Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orthodox

The Orthodox Church, formally known as the Eastern Orthodox Church, constitutes a major branch of Christianity comprising multiple autocephalous (self-governing) churches united by shared doctrine, liturgy, and apostolic succession, with roots in the ancient sees of the Eastern Roman Empire.^[1] It formally diverged from the Western (Roman Catholic) Church during the Great Schism of 1054, precipitated by longstanding disputes over papal primacy, the filioque clause in the Nicene Creed, and ecclesiastical jurisdiction, resulting in mutual excommunications between the Patriarch of Constantinople and the Pope.^[2] The name "Orthodox" stems from the Greek orthos doxa, signifying "right belief" or "true worship," underscoring its self-understanding as the faithful guardian of early Christian tradition against doctrinal innovations.^[3] As the second-largest Christian communion globally, it encompasses roughly 260 million baptized members, predominantly in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Russia, though with significant diaspora communities.^[4] Central to Orthodox identity are its adherence to the decisions of the first seven ecumenical councils (from Nicaea I in 325 to Nicaea II in 787), which defined core Trinitarian and Christological teachings, alongside a sacramental worldview emphasizing theosis (divinization of humanity through union with God) and the transformative role of the seven mysteries (sacraments).^[5] Worship is highly liturgical, centered on the Divine Liturgy with Byzantine chant, iconography as windows to the divine, and a fasting regimen more rigorous than in Western traditions.^[3] The church's conciliar structure features no single supreme authority akin to the papacy; instead, decisions emerge from synods among patriarchs and bishops, with the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople holding a primacy of honor rather than jurisdiction. Defining historical challenges include the fall of Constantinople in 1453 to Ottoman forces, which subordinated Orthodox lands to Islamic rule for centuries, and modern geopolitical tensions, such as the 2018 schism between Moscow and Constantinople over Ukrainian autocephaly, highlighting ongoing jurisdictional frictions.^[1] Despite such divisions, Orthodoxy maintains a strong emphasis on mystical theology, patristic exegesis, and cultural continuity, influencing art, philosophy, and national identities in regions like Greece, Serbia, and Romania.

Etymology and General Definition

Linguistic Origins

The term "orthodox" derives from the Ancient Greek adjective orthódoxos (ὀρθόδοξος), a compound formed from orthós (ὀρθός), meaning "straight," "right," or "correct," and dóxa (δόξα), denoting "opinion," "belief," or "judgment."^[6]^[7] This etymological structure conveys the literal sense of "having the right opinion" or "correctly believing," emphasizing alignment with established or true doctrine rather than deviation.^[7] The root orthós appears in other Greek terms like orthopédics (straight child) and orthography (correct writing), underscoring a semantic field of rectitude or accuracy, while dóxa relates to cognition and glory, as in doxology (praise or opinion-expressing).^[6] The word entered Late Greek as orthodoxos by the early Christian era, reflecting its application to theological conformity, before being Latinized as orthodoxus in Late Latin texts.^[7] In English, it first appears in the mid-15th century, borrowed via ecclesiastical Latin or Middle French orthodoxe, initially in religious contexts to denote adherence to approved faith but later extending to general conformity with accepted norms.^[7] This linguistic evolution parallels the term's use in Koine Greek, the Hellenistic dialect that facilitated its spread through early Christian writings, where it contrasted "right belief" against heresy (hairesis, meaning "choice" or "faction").^[6] Pre-Christian Greek usage of the components existed independently, but the compound orthódoxos gained prominence in patristic literature around the 4th century CE to affirm doctrinal purity.^[7]

Core Meaning and Usage

The adjective orthodox denotes conformity to established doctrine, standards, or beliefs, particularly those deemed traditional or authoritative within a given domain.^[6] ^[8] In general usage, it applies to ideas, behaviors, or methods accepted as conventional or normative by a majority, often implying reliability through widespread adherence rather than innovation.^[9] ^[10] For instance, "orthodox medicine" refers to treatments grounded in evidence-based protocols validated by clinical trials and regulatory bodies, as opposed to unproven alternatives.^[11] Beyond religion—where it originally emphasized "right opinion" (from Greek orthos, "correct," and doxa, "belief")—the term extends to secular fields like economics, where "orthodox economics" describes mainstream theories emphasizing market efficiency, fiscal restraint, and monetary policy tools, as articulated in works by economists such as Milton Friedman in the mid-20th century.^[7] ^[12] This usage highlights a preference for tested paradigms over speculative ones, though critics argue it can stifle paradigm shifts, as seen in historical transitions like the Keynesian challenge to classical orthodoxy during the Great Depression of the 1930s.^[6] In contemporary discourse, "orthodox" often contrasts with "heterodox" or "unorthodox," signaling deviation from consensus; for example, orthodox political views might align with institutional norms on trade or governance, while unorthodox positions challenge them with empirical anomalies or first-principles critiques.^[10] ^[13] Such terminology underscores a cultural valuation of stability, but empirical evidence from scientific history—e.g., the eventual acceptance of heliocentrism over Ptolemaic orthodoxy in the 17th century—demonstrates that orthodoxy represents prevailing acceptance at a point in time, not immutable truth.^[8] Usage remains neutral in tone, avoiding pejorative connotations unless contextually implied, and prioritizes descriptive accuracy over ideological endorsement.^[12]

Religious Contexts

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

The Eastern Orthodox Church maintains continuity with the apostolic era, viewing itself as the faithful preserver of the teachings and practices of the early Christian communities founded by Jesus Christ and the apostles, as enlivened by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost.^[2] It comprises a communion of fourteen universally recognized autocephalous churches, each self-governing yet in doctrinal unity, led by bishops in apostolic succession who convene in synods rather than a centralized authority.^[14] The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople holds a position of honor as primus inter pares among the heads of these churches, without jurisdictional supremacy over them.^[5] The formal separation from the Western (Roman Catholic) Church occurred amid the East-West Schism, culminating in mutual excommunications on July 16, 1054, when papal legate Cardinal Humbert placed a bull of excommunication on the altar of Hagia Sophia against Patriarch Michael I Cerularius, who reciprocated against the legates.^[15] This event symbolized deeper, accumulating tensions rather than initiating the divide, including Western assertions of universal papal primacy, the unilateral addition of the Filioque ("and the Son") clause to the Nicene Creed by the West starting in Spain around 589 CE and spreading to Rome by the 11th century, disputes over the use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist, and clerical celibacy requirements.^[16] ^[17] Eastern theologians argued the Filioque disrupted Trinitarian balance by implying a double procession that subordinates the Holy Spirit, contrary to the original Creed's statement that the Spirit "proceeds from the Father."^[18] Core doctrines include adherence to the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 CE in its original form, affirming the Trinity, the Incarnation, and the resurrection without later Western additions or Protestant reforms.^[5] The seven ecumenical councils (from Nicaea I in 325 to Nicaea II in 787) define orthodoxy, rejecting heresies like Arianism and iconoclasm while upholding the veneration of icons as depictions of Christ's incarnation, not idolatry.^[2] Soteriology emphasizes theosis (deification), the process by which humans participate in divine life through grace, distinct from imputed righteousness in Western traditions. The church recognizes seven mysteries (sacraments): baptism by triple immersion, chrismation, Eucharist, confession, holy unction, marriage, and ordination.^[19] Worship centers on the Divine Liturgy, primarily the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom (dating to the 4th century), conducted in vernacular or ancient languages with elaborate iconography, incense, and chant, fostering communal participation over individualistic devotion. Monasticism plays a pivotal role, with ascetics like the Desert Fathers influencing spirituality through hesychasm—a contemplative prayer practice validated at the hesychast councils of 1341–1351 under St. Gregory Palamas, affirming uncreated divine energies distinct from God's essence. Fasting is rigorous, with over 180 days annually abstaining from meat, dairy, and sometimes oil, rooted in patristic discipline for spiritual purification.^[2] As of 2017, Eastern Orthodox Christians numbered approximately 260 million worldwide, constituting about 12% of global Christians and 4% of the world population, with concentrations in Eastern Europe (e.g., Russia with over 100 million, Ukraine, Romania) and the Middle East, though the share has declined from 20% of Christians in 1910 due to secularization, wars, and migrations.^[4] The Russian Orthodox Church is the largest, followed by the Romanian and Greek Orthodox Churches; diaspora communities exist in the Americas and Australia, often organized under jurisdictions like the Orthodox Church in America (granted autocephaly by Moscow in 1970). Recent tensions include the 2018 granting of autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine by Constantinople, leading to a schism with Moscow over canonical territory.^[14]

