Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Elementary charge

The elementary charge, denoted by the symbol e, is a fundamental physical constant in physics that represents the magnitude of the electric charge carried by a proton or an electron, serving as the basic unit of electric charge in nature.^[1] Its exact value, fixed by international convention, is 1.602176634 × 10^{-19} coulombs (C).^[2] Since the 2019 revision of the International System of Units (SI), the elementary charge has been one of the seven defining constants of the SI, with the ampere—the SI base unit of electric current—defined by fixing e at this precise value, such that the flow of one ampere corresponds to exactly 1 / (1.602176634 × 10^{-19}) elementary charges per second.^[3] This redefinition eliminated previous uncertainties in measurements of e, enhancing the precision of electrical standards worldwide.^[4] The elementary charge is central to understanding charge quantization, the principle that all observable electric charges in the universe are integer multiples of e, a property first experimentally confirmed in the early 20th century through studies of oil droplets and electron behavior.^[5] In atomic and particle physics, e appears in key equations, such as those governing electromagnetic interactions and the fine-structure constant α = e² / (4πε₀ℏc) ≈ 1/137, which characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic force between charged particles.^[1] This constant underpins phenomena from the stability of atoms to the behavior of quarks and leptons in the Standard Model of particle physics.

Fundamental Properties

Definition and Magnitude

The elementary charge, denoted e, is defined as the magnitude of the electric charge carried by a single proton or electron.^[6] It constitutes the smallest unit of electric charge observed in everyday matter composed of atoms and molecules.^[1] Since the 2019 redefinition of the International System of Units (SI), the elementary charge has a fixed exact value of e = 1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} coulombs (C).^[3] This value is one of the seven defining constants of the SI and directly determines the ampere, the unit of electric current, as the flow of exactly $1 / e elementary charges per second.^[7] In classical electromagnetism, e quantifies the basic interaction strength between charged particles via Coulomb's law, while in quantum mechanics, it appears in fundamental relations such as the fine-structure constant \alpha = e^2 / (4\pi \epsilon_0 \hbar c), governing electromagnetic phenomena at atomic scales.^[8] As the quantum of charge, e implies that observable electric charges in ordinary matter are integer multiples of this value.^[9] The recognition of e as a fundamental physical constant emerged in the early 20th century, marking a pivotal shift in understanding electric charge as discrete rather than continuous.^[10]

Sign and Universality

The elementary charge e is defined as a positive quantity by international convention, representing the fundamental unit of electric charge in nature. The electron carries a charge of -e, while the proton carries +e, ensuring a consistent framework for describing the electromagnetic properties of subatomic particles. This sign convention reflects the arbitrary but universally adopted choice originating from early electrostatic experiments, where the charge responsible for attraction to glass (positive) was assigned the positive sign. All observed electrons and protons in stable matter exhibit charges of exactly -e and +e, respectively, with no deviations detected within the limits of experimental precision. The magnitude e is the same for every electron and every proton, verified to a relative precision better than $10^{-21}, as confirmed by tests of the neutrality of matter.^[11] The universality of the elementary charge has profound implications for fundamental physical laws. It guarantees the conservation of electric charge in all known interactions, as processes involving particle creation or annihilation must preserve the total charge in integer multiples of e. Furthermore, this uniformity enables the electrical neutrality of atoms, where the positive charge from an equal number of protons in the nucleus is precisely balanced by the negative charge from the surrounding electrons, stabilizing matter at the atomic scale. No violations of this charge universality have been observed in stable matter, reinforcing the foundational role of e in the standard model of particle physics.^[1]

