Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ebullioscopic constant

The ebullioscopic constant, denoted as K_b, is a solvent-specific physical constant in that quantifies the of a caused by the of a non-volatile solute, serving as a key parameter in the study of . It relates the change in \Delta T_b to the m of the solute through the equation \Delta T_b = i K_b m, where i is the van't Hoff factor representing the number of particles produced per formula unit of solute. This constant is independent of the solute's identity and depends solely on the solvent's properties, such as its , , and . The ebullioscopic constant arises from the thermodynamic requirement for equilibrium between the liquid solution and its vapor phase, where the presence of solute reduces the solvent's vapor pressure, necessitating a higher temperature for boiling. It can be derived as K_b = \frac{R T_b^2 M}{\Delta H_{vap}}, with R as the gas constant, T_b the boiling point of the pure solvent in Kelvin, M the solvent's molar mass, and \Delta H_{vap} the molar enthalpy of vaporization. This relationship assumes ideal dilute solutions and non-volatile solutes; deviations occur in concentrated or non-ideal systems. The units of K_b are typically Kelvin per kilogram per mole (K kg/mol), reflecting the elevation per unit molality. Values of K_b vary significantly across solvents, influencing their suitability for experimental applications. In practice, the ebullioscopic constant is applied in ebullioscopy to determine the molecular weight of unknown solutes by measuring elevations, particularly useful for non-electrolytes in solvents.

Fundamentals

Definition

The ebullioscopic constant, denoted as K_b, is a solvent-specific property that quantifies the extent to which the of a increases upon the addition of a non-volatile solute. It represents the per unit of the solute in the , serving as a key parameter in understanding solution behavior. The units of the ebullioscopic constant are typically expressed as °C /mol or K /mol, reflecting the temperature change in degrees (or ) per of solute per kilogram of . This constant captures the proportional rise in with increasing solute concentration, a phenomenon inherent to that depend solely on the number of solute particles rather than their chemical identity. The term "ebullioscopic" originates from the technique of ebullioscopy, derived from the Latin ebullire meaning "to boil over," combined with the suffix -scopy indicating measurement or observation. This naming reflects its historical association with methods for determining molecular weights through observations.

Relation to Colligative Properties

Colligative properties of solutions are physical characteristics that depend solely on the number of solute particles present, rather than on their chemical identity or nature. These properties include lowering, , , and , all of which arise from the dilution of the by the solute, thereby altering the solvent's . , in particular, occurs when a non-volatile solute is added to a , requiring higher temperature to achieve the same as the pure solvent. The ebullioscopic constant, denoted as K_b, quantifies this and serves as a solvent-specific parameter in colligative property calculations. It acts as the direct counterpart to the K_f, which similarly measures but for the solid-liquid instead of liquid-vapor./14%3A_Properties_of_Solutions/14.02%3A_Colligative_Properties) Both constants enable the determination of solute concentration effects on phase changes, emphasizing the particle-number dependence inherent to colligative phenomena. In comparing the two, K_f values are generally larger than K_b for the same , primarily because the molar significantly exceeds the molar , outweighing the higher relative to the freezing point in the underlying thermodynamic expressions./14%3A_Properties_of_Solutions/14.02%3A_Colligative_Properties) For instance, in , K_f is approximately 1.86 K kg mol⁻¹, while K_b is about 0.512 K kg mol⁻¹, illustrating this disparity. This difference highlights how energetics influence the magnitude of colligative effects. The validity of ebullioscopic and related colligative measurements relies on assumptions of ideal, dilute solutions where solute-solvent interactions are negligible and the solute does not volatilize or dissociate. Non-volatile solutes are essential, as volatile ones would contribute to the vapor phase and complicate the elevation effect. These conditions ensure that the observed changes accurately reflect particle concentration alone.

