Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Extended Project Qualification

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is 3 qualification in the , available to students aged 16–18 in or college, that involves completing an independent equivalent in size to half an . Introduced in following a pilot phase, the EPQ enables learners to explore a self-chosen topic not necessarily covered in their main studies, fostering skills in , , and project management essential for and . Students undertaking the EPQ must plan and execute their over approximately 120 guided learning hours, producing either a 5,000-word dissertation or an artefact (such as a creative or practical outcome) accompanied by a 1,000–2,000-word report, followed by a and . is internally marked by teachers and externally moderated, with grades from A* to E determined by performance across four objectives: managing the , using resources, developing and realizing the outcome, and reviewing the work. Offered by exam boards including , Pearson , OCR, and WJEC, the qualification emphasizes autonomy, allowing individual or group work (with individual ). The EPQ is highly regarded by universities, which often recognize it in admissions by reducing conditional offers (e.g., from to AAB) due to its demonstration of independent learning akin to undergraduate-level work. It awards points as follows: A* (28 points), A (24), B (20), C (16), D (12), and E (8), making it a valuable addition to A-level profiles. Participation has grown steadily since its launch, with 36,114 entries across the in summer 2024, reflecting its popularity among students aiming to enhance their applications to competitive programs. In that cohort, nearly 20% achieved an A* , underscoring the qualification's rigor and the high standards maintained by awarding organizations.

Overview

Definition and Scope

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is a Level 3 qualification within the Regulated Qualifications Framework, designed for students aged 16 to 19 who are typically in post-16 education, such as or . It emphasizes independent research and project-based learning, allowing learners to explore a self-selected topic in depth while developing skills applicable to or . In terms of workload and academic rigor, the EPQ is equivalent to half an , with a total allocation of 120 guided learning hours, typically comprising around 30 hours of supervised teaching and the remainder dedicated to . This structure positions it as a standalone that complements other post-16 qualifications without overlapping substantially in content. Eligibility for the EPQ is broad, extending to students enrolled in schools, colleges, or pursuing it independently, and it is commonly undertaken alongside A-levels, BTECs, or other Level 3 qualifications. To promote intellectual breadth, project topics are selected outside the student's primary areas, fostering exploration of new interests or interdisciplinary themes. The qualification is offered by major awarding bodies including , Pearson (), OCR, and WJEC Eduqas, each providing specifications that are broadly aligned but may include minor variations in delivery guidance. An international variant, the International EPQ offered by OxfordAQA, adapts the qualification for global students following non-UK curricula, such as International A-levels, with a similar 120-hour structure and emphasis on transferable skills like and self-management to support progression worldwide.

Objectives

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) primarily aims to develop students' independent skills, critical , , and communication abilities through a student-led inquiry process. By enabling learners to make a significant contribution to the choice and design of their , the EPQ fosters critical, reflective, and independent learning, enhancing , problem-solving, , , , , synthesis, evaluation, and presentation skills that are transferable to and career contexts. These objectives emphasize autonomous work, where students identify, design, plan, and complete an individual , applying organizational skills to obtain, select, and critically analyze while demonstrating understanding of topic complexities. Introduced as part of government reforms to bridge the gap between school and university education, the EPQ simulates undergraduate-level work in line with the 2004 Tomlinson Report's recommendations for an extended project that prepares learners for in . The report advocated for such a project to synthesize main learning with core skills, encouraging in-depth exploration and reducing assessment burdens by consolidating coursework into a single, motivational task. This alignment supports the EPQ's role in developing high-level investigation, planning, and analysis skills, with potential involvement from university or business experts to enhance relevance to post-secondary pathways. Specific learning outcomes of the EPQ include encouraging depth in a chosen topic through and ethical practices, such as critically selecting resources and addressing complexities responsibly. Students are also required to reflect on their personal learning processes by evaluating project outcomes against initial objectives, promoting intellectual flexibility and self-managed learning. Broader aims of the EPQ extend to promoting , problem-solving, and by emphasizing topics of personal interest, which boosts engagement and initiative while inspiring independent learning and enterprise. Equivalent to half an in academic value, the qualification complements existing programs without overlap, ensuring genuine extension.