Quantization of Charge

Integer Quantization

In the early 1910s, Robert A. Millikan concluded from his systematic measurements of charges on small oil droplets that the electric charge q on any isolated particle is given by q = n e, where n is an integer and e is the elementary charge. These measurements consistently revealed discrete values that were simple integer multiples of a fundamental unit of charge. Millikan's work established that there are no observable charges that are not whole-number multiples of this basic quantum, marking a key insight into the discrete nature of electricity.^[12] The theoretical basis for this integer quantization stems from the particle-like nature of matter in quantum mechanics, where electrons carry a charge of -e and protons carry +e. Any net charge arises from an imbalance in the number of these indivisible charged constituents, ensuring that the total charge on atoms, ions, or larger assemblies is always an integer multiple of e. This discreteness reflects the atomic and subatomic structure of matter, prohibiting fractional charges in ordinary particles composed of electrons and protons.^[13] This principle manifests in various physical contexts, such as ionized gases where ions acquire charges like +e (singly ionized) or +2e (doubly ionized) through electron loss. In aqueous solutions, electrolyte ions similarly exhibit charges that are integer multiples of e, as seen in common species like Na^+ (+e) or Cl^- (-e), underscoring the universality of quantization in chemical and plasma environments.^[14] The quantization condition is formally stated as

q = n e, \quad n \in \mathbb{Z}

where n can be positive, negative, or zero, corresponding to net positive, negative, or neutral charge, respectively.^[13]

Fractional Charges

In the Standard Model of particle physics, quarks are fundamental constituents that carry fractional electric charges relative to the elementary charge e: up-type quarks (such as up and charm) have a charge of +2/3\,e, while down-type quarks (such as down and strange) have -1/3\,e, with antiquarks bearing the opposite signs. These fractional charges ensure that combinations of quarks form hadrons, like protons (charge +e) and neutrons (charge $0), with integer multiples of e$, adhering to the observed quantization of charge for composite particles. However, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) predicts that quarks are subject to color confinement, a phenomenon where the strong force prevents quarks from existing in isolation, binding them permanently within hadrons. Extensive experimental searches for free quarks—conducted in cosmic rays, particle accelerators, and fixed-target experiments—have yielded no evidence of such particles, with limits on their production cross-sections exceeding several orders of magnitude below expectations for unconfined quarks.^[15] This null result reinforces the confinement hypothesis and explains the absence of free fractional charges in everyday matter.^[16] Beyond particle physics, fractional charges appear in exotic condensed-matter systems, particularly in two-dimensional electron gases under strong magnetic fields, as in the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). Here, quasiparticles called anyons emerge with effective charges that are fractions of e, such as e/3 in the \nu=1/3 FQHE state, arising from the collective behavior of electrons rather than true elementary particles.^[17] These anyons also exhibit fractional statistics, interpolating between bosons and fermions, and have been observed through interferometry and noise measurements, providing a realization of fractional charge in accessible laboratory settings without violating the integer quantization for isolated elementary charges.^[18]

Experimental Confirmation

Early experimental confirmations of charge quantization emerged from ionization studies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, where discrete steps in charge accumulation were observed during gas ionization processes under electric fields.^[19] These experiments demonstrated that charges on ionized particles increased in finite increments rather than continuously, providing initial empirical evidence for the discrete nature of electric charge.^[20] Modern reanalyses of historical data have further solidified this evidence. For instance, a detailed reexamination of Robert Millikan's original oil-drop measurements from 1909-1913 by physicist Allan Franklin confirmed that the charges on the drops were consistently integer multiples of a fundamental unit, supporting quantization without altering the core findings despite debates over data selection.^[21] Similarly, statistical analyses using contemporary computational tools on Millikan's datasets reveal clear clustering of charge values around integer multiples of the elementary charge, reinforcing the quantized structure.^[22] The quantum Hall effect provides an indirect yet precise confirmation of charge quantization in two-dimensional electron systems. Discovered in 1980, this phenomenon exhibits quantized Hall resistance values that depend directly on the elementary charge e and Planck's constant h, with plateaus at R_H = \frac{h}{i e^2} (where i is an integer), unambiguously tying the observed quantization to discrete electron charges.^[23] This effect has been replicated across numerous low-temperature experiments, serving as a cornerstone for verifying the universality of e.^[24] In high-energy physics, extensive searches in particle accelerators have yielded no evidence of free particles carrying charges that are not integer multiples of e. Decades of experiments at facilities like CERN and SLAC, probing collision products and cosmic ray interactions, consistently show that all observed free charges adhere to integer quantization, with stringent limits set on hypothetical fractionally charged particles.^[25] Although theoretical models predict fractional charges for confined quarks (such as \pm \frac{1}{3}e or \pm \frac{2}{3}e), no free instances have been detected.^[26]