Oriental Orthodox Churches

The Oriental Orthodox Churches form a communion of ancient Christian bodies that trace their origins to apostolic foundations in regions including Egypt, Syria, Armenia, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and India. These churches accept the first three ecumenical councils—Nicaea (325 AD), Constantinople (381 AD), and Ephesus (431 AD)—as authoritative for defining core doctrines such as the Trinity and the hypostatic union against Arianism and Nestorianism, but reject the Council of Chalcedon (451 AD) and subsequent councils due to their formulation of Christ's two natures (divine and human) as distinct yet united in one person, which they view as risking a conceptual division incompatible with the Cyrillene emphasis on unity.^[20] This rejection led to their separation from the churches aligned with the Byzantine Empire and Rome, forming distinct hierarchies by the mid-5th century amid imperial enforcement of Chalcedon, which exacerbated ethnic and linguistic tensions in non-Greek speaking provinces.^[21] Doctrinally, the Oriental Orthodox affirm Miaphysitism, holding that Christ possesses one incarnate nature (physis) from two natures (divine and human), united without confusion, change, division, or separation—a position rooted in the writings of Cyril of Alexandria and intended to safeguard the full reality of both natures in the single subject of the Word incarnate, while explicitly repudiating Eutychian Monophysitism (which dissolves the human nature into the divine) as heretical.^[22] This contrasts with the Dyophysite (two-nature) terminology of Chalcedon, though 20th- and 21st-century joint theological dialogues, such as those initiated in the 1960s and continued through commissions like the Agreed Statements of 1989 and 1990, have concluded that the formulations express equivalent intentions against extremes like Nestorianism or Monophysitism, attributing the schism primarily to linguistic and contextual misunderstandings rather than substantive heresy.^[23] Despite such clarifications, full sacramental communion remains unrealized, as mutual recognition of post-Chalcedonian councils and liturgical practices differs, with Oriental Orthodox maintaining their own canon of three ecumenical councils.^[24] The six autocephalous churches are the Coptic Orthodox Church (headquartered in Cairo, with roots in St. Mark's evangelism circa 42 AD), the Syriac Orthodox Church (tracing to Antioch and St. Peter, formalized under Severus of Antioch in 512 AD), the Armenian Apostolic Church (established post-301 AD conversion under Gregory the Illuminator, rejecting Chalcedon at the Second Council of Dvin in 555 AD), the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church (linked to the 4th-century mission of Frumentius, integrating Jewish and Aksumite traditions), the Eritrean Orthodox Tewahedo Church (gaining autocephaly in 1993 after independence from Ethiopia), and the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church (originating from the 1st-century arrival of Thomas the Apostle in India, formalized in the 20th century amid schisms).^[25] Collectively, they number approximately 60 million adherents worldwide as of the early 21st century, concentrated in their historic homelands but with growing diasporas in Europe, North America, and Australia due to migration; for instance, the Ethiopian church alone reports over 36 million members, while Coptic membership exceeds 10 million.^[23]^[26] Liturgically, these churches employ ancient rites—such as the Coptic, West Syriac, Armenian, and Alexandrian traditions—featuring elaborate anaphoras attributed to early fathers like Basil the Great and Cyril, with practices including rigorous fasting (up to 250 days annually), veneration of icons and relics, and monasticism as a pillar of spiritual life, exemplified by figures like Shenoute of Atripe (4th-5th century) in Egypt.^[21] Governance is patriarchal or catholicosal, with synodal oversight; for example, the Coptic Pope of Alexandria holds primacy of honor among them, a precedence affirmed in inter-Orthodox gatherings like the 1965 Addis Ababa conference. Persecution has marked their history, from Byzantine imperial policies post-Chalcedon to Islamic conquests from the 7th century onward, yet they preserved theological texts and institutions, contributing to patristic heritage shared with other traditions.^[23] In contemporary contexts, they engage in ecumenical relations cautiously, prioritizing doctrinal fidelity amid challenges like secularism, emigration, and internal reforms, such as the Ethiopian church's 2023 synodal restructuring to address administrative issues.^[27]

