanent in states like Florida for certain crimes—stems from the view that serious violations forfeit civic trust, akin to ancient concepts of civil death, though modern courts uphold it as a permissible regulation to preserve electoral legitimacy rather than mere punishment. Historical property or literacy qualifications, once tied to tangible stakes, have largely yielded to these core filters, reflecting a shift toward broader but competence-bounded access.

Distinction from Related Concepts

Suffrage, defined as the legal right to vote in public elections and referendums, is conceptually distinct from citizenship, which establishes an individual's membership in a sovereign state and entails broader rights and obligations such as protection under law and potential taxation. While many constitutions link suffrage eligibility to citizenship—such as Article I, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution implicitly tying federal voting to citizenship status—disqualifications like felony convictions or mental incapacity can deny suffrage to citizens without revoking citizenship. Conversely, certain non-citizens, including resident aliens in local elections in places like San Francisco since 2016, have been granted limited suffrage, underscoring that citizenship is neither necessary nor sufficient for voting rights. Historically, in early American republics, suffrage was restricted to propertied male citizens, separating it from full civic equality. A key delineation within suffrage itself is between active and passive forms: active suffrage grants the right to vote for representatives, while passive suffrage (or the passive electoral right) permits eligibility to run for or hold office. Passive suffrage often carries stricter criteria, such as elevated age thresholds—18 for active voting but 25 or higher for parliamentary candidacy in countries like —or additional residency and non-conviction requirements, ensuring that those seeking office demonstrate greater stake or maturity than mere voters. This distinction promotes democratic balance by allowing broader participation in selection while limiting candidacy to qualified individuals, as reflected in electoral laws across where passive rights are constitutionally protected but more narrowly applied. Suffrage differs from enfranchisement, the latter being the procedural or legislative act of extending voting rights to previously excluded groups, such as through constitutional amendments or statutes. For example, the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1920 represented enfranchisement by prohibiting denial of suffrage on sex grounds, thereby conferring the right rather than defining it anew. Enfranchisement can be partial or conditional, as in gradual expansions via literacy tests or property qualifications historically, whereas suffrage denotes the exercised right post-grant. It also contrasts with compulsory voting systems, where suffrage remains a right but enforcement mandates participation for eligible voters, imposing fines or penalties for abstention in nations like Australia since 1924, without altering the underlying franchise. This enforcement addresses turnout issues but raises debates over coercion versus voluntary civic duty.

Philosophical and Theoretical Perspectives

Justifications for Restricted Suffrage

Restricted suffrage has been justified on the grounds that voting confers significant over collective resources and policies, warranting qualifications to ensure decisions reflect and stake in outcomes rather than mere numerical . Proponents argue that unrestricted risks poor , as uninformed or disinterested voters may prioritize short-term gains over long-term stability, leading to fiscal irresponsibility or policy errors. This view draws from epistemic critiques positing that democracy's equal weighting of votes violates a competence principle, where electoral outcomes should approximate knowledgeable judgment akin to or professional licensing. A primary historical justification emphasized property ownership or tax payment as a prerequisite, on the rationale that those funding government expenditures possess a direct stake and thus incentive for prudent . In the founding , figures like contended that property-less individuals lack the judgment and independence required for voting, as they might favor redistributive measures at others' expense without bearing equivalent costs. writings, including No. 57, implicitly supported such qualifications by noting that suffrage tied to property prevented dominance by transient majorities, safeguarding against confiscatory policies that could undermine economic incentives and liberty. Competence-based restrictions, such as , , or tests, have been advanced to filter for voters capable of evaluating complex issues, thereby elevating policy quality over populist appeals. proposed —extra votes for the educated—to weight ballots by intellectual merit, arguing in Considerations on Representative Government (1861) that universal equal suffrage would entrench , as the less informed outnumber the informed and skew outcomes toward mediocrity. Empirical correlations between voter and policy preferences, such as studies showing low civic correlating with support for inefficient entitlements, bolster this by suggesting restricted electorates yield more effective . From first-principles reasoning, allocation should mirror : since votes impose externalities on non-voters (e.g., on or taxes on stakeholders), limiting it to those demonstrably affected or qualified prevents , akin to restricting high-stakes decisions like to trained professionals. Critics of , including modern epistocrats, contend that equal voting ignores variance in decision-making ability, empirically evidenced by surveys where median voters fail basic economic tests yet influence redistributive policies with cascading costs, as seen in ballooning public debts post-expansions like the U.S. 26th Amendment lowering the age to 18 in 1971, which correlated with increased entitlement spending without proportional fiscal restraint.

Arguments for Expanding Suffrage

Proponents of expanding suffrage have advanced arguments rooted in the principle of , positing that legitimate government authority derives from the consent of those governed rather than a restricted elite. , in his 1762 work , contended that resides in the general will of the people, advocating for direct participation by adult citizens to ensure laws reflect collective interests and prevent alienation from arbitrary rule. This view holds that excluding large segments of the population undermines democratic legitimacy, as laws bind all subjects equally yet only a subset consents, echoing critiques of where unchecked minorities impose burdens without accountability. A complementary ethical argument emphasizes individual and under : since policies affect all citizens' lives, liberties, and properties, denying the vote to competent adults constitutes unjust subjugation akin to taxation without . Advocates, drawing from natural traditions, assert that arbitrary exclusions—such as by , , or minor property thresholds—fail first-principles tests of reciprocity, as affected parties bear risks and costs without influence, fostering resentment and instability. Historical expansions, like the extension of in from 1869 to 1960, are cited as demonstrating that inclusion enhances political responsiveness without destabilizing governance, with women's enfranchisement correlating to sustained increases in social spending (0.6–1.2% of GDP short-term) directed toward public goods like and . Empirical claims further bolster the case, particularly from U.S. women's suffrage post-1920, where expanded electorates facilitated policy shifts prioritizing child welfare; bacteriological public health reforms, previously resisted, accelerated, reducing infant mortality by enabling maternal advocacy for sanitation and education investments. Studies attribute intergenerational benefits, including improved childhood education outcomes and long-term health gains, to women's voting power incentivizing family-oriented policies over elite preferences. Proponents argue these effects arise causally from diversified voter interests countering narrow-group capture, as broader suffrage dilutes factional dominance and aligns governance with aggregate societal needs, evidenced by wartime accelerations of enfranchisement yielding inclusive reforms without proportional rises in unrest. Such data, while drawn from peer-reviewed analyses, warrant scrutiny for potential confounders like concurrent industrialization, yet consistently link inclusion to measurable welfare gains absent in restricted systems.

First-Principles Analysis of Voter Competence

Voter competence, evaluated from foundational considerations of , entails individuals possessing sufficient factual , analytical skills, and foresight to assess policies and candidates in ways that align with accurate predictions of causal outcomes, such as economic trade-offs or institutional incentives. In electoral systems, where votes aggregate to determine , this competence is essential for producing outcomes superior to alternatives like markets or expert rule, as uninformed choices risk endorsing inefficient or harmful policies due to misperceptions of reality. Yet, the marginal impact of a single vote in mass democracies—often calculated as less than one in tens of millions—creates a high informational cost relative to benefit, fostering what economists term "," where citizens rationally forgo acquiring political because their effort yields negligible personal influence on results. Empirical assessments reveal pervasive deficits in this competence. Surveys demonstrate that large majorities of voters fail basic tests of civic knowledge: for instance, fewer than one-third of can name the three branches of the federal government, and similar proportions cannot identify key officeholders or legislative functions. Political scientist documents that this extends to policy-relevant facts, with voters often unaware of the size of government programs, the direction of economic trends, or the implications of fiscal deficits, leading to systematic errors in evaluating trade-offs. Bryan Caplan's analysis of data identifies four robust cognitive biases—antiforeign, antitrade, antimarket, and pro-spending—where lay voters diverge from expert economists, favoring policies that shows reduce prosperity, such as despite net gains from . These biases persist even among the informed, suggesting not mere but "rational irrationality," where voters indulge expressive preferences over truth-seeking due to low stakes. Such incompetence undermines the causal efficacy of suffrage as a for . Jason argues that universal enfranchisement equates to entrusting high-stakes decisions to an electorate akin to "hobbits" (uninformed but well-intentioned) or "hooligans" (misinformed and biased), yielding no better than chance or worse than epistocratic alternatives restricting votes to the knowledgeable. Studies of outcomes corroborate this, showing voter correlates with support for demagogic or fiscally irresponsible platforms, as politicians exploit misperceptions rather than correct them. While proponents of broad suffrage counter that collective deliberation or heuristics mitigate individual flaws, evidence indicates these s falter under informational asymmetries and partisan cues, perpetuating suboptimal equilibria. Institutional biases in and media, which often prioritize egalitarian ideals over scrutiny of voter flaws, may understate these realities, yet the data compel recognition that unrestricted amplifies errors over expertise.

Types and Variants of Suffrage

Universal Suffrage

Universal suffrage refers to the extension of voting rights to nearly all adult citizens of a , without discrimination based on , , , , ownership, , or social status, though typically qualified by minimum requirements (often 18 years) and or residency criteria. This principle contrasts with earlier restricted franchises by prioritizing broad inclusion to reflect the collective will of the governed, grounded in egalitarian that emerged during thought and 19th-century reform movements. In practice, no achieves absolute universality, as exclusions persist for minors, non-citizens, individuals deemed mentally incompetent, and often those with criminal convictions, reflecting ongoing debates over competence and civic responsibility. Historically, universal suffrage developed incrementally, building on male-only expansions in the early . achieved the first national implementation in 1893 by enfranchising all adult women alongside existing male voters, marking a pivotal shift toward gender-neutral adult eligibility. followed in 1902 with federal legislation granting full rights to women, including Indigenous populations in principle, though practical barriers lingered until later. In , pioneered in 1906, extending equal rights to women and men over 24 in parliamentary elections amid revolutionary pressures. accelerated adoption elsewhere: and enacted it in 1918, the extended it to women over 30 in 1918 (full parity by 1928), and in 1944, often tied to wartime contributions and social upheavals that underscored broad societal stakes in governance. By the mid-20th century, and post-war constitutions embedded in newly independent states, such as in 1950 and much of and by the 1960s, aligning with anti-imperialist and human rights frameworks like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Today, over 190 countries claim adherence to this standard for citizens aged 18 or older, per international electoral databases, though empirical turnout and enforcement vary. Remaining restrictions include felony disenfranchisement, affecting about 2% of the U.S. voting-age population (roughly 4.4 million people in 2022, concentrated in states like and ), rooted in traditions linking criminality to forfeited civic rights. Some nations, such as and , impose on eligible adults to maximize participation, fining non-voters, while others experiment with lowering age thresholds to 16 (e.g., , ) based on arguments for youthful . These variations highlight that remains an aspirational benchmark rather than an unqualified reality, with exclusions justified by concerns over and societal stability.

Equal and Unequal Suffrage

Equal suffrage denotes the electoral under which each qualified voter exercises a single vote of uniform weight, ensuring parity in individual influence on outcomes. This standard emerged prominently in modern democracies as a counter to earlier hierarchical systems, aiming to embody the notion of political among enfranchised citizens. Unequal suffrage, by contrast, allocates varying voting power to individuals based on criteria such as property ownership, , , or , resulting in some votes carrying multiple or weighted value relative to others. Such systems, often termed censitary or arrangements, were rationalized historically as mechanisms to amplify the voices of those presumed to have greater stakes in or in , thereby mitigating risks from uninformed majorities. Censitary suffrage, for instance, subdivided voters into classes where influence scaled with or , producing a gradient of electoral power rather than uniformity. In the , exemplified unequal suffrage until the mid-20th century, permitting certain electors—such as owners of business premises, long-term lodgers, or university graduates entitled to additional constituency seats—to cast multiple votes in parliamentary elections. This practice, inherited from pre-reform eras and persisting through acts like the , effectively granted extra electoral weight to propertied and educated classes; by 1918, it accounted for approximately 2 million additional votes amid a total electorate of around 21 million. The system faced criticism for distorting representation, as it allowed a minority to exert disproportionate influence, and was fully abolished by the Representation of the People Act 1948, which mandated "one vote only in respect of each person—one man one vote" for both parliamentary and local elections. Similar unequal mechanisms appeared across 19th-century Europe, including in Belgium, where until 1919, male citizens could earn up to three votes through factors like household headship, primary education, or higher income and secondary education, weighting suffrage toward economic contributors and the literate. These arrangements reflected a broader philosophical tension between egalitarian ideals and elitist safeguards, with proponents arguing they aligned voting power with civic responsibility; however, pressures from industrialization, literacy gains, and democratization waves led to their phased replacement by equal suffrage models post-World War I, as evidenced by Belgium's shift to universal male suffrage in 1919 and subsequent female inclusion in 1948. Today, unequal suffrage survives rarely in pure form within national legislatures, though echoes persist in weighted systems like corporate shareholder voting or certain international bodies (e.g., population-based vote allocation in the ). Proposals for reintroducing weights—tied to taxpayer contributions or cognitive tests—surface in academic discourse but encounter resistance on grounds of eroding foundational democratic , underscoring a global normative pivot toward uniform voting since the early .

Compulsory and Voluntary Suffrage

Compulsory suffrage, also known as mandatory or universal civic duty , imposes a legal on eligible citizens to participate in elections, typically enforced through penalties such as fines, , or disenfranchisement for repeated non-compliance. In contrast, voluntary suffrage permits citizens the right to vote without any requirement to exercise it, allowing as a personal choice, which prevails in the majority of democracies including the , , and . This distinction hinges on whether non-participation incurs state-sanctioned consequences, with compulsory systems aiming to maximize turnout while voluntary ones treat as an optional civic act. Historically, compulsory suffrage emerged in modern democracies to counteract declining voluntary participation rates. adopted it in 1892 following low turnout in voluntary elections, making it one of the earliest implementations with fines up to €80 for non-voters. introduced compulsory enrollment in 1912 and full in 1924 after federal elections saw turnout drop to 59.4% in 1922, resulting in sustained national turnout above 90% in subsequent decades. Other nations followed: in 1912 (though enforcement varies), in 1932 for those aged 18-70, and in 1959, where non-voting leads to removal from the . As of 2023, approximately 20-25 countries enforce compulsory voting to varying degrees, including (since 1931, with fines), (1927, fines up to $100 equivalent), and (1918, with escalating penalties), though some like the abandoned it in 1970 due to administrative burdens and public resistance.
CountryYear EnactedEnforcement MechanismTypical Turnout Impact
1924Fines up to AUD 20 initially, now higher; imprisonment for evasion90-95% in federal elections
1892Fines; temporary disenfranchisement87-94%
1932Fines; restrictions on public services for non-voters70-80%
Fines; labor certification denial70-80%, with variability
Empirical studies demonstrate that compulsory suffrage reliably boosts turnout by 5-15 percentage points compared to voluntary systems, reducing gaps tied to , education, and age. For instance, in Austria's temporary regional implementations, turnout rose by 3.5 points in national elections without significantly altering vote shares, though invalid ballots increased slightly among coerced low-interest voters. This homogenization of participation can mitigate class biases in voluntary electorates, where higher-income groups dominate, but it may incorporate less informed or apathetic voters, potentially diluting aggregate political knowledge as measured by policy comprehension tests. Cross-national analyses indicate compulsory systems correlate with modestly more centrist policies and reduced , as low-engagement voters tend to favor options, though causation remains debated due to factors like cultural norms. Critics, drawing from rational choice models, argue voluntary abstention filters for motivated participants, enhancing electoral quality, while proponents cite evidence of heightened , such as increased news consumption in compulsory regimes. Enforcement challenges persist, with evasion rates of 5-20% in some systems leading to higher administrative costs and occasional invalid votes signaling .

