Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Enthalpy of mixing

The of mixing, denoted as \Delta H^\text{mix}, is the change in that occurs when two or more pure substances are combined at constant and to form a homogeneous or , reflecting the energetic interactions between the components. This quantity is formally defined as \Delta H^\text{mix} = H - \sum_i n_i \bar{H}_i, where H is the of the , n_i is the number of moles of component i, and \bar{H}_i is the molar of pure component i. In ideal mixtures, such as those of perfect gases or solutions with negligible intermolecular interactions, \Delta H^\text{mix} = 0, meaning no heat is absorbed or released during mixing. However, real mixtures often exhibit non-zero values: positive \Delta H^\text{mix} indicates endothermic mixing (e.g., due to repulsive interactions), while negative values signify exothermic mixing (e.g., from favorable attractions). The magnitude and sign of \Delta H^\text{mix} depend on the nature of the components and can be modeled using approaches like regular , where \Delta H^\text{mix} = V \phi_1 \phi_2 (\delta_1 - \delta_2)^2 for binary liquid mixtures, with V as the total , \phi_i as fractions, and \delta_i as solubility parameters capturing cohesive energies. In solid , it arises from differences in pairwise energies (A-A, B-B, A-B bonds) and is expressed as \Delta H^\text{mix} = 0.5 N z x_A x_B W, where N is the number of sites, z the coordination number, x_i the mole fractions, and W the parameter. These models highlight how \Delta H^\text{mix} deviates from ideality due to molecular or atomic interactions, influencing properties like miscibility and phase stability. Enthalpy of mixing plays a crucial role in by contributing to the of mixing, \Delta G^\text{mix} = \Delta H^\text{mix} - T \Delta S^\text{mix}, which determines the spontaneity and of mixing processes. Positive \Delta H^\text{mix} can oppose mixing unless compensated by entropic gains, leading to , while negative values promote solution formation. This concept is essential across disciplines: in for process design and heat balance calculations; in for predicting stability and compatibility; and in for modeling mineral solid solutions. Experimental measurement often involves , providing data for thermodynamic databases used in simulations.

Definition and Fundamentals

Formal Definition

The of mixing, denoted as \Delta [H](/page/H+)_{\text{mix}}, is a thermodynamic property defined as the change in that occurs when pure components are combined to form a at constant and , without any . This quantity represents the between the of the resulting and the of the enthalpies of the pure components in their initial states. The general expression for the total enthalpy of mixing in a multicomponent system is given by \Delta H_{\text{mix}} = H_{\text{mixture}} - \sum_i n_i H_{i,\text{pure}}, where H_{\text{mixture}} is the enthalpy of the mixture, n_i is the number of moles of component i, and H_{i,\text{pure}} is the molar enthalpy of pure component i under the same conditions. It is commonly expressed on a per-mole basis as the molar enthalpy of mixing, \Delta h_{\text{mix}} = \frac{\Delta H_{\text{mix}}}{n_{\text{total}}}, where n_{\text{total}} is the total number of moles in the mixture. The units for \Delta h_{\text{mix}} are typically joules per mole (J/mol) or kilojoules per mole (kJ/mol), and the process is evaluated under isobaric (constant pressure) and isothermal (constant temperature) conditions to isolate the mixing contribution. The enthalpy of mixing is equivalent to the heat of mixing measured directly via calorimetry, where heat transfer during mixing reveals whether the process is endothermic or exothermic. The concept developed within 19th- and early 20th-century solution thermodynamics.