Historical Development

Origins and Introduction

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) was devised as part of Sir Mike Tomlinson's comprehensive review of 14-19 education in England, announced in 2003 with the final report published in October 2004, which sought to establish a more unified and coherent qualifications framework. In the final report, Tomlinson recommended an extended project as a mandatory core element across all levels of a proposed diploma system, emphasizing its role in developing essential skills such as independent research, problem-solving, and self-managed learning while reducing reliance on fragmented coursework assessments. This initiative aimed to bridge academic and vocational pathways, providing stretch and challenge for advanced learners and preparing them for higher education by allowing personalized exploration of topics. Following the report's recommendations, the EPQ entered a pilot phase in 2007-2008, implemented in a limited number of schools and colleges to evaluate its practicality and impact on student engagement. During this period, the first cohorts produced project proposals and received certifications, with entries rising fourfold from the initial group to around 1,170 proposals across 68 centers by the third cohort, demonstrating early feasibility despite a retention rate of about 42.5%. The pilot focused on refining delivery and assessment processes, gathering data on student outcomes to inform wider rollout. The qualification was officially launched in September 2008 by the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA), positioning it as a standalone Level 3 qualification equivalent to half an , while integrating it as a key component of the newly introduced 14-19 programme. This introduction aligned with broader reforms outlined in the 2005 on 14-19 education, making the EPQ compulsory within Advanced Diplomas to support additional and specialist learning. Early adoption emphasized its potential to broaden post-16 study programmes, countering concerns about the narrowing of curricula in traditional routes by encouraging independent inquiry.

Evolution Since Inception

Following the discontinuation of the 14–19 Diploma in 2013, the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) transitioned to a fully standalone Level 3 qualification, with the actively promoting it as an independent option for post-16 students to develop research and skills. This shift allowed the EPQ to exist separately from broader diploma structures, enabling greater flexibility in school curricula and increasing its availability beyond the original integrated framework introduced in 2008. Participation in the EPQ expanded rapidly after its initial launch, rising from around 1,700 entries in 2008 to over 38,000 by 2016, reflecting its growing integration into sixth-form programmes. This growth was supported by its inclusion in school and college performance tables starting in 2014, where it contributed to average point scores and attainment measures, incentivizing schools to offer it more widely. The EPQ was incorporated into the Technical Baccalaureate performance measure, introduced for reporting in 2016 as part of broader post-16 reforms including the Skills Plan, to support research abilities in technical education pathways. Awarding bodies introduced minor specification updates to address evolving educational needs, such as AQA's 2019 revision, which placed greater emphasis on ethical considerations in digital research and project proposals. In recent years (first teaching from around 2021), international variants such as the International Extended Project Qualification (previously International IPQ), offered by OxfordAQA, have been launched to accommodate overseas students, adapting the qualification for global contexts while maintaining core skills in independent inquiry. Following the phase-out of the Technical Baccalaureate with the introduction of T-Levels from 2020, the EPQ continued to grow as a standalone valued for skill development. Participation exceeded 36,000 entries in summer 2024, with awarding bodies continuing to refine specifications to meet contemporary needs as of 2025.

Qualification Structure

Project Formats

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) offers students two primary formats for completing the project: a dissertation or an artefact/production. Requirements may vary slightly by awarding body (e.g., , OCR, , WJEC Eduqas). The dissertation involves producing a written of approximately 5,000 words that investigates a , drawing on primary and secondary sources to demonstrate analysis and evaluation. In contrast, the artefact or production format requires the creation of a tangible or digital output, such as an artwork, , or , accompanied by an evaluative of at least 1,000 words (varying by awarding body) and a production log documenting the development process. Both formats are designed to span approximately 120 guided learning hours, emphasizing independent work while meeting standards. Across both formats, students follow a structured process beginning with an initial project proposal, which outlines the topic, objectives, and rationale for approval. This is followed by a phase involving the collection and evaluation of evidence from diverse sources, such as interviews, experiments, or literature reviews, to inform the project's development. The core output—either the dissertation or the artefact—is then produced, culminating in a of approximately 10–30 minutes (depending on the awarding body), often called a , delivered to a non-specialist audience to explain the project's outcomes, , and personal learning. Topic selection for the EPQ must prioritize academic rigor, allowing for in-depth exploration of complex ideas, while ensuring originality and relevance to the student's interests or future studies. Projects are prohibited from duplicating content from A-level or other qualifications to prevent overlap and promote genuine extension of learning. For instance, a dissertation might examine a scientific hypothesis, such as the environmental impacts of renewable energy sources, or a historical question like the factors influencing a major event. Artefact examples include designing a short film analyzing creative decision-making or building a digital tool with a report on its technical challenges and innovations.

