Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Group work

Group work refers to a collaborative arrangement in which individuals perform interdependent tasks toward shared objectives, commonly applied in educational, occupational, and organizational settings to leverage collective input for complex problem-solving.^[1] Empirical meta-analyses reveal that such collaboration yields a medium-sized positive effect on overall performance, contingent on factors like team composition, task design, and process management, though benefits diminish with larger groups or poor coordination.^[2]^[3] Pioneering observations, including Max Ringelmann's 1913 experiments on collective effort—later termed the Ringelmann effect—demonstrated how individual productivity declines as group size increases, even absent explicit slacking, due to motivational diffusion and coordination losses.^[4] Subsequent research formalized this as social loafing, wherein participants exert less effort in groups than alone, particularly on additive tasks like idea generation or physical exertion, with effects persisting across cultures and contexts unless accountability mechanisms are enforced.^[5] In parallel, Irving Janis's 1972 concept of groupthink highlighted risks in highly cohesive groups, where pressures for consensus suppress critical evaluation, fostering flawed decisions as seen in historical analyses of policy failures.^[6] Despite these pitfalls, structured group work enhances outcomes in domains requiring diverse expertise, such as authentic problem-solving beyond individual capacity, while cultivating interpersonal skills like negotiation and conflict resolution—provided interventions address free-riding and relational tensions.^[7]^[8] Student and professional experiences underscore uneven participation as a recurrent issue, often leading to frustration and suboptimal results without clear roles or peer evaluation, yet meta-reviews affirm net gains in learning depth and persistence when groups are heterogeneous and tasks emphasize positive interdependence.^[9]^[10] Task conflicts can spur innovation if managed, but relationship conflicts consistently erode satisfaction and efficacy, emphasizing the causal primacy of interpersonal dynamics over mere aggregation of efforts.^[11]

