Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Euroregion

Euroregions are transnational cooperation frameworks established by contiguous local and regional authorities across two or more European countries to coordinate joint actions addressing shared economic, social, environmental, and infrastructural challenges, typically without independent legislative powers. The model originated in Western Europe during the late 1950s as a bottom-up response to postwar border frictions, with the first such entity, EUREGIO, formed in 1958 along the Dutch-German frontier to promote practical collaboration in adjacent territories. Their proliferation accelerated in the 1990s, driven by deepening European integration, national decentralization in countries like Germany, and targeted EU funding via programs such as Interreg, resulting in over one hundred Euroregions spanning the continent by the early 21st century. Legally underpinned by instruments like the Council of Europe's 1980 Madrid Outline Convention on transfrontier cooperation, these entities facilitate bilateral or multilateral agreements for initiatives ranging from transport links and environmental protection to labor mobility and cultural exchanges, though empirical assessments reveal varying intensities of activity, with higher effectiveness in cases anchored by robust local governance structures. Notable examples include the Öresund Region bridging Denmark and Sweden, which has advanced cross-border infrastructure like the 2000 Öresund Bridge, underscoring Euroregions' role in tangible regional integration despite persistent challenges from differing national regulations and administrative asymmetries.

Origins and Historical Development

Inception and Early Examples

The concept of the Euroregion originated in the late as a decentralized, local-level initiative to address practical barriers to cross-border cooperation in , particularly along the Dutch-German border, amid efforts to rebuild economic ties and foster reconciliation following . Local authorities recognized that administrative divisions hindered , , and cultural exchange, prompting efforts independent of supranational directives. This bottom-up approach emphasized pragmatic collaboration on issues like , , and environmental management, aligning with broader post-war goals without formal legal mandates at the outset. The inaugural Euroregion, EUREGIO, was established on October 21, 1958, encompassing territories around in the and Gronau in , involving initial participation from eight Dutch municipalities and seven German ones. Formed through a cross-border of local leaders, it operated initially as a German-registered association (Eingetragener Verein), focusing on coordinating policies for fire services, , and promotion. By prioritizing tangible projects over ideological unification, EUREGIO demonstrated the viability of subnational entities in bridging national divides, serving as a model that influenced subsequent formations without relying on centralized funding. In the , early examples proliferated along Western European borders, reflecting growing recognition of shared regional challenges amid economic recovery and the early European Economic Community's emphasis on internal market liberalization. Additional initiatives included structures in the Benelux-Germany axis and adjacent areas, such as preliminary cooperative frameworks between French and German border regions, which tackled disparities in , education access, and labor mobility. These nascent Euroregions, numbering fewer than a dozen by decade's end, operated with modest secretariats and voluntary contributions, underscoring their experimental nature and dependence on political goodwill rather than enforceable treaties. Their success in implementing joint ventures, like coordinated , validated the model despite limited resources and occasional national regulatory hurdles.

Growth Through European Integration

The establishment of the in 1993 and the launch of the EU's I programme in 1990 provided institutional and financial impetus for the proliferation of Euroregions, enabling subnational authorities to pursue cross-border initiatives amid deepening . allocated structural funds specifically for cross-border cooperation, with initial appropriations of approximately €1 billion for 1990-1994, fostering the creation of formal Euroregional bodies to manage joint projects in , , and . This funding mechanism, tied to the EU's cohesion policy, incentivized regions in member states to formalize partnerships, resulting in a marked increase in Euroregions from fewer than 30 in prior to 1990 to 72 by the late . The fall of the in 1989-1991, coinciding with EU preparations for eastward enlargement, accelerated Euroregion formation in , where previously rigid state borders had inhibited cooperation. By the early , the number approached 120, driven by pre-accession preparations that aligned candidate countries' regional policies with EU norms, including the adoption of Euroregional models to demonstrate readiness for integrated markets and free movement. The 2004 enlargement, incorporating ten new member states, further expanded the network, as newly integrated border regions—such as those along Poland's eastern frontiers—established Euroregions to leverage EU funds for reconciling post-communist economic disparities with Western partners. Subsequent EU policy evolutions, including the Schengen Area's progressive enlargement and successive INTERREG phases (e.g., INTERREG III for 2000-2006 with €4.8 billion in commitments), sustained this trajectory by prioritizing tangible cross-border outcomes over mere administrative labels, though empirical assessments indicate varying efficacy in delivering measurable economic spillovers. By 2010, over 100 Euroregions operated across the continent, with integration-driven growth evident in the shift from ad hoc bilateral agreements to institutionalized entities governed by EU-compatible charters, reflecting causal links between supranational incentives and regional agency in border management. This expansion underscored European integration's role in transforming peripheral border zones into cooperative hubs, albeit constrained by persistent national sovereignty variances and funding dependencies.

Expansion Beyond Western Europe

The political transformations in Central and Eastern Europe following the fall of the in November 1989 and the subsequent dissolution of communist regimes facilitated the rapid establishment of Euroregions across former borders. This shift enabled subnational authorities in newly democratizing states to engage in cross-border partnerships previously impeded by ideological divisions, with the and emerging EU programs providing institutional support for such initiatives. By 1991, the number of Euroregions began surging beyond , reflecting a "second wave" of formations involving post-communist countries that would later accede to the EU. The inaugural Euroregion in this expanded sphere, the Nysa Euroregion (also known as Neisse-Nisa-Nysa), was founded on February 21, 1991, encompassing border regions of , , and the . This trilateral entity served as a for substate cross-boundary cooperation in former territories, emphasizing economic reconstruction, infrastructure links, and cultural exchanges amid post-1989 economic transitions. Between 1991 and 1995, at least four additional Euroregions emerged along 's eastern frontier with , including the Spree-Neisse/Nysa-Bóbr (SNB) in 1993, Pro Europa Viadrina in 1993, and in 1995, which collectively addressed shared challenges like labor mobility and environmental management in deindustrializing areas. This eastward proliferation continued into the mid-1990s and beyond, with formations extending to the , , and even non-EU neighbors like by the early 2000s, driven by EU enlargement preparations and funding mechanisms. For instance, the Euroregion was established in 1990, predating full of some members but gaining momentum post-1991 Soviet , while Carpathian Euroregion initiatives followed in 1993 involving , , , , and . By the late 1990s, over 70 Euroregions operated across Europe, with a significant portion—approximately 40%—now incorporating Central and Eastern European territories, fostering integration but also revealing disparities in governance efficacy between western-origin models and newer eastern adaptations.

