Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Emperor Min of Jin

Emperor Min of Jin (300–318), personal name Sima Ye (司馬鄴), courtesy name Yanqi (彥旗), was the last emperor of the Western Jin dynasty, reigning from 313 to 316 as northern China succumbed to invasions by the Xiongnu-led Han Zhao state. A nephew of his predecessor Emperor Huai, Sima Ye ascended the throne as a teenager amid the dynasty's disintegration following the catastrophic War of the Eight Princes and relentless nomadic incursions that had already toppled Luoyang in 311. His reign, under the era name Jianxing ("Establishing Prosperity"), proved futile against the military tide; , the western capital, endured a prolonged by forces under Liu Yao, culminating in Sima Ye's surrender in late 316, which historians mark as the definitive collapse of unified rule over the north. Demoted to the powerless title of Duke of Guangling (or Marquis of in some accounts), he was transported eastward as a captive, only to be executed two years later in 318 by Liu Yao's son Liu Cong during a hunt, underscoring the precarious fate of royals in the ensuing . This event precipitated the establishment of the Eastern court in by Sima Rui (Emperor Yuan) in 317, confining authority to the basin while the north devolved into the Sixteen Kingdoms, a period of prolonged multi-ethnic warfare and division. Sima Ye's posthumous designation as Emperor Min ("Pitiable" or "Lamentable") by the Eastern reflected the dynasty's narrative of northern loss as a temporary , though his rule embodied the systemic failures of Jin governance—internal princely strife, inadequate defenses against steppe nomads, and eroded imperial legitimacy—that causal analyses attribute to overreliance on clan alliances rather than merit-based administration. No major reforms or military successes defined his tenure, but his capitulation symbolized the transition from the brief unity achieved under Emperor Wu to centuries of disunity, with primary accounts in the portraying him as a hapless figure in an empire's death throes.

Early Life and Background

Birth and Ancestry

Sima Ye, the personal name of , was born in 300 CE as the son of Sima Yan (281–311 CE), the Prince Xiao of Wu. His was Yanqi. Sima Yan, Prince of Wu, was the twenty-third son of , Sima Yan (236–290 CE), who founded the Western Jin dynasty in 265 CE by usurping the throne and completed China's unification by conquering in 280 CE. Through this lineage, Sima Ye was a direct descendant of the Sima clan's founding figures: grandson of Emperor Wu, great-grandson of (211–265 CE), the Wei regent whose military and political maneuvers enabled the Sima usurpation, and great-great-grandson of (179–251 CE), the strategist who began the family's rise under the late and early regimes. This positioned him within the core imperial branch of the Sima aristocracy, which had supplanted the Cao family to establish rule over a briefly reunified empire. Sima Ye's early years unfolded in a princely household amid the dynasty's post-unification fragility, exacerbated by clan infighting. The (291–306 CE), involving rivalries among Emperor Wu's sons and grandsons—including Sima Ye's father—devastated central authority through cycles of rebellion, purges, and resource depletion, fostering an environment of chronic insecurity for junior Sima princes without direct involvement in the conflicts. These familial power struggles, rooted in the proliferation of enfeoffed princes under Emperor Wu's expansive policies, eroded Jin's administrative cohesion long before external invasions intensified, though records provide limited specifics on Sima Ye's infancy beyond his sheltered status.