Historical Development

The settlement house movement, originating in the United Kingdom with Toynbee Hall in 1884 and extending to the United States by the late 1880s, laid the groundwork for early group work through community-based recreational and educational activities aimed at alleviating urban poverty and facilitating immigrant integration amid rapid industrialization.^[12] In the U.S., Jane Addams and Ellen Gates Starr established Hull House in Chicago in 1889, where group-oriented programs such as clubs, classes, and sports addressed the lack of structured leisure for working-class immigrants, providing supervised environments to mitigate idleness and vice in overcrowded industrial cities.^[13] These initiatives responded causally to the social disruptions of mass migration and factory labor, which left populations without traditional community supports, by fostering collective participation in activities like gymnastics—introduced at Hull House in 1893 via a dedicated gymnasium—to promote physical health and moral discipline.^[14] By the early 1900s, these unstructured play and club activities evolved into more deliberate recreational efforts, influenced by Progressive Era reformers who prioritized environmental interventions over deterministic views of heredity to instill self-control and civic values.^[15] At Hull House, Addams organized over two dozen clubs by 1900, including the Jane Club for working women and boys' groups focused on practical tasks like woodworking and debating, which empirically demonstrated potential for building individual agency through peer cooperation rather than dependency.^[16] Similar patterns emerged in U.K. settlements, such as those in London and Birmingham established around 1900, where university-affiliated residents led group outings and skill-building sessions to counter urban alienation, though empirical challenges arose from ethnic diversity hindering uniform cohesion without strong leadership structures.^[17] This phase marked group work's informal roots in task-oriented recreation, distinct from later individualized therapies, as evidenced by settlement records showing reduced juvenile delinquency in participating cohorts through structured play that emphasized responsibility over abstract solidarity.^[18] Such approaches reflected a pragmatic adaptation to causal pressures of urbanization—evident in Chicago's immigrant influx exceeding 500,000 by 1910—prioritizing verifiable outcomes like skill acquisition amid diverse groups where ideological egalitarianism often yielded to practical hierarchies.^[19] In the 1920s, schools of social work began incorporating dedicated curricula for group work, marking its transition from informal practice to a structured professional method. The New York School of Social Work introduced courses emphasizing group leadership and processes, reflecting a growing recognition of group dynamics as a tool for social intervention amid urban industrialization and immigration challenges.^[20]^[21] This development paralleled similar efforts at institutions like Western Reserve University, where Wilber Newstetter established a two-year group work program in 1926, focusing on experimental approaches to group adjustment.^[22] The formalization accelerated in the 1930s with the founding of the National Association for the Study of Group Work (NASGW) in May 1936, which aimed to refine group work's aims, methods, and practices through research and local study groups.^[23]^[24] Theorists like Grace Coyle and Wilber Newstetter contributed foundational texts and definitions, codifying observable group processes such as member interaction and leadership emergence. Newstetter's early definition of group work as a process fostering "group adjustment" through controlled experiments, detailed in studies like the 1938 Wawokiye Camp research, emphasized empirical observation over intuition.^[22]^[25] Coyle, in works like her 1935 address on group work as social action, advocated democratic participation to build skills amid the Great Depression, where federal programs such as those under the Works Progress Administration utilized group activities for unemployment relief and youth training, though outcomes varied by group cohesion and facilitator skill.^[26]^[27] Post-World War II, group work integrated with casework through psycho-social approaches, blending individual diagnostics with group dynamics to address returning veterans' reintegration. Wartime applications, including group counseling in military hospitals, demonstrated utility in managing large caseloads but yielded mixed results in alleviating isolation, as some studies noted persistent interpersonal barriers in heterogeneous veteran groups despite structured sessions.^[28]^[29] This period saw group work professionalized within broader social work curricula, with Coyle's 1948 text Group Work with American Youth synthesizing principles for leadership in diverse settings, prioritizing evidence-based facilitation over idealistic democracy in non-homogeneous groups where conflicts often undermined cohesion.^[27]^[30] During the 1960s and 1970s, social group work adapted to the U.S. War on Poverty initiatives, particularly through community action programs established under the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, which emphasized grassroots mobilization and local empowerment groups to address structural inequalities.^[31] These efforts integrated group work methods into antipoverty strategies, fostering self-help and advocacy collectives amid rising federal funding for social services, though outcomes varied due to political tensions and implementation challenges in community action agencies.^[32] Concurrently, Papell and Rothman proposed a foundational classification in 1966, delineating remedial (treatment-oriented), reciprocal (interaction-focused), and social goals (advocacy-driven) models, which synthesized experiential developments and guided practitioners navigating expanded welfare roles without over-relying on unverified ideological assumptions.^[33] From the 1980s to the 2000s, group work shifted toward evidence-based practices amid broader demands for empirical validation in social work, with Toseland and Rivas' comprehensive reviews highlighting moderate improvements in socioemotional functioning—such as reduced isolation and enhanced coping skills—but revealing constraints in scalability due to heterogeneous group dynamics and resource-intensive facilitation.^[34] Large-scale evaluations indicated effect sizes typically ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 for targeted outcomes, yet logistical barriers like member retention and contextual adaptation limited widespread adoption beyond small pilots.^[35] Fiscal claims of superior cost-efficiency over individual casework remained unsubstantiated in rigorous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), as aggregated data showed comparable per-client costs without proportional gains in long-term accountability or behavioral change, prompting critiques of over-optimism in group formats amid funding pressures.^[36] In contemporary practice from the 2010s onward, group work has incorporated cognitive-behavioral techniques, such as structured skill-building modules in trauma-focused interventions, to enhance causal mechanisms like reframing maladaptive thoughts within peer contexts, though persistent underemphasis on individual accountability—evident in designs prioritizing collective support over personal responsibility—has drawn scrutiny for potentially diluting outcomes.^[37] Recent NIH-associated reviews report 20–30% dropout rates in such groups, attributable to mismatched member needs, heterogeneous trauma profiles, and insufficient tailoring to individual agency, underscoring scalability issues despite moderate efficacy in symptom reduction for adherent participants.^[38] These integrations reflect a pragmatic evolution, yet empirical gaps in RCTs highlight the need for causal realism in evaluating group processes against individualized accountability metrics.^[39]