Definition and Core Principles

A Euroregion constitutes a formalized structure for cross-border cooperation, uniting local and regional authorities from contiguous territories across two or more European countries to address shared challenges and opportunities. This framework emphasizes practical collaboration at the subnational level, distinct from interstate , and typically involves agreements on joint planning, resource pooling, and project implementation in domains such as , environmental management, and cultural exchange. The legal foundation traces to the Council of Europe's European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities, opened for signature in on 30 May 1980 and entered into force on 22 December 1981, which obliges signatory states to enable territorial authorities to conclude cooperation agreements and exchange information without prejudice to national laws. Subsequent protocols, including Protocol No. 1 (1995) on joint authorities and Protocol No. 3 (2009) on cross-border statistical cooperation, expanded mechanisms for legal personality and data sharing, while the European Union's Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 introduced European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs) in 2006 to grant certain Euroregions supranational legal capacity under EU law. Core principles governing Euroregions prioritize subsidiarity, vesting decision-making closest to affected communities; voluntarism, requiring mutual consent without compulsion; and barrier removal, targeting administrative, psychological, and infrastructural obstacles inherited from historical divisions to foster economic complementarity and social cohesion. These principles derive from the Madrid Convention's mandate for good-neighborly relations through joint action, ensuring cooperation remains pragmatic and non-hierarchical, with no transfer of sovereignty to the Euroregion itself, and outcomes measured by tangible deliverables like coordinated infrastructure projects rather than abstract integration goals.

Formation Criteria and Governance Structures

Euroregions are typically formed through voluntary agreements between local and regional authorities from adjacent territories spanning two or more states, without requiring formal approval from national governments or supranational bodies, though they often align with recommendations for transfrontier cooperation. The Association of European Border Regions outlines key criteria for recognition as a Euroregion: an association of authorities on both sides of a state border; a joint committee comprising representatives from partner regions; a permanent staffed and located centrally; and a shared strategy with actionable programs focused on cross-border issues. These structures emerge bottom-up, often initiated by municipalities or districts forming bilateral "twin associations" before expanding to multilateral frameworks, as seen in early examples like the Euregio on the Dutch-German border. Establishment involves drafting a foundational or that defines objectives, membership, and operational rules, sometimes formalized under national laws or as a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) per EU Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006, which grants legal personality for joint projects and funding access. EGTC formation requires approval from member states and registration with the , emphasizing territorial contiguity and shared interests in areas like or environmental management, but the "Euroregion" label itself lacks legal protection and is applied loosely. Non-EGTC Euroregions rely on informal pacts or national equivalents, such as Germany's Zweckverband or Spain's Consorcio, to enable resource pooling without supranational mandate. Governance centers on a plenary assembly or council with delegates from member entities, ensuring balanced representation proportional to population or territory, which convenes periodically to approve strategies and budgets. An executive body, often a rotating presidency or board, handles daily decisions delegated by the assembly, while a dedicated secretariat—funded by member contributions or EU grants—coordinates activities, project implementation, and stakeholder liaison. In EGTC variants, a director or secretary-general leads operations under assembly oversight, with statutes mandating transparency, dispute resolution via national courts, and alignment with EU law to mitigate sovereignty concerns. This decentralized model fosters flexibility but varies: smaller Euroregions may lack staff, relying on ad hoc committees, whereas larger ones integrate working groups for thematic priorities like infrastructure. Overall, structures emphasize consensus over hierarchy, reflecting their non-statutory origins and dependence on sustained political will from subnational actors.

Relationship to EU and Council of Europe Initiatives

The foundational legal framework for Euroregions stems from the 's European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities, signed on 21 May 1980 in , which facilitates agreements between local and regional authorities across borders for joint planning and implementation of projects. This , ratified by numerous states including non-EU members, established guidelines for Euroregional statutes and emphasized voluntary without supranational , enabling over 100 such entities by promoting transfrontier exchanges in areas like and . The continues to oversee model agreements and advisory roles, distinguishing Euroregions as decentralized instruments applicable to broader pan- contexts beyond EU integration. In parallel, the European Union has integrated Euroregions into its cohesion policy framework, primarily through the INTERREG programmes, initiated in 1990 to fund cross-border, transnational, and interregional cooperation using the . These programmes, part of the EU's European Territorial Cooperation objective, allocate billions in grants—such as €10.4 billion for 2014–2020—to support Euroregional projects addressing economic disparities and border obstacles, with Euroregions serving as key implementing bodies for initiatives in transport, environmental protection, and labor mobility. Complementing this financial support, the EU's Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 established the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) in 2006, granting Euroregions an optional legal personality under EU law to manage joint assets and liabilities, adopted by dozens of Euroregions to streamline operations within member states. While the Council of Europe's initiatives prioritize normative and inclusive standards for all European neighbors, EU mechanisms emphasize measurable outcomes tied to internal market goals, often critiqued for concentrating funds in wealthier border regions despite broader ambitions; nonetheless, this synergy has amplified Euroregions' scale, with enabling empirical expansions not reliant solely on national budgets. Euroregions outside EU territory, such as those bordering or , rely more heavily on frameworks, highlighting the complementary yet distinct scopes of these organizations.

