Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Convention

A convention is a customary, arbitrary regularity in behavior or expectations that coordinates interdependent actions in recurring situations, sustained by mutual knowledge that others conform conditionally on reciprocal adherence, distinguishing it from mere habits or enforced rules.^[1]^[2] Unlike laws, which courts enforce through sanctions, conventions rely on social pressure and self-perpetuation, emerging empirically as equilibria in coordination games where alternatives exist but one prevails due to precedent and expectations.^[3]^[4] Philosophically, conventions underpin solutions to problems like language use and signaling, as analyzed by David Lewis in his 1969 study, where they resolve indeterminacy through shared precedents rather than inherent necessity.^[1] Empirically observed in practices such as driving on a specific road side or greeting rituals, they demonstrate stability despite arbitrariness, evolving via imitation or learning in populations facing repeated interactions.^[5]^[6] In constitutional contexts, they guide political conduct without legal compulsion, as seen in unwritten norms of Westminster systems, though breaches invite political repercussions rather than judicial ones.^[3] Key characteristics include arbitrariness—multiple equilibria possible—and self-enforcement via expectations, enabling rapid emergence in decentralized groups, such as online norms or crisis responses like social distancing.^[7] Controversies arise over their normative force: while efficient for coordination, entrenched conventions can resist beneficial change, requiring tipping points or external shocks for shifts, as evidenced in experimental and observational studies of norm dynamics.^[8]^[9]

Definition and Etymology

Core Definition

In philosophical and social scientific contexts, a convention is defined as a regularity R in behavior or belief to which agents conform because they expect others to do likewise, thereby resolving a recurrent coordination problem where multiple equilibria are possible but R prevails due to its salience from precedent or common knowledge.^[10] This formulation, originating in David Lewis's analysis, requires that conformity to R be mutually beneficial given the expectations, and that an alternative regularity R' exists such that, if expectations shifted to anticipate conformity to R', agents would prefer it instead, yet R persists self-sustainingly without external imposition.^[10]^[11] Common knowledge among participants—that everyone knows the regularity, knows that others know it, and so on—is essential for its stability, as it underpins the conditional preferences driving adherence.^[10] Conventions exhibit arbitrariness in that the selected equilibrium lacks intrinsic superiority over alternatives; for instance, driving on the right versus the left side of the road yields equivalent coordination benefits in isolation, with the choice hinging on historical precedent rather than inherent properties.^[10] Yet this arbitrariness coexists with mutual advantage, as deviation by one agent harms their interests if others maintain the regularity, enforcing compliance through rational expectations rather than coercion or punishment.^[10]^[12] The self-perpetuating nature arises from this interdependence: expectations sustain the behavior, and the behavior reinforces expectations in a feedback loop.^[10] Unlike laws, which rely on authoritative enforcement and sanctions, conventions operate absent centralized coercion, deriving force solely from agents' strategic interdependence and shared anticipations.^[10] They differ from instincts or evolved biological drives, which stem from innate predispositions independent of social expectations or alternatives, whereas conventions demand cognitive awareness of others' likely actions and can dissolve if common knowledge erodes or a superior precedent emerges.^[10] Mere habits, by contrast, lack the coordination-solving function and alternative equilibria that define conventions, often persisting without regard to others' conformity.^[10] This framework underscores conventions as emergent solutions to practical dilemmas, contingent on informational equilibria rather than fixed essences.^[10]

Historical Origins of the Term

The term convention originates from the Latin conventio(n-), denoting an assembly, formal agreement, or mutual coming together, derived from the verb convenire, meaning "to come together" or "to agree." This root entered Middle English via Old French convention around 1375–1425, primarily signifying a binding compact or covenant, often in legal or diplomatic contexts such as treaties between parties.^[13]^[14] By the 17th and 18th centuries, philosophical discourse adapted convention to distinguish human-made agreements or habitual practices from purported natural laws or divine mandates. Thinkers like Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651) described societal foundations as arising from covenants—implicitly conventional pacts—where individuals surrender rights to a sovereign to escape the state of nature, contrasting this with innate instincts. Similarly, John Locke in Two Treatises of Government (1689) framed government legitimacy as stemming from consensual compacts, akin to conventions, that limit natural liberty through mutual consent rather than arbitrary imposition. These usages highlighted convention as a mechanism for resolving conflicts absent universal natural dictates, though both authors prioritized explicit or tacit agreements over mere custom.^[15] In the 19th and early 20th centuries, anthropological inquiry broadened convention to encompass customary behaviors in non-Western societies, viewing them as evolved social norms rather than primitive relics. Bronisław Malinowski, in Crime and Custom in Savage Society (1926), analyzed Trobriand Island customs—such as kula exchange rings and garden magic—as functional conventions that enforce reciprocity and stability without centralized law, binding participants through mutual dependence and social pressure rather than coercion. This functionalist perspective shifted emphasis from convention as deliberate pact to habitual rule systems that sustain group cohesion, influencing later ethnographic studies of norms as arbitrary yet adaptive.^[16]