Passive, Active, and Census-Based Suffrage

Active suffrage denotes the legal right of eligible citizens to participate in voting during public elections and referendums. Passive suffrage, in contrast, refers to the right of citizens to stand as candidates for election or to hold public office. These concepts, rooted in constitutional frameworks across Europe and beyond, distinguish between electoral participation and eligibility for representation, with passive suffrage typically imposing additional criteria beyond those for active suffrage, such as minimum age thresholds (often 25 years or older for candidacy versus 18 for voting), extended residency periods, or absence of certain criminal convictions. For instance, in Ukraine's electoral law, active suffrage requires citizenship and age 18, while passive suffrage for parliamentary seats demands age 21, Ukrainian nationality, and residency for at least five years. Historically, the sequencing of active and passive has varied, sometimes granting passive suffrage to groups before full active participation. In the , a 1917 constitutional revision extended passive suffrage to women, permitting them to run for , though active suffrage followed only in 1919. Similarly, in , the of 1919 provided women with both simultaneously, but early implementations in some states differentiated qualifications, reflecting debates over competence for office-holding. Passive suffrage restrictions serve to ensure candidates possess greater maturity or stake in , as rationalized in 19th-century reforms where or qualifications amplified passive eligibility to align with perceived leadership capacities. Census-based suffrage, also termed censitary suffrage, restricts voting rights—primarily active suffrage—to individuals meeting or contribution thresholds, often weighting votes by socioeconomic rather than granting equal say. This system, derived from "census" as a of taxable or income, emerged prominently in post-revolutionary to limit to those with economic stakes, thereby purportedly enhancing decision quality by excluding the propertyless. In under the 1830 , censitary suffrage confined active to males paying at least 200 francs in direct taxes, enfranchising roughly 250,000 out of 35 million inhabitants, or about 0.7% of the population, until broader reforms in 1848. Such mechanisms persisted in nations like and into the mid-19th century, where granted extra ballots to higher taxpayers, embedding inequality to reflect "" of societal interests. Critics, including early socialists, argued this perpetuated oligarchic control, as empirical data from the era showed electorates dominated by landowners and , sidelining industrial workers despite their growing economic role.

Historical Rationales for Franchise Restrictions

Wealth and Property Qualifications

Wealth and property qualifications for suffrage originated from the principle that only those with a tangible stake in society's —through ownership of land, houses, or other assets—should influence governance, as they bore the direct costs of taxation and policy decisions. Proponents, including Founding Father in 1776, argued that extending the vote to non-property owners risked "universal plunder," where the propertyless majority could enact redistributive measures at the expense of owners without personal accountability. This view posited that property ownership fostered , independence, and rational decision-making, reducing susceptibility to demagoguery or short-term that might undermine long-term prosperity. Such restrictions aimed to align electoral participation with those funding the state, echoing classical concerns over mob rule in democracies lacking economic filters. In ancient , Solon's constitutional reforms around 594 BCE stratified citizens into four wealth-based classes—the pentakosiomedimnoi (wealthiest, yielding 500 measures of produce), (cavalry class), zeugitai ( farmers), and thetes (laborers)—with political rights scaled accordingly; thetes could participate in but were initially barred from most offices, reflecting a belief that higher wealth correlated with greater competence for leadership. ' reforms circa 508 BCE expanded and access to adult male citizens without explicit property thresholds for voting, yet property classes persisted for military and magisterial roles, ensuring that key decisions remained influenced by those with economic investment. This system balanced broader participation with safeguards against the landless exerting disproportionate power, as thetes' votes were diluted by their exclusion from elite institutions. Colonial America and early U.S. states universally imposed requirements by the , typically mandating 40-50 acres of or equivalent value (e.g., £40-£50 in some colonies) for white male voters, excluding about 50-60% of adult white males in regions like . These ensured voters paid direct taxes, tying to fiscal responsibility; for instance, New Jersey's required £50 in . Gradual abolition began post-1800 amid westward expansion and Jacksonian , with states like dropping requirements by 1821, though full elimination for white males occurred unevenly by the 1850s, expanding the electorate from roughly 10-20% to near-universal manhood suffrage among whites. In , pre-1832 suffrage hinged on property thresholds, such as the 40-shilling freehold for county voters since 1430, limiting the electorate to about 3-5% of adults, primarily landowners and substantial tenants who financed ary representation. The 1832 Reform Act standardized and lowered these—e.g., £10 householders in boroughs—enfranchising middle-class owners and doubling voters to around 650,000, while retaining exclusions for the to prevent radical shifts toward property redistribution. The 1867 Act further extended urban £10 occupiers, adding 1 million voters, but property criteria endured until the 1918 Representation of the People Act, which enfranchised most adult males irrespective of wealth amid wartime pressures. These reforms reflected pragmatic expansions tied to , yet preserved the core rationale until broader suffrage movements prevailed.

Knowledge and Literacy Requirements

Knowledge and literacy requirements for suffrage historically served as mechanisms to restrict the to individuals deemed capable of informed participation in electoral processes. Proponents argued that such tests ensured an electorate able to read and comprehend ballots, constitutions, and policy issues, thereby preventing manipulation by demagogues or from employers and political machines. This rationale drew from an English legal tradition positing that uneducated voters were susceptible to coercion, prioritizing over universal access. In the United States, Connecticut became the first state to enact a literacy requirement in its 1855 constitution, mandating that voters demonstrate the ability to read any article of the U.S. Constitution or state constitution, primarily targeting Irish immigrants perceived as easily swayed. Following Reconstruction, Southern states adopted similar tests between the 1890s and 1920s, such as Mississippi's 1890 constitution provision requiring voters to read or interpret any section of the state constitution, ostensibly to elevate voter quality amid widespread illiteracy. During congressional debates from 1864 to 1869, advocates for literacy tests in freedmen's voting rights contended they established a necessary barrier for competent citizenship, while opponents viewed them as tools to exclude newly emancipated African Americans lacking formal education. These requirements often functioned as proxies for broader knowledge of civic duties, with administrators wielding discretion to interpret answers, leading to disproportionate disenfranchisement of , poor whites, and immigrants despite grandfather clauses exempting pre-1867 voters in some states. By , the Voting Rights Act suspended literacy tests nationwide in jurisdictions with low , and a 1970 amendment extended the federal ban, reflecting recognition of their role in suppressing minority participation rather than enhancing competence. Beyond the U.S., literacy qualifications appeared in Latin American constitutions, such as in and , where they persisted until reforms in the mid-20th century despite illiteracy rates exceeding 20% of the population, rationalized similarly as safeguards for but often limiting rural and enfranchisement. In , formal literacy tests were rare for native suffrage, with restrictions more commonly tied to or residency, though debates on educational competence influenced proposals, underscoring a recurring tension between inclusivity and voter qualifications.

Age and Maturity Thresholds

In city-states such as , male citizens were generally eligible to vote upon reaching hood, typically around age 20, following completion of military training and marking the transition to full civic responsibility. This threshold reflected the view that younger males lacked the requisite experience and judgment for participating in assemblies, where decisions affected warfare, alliances, and governance. Similarly, in the , suffrage in popular assemblies was restricted to male citizens, with boys attaining legal manhood around age 16 via rituals like assuming the toga virilis, though full political maturity for higher offices was set at 25 or later to ensure seasoned decision-making. During the in and its colonies, the standardized at 21, derived from English traditions where this marked the age of majority for inheritance, contracts, and without guardianship, presuming sufficient physical and mental maturity for independent action. This rationale emphasized protecting polities from impulsive or uninformed votes by the young, who were seen as prone to factionalism or external influence due to incomplete life experience. In the United States, state constitutions from the late onward uniformly adopted 21 as the minimum, aligning with the capacity for rational civic judgment rather than mere chronological adulthood. Empirical support for age thresholds draws from , indicating that maturation—critical for impulse control, long-term planning, and risk assessment—continues into the mid-20s, correlating with lower in complex decisions among adolescents. Historical restrictions thus served as a for ensuring voter , avoiding the causal risks of enfranchising those with underdeveloped , as evidenced by studies showing younger cohorts exhibit higher susceptibility to peer influence and lower information-seeking in political contexts. Critics of lowering thresholds, such as prior to the U.S. 26th Amendment in 1971, argued that 18- to 20-year-olds, despite draft eligibility, often lacked the deliberative maturity for electoral choices, prioritizing short-term gains over societal stability.
Historical Voting Age ExamplesThresholdRationale/Context
Ancient Athens (5th c. BCE)~20 yearsPost-military service; full civic maturity
(c. 509–27 BCE)~16–25 yearsLegal manhood at 16, offices at 25 for experience
Early U.S. States (1789–1971)21 yearsCommon law majority; judgment for contracts/
(pre-1969)21 yearsInheritance and responsibility age

Gender Exclusions and Rationales

Throughout history, suffrage systems in most societies excluded women from , with rationales rooted in established roles, legal doctrines, and perceived differences in civic responsibilities. In ancient , for instance, only free adult males participated in the assembly, as and obligations were tied to men, while women were confined to domestic spheres without public duties. Similar exclusions persisted in medieval , where feudal obligations like applied to men, justifying male-only political voice. A primary rationale was the legal concept of in English , under which married women lost independent legal identity, subsumed under their husbands' authority, rendering separate female suffrage redundant as male votes represented family interests. Anti-suffragists in the extended this by arguing that women's domestic responsibilities—child-rearing and household management—left insufficient time or aptitude for political engagement, potentially disrupting family stability if women entered conflicts. Both men and women voiced concerns that suffrage would erode natural complementarity, pitting sexes against each other in governance rather than fostering companionship, as nature intended distinct roles for harmony. Perceived psychological differences formed another basis, with opponents claiming women were more emotional and less capable of dispassionate judgment on state matters like or , unfit for the "cool and calm" deliberation required of voters. Empirical observations supported this in some contexts; for example, in 19th-century , surveys indicated a of women opposed enfranchisement, prioritizing indirect through over direct political involvement. In the United States, the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage, comprising thousands of women, contended that existing power in the home sufficed, warning that votes might dilute maternal focus and invite corruption or radicalism. These exclusions were not merely patriarchal impositions but reflected causal links between gender-specific societal contributions and allocation; men's exposure to economic risks and justified their primacy in , while women's sheltered roles preserved social cohesion. Post-enfranchisement data, such as divergent voting patterns by gender on security issues, retrospectively aligns with pre-suffrage apprehensions of differing risk assessments influencing outcomes like expansions. Though modern narratives often frame these as outdated biases, historical proponents grounded them in observable family dynamics and reluctance among women themselves, evidenced by repeated defeats, such as Switzerland's 1959 vote where women joined men in rejecting female suffrage.

Racial, Religious, and Nationality-Based Limits

In the , racial restrictions on suffrage predated the , with enslaved Africans and their descendants denied and under laws treating them as rather than political participants. The 15th Amendment, ratified on February 3, 1870, explicitly prohibited denying the vote based on , color, or previous condition of servitude, yet Southern states circumvented it through devices like tests, poll taxes, and grandfather clauses that disproportionately affected voters, reducing their turnout from over 50% in some Reconstruction-era states to under 2% by in . Proponents of these measures, including Southern Democratic legislatures, justified them as necessary to maintain and prevent what they viewed as unqualified or vengeful majorities from upending established governance structures, often citing lower rates—around 20-30% among Southern s in compared to 80% among whites—as evidence of incapacity for informed . Similar racial exclusions persisted globally; in , Aboriginals were denied federal suffrage until the Electoral Act, despite earlier state-level grants, with rationales rooted in colonial perceptions of nomadism and cultural incompatibility rendering them unprepared for democratic participation. In under , non-white suffrage was limited to advisory Colored and Indian councils until the 1994 elections, defended by the National Party as preserving a European-derived civilization against numerical swamping by Black majorities lacking equivalent historical ties to parliamentary traditions. Religious limits on suffrage were common in early modern Europe and its colonies to align voters with dominant faiths and exclude perceived threats to moral or confessional unity. In colonial , Puritan authorities in restricted to full church members, estimated at 40-60% of adult males, arguing that only those demonstrating spiritual regeneration could responsibly steward civil authority as "public ministers of ." Post-independence, nine of the thirteen original U.S. states imposed religious tests for officeholding or in their 1776-1784 constitutions, requiring oaths affirming Protestant or belief in to exclude Catholics, , or atheists, whom framers like saw as prone to divided loyalties or subversive doctrines undermining republican virtue. The federal Constitution's Article VI clause of 1787 banned religious tests for national offices, reflecting influences but leaving states free; retained a Trinitarian oath for office until 1826 and for some contexts into the , rationalized as safeguarding against "infidel" influences eroding Protestant ethical foundations essential for . Nationality-based restrictions typically tied suffrage to citizenship, emphasizing allegiance and assimilation to avert foreign meddling or balkanized polities. The U.S. Naturalization Act of 1790 confined citizenship—and thus voting eligibility—to "free white persons" of good character after two years' residency, extended in 1870 to persons of African descent but excluding Asians until piecemeal reforms like the 1943 repeal of Chinese exclusion, with nativists arguing that non-European nationalities harbored incompatible customs or loyalties, as evidenced by anti-Irish Catholic campaigns in the 1850s citing papal allegiances over American sovereignty. In the British Empire, the 1801 Act of Union initially barred Irish Catholics from parliamentary voting until the 1829 Catholic Emancipation Act, justified by Protestant ascendancy fears of reversing the 1690-1714 Penal Laws' suppression of Jacobite rebellions tied to Vatican influence. Some 19th-century U.S. states permitted non-citizen declarant aliens to vote after intent-to-naturalize filings—peaking at 14 states by 1890—but revoked this by 1926 amid concerns over unvetted immigrant blocs swaying elections, as in San Francisco's 1870s debates over Chinese laborers diluting native-born control without cultural integration. These limits often intersected; for instance, U.S. states like imposed alien land laws and suffrage bars on immigrants until , blending racial and nationality criteria under rationales of economic and preventing "inassimilable" groups from altering policy toward ancestral homelands. While modern frequently frames such restrictions as discriminatory artifacts, historical defenders invoked empirical observations of group differences in , ownership, and conflict histories to argue they preserved cohesive republics capable of deliberative consent over mob rule or external .

