Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Drag curve

In , a drag curve represents the variation in total force acting on an or other aerodynamic body as a function of its or , typically exhibiting a characteristic U-shaped or "bucket" profile when plotted against velocity in level flight, with drag increasing at both low and high speeds due to the opposing influences of induced and parasite drag components. The total drag on an aircraft comprises parasite drag, which is independent of lift generation and includes skin friction, form (pressure), and interference effects, increasing proportionally with the square of the airspeed, and induced drag, which arises from the creation of lift via wingtip vortices and dominates at lower speeds where higher angles of attack are required to maintain altitude. At low airspeeds, induced drag is predominant, causing the left side of the curve to rise sharply, while at high speeds, parasite drag becomes the primary contributor, steepening the right side; the minimum point on the curve occurs at a specific speed where these components balance, corresponding to the maximum lift-to-drag ratio (L/D_max) and optimal aerodynamic efficiency for cruise or range performance. Closely related is the drag polar, a nondimensional form of the drag curve plotting the drag coefficient (C_D) against the lift coefficient (C_L), often approximated by the parabolic equation C_D = C_{D0} + \frac{C_L^2}{\pi \cdot AR \cdot e}, where C_{D0} is the zero-lift drag coefficient, AR is the wing aspect ratio, and e is the Oswald efficiency factor (typically 0.7–0.9 for conventional aircraft). This representation allows analysis across varying flight conditions without direct dependence on speed or density, revealing key performance metrics such as the minimum drag speed (V_{MD}) and stall characteristics, where C_D rises rapidly beyond a critical angle of attack (around 14°–16° for many airfoils) due to flow separation and stall. In practice, drag curves are derived from wind tunnel tests, computational fluid dynamics simulations, or flight data, and they inform aircraft design for fuel efficiency, maximum range, and speed envelopes, with real-world variations influenced by factors like Mach number (introducing wave drag at transonic speeds) and configuration changes (e.g., flaps or landing gear).

Fundamentals of Drag

Definition and Components

The drag polar in , which underlies the drag curve, is a graphical representation plotting the total (C_D) against the coefficient (C_L) for an or . The drag polar provides a nondimensional foundation for the drag curve, which plots total force against in level flight and exhibits a characteristic U-shaped profile derived by combining the polar with the requirement for steady flight. This curve illustrates how varies with changes in under controlled conditions, typically revealing a parabolic shape that arises from the combined effects of parasite and induced components. Parasite drag, represented by the zero-lift drag coefficient (C_{D0}), constitutes the baseline aerodynamic resistance experienced by the aircraft when no lift is being generated, making it independent of the lift coefficient. It encompasses several subcomponents: form drag, which results from pressure differences across the aircraft's bluff shapes like fuselages or nacelles; skin friction drag, stemming from the viscous interaction between the airflow and the surface of the aircraft; and interference drag, caused by the disruption of airflow at junctions between components such as wings and fuselages. These elements collectively form a speed-independent drag in coefficient terms but contribute to the flat initial portion of the drag polar at low C_L. Induced drag, in contrast, is a byproduct of lift production and increases with the square of the lift coefficient (C_L^2), dominating at higher angles of attack. It originates from the formation of wingtip vortices, where high-pressure air beneath the wing spills over to the low-pressure region above, creating counter-rotating swirling flows that trail behind the wingtips. This vortex system induces downwash, an downward deflection of airflow over the wing that effectively reduces the angle of attack and tilts the resultant aerodynamic force vector rearward, introducing a drag component. The total drag coefficient is thus the direct sum of the parasite and induced components: C_D = C_{D0} + C_{Di}, with the minimum drag coefficient on the polar occurring at C_L = 0. The C_L value where parasite drag equals induced drag in magnitude, C_L = \sqrt{\pi e AR C_{D0}}, corresponds to the condition for minimum total drag force in level flight (as velocity adjusts to maintain lift-weight balance). The drag polar is derived under key assumptions, including steady, level flight where aerodynamic forces balance (lift equals weight, thrust equals drag), and for subsonic regimes, incompressible flow to simplify the analysis by neglecting density variations with speed. These conditions allow the curve to provide a foundational tool for understanding drag behavior without the complications of unsteady motions or high-speed compressibility effects./03%3A_Aerodynamics/3.02%3A_Airfoils_shapes/3.2.03%3A_Aerodynamic_dimensionless_coefficients)

