Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Potential energy

Potential energy is the energy possessed by an object or system due to its position within a force field or the arrangement of its internal components, representing stored energy that can be converted into other forms such as kinetic energy.^[1] This form of energy arises from conservative forces, where the work done by the force depends only on the initial and final positions, not the path taken, allowing for a well-defined potential energy function.^[2] The unit of potential energy is the joule (J), equivalent to a newton-meter, reflecting its role as the work required to assemble or position the system against the conservative force.^[3] Key types of potential energy include gravitational potential energy, which depends on an object's mass and height relative to a reference point in Earth's gravitational field, calculated as U_g = mgh where m is mass, g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²), and h is height.^[4] For instance, a 75-kg object elevated 10 meters above the ground stores about 7,350 J of gravitational potential energy, which can be released as the object falls.^[4] Another prominent form is elastic potential energy, stored in stretched or compressed elastic materials like springs, given by U_s = \frac{1}{2} k x^2 where k is the spring constant and x is the displacement from equilibrium.^[5] This energy powers devices such as catapults or shock absorbers, converting back to kinetic energy upon release.^[6] Beyond mechanical forms, potential energy encompasses electric, magnetic, chemical, and nuclear varieties, each tied to specific interactions like charged particle positions in electric fields or molecular bond configurations.^[3] The force associated with potential energy is the negative gradient of the potential function, \mathbf{F} = -\nabla U, ensuring that decreases in potential energy correspond to increases in kinetic energy, as governed by the conservation of mechanical energy in isolated systems.^[1] This principle underpins applications in physics, engineering, and everyday phenomena, from hydroelectric power generation to biochemical reactions.^[4]

Overview and History

Definition and Basic Concepts

Potential energy, denoted as U, is the energy that a physical system possesses due to its position within a force field or its internal configuration of particles, that can be converted into other forms of energy, such as kinetic energy, without dissipation when only conservative forces are present.^[1] This stored energy represents the capacity of the system to perform work when its configuration changes, arising fundamentally from interactions governed by conservative forces, where the work done by the force is independent of the path taken.^[4] In essence, potential energy quantifies the potential for motion or change inherent in the system's arrangement relative to other objects or fields.^[7] A key basic concept is that potential energy emerges specifically from conservative forces, such as gravity or electrostatic forces, which allow the definition of a potential function because the net work done in moving between two points depends only on the endpoints, not the trajectory.^[8] For intuitive understanding, consider a book held above the ground: its potential energy stems from its elevated position in Earth's gravitational field, ready to convert to kinetic energy if released.^[9] Similarly, a compressed or stretched spring stores potential energy due to the elastic deformation in its molecular configuration, which can propel an attached object upon release.^[10] These examples illustrate how potential energy is "stored" temporarily, contrasting with kinetic energy, which is associated with the system's motion. In isolated systems subject only to conservative forces, the total mechanical energy—the sum of potential energy U and kinetic energy K—remains constant, as interconversions between U and K occur without loss to other forms like heat.^[11] This conservation principle, U + K = \text{[constant](/page/Constant)}, underscores the interchangeable nature of these energy components in such systems.^[12] The specific mathematical expression for potential energy in any given scenario depends on the underlying force law, such as those for gravity or elasticity, which will be explored in subsequent sections.^[4]

Historical Background

The concept of potential energy has deep roots in ancient philosophy, tracing back to Aristotle's notion of energeia, which described the actualization of potentiality in natural processes and motion, providing an early framework for understanding stored capacities in physical systems.^[13] This idea evolved significantly in the 17th century with Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's introduction of vis viva in 1686, defined as the product of mass and the square of velocity (mv²), which served as a precursor to kinetic energy and highlighted the conservation of a quantity associated with motion, contrasting with earlier momentum-based views like Descartes' quantité de mouvement.^[13] Leibniz's work laid groundwork for distinguishing dynamic forces from positional ones, though the full separation into kinetic and potential forms emerged later. In the 18th century, the concept advanced through applications in celestial mechanics, where Pierre-Simon Laplace introduced the gravitational potential function in the 1780s within his Mécanique Céleste, enabling the calculation of gravitational forces as the gradient of a scalar potential rather than direct integration of inverse-square laws.^[14] This approach simplified analyses of planetary perturbations and stability. Complementing Laplace, Carl Friedrich Gauss developed a general theory of potential in 1839–1840, formalizing the scalar potential for attractive and repulsive forces, including gravity, and introducing key mathematical tools like spherical harmonics for geomagnetic and gravitational computations.^[15] These developments marked a shift toward using potentials to model conservative fields efficiently. The 19th century saw the formalization of potential energy as a distinct term and its integration into broader conservation principles. Scottish engineer William John Macquorn Rankine coined the phrase "potential energy" in 1853, explicitly denoting the energy stored due to position or configuration in a force field, such as gravitational or elastic systems, to distinguish it from "actual energy" (kinetic).^[16] Hermann von Helmholtz advanced this in his 1847 memoir "On the Conservation of Force," demonstrating that potential energy, alongside kinetic, remains invariant across mechanical, electrical, and chemical transformations, unifying diverse phenomena under a single conservation law.^[17] William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) further popularized these ideas in the 1850s, collaborating on thermodynamic applications and emphasizing potential's role in energy dissipation and equilibrium.^[13] This evolution reflected a pivotal post-1800 transition from momentum-centric mechanics to energy conservation, influenced by experiments like those of James Joule on heat-work equivalence, enabling solutions to complex problems such as planetary motion through potential-based variational methods rather than exhaustive force integrations.^[13] The concept's adoption revolutionized physics by providing a conserved quantity for non-contact interactions, facilitating advancements in thermodynamics and electromagnetism.^[16]

Theoretical Framework

Conservative Forces

A conservative force is a force for which the work done by the force on an object as it moves between two points depends only on the initial and final positions of the object, and not on the specific path taken between those points.^[18] This path independence implies that the work done around any closed path is zero.^[19] In mathematical terms, a vector force field \mathbf{F} is conservative if its curl vanishes everywhere in a simply connected domain, that is, \nabla \times \mathbf{F} = \mathbf{0}.^[20] This condition ensures that the line integral \int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r} along any path C connecting two points is independent of the path chosen and equals the difference in a scalar function evaluated at the endpoints.^[21] Consequently, such a force can be expressed as the negative gradient of a scalar potential function U, so \mathbf{F} = -\nabla U.^[22] Examples of conservative forces include the gravitational force acting on masses, the electrostatic force between charged particles, and the restoring force exerted by an ideal spring.^[23] In contrast, non-conservative forces, such as friction, dissipate energy in a manner that depends on the path traversed, leading to work that varies with the details of the motion.^[24] The defining properties of conservative forces form the foundation for potential energy, as they permit the storage of mechanical energy in a reversible form without net loss during motion.^[25] Specifically, the work done by a conservative force equals the negative change in the associated potential energy, \Delta U = -\int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}, which conserves the total mechanical energy in isolated systems governed solely by such forces.^[26] This reversibility distinguishes conservative forces as prerequisites for defining potential energy functions in classical mechanics.

