Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Field holler

The field holler is an improvised form of solo vocal music performed by American agricultural laborers in the American South, primarily during the era of and subsequent , consisting of extended, melismatic calls that conveyed rhythm, emotion, or signals across expansive fields. These unaccompanied shouts, often wordless or featuring fragmented lyrics, emerged from West musical traditions transported via the slave trade and adapted to the demands of repetitive, isolated fieldwork such as or cultivation. Unlike structured work songs with call-and-response patterns, field hollers were typically solitary expressions suited to individual tasks, providing psychological relief amid grueling labor while potentially aiding in pacing physical exertion through innate rhythmic phrasing. Their raw, emotive quality, marked by vocal bends and improvisational freedom, positions them as a foundational element in the development of music, with scholars tracing direct lineages from holler intonations to early phrasing and melodic contours. Preservation efforts, notably through ethnomusicologist 's field recordings in Southern prisons and farms during the 1930s and 1950s, captured surviving exemplars, revealing persistent use among chain gangs and rural workers into the mid-20th century. Narratives surrounding hollers have evolved, with early 20th-century transcriptions by white observers sometimes imposing interpretive biases that romanticized or misinterpreted their primal utility, underscoring challenges in reconstructing oral traditions reliant on imperfect ethnographic documentation.

Musical Characteristics

Vocal Techniques and Style

![Convicts singing in woodyard, Reed Camp, South Carolina, 1934]float-right Field hollers consist of unaccompanied solo vocalizations, typically improvised by individual laborers to accompany fieldwork or express personal sentiments. Singers utilized spontaneous phrasing without fixed structure, emphasizing emotional depth through raw, emotive delivery. Key techniques include a wide pitch range, often beginning at high registers and gliding downward in loose, flexible rhythms, frequently drawing on pentatonic scales with microtonal inflections resembling blue notes. Melismatic ornamentation— multiple notes per —added expressive elaboration, while slides, , and strategic pauses enhanced projection and nuance. These elements enabled far-carrying calls suited to open fields, prioritizing auditory reach over melodic precision. Vocal power and dynamic variation distinguished hollers, with performers employing forceful, sustained tones to convey urgency or solace amid labor, influencing subsequent genres like through shared improvisational and intonational traits. Recordings from the early 20th century, such as those by , preserve examples demonstrating these idiomatic bends and cries, underscoring the style's reliance on individual interpretation over standardized form.

Structural and Rhythmic Features

Field hollers exhibit an improvisational structure characterized by free-form expression rather than predetermined verses, choruses, or harmonic progressions, often consisting of brief, spontaneous vocalizations that merge melodic lines with spoken elements. Performed typically as utterances by individual laborers, they lack coordination or call-and-response patterns common in group work songs, prioritizing personal invention over collective repetition. This structural fluidity enables hollers to function as signals, greetings, or introspective accompaniments to solitary tasks, with content drawn from immediate experiences or emotions rather than scripted narratives. Rhythmically, field hollers are unmetered and non-pulsatile, eschewing regular beats in favor of elastic phrasing that syncs with the variable cadence of physical labor, such as chopping or picking motions. They feature a loose, improvisatory influenced by bodily rather than metronomic time, allowing for irregular durations and accelerations that reflect the singer's exertion. Melismatic —where single syllables stretch across multiple pitches—contribute to a slow, drawn-out , emphasizing timbral variation and vocal over rhythmic precision. Recordings from the early 20th century, such as those by in Southern prisons and fields, document this rhythmic independence, with durations varying from seconds to minutes based on context.