Early Positions and Education

Sima Ye, born in 300 as a grandson of Jin's founding Emperor Wu through his son Sima Yan (Prince of Wu), received the nominal title of Prince of Longshou (龍首王) in early childhood, a common practice among the Sima imperial clan to secure loyalty and delineate succession lines amid dynastic consolidation efforts. This enfeoffment, likely occurring shortly after his birth during the turbulent aftermath of the (291–306), underscored the clan's nepotistic control over court hierarchies, where juvenile titles served more as markers of lineage privilege than substantive roles. Historical provide scant detail on Sima Ye's formal , which would have conventionally emphasized Confucian classics, ritual propriety, and basic administrative principles as standard for imperial princes under the Jin system inherited from precedents. Exposure to such training occurred amid the regency of Emperor Huai (r. 307–311), where court tutors and retainers imparted rudimentary governance knowledge, though the era's factional strife—exacerbated by influences and regional —likely curtailed depth or consistency. By 312, as Jin's authority fragmented under Xiongnu-led pressures, Sima Ye's visibility increased through his appointment as (皇太子), a move reflecting regents' strategic elevation of Sima kin to stabilize imperial symbolism during Emperor Huai's weakening hold. This position, though ceremonial given his age of approximately 12, integrated him into court protocols and exposed him to the interplay of Jia Nanfeng's lingering factional remnants and opportunistic officials, as chronicled in primary annals like the . Such early placements highlighted the precarious defining Western Jin's later phases, prioritizing blood ties over merit amid existential threats.

Ascension and Reign

Path to the Throne

In 313 CE, died while in captivity under the regime, creating a profound in the remnants of the Western Jin court at . Loyalist officials, facing the collapse of central authority following the sack of two years prior, selected Sima Ye, the 13-year-old nephew of the deceased emperor and a member of the Sima imperial clan, to succeed him. Sima Ye, previously appointed in 312 CE amid efforts to stabilize the fractured regime, was proclaimed emperor on behalf of his lineage's purity and direct descent from the founding Sima Yan, despite his youth rendering him incapable of independent rule. This elevation reflected the factional maneuvers characteristic of the dynasty's terminal decline, where regents and military figures asserted control through puppet installations rather than merit or consensus. Officials such as Jia Pi, a regional inspector who had sheltered Sima Ye, played key roles in facilitating the proclamation, prioritizing clan continuity over experienced governance amid barbarian incursions and internal dissent. The young emperor's legitimacy rested solely on Sima , underscoring the causal fragility of rule, as personal ambitions and survival instincts supplanted institutional stability in a marked by repeated betrayals among and courtiers. The hasty , accompanied by an imperial and adoption of the Jianxing era name, failed to rally unified support, as regional power holders viewed the adolescent sovereign as a symbolic susceptible to . This process exemplified the Western Jin's into regency-dominated politics, where the throne served as a tool for factional consolidation rather than a locus of effective .

Administrative Policies and Court Politics

Emperor Min ascended the throne in July 313 at the age of 13 following the death of Huai in , inheriting a court in dominated by senior officials and military figures amid the dynasty's collapse. His administrative oversight remained nominal, with effective control exercised by regents and advisors relying on Sima clan loyalists to staff key positions in a bid to preserve dynastic continuity. The , structured around the Three Dukes and nine ministers inherited from precedents, persisted in form but suffered from institutional decay exacerbated by factional power struggles and influence carried over from prior reigns. Court politics under Min were defined by intense rivalries among officials, who maneuvered for influence amid chronic resource shortages that fueled and eroded . Edicts were issued urging officials to reaffirm oaths of allegiance to the Sima house, yet these proved ineffective as verifiable patterns of and self-interest prevailed, reflecting the absence of robust central enforcement. Reliance on advisors for counsel, a holdover from Emperor Huai's , further fragmented , prioritizing short-term intrigue over systemic . This regent-driven dynamic, devoid of the emperor's personal , hastened bureaucratic paralysis, as appointments favored clan ties over merit and fiscal mismanagement deepened amid the court's isolation. Minor adjustments to Yongjia-era policies emphasized defensive consolidation through loyalty incentives, such as preferential promotions for Sima kin, but lacked the resources for implementation, leading to verifiable failures in maintaining administrative cohesion. Historical accounts in the highlight how these efforts were subverted by court betrayals, underscoring causal links between unchecked factionalism and the unraveling of Jin governance. No major structural overhauls occurred, as the focus shifted to measures amid pervasive graft, with officials exploiting shortages for personal gain rather than bolstering imperial institutions.