Historical Determination

Electrolysis and Faraday Constant

In the 1830s, Michael Faraday established the quantitative laws of electrolysis through a series of experiments involving the decomposition of electrolytes using electric current. His first law states that the mass of a substance deposited or liberated at an electrode is directly proportional to the total electric charge passed through the electrolyte. The second law asserts that when the same quantity of charge is passed through different electrolytes, the masses of the substances deposited or liberated are proportional to their chemical equivalent weights.^[27] These laws underpin the definition of the Faraday constant, denoted F, which represents the electric charge required to deposit or liberate one mole of a univalent substance during electrolysis, expressed as Q = n F, where Q is the total charge and n is the number of moles of electrons transferred. The constant F thus quantifies the charge associated with a macroscopic amount of matter, linking electrochemical reactions to the flow of electricity. Historical determinations of F relied on precise measurements from electrolysis experiments, particularly those involving silver or copper deposition, which provided reliable and reproducible results due to the metals' high purity and electrochemical stability. In such experiments, a known quantity of charge Q was passed through a solution of silver nitrate or copper sulfate, and the mass m of the deposited metal was measured using a balance; F was then calculated from the relation m = (Q M) / (n F), where M is the molar mass and n the number of electrons per ion (n=1 for Ag⁺ and Cu²⁺). Early 19th-century measurements, refined over decades with improved instrumentation, yielded values of F around 96,000 C/mol.^[28] The elementary charge e, the fundamental unit of electric charge, is related to the Faraday constant by e = F / N_A, where N_A is Avogadro's constant, representing the number of particles in one mole. This relation allows indirect determination of e from macroscopic electrochemical data, assuming knowledge of N_A from independent measurements like gas laws or crystal densities. The concept of a fundamental unit of charge was first proposed by George Johnstone Stoney in 1874, who estimated its value using Faraday's laws and contemporary estimates of Avogadro's number, yielding approximately 10^{-20} C. More precise calculations in the early 20th century, using improved values of F and N_A, gave results closer to the modern value of 1.602 × 10^{-19} C, demonstrating the discrete nature of charge underlying continuous electrolytic processes.^[29]

Millikan Oil-Drop Experiment

The Millikan oil-drop experiment, conducted between 1909 and 1913, provided the first direct measurement of the elementary electric charge by observing the behavior of charged oil droplets suspended in an electric field.^[30] Tiny oil droplets were produced using a perfume atomizer and introduced into a horizontal chamber between two parallel metal plates, where they became charged by exposure to ionizing X-rays.^[30] The motion of individual droplets was viewed through a low-power microscope, allowing precise tracking of their fall under gravity and rise when an electric field was applied between the plates.^[31] The core principle relied on balancing the gravitational force on a droplet against the electrostatic force in the electric field. With the field off, the droplet reached a terminal falling velocity due to air viscosity, from which its radius and mass could be calculated. When the field was turned on and adjusted to suspend the droplet stationary, the forces balanced such that the droplet weight equaled the electric force: mg = qE, where m is the mass, g is gravitational acceleration, q is the charge, and E is the electric field strength.^[30] Solving for q gave q = \frac{mg}{E}. By repeating measurements on numerous droplets and observing that their charges were discrete multiples of a fundamental unit—q = ne, where n is an integer—this unit e was identified as the elementary charge, confirming the quantization of electric charge.^[31] In his 1913 publication, Millikan analyzed data from 58 droplets, reporting a value of e \approx 1.592 \times 10^{-19} C with an uncertainty of about 0.2%.^[30] This result was slightly lower than the modern accepted value of 1.602 × 10^{-19} C due to an underestimate of air viscosity used in the mass calculations, but it established the scale and discreteness of the charge.^[30] The experiment faced controversy over data selection, as Millikan's laboratory notebooks revealed measurements on more droplets than reported, with some discarded for not fitting expected patterns; he later admitted exercising "discrimination" in choosing reliable data, though including all would not have significantly altered the value of e.^[32] Despite this, the work irrefutably demonstrated charge quantization and earned Millikan the 1923 Nobel Prize in Physics.^[31]