Historical Context

Antebellum Slavery Era

During the period, spanning roughly from the early to 1861, field hollers emerged as a prominent form of vocal expression among enslaved laboring in the agricultural fields of the American South, particularly in , , and plantations across states like , [South Carolina](/page/South Carolina), and . These were typically solo, unaccompanied improvisations characterized by prolonged, high-pitched cries that incorporated melismatic phrasing, rhythmic pulses, breaks, and occasional nonsensical syllables or minimal lyrics, distinguishing them from structured songs. Enslaved field hands, who comprised the majority of the South's approximately 4 million enslaved population by 1860, performed hollers individually to pace grueling tasks such as hoeing or picking, often starting at dawn and continuing through 12- to 16-hour workdays under overseer supervision. Contemporary observers documented field hollers as evocative of musical traditions, with landscape architect and abolitionist providing one of the earliest detailed accounts during his 1850s travels through the slave states. In , Olmsted described hearing an enslaved man suddenly emit "a long, loud musical shout, rising and falling and breaking away into ," which carried across fields and evoked an otherworldly quality, contrasting sharply with European musical forms. Similar reports from planters and travelers noted hollers' utility in signaling to distant workers or drivers, relieving physical monotony, and venting personal anguish amid the dehumanizing conditions of chattel slavery, where field laborers faced routine whippings, inadequate rations, and family separations. Former enslaved individuals later clarified that such singing did not signify contentment, countering pro-slavery narratives that portrayed it as evidence of slaves' supposed happiness. In his 1845 autobiography, Frederick Douglass recounted field songs from his Maryland youth as expressions of profound sorrow: "Slaves sing most when they are most unhappy. The songs of the slave represent the sorrows of his heart; and he is relieved by them, only as an aching heart is relieved by its tears." Douglass emphasized that overseers encouraged vocalization to drown out complaints, interpreting silence as potential discontent, yet the raw, "barbaric" tones—often improvised without fixed melody—reflected resilience and cultural continuity rather than acquiescence. Scholar Dena J. Epstein, compiling pre-Civil War accounts in her analysis of black folk music, corroborates these as adaptations of African call-and-response practices, preserved despite prohibitions on drums and instruments that might facilitate organized resistance. Field hollers thus served dual functions in the coercive labor system: facilitating individual endurance in isolated fieldwork, where slaves worked in scattered groups rather than tight crews, and subtly preserving non-European aesthetics amid efforts to impose Christian hymns or silence. By the 1850s, as cotton production surged to over 4 million bales annually, these cries became emblematic of the era's plantation economy, though rarely notated due to their improvisational nature and the low literacy rates among the enslaved (estimated at under 10%). Post-emancipation recollections and early recordings suggest hollers' persistence, but antebellum evidence relies heavily on white eyewitnesses, whose biases—ranging from romanticization to dismissal as primitive—necessitate cross-verification with ex-slave testimonies for causal insight into their emotional and adaptive roles.

Post-Emancipation and 20th-Century Persistence

![Convicts singing in woodyard, Reed Camp, South Carolina, 1934][float-right] Following the emancipation of enslaved African Americans in 1865, field hollers continued as a vocal tradition among freed laborers engaged in sharecropping and tenant farming across the American South, where many remained economically tied to former plantations through debt and crop-lien systems from the late 19th century onward. These improvised calls facilitated work coordination and emotional expression in cotton, tobacco, and rice fields, adapting from antebellum practices to the post-Reconstruction era's agrarian labor demands. The tradition persisted prominently in penal labor systems, including —prevalent from the 1870s to the 1920s—and subsequent chain gangs, which relied heavily on African American prisoners for and agricultural projects until reforms in the 1940s and beyond. In these environments, inmates used field hollers to synchronize tasks like railroad tamping or wood chopping, with examples recorded at Mississippi's Parchman Penitentiary in 1947, 1959, and 1960. Ethnomusicologists began documenting field hollers through audio recordings in the 1930s, capturing their use among convicts and rural workers; John A. Lomax recorded examples in 1939, while documented performances in prison camps in 1934 and levee camps thereafter. The practice endured into the mid-20th century, with instances noted until the 1960s amid declining manual field labor due to mechanization and the , after which reduced opportunities for such communal singing.