Thermodynamic Relations

The enthalpy of mixing, \Delta H_\text{mix}, forms a fundamental component of the Gibbs free energy of mixing through the relation \Delta G_\text{mix} = \Delta H_\text{mix} - T \Delta S_\text{mix}, where T is the absolute temperature and \Delta S_\text{mix} is the entropy of mixing. This equation underscores the enthalpic contribution to the driving force for mixing, balancing energetic interactions against entropic effects to determine solution stability. In terms of partial molar quantities, the contribution for component i is \bar{g}_i^\text{mix} = \bar{h}_i^\text{mix} - T \bar{s}_i^\text{mix}, where the partial molar enthalpy \bar{h}_i^\text{mix} directly influences chemical potentials and phase behavior. These relations are central to phase equilibria, as \Delta G_\text{mix} governs the shape of the free energy surface, enabling predictions of miscibility gaps and coexistence curves via minimization principles. In non-ideal , the excess h^E quantifies deviations from ity and is defined as h^E = h - \sum x_i h_i, where h is the of the , x_i are the fractions, and h_i are the enthalpies of the pure components. For , where the of mixing vanishes, h^E = \Delta H_\text{mix}, capturing the net energetic effects of unlike interactions. This excess property integrates with the enthalpies of and dilution: the of measures the heat released or absorbed upon dissolving a solute to a specific concentration, while the of dilution accounts for changes upon further addition. Mathematically, \Delta H_\text{mix} for a binary can be obtained as the difference between the integral of at dilution and the of dilution to the desired composition, providing a pathway to compute mixing properties from calorimetric data. The partial molar excess enthalpy \bar{h}_i^E is derived from the total excess enthalpy H^E = n h^E as \bar{h}_i^E = \left( \frac{\partial (n h^E)}{\partial n_i} \right)_{T,P,n_j}, where n is the total moles and n_j are moles of other components. This partial quantity links to activity coefficients through the excess Gibbs energy, g^E = h^E - T s^E, yielding \bar{g}_i^E = RT \ln \gamma_i, with \bar{h}_i^E contributing via the temperature derivative \left( \frac{\partial \ln \gamma_i}{\partial T} \right)_P = -\frac{\bar{h}_i^E}{RT^2}. The Gibbs-Duhem equation, \sum x_i d\bar{\mu}_i = 0 at constant T and P, ensures consistency among these partial properties, constraining activity coefficients derived from enthalpic data and facilitating accurate modeling of non-ideal behaviors in phase equilibria. The temperature dependence of \Delta H_\text{mix} is given by \Delta C_{p,\text{mix}} = \left( \frac{\partial \Delta H_\text{mix}}{\partial T} \right)_P. This relation stems from Maxwell identities applied to the fundamental thermodynamic potentials and enables extraction of \Delta C_{p,\text{mix}} from \Delta H_\text{mix} measurements across temperatures, informing the thermal evolution of mixing energetics in equilibria. In ideal mixtures, \Delta H_\text{mix} = 0 simplifies \Delta G_\text{mix} to entropic dominance. Pressure effects on \Delta H_\text{mix} arise indirectly through the volume of mixing via \left( \frac{\partial \Delta H_\text{mix}}{\partial P} \right)_T = \Delta V_\text{mix} - T \left( \frac{\partial \Delta V_\text{mix}}{\partial T} \right)_P, but are typically secondary for condensed phases.

Theoretical Models for Mixtures

Ideal Mixtures

In ideal mixtures, the , \Delta H_{\text{mix}}, is zero for all compositions, indicating that no net heat is absorbed or released when the pure components are mixed isothermally and isobarically. This condition arises because the process of mixing does not alter the of the system beyond what would be expected from the separate components. The concept of ideal mixtures rests on key assumptions about molecular behavior. Mixing occurs randomly, with molecules distributed without preference, and intermolecular interactions remain unchanged: the average energy of unlike-pair interactions (A-B) equals that of like-pair interactions (A-A and B-B) in the pure components. As a consequence, ideal mixtures obey , where the partial vapor pressure of each component is directly proportional to its in the . These assumptions simplify the modeling of solution properties, treating the mixture as a statistical akin to an . Thermodynamically, the zero enthalpy of mixing implies that the of mixing, \Delta G_{\text{mix}}, is determined solely by the entropic contribution: \Delta G_{\text{mix}} = -T \Delta S_{\text{mix}}. For an ideal mixture, this takes the form \Delta G_{\text{mix}} = RT \sum_i x_i \ln x_i, where R is the , T is the , and x_i are the mole fractions of the components; the negative value of \Delta G_{\text{mix}} for $0 < x_i < 1 drives spontaneous mixing through increased configurational entropy. Representative examples include mixtures of structurally similar non-polar molecules, such as and , which exhibit nearly ideal behavior due to comparable intermolecular forces. Dilute ideal gases also approximate this model, as interactions are negligible at low densities. However, ideal mixtures apply only when components have similar molecular sizes and weak, comparable interactions; significant deviations arise at high concentrations or with dissimilar species, where interaction energies differ.