Criminality, Residency, and Functional Restrictions

Restrictions on suffrage based on criminal convictions have historical roots in English , where individuals convicted of —termed "infamous crimes"—forfeited civil capacities, including the right to vote, as a form of signifying a of . This rationale posited that serious offenders demonstrated moral unfitness or untrustworthiness for , justifying temporary or permanent exclusion to maintain and deter antisocial behavior. In the United States, early state constitutions from the late 18th century, such as New York's 1777 provision excluding those convicted of "infamous crime," embedded this principle, with the U.S. Constitution's Article I, Section 4 deferring voter qualifications to states while implicitly allowing such limits. By the , as suffrage expanded to adults without property tests, felony disenfranchisement persisted as a targeted restraint, applied to crimes like or , reflecting a retributive logic that voting rights were privileges contingent on lawful conduct. Residency requirements emerged to verify a voter's genuine stake in the , preventing manipulation by non-residents or transients who lacked to local outcomes. In colonial and early republics, domicile-based rules ensured electors were embedded in the , with durations like six months to one year common by the to allow administrative verification and curb , such as organized voting by outsiders. For instance, the U.S. Constitution's Article I indirectly supported state-set residency via elector qualifications, while international precedents, including ancient Athenian tied to residency, underscored the causal link between territorial attachment and informed participation. These thresholds balanced accessibility with safeguards against electoral distortion, though durations exceeding 30-50 days faced constitutional scrutiny by the for unduly burdening mobility without proportional justification. Functional restrictions, targeting mental incapacity, rested on the premise that suffrage demands cognitive competence for rational deliberation and comprehension of issues, akin to contractual capacity in traditions excluding "idiots" or the "insane" since medieval . Historically, U.S. states from the 19th century onward codified exclusions for those adjudicated incompetent, as in ' 1780 constitution barring the "insane," rationalized by the need to preserve vote quality against uninformed or manipulable inputs that could undermine democratic legitimacy. This drew from philosophical views, including John Locke's emphasis on rational consent in governance, positing incapacity as evidencing unfitness for civic judgment without implying broader . Globally, similar provisions appeared in codes, such as France's 19th-century s linking voting to mental soundness, prioritizing electoral efficacy over universal inclusion for those demonstrably unable to engage meaningfully.

Global Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Origins

In ancient , the development of democratic institutions around 508 BCE under marked an early instance of formalized suffrage, granting voting rights in the assembly to free adult male citizens, who numbered approximately 30,000 to 40,000 out of a total population exceeding 250,000, thereby excluding women, slaves (who comprised about 20-30% of the populace), and resident foreigners (metics). Voting occurred via hand-raising or secret ballots using pebbles or pottery shards (ostraka) for mechanisms like , which allowed citizens to potentially tyrannical figures by majority vote if at least 6,000 participated. Earlier reforms by circa 594 BCE had introduced property-based classes (timai) influencing political eligibility, but Cleisthenes' tribal reorganization aimed to dilute aristocratic control, establishing a precursor to broader citizen participation, though still restricted to those born of Athenian fathers (tightened further by ' law in 451 BCE requiring both parents to be citizens). In the , established circa 509 BCE, suffrage was exercised by male in popular assemblies such as the and comitia tributa, where votes elected magistrates like consuls and passed laws, but the system weighted influence heavily toward wealthier classes: the divided into centuries based on , with the top five and first senatorial classes (holding about 1% of ) controlling 97 votes, often deciding outcomes before lower classes voted. Tribal assemblies offered somewhat more equitable voting by geographic tribe (35 total), yet excluded women, slaves, and non-, with full citizenship rights accruing to freeborn males upon reaching adulthood around age 17, subject to obligations; (ambitus) and networks frequently undermined formal equality. This structure reflected a causal emphasis on ownership and as prerequisites for rational political judgment, limiting participation to roughly 10-20% of the empire's inhabitants by the late Republic. Medieval Europe saw suffrage evolve from ancient precedents into consultative assemblies dominated by feudal elites, with broad voting absent until later periods; for instance, featured the , a council of and advising kings on laws and succession from at least the , but without general enfranchisement. The Icelandic , convened in 930 CE at Thingvellir, represented a rare continuity of participatory governance, where freehold chieftains (goðar) and their supporters—adult males owning land or aligned with chieftains—gathered annually to proclaim laws, resolve disputes, and elect officials via consensus or acclamation in the lögrétta legislative council, encompassing perhaps 1,000-2,000 participants from a of around 50,000, excluding women and thralls (slaves). Elsewhere, emerging assemblies in 12th-13th century kingdoms like León (1188) and (Simon de Montfort's 1265 parliament) included , , and occasionally burgesses, but suffrage remained tied to status and , serving fiscal-military coordination rather than popular consent, with monarchs convening them amid warfare pressures. These bodies prioritized representation by corporate orders over individual votes, reflecting a causal logic where political agency derived from economic independence and social hierarchy, not .

Early Modern Reforms in Europe

In England, the of 1688–1689 entrenched parliamentary authority through the Bill of Rights 1689, which reaffirmed the electoral rights of Protestant male freeholders possessing property valued at least at 40 shillings annually in counties, alongside freemen and burgage holders in boroughs, while prohibiting royal interference in elections. This reform emphasized regular parliamentary sessions, reinforced by the Triennial Act of 1694 mandating dissolution and new elections at least every three years, yet the qualified electorate numbered roughly 200,000–250,000 voters, or about 4–5% of adult males, excluding non-property owners, Catholics, and women. Sweden's (1718–1772) represented a notable shift from royal to estate-based parliamentary dominance in the , comprising nobility, clergy, burghers, and—uniquely—peasants elected by male freeholding farmers paying taxes on at least half a hides of land, thus incorporating rural proprietors into national decision-making at a time when many European monarchies marginalized agrarian interests. This structure convened assemblies biennially after , expanding deliberative influence beyond urban elites, though total voters remained under 10% of adult males due to property and estate restrictions, with decisions requiring consensus among estates rather than . In the during the , municipal voting qualifications typically required male citizenship (poorterrecht), entailing residency, , and payment of a modest or , enabling several thousand urban males per city to participate in indirect elections for vroedschappen (city councils) that selected delegates to provincial states. However, regent oligarchies—intermarrying patrician families—dominated outcomes through co-optation and controlled nominations, limiting competitive reforms despite the republic's decentralized , which excluded rural laborers, women, and non-citizens from formal . Elsewhere, such as in the , the codified "" for the (), granting near-universal male noble suffrage in local iki assemblies numbering up to 10% of the population by the , with delegates electing the king via electoral sejm; yet this entrenched class exclusivity, excluding burghers and peasants, and lacked reforms toward broader inclusion amid growing noble factionalism. Across Europe, these adjustments prioritized property-holding males within or corporations, reflecting causal priorities of fiscal contribution and stakeholding over egalitarian expansion, with absolutist states like suspending assemblies entirely after 1614 until the late .

19th-Century Expansions and Backlashes

In , the Reform Act of 1832 marked a pivotal expansion of male suffrage by redistributing parliamentary seats from "rotten boroughs" to growing industrial cities and extending the franchise to middle-class men meeting a £10 household occupancy qualification, increasing the electorate from approximately 400,000 to 650,000 voters. This reform addressed grievances over electoral corruption and unrepresentative districts but explicitly defined voters as male, formalizing the exclusion of women. Subsequent acts in 1867 and 1884 further broadened male suffrage to include many urban working-class men and agricultural laborers, respectively, driven by pressures from Chartist movements demanding and fears of social unrest. Across , the saw uneven suffrage expansions amid revolutionary fervor, such as France's constitution granting near-universal male suffrage to over 9 million voters before its restriction under in 1852 to about 250,000 property-owning men, reflecting elite concerns over democratic excess. Similar patterns emerged in other states, where suffrage extensions to broader male populations aimed to legitimize regimes or avert uprisings, though often limited by property, literacy, or residency requirements to maintain control. In the United States, from the 1820s to 1850s eliminated property qualifications for voting in most states, extending suffrage to nearly all white adult males and boosting to over 80% in presidential elections by the 1840s, as partisan competition mobilized the "common man." This shift transformed from elite deference to mass participation but reinforced exclusions based on , , and in some southern states. Early women's suffrage advocacy gained traction mid-century, exemplified by the 1848 in the , where organizers like demanded voting rights alongside other reforms, inspiring petitions and societies but yielding no immediate enfranchisement. In , the London National Society for Women's Suffrage formed in 1867, petitioning Parliament amid male-focused reforms, yet faced dismissal as peripheral to core democratic struggles. Backlashes against these expansions manifested in violent suppression and ideological resistance, notably the 1819 Peterloo Massacre in , where cavalry charged a crowd of 60,000 reformers seeking parliamentary reform and broader suffrage, killing 18 and injuring hundreds, prompting government crackdowns on radical organizing under the . Elites justified such measures by invoking fears of mob rule and instability, as seen in post-1848 European restorations curtailing franchises to restore monarchical authority. Anti-suffrage sentiments, particularly against women's inclusion, coalesced around arguments preserving and gender roles, with early 19th-century reversals like New Jersey's 1807 law revoking women's voting rights—previously allowed since 1776—to counter perceived threats from expanding . These reactions often stemmed from causal concerns that wider enfranchisement would redistribute wealth or disrupt hierarchies, as evidenced by bourgeois opposition to proletarian votes in and unless offset by institutional checks. Despite backlashes, incremental expansions laid groundwork for later universalization by demonstrating that controlled could stabilize rather than destabilize regimes.

20th-Century Universalization Efforts

The early marked accelerated pushes for amid I's social upheavals, with many European nations enfranchising women and standardizing male voting rights. became the first European country to grant full suffrage to women in 1906, allowing them to vote and stand for election in parliamentary contests. Following the war, Germany's constitution of 1919 established for all citizens over 20, encompassing women for the first time. and the similarly adopted universal adult suffrage in 1918 and 1919, respectively, reflecting pressures from wartime contributions by women and socialist movements advocating broader electoral inclusion. In the , expansions continued despite economic instability. The United Kingdom's Representation of the People Act 1918 enfranchised women over 30 meeting property qualifications, extending to all adults over 21 by the 1928 Equal Franchise Act, thereby achieving near-universal suffrage excluding only minors and certain felons. delayed until 1944, when General Charles de Gaulle's provisional government granted women voting rights amid liberation efforts, influenced by resistance movements and Allied democratic rhetoric. followed in 1945 under its post-fascist constitution, while lagged, requiring a 1971 federal referendum to extend women's federal voting rights after cantonal variations. Across the Atlantic, the ratified the 19th Amendment on August 18, 1920, prohibiting sex-based voting denial, though Southern states maintained racial barriers via poll taxes and literacy tests until the 1965 Voting Rights Act suspended such devices, effectively universalizing access for Black Americans. Latin American nations varied: granted women suffrage in 1932, in 1953, and in 1932, often tied to revolutionary or authoritarian reforms rather than campaigns. Post-World War II decolonization propelled in and , as emerging states embedded it in to legitimize new regimes. India's 1950 constitution instituted for those over 21, enfranchising approximately 173 million voters regardless of , , or , a scale unprecedented at the time. Ghana's 1957 independence adopted over 21, followed by rapid African adoptions like in 1960 and in 1963, though implementation faced ethnic and logistical hurdles. In , the granted women suffrage via 1937 plebiscite, while Indonesia's 1955 elections under its provisional extended votes to all literate adults over 21, later universalized. These efforts, while formalizing broad enfranchisement, often coexisted with one-party dominance or , limiting electoral competition. Communist states declared early but under controlled systems: the extended it to all adults over 18 in 1918, excluding only certain political opponents, yet elections lacked multiparty choice. Eastern European satellites post-1945 mirrored this, granting formal universality while suppressing opposition, highlighting a distinction between legal expansion and substantive democratic practice. By century's end, formal universal adult suffrage prevailed globally, though age thresholds (typically 18-21) and residency persisted, with outliers like South Africa's 1994 abolition of racial restrictions completing its universality.

Post-Colonial and Contemporary Adoptions

Following the wave after , numerous newly independent nations in and adopted universal adult suffrage as part of their inaugural constitutions, extending voting rights to both sexes without the , , or racial restrictions common under colonial rule. This shift enfranchised large populations rapidly; for instance, India's 1950 Constitution granted suffrage to all citizens aged 21 and older, incorporating over 173 million voters from diverse castes and literacy levels upon . Similarly, in , countries like (independent 1957) and (1963) included gender-neutral voting rights in their frameworks, reflecting a break from prior selective colonial franchises that often excluded women and majorities. These adoptions prioritized numerical over capacity-based thresholds, amid low literacy rates—India's hovered around 18% in 1951—and contributed to immediate expansions in electorate size, though implementation faced logistical challenges in rural areas. In sub-Saharan Africa, the pattern held across 29 nations south of the Sahara by the 1960s, where women exercised constitutional suffrage rights post-independence, often modeled on British or French systems but applied universally to adults. Exceptions persisted in settler colonies like South Africa, where racial exclusions limited non-white suffrage until 1994, despite earlier nominal grants to white women in 1930. Post-colonial Asia saw parallel moves, with Indonesia extending full suffrage to women in 1955 elections following 1945 independence declarations, and Pakistan mirroring India's approach in its 1956 Constitution before political disruptions. These reforms, while advancing formal equality, occurred in contexts of fragile governance, where expanded electorates correlated with populist policies but also instability, as evidenced by frequent coups in African states enfranchising illiterate majorities. Contemporary adoptions have focused on lingering exclusions in non-colonial holdouts, particularly Gulf monarchies and isolated kingdoms. permitted women to vote and run in municipal elections for the first time in December 2015, enacting a 2011 royal decree that applied to about 130,000 female voters in limited local contests, though national parliamentary elections remain absent. The granted women suffrage in 2006 for the , an advisory body selected via electoral colleges representing roughly 12% of citizens, marking a partial extension amid broader reforms. Other followed sequenced timelines: in 1994, in 1999, in 2001, and in 2005, often confining women's votes to consultative rather than sovereign assemblies. achieved full in 2008 with its first parliamentary elections, enfranchising women alongside men aged 18 and over after reforms. These late extensions, driven by royal initiatives rather than movements, have yielded modest participation—Saudi women's 2015 turnout was under 20% in some areas—while preserving male-dominated selection processes and excluding expatriate majorities. remains the sole polity without , restricting votes to male cardinals in papal conclaves as of 2025. Such adoptions highlight causal tensions between formal and substantive , with empirical data showing minimal shifts in outcomes where elections lack competitive .

