Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Eruv

An eruv (Hebrew: עֵרוּב, pronounced ay-roov) is a ritual enclosure defined by rabbinic Jewish law () that symbolically transforms a public or semi-public area into a single private domain, thereby permitting Orthodox Jews to carry objects such as prayer books, keys, or infants within its boundaries on the (), an act otherwise prohibited under the Torah's restrictions on labor in public spaces. The mechanism relies on both a physical demarcation—often utilizing existing structures like walls or utility poles supplemented by thin wires, posts (lechim), or symbolic doorways (tzurat hapetach)—and a preparatory ritual involving the shared placement of (typically or ) to signify communal partnership, as codified in the Talmudic tractate Eruvin. Established before sundown on Friday, an eruv effectively extends the "home" domain for observance, addressing the halakhic against transferring items between private and public realms (hotza'ah) while enabling practical daily activities like pushing strollers or accessing synagogues without technical violation. This construct, rooted in post-biblical rabbinic rather than biblical , has facilitated the of traditional observance in environments, with thousands of eruvin operating globally in cities from to . While praised within communities for promoting communal cohesion and accessibility to on , eruvin have sparked rabbinic debates over their stringency and validity—particularly in areas with incomplete enclosures or non-Jewish residents—and occasional legal controversies with municipalities regarding installation on , underscoring tensions between religious practice and civic infrastructure. Some stringent authorities question reliance on eruvin as a leniency that may erode stricter personal observance, though empirical data from communities with functional eruvin indicate heightened participation rates.

Halachic Foundations

Biblical Prohibition on Transfer

The prohibits all forms of creative labor (melachah) on the , as stated in 20:10: "But the seventh day is a sabbath unto the thy ; in it thou shalt not do any manner of work." This general encompasses the specific category of hotza'ah, or transfer, derived rabbinically from biblical texts but rooted in scriptural commands against bearing burdens or departing one's place. A primary biblical source is 17:21-22, where the prophet declares: "Thus saith the Lord: Take heed to yourselves, and bear no burden on the day, nor bring it in by the gates of ; nor carry forth a burden out of your houses on the day, neither do ye any work." This verse explicitly forbids transporting loads into or out of domiciles or through public thoroughfares on the , establishing a direct on carrying objects across boundaries. Further reinforcement appears in 16:29, from the manna narrative: "See that the Lord hath given you the ; therefore he giveth you on the sixth day the bread for two days; let every man abide in his place, let no man go out of his place on the seventh day." Traditional interprets "going out of his place" as prohibiting movement or conveyance beyond one's immediate private domain, thus framing transfer between distinct spatial realms—private residences versus communal or open areas—as a violation. This scriptural basis underscores the 's intent to demarcate sacred rest from profane activity, with unauthorized carrying symbolizing disruption of that repose.

Concept of Eruv Chatzerot

The eruv chatzerot, or "joining of s," constitutes a rabbinic ordinance enabling residents of multiple dwellings encircling a shared to carry items between their residences and the on the , which would otherwise be prohibited as between distinct domains (reshuyot yachid). In the absence of this mechanism, each residence functions as an independent domain, rendering the inaccessible for carrying without violating the biblical on hotza'ah (). The procedure involves residents collectively designating a portion of —typically a full of or sufficient for at least one meal—placed in a mutually accessible location prior to onset, thereby symbolizing unified ownership of the and reclassifying the entire enclosed area as a single domain. This institution originates in the (Eruvin 1:1–2), which mandates the joint meal to preempt potential quarrels over courtyard usage, as articulated in the : "This serves as a condition that all will eat together on the , and there will be no quarreling among them over the courtyard." Rabbinically enacted rather than biblically mandated, the eruv chatzerot reflects a grounded in principles of acquisition (kinyan) or habitation (dirah), with Talmudic authorities favoring the former (transactional transfer of rights) and Rabbah the latter (establishing joint residency). If a single resident owns the courtyard outright and provides food for all, no eruv is required, as the space already qualifies as their private domain. The mechanism underscores a broader halachic emphasis on communal , extending permissibility only to enclosed courtyards (chatzerot) and not public thoroughfares, which necessitate alternative constructs like shituf mevo'ot. is preferred for the eruv due to its status as a staple, though certain other foods suffice in specific cases, with the quantity calibrated to ensure symbolic adequacy (e.g., at least a kav or approximately 68 grams for baked goods). Failure to include all residents voids the eruv, prohibiting carrying for non-participants, though unaware or coerced individuals may benefit under certain conditions per later codifiers like the (Orah Hayyim 366:3).

Scriptural and Rabbinic Sources

The biblical prohibition against carrying objects on the stems from the Torah's commandment to abstain from labor, with carrying specifically interpreted as transferring items between distinct domains—a private domain (reshut hayahid) and a (reshut harabim). This derives exegetically from Exodus 16:29, which states, "Let no man go out of his place on the seventh day," limiting movement and transfer to one's immediate domain, and is reinforced by prophetic rebukes such as 17:21-22, which explicitly forbids bearing burdens through Jerusalem's gates on the . The broader no-work injunction appears in Exodus 20:8-11 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15, under which rabbinic tradition categorizes carrying (hotza'ah) as one of the 39 prohibited labors (melachot), modeled on activities involved in constructing the . Rabbinic sources address this restriction through the institution of eruv chatzerot, a mechanism to symbolically merge multiple private domains into a single shared , thereby permitting intra-domain carrying. Attributed to King Solomon as a safeguard (gezeirah) against inadvertent violations, this enactment is recorded in the ( 14b), where it is described as transforming separate residences into a unified private area via joint ownership of a prepared food portion. codifies this in (Hilchot Eruvin 1:1-3), explaining that without such merging, law would strictly prohibit transfers even within a shared among neighbors, but Solomon's ordinance allows it through the eruv mixture. The Mishnah's tractate Eruvin (e.g., chapters 1-2) systematically delineates the requirements, such as placing a joint meal in a designated spot before to effect the merger, while the Babylonian Talmud's on Eruvin (e.g., 21b-22a) expands with dialectical analysis, including debates on domain definitions and exceptions like non-observant residents invalidating the eruv. These texts emphasize the eruv's role as a rabbinic leniency rooted in communal intent, not a biblical mandate, and require expert rabbinic oversight due to the topic's complexity. Later codes, such as the (Orah Hayim 370-386), synthesize these sources into practical halachic guidelines.

Construction and Technical Requirements

Materials and Boundary Formation

The boundary of an eruv encloses a designated area to designate it as a single private domain (reshut ha-yachid) under halachic law, permitting carrying within it on . This enclosure relies on existing structures such as walls, fences, hedges, or natural barriers like rivers and railways, which qualify as partitions if they meet minimum and requirements of at least 10 tefachim (approximately 80-100 cm or 31-39 inches). Where gaps occur, supplemental elements form valid or walls. Primary symbolic construction employs tzurat ha-petach (doorway form), comprising two vertical sideposts (lechayim, singular lechi) and a horizontal (korah) atop them, as codified in the (Eruvin 11b): "a cane from here and a cane from there and a cane above them." Lechayim are typically constructed from wooden boards, PVC pipes, or thin metal strips affixed to utility poles, buildings, or fences, requiring a minimum height of 10 tefachim and sufficient width (often 4 tefachim or about 32-40 inches). The utilizes existing overhead utility wires—such as or cable lines—or supplemented with strung wire, ensuring direct contact or close proximity to the sideposts. In urban settings, continuous overhead boundaries often incorporate thin cord, , or black plastic-coated wire strung between poles at heights of 10-18 feet to form the korah where natural lintels are absent, minimizing visual impact while adhering to halachic standards against excessive tenuousness. These materials must withstand weather and maintain , with vertical components not exceeding practical limits for but without strict upper restrictions for tzurat ha-petach. Gaps exceeding 10 tefachim in width invalidate sections unless bridged by approved mechanisms like lavud (proximity ) or lamed shapes. Alternative boundary types include full solid walls or partial partitions (mechitzot), but tzurat ha-petach predominates in community eruvin due to practicality. Materials selection prioritizes durability and halachic validity, with rabbinic authorities like endorsing utility wires as lintels provided they are strung pre-Shabbat intent. Weekly inspections verify integrity, as breaks revert the area to (reshut ha-rabim).

Preparation of the Eruv Mixture

The eruv mixture for eruv chatzerot consists of baked goods, primarily whole loaves of or pat haba b'kisinim (foods baked like bread, such as certain pastries), contributed by or on behalf of all adult Jewish residents within the enclosed courtyard or area. This shared food symbolizes the unification of private domains into a single communal domain, permitting carrying on . Contributions are typically collected from each household in the form of a small portion, such as a piece of or bread equivalent to at least a kazayit (an olive's volume) per participant, though one individual may supply the entire amount if designated to represent the community. The required quantity totals at least the volume of six to eight eggs (kebaytzim), representing sufficient for two meals, though larger amounts like a full box of matzot are common in practice to ensure validity even if portions are invalidated. The must be whole and unbroken where possible, derived from one of the five grains specified in halacha (, , , , or oats), and prepared without leaven if used during . Preparation occurs before or , ideally during daylight hours, to avoid any doubt regarding timeliness. Once collected, the foods are placed together in a single vessel or container, not scattered, and stored in an accessible location such as a designated or within the eruv boundary to remain available throughout . A Jewish adult male, preferably unrelated to the hosting household, then lifts the vessel approximately a handbreadth (tefach) off the ground while reciting the Aramaic : "Harcheivan eruvei chatzerot... zeh ha-eruv shelanu she-yehe lanu l'hotzi ule-havi min ha-batim la-chatzerot ve-min ha-chatzerot la-batim" (This shall be our eruv, permitting us to carry from houses to courtyards and from courtyards to houses). This act finalizes the partnership. If the eruv is established for the first time, renewed after invalidation, or if the group has not participated previously, "Baruch Atah Adonai... asher kid'shanu b'mitzvotav v'tzivanu al mitzvat eruv" is recited beforehand. The mixture remains in place until after Shabbat, at which point it may be consumed, though its symbolic role persists even if partially eaten during Shabbat provided the remainder suffices for the halachic minimum; a new preparation is required weekly or after any disruption. Sephardic custom favors placement in a private home for accessibility, while Ashkenazic practice often uses a synagogue. Failure to meet these specifications, such as using insufficient quantity or improper foods like raw produce, invalidates the eruv, reverting the area to separate domains.