Cultural and Social Functions

Role in Labor and Communication

Field hollers functioned as solo vocal expressions accompanying individual agricultural tasks performed by enslaved , such as hoeing crops or picking cotton, where laborers were frequently isolated across expansive fields. These improvised calls helped sustain personal work rhythms, alleviate tedium, and provide emotional endurance amid grueling, repetitive labor, differing from coordinated songs by emphasizing solitary performance. Enslaved workers were often prohibited from speaking during tasks to prevent coordination or unrest, but singing was permitted and even encouraged by overseers, who associated it with increased output; a silent laborer was deemed unproductive or defiant. Field hollers thus enabled rhythmic pacing for tasks like synchronized chopping or harvesting, with performers occasionally echoing phrases to loosely align efforts across distances without direct verbal exchange. In terms of communication, field hollers served as audible signals traversing fields, conveying practical needs such as requests for or through improvised cries, which could be echoed by distant workers to affirm receipt or . They also facilitated subtler exchanges, including coded expressions of distress, indirect critiques of overseers, or personal narratives, preserving communal bonds and resilience under where overt speech risked . "Improvised words are proclaimed as the enslaved cries for , , or the cries of what is taking place in their life," with echoes reinforcing group awareness.

Expression of Individual and Collective Experience

![Convicts singing in woodyard, Reed Camp, South Carolina, 1934][float-right] Field hollers functioned as a primary outlet for enslaved African Americans to articulate personal emotions during solitary or small-group fieldwork, often manifesting as unaccompanied laments conveying sorrow, fatigue, and existential hardship. Solo performers, such as plowmen separated from others, used these improvised cries—characterized by melismatic phrasing and falsetto breaks—to express individual frustrations and transient joys, transforming monotonous labor into moments of raw self-expression. Historical accounts document hollers like those refusing residence in oppressive locales, underscoring their role in voicing personal discontent without direct confrontation. In collective contexts, field hollers facilitated shared emotional release through call-and-response patterns, where a leader's holler elicited group replies, fostering amid collective suffering and coordinating physical tasks. This antiphonal structure not only synchronized movements in or fields but also encoded subtle communications of resistance or mutual encouragement, binding laborers in a communal of . Enslaved workers improvised verses mocking overseers or dreaming of escape, channeling group frustrations into rhythmic unity that mitigated isolation and amplified shared . Such practices persisted into post-emancipation eras, as evidenced in early 20th-century prison recordings, where hollers continued to reflect intertwined personal and communal traumas.

Origins and Scholarly Debates

Evidence of African Cultural Retentions

Scholars have identified melodic and structural elements in field hollers as direct retentions from West and Central vocal traditions, particularly those of the and regions. Ethnomusicologist Gerhard Kubik argues that the tonality of field hollers, including pentatonic scales and patterns derived from the natural harmonic series, mirrors West styles documented in field recordings from northeastern and central during the 1960s. These traits survived enslavement due to cultural isolation in communities following post-1803 slave resettlements, enabling intra-family transmission akin to apprenticeship models. Vocal techniques further substantiate African continuities, with field hollers featuring melismatic embellishments, slides, and declamatory projection comparable to performances and rural signaling songs in . Early analyses, such as Charles Peabody's 1903 observations of "snaps" and high in hollers, align with practices in Nigerian pastoralist cultures for long-distance communication, while humming styles using prolonged bilabial consonants echo Central African recordings. Though sparse—only about 5 of 200 documented hollers exhibit explicit —these elements predate European influences and persist in unaccompanied forms, distinguishing them from later syncretic genres. Kubik extends this to heterophonic textures and rhythmic freedom in hollers, linking them to non-tempered systems rather than imposed , as evidenced by comparative transcriptions of American recordings against analogs. Such retentions underscore field hollers' role as adaptive survivals, where enslaved individuals maintained solo expressive cries for labor endurance and signaling, paralleling precedents without reliance on .