Regional Case Studies

United Kingdom and Commonwealth

Suffrage in the originated in the medieval period with voting rights restricted to free male property owners, comprising roughly 3% of the adult population by the early . The Great Reform Act of 1832 expanded the male electorate by enfranchising most middle-class men through standardized property qualifications and seat redistribution, increasing voters from approximately 400,000 to 650,000 in while excluding working-class men and all women. This reform addressed electoral corruption and urban underrepresentation but maintained property-based rationales tied to stakeholding in society. The Second Reform Act of 1867 further broadened male suffrage by granting household suffrage to urban working men, roughly doubling the electorate to 2 million across the and incorporating those with modest economic contributions. The Third Reform Act of 1884 extended similar qualifications to rural agricultural laborers, raising the total electorate to about 5 million, or two-thirds of adult males, though paupers, criminals, and non-residents remained excluded. campaigns, initiated with petitions in the 1830s and formalized societies by 1867, gained traction amid arguments for equal civic capacity but faced opposition on grounds of differing interests and potential family disruption. The Representation of the People Act 1918 marked a pivotal shift, enfranchising all men over 21 and women over 30 meeting property or residency criteria, tripling the electorate to 21 million and adding 8.4 million women, largely crediting their industrial and military support roles. The Equal Franchise Act 1928 equalized terms, granting women over 21 the vote regardless of property, adding 5 million more voters and establishing near-universal adult suffrage, though peers and certain professionals retained special qualifications until later. In the British Commonwealth, suffrage developments mirrored the UK's gradualism but often incorporated racial and colonial exclusions reflecting governance stability concerns. granted women full suffrage in 1893, the first self-governing dominion to do so without property limits. achieved federal women's enfranchisement in 1902 via the Commonwealth Franchise Act, building on state precedents, while extending rights primarily to white subjects. adopted federal male universal suffrage by 1918 alongside partial women's rights, with full equality by 1919, though and Asian populations faced disenfranchisement until mid-20th century reforms. Colonial territories under British rule typically restricted suffrage to or property-qualified elites, prioritizing administrative control over inclusion; for instance, in , limited communal electorates based on literacy and wealth persisted until in , when adult suffrage was adopted in 1950. Post-colonial Commonwealth nations like delayed non-racial suffrage until 1994, underscoring how empire-era rationales of civic competence and contribution influenced uneven expansions, often lagging behind metropolitan due to fears of ethnic fragmentation. These patterns highlight causal links between suffrage criteria and perceived or societal status, with empirical delays in diverse polities correlating to stability risks.

United States

In the early years of the United States, suffrage was restricted primarily to white male property owners, with states determining qualifications under the Constitution's delegation of electoral authority. Property requirements, often requiring ownership of land or payment of taxes, excluded a significant portion of white men, as well as all women, enslaved people, free Black individuals, and Native Americans. By the 1820s and 1830s, most states eliminated property qualifications for white men, expanding the electorate to nearly all adult white males and aligning with Jacksonian democratic ideals, though literacy tests and other barriers persisted in some areas. The prompted formal expansions via constitutional s. The 15th , ratified on February 3, 1870, prohibited denial of voting rights based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude, enabling Black male enfranchisement during ; thousands of Black men registered to vote, leading to elected officials in Southern legislatures. However, after federal troops withdrew in 1877, Southern states enacted —including poll taxes, tests, grandfather clauses, and white primaries—that effectively disenfranchised most Black voters without explicitly violating the . By 1900, Black in states like had fallen below 2%, sustained by and until federal intervention. Women's suffrage advanced through state-level campaigns and national advocacy, beginning with the 1848 , which demanded voting rights alongside other reforms. Territorial granted women suffrage in 1869, followed by several Western states, but federal resolution came with the 19th Amendment, passed by on June 4, 1919, and ratified on August 18, 1920, barring denial of suffrage on account of sex. This enfranchised approximately 26 million women, though barriers like poll taxes and literacy tests continued to limit minority women's access until later reforms. Mid-20th-century laws addressed lingering restrictions. The 24th Amendment, ratified January 23, 1964, abolished poll taxes in federal elections, targeting Jim Crow holdovers. The , signed August 6, authorized federal oversight of discriminatory practices in jurisdictions with histories of suppression, resulting in Black voter registration in the South rising from about 29% in 1964 to 61% by 1969. Subsequent expansions included the 23rd Amendment (1961) granting electoral votes to , and the 26th Amendment (1971) lowering the to 18, prompted by Vietnam War-era arguments for youth enfranchisement. Native Americans gained citizenship via the of 1924, though full practical access varied by state until Voting Rights Act enforcement.

Continental Europe

In , universal male suffrage was introduced in under the Second Republic, marking the first implementation of voting rights for nearly all adult men regardless of property or tax qualifications, though it was briefly suspended under before being reinstated. This reform enfranchised approximately 9 million voters, a dramatic expansion from the roughly 250,000 under the July Monarchy's restricted system. Across other continental states, 19th-century male suffrage expansions were gradual and tied to constitutional reforms. In the , universal male suffrage for the was established in 1871, applying to all men over 25 without property tests, though state-level voting remained more restricted. adopted near-universal male suffrage in 1849 during its constitutional assembly, but with three-class voting that weighted votes by wealth. introduced universal male suffrage in 1893 after social unrest, initially with for certain classes before equalizing in 1919. Women's suffrage emerged later and unevenly, often amid revolutionary or wartime disruptions. , then a grand duchy under , granted women the right to vote and stand for election in 1906, the first in , enfranchising about 1.2 million women and leading to 19 female MPs in the 1907 parliament. Post-World War I republics accelerated progress: extended full suffrage to women in 1918 via the , enabling their participation in the January 1919 elections. followed in 1918, with women voting in the November constituent assembly. The achieved women's suffrage in 1919, after partial municipal rights in 1908. Southern and Western delays persisted due to conservative institutions and wartime priorities. granted women suffrage in 1945 under the post-fascist provisional government, with first votes in the 1946 . , despite early feminist demands during the 1789 , withheld national women's suffrage until 1944, when a decree under enfranchised them for the 1945 elections. briefly allowed women to vote in 1931 under the Second Republic, but Franco's suspended it until in 1977. lagged furthest, approving federal women's suffrage only in 1971 via , after some cantons like in 1959; Appenzell Innerrhoden held out until 1990.
CountryWomen's Suffrage YearKey Context
Finland1906Parliamentary reform amid autonomy struggles.
Germany1918 constitution post-WWI abdication.
Netherlands1919Post-WWI constitutional amendment.
France1944Provisional government decree during WWII liberation.
Italy1945Anti-fascist coalition amid Allied occupation.
Switzerland1971National ; cantonal variations persisted.
These expansions frequently correlated with regime changes or external pressures, such as defeat in war or waves, rather than organic consensus alone, though suffrage movements like Germany's Social Democratic campaigns contributed. In cases like and , entrenched Catholic or rural delayed inclusion, reflecting causal links between cultural homogeneity and resistance to broadening the electorate.

Asia and Majority-Muslim Countries

Suffrage in expanded unevenly, often linked to , post-war occupations, and nationalist movements, with many nations adopting universal adult voting rights upon independence or constitutional reform in the mid-20th century. established universal adult suffrage through its 1950 Constitution, enfranchising all citizens aged 21 and older regardless of gender, literacy, or property, marking one of the world's largest immediate expansions to over 173 million voters by 1951. granted women the right to vote on December 17, 1945, via revisions to the General Election Law under Allied occupation, enabling their participation in the 1946 elections where 67% of eligible women voted. In , women secured voting rights under the Republic of China's 1947 Constitution, effective April 12, though implementation varied amid and subsequent communist rule. Earlier adoptions occurred in select cases; extended suffrage to women in 1932 following the Siamese Revolution, while did so in 1924 under Soviet-influenced reforms. Post-colonial expansions prioritized broad enfranchisement to foster national unity, contrasting with property or restrictions in earlier models, though enforcement faced challenges from illiteracy and rural isolation.
CountryYear of Universal/Women's SuffrageKey Context
1950Constitution granted to all adults over 21.
1945Post-WWII reforms under U.S. influence.
1947Republic Constitution amid political upheaval.
1932Following shift.
In majority-Muslim countries, suffrage timelines reflect tensions between secular reforms, colonial legacies, and Islamic governance interpretations, ranging from early secular adoptions to recent concessions. pioneered full on December 5, 1934, via constitutional amendment under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's secularization drive, predating many European nations and enabling women to vote and stand for election nationally. incorporated women's voting rights in its 1945 independence proclamation and provisional constitution, with full implementation post-1950 amid democratic experiments. extended suffrage to women upon in 1947, inheriting British India's limited but affirming it in the new state's framework, though participation remained constrained by socio-cultural factors. Later grants highlight persistent barriers; permitted women to vote and run in municipal elections for the first time on December 12, 2015, following King Abdullah's 2011 decree, though national elections remain absent and guardianship laws limited access. formalized in 1956 under Gamal Abdel Nasser's , while followed in 1959 post-independence. These reforms often decoupled from sharia-based restrictions on public roles, yet empirical data shows lower female in conservative regions due to familial controls and mobility limits, as evidenced by Pakistan's 2024 elections where female participation lagged despite legal equality. In contexts prioritizing religious authority over democratic universality, suffrage expansions have yielded mixed governance impacts, with secular outliers like exhibiting higher female parliamentary representation historically.

Africa and Latin America

In Latin America, suffrage expansions began with independence movements in the early 19th century, where several newly formed republics adopted broad male suffrage without property or literacy qualifications, marking an early adoption of near-universal male voting rights compared to Europe. For instance, countries like Argentina, Chile, and Peru extended voting rights to most adult males shortly after gaining independence from Spain, though electoral fraud and elite dominance limited effective participation. Women's suffrage followed in the 20th century, with Ecuador granting literate women the vote in 1929, the first in the region, though full universality required removing literacy barriers later. Subsequent adoptions included Uruguay and Brazil in 1932, Cuba in 1934, and Mexico achieving full women's enfranchisement in 1953 after revolutionary reforms. Paraguay was the last, enacting universal suffrage in 1961, with literacy requirements persisting until 1978 in some cases, reflecting ongoing restrictions tied to education levels. These expansions often occurred amid political instability, with suffrage used to legitimize regimes rather than purely empower populations; for example, literacy tests in nations like and disproportionately excluded and rural voters, maintaining elite control despite formal universality. By the mid-20th century, most Latin American countries had achieved universal adult suffrage, but access varied due to , intimidation, and incomplete registration, as evidenced by low female in early elections post-enfranchisement. In Africa, suffrage during colonial eras was highly restricted, typically limited to European settlers or qualified indigenous elites under systems like the Cape Colony's multi-racial property-based in the 19th century, which allowed some non-white men to vote based on income and education thresholds. Post-colonial independence waves from the 1950s to 1970s introduced universal adult suffrage in most constitutions, aligning with norms promoted by departing powers; colonies, for instance, emphasized secret ballots and adult to foster nationhood, as seen in Nigeria's 1960 independence granting votes to all adults over 21. French territories like adopted female-inclusive upon 1960 independence, extending rights inherited from limited colonial experiments. South Africa diverged, enfranchising white women in 1930 while excluding non-whites until the 1994 , which implemented for all adults, ending restrictions that had confined voting to about 10-15% of the population. Across , formal masked practical challenges: many one-party states post- curtailed opposition, rendering elections non-competitive, with turnout often below 50% due to or , as in Ghana's early post-1957 votes. North African countries like extended limited suffrage in 1923 but achieved broader universality only after 1956 revolutions, though frequently undermined . Empirical data from the era shows suffrage expansions correlated with but not necessarily , as authoritarian in over 30 African states by the 1970s prioritized regime survival over voter agency.

Empirical Impacts and Consequences

Effects on Policy Outcomes

The expansion of suffrage, particularly to women and lower-income groups, has been empirically associated with shifts toward more redistributive and welfare-oriented policies. In the United States, the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920, granting women the vote nationwide, coincided with immediate increases in expenditures and revenues by approximately 14% on average, with women's suffrage accounting for about 16% of the total growth in state spending over the subsequent nine years. This pattern was evident across states with varying timing of female enfranchisement, where earlier adopters saw faster fiscal expansion, driven by demands for , , and maternal/child programs. Cross-national evidence from reinforces this link, with contributing to a rise in social spending as a share of GDP by 0.6-1.2 points between and in countries like the , , and . These increases targeted family allowances, public education, and initiatives, reflecting newly enfranchised women's preferences for policies addressing child welfare and alleviation, as opposed to prior emphases on or . In the U.S., suffrage also correlated with heightened political responsiveness to , yielding an 8-15% decline in child mortality from infectious diseases through expanded and expenditures. Broader extensions, including to non-property owners, amplified redistributive tendencies. Historical analyses indicate that enfranchising broader electorates shifted fiscal priorities toward progressive taxation and transfer programs, as median voter preferences moved leftward with inclusion of lower-income and voters less invested in . For instance, U.S. states granting women suffrage exhibited more voting records among representatives, facilitating policies like (via the 18th Amendment in 1919, supported by temperance movements with strong female backing) and subsequent expansions in oversight of issues. However, these outcomes varied by context; in some developing regions, female boosted and allocations without proportionally inflating overall budgets. Critically, while these causal estimates—derived from quasi-experimental designs exploiting staggered suffrage adoptions—suggest enfranchisement causally enlarged the , they do not imply uniform efficiency gains. Studies attribute much of the spending surge to women's for family-centric interventions, but note potential trade-offs, such as reduced emphasis on market-oriented policies. Empirical consensus holds that suffrage expansions systematically favored provision over alternatives, reshaping from elite-driven priorities to mass-appeal redistribution.

Economic and Fiscal Ramifications

Empirical analyses of women's suffrage in the United States indicate that its adoption at the state level correlated with expansions in fiscal activity. A study by economists John R. Lott Jr. and Lawrence W. Kenny, examining data from U.S. states between 1870 and 1940, found that granting women voting rights led to immediate and sustained increases in state expenditures and revenues, with the initial fiscal expansion averaging 20-30% in the years following enfranchisement. This effect persisted, accounting for roughly 16% of the total growth in state spending over the nine years post-suffrage and up to 28% over 25 years, driven by shifts toward policies favoring higher public outlays on , , and . The revenue increases, primarily through elevated tax burdens, aligned with these spending hikes, suggesting that newly enfranchised female voters prioritized redistributive programs, altering legislative incentives toward larger scopes. These U.S. findings align with of targeted fiscal reallocations post-suffrage. For instance, research by Grant Miller (2008) demonstrates that women's enfranchisement prompted a 20-30% rise in state expenditures, contributing to measurable declines in from infectious diseases by 8-15%, though at the cost of reorienting budgets away from other areas. Complementary work by Lott and Kenny notes more patterns among representatives from suffrage-adopting states, correlating with national policy drifts toward taxation and expansions. Critics of broader interpretations, such as a 2018 cross-country analysis by Christian Bjørnskov and colleagues, argue that female suffrage did not uniformly enlarge total government size internationally, finding no average uptick in social or overall expenditures across 22 democracies from 1870-2000, potentially due to varying institutional contexts or pre-existing fiscal trends. Internationally, suffrage extensions have been linked to welfare state growth in Western contexts. Paola Bertocchi's 2011 model and empirical review of European cases posits that enfranchising women, who often exhibit stronger preferences for redistribution due to lower average market wages and higher reliance on public goods, incentivized expansions in social spending and progressive fiscal policies, particularly in pre-World War I settings where gender gaps in economic stakes amplified demands for safety nets. This dynamic contributed to the fiscal foundations of modern welfare regimes, with post-suffrage eras seeing elevated public debt and tax-to-GDP ratios in nations like the United Kingdom and Sweden, though causal attribution remains debated amid confounding factors like industrialization and war. Overall, while total government size effects vary, suffrage consistently redirected fiscal priorities toward human capital and social investments, imposing long-term revenue demands on economies.