Military Responses to Threats

Under Emperor Min's brief reign from 313 to 316 CE, military command was delegated to key generals including Qu Yun and Suo Chen, who focused on fortifying against probing incursions by the regime. Qu Yun, appointed as overseer of imperial secretaries with military oversight, coordinated defenses leveraging remaining Jin loyalists from Anding commandery, while Suo Chen supported operations against vanguard forces. These efforts temporarily stabilized the western frontier amid 's expansion under Liu Yao, but revealed underlying logistical strains from the exhaustion of central armies following the (291–306 CE), which had decimated professional troops and eroded supply lines. In June 314 CE, Liu Yao initiated a major offensive from the Wei River-Yellow River confluence, besieging in a bid to exploit Jin's disarray; Qu Yun's forces repelled the assault through coordinated counterattacks, preventing a of the capital's walls. Suo Chen reinforced these defenses by routing Huyan Mo, a subordinate of Liu Yao, in skirmishes that disrupted supply chains and forced a withdrawal. Similar probes in 313–315 CE, including raids on outlying garrisons, were met with tactical retreats and localized reinforcements, but high desertion rates among conscripted peasants and unreliable barbarian auxiliaries—recruited due to shortages of seasoned soldiers—undermined sustained operations. These engagements highlighted Jin's overextension, as fragmented commands prioritized immediate survival over strategic counteroffensives, allowing to regroup for larger invasions. Resource limitations exacerbated vulnerabilities, with prior civil strife leaving arsenals depleted and taxation yields insufficient for maintaining garrisons beyond Chang'an's environs. Reliance on ad hoc levies from locals yielded forces numbering in the tens of thousands but plagued by poor morale and indiscipline, as chronicled in records emphasizing failed mobilizations against nomadic . Min's edicts, such as appeals to distant princes like Sima Bao for aid, yielded minimal reinforcements, underscoring the regime's isolation and tactical myopia in failing to consolidate allied groups under unified command before defections mounted.

Decline and Capture

Escalation of Han-Zhao Invasions

In 315 CE, the regime under Emperor Liu Cong renewed its offensives against the beleaguered Western Jin, exploiting the dynasty's exhaustion from the protracted (291–306 CE), which had decimated its military manpower and fractured regional loyalties. Liu Cong dispatched forces to probe and seize peripheral territories, including advances into commanderies such as Shangdang, where troops under subordinate generals overran weakly defended outposts amid Jin's fragmented command structure. These incursions capitalized on Jin's internal disarray, as provincial governors prioritized self-preservation over coordinated defense, allowing to establish footholds without decisive Jin counteroffensives. Emperor Min (Sima Ye), reigning from since 313 CE, responded with edicts mobilizing reinforcements from loyalist holdouts, but these efforts were undermined by logistical breakdowns, including chronic grain shortages exacerbated by disrupted supply convoys and corruption among quartermasters. Verifiable indicate that Jin armies suffered desertions and mutinies, with some units refusing to engage due to unpaid stipends and fears of cavalry superiority in open terrain. Han-Zhao's strategy emphasized divided fronts, splitting Jin resources between northern threats from allied groups and the main thrust from Pingyang, their capital southeast of the . By early 316 CE, Liu Cong escalated the campaign by entrusting his brother Liu Yao with a concentrated assault on , advancing via established invasion corridors through the fords and mountain passes like the one at Puban. Liu Yao's forces methodically captured secondary cities en route, such as those in the Hedong region, isolating by severing tributary routes and inducing within the capital's walls through prolonged blockades. Jin defenses, though bolstered by temporary levies, faltered due to empirical failures in provisioning—historical tallies report insufficient arrows and mounts for sustained volleys—and the opportunistic of border commanders, who cited Han-Zhao's promises of as rationale. This phase marked the transition from sporadic raids to a siege-oriented push, driven by Han-Zhao's superior mobilization of horse archers and conscripted infantry against Jin's depleted regulars.