Drag Polar Equation

The drag polar equation provides the fundamental mathematical relationship between the total drag coefficient C_D and the lift coefficient C_L for an wing or the entire , assuming and neglecting effects. This equation is derived from the decomposition of total drag into its zero-lift (parasite) component and the lift-dependent (induced) component. The zero-lift drag coefficient C_{D0} represents the parasite drag due to skin friction, form drag, and , which persists even at zero lift and is independent of C_L. The induced drag coefficient C_{Di}, arising from the generation of through and , is derived using Prandtl's or the equivalent Trefftz-plane analysis, which analyzes the far-field wake energy. In , the induced drag results from the component of tilted rearward by the angle, leading to C_{Di} = \frac{C_L^2}{\pi AR e}, where AR is the wing (span squared over wing area) and e is the Oswald efficiency factor accounting for non-ideal spanwise distribution (with e = 1 for an ). Combining these components yields the standard drag polar equation: C_D = C_{D0} + \frac{C_L^2}{\pi e AR} Here, the induced drag term can be rewritten using the factor k = \frac{1}{\pi e AR}, so C_D = C_{D0} + k C_L^2. This form highlights that C_{D0} originates from viscous and pressure drag sources unrelated to lift, while the quadratic term captures the energy lost to vortex formation, scaling inversely with span efficiency and aspect ratio. The Oswald factor e typically ranges from 0.8 to 0.9 for conventional wing designs, reflecting losses from non-elliptical lift distributions, such as those in tapered or rectangular planforms; for example, e \approx 0.85 is common in general aviation aircraft. The equation produces a parabolic curve when plotting C_D versus C_L, opening upward due to the positive quadratic term, with the vertex (minimum C_D = C_{D0}) occurring at C_L = 0. However, in practical flight conditions requiring lift, the relevant design point on the polar is where parasite drag equals induced drag, at C_L = \sqrt{\pi e AR \, C_{D0}}, which corresponds to the condition for minimum total drag force in level flight (as velocity adjusts to maintain equilibrium). Typical values for C_{D0} in clean (unretracted gear, no flaps) general aviation aircraft range from 0.015 to 0.030, depending on wetted area and surface finish; for instance, a well-streamlined single-engine piston aircraft might achieve C_{D0} \approx 0.023. The shape of the drag polar is significantly influenced by wing design parameters. A higher aspect ratio AR reduces the slope of the parabolic term by increasing the denominator, thereby lowering induced drag for a given C_L—an advantage in designs prioritizing cruise efficiency, such as gliders with AR > 20. Conversely, airfoil selection affects C_{D0}, with laminar-flow profiles (e.g., NACA 6-series) enabling lower values through delayed transition to turbulent boundary layers, though they may compromise off-design performance. The Oswald factor e is modulated by planform shape and twist; rectangular wings often yield e \approx 0.8, while optimized tapered designs approach 0.9, emphasizing the trade-offs in aircraft design for balancing drag across operating conditions.