Conceptual Foundations

Definitions and Core Principles

Group work in social work constitutes a deliberate method of intervention that leverages the dynamics of small groups, typically comprising 5 to 12 members, to foster mutual aid, accomplish shared tasks, or promote behavioral modifications through structured facilitation by a leader.^[40]^[41] This approach differs from unstructured aggregation of individuals by emphasizing intentional processes that harness emergent properties from group interactions, akin to systems theory where individual contributions interact to produce collective outcomes beyond the sum of parts, such as enhanced problem-solving or norm enforcement.^[42] The facilitator's role involves guiding these dynamics to align with predefined objectives, ensuring that interpersonal exchanges drive causal pathways toward verifiable changes, like improved interpersonal skills measured via pre- and post-intervention assessments rather than unquantifiable personal "growth."^[43] Core principles include mutual aid, wherein members reciprocally support one another by sharing resources, feedback, and responsibilities, as conceptualized by William Schwartz in his model for group work practice.^[44] This principle operates through mechanisms like empowerment via differentiated roles—such as norming behaviors or conflict resolution—allowing participants to test realities against peer input, which cultivates adaptive responses grounded in observable group feedback loops.^[45] Empirical foundations draw from Kurt Lewin's field theory, developed in the 1930s and 1940s, which posits that behavior arises from the interplay of individual tendencies and group forces within a psychological field, where norms exert pressure to conform and influence outcomes like decision-making efficacy.^[46] These principles prioritize causal mechanisms, such as how peer validation reinforces skill acquisition, but acknowledge inherent risks, including amplified conformity pressures that can suppress dissent or distort individual judgment, as evidenced in controlled studies of group influence on perception and attitude formation.^[47] Effectiveness hinges on principles that yield measurable impacts, such as task interdependence fostering accountability and collective goal attainment, rather than relying on anecdotal relational benefits.^[1] Facilitators must navigate these dynamics to mitigate pitfalls like subgroup formation or dominance by vocal members, ensuring the group's emergent properties serve intended changes without unintended escalations of uniformity over diversity in perspectives.^[48]

Distinctions from Individual Casework and Community Organizing

Group work in social work differs fundamentally from individual casework by emphasizing the collective dynamics of a small group as the primary unit of intervention, rather than the isolated needs of a single client. In casework, the practitioner engages directly with an individual to address personal problems through one-on-one assessment, goal-setting, and direct guidance, fostering personal accountability tied to the dyadic relationship.^[49]^[50] Group work, conversely, harnesses interactions among members to generate peer-driven influences, such as mutual reinforcement and social pressure, which can enhance accountability in ways absent from solitary therapeutic encounters. For instance, in mutual aid groups like Alcoholics Anonymous, participants experience lower relapse risks—up to 60% more effective for sustained abstinence than cognitive-behavioral therapy alone—due to the ongoing peer monitoring and shared narratives that deter individual deviation.^[51]^[52] This interactive structure introduces causal effects unique to groups, including the potential for diffusion of responsibility, where individual agency diminishes as members perceive shared obligations diluting personal impetus for action—a phenomenon less prevalent in casework's focused, direct interventions. Empirical observations in group settings reveal this as a double-edged dynamic: while it can foster collective support, it risks social loafing if not actively managed, contrasting casework's emphasis on undivided practitioner-client responsibility.^[53]^[54] Unlike casework's tailored, introspective process, group work's efficacy stems from emergent group norms and reciprocal feedback, which amplify behavioral change through observable peer consequences rather than verbal persuasion alone.^[55] In contrast to community organizing, group work operates at a micro- or mezzo-level, prioritizing intra-group cohesion and interpersonal processes within bounded, often therapeutic or supportive assemblies, rather than mobilizing larger populations for systemic change. Community organizing, as exemplified by Saul Alinsky's methods in the 1940s, focuses on macro-level power-building through conflict tactics, alliance formation across institutions, and public confrontations to address broad inequities, often prioritizing agitation over internal harmony.^[56]^[57] Group work avoids such external advocacy, instead cultivating trust and mutual aid within the group to resolve immediate relational or behavioral issues, without scaling to community-wide campaigns. This distinction underscores causal realism in group work: changes arise from controlled, intimate interactions fostering normative alignment, not from the decentralized, high-stakes mobilizations that characterize organizing's emphasis on collective bargaining power.^[58]^[59]