Modern Measurements

Shot Noise Method

The shot noise method measures the elementary charge e by analyzing statistical fluctuations in electric current arising from the discrete nature of charge carriers. These fluctuations, known as shot noise, follow Poisson statistics for independent electron arrivals, leading to a mean-square current fluctuation given by

\langle \Delta I^2 \rangle = 2 e I \Delta f,

where I is the average current and \Delta f is the measurement bandwidth. This relation allows e to be determined directly from the measured noise power spectrum, which is linear in I. Walter Schottky first described shot noise in 1918 while investigating current variations in vacuum tubes, proposing it as a means to quantify e more accurately than contemporary methods. Early experiments applied the principle to vacuum diodes, where noise was detected using tuned circuits coupled to the tube's electron stream. For instance, in 1925, measurements on a vacuum tube yielded e \approx 1.59 \times 10^{-19} C, with precision around 5%, limited by amplifier noise and bandwidth control. Subsequent refinements in the mid-20th century adapted the technique to semiconductors, enabling operation at lower currents and reducing thermal noise interference through improved amplifiers and filtering. By the 1960s, these advancements achieved relative precision of 0.1%, producing values of e \approx 1.602 \times 10^{-19} C that aligned closely with other determinations. The method's key advantages include its non-mechanical nature, avoiding issues like gravity or fluid dynamics in particle-based techniques, and its suitability for low-current regimes where individual charge discreteness is prominent. This statistical approach also indirectly confirms charge quantization, as the noise's proportionality to e reflects the indivisible unit of electron transport.

Josephson and Quantum Hall Effects

The Josephson effect in superconducting junctions establishes a fundamental quantum relation between voltage and frequency, expressed as V = n \frac{h f}{2 e}, where V is the voltage across the junction, n is an integer denoting the step number, f is the applied microwave frequency, h is Planck's constant, and e is the elementary charge.^[33] This AC Josephson relation arises from the phase coherence of the superconducting wavefunctions, enabling the generation of precise, quantized voltage steps when the junction is irradiated with microwaves.^[33] By measuring these voltage steps against highly accurate frequency standards traceable to cesium clocks, the ratio $2e/h, known as the Josephson constant K_J, can be determined with relative uncertainties below $10^{-9}.^[34] The quantum Hall effect, observed in two-dimensional electron gases under perpendicular magnetic fields and cryogenic temperatures, produces quantized Hall resistance values at plateaus given by R_H = \frac{h}{i e^2}, where i is the integer filling factor.^[35] This quantization stems from the formation of Landau levels and the topological invariance of the Hall conductance, \sigma_H = i \frac{e^2}{h}, making it robust against material imperfections.^[35] The inverse, the von Klitzing constant R_K = h/e^2, serves as a universal resistance standard, measured via Hall voltage and current in devices like GaAs heterostructures.^[36] In the 1980s and 1990s, metrology laboratories worldwide, including NIST and PTB, conducted experiments combining Josephson voltage standards with quantum Hall resistance standards to measure the e/h ratio through comparisons of electrical power or direct linkage of units.^[37] These efforts achieved precisions of parts in $10^8 to $10^9, as seen in series of measurements refining K_J and R_K values, which directly yielded e/h from their theoretical ratios.^[38] The 1990 CIPM recommendation formalized these effects for maintaining SI voltage and resistance units, enhancing global consistency.^[37] These quantum phenomena were pivotal in the 2019 SI redefinition, where e was fixed exactly at $1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C, rendering K_J and R_K exact by definition and deriving h from them.^[39] This shift eliminated uncertainties in electrical metrology tied to experimental realizations of e.^[39]