Orthodox Judaism

Orthodox Judaism constitutes the stream of Judaism committed to the full and unaltered observance of traditional Jewish law, known as halakha, derived from the Written Torah (the Five Books of Moses) and the Oral Torah (rabbinic interpretations codified in the Talmud and subsequent codes). Adherents regard these texts as divinely revealed to Moses at Mount Sinai around 1312 BCE and transmitted unchanged through generations, rendering halakha eternally binding on all aspects of life without accommodation to contemporary norms.^[28]^[29] This contrasts with Reform and Conservative Judaism, which permit selective observance or egalitarian modifications based on historical-critical analysis or personal ethics. The label "Orthodox" arose in the early 19th century in Western Europe, particularly Germany, amid the Haskalah (Jewish Enlightenment) and the emergence of Reform Judaism, which from the 1810s onward advocated abolishing practices like circumcision, kosher laws, and Hebrew liturgy to assimilate Jews into modern society. Traditional rabbis, viewing these changes as heretical dilutions of divine covenant, coalesced to defend unaltered tradition; key figures included Rabbi Moses Sofer (1762–1839), who decreed "חדש אסור מן התורה" ("anything new is forbidden by the Torah"), and Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808–1888), who in the 1850s articulated "Torah im Derech Eretz" (Torah with the way of the land), enabling selective engagement with secular knowledge while prioritizing halakha. By the late 19th century, Orthodox institutions like yeshivas and synagogues formalized this resistance, solidifying the movement's identity.^[29]^[30]^[31] Theologically, Orthodox Judaism affirms classical Jewish doctrines outlined in Maimonides' (1138–1204) Thirteen Principles: God's absolute unity and incorporeality; the creation of the universe ex nihilo; Torah's divine authorship; its immutability; prophetic superiority of Moses; belief in reward, punishment, Messiah, and bodily resurrection. Rabbinic authority derives from the Oral Torah's role in interpreting the Written Torah, with ongoing adjudication via poskim (legal decisors) but no power to abrogate core commandments. This framework rejects theological innovations, such as Reform's view of Torah as human-inspired or Conservative's evolutionary halakha, insisting on causal fidelity to Sinai's revelation as prerequisite for Jewish authenticity.^[28]^[29] Observance of halakha permeates daily conduct: Shabbat (from Friday sunset to Saturday nightfall) prohibits work via 39 melachot (creative labors), enforced by eruvin in urban areas; kashrut mandates separate utensils for meat and dairy, ritual slaughter (shechita), and avoidance of non-kosher species; thrice-daily prayers (tefillah) in minyanim (quorums of 10 adult males) include Shema recitation; men don tefillin (phylacteries) and tzitzit (fringes) weekdays, while modesty (tzniut) governs attire, with women covering hair post-marriage in many communities. Lifecycle rituals—brit milah (circumcision on the eighth day), bar/bat mitzvah at 13/12, and traditional marriage without interfaith options—reinforce communal boundaries. Gender roles follow Torah delineations, with men leading public prayer and women exempt from time-bound positive commandments to prioritize family. Violations incur communal sanctions or personal atonement via teshuva (repentance).^[32]^[33]^[29] Orthodox Judaism encompasses diverse subgroups united by halakhic fidelity but differing in modernity's embrace. Modern Orthodox, comprising about 35% of US Orthodox in 2013, pursue secular professions, higher education, and Zionism while maintaining observance, often via institutions like Yeshiva University (founded 1886). Haredi (from "hared," trembling before God; ~57% of US Orthodox) emphasize Torah study for males, large families, and cultural seclusion, with low workforce participation (e.g., 50% of Israeli Haredi men in 2023) and resistance to compulsory military service. Within Haredi, Hasidim (~20% of US Orthodox) follow dynastic rebbes, incorporating Kabbalistic mysticism and joyful worship; Litvish (Yeshivish) prioritize analytical Talmud study; Sephardic/Mizrahi variants adapt Ashkenazi norms to non-European customs. "Open Orthodoxy," a marginal 21st-century variant, incorporates women's clerical roles, drawing criticism for halakhic laxity from mainstream bodies like the Rabbinical Council of America.^[34]^[35] Empirically, Orthodox Judaism demonstrates resilience via demographics: US Orthodox fertility averages 4.1 children per woman (vs. 1.7 national average), with 83% retention of children in the faith, yielding projected growth to 20-25% of US Jews by 2050 despite comprising 10% in 2020 surveys. In Israel, Haredim number ~1.3 million (13% of population in 2023), expanding at 4% annually due to exemptions from secular curricula fostering insularity. This contrasts with Reform/Conservative declines from intermarriage (58%/39% rates) and low birth rates, underscoring causal links between strict boundaries and communal perpetuation. Challenges include internal tensions over technology use, women's education, and Israel-Diaspora relations, yet high religiosity—e.g., 77% daily prayer among US Orthodox—sustains vitality.^[35]^[36]^[37]

Other Religious Traditions

In Islam, the term "orthodox" is commonly applied to Sunni Islam, which represents the mainstream tradition adhering to the Quran, the Sunnah (practices of Muhammad), and scholarly consensus (ijma). This usage distinguishes it from sects like Shia Islam, emphasizing continuity with early Muslim practices established by the companions of the Prophet. Sunni Muslims, estimated at 85-90% of the global Muslim population of about 1.8 billion as of 2020, follow four major schools of jurisprudence (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali) that codify orthodox interpretations.^[38]^[39] In Hinduism, "orthodox" designates the Āstika (affirming) schools of philosophy, which accept the Vedic scriptures as authoritative revelation. These include the six classical darśanas: Nyāya (logic), Vaiśeṣika (atomism), Sāṃkhya (enumeration), Yoga (discipline), Pūrva Mīmāṃsā (ritual exegesis), and Uttara Mīmāṃsā or Vedānta (metaphysical inquiry). Developed between approximately 200 BCE and 200 CE, these schools contrast with Nāstika (non-affirming) traditions such as Buddhism, Jainism, and Cārvāka materialism, which reject Vedic infallibility. Orthodox Hinduism thus prioritizes ritual observance, dharma (cosmic order), and soteriological paths like karma and moksha (liberation).^[40] In Buddhism, Theravāda is often characterized as the orthodox or most conservative branch, preserving the Pāli Canon (Tipiṭaka) as compiled around the 1st century BCE in Sri Lanka, which records the earliest teachings attributed to the Buddha. Predominant in Sri Lanka, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia, with about 150 million adherents as of recent estimates, Theravāda emphasizes individual enlightenment through monastic discipline, meditation (vipassanā), and adherence to the Vinaya (monastic code), viewing itself as faithful to the historical Buddha's doctrines without later Mahāyāna elaborations like bodhisattva ideals.^[41]

Theological Principles

Adherence to Doctrine

In theological contexts, adherence to doctrine within Orthodox traditions denotes strict fidelity to established creeds, scriptural interpretations, and authoritative traditions derived from foundational revelations, such as the apostolic deposit in Christianity or the Torah in Judaism, rejecting innovations that deviate from these sources. This principle emphasizes the preservation of "right belief" (from Greek orthos doxa), where doctrine is not subject to individualistic reinterpretation but is safeguarded through communal consensus, conciliar decisions, and exegetical continuity.^[42]^[43] In Eastern Orthodox Christianity, adherence manifests as unwavering commitment to the Holy Trinity as revealed in Scripture and articulated in the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed of 381 AD, alongside the dogmatic definitions of the seven ecumenical councils (from Nicaea I in 325 AD to Nicaea II in 787 AD), which collectively form the unalterable core of faith against heresies like Arianism or iconoclasm. Tradition here functions as a dynamic yet bounded transmission of apostolic teachings through patristic writings and liturgical practice, equating Holy Scripture and Holy Tradition as coequal pillars, in contrast to Protestant sola scriptura. Personal opinions or novel theological developments are subordinate to synodal authority, ensuring doctrinal unity across autocephalous churches.^[44]^[42] Orthodox Judaism similarly prioritizes adherence to Halakha—the corpus of Jewish law encompassing 613 mitzvot from the Torah, elaborated in the Talmud and codified in works like the Shulchan Aruch (1565 AD)—as binding and divinely ordained, with rabbinic interpretations extending but never abrogating the original revelation at Sinai circa 1312 BCE. While Halakha permits responsive applications to contemporary circumstances through poskim (legal decisors), it maintains the Torah's immutability, viewing deviations as erosions of covenantal obligation; for instance, observance includes Shabbat restrictions and kashrut laws enforced daily by observant communities worldwide, numbering approximately 2 million strictly adherent Haredi Jews as of 2020.^[45] Across these traditions, doctrinal adherence fosters resilience against modernism by privileging empirical continuity with historical precedents over speculative reforms, though internal debates persist on interpretive stringency without altering foundational tenets.^[43]