Applications in Powered Flight

Power Required Curve

The power required for steady, level flight in a powered is derived from the force, as the must balance and the power is the product of this (or ) and the flight : P_r = D \cdot V. Substituting the D = \frac{1}{2} \rho V^2 S C_D, where \rho is air density, V is , S is area, and C_D is the from the drag polar C_D = C_{D_0} + K C_L^2 (with K = \frac{1}{\pi e AR}, e as Oswald efficiency factor, AR as , and C_L = \frac{W}{\frac{1}{2} \rho V^2 S} as for W), yields P_r = \frac{1}{2} \rho S C_{D_0} V^3 + \frac{2 K W^2}{\rho S V}. This expression separates into parasitic power (proportional to V^3) and induced power (proportional to $1/V), highlighting the that shapes the curve. Graphically, the power required curve plots P_r against V, forming a characteristic U-shape with high power at low speeds due to dominant induced and high power at high speeds due to , reaching a minimum at the speed for minimum power V_{mp}. This minimum occurs where \frac{d P_r}{d V} = 0, giving V_{mp} = \left( \frac{b}{3a} \right)^{1/4}, approximately \frac{3}{4} of the minimum speed V_{md} (where a = \frac{1}{2} \rho S C_{D_0} and b = \frac{2 K W^2}{\rho S}). Steady level flight speeds are determined by intersections of this curve with the power available curve, which for propeller-driven is roughly constant with speed (engine horsepower) and for jets increases linearly as times (with decreasing at higher speeds). These intersections define the range of sustainable airspeeds, with the low-speed intersection on the "back side" of the curve being unstable. Altitude affects the power required curve through air density \rho, which decreases with height (e.g., \rho = \rho_{SL} e^{-\beta h}, \beta \approx 1/9042 m^{-1} ). Lower \rho shifts the curve rightward to higher true airspeeds for the same , increasing V_{mp} (scaling as \rho^{-1/2} for the induced term dominance) and raising the minimum P_r value, as the aircraft must fly faster to generate equivalent . For instance, in a like the , the minimum power speed is approximately 55 knots with P_r \approx 41 hp at , but these values increase at higher altitudes, requiring adjusted power settings for level flight.

Rate of Climb Analysis

The (ROC) for an is determined by the excess power available beyond that required for level flight, expressed as ROC = (P_a - P_r) / W, where P_a is power available from the system, P_r is power required to overcome , and W is the aircraft weight. This formula highlights that climb performance relies on generating surplus energy to increase altitude, with the maximum ROC occurring at the yielding the greatest excess power. The power required curve, derived from the drag polar (C_D = C_{D_0} + C_L^2 / (\pi AR e)), directly influences excess power since P_r = D \cdot V, where D is total and V is . Excess power peaks where the power available curve is farthest above the power required curve, typically at the speed for minimum power required adjusted for characteristics—often near the best speed V_y for propeller-driven aircraft. For , this optimum shifts higher due to increasing with speed, but effects from induced and parasitic components still define the baseline curve shape. Service ceiling is the maximum altitude at which the aircraft achieves a ROC of 100 ft/min, marking the practical limit for sustained climb under standard conditions. This ceiling arises from diminishing engine power output with altitude (due to reduced ) and increasing requirements to maintain excess power, which narrows the gap between P_a and P_r as forces adjust. Above this altitude, the can still level off but cannot climb effectively. Aircraft weight and configuration significantly alter optimal climb performance. Increased weight reduces excess power per unit mass, lowering and shifting V_y to a higher to compensate for greater induced . Similarly, configurations like extended flaps increase (primarily induced), reducing excess power and necessitating a higher climb speed or lower until retracted for clean flight. For example, the F-16 Fighting Falcon achieves an initial ROC of approximately 50,000 ft/min at sea level in clean configuration, but this rate decreases rapidly with altitude due to drag curve shifts from density changes and sustained power limitations.