Guided Learning Hours and Timeline

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) requires a total commitment of 120 guided learning hours, encompassing both structured teaching and independent work. Of these, typically around 30–45 hours (varying by awarding body) are allocated to taught elements, such as introductory sessions on methodologies, , and ethical considerations, while the remaining minimum of 90 hours are dedicated to , including planning, , and . This structure emphasizes student , with the guided hours designed to build foundational skills without dominating the overall workload. The typical timeline for completing the EPQ spans 12 to 18 months, often beginning in (for students aged 16-17) to allow sufficient time for development alongside studies. A common schedule involves submitting a project proposal by autumn , conducting primary during winter and spring, and finalizing the output—such as a dissertation or artefact—with a by summer of . This framework is flexible to accommodate individual school calendars and student pace, with some centers opting for a compressed Year 12-only model or extending into early Year 13 for maturity in handling complex topics. Students bear primary responsibility for self-directed planning and execution, including selecting a topic, outlining objectives, and maintaining a production log to record progress, reflections, and decision-making throughout the process. This log serves as a chronological of the journey, documenting sources, challenges encountered, and adjustments made, which is submitted as part of the assessment evidence. Students must also adhere to center-set deadlines while managing their time independently to ensure completion within the allocated hours. Centers, typically schools or colleges, play a supportive yet non-interventionist , providing training on essential skills like and source evaluation during the taught phase, followed by periodic supervision to offer guidance without influencing content. Supervisors monitor overall progress through log reviews but intervene minimally to preserve the qualification's focus on independence, ensuring students develop resilience and self-management capabilities.

Assessment Process

Supervision and Submission

While the core structure is consistent, specific procedures may vary by awarding body. Students undertaking the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) are assigned a , typically a teacher or qualified mentor within their , to provide structured guidance throughout the project. The 's role involves approving the project proposal, offering feedback on planning and drafts, and ensuring the work aligns with qualification requirements, while maintaining a balance to promote student independence. This assignment occurs early in the process, with the number of students per determined by the center's capacity to avoid overburdening staff. Guidance from the supervisor involves a limited number of one-to-one meetings, typically at least three to four sessions focusing on skills, such as time allocation and resource use, rather than content-specific expertise, to prevent undue influence on the student's original work. Supervisors may suggest revisions to proposals or interim drafts but cannot edit or contribute directly to the final output. These sessions are part of the overall 120 guided learning hours framework. Progress is monitored through regular check-ins documented in a production log or project record, which captures the student's planning, research activities, and reflections on challenges encountered. Supervisors review these logs during scheduled meetings and assess interim milestones, such as proposal feasibility and mid-project updates, without altering the student's submissions. This ongoing oversight ensures steady advancement while emphasizing the student's autonomy in decision-making. For submission, students compile a final portfolio comprising the project output (such as a 5,000-word report or an artefact with supporting commentary), the production log, a recording or evidence of the presentation, and the supervisor's witness statement or candidate record form. This is submitted to the awarding body, such as or OCR, typically by mid-May to early June, allowing for summer grading cycles. Centers handle internal standardization before forwarding samples for external moderation. Ethical considerations are integral, requiring a mandatory declaration of originality signed by both the student and supervisor to confirm the work is unaided and not submitted for other qualifications. Projects involving sensitive topics, such as those with human subjects or potential risks, necessitate prior ethical approval from , adherence to policies, and impartial handling to ensure safety and compliance with Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) guidelines. Supervisors verify these aspects in their witness statements to uphold .