Evidence on Governance Stability

Empirical analyses of suffrage expansions' effects on governance stability, defined as the durability of regimes, frequency of cabinet turnover, or resistance to coups and civil unrest, remain limited and often indirect. Studies primarily examine intermediate outcomes like policy volatility or polarization, which can influence stability. In the United States, the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920 granting women suffrage correlated with reduced political polarization. Research analyzing congressional voting patterns from 1870 to 1940 found that states adopting women's suffrage experienced an average 13.5% decline in partisan polarization, as measured by the ideological distance between Democratic and Republican legislators, compared to non-adopting states. This moderation effect, attributed to women's preferences for centrist policies on issues like prohibition and welfare, likely fostered greater legislative compromise and cabinet longevity in state governments, though direct causation with national regime stability is not established. Conversely, suffrage expansions in fragile institutional contexts have been linked to heightened volatility. The implementation of in January 1919, extending voting rights to all citizens over age 20 regardless of gender or property, coincided with extreme governmental instability. Between 1919 and 1933, the republic saw 20 chancellors and frequent coalition collapses due to parliamentary fragmentation under , enabling small extremist parties to wield disproportionate influence and block stable majorities. Historians note that the broad franchise amplified divisions exacerbated by post-World War I economic crises, contributing to policy gridlock and the eventual rise of authoritarian alternatives, though economic factors like in 1923 were primary drivers. Similar patterns appeared in interwar Europe, where rapid enfranchisement without strong increased electoral volatility and shortened government durations in countries like and . Fiscal ramifications of suffrage provide indirect on long-term . Cross-state analyses in the U.S. from to 1940 show women's enfranchisement prompted immediate 14-20% surges in state expenditures on and , followed by revenue adjustments via higher taxes, without precipitating fiscal crises or regime threats in stable democracies. However, in less developed settings, such redistributive shifts have correlated with debt accumulation and vulnerability to shocks; for instance, post-colonial in some African states after the aligned with frequent coups, though institutional weaknesses predominate as causal factors over breadth alone. Overall, suggests suffrage bolsters in mature institutions by broadening but risks amplifying volatility where veto players proliferate or economic buffers are absent, underscoring the interplay with electoral systems and prior quality.

Contemporary Controversies and Reforms

Voter Fraud and Election Integrity

Voter fraud encompasses illegal practices such as casting ballots by ineligible individuals, duplicate voting, or altering ballots, posing risks to election integrity especially following suffrage expansions that include broader access methods like mail-in voting. Documented cases illustrate these vulnerabilities; for instance, in Iowa's 2020 general election, Kim Phuong Taylor was convicted in 2023 for orchestrating a scheme involving absentee ballot fraud, where she fraudulently requested and cast votes on behalf of others to benefit her husband's candidacy, resulting in multiple felony counts. Similarly, a 2024 investigation in Pennsylvania led to charges against seven individuals for submitting fraudulent voter registration forms, highlighting irregularities in registration processes that could enable ineligible participation. The Heritage Foundation's database records over 1,500 proven instances of election fraud across the U.S. since the 1980s, including absentee ballot misuse and non-citizen voting, though critics argue this undercounts undetected cases due to limited audits. Empirical assessments of fraud incidence vary, with some analyses estimating it affects less than 1% of votes based on prosecuted cases over decades, yet such figures may reflect prosecutorial constraints rather than true , as many irregularities evade detection without rigorous . Non-citizen , prohibited federally and in all states, shows low prosecution rates but potential underreporting; a 2014 study estimated thousands of non-citizen ballots in 2008, potentially influencing close races, while recent audits like Georgia's 2024 review identified discrepancies warranting further scrutiny. Mail-in ballots, expanded during the 2020 election amid , have been linked to heightened risks through methods like ballot harvesting or , as evidenced by post-2020 prosecutions, though comprehensive audits remain inconsistent across jurisdictions. To mitigate these risks, election integrity measures such as voter ID requirements have been implemented in varying forms across states, with proponents citing their role in deterring impersonation and ineligible voting without substantially suppressing turnout. Studies on voter ID laws indicate minimal impact on participation rates, as most eligible voters possess qualifying , while enhancing public confidence in results; for example, states with strict photo ID mandates reported no widespread disenfranchisement in recent cycles. Debates persist over balancing access with security, particularly as no-excuse absentee and universal mail-in systems proliferate, prompting calls for uniform standards like signature matching and citizenship verification to uphold causal links between voter eligibility and outcome legitimacy.

Debates on Universal vs. Merit-Based Suffrage

The concept of merit-based suffrage, which conditions voting rights on criteria such as ownership, tax payment, , or demonstrated political knowledge, has long contrasted with adult suffrage by emphasizing competence and stakeholding over sheer numerical inclusion. Historically, many early democratic systems restricted the to owners or taxpayers to align voter incentives with fiscal , as non-contributors could otherwise impose costs without bearing them; for example, in the early , only about 6% of the population qualified to vote under initial state constitutions tied to landownership, a threshold justified by framers like to mitigate impulsive . tests, employed in various forms until the mid-20th century, aimed to ensure minimal civic competence, though their application often varied in rigor and faced criticism for disparate enforcement. Philosophical defenses of merit-based restrictions gained articulation in the , notably through John Stuart Mill's 1861 proposal in Considerations on Representative Government for , whereby educated individuals—such as university graduates or professionals—would receive additional votes to offset the "numerical inferiority" of the less informed masses, thereby weighting outcomes toward expertise without fully excluding the uneducated. Mill argued this system would foster better governance by balancing democratic participation with intellectual merit, a view rooted in the empirical observation that political judgment correlates with and . Such ideas persisted into modern discourse, with proponents contending that dilutes accountability, as evidenced by the "skin in the game" principle: voters without economic stakes, like net tax recipients, disproportionately favor redistributive policies that burden producers. Empirical evidence underscores potential drawbacks of universal expansion, particularly in policy shifts following enfranchisement. Studies of in the early reveal causal links to expanded states; in the United States, states granting women the vote experienced an immediate 14% increase in total expenditures and a 24% surge in outlays, driven by preferences for spending on , and . Similarly, in , suffrage extension correlated with a 28% rise in budgets relative to non-suffrage cantons, suggesting broadened electorates prioritize compensatory policies over fiscal restraint. These shifts, while varying by context—smaller in conservative Catholic societies with preexisting norms—indicate that inclusive suffrage can amplify demands for public goods without equivalent revenue discipline, potentially straining long-term . Contemporary advocates revive merit-based models through epistocracy, a system restricting votes to those passing basic political knowledge tests, as proposed by Jason Brennan in Against Democracy (2016), who cites surveys showing 70-80% of voters ignorant of fundamental facts like congressional term lengths or major policy trade-offs, leading to decisions akin to "drunk driving" in governance. Brennan argues epistocracy outperforms universal democracy empirically, drawing parallels to market selection of competent actors and historical restricted franchises that yielded stable policies; for instance, simulated epistocratic voting on issues like trade yields outcomes closer to expert consensus than mass referenda. Opponents raise selection bias concerns, noting that competence thresholds could entrench demographic advantages for the educated or affluent, yet Brennan counters with randomized or provisional voting trials to mitigate arbitrariness, emphasizing that uninformed universal suffrage empirically correlates with populist volatility over evidence-based rule. Academic sources advancing universalism often downplay these competence deficits, potentially reflecting institutional incentives favoring inclusivity, but data on voter ignorance—consistent across surveys since the 1950s—supports prioritizing informed input for causal policy efficacy.

Recent Developments in Voting Restrictions (2023-2025)

In the United States, 14 states enacted 17 restrictive voting laws in 2023, targeting aspects such as mail-in voting access and voter registration processes. North Carolina shortened the mail-in ballot return window to Election Day receipt, banned unsupervised drop boxes, and reduced the governor's election board appointment authority. Texas consolidated polling locations in some counties, potentially lengthening wait times, and expanded the secretary of state's oversight of local election administration in Harris County. Florida imposed stricter rules on third-party voter registration groups, prohibiting noncitizens from handling forms and barring retention of voter data beyond 90 days. Building on these measures, battleground states implemented further verification enhancements for the 2024 elections. Georgia's 2021 law, effective in subsequent cycles, mandated photo ID for mail voting applications and returns while limiting drop box availability to periods and county sites, resulting in quadrupled rejection rates from 2020 to 2022. required photo ID for both in-person and mail voting, with mail s needing a copy of ID, , or two witnesses, and shifted to strict receipt deadlines. The trend accelerated in 2025, with at least nine states passing additional laws tightening procedures amid ongoing election integrity debates. mandated witness affidavits for mail ballots. and required passports or birth certificates for certain voter registrations. and eliminated grace periods for mail ballot receipt, enforcing deadlines. restricted acceptable student IDs for verification, while limited options to photo IDs only. shortened the inactivity threshold for purging inactive voters to two missed elections, and phased out universal mail voting by 2029 with stricter ID and list maintenance rules. At the federal level, the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act passed the in April 2025 by a 220-208 vote, requiring documentary proof of U.S. —such as a , , or naturalization papers—for federal , beyond existing sworn affirmations. Proponents argued it addressed rare but documented noncitizen voting incidents, while critics contended it imposed barriers absent widespread fraud evidence. The bill advanced to the , where its fate remained pending as of October 2025. Internationally, European developments emphasized authentication over broad access curbs. The adopted a revised directive in June 2025 strengthening safeguards against mobile EU citizens voting or running in multiple countries for elections, including penalties for dual participation while facilitating clearer registration processes. Separately, the issued October 2024 guidelines promoting secure and authentication technologies to balance integrity and privacy across member states. Few comparable restrictions emerged elsewhere globally during the period, with focus remaining on U.S. state-level reforms.