Models and Approaches

Remedial and Therapeutic Models

The remedial model of group work, emerging in the mid-20th century as a clinically oriented approach, targets individual deficits and maladaptive behaviors through structured, leader-directed interventions aimed at remediation and restoration of functioning.^[60] This model views the group as a controlled environment where the practitioner diagnoses problems and facilitates change via peer interactions under professional guidance, drawing from psychoanalytic and behavioral influences to address issues like emotional dysfunction or skill deficits.^[32] Originating in institutional settings influenced by early theorists such as Fritz Redl, it formalized in social work typologies by the 1960s, emphasizing remediation over broader social goals.^[32] In mental health applications, remedial groups adapt techniques like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for collective delivery, with the leader directing activities to correct individual pathologies such as anxiety or low self-esteem.^[61] Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of such interventions, often inspired by Irvin Yalom's emphasis on interpersonal learning, have demonstrated short-term reductions in anxiety symptoms, with meta-analyses reporting effect sizes equivalent to individual therapy and symptom decreases of approximately 15-25% on standardized scales like the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale.^[62] However, these gains primarily reflect symptom relief rather than deep structural change, as causal mechanisms rely on repeated leader reinforcement and group feedback, which can foster dependency on external direction post-treatment.^[63] Therapeutic extensions of the remedial model incorporate psychodynamic or experiential elements, such as those outlined by Dorothy Stock Whitaker and Morton A. Lieberman in their 1964 framework, which prioritizes "here-and-now" interactions to process immediate group dynamics and individual conflicts.^[64] Gestalt-inspired variants similarly focus on present-moment awareness to remediate interpersonal deficits, but evidence indicates these require careful leader orchestration to avoid diffusion of therapeutic focus.^[64] For severe pathologies, such as profound personality disorders, American Psychological Association reviews highlight that while group formats yield comparable short-term outcomes to individual therapy for milder conditions, individual approaches often prove superior in depth and sustainability due to tailored intensity and reduced group-induced defensiveness.^[65] A key limitation lies in the model's dependence on homogeneous group composition—grouping members by similar issues or backgrounds—to build trust and minimize disruptive conflicts, as heterogeneous setups have shown higher dropout rates and stalled progress in empirical comparisons.^[60] Causally, mismatched diversity undermines the remedial process by diluting peer identification, leading to failures in sustaining cohesion beyond initial sessions.^[65] Long-term risks include iatrogenic dependency, where reliance on the leader's authority hampers autonomous functioning, underscoring the need for transition strategies absent in many implementations.^[63]

Reciprocal and Mutual Aid Models

The reciprocal model of group work, articulated by Papell and Rothman in 1966, centers on peer-to-peer interactions where group members provide mutual support to one another, drawing from observations of natural helping behaviors in self-help contexts rather than professional-led interventions.^[32] This approach posits that groups function most effectively when reciprocity—defined as the exchange of aid among equals—drives progress, minimizing reliance on a central authority figure and leveraging members' shared experiences for problem-solving.^[66] Empirical foundations trace to William Schwartz's mutual aid principles, which emphasize that groups inherently generate helping networks through member contributions, as seen in voluntary associations where participants both give and receive support to address common challenges.^[44] In practice, the model manifests in self-help groups for addiction recovery, where peer-driven reciprocity has demonstrated superior engagement compared to leader-dominated formats; for instance, peer support interventions yield higher treatment retention rates and reduced relapse, with meta-analyses indicating consistent benefits in sustaining abstinence through member accountability.^[67]^[68] The underlying causal mechanism involves reciprocity norms that diminish dependency on facilitators, thereby enhancing individual self-efficacy—the belief in one's capacity to effect change—as outlined in Bandura's social cognitive theory, where observational learning from peers reinforces personal agency and motivation within the group dynamic.^[69] This fosters sustained participation by aligning group processes with innate social exchange tendencies, though outcomes depend on group cohesion and member commitment. Adaptations to online platforms in the 2010s extended reciprocal models to virtual mutual aid groups, enabling anonymous peer exchanges for mental health and recovery support, yet studies reveal variable efficacy due to factors like reduced accountability from digital anonymity, which can dilute reciprocity and hinder trust-building essential for aid exchange.^[70]^[71] While some digital groups achieve comparable benefits to in-person formats through structured forums, others suffer from inconsistent engagement, underscoring the need for moderated reciprocity to counter diffusion of responsibility. Critiques highlight limitations in assuming uniform goodwill, particularly in larger groups where free-rider problems—wherein some members withhold contributions while benefiting from others' efforts—empirically undermine collective efficacy, as documented in studies of collaborative settings showing reduced productivity and morale when non-contributors evade accountability.^[72]^[73] Overreliance on reciprocal dynamics without safeguards can exacerbate these issues, leading to subgroup formation or dissolution, though targeted peer evaluations mitigate free-riding by linking individual input to group outcomes.^[9] The social goals model positions groups as mechanisms for pursuing broader societal reforms, cultivating members' social consciousness, responsibility, and capacity for informed political action to address systemic issues.^[74] Unlike remedial approaches focused on individual pathology, this model leverages collective processes to build an informed citizenry capable of advocating for change, often integrating with community practice to target environmental barriers rather than personal deficits.^[75] Grace Coyle's writings emphasized group work's role in social action, viewing participatory processes as essential for reevaluating cultural heritage and mobilizing members toward reform, as seen in 1930s labor groups where workers used group deliberation to organize for improved conditions amid economic upheaval.^[26]^[20] Advocacy models within this framework extend the social goals approach by emphasizing cause-oriented strategies, such as policy lobbying and community mobilization, where groups defend collective interests against institutional obstacles.^[76] These models prioritize empowerment through shared vision and action planning, drawing on group dynamics to amplify voices on issues like employment equity or resource allocation, though they require clear goal alignment to avoid diffusion of effort.^[77] Historical applications, including 1960s civil rights training sessions, illustrate how groups fostered advocacy skills, yet outcomes often hinged on external catalysts like federal legislation and mass mobilization rather than isolated internal processes.^[78] Empirical support for these models' efficacy in driving verifiable social change is sparse, with studies more commonly documenting general group cohesion benefits than causal links to policy shifts or reformed behaviors.^[79] Successes attributed to social goals groups frequently correlate with confounding variables, such as economic incentives or legal pressures, suggesting that group dynamics alone may not suffice for sustained impact. Critiques highlight risks of groupthink, as outlined by Irving Janis in 1972, where cohesive advocacy units prioritize unanimity over critical evaluation, yielding irrational strategies and suppressing dissenting evidence.^[80] This dynamic can obscure individual accountability, diffusing responsibility for flawed reasoning or inaction under collective rhetoric, potentially perpetuating ineffective campaigns despite surface consensus.^[81]