Theoretical Basis

Boiling Point Elevation

The boiling point elevation refers to the increase in the boiling temperature of a upon the addition of a non-volatile solute, quantified by the \Delta T_b = K_b \times m, where \Delta T_b is the change in boiling point, K_b is the ebullioscopic constant specific to the , and m is the of the solute (moles of solute per of ). This relationship holds as a direct , with the ebullioscopic constant K_b serving as a characteristic property of the that determines the magnitude of the elevation for a given solute concentration. Physically, the addition of solute particles disrupts the 's surface, reducing its compared to the pure at the same . To achieve —where the equals the external —the solution must be heated to a higher , resulting in the observed . This effect is a colligative property, depending solely on the number of solute particles rather than their identity. The formula applies specifically to non-volatile solutes, which do not contribute significantly to the vapor phase and thus solely lower the solvent's without adding their own. Volatile solutes, by contrast, can evaporate and alter the total in complex ways, invalidating the simple . Additionally, the relationship is a valid for dilute solutions, typically up to about 0.1 molal, where solute-solute interactions remain negligible and behavior is closely approached.

Thermodynamic Derivation

The thermodynamic derivation of the ebullioscopic constant begins with , which describes the vapor pressure lowering in an dilute containing a non-volatile solute. According to , the vapor pressure P of the is given by P = x_{\text{solvent}} P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}, where x_{\text{solvent}} is the mole fraction of the (approximately $1 - x_{\text{solute}} for dilute solutions) and P^\circ_{\text{solvent}} is the of the pure at the same temperature. This reduction in vapor pressure means that the boiling point of the solution—the temperature at which P = P_{\text{ext}} (typically 1 atm)—is elevated compared to the pure . To relate this elevation \Delta T_b to temperature, the Clausius-Clapeyron equation is applied, which governs the temperature dependence of the : \frac{d \ln P}{dT} = \frac{\Delta H_{\text{vap}}}{R T^2}, where \Delta H_{\text{vap}} is the molar enthalpy of vaporization of the , R is the , and T is the . For the pure at its normal T_b, P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b) = P_{\text{ext}}. In the solution, the lower requires an increase in temperature to reach P_{\text{ext}}. For small elevations \Delta T_b, the change in vapor pressure can be approximated by integrating the Clausius-Clapeyron equation over a narrow temperature range around T_b, assuming \Delta H_{\text{vap}} is constant. This yields \ln \left( \frac{P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b + \Delta T_b)}{P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b)} \right) \approx \frac{\Delta H_{\text{vap}}}{R T_b^2} \Delta T_b. At boiling, P = P_{\text{ext}} = P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b), so P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b + \Delta T_b) \approx P^\circ_{\text{solvent}}(T_b) / x_{\text{solvent}}. Substituting and approximating for small \Delta T_b and x_{\text{solute}} \ll 1 (where x_{\text{solvent}} \approx 1 - x_{\text{solute}}) gives \Delta T_b \approx \frac{R T_b^2}{\Delta H_{\text{vap}}} x_{\text{solute}}. This relates the boiling point elevation to the solute mole fraction. To express this in terms of molality m (moles of solute per kg of solvent), note that for dilute solutions, x_{\text{solute}} \approx m \cdot M_{\text{solvent}} / 1000, where M_{\text{solvent}} is the molar mass of the solvent in g/mol. Substituting yields the standard boiling point elevation formula \Delta T_b = K_b m, where the ebullioscopic constant is K_b = \frac{R T_b^2 M_{\text{solvent}}}{1000 \Delta H_{\text{vap}}}. Here, the factor of 1000 accounts for the conversion from grams to kilograms in the definition of molality. This derivation assumes an ideal solution (obeying Raoult's law), a non-volatile solute (negligible contribution to vapor pressure), constant \Delta H_{\text{vap}} over the temperature range, and dilute conditions where higher-order terms in x_{\text{solute}} can be neglected. These approximations hold well for many non-electrolyte solutions but may require corrections for real systems or electrolytes via the van't Hoff factor.