Regular and Non-Ideal Mixtures

Regular solution theory provides a foundational model for describing the enthalpy of mixing in binary liquid mixtures where the entropy of mixing follows ideal behavior, but the enthalpy deviates due to intermolecular interactions. In this framework, the molar enthalpy of mixing is given by \Delta H_\text{mix} = x_1 x_2 \Omega, where x_1 and x_2 are the mole fractions of the components, and \Omega is the interaction parameter that quantifies the energetic cost of unlike-pair interactions relative to like-pair interactions. A positive \Omega corresponds to endothermic mixing, where energy is absorbed to form the mixture, while a negative \Omega indicates exothermic mixing, where energy is released. This expression arises from a lattice model of the solution, in which molecules occupy sites on a regular lattice with coordination number z, the average number of nearest neighbors. The interaction parameter \Omega is derived as \Omega = z w_{12} - \frac{z w_{11} + z w_{22}}{2}, where w_{ij} represents the pairwise interaction energy between molecules of types i and j. This formulation assumes a random distribution of molecules on the lattice (mean-field approximation), leading to a quadratic dependence of \Delta H_\text{mix} on composition without volume changes or specific ordering effects. Many real mixtures exhibit more complex non-ideal behavior where \Delta H_\text{mix} does not conform to the simple symmetric quadratic form of regular solutions, often due to asymmetric interactions or higher-order terms. Extensions such as the Margules model introduce additional parameters to capture asymmetries in excess properties, expressing the excess Gibbs energy (and thus enthalpy via thermodynamic relations) as a power series in mole fractions. Similarly, the van Laar model accounts for strong deviations in activity coefficients, suitable for systems with significant positive deviations from ideality. The sign of \Delta H_\text{mix} reflects the balance of intermolecular forces: positive values occur in systems like oil and water, where weak dispersion forces between hydrocarbons cannot overcome strong hydrogen bonding in water, leading to immiscibility and endothermic mixing. In contrast, negative \Delta H_\text{mix} is observed in exothermic processes such as the hydration of concentrated sulfuric acid with water, where strong ion-dipole interactions release significant heat. For polymeric systems, the Flory-Huggins theory extends regular solution concepts to account for chain connectivity and size asymmetry in lattice models. The enthalpic contribution is incorporated via the dimensionless Flory-Huggins interaction parameter \chi, defined as \chi = \frac{z \Delta \epsilon}{kT}, where \Delta \epsilon = \epsilon_{12} - \frac{\epsilon_{11} + \epsilon_{22}}{2} is the effective interaction energy difference, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature; positive \chi > 0.5 typically signals due to unfavorable enthalpic mixing.