CODATA Adjustment

The CODATA adjustment process employs a least-squares method to derive self-consistent recommended values for fundamental physical constants, including the elementary charge e, by minimizing discrepancies among diverse experimental inputs while accounting for their uncertainties. This global analysis ensures that the resulting values are mutually consistent across interconnected measurements in physics and chemistry. The Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA), through its Task Group on Fundamental Physical Constants, conducts these adjustments approximately every four years, incorporating all relevant data published up to a strict cutoff date. For the 2022 adjustment, the cutoff was midnight, December 31, 2022, allowing inclusion of measurements that refine the network of constants. Input data for [e](/page/E!) encompass results from classical methods like oil-drop and cyclotron-frequency ratios, as well as modern techniques involving shot noise and quantum effects, each weighted by their reported uncertainties to balance precision and reliability.^[40] Following the 2019 redefinition of the SI, where e was established as an exact defining constant at $1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C, CODATA adjustments no longer vary its value but instead use it to determine or refine other constants, such as the Planck constant and fine-structure constant. The 2022 adjustment, involving 133 input data points and 79 adjusted constants, confirmed the exactness of e through rigorous consistency checks, revealing no significant discrepancies among the inputs at the level of their uncertainties.

Role in Physical Constants

As an SI Defining Constant

In the 2019 revision of the International System of Units (SI), the elementary charge e was established as one of the seven defining constants, with its numerical value fixed exactly at $1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} coulombs (C).^[7] This redefinition, effective from 20 May 2019, anchors the SI to fundamental physical constants rather than physical artifacts or reproducible experiments.^[41] The ampere, the SI base unit of electric current, is now defined by fixing the value of e, such that a current of one ampere consists of the flow of exactly $1 / e elementary charges per second.^[42] In practical terms, one ampere corresponds to a flow of $1 / (1.602176634 \times 10^{-19}) elementary charges per second.^[7] This definition replaces the previous ampere standard, which was based on the force between two infinitely long parallel current-carrying conductors.^[41] Historically, the SI base units like the kilogram and ampere relied on carefully maintained physical prototypes, introducing potential drifts and measurement uncertainties over time. The 2019 shift to constant-based definitions, including the fixation of e, ensures universal and invariant standards accessible through fundamental physics.^[43] As a result, the coulomb—the SI unit of electric charge—is now a derived unit, expressed in terms of e and the second (itself defined via the speed of light and the caesium hyperfine transition frequency).^[42] By fixing e exactly, the redefinition eliminates uncertainty in charge-related units that previously arose from experimental determinations of the constant, with the adopted value confirmed by the 2018 CODATA adjustment.^[7]

Implications for Other Constants

The fixing of the elementary charge e to the exact value of $1.602176634 \times 10^{-19} C in the 2019 revision of the SI has profound effects on related physical constants. The Faraday constant F, defined as F = N_A e where N_A is the Avogadro constant, is now exactly $96485.3321233100184 C/mol, as both e and the fixed N_A = 6.02214076 \times 10^{23} mol^{-1} contribute no uncertainty. This exactness contrasts with pre-2019 evaluations, where F's uncertainty stemmed from interdependent measurements of e and N_A in CODATA adjustments.^[44] The revised SI decouples the determination of N_A from e, allowing N_A's fixed value to derive primarily from mass-based experiments like the silicon sphere method, which measures particle number density without invoking electrical charge quantities. This independence enhances consistency across metrology fields, as variations in electrical measurements no longer propagate to chemical constants like N_A.^[45] For the fine-structure constant \alpha = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 \hbar c}, the exact e, Planck's constant h (yielding exact \hbar = h / 2\pi), speed of light c, and vacuum permittivity \epsilon_0 (derived exactly from fixed permeability \mu_0 and c) shift all uncertainty to direct experimental determinations of \alpha. This structural change has enabled higher precision in \alpha's evaluation; post-2019 measurements, such as those from cesium atom recoil spectroscopy, achieve a relative uncertainty of approximately $10^{-10}.^[8]