Fall of Chang'an and Surrender

In autumn 316, forces of the state under general Liu Yao laid siege to , the temporary capital of the Western Jin dynasty. The city's defenses were led by officials Suo Chen and Qu Yun, alongside loyalist troops, but prolonged starvation within the walls severely undermined resistance. By late November, after months of encirclement beginning in August, the food supplies had been depleted, exacerbating internal discord. Key defections accelerated the collapse, as palace attendant Liu Tan, colonel director of retainers Xi Jian, and General of Agile Cavalry Yan Yin surrendered to forces, providing intelligence and weakening fortifications. These betrayals, amid systemic exhaustion from prior defeats and inadequate reinforcements, eroded command cohesion. When troops breached the city walls, Emperor Min (Sima Ye) formally capitulated to Liu Yao on November 29, 316, ending organized resistance in the region. The surrender prompted the immediate evacuation of imperial artifacts, seals, and remaining court personnel to territory, signifying the collapse of Western Jin central authority. Despite the capitulation, Han-Zhao soldiers looted and sacked , underscoring the futility of the Jin court's final stand against superior siege tactics and internal failures. This event dismantled the dynasty's northern holdings, shifting power dynamics toward the era.

Captivity and Death

Treatment Under Han-Zhao

Following his surrender in , Emperor Min of Jin (Sima Ye) was escorted under guard to Pingyang, the capital, in late 316 CE, where he was initially received with nominal honors by the captors' general Liu Yao. Liu Yao granted him the title of Marquis of , permitting residence within the city while retaining vestiges of imperial status, such as ceremonial recognition, though strictly supervised to prevent escape or influence. This arrangement highlighted 's initial , using the deposed ruler's prestige to consolidate authority over subjugated Jin territories and elites without immediate elimination. Under Emperor Liu Cong, who assumed direct oversight of the captive, privileges diminished progressively from 317 CE onward, as Sima Ye was elevated to the sinecure of Grand Master of Splendid Happiness—a rank evoking courtly dignity but paired with degrading duties to enforce subservience. He was required to perform auxiliary roles at court functions, including carrying halberds in processions, mixing and serving drinks at banquets, and shading Liu Cong with an umbrella during hunts, tasks that symbolized the inversion of imperial hierarchy. Such impositions, drawn from primary accounts in the , served to integrate him into the victors' rituals while underscoring power disparities, prioritizing administrative control over ethnic retribution. These dynamics reflected pragmatic governance rather than ideological vendetta, as leveraged Sima Ye's presence for two years to monitor loyalties among former officials and extract symbolic allegiance, eroding his autonomy through enforced participation in captors' ceremonies without outright abolition of titles until tensions escalated.

Execution and Immediate Aftermath

In early 318 CE, amid escalating internal tensions within the regime—including the recent elevation of Liu Cong's son Liu Can as —Sima Ye was publicly humiliated at a banquet where he was forced to serve as butler to officials. When Sima Ye's former ministers wept in response to this degradation, Liu Cong, enraged, ordered his immediate execution, reportedly on the recommendation of Liu Can, who viewed the deposed as a lingering of rival legitimacy that could incite unrest. The killing occurred on February 7, 318 CE, effectively eliminating Sima Ye as a potential focal point for restoration efforts in the north. Sima Ye's body received no elaborate under Han-Zhao control, reflecting the regime's disdain for Jin imperial symbols and its prioritization of political expediency over ceremonial honors. Surviving Jin loyalists and officials, facing further purges and instability in Han-Zhao territories, dispersed southward toward the region, where fragmented court remnants had already coalesced under Sima Rui. This exodus accelerated the consolidation of anti-Han-Zhao resistance in the south. News of the execution reached Jiankang approximately three months later, prompting Sima Rui to formally declare himself emperor as Sima Yuan (Emperor Yuan of Jin) on May 6, 318 CE, thereby establishing the Eastern Jin court while explicitly rejecting Han-Zhao's authority over the Jin dynastic line. The Eastern Jin regime maintained continuity of Jin legitimacy, refusing to recognize the northern conquests as a definitive end to the dynasty and instead framing Sima Ye's death as a martyrdom that underscored the moral imperative for restoration efforts. This stance fueled short-term diplomatic isolation of Han-Zhao among southern elites but also sowed seeds for prolonged civil strife, as northern Jin holdouts either submitted or fled without mounting effective counteroffensives.