Calculations and Applications

Binary Mixture Calculations

Empirical fitting methods for the enthalpy of mixing in binary mixtures typically rely on calorimetric measurements to parameterize simple expressions that capture the composition dependence of ΔH_mix. These approaches use experimental data from isothermal to determine adjustable parameters in models such as the two-parameter form: \Delta H_\text{mix} = x_1 x_2 (A + B x_1) where x_1 and x_2 = 1 - x_1 are the mole fractions of components 1 and 2, and A and B are temperature-dependent constants fitted to the data. This model, a variant of the Margules expansion, effectively describes asymmetric non-ideal behavior in many liquid binaries by accounting for deviations from ideality through the linear term in x_1. For instance, calorimetric studies on systems like Ga-Li alloys have employed similar fits to quantify exothermic mixing enthalpies, yielding parameters that reproduce measured values within experimental precision. Predictive methods for binary enthalpy of mixing often employ group contribution approaches, which estimate interaction parameters based on molecular structure without requiring mixture-specific experimental data. The model, for example, divides molecules into functional groups and uses predefined group-group interaction parameters to compute the excess enthalpy contribution, enabling predictions for a wide range of organic binaries. Developed initially for vapor-liquid equilibria, extensions of to enthalpies incorporate enthalpy-specific parameters, allowing estimation of ΔH_mix from combinatorial and residual terms in the excess Gibbs energy. This method has been validated for alkane-alcohol systems, where it correlates mixing enthalpies with average deviations of 10-20% from . Computational tools like (MD) simulations provide an alternative for calculating ΔH_mix in binary systems by directly evaluating changes in upon mixing. In MD, the enthalpy of mixing is obtained from the difference in average potential energies of pure components and the equilibrated mixture, simulated under constant pressure and temperature using force fields such as OPLS or methods. This approach is particularly useful for systems where experimental data is scarce, such as blends or ionic liquids, as it captures atomic-level interactions leading to exothermic or endothermic behavior. For example, MD simulations of pseudo-binary deep eutectic solvents with have reproduced strongly exothermic mixing profiles, attributing them to bonding networks. A representative example is the ethanol-water at 25°C and equimolar (x_ethanol = 0.5), where ΔH_mix ≈ -400 J/mol, indicating exothermic mixing due to favorable hydrogen bonding between unlike molecules. This value, derived from high-precision , highlights the non-ideal nature of the system and serves as a for model validation. Predictions of ΔH_mix for non-ideal , whether from empirical fits, group contribution methods, or simulations, typically carry uncertainties of 5-20%, with higher errors in hydrogen-bonded systems due to complex intermolecular effects. These uncertainties arise from parameter sensitivity, approximations, or limited training data in predictive models, but they are often reduced through hybrid approaches combining with simulations.

Multicomponent Mixture Extensions

The enthalpy of mixing for multicomponent systems extends the binary framework by incorporating pairwise interactions between all constituent components, assuming the dominant contributions arise from binary pairs while higher-order effects can be added as needed. In the pairwise approximation, the excess molar enthalpy of mixing is given by \Delta H^\text{E}_\text{mix} = \sum_{i < j} x_i x_j B_{ij}, where x_i and x_j are the mole fractions of components i and j, and B_{ij} represents the temperature-dependent binary interaction parameter characterizing the energetic interaction between the pair (with B_{ii} = 0). This formulation builds on binary calculations as foundational elements, scaling them to higher dimensions while maintaining thermodynamic consistency through the Gibbs-Duhem relation. Such models are particularly effective for systems where ternary or higher interactions are minor, allowing predictions across composition space with a manageable number of parameters derived from binary data. For ternary mixtures, direct summation of subsystem binary enthalpies often fails to capture observed asymmetries, as \Delta H^\text{ternary}_\text{mix} \neq \sum \Delta H^\text{binary}_\text{mix} due to altered local compositions and non-additive effects in the mixed state. To address this, models introduce ternary correction terms, such as x_1 x_2 x_3 C_{123}, where C_{123} quantifies three-body interactions beyond pairwise contributions; this term adjusts for deviations in systems exhibiting significant non-ideality, like those with directional bonding or volume changes upon mixing. In alloy systems such as , experimental calorimetry reveals negative enthalpies dominated by binary Cu-Zn and Ni-Zn attractions, but ternary parameters are essential to fit phase boundaries and mixing data above 600°C, as optimized via in thermodynamic assessments. These extensions highlight how multicomponent mixing introduces compositional asymmetries not predictable from binaries alone, necessitating fitted higher-order coefficients for accuracy. A key challenge in multicomponent extensions lies in the proliferation of parameters—for an n-component system, the number of unique B_{ij} pairs grows as n(n-1)/2, compounded by ternary (C_{ijk}) and higher terms, which demands extensive experimental data or computational optimization to avoid overfitting. Thermodynamic databases developed via the method mitigate this by systematically integrating assessed binary and limited ternary data into self-consistent models, enabling reliable predictions for complex alloys and solutions without exhaustive measurements. In practice, these models are implemented in process simulation software like , where multicomponent enthalpy of mixing informs multi-phase equilibrium calculations for distillation, extraction, and reaction processes, ensuring accurate energy balances and phase splits in industrial designs.