Claims of Syncretic or Non-African Influences

Some musicologists have posited that field hollers, while rooted in vocal traditions, underwent syncretic evolution in the context, incorporating elements from European-derived forms and work songs prevalent among white laborers and settlers. , in his 1963 analysis, argued that hollers emerged post-Civil War through repetitive adaptations of "old ballads," suggesting a hybridization rather than direct carryover, as enslaved individuals repurposed existing Anglo- musical structures for expressive purposes amid emancipation's social shifts. This view challenges stricter retentionist interpretations by emphasizing in the postbellum South, where calls merged with local folk idioms to form a distinctly idiom. Paul Oliver, in works spanning 1969 to 2003, extended this syncretic perspective by proposing that field hollers transitioned into proto-blues forms when overlaid with harmonic and structural elements from ballad traditions, such as narrative phrasing and tonal resolutions not prominent in documented West prototypes. Oliver highlighted the absence of direct evidentiary links between antebellum hollers and later , attributing developmental changes to intercultural exchanges in labor contexts, including shared fieldwork with immigrants whose songs featured melismatic cries akin to herding calls observed by early travelers in but adapted locally. Gerhard Kubik similarly noted in 1999 that accounts of music often projected familiar traits, implying that observed similarities in hollers—such as unbound rhythms—may reflect hybrid observer biases or genuine fusions in the environment. These claims underscore methodological critiques of overemphasizing purity, as only a minority of recorded hollers (e.g., fewer than 5% of over 200 examples) exhibit specific traits like "snaps" purportedly retained from , per analyses questioning direct lineages. cautioned in 1963 against deeming hollers exclusively "African," advocating recognition of their composite nature shaped by American isolation and adaptation, though he maintained core vocal techniques as African-derived. Such syncretic arguments, while minority positions amid prevailing retention theories, highlight causal influences from economies' multicultural labor pools, where non-African elements like rhythmic coordination from work chants could have intermingled, fostering resilience in a coercive setting without verifiable dominance of any single origin.

Methodological Challenges in Analysis

Analysis of field hollers faces significant hurdles due to the scarcity of contemporaneous primary sources from the era, with most evidence derived from late 19th- and early 20th-century notations and recordings that postdate by decades. Early textual descriptions, such as those in Frederick Law Olmsted's 1856 travel accounts, provide anecdotal glimpses but lack systematic musical detail, while audio documentation began only in through collectors like John and , capturing performances in penitentiaries rather than agricultural fields. This temporal gap complicates causal attributions to slavery-era practices, as post-emancipation influences, including and incarceration, may have altered forms. Transcription poses acute difficulties given the hollers' improvisational, non-metrical structure, featuring irregular rhythms, melismatic vocal lines, and idiomatic "snaps" or that resist standard Western notation. Ethnomusicologists have noted that hollers were deemed "singularly hard to copy in notes" even by early observers, with chronic under-provision of transcriptions for extant audio, leading to mismatched or absent lyrics in archives. For instance, analyses of recordings reveal sparse notational attempts, often generic and failing to capture performative nuances like or contextual calls, which hinders comparative studies across regions or with purported antecedents. These limitations foster reliance on subjective auditory impressions, amplifying interpretive variability. Scholarly interpretation is further challenged by biases inherent in documentation processes, where white collectors' preconceptions—ranging from to pejorative labels like "barbarous"—shaped selective recording and descriptions, often overlooking women's hollers or non-falsetto variants. Academic trends, influenced by mid-20th-century emphases on , have propagated narratives linking hollers directly to origins or African retentions without robust evidential chains, as seen in unverified claims of Savannah Syncopators' influence or fabricated lyrics in secondary sources. Such debates reveal evidential opacity, with no confirmed pre-1900 recordings to test syncretic versus retentionist hypotheses empirically, underscoring the need for critical scrutiny of institutional archives that may prioritize ideological continuity over interdisciplinary verification.

Influence on American Music

Field hollers contributed directly to the through their improvisational vocal techniques, including melismatic phrasing and note bending, which early blues performers like Eddie "Son" House identified as a primary antecedent to the genre's distinctive singing style. These solo cries, often sung by individuals in fields or camps to express personal hardship or signal across distances, paralleled the introspective, narrative quality of lyrics emerging in the late among African American communities in the and surrounding regions. Work songs, frequently incorporating call-and-response patterns rooted in coordinated labor rhythms, provided structural elements that transitioned into accompaniment and forms. In settings like camps and prisons, where hollers evolved into group chants synchronized with tasks such as chopping or hauling, performers adapted these to guitar accompaniment by the early , as documented in recordings from by folklorists like and . This synthesis is evident in the origins of , where unaccompanied field cries and rhythmic work shouts prefigured the 12-bar form and blue notes commercialized in the . Scholars note that while field hollers were predominantly solo expressions, their integration with dynamics fostered the ' communal yet individualistic ethos, distinguishing it from stricter musical forms. Ethnomusicological analyses trace specific melodic from preserved hollers to early artists like , whose levee camp experiences embodied this continuity.