Titles and Honors

Era Names and Regnal Periods

Emperor Min ascended the throne in 313 CE following the death of Emperor Huai, establishing his regnal period from that year until the fall of in 316 CE. The sole era name adopted was Jianxing (建興), translating to "Promoting Prosperity" or "Establishing Prosperity," which began in the year of his enthronement and provided the primary chronological framework for official edicts, military dispatches, and court records during this interval. This era succeeded the Yongjia period (307–313 ) of the prior reign without transitional overlap, aligning with conventions in dynastic annals where new emperors promptly declared mottos to mark legitimacy amid ongoing disruptions from the . Events such as defensive campaigns against forces were systematically dated to Jianxing years in sources like the , with the first year (Jianxing 1) corresponding precisely to 313 and the final (Jianxing 4) encompassing 316 up to the dynasty's collapse in the west. Eastern Jin compilations posthumously upheld Jianxing dating for Western Jin events to ensure in historical chronologies, avoiding retroactive alterations despite the regime's and execution of the in 318 ; minor variations in terminal dating to 317 appear in select records, likely due to reckonings extending beyond the solar year of surrender.

Posthumous Designations

Following his execution by the ruler Liu Yao on February 7, 318, Sima Ye was posthumously designated Emperor Xiaomin (孝愍皇帝), with "Min" (愍) signifying a pitiable or deplorable condition in line with Confucian conventions for evaluating rulers who suffered untimely or humiliating ends, such as the loss of the capital and dynastic collapse under his watch. This title, emphasizing filial piety alongside tragedy, was conferred by Sima Rui (Emperor Yuan of Eastern Jin) shortly after ascending the throne in mid-318 to assert with Western Jin legitimacy amid the regime's extinction in the north. No (庙号) was granted, aligning with precedents for Western 's later emperors—Hui, Huai, and Min—whose reigns ended in upheaval, precluding the establishment of dedicated ancestral shrines as per ritual norms reserved for stabilizing founders or long-term sovereigns. Sources exhibit minor discrepancies on the exact timing, with some attributing the honor to 317 during Sima Rui's tenure as King of , potentially reflecting preliminary recognitions before death confirmation reached , though primary annals like the tie it to post-execution formalities. Owing to Sima Ye's body remaining under Han-Zhao control without recovery, no mausoleum was erected, diverging from standard imperial ; Eastern Jin courts instead conducted nominal sacrifices and erected commemorative plaques in ancestral temples to symbolically integrate him into the lineage, underscoring the honors' role in political rhetoric rather than physical reverence.

Family and Personal Life

Immediate Relatives

Sima Ye was the biological son of Sima Yan (司馬晏; 281–311), posthumously honored as Prince Xiao of Wu (吳孝王), the twenty-third son of Jin's founding Emperor Wu (Sima Yan, r. 266–290). His mother was Lady Xun (荀氏), daughter of Xun Xu (荀勖; d. 289), a prominent , , and high under Emperor Wu who rose to the rank of Grandee Remonstrant and served as a key advisor during the dynasty's early years. Sima Ye was adopted by his paternal uncle Sima Jian (司馬柬; d. ca. 300), Prince Xian of Qin (秦獻王), inheriting the princely title upon his adoptive father's death, which positioned him within the Sima clan's fragmented noble structure amid ongoing princely conflicts. Sima Ye's brothers were executed alongside their father by forces following the fall of in 311, eliminating any surviving immediate paternal siblings and severing direct lines of familial inheritance or military support from his father's branch. This early annihilation of his left Sima Ye reliant on broader Sima clan ties and adoptive lineage, with no substantial estates or resources passing from his biological father due to the timing of the executions shortly after Emperor Huai's capture. His paternal uncles, other sons of Emperor Wu such as Sima Zhong (Emperor Hui) and participants in prior regnal successions, had contended for influence in the dynasty's internal upheavals, but their relations to Sima Ye were distant and uninvolved in his personal upbringing beyond the adoptive arrangement with Sima Jian.