Philosophical Foundations

Precursors in Early Thought

David Hume, in A Treatise of Human Nature (1739–1740), identified conventions as emergent customary practices rooted in repeated human experiences and habits, rather than innate ideas, rational imperatives, or explicit pacts. He contended that such conventions underpin essential social mechanisms like language, monetary exchange, and justice, arising spontaneously to serve utility and foster coordination among individuals whose limited benevolence requires artificial supports for stability. Languages, for example, become established through human conventions without promises, much as gold and silver gain status as common measures of exchange via habitual acceptance and mutual benefit.^[17] Justice, in Hume's account, qualifies as an artificial virtue—distinct from natural virtues like benevolence—sustained by these conventions, which align self-interest with social sympathy to prevent conflict over scarce resources.^[18] This empirical framing emphasized causal processes of habituation over abstract moral necessities, portraying conventions as pragmatic solutions to coordination dilemmas observable in human nature.^[19] Emer de Vattel built on similar voluntarist lines in The Law of Nations (1758), treating conventions as deliberate yet arbitrary compacts among sovereign states that form the basis of voluntary international law, supplementing universal principles derived from reason and nature. These agreements, binding through express treaties or tacit consent inferred from conduct, enable orderly interstate relations by resolving ambiguities in natural law through mutual accommodation, often selecting among equipollent options for practical efficacy.^[20] Vattel's analysis highlighted the self-perpetuating force of such conventions, where states adhere not solely from moral duty but from the reciprocal advantages of compliance, prefiguring recognition of conventions as equilibria maintained by conditional expectations rather than coercion.^[21] This approach grounded international order in empirical state practices and utility, eschewing reliance on transcendent authority.

David Lewis's Framework

David Lewis introduced a rigorous, game-theoretic account of conventions in his 1969 book Convention: A Philosophical Study, analyzing them as self-perpetuating equilibria in recurrent coordination problems among rational agents.^[12] In this framework, a convention emerges as a regularity R in behavior or belief, sustained by mutual expectations and preferences, where conformity to R is preferred by all participants given common knowledge of others' conformity, yet an alternative regularity R' exists with identical payoff properties.^[22] This structure arises in coordination games featuring multiple Nash equilibria, where agents select a salient outcome not due to intrinsic superiority but through precedents that establish common knowledge, enabling escape from suboptimal patterns—such as arbitrary signaling systems in language, where meanings coordinate without inherent links between signals and referents.^[23] Central to Lewis's analysis is the arbitrariness of conventions: no equilibrium holds objective preference over alternatives absent historical contingency, with stability deriving causally from self-enforcing expectations rather than external enforcement or inherent value.^[12] Precedents generate this stability by fostering common knowledge that deviation prompts collective shift to another equilibrium, as agents rationally anticipate others' responses; for instance, driving on the right persists because mutual adherence creates expectations that override any isolated incentive to switch.^[22] Lewis emphasizes that conventions require no explicit agreement, only iterated interactions where salience—often from past regularity—resolves coordination without invoking non-rational factors.^[23] Lewis extends this model to implications for "truth by convention," particularly in logic and mathematics, arguing that claims of conventional necessity (e.g., logical axioms as arbitrary yet obligatory) falter under his criteria, as they presuppose non-conventional knowledge of alternatives and payoffs, risking infinite regress or ontological circularity.^[24] Unlike social conventions like linguistic rules, which admit viable alternatives with equivalent utility, purported logical conventions lack genuine equilibria without begging questions about prior truths, rendering them unstable or non-arbitrary in Lewis's sense.^[10] This critique underscores that conventions explain coordination amid indifference but cannot ground foundational truths, preserving realism against reductive conventionalism.^[24]

Subsequent Developments

John Searle, in his 1969 work Speech Acts, refined the understanding of conventions by distinguishing them from mere regulative rules, positing instead that they often function as constitutive rules of the form "X counts as Y in context C." These rules create institutional facts by imposing status functions on preexisting brute facts, such as when pieces of paper or metal are endowed with the status of money, enabling economic transactions that would otherwise be impossible.^[25] ^[26] This framework critiques pure conventionalism by emphasizing declarative acts of imposition that generate new realities, rather than relying solely on self-sustaining expectations in coordination equilibria. Margaret Gilbert's 1989 book On Social Facts introduced plural subject theory, portraying conventions as grounded in joint commitments among participants to treat certain behaviors or beliefs as obligatory for the group as a whole. Under this view, a convention persists not merely through reciprocal expectations of conformity, as in Lewis's model, but through normative obligations arising from collective intentionality, where individuals are bound as co-authors of the plural subject's actions.^[27] ^[28] This approach addresses limitations in equilibrium-based accounts by incorporating deontic forces inherent in group commitments, explaining the binding nature of conventions even absent strict rationality assumptions. Cristina Bicchieri's 2006 analysis in The Grammar of Society further advanced the field by modeling social norms—closely akin to conventions—as dynamic systems shaped by conditional preferences and empirical psychological factors, including beliefs about others' conditional compliance. Norms emerge and enforce through strategic interactions where individuals conform based on perceived empirical and normative expectations, supported by evidence from behavioral experiments showing context-sensitive norm activation.^[29] ^[30] This integration critiques static conventionalism by highlighting causal pathways via preference conditioning and enforcement, such as reputation costs, which sustain norms amid uncertainty.