Fuel Efficiency Implications

In cruise flight for powered aircraft, the drag curve plays a pivotal role in determining fuel efficiency by identifying speeds that minimize drag relative to lift, thereby reducing the thrust—and thus fuel flow—required to maintain level flight. For jet aircraft, specific fuel consumption (SFC) is defined as fuel flow per unit thrust, so fuel burn is directly proportional to drag since thrust equals drag in steady cruise. The speed for maximum lift-to-drag ratio (L/D_max), derived from the drag polar where total drag is minimized for the given weight, yields the best range by maximizing distance per unit fuel. In contrast, best endurance occurs at the minimum power-required speed, which for propeller-driven aircraft is lower than L/D_max (approximately 76% of that speed for parabolic drag polars), as it minimizes fuel flow per unit time by optimizing power rather than thrust. For jets, however, both optimal range and endurance align closely with L/D_max due to constant SFC and fuel flow scaling with drag. This relationship is formalized in the Breguet range equation for , which quantifies how aerodynamic efficiency from the drag curve extends operational range: R = \frac{V}{c} \left( \frac{L}{D} \right) \ln \left( \frac{W_i}{W_f} \right) Here, R is range, V is cruise speed, c is SFC, L/D is the (maximized at the drag curve's minimum total drag point, corresponding to the optimal C_L / C_D from the drag polar C_D = C_{D0} + k C_L^2), W_i is initial weight, and W_f is final weight after fuel burn. Achieving L/D_max in this equation directly amplifies range, as higher L/D values—enabled by the drag curve's low-drag regime—allow greater distance for the same fuel load, assuming constant SFC and speed. Drag minimization strategies, informed by the drag curve's components (parasite and induced drag), significantly enhance in . High (AR) wings, typically around 9 for modern airliners, reduce induced drag (proportional to $1/AR) and contribute to peak L/D values of 15-20 by shifting the drag polar downward. aerodynamic designs further lower parasite drag through smooth surfaces, flush rivets, and anti-contamination coatings like riblets, which emulate shark skin to cut skin friction by 1-2%, translating to proportional reductions in and burn. These approaches prioritize the drag curve's minimum point, enabling sustained efficiency without excessive structural weight penalties. A key arises when prioritizing speed over : operating above L/D_max speed shifts dominance to parasite , which varies quadratically with (D \propto V^2), causing —and fuel consumption—to rise quadratically as well for constant SFC jets. For instance, a 20-30% speed increase above L/D_max can double fuel burn rates, eroding range gains despite shorter flight times. Commercial jets exemplify this balance, achieving L/D ≈ 18 at Mach 0.8 cruise (near L/D_max), which supports ranges exceeding 5,000 nautical miles on typical fuel loads, as seen in designs like the 777.

Applications in Gliding

Sink Rate Determination

In unpowered , the steady sink rate V_s is derived from the balance between the glider's and aerodynamic , where the rate of loss equals the power dissipated by . Specifically, V_s = \frac{D V}{W}, with D as total , V as , and W as ; for small glide angles, this simplifies to V_s \approx \left( \frac{C_d}{C_l} \right) V, using the drag polar C_d = C_{d0} + k C_l^2 to relate coefficients at a given C_l \approx \frac{2W}{\rho V^2 S}. The minimum sink rate occurs at the minimizing V_s, analogous to the minimum power required point on the drag curve, where C_{l_{ms}} = \sqrt{3 C_{d0}/k} and total C_d = 4 C_{d0}, yielding V_{ms} \approx 0.76 V_{L/D_{max}}. The drag polar significantly influences achievable sink rates, as low parasite drag coefficient C_{d0} (from smooth surfaces and efficient fuselages) and high aspect ratio wings (reducing induced drag factor k = 1/(\pi AR e)) shift the polar downward, enabling lower V_s. For high-performance sailplanes, minimum sink rates are typically 0.6-1.0 m/s, with modern designs achieving around 0.6 m/s through optimized polars featuring C_{d0} \approx 0.008 and AR > 30. Typical minimum sink speeds range from 40-60 knots for sailplanes, depending on wing loading and polar shape, as seen in polar curves where the lowest point on the sink rate versus airspeed plot defines this condition. The best glide angle \theta, which minimizes horizontal distance loss per unit altitude, approximates \theta \approx C_d / C_l = 1/(L/D) for small angles and reaches its minimum at maximum L/D, distinct from the minimum sink condition but derived from the same polar. Polar optimization extends endurance in weak lift.