Objectives, Functions, and Activities

Economic and Infrastructure Cooperation

Euroregions promote economic cooperation by facilitating joint initiatives in trade, investment, labor markets, and business development across borders, often leveraging funding mechanisms such as the programs. These efforts aim to reduce barriers to cross-border economic activity, including administrative hurdles and differing regulations, thereby enhancing regional competitiveness. For instance, in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, operational programs from 2007 to 2013 focused on improving business competitiveness through and innovation support, contributing to shared economic strategies among , , and the . Similarly, the EUREGIO between and the has supported projects like the ET2SMEs initiative, funded with €1.25 million from the , to maximize economic and social impacts via to small and medium-sized enterprises. Infrastructure cooperation within Euroregions emphasizes coordinated planning and investment in transport, energy, and digital networks to integrate regional economies. Activities include developing cross-border transport links, such as roads and rail connections, to lower costs and boost flows. In the Euregio Rhine-Waal, funding advice centers guide projects under for in , exemplified by the INDUSTR_I4.0 small project fund aimed at accelerating industry 4.0 adoption in the German-Dutch border area. For the 2021-2027 period, the Euregio Meuse-Rhine allocated over €176 million for cross-border projects, including greener low-carbon infrastructure and smarter innovations to support sustainable economic growth. These initiatives align with broader goals of harmonizing infrastructure standards, as seen in Euroregions like the Carpathian Euroregion, where cooperation extends to economic structures and technical infrastructure to stimulate . Empirical assessments indicate that such cooperation can positively influence regional growth, though border regions often lag national averages in economic performance. Studies on cross-border intensity show it correlates with higher GDP growth in participating areas, particularly through improved labor and trade facilitation. However, evaluations by the note that while programs yield some benefits in economic cohesion, untapped potential persists due to fragmented implementation and higher cross-border trade costs—up to 50% above domestic levels even within the . Euroregions thus serve as platforms for addressing these disparities, with primary areas encompassing , , and to foster mutual economic .

Social, Cultural, and Environmental Initiatives

Euroregions facilitate cross-border social initiatives aimed at enhancing and addressing shared demographic challenges, such as aging populations and labor mobility. For instance, working groups in structures like the Euroregion Niemen focus on social matters, including joint efforts in healthcare access and social welfare coordination across , Lithuanian, and Belarusian territories. These activities often involve harmonizing to reduce disparities, with empirical outcomes including improved response mechanisms in border areas, as documented in evaluations of regional cooperation. Cultural initiatives within Euroregions emphasize heritage preservation, artistic exchange, and promotion to build mutual understanding. The Euroregio, spanning , , and , has operated an annual cultural grants program since 2010, funding collaborative projects in arts and languages that have supported over a decade of cross-Mediterranean artistic production. Similarly, Euroregions like the Adriatic network integrate cultural elements into urban development, fostering events and exchanges that enhance regional identity while attracting , with goals explicitly including among 46 cities in seven countries. Environmental initiatives prioritize sustainable resource management and pollution control, leveraging shared ecosystems. In the Euroregion Baltic, projects target through promotion and infrastructure improvements for better trans-border access, contributing to reduced cross-border pollution since the early 2000s. The Carpathian Euroregion supports ecological monitoring and efforts, with cooperation extending to sustainable forestry and agriculture practices amid regional pressures. frameworks underscore these as core to , yielding tangible benefits like coordinated prevention and restoration, though effectiveness varies by funding availability and national alignment. Overall, such initiatives demonstrate causal links between localized cooperation and measurable environmental gains, such as decreased transboundary emissions in monitored basins.

Role in Cross-Border Policy Implementation

Euroregions function as operational entities that translate cross-border policies into actionable projects, often serving as managing authorities or partners in -funded initiatives under the European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) strand of Cohesion Policy, such as programs, which allocate resources for joint infrastructure, environmental, and social developments spanning national borders. This role involves coordinating funding disbursement, project selection, and monitoring compliance with EU regulations, thereby enabling regions to address shared challenges like connectivity and control without relying solely on national governments. In practice, Euroregions implement policies by fostering agreements that align local priorities with supranational objectives, as outlined in the Council of Europe's European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation (1980), which provides the legal foundation for joint planning and execution of measures in areas such as emergency services and . For instance, during the initial wave in 2020, several Euroregions, including those along the German-French and Polish-German borders, adapted border management policies to facilitate essential cross-border worker movements and health resource sharing, demonstrating their capacity to enforce ad-hoc policy adjustments amid crises. Their implementation efforts extend to non-EU neighboring contexts, where Euroregions support policy execution through bilateral or multilateral pacts, though effectiveness varies due to differing administrative capacities and funding availability outside EU programs. Empirical assessments indicate that Euroregions enhance policy delivery by reducing administrative silos, with studies showing improved outcomes in targeted sectors like , albeit with limitations in scaling beyond funded projects.

Directory of Euroregions

Geographic Distribution and Major Examples

Euroregions are predominantly situated along the land borders of , with the densest concentrations in , where the concept originated in the post-World War II era to foster reconciliation and economic ties between neighboring states. Initial formations clustered around the countries, , and , reflecting early efforts to overcome historical divisions in densely populated, industrially integrated areas. Following the geopolitical shifts after , including and the opening of Eastern borders, Euroregions proliferated in , extending cooperation to , the , , and the , often involving former divides. Fewer instances exist in Northern Europe, such as Scandinavian-Nordic partnerships, and in , though macro-scale groupings like those around the Adriatic involve , , and Balkan neighbors. Some extend to non-EU neighbors, including and , but maritime or overseas territories host minimal examples due to logistical challenges. This distribution aligns with varying border lengths and integration levels: Western Europe's longer internal EU borders and higher cross-border traffic facilitated early adoption, while Eastern expansions capitalized on EU enlargement incentives post-2004. As of the early , over 70 Euroregions operated across these zones, though precise counts fluctuate due to mergers, dissolutions, and definitional variances between bilateral agreements and larger assemblies. Prominent examples illustrate this spread:
  • Euregio (Netherlands-Germany): Established in 1958 as the first Euroregion, it spans eastern Dutch provinces (e.g., , region around ) and western German districts (e.g., Münsterland around Gronau), focusing on economic and cultural exchanges in a Rhine-adjacent area of approximately 13,000 km² with over 2 million residents.
  • SaarLorLux (France-Germany-Luxembourg): Formed in the late 1970s, this trilateral entity covers (Germany), (France), and regions in , emphasizing resource sharing in a coal-and-steel heritage zone near the River, with joint initiatives in transport and environmental management.
  • Pro Europa Viadrina (Germany-Poland): Initiated in the 1990s along the Oder-Neisse border, it links (Germany) and (Poland), promoting post-Cold War integration through infrastructure projects and labor mobility in a region marked by historical tensions.
  • Sprewa-Nysa-Bobr (Germany-Poland-Czech Republic): Emerging in Central Europe during the 1990s, this involves (Germany), (Poland), and (Czech Republic), targeting river basin management and tourism along the Spree, Nysa, and Bobr waterways.
  • North West Region Cross Border Group (Ireland-United Kingdom): Operating in Northwest Europe, it connects and the Irish Republic's border counties (e.g., , Derry), with activities in despite post-Brexit complications, established under pre-EU frameworks.
These cases highlight Euroregions' role in bridging diverse terrains, from river valleys to mountainous frontiers, though effectiveness varies by funding access and political alignment. Approximately 150 Euroregions operate across Europe, primarily involving contiguous territories from at least two countries to promote transfrontier cooperation among local and regional authorities. The first Euroregion, Euregio, was established in 1958 between regions in the and , marking the inception of formalized cross-border structures; initial growth remained modest through the and , with fewer than 20 entities formed amid limited post-World War II reconciliation efforts. A significant expansion occurred in the , driven by the fall of the and EU enlargement preparations, resulting in a surge of new Euroregions particularly along former East-West divides in . By the early 2000s, the total approached 100, with subsequent increments tapering as emphasis shifted from proliferation to operational deepening; broader counts of up to 267 transboundary cooperation structures exist in some analyses, though these encompass informal networks beyond the strict Euroregion model endorsed by the . From 2000 to 2020, Euroregions served as platforms for over 25,000 projects under the EU's program for cross-border cooperation, underscoring their role in channeling funds despite varying efficacy. Contemporary trends show numerical stability, with adaptations focusing on digital integration and response rather than new formations, amid critiques of in an era of supranational frameworks.