Role in Coordination

Conventions serve as self-sustaining equilibria in recurrent coordination games, where agents face multiple outcomes that yield mutual benefits only if aligned, enabling large-scale cooperation without centralized directive. In pure coordination problems, such as drivers deciding whether to pass on the left or right, conventions select a salient equilibrium to avert inefficiency or collision, as formalized in game-theoretic models where payoffs incentivize convergence on shared expectations rather than defection.^[31] Empirical lab experiments demonstrate this through Schelling points, focal solutions that emerge tacitly; for instance, in Schelling's 1960 study, participants independently converged on prominent locations like Grand Central Station at noon for a hypothetical New York meeting without communication, with over 90% alignment in some groups on clock towers or central hubs as default choices. More recent experiments confirm focal points' efficacy in tacit bargaining, where subjects coordinate payoffs 20-30% more effectively on salient options than arbitrary ones, even under strategic uncertainty.^[32] By minimizing the need for explicit negotiation or monitoring in every interaction, conventions substantially lower transaction costs, allowing agents to bypass repeated bargaining that would otherwise erode efficiency in markets and communities. Economic analysis quantifies this: absent conventions like standardized driving sides, each road encounter would demand costly signaling or enforcement, inflating operational expenses; with them, flows proceed fluidly, as seen in models where conventions act as low-cost indicators for equilibrium selection.^[33] In behavioral economics paradigms, such as indefinitely repeated coordination tasks, conventions prove robust via self-enforcement mechanisms like conditional reciprocity, where deviation risks reciprocal misalignment; data from anonymous one-shot analogs show sustained coordination rates above 60% when precedents are salient, outperforming non-conventional strategies by leveraging inferred common knowledge.^[34] Causally, conventions arise bottom-up through iterated interactions among decentralized agents, where initial alignments propagate via imitation or reinforcement learning, fostering trust and scalability in anonymous or high-volume settings without reliance on top-down imposition. Game-theoretic simulations of coordination games reveal that, starting from random play, agents converge to stable conventions in 10-20 iterations under minimal information, as mutual reinforcement selects against inefficient equilibria; this dynamic underpins efficiency in decentralized systems like informal marketplaces, where emergent rules on payment timing or quality signals reduce opportunism without formal contracts.^[35] Such emergence contrasts with imposed rules, which often falter due to enforcement costs, highlighting conventions' adaptive edge in enabling cooperation at scale.^[36]

Examples Across Cultures

In the domain of transportation, the convention of right-hand traffic predominates in 163 countries and territories, encompassing most of continental Europe, the Americas, and mainland Asia, while left-hand traffic prevails in 76 nations, primarily former British colonies such as the United Kingdom, Australia, and India.^[37] This bifurcation, lacking inherent superiority and rooted in historical precedents like Roman chariot practices or papal decrees, exemplifies how arbitrary norms achieve coordination by standardizing vehicle positioning to avert collisions, with non-adherence historically leading to fatalities, as seen in Sweden's 1967 switch from left to right that reduced accidents by 19% in the initial year.^[38] Linguistic and social greetings further illustrate cultural variability in conventions. In many Western societies, the handshake—traced to ancient Assyrian depictions around 9th century BCE and formalized in medieval Europe to demonstrate unarmed intent—serves as a standard egalitarian gesture of agreement or introduction.^[39] By contrast, in Japan and other East Asian cultures, bowing (ojigi) conveys hierarchy and respect, with depth varying by status: a 15-degree incline for peers, up to 45 degrees for superiors, enforcing social order without physical contact.^[40] These practices, while arbitrary in form, reliably signal intentions and reduce uncertainty in interactions across diverse groups. Economically, conventions govern exchange mediums and attire signaling. The gold standard, adopted internationally by the late 19th century, pegged currencies to fixed gold quantities for stability until the U.S. suspended dollar convertibility on August 15, 1971, amid inflationary pressures and balance-of-payments deficits, ushering in fiat systems reliant on collective trust rather than commodity backing.^[41]^[42] Similarly, dress codes denote status universally: in pre-industrial societies, elaborate feathers or beads among Amazonian tribes or historical European sumptuary laws restricted luxury fabrics to elites, while modern corporate environments enforce suits to cue competence and conformity, deviations from which can impair perceived authority in negotiations.^[43] In family structures, monogamy functions as a widespread convention for reproductive coordination. George P. Murdock's 1967 Ethnographic Atlas, surveying over 1,200 societies, documented monogamy in approximately 80% of cases, correlating with efficient paternal investment and resource allocation for offspring, in contrast to polygynous arrangements limited to about 16% where resource inequality permits multiple wives.^[44] This prevalence underscores how the norm, absent biological mandate for exclusivity, emerges from mutual expectations stabilizing pair-bonding and inheritance across agrarian and industrial contexts.

Evolutionary and Biological Underpinnings

Adaptive Origins

Conventions in human societies can be traced to adaptive biological signaling systems observed across species, where standardized behaviors enhance coordination and survival without relying solely on genetic determinism. In honeybees, for instance, the waggle dance serves as a precise convention for communicating food source location, direction, and distance, enabling efficient foraging and colony fitness; this system was decoded through experiments showing recruits follow the dance to extract spatial information relative to the sun's position.^[45] Such animal precedents illustrate conventions as evolved mechanisms for information transfer, countering notions of human conventions as entirely arbitrary cultural overlays by demonstrating their roots in selection pressures favoring reliable, repeatable signals. Human conventions exhibit similar innate foundations, particularly in near-universal taboos like incest avoidance, which align with the Westermarck effect—a proximity-induced aversion to sexual attraction among those reared together from early childhood, reducing inbreeding depression risks. Empirical support includes studies of Israeli kibbutzim, where unrelated children raised communally showed diminished sexual interest in one another as adults, with marriage rates near zero among peers, indicating an automatic developmental process rather than learned prohibition alone.^[46] This effect underscores conventions as extensions of genetic imperatives, where the taboo emerges as a cultural ratification of pre-existing biological deterrence, promoting genetic fitness through outbreeding without requiring explicit cultural invention. Cultural evolution extends these biological bases via gene-culture coevolution, as modeled by Boyd and Richerson, where conventions propagate through imitation and conformist transmission, interacting with genes to amplify adaptive outcomes beyond genetic constraints alone. In their framework, cultural variants like property norms—rules enforcing ownership and exchange—facilitate division of labor by reducing transaction costs and enabling specialization, thereby increasing group productivity and individual fitness in resource-scarce environments.^[47]^[48] These norms evolve culturally because they align with genetic predispositions for reciprocity and coalitional cooperation, allowing human populations to adapt rapidly to ecological niches where pure genetic evolution would lag.^[49] Behavioral genetic evidence reinforces this interplay, with twin studies revealing heritability in adherence to social norms and attitudes often transmitted via conventional channels. For example, analyses of monozygotic and dizygotic twins indicate that individual differences in attitudes, including those toward authority and tradition, show moderate to high heritability (e.g., 30-50% for factors like comfort with ethical violations), suggesting genetic influences on receptivity to normative conventions beyond shared environment.^[50] Political orientations, frequently shaped by familial and societal conventions, likewise exhibit genetic components, with twin data from multiple cohorts estimating 40-60% heritability, implying evolved predispositions modulate how conventions are internalized and enforced for social cohesion.^[51] This heritability counters purely cultural imposition views by demonstrating biological variance in convention uptake, where genes predispose individuals to favor norms enhancing kin and group fitness.^[52]