Grading Criteria

The Extended Project Qualification undergoes a holistic assessment marked by trained center assessors, with subsequent moderation by the awarding body to ensure consistency. The criteria are structured around four key assessment objectives: management of the project, effective use of resources, development and realization of the outcome, and review of the process, with weighting typically 20%, 20%, 40%, and 20% respectively, though total marks and exact allocations vary by awarding body (e.g., 50 marks for AQA, 60 for OCR). These elements evaluate the student's ability to plan, research, execute, and reflect on their work independently. Grades are awarded on a scale from A* to E, with U for unclassified submissions below the E threshold. Grade boundaries are set annually by each awarding body based on national performance to maintain standards. For example, in the June 2024 series for (out of 50 marks), A* was awarded for 45-50 marks, A for 40-44, B for 35-39, C for 30-34, D for 25-29, and E for 21-24; boundaries differ for other boards and series. These grades correspond to points as follows: A* (28 points), A (24), B (20), C (16), D (12), and E (8). Moderation begins with internal at the center to align assessor judgments, followed by external from the awarding body, which samples approximately 10-20% of submissions (or more if inconsistencies arise) to standardize marking across all centers. This process ensures fairness and reliability in grading. Students or centers may grades through established protocols provided by the awarding body, such as requests for remarking or of . An A* signifies exceptional independence, critical , and sophisticated of skills across all criteria, often featuring original contributions and rigorous . In contrast, an E denotes basic competence with some evidence of and execution but limited depth, , or critical in the project outcomes.

Recognition and Benefits

UCAS Tariff and University Admissions

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is integrated into the system, where it is valued equivalently to half an and awards points based on the achieved grade, ranging from 28 UCAS points for an A* to 8 points for an E. This structure allows the EPQ to contribute up to 28 points toward an applicant's total tariff score in university applications, providing a measurable boost comparable to a strong AS-level performance but with greater emphasis on independent research skills. Many universities recognize the EPQ by offering reduced entry requirements to students who achieve high grades in the , often lowering the standard offer by one grade equivalent, such as from AAA to AAB. For instance, the provides alternative offers to eligible applicants excelling in the EPQ, such as AAA becoming AAB with an A in the EPQ, while s like the and explicitly reduce offers by one grade for predicted B or higher in the EPQ. All 24 universities, including the , accept the EPQ as a valued that can strengthen applications, though specific reductions vary by and . In the university admissions process, the EPQ is typically highlighted in personal statements to demonstrate and analytical abilities, and some institutions, such as those reviewing extended essays, may request submission of the artifact for during interviews or offers. This integration helps admissions teams assess applicants' readiness for beyond standard grades. Research indicates that EPQ completers are more likely to achieve strong degree outcomes, with studies showing higher probabilities of attaining first-class or upper-second-class honors compared to non-EPQ peers, which influences universities' policies on recognizing the qualification.

Skill Development and Long-term Impact

The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) fosters a range of transferable skills essential for academic and professional success. Participants develop advanced abilities, including the of sources for reliability and relevance, which enables them to conduct independent investigations effectively. is enhanced through the synthesis of arguments from diverse perspectives, requiring students to analyze complex ideas and construct coherent responses. Additionally, communication skills are strengthened via the preparation and delivery of presentations, as well as writing extended reports under time constraints, promoting clarity and persuasion under pressure. Long-term evidence underscores the EPQ's positive influence on educational outcomes. An analysis by Cambridge Assessment revealed a small but statistically significant positive effect, with EPQ participants achieving better average results in their A-levels compared to non-participants. Furthermore, a 2023 Cambridge Assessment study indicated that EPQ students are more likely to progress to and experience improved outcomes there, including a higher probability of attaining a first-class (e.g., 0.39 versus 0.34 for non-EPQ peers at equivalent prior attainment levels) and lower dropout rates (2.3% in the first year versus 5.0% for others). Alumni frequently report enhanced adaptation to workloads, attributing this to the EPQ's emphasis on self-directed learning and referencing systems that mirror demands. The EPQ also yields broader impacts on and global opportunities. By demonstrating initiative through self-managed projects, completers gain credentials that highlight proactive problem-solving, making them more attractive to employers seeking versatile graduates. For international students, the OxfordAQA version of the EPQ builds independent learning skills tailored to global contexts, enabling better preparation for competitive admissions worldwide and fostering adaptability in diverse academic environments. Participation in the EPQ has grown steadily, with 35,665 entries across the in summer 2025. Achievement rates remain strong, with over 85% of entrants securing A*-C grades based on recent exam board data (e.g., 88.1% for OCR in 2025), and studies show a correlation between EPQ completion and elevated progression rates to universities, where the qualification supports contextual offers and demonstrates readiness for rigorous study.