Physical and Experimental Basis

Intermolecular Forces

The enthalpy of mixing, ΔH_mix, arises primarily from changes in intermolecular interactions when unlike molecules are brought together in a mixture, overriding the enthalpic contributions from volume changes which are often negligible for liquids. Dispersion forces, which are universal van der Waals attractions arising from temporary dipoles in all molecules, contribute to ΔH_mix by favoring mixing when the dispersion interactions between unlike pairs are comparable to those between like pairs, as seen in nonpolar hydrocarbon blends. Dipole-dipole forces, present in polar molecules, can lead to either positive or negative ΔH_mix depending on whether the unlike-pair dipole alignments are weaker or stronger than like-pair ones, while hydrogen bonding, a particularly strong directional interaction in molecules like water or alcohols, often dominates in aqueous systems and promotes exothermic mixing when new hydrogen bonds form between solute and solvent. In endothermic mixing, where ΔH_mix > 0, the interactions between unlike molecules are weaker than the average of the like-like interactions, requiring input to the stronger cohesive forces in the pure components. A classic example is the - system, where nonpolar hexane molecules interact weakly via dispersion forces with polar molecules dominated by hydrogen bonding and dipole-dipole forces, resulting in immiscibility and a positive ΔH_mix that favors . Conversely, exothermic mixing occurs when ΔH_mix < 0 due to stronger attractions between unlike molecules than in the pure states, releasing as new bonds form. This is evident in acid-base pairs like and , where the of protons and formation of ions through hydrogen bonding and ion-dipole interactions yield highly exothermic mixing, with ΔH_mix values as low as -74 kJ/mol for concentrated solutions. A quantitative connection between these forces and ΔH_mix emerges from mean-field approximations in lattice models, where the mixing enthalpy is approximated as the difference in pair interaction energies: \Delta H_{\text{mix}} \approx \frac{1}{2} \sum n_{ij} (u_{ij} - u_{ii} - u_{jj}) Here, n_{ij} represents the number of unlike i-j pairs formed, and u_{ij}, u_{ii}, u_{jj} are the pairwise interaction energies (negative for attractive forces) for unlike and like pairs, respectively; positive values of (u_{ij} - u_{ii} - u_{jj}) indicate endothermic mixing. Molecular size and shape further modulate ΔH_mix by affecting packing efficiency in the mixture, where mismatched sizes or shapes can create voids that reduce favorable interactions and contribute to positive ΔH_mix, as larger disparities lead to less efficient space filling and weaker overall attractions compared to the pure components.