Distinction from Heterodoxy and Schisms

In theological contexts, orthodoxy signifies adherence to a body of doctrine deemed authoritative, derived from scripture, tradition, and conciliar definitions, serving as the normative standard for belief and practice. Heterodoxy, conversely, encompasses any deviation from this standard, varying in degree from permissible diversity in non-essential matters to formal heresy, which involves obstinate denial of essential truths such as the divinity of Christ or the Trinitarian nature of God. Schisms represent formal divisions within the ecclesial body, typically arising from refusals to maintain communion over issues of authority or governance, distinct from heterodoxy in that they may occur without doctrinal innovation but often entangle both elements, as seen in historical separations where interpretive disputes escalated into institutional breaks.^[46]^[47]^[48] The distinction hinges on the causal priority of doctrinal fidelity: orthodoxy prioritizes pistis (right belief) as foundational to koinonia (communal unity), such that heterodoxy undermines the former and risks the latter, while pure schism fractures the latter without necessarily originating in the former, though prolonged schisms frequently foster heterodox developments due to independent doctrinal evolution. In Eastern Orthodox theology, for example, adherence to the first seven ecumenical councils (from Nicaea I in 325 CE to Nicaea II in 787 CE) demarcates orthodoxy from heterodoxy, with non-acceptance rendering groups heterodox, as in the case of Oriental Orthodox churches rejecting Chalcedon (451 CE). Schisms, like the Acacian Schism (484–519 CE), illustrate temporary breaches over Christological emphases that, if unresolved, calcify into enduring heterodox identities.^[49]^[50] This framework extends to other traditions; in Orthodox Judaism, heterodoxy manifests in movements like Reform Judaism, which, from the orthodox viewpoint, dilutes halakhic observance by prioritizing ethical reinterpretation over literal Torah adherence, leading to de facto schisms in communal practice without formal excommunications. Theologically, schisms are critiqued as violations of unity mandated by scripture (e.g., 1 Corinthians 1:10), often rooted in human factors like ambition or misinterpretation rather than pure doctrinal purity, yet orthodoxy demands restoration through repentance and realignment rather than accommodation of error. Empirical patterns across schisms, such as the Protestant Reformation's 1517–1648 span yielding over 30,000 denominations, underscore how initial unity fractures propagate heterodox proliferation absent a binding authoritative norm.^[51]^[52]

Contemporary Developments and Controversies

Growth and Resilience in Modern Society

Orthodox religious traditions have demonstrated notable resilience against secularization pressures in modern societies, often bucking broader trends of declining religiosity through institutional continuity, communal insularity, and high fertility rates that sustain demographic expansion. Empirical studies indicate that Eastern Orthodox contexts in post-communist Eastern Europe exhibit patterns of religious revival rather than decline, with increased self-identification as Orthodox and rising church attendance linked to historical state repression fostering underground resilience rather than erosion of faith.^[53] ^[54] In contrast to more liberal denominations experiencing membership losses, orthodox adherence correlates with stronger retention of doctrinal fidelity amid modernization, as evidenced by lower rates of apostasy in communities emphasizing separation from secular influences.^[55] In Orthodox Judaism, particularly among Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) communities, population growth has been robust, driven by fertility rates averaging 6-7 children per woman globally and sustained by cultural norms prioritizing large families and limited integration with secular education or media. The global Haredi population reached approximately 2.1 million by 2022, representing about 14% of the world's Jewish population and expanding at an annual rate of 3.5-4%, with life expectancies of 83-86 years further bolstering cohort sizes.^[56] In Israel, the Haredi sector grew to 1.28 million individuals in 2022, comprising 13.3% of the national population—up from 750,000 in 2009—owing to a total fertility rate of around 6.4, which contrasts sharply with declining rates among secular Jews.^[57] ^[58] This demographic momentum has enabled resilience, as Haredi enclaves maintain high religious observance rates exceeding 90% into adulthood, resisting assimilation pressures through yeshiva-based education and arranged marriages typically in early adulthood.^[59] Eastern and Oriental Orthodox Churches have shown parallel vitality in specific regions, with revivals post-persecution and expansions via missions and migration offsetting Western declines. In post-Soviet Russia, Orthodox self-identification surged alongside church attendance from the 1990s onward, with surveys by 2010s revealing over 70% affiliation rates and growing associations between religiosity and national identity, challenging secularization theses by highlighting institutional rebound after decades of suppression.^[60] Oriental Orthodox communities, totaling around 60-70 million adherents worldwide, have experienced significant U.S. growth, with a 67% increase in membership since 2010—Coptic Orthodox congregations doubling—fueled by immigration from Egypt and Ethiopia and high retention among diaspora youth.^[61] ^[62] In Africa, Ethiopian Täwaḥǝdo Orthodox Christians number over 55 million domestically as of 2025, comprising a core of global Oriental Orthodoxy and demonstrating endurance through ancient liturgical traditions amid rapid societal changes.^[63] These patterns underscore causal factors like doctrinal rigidity and communal networks enabling orthodox groups to thrive where heterodox or secular alternatives falter under individualism and skepticism.

Major Disputes and Criticisms

In Eastern Orthodoxy, a major contemporary dispute is the schism between the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople and the Patriarchate of Moscow, initiated in 2018 when Constantinople granted autocephaly to the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, prompting Moscow to sever eucharistic communion and accuse the move of violating canonical territories.^[64] This conflict, rooted in jurisdictional overlaps and national loyalties, has persisted, with the Russian Orthodox Church boycotting pan-Orthodox gatherings and deepening ethnic divisions within global Orthodoxy.^[65] Critics, including some Orthodox theologians, attribute such tensions to "ethnodoxy," a fusion of ethnic identity and faith that prioritizes national churches over universal unity, as evidenced by historical patterns of jurisdictional fragmentation in diaspora communities.^[65] Further criticisms target Eastern Orthodoxy's church-state entanglements, particularly in nations like Russia, where the Russian Orthodox Church has collaborated with the government, endorsing policies that blend religious rhetoric with state nationalism, such as during the 2022 Ukraine invasion.^[65] Detractors argue this compromises ecclesiastical independence and moral authority, citing instances where church leaders have justified military actions as defensive wars, diverging from traditional just war criteria.^[65] Internal fundamentalist strains have also drawn rebuke for rigid literalism and resistance to ecumenical dialogue, exemplified by opposition to the 2016 Holy and Great Council, which some viewed as diluting doctrinal purity despite its limited attendance.^[65] In Orthodox Judaism, particularly Haredi communities, criticisms center on social insularity and resistance to modern integration, with observers noting high welfare dependency in Israel—where Haredim constitute about 13% of the population but rely disproportionately on state subsidies due to low workforce participation rates below 50% for men.^[66] This stems from emphasis on full-time Torah study over secular education and employment, fueling political tensions, including 2023-2024 protests against proposed Haredi military draft reforms amid exemptions for ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students.^[66] Modern Orthodox variants face internal critique for inconsistent engagement with biblical criticism and scientific advances, as some rabbis reject historical-documentary approaches to Torah authorship despite archaeological evidence challenging traditional Mosaic origins, leading to accusations of intellectual compartmentalization.^[67] Gender roles in Orthodox Judaism elicit ongoing disputes, with halakhic restrictions barring women from certain leadership positions and ritual roles, prompting feminist critiques that such practices perpetuate inequality, though proponents defend them as divinely mandated and essential to communal stability.^[68] Reports of inadequate responses to child sexual abuse in insular communities have amplified external condemnations, highlighting cover-up tendencies to preserve institutional reputation over victim protection, as documented in cases involving rabbinic figures since the early 2000s.^[69] For Oriental Orthodox Churches, contemporary disputes are fewer, largely limited to ecumenical tensions with Chalcedonian bodies, but internal critiques mirror broader Orthodox concerns over adapting ancient miaphysite Christology to modern ethical debates without schismatic fractures reported in the 21st century.^[20]