Measurement and Values

Experimental Methods

The ebullioscopic constant is determined experimentally by dissolving a known mass of non-volatile solute in a measured quantity of and observing the elevation in the of the compared to the pure . This rise, denoted as ΔT_b, serves as the basis for calculation, where the constant K_b is obtained from the relation K_b = ΔT_b / m for dilute solutions, with m representing the of the solute. The method was pioneered by François-Marie Raoult in the 1880s, who conducted systematic measurements on various solutes in solvents like and , establishing the foundational principles of ebullioscopy as a colligative property technique. A classical procedure for these measurements is the Landsberger-Walker method, which employs vapor to achieve steady conditions and minimize direct application to the liquid. In this approach, pure is first boiled in an inner tube surrounded by an outer jacket through which vapor from a separate flask is passed, equilibrating the ; the is recorded using a high-precision . A known of solute is then introduced, and the process is repeated to measure the elevated , allowing of ΔT_b after correcting for via at the . For enhanced precision, especially with small elevations, the method is preferred, involving simultaneous of pure and solution in adjacent chambers connected by a or thermoelement that directly registers the difference. The apparatus exemplifies this design, utilizing a vacuum-jacketed setup to reduce losses and barometric effects. Significant sources of error in ebullioscopic determinations include , where localized overheating causes premature and inflated ΔT_b values, as well as by volatile impurities in the solute that contribute to vapor pressure lowering independently of colligative effects. Non-ideal behavior at concentrations beyond dilute limits can also introduce deviations, necessitating to dilution for accurate K_b values. To mitigate these, apparatus like the Cottrell ebullioscope incorporates mechanical stirring via vapor jets to promote uniform without superheat. Modern refinements build on these foundations, with the Beckmann thermometer—calibrated for temperature spans of 0.01°C—remaining a standard for precise ΔT_b readings in traditional setups due to its adjustable mercury scale tailored to small changes near the solvent's . Contemporary techniques often integrate automated boiling point apparatus equipped with thermistors or digital potentiometers for potentiometric detection, enabling measurements with reproducibility better than ±0.001°C and reducing manual errors, as demonstrated in high-accuracy calibrations for fractions.

Solvent-Specific Values

The ebullioscopic constant (K_b) for various solvents is a key parameter in colligative property calculations, with values determined experimentally under standard conditions of 1 atm pressure. These constants are compiled in authoritative references and reflect the solvent's inherent properties at its normal . Representative values for common solvents are provided below, illustrating the range encountered in and applications._Constants)
SolventNormal Boiling Point (°C)K_b (°C kg/mol)
Water100.00.512
80.12.53
78.41.22
Acetic acid118.13.07
Acetone56.21.71
61.23.63
76.75.02
Compiled from standard references such as the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (97th ed.) and supporting experimental data._Constants) Trends in K_b values arise from the solvent's thermodynamic properties; specifically, higher K_b is observed for solvents with elevated normal boiling points (T_b) or reduced enthalpies of vaporization (ΔH_vap), as these factors amplify per unit . For instance, non-polar solvents such as (K_b = 2.53 °C kg/mol) and (K_b = 5.02 °C kg/mol) typically exhibit larger K_b than highly polar ones like (K_b = 0.512 °C kg/mol), owing to their lower ΔH_vap relative to intermolecular forces. Reported K_b values pertain to standard pressure (1 atm) and are generally treated as constant for dilute solutions near the solvent's boiling point, though minor temperature dependence can occur in precise measurements. Discrepancies among sources, such as variations of 0.01–0.1 °C kg/mol for a given solvent, often stem from differences in experimental methods (e.g., ebullioscopic vs. vapor pressure techniques) or solvent purity levels._Constants)