Inspection and Certification Processes

Eruvs require regular to verify the integrity of their boundaries, as any break invalidates the for carrying on . Weekly checks are typically conducted on afternoons or mornings by trained volunteers or eruv technicians, who traverse the perimeter—often by vehicle for efficiency—to examine wires, poles, fences, and other elements for damage from weather, animals, or human activity. These inspections focus on ensuring continuity, with visual confirmation of attachments like lechis (doorpost symbols) and tzuros ha-pesach (doorway frames), and may incorporate modern aids such as GPS-enabled apps for real-time reporting of issues to the overseeing (halachic authority). In cases of suspected disruptions, such as after storms, additional verifications occur, though rabbinic opinions vary on relying solely on prior checks versus re-inspection. Annual foot inspections by the local rav provide a thorough halachic review, adhering to standards outlined by bodies like the . Certification follows successful inspection, with the or eruv declaring the boundary kosher via announcements, websites, or hotlines; reliance on an uncertified eruv risks violating prohibitions. This process underscores the eruv's status as a rabbinic leniency requiring meticulous maintenance, as even minor flaws can encompass public domains improperly.

Scope and Limitations

Permitted Activities Within an Eruv

The eruv transforms a designated or mixed area into a single reshut hayachid (private domain) for the purposes of observance, thereby permitting the transfer of objects within its boundaries that would otherwise violate the prohibition against carrying in a reshut harabbim (). This halachic mechanism, derived from Talmudic principles in tractate Eruvin, enables residents to carry items indispensable for Shabbat activities, provided those items are not independently forbidden under other restrictions such as hotza'ah (transfer) of non-permissible objects or melachot (creative labors). Permitted carrying includes personal ritual items, such as a (prayer shawl), (prayer book), or bag, from home to synagogue, as these facilitate prayer without constituting prohibited labor. Similarly, keys, handkerchiefs in pockets, or lightweight personal effects may be carried if needed for immediate use, though opinions vary on minimal encumbrances like watches, with stricter views requiring pre-Shabbat placement in a permissible domain. Food and beverages prepared before Shabbat, along with utensils for consumption, can be transported within the eruv to enhance communal meals, aligning with the spirit of oneg Shabbat (Shabbat delight). Actions involving assisted mobility, such as pushing baby strollers or wheelchairs, are authorized under the eruv, as these constitute carrying the occupant or contents across domain boundaries that are unified by the ; however, the propulsion must avoid direct violation of uvdin d'chol (weekday-like activities) or other labors, and battery-powered devices remain prohibited regardless. Children may carry toys suitable for Shabbat play, and adults can transport children's paraphernalia, fostering family participation in without isolation. Throwing objects short distances within the eruv, if not for a forbidden purpose, is also halachically viable, though caution is advised to prevent inadvertent incursions. Critically, the eruv does not supersede core prohibitions: items like money, writing instruments, or electronic devices cannot be carried, as their handling or possession contravenes independent rabbinic or decrees against commerce, writing, or electricity use. Disputes among poskim (halachic decisors) may arise over the eruv's validity in certain locales, potentially nullifying these permissions if the boundary is deemed defective, underscoring the need for rabbinic certification prior to reliance.

Prohibitions Persisting Despite an Eruv

An eruv chatzerot permits the carrying of certain objects within its boundaries by symbolically unifying multiple dwellings or areas into a single private domain, thereby resolving the prohibition against transferring items between distinct domains on the . However, this mechanism addresses only one aspect of observance: the domain-based restriction on carrying. It does not override or permit the performance of the other 38 categories of biblically prohibited labors (melachot), which include activities such as plowing, , grinding, cooking, writing, erasing, building, and kindling a . Even within the eruv, carrying remains subject to rabbinic restrictions, such as the prohibition against moving (set-aside) items, which are objects not designated for use on the or whose handling might lead to inadvertent labor. For instance, tools, , or non-essential items intended solely for post-Sabbath use cannot be carried, as these violate separate halachic principles independent of domain transfer. Similarly, objects whose use entails another melachah—such as pens (implicating writing) or umbrellas (implicating erecting a temporary structure)—remain forbidden to carry or deploy. Rabbinic authorities emphasize that reliance on an eruv does not diminish the to observe the full of laws, including those governing commerce, travel beyond limits, and interpersonal conduct. An eruv's validity presupposes strict adherence to these persisting prohibitions; any assumption otherwise misrepresents its narrow halachic function. Local rabbinic certification typically includes reminders of these boundaries to prevent overreach.

Disputes Among Orthodox Authorities

Within Orthodox Judaism, disputes over eruvin center on their technical halachic validity, particularly in expansive urban areas classified as a reshut harabim (biblical public domain), where an eruv chatzerot may not suffice to permit carrying, as well as broader concerns that reliance on eruvin could confuse visitors or erode stringent Shabbat observance. Rav Moshe Feinstein, a leading 20th-century posek, opposed constructing an eruv around Manhattan, arguing in Iggerot Moshe (Orah Hayyim 1:138–140, 1952) that such an enclosure is invalid due to the island's status as a public domain under the Rashba's stringent view, which holds that areas housing more than 6,000 residents retain biblical prohibitions even when walled. He reiterated this in a June 1959 letter published in Hapardes and a December 16, 1960, letter to Rabbi Leo Jung, permitting personal leniency for others but refusing endorsement to avoid implying universal permissibility, akin to the traditional absence of an eruv in Jerusalem to prevent misleading out-of-towners (Eruvin 22a). Feinstein extended similar reasoning to Brooklyn, deeming it a biblical public domain in Iggerot Moshe (Orah Hayyim 4:87; 5:28:2) due to its population exceeding 600,000 (including commuters), rejecting leniencies like the Arukh ha-Shulhan's classification of city blocks as merely rabbinic prohibitions and viewing non-Jewish drivers as violating Shabbat norms rather than constituting a private domain. He supported bans by Agudath HaRabbanim on June 20, 1962, and , 1966, citing enclosure flaws such as bridges and tunnels. In contrast, Rav Yosef Eliyahu Henkin initially invalidated an earlier Manhattan eruv in Edut Le-Yisrael (1949) but later approved reliance in cases of great need (e.g., for women, children, or doctors) via a July 12, 1961, letter, though with reservations requiring broad rabbinic consensus, which he believed lacking. Rav Zvi Pesach Frank rejected Feinstein's visitor-confusion argument, citing precedents like Warsaw's eruv and Jerusalem's modern one. These debates persist in specific communities; for instance, in 2016, Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis in Brooklyn's issued an edict voiding a new eruv erected by modern Orthodox groups, deeming it halachically unreliable amid ongoing stringency debates. Some authorities further oppose large eruvin on grounds of frequent disruptions (e.g., from weather or infrastructure) rendering them presumptively invalid, prioritizing caution to uphold Shabbat's core prohibitions over convenience. Despite such opposition, proponents like Rabbi Menachem Mendel Kasher endorsed Manhattan's 1962 eruv completion, arguing technical feasibility with rabbinic approbations (haskamot). Adherents of dissenting views, including many Haredi communities, instruct followers to refrain from carrying even within certified eruvin, reflecting a commitment to maximal stringency.

Denominational Perspectives

Orthodox Observance and Variations

In , observance of the eruv entails verifying its validity prior to commencement, typically through rabbinic certification confirming the boundary's integrity and compliance with halakhic standards, thereby permitting carrying of items such as keys, handkerchiefs, and infants within the enclosed area, which would otherwise constitute a violation of the rabbinic on transferring objects between domains. This practice aligns with the Talmudic institution of eruv chatzerot, involving a shared to unify residents as co-dwellers in a single private domain, and eruv boundaries formed by walls, doors, or symbolic wires enclosing public spaces. Orthodox adherents must remain within the eruv's limits to avoid inadvertent transgression, and communities often announce any disruptions, such as downed wires from weather, nullifying its status for that . Variations in Orthodox observance arise primarily from differing rabbinic interpretations of halakhic stringencies, particularly regarding the classification of modern areas as reshut harabim (true public domains) where eruvin may be invalid, or technical issues like reliance on utility poles and non-Jewish owned structures. Modern communities frequently establish and rely on eruvin to accommodate suburban and living, viewing them as legitimate rabbinic leniencies that enhance Shabbat observance without compromising core prohibitions. In contrast, many Haredi and some Chasidic groups exercise greater caution, often declining to use contested eruvin due to doubts about their halakhic robustness; for example, in 2016, Lubavitch rabbis issued a ruling invalidating a proposed eruv by a Modern Orthodox congregation, citing insufficient traditional oversight. Prominent poskim have historically opposed specific eruvin on these grounds; Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, a leading 20th-century authority, deemed the Manhattan eruv unreliable, a view shared by rabbis such as Aharon Kotler and Yaakov Kamenetsky, influencing stringent communities to abstain from carrying regardless. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, emphasizing strict adherence to unaltered Talmudic criteria, frequently reject eruvin incorporating modern elements like fishing line on poles, preferring personal avoidance of carrying to sidestep potential invalidity. Individual observance thus hinges on one's rabbi's psak (ruling), with some Orthodox Jews opting for non-reliance even in certified areas to uphold personal chumrot (stringencies), reflecting a spectrum from permissive to conservative applications within halakhic bounds.