Non-Religious Applications

In Economics and Academia

In economics, "orthodox" designates the mainstream paradigm, synonymous with neoclassical economics and its syntheses, which analyzes human behavior under scarcity through models of rational choice, marginal analysis, and market equilibrium. This framework assumes individuals maximize utility subject to constraints, with prices coordinating supply and demand to allocate resources efficiently, as formalized in works from the late 19th century onward by figures like Alfred Marshall and later integrated with Keynesian macroeconomics after 1936. Orthodox economics dominates academic training and publication; for instance, core undergraduate curricula in top U.S. departments emphasize its tools, with heterodox alternatives like post-Keynesian or evolutionary economics comprising less than 10% of journal articles in leading outlets such as the American Economic Review.^[70]^[71]^[72] Critics of orthodoxy, including heterodox economists, contend it overlooks institutional power, historical contingencies, and non-market social provisioning, leading to policy prescriptions that prioritize efficiency over equity or stability; empirical tests, such as those on rational expectations, have shown mixed results, yet the paradigm persists due to its mathematical rigor and alignment with observable aggregate trends like GDP growth correlations with trade openness. Mainstream dominance is evident in hiring and funding: a 2023 analysis found that over 95% of economics faculty positions in elite universities adhere to orthodox methods, marginalizing dissenters who face barriers in tenure tracks.^[73]^[74] In academia beyond economics, "orthodox" refers to adherence to disciplinary consensus, prioritizing falsifiable hypotheses, peer-reviewed evidence, and methodological replicability over anecdotal or ideologically framed narratives. This approach underpins natural sciences' successes, such as quantum mechanics validated through repeated experiments since the 1920s, but faces contestation in humanities and social sciences, where systemic left-leaning biases—documented in faculty surveys showing Democrats outnumbering Republicans by ratios exceeding 10:1 in fields like sociology—can elevate interpretive orthodoxies that resist empirical disconfirmation, such as certain equity-focused theories despite contradictory data on outcomes like affirmative action's long-term effects. Such biases, rooted in institutional hiring and grant allocation patterns, undermine causal realism by favoring normative priors over first-principles scrutiny, as heterodox scholars like those in psychology have demonstrated through replication crises exposing overreliance on p-hacking in orthodox studies.^[75]^[76]

In Politics and Ideology

In politics and ideology, the term "orthodox" denotes adherence to the established or authoritative interpretations of a doctrinal framework, typically implying conformity to foundational principles derived from originators or canonical texts, in contrast to heterodox positions that introduce deviations or innovations.^[77] This usage underscores methodological fidelity and resistance to revisionism, often serving to delineate boundaries within ideological movements where challenges to core tenets risk marginalization or expulsion.^[78] A key historical example is orthodox Marxism, which emerged in the late 19th century following the deaths of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, emphasizing strict application of dialectical materialism as the scientific method for understanding historical and social processes.^[79] Georg Lukács, in his 1919 essay "What is Orthodox Marxism?", defined orthodoxy not as uncritical textual repetition but as conviction in dialectical materialism's capacity to reveal truth through ongoing analysis of concrete conditions, critiquing both revisionist dilutions and dogmatic rigidity.^[80] This strain influenced Second International socialists like Karl Kautsky, who prioritized evolutionary socialism within parliamentary systems over revolutionary adventurism, until supplanted by Leninist adaptations post-1917.^[81] In conservative ideologies, orthodox variants prioritize preservation of inherited cultural and institutional norms as a trust held across generations, rejecting cosmopolitan or progressive reinterpretations.^[82] British Orthodox Conservatism, for instance, as outlined by groups like the Orthodox Conservatives, posits that societal values are particular to a nation's historical continuum, advocating defense against universalist ideologies that erode sovereignty and tradition—evident in opposition to supranational entities like the European Union since the 2016 Brexit referendum.^[83] Similarly, in American contexts, orthodox conservatism aligns with originalist interpretations of constitutional principles, such as limited federal power and states' rights, distinguishing it from neoconservative emphases on global interventionism that gained prominence in the 1980s under figures like Ronald Reagan.^[84] Political orthodoxy can also manifest as enforced ideological uniformity within ruling structures, where heterodox views—such as individual politicians defying party lines on issues like gun control or foreign policy—threaten cohesion and invite sanctions.^[78] In authoritarian systems, this often involves state mechanisms to suppress alternatives, as in mid-20th-century Soviet purges of "deviationists" from Marxist-Leninist doctrine, resulting in the execution or imprisonment of thousands between 1936 and 1938 for ideological nonconformity.^[85] Such dynamics highlight orthodoxy's dual role: stabilizing movements through consensus while potentially stifling adaptation, a tension observable in contemporary debates over ideological purity in both left- and right-wing parties.^[86]

In Medicine and Science

In medicine, "orthodox" refers to conventional practices rooted in the biomedical model, emphasizing empirical evidence, randomized controlled trials, and mechanistic understandings of disease causality, such as through pharmacology, surgery, and diagnostic technologies like MRI and CT scans. This approach emerged prominently in the 19th century as irregular healing systems were marginalized, with orthodox medicine asserting authority via formalized training, licensing, and institutional control, leading to the dominance of allopathic treatments over eclectic or homeopathic alternatives.^[87]^[88] By the early 20th century, regulatory bodies like the American Medical Association enforced standards that prioritized interventions with reproducible outcomes, sidelining therapies lacking rigorous validation, though this process involved professional rivalries rather than pure evidential merit in all cases.^[89] Orthodox medicine's causal realism focuses on identifiable pathogens, genetic factors, and physiological disruptions, as seen in treatments for conditions like bacterial infections via antibiotics developed post-1928 with penicillin's discovery, or chronic diseases managed through evidence-based protocols yielding measurable reductions in mortality—e.g., a 50% drop in cardiovascular death rates in Western nations from 1970 to 2000 attributable to statins and hypertension drugs.^[90] Critics from heterodox perspectives argue this model overemphasizes reductionism, neglecting holistic or psychosocial elements, yet meta-analyses consistently show orthodox interventions outperforming placebos or alternatives in survival metrics, such as chemotherapy's extension of life in oncology by years on average.^[91] Institutional biases in funding and publication, often favoring incremental biomedical research over paradigm shifts, can entrench orthodoxy, but its resilience stems from falsifiability and replicability rather than mere conformity.^[92] In broader science, "orthodox" denotes adherence to prevailing paradigms, methodologies, and consensus interpretations within disciplines, as articulated in Thomas Kuhn's framework of normal science, where established theories like general relativity or the Big Bang model guide inquiry until anomalies accumulate. Heterodox positions, such as challenges to neoclassical economics or certain quantum interpretations, operate on the periphery, often facing citation disadvantages and institutional resistance due to entrenched review processes favoring incrementalism over disruptive claims.^[93] Empirical data underscores orthodoxy's efficacy: for instance, the standard model of particle physics has predicted outcomes verified in experiments like the 2012 Higgs boson discovery at CERN, with predictive accuracy exceeding 10 decimal places in quantum electrodynamics calculations.^[86] While heterodox approaches can catalyze progress—e.g., plate tectonics initially dismissed as fringe in the 1920s—transition to orthodoxy requires overwhelming evidential convergence, not mere dissent, mitigating risks of pseudoscientific proliferation. This dynamic reflects causal realism, prioritizing theories with robust explanatory and predictive power over speculative alternatives lacking comparable validation.^[94]