Broader Impacts on Spirituals, Gospel, and Jazz

Field hollers contributed melodic and structural elements, including call-and-response patterns and melismatic phrasing, to , which emerged as religious adaptations of secular labor songs among enslaved in the 18th and 19th centuries. These features allowed to convey both communal solidarity and individual lament, blending African-derived vocal improvisation with biblical narratives, as documented in early collections of slave songs. While were primarily sacred, the raw emotional intensity of field hollers—often sung solo in isolation—infused them with a secular undercurrent of resilience and sorrow, evident in performances where leaders initiated calls answered by groups in the fields or during covert gatherings. In gospel music, which formalized in urban Black churches around the 1930s, field hollers evolved into "gospel hollers" or shouts, providing spontaneous vocal flourishes that amplified ecstatic and personal testimony. This adaptation retained the hollers' unaccompanied, improvisational style but aligned it with rhythmic handclapping and organ accompaniment, as heard in recordings by artists like , who fused with blues-derived elements traceable to field cries. The result was a heightened expressiveness in gospel quartets and choirs, where hollers served as bridges between structured hymns and free-form praise, influencing mid-20th-century performers such as in their 1940s-1950s output. Field hollers indirectly shaped through their integration into the improvisational vocabulary of and work songs, which early jazz musicians drew upon for vocal and ensemble dynamics in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In contexts around 1900-1920, the hollers' syncopated cries and territorial signaling paralleled the collective shouts in brass bands and second-line parades, contributing to jazz's polyrhythmic texture and call-response interplay between instruments and voices. This influence persisted in styles, where echoed the unbound, phonetic freedom of hollers, as analyzed in studies of African retentions in jazz form.

Documentation and Preservation

Early Ethnographic Collections

![Alan Lomax recording convicts singing in a woodyard, Reed Camp, South Carolina, 1934][float-right] Ethnographic documentation of field hollers commenced in the early 1930s through audio field recordings conducted by folklorists John A. Lomax and his son , who targeted Southern prisons and agricultural sites to capture African American work songs. Their initial expedition to (Parchman Farm) in 1933 yielded recordings of inmates performing field hollers alongside coordinated work chants, preserving vocal expressions tied to labor rhythms. These efforts, supported by the Library of Congress's Archive of American Folk Song, emphasized unaccompanied solo calls that conveyed individual improvisation over group synchronization. Subsequent collections expanded this archive; on April 15, 1936, at , performers including Robertson, , and others rendered field hollers documented in the Lomax Digital . In 1937, John A. Lomax's Southern States collection incorporated field hollers within broader recordings of and folk songs from African American communities. The 1939 Southern States Recording Expedition, led by John and Ruby Lomax, produced 21 tracks featuring field hollers and , such as those from Booker T. Washington White, across , , and other states. These early recordings, often made on acetate discs under rudimentary conditions, provided the foundational ethnographic evidence for field hollers as pre-blues vocal forms, with artifacts including field notes and photographs housed in institutions like the American Folklife Center. Alan Lomax's 1939 sessions, including a recording of Lonnie Stegall's field holler, further exemplified the genre's melodic and rhythmic isolation techniques. Prior descriptive accounts existed, such as an 1853 notation of corn-field hollers, but lacked the aural fidelity of these audio collections, which enabled later scholarly analysis of African retentions in and phrasing.