Best Glide Speed Factors

The best glide speed in a glider, which maximizes the (L/D) for optimal distance over the ground in still air, must be adjusted based on weight to maintain performance. As weight increases, the optimal airspeed scales with the of the weight-to-reference weight ratio, ensuring the required equals the increased weight while preserving the maximum L/D. For instance, a 10% increase in weight necessitates approximately a 5% higher airspeed to achieve this balance. In the FAA Glider Flying Handbook, examples illustrate this effect: at 800 pounds, best L/D occurs at 60 knots, rising to 73 knots at 1,200 pounds and 83 knots at 1,600 pounds. Wind conditions significantly alter the effective best glide speed to minimize ground distance loss, particularly for headwinds and tailwinds, while crosswinds require directional adjustments. In a headwind, pilots increase above the still-air optimum to compensate for reduced groundspeed and maximize ; a of thumb is to add half the headwind component to the zero-wind best L/D speed. Conversely, in a tailwind, reduce the speed by half the tailwind component, though never below minimum speed to avoid excessive . For crosswinds, maintain the adjusted but apply a crab angle to track the desired ground path without sideslipping. An example from glider operations demonstrates this: in a 20-knot headwind, a pilot adds 10 knots to the still-air best glide speed of 50 knots, resulting in a 60-knot for optimal ground coverage. Vertical air currents, such as in or , prompt speed adjustments relative to the unadjusted minimum to optimize altitude preservation or gain. In rising air like , shift to minimum speed to maximize time aloft and climb , allowing the glider to circle efficiently within the . In sinking air, increase speed beyond best L/D to minimize time spent descending and reduce total altitude loss. These adjustments derive from lines on the glider's , balancing vertical motion with horizontal progress. Configuration changes, such as deploying flaps or airbrakes, modify the drag polar and thus shift the best glide speed, often at the cost of overall L/D efficiency. Flaps typically increase the zero-lift drag coefficient (C_{d0}), lowering the speed for maximum L/D while degrading the ratio itself; for example, positive flap settings in applicable gliders reduce best glide speed by 5-10 knots compared to configuration but worsen glide performance. Airbrakes or spoilers, common in gliders, similarly elevate drag, requiring a lower airspeed for the new optimum L/D but primarily used for descent control rather than extended gliding. Pilots avoid such configurations during maximum-range glides unless necessary for adjustments.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Aerodynamics of Flight - Federal Aviation Administration
    The coefficient of drag curve (orange) increases very rapidly from 14° AOA and completely overcomes the lift curve at 21° AOA. The lift/drag ratio. (green) ...
  2. [2]
    The Aircraft Drag Polar | AeroToolbox
    The resulting drag curve is often called a drag bucket as the plot resembles a bucket with high drag at speed extremes (low and high) and a minimum drag value ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Drag of a Sphere | Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Jun 30, 2025 · The drag for each case number is noted on the figure at the top of the page near the drag curve. Cases of Flow Past a Cylinder and a Sphere.
  4. [4]
    Chapter 4. Performance in Straight and Level Flight – Aerodynamics ...
    The intersections of the thrust and drag curves in the figure above obviously represent the minimum and maximum flight speeds in straight and level flight.
  5. [5]
    Induced Drag Coefficient | Glenn Research Center - NASA
    Jul 27, 2023 · This additional force is called induced drag because it faces downstream and has been “induced” by the action of the tip vortices. It is also ...
  6. [6]
    The Drag Coefficient
    The drag coefficient is a number that aerodynamicists use to model all of the complex dependencies of drag on shape, inclination, and some flow conditions.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] 3. Drag: An Introduction - Virginia Tech
    Jan 31, 2019 · sum of the drag at zero lift and the drag due to lift. This is the approach that leads to the typical drag polar equation: CD = CD0. +. CL. 2 π ...Missing: textbook | Show results with:textbook
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Induced Drag and High-Speed Aerodynamics - Robert F. Stengel
    Drag-due-to-lift and effects of wing planform. • Effect of angle of attack on lift and drag coefficients. • Mach number (i.e., air compressibility).
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Span Efficiencies of Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers - USC
    Reference [1] gave a table of e values for 15 entire planes ranging from 0.73 for the Cessna C-310 to 0.93 for the Gulfstream G-II (both low-wing), and [7] ...
  10. [10]