Applications

Molecular Weight Determination

The ebullioscopic method determines the molecular weight of a non-volatile solute by measuring the (ΔT_b) of a upon of a known of the solute. The procedure involves dissolving a precise of the solute (w_solute) in a known of (W_solvent in kg), heating the to , and recording the increase compared to the pure . The (m) is calculated as m = ΔT_b / K_b, where K_b is the ebullioscopic constant of the ; the number of moles of solute is then m × W_solvent, yielding the molecular weight M = w_solute / (m × W_solvent). For example, dissolving 5 g of an unknown solute in 100 g (0.1 kg) of water results in ΔT_b = 0.2°C. With K_b = 0.512 °C kg mol⁻¹ for water, m = 0.2 / 0.512 ≈ 0.3906 mol kg⁻¹, so moles of solute = 0.3906 × 0.1 = 0.03906 mol, and M ≈ 5 / 0.03906 ≈ 128 g mol⁻¹. This method offers simplicity, requiring only basic laboratory equipment for non-volatile and thermally stable solutes, with typical accuracy of 1-5% in dilute solutions (up to 0.01 mol kg⁻¹). It provides advantages over cryoscopy, including a broader choice of solvents (not limited to those with accessible freezing points), higher solute solubility at elevated temperatures, and reduced formation of solvent-solute compounds due to the endothermic nature of boiling processes. Limitations include unsuitability for volatile solutes, which contribute to and distort measurements, and for associating solutes like carboxylic acids, which alter effective particle counts via hydrogen bonding. It is more effective for than inorganic solutes due to differences and is prone to errors from solvent evaporation, necessitating precise controls. Historically, ebullioscopy played a key role in early 20th-century of polymers and biomolecules, such as rubber and proteins, where it helped establish high molecular weights (often exceeding 10,000 g mol⁻¹) before the advent of and in the mid-20th century.