Audio Recordings and Modern Archival Efforts

The earliest known audio recordings of field hollers date to the 1930s, captured primarily through ethnographic fieldwork in Southern prisons and rural areas where such vocal traditions persisted among African American laborers. In April 1936, folklorist recorded field hollers performed by inmates Lonnie Robertson, Jim Taylor (known as Dobie Red), and others at Mississippi's Parchman Farm penitentiary, documenting improvisational calls used during work activities. These sessions, part of broader efforts, preserved raw examples of the form's melodic and rhythmic elements, often sung without accompaniment to coordinate labor or express solitude. Subsequent recordings expanded the archive in the mid-20th century. In 1947, captured additional field hollers and related prison work songs on location at Parchman Farm, utilizing portable disc recording technology to document performers in their work environments. By 1959, Lomax returned to Parchman, recording inmate Leroy Grant's unidentified field holler on September 16, highlighting the tradition's endurance in isolated settings. A notable later example from September 3, 1978, features blues musician Belton Sutherland performing a field holler in Mississippi's Hill Country, filmed and audio-recorded by Lomax, , and Worth Long, demonstrating the form's improvisational depth and connection to . These efforts culminated in compilations like the 1962 Library of Congress LP Negro Blues and Hollers, edited by Marshall W. Stearns, which included holler excerpts alongside variants. Modern archival initiatives have focused on and public access to these fragile analog recordings. The Lomax Digital Archive, maintained by the Association for Cultural Equity, provides streaming access to field hollers from Lomax's 1930s–1970s fieldwork, including high-fidelity transfers of Parchman sessions and Sutherland's 1978 performance, enabling scholarly analysis of phonetic and cultural elements. The American Folklife Center holds extensive Lomax collections, with digital presentations of field recordings from the 1930s onward, supporting preservation through enhancement and reissues like the 2016 CD of Negro Blues and Hollers. Recordings contributes via cataloged tracks, such as T.J. Chesser's rendition, integrated into broader anthologies that trace holler influences, though primary emphasis remains on historical rather than contemporary recreations. These efforts prioritize analog-to-digital conversion to mitigate deterioration, with ongoing projects ensuring contextual accuracy for researchers studying African American .