Marital and Offspring Details

Historical records, including the , contain no mention of Emperor Min formalizing a , appointing an empress, or establishing consorts during his brief reign from 313 to 316 CE. His ascension at approximately age 13, followed by incessant warfare and the fall of , precluded such arrangements amid the dynasty's collapse. Secondary analyses of primary sources similarly note the absence of any documented empress after that of his predecessor, Emperor Huai. No offspring are recorded for Emperor Min, with biographical accounts silent on sons or daughters, consistent with his youth (aged 16 at capture) and lack of established domestic partnerships. Unsubstantiated claims of progeny occasionally appear in modern speculation but lack support from verifiable texts like the or , which detail imperial lineages exhaustively elsewhere. Following his surrender in December 316 CE, the absence of a conjugal line meant no immediate marital or offspring dispersal akin to that of other Sima princes, whose families fragmented or perished under captivity. Any potential informal relations remain unrecorded, underscoring the empirical scarcity of personal details amid the era's turmoil.

Historical Evaluation

Achievements and Shortcomings

Emperor Min's reign, spanning from his enthronement in spring 313 to the surrender of in autumn 316, saw no substantive territorial expansions, administrative reforms, or military victories that could arrest the Western Jin's decline. His primary accomplishment lay in briefly sustaining a provisional imperial court in after the sack of in 311, where he had initially served as under Huai; with the aid of generals such as Jia Pi and Ding, he escaped forces and reestablished nominal central authority amid a severely depopulated capital that housed fewer than 100 households and scant resources. Advisors like Qu Yun and Suo Lin provided initial stability, with Suo Lin successfully repelling an early assault by general Liu Yao, allowing the court to endure sieges for three years. However, these efforts proved insufficient against the dynasty's accumulated weaknesses, exacerbated by Min's youth—he ascended at age 13, rendering him a susceptible to influence without personal command. Edicts seeking reinforcement from kin such as Sima Bao and Sima Rui yielded no substantial aid, isolating as regional warlords prioritized self-preservation amid the post-War of the Eight Princes fragmentation, which had already eroded Jin's military capacity through fratricidal conflicts from 291 to 306. The failure to rally dispersed forces or implement defensive consolidations culminated in the 316 , where famine and exhaustion compelled surrender to Liu Yao without prolonged resistance, directly precipitating Western Jin's extinction and symbolizing governance paralysis rooted in prior internal mismanagement rather than solely external pressures.

Legacy and Scholarly Perspectives

Emperor Min's legacy endures as the emblematic close of the Western dynasty, with his surrender to forces on November 1, 316 CE, and subsequent demotion to the title of Marquis of marking the effective dissolution of imperial control over northern and the onset of the Kingdoms period of division and warfare. His execution on February 8, 318 CE, by ruler Liu Cong during a excursion—prompted by the distress of accompanying former officials—further symbolized the dynasty's utter humiliation and the perils of dynastic overextension. The Xiaomin (孝愍), conferred by Eastern Jin's Emperor in 318 , incorporates "Min" (愍), denoting pitiable or deplorable fate, a designation reserved in Chinese tradition for rulers who suffered untimely losses of territory or life amid broader misfortunes, evoking sympathy for Min's youth—he ascended at age 13—and the scant resources at his disposal in a depopulated with fewer than 100 households. Traditional historiography, as reflected in Tang-era compilations like the , portrays Min's Jianxing era (313–316 CE) as a desperate rearguard against incursions, inheriting a realm ravaged by the (291–306 CE), which had depleted military and administrative capacities. Eleventh-century scholar , in his , evaluates the Western Jin's fall—including Min's tenure—as a moral failing of ethnic policies that integrated non-Han groups into the military, fostering rebellions and eroding loyalty, rather than ascribing primary blame to the adolescent emperor himself. Modern analyses concur, emphasizing structural vulnerabilities from civil strife and barbarian enlistment over personal shortcomings, positioning Min as a nominal in an inexorable decline.