Relation to Work

The relationship between potential energy and work arises in the context of conservative forces, which are defined such that the work they perform depends only on the initial and final positions of an object, independent of the path taken.^[27] For such forces, the change in potential energy \Delta U of a system is equal to the negative of the work W done by the conservative force: \Delta U = -W.^[25] This relation implies that when a conservative force does positive work on an object, the system's potential energy decreases, converting it into other forms such as kinetic energy.^[28] In conservative systems, this connection adapts the work-energy theorem, which generally states that the net work done on an object equals its change in kinetic energy. For forces that are exclusively conservative, the work done by these forces W_\text{conservative} equals the negative change in potential energy: W_\text{conservative} = -\Delta U.^[27] Consequently, the total mechanical energy, defined as the sum of kinetic energy K and potential energy U, remains constant: \Delta K + \Delta U = 0, provided no non-conservative forces (such as friction) perform work.^[25] This conservation holds because the work by conservative forces merely redistributes energy between kinetic and potential forms without dissipation.^[28] The vector formulation of this relation expresses the work done by a conservative force \mathbf{F} along a path as the line integral W = \int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{r}. Since \mathbf{F} = -\nabla U for a conservative force, where \nabla U is the gradient of the potential energy function, the integral becomes W = -\int \nabla U \cdot d\mathbf{r} = U_i - U_f = -\Delta U, with U_i and U_f denoting initial and final potential energies.^[25] This equality confirms the path independence of the work, as the line integral of a gradient depends solely on the endpoints.^[27] These relations enable the prediction of an object's motion in conservative fields without computing the full trajectory or integrating forces at every point, relying instead on energy differences between positions. For instance, in systems like gravitational or electrostatic fields, the path-independent nature allows straightforward analysis of energy transfers, facilitating solutions to complex dynamics through conservation principles alone.^[28]

Computing Potential Energy

The potential energy U(\mathbf{r}) for a conservative force field \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{r}) is defined such that the work done by the force along any path from a reference point \mathbf{r}_0 to \mathbf{r} equals the negative change in potential energy: W = U(\mathbf{r}_0) - U(\mathbf{r}). This leads to the general computational method via the path-independent line integral

U(\mathbf{r}) = -\int_{\mathbf{r}_0}^{\mathbf{r}} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{l},

where the integral can be evaluated analytically if \mathbf{F} is known explicitly, and U(\mathbf{r}_0) is set to an arbitrary constant, often zero.^[29]^[1] The choice of reference point \mathbf{r}_0 determines this constant and is arbitrary, as detailed in the section on Choice of Reference Level. For systems involving multiple independent conservative forces \mathbf{F}_i, the superposition principle applies because the total force is the vector sum \mathbf{F} = \sum_i \mathbf{F}_i, and the total work is the sum of individual works. Consequently, the total potential energy is the sum of the individual potentials: U(\mathbf{r}) = \sum_i U_i(\mathbf{r}).^[30] To verify a computed potential or derive the force from a given U, the relationship \mathbf{F} = -\nabla U is used, where the components are the negative partial derivatives: F_x = -\partial U / \partial x, F_y = -\partial U / \partial y, and F_z = -\partial U / \partial z. This assumes the force field is known from specific laws, as covered in later sections on gravitational and elastic potentials.^[29] In cases of complex force fields where analytical integration is impractical, numerical methods are employed to approximate the line integral or solve the gradient equation \nabla U = -\mathbf{F}, such as through discretization techniques like finite differences on a grid.

Reference and Measurement

Choice of Reference Level

The potential energy U of a system is inherently defined relative to an arbitrary zero point, meaning its absolute value lacks unique physical meaning; instead, only the change in potential energy \Delta U between states is observable and corresponds to the negative of the work done by conservative forces along a path.^[31] This arbitrariness arises because the definition of potential energy involves an indefinite integral of the force, which introduces an additive constant that can be chosen freely without affecting the laws of physics, such as energy conservation.^[30] Consequently, calculations focus on differences rather than absolute values to determine energy transfers or mechanical equilibria.^[1] Common choices for the reference level are selected for mathematical convenience or practical relevance. For inverse-distance potentials like those in gravitational or electrostatic interactions, the zero of potential energy is often set at infinite separation, where interactions vanish, simplifying the analysis of bound orbits or scattering processes.^[32] In contrast, for near-surface gravitational scenarios, such as objects on Earth, the reference is typically the ground level or the minimum height in the system, allowing straightforward computation of changes during motion without needing to account for planetary scales.^[4] These conventions ensure that the chosen zero aligns with the problem's context while preserving the invariance of \Delta U.^[33] Certain potentials, such as the Newtonian gravitational one, are unbounded below, approaching negative infinity as the separation between bodies approaches zero, which might suggest ill-defined energies for close approaches.^[34] However, since physical predictions rely solely on finite differences \Delta U, this unboundedness poses no issue; the energy conservation principle remains robust as long as the reference is consistently applied, even for highly negative absolute values in bound systems.^[31] In multi-body systems, where potential energy is the sum of pairwise contributions, maintaining a uniform reference level across all components is essential to avoid inconsistencies in the total energy. This often involves adopting a global zero, such as the configuration where all inter-body distances tend to infinity, ensuring that the collective \Delta U accurately reflects interactions without artificial offsets between subsystems.

Units and Dimensions

The SI unit of potential energy is the joule (J), defined as 1 J = 1 kg·m²/s², which is the same unit used for work and kinetic energy.^[1] This equivalence arises because potential energy represents stored work that can be converted into kinetic energy, ensuring dimensional consistency in energy transformations.^[35] The dimensional formula for potential energy is [M L^2 T^{-2}], matching that of all forms of mechanical energy and underscoring the principle of energy conservation where total energy remains invariant.^[36] In various physical systems, potential energy scales differently with mass and distance parameters. For gravitational potential, it scales linearly with the object's mass and the vertical distance from a reference level, reflecting the direct proportionality to positional changes in a uniform field.^[5] For elastic potential in deformable systems like springs, it scales quadratically with displacement from equilibrium, capturing the nonlinear storage in strained configurations.^[37] At atomic and subatomic scales, where joules yield impractically small values, potential energies are commonly expressed in electronvolts (eV), with 1 eV = 1.602 × 10^{-19} J, facilitating analysis in quantum and particle physics contexts.^[38] While absolute potential energy values depend on the selected reference level, measurable differences between states are independent of this choice and quantified in these units.^[5]

Gravitational Potential Energy

Near-Earth Approximation

In the near-Earth approximation, gravitational potential energy is modeled as a linear function of height, suitable for objects close to Earth's surface where the gravitational field can be treated as uniform. This simplification arises from the constant gravitational force F = mg, where m is the mass of the object and g is the acceleration due to gravity, approximately $9.8 \, \mathrm{m/s^2}. The potential energy U relative to a reference height is then given by

U = m g h,

where h is the height above the reference level. This formula represents the work done to lift the object against gravity in a constant field, and only differences in U (i.e., \Delta U = m g \Delta h) have physical significance for energy conservation in motion.^[39]^[40] The key assumptions underlying this approximation include a uniform gravitational field, which holds when the height h is much smaller than Earth's radius (about 6371 km), ensuring negligible variation in g over the distance. It derives directly from integrating the constant force F = mg over height, yielding a linear potential without accounting for the inverse-square nature of gravity at larger scales. This model is valid for everyday terrestrial applications, such as calculating energy changes in vertical motion near the surface. Representative examples illustrate its utility. For a book of mass 1 kg placed on a shelf 2 m above the floor, the potential energy stored is U = (1 \, \mathrm{kg})(9.8 \, \mathrm{m/s^2})(2 \, \mathrm{m}) = 19.6 \, \mathrm{J}, which converts to kinetic energy if the book falls. In larger-scale applications, hydroelectric dams harness this energy; water held at a height behind a dam, such as 50 m, releases gravitational potential energy as it flows downward, driving turbines to generate electricity—for instance, for a reservoir mass of $10^{12} \, \mathrm{kg}, the available energy difference is on the order of $5 \times 10^{14} \, \mathrm{J}. These cases highlight how \Delta U drives mechanical work in systems like pendulums or falling objects.^[39] This approximation breaks down for large heights, such as in orbital mechanics or high-altitude flights, where the varying gravitational field requires the more general two-body formula for accuracy. It remains indispensable, however, for engineering and introductory analyses on Earth-bound scales.