    Drag and Drag Coefficient - Aerodynamics for Students
    The consequence of this physics is that most aircraft have a roughly quadratic drag curve for level flight. The graph below shows that there is a minimum ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] C9 E in Aerodynamics
    Oct 28, 2015 · Lets see what the values of E are for aspect ratios of 6 and 20. For an AR of 6, E = 0.919, while for an AR of 20, E = 0.773.
  12. [12]
    13.2 Power Required - MIT
    Figure 13.3: Typical power required curve for an aircraft. Image ... The velocity for minimum power is obtained by taking the derivative of the equation for ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] 7. Power & Thrust for Cruising Flight - Robert F. Stengel
    values with maximum thrust or power. Back Side of the. Thrust Curve. 31. Power Required for. Steady, Level Flight. 32. P = T x V. Page 17. 17. Power Required ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Cessna Skyhawk II / 100 Performance Assessment
    Jan 23, 2003 · Airspeed for minimum sink. Vmins = 63.5 mph. Minimum power required for level flight THPm = 41.06 HP. Minimum drag. Dmin = 210.1 lb. Minimum ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Airplane Flying Handbook (FAA-H-8083-3C) - Chapter 4
    Power Required. The airplane's rate of energy loss due to total drag at a given airspeed. Expressed as DV, where D = total drag and V = airspeed. Usually ...
  16. [16]
    Climbing, Ceiling & Gliding – Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles
    Recall that the possible rate of climb is proportional to the excess power available over and above that required for straight-and-level flight at the same ...Climbing Flight · Rate Of Climb & Excess Power · Descending Flight
  17. [17]
    Lockheed Martin F-16 Fighting Falcon - Military Factory
    Aug 18, 2023 · 2,622 miles (4,220 km | 2,279 nm). Rate-of-Climb 50,000 ft/min (15,240 m/min). City-to-City Ranges Operational range when compared to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    13.3 Aircraft Range: the Breguet Range Equation - MIT
    The above equation is known as the Breguet range equation. It shows the influence of aircraft, propulsion system, and structural design parameters.
  19. [19]
    IV. Aircraft Performance
    Figure 4.3 Typical power required curve for an aircraft. The velocity for minimum power is obtained by taking the derivative of the equation for Preq with ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Range and Endurance
    If we draw a line from the origin through the power required curve, the points of intersection give. Hence the smallest angle obtained by drawing the tangent ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Flight Range & Endurance – Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles
    An airplane's generic fuel flow curve will mimic the shape of a jet aircraft's thrust curve and a propeller aircraft's power-required curve. For a given ...Missing: light | Show results with:light<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Performance predictor - Aerospace America - AIAA
    Feb 1, 2018 · Currently, most commercial aircraft wings have an aspect ratio of about 9, which means the square of the wingspan is nine times larger than its ...
  23. [23]
    Surface Coatings and Drag Reduction | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    If drag is reduced, the thrust required to overcome it will be proportionally reduced and the required fuel burn will decrease. During the design phase, ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Aircraft Drag Reduction: An Overview - Chalmers Publication Library
    The optimized FCSD has the potential of reducing overall fuel consumption of large transport aircraft by at least 10% through retrofitting, resulting in ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Towards a Silent Aircraft - HAW Hamburg
    May 27, 2008 · Mission: 215 passengers (3 class), cruise Mach 0.8,. 5,000 nm range ... arrangement allows for small fan diameter (D). • L/D determines liner ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Gliding, Climbing, and Turning Flight Performance - Robert F. Stengel
    What is a “lift-drag polar”? ▫ Power and thrust: How do they vary with ... Sink rate = altitude rate, dh/dt (negative). 8. D = CD. 1. 2. PV2S = −W sinγ.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: Glider Performance
    A tangent from the origin to the polar indicates the best glide speed (best L/D). The best L/D speed is 50 knots with a sink speed of 2.1 knots. The glide ratio ...
  28. [28]
    DG-300 Flight Test - DG Aviation EN
    The DG-300 has an L/D of 42/1, a minimum sink rate of 106 feet per minute, and a 42/1 L/DMax at 48 knots, and is considered an excellent sailplane.
  29. [29]
    A Pilot's Guide to the Engine-Out Glide: The Effect of Wind on Best ...
    Jul 17, 2025 · The recommendations currently available for how to adjust vG for winds will be discussed. The aerodynamic foundation of engine-out glide ...