Conservative Judaism's Approach

In Conservative Judaism, the prohibition against hotza'ah—the transfer of objects between private and public domains on the —is upheld as a biblical-level restriction when crossing from a private to a public area, with rabbinic extensions applying to carrying within public spaces. An eruv addresses this by symbolically enclosing a territory, treating it as a unified private domain and thereby permitting carrying of items such as keys, prayer books, or infants within the boundary. This aligns with the movement's commitment to halakhic observance, as articulated by the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards (CJLS) of the Rabbinical Assembly, which references eruvin in responsa on Sabbath practices without challenging their fundamental validity. Conservative communities frequently establish or participate in eruvin, particularly in urban settings, to enable fuller participation, including synagogue attendance with necessary items. These eruvin are often certified by rabbis trained in traditional , though the movement's approach emphasizes practical implementation over the stringent technical debates common in circles, such as disputes over boundary materials or interruptions. For instance, eruvin in areas with Conservative synagogues, like parts of or , facilitate carrying while accommodating modern infrastructure, reflecting a balance between fidelity to Talmudic sources (e.g., Tractate Eruvin) and communal needs. While the halakhic rationale mirrors Orthodox usage, Conservative Judaism's eruv practice receives less emphasis in movement-wide discourse compared to other Sabbath innovations, such as limited allowances for travel to services, due to varying observance levels among adherents. Official guidance does not relax core requirements for eruv validity, but individual rabbis may advise reliance on existing community eruvin without independent -level inspections, prioritizing accessibility for those committed to the prohibition. This pragmatic stance supports eruv maintenance in mixed-denominational neighborhoods, though reliance on an eruv remains optional for less observant members.

Reform Judaism's Stance

emphasizes the ethical and spiritual dimensions of over strict adherence to the 39 categories of prohibited labor (melachot), including the rabbinic extension prohibiting carrying objects between domains. As a result, the denomination does not mandate avoidance of carrying on , rendering the eruv—a technical enclosure designed to unify public and private domains under traditional —unnecessary for observance. The Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR), Reform Judaism's rabbinic body, has explicitly critiqued the eruv as a "legal fiction" inconsistent with the spirit of , arguing that Reform Jews prioritize the law's underlying intent of rest and renewal rather than ritual circumventions. This perspective aligns with broader principles of autonomous decision-making in ritual practice, where individuals may carry keys, prayer books, or other items without relying on boundary enclosures. No Reform congregations maintain or certify eruvs, as the practice conflicts with the movement's rejection of detailed in favor of meaningful, non-legalistic holiness. Observant Reform Jews might enhance Shabbat through communal meals, study, or family time, but without the halakhic framework that necessitates eruvim. This stance reflects Reform's historical adaptation of traditions to contemporary life, as articulated in CCAR platforms since the .

Historical Development

Ancient and Talmudic Origins

The eruv addresses the Torah's prohibition on carrying objects during , which rabbinic interprets as forbidding the transfer (hotza'ah) of items between a private domain (reshut hayahid), a public domain (reshut harabbim), or an intermediate domain (karmelit). This restriction derives from biblical injunctions, including Exodus 16:29—"Let no man go out of his place on the seventh day"—extended through oral traditions to encompass domain-based carrying as one of the 39 prohibited labors (melachot) modeled on construction activities. In ancient walled settlements such as during the Second period (circa 516 BCE–70 ), city walls inherently delineated a shared private domain, permitting intra-city carrying without additional constructs, as the symbolized communal unity under halakhic domains. The formalized eruv emerged as a rabbinic ordinance to merge multiple private domains (e.g., courtyards or neighborhoods) into a single "private" space via symbolic acts, such as placing shared bread (eruv chatzerot) to indicate joint residency and ownership. The term eruv ("mixture" or "joining") first appears in the , the codified redacted by Rabbi Judah the Prince around 200 , where it outlines preparatory rituals to avoid violations in multi-household settings. These Mishnaic rules, attributed to Tannaitic sages of the 1st–2nd centuries , reflect practical adaptations for Jewish life amid Roman-era dispersions, prioritizing causal efficacy in domain unification over strict literalism of prohibitions. Tractate Eruvin in the Babylonian (completed circa 500 CE), the second in the Mo'ed, systematizes these laws through debates among , detailing eruv types (e.g., for courtyards, fields, or pathways via gates or partitions) and validity conditions like unbroken enclosures and resident participation. Talmudic discussions, such as those on symbolic doorposts (lechi) or cross-beams (), emphasize first-principles spatial continuity to render enclosed areas halakhically private, with disputes resolving via majority precedents from earlier authorities like Hillel and Shammai schools. Scholarly examination posits potential pre-Mishnaic roots, including allusions in (circa 3rd century BCE–1st century CE) to boundary rituals that prefigure rabbinic eruvin, suggesting continuity rather than wholesale innovation amid sectarian practices. This framework underscores the eruv's role in facilitating observance without diluting core prohibitions, grounded in empirical domain distinctions verifiable through physical inspection.

Medieval and Early Modern Usage

In medieval Jewish communities across , eruvs were constructed or adapted to enclose residential quarters where natural boundaries like full city walls were absent or incomplete. In 13th-century , Rabbi Eliezer ben Joel HaLevi (known as Ra'aviah, c. 1140–1225) issued a ruling permitting a symbolic eruv that integrated actual structures with conceptual extensions, effectively designating the entire Jewish neighborhood as a shared domain for carrying on . This approach marked a shift from strictly physical enclosures to hybrid ones, addressing the dispersed layout of Jewish homes in urban settings. Similarly, in medieval , eruvin were established in all major Jewish centers, often relying on existing alleys, doorways, and partial walls to form the perimeter. Existing city walls frequently served as halakhically valid boundaries in walled medieval towns, obviating the need for additional construction where Jewish areas aligned with them. These eruvin facilitated communal observance by treating the enclosed space as a single "," but required collective participation through shared food (eruv tavshilin or hatzerot) to unify residents. Usage emphasized practical over expansive territory, limited typically to neighborhoods rather than entire cities. In the (roughly 16th–18th centuries), eruv construction persisted amid ghettoization, with communities erecting boundaries around confined Jewish districts to permit carrying within and sometimes beyond gates. Communal bodies (kehillot) oversaw these, stringing wires or poles where walls fell short, as in many Italian and German cities post-1516 model. A documented case arose in , , in 1720, when Isaiah Bassan (1665–1734) authorized an eruv hatzerot enclosing the ghetto, allowing transfer of items to adjacent areas and reducing inadvertent violations by integrating symbolic gateways. Such eruvin underscored kehillah authority in negotiating halakhic compliance with urban restrictions, though they often sparked internal rabbinic scrutiny over technical validity.

19th-20th Century Expansion

In the , the of ancient city walls in urban centers necessitated innovative rabbinic adaptations for eruv boundaries, relying on , railroads, and other linear features to enclose Jewish quarters. This shift facilitated the maintenance of eruvin in expanding cities like and , where such enclosures supported observance amid growing populations. The late 19th-century wave of Eastern European Jewish immigration to spurred the establishment of municipal eruvin to accommodate urban life. The first documented eruv on the continent was constructed in , , in 1894, marking a pioneering effort amid halakhic debates over its validity in non-traditional settings. This was soon followed by an eruv in in 1905, extending the practice to denser metropolitan areas and setting precedents for future constructions. Throughout the , eruv expansion accelerated with the post-World War II of communities, transforming scattered neighborhoods into symbolically unified domains. Efforts in cities like , where an eruv was formalized in the mid-century despite opposition, exemplified this growth, with rabbinic endorsements enabling broader adoption. By the , virtually every major population center in the United States and beyond had established or was developing an eruv, reflecting institutional maturation and technological refinements in boundary demarcation.

Modern Implementation and Communities

Major Urban Eruvin

Major urban eruvs serve large Jewish communities in densely populated cities, symbolically enclosing vast areas to permit carrying on the within halachic guidelines. These installations often integrate existing like utility poles, natural barriers, and thin wires, requiring meticulous weekly inspections to ensure continuity. Notable examples include those in , , , and , each adapted to unique urban topographies and community needs. The Eruv encloses most of the borough, spanning approximately 18 miles of primarily translucent affixed to buildings, bridges, and poles. Initially established in 1999 for the under rabbinic supervision, it expanded to cover the majority of 's 22.8 square miles, facilitating observance for thousands in this high-density environment. Earlier attempts date to , when Rabbi Yehoshua Seigel created a limited eruv for the , but the modern version addresses broader urban challenges like heavy foot traffic exceeding 600,000 daily in parts, which complicates halachic validity under some interpretations. Maintenance costs exceed $200,000 annually due to the scale and vulnerability to disruptions like storms or construction. The Community Eruv is the largest in the United States, encompassing over 100 square miles across and adjacent areas, potentially rivaling the world's biggest. Constructed with input from Avrohom Teichman and local rabbanim, it relies on a combination of wires, poles, and existing structures, serving 40,000 to 50,000 observant weekly despite the expansive perimeter that demands rigorous checks. Its scale highlights adaptations for sprawling suburban-urban interfaces, where natural and man-made barriers supplement symbolic elements. Sydney's Eruv, activated in 2002, bounds Eastern Sydney including , utilizing predominantly solid mechitzot such as South Head Peninsula cliff faces, golf course fences, and telegraph infrastructure rather than extensive wiring. This configuration, one of the few globally emphasizing physical barriers, extends private domain status over the area, aiding families with young children and the mobility-impaired during . The setup reflects Australia's , integrating natural features to minimize visual and maintenance intrusions. In , the North-West Eruv, the United Kingdom's first operational eruv since March 2003, covers about 10 square kilometers in areas like and , marked by poles and wires to enclose public spaces for Orthodox use. Supervised through communal rabbinic bodies, it faced initial opposition but enables routine Sabbath activities like pushing prams within its perimeter, supporting a growing Jewish population amid urban density. Additional eruvs exist in and , but the NW zone remains a flagship for European urban adaptation.