General Two-Body Formula

The gravitational potential energy U for two point masses M and m separated by a distance r is given by the formula

U = -\frac{G M m}{r},

where G is the gravitational constant.^[41] This expression arises from Newton's law of universal gravitation and represents the work required to separate the masses from their current positions to infinite separation.^[30] The negative sign in the formula indicates that the force is attractive, as the potential energy decreases (becomes more negative) when the masses approach each other.^[42] By convention, U = 0 when r \to \infty, reflecting that no work is needed to assemble the system from infinitely separated masses.^[42] The $1/r dependence highlights how the potential weakens inversely with separation, distinguishing it from linear approximations valid only over small distances.^[41] For extended bodies that are spherically symmetric, such as uniform spheres, the gravitational potential energy can be approximated by treating each body as a point mass located at its center of mass, provided the separation r is much larger than the bodies' radii.^[43] This equivalence follows from Newton's shell theorem, which shows that the gravitational field outside a spherical mass distribution matches that of a point mass at the center.^[43] In a multi-body system consisting of N point masses, the total gravitational potential energy is the sum of the pairwise interactions:

U = -\sum_{i < j} \frac{G m_i m_j}{r_{ij}},

where r_{ij} is the distance between masses i and j.^[30] This pairwise summation assumes no higher-order interactions beyond two-body terms, making it exact for Newtonian gravity in the absence of relativistic effects. The derivation of the two-body formula via integration over mass distributions is detailed in the section on Derivation for Gravitational Potential.^[30]

Derivation for Gravitational Potential

The gravitational potential energy for two point masses arises from Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the force \mathbf{F} between masses M and m separated by a distance r is given by \mathbf{F} = -\frac{[G](/page/Gravitational_constant) M m}{r^2} \hat{r}, where G is the gravitational constant and \hat{r} is the unit vector pointing from M to m.^[44] To derive the potential energy U(r), recall that for a conservative force, the change in potential energy is the negative of the work done by the force, \Delta U = -W, with the work computed as the line integral \int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{l}.^[44] Choosing the reference point where U(\infty) = 0, the potential energy at separation r is

\begin{aligned} U(r) &= -\int_{\infty}^{r} \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{l} \\ &= -\int_{\infty}^{r} \left( -\frac{G M m}{s^2} \right) ds \\ &= G M m \int_{\infty}^{r} \frac{1}{s^2} ds \\ &= G M m \left[ -\frac{1}{s} \right]_{\infty}^{r} \\ &= -\frac{G M m}{r}, \end{aligned}

where the integral is taken along a radial path, with s as the dummy variable for separation distance.^[44] This derivation relies on the path independence of the line integral, which holds because the gravitational force is conservative; its curl vanishes (\nabla \times \mathbf{F} = 0) for the inverse-square law, ensuring the work depends only on initial and final positions.^[44] For the two-body problem, this expression U(r) = -\frac{G M m}{r} fully captures the gravitational potential energy, though generalizations exist for systems with variable mass distributions or non-point sources by integrating over volume elements.^[44]

Sign Convention and Applications

In gravitational potential energy, the sign convention defines the potential U as negative for bound systems, where the reference point of zero potential is conventionally set at infinity. This choice arises from the integration of the gravitational force, resulting in U = -\frac{GMm}{r}, which ensures that work done by gravity is positive as objects move closer together.^[45]^[46] For such systems, the escape energy required to reach infinity with zero kinetic energy equals the negative of the potential energy, -U, representing the minimum energy input needed to unbind the system.^[45] The negative sign implies that gravitationally bound states, such as planets orbiting stars, possess negative total mechanical energy, preventing escape without external input. In these configurations, the total energy E = K + U is negative, where kinetic energy K is positive but insufficient to overcome the deeper negative potential well. Parabolic orbits, marking the boundary between bound and unbound trajectories, have zero total energy, allowing objects to coast to infinity with vanishing speed. This convention highlights the stability of bound systems like planetary orbits, where perturbations must supply energy exceeding -E to achieve escape.^[45]^[46] In orbital mechanics, the negative potential underpins the vis-viva equation, which conserves energy to relate an object's speed at any point to its orbital parameters, enabling predictions of satellite trajectories without recomputing forces at each step. For black holes, the extremely negative potential near the event horizon traps matter and light, with Newtonian approximations yielding potentials orders of magnitude deeper than Earth's, illustrating binding energies that approach infinite depth.^[47] Tidal energy harnesses gradients in this potential between Earth, Moon, and Sun, converting differential gravitational pulls into kinetic flows that drive ocean currents, powering renewable systems with global potential exceeding 3 terawatts.^[48] Modern applications leverage this convention for precision engineering. In GPS systems, satellite clocks run faster by about 45 microseconds daily due to weaker negative gravitational potential in orbit compared to Earth's surface, necessitating relativistic corrections to maintain positional accuracy within meters.^[49] Satellite launches account for escape energy in staging designs; for instance, the theoretical minimum energy for reaching low Earth orbit is roughly 32 megajoules per kilogram to overcome the planet's binding potential, while full escape to interplanetary space demands an additional approximately 30 megajoules per kilogram, guiding fuel efficiencies in missions like those to Mars.^[50]

Elastic Potential Energy

Linear Spring Model

The linear spring model provides a foundational description of elastic potential energy in systems where materials deform proportionally under applied forces, such as in ideal springs. This model assumes the material behaves linearly, with the restoring force directly opposing the deformation and proportional to its magnitude, applicable primarily to small extensions or compressions that do not exceed the elastic limit of the material.^[51]^[52] Central to this model is Hooke's law, which states that the force F exerted by the spring is F = -kx, where x is the displacement from the equilibrium position and k is the spring constant, a measure of the spring's stiffness with units of newtons per meter (N/m).^[52] The negative sign indicates the restorative nature of the force, directed toward the equilibrium. This linear relationship holds under the assumption of small deformations, where the spring's response remains proportional and reversible without hysteresis or plastic yielding.^[51] The elastic potential energy U stored in the deformed spring is given by the quadratic formula

U = \frac{1}{2} k x^2,

which quantifies the energy available to do work upon release. This expression derives from the work-energy principle, where U equals the work required to deform the spring from equilibrium, computed as the line integral of the conservative force:

U(x) = -\int_0^x F \, dx = \int_0^x k s \, ds = \frac{1}{2} k x^2.

The integration assumes a quasi-static process with negligible kinetic energy during deformation, deferring detailed treatment of dynamic effects to broader analyses of oscillatory systems. In practical applications, the linear spring model underpins the analysis of mass-spring systems undergoing simple harmonic motion (SHM), where a mass m attached to the spring oscillates with the total mechanical energy conserved as E = \frac{1}{2} k A^2, with A as the amplitude; at maximum displacement, all energy is potential (U = E), converting fully to kinetic at equilibrium.^[53] Similarly, for small angular displacements (\theta \ll 1 radian), the simple pendulum approximates SHM akin to a spring, with an effective restoring torque leading to an equivalent potential energy form that mirrors the quadratic dependence on displacement.^[54] These examples illustrate the model's utility in predicting periodic behaviors in mechanical oscillators, from engineering components to geophysical phenomena.^[53]

General Elastic Deformations

In linear elasticity, the elastic potential energy stored in a deformable solid due to general deformations is given by the integral of the strain energy density over the volume of the material:

U = \frac{1}{2} \int_V \sigma_{ij} \epsilon_{ij} \, dV

where \sigma_{ij} is the stress tensor, \epsilon_{ij} is the infinitesimal strain tensor, and the integration is performed over the volume V of the body.^[55] This expression assumes small deformations where the material response is linear, meaning stress is proportional to strain via the elasticity tensor.^[56] For isotropic materials, the relationship between stress and strain is characterized by two independent constants: Young's modulus E, which quantifies resistance to uniaxial tension or compression, and Poisson's ratio \nu, which describes the ratio of transverse to axial strain under uniaxial loading.^[57] In bulk materials, the effective spring constant k for a structural element, such as a rod of length L and cross-sectional area A, relates to Young's modulus as k = E A / L, illustrating how material stiffness scales with geometry.^[57] Poisson's ratio enters the full constitutive relations, affecting the strain energy density, for example, u = \frac{1}{2E} [\sigma_{xx}^2 + \sigma_{yy}^2 + \sigma_{zz}^2 - 2\nu (\sigma_{xx}\sigma_{yy} + \sigma_{yy}\sigma_{zz} + \sigma_{zz}\sigma_{xx})] + \frac{1}{2G} (\sigma_{xy}^2 + \sigma_{yz}^2 + \sigma_{zx}^2), where G = E / [2(1 + \nu)] is the shear modulus.^[55] This framework applies to various deformation modes in solids. In beam bending, the strain energy arises primarily from normal stresses varying linearly across the cross-section, leading to U = \int_0^L \frac{M(x)^2}{2 E I} \, dx, where M(x) is the bending moment and I is the second moment of area; this captures the energy stored during deflection under transverse loads.^[55] For torsion in cylindrical shafts, the energy is due to shear stresses, expressed as U = \int_0^L \frac{T(x)^2}{2 G J} \, dx, with T(x) the torque and J the polar moment of inertia, relevant for twisted structural components.^[56] At the atomic scale, lattice vibrations in crystals embody elastic potential energy through harmonic interatomic forces, quantized as phonons—collective modes that contribute to thermal and elastic properties without net macroscopic deformation.^[58] For larger strains beyond the linear regime, such as in elastomers, nonlinear extensions replace the quadratic strain energy density with hyperelastic models that depend on deformation invariants. Rubber elasticity, for instance, is often modeled using the neo-Hookean form W = \frac{\mu}{2} (I_1 - 3), where W is the strain energy density, \mu is a shear modulus parameter, and I_1 is the first invariant of the right Cauchy-Green deformation tensor; this accounts for entropic restoring forces in polymer networks under finite strains up to several hundred percent.^[59] More general models, like the Ogden form, extend this by incorporating multiple terms to fit experimental stress-strain data across tension, compression, and shear.^[59] The linear spring serves as a special case for these continuum descriptions in one-dimensional, small-deformation limits.^[57]

Electrostatic Potential Energy

Between Point Charges

The electrostatic potential energy between two point charges quantifies the work required to assemble the charges from infinite separation to a finite distance, under the influence of their mutual Coulomb interaction. This energy is a fundamental concept in electrostatics, applicable to discrete charge configurations where continuous distributions are not considered.^[60] For two static, point-like charges q_1 and q_2 in vacuum, separated by distance r, the potential energy U is expressed as

U = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r},

where \epsilon_0 is the permittivity of free space. This formula assumes the charges are idealized points with no spatial extent and remain at rest, neglecting relativistic or quantum effects. The potential is defined relative to zero at infinite separation, ensuring U \to 0 as r \to \infty.^[60]^[61] The sign of U reflects the nature of the interaction: positive for like charges (repulsive force, requiring external work to bring them closer) and negative for opposite charges (attractive force, with the system doing work as charges approach). This convention highlights the stability of opposite-charge configurations at finite distances. The derivation of this expression from the integral of Coulomb's law is outlined in the dedicated section on electrostatic potential energy origins.^[60]^[61] A representative example occurs in ion pairs, such as the Na^+ and Cl^- in ionic crystals, where the attractive potential energy (negative U) contributes dominantly to the lattice binding, on the order of several electronvolts per pair despite lattice summation effects. In the context of capacitor charging, the total energy stored arises from pairwise interactions between accumulated charges on the plates, approximated as point charges for small separations, yielding stored energies proportional to q^2 / (2C) for capacitance C. This energy is fundamentally stored in the electric field pervading the space between the charges.^[62]^[63]^[61] For assemblies exceeding two charges, the total electrostatic potential energy is the scalar sum over all unique pairwise contributions, as explored in the subsequent section on systems of multiple charges.^[61]

Systems of Multiple Charges

In systems consisting of multiple point charges, the total electrostatic potential energy is given by the sum over all unique pairs of charges to account for their interactions without double-counting:

U = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i \neq j} \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q_i q_j}{r_{ij}},

where q_i and q_j are the charges, r_{ij} is the distance between them, and the factor of $1/2 ensures each pair is counted once.^[61] This expression extends the pairwise potential energy for two charges by aggregating contributions from all pairs in the assembly.^[64] A notable aspect is the self-energy term for an individual point charge, which arises from the interaction of the charge with its own electric field and formally diverges to infinity in the classical point-charge model, requiring regularization techniques such as finite charge radius or quantum mechanical treatments for physical applications.^[61] In practice, this infinite self-energy is often excluded or renormalized when computing the total energy of finite systems, focusing instead on interaction energies. Applications of this formulation include calculating the electrostatic contributions to the binding energies in molecular ions, such as H₂⁺, where the potential energy from nuclear and electronic charge distributions stabilizes the ion.^[65] For continuous charge distributions, the total electrostatic potential energy can be expressed as an integral over the electric field throughout space:

U = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2} \int E^2 \, dV,

where the integration covers all space, and E is the magnitude of the electric field produced by the distribution.^[61] This field-based form is equivalent to the charge-potential integral U = \frac{1}{2} \int \rho \phi \, dV, with \rho as charge density and \phi as electric potential, and proves useful for complex geometries.^[64] In dielectric media, the presence of polarizable materials modifies the energy expression, replacing the vacuum permittivity \epsilon_0 with the material's permittivity \epsilon = \kappa \epsilon_0, where \kappa is the dielectric constant, yielding an energy density of \frac{1}{2} \mathbf{E} \cdot \mathbf{D} = \frac{\epsilon}{2} E^2 for linear isotropic dielectrics, with \mathbf{D} as the electric displacement field.^[66] This adjustment accounts for the reduced field strength and energy storage in materials like capacitors filled with insulators, enhancing energy density compared to vacuum.^[67]

Derivation from Coulomb's Law

The electrostatic force between two stationary point charges q_1 and q_2 separated by a distance r is given by Coulomb's law:

\vec{F} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r^2} \hat{r},

where \epsilon_0 is the vacuum permittivity, \hat{r} is the unit vector pointing from q_1 to q_2, and the force is repulsive if q_1 and q_2 have the same sign.^[68] This force arises from experimental observations and is fundamental to electrostatic interactions.^[68] The Coulomb force is conservative, meaning the work done by it to move a charge between two points depends only on the endpoints and not on the path taken, due to its inverse-square dependence and central nature (with zero curl in electrostatics).^[60] This path independence allows the definition of a scalar potential energy function U(r), analogous to the gravitational potential energy between masses, where the gravitational force also follows an inverse-square law but is always attractive.^[69] For static charges, the potential energy is associated solely with their positions, without time-varying fields. To derive the electrostatic potential energy, consider fixing q_1 at the origin and bringing q_2 from infinity (where U = 0) to distance r. The change in potential energy is the negative of the work done by the electrostatic force:

U(r) = -\int_{\infty}^{r} \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{l}.

Along the radial path, d\vec{l} = dr' \hat{r} (with dr' negative inward, but handled by limits), and \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{l} = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r'^2} dr', yielding

U(r) = -\int_{\infty}^{r} \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r'^2} dr' = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 q_2}{r}.