Innate vs. Arbitrary Elements

Conventions frequently display a hybrid character, featuring arbitrary selection among equipollent options while anchoring in biological substrates that predispose certain outcomes. For instance, the choice of driving on the left or right side of the road is conventionally arbitrary, as either could facilitate coordination if uniformly adopted; however, empirical studies reveal a subtle bias toward right-side preferences among right-handed individuals, who comprise approximately 90-92% of the population according to meta-analyses of handedness distribution.^[53] This bias manifests additively with learned conventions, as right-handers exhibit a stronger tendency to turn right in pedestrian navigation tasks, independent of cultural driving norms.^[54] Such patterns suggest that while the specific convention remains selectable, underlying neural and motor asymmetries—rooted in evolved hemispheric specialization—tilt the salience of alternatives, rendering pure arbitrariness incomplete. Critiques of thoroughgoing conventionalism underscore this interplay by challenging the notion that conventions alone suffice to ground necessity or normativity without empirical tethering. Philosopher W.V.O. Quine, in his analysis of analyticity, rejected the idea that truths held by convention could evade empirical scrutiny, arguing that appeals to linguistic rules circularly presuppose the very distinctions they aim to explain, such as between analytic and synthetic statements.^[55] Complementing this, neuroimaging evidence falsifies detached conventionalism: functional MRI studies demonstrate that violations of social norms activate disgust-related circuitry, including the insula and anterior cingulate cortex, akin to responses to pathogen threats, indicating an innate affective substrate that conventions modulate rather than originate.^[56] These responses persist across cultures, implying causal realism where biological preparedness shapes the enforceability of arbitrary forms. Historical precedents affirm that convention shifts succeed when leveraging innate coordination imperatives amid enforcement, rather than floating freely. The metric system's adoption in France, decreed mandatory on April 7, 1795, by the Revolutionary National Assembly, overcame resistance from customary units only through state compulsion and decimal alignment with human perceptual bases like base-10 counting, which exploits bilateral symmetry in digit representation.^[57] Initial non-compliance necessitated punitive measures, yet eventual entrenchment built on evolved cognitive affinities for scalable, ratio-based measurement, illustrating how arbitrary reforms endure by interfacing with predisposed faculties rather than supplanting them wholesale.^[58]

Formal and Institutional Applications

Legal Conventions

In jurisprudence, legal conventions manifest as unwritten precedents and normative agreements that guide official conduct, prioritizing adaptive stability over exhaustive codification to minimize disputes and maintain institutional continuity. These differ from enforceable statutes by relying on reciprocal expectations and political accountability rather than judicial remedies, allowing systems to evolve without frequent legal challenges. In the United Kingdom's uncodified constitution, conventions underpin governance, as theorized by A.V. Dicey in his 1885 treatise Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, which distinguishes them as binding moral imperatives enforceable through resignation or censure rather than courts.^[59] A core example is the convention of royal assent, whereby the monarch routinely approves bills passed by Parliament; no refusal has occurred since Queen Anne withheld assent to the Scottish Militia Bill on March 11, 1708, averting potential veto disputes and associated litigation for over three centuries.^[60] This unbroken adherence illustrates conventions' role in preempting constitutional friction, as deviations would trigger political rather than legal escalation, fostering empirical governance resilience evidenced by the absence of assent-related court cases since 1708.^[61] The United States, despite its written Constitution, incorporates conventions in executive operations, such as the Cabinet's advisory function to the President, formalized as precedent by George Washington via weekly meetings starting in 1791 to deliberate neutrality, ambassadorships, and privateering amid post-revolutionary uncertainties.^[62] While Article II, Section 2 explicitly authorizes the President to solicit written opinions from principal officers, the collective Cabinet consultation operates conventionally, enabling flexible counsel without statutory micromanagement and reducing intra-executive litigation by channeling advice through established norms rather than ad hoc mandates.^[63] In international law, customary rules emerge as conventions from widespread state practice coupled with opinio juris—a belief in legal obligation—forming binding norms absent formal treaties.^[64] This contrasts with explicit agreements like treaties, whose formation and validity are codified in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, adopted May 23, 1969, and entering force January 27, 1980, which mandates good faith interpretation under pacta sunt servanda.^[65] Customary conventions, such as those governing diplomatic immunities or territorial sea limits (initially 3 nautical miles, expanding via practice to 12 by the mid-20th century), develop incrementally, enhancing stability by filling treaty gaps and curtailing litigation in forums like the International Court of Justice, where opinio juris has upheld practices without codification in over 70% of foundational rulings since 1946.^[66]