Recent Establishments and Expansions

In the past decade, the proliferation of eruvin has been driven by demographic growth in Jewish populations and advancements in construction and monitoring technologies, such as GPS-enabled sensors and durable synthetic wires, facilitating larger and more reliable enclosures in suburban and urban settings. These developments have enabled expansions that incorporate previously excluded areas, including parks and residential developments, while adhering to halakhic standards validated by rabbinic authorities. In , the community's eruv underwent a comprehensive upgrade and expansion starting in mid-2023, incorporating new boundary elements and structural reinforcements to extend coverage across additional neighborhoods; the project was completed by July 2025 after 18 months of work. Similarly, Milwaukee's Eruv, long in planning, was finalized in March 2023, enclosing a significant portion of the area to support Shabbat carrying for local residents. Brooklyn's boroughwide eruv, assembled over two years through designation of buildings as walls and stringing of fishing line along poles, became operational by early 2023, symbolically unifying much of the borough's for observance amid rapid Hasidic community expansion. In the Dallas-Fort Worth area, the Far North Dallas Eruv expanded in 2024-2025 to encompass over 1,000 additional homes and three new playgrounds or parks, approved by local rabbis to meet rising demand from growing families. Manhattan's Lincoln Square Eruv, initially established in 1999, has seen multiple boundary extensions northward and southward, now covering most of the island from 145th to the , with battery-operated sensors introduced in 2025 to automate weekly checks and reduce manual labor. In the Denver suburbs, announced plans in June 2023 for Colorado's largest eruv in Douglas County, aiming to enclose expansive residential zones to accommodate suburban Jewish growth, though construction timelines remain pending rabbinic and municipal approvals. These initiatives reflect a broader trend, with over 200 eruvin operational in by the mid-2020s, often requiring annual maintenance costs exceeding $100,000 for major urban systems.

Maintenance Challenges in Contemporary Settings

Maintaining an eruv in contemporary urban and suburban environments demands rigorous weekly inspections to verify its halachic integrity, as any breach invalidates the enclosure and prohibits carrying within it on the . Rabbinic guidelines require inspectors knowledgeable in the laws of eruvin to examine the entire perimeter, ideally on foot, recording vulnerabilities and reporting issues to a supervising or for approval of repairs. In large city eruvs, such as West Los Angeles's 60-mile boundary, teams of rabbis patrol by vehicle weekly, followed by specialized crews for fixes, yet breaks occur almost every week due to the scale and exposure. Environmental factors pose significant risks, with severe weather frequently disrupting eruv structures; for instance, winter storms in 2010 damaged eruvim in multiple U.S. communities including , and , while Superstorm Sandy in 2012 destroyed portions in , and a 2021 tornado toppled poles in . Urban infrastructure exacerbates these issues, as overhead cables—common in modern eruvim for enclosing areas—prove vulnerable to utility work, construction, falling trees, and vehicle impacts, often necessitating immediate rabbinic re-inspection post-repair. Vandalism adds another layer, as seen in 2017 incidents in , where eruv piping was deliberately damaged in multiple bias-related acts, requiring police investigation and swift community repairs. Financial burdens are substantial, with annual maintenance costs for major urban eruvim ranging from $100,000 to $150,000, funded by synagogue donations and covering materials, labor, and professional consultations; the eruv, for example, demands such expenditures to sustain its fishing-line perimeter amid constant urban flux. Logistical hurdles in sprawling metropolises include coordinating with municipal authorities for access to poles and rights-of-way, while the isolation of eruv professionals—lacking prior networks for sharing best practices—has prompted initiatives like the 2023 conference to address these persistent challenges. Halachic oversight remains paramount, with eminent poskim required to resolve complex validations, such as those involving contemporary elements like monofilament lines, ensuring adherence despite evolving urban landscapes.

Neighborhood Opposition and Demographic Concerns

Opposition to eruv construction in suburban neighborhoods frequently stems from residents' concerns that such enclosures would attract larger numbers of Jews, thereby altering local demographics and community character. In , during public hearings in the early 2000s, numerous residents voiced fears that an eruv would encourage an influx of families, potentially leading to increased demands on public schools and changes in neighborhood aesthetics. These apprehensions contributed to the borough's denial of permission for eruv markers, prompting a federal lawsuit by the Tenafly Eruv Association; the case ultimately settled in 2003 with the eruv approved and Tenafly paying $325,000 in legal fees to plaintiffs. Similar demographic worries surfaced in Westhampton Beach, New York, where a 2011 proposal for an eruv enclosing parts of the village and nearby areas drew opposition from a coalition including non-Orthodox Jews and other residents, who argued it would signal to communities that were amenable to expansion, risking property value declines and shifts in the affluent, low-density residential profile. The dispute escalated into multi-year litigation, with opponents forming groups like Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach to challenge the eruv on constitutional grounds; federal courts ruled in favor of the eruv in 2015, allowing its maintenance despite ongoing local tensions. In , the 2017 eruv proposal ignited protests from hundreds of residents, many citing fears of an Orthodox Jewish influx from neighboring Rockland County, which could strain municipal resources, inflate housing competition, and transform the suburb's demographic balance toward higher religious observance and family sizes. Opponents, including some non-Orthodox Jews, referenced patterns in other towns where eruvin preceded rapid Orthodox population growth, potentially eroding property values and quality due to private enrollments reducing tax support for . The controversy led to temporary ordinances restricting park access and eruv poles, though legal challenges and public backlash ultimately halted aggressive municipal blocks. Critics of these oppositions, including advocates, contend that such fears often reflect unsubstantiated stereotypes about Orthodox communities' impacts, noting that eruvin enable existing residents to observe laws without necessarily driving migration; however, empirical patterns in places like Bergen County show correlations between eruv establishment and subsequent Orthodox home purchases. Non-Orthodox and secular Jewish opponents sometimes frame resistance as preserving a pluralistic against perceived ultra-Orthodox dominance, though courts have consistently viewed blanket eruv bans as discriminatory under the First Amendment's free exercise protections. In the , legal challenges to eruv construction have primarily invoked the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, arguing that municipal permissions for attaching eruv markers, such as lechis on utility poles, constitute government endorsement of religion. Courts have consistently rejected these claims, finding eruv symbols unobtrusive and functionally neutral, akin to other permitted signage, while upholding proponents' rights under the and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). A landmark case arose in , where the Tenafly Eruv Association sought permission in 1999 to install lechis on utility poles to enclose a residential area for observance. The borough initially granted approval but reversed course after resident opposition, enacting an ordinance banning all wire attachments and removing existing lechis, prompting a 2000 federal lawsuit alleging Free Exercise and equal protection violations. The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey issued a temporary preserving the eruv and ultimately ruled in favor of the association in 2001, finding the borough's actions discriminatory and not neutral. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this in 2002, emphasizing that Tenafly selectively enforced its ordinance against the eruv while permitting comparable non-religious attachments. The U.S. denied in June 2003, allowing the lower court ruling to stand, after which the borough settled in 2004, paying $325,000 in legal fees to the association. In Westhampton Beach, New York, the East End Eruv Association filed suit in 2011 against the village after it denied a permit for an eruv enclosing Jewish homes, citing aesthetic and concerns. A federal district court dismissed challenges from opponents, including Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach, who argued in a 2012 countersuit that the eruv promoted dominance; the court ruled in 2013 and 2014 that the eruv did not violate the , as it imposed no burden on non-adherents and served a minimal religious purpose without governmental promotion. The Second Circuit upheld this in 2015, affirming the village's eventual approval and expansion of the eruv to adjacent areas. The 2017 Mahwah, New Jersey, eruv expansion by the Bergen Rockland Eruv Association triggered ordinances restricting attachments, leading to federal and state lawsuits under RLUIPA for . Although no full trial occurred, the sued the township in October 2017, alleging exclusionary intent toward Orthodox Jews; Mahwah settled in January 2018 by withdrawing the ordinances and permitting the eruv extension, avoiding further litigation penalties. A parallel federal settlement in February 2018 reinforced this, with the township agreeing to non-discriminatory permitting processes. These rulings reflect a judicial pattern favoring eruv approvals when municipalities apply neutral policies, distinguishing eruvs from more overt religious displays by their symbolic and non-coercive nature.