This expression is positive for like charges (requiring work against repulsion) and negative for opposite charges (releasing energy).^[60] For static configurations of point charges, this pairwise form generalizes directly, though multi-charge systems require summing over interactions while accounting for assembly order to avoid double-counting.^[70]

Magnetic Potential Energy

Dipoles in Magnetic Fields

The magnetic potential energy of a dipole in a magnetic field arises from the interaction between the dipole's magnetic moment and the external field, analogous to gravitational or electrostatic potentials but specific to magnetic configurations.^[71] For a magnetic dipole with moment \vec{\mu}, the potential energy U in a uniform magnetic field \vec{B} is given by

U = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{B} = -\mu B \cos\theta,

where \theta is the angle between \vec{\mu} and \vec{B}.^[72] This expression shows that the energy is minimized when the dipole is aligned parallel to the field (\theta = 0^\circ), reaching a maximum when anti-aligned (\theta = 180^\circ). The torque \vec{\tau} on the dipole, which tends to align it with the field, can be derived from the negative gradient of the potential energy: \vec{\tau} = -\nabla U. In a uniform field, this simplifies to \vec{\tau} = \vec{\mu} \times \vec{B}, with magnitude \tau = \mu B \sin\theta.^[73] This torque relation highlights the rotational force acting on the dipole until equilibrium is achieved at minimum potential energy. A classic example is the compass needle, a bar magnet with magnetic moment \vec{\mu} that aligns with Earth's magnetic field \vec{B} to minimize its potential energy, pointing north.^[74] In paramagnetic materials, atomic or molecular dipoles experience a similar alignment tendency in an applied field, though thermal agitation limits full alignment, leading to a net magnetization proportional to the field strength.^[75] Another application occurs in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), where the potential energy difference between aligned and anti-aligned nuclear spins in a strong magnetic field \Delta U = 2\mu B determines the energy splitting and resonance frequency for spectroscopic analysis.^[76] This formulation assumes quasi-static magnetic fields, where the field varies slowly compared to the system's response time, and neglects retardation effects, valid when the dipole size is much smaller than the wavelength of any associated electromagnetic radiation.^[77]

Current Loops and Conductors

In current-carrying conductors, such as loops or solenoids, magnetic potential energy arises from the interaction between the current and the magnetic field it generates, primarily through inductance effects. For a single circuit, the magnetic potential energy stored is given by U = \frac{1}{2} L I^2, where L is the self-inductance of the circuit and I is the steady current flowing through it.^[78] This energy represents the work done to establish the current against the opposing self-induced electromotive force, and it is conserved in the absence of dissipation.^[79] Self-inductance L quantifies how effectively the circuit's own magnetic field links with itself, as in a solenoid where L depends on the number of turns, geometry, and surrounding medium. For example, in practical inductors used in electronic circuits, this stored energy enables functions like filtering signals or storing energy in switched-mode power supplies, with typical values of L ranging from microhenries to henries.^[78] The energy formula holds under the quasi-static approximation, where currents vary slowly enough that radiative losses and retardation effects are negligible, allowing the magnetic field to be treated as effectively conservative.^[80] When two circuits interact, mutual inductance introduces an additional term to the total magnetic potential energy. For two circuits carrying currents I_1 and I_2, the interaction energy is U = M I_1 I_2, where M is the mutual inductance measuring the flux through one circuit due to the current in the other.^[78] This term can be positive or negative depending on the relative orientation of the currents, reflecting whether the fields aid or oppose each other. In transformers, mutual inductance M couples primary and secondary windings to transfer energy efficiently between circuits, with the total stored energy including both self and mutual contributions: U = \frac{1}{2} L_1 I_1^2 + \frac{1}{2} L_2 I_2^2 + M I_1 I_2.^[78] The inductance-based energy expressions are equivalent to the energy stored in the magnetic field itself. The total magnetic energy is U = \frac{\mu_0}{2} \int B^2 \, dV, integrated over all space, where B is the magnetic field and \mu_0 is the permeability of free space.^[79] For a solenoid or current loop, this integral yields the same \frac{1}{2} L I^2 when the field is confined, confirming that the energy resides in the field rather than the conductor. This equivalence underscores the macroscopic electromagnetic nature of the potential energy in such systems, distinct from microscopic dipole orientations.^[78]

Chemical Potential Energy

Molecular Bond Energies

Molecular bond energies represent the potential energy stored in the chemical bonds of molecules, arising primarily from electrostatic interactions between nuclei and electrons, augmented by quantum mechanical exchange effects that stabilize shared electron pairs in covalent bonds and electron transfer in ionic bonds.^[81] The bond dissociation energy (BDE) quantifies this, defined as the energy required to break a specific bond into neutral fragments under standard conditions, reflecting the depth of the potential energy well associated with that bond.^[82] For instance, the H–H bond in the dihydrogen molecule has a BDE of approximately 436 kJ/mol, corresponding to the energy minimum on its potential energy surface (PES) at the equilibrium bond length of about 0.74 Å.^[83] This PES describes the total molecular energy as a function of nuclear coordinates, with the equilibrium geometry occurring at a local minimum where the forces on the nuclei vanish.^[84] The quantum mechanical foundation of these bond energies relies on the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, which separates electronic and nuclear motions due to the much larger mass of nuclei, allowing the electronic energy to be computed as a function of fixed nuclear positions to generate the PES.^[85] Within this framework, methods like Hartree-Fock theory solve the electronic Schrödinger equation by assuming a single Slater determinant wavefunction, providing approximate bond energies, while density functional theory (DFT) improves accuracy by incorporating electron correlation effects through exchange-correlation functionals, often yielding bond energies within chemical accuracy (about 4 kJ/mol) for many systems.^[86] These computational approaches reveal how quantum exchange—arising from the indistinguishability of electrons—lowers the energy below classical electrostatic predictions, enabling stable covalent bonding.^[81] In practical applications, molecular bond energies serve as the basis for chemical potential energy storage in fuels like hydrocarbons, where high-energy C–H and C–C bonds store energy derived from their formation, and in batteries, such as lithium-ion systems, where intercalation involves bond rearrangements that store and release energy upon charge-discharge cycles.^[87] The release of this stored energy occurs when bonds are broken or reformed during chemical processes, converting potential energy into other forms.^[88]

Role in Chemical Reactions

In chemical reactions, the potential energy landscape is described by the potential energy surface (PES), a multidimensional map of potential energy as a function of atomic positions for the reacting system. Along the reaction coordinate—the minimum-energy pathway connecting reactants to products—the PES features a transition state at the saddle point, where the potential energy reaches a local maximum. The activation energy E_a corresponds to the difference in potential energy \Delta U between the reactants and this transition state, determining the energy barrier that must be overcome for the reaction to proceed.^[89] Reactions are characterized as endothermic or exothermic based on the sign of the potential energy change \Delta U: positive for endothermic processes where products have higher potential energy than reactants, and negative for exothermic ones where energy is released. While \Delta U provides insight into the energetic driving force, the overall feasibility and direction of a reaction under constant temperature and pressure are governed by the Gibbs free energy change, given by

\Delta G = \Delta U - T \Delta S + P \Delta V,

where T is temperature, \Delta S is the entropy change, and \Delta V is the volume change; a negative \Delta G indicates a spontaneous reaction.^[90] Representative examples illustrate these concepts: combustion of hydrocarbons, such as methane with oxygen, is a highly exothermic reaction that releases substantial potential energy stored in molecular bonds, converting it to heat and light with \Delta U on the order of hundreds of kJ/mol. In photosynthesis, light energy drives an endothermic process in plants, storing potential energy by forming glucose from carbon dioxide and water, effectively increasing \Delta U. Catalysts, such as enzymes in biological systems, accelerate reactions by stabilizing the transition state and lowering the activation energy barrier through an alternative pathway on the PES, without altering the overall \Delta U.^[91]^[92]^[93] These potential energy changes, including differences arising from molecular bond energies, are experimentally measured using calorimetry, which detects heat transfer at constant pressure (bomb calorimetry) or volume to quantify enthalpies and infer bond dissociation energies with precisions often better than 1 kJ/mol.^[94]

Nuclear Potential Energy

Strong Nuclear Force Potential

The strong nuclear force, responsible for binding protons and neutrons within atomic nuclei, is modeled at low energies by short-range potentials that capture its attractive nature over distances of approximately 1 femtometer (fm).^[95] This force dominates over electromagnetic repulsion at nuclear scales, enabling stable nuclear structures.^[96] The foundational model is the Yukawa potential, proposed by Hideki Yukawa in 1935, which describes the interaction between nucleons as an exchange of massive particles, later identified as pions.^[95] The potential takes the form