Practical Uses in Chemistry

In processes, the ebullioscopic constant facilitates monitoring solute concentrations in industrial by measuring boiling point elevations, such as in formulations where ASTM D1120 standards require boiling point tests to verify performance and concentration levels. Similarly, in pharmaceutical , ebullioscopy aids in assessing purity and solute content to ensure formulation stability and compliance with quality specifications. In , the ebullioscopic constant enables estimation of number-average molecular weights in dilute solutions, providing data that correlates with measurements for material characterization, particularly for low-molecular-weight polymers like . This approach, based on the ΔT_b = K_b × m, offers an absolute method without standards, though it is best suited for samples below 10,000 g/mol. In , boiling point elevation measurements using the ebullioscopic constant help assess pollutant concentrations in water bodies, where elevated boiling points signal the presence of dissolved salts or industrial contaminants, supporting basic purity evaluations in field or low-resource settings. Ebullioscopy serves as a practical demonstration tool in educational settings, where laboratory experiments measure boiling point changes in simple solutions to illustrate and reinforce concepts like and solute effects on behavior. Despite these uses, ebullioscopy has limitations in modern contexts, as it is largely superseded by techniques like (NMR) and (MS) for precise molecular weight analysis due to its sensitivity to ideality, interferences, and inability to handle high-molecular-weight or complex mixtures effectively./02%3A_Physical_and_Thermal_Analysis/2.02%3A_Molecular_Weight_Determination) However, it remains valuable for quick, low-technology assays in resource-limited environments.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    14.2: Colligative Properties - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Nov 24, 2022 · If we assume ideal solution behavior, the ebullioscopic constant can be obtained from the thermodynamic condition for liquid-vapor equilibrium.
  3. [3]
    Elevation of Boiling Point: Definition, Formula, and Examples
    Rating 4.2 (373,000) Kb, the ebullioscopic constant, is a solvent-specific constant that represents the elevation in boiling point caused by a 1 molal solution of a non-volatile, ...
  4. [4]
    EBULLIOSCOPY Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    Word History and Origins. Origin of ebullioscopy. C19: from ebullioscope, from Latin ebullire to boil over + -scope. Advertisement. Word of the Day. November 09 ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  5. [5]
    Colligative Properties
    A colligative property if it depends only on the ratio of the number of particles of solute and solvent in the solution, not the identity of the solute.Missing: ebullioscopic | Show results with:ebullioscopic
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    Ebullioscopy (Theory) : Physical Chemistry Virtual Lab
    1. To understand colligative properties of solutes. 2. To find the boiling point elevation of a solution. 3. To determine the van à...<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    Which constant is usually larger for a solvent, the cryoscopic ...
    The cryoscopic constant is higher than the ebullioscopic constant is due to the larger difference between the molar enthalpy of vaporization and the molar ...
  9. [9]
    12.5 Colligative Properties – Chemistry Fundamentals
    ... equation relating boiling point elevation to solute molality; also known as the ebullioscopic constant. colligative property: property of a solution that ...
  10. [10]
    Boiling Point Elevation
    Non-Volatile Solutes​​ The boiling point of the solvent above a solution will be greater than the boiling point of the pure solvent whether the solution contains ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Boiling Point Elevation Formula
    Use the Correct Constants: The ebullioscopic constant ... boiling point elevation equation, boiling point elevation constant, colligative properties,.
  12. [12]
    [PDF] PROPERTIES OF SOLUTIONS
    Solute concentration must be low. (0.10m). Disadvantage--compound must be nonvolatile and stable at the boiling point. Still used widely. Remember that you ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Atkins' physical chemistry / Peter Atkins, Julio de Paula, James Keeler.
    (b) The elevation of boiling point. 159. (c) The depression of freezing point. 161. (d) Solubility. 161. (e) Osmosis. 162. Checklist of concepts. 164. Checklist ...
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] An accurate ebullioscopic method for determining the molecular ...
    Accurate molecular weights may be obtained if the value of the ebullioscopic constant at infinite dilution is first determined by extrapolation from ...
  16. [16]
    None
    ### Summary of Methods for Measurement of Boiling Point Elevation
  17. [17]
    The Constants of Ebullioscopy
    CONSTANTS OF EBULLIOSCOPY. 455. EXPERIMENTAL. The experimental determinations of the ebullioscopic constant were made with the apparatus designed by Menzies ...
  18. [18]
    The Application of a Differential Thermometer in Ebullioscopy - PNAS
    Unlike every other ebullioscopic apparatus, this form is entirely free from all corks, ground glass joints or stoppers. The sources of error, especially that ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Molecular Mass Determination by Boiling Point Elevation Method
    Kb is the ebullioscopic constant of the solvent m is the molality of the solution. Using the equation above, the molality of the solution can be determined.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
    None
    ### Procedure for Ebullioscopy for Molar Mass Determination
  21. [21]
    11.4: Colligative Properties - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Aug 26, 2023 · These colligative properties include vapor pressure lowering, boiling point elevation, freezing point depression, and osmotic pressure.
  22. [22]
    None
    ### Summary of Ebullioscopy for Molecular Weight Determination
  23. [23]
    Antifreeze Testing - Nevada Department of Agriculture
    Boiling Point by ASTM D1120. The boiling point determination of an engine coolant is primarily used as a production control test. Freezing Point by ASTM D1177.
  24. [24]
    2. Molecular Weight Determinations - Pharmaceutical Analysis [Book]
    Molecular weight of the compounds is determined by the determination of colligative properties. The methods are as follows: Ebullioscopic method; Cryoscopic ...
  25. [25]
    Determination of Number-Average Molecular Weights by Ebulliometry
    This paper describes an ebulliometric system for routine and special determinations of molecular weights. The sys- tem uses a simple ebulliometer, ...
  26. [26]
    Measurement of molecular weight of polyethylene by menzies ...
    The Menzies-Wright ebullioscopic method was used to evaluate unfractionated polyethylene resin, DYNH (Blend 1004). This material was found to have a number ...
  27. [27]
    Test for purity of water using melting and boiling points - Sparkl
    Elevated boiling points may indicate the presence of dissolved salts and industrial chemicals, while altered freezing points could suggest organic contaminants.