Achievements and Empirical Outcomes

Documented Successes and Case Studies

In the EUREGIO spanning and the , founded in 1958 as Europe's oldest Euroregion, cross-border cooperation has achieved organizational autonomy through a dedicated secretariat, diversified funding sources including membership fees of €0.29 per inhabitant yielding €500,000 annually and contributions of €400,000, and a role as a agency managing €4.5 per inhabitant yearly across 140 municipalities and 3 million residents. This has enabled sustained engagement, with approximately 20,000 annual citizen contacts and facilitation of infrastructure and economic projects, bolstered by supportive national and EU policies. In recognition of its contributions to urban-rural integration and cooperation, EUREGIO received second place in the Association of European Border Regions' "Sail of Papenburg" award in 2019. The Euregio Meuse-Rhine, established in 1976 with legal status in 1991, demonstrates success in transport integration via the EMR Connect project from October 2017 to March 2022, which fostered cooperation among public transport operators in , , and the , extended student tickets from to Limburg in 2019, launched a bike-sharing system with initial stations in the , and introduced a €4 cross-border bike ticket for trains in January 2020. Supported by €2.3 million in funding out of a €4.6 million total budget, the initiative piloted ID-based ticketing in 2018 and conducted studies advocating direct Aachen-Liège rail links and distance-based tariffs, thereby enhancing sustainable mobility and reducing travel barriers for 3.9 million residents across 11,000 km². Broader empirical analysis of cross-border cooperation, frequently channeled through Euroregions via programs like , links intensified project partnerships to economic gains, with a doubling of partners per associated with a 2.3% rise in regional , based on data from 584 NUTS-3 border regions during 2007-2013. Such outcomes underscore Euroregions' capacity to leverage EU funding for tangible infrastructure and growth effects, though attribution requires isolating cooperation from confounding factors like border openings, which independently correlate with a 2.7% GVA increase post-Schengen implementation from 1990-2015.

Evaluations of Effectiveness

Empirical evaluations of Euroregions' effectiveness reveal mixed outcomes, with local surveys indicating moderate positive perceptions but broader studies highlighting limited tangible impacts beyond symbolic cooperation and EU funding absorption. A 2020 survey of 220 residents on the Polish side of Euroregion Beskydy found that 63% viewed Euroregions positively overall, with 68% attributing faster over the prior decade to cross-border initiatives, though only 53% rated Beskydy's specific developmental impact as rather positive and awareness of concrete projects remained low at 14%. Legal and administrative barriers were cited by 60% as primary obstacles to cooperation, underscoring persistent institutional hurdles despite formal structures. Quantitative assessments tied to EU programs like , which fund many Euroregion activities, show inconsistent results across regions, with some analyses concluding that cooperation often prioritizes project implementation over measurable economic or social gains. For instance, literature reviews of cross-border cooperation note that while Euroregions facilitate knowledge exchange in select cases, such as infrastructure projects in the Meuse-Rhine area, outcomes vary widely due to gaps and cognitive distances between partners, challenging claims of uniform . Studies from 2007 onward describe many Euroregions as existing primarily on paper, with activities confined to low-impact events rather than transformative integration, particularly in peripheral or external EU borders where political asymmetries limit functionality. Critiques grounded in theory argue that Euroregions fail as robust instruments for re-territorialization or policy innovation, often serving more as conduits for subsidies than drivers of endogenous growth, with from cases like Polish-Belarusian borders revealing dependency on external conditions rather than inherent efficacy. Overall, while localized benefits in cultural or environmental domains are documented—such as improved perceptions in Beskydy (41% positive)—systematic evaluations indicate that Euroregions' contributions to competitiveness and disparity reduction remain marginal compared to national or supranational efforts, hampered by and in overlapping structures.