Experimental Determination

The experimental determination of the enthalpy of mixing, ΔH_mix, primarily relies on direct calorimetric measurements that quantify the heat absorbed or released upon mixing components under controlled conditions. (ITC) is widely used to measure ΔH_mix at specific compositions by injecting one component into another in a thermally isolated , recording the heat flow to maintain constant . This technique allows precise determination of partial molar enthalpies of mixing through successive titrations, with sensitivities down to microjoules, making it suitable for mixtures at ambient pressures. For obtaining complete ΔH_mix curves across compositions, adiabatic employs a where the is isolated from heat exchange with surroundings, enabling measurement of temperature changes to calculate total heat effects. This method integrates the over the temperature rise post-mixing, providing excess enthalpies for binary and multicomponent systems, often at temperatures from 293 to 363 . Indirect methods derive ΔH_mix from vapor-liquid equilibrium (VLE) data by first obtaining excess (G^E) from activity coefficients, then estimating excess (S^E) via or configurational assumptions, and applying the relation H^E = G^E + T S^E. This approach is validated against direct measurements for consistency in thermodynamic models, particularly for systems where is challenging. For supercritical mixtures under high pressure, flow calorimeters measure ΔH_mix by continuously mixing streams in a high-pressure , capturing effects across critical loci up to several hundred . These setups, often using power-compensation designs, handle fluids like CO2 with organic solvents, yielding excess molar enthalpies with uncertainties below 2%. Compiled experimental data on ΔH_mix are accessible through databases such as the Dortmund Data Bank (DDB), which stores excess enthalpy records for over 30,000 binary mixtures, and the NIST Chemistry WebBook, providing thermophysical properties including mixing enthalpies for select fluids. Accurate measurements require stringent best practices, including temperature control to ±0.01 K to minimize baseline drifts and sample purity exceeding 99.5% to avoid impurity contributions to heat effects. Uncertainties typically range from 1-5% in modern setups, influenced by heat leaks and mixing efficiency, but can be reduced through calibration with known standards like water-ethanol mixtures. Since the , advancements in microcalorimeters, such as high-resolution flow microcalorimeters, have enabled measurements with sample volumes under 200 μL and resolutions better than 1 μW, enhancing precision for small-scale or reactive systems.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Chem 728 Lecture Notes – Part 3 – Thermodynamics
    Alternatively viewed, an ideal solution is one for which the enthalpy of mixing is 0 and the only source of energy change is due to changes in the entropy ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Thermodynamics of solid solutions - DoITPoMS
    The excess enthalpy relative to the mechanical mixture is known as the enthalpy of mixing, ΔHmix. This can either be positive or negative, or zero. Graph of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    [PDF] MIXING
    THE ENTHALPY OF MIXING. The enthalpy of the system depends upon the interactions. Between the molecules - we need an expression for the. Change in enthalpy on ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Mixing enthalpies of alloys with dynamical instability: bcc Ti-V system
    Abstract. Enthalpy of mixing is among the key materials parameters to determine phase stability and phase transformations in solid solutions.
  6. [6]
    Enthalpy of Mixing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Enthalpy of mixing (Δ H mix) is defined as the difference between the sum of the enthalpies of the solute and solvent and the enthalpy of the mixture, ...Missing: n_i N_i
  7. [7]
    A HISTORY OF SOLUTION THEORY - Annual Reviews
    Van't Hoff called the "analogy" between osmotic pressure and gas pres sure "a profound analogy, almost an identity." He proceeded to relate the osmotic pressure ...Missing: enthalpy | Show results with:enthalpy
  8. [8]
    The thermodynamics of mixing
    Mixing of perfect gases is spontaneous. The isothermal, isobaric enthalpy of mixing, DmixH, of two perfect gases may be found from DG = DH - TDS.
  9. [9]
    Chapter 7 Simple Mixtures
    The enthalpy of mixing is zero. Real gases have different A-A, A-B, and B-B interactions.
  10. [10]
    Temperature dependent thermodynamic model of the system H(+ ...
    Nov 4, 2010 · The model is valid for temperatures < or approximately 263.15 up to 330 K and concentrations from infinite dilution to saturation with respect ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] 1 x B x B B ∂ ∂ − = - MIT