Allegations of Antisemitism in Disputes

In disputes over eruv construction, particularly in suburban U.S. communities experiencing influxes of Jewish residents, proponents have frequently alleged against local opponents, citing rhetoric that evokes historical tropes or discriminatory enforcement. For instance, in , during the 2017 controversy, residents opposed an eruv proposed by the Northeast Jersey Eruv Association, expressing fears of demographic shifts from nearby Monsey's ultra- population, including potential increases in housing density and cultural changes like business closures. Some opponents referenced concerns about "takeovers" and invoked stereotypes of Jewish , prompting accusations of from figures like Governor , who condemned the rhetoric as such, and the New Jersey Attorney General's office, which sued the town in 2018 for under the state's Law Against Discrimination after police removed eruv markers. The case settled in September 2018, with Mahwah agreeing to permit the eruv and pay legal fees, though opponents maintained their stance was rooted in zoning precedents and aesthetic impacts rather than religious animus. Similar allegations arose in , where the Tenafly Eruv Association sued the borough in 2000 after it denied permission for lechis on utility poles, leading to a 2002 U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that the denial violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) by selectively enforcing ordinances against practices. Critics, including advocates, portrayed the opposition—including resolutions against the eruv and complaints about its visibility—as veiled bigotry, especially given the borough's prior tolerance of other pole attachments like holiday decorations. However, court records highlighted that much resistance stemmed from neighborhood associations' worries over setting precedents for further religious symbols, with non- Jewish residents also voicing aesthetic and uniformity concerns, suggesting drivers beyond overt . In , a 2013 eruv installation sparked multi-year litigation, culminating in a 2016 settlement allowing the boundary after federal courts rejected the village's arguments against it under RLUIPA. Opponents, including year-round residents, argued the lechis would alter the community's secular vacation character and invite more , but Jewish groups labeled the antisemitic, pointing to emails and statements decrying "Orthodox encroachment." Courts found no evidence of intentional , emphasizing neutral application of ordinances, though the dispute amplified claims of underlying bias in enclaves historically resistant to demographic changes. More recently, in November 2024, plans for an eruv in the rural English village of , elicited over 100 online comments, including references and conspiracy theories about Jewish control, as reported by local Jewish leaders responding to initial aesthetic objections from residents. While core opposition focused on visual clutter in a conservation area, the vitriolic backlash underscored how eruv proposals can unearth explicit prejudices amid broader concerns over preserving small-town homogeneity. These cases illustrate a where legitimate qualms about , infrastructure, and cultural shifts coexist with, or escalate into, expressions, though empirical reviews of court documents often reveal mixed motivations rather than uniform bigotry.

Additional Eruv Forms

Eruv Techumin for Travel Limits

The eruv techumin (Hebrew: עירוב תחומין, "joining of boundaries") is a rabbinic mechanism in that permits extending the standard travel limit, known as the , by an additional 2,000 cubits (approximately 1 kilometer or 0.6 miles) in a designated direction. Under derived from 16:29, a person is restricted to walking no more than 2,000 cubits beyond the inhabited area's boundary on , measured from the point where one stands at the onset of the . This extension applies only in cases of necessity and does not permit carrying objects beyond the original domain unless combined with other eruv provisions. To establish an eruv techumin, an individual must deposit a quantity of —typically bread sufficient for two meals, valued at least a perutah (a minimal )—at the 2,000-cubit before on . This act symbolically "acquires" the deposit site as one's residence, shifting the travel radius to center on that point and allowing up to 2,000 cubits further outward, for a total of 4,000 cubits from the original starting point in that direction. The procedure is outlined in the tractate Eruvin and codified in works like the (Orach Chaim 408), emphasizing that the food must remain untouched until after to validate the extension. Key limitations include forfeiture of an equivalent distance in the opposite direction from the deposit point, preventing bidirectional extensions without multiple deposits. The eruv is ineffective if the deposit is made after twilight or if one returns beyond the original techum without reestablishing it, and it applies individually or via communal preparation but not for routine use absent need. In contemporary observance, eruv techumin is rarely invoked in settings with established eruv chatzerot for carrying, but it retains relevance for rural or , such as or visiting isolated sites on , where precise boundary calculations using GPS or traditional measurements ensure compliance.

Eruv Tavshilin for Festival Preparations

Eruv tavshilin is a rabbinic ordinance in Jewish law that permits the preparation of food for on an intervening day when the festival falls on a Thursday or the eve of . This ritual addresses the prohibition against cooking on a for , which stems from rabbinic concerns to honor 's sanctity and prevent preparations intended for post- consumption. By initiating preparations symbolically before the festival begins, the eruv tavshilin creates a legal mechanism allowing such activities on the festival while ensuring they are explicitly designated for . The Talmudic foundation for eruv tavshilin appears in tractate Beitzah (36b), where sages debate its enactment to reconcile the permissions of festival cooking—limited to immediate needs—with Shabbat's stricter prohibitions. Rabbinic authorities instituted it to avoid diminishing the festival's dignity by treating it as a mere prelude to Shabbat, yet practically enabling necessary preparations like baking challah or cooking meats on Friday during festivals such as Sukkot or Shemini Atzeret when followed by Shabbat. In cases of multi-day festivals, the eruv must be established before the first day if Shabbat immediately follows any subsequent festival day, but it does not authorize cooking between festival days themselves. The procedure requires selecting a baked item, such as or (at least a k'zayit volume, equivalent to an 's size), and a cooked dish, such as a hard-boiled , , or (at least the volume of an ), sufficient in total for two meals. These items are held in the right hand while standing before sunset on the day preceding the festival (erev ), followed by the blessing: "Barukh atah Adonai, Eloheinu Melekh ha'olam, asher kid'shanu b'mitzvotav v'tzivanu al eruv tavshilin." A declarative formula is then recited: "B'eruv tavshilin zeh, yesh lan l'ofos u'l'vashel u'l'dal'k neros v'la'asos kol tzorech she-yihye l'—Through this eruv tavshilin, may we be permitted to bake, cook, kindle lights, and perform all needs for ." The designated foods must remain uneaten until to maintain the ritual's validity, serving as a tangible reminder of the restricted intent behind festival-day labors. Communal eruv tavshilin, often announced by rabbis, extends permission to all household members and residents who rely on it, though individuals in isolated settings must perform it personally. Failure to establish it invalidates subsequent preparations, with no post-facto remedy except in extenuating circumstances like oversight by a or groom, per some authorities citing (Orach Chaim 527:13). This practice underscores halakhic precision in balancing ritual sanctity with practical observance, ensuring that festival cooking aligns strictly with needs as codified in the (Orach Chaim 527).