Criticisms, Challenges, and Controversies

Doubts on Practical Impact and Efficiency

Critics have argued that Euroregions often fail to overcome entrenched national barriers, resulting in limited practical impact on cross-border integration. For instance, analyses indicate that inter-firm linkages in Euroregions like Maas-Rhine remain predominantly national rather than transnational, undermining claims of enhanced economic cohesion. Similarly, Church and Reid (1999) observed a lack of genuine , characterized by volatile, ad-hoc strategies and short-term funding coalitions that do not foster enduring cross-border identities. Efficiency concerns stem from bureaucratic and institutional hurdles, including legal-administrative barriers cited by 60% of respondents in studies as primary obstacles to Euroregion activities. Surveys of mayors across six Euroregions revealed widespread due to institutional mismatches and cognitive distances, particularly in coordination, with cooperation often appearing funding-driven rather than addressing core problems. In , cross-border projects frequently terminate upon funding exhaustion, as seen in nearly all 30 Hungarian-partnered initiatives ending post-support, highlighting dependency on EU grants like without sustainable outcomes. Empirical evaluations underscore weak governance capacities, with Euroregions described as ineffective for coordination, especially on external EU borders. awareness remains low, with only 14% of residents in the Euroregion Beskydy familiar with specific initiatives, and 38% doubting full utilization of regional potential. Broader assessments note persistent weaknesses in cross-border structures, including and from oversizing, which dilute focused efforts. These factors contribute to questionable overall effectiveness, as Euroregions' influence on strategic cross-border policies remains limited despite decades of operation.

Concerns Over Sovereignty and National Priorities

Critics contend that Euroregions, by promoting direct cross-border ties between subnational entities, risk diluting central government oversight and thereby challenging national sovereignty. This perspective posits that such structures enable regional actors to pursue agendas potentially at odds with national policy, fostering a gradual shift toward supranational regionalism that bypasses state-level decision-making. In specific cases, opposition has materialized over fears of external influence undermining domestic control. During debates on forming the Danish-German Euroregion, Danish critics highlighted risks of loss and uncontrollable German sway over internal Danish affairs, viewing the initiative as a potential conduit for foreign priorities to encroach on national . Similar apprehensions have arisen in Poland's eastern borderlands, where government hesitation toward deeper Euroregion stems from concerns that enhanced cross-border mechanisms could erode central authority and , particularly amid geopolitical tensions. Empirical patterns reinforce these sovereignty-related qualms, with residents of EU border regions demonstrating elevated support for parties compared to inland populations—a disparity attributed in part to heightened awareness of borders as symbols of national control and identity. This borderland suggests that local experiences of cross-border cooperation may amplify perceptions of national priorities being subordinated to regional or EU-driven initiatives, such as favoring joint projects over unilateral national strategies. Proponents of these criticisms further argue that Euroregions can skew priorities away from core national interests, like or economic , by embedding regions in interdependent networks that prioritize harmony with neighbors—sometimes stronger economies—over independent national pursuits. In Eastern European contexts, for example, such dynamics have raised alarms about asymmetric power balances, where smaller or transitioning states' regions become conduits for larger neighbors' influence, potentially compromising national cohesion. These views, often voiced by nationalistic or centralist factions, underscore a tension between localized collaboration and the preservation of undivided state , though of outright sovereignty erosion remains debated and context-dependent.

Institutional and Funding Dependencies

Euroregions primarily rely on funding from the European Union's programmes, which are financed through the (ERDF) as part of the 's cohesion policy. For the 2021-2027 programming period, allocates approximately €10.1 billion across 86 cooperation programmes, enabling cross-border projects that typically receive 60-85% co-financing, with the balance covered by national, regional, or local contributions. This structure replaced earlier informal quota-based financing among members, shifting emphasis to competitive grant applications since the . This funding model fosters dependency, as Euroregions' project pipelines and operational sustainability hinge on EU budget cycles and approval processes, exposing them to risks from fiscal constraints or reallocations—such as anticipated pressures in the post-2027 , where funding could face adjustments amid competing priorities like defense or green transitions. Member contributions, while present, often prove insufficient for standalone operations, particularly in less affluent border areas, reinforcing a cycle where EU grants dictate activity scale and focus. Institutionally, Euroregions function through lightweight structures—typically comprising a of local and regional representatives, a rotating , thematic working groups, and a small —lacking legal personality or enforcement powers in most cases. Their efficacy depends on voluntary alignment among participating national and subnational authorities, subjecting them to variances in domestic political priorities and administrative capacities, which can disrupt continuity if key members withdraw support. Access to EU funding further embeds these bodies within supranational regulatory frameworks, mandating compliance with eligibility criteria, procurement rules, and performance audits that impose standardized reporting across diverse jurisdictions. These dependencies can constrain operational flexibility, as adherence to EU modalities often entails protracted approval timelines and resource-intensive compliance, diverting efforts from cooperation to bureaucratic navigation. Empirical assessments note that while enables scale, the resultant institutional layering may amplify coordination costs without commensurate gains in , particularly for Euroregions spanning external EU borders where additional geopolitical factors compound reliance on Brussels-mediated mechanisms.

Recent Developments and Future Outlook

Adaptations to Contemporary Crises

During the , Euroregions demonstrated adaptability by serving as platforms for coordinated border management and health responses, particularly in the initial wave of 2020, where they navigated national border closures through advocacy for exemptions and joint protocols to maintain essential cross-border flows. Specific initiatives included the Euroregion Pyrenees Mediterranean's €700,000 fund launched in 2020, which supported 32 projects to enhance university resilience, such as digital learning platforms like sinAPsis for AI education and Eurocampus Digital for virtual mobility, addressing disruptions in cross-border student exchanges and promoting inclusive distance learning. These efforts highlighted Euroregions' role in mitigating educational and economic fallout via targeted EU-aligned funding, though challenges persisted due to divergent national policies. In response to Russia's 2022 invasion of , Euroregions bordering and EU eastern frontiers adapted by prioritizing refugee reception and long-term , with western Ukrainian regions functioning as hubs for displaced populations and economic engines. The Association of European Border Regions (AEBR), representing Euroregion interests, advocated for decentralized EU structural funds to bolster , for materials, and services like healthcare and in overburdened areas, emphasizing citizen-centered cross- to integrate Ukraine's with neighboring EU regions. This involved macro-spatial strategies to barriers and displacements affecting over 6 million refugees hosted in EU regions by mid-2022. To counter energy vulnerabilities exacerbated by the Ukraine conflict and prior dependencies on Russian supplies, Euroregions incorporated resilience measures into disaster risk management frameworks, utilizing INTERREG programs to fund 110 cross-border projects focused on multi-risk preparedness, including energy-related infrastructure like early warning systems for droughts and floods that indirectly support supply chain stability. Case studies, such as the Nordred Framework across Nordic Euroregions, enabled borderless emergency responses adaptable to energy disruptions, while nature-based solutions in Danube and POCTEP (€427 million) initiatives enhanced floodplains and wildfire prevention, reducing climate-aggravated risks to energy grids. The EU's Resilient Borders project, launched in 2024, further promotes spatial planning and crisis management pilots in border regions to integrate energy security with cross-border governance. Overall, these adaptations underscore Euroregions' shift toward proactive, funded mechanisms like 268 cross-border agreements and 339 tools for risk mapping, addressing gaps in pandemics, geopolitical shocks, and climate threats through harmonized assessments and , though implementation varies by regional strength. recommendations from EU analyses call for increased allocations post-2027 to mainstream such resilience, prioritizing joint exercises and data hubs to overcome national silos.