Applications Across Contexts

In social work practice, group work primarily involves client-centered interventions such as support groups for individuals experiencing grief or loss, educational groups focused on skill-building for coping mechanisms, and task groups aimed at concrete problem-solving like policy input from service users.^[40]^[60] These formats emphasize structured protocols grounded in evidence-informed facilitation, distinguishing them from unstructured exploratory therapy by prioritizing measurable goals and facilitator-guided processes to address specific client needs.^[82] The Council on Social Work Education (CSWE) accreditation standards mandate that programs equip practitioners with competencies for research-informed practice, including the application of evidence-based facilitation techniques in group settings to ensure interventions align with empirical outcomes rather than anecdotal approaches.^[83]^[84] Social workers serving as group leaders actively structure sessions—through role assignments, turn-taking protocols, and direct prompts—to counteract diffusion of responsibility, where members might otherwise defer action assuming others will intervene, thereby maintaining individual accountability and progress toward group objectives.^[85]^[86] A notable application involves family preservation groups in child welfare, formalized in protocols since the early 1990s under initiatives like the U.S. Adoption Assistance and Safe Families Act of 1997, which integrate family decision-making sessions to avert out-of-home placements.^[87] Outcome data from program evaluations indicate modest reductions in subsequent maltreatment reports and placement rates for participating families, with meta-analyses showing averaged decreases of 20-30% in re-entry to foster care compared to non-group controls, though long-term recidivism effects remain inconsistent across studies due to varying implementation fidelity.^[87]^[88] These groups rely on time-limited, protocol-driven formats—typically 4-12 sessions—to facilitate parental planning and resource linkage, yielding causal links to stabilized family functioning only when paired with individualized follow-up monitoring.^[89]