References

  1. [1]
    SUFFRAGE | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
    the right to vote in an election, especially to vote for representatives in a government: universal suffrage (= the right of all adults to vote)
  2. [2]
    What is Suffrage? - Pieces of History
    May 14, 2019 · The term has nothing to do with suffering but instead derives from the Latin word “suffragium,” meaning the right or privilege to vote.
  3. [3]
    History Now, Issue 51 (Summer 2018) The Evolution of Voting Rights
    The Evolution of Voting Rights | | Special Feature “The Fifteenth Amendment Celebrated: An In-Depth Exploration” Videos “Inside the Vault: Susan B. Anthony ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Woman Suffrage and the 19th Amendment | National Archives
    Jun 2, 2021 · Beginning in the mid-19th century, several generations of woman suffrage supporters lectured, wrote, marched, lobbied, and practiced civil ...
  5. [5]
    Voting Rights: A Short History - Carnegie Corporation of New York
    white male landowners ...
  6. [6]
    Anti-Suffragism in the United States (U.S. National Park Service)
    Apr 10, 2019 · While anti-suffragists eventually lost their battle, their opposition delayed woman suffrage for decades and transformed family-based ...
  7. [7]
    Opposition to Suffrage — History of U.S. Woman's Suffrage
    Anti-suffrage views dominated among men and women through the early twentieth century. The National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage did not form until ...
  8. [8]
    Countries that have universal voting rights - Our World in Data
    This does not consider elections being postponed, informal restrictions on voting rights, or legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, ...
  9. [9]
    Voting Rights by Country 2025 - World Population Review
    Voting age minimum value is based upon reporting from the UAE National Elections Committee about the distribution of ages among chosen voters in 2023. Actual ...
  10. [10]
    The 19th Amendment, Explained | Brennan Center for Justice
    Mar 3, 2025 · The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution reads, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by ...
  11. [11]
    Make Voting Rights Universal | International Democracy Community
    Apr 2, 2024 · How can we make universal suffrage truly universal? That such a question must be asked points out a democratic paradox. Universal suffrage—the ...
  12. [12]
    SUFFRAGE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Oct 12, 2025 · 1. a short intercessory prayer usually in a series 2. a vote given in deciding a controverted question or electing a person for an office or trust.
  13. [13]
    Suffrage - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    suffrage(n.) late 14c., "prayer," especially "intercessory prayers or pleas on behalf of another," from Old French sofrage "plea, intercession" (13c.) ...
  14. [14]
    Suffrage | Definition, History, & Facts - Britannica
    Oct 10, 2025 · Suffrage, in representative government, the right to vote in electing public officials and adopting or rejecting proposed legislation.
  15. [15]
    https://www.tutor2u.net/politics/topics/franchise-suffrage
  16. [16]
    Voting Rights Act (1965) | National Archives
    Feb 8, 2022 · EnlargeDownload Link Citation: An act to enforce the fifteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States and for other purposes, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    https://oxcon.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law-mpeccol/law-mpeccol-e685
  18. [18]
    [PDF] What Should the Voting Age Be? - Journal of Practical Ethics
    What Should the Voting Age Be? DANA KAY NELKIN. Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego. ABSTRACT. In this paper, I endorse ...
  19. [19]
    Characteristics of Eligible Voters - ACE
    In a democracy, all adult citizens must be eligible to participate in elections. This means that eligibility requirements must be broad enough so that all ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Philosophical Justification for Universal Suffrage
    ... Suffrage" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 418. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/418. Page 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .Missing: criteria eligibility
  21. [21]
    Voting age - Wikipedia
    A legal voting age is the minimum age that a person is allowed to vote in a democratic process. Most nations use 18 years of age as their voting age, ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Philip Cook - Against a Minimum Voting Age
    A procedural test for minimal literacy and independent voting is the most justified means to ensure competency from voters and to promote the democratic agency ...Missing: restrictions | Show results with:restrictions
  23. [23]
    https://www.brennancenter.org/series/voting-and-citizenship
  24. [24]
    Voting and Citizenship | Brennan Center for Justice
    Federal law dictates that only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections. States have multiple checks in place to ensure that only eligible citizens can vote.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Felon Disenfranchisement as a Legitimate State Regulation
    Courts have upheld state disenfranchisement statutes that prohibit convicted felons from voting in any election and make it a felony for any person to register ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  26. [26]
    White Manhood Suffrage | National Museum of American History
    Throughout the first half of the 19th century, “free suffrage” was the goal of men who believed that they did not need to own property to have an interest ...Missing: criteria eligibility
  27. [27]
    Municipal Suffrage, Sanctuary Cities, and the Contested Meaning of ...
    Jan 19, 2018 · In November 2016, the city of San Francisco enacted a ballot initiative that was somewhat overshadowed by other election results.
  28. [28]
    Suffrage and Citizenship - The Journal of early American Life
    U.S. citizenship and suffrage have not always been two sides of the American coin. . . . the voters who elected presidents from George Washington to Abraham ...
  29. [29]
    Deprivation of the Right to Vote — - ACE Electoral Knowledge Network
    Participation in electoral processes is a constitutional right, in its dual dimension of active suffrage (the possibility to vote) and passive suffrage (the ...
  30. [30]
    Electoral System | Parliament Austria - Parlament Österreich
    All Austrian citizens are entitled to vote (active suffrage) and to be elected (passive suffrage) once they have reached voting age.
  31. [31]
    What is active and passive suffrage? How does the electoral system ...
    May 13, 2022 · "Suffrage" or "electoral law" refers to all the legal provisions that lay down the procedures for democratic elections.
  32. [32]
    Compulsory Voting | International IDEA
    Most democratic governments consider participating in national elections a right of citizenship. Some consider that participation in elections is also a ...
  33. [33]
    Is voting mandatory in the U.S.? - USAGov
    Sep 18, 2024 · In the U.S., no one is required by law to vote in any local, state, or presidential election. Voting is a right, but it is not a ...
  34. [34]
    Compulsory Voting - Center for Effective Government
    Feb 20, 2024 · "For democracy to work, citizens must vote. Yet turnout rates are low or declining in many democratic countries. In the United States, turnout ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] The Right to a Competent Electorate - rintintin.colorado.edu
    Democracy violates the competence principle, but epistocracy violates the qualified acceptability requirement. However, in §V, I argue that restricted suffrage ...
  36. [36]
    John Adams Argues for Limited Suffrage · SHEC
    Adams sets forth his arguments against giving women, children, and property-less men the right to vote.
  37. [37]
    The Federalist Papers : No. 57 - Avalon Project
    ... qualification of property was annexed to the right of suffrage; or that the right of eligibility was limited to persons of particular families or fortunes ...
  38. [38]
    REPGOV Chapter 8 Section 2 - LAITS
    Considerations on Representative Government. John Stuart Mill. Chapter VIII OF THE EXTENSION OF THE SUFFRAGE. Section 2. In ...
  39. [39]
    JS MILL ON PLURAL VOTING, COMPETENCE - jstor
    Abstract: J.S. Mill's plural voting proposal in Considerations on Representative. Government presents political theorists with a puzzle: the elitist ...
  40. [40]
    "Voting Rights and Wrongs: Philosophical Justification for Universal ...
    This thesis analyzes Jason Brennan's paper "The Right to a Competent Electorate," then critiques his argument in favor of restricting voting rights to those ...
  41. [41]
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Sep 27, 2010 · Although a variety of forms of government turn out to be theoretically compatible with popular sovereignty, Rousseau is sceptical about the ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] EARLY LIBERALS AND UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE - Cicero Foundation
    Jun 1, 2019 · Soon another philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), took up the torch. He pleaded for a radical democracy, in which all adult citizens ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    SOCY 151 - Rousseau: Popular Sovereignty and General Will
    Rousseau's path-breaking and controversial ideas about universal suffrage, the general will, consent of the governed, and the need for a popularly elected ...
  44. [44]
    The Ethics and Rationality of Voting
    Jul 28, 2016 · 2.1 A General Moral Obligation Not to Vote? 3. Moral Obligations Regarding How One Votes. 3.1 The Expressivist Ethics of Voting; 3.2 The ...
  45. [45]
    (PDF) Female voting power: The contribution of women's suffrage to ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · We provide evidence that social spending out of GDP increased by 0.6–1.2% in the short-run as a consequence of women's suffrage, while the long-run effect is ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    WOMEN'S SUFFRAGE, POLITICAL RESPONSIVENESS, AND ...
    This paper presents new evidence on how suffrage rights for American women helped children to benefit from the scientific breakthroughs of the bacteriological ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Women's Suffrage and Children's Education Esra Kose, Elira Kuka ...
    However, there is little empirical evidence that increase in women's influence leads to different policies or better economic outcomes. In this paper, we ...
  48. [48]
    Long-Run Intergenerational Health Benefits of Women Empowerment
    Suffrage laws may empower women by providing them with incentives for investing more in their children, leading to improved health, developmental outcomes, and ...
  49. [49]
    War and the political zeitgeist: Evidence from the history of female ...
    This paper examines the hypothesis that international wars accelerated democratization by fostering political inclusion.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Who Benefited from Women's Suffrage? - elira kuka
    Studies of the broad enfranchisement of women, on the other hand, have not linked women's voting to children's outcomes beyond childhood mortality (see earlier ...
  51. [51]
    A Test for the Rational Ignorance Hypothesis: Evidence from a ...
    ... in volume 6, issue 4, pages 380-98 of American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, November 2014, Abstract: This paper tests the rational ignorance hy...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  52. [52]
    https://masonlec.org/site/rte_uploads/files/Somin_Introduction.pdf
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is ...
    Most of the American public is largely ignorant of politics. Much evidence suggests that political ignorance is often great indeed. The biggest issue in the ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  54. [54]
    Democracy and Political Ignorance | Stanford University Press
    Ilya Somin mines the depths of the current state of ignorance in America and reveals it as a major problem for democracy. He weighs various options for solving ...
  55. [55]
    The Myth of the Rational Voter | Cato Unbound
    and many political scientists — the answer is “No, but it doesn't matter ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  56. [56]
    The political consequences of uninformed voters - ScienceDirect.com
    Americans fail to meet the democratic ideal of an informed electorate, and the consequences of this political ignorance are a topic of significant scholarly ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Voter Ignorance and Judicial Elections
    the empirical studies generally show a pervasive ignorance of politics and government. Political scientists have recognized the problem for decades,81 and ...
  58. [58]
    Solving the Problem of Political Ignorance - Cato Institute
    Ilya Somin, who recently released a second edition of his highly regarded book, Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government Is Smarter, came to ...
  59. [59]
    Universal Suffrage - Oxford Constitutional Law
    Universal suffrage is generally understood as the right to vote for political representatives conferred to almost all adult citizens or residents.Missing: first implementations countries
  60. [60]
    Who Should Vote? Conceptualizing Universal Suffrage in Studies of ...
    Feb 28, 2008 · As a result of vast political transformations in the last century, suffrage has undergone a massive expansion nearly all over the world.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  61. [61]
    Children, Voting, and the Meaning of Universal Suffrage
    Aug 29, 2023 · This child-excluding model of universal suffrage is so familiar it is easy to overlook the way it subordinates political equality to the goal of ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  62. [62]
    Woman Suffrage - National Geographic Education
    Apr 16, 2025 · In 1893, New Zealand became the first country in the world to give women the same voting rights as men. Australia did the same in 1902 ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  63. [63]
    The Political Origins of the Women's Vote
    New Zealand was the first country to adopt a truly universal suffrage that allowed women to vote on the same terms as men in 1893 and Norway takes the prize ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  64. [64]
    Commemorating the Nineteenth Amendment: Women's Suffrage at ...
    Aug 27, 2020 · One year later, in 1906, Finland became the first European country to recognize universal suffrage, and the first in the world to extend to ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Conquered or Granted? A History of Suffrage Extensions*
    In pursuit of their economic and social goals, these parties sought to enhance their electoral positions, treating the issue of female suffrage as an instrument ...
  66. [66]
    The Impact of Universal Suffrage: A Comparison of Popular and ...
    Aug 1, 2014 · Struggles for the vote have had to overcome restrictions based on factors such as sex, race and tenure of property. While gaps in the exercise ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  67. [67]
    Locked Out 2022: Estimates of People Denied Voting Rights
    Oct 25, 2022 · In 2022, an estimated 4.4 million Americans, representing 2 percent of the voting-age population, will be ineligible to vote due to these laws or policies.
  68. [68]
    22 countries where voting is mandatory | PBS News
    Nov 3, 2014 · Despite all of the U.S. media's fanfare about Tuesday's midterm elections, most eligible voters likely will duck their civic duties on ...
  69. [69]
    (PDF) The Significance of Universal Suffrage and its Restrictions
    Nov 8, 2020 · legislation of the majority of countries, only citizenship is not enough to exercise suffrage;. the residence has crucial significance when ...
  70. [70]
    REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE BILL (Hansard, 23 June 1948)
    It abolishes plural voting, and ensures that both in Parliamentary and local government elections, there will be one vote only in respect of each person—one ...
  71. [71]
    Suffrage, curial and censitary - Brill Reference Works
    ... suffrage), subdivision into classes of voters created a gradient of voting power (unequal suffrage). Parliaments elected under curial and censitary suffrage ...
  72. [72]
    censitary suffrage- WordWeb dictionary definition
    Noun: censitary suffrage. A system where the votes cast by those eligible to vote are not equal, but are weighed differently according to the person's rank ...Missing: weighted | Show results with:weighted
  73. [73]
    Plural Voting Bill - Hansard - UK Parliament
    It was a Bill to impose pains and penalties upon a Parliamentary elector registered in more than one constituency if he should vote in any constituency except ...
  74. [74]
    Representation Of The People Bill - Hansard - UK Parliament
    This Bill completes the progress of the British people towards a full and complete democracy begun by the great Reform Bill of 1832.
  75. [75]
    Weighted representative democracy - ScienceDirect.com
    We propose a new system of democratic representation. Any voter can choose any legislator as her representative; thus, different legislators can represent ...
  76. [76]
    One person, one weight: when is weighted voting democratic?
    Mar 21, 2022 · The optimal allocation of weights is almost always democratic or “semi-democratic”, in that it satisfies or draws close to “one person, one weight”.Missing: democracies | Show results with:democracies<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    The Paradox of Compulsory Voting
    Participation Does Not Equal Political Knowledge · Voter turnout has been in decline in Canada since the late 1980s. · While any drop in turnout is cause for ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Compulsory voting around the world - Electoral Commission
    Although compulsory voting has never been part of the UK electoral system, mandatory participation in elections is a feature in a diverse range of countries ...
  79. [79]
    Which countries make voting compulsory? | World Economic Forum
    Oct 26, 2015 · In Belgium, Turkey and Australia, three nations with compulsory voting, the turnout was 87.2% (in 2014), 86.4% (2011) and 80.5% (2013) ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
  80. [80]
    The Consequences of Compulsory Voting | Beyond Turnout
    Compulsory voting has an unsurprising upward impact on voter participation, which lessens the impact of many socioeconomic and demographic forerunners of ...
  81. [81]
    Compulsory voting and political participation: Empirical evidence ...
    Some Austrian states temporarily introduced compulsory voting (CV). · CV increases voter turnout by 3.5 percentage points in national elections. · But CV has no ...
  82. [82]
    Masking turnout inequality. Invalid voting and class bias when ...
    Our results show that CV raised participation and reduced class-biased turnout, but it doesn't automatically correct inequalities, as it produces heterogeneous ...
  83. [83]
    Moving toward the Median: Compulsory Voting and Political ...
    Feb 1, 2024 · Our article strengthens the normative case for compulsory voting by arguing that it could improve democracy by reducing polarization.
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Compulsory Voting, Turnout, and Government Spending
    19. For these elections, we hand-collected data on voter turnout, invalid ballots and party vote shares from the Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior's.
  85. [85]
    Isolating the effect of compulsory voting laws on political sophistication
    The results suggest that exposure to mandatory voting laws caused Austrian citizens to increase their political interest and attention to political news.