Evolving Role in a Changing Europe

In response to the , Euroregions demonstrated adaptability by serving as platforms for cross-border coordination on border management, measures, and economic continuity, often bridging national policy divergences during the first wave in early 2020. For instance, in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion spanning , , and the , longitudinal studies documented collaborative efforts in , mobility tracking, and joint recommendations to sustain essential cross-border activities amid lockdowns. This role underscored their utility in mitigating the reimposition of internal EU borders, which temporarily disrupted the Schengen Area's free movement principle. The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine further highlighted Euroregions' evolving geopolitical relevance, particularly along eastern EU borders, where they facilitated refugee reception, humanitarian aid logistics, and resilience-building initiatives funded through programs like . Eastern border regions, such as those in and the , leveraged Euroregional frameworks to enhance strategic policy interventions, including infrastructure adaptations and community support, amid heightened security pressures and energy dependencies. The Association of European Border Regions emphasized long-term with a citizen-centered focus, positioning Euroregions as intermediaries between local needs and EU-level responses. Post-Brexit, Euroregions involving the , such as those along the Irish border, encountered disruptions in funding and legal frameworks but adapted by prioritizing bilateral agreements and internal collaborations to preserve economic ties. In a broader context of stalled enlargements and rising external threats, Euroregions have shifted toward addressing cascading challenges like vulnerabilities and divides, though they face risks of institutional redundancy with newer structures like European Groupings of Territorial Cooperation (EGTCs). Their future viability hinges on demonstrating tangible local impacts amid sovereignty-focused national policies, with assessments affirming their mechanism for transfrontier resilience without supplanting state authority.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    [PDF] perkmann-rise-of-euroregion.pdf - Lancaster University
    Dec 5, 2003 · The 1990s have seen a strong surge in the number of Euroregions and other cross-border regions all over Western and Eastern Europe. The article ...
  3. [3]
    The Case of the EUREGIO on the Dutch-German Border
    Aug 28, 2018 · and Osnabrück (D). The origins of the EUREGIO date back to 1958 when local. authorities on both sides of the Dutch-German border organised ...
  4. [4]
    Thirty years of European territorial cooperation
    Nov 9, 2020 · Established in 1990, the first European territorial cooperation initiative, Interreg I, focused on cross- border cooperation.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Euroregions as a factor of successful international integration in ...
    In the mid-20th century, these countries founded the European Economic. Community, which later transformed into the European Union. The Rhine states constitute ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] REPORT “EUROREGION AS A MECHANISM FOR ...
    Feb 25, 2010 · European Commission and prepared by AEBR method of working of Euroregion are defined: • development and strategic-oriented cooperation, no ...
  7. [7]
    Other Euroregions | karpacki.pl
    The political and political breakthrough in 1989 between the countries of Central Europe made it possible to establish cross-border cooperation and its ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] euroregions and other eu's cross-border organizations: the risk of ...
    From the outset of the European cross-border cooperation of the 1960s and 1970s, the Council of Europe and the. European Union generated parallel routes in ...
  9. [9]
    The Nysa Euroregion: The First Ten Years - Taylor & Francis Online
    May 15, 2013 · Abstract. Established in 1991, the Nysa Euroregion is the prototype of substate crossboundary cooperation in the former Eastern Europe.
  10. [10]
    The Nysa Euroregion: The First Ten Years - ResearchGate
    Established in 1991, the Nysa Euroregion is the prototype of substate crossboundary cooperation in the former Eastern Europe.
  11. [11]
    What is Euroregion? - STG ERB
    The definition of the Euroregion is:​​ it is a formal structure of cross-border cooperation bringing together representatives of the local and regional level, as ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation ...
    Each Contracting Party undertakes to facilitate and foster transfrontier co-operation between territorial communities or authorities within its jurisdiction ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] CETS 206 - Explanatory Report to Protocol No. 3 to the European ...
    Crossborder co-operation between member. States of the Council of Europe, be it at interstate level or at the level of territorial communities or authorities, ...
  14. [14]
    European Grouping for Territorial Co-operation (EGTC/GECT)
    The idea was, in a sense, to establish a set of substantive legal rules to regulate Euroregions[5] and other transfrontier bodies in the same way in all Council ...
  15. [15]
    Report on the role of "Euroregions" in the development of regional ...
    Oct 19, 2005 · Existing Euroregions are initiatives of border regions or other local entities of several countries (not necessarily Member States of the E U) ...
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    [PDF] COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2019/ 247 - EUR-Lex
    Feb 13, 2019 · (1) E.g. Euroregional Cooperation Grouping (Council of Europe); Euroregions, Eurodistricts; Zweckverband (German law), Consorcio. (Spanish law), ...
  18. [18]
    Governance - Euroregion
    The Euroregion Pyrenees Mediterranean is a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), a legal entity defined in the framework of European ...
  19. [19]
    Euroregions as political actors: managing border policies in the time ...
    Jan 19, 2022 · The article examines the role of the Euroregions in the first Covid-19 pandemic wave in Europe.
  20. [20]
    Interreg : European Territorial Co-operation
    The European Union promotes cooperation between regions and countries to help their economic and social development and tackle the obstacle of borders.Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  21. [21]
    Interreg EU: Home
    Interreg is a series of EU funding programmes that support cooperation. By bringing together organisations from across Europe and beyond, Interreg tackles ...About · Interreg explained · Learn more about Interreg · ProgrammesMissing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  22. [22]
    European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation
    ​​The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) allows different Member States' public entities to come together under a new entity with a legal ...
  23. [23]
    Interreg A - Cross-border cooperation - European Commission
    European Cross-Border cooperation, known as Interreg A, supports cooperation between NUTS III regions from at least two different Member States lying directly ...
  24. [24]
    Inforegio - Operational Programme 'Euregio Maas-Rhein'