Adaptations and Challenges

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The significantly disrupted the delivery and assessment of the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) between and 2022, prompting adaptations to maintain continuity while addressing health and safety concerns. In summer , the cancellation of formal exams led to the adoption of centre-assessed grades (CAGs), where teachers predicted student performance based on existing evidence such as , drafts, and mock assessments. Ofqual's standardization algorithm, using historical centre performance and prior attainment data like mean scores, adjusted these CAGs to ensure national consistency and fairness, with 35,611 EPQ entries processed under this system in . Delivery of EPQ projects faced substantial challenges, including a mandatory shift to remote supervision via online platforms and virtual presentations to minimize in-person contact. Library closures and restrictions on fieldwork and physical resources forced many students to modify or delay their projects, often pivoting to digital alternatives for and analysis. Participation declined notably across the , with entries dropping from 38,852 in 2019 to 35,971 in 2020—a roughly 7% decrease—reflecting broader disruptions in post-16 ; numbers recovered to 39,734 in 2021 before stabilising at 38,476 in 2022, close to pre-pandemic levels. This period also accelerated the integration of digital tools in EPQ work, such as online databases and virtual collaboration software, influencing ongoing project methodologies. Policy responses from the (DfE) and included provisions for deadline extensions and an autumn 2020 exam series to accommodate delayed submissions. requirements were relaxed, allowing virtual or alternative formats to replace in-person defenses where necessary. In 2021, teacher-assessed grades (TAGs) replaced exams amid ongoing restrictions, supported by moderation processes to align outcomes with pre-pandemic standards; this approach continued into early 2022 before a full return to examinations.

Current Implementation and Support

Awarding bodies such as , Pearson , OCR, and WJEC provide essential support for centers delivering the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ), including training for supervisors through webinars, e-learning modules, and recorded sessions to ensure effective guidance and assessment. For instance, Pearson offers a dedicated playlist with pre-recorded training on EPQ delivery and assessment, while provides on-demand e-learning courses covering supervisor roles and . Centers also access online resources tailored to EPQ administration, such as 's free Project Q tool for workflow and planning, and ethics guidelines from bodies like OCR and to address research integrity in student projects. Students undertaking the EPQ benefit from free guides and resources available through and government-backed initiatives, which offer practical on topic selection, methods, and essay writing. publishes a series of articles, updated in 2025, covering EPQ planning, approaches, and standards to support . Additionally, there is growing integration of tools for initial phases, with awarding bodies like the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) and OCR issuing guidelines that permit their use for brainstorming and data gathering, provided students cite AI contributions transparently to uphold . Despite these supports, challenges persist in EPQ delivery, particularly uneven access in under-resourced schools, where participation rates are lower in deprived and rural areas compared to urban centers due to factors like limited supervisor availability and student travel barriers. Research from the Nuffield Foundation highlights geographic and socioeconomic disparities, with lower uptake in deprived regions, prompting calls for targeted interventions to broaden access. To address this, the (DfE) provides funding through the 16 to 19 Bursary Fund, offering financial support for disadvantaged students that can cover costs like materials and travel for qualifications including the EPQ. EPQ specifications emphasize contemporary themes like , with Pearson offering dedicated topic pathways on and to encourage projects exploring environmental solutions and technologies. ly, the qualification continues to expand, facilitated by versions like OxfordAQA's EPQ and Cambridge 's Project Qualification, enabling non- students to gain equivalent skills and points. By 2024, entries had recovered to over 36,000 across the .