    Activity coefficients from ∆GEX models. The activity coefficient is defined in terms of the partial molar excess Gibbs free energy of mixing and can be ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] heats of mixing of aqueous electrolytes temperatjre dependence
    Thus, kn owledge of the heat of mixing as a function of temperature would make it possible to calculate thermodynamic properties from as few Para- meters as ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Chapter 5: The Thermodynamic Description of Mixtures - Chemistry
    Describes the relationship between changes in chemical potential for components in a mixture. The chemical potential of one component in a mixture cannot change ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Ideal Solutions Calculate the Gibbs energy of mixing for the ...
    Apr 18, 2021 · Partial molar quantities allow the variation of the intermolecular forces in solution to be easily accounted for in thermodynamic relationships.
  15. [15]
    Raoult's Law and Ideal Mixtures of Liquids - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Jan 29, 2023 · This page deals with Raoult's Law and how it applies to mixtures of two volatile liquids. It covers cases where the two liquids are entirely miscible in all ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Ideal Solutions Chapter 18 Problems
    At 30.0°C the vapor pressure of pure toluene and pure benzene are 36.7 and 118.2 torr, respectively. The two liquids form a nearly ideal solution. (a) For a ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Two component systems Ideal solutions Raoult's law
    This holds for ideal solutions. An ideal solution is approached by binary solutions of molecules that have similar properties (e.g. benzene and toluene).
  18. [18]
    13.5 Colligative Properties of Solutions
    Mixtures of benzene and toluene approximate an ideal solution because the intermolecular forces in the two pure liquids are almost identical in both kind and ...
  19. [19]
    SOLUBILITY. XII. REGULAR SOLUTIONS 1 - ACS Publications
    Large decrease in the melting point of benzoquinones via high-n eutectic mixing predicted by a regular solution model.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The lattice model of solutions - University of Lethbridge
    Feb 22, 2009 · This equation turns out to be a good initial approximation to the enthalpy of mixing, even when the solvent and solute are different in size. ...Missing: derivation | Show results with:derivation
  21. [21]
    Margules activity model - Wikipedia
    The Margules activity model is a simple thermodynamic model for the excess Gibbs free energy of a liquid mixture introduced in 1895 by Max Margules.Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  22. [22]
    Van Laar equation - Wikipedia
    The Van Laar equation is a thermodynamic activity model, which was developed by Johannes van Laar in 1910-1913, to describe phase equilibria of liquid mixtures.Missing: non- | Show results with:non-
  23. [23]
    Calorimetric studies of mixing enthalpy in the liquid system Ga-Li ...
    Dec 1, 2019 · It is shown, that the binary sub-system Ga-Li shows a strong exothermic behavior with a molar liquid mixing enthalpy of Δ mix H = −22.4 kJ·mol −1 at x(Li) =
  24. [24]
    Prediction of enthalpies of mixing with a UNIFAC model
    Application of Different Group Contribution Models and Empirical Methods to Excess Enthalpies of Ternary Mixtures. Journal of Thermal Analysis and ...
  25. [25]
    Prediction of the excess enthalpies of mixing of mixtures using the ...
    The UNIFAC model, developed for binary systems alkanes with n-alcohols, ketones, esters and ethers, and for ternary n-alcohol—n-alcohol—n-alkane systems, ...
  26. [26]
    Molecular dynamics simulations of the enthalpy of mixing of poly ...
    In this work, we attempt to determine the enthalpy of mixing using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation in order to analyze the miscibility of polymer blends, ...
  27. [27]
    MD simulations explain the excess molar enthalpies in pseudo ...
    Nov 14, 2022 · Mixing of the DES with water is strongly exothermic, while methanol mixtures are endothermic over the entire mixture composition range.
  28. [28]
    Enthalpies of mixture of ethanol and water at 25.degree.C
    Excess molar enthalpy for methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol + n-butylamine mixtures at 288.15 and 308.15 K at atmospheric pressure. Journal of ...
  29. [29]
    Thermodynamic properties of aqueous non-electrolyte mixtures I ...
    Thermodynamic properties of aqueous non-electrolyte mixtures I. Excess enthalpy for water + ethanol at 298.15 to 383.15 K.
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    Data-driven study of the enthalpy of mixing in the liquid phase
    The enthalpy of mixing in the liquid phase is a thermodynamic property reflecting interactions between elements that is key to predict phase transformations ...