Political and Organizational Conventions

Political conventions serve as structured gatherings where parties coordinate to select nominees and unify supporters, addressing coordination challenges in large-scale decision-making under informational asymmetries. The first national nominating convention in the United States was organized by the Anti-Masonic Party on September 26–28, 1831, in Baltimore, Maryland, marking a shift from informal caucuses to formalized assemblies for aggregating delegate preferences and signaling candidate viability.^[67] In the modern era, following the dominance of primaries since the 1970s, these events primarily ratify the primary winner while emphasizing party unity through speeches and platforms, thereby reducing post-nomination uncertainty and bolstering collective commitment to the ticket.^[68] Historically, U.S. party conventions evolved from opaque, brokered negotiations in "smoke-filled rooms" to public spectacles, with the 1952 Republican and Democratic national conventions in Chicago representing the first fully televised events nationwide, which enhanced transparency by exposing proceedings to millions but preserved arbitrary elements like ritualistic roll calls and demonstrations.^[69] This format facilitates preference aggregation by allowing delegates to observe and respond to real-time signals of support, though outcomes remain path-dependent on prior primary momentum rather than open bargaining. Organizational conventions, including corporate bylaws and enthusiast gatherings, similarly function as equilibria for coordinating repeated interactions within groups facing shared uncertainties. Corporate bylaws establish predefined rules for governance, such as board election procedures and meeting quorums, codifying conventions that minimize disputes over authority and enable efficient decision-making in firms with dispersed stakeholders.^[70] For instance, these documents specify director terms and powers, providing a stable framework that aligns incentives without constant renegotiation.^[71] Fan conventions exemplify voluntary coordination for niche interests, convening participants around common preferences to exchange information and build networks. The San Diego Comic-Con, initiated as a three-day event from August 1–3, 1970, at the U.S. Grant Hotel with around 300 attendees, grew into a mechanism for aggregating demand in comics and media fandom, fostering transactions like artist panels and merchandise trades that would be inefficient in decentralized settings.^[72] Such gatherings reduce search costs amid uncertain participant turnout, relying on recurring dates and venues as self-enforcing norms to sustain attendance and vendor participation.

Criticisms and Debates

Challenges from Relativism and Progressivism

Postmodern relativists contend that social conventions lack universal validity, viewing them instead as arbitrary constructs imposed by dominant groups to enforce particular worldviews without objective grounding.^[73] This perspective posits that conventions, such as linguistic or behavioral norms, emerge from historical contingencies and power dynamics rather than inherent truths, rendering challenges to them as acts of subversion against imposed uniformity.^[74] In feminist theory, Judith Butler's Gender Trouble (1990) exemplifies this by arguing that gender conventions operate through performative repetition, where individuals enact roles prescribed by societal scripts, concealing their constructed nature and suppressing alternative expressions of identity.^[75] Butler challenges these as regulatory fictions that naturalize binary categories, advocating disruption to reveal their contingency and enable fluidity beyond fixed norms.^[76] Progressive critiques extend this to broader social norms, portraying conventions around family structures—such as disapproval of single motherhood—as patriarchal mechanisms that entrench inequality by pathologizing women's autonomy outside male-headed households.^[77] Scholars influenced by second-wave feminism, like Adrienne Rich in Of Woman Born (1976), distinguish institutionalized motherhood as a site of oppression, where conventions enforce dependency and devalue non-traditional caregiving to sustain gender hierarchies.^[78] The 1960s counterculture drew on Herbert Marcuse's analysis in One-Dimensional Man (1964) to reject bourgeois conventions as tools of repressive integration, alienating individuals by subsuming authentic needs under conformist consumerism and traditional mores.^[79] Marcuse's advocacy for a "great refusal" inspired movements to dismantle these norms, seeing them as ideological barriers to liberation rather than functional adaptations.^[80]

Empirical Defenses and Causal Evidence

Empirical analyses of coordination problems reveal that conventions mitigate inefficiencies arising from uncertainty and asymmetric information. In Akerlof's 1970 model of the used car market, the absence of reliable signaling conventions leads to adverse selection, where sellers withhold high-quality goods, contracting the market and reducing overall welfare.^[81] Experimental studies in game theory corroborate this by showing that emergent conventions in repeated coordination games enable players to achieve Pareto-superior equilibria faster than trial-and-error alone, with success rates improving through precedent-based salience.^[82]^[83] These findings underscore conventions' role in resolving multi-equilibria scenarios, where shared expectations prevent suboptimal outcomes like those in pure coordination tasks.^[84] In familial contexts, adherence to two-parent stability conventions correlates with measurable child welfare gains. Data indicate that children raised in intact married-parent households are twice as likely to graduate college and half as likely to face incarceration compared to peers in single-parent homes.^[85]^[86] Single-parent families, often resulting from norm erosion around marriage, exhibit poverty rates around 30%, versus 6% for married-couple families, with children in such arrangements facing elevated risks of emotional, behavioral, and academic difficulties.^[87]^[88] Longitudinal evidence links rising single parenthood—now affecting 25% of U.S. children—to intergenerational poverty persistence, challenging narratives of neutral family form variability by highlighting causal pathways through reduced parental investment and stability.^[89] From an evolutionary standpoint, social conventions function as adaptive heuristics refined over generations, often surpassing outcomes from top-down rational redesign in uncertain environments. Simple norm-based rules, such as reciprocity or monogamy precedents, yield "less-is-more" accuracy by ignoring extraneous information, outperforming complex optimization in boundedly rational agents.^[90] Self-enforcing norms evolve to promote group coordination, with deviations incurring fitness costs that reinforce adherence.^[91] While shifts occur via gradual selection, Lewis's framework cautions that conventions rely on historical salience and precedent for persistence; abrupt deconstruction, absent superior alternatives, invites coordination breakdowns, as initial equilibria derive from these anchors rather than arbitrary resets.^[22] Empirical intergenerational games confirm that disrupting precedents slows convergence to efficient conventions, validating reticence toward ideologically driven overhauls.^[92]