  86. [86]
    Compulsory Voting's American History - Harvard Law Review
    Feb 12, 2024 · Voter turnout was higher in the 2020 U.S. presidential election than it had been in 120 years. Nearly sixty-seven percent of citizens over ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPULSORY VOTING: EVIDENCE ...
    Compulsory voting involves a government legally requiring its citizens to register to vote and cast ballots on election day. While the practice of compulsory ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Exercise of Citizens' Suffrage as One of the Basic Principles of the ...
    The basic requirements of the electoral legislation of most European countries for the implementation of both active and passive suffrage are identified, which ...
  89. [89]
    Women's voting rights | Atria
    Only in 1919 a bill for active women's suffrage was adopted in the Netherlands and women were allowed to vote. ... In 1917, the passive suffrage for women ...
  90. [90]
    Equal Rights, Equal Duties – Women's Suffrage in Germany
    On 24 September 2017, the Federal Republic of Germany will be holding elections to its national parliament, the “Bundestag”, for the 19th time.<|control11|><|separator|>
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Census suffrage
    Census suffrage. Also known as "censitary suffrage", the opposite of Equal suffrage, meaning that those eligible to vote are not equal, but are weighed ...Missing: weighted | Show results with:weighted
  92. [92]
    John Adams Explains Why People Without Property Should Not Be ...
    Adams believed those without property lack judgment, are too dependent, and would vote as directed, and that changing voting qualifications would lead to more ...
  93. [93]
    Property and Suffrage in the Early American Republic - jstor
    Jan 5, 1989 · at 485. By the eighteenth century, property qualifications had been adopted almost everywhere in the American colonies. But some of the colonies ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] The Five Ancient Criteria of Democracy: The Apotheosis of Equality
    In comparison and according to five criteria, modern democracies are inferior to what the eligible citizens of Ancient Athens enjoyed. The ancient Greek ...
  95. [95]
    Voting in Early America - Colonial Williamsburg
    Requirements shifted by place and time, but in the eighteenth century, the right to cast a vote belonged largely to white, male property holders.
  96. [96]
    Winning the Vote: A History of Voting Rights
    The County Election, based on a painting by George C. Bingham, 1854. (Gilder Leh The basic principle that governed voting in colonial America was that voters ...
  97. [97]
    Who Voted in Early America? - Colonial Williamsburg
    Nov 6, 2024 · Most of the British American colonies only allowed people who owned property, especially land, to vote. Eighteenth-century political thinkers ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    The Reform Act 1832 - UK Parliament
    The first Reform Act​​ created 67 new constituencies. broadened the franchise's property qualification in the counties, to include small landowners, tenant ...
  99. [99]
    Second Reform Act 1867 - UK Parliament
    The 1867 Reform Act: Men in urban areas who met the property qualification were enfranchised and the Act roughly doubled the electorate in England and Wales.
  100. [100]
    Literacy Tests - National Museum of American History
    Proponents of tests to prove an applicant's ability to read and understand English claimed that the exams ensured an educated and informed electorate.
  101. [101]
    Literacy Tests and the Right To Vote - Connecticut History
    Connecticut was the first state to require a literacy test of would-be voters and, even as the practice came under fire as a tool of discrimination, ...
  102. [102]
    Literacy Test Debates in the Reconstruction Era Congress, 1864-1869
    These debates offer a critical early perspective on the development of literacy as a racial marker serving official racist agendas.
  103. [103]
    Suffrage Extensions and Voting Patterns in Latin America - jstor
    When Ecuador, and Peru removed literacy restrictions on suffrage, more than 20 of their populations were illiterate.
  104. [104]
    Literacy test - Wikipedia
    A literacy test assesses a person's literacy skills: their ability to read and write. Literacy tests have been administered by various governments, ...
  105. [105]
    Adolescence during Antiquity: the Greek and Roman periods
    There is an evolution in the perception of the adolescence during the Antiquity: for the Greeks, the adolescence ends at 20 years old with an important ...
  106. [106]
    What age was a boy considered to reach adulthood in ancient Rome ...
    Sep 20, 2018 · For ancient Romans, a boy became a man at 16. There was a public festival, the Liberalia on March 17, at which boys donned the toga virilis.
  107. [107]
    Is it true that 25 was the age of majority in Ancient Rome even ...
    Mar 4, 2022 · 25 was the minimum age to run for an elective office. That is all. It was similar to US laws which set minimum age for Senate at 30 and for President at 35.
  108. [108]
    What is the historical reason for 18 years being the most commonly ...
    May 16, 2016 · Age of consent laws could, in part, explain why we've settled on 18 or ages near to it. Age of consent statutes can be dated as far back as ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    Amdt26.2.1 Voter Age Qualifications in the Early United States
    Section 2: The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. The original Constitution, which took effect in 1789, deferred to ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Democratic Inclusion, Cognitive Development, and the Age of ...
    The voting age in every. U.S. state is eighteen, but the United States is not among the growing number of democracies deliberating the electoral inclusion of ...
  111. [111]
    Coming of voting age. Evidence from a natural experiment on the ...
    Hence, we expect that attaining electoral eligibility positively affects the information-seeking behaviour of young citizens while not affecting political ...
  112. [112]
    “Old Enough to Fight, Old Enough to Vote”: The WWII Roots of the ...
    Oct 28, 2020 · The 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18, has roots in WWII history.
  113. [113]
    Arguments in 1912 For and Against Woman Suffrage
    The same arguments used in defense of depriving women of suffrage were used to keep the Romans enslaved, to keep the peasants of Europe in serfdom, to clog the ...<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    Arguments against Women's Suffrage - JohnDClare.net
    1. Women would be corrupted by politics and chivalry would die out · 2. If women became involved in politics, they would stop marrying, having children, and the ...
  115. [115]
    With All Due Respect: Understanding Anti-Suffrage Women
    Anti-suffragists believed that women had a duty to support their government, and many recognized that the United States would eventually have to enter the war.Missing: universal | Show results with:universal
  116. [116]
    Suffrage Debates & Women's Rights - Online Exhibits
    Anti-suffrage arguments were strongly grounded in women's domestic role: ... Men are the head of the household—men's votes cover women's interests ...
  117. [117]
    https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2021/05/politics/black-voting-rights-suppression-timeline/
  118. [118]
    Black Americans and the Vote | National Archives
    Jun 9, 2021 · The struggle over voting rights in the United States dates all the way back to the founding of the nation. The original U.S. Constitution ...Selma Marches · People and Icons · Laws and Court Cases · Freedom Summer
  119. [119]
    Black voting rights and voter suppression: A timeline - CNN
    A timeline of new and old efforts to limit the political power of Black Americans and other voters of color.
  120. [120]
    Key facts about women's suffrage around the world
    Oct 5, 2020 · At least 20 nations preceded the U.S. in granting women the right to vote, according to an analysis of measures in 198 countries and ...
  121. [121]
    Voting Rights | Articles and Essays | Civil Rights History Project
    One of the major goals of the Civil Rights Movement was to register voters across the South in order for African Americans to gain political power.
  122. [122]
    Religious Freedom | George Washington's Mount Vernon
    Puritans in New England based laws on the Bible, and only full church members were permitted to vote. Magistrates, considered “public ministers of God,” were ...
  123. [123]
    Religious Tests and Oaths in State Constitutions, 1776-1784
    Nine out of thirteen states had some sort of religious test requirement for officeholders in their constitutions. At the time, many believed religious oaths ...
  124. [124]
    Religious Tests for Office and Voting in the States - People.SMU
    In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, many governments applied religious tests to voting or to officeholding, to privilege particular faiths.
  125. [125]
    Historical Background on Religious Test for Government Offices
    Religious test oaths were initially required in the colonies, as well, as part of the legal framework supporting state-established churches.
  126. [126]
    [PDF] The Lingering Bigotry of State Constitution Religious Tests
    Nov 14, 2014 · There is a clear historical trend away from state constitutional religious tests for office. While a handful of states had religious tests.
  127. [127]
    History of Voting in America - Voting and Civic Engagement
    Sep 14, 2025 · 1789: The U.S. constitution did not establish any specific voting rights, instead states were given the power to regulate voting laws. As a ...
  128. [128]
    Voting Rights - APIAVote
    In early US history, only white adult male property voters were allowed to vote. The 15th Amendment and later the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution set ...<|separator|>
  129. [129]
    Revisiting the Origins of Felony Disenfranchisement in the United ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · These laws coincided with the expansion of male voting rights. The first use of the term “felony” was in 1831, but “infamous crime” was still ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Criminal Disenfranchisement: Deconstructing Its Justifications and ...
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF CRIMINAL DISENFRANCHISEMENT IN THE. UNITED STATES. The ... A third common rationale behind criminal disenfranchisement is the concern ...
  131. [131]
    Felon Disenfranchisement: Law, History, Policy, and Politics
    constituencies that have traditionally ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  132. [132]
    "Residency and Democracy" by Eugene D. Mazo
    After years of struggle, we no longer require property ownership, employ poll taxes, or force citizens to take literary tests to vote. The franchise is now ...
  133. [133]
    [PDF] State Residency Requirements and the Right to Vote in Presidential ...
    Jun 30, 2025 · 13 Tenta- tive estimates show almost two million voters lost the privilege of voting by moving prior to the election date in 1968.14 These ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Constitutional Law--Elections--Durational Residency Requirement
    ' Several courts have recently been presented with the question of whether one year residency requirements for voting violate the equal protection clause of the ...
  135. [135]
    [PDF] Voting Restrictions Based on Mental Competency
    Appelbaum, Defining and Assessing Capacity to Vote: The Effect of Mental Impairment on the Rights of Voters, 38 MCGEORGE L. REV. 931, 961 (2016). 8. For example ...
  136. [136]
    Voting Rights and People with Intellectual and Developmental ...
    ... basis of disability, but more states adopted such measures in subsequent decades. ... voting because of mental illness. Louisiana constitutionally required the ...
  137. [137]
    [PDF] Modernizing State Voting Laws that Disenfranchise the Mentally ...
    Appelbaum, Defining and Assessing Capacity to Vote: The. Effect of Mental Impairment on the Rights of Voters, 38 MCGEORGE L. REV. 931, 962 (2007). 59. Id. 60.<|separator|>
  138. [138]
    How People Voted in Ancient Elections - History.com
    Nov 4, 2022 · In Athens and Rome, voting could entail shouting contests, secret stone ballots and an election system with built-in ...
  139. [139]
    The Emergence of Direct Democracy in Ancient Athens
    The paper uses political economy methodology to analyze the shift from aristocracy to democracy at the end of 6 th century BC in ancient Athens.
  140. [140]
    How the Romans Voted in the Roman Republic - ThoughtCo
    May 13, 2025 · Being eligible to vote in a Roman election did not guarantee that your vote counted for as much as the guy at the next voting enclosure.
  141. [141]
    Medieval | History of Parliament Online
    All long-lived institutions have their antecedents, and the antecedents of the Lords are to found in the Anglo-Saxon witan which brought the leading men of ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] The Icelandic Althing - Jesse Byock
    A major feature of the Althing was the meeting of the legislative or law council, called the lögrétta.6 Here the chieftains reviewed old laws and made new ones.
  143. [143]
    A Political History of the World's Oldest Democracy
    Nov 9, 2020 · The Althing. It happened in the summer of 930. Just a few generations earlier, Irish monks and Norse farmers had begun settling this remote ...
  144. [144]
    Late Medieval Europe: Founding a Parliamentary Culture
    Nov 18, 2021 · They originated from ancient feudal, and highly ceremonial, gatherings such as public crownings or solemn judicial sentencings, often staged in ...
  145. [145]
    Medieval representative assemblies: collective action and ...
    Feb 15, 2018 · Medieval monarchs in Western Europe responded to financial and military pressures by instituting representative assemblies.
  146. [146]
    https://www.parliament.uk/about/living-heritage/evolutionofparliament/houseofcommons/reformacts/overview/one-man-one-vote/
  147. [147]
    The Authorities (Chapter 10) - The Dutch Republic in the ...
    In the seventeenth century the Dordrecht guilds appointed Eight Good Men (Goede Lieden van Achten) who took part in the annual elections of the burgomasters. In ...Missing: qualifications | Show results with:qualifications
  148. [148]
    Third Reform Act 1884 - UK Parliament
    Parliament's resistance to 'one man, one vote' was partly overturned in 1884 with the third Reform Act which: established a uniform franchise throughout the ...
  149. [149]
    Democracy, extension of suffrage, and redistribution in nineteenth ...
    Jun 27, 2015 · By extending suffrage to popular masses, the political elite makes it less advantageous for the bourgeoisie to seek a more powerful parliament.
  150. [150]
    The European Case for Male Suffrage in the Nineteenth Century
    As a result of a gradual extension of suffrage in most European countries by the First World War the right to vote was granted to the overwhelming majority of ...
  151. [151]
    The Expansion of Democracy during the Jacksonian Era
    Between the 1820s and 1850, as more white males won the right to vote and political parties became more organized, the character of American democracy changed.
  152. [152]
    Expanding democracy (article) | Khan Academy
    This expansion of the franchise has been dubbed Jacksonian Democracy, as the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 became symbolic of the new “politics of the ...
  153. [153]
    The Early Suffrage Societies in the 19th century - a timeline
    The Second Reform Bill fails to include women in an enlarged electorate. 1867. London National Society for Women's Suffrage formed.
  154. [154]
    Protest and Peterloo: the story of 16 August 1819
    The British government was keen to cover up the massacre, imprisoning the reform leaders and clamping down on those who spoke out against the government. Within ...
  155. [155]
    Why Did Women Lose the Vote? - Museum of the American Revolution
    In November 1807, the New Jersey State Legislature stripped the vote from women, people of color, and recent immigrants.
  156. [156]
    [PDF] The Political Economy of Suffrage Reform: The Great Reform Act of ...
    ABSTRACT. We argue that the Great Reform Act's suffrage provisions were part of a broader effort to constrain the executive, thereby enabling.
  157. [157]
    World suffrage timeline - Women and the vote - NZ History
    Apr 27, 2023 · Although a number of other territories enfranchised women before 1893, New Zealand can justly claim to be the first self-governing country ...
  158. [158]
    Worldwide Women's Suffrage Timeline - Wilson Center
    Aug 14, 2020 · Julieta Lanteri, an Italian-Argentinian woman, becomes the first woman to vote in Latin America. The First Feminist Congress of the Yucatan ...<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    Key dates - UK Parliament
    1535 Legislation provides for Welsh representatives in the House of Commons 1707 Acts of Union passed in the Parliaments of England and Scotland unite the two ...
  160. [160]
    Decolonization of Asia and Africa, 1945–1960 - Office of the Historian
    Between 1945 and 1960, three dozen new states in Asia and Africa achieved autonomy or outright independence from their European colonial rulers.
  161. [161]
    Decolonization of Africa | Summary, Factors, Independence, & Facts
    The decolonization process in Africa began in earnest in the 1950s, with most colonies becoming independent of European powers in that decade and the 1960s.
  162. [162]
    https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/12/11/saudi-arabia-landmark-elections-women
  163. [163]
    https://agsi.org/analysis/cracking-glass-ceiling-gulf-women-politics/
  164. [164]
    Saudi Arabia: Landmark Elections for Women | Human Rights Watch
    Dec 11, 2015 · In September 2011, the late King Abdullah declared by royal decree that women would be allowed to vote and run as candidates in the third ...
  165. [165]
    Cracking the Glass Ceiling: Gulf Women in Politics - AGSI
    The first country to allow women's suffrage was Oman in 1994, followed by Qatar in 1999, Bahrain in 2001, Kuwait in 2005, the UAE in 2006, and Saudi Arabia in ...
  166. [166]
    Countries Where Women Cannot Vote 2025
    Women now have the right to vote in every country and territory in the world except for one: Vatican City, in which only Catholic Church cardinals, who must be ...Missing: adoptions | Show results with:adoptions
  167. [167]
    [PDF] history of the Parliamentary franchise - UK Parliament
    Mar 1, 2013 · The Second Reform Act of 1867 again only affected England and Wales. Separate legislation was required for Scotland and Ireland. This reform ...
  168. [168]
    What caused the 1832 Great Reform Act? - The National Archives
    In 1832, Parliament passed a law that changed the British electoral system. It was known as the Great Reform Act, which basically gave the vote to middle class ...
  169. [169]
    Representation of the People Acts | Suffrage, Women, Reform
    Oct 10, 2025 · The act of 1918 gave the vote to all men over age 21 and all women over age 30, which tripled the electorate. The act of 1928 extended the ...
  170. [170]
    Key dates - UK Parliament
    1832 First petition on women's suffrage presented to Parliament. 1867 First debate on women's suffrage in Parliament, led by John Stuart Mill.
  171. [171]
    1918 Representation of the People Act - UK Parliament
    The Representation of the People Act of 1918 granted the vote to women over the age of 30 who met a property qualification.
  172. [172]
    The Representation of the People Act 1928 - Research