References

[1]
Introduction to the Fundamental Physical Constants
The elementary charge (e) and the electron mass are examples of constants that characterize the basic, or elementary, particles that constitute matter, such as ...
[2]
elementary charge - CODATA Value
elementary charge $e$. Numerical value, 1.602 176 634 x 10-19 C. Standard uncertainty, (exact). Relative standard uncertainty, (exact).
[3]
Definitions of SI Base Units | NIST
May 29, 2019 · The ampere is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the elementary charge e to be 1.602176634 × 10−19 when expressed in the unit C, ...
[4]
Ampere: Introduction | NIST
May 15, 2018 · Starting on May 20, 2019, the ampere is based on a fundamental physical constant: the elementary charge (e), which is the amount of electric ...
[5]
Electric charge and Coulomb's law - Physics
Jul 6, 1999 · charge is quantized, meaning that charge comes in integer multiples of the elementary charge e ... Table of elementary particle masses and charges ...
[6]
- ampere - BIPM
The ampere, symbol A, is the SI unit of electric current. It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the elementary charge e to be 1.602 176 634 x 10 ...
[7]
The International System of Units (SI): Defining constants - BIPM
The SI is defined in terms of a set of seven defining constants. The complete system of units can be derived from the fixed values of these defining constants.
[8]
Current advances: The fine-structure constant
It is the coupling constant or measure of the strength of the electromagnetic force that governs how electrically charged elementary particles (eg, electron, ...
[9]
[PDF] 21-1 coulomb's law - UF Physics Department
The elementary charge e is one of the important constants of nature. The ... The quantum of charge is small. In an ordinary 100 W lightbulb, for ...
[10]
Introduction to the constants for nonexperts 19001920
The following material is intended to give nonexperts insight into the general subject of fundamental physical constants.
[11]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
[PDF] Quantization in Nature
Electric charge is quantized. A charged object has a surplus or deficit of the number of electrons relative to protons. For any charged object: Q = ne, n ...
[13]
5.1 Electric Charge – University Physics Volume 2 - UCF Pressbooks
An atom that has had the charge altered in this way is called an ion. Positive ions have had electrons removed, whereas negative ions have had excess electrons ...
[14]
[PDF] Free Quark Searches - Particle Data Group
Experiments have produced no evidence for free quarks. This compilation is only a guide to the literature, since the quoted experimental limits are often only ...
[15]
Nobel Focus: Limited Freedom for Quarks - PHYSICS - APS.org
Oct 11, 2004 · ... free quark. Most physicists find this argument convincing, though there is still no complete theoretical proof for absolute quark confinement.
[16]
Observation of the scaling dimension of fractional quantum Hall ...
Jul 3, 2024 · These are characterized by three unconventional properties: (1) their charge e* is a fraction of the elementary electron charge e; (2) their ...
[17]
Fractional statistics in anyon collisions - Science
Apr 10, 2020 · Elementary particles in three dimensions are either bosons or fermions, depending on their spin. In two dimensions, it is in principle ...
[18]
<i>Landmarks</i>—Millikan Measures the Electron's Charge
Jan 20, 2012 · Robert Millikan's oil drop experiment provided the first clear measurement of the fundamental electric charge and thus helped cement the notion ...
[19]
Quantization of Electric Charge: Absorption of an Individual Electron ...
Jun 20, 2021 · Electrons are one of these fundamental particles. In 1909, Robert Millikan proved that the charge of the electron is quantized. In other words, ...Missing: ionization | Show results with:ionization
[20]
[PDF] In Defense of Robert Andrews Millikan - Caltech Magazine
A modern reanalysis of Millikan's raw data by Allan Franklin (see following page) reveals that his result for the unit of charge and for the limits of uncer- ...
[21]
Revisiting Millikan's Oil-Drop Experiment - ACS Publications
This article revisits the original data from Millikan's oil-drop experiment. The data have been analyzed using Microsoft Excel. As expected, the results ...Missing: reanalysis integer
[22]
[PDF] THE QUANTIZED HALL EFFECT - Nobel lecture, December 9, 1985
In this picture the main reason for the Hall quantization is the flux quantiza- tion h/e and the quantization of charge into elementary charges e. In ...
[23]