References

[1]
Convention: A Philosophical Study | Wiley
Free delivery 30-day returnsLewis analyzes social conventions as regularities in the resolution of recurring coordination problems-situations characterized by interdependent decision ...<|separator|>
[2]
(PDF) Social Conventions - ResearchGate
A social convention is a customary, arbitrary, and self-enforcing rule of behavior that is generally followed and expected to be followed in a group or in a ...
[3]
Laws and Constitutional Conventions by Nicholas W. Barber :: SSRN
Apr 14, 2016 · First, that laws are enforced by courts, with legal sanctions following their breach, whilst conventions are enforced only by political pressure ...
[4]
Law and convention (Chapter 2)
It is said that law is ultimately no different from convention because both law and convention consist of rules which regulate conduct, and law, like convention ...
[5]
[PDF] The Emergence of Conventions in Online Social Networks
Social conventions guide us through complex in- teractions: eating dinner out (differing between restaurants and friends' homes), driving (on which side of the ...
[6]
The Explanation of Social Conventions by Melioration Learning
One example of belief learning is fictitious play: "in fictitious play, an agent believes that his opponent is playing the mixed strategy given by the empirical ...
[7]
Modeling the formation of social conventions from embodied real ...
Jun 22, 2020 · Among most recent examples of rapidly emerging social norms with unprecedented consequences one might refer to the social distancing convention ...
[8]
Group interactions modulate critical mass dynamics in social ...
Mar 18, 2022 · Controlled experiments of social coordination have brought empirical evidence for tipping points in the dynamics of social conventions, finding ...
[9]
The Dynamics of Social Conventions in LLM populations - arXiv
Oct 11, 2024 · Here, we investigate the dynamics of conventions within populations of Large Language Model (LLM) agents using simulated interactions.
[10]
Convention - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sep 6, 2007 · Lewis analyzes convention as an arbitrary, self-perpetuating solution to a recurring coordination problem. It is self-perpetuating because no ...Issues raised by convention · Truth by convention · Analyzing social convention
[11]
Convention: A Philosophical Study - Wiley Online Library
Jan 1, 2002 · Lewis analyzes social conventions as regularities in the resolution of recurring coordination problems-situations.
[12]
[PDF] David Lewis on Convention
A convention is a regularity in behavior, sustained by a system of preferences and expectations, that has a possible alternative: so claims. David Lewis.
[13]
CONVENTION Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
unconvention noun. Discover More. Word History and Origins. Origin of convention. First recorded in 1375–1425; late Middle English convencio(u)n “formal ...
[14]
Convention - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
"Convention" originates from Old French and Latin, meaning a formal agreement, meeting, or secret pact, derived from convenire, "to come together."
[15]
Locke's Political Philosophy
Nov 9, 2005 · ... convention had been established. This distinction is sometimes formulated as the difference between natural law and positive law. Natural ...
[16]
(PDF) Crime and custom in savage society - ResearchGate
Crime and Custom in Savage Society represents Bronislaw Malinowski's major discussion of the relationship between law and society.Missing: conventions | Show results with:conventions
[17]
Treatise > Book 3 - Hume Texts Online
To avoid giving offence, I must here observe, that when I deny justice to be a natural virtue, I make use of the word, natural, only as oppos'd to artificial.
[18]
David Hume: Moral Philosophy
Hume's moral philosophy is found primarily in Book 3 of The Treatise of Human Nature ... conventions of justice are based upon promises or explicit agreements.
[19]
[PDF] Treatise of Human Nature Book III: Morals - Early Modern Texts
Treatise III. David Hume ii: Justice and injustice the greatest regarding the latter. If someone is forced to make a certain promise, the promise isn't ...
[20]
Vattel's Law of Nations (1758) | Online Library of Liberty
The Law of Nations (1758) is a 2 volume work in which Vattel explores the application of natural law to the conduct of states and sovereigns.
[21]
[PDF] The Law of Nations; or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied ... - Loc
And, as regards lawytrs, it contains the clearest rules of construing private contracts, and· respecting the Admiralty and Insurance Law. The positions oCthe au.
[22]
[PDF] David Lewis on Convention - Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science
Convention, for Lewis, is the canonical form that this social competence takes when it is grounded in agents' knowledge and experience of one another's self- ...
[23]
Game Theory in the Philosophy of Convention - Cornell blogs
Sep 15, 2017 · Lewis characterizes convention as “an arbitrary, self-perpetuating solution to a recurring coordination problem.” Let's break down this dense ...
[24]
[PDF] 39 David Lewis (1941– ) - Blackwell Publishing
His first major philosophical project responded to Quine's critique of this distinction, and of truth by convention. Lewis accepted the terms of Quine's ...
[25]
[PDF] 1 John Searle's ontology of money, and its critics Forthcoming in ...
For Searle argues that constitutive rules are of the general form “X count as Y in C”, where X is some object, person or state of affair, Y is a status imposed ...
[26]
[PDF] Constitutive Rules | Argumenta
Institutional facts are always applications of the form of the constitutive rule and institutions such as money, property and government are systems of such ...Missing: conventions | Show results with:conventions
[27]
https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691020808/on-social-facts
[28]
(PDF) On Plural Subject Theory - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · with the relevant others as such a body. Gilbert argues that a joint commitment is not simply a matter of there. being corresponding and ...
[29]
The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms
Dec 12, 2005 · In The Grammar of Society, first published in 2006, Cristina Bicchieri examines social norms, such as fairness, cooperation, and reciprocity ...
[30]
The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms, by Cristina Bicchieri ...
In The Grammar of Society Cristina Bicchieri presents a rational reconstruction of social norms in terms of preferences and expectations, making a key ...
[31]
Conventions and institutions in coordination problems | De Economist