References

  1. [1]
    Work Song, Field/Street Call, Satirical & Protest Songs
    These improvised songs, known as work songs, field calls (also field hollers) and street calls (also street cries) served many functions.
  2. [2]
    The historical influence of white listeners' aural perspectives on ...
    Feb 27, 2019 · Hollers were a genre of solo-singing renditions of short poetic compositions, sung only by African American men and women in the south of the ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Transformations of Narratives About African American Hollers
    The blues genre arose from the field hollers sung by black farmers working alone behind a mule and plow or chopping weeds with a hoe.
  4. [4]
    Work Songs and Field Hollers Might Have Been the Birthplace of the ...
    I believe that work songs & field hollers might have been the birthplace of the blues. If these songs had not been sung by slaves, by prisoners and by ...
  5. [5]
    Field holler | Lomax Digital Archive
    Title: Field holler ; Date recorded: September 16, 1959 ; Contributor(s): Performer: Grant, Leroy; Recordist: Lomax, Alan ; Genre: holler, prison song, work song
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Mississippi Blues Trail Curriculum
    Field holler: an unaccompanied song that individual African. American agricultural laborers sang while working in the fields. These don't have a set form or a ...
  7. [7]
    97.05.03: How to Blues - Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute
    The blues derived from the field holler style in which the singer sang at the top of his range in loose rhythms from high to low pitch, using the pentatonic ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Blues | Grove Music - DocDrop
    Jul 10, 2012 · Making frequent use of melisma and microtonal slides, hollers influenced both blues singing and instrumental performance. As a result most of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    What Islam Gave the Blues - Article - Renovatio
    Jun 17, 2019 · His field holler “My Little Annie, So Sweet,” recorded in situ—one can hear birds chirping—features the traditional waves, vibrato, and pauses.
  10. [10]
    (PDF) Filling the Space. Field Hollers and the Social Role of Singing ...
    Sources include contemporary scholars Kay Kaufman Shelemay, Kamau Braithwaite, Jean-Luc Nancy, Walter Ong, Carlo Serra, Jacques Deridda, and others. ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] THE BLUES
    ▫ FIELD HOLLER ... she studied opera singing and had strong technical skills, hitting notes dead center, using vibrato etc. ▫ powerful vocal style; Bessie Smith ...
  12. [12]
    Blues | Popular Songs of the Day | Musical Styles | Articles and Essays
    A field holler performed by Charlie "Big Charlie" Butler at State Penitentiary, Camp #1; Stockade Hall, Parchman, Sunflower County, Mississippi. Early in the ...
  13. [13]
    Sage Reference - Work Song - Sage Knowledge - Sage Publishing
    Among the most common and influential African American work song was the field holler: an improvised, typically unmetered song, that was sung ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] BRI 003 - Smithsonian Institution
    The field holler is a free form unaccompanied cry, part song and part speech. It may be used as a signal, a greeting, an introspective accompaniment to.
  15. [15]
    Exploring Jazz: Instruments, Styles & Improvisation - CliffsNotes
    Rating 1.0 (1) - Field hollers : unaccompanied, rhythmically loose, designed to accompany farm labor. ... musical characteristics: o Timbre : it frequently changes and ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    ideology and aurality in the vernacular traditions of african-american ...
    slow tempo and melismatic profile of the field holler; the term also iden- tifies a practice of heterophonic religious singing. Field hollers tend to be.
  17. [17]
    Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave
    Slaves sing most when they are most unhappy. The songs of the slave represent the sorrows of his heart; and he is relieved by them, only as an aching heart is ...
  18. [18]
    Dena J. Epstein | Sinful Tunes and Spirituals - UI Press
    Anchored by groundbreaking scholarship, it redefined the study of black music in the slavery era by presenting the little-known development of black folk music ...Missing: hollers | Show results with:hollers
  19. [19]
    ROOTS AND THE FRUITS - Blues Matters Magazine
    Nov 26, 2019 · The slaves working in the cotton fields and living in and around the sharecropping communities began a 'Field Holler' as a means of ...
  20. [20]
    Prisoner Music and Memoir and the Fall of Convict Leasing in Texas
    African-American convicts, in particular, drew on slavery's cultural memory to compose thousands of field “hollers” and work songs that would eventually ...
  21. [21]
    Hollers - Alan Lomax Collection - eGrove - University of Mississippi
    ... field hollers, and the occasional blues, recorded by Alan Lomax on paper-backed tape at Mississippi's Parchman Farm Penitentiary in 1947 and on February 9 ...
  22. [22]
    Field hollers | Lomax Digital Archive
    Title: Field hollers ; Date recorded: May 21, 1939 ; Contributor(s): Performer: Stegall, Lonnie; Recordist: Lomax, John A. ; Genre: holler ; Instruments: voiceMissing: Alan | Show results with:Alan
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Holla Back: The African American Rhetorical Tradition of Call and ...
    May 18, 2025 · The field holler or field call is an acapella vocal song sung by enslaved Africans on ... It is differentiated from "work songs'' in that this ...
  24. [24]
    Music & Politics in the Classroom: Music, Politics and Protest
    ### Summary of Field Hollers in Labor, Work, Communication, and Social Functions Among Enslaved African Americans
  25. [25]
    Shaping Words to Fit the Soul - Project MUSE - Johns Hopkins ...
    transcribed the plowman's six-bar field holler, whose lyrics consisted solely of the singer's refusal to live in Cairo, Handy continues,. All through the ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    WORK/FIELD SONGS - Jazz History Tree
    African American work songs originally developed in the era of slavery, between the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries. Because they were part of an ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  27. [27]