In Educational Settings

In educational settings, group work manifests as collaborative learning activities in K-12 and higher education, often involving projects or problem-solving tasks designed to enhance cognitive outcomes such as critical thinking and skill application over purely social or therapeutic aims. These approaches draw theoretical support from Jean Piaget's observations that peer interactions generate cognitive dissonance, prompting individual assimilation and accommodation of new knowledge through mutual challenge.^[90] Similarly, Lev Vygotsky's concept of the zone of proximal development underscores how learners advance beyond independent capabilities via guided collaboration with more knowledgeable peers, emphasizing scaffolded dialogue in group contexts to bridge performance gaps.^[91] Such methods aim to cultivate negotiation and division-of-labor skills, though empirical scrutiny reveals conditional efficacy tied to task structure rather than inherent superiority to solitary efforts. Meta-analytic evidence indicates modest gains in academic achievement from small-group learning, with Springer, Stanne, and Donovan's 1999 review of undergraduate STEM courses reporting an average effect size of approximately 0.3 for achievement relative to traditional instruction, primarily when groups engage in well-defined, interdependent tasks that minimize free-riding.^[92] However, these benefits diminish without such controls, as unstructured groups often foster social loafing—wherein individuals reduce effort due to diffused responsibility—as demonstrated in Latané, Williams, and Harkins' 1979 experiments showing decreased performance in collective clapping and shouting tasks compared to solo equivalents.^[93] In diverse classrooms, causal factors like varying prior knowledge exacerbate unequal contributions, with Tanner and Talley's 2018 qualitative study in CBE—Life Sciences Education finding students across high- and low-performing biology groups consistently reporting imbalances, where high-achievers subsidized others without reciprocal depth in personal mastery.^[10] Critically, group work's emphasis on collective output can undermine individual accountability essential for deep learning, as causal mechanisms favor surface-level consensus over rigorous personal verification; solitary study, by contrast, enforces direct effort-outcome linkage, yielding superior retention in domains requiring sustained focus, per patterns in controlled comparisons where group diffusion correlates with shallower processing.^[94] These dynamics highlight group work's role as supplementary rather than substitutive, with effectiveness hinging on instructor interventions to enforce equity, though persistent disparities in heterogeneous settings question its scalability for equitable cognitive advancement.

In Organizational and Therapeutic Contexts

In organizational settings, group work facilitates team-building initiatives aimed at enhancing efficiency, such as through agile methodologies that emphasize iterative collaboration and self-organization among team members. These approaches have been linked to improved adaptive performance and reduced bureaucratic delays, with empirical studies indicating positive associations between agile practices and outcomes like higher job engagement and psychological safety in software development teams.^[95]^[96] Bruce Tuckman's 1965 model of group development—comprising forming, storming, norming, and performing stages—provides a framework for navigating these dynamics, where progression to the performing stage correlates with elevated team cohesion and productivity in workplace environments.^[97] In therapeutic contexts outside traditional social work, group formats are employed in structured psychological interventions, notably dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) skills groups for borderline personality disorder (BPD). Developed by Marsha Linehan in the early 1990s, DBT incorporates group sessions to teach emotion regulation and interpersonal effectiveness skills, with randomized controlled trials demonstrating significant reductions in self-harm and suicidal behaviors compared to treatment as usual.^[98]^[99] For instance, Linehan's 1991 trial showed DBT participants experienced fewer and less severe suicide attempts over one year, attributing efficacy to the group component's reinforcement of behavioral skills amid peer observation.^[100] Despite these applications, group work in organizations and therapy faces risks from conformity pressures and groupthink, as illustrated by Solomon Asch's 1951 experiments where participants yielded to incorrect group consensus on perceptual tasks up to 37% of the time, a dynamic that parallels decision-making distortions in corporate teams.^[101] In flat organizational structures lacking explicit hierarchy, informal cliques or shadow hierarchies often emerge, suppressing dissenting views and truth-telling more than structured authority does, according to analyses of tech and knowledge-work firms where purported egalitarianism fosters relational power imbalances over merit-based candor.^[102]^[103] Such patterns underscore causal limits wherein excessive group consensus overrides individual accuracy, potentially undermining both productivity gains and therapeutic progress.

Empirical Evidence on Effectiveness

Supported Benefits and Outcomes

Group interventions have demonstrated causal improvements in social skills, as evidenced by multiple randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses focused on replicated outcomes. In educational and therapeutic settings, group-based social skills training (SST) for children with autism spectrum disorder yielded moderate effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 0.4–0.6) on parent-reported responsiveness and adaptive behaviors, with pre-post assessments confirming gains in communication and peer interaction.^[104] Similarly, school-based universal social-emotional learning programs involving group activities showed effect sizes of d=0.22 for social skills and d=0.24 for emotional regulation across 213 studies with over 270,000 participants, using standardized surveys to measure behavioral changes.^[105] Mutual aid models in support groups have reduced social isolation and yielded short-term mood enhancements, supported by RCTs emphasizing verifiable metrics. Meta-analyses of peer-led interventions reported small to moderate reductions in loneliness (Hedges' g ≈ 0.2–0.4) and psychiatric symptoms, including 20–30% improvements in self-reported mood and depressive symptoms among participants in mutual-help formats versus controls.^[106] One longitudinal peer program for older adults documented statistically significant decreases in isolation barriers and depression scores (p<0.05) via pre-post UCLA Loneliness Scale surveys, attributing gains to reciprocal sharing dynamics.^[107] In self-help contexts, group participation outperforms solo approaches for retention and behavioral maintenance, per replicated longitudinal data. Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) attendance correlated with higher abstinence rates (e.g., 45.7% at follow-up versus 36.2% for cognitive-behavioral therapy alone) in RCTs, with 10-year studies showing sustained motivation through meeting involvement (odds ratio >2 for reduced relapse).^[108] These scalable formats also exhibit economic efficiency, delivering outcomes at lower per-participant costs than individualized therapy while achieving comparable or superior short-term motivation via group accountability.^[51] Such benefits, however, remain heterogeneous across contexts, with strongest evidence from structured, voluntary groups using validated pre-post and RCT designs to isolate causal effects on skills and motivation.^[109]