This survey article starts with a game-theory interpretation of coordination problems that occur in an economy. Three types of games are discussed in which.
[32]
Focal points in tacit bargaining problems: Experimental evidence
We use a new experimental design to test Schelling's hypotheses about the nature and effectiveness of focal points in tacit bargaining problems.
[33]
The Economics of Convention
The economic significance of conventions is that they reduce transaction costs. Imagine the inconvenience if, whenever two vehicles approached one another ...
[34]
How Norms Emerge from Conventions (and Change) - Sage Journals
Sep 29, 2022 · Here the authors investigate experimentally whether spontaneously emerging behavioral regularities (i.e., conventions) gain normativity over ...
[35]
[PDF] Coordination, timing and common knowledge - MIT Economics
Modern game theory describes such situations as coordination games and the existence of multiple stable conventions as multiple equilibria. Coordination ...<|separator|>
[36]
(PDF) Self-enforcing Institutions: Comparative and Historical ...
PDF | On Jan 1, 2004, Avner Greif published Self-enforcing Institutions: Comparative and Historical Institutional Analysis | Find, read and cite all the ...
[37]
Which Countries Drive on the Left? England, India, Australia, and More
Oct 19, 2018 · There are 163 countries and territories that drive on the right side of the road, while 76 of them drive on the left.
[38]
List of left- & right-driving countries - WorldStandards
Jul 29, 2024 · This world map shows which side of the road traffic drives on. Green coloured countries drive on the right, orange countries drive on the left.
[39]
6 Ways People Around The World Say Hello Without Touching
Mar 23, 2020 · The namaste and other contactless cultural greetings may be safer alternatives to handshakes during the coronavirus pandemic. Photograph by ...
[40]
How People Say Hello Around the World - AFAR
Jul 15, 2025 · In Japanese culture, a deeper bow indicates a higher level of respect than a slight bow (90 degrees is the max), and prayer hands are not used.
[41]
What Is the Gold Standard? History and Collapse - Investopedia
Why Did the U.S. Abandon the Gold Standard? The U.S. abandoned the gold standard in 1971 to curb inflation and prevent foreign nations from overburdening ...The Gold Standard: A History · The Rise of the Gold Standard
[42]
Nixon and the End of the Bretton Woods System, 1971–1973
Under the Bretton Woods system, the external values of foreign currencies were fixed in relation to the U.S. dollar, whose value was in turn expressed in gold ...
[43]
What You Wear Can Signal a Part of Your Identity | Psychology Today
Oct 17, 2022 · Clothing can be a signal regarding your identity. Cultural and institutional norms may constrain personal choices regarding dress. A law school ...
[44]
When one wife is enough: A cross-cultural study of the determinants ...
When one wife is enough: A cross-cultural study of the determinants of monogamy. ... Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of ...
[45]
[PDF] Karl von Frisch - Nobel Lecture
DECODING THE LANGUAGE OF THE BEE. Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1973 by. KARL VON FRISCH†. University of Munich, Federal Republic of Germany. Some 60 years ago ...
[46]
[PDF] An Update on Westermarck, Freud, and the Incest Taboo
FDB marriage: Further support for the. Westermarck hypothesis of the incest taboo. American Anthro- pology, 85, 50-69. Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982).
[47]
Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Boyd, Richerson
Boyd and Richerson explore how genetic and cultural factors interact, under the influence of evolutionary forces, to produce the diversity we see in human ...
[48]
[PDF] Division of Labor, Economic Specialization, and the Evolution of ...
It depends on technology, know-how, environment and ecological resources/constraints, norms of interaction, and transaction costs. ... Evolutionary Anthropology ...
[49]
(PDF) Culture and the Evolutionary Process. - ResearchGate
PDF | On Mar 1, 1988, Christopher Badcock and others published Culture and the Evolutionary Process. | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ...
[50]
The heritability of attitudes: a study of twins - PubMed
The genetic basis of individual differences in attitudes was examined in a survey of 195 pairs of monozygotic twins and 141 pairs of same-sex dizygotic twins.
[51]
Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 ...
Twin analyses of 19 measures of political ideologies from five democracies and genome-wide findings from three populations.
[52]
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-3514.80.6.845
[53]
The incidence of left-handedness: a meta-analysis - ResearchGate
Abstract. A meta-analysis is reported of 88 studies, examining 100 study populations, in. which the handedness of 284665 individuals has been assessed.
[54]
Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right - PubMed
The findings support that walking direction preference is an additive function of both learned driving patterns and genetic handedness.
[55]
Willard Van Orman Quine: The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction
Quine argues that all attempts to define and understand analyticity are circular. Therefore, the notion of analyticity should be rejected.
[56]
Moral Violations and the Experience of Disgust and Anger - PMC - NIH
Aug 22, 2018 · The present study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (n = 22) to investigate whether core and moral disgusts entrain common neural systems.
[57]
Origin of the Metric System
Oct 22, 2019 · Napoleon once banned its use. However, the metric system was officially adopted by the French government on 7 April 1795 .Missing: enforcement | Show results with:enforcement
[58]
France Adopts the Metric System | Research Starters - EBSCO
The metric system, formally adopted by France on April 7, 1795, would prove to be a permanent achievement of the French Revolution and Enlightenment science ...
[59]
[PDF] INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF THE LAW OF THE ...
This book, by A.V. Dicey, introduces the study of the law of the constitution, covering the true nature of constitutional law, parliamentary sovereignty, and ...
[60]
[PDF] Royal Assent - UK Parliament
May 12, 2025 · Royal Assent is the Monarch's agreement that a bill which has completed all its stages of consideration in the UK Parliament or in one of the ...
[61]
Constitutional Convention | The Lawyers & Jurists
(Dicey, 1885). Conventions are non-legal (cannot be enforced by courts ... The royal assent has not been refused since 1708. No monarch has refused to ...<|separator|>
[62]
A Precedent: The First Cabinet | George Washington's Mount Vernon
Frequent cabinet meetings provided Washington the immediate advice he needed to make precedent-setting decisions about neutrality, privateers, ambassadors, and ...