Miscellaneous Uses

In combat sports such as boxing, the term "orthodox" denotes the conventional fighting stance for right-handed participants, characterized by the left foot positioned forward, the left hand extended as the lead jab, and the right hand reserved for power punches from the rear.^[95] This configuration, which contrasts with the "southpaw" stance used by left-handed fighters, facilitates optimal weight distribution and leverage for approximately 90% of boxers who adopt it due to predominant right-handedness in the population.^[96] The stance originated from early 20th-century boxing conventions and remains standard in professional bouts governed by organizations like the World Boxing Association.^[95] In legal theory and jurisprudence, "orthodox" describes adherence to prevailing doctrinal frameworks, such as the traditional interpretation of statutes under textualism, which prioritizes plain textual meaning over purposive or substantive policy considerations.^[97] For instance, orthodox textualism, as articulated in U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence since the 1980s, emphasizes objective linguistic analysis derived from sources like dictionaries contemporaneous to enactment, rejecting extratextual judicial intent-divining.^[97] Similarly, in analytic philosophy of law, "Hartian orthodoxy" refers to H.L.A. Hart's positivist view of law as a system of primary and secondary rules, distinguishing it from revisionist critiques that incorporate moral or perspectival elements.^[98] These usages underscore "orthodox" as synonymous with established, non-deviant interpretive norms within scholarly discourse.