U(r) \approx -\frac{g^2}{4\pi} \frac{e^{-m r}}{r} + \text{repulsive core at small } r,

where g is the coupling constant, m is the pion mass (approximately 140 MeV/c²), and r is the separation distance; the exponential decay ensures a finite range unlike the infinite-range Coulomb potential.^[95]^[97] At distances around 1 fm, the potential is strongly attractive, while a hard repulsive core emerges for r \lesssim 0.5 fm due to overlapping quark wavefunctions and Pauli exclusion effects, preventing nucleons from collapsing.^[98] Key properties include mediation by virtual pion exchange, which imparts a spin- and isospin-dependent character to the force.^[96] The strong force exhibits charge independence, acting equally between proton-proton, neutron-neutron, and proton-neutron pairs, as the underlying quark-level interactions are flavor-blind.^[96] For mean-field approximations in nuclear structure calculations, phenomenological models like the Woods-Saxon potential are employed, given by

U(r) = -U_0 \left[1 + \exp\left(\frac{r - R}{a}\right)\right]^{-1},

where U_0 is the depth (around 50 MeV), R approximates the nuclear radius, and a sets the surface diffuseness (about 0.5-0.7 fm); this form effectively averages nucleon interactions across the nucleus.^[99] The Yukawa potential successfully explains the binding of the deuteron, the simplest nucleus (proton-neutron pair), with a binding energy of 2.224 MeV arising from the delicate balance of attraction and repulsion.^[97] Overall, the potential vanishes beyond 2-3 fm, confining its effects to nuclear dimensions and dropping to negligible values outside.^[100] This short range underpins nuclear stability while allowing for the observed binding energies in multi-nucleon systems.^[101]

Nuclear Binding Energies

Nuclear binding energy is the minimum energy required to disassemble an atomic nucleus into its constituent protons and neutrons, representing the stability imparted by the strong nuclear force. This energy originates from the attractive potential between nucleons, which overcomes the repulsive Coulomb force between protons, resulting in a net negative potential energy for the bound system. The binding energy quantifies the depth of this potential well; for instance, in light nuclei like helium-4, the total binding energy is approximately 28.3 MeV, corresponding to about 7.07 MeV per nucleon.^[102]^[103]^[104] The binding energy is calculated using the mass defect principle, derived from Einstein's mass-energy equivalence E = mc^2. The mass defect \Delta m is the difference between the mass of the isolated nucleons and the mass of the nucleus:

\Delta m = Z m_p + N m_n - M(A, Z)

where Z is the atomic number, N = A - Z is the neutron number, A is the mass number, m_p and m_n are the masses of the proton and neutron, and M(A, Z) is the nuclear mass. The total binding energy B is then B = \Delta m c^2. This approach reveals that bound nuclei have less mass than their separated parts, with the "missing" mass converted to binding energy. For deuterium (^2_1H), the binding energy is 2.224 MeV, illustrating the strong force's role in overcoming proton-proton repulsion.^[104]^[105] To model binding energies across nuclei, the semi-empirical mass formula approximates B(A, Z) by balancing nuclear and electromagnetic contributions:

B(A, Z) = a_v A - a_s A^{2/3} - a_c \frac{Z(Z-1)}{A^{1/3}} - a_a \frac{(A - 2Z)^2}{A} \pm \delta

Here, a_v \approx 15.5 MeV accounts for the volume saturation of the strong force potential; a_s \approx 16.8 MeV for surface effects reducing attraction at the nuclear boundary; a_c \approx 0.72 MeV for Coulomb repulsion; a_a \approx 23.3 MeV for asymmetry due to neutron-proton imbalance; and \delta is a pairing term favoring even-even nuclei. This formula, rooted in the liquid drop model, predicts binding energies with good accuracy for medium to heavy nuclei.^[103] The binding energy per nucleon B/A peaks at around 8.8 MeV for iron-56 and nickel-62, indicating maximum stability near A \approx 56. For lighter nuclei (A < 56), B/A increases with A due to growing strong force contributions, enabling energy release in fusion; for heavier nuclei, it decreases owing to dominant Coulomb repulsion, favoring fission. This curve explains stellar nucleosynthesis and nuclear power: fusion of hydrogen to helium releases ~7 MeV per nucleon, while uranium-235 fission yields ~200 MeV per event.^[106]^[105]^[102]