  32. [32]
    Thermodynamic Description of the Cu-Ni-Zn System Above 600 C ...
    The enthalpy of mixing for ternary liquid Ni-Sn-Zn alloys was determined along two sections at 873 K where pure Ni was dropped into liquid Sn 1Àx Zn x ...
  33. [33]
    CALPHAD Methodology - Thermo-Calc Software
    CALPHAD is a phenomenological approach for calculating/predicting thermodynamic, kinetic, and other properties of multicomponent materials systems.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Physical Property Methods and Models 11.1
    This manual is intended as a guide to using AspenTech's software. This documentation contains AspenTech proprietary and confidential information and may not ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Intermolecular Forces in Mixtures And Solutions
    Jan 29, 2023 · Mixing is a spontaneous process that increases the entropy of the solution. ... ΔH is the change in heat energy found by subtracting the enthalpy ...
  36. [36]
    The Solution Process
    If we add hexane to water, the hexane will float on the top of the water with no apparent mixing. The reasons why hexane and water do not mix are complex, but ...
  37. [37]
    7.1: Thermodynamics of Mixing - Chemistry LibreTexts
    Apr 24, 2022 · Regular solution theory, as we consider it here, is a mean-field approach where the interaction at a given lattice site is approximated by a ...
  38. [38]
    Effects of molecular size and shape on thermodynamic properties of ...
    However, packing effects governed by molecular shape are important in the calculation of thermodynamic properties at high fluid densities.
  39. [39]
    Heats of Mixing Using an Isothermal Titration Calorimeter - NIH
    Jun 29, 2009 · When an ITC is used to determine heats of mixing of liquids, two operation modes are possible: (1) in the standard mode, a known amount of a ...
  40. [40]
    Isothermal titration calorimetry and molecular dynamics study of ion ...
    We used isothermal titration calorimetry to measure the enthalpies of mixing , ΔHmix, of 3,3- and 6,6-ionene fluorides and bromides with low molecular weight ...
  41. [41]
    An Adiabatic Solution Calorimeter and Measurements of a Standard ...
    The calorimeter is capable of measuring the enthalpies of solution reactions which occur at atmospheric pressure between 293 and 363 K providing the chemicals ...
  42. [42]
    (PDF) Enthalpy of Mixing in Al–Tb Liquid - ResearchGate
    Oct 16, 2025 · The mixing enthalpies of Al–Pr binary liquid alloys are measured in the ranges 0 < x Pr < 0.15 at 1560 K and 0.46 < x Pr < 1 at 1410–1670 K by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Critical Evaluation of Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium, Heat of Mixing, and ...
    This paper is the first in a series of reports on the critical evaluation of vapor-liquid equilibrium, heat of mixing, and volume change of mixing data for ...
  44. [44]
    Simultaneous description of vapor-liquid equilibrium and excess ...
    Mar 1, 1996 · Simultaneous description of vapor-liquid equilibrium and excess enthalpies for methanol and ethanol binary mixtures with propanal. Full Record ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] or THIS twmon is mwtrc - OSTI.GOV
    Using a flow calorimetric procedure, heats of mixing (H^) were determined in temperature and pressure regions spanning critical loci for a large number of ...
  46. [46]
    Excess molar enthalpies for mixtures of supercritical CO2 and linalool
    Aug 6, 2025 · An isothermal high-pressure flow calorimeter has been used to measure excess molar enthalpies (HmE) for mixtures of supercritical CO2 and N ...
  47. [47]
    HE – Excess Enthalpies in Non-Electrolyte Mixtures - DDBST
    The h E data bank contains excess enthalpy (heats of mixing) data for a large number of binary and multicomponent mixtures.
  48. [48]
    Thermophysical Properties of Fluid Systems - the NIST WebBook
    Accurate thermophysical properties are available for several fluids. These data include the following: Density; Cp; Enthalpy; Internal energy; Viscosity; Joule- ...
  49. [49]
    Enthalpy of mixing of liquid Co–Sn alloys - PMC - NIH
    The integral molar enthalpy of mixing, ΔMixH, was calculated by summing the respective reaction enthalpies and division by the total molar amount of ...Missing: x_j B_ij
  50. [50]
    μFlowCal – High‐Resolution Differential Flow Microcalorimeter for ...
    Mar 18, 2022 · The μFlowCal is a high precision microcalorimeter developed to measure accurately heats of mixing using small samples sizes (200 μL) in a wide variety of ...
  51. [51]
    High Precision Microcalorimetry: Apparatus, Procedures, and ... - NIH
    Microcalorimetry is an important technique for the measurement of heats of reaction in solution. Since small amounts of solution (typically less than one mL) ...