References

  1. [1]
    Level Three Projects 7993 | Specification - AQA
    Jan 7, 2019 · The EPQ allows students to lead their own projects. Students get to plan and carry out research on a topic that they've chosen and isn't covered ...
  2. [2]
    None
    ### Summary of Pearson Edexcel Level 3 Extended Project Qualification
  3. [3]
    [PDF] An investigation of the variability in grade outcomes in Extended ...
    The Extended Project Qualification was first introduced in 2008. The entries have gone up steadily, from slightly over 1,700 in 2008 to over 38,000 in 2016 ( ...
  4. [4]
    Level 3 Extended Project - Pearson qualifications
    Designed to develop learners' critical, reflective, problem-solving and independent learning skills, the Extended Project supports students with the transition ...
  5. [5]
    Results trends 2024: A Levels - OCR
    Aug 16, 2024 · Entries for the Extended Project Qualification decreased to 36,114 (down by 2.7%). Age profiles. Entries from UK 18 year-olds account for over ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Exam results statistics EPQ - June 2024 - AQA
    Aug 15, 2024 · For this subject you can see: • number of candidates who sat the subject. • cumulative percentages of candidates at each grade (i.e. the ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] OCR Level 3 Extended Project H587 Specification
    This qualification is regulated by Ofqual, the Regulator for qualifications offered in England. The qualification number for. OCR's Level 3 Extended Project is ...
  8. [8]
    Extended Project assessment & submission guidance
    The EPQ is assigned 120 guided learning hours, with a recommended 40 guided learning hours for teaching and 80 hours for students to carry out their project ...
  9. [9]
    Project and Extended Project - WJEC
    Level 3 Extended Project · Extended Project Case Studies · EPQ Admin Handbook 2025-2026 · Candidate Assessment Record · Approving Project Proposals and Titles.Missing: awarding bodies AQA Pearson OCR
  10. [10]
    Qualification details
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    International Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) (9695) - OxfordAQA
    The International EPQ requires 120 hours of study, consisting of 30 hours of ... Teaching guidance to outline clearly the scope of teaching and learning ...
  12. [12]
    Project Qualification Level Conditions and Requirements - GOV.UK
    Apr 22, 2022 · This document sets out the Project Qualification Level Conditions. These conditions will come into effect at 9:30am on Friday 22 April 2022 for all project ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Level 3 Extended Project Qualification 7993 Specification ... - AQA
    The Extended Project involves autonomous work, 120 guided hours, planning, research, presentation, and evidence of project development. Students will also ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform - Education in the UK
    Oct 18, 2004 · Within open diplomas up to and including intermediate level, assessment of main learning and the extended project would be predominantly teacher ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Extended project (cohort 3) and project qualification (level 1 and 2)
    Sep 24, 2008 · In summer 2008, the third cohort of students were awarded grades for the pilot Extended Project. Qualification (EPQ). At the same time, awards ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Uptake and results in the Extended Project Qualification 2008-2015
    In 2007/08 the EPQ was in a pilot phase, which explains why the numbers of students was so low in that year. Table 1 demonstrates the large increase in ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Promoting achievement, valuing success: a strategy for 14–19 ...
    We are introducing an Extended. Project from September 2008. We want to consider how we might make the Extended Project an entitlement to all students ...
  18. [18]
    T Levels' struggle to gain credibility just got harder - FE Week
    Oct 6, 2023 · As someone involved in the launch of the 14-19 diploma, discontinued in 2013, I have first-hand experience of the challenges in rolling out new ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Building a 14 -19 education system of choice, diversity and opportunity
    The 14-19 Diploma was abandoned in 2010; Prue Huddleston (2020). A Short History of Employer Engagement: Once More Round the Buoy or Set Fair for a Better ...
  20. [20]
    School and college performance tables: 2014 to 2015 - GOV.UK
    Jan 21, 2016 · The performance tables report the results of students of sixth-form age in secondary schools and further education colleges in the academic year 2014 to 2015.Missing: Extended Project
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Extending into the future - Oxford AQA
    The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) is a stand-alone UK-based qualification for 16-19 year olds, usually taken alongside A-levels. It was originally ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Technical and applied qualifications for 14 to 19 year olds - GOV.UK
    On 8 July 2016, the government published the Post-16 Skills Plan, setting out the ... mathematics qualification and an Extended Project qualification. The ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Extended Project Qualification - Eduqas