References

[1]
Potential Energy - HyperPhysics
Potential energy is energy from position or configuration, like gravitational, electric, magnetic, or elastic energy. It's the work needed to move an object ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[2]
Work, Kinetic Energy, and Potential Energy - Mechanics Map
Potential energy can come in many forms, but the two we will discuss here are gravitational potential energy, and elastic potential energy. As the names imply, ...
[3]
None
### Summary of Potential Energy from Lecture Note
[4]
8.1 Potential Energy of a System – University Physics Volume 1
This property allows us to define a different kind of energy for the system than its kinetic energy, which is called potential energy.<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Potential Energy - The Physics Classroom
Potential energy is the stored energy of position, relative to a zero position. It includes gravitational and elastic forms.Missing: authoritative sources
[6]
Potential Energy – Physics 131: What Is Physics? - Open Books
Experiments show that these three factors all contribute equally: mass, height, and gravitational strength are all of equal importance to the gravitational ...
[7]
13 Work and Potential Energy (A) - Feynman Lectures
The simplest example of the conservation of energy is a vertically falling object, one that moves only in a vertical direction.
[8]
The Master Equation for Energy Problems - Physics
Potential energy is energy associated with position. Usually we view potential energy as energy that is stored temporarily. One type of potential energy is ...
[9]
Thermodynamics: Kinetic and Potential Energy
Potential energy is energy an object has because of its position relative to some other object. When you stand at ...
[10]
Conservation of energy - Physics
Oct 13, 1999 · Conservation of mechanical energy means the total mechanical energy (potential + kinetic) remains constant with conservative forces, like ...
[11]
8. THE CONSERVATION OF ENERGY - Home Page of Frank LH Wolfs
Conservation of energy tells us that the total energy of the system is conserved, and in this case, the sum of kinetic and potential energy must be constant.
[12]
The concept of energy and its early historical development
The concept of energy and its early historical development. Published ... Lindsay, R.B. The concept of energy and its early historical development.
[13]
Pierre-Simon Laplace (1749 - 1827) - Biography - MacTutor
Pierre-Simon Laplace proved the stability of the solar system. In analysis Laplace introduced the potential function and Laplace coefficients. He also put ...
[14]
Carl Friedrich Gauss (1777 - 1855) - Biography - MacTutor
At the age of seven, Carl Friedrich Gauss started elementary school, and his potential was noticed almost immediately.Missing: date | Show results with:date
[15]
What is potential energy? - IOPscience
Feb 25, 2003 · W J M Rankine coined the term 'potential energy' 150 years ago. This paper examines why he introduced it, the evolution of its ...
[16]
Hermann von Helmholtz - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Feb 18, 2008 · On the 23rd of July in 1847, Helmholtz gave an address, “The Conservation of Force,” at the Physical Society. “Force” [Kraft], as Helmholtz uses ...Biographical note and... · Theory of Perception · Conservation laws... · Bibliography
[17]
7.4 Conservative Forces and Potential Energy - UCF Pressbooks
A conservative force is one for which work done by or against it depends only on the starting and ending points of a motion and not on the path taken.
[18]
8.2 Conservative and Non-Conservative Forces - UCF Pressbooks
A conservative force is one for which the work done is independent of path. Equivalently, a force is conservative if the work done over any closed path is zero.
[19]
[PDF] U ○ Section 4.3: Force as the gradient of potential energy ...
Theorem. For a conservative force F,. ∇ × F = 0 . Proof: The curl of a gradient is always 0... Since F can be written as a gradient,. i.e., F = − ∇U ,. ∇ × F = ...
[20]
[PDF] Conservative fields and potential functions. (Sect. 16.3)
F · dr = f (r1) − f (r0). F · dr is path independent. The line integral of conservative fields. F · dr = f (r1) − f (r0).
[21]
[PDF] PHYS 419: Classical Mechanics Lecture Notes
Theorem 2a: For any conservative force field F(r) there exists a scalar function U(r) such that F(r) = −VU(r). The function U(r) is called the potential energy.<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
[PDF] Conservative and Non-conservative Forces F - Montgomery College
The work done by a conservative force depends only on the beginning and ending positions of the object. Hence (as shown in the figure), the work done by the ...
[23]
8.2: Conservative and Non-Conservative Forces
The work done by a conservative force is independent of the path; in other words, the work done by a conservative force is the same for any path connecting two ...
[24]
[PDF] 8. Conservative Forces and Potential Energy
In particular, for any conservative force, we can define the change in potential energy of an object as minus the work done by this force. In this course ...
[25]
[PDF] Energy 2 - Duke Physics
The change in one form of energy is accompanied by an opposite change in the other. This is the defining property of conservative forces. Conservation of ...
[26]
7.4 Conservative Forces and Potential Energy - College Physics 2e
Jul 13, 2022 · Use the work-energy theorem to show how having only conservative forces implies conservation of mechanical energy. Potential Energy and ...
[27]
Potential energy and conservative forces (article) | Khan Academy
If a resistive force like friction does the negative work, then the kinetic energy transferred from the object is dissipated as thermal energy and sound.
[28]
[PDF] Lecture D8 - Conservative Forces and Potential Energy
It is clear that the potential satisfies dV = −F · dr (the minus sign is included for convenience). There are two main consequences that follow from the ...
[29]
14 Work and Potential Energy (conclusion) - Feynman Lectures
Physical work is expressed as ∫F⋅ds, called “the line integral of F dot ds,” which means that if the force, for instance, is in one direction and the object on ...
[30]
Potential energy - Richard Fitzpatrick
Fourthly, potential energy is only defined to within an arbitrary additive constant. ... potential energy between two points represents the net energy ...
[31]
Gravitational potential energy - Richard Fitzpatrick
Gravitational potential energy. ... Here, we have adopted the convenient normalization that the potential energy at infinity is zero.
[32]
chap19 - Galileo
$$mgh$ , where h is the height above an arbitrary reference level; given that the choice of reference level is arbitrary, potential energy does not have an ...
[33]
13.3 Gravitational Potential Energy and Total Energy
First, U → 0 as r → ∞ . The potential energy is zero when the two masses are infinitely far apart. Only the difference in U is important, so the choice of U = ...
[34]
The Law of Conservation of Energy and Examples - Albert.io
Feb 28, 2023 · We've now introduced three values that all have the same unit – kinetic energy, potential energy, and work. Since they have the same unit of ...
[35]
Dimensional Formula of Potential Energy - BYJU'S
Therefore, Potential Energy is dimensionally represented as [M1 L2 T-2]. ⇒ Check Other Dimensional Formulas: Dimensions of Young Modulus · Dimensions of ...
[36]
9.1: Potential Energy of a System - Physics LibreTexts
Jun 15, 2023 · A simple system embodying both gravitational and elastic types of potential energy is a one-dimensional, vertical mass-spring system. This ...
[37]
19.1 Electric Potential Energy: Potential Difference - UCF Pressbooks
On the submicroscopic scale, it is more convenient to define an energy unit called the electron volt (eV), which is the energy given to a fundamental charge ...
[38]
Gravitational Potential Energy | Physics - Lumen Learning
The gravitational potential energy of an object near Earth's surface is due to its position in the mass-Earth system. Only differences in gravitational ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[39]
standard acceleration of gravity - CODATA Value
standard acceleration of gravity $g_{\rm n}$ ; Numerical value, 9.806 65 m s ; Standard uncertainty, (exact).
[40]
AST 101: Forces, Orbits, and Energy
The potential energy available due to gravity is given by the expression. U = -G m M / d ,. where m and M are the masses of the 2 objects and d is the ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[41]
https://www.astro.sunysb.edu/fwalter/AST101/newton.html
[42]
14. GRAVITY - Home Page of Frank LH Wolfs
Gravitational Potential Energy. In chapter 8 we have discussed the relation between the force and the potential energy. Consider two particles of masses m1 and ...
[43]
Week 8: Potential Energy and Energy Conservation | Physics
Lesson 25: Potential Energy Diagrams · 25.1 Force is the Derivative of Potential · 25.2 Stable and Unstable Equilibrium Points · 25.3 Reading Potential Energy ...
[44]
Gravitational Potential Energy - HyperPhysics
Since the zero of gravitational potential energy can be chosen at any point (like the choice of the zero of a coordinate system), the potential energy at a ...
[45]
[PDF] The Gravitational Energy of a Black Hole - arXiv
An exact energy expression for a physical black hole is derived by considering the escape of a photon from the black hole. The mass of the black hole within.Missing: convention | Show results with:convention
[46]
Sun, Moon, Oceans: The Potential of Ocean Tidal Energy - Stanford
Dec 10, 2019 · Tidal potential energy involves harnessing the potential energy stored in the oceans due to the height difference of high and low tides, whilst ...
[47]
Relativity and the Global Positioning System - Physics Today
May 1, 2002 · If the GPS orbits were perfectly circular, the corrections would include just a few constant contributions: for the gravitational potential ...Gps Receivers · Rotating And Inertial Local... · The Topex Experiment
[48]
Elastic Potential Energy - HyperPhysics
According to Hooke's law, the force required to stretch the spring will be directly proportional to the amount of stretch. Since the force has the form. F ...
[49]
16.1 Hooke's Law: Stress and Strain Revisited - UCF Pressbooks
The potential energy stored in a spring is PE el = 1 2 k x 2 . Here, we generalize the idea to elastic potential energy for a deformation of any system that can ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[50]
16.5 Energy and the Simple Harmonic Oscillator | Texas Gateway
As the object starts to move, the elastic potential energy is converted to kinetic energy, becoming entirely kinetic energy at the equilibrium position. It is ...
[51]
The Simple Pendulum - Ximera - The Ohio State University