    This priority seeks to improve the economic competitiveness of the Euregio Maas-Rhein by developing business competitiveness, promoting technology and ...
  25. [25]
    ET2SMEs – Maximising the economic and social impact of the ...
    The ET2SMEs project is carried out under the Interreg V-A Euregio Meuse-Rhine Programme, with € 1.25 million from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
  26. [26]
    Support in the German-Dutch border area - Euregio Rijn-Waal
    The INDUSTR_I4.0 small project fund accelerates the digital transformation in the (manufacturing) industry in the German-Dutch border region.
  27. [27]
    2021-2027 | Interreg Euregio Meuse-Rhine
    We will offer more than 176 million euros to cross-border projects on smarter innovations, greener, low-carbon initiatives, social inclusion concepts, and ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Carpathian Euroregion from the perspective of economic ...
    Mar 27, 2020 · Euroregions provide an institutional framework that fosters cross-border cooperation. Their main objective is to manage and support economic ...
  29. [29]
    The role of open borders and cross-border cooperation in regional ...
    Nov 13, 2020 · This paper estimates the impacts of opening of borders and intensity of cross-border cooperation (CBC) on regional growth across European border regions.
  30. [30]
    The potential of the EU's cross-border regions not yet fully unlocked
    Many such regions generally perform less well economically than other regions within a Member State. We found that the cooperation programmes we examined had ...
  31. [31]
    Building More Resilient Cross-border Regions - OECD
    Dec 18, 2024 · Firms engaged in cross-border trade face costs up to 50% higher than domestic businesses, even within the EU single market.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Key conditions for Euroregions development at external EU borders
    The legal basis for the Euroregions operations is statutes and regulations prepared pursuant to the guidelines of the Council of Europe, including the European ...
  33. [33]
    Euroregion Niemen and its Prospects
    It was decided to form 4 working groups for co-operation in the areas of economy, social matters, tourism, environmental protection and spatial planning. The ...
  34. [34]
    Culture and languages - Euroregion
    Jul 15, 2025 · The Euroregion is a benchmark at European and Mediterranean level for cooperation in the field of artistic creation in all its forms and for ...Missing: Council | Show results with:Council
  35. [35]
    Co-operation and sustainable development in the Adriatic basin
    Its goal is “to create and develop the economic, social, cultural and environmental integration among the towns and cities on the Adriatic and Ionian Sea” as ...
  36. [36]
    Projects - Euroregion Baltic
    ... environmental protection and promotion of renewable energy sources, as well as improving the infrastructures in order to provide better access to the Trans ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  37. [37]
    Economic and legal bases of the Carpathian Euroregion ...
    Jul 3, 2023 · The article dwells upon the history of the Carpathian Euroregion as the form of a cross-border cooperation.
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities - https: //rm. coe. int
    Oct 11, 2010 · An effective Euroregion can provide a platform to strengthen social and economic cohesion throughout the massif and promote the sustainable use ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] DRAFT LAW ON THE STATUS OF EUROREGIONS OF THE ...
    Nov 23, 2009 · Euroregion/s - are set up from the territorial administrative units of the Republic of Moldova and represent an organizational cooperation from ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    The implications of the EU cohesion policy instruments and cross ...
    Cross-border cooperation projects are implemented in Euroregions and invest in new knowledge and innovative solutions in policy priorities spread over social, ...
  41. [41]
    Should EU cross-border cooperation programmes focus mainly on ...
    EU cross-border cooperation programmes were formally established with the launching of the first INTERREG Community Initiative (1989-1993).<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    EUR-Lex - 51996AR0207 - EN - European Union
    1.7. A dense network of cross-border links developed very quickly along the EU's external frontier - from the Baltic to the Mediterranean. Euro regions were ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  43. [43]
    the role of euroregions in integration processes - ResearchGate
    Euroregions allow their participants to quickly solve common problems, create flexible, joint economic structures, establish cross-border trade, tourism, and ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Cross-border cooperation in the EU: Euroregions amid multilevel ...
    The article focuses on Euroregions as formal organizations within the wider context of cross-border cooperation (CBC) in the EU. Nowadays, CBC promoted.<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Euroregions and Local and Regional Development—Local ... - MDPI
    The purpose of this study is to verify how people perceive the activity and effectiveness of Euroregions, as well as to try to determine whether they think ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  46. [46]
    [PDF] (RE)DEFINING THE EUROREGION CONCEPT
    So, having this definition in mind, to put simple, we could add that an Euroregion is a region that crosses the border separating two or more European countries ...
  47. [47]
    Introduction - https: //rm. coe. int - The Council of Europe
    Over the last few years, many Euroregions have been established along the borders of central and east European countries: Sprewa-Nysa-Bobr, Pro Europa Viadrina, ...
  48. [48]
    Introduction - https: //rm. coe. int - The Council of Europe
    (5) Reducing environmental damage; (6) Enhancing and protecting natural resources and the natural heritage; (7) Enhancing the cultural heritage as a factor for ...
  49. [49]
    Euroregions, Excellence and Innovation across EU borders
    The Euroregions can be defined as European cross-border structures that play an influential role at the borders between European countries.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Markus Perkmann CSGR Working Paper No. 166/05 May 2005
    Having defined the criteria for successful Euroregions in this section primary empirical evidence is provided on three cases, with a specific focus on the ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    AEBR's Award for projects of cross-border cooperation “Sail of ...
    The second place was conferred to EUREGIO, the oldest Euroregion in Europe which includes an urban-rural area on the border between Germany and the Netherlands, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Improving cross-border public transport in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine
    The project has improved cross-border cooperation between public transport operators in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands, created new tariffs, tested new ...
  53. [53]
    None
    ### Empirical Evidence and Case Studies on Cross-Border Cooperation in Euroregions
  54. [54]