    Your project topic can be linked to your study programme of GCE A Level or Level. 3 Vocational qualifications, on a topic of personal interest or a topic you'd ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Getting started: when and how to deliver Project Qualifications
    A common model involves the timetabling of the EPQ from January of Year 12 through to December of Year 13. This gives students time to settle into sixth form ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) Frequently Asked Questions
    The Extended Project is a Level 3 qualification equivalent to half an A Level (50%), therefore worth more in UCAS points than an AS Level qualification.
  26. [26]
    None
    ### Summary of EPQ Supervisor Handbook
  27. [27]
    [PDF] EXTENDED PROJECT QUALIFICATION - OCR
    It aims to develop students beyond their existing study programme by giving them the freedom to complete a project on an area of personal interest or benefit, ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] EXTENDED PROJECT - Eduqas
    May 15, 2025 · The EPQ supervisor will need to confirm that no work to be submitted for the EPQ is also to be submitted, or has been submitted, for any other ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Grade boundaries EPQ - June 2024 exams - AQA
    Aug 15, 2024 · Here you can see the grade boundaries for the Extended Project Qualification. As the project consists of one component these are raw mark grade ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Grade Boundaries - June 2024 - Project Qualifications
    This document shows the grade boundaries for our suite of Project qualifications. For each set of grade boundaries, the maximum number of available marks is ...
  31. [31]
    Moderation and internal assessment for General Qualifications
    This page gives you some guidelines on marking internally assessed work, and explains how the moderation process works.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Extended Project Qualification – UCAS tariff points | WJEC
    The Extended Project is very much valued by universities and is worth half an A level (50%) whereas an AS level is only worth 40%, so the Extended Project ...
  33. [33]
    Extended Project and universities - Pearson qualifications
    UCAS points and university offers. The Edexcel Extended Project qualification carries up to 28 UCAS points, depending on what grade you achieve.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Uptake and results in the Extended Project Qualification
    Oct 3, 2022 · Table 4: Mean EPQ grade and A level grade amongst students taking both qualifications. Subject n. EPQ mean grade. A level mean grade. Maths.Missing: performance | Show results with:performance
  35. [35]
    EPQ admissions policy | The Learn With US Transition Programme
    The University of Southampton was the first to introduce an alternative offer scheme for applicants who excel in the EPQ. Under this scheme, eligible applicants ...
  36. [36]
    Alternative offers for undergraduate applicants - University of Bath
    Our alternative offers ask for a reduced grade in your core studies combined with strong achievement in specific extra qualifications.
  37. [37]
    Entry requirements - Swansea University
    Extended Project Qualification - applicants predicted grade B or above in EPQ will receive an offer with a one-grade reduction. e.g., an offer of AAB would ...
  38. [38]
    Is the Extended Project Qualification worth doing? - First Tutors
    Aug 23, 2024 · All 24 Russell Group universities accept the EPQ as a qualification, and some universities lower their grade offerings for students with an EPQ.
  39. [39]
    Extended Project qualification at The University of Manchester
    The EPQ gives A-level students excellent preparation for university-level study and may help boost their UCAS application.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Are students who take the Extended Project Qualification better ...
    Oct 3, 2022 · This shows that EPQ students were more likely to achieve a first or at least an upper second than students without EPQ. Table 25: Degree class ...
  41. [41]
    Students taking an EPQ have better higher education outcomes
    Jun 13, 2023 · Finally, we found that EPQ students had a higher probability of achieving a first (or at least an upper second) in their degree for every level ...Missing: HEPI | Show results with:HEPI
  42. [42]
    [PDF] OCR Level 3 Extended Project Qualification H856 - Specification
    It's a stand-alone qualification that is worth up to 70 UCAS points – equivalent to an AS Level. It can also be taken as a component of an academic or a ...
  43. [43]
    [DOC] Extended Project qualification (EPQ) migration (DOCX, 125KB) - OCR
    EPQ gives students the opportunity to explore any subject of interest, work in an interdisciplinary way; develop the skills of research, evaluation, critical ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] An analysis of the effect of taking the EPQ on performance in other ...
    Previous research has shown that EPQ grades are good predictors of degree outcomes (Gill & Vidal Rodeiro, 2014) and that students taking. EPQ alongside A levels ...
  45. [45]
    How completing an EPQ can impact your university experience - Blogs