When the angle is small, perhaps less than , then . This is referred to as the small angle approximation. This greatly simplifies the differential equation:.
[52]
[PDF] Strain Energy in Linear Elastic Solids - Duke People
This last integral reduces to a constant that depends only upon the shape of the cross-section. This constant is given the variable name α. α = A. I2 z. ZZ. A.
[53]
[PDF] 16. Energy methods
Write down the equilibrium form of the work energy equation for the system. For equilibrium, we know that P = ke for all deformations e. Therefore, the work ...Missing: numerical compute field
[54]
Young's Modulus as a Spring Constant - Stanford CCRMA
Young's modulus is the Hooke's-law spring constant for the spring made from a specifically cut section of the solid material, cut to length 1 and cross- ...
[55]
[PDF] Part VII: Lattice vibrations – phonons 1 The simple harmonic oscillator
Hamiltonian contains the kinetic energy (first term) and the potential energy (second term), which here is the elastic energy stored in the deformed spring.<|control11|><|separator|>
[56]
(PDF) The Ogden model of rubber mechanics: 50 years of impact on ...
We place the Ogden model of rubber elasticity, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society 50 years ago, in the wider context of the theory of nonlinear ...
[57]
https://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Young_s_Modulus_Spring_Constant.html
[58]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 8: Electrostatic Energy
We also know, from the principle of superposition, that if we have many charges present, the total force on any charge is the sum of the forces from the others.
[59]
8.2 Ionic Bonding
The electrostatic attraction energy between ions of opposite charge is directly proportional to the charge on each ion (Q 1 and Q 2 in Equation 8.1). Thus, more ...
[60]
Electrostatic Energy - Richard Fitzpatrick
This expression implies that the potential energy of a continuous charge distribution is stored in the electric field generated by the distribution ...
[61]
[PDF] Electric potential invariants and ions-in-molecules effective ...
Dec 15, 2016 · In perturbation theory, the energy of the molecular ion modified by the external potential is a sum of terms: the energy of the static ...
[62]
Energy density within a dielectric medium - Richard Fitzpatrick
The electrostatic energy density inside a dielectric medium is given by \begin{displaymath} U = \frac{1}{2} {\bf E}\!\cdot\!{\bf D}. \end{displaymath}
[63]
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 10: Dielectrics - Caltech
10–4The electrostatic equations with dielectrics. Now let's combine the above result with our theory of electrostatics. The fundamental equation is ∇⋅E=ρϵ0.
[64]
[PDF] 08. Electric potential and potential energy - DigitalCommons@URI
Sep 25, 2020 · By construction, the potential energy has the value zero at this position. We are free to choose the reference position. Some choices are more ...
[65]
[PDF] Chapter 4 The Electric Potential
Electric potential (V) is a function derived by dividing potential energy by charge, and its units are J/C (joules per coulomb).
[66]
Magnetic Potential Energy - HyperPhysics
Magnetic potential energy depends on a magnetic dipole's orientation in a field, and is lowest when aligned. It relates to magnetic torque on a current loop.
[67]
The magnetic dipole moment - Physics
For a coil with N turns, m = NIA. The torque is then given by: t = m ´ B. A loop, or coil, in a uniform magnetic field has a potential energy given by: U = -m · ...
[68]
[PDF] Magnetic Dipoles Magnetic Field of Current Loop i - MRI Questions
Oct 24, 2006 · The potential energy on one dipole from the magnetic field from the other is: 1. 2. 1. 2 z z. U. B μ. = − ⋅. = − μ B. (choosing the z-axis for ...
[69]
[PDF] 32-1 gauss' law for magnetic fields - UF Physics
The simplest magnetic structure that can exist and thus be enclosed by a Gaussian surface is a dipole, which consists of both a source and a sink for the field ...Missing: NMR | Show results with:NMR
[70]
12.7 Magnetism in Matter – University Physics Volume 2
Paramagnetic materials have partial alignment of their magnetic dipoles with an applied magnetic field. This is a positive magnetic susceptibility. Only a ...
[71]
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance - HyperPhysics
The magnetic potential energy difference is hυ = 2μB. The short table of Larmor frequencies below is from Hobbie, Ch 17 and Becker. An extensive list including ...
[72]
[PDF] Electromagnetic Fields and Energy - Chapter 9: Magnetization
May 9, 2022 · The sources of magnetic field in matter are the (more or less) aligned magnetic dipoles of individual electrons or currents caused by ...
[73]
Magnetic energy - Richard Fitzpatrick
The energy stored in an inductor is actually stored in the surrounding magnetic field. Let us now obtain an explicit formula for the energy stored in a ...
[74]
[PDF] Inductance and Magnetic Energy
This coefficient L is called the self-inductance of the coil, which is often shortened to the coil's inductance or inductivity. Now let the current through the ...
[75]
17 The Laws of Induction - Feynman Lectures - Caltech
But so long as the currents are changed slowly, the magnetic field will at each instant be nearly the same as the magnetic field of a steady current. We will ...
[76]
The Basics of Covalent Bonding in Terms of Energy and Dynamics
We summarize the mechanistic bonding models and the debate over the last 100 years, with specific applications to the simplest molecules: H 2 + and H 2.
[77]
Types of Molecular Bonds – University Physics Volume 3
An ionic bond forms when an electron transfers from one atom to another. A covalent bond occurs when two or more atoms share electrons. A van der Waals bond ...
[78]
Chemical Bonding in the H 2 Molecule
For comparision, the experimental H-H bond length is 0.74 Å and the experimental bond dissociation energy is 436 kJ/mole or 4.52 eV. H-H Chemical Bond. As ...Missing: mol | Show results with:mol
[79]
[PDF] The Potential Energy Surface (PES)
• But, the PES should not depend on the absolute location of the atoms, only on their location relative to one another (i.e., the molecular geometry). • So ...
[80]
[PDF] The Born-Oppenheimer Approximation
equation for the motion of the nuclei on a given Born-Oppenheimer potential energy surface: [ ˆ. TN + T00 kk + Ukk] χk(R) = Eχk(R). (25). This equation clearly ...
[81]
[PDF] Density Functional Theory - Department of Chemistry
Hybrid DFT was a breakthrough. Bond. Barrier energies heights. Hartree-Fock theory ... and algorithms to perform a HF and DFT calculation, the cost of DFT is ca.
[82]
Forms of energy - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)
Chemical energy is energy stored in the bonds of atoms and molecules. Batteries, biomass, petroleum, natural gas, and coal are examples of chemical energy.
[83]
Chemical Energy Storage | PNNL
Chemical energy storage involves storing energy in chemical bonds, like hydrogen, which can be stored as a gas or liquid, or in materials, and can be converted ...
[84]
[PDF] Exploring Potential Energy Surfaces for Chemical Reactions
Potential energy surfaces are central to studying molecular structures and reactivities. Methods include geometry optimization, transition state searching, and ...
[85]
Gibbs Free Energy
The Gibbs free energy of a system at any moment in time is defined as the enthalpy of the system minus the product of the temperature times the entropy of the ...
[86]
[PDF] Combustion Chemistry - Princeton University
Jun 24, 2018 · Combustion involves the oxidation of a fuel, ideally leading, for an organic fuel such as octane or ethanol, to the formation of carbon dioxide ...
[87]
Photosynthesis - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Photosynthesis takes place in two distinct stages. In the light reactions, energy from sunlight drives the synthesis of ATP and NADPH, coupled to the formation ...
[88]
Effect of catalysts - Chemistry 302
The effect of a catalyst is that it lowers the activation energy for a reaction. Generally, this happens because the catalyst changes the way the reaction ...
[89]
Calorimetry - Chemistry 301
Calorimetry is the measurement of heat, typically done at constant pressure or volume, using water temperature changes to quantify heat.
[90]
[PDF] Hideki Yukawa - Nobel Lecture
The meson theory started from the extension of the concept of the field of force so as to include the nuclear forces in addition to the gravitational and.
[91]
[PDF] DAMTP - 3 The Strong Force
Both the strong and weak nuclear forces share a common property with electromag- netism: the force is carried by a field of spin 1. In the case of ...
[92]
On the Neutron-Proton Scattering Cross Section | Phys. Rev.
The Yukawa well is in better agreement with experiment than is the square well. One of the constants entering into the determination of the potential is the ...
[93]
Don't get too close | RIKEN
Oct 12, 2007 · The repulsive core explains scattering experiments, the stability of nuclei, and even supernova explosions. It is probably caused by the ...
[94]
Woods-Saxon-type of mean-field potentials with effective mass ...
Dec 30, 2020 · Those ready-for-use potentials are advertised as an alternative to other existing phenomenological mean-field potentials.
[95]
A.42 Nuclear forces - FAMU-FSU College of Engineering
Because of the exponential in the Yukawa potential, the nuclear force is very short range. It is largely gone beyond distances of a couple of fm.
[96]
Yukawa potential approach to the nuclear binding energy formula
Apr 1, 1990 · Yukawa's meson theory of the nucleon–nucleon interaction is used to show that the potential energy contains a volume term that is linear in the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[97]
Energy and Nuclear Change - Chemistry 302
The potential energy of a nucleus is simply the energy of the nucleus compared to the energy of the sub-atomic parts of the nucleus broken apart. For example, a ...
[98]
21.2: Nuclear Binding Energies - Physics LibreTexts
Nov 6, 2024 · When nucleons are close-packed, the binding energy per nucleon due to the strong force is simply the number of nearest neighbors for each ...
[99]
Nuclear Binding Energy - HyperPhysics
Nuclear binding energy is the difference between the mass of a nucleus and the sum of its protons and neutrons, holding the nucleus together.Missing: potential | Show results with:potential
[100]
The Isotopes of Hydrogen
Aug 9, 2000 · The binding energy per nucleon continues to grow as protons and neutrons are added to construct more massive nuclei until a maximum of about 8 ...
[101]
(S-8A-2) Nuclear Binding Energy - PWG Home - NASA
Feb 11, 2009 · The curve of binding energy (drawing) plots binding energy per nucleon against atomic mass. It has its main peak at iron and then slowly ...