References

[1]
Orthodox churches (Eastern) - World Council of Churches
Eastern Orthodoxy consists of several autocephalous (self-governing) churches: the four ancient Patriarchates of the early church, Constantinople, Alexandria, ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[2]
History of the Orthodox Church
The Great Schism. The Great Schism is the title given to separation between the Western Church (the Roman Catholic) and the Eastern Church, (the Orthodox), ...
[3]
What is the Eastern Orthodox Church? Its History & Beliefs
Aug 4, 2023 · Together they constitute what is called the “Orthodox Church”, literally meaning "right teaching" or "right worship", derived from two Greek ...
[4]
Orthodox Christianity in the 21st Century | Pew Research Center
Nov 8, 2017 · Over the last century, the Orthodox Christian population around the world has more than doubled and now stands at nearly 260 million.
[5]
An Introduction to the Orthodox Church
The first definition is “true teaching.” The Orthodox Church believes that she has maintained and handed down the Christian faith, free from error and ...
[6]
ORTHODOX Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 8, 2025 · In English such opinions might be called "orthodox." The English word orthodox comes originally from the Greek words orthos, meaning "right, ...
[7]
Orthodox - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in the mid-15c. from Greek orthodoxos ("having the right opinion"), orthodox means "what is regarded as true or correct" in faith or theology.
[8]
orthodox, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more
There are ten meanings listed in OED's entry for the word orthodox, one of which is labelled obsolete. See 'Meaning & use' for definitions, usage, and quotation ...
[9]
ORTHODOX | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary
(of beliefs, ideas, or activities) considered traditional, normal, and acceptable by most people: orthodox treatment/methods, orthodox views/opinions.
[10]
ORTHODOX Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
conforming with established or accepted standards, as in religion, behaviour, or attitudes · conforming to the Christian faith as established by the early Church.
[11]
orthodox adjective - Oxford Learner's Dictionaries
orthodox · (especially of beliefs or behaviour) generally accepted or approved of; following generally accepted beliefs synonym traditional. orthodox medicine ...
[12]
ORTHODOX definition in American English - Collins Dictionary
4 senses: 1. conforming with established or accepted standards, as in religion, behaviour, or attitudes 2. conforming to the.... Click for more definitions.
[13]
orthodox - American Heritage Dictionary Entry
1. Adhering to the accepted or traditional and established faith, especially in religion. · 2. Adhering to the Christian faith as expressed in the early ...<|separator|>
[14]
World Churches - Orthodox Church in America
Autocephalous Churches · The Church of Constantinople · The Church of Alexandria · The Church of Antioch · The Church of Jerusalem · The Church of Russia · The Church ...
[15]
1054 The East-West Schism | Christian History Magazine
What caused the schism? It was not the excommunications of 1054; not differences in theology, discipline, or liturgy; not political or military conflicts. These ...
[16]
What Is the Great Schism of 1054? - Bible Study Tools
Jan 10, 2022 · Three Causes of the Great Schism of 1054 · 1. A power struggle between bishops. · 2. Differences and disunity in the church. · 3. Jurisdiction of ...
[17]
The Great Schism That Divided East and West - EWTN
From 861 to 867, Pope Nicholas I and Patriarch Photius excommunicated each other when both attempted to exert control over the emerging church in Bulgaria.
[18]
The Filioque Clause - Orthodox Church in America
Jul 11, 2012 · The Filioque clause, meaning 'from the Son', is added to the Creed in the West, stating the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, which ...
[19]
History of the Orthodox Church
Our brief survey of the long and complex evolution of Orthodox Christianity begins with the first Pentecost in Jerusalem and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[20]
Oriental Orthodox Churches
They are the churches of the first three ecumenical councils" (Nicea,* Constantinople* and Ephesus) but do not accept the fourth, Chalcedon" (451). The six ...
[21]
[PDF] Introduction to the Oriental Orthodox Churches
The Oriental Orthodox churches are ancient churches founded in apostolic times, united with Rome and Byzantium until the 5th century, and acknowledge only the ...
[22]
Six Things You Did Not Know About the Oriental Orthodox Churches
Nov 15, 2023 · Oriental Orthodox Churches adhere to a miaphysite Christology, stressing the unity of Christ's two natures, whereas Eastern Orthodox churches ...
[23]
Orthodox churches (Oriental) | World Council of Churches
The Oriental Orthodox churches are ancient churches which were founded in apostolic times, by apostles or by the apostles' earliest disciples. Their doctrinal ...
[24]
Eastern Orthodoxy and "Oriental Orthodoxy"
There is thus no real distinction between the term Eastern Orthodox (which identifies the only True Church) and the term "Oriental Orthodox" (which denotes ...
[25]
Oriental Orthodox Church | History & Beliefs - Study.com
There are six Christian churches considered Oriental Orthodox: Armenian, Ethiopian, Syrian, Indian, Eritrean, and Coptic. All six have beliefs that do not ...Oriental Orthodox Church Beliefs · History of Oriental Orthodox...
[26]
Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church | History, Beliefs & Practices
The Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church is an autocephalous Oriental Orthodox church in Ethiopia, with headquarters in Addis Ababa, and believes in miaphysitism.<|separator|>
[27]
Oriental and Eastern Orthodox churches
The Oriental Orthodox family has five Churches -- India, Armenia, Syria, Egypt and Ethiopia - three in Asia and two in Africa. Total membership is over 25 ...
[28]
Background & Overview of Orthodox Judaism - Jewish Virtual Library
Orthodox Judaism is dedicated to Torah, views itself as continuing normative Judaism, and believes both Written and Oral Torah are divine. It is a recent term, ...
[29]
Orthodox Judaism | My Jewish Learning
Orthodox Judaism is the most religiously stringent of the three main streams of American Judaism. Its adherents believe the Torah was given to the Jewish ...
[30]
[PDF] Judaism and Orthodox Judaism - BYU ScholarsArchive
Judaism is a religion, tradition, and way of life. Traditional Judaism, developed by rabbis, is also called Rabbinic Judaism.Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
[31]
Orthodox Judaism: History, Beliefs, Practices
Orthodox Judaism soon organized in reaction to Reform, rallying to defend the strict observance of Jewish customs and law. Orthodox leaders often blurred the ...
[32]
Halakhah: The Laws of Jewish Life
Halakhah is the 'way' a Jew is directed to behave, encompassing civil, criminal, and religious law, and is the 'way' in every aspect of life.
[33]
Halakhah: Jewish Law - Judaism 101 (JewFAQ)
Halakhah is a set of Jewish rules and practices affecting every aspect of life, from what you eat to how you treat others. It's also called 'the path that one ...
[34]
The Jewish Denominations
Orthodox Judaism · Modern Orthodox · Haredi (or Ultra) Orthodox · Open Orthodox.
[35]
A Portrait of American Orthodox Jews | Pew Research Center
Aug 26, 2015 · Orthodox Jews are more likely than other Jews to believe in God with absolute certainty and participate in various Jewish religious practices.Missing: history | Show results with:history
[36]
Jewish Americans in 2020 | Pew Research Center
May 11, 2021 · Roughly four-in-ten Jewish adults under 30 identify with either Reform (29%) or Conservative Judaism (8%), compared with seven-in-ten Jews ages ...
[37]
American Orthodox Jews: Demographic Trends and Scenarios
If, as estimated in 1990, the Orthodox have an average of 3.7 children but over time one half of them pass to other denominations, and the Reform have 1.5 ...
[38]
What Is Orthodox Islam? | About Islam
May 1, 2017 · Orthodox Islam refers to the main body of Islamic following which is referred to within that body as the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaa.
[39]
About - Orthodox Muslim
Orthodox Islam There is only one true god, Allah, and He is the creator of ... The beliefs (Aqida) of Orthodox (Sunni) Muslims have been codified in three schools ...
[40]
On Bhagavān - Embodied Philosophy
Jan 1, 2020 · Let's unpack this sentence. Vedānta is one of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism ... orthodox schools of Hinduism as the guide books of humanity ...
[41]
Intro to Theravada Buddhism - Sae Taw Win II
Sae Taw Win II is part of the Theravada branch, which is regarded as classic orthodox Buddhism. Theravadans hold the original doctrines of the Buddha ...
[42]
Tradition in the Orthodox Church
Aug 13, 1998 · In theological terms it means any teaching or practice which has been transmitted from generation to generation throughout the life of the ...
[43]
Orthodoxy Today: Tradition or Traditionalism?
Jan 30, 2005 · A central affirmation of Orthodoxy is faithfulness to Tradition. This is true in every setting and context. Orthodox Churches and Orthodox ...
[44]
The Fundamental Teachings of the Eastern Orthodox Church
The fundamental truth of the Orthodox Church is the faith revealed in the True God: the Holy Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. The doctrine ...
[45]
Orthodox Judaism & Halakhah - My Jewish Learning
Halakhah is the application of an unchanging Torah to a changing world. Halakhah changes so that the Torah should not change.
[46]
Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy | Encyclopedia.com
Orthodoxy means correct or sound belief according to an authoritative norm; heterodoxy refers to belief in a doctrine differing from the norm.
[47]
What is the difference between heresy and schism? - U.S. Catholic
May 15, 2023 · Heresy is a freely chosen denial or stubborn doubt by a Christian of Catholic doctrine. Schism is refusal to remain in communion with the pope or with fellow ...
[48]
Schism, Heresy, and Apostasy | Catholic Answers Magazine
Jul 11, 2024 · By rejecting part of the Faith, heresy strikes at the former, while by rejecting communion, schism strikes at the latter. As St. Augustine said,.
[49]
Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy - Biblical Cyclopedia
Orthodoxy And Heterodoxy. The use of these two words implies the possession of a standard of truth, so that what agrees with it is right, and what disagrees ...<|separator|>
[50]
Chalcedonian Orthodoxy and Non-Chalcedonian Heterodoxy
Apr 12, 2016 · It has always been a basic principle of Orthodox dialogue with the heterodox that communion must be the result of full theological agreement, ...