    Jul 26, 2023 · Firstly, many universities, including Cardiff University, offer reduced offers for students who have achieved an A or above at EPQ. This ...
  46. [46]
    Extended Project qualification - H857 - OCR
    The Extended Project qualification (EPQ) provides skills for universities and employers, allowing students to work on a project based on their subject or ...Specification at a glance · Administration · Assessment · Planning and teaching
  47. [47]
    Introducing the International EPQ: what you need to know
    Apr 18, 2023 · The new and improved International EPQ will continue to help students to demonstrate their independent learning skills and successfully progress to university ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) and its role in fostering ...
    Leeds will increase the percentage of students from IMD Q1 attending the. University to 16.1% by 2027/28 through attainment raising in schools, targeted.Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Tracking the June 2020 Key Stage 5 cohort - Cambridge Assessment
    Mar 28, 2024 · This research focused on the immediate progression to higher or further education of students who achieved at least an A Level, AS Level, ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Awarding GCSE, AS, A level, advanced extension awards and ...
    Aug 20, 2020 · Since then, we have been working with exam boards to enable the award of grades for GCSE, AS, A level, Extended Project Qualification and ...
  51. [51]
    General Qualifications, COVID-19 Conditions and Requirements
    This document set out our regulatory requirements for awarding organisations offering general qualifications during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.Missing: relaxed viva voce
  52. [52]
    Learning during the pandemic: review of research from England
    Jul 12, 2021 · This review is a report in our 'Learning During the Pandemic' series. It comprises a review of the literature exploring what is currently known about changes ...Missing: EPQ | Show results with:EPQ
  53. [53]
    [PDF] An additional GCSE, AS and A level exam series in autumn 2020
    Jun 8, 2020 · Extended Project Qualification or the Advanced Extension Award. Page 11. An additional GCSE, AS and A level exam series in autumn 2020.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Ofqual annual report and accounts 2021 to 2022 - GOV.UK
    Jul 5, 2022 · Overall, GCSE entries remained stable. (approximately 5.3 million) in 2021 (an increase of 0.4% on 2020), though a rise in entries from ... 2018, ...
  55. [55]
    Extended Project Qualification (EPQ): Training Playlist
    You can find recordings of past events and pre-recorded training for Pearson Edexcel Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) on the YouTube playlist.
  56. [56]
    EPQ What Is Required To Deliver The Extended Project Qualification
    This AQA on-demand e-learning course will give expert instruction on what is required to deliver the Extended Project for the Level 3 Extended Project ...Missing: center | Show results with:center
  57. [57]
    [PDF] get the most out of Project Q - AQA
    Project Q is the only project management tool you need - it provides tailored workflow that simplifies the admin tasks of the EPQ and is free to AQA customers.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] OCR Extended Project - Unit H856 - Exemplar Folder 7 – 56/60
    Level 3 Extended Project H856. Ethical Guidelines. 45. Candidate exemplar work ... Looking for a resource? There is now a quick and easy search tool to help find ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    What is an EPQ and Why Should I do one? (EPQ Advice #1) - UCAS
    Apr 18, 2025 · An EPQ (Extended Project Qualification) is, to put it simply, a BIG independent project for which you'll earn a qualification.
  60. [60]
    How to Approach EPQ Research (EPQ Advice #3) - UCAS
    Apr 18, 2025 · Google Scholar is a good research tool. Your EPQ essay is supposed to be written in an academic style, and that means academic research and references.Missing: Extended Qualification
  61. [61]
    [PDF] AI Use in Assessments: Your role in protecting the integrity of ...
    Apr 30, 2025 · This document highlights the regulations that apply in relation to AI use in assessments and provides guidance to help teachers and ...
  62. [62]
    Guidance and support for the use of AI in the Extended Project ...
    Feb 16, 2024 · In this blog, we highlight the guidance available for managing AI use in the Extended Project Qualification (EPQ) and how to deal with misuse in assessments.
  63. [63]
    The Extended Project Qualification: An Opportunity for All?
    This research shows that taking the EPQ does not undermine attainment in other subjects, can reduce gender gaps in attainment and is academically enriching.
  64. [64]
    16 to 19 study programmes guidance: 2025 to 2026 academic year
    Jul 16, 2025 · This guidance is for everyone involved in the planning or delivery of 16 to 19 study programmes. It also covers:
  65. [65]
    Project Qualification Climate and sustainability - Pearson qualifications
    The EPQ allows learners to study climate and sustainability, exploring trends, technologies, and solutions, and developing skills for university or career.