    [PDF] blind willie johnson 1927-1930
    His other Gongs have been so completely changed in his bands that they become his own personal expression, building on the great Biblical figures of Samson and ...
  28. [28]
    Africa and The Blues: An Interview with Gerhard Kubik
    It then turned out to be possible to first back a field holler melody with the tonic chord (C) on the guitar, and then switch back to the sub dominant chord (F) ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] The Roots and Impact of African American Blues Music
    The basic blues melodies were most commonly derived from several traditional spirituals (Brooks 52) and field hollers, solo songs sung to communicate or ...
  30. [30]
    Discovering music: the blues: 5 A short history of the blues
    Other important sources for blues songs were the work songs and field hollers from the days of slavery and ballads and dances from music hall-type ...
  31. [31]
    The Birth of the Blues - Talking Guitar Jas Obrecht's Music Magazine
    Dec 12, 2024 · Contemporaneous accounts from that era do describe slaves using a variety of field hollers and work songs to set the pace of their labors.Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
  32. [32]
    Blues Journey - The Kennedy Center
    Sep 9, 2019 · The roots of blues can be found in slave songs, spirituals, and field hollers of the American South; its sound can be heard in early ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Blues – Music Rising ~ The Musical Cultures of the Gulf South
    The tradition of call and response which this exemplifies is another important characteristic of West African music. While many work-song and field-holler ...
  35. [35]
    The Spiritual | Christian History Magazine
    African-American field hollers, work songs, and spirituals blended African and European-American musical traditions. The spiritual in particular was ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] What They Sang: The Religious Roots of Spirituals and Blues
    5 Field hollers were work songs enslaved people sang while working in the fields. They used these songs to communicate, keep pace, and pass the time during the ...
  37. [37]
    The Field Hollers and Slave Songs - The Murfreesboro Pulse
    May 6, 2015 · These songs came from the marginalized existence of the slaves and their everyday, back-breaking life as field hands from early spring through ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  38. [38]
    Call & Response | Genres | Black Music Project
    The call and response genre was a direct influence on work songs of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, spirituals, gospel, and blues.
  39. [39]
    African Rhythms, Ideas of Sin, and the Hammond Organ: Gospel ...
    Mar 5, 2018 · In time, versions of these rhythms were attached to work songs, field hollers and street cries, many of which were accompanied by dance.
  40. [40]
    Origins - Early Gospel Music
    Work songs and “field hollers” were used to ease the drudgery of hard labour in the fields, later they were sung while laying railroad track, or while working ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The Roots of Jazz: African and Early American Music
    The blues, an integral part of jazz, developed from slave music such as the work song and field holler, ... The blues was derived from the work songs from slavery ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] African Music and the Pre-Jazz Era - Kendall Hunt Publishing
    “Holler” is a field holler, performed in the rambling and spontaneous shouting/singing fashion by a solitary worker in the field. “Early in the Mornin'” is a ...
  43. [43]
    The Lomax Prison Song Recordings from Parchman Farm, 1933–69
    Aug 10, 2020 · We explore in audio, photo, and text, the history of John and Alan Lomax's multiple visits to Parchman Farm to record prisoners' work songs ...
  44. [44]
    Digital Collections - Lomax Family: Resources in the American ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · The Alan Lomax Collection includes ethnographic field documentation, materials from Lomax's various projects, and cross-cultural research ...
  45. [45]
    Field hollers | Lomax Digital Archive
    Title: Field hollers. Date recorded: April 15, 1936. Contributor(s): Performer: Robertson, Lonnie; Performer: Taylor, Jim (Dobie Red); Performer: Winters, ...
  46. [46]
    John A. Lomax Southern States collection, 1937
    Collection of field recordings of African American and Anglo-American religious songs, hymns, spirituals, play-party songs, ballads, folk songs, ...
  47. [47]
    Southern Mosaic: The John and Ruby Lomax 1939 Southern States ...
    Here they recorded 21 tracks (17 included online), mostly blues songs, field hollers, and work songs, including two songs by country blues artist Booker T.
  48. [48]
    Field holler - Wikipedia
    The field holler or field call is mostly a historical type of vocal work song sung by field slaves in the United States to accompany their tasked work, ...
  49. [49]
    American Folklife Center Reissues Four Historic LPs
    Jun 16, 2016 · Negro Blues and Hollers was first issued as AFS L59 in 1962, and reissued as Rounder CD 1501. Originally edited by Marshall W. Stearns, this ...
  50. [50]
    Belton Sutherland's field holler (1978) - YouTube
    May 14, 2012 · Belton Sutherland sings a brief holler at Clyde "Judas" Maxwell's farm in Madison County, Mississippi. Shot by Alan Lomax, John Bishop, ...
  51. [51]
    Belton Sutherland's field holler (1978) - Lomax Digital Archive
    Video: Belton Sutherland's field holler (1978). Part of the Mississippi Delta and Hill Country (1978) Lomax Digital Archive collection.
  52. [52]
    Field Holler - Smithsonian Folkways Recordings
    Field Holler. T.J. Chesser. From Back Roads to Cold Mountain. Audio. Field Holler. Buy Track 0.99. Track Info. Release. Back Roads to Cold Mountain. Artist(s).Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  53. [53]
    Digital Collections - American Folklife Center - Library of Congress
    A number of American Folklife Center collections are available as online presentations, and we continue to add new materials and update existing collections.Missing: holler | Show results with:holler