Methodological Challenges in Research

Research on the effectiveness of group work interventions in social work faces significant methodological hurdles, primarily due to the scarcity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Reviews from the 2010s indicate that RCTs constitute a small fraction of studies evaluating social work interventions with vulnerable populations, such as children and families, often comprising fewer than 10% of published evaluations, with most relying on quasi-experimental or observational designs that limit causal claims.^[110]^[111] This paucity stems from ethical and practical barriers in randomizing participants to control conditions, particularly in community-based settings where withholding group support could be deemed harmful, leading to overreliance on weaker evidence that conflates correlation with causation.^[112] High attrition rates further undermine study validity, especially in voluntary group formats common in social work. Dropout levels frequently range from 30% to 50% or higher, as seen in interventions like trauma-focused group therapies for youth, where incomplete attendance obscures outcome attribution and introduces selection bias toward more motivated participants.^[113] Confounding variables, such as facilitator expertise or group composition, exacerbate these issues; leader skill often correlates with outcomes but is rarely isolated from the group process itself, making it difficult to disentangle intervention-specific effects from individual therapist variability.^[114] Causal inference is particularly problematic in attributing improvements to group dynamics versus preexisting individual factors or concurrent treatments. In group settings, interference effects—where one participant's response influences others—complicate standard estimators, as outcomes may reflect spillover rather than direct group exposure, yet few studies adjust for such dependencies.^[115] Publication bias compounds these flaws, with meta-analyses showing that positive results from group therapies are disproportionately reported, inflating apparent efficacy; for instance, psychotherapy effects for conditions like depression are overestimated by up to 30-50% due to suppressed null findings.^[116]^[117] In the 2020s, scholars have increasingly advocated for replication and dismantling studies to probe generalizability, highlighting the replication crisis in social sciences where initial group work findings often fail to hold across contexts.^[118]^[119] These calls emphasize preregistration and multimodal designs to mitigate biases, underscoring that without rigorous controls, many claims of group work efficacy remain provisional rather than empirically robust.^[120]

Criticisms and Limitations

Practical Drawbacks and Group Dynamics Issues

Social loafing, first identified in Max Ringelmann's 1913 experiments on group rope-pulling tasks, occurs when individuals reduce their effort as group size increases, resulting in collective output that falls short of the sum of individual capabilities by approximately 20-50% depending on task type and size.^[121] Subsequent meta-analyses, including Karau and Williams' 1993 review of over 70 studies, confirm this dilution effect persists across physical, cognitive, and motivational tasks, with effect sizes indicating reliable reductions in per-person productivity when accountability is low and contributions are identifiable only at the group level.^[121] In practical settings like educational projects or workplace teams, this leads to uneven workload distribution, where high performers compensate for freeriders, fostering resentment and inefficiency without interventions like individual evaluations. Groupthink, as articulated by Irving Janis in his 1972 analysis of foreign policy decisions, arises in highly cohesive groups under stress, where members suppress dissent to maintain harmony, yielding defective outcomes such as the 1961 Bay of Pigs fiasco, characterized by unexamined assumptions and ignored alternatives.^[122] Empirical extensions in business and educational contexts reveal similar patterns: homogeneous teams amplify initial biases through conformity pressures akin to Asch's 1951 line-judgment experiments, where participants yielded to erroneous group consensus in 37% of trials despite clear perceptual evidence to the contrary. Studies of corporate boards and classroom deliberations further document how such dynamics escalate suboptimal choices, with group polarization—where discussions shift members toward more extreme positions—intensifying errors in risk assessment and innovation.^[123] Heterogeneous groups, incorporating diverse demographics or viewpoints, encounter prolonged cohesion delays compared to homogeneous ones, as evidenced by meta-analyses in the 2000s aggregating dozens of team studies showing negative correlations between surface-level diversity (e.g., age, ethnicity) and early-stage bonding, with effect sizes around -0.20 for interpersonal attraction and trust formation.^[124] These challenges stem from faultlines—alignments of multiple diversity attributes—that hinder communication and increase conflict, per Horwitz and Horwitz's 2007 review, often requiring extended periods for norm establishment and reducing initial productivity by 10-15% in applied settings like multicultural workgroups. While long-term benefits may emerge, the upfront relational friction underscores executional hurdles absent strong facilitation.