    A review of the literature on the cross-border cooperation in Europe
    Feb 3, 2025 · This paper critically examines the motivations, patterns, and outcomes of CBC initiatives in Europe, focusing on the interplay between normative drivers.<|separator|>
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
    None
    ### Summary of Doubts, Criticisms, and Barriers to Euroregions' Effectiveness, Efficiency, or Practical Impact
  57. [57]
    [PDF] A review of the literature on the cross-border cooperation in Europe
    INTERREG project in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion to identify the main factors supporting cross-border learning networks. Van den Broek and Smulders (2015) ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Analysis of Cross-border obstacles between EU Member States and ...
    The study 'Analysis of Cross-border obstacles between European Union (EU) Member. States and Enlargement Countries' aims to comprehensively review existing.
  59. [59]
    Euroregions in Europe - EuroEkonom.sk
    Feb 8, 2012 · ... Euroregion; Pomerania Euroregion; Glacensis Euroregion; Niemen (Nieman) Euroregion. ... national sovereignty by undermining the control of ...
  60. [60]
    The Conflicting Logics of Cross-Border Reterritorialization
    Aug 6, 2025 · The literature on Euroregions has primarily examined the reterritorialization of state power and institutions across borders, documenting the ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The possibility of de-marginalisation of the Polish border zone with ...
    Sep 30, 2023 · For fear of loss of sovereignty, government ... The Baltic Euroregion decided to suspend the membership of the Kaliningrad Oblast.
  62. [62]
    Bringing geography back in: Borderlands and public support for the ...
    Dec 25, 2023 · Our study reveals a remarkable pattern, indicating that individuals living in border regions exhibit a higher propensity to vote for Eurosceptic parties and ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  63. [63]
    Bordering, Political Landscapes and Social Arenas: Potentials and ...
    Jan 13, 2017 · The issues of sovereignty carry different weight in different regions. In Western Europe, for example, fears of loss of sovereignty to the ...
  64. [64]
    Europeanisation versus Euroscepticism: Do Borders Matter?
    Feb 10, 2020 · Borders are ascribed the role of factual and symbolic manifestations of national sovereignty ... Reviving unfamiliarity—the case of public ...
  65. [65]
    European Territorial Cooperation - INTERREG - EU Social Economy ...
    Overall budget available. The total budget of Interreg 2021-2027 is €10 billion for 86 programmes. What is the goal of the funding programme? Interreg is one ...
  66. [66]
    Project budget - Apply for funding - Interreg Europe
    Under the Interreg Europe programme, the project activities are co-financed by the Interreg Fund at either 70% or 80% depending on the legal status of the ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Organizational and Financial Principles for the Development of ...
    Feb 9, 2020 · It has been noted, that the Euroregions (2010) represent a transactional structure of cooperation between at least two territories of different ...Missing: core | Show results with:core
  68. [68]
    What the European Commission's 2028–2034 budget proposal ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · A new Interreg plan with new objectives, performance-based delivery, 4% pre-financing, 80% EU co-financing, and total funding of €10.2 billion.
  69. [69]
    Europe's poor regions fear cuts in budget battle - Politico.eu
    Feb 20, 2018 · With debate raging over the next EU budget, the Continent's poorer regions are bracing for the possibility of big cuts in funding from Brussels.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Euroregions: institutional entrepreneurship in the European Union
    Euroregions are co-operative arrangements between local authorities across borders, with a council, presidency, working groups, and a secretariat, typically 50 ...Missing: dependencies | Show results with:dependencies
  71. [71]
    Euroregions: Institutional Entrepreneurship in the European Union
    These initiatives consist of more or less stable cooperative arrangements between neighbouring local or regional authorities across a European nation-state ...Missing: dependencies | Show results with:dependencies
  72. [72]
    [PDF] 5 Euroregions: institutional entrepreneurship in the European Union
    In the following, I would like to stress three major conclusions that can be drawn from existing case studies, as well as my own empirical work on various ...Missing: successes | Show results with:successes<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Institutional mapping of cross-border cooperation. INTERREG ...
    Apr 11, 2022 · The aim of our paper is two-fold. Firstly, we aim to understand the cooperation dynamics and funding geographies of the recent INTERREG A period.
  74. [74]
    Covid Aid for Universities - Euroregion
    Improving the resilience of students and universities facing systemic crises such as Covid-19 · Inclusion and equality of Euroregional students in the new forms ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Strengthening the Resilience of EU Border Regions
    addressing crises in interconnected regions. The Nordred case study underscores the significance of collaborative efforts among countries, leveraging ...
  76. [76]
    AEBR on Ukraine
    AEBR's work will focus on the middle to longer term efforts necessary to secure a sustainable and citizen-centred reconstruction of Ukraine which has a focus on ...
  77. [77]
    Resilient Borders – EU-funded project supporting spatial planning ...
    This EU-funded project supports actors in border regions to enhance resilience through cross-border spatial planning and cross-border crisis management.
  78. [78]
    COVID-19 pandemic response in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion
    May 13, 2023 · COVID-19 pandemic response in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion: methods, participation and recommendations of a longitudinal cross-border study
  79. [79]
    Covid-19 across European regions: The role of border controls | CEPR
    Nov 4, 2020 · The Covid-19 pandemic has seen the reintroduction of national border controls within Europe's Schengen Area, but the effectiveness of this is ...
  80. [80]
    How Interreg strengthens eastern EU regions after Russia's invasion ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · For the 2021–2027 period, the European Commission reallocated EUR 150 million from planned Interreg programmes with Russia and Belarus to ...
  81. [81]
    Eastern Border Regions | Interreg Europe
    Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, Eastern Border Regions have gained importance in European politics as strategic areas for policy intervention to ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Impact of Brexit on the Development of Irish Regions and their Cross
    This report explains and evidences the impact of Brexit – anticipated, actual and potential – in this unique case study.
  83. [83]
    Challenges at EU's North-East External Borders - CHANEBO - ESPON
    Aug 31, 2023 · This targeted analysis aims to develop evidence on lost development opportunities of regions at the north-eastern EU external border.