[51]
The Wickedness of Schisms Proven From the Scriptures Alone
Mar 7, 2017 · We may conclude from the Scriptures that schisms are motivated by greed and coupled with doctrinal error which parts with Apostolic teaching.
[52]
The Boundaries of the Church: An Orthodox Debate
Aug 17, 2010 · Faithful to biblical and patristic Tradition, Orthodoxy strongly believes that there can only be one Church of God since we know only one Lord, ...
[53]
(PDF) Secularization versus Religious Revival in Eastern Europe
Aug 7, 2025 · Secularization versus Religious Revival in Eastern Europe: Church Institutional Resilience, State Repression and Divergent Paths. November 2015 ...
[54]
Secularization versus religious revival in Eastern Europe - PubMed
We show that Catholic and Orthodox countries are experiencing different trends, the first group displaying evidence of secularization and the second of revival.Missing: traditions empirical data<|control11|><|separator|>
[55]
Secularization versus religious revival in Eastern Europe
Secularization versus religious revival in Eastern Europe: Church institutional resilience, state repression and divergent paths · Abstract · Section snippets.
[56]
The Global Haredi Population
The global Haredi Jewish population is about 2,100,000, growing at 3.5-4.0% annually, with 6-7 children per woman, and life expectancy of 83-86 years.
[57]
Statistical Report on Ultra-Orthodox Society in Israel - The Israel ...
Dec 31, 2022 · In 2022, the Haredi population numbered around 1,280,000, up from 750,000 in 2009, and constituting 13.3% of Israel's total population.Missing: Judaism | Show results with:Judaism
[58]
The Annual Assessment of the Jewish People 2024 | 5784
Sep 22, 2024 · Due to the high Haredi fertility rate of 6.4 children per woman, this population is also very young. Half of the Haredi sector is under the age ...
[59]
Fertility and nuptiality of Ultra-Orthodox Jews in the United States
Jan 15, 2024 · Ultra-Orthodox Jews in the US have a fertility rate of about 6.6 children per woman, driven by adult marriage, not teen pregnancy, and similar ...
[60]
The Limits of Secularization? The Resurgence of Orthodoxy in Post ...
Aug 6, 2025 · The analysis indicates continued growth in Orthodox self-identification, increased church attendance, and an increasingly strong association ...
[61]
Oriental Orthodox churches become growth center of U.S. Orthodoxy
These churches showed a 67 percent increase since the last religion census in 2010, with the Coptic Orthodox seeing a doubling of members since that time.
[62]
The Growing Significance of the Ethiopian Orthodox Täwaḥǝdo ...
Jul 29, 2025 · Today, there are roughly 55 million Täwaḥǝdo Christians in Ethiopia alone and likely over 60 million when diaspora communities across the globe ...
[63]
The Captivating History and Beliefs of Oriental Orthodox Faith
Jan 22, 2025 · The Oriental Orthodox Church is a rich and ancient Christian tradition. It is one of the oldest branches of Christianity, with around 70 million followers ...
[64]
Why a centuries-old religious dispute over Ukraine's Orthodox ...
Feb 19, 2019 · This competition between the churches of Constantinople and Moscow for dominance in the Orthodox Christian world is not new – it goes back more than 500 years.
[65]
Both Symptom and Cause: Four Problems in Eastern Orthodoxy ...
Feb 24, 2023 · The four problems are: jurisdictional conflict, church-state collaboration, fundamentalism and ethnodoxy, and morality and the orthodoxy of war.
[66]
(PDF) Orthodox Judaism: From Declining to Rising? - ResearchGate
May 16, 2025 · Conservative Jews, 56% of Reform Jews, and 25% of the Just Jewish. Table D.5A shows that only 15% of Orthodox Jews responded that being Jewish ...
[67]
The Religious Value of Biblical Criticism: My Modern Orthodox ...
Feb 13, 2023 · I confidently prepared a unit which presented the fundamental contentions of biblical criticism regarding the origins of the text of the Torah, ...
[68]
What is wrong with Judaism in the 21st century? - Quora
Jul 31, 2017 · Judaism, of course, is a deeply spiritual religion, but outwardly, Orthodox Judaism can seem obsessed with seemingly irrelevant details, totally ...
[69]
When Modern Orthodox Judaism Failed During Covid - The Blogs
Jul 11, 2023 · Major issues that Modern Orthodoxy confronts include integrating modern technology into Jewish observance, meshing breakthroughs in scientific ...
[70]
2.2 – What is Orthodox Economics?
Orthodox economics seeks to apply the concept of scarcity, which is when human wants for goods and services exceed the available supply.
[71]
What is Mainstream Economics or Orthodox Economics?
Jan 8, 2025 · Mainstream or orthodox economics refers to the traditional schools of thought that dominate economic theory, such as neoclassical and Keynesian ...
[72]
(PDF) Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics
Aug 7, 2025 · Heterodox economics can be defined negatively, in opposition either to the orthodoxy or to the mainstream. The lack of consensus generates ...
[73]
[PDF] Orthodox Economics and the Economics of Harm Lane Vanderslice
Oct 15, 2021 · Orthodox economics understands productive activity, which obtains income by benefitting others, but does not have an adequate conception of ...
[74]
The Stagnant Science: Mainstream Economics in America
Nov 20, 2023 · In view of this, what accounts for the enduring grip of mainstream economics on academic prestige and public discourse? The question is not ...
[75]
To Find Orthodoxy in Academia, Look to Business Schools
Nov 3, 2023 · Right-wing attacks on academia allege that modern secular universities are hotbeds of liberal orthodoxy and must be reformed to expand the range ...Missing: approaches | Show results with:approaches
[76]
Economics students need to be taught more than neoclassical theory
Oct 28, 2013 · Economics education is dominated by neoclassical economics, which tries to understand the economy through modelling individual agents.
[77]
What is the Difference Between Orthodox and Heterodox
Mar 5, 2024 · Orthodox views represent mainstream or widely accepted beliefs, while heterodox views offer alternative viewpoints. Ultimately, this difference ...
[78]
Heteodox vs orthodox political stands - by Ken Kovar
Sep 5, 2025 · Heterodox stands are ones that individual politicians can buck the orthodox “party line”. For Democrats a good example would be gun control. I ...
[79]
6— The Rise of Orthodox Marxism - UC Press E-Books Collection
The Rise of Orthodox Marxism. Orthodox Marxism attempted to consolidate "dialectical materialism" as an objective science.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[80]
What is Orthodox Marxism? by Georg Lukacs
Orthodoxy refers exclusively to method. It is the scientific conviction that dialectical materialism is the road to truth.
[81]
What is Orthodox Marxism and Why it Matters Now More Than Ever ...
Capitalism in Orthodox Marxism is explained as an historical mode of production based on the privatization of the means of subsistence in the hands of a few, ...
[82]
The “Orthodox Conservatives” and the Essence of British ...
Feb 14, 2020 · “Orthodox Conservatism believes that the culture we have is held in trust—and that it is particular to us and our shared history; it is ...<|separator|>
[83]
Orthodox Conservatives
Examine our research and comment on different aspects of social conservatism – and how we engage in making a robust intellectual argument.Team · Our Story · What is Social Conservatism? · Folder
[84]
Wonder Blog: Orthodoxy and Political Conservatism
Apr 15, 2011 · The words “orthodox” and “conservative” both can refer to those ideas and practices that are long-standing, established, and time-tested.
[85]
Has there ever been a political orthodoxy? - Quora
Apr 11, 2021 · Orthodoxy means a foundational belief at times when direct experience cannot be had. The central example is Christian orthodoxy: belief that ...
[86]
A relational approach to heterodox versus orthodox positions in ...
Nov 13, 2020 · This article examines the categories of orthodoxy and heterodoxy in regards to their use by many authors to position themselves within a research field.
[87]
Schism and heresy in the development of orthodox medicine
Orthodox medicine emerged from a number of healing systems in the 19th century by claiming the superiority and consequent authority of the biomedical model and ...
[88]
Orthodox Medicine | Encyclopedia.com
Orthodox medicine involved practitioners with recognized training, based on humoral theory, and treatments like bleeding and purging to restore balance.
[89]
Demarcating scientific medicine - ScienceDirect.com
In nineteenth-century America, the competition between orthodox doctors and heterodox homeopaths spilled over into public lectures, medical journals, and ...
[90]
Alternative and orthodox medicine and the “odd” principle - PMC
Although orthodox medicine trains general medical practitioners to comprehensively treat the whole patient and to refer to specialists only when patients ...
[91]
Orthodox and Alternative Medicine: Politics, Professionalization and ...
Dec 6, 2004 · In this framework, orthodox medicine is defined as those forms of health care that are to a significant extent formally underwritten by the ...
[92]
The role of methods in maintaining orthodox beliefs in health research
Orthodox views about health and correct ways to conduct health research are maintained by traditions that are developed in support of dominant beliefs and by ...
[93]
Orthodox Core–Heterodox Periphery? Contrasting Citation ...
Many authors have described this relation between heterodoxy and orthodoxy as a core–periphery pattern with insiders and outsiders (e.g., Colander, Holt, and ...
[94]
Heterodox Science Leadership - IDEAS/RePEc
Heterodox science challenges orthodox science. Unorthodox science approaches are heterodox if they apply more unconventional, pluralistic views and methods ...
[95]
What do 'orthodox' and 'southpaw' mean in boxing? | DAZN News US
Apr 7, 2023 · What does 'orthodox' mean in boxing? An 'othodox' fighter will use an othordox stance when competing inside the ring. This sees the fighter ...
[96]
What 'southpaw' and 'orthodox' mean in boxing - GiveMeSport
Jan 16, 2024 · Orthodox is the most common stance in boxing, whereby the left foot is positioned in front of the right foot. For right-handed fighters, this ...
[97]
The Incompatibility of Substantive Canons and Textualism
Dec 11, 2023 · But because we take the approach that we have described to represent the orthodox conception of textualism among most self-described ...
[98]
Legal Perspectivalism and Hartian Orthodoxy | Legal Theory
Jul 30, 2025 · Language and Linguistics ... Still, you may wonder whether we could understand (3a) as a proposition along Hartian Orthodox—but not perspectival— ...