References

  1. [1]
    What Is an Eruv? - Chabad.org
    An eruv (ערוב, pronounced ay-roov), in modern terminology, is a technical boundary that allows Jews to carry in public areas on Shabbat.Why Is an Eruv Needed? · The Answer Is the Eruv · The Eruv vs. the Law
  2. [2]
    What Is An Eruv? - My Jewish Learning
    The eruv is a boundary that allows observant Jews to carry needed things in public on Shabbat. By Sharonne Cohen
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Law of The Eruv
    Heiden, Fences and Neighbors, 17 Law & Literature 225, 231 (2005) (“The Hebrew word eruv means 'to mix or join together,' and an eruv serves to integrate areas ...
  4. [4]
    Why Do Jews Carry in an Eruv on Shabbat? - Chabad.org
    On Shabbat, one of the 39 forbidden activities is to carry anything four cubits (approximately six feet) within a public domain. This also includes transporting ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Strings Attached: An Analysis of the Eruv under the Religion ...
    The eruv, in contrast, is a mechanism of Jewish law that gives benefits to Orthodox Jews alone. An eruv facilitates religious worship by making it easier for ...
  7. [7]
    Carrying on Shabbat - Meaning in Mitzvot - OU Torah
    And it is from this verse that we learn that carrying from one domain to another on Shabbat is a forbidden melacha. (Shabbat 96b.) The labor of moving an object ...
  8. [8]
    The Prohibition to Carry on Shabbat: Historical and Exegetical ...
    Mar 3, 2016 · Mishnah Shabbat 1:1 delineates two domains in which the law of carrying applies: public domain and private domain. Like the Damascus Document, ...Missing: transfer | Show results with:transfer
  9. [9]
    Shabbat 2a-b: The Prohibition of Carrying on Shabbat - Aleph Society
    Oct 5, 2012 · According to the Penei Yehoshua, since the matter of carrying out is derived from the verse, “A man should not go out of his place” (Shmot 16:29) ...
  10. [10]
    The Thirty-Nine Categories of Sabbath Work Prohibited By Law
    Carrying in a private home is permitted on the Sabbath. It is only in a public domain that it is forbidden. The spirit of the law, however, forbids the carrying ...
  11. [11]
    Eruvin - Chapter One - Chabad.org
    6What is meant by an eruv? That all the individuals will join together in one collection of food before the commencement of the Sabbath. This serves as a ...
  12. [12]
    Eiruv Chatzerot - Meaning in Mitzvot - OU Torah
    Such carrying is permissible only through eiruv chatzerot, a “mingling of courtyards” in which several adjoining properties are symbolically combined into one ...
  13. [13]
    Summary of Eruvin Daf 84a to 90b - OU Life - Orthodox Union
    The mishna indicates that if one set of residents can make use of a place by lowering and another set of residents can use it by throwing, the use of the place ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Eruv Chatzerot ( Joining of Courtyards) - Rambam Press
    Eruv Chatzerot is a special arrangement where people join by owning a common food, like a whole loaf of bread, to allow carrying on Shabbat.Missing: halacha | Show results with:halacha
  15. [15]
    Eruvin - Chapter Six - TheShul.net - Chabad.org
    ... eruv chatzerot. There a chezkat kiyyum is not necessary, for an eruv chatzerot is only a Rabbinic institution (in contrast to an eruv t'chumin, which ...
  16. [16]
    Eruv – Creating a Community By Rabbi Chaim Metzger ('10)
    Nov 5, 2020 · In Masechet Eruvin, Shmuel says that Eruv Chatzerot works based on Kinyan, a transaction, while Rabbah says it works based on Dirah, creating ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  17. [17]
    Eruv Chatzeirot in a Hospital and other Non-Domestic Areas, by ...
    Oct 15, 2020 · The Gemara and Shulchan Aruch teach that if the owner provides food for all the residents of the courtyard, an Eruv Chatzeirot is not needed.
  18. [18]
    Eruv Chatzerot in Apartment Building - Din - Ask the Rabbi - Dinonline
    Eruv Chatzerot in Apartment Building. 02/10/2016. tzuras hapesach. Do ... is a matter of debate, which depends on the halachic definition of the stairwell/hallway. There is room for leniency in this regard.Missing: rabbinic | Show results with:rabbinic
  19. [19]
    Jeremiah 17:22 You must not carry a load out of your houses or do ...
    You must not carry a load out of your houses or do any work on the Sabbath day, but you must keep the Sabbath day holy, just as I commanded your forefathers.
  20. [20]
    The 39 Acts Forbidden on the Sabbath - The Israel Bible
    Feb 21, 2022 · The Torah specifically mentions two melachot (Jewish Sabbath rules) that are expressly forbidden: kindling a fire and carrying/transferring between 'domains'.
  21. [21]
    The Laws of Creating an Eruv - Part VI by Rabbi Chaim Jachter
    Apr 17, 2018 · An Eruv is made to make people aware of the difference between carrying from one residence to another (into a common area such as apartment ...
  22. [22]
    Mishneh Torah, Eruvin 1 - Sefaria
    חָצֵר שֶׁיֵּשׁ בָּהּ שְׁכֵנִים הַרְבֵּה כָּל אֶחָד מֵהֶם בְּבַיִת לְעַצְמוֹ דִּין תּוֹרָה הוּא שֶׁיִּהְיוּ כֻּלָּן מֻתָּרִין לְטַלְטֵל בְּכָל הֶחָצֵר וּמִבָּתִּים לֶחָצֵר וּמֵהֶחָצֵר לַבָּתִּים מִפְּנֵי שֶׁכָּל הֶחָצֵר רְשׁוּת הַיָּחִיד אַחַת וּמֻתָּר לְטַלְטֵל ...
  23. [23]
    Mishnah Eruvin - Sefaria
    It serves as a continuation of tractate Shabbat, discussing the rabbinic enactments - namely, ritual enclosures and designated food items.
  24. [24]
    Eruv - Chabad.org
    This wall or gate, the Eruv, is an enclosure that legally transforms a non-private public thoroughfare into a private domain.Missing: halakha explanation
  25. [25]
    [PDF] OUTDOOR ERUV - Practical Halacha
    All vertical eruv components must be at least 40 inches high. There is no maximum height for the eruv if it is a halachic doorway (tzurat ha'petach--two ...
  26. [26]
    Eruv Halachic Principles
    The goal in creating a proper eruv is to render the entire area within the eruv into a reshus hayachid by way of walls or enclosures.Missing: orthodox | Show results with:orthodox
  27. [27]
    [PDF] CONSTRUCTING TZUROT HAPETACH
    Talmud (Eruvin 11b) states that a tzurat hapetach consists of two vertical poles with a horizontal pole directly on top of them. (kaneh mikan vekaneh mikan ...
  28. [28]
    Tzurot Hapetach – A Report from the Field - Part Two by ... - Kol Torah
    Aug 6, 2018 · The Gemara (Eiruvin 11b) states that a Tzurat HaPetach consists of two vertical poles (Lechis) with a horizontal pole directly on top of them ( ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  29. [29]
    The Eruv Revolution - Jewish Action
    Most modern-day North American eruvin use thin pipes affixed to telephone poles as the lechayayim and the telephone wires above them as the lintel. The day-to- ...
  30. [30]
    A Lechi on Every Utility Pole? - A Report from the Field - Kol Torah
    Aug 8, 2018 · We shall focus on the construction of a Tzurat HaPetach (symbolic doorframes), which most often constitutes the bulk of a community Eruv. The ...Missing: materials sources
  31. [31]
    Guidelines for Creating and Maintaining a Kosher Eruv
    Feb 11, 2015 · Creating and maintaining proper Eruvin involves complex Halachic issues. A Posek of eminent stature must be consulted to issue Halachic rulings ...
  32. [32]
    Orthodox Union and partners host a conference on 'eruv' - JNS.org
    Dec 24, 2024 · While a city eruv, a physical boundary that allows observant Jews to carry on Shabbat, is largely constructed out of simple material, the ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Eruv Chatzerot - Halachipedia
    Jul 13, 2023 · The eruv consists of 3 parts: 1) Walls or halachic partitions surrounding the desired area (Mechitzot), 2) Renting access from the non-Jewish ...Missing: Talmud | Show results with:Talmud<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Eruv—Defining Space - OK Kosher Certification
    May 2, 2016 · The eruv is a rabbinic method to allow an otherwise rabbinic restricted activity on Shabbos and Yom Tov. The common form of eruv is eruv chatzeros.
  35. [35]
    How Is An Eruv Checked? - Jewish Teachings For All - YouTube
    Aug 6, 2025 · The AOV must be checked regularly this inspection usually happens weekly often on Friday mornings or Thursday afternoons.
  36. [36]
    THE HALAKHOT OF ERUV
    WEEKLY ERUV INSPECTION. The Eruv will usually be inspected on Thursday ... The Eruv Hatzairot is a procedure whereby all the dwellings opening into the ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  37. [37]
    Frequently Asked Questions - The Edgware Eruv
    Weekly Eruv Inspection The Eruv will be inspected every Friday morning and ... The Eruv Hatzairos is a procedure whereby all the dwellings opening into ...Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  38. [38]
    Eruv Software Solutions - Orthodox Union
    Eruv checkers can quickly and accurately report their exact locations and describe any issues directly to the Posek. Effective Communication The immediacy and ...
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
    How often is it neccessary to check the strings of an Eruv? - Mi Yodeya
    Aug 15, 2011 · You really should check every Thursday night or Friday before Shabbat. If it rains or there is a strong wind or snow during shabbat most say you can still use ...
  41. [41]
    Rabbinical Council of America Guidelines for Creating and ...
    should conduct a full walking inspection of the Rav at least once a year. The proper way to conduct a yearly inspection of an Eruv is to inspect it on foot.
  42. [42]
    Eruv Halacha - ChabadRichmond.com
    For this reason the Eruv is checked before every Shabbat. Once that inspection has been successfully completed, the website will be updated with the Eruv Status ...
  43. [43]
    Eruv Guide - Los Angeles Community Eruv
    call the ERUV hotline at 877-ERUV-INFO and go to the eruv option to check the status of the eruv; check the website www.laeruv.com which will show the status of ...
  44. [44]
    About Eruv - ChabadWMC.com
    The eruv will be inspected every week to make ... For all these reasons, it is imperative that an expert Rabbi oversee the construction of any eruv.
  45. [45]
    Shabbat: C (part 1) - Carrying - Halacha L'Maaseh - OU Torah
    On Shabbat, carrying is restricted without an eruv. In a public area, moving an object is limited to 4 amot. Carrying in mouth is restricted outside private ...
  46. [46]
    Halacha in a Nutshell: What Is an Eruv? - Building a Jewish Life
    Apr 7, 2011 · You can carry items to synagogue: prayer shawl (tallit/tallis), siddurim, other books, toys for kids. You can also carry food, drinks, etc, ...Missing: activities sources
  47. [47]
    The Shabbat Laws - Chabad.org
    Neither may one carry an object in a reshut ha-rabim for more than four cubits (six feet). Examples of this prohibition include: carrying in one's pocket; ...<|separator|>
  48. [48]
    Vayakhel-Pekudei: Eruv Chatzerot - Orthodox Union
    Eruv chatzerot, a “mingling of courtyards” in which several adjoining properties are symbolically combined into one via joint ownership of a Shabbat meal.
  49. [49]
    The Laws of Creating an Eruv - Part III by Rabbi Chaim Jachter
    Apr 17, 2018 · The second reason why Rav Feinstein felt that an Eruv should not be constructed in Manhattan is based on a fascinating but debatable argument.