[63]
The Cabinet | whitehouse.gov - Obama White House
Established in Article II, Section 2, of the Constitution, the Cabinet's role is to advise the President on any subject he may require relating to the duties of ...<|separator|>
[64]
Customary International Law
Customary international law refers to rules from a general practice accepted as law, requiring a general practice and its acceptance as law.
[65]
[PDF] Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969)
The Vienna Convention, done in 1969, recognizes treaties as a source of international law and a means of peaceful cooperation. A treaty is an international ...
[66]
Customary IHL - ICRC
Customary IHL is of crucial importance in today's armed conflicts because it fills gaps left by treaty law and so strengthens the protection offered to victims.
[67]
the Anti-Masonic Party (1831) | Retro Report | PBS LearningMedia
Jun 12, 2021 · This four-minute video shows students how the Anti-Masonic Party pioneered the political party convention as a means of nominating presidential candidates.
[68]
National conventions | USAGov
Oct 2, 2024 · What happens at a national political convention? To become the presidential nominee, a candidate typically has to win a majority of delegates.
[69]
Remembering the First Nationally Televised Convention - NPR
Jul 8, 2002 · Commentator and former CBS Anchorman Walter Cronkite tells the story behind his initial experience as a TV network anchorman.
[70]
Corporate Bylaws: Definition, Requirements | Wolters Kluwer
The bylaws are the regulations of a corporation. They contain the basic rules for the conduct of the corporation's business and affairs.
[71]
Everything you need to know about company bylaws - Wolters Kluwer
What should be included in the corporate bylaws? · Definition of the number and term of office · Enumeration of powers of directors · Rules for increasing/ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[72]
About - Comic-Con Museum
A long-standing San Diego institution, Comic-Con began in 1970 when a small group of comics, movie, and science fiction fans from San Diego put on an event ...
[73]
Postmodernism - Relativism, Deconstruction, Critique | Britannica
Sep 26, 2025 · Postmodernists deny that there are aspects of reality that are objective; that there are statements about reality that are objectively true or false.
[74]
Relativism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Spring 2022 Edition)
Sep 11, 2015 · Relativism, roughly put, is the view that truth and falsity, right and wrong, standards of reasoning, and procedures of justification are ...Missing: impositions | Show results with:impositions
[75]
Gender Trouble in Social Psychology: How Can Butler's Work Inform ...
Jul 26, 2018 · In this paper, we will discuss how Butler's ideas can add to experimental social psychologists' understanding of gender.Abstract · Introduction · Butler's View on Gender · Is Butler's View Compatible...
[76]
[PDF] GENDER TROUBLE: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
Butler, Judith P. Gender trouble : feminism and the subversion of identity ... performativity in terms of its social, psychic, corporeal, and temporal.
[77]
Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family
Nov 6, 2004 · Feminists argue that the so-called private realms of family, sex and reproduction must be part of the political realm and thus subject to principles of justice.
[78]
Third Wave Feminism and the Politics of Motherhood | Genders
Mar 17, 2017 · Since Adrienne Rich made a distinction between motherhood as a patriarchal institution and mothering as a woman's potential relationship to her ...
[79]
[PDF] Herbert Marcuse, Volume 3: The New Left and the 1960s Edited by ...
Marcuse long admired bohemian and counterculture refusals to conform to existing bourgeois society and admired the modernist art that rejected its contemporary ...
[80]
Marcuse and the 1960s 'New Left': the politics of impatience
May 28, 2021 · His 1964 book, One-dimensional Man, proclaimed that the new 'consumerism' had already bought off the working class. From being the 'ferment of ...
[81]
[PDF] Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism
May 3, 2003 · As a result there tends to be a reduction in the average quality of goods and also in the size of the market. It should also be perceived that.
[82]
The Formation of Social Conventions in Real-Time Environments
We experimentally investigate two factors contributing to the formation of conventions in a game of impure coordination: the continuity of interaction within ...
[83]
https://journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/374187
[84]
Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games
Because social norms reflect “collective perceptions”, coordination games present a useful incentivized way to identify such socially held judgments. From a ...
[85]
Do Two Parents Matter More Than Ever? | Institute for Family Studies
Sep 20, 2023 · Marriage and a stable two-parent family appear to matter more than ever for children on a range of outcomes.
[86]
Data Shows Kids Benefit Greatly in Two-Parent Households
Nov 3, 2023 · “Kids who are raised in their own married parents are twice as likely to graduate from college…the boys are half as likely to end up in prison ...Missing: W. outcomes
[87]
Child Well-Being in Single-Parent Families
Aug 1, 2022 · In 2022, nearly 30% of single-parent families lived in below the federal poverty level while just 6% of married-couple families. Single parents ...Missing: CDC | Show results with:CDC
[88]
[PDF] Health Statistics - Family Structure and Children's Health - CDC
In numerous studies, children from divorced families and those living with single parents have been found to have more emotional, behavioral, and academic.
[89]
America's single-parent households and missing fathers - N-IUSSP
Jan 13, 2025 · The percentage of US children living in single-parent households nearly tripled between 1960 and 2023, increasing from 9% to 25% (US Census ...Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
[90]
Homo Heuristicus: Less-is-More Effects in Adaptive Cognition - NIH
Less-is-more effects mean that more information or computation can decrease accuracy, and minds use simple heuristics to be more accurate.
[91]
The Evolution of Social Norms - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Social norms are patterns of behavior that are self-enforcing within a group: Everyone conforms, everyone is expected to conform, and everyone wants to conform.
[92]
(PDF) Social Learning and Coordination Conventions in ...
Aug 10, 2025 · We investigate the creation and evolution of conventions of behavior in "intergenerational games" or games in which a sequence of nonoverlapping ...