Quantum Hall Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The quantum Hall effect (QHE) is a quantisation of resistance, exhibited by two-dimensional electronic systems, that is defined by the electron charge e and ...
[24]
SEARCHES FOR FRACTIONAL ELECTRIC CHARGE IN ...
Searches for free fractionally charged particles produced by high energy particle beams from accelerators (and also by cosmic rays), using con ventional ...
[25]
Fractionally charged particles not yet seen | Physics Today
Nov 29, 2012 · Quarks have fractional charges ±e/3 and ±2e/3. But the force that binds them into hadrons is so strong that quarks cannot be free particles.Missing: accelerators | Show results with:accelerators
[26]
IV. Experimental researches in electricity.—Third series - Journals
Cite this article. Faraday Michael. 1833IV. Experimental researches in electricity.—Third seriesPhil. Trans. R. Soc.12323–54http://doi.org/10.1098/rstl ...
[27]
Determination of the Charge of an Electron Using Faraday's Law of ...
Mar 1, 2025 · In this experiment, students use Faraday's laws of electrolysis to determine the charge of an electron using the fundamental Avogadro constant.
[28]
August, 1913: Robert Millikan Reports His Oil Drop Results
Aug 1, 2006 · In 1910 Millikan published the first results from these experiments, which clearly showed that charges on the drops were all integer multiples ...Missing: postulate | Show results with:postulate
[29]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-018-0108-x
[30]
The Millikan Case - Discrimination Versus Manipulation of Data
Jan 1, 2000 · What these tables indicated was that the charges on the droplets were, indeed, multiples of the same number -- thus, the charge of the electron.Missing: reanalysis integer
[31]
[PDF] Application of the Josephson Effect to Voltage Metrology
The Josephson effect, relating frequency and voltage, is used to improve the accuracy of dc voltage standards, relating the volt to the second.
[32]
[PDF] CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical ...
This paper gives the third such set together with a detailed description of the 1998 adjustment of the values of the subset of constants on which it is based.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
[33]
Quantum Hall Effect and Quantum Hall Resistance Standards - PTB.de
The Hall resistance, which is the quotient of Hall voltage and sample current, amounted to fractions of h/e² (h Planck's constant, e elementary charge). The ...
[34]
[PDF] The Quantum Hall Effect in the Era of the New SI
Aug 2, 2019 · With the discovery of the integer QHE in the early 1980s, the electrical metrology community immediately sought to develop a resistance standard ...
[35]
The ampere and the electrical units in the quantum era - ScienceDirect
In 1990, the Josephson effect and the quantum Hall effect were recommended by the CIPM to maintain the units of voltage and resistance in national metrology ...
[36]
[PDF] The 1986 adjustment of the fundamental physical constants
frequency-voltage quotient,. 483594.0 GHz/V76. BI (but of course still limited by the precision of the transfer of the Josephson frequency to the reference ...
[37]
Ampere: The Quantum Metrology Triangle | NIST
May 15, 2018 · That proportion is expressed by the Josephson constant KJ = 2e/h, where e is the elementary charge and h is the Planck constant. “Quantized” ...
[38]
[2409.03787] CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental ...
Aug 30, 2024 · We report the 2022 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of the ...
[39]
[PDF] SI Brochure - 9th ed./version 3.02 - BIPM
May 20, 2019 · The elementary charge e corresponds to a coupling strength of the electromagnetic force via the fine-structure constant α = e2/(2cε0h) where ε0 ...
[40]
[PDF] The International System of Units (SI), 2019 Edition
. • The ampere, symbol A, is the SI unit of electric current. It is defined by taking the fixed numerical value of the elementary charge e to be 1.602 176 634 × ...
[41]
The SI - BIPM
SI definition. The SI is the system of units in which. the unperturbed ... the elementary charge e is 1.602 176 634 x 10–19 C; the Boltzmann constant k ...
[42]
[PDF] CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants
Jan 20, 2017 · We report the 2022 self-consistent values of constants and conversion factors of physics and chemistry recommended by the Committee on Data of ...
[43]
The revision of the SI—the result of three decades of progress in ...
The uncertainty is dominated by the experimental uncertainty of the Planck constant. In the revised SI, the elementary charge e has the numerical value. by ...