  50. [50]
    Article | The Manhattan Eruv – Rabbi Mintz
    ... Rabbi Feinstein opposed the eruv while Rabbi Henkin approved it with reservations. Neither of these great Torah sages explained what led them to follow the ...
  51. [51]
    Unpacking the Iggerot: Brooklyn Eruv Battles - Tradition Online
    May 22, 2025 · However, for similar reasons we reviewed in our column about the Manhattan eruv, R. Feinstein did not wish to support it, even as he reassured ...
  52. [52]
    Lubavitch rabbis issue edict against modern Orthodox eruv in Crown ...
    Jun 24, 2016 · Chabad-Lubavitch rabbis in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn issued an edict to void the New York neighborhood's new eruv.
  53. [53]
    BBC - Religion - Judaism: Jewish living - eruvs
    Jul 23, 2009 · What doesn't an eruv allow? An eruv doesn't permit Orthodox Jews to carry things that cannot be moved at all on the Sabbath, such as mobile ...
  54. [54]
    Relying on a Problematic 'Eruv | UTJ Viewpoints
    The rabbinic institution of 'eruv merely suspends rabbinic restrictions ... Orthodox rabbi's opinion to the contrary is of no consequence. In sum, the ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Electric Cars and Driving on the Sabbath - The Rabbinical Assembly
    Jul 21, 2023 · Without an eruv, carrying something, such as keys or a driver's license, from one's house to the outside, meaning from a private domain to a ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Page | 1 Daniel Nevins, Electricity and Shabbat
    May 31, 2012 · Molid reicha is not used in halakhah as a source from which to extrapolate other prohibitions. ... Within an eruv, he permits even the ...
  57. [57]
    Committee on Jewish Law and Standards | The Rabbinical Assembly
    The Committee sets halakhic policy for the Conservative movement, discusses Jewish law questions, and creates official halakhic positions.
  58. [58]
    Shabbat & Holidays | American Jewish University
    Travel in an automobile on Shabbat is also an area for which the Conservative Movement has different approaches. ... eruv, where carrying on Shabbat is permitted.
  59. [59]
    Shabbat: Eruv - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Hebrew word "eruv" means to mix or join together; an Eruv Chatzayrot (henceforth just "Eruv") serves to integrate a number of private and public properties ...
  60. [60]
    5780.1 - Central Conference of American Rabbis
    That carrying and using money is in the category of traditional Shabbat prohibitions in which Reform Jews find no religious meaning, i.e., it does not feel like ...
  61. [61]
    The Roots of Shabbat | Reform Judaism
    Oct 16, 2012 · Many of the Sabbath rituals originated during the period of the Talmud. Elaborating on the Bible's general and often vague Sabbath prohibitions, ...
  62. [62]
    Eruv (see Eiruv) Archives - Central Conference of American Rabbis
    Certainly we, as Reform. Jews, who are interested in the spirit of the law, would reject this kind of legal fiction for the. observance of the shabbat, and we ...
  63. [63]
    Sermon - To keep Shabbat as a Reform Jew - Alyth
    Mar 5, 2010 · The prohibitions on carrying or writing are not in the Torah but are among what are known as the 39 melachot, the 39 areas of work outlined in ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] The Community Eruv and the American Public Square - Rabbi Mintz
    The creation of the rabbinic eruv requires the physical enclosing of the desired area as well as a symbolic collection of a food item from every resi- dent of ...
  65. [65]
    RR21 no. 5756.4 - Central Conference of American Rabbis
    [21] We maintain the prohibition against performing weddings and funerals on the Sabbath, even though both of these ceremonies enjoy the status of mitzvah in ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    Carrying in Public and the Use of an Eruv | Rabbi Yirmiyohu Kaganoff
    We discovered that the Torah prohibits carrying an object from one's house or any other enclosed area (halachically called a reshus hayachid), to an area ...
  67. [67]
    The History and Meaning of an Eruv - Germantown Jewish Centre
    This “merged” space was called an eruv hatzerot (“merger of domains”); because this is the most common kind of eruv in halachah (Jewish law), it is often ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Eruv: History, Problems, and Solutions | Sephardic U
    The Eruv, which shows that Shabbat is taken lightly. How can one allow what the Creator has prohibited with this lowly and disrespectful trick?
  69. [69]
    Eruv - Jewish Studies - Oxford Bibliographies
    Jan 15, 2019 · Eruv is a term coined in the rabbinic Hebrew of the Mishnah (late second century CE). It refers to a rabbinic ritual construct, mostly for urban Jewish ...
  70. [70]
    Tractate Eruvin: Chapter 1 - Jewish Virtual Library
    Completion) Popularly applied to the Babylonian Talmud as a whole, to discussions by rabbinic teachers on Mishnah, and to decisions reached in these discussions ...
  71. [71]
    The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Origins of the Rabbinic 'Eruv - jstor
    The concept of the 'eruv appears to be one of the most radical innovations of rabbinic law (halakhah), both with respect to biblical.
  72. [72]
    Eliezer Ben Joel and the Eruv,” Images: A Journal of Jewish Art and ...
    The eruv in medieval times, as in antiquity, defines and marks the borders of Jewish identity. This iden- Parallel Imaginary Cartographies tity is separate ...
  73. [73]
    Eliezer Ben Joel and the Eruv - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · This ruling shows that in medieval Europe the eruv was redefined to encompass the entire Jewish neighborhood.
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Installations of Jewish Law in Public Urban Space
    Jan 30, 2015 · An eruv is a practice aiding Sabbath observance, allowing Jews to circumvent restrictions. The controversy arises from its public installation, ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Question of the Eruv in Early Modern Europe
    The urban eruv, a physical boundary delineating space in which one is permitted to carry items on Sabbath, erected by the kehillah.
  76. [76]
    The Establishment of an Eruv and Its Socio-religious Context in 18th ...
    The eruv aimed to prevent Sabbath transgressions by allowing Jews to carry items between the ghetto and city. It emerged from growing community concerns over ...
  77. [77]
    An Exercise in Civic Kabbalah - jstor
    For eruvin during the early modern period, see David Katz,. "Question of the Eruv in Early Modern Europe," presented at the Early Modern Work- shop: Jewish ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Question of the Eruv in Early Modern Europe
    The Talmudic solution to this problem was to create an eruv, a seaparate enclosure which might legally be viewed as one big house. This required two steps: a.) ...Missing: usage | Show results with:usage
  79. [79]
    [PDF] The History of City Eruvin, 1894-1962 by Adam Mintz A dissertation ...
    An eruv, meaning 'mixture', joins residents of a limited area to allow carrying on the Sabbath. It was adapted to allow Jews to carry possessions into ...
  80. [80]
  81. [81]
    Carrying On: The Eruv … Past, Present, and Future | Michael Feldstein
    Jan 7, 2021 · By the mid- to late-1980s, virtually all Orthodox Jewish communities had built an eruv, or were in the process of constructing one.
  82. [82]
    A Fishing Line Encircles Manhattan, Protecting Sanctity Of Sabbath
    May 13, 2019 · This fishing line, barely visible between Manhattan buildings, is an eruv, used by observant Jews to create a symbolic domestic perimeter for the Sabbath.Missing: Sydney | Show results with:Sydney
  83. [83]
    "Eruv" Wires Symbolically Extend Homes to Encompass Cities
    Mar 19, 2018 · This thread conceptually turns public space into private domain, and allows observers of the Sabbath to carry their essential belongings with them.
  84. [84]
    Manhattan Eruv - Eruv.NYC
    Begun in 1999 as a local eruv on the Upper West Side, the Manhattan Eruv now encloses most of the borough of Manhattan. The eruv, build and supervised by the ...
  85. [85]
    Understanding the Significance of Sydney's Eruv - Bondi Beach News
    Notably, the most expensive Eruv is the one surrounding Manhattan Island in New York, with an estimated annual maintenance cost of $220,000.Missing: major urban
  86. [86]
    Eruv in New York and Other Large Cities | Anash.org
    Jul 13, 2023 · Ask the Rov: What are the issues with making an eruv in New York or other large city? Rabbi Chaim Hillel Raskin replies.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Los Angeles Community Eruv
    Jun 21, 2022 · The LA ERUV is the largest eruv in the. United States at over. 100 square miles and may be the largest in the world. Despite the size of the.
  88. [88]
    Los Angeles Eruv
    Feb 5, 2025 · The Los Angeles Eruv was constructed under the halachic and technical ingenuity of R' Avrohom Teichman in collaboration with local rabbanim.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  89. [89]
    Massive 405 Freeway project respects the boundaries of a Jewish ...
    Jul 4, 2011 · Witkin estimated that 40,000 to 50,000 observant Jews depend on the eruv each Sabbath, when Jewish law prohibits working from sundown Friday ...Missing: size | Show results with:size
  90. [90]
    THE ERUV | Sydneyeruv Org Au
    The Sydney Eruv is created from a combination of natural walls (the South Head Peninsula cliff faces), existing telegraph poles and cables, golf course and ...
  91. [91]
    HOME | Sydneyeruv Org Au
    The Sydney Eruv is unique in that it is one of the few Eruvin in the world that has a majority of solid boundaries, 'mechitzot'. In over five years, it has ...
  92. [92]
    London Eruv
    The Borehamwood Eruv is UP AND IN USE. Status: Sponsored by Justin Kett in loving memory on the yahrzeit of his mother, Marat Rachel bat Leib HaLevi ...What Is An Eruv? · NW London · Barnet · St Johns Wood
  93. [93]
    UK's first eruv boundary set up in London - Planning Resource
    Mar 7, 2003 · UK's first eruv boundary set up in London. 7 March 2003. Share article ... The UK's first Jewish "eruv" boundary came into operation in north-west ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  94. [94]
    New North London eruv will be feather in the Federation's black hat
    Aug 17, 2023 · The Sabbath boundary zone, which converts ostensibly public space into a notional private area so that Jews can push prams or wheelchairs or ...
  95. [95]
    Columbus eruv nearing completion of expansion project | Local News
    Jan 25, 2024 · The entire eruv is undergoing an upgrade and expansion project, on track to be completed by the end of January.Missing: establishments 2010-2025
  96. [96]
    From long-held idea to reality, the East Side Eruv is complete
    Mar 9, 2023 · The new eruv serves a large part of Milwaukee's Upper East Side ... This position has existed for roughly the last 10 years, and so was ...Missing: built major
  97. [97]
    For Strictly Observant Jews in Brooklyn, the Sabbath Expands
    Feb 16, 2023 · On the day of rest, observant Jews cannot carry possessions (including children); an eruv is a zone that makes an exception for this.
  98. [98]