    This reform added around five million women to the electoral roll and established, for the first time, the principle of universal adult suffrage in Britain.
  173. [173]
    Women's Suffrage in the UK: A Timeline from Petitions to Protests
    May 15, 2023 · What was Women's Suffrage? · 1832: The First Recorded Petition · 1870: The Married Women's Property Act · 1897: The National Union of Women's ...
  174. [174]
    Women granted the vote in federal elections
    The Commonwealth Franchise Act on June 12, 1902, gave women over 21 the right to vote in federal elections, after initial state-based voting rights.
  175. [175]
    Women get the vote - UK Parliament
    In 1918 the Representation of the People Act was passed which allowed women over the age of 30 who met a property qualification to vote.
  176. [176]
    Sisters In Arms: Race, Empire and Women's Suffrage | History Today
    Dec 12, 2018 · The women's suffrage movement was global, but racial inequality often undermined the notion of universal sisterhood.
  177. [177]
    A timeline of voting rights in the UK - UK Defence Journal
    Apr 4, 2018 · Marking the beginning of a series of electoral reforms, the Reform Act 1832 was a pivotal moment in British political history.
  178. [178]
    Module 13: Voting Rights in America | Constitution Center
    These amendments have protected the voting rights of new groups, including by banning discrimination at the ballot box based on race (15th Amendment) and sex ( ...
  179. [179]
    15th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Voting Rights (1870)
    May 16, 2024 · Passed by Congress February 26, 1869, and ratified February 3, 1870, the 15th Amendment granted African American men the right to vote.
  180. [180]
    The Promise and Pitfalls of the 15th Amendment Over 150 Years
    Feb 3, 2020 · Today marks the 150th anniversary of the ratification of the 15th Amendment, which was adopted to give Black people access to the ballot after ...
  181. [181]
    Voting rights laws and constitutional amendments - USAGov
    Aug 22, 2024 · U.S. election laws date back to Article 1 of the Constitution. This gave states the responsibility of overseeing federal elections.
  182. [182]
    One Man, One Vote: The Long March towards Universal Male Suffrage
    Universal manhood suffrage was proclaimed in the French Constitution of 1793, but not implemented, and its later foundation in 1848 was unanticipated.
  183. [183]
    [PDF] The European Case for Male Suffrage in the Nineteenth Century
    A series of successive reforms, extending the right to vote increased the numbers remarkably, now being 6.5 per cent of the population (1887), later 12 per cent.
  184. [184]
    Universal manhood suffrage - Wikipedia
    Universal manhood suffrage is a form of voting rights in which all adult male citizens within a political system are allowed to vote, regardless of income, ...
  185. [185]
    [PDF] THE EARLY ADOPTION OF UNIVERSAL MALE SUFFRAGE, 1810 ...
    This argument is explored by looking at the politics of New. Granada between 1848 and 1853, in the context of the European revolutions which brought the issue ...<|separator|>
  186. [186]
    [PDF] universal male suffrage and the political - Dialnet
    During the 19th century, debates about universal suffrage in Europe and the Americas were marked by deliberations about its meaning and impact on society ...
  187. [187]
    Women in Parliament, a historical view | Epthinktank
    Oct 4, 2012 · In 1906, Finland (part of the Russian empire at the time) became the first European country to introduce women's suffrage, which quickly led to ...Missing: continental | Show results with:continental
  188. [188]
    Women's right to vote in Europe
    The first voices in Europe to demand political participation for women were heard during the French Revolution and the revolutions of 1848.
  189. [189]
    Votes for women! | Europeana
    Sep 14, 2024 · When did male and female voting become equal in the European Union? ; Finland, 1906 ; France, 1944 ; Germany, 1918 ; Greece, 1952.
  190. [190]
    Women's Suffrage by Country - InfoPlease
    1918 Austria, Germany, Poland, Russia; 1919 Netherlands; 1920 United States; 1921 Sweden; 1928 Britain, Ireland; 1930 South Africa 3; 1931 Spain; 1934 Turkey ...
  191. [191]
    Women's Suffrage
    Unless otherwise indicated, the date signifies the year women were granted the right both to vote and to stand for election. The countries listed below ...
  192. [192]
    International Women's Suffrage Timeline: 1851-Present - ThoughtCo
    Jun 10, 2025 · When did various countries around the world extend the right to vote (and hold public office) to women on the same basis as men?<|separator|>
  193. [193]
    Suffrage Abroad | Historic Denver/Molly Brown House Museum
    Switzerland was the last major European country to grant women equal suffrage. This didn't happen until 1971. However, some parts of the country did not allow ...Missing: continental | Show results with:continental
  194. [194]
    How continental Europe (and the Isle of Man) led the way on suffrage
    Feb 9, 2018 · Robert Lee writes that the Finns were 20 years ahead of Britain in establishing universal suffrage for men and women.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline<|separator|>
  195. [195]
    Women in Japan Were Granted the Right to Vote | Tokyo Weekender
    Dec 17, 2020 · Japan's General Election Law was revised on December 17, 1945, granting suffrage to women for the first time in the nation's history.
  196. [196]
    Women's Right to Vote in China - (RYB) Culture of Peace
    Women in China officially gained the right to vote on April 12, 1947, when the Republic of China's constitution took effect.<|separator|>
  197. [197]
    A World Tour of Women's Suffrage - OER Project
    Nations in East and Southeast Asia gave women the right to vote at various times. Mongolia led the way in 1924. Thailand soon followed in 1932. Women in China ...
  198. [198]
    Women's Right to Vote in Turkey - Women's Suffrage
    The full right to vote and stand for national elections granted on December 5, 1934, a landmark date in Turkish history.
  199. [199]
    Women's Right to Vote in Indonesia - (RYB) Culture of Peace
    This article explores the journey of Indonesian women's voting rights, highlighting the key date of women's suffrage, significant female figures who shaped this ...
  200. [200]
    Women's Right to Vote in Pakistan - (RYB) Culture of Peace
    Women's Right to Vote in Pakistan: A Milestone in Equality & Political Participation, gained in 1947, the year of the country's independence.
  201. [201]
    Saudi Arabia's women vote in election for first time - BBC News
    Dec 12, 2015 · Women in Saudi Arabia have cast their first votes in the country's history, in municipal elections. Women were also standing as candidates, another first.
  202. [202]
    Women's rights in the Islamic world – DW – 09/27/2017
    Sep 27, 2017 · In Egypt, women gained the right to vote in 1956, in Tunisia in 1959 and in Mauretania in 1961. In Iran, women gained suffrage in 1963, after a ...
  203. [203]
    Looking back at the election in Pakistan: What kept women voters ...
    Why did ten million fewer women vote in this year's general election in Pakistan? DR MONA MORGAN-COLLINS discusses the reasons for the reduced turnout and ...
  204. [204]
    Grand National Assembly of Türkiye | Historical data on women
    On 3 April 1930, women were granted the right to vote and stand for election in local elections. in 1934 a new constitution was introduced that raised the ...
  205. [205]
    the early adoption of universal male suffrage, 1810-1853
    Dec 13, 2021 · Democracy in Spanish America: the early adoption of universal male suffrage, 1810-1853 | Latin American Centre.
  206. [206]
    Elections and Democracy in South America before 1930 (Chapter 2)
    Jun 4, 2025 · Some South American countries established broad suffrage rights during the nineteenth century and a few even enacted universal male suffrage.
  207. [207]
    [PDF] Chronology of Women's Suffrage in Latin America
    Chronology of Women's Suffrage in Latin America. Ecuador. 1929. Brazil. 1932. Uruguay. 1932. Cuba. 1934. El Salvador. 1939. Dominican Republic 1942. Panama.
  208. [208]
    El Voto Femenino - Wilson Center
    Aug 12, 2020 · In 1929, Ecuador became the first nation in Latin America to grant women the right to vote. Since then, almost all democratic Latin American ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  209. [209]
    Women's Right to Vote in Latin America - Hispanic Outlook
    Latin American women fought for the right to vote, with key movements in the 1920s-30s. Ecuador first granted national voting rights in 1929, and universal ...
  210. [210]
    History of Latin America - Political Challenges, Revolutions ...
    Ecuador in 1929 became the first Latin American nation to adopt woman suffrage, though it still required literacy to vote (and far fewer women than men could ...
  211. [211]
    Cape Qualified Franchise - Wikipedia
    The Cape Qualified Franchise was the system of multi-racial franchise that was adhered to in the Cape Colony, and in the Cape Province in the early years of ...
  212. [212]
    VOTING, NATIONHOOD, AND CITIZENSHIP IN LATE-COLONIAL ...
    Jul 24, 2018 · In the face of considerable scepticism from some British commentators, elections by secret ballot and adult suffrage emerged as central ...
  213. [213]
    Senegal: Gender and Colonial Legacy – AHA
    Sep 1, 2016 · Ever since it secured independence from France in 1960, Senegal has indeed had female suffrage.
  214. [214]
    A Long Walk To Universal Franchise In South Africa
    Universal franchise involves the extension of the right to vote to all citizens. Historically, universal suffrage is a relatively recent basis for political ...
  215. [215]
    [PDF] African Political Institutions and the Impact of Colonialism
    Conventional wisdom proposes deep historical roots for authoritarianism in Africa: either colonial “decentralized despotism” or enduring structural features. We ...
  216. [216]
    Women's Suffrage
    It is not uncommon, in countries previously under colonial rule, for women to have been granted the rights to vote and be elected by the colonial administration ...
  217. [217]
    VOTING, NATIONHOOD, AND CITIZENSHIP IN LATE-COLONIAL ...
    secret ballot and adult suffrage emerged as central features of the end of British rule in Africa. This article considers the trajectories of electoral ...
  218. [218]
    Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government ...
    Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue, and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives.
  219. [219]
    [PDF] Žs Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?
    The remaining empirical analysis utilizes more recent polling data to help explain why women and men vote so differently. We find that there is a greater gender ...
  220. [220]
    the contribution of women's suffrage to the growth of social spending ...
    Using historical data from six Western European countires for the period 1869-1960, we provide evidence that social spending out of GDP increased by 0.6-1.2% in ...
  221. [221]
    [PDF] The Economics and Politics of Women's Rights
    Women's political rights (as voters and as representatives) have been shown to have a substantial impact on policy outcomes and favor the public pro- vision ...
  222. [222]
    [PDF] Female Political Representation and Substantive Effects on Policies
    In developing countries, female representation improves public goods like education and health. In developed countries, it may not affect spending, but can ...
  223. [223]
    Women's Suffrage: Causes and Consequences - Annual Reviews
    Jun 17, 2025 · Finally, a growing body of scholarship has shown how suffrage led to expansions of early welfare state policies. Future work should examine ...
  224. [224]
    https://www.bundestag.de/en/parliament/history/parliamentarism/weimar/weimar-200326
  225. [225]
    What do women want? Female suffrage and the size of government
    Indeed, Lott and Kenny (1999) found that the introduction of women's suffrage in U.S. states increased state government expenditure immediately by 14%, followed ...
  226. [226]
    The enfranchisement of women and the welfare state - ScienceDirect
    The model's main predictions are that the decision to enfranchise women is affected negatively by the gender gaps in wages and in the preferences for public ...
  227. [227]
    [PDF] Women's Suffrage and Political Polarization
    Dec 31, 2018 · The dataset covers congressmen from 48 states, allowing us to empirically test the effect of women's suffrage on their change of ideology ...
  228. [228]
    German Bundestag - The Weimar Republic (1918 - 1933)
    Although a few new political parties were founded, the party system of the Weimar Republic showed a remarkable continuity in relation to the imperial system.
  229. [229]
    The Weimar Republic - Holocaust Encyclopedia
    The social and economic upheaval that followed World War I powerfully destabilized the Weimar Republic, Germany's fledgling democracy, and gave rise to many ...
  230. [230]
    Transition to broader-based politics: The role of suffrage extension ...
    The distribution of political power is fundamental in any political system. Amongst many other factors, voting rights have arguably been a central element of ...
  231. [231]
    Woman Convicted for Voter Fraud Scheme - Department of Justice
    Nov 21, 2023 · Kim Phuong Taylor, 49, of Sioux City, perpetrated a scheme to fraudulently generate votes for her husband in the primary election for Iowa's 4th US ...
  232. [232]
    https://www.ncsl.org/resources/details/states-consider-options-to-ensure-that-noncitizens-arent-voting
  233. [233]
    Heritage Database | Election Fraud Map | The Heritage Foundation
    Jul 28, 2025 · The Heritage Foundation's Election Fraud Map is an interactive tool providing a sampling of proven instances of election fraud across the ...Explore the Data · Categories of Election Fraud · About · Interactive Graphics
  234. [234]
    How widespread is election fraud in the United States? Not very
    Oct 28, 2024 · Voter fraud is minuscule in US elections. Share of reported cases of fraud over the past 13 to 38 years is less than 1%.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  235. [235]
    Do non-citizens vote in U.S. elections? - ScienceDirect.com
    Non-citizen voting likely changed 2008 outcomes including Electoral College votes and the composition of Congress. •. Voter photo-identification rules have ...
  236. [236]
    States Consider Options to Ensure That Noncitizens Aren't Voting
    Jan 30, 2025 · Is noncitizen voting a problem? Some states have been trying to find out. In 2024, Georgia conducted a citizenship audit of its voter rolls and ...Missing: incidence | Show results with:incidence
  237. [237]
    Voter identification | MIT Election Lab
    Jun 10, 2021 · All states have voter identification requirements, ranging from simply announcing one's name to showing an official photo ID card.
  238. [238]
    The Effects of Voter ID Notification on Voter Turnout in the United ...
    Voter identification (ID) laws currently exist in the majority of states in the United States. Advocates see them as necessary to ensure electoral integrity ...Missing: measures | Show results with:measures
  239. [239]
    Protect Electoral Integrity and Enhance Voter Participation
    Voting at the federal, state, and local levels is fundamental to American democracy, and citizens must have confidence in electoral systems, processes, ...
  240. [240]
    The Historical Expansion of Voting Rights in the United States
    May 30, 2024 · Voting rights in the United States have evolved over time with the passage of new election laws and Constitutional amendments.
  241. [241]
    U.S. Congress Bans Literacy Tests for Voting | Research Starters
    The U.S. Congress's ban on literacy tests for voting, established through the Voting Rights Act of 1975, marked a significant advancement in the protection ...
  242. [242]
    What Justifies Electoral Voice? J. S. Mill on Voting - Oxford Academic
    Apr 12, 2024 · Abstract. Mill advocates plural voting on instrumentalist grounds: the more competent are to have more votes. At the same time, ...A personal injustice? · Two popular arguments · A solution: dual justification of...
  243. [243]
    Women's suffrage and the growth of the welfare state | Public Choice
    Evidence indicates that this extension of voting rights increased Swiss social welfare spending by 28% and increased the overall size of the Swiss government.Missing: impact studies
  244. [244]
    Women's Suffrage and the Growth of the Welfare State - jstor
    fect on social welfare spending, suggests that the overall effect of women's suffrage on total government spending in Switzerland is around 12%. 5 ...
  245. [245]
    The Case Against Democracy | The New Yorker
    Oct 31, 2016 · If most voters are uninformed, who should make decisions about the public's welfare? ... Voter ignorance has worried political philosophers since ...
  246. [246]
    Epistocracy: a political theorist's case for letting only the informed vote
    Jul 23, 2018 · According to Brennan, we'd be better off if we replaced democracy with a form of government known as “epistocracy.” Epistocracy is a system in ...
  247. [247]
    [PDF] Demographic Objections to Epistocracy: A Generalization - PhilArchive
    May 3, 2021 · We develop what we call the objection from selection bias to epistocracy: a procedure that selects voters on the basis of their observed ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates
  248. [248]
    The Power of the Multitude: A Realistic Defense of Elections
    Jan 18, 2024 · It proceeds by comparing competitive elections and universal suffrage with their most plausible concrete alternatives: a political meritocracy ...
  249. [249]
    These states passed new 2023 voting laws. Here's what it means for ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · At least 14 states enacted 17 restrictive voting laws this past year that will make it more difficult to vote.
  250. [250]
    Battleground 2024: How New Voting Laws Will Impact the Election
    Oct 7, 2024 · As the 2024 election approaches, a wave of new election laws will be put to the test for the first time in a presidential election.<|separator|>
  251. [251]
    State Voting Laws Roundup: October 2025
    ### Summary of New Restrictive Voting Laws Enacted in 2025
  252. [252]
    Text - H.R.22 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): SAVE Act
    An Act to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for ...
  253. [253]
    Golden votes to pass bipartisan SAVE Act
    Apr 10, 2025 · Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) today voted for the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. The bill passed the House 220- 208, with four Democrats ...<|separator|>
  254. [254]
    9 Things to Know About the Proposed SAVE Act - National...
    Mar 27, 2025 · Congress and many state legislatures are focusing on the same thing: ensuring that only U.S. citizens can vote.The U.S. House is expected to ...
  255. [255]
    The SAVE Act Status: Now is the Time to Stop it in the Senate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Already passed by the House, the SAVE Act would undermine voting access – especially for people most harmed by climate change.
  256. [256]
    Mobile EU citizens: Council strengthens rules on right to vote and ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · For example, citizens may not vote in more than one EU country in the same European elections, which can also be a criminal or administrative ...Missing: 2023-2025 | Show results with:2023-2025
  257. [257]
    Council of Europe: new guidelines on voter registration and ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · The Council of Europe recently published guidelinesthat aim to ensure the security and privacy of voters, in the processes of registration ...