References

  1. [1]
    Jin Mindi 晉愍帝Sima Ye 司馬鄴
    Emperor Jin Mindi 晉愍帝(270-317, r. 313-316), personal name Sima Ye 司馬鄴, courtesy name Yanqi 彥旗, was the last emperor of the Western Jin dynasty 西晉(265 ...
  2. [2]
    Western Jin (Chapter 4) - The Cambridge History of China
    In Chang'an, now a nearly abandoned city, the last ruler, Sima Ye (Emperor Min, 300–318, r. 313–316), Emperor Huai's nephew, came to the fragile Jin throne. He ...
  3. [3]
    Dynasties of China - The History Files
    With the fall of the impoverished and poorly-defended town of Chang'an, Emperor Min is captured by the forces of Han Zhao. He is briefly held captive before the ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Political History of the Jin Period (www.chinaknowledge.de)
    Sima Rui 司馬睿, the Prince of Langya 琅琊, quickly enthroned Sima Ye 司馬鄴, the Prince of Qin 秦 (known as Emperor Min 晉愍帝, r. 313-316) as the new ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  5. [5]
    Jinshu 晉書(www.chinaknowledge.de)
    The main primary source for the Tang-made Jinshu ... 5. 5 孝懷帝熾Emperor Xiaohuaidi [Sima] Chi (r. 306-312) and 孝愍帝鄴Emperor Xiaomindi [Sima] Ye (r.
  6. [6]
    晉愍帝
    Emperor Min of Jin (晉愍帝Jìn Mǐn Dì; 300 – February 7, 318), personal name Sima Ye (司馬鄴or 司馬業), courtesy name Yanqi (彥旗), was an emperor of the Jin ...
  7. [7]
    Emperor Min of Jin - Wikipedia
    Prior to becoming emperor​​ Sima Ye was a son of Sima Yan (司馬晏), Prince Xiao of Wu, a son of Jin's founding emperor Emperor Wu, and Lady Xun, a daughter of ...
  8. [8]
    晉武帝
    Emperor Wu of Jin (晉武帝Jìn Wǔ Dì; 236 – 16 May 290), personal name Sima Yan (司馬炎Sīmǎ Yán), courtesy name Anshi (安世), was a grandson of Sima Yi, ...
  9. [9]
    司馬昭
    Sima Zhao (司馬昭Sīmǎ Zhāo; 211 – 6 September 265), courtesy name Zishang (子上), was a Chinese military general, politician, and regent of the state of Cao ...
  10. [10]
    War of the Eight Princes - World History Encyclopedia
    Jul 18, 2019 · Sima Chi was succeeded by Sima Ye (known posthumously as Emperor Min, d. 318 CE) who surrendered to the Xiongnu in 316 CE and was executed ...
  11. [11]
    Eastern Jin (Chapter 5) - The Cambridge History of China
    ... emperor's personal name (Sima Ye, 300–318, posthumously known as Emperor Min, r. 313–316). This city had been the capital of Three Kingdoms' Wu in the third ...
  12. [12]
    Military history of the Jin dynasty (266–420) and the Sixteen ...
    Emperor Huai died in captivity in 313 and was succeeded by his 11 year old nephew Sima Ye, posthumously Emperor Min of Jin. In 315 Tuoba Yilu became King of ...
  13. [13]
    Political System of the Jin Empire (www.chinaknowledge.de)
    The highest posts or titles of the Jin central government were inherited from the Han, like the triumvirate of the Three Dukes (sangong 三公: Counsellor-in- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Courtly Exchange and the Rhetoric of Legitimacy in Early Medieval ...
    Cheng Yan answered that court politics changed based on new ... Emperor Min of the Western Jin [Sima Ye 司馬鄴. (300–318, r. 313–316)] again ...
  15. [15]
    Book of Jin - Wikipedia
    Emperor Huai; Emperor Min, Sima Chi, Sima Ye. Volume 6, 帝紀第6 元帝 明帝 ... primary sources, it appears that the book was primarily based on Zang ...