    Far North Dallas Eruv Expansion - DOJLife.com 2025
    Concerning the Far North Dallas Eruv Expansion; The Expansion Adds 1000+ Homes and Three New Playgrounds/Parks. Concerning the Far North Dallas Eruv Expansion.Missing: 2010-2025 | Show results with:2010-2025
  99. [99]
    Colorado's largest eruv could sprout in the Douglas County suburbs
    Jun 8, 2023 · The Chabad Jewish Center of South Metro Denver is exploring plans to erect Colorado's largest eruv.<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    West LA's eruv, the hidden wall built and maintained… - KCRW
    Mar 13, 2018 · Rabbi Yosef Kanefsky of B'nai David-Judea, a modern Orthodox congregation, said that if the eruv is not operable it creates a challenge for the ...
  101. [101]
    A Jewish Ritual Collides With Mother Nature - The New York Times
    Mar 5, 2010 · “Eruv is one of the only Jewish practices that forces the Jew and the Jewish community to confront the broader world,” said Rabbi Adam Mintz of ...
  102. [102]
    Long Beach Orthodox Jews adjust to Sandy-damaged eruv - Newsday
    Apr 7, 2013 · Amid the destruction wrought by superstorm Sandy in Long Beach, one of the biggest disruptions to the city's Orthodox Jewish community is ...Missing: weather | Show results with:weather
  103. [103]
    Tornado Destroys St. Louis Eruv; Urgent Efforts Underway To Repair It
    essential components of the eruv — were toppled or torn from ...Missing: weather | Show results with:weather
  104. [104]
    Problems in the Construction of Eruvin in Modern Metropolitan Areas
    Feb 12, 2015 · It is the use of overhead cable which causes most of the problems encountered in contemporary urban eruvin.
  105. [105]
    Mahwah Police Investigating Vandalism Against 'Eruv' Pipes Amid ...
    Damage to the piping has since been repaired and the police department is investigating the four cases of vandalism as bias crimes. More from ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  106. [106]
    There's a Wire Above Manhattan That You've Probably Never Noticed
    Jan 27, 2017 · Manhattan has had an eruv in one form or another since the early 20th century, but the present-day incarnation began on the Upper West Side in ...
  107. [107]
    The Orthodox Union and partners host unprecedented City Eruv ...
    Oct 30, 2023 · “People don't appreciate how hard it is to build an eruv properly and the effort needed to maintain it from week to week. The conference created ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] TENAFLY ERUV ASSOCIATION INC v. THE BOROUGH ... - NJ MEL
    Many of those present expressed vehement objections prompted by their fear that an eruv would encourage Orthodox Jews to move to. Tenafly. A Council member whom ...
  109. [109]
    Eruv lawsuit in Tenafly provides a cautionary tale
    Jul 30, 2017 · In the end, Tenafly agreed to pay $325,000 in legal fees to the Tenafly Eruv Association as part of the settlement, according to the borough ...
  110. [110]
    In Westhampton Beach, a Ritual Jewish Boundary Stirs Real Town ...
    Feb 4, 2013 · The strips would create an eruv, a ritual boundary that would allow those Orthodox Jews who do not push or carry things outside the home on the Sabbath to do ...
  111. [111]
    Judges: Orthodox Jewish Zone Can Stay In Westhampton Beach
    Jan 7, 2015 · A panel of federal judges has ruled that an Orthodox Jewish religious zone called an "eruv" erected in a Hamptons beach community can stay.
  112. [112]
    Mahwah Eruv Sparks Debate Over Anti-Semitism - The Forward
    Jul 26, 2017 · The opposition to the eruv reflects concern among non-Jews and secular Jews over the impact that a fast-growing Orthodox population could have ...
  113. [113]
    Can't We Just Get Along? - Jewish Action
    A meeting was held in the town hall over the issue, and 2,000 non-Jewish residents showed up to oppose the shul. Tensions were running high. The Toms River ...Missing: demographic | Show results with:demographic
  114. [114]
    [PDF] How the Eruv Fits Into Evolving Free Exercise and Establishment ...
    Courts historically held that erecting an eruv did not violate the Establishment Clause and also held that the Free Exercise Clause only required that a ...Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings
  115. [115]
    How Courts Paved the Way for the Eruv - Law.com
    Feb 28, 2019 · Over the years, courts in New York and the region have issued a number of decisions regarding challenges to a local government's willingness, or ...Missing: rulings | Show results with:rulings
  116. [116]
    Tenafly Eruv Association v. The Borough of ... - ACLU of New Jersey
    Jun 2, 2011 · This matter arose when a group of Orthodox Jews in the Borough of Tenafly requested permission to erect an eruv on utility poles in a large ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  117. [117]
    TENAFLY ERUV ASSOCIATION INC v. THE BOROUGH OF ...
    The plaintiffs in this case are Orthodox Jewish residents of Tenafly whose faith forbids them from pushing or carrying objects outside their homes on the ...<|separator|>
  118. [118]
    JEWISH PEOPLE FOR THE BETTERMENT OF WESTHAMPTON ...
    Based on these allegations, plaintiffs sought (1) a declaration that the proposed eruv violates the Establishment Clause, and (2) an injunction preventing its ...
  119. [119]
    Court upholds Westhampton Beach Shabbat boundary
    Jan 7, 2015 · A lawsuit in connection with the eruv around Westhampton Beach, a tony area approximately 80 miles from Manhattan, was dismissed in 2013.
  120. [120]
    Attorney General Porrino Announces State Lawsuit Charging ...
    Oct 24, 2017 · Porrino announced today that the State has filed a Superior Court complaint against the Mahwah Township Council and the Township of Mahwah ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  121. [121]
    Mahwah, NJ Agrees to Settle Eruv Dispute | RLUIPA Defense Blog
    Feb 7, 2018 · The Mahwah Township Council (“Council”) voted to withdraw two ordinances at the center of RLUIPA litigation involving the expansion of an eruv proposed by ...
  122. [122]
    Mahwah approves settlement over eruv litigation
    Jan 30, 2018 · Mahwah Council approves a settlement to resolve litigation with a N.Y. Orthodox Jewish group that filed suit when the town threatened to ...
  123. [123]
    Legal Decisions Related to Eruvs - Orange & Rockland
    As discussed below, courts have rejected arguments that eruvs violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Conversely, courts have held that refusal ...
  124. [124]
    Mahwah Settles Lawsuit Charging Town With Anti-Semitism - Patch
    Sep 17, 2018 · Mahwah Settles Lawsuit Charging Town With Anti-Semitism. The NJ Attorney General's office filed the lawsuit after the town allegedly attempted ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  125. [125]
    In Rejecting an Eruv, Tenafly Shows Bigotry - The New York Times
    Jan 14, 2001 · In ''Drawing a Line in Tenafly,'' on Dec. 31, about seeking approval for an eruv, a symbolic enclosure that allows observant Jews to do ceratin ...
  126. [126]
    Hamptons Town Nears a Deal on a Jewish Ritual Boundary
    May 29, 2016 · Westhampton Beach is the last holdout after years of losing legal battles to prevent an eruv, a ritual Jewish boundary, from being installed ...
  127. [127]
    Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. Village ...
    ... Jewish People for the Betterment of Westhampton Beach v. Village of ... eruv," a delineated geographic area significant to certain adherents of Judaism.
  128. [128]
    Antisemitism follows plans to build Jewish eruv in English village
    Nov 10, 2024 · Plans for Jewish eruv spark influx of antisemitism in small English village ... Complaints over the eruv. While many eruvs are designed to ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  129. [129]
    What Is Techum Shabbat? - Chabad.org
    Techum Shabbat is the 'Shabbat boundary' defining the allowable distance one may walk outside an inhabited area on Shabbat, usually 2,000 cubits.Missing: halakhic | Show results with:halakhic
  130. [130]
    Kitzur Shulchan Aruch - Chapter 95: Laws of Eiruvei Techumin ...
    1. On Shabbos and Yom Tov1 it is forbidden2 to walk more than 2, 000 amos from the place you were3 at the onset of Shabbos. This is [in addition] to the ...Missing: halakhic | Show results with:halakhic
  131. [131]
    Shulchan Aruch: Chapter 408 - The Laws Applying to Depositing ...
    The word eruv means “mix” or “join.” 4. Eruvin 32b. As mentioned in sec. 261:2, an eruv techumin must be established before sunset.Missing: definition rules
  132. [132]
    A Practical Application of Techum Shabbat - Chabad.org
    10) In order to permit walking beyond 2,000 amah from one's town, there is a halacha known as eruv techumin. Before Shabbat, one places a loaf of bread some ...Missing: halakha | Show results with:halakha<|separator|>
  133. [133]
    What You Need to Know About Taking a Walk on Shabbat
    On Shabbat, we don't carry outside of an eruv (read up on that here). So there's a mitzvah to check your pockets before Shabbat to make sure you won't carry ...
  134. [134]
    24. Stay Put!: The prohibition against traveling outside ... - OU Torah
    When one makes an eruv techumin in one direction, he loses the equivalent distance from the amount he is permitted to walk in the opposite direction. For ...Missing: sabbath | Show results with:sabbath
  135. [135]
    01. The Reason for Eruv Tavshilin - Peninei Halakha - פניני הלכה
    It is a mitzva to set aside an eruv tavshilin before Yom Tov. Doing so makes it permissible to cook and bake on Yom Tov for Shabbat.
  136. [136]
    Eruv Tavshilin - Chabad.org
    The eruv tavshilin only allows one to cook on Friday for Shabbat, it does not permit cooking from one day of the holiday to the next (i.e. Thursday for Friday).
  137. [137]
    Eiruv Tavshilin: Why And How? • Torah.org
    The purpose of the eiruv, then, is to serve as a reminder that on Yom Tov it is permitted to cook only for Shabbos and not for weekday. The basic requirement ...<|separator|>
  138. [138]
    An Eruv Tavshilin Primer - OU Life - Orthodox Union
    Sep 22, 2014 · Eruv Tavshilin is a ritual that, when performed, permits the preparation for the Sabbath during a holiday. It is interesting to note that there ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  139. [139]
    The Laws of Eruv Tavshilin - Tishrei 5785 - cRc Consumer Kosher
    Sep 30, 2024 · By setting aside some cooked food and baked food in honor of Shabbos before the onset of Yom Tov, one is permitted to prepare Shabbos foods on Friday.Missing: halakha orthodox sources
  140. [140]
    The Legal Mechanism of 'Eruv Tavshilin' - Chabad.org
    Sep 17, 2015 · Join the Talmud's stimulating discussion on the mechanism of the 'Eruv Tavshilin'—a rabbinic legal device that allows one to cook on the ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  141. [141]
    An Eruv Tavshilin Primer - OU Kosher Certification
    Sep 12, 2017 · All about an Eruv Tavshilin including why we do it when Yom Tov occurs on Friday, the procedure, and what if one forgot to make an Eruv ...Missing: inspection process
  142. [142]
    Eiruv Tavshilin: Why And How? • Torah.org
    Two types of food, one cooked and one baked,(4)are set aside. They are held in the right hand5 and, while standing,(6)the blessing – followed by the appropriate ...