  16. [16]
    麴允 - Chinese Text Project
    When news of Emperor Huai's execution reached Chang'an in 313, Sima Ye ascended the throne and was known as Emperor Min. As new emperor, he appointed Qu Yun ...
  17. [17]
    https://en.zhihu.com/article/713500306
  18. [18]
    ba wang zhi luan 八王之亂, the Rebellion of the Eight Princes
    The rebellion of the eight princes (ba wang zhi luan 八王之亂) was a large-scale uprising of members of the imperial house against the central government of ...
  19. [19]
    知乎 - 有问题，就会有答案 - zhihu
    313: Emperor Min of Jin, Sima Ye, ascended the throne in Chang'an, officially inheriting the imperial throne, granting amnesty, and changing the era name ...
  20. [20]
    Western Jin - Chinaculture.org
    The Western Jin army supported Emperor Mindi in assuming the throne in Chang'an. Five years later, in 316, the Hun army, now led by Liu Yao, launched an attack ...Missing: Min engagements sieges
  21. [21]
    16 Nations -- Political, Social, Cultural, Historical Analysis Of China
    In March of A.D. 314, Shi Le sacked Youzhou, killed "zhou mu" Wang Jun, and massacred over 10,000 people. Liu Yao's attacks against Chang'an were repelled by ...
  22. [22]
    https://www.nouahsark.com/en/infocenter/culture/history/monarchs/jin_yuandi.php
  23. [23]
    漢趙烈帝 - Chinese Text Project
    In late 317, Liu Cong made Liu Can crown prince. In early 318, at a feast, Liu Cong had the former Jin emperor, the Marquess of Huai'an serve as butler, and ...
  24. [24]
    Emperor Yuan of Jin - Nouah's Ark
    Jun 4, 2012 · In early 318, Han Zhao's emperor Liu Cong executed Emperor Min, and three months later, news arrived in Jiankang. Sima Rui then declared ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  25. [25]
    Emperors of the Jin Dynasty - Chinaknowledge
    Emperor Min 晉愍帝(r. 313-316). Demoted as Marquis of Huai'an 懷安侯. Sima Ye ... The Deposed Emperor (Jin Feidi) 晉廢帝(r. 365-370). Demoted as Prince of ...
  26. [26]
    庙号、谥号、尊号及年号考述 - 中华文史网
    ... 庙号，“武”乃谥号；而以下三帝即惠帝、怀帝和愍帝，则属于有谥号而无庙号者。亦有庙号谥号皆无者。如西汉最后一个皇帝孺子婴，曾为傀儡皇帝三年，王莽废之，庙号谥号皆无。
  27. [27]
    https://ctext.org/datawiki.pl?if=en&res=585274
  28. [28]
    晉書: 帝紀第五孝懷帝孝愍帝- 中國哲學書電子化計劃
    孝愍皇帝讳邺，字彦旗，武帝孙，吴孝王晏之子也。 出继后伯父秦献王柬，袭封秦王。 永嘉二年，拜散骑常侍、抚军将军。Missing: 父母 | Show results with:父母<|separator|>
  29. [29]
    荀勗
    , while the other was the mother of Emperor Min of Jin. One of Xun Xu's grandsons, Xun Xian (荀顯), was enfeoffed by Emperor Wu as the Marquis of Yingyang ...
  30. [30]
    Emperor Min of Jin - Chinese Monarchs - Nouah's Ark
    May 4, 2012 · Prior to becoming emperor. Sima Ye was a son of Sima Yan (司馬晏) the Prince of Wu, a son of Jin's founding emperor Emperor Wu. However, he ...
  31. [31]
    Posthumous name - Nouah's Ark
    ... (愍 mǐn). Those who lose their spouses and pass away at their early age ... All Chinese posthumous names for rulers end in one or two of the characters ...
  32. [32]
    An Eleventh-Century View of Chinese Ethnic Policy: Sima Guang on ...
    It argues that his characterisation of the barbarians that threatened Western Jin resonated with his response to eleventh-century foreign relations. And it ...