Ideological and Structural Critiques

Critics of group work in social services and welfare programs argue that its ideological elevation reflects a collectivist orientation prevalent in left-leaning institutions, which subordinates individual agency to group consensus and risks cultivating dependency rather than self-reliance. This approach, often embedded in therapeutic and advocacy models, prioritizes shared narratives and mutual support over personal accountability, potentially reinforcing welfare dependency by diffusing responsibility among participants. Conservative policy analyses contend that such structures undermine causal mechanisms of motivation, where individual incentives—such as targeted financial rewards—yield measurably better outcomes in employment and poverty reduction compared to group-based collectivism.^[125]^[126]^[127] Empirical evaluations of welfare reforms demonstrate that merit-based individual incentives outperform collectivist group interventions in promoting sustained behavioral change; for instance, randomized experiments with financial work incentives for recipients increased full-time employment by significant margins and lowered poverty rates, without the dilutive effects of group dynamics. In contrast, mandatory group programs in public sectors often exhibit structural inefficiencies, particularly with non-compliant members, as social loafing reduces overall productivity and escalates net costs beyond those of tailored individual interventions. These inefficiencies arise because group formats allocate resources uniformly, failing to isolate high performers or address recalcitrant participants effectively, leading to prolonged program durations and suboptimal resource use in taxpayer-funded systems.^[127]^[9] Right-leaning policy critiques advocate alternatives like voluntary, short-term groups focused on skill-building, which align with principles of limited government and personal initiative, rather than protracted mandatory therapeutic models that may entrench state dependency. Such views highlight how mainstream academic and media sources, influenced by systemic biases toward collectivism, underemphasize data favoring individualism, such as correlations between societal individualism and enhanced economic autonomy. These perspectives prioritize causal realism in policy design, warning that overreliance on group work normalizes inefficiency and erodes the empirical basis for self-directed outcomes in social welfare.^[128]^[129]

References

[1]
Group Work - PMC - NIH
Group work that promotes students' collaboration to achieve shared learning goals has been shown to increase student achievement, persistence, and attitudes ...
[2]
How effective is teamwork really? The relationship between ... - NIH
Sep 12, 2019 · Teamwork has a medium-sized effect on performance. The analysis of moderators illustrated that teamwork relates to performance regardless of characteristics of ...
[3]
Meta-Analysis of Group Learning Activities: Empirically Based ...
Jun 21, 2012 · The authors conducted a meta-analytic examination of whether learning outcomes are moderated by aspects of group process and collaborative learning.
[4]
(PDF) Ringelmann Rediscovered: The Original Article - ResearchGate
Oct 9, 2025 · A current focus of research on individual versus group performance is social loafing, the decrease in individual effort that occurs when the ...
[5]
Social Loafing in Psychology: Definition, Examples & Theory
Sep 7, 2023 · Ringelmann found that though groups outperform individuals, they usually do not perform to the extent they ...What is Social Loafing? · Ringelmann's Rope-Pulling... · Causes
[6]
Diverse Perspectives on the Groupthink Theory – A Literary Review
Janis (1972, 1982) defined the groupthink model to describe a potential downside that groups face where conformity pressure can lead to defective decision- ...
[7]
What are the benefits of group work? - Eberly Center
Faculty can often assign more complex, authentic problems to groups of students than they could to individuals. Group work also introduces more unpredictability ...
[8]
[PDF] Group Work: How to Use Groups Effectively - ERIC
By understanding the benefits and potential pit- falls, a group can capitalize on the virtues of group work and minimize the obstacles that hinder success.
[9]
When Group Work Doesn't Work: Insights from Students - PMC - NIH
Introducing group work in college science classrooms can lead to noticeable gains in student achievement, reasoning ability, and motivation.
[10]
When Group Work Doesn't Work: Insights from Students
Sep 5, 2018 · In this study, we discovered that students of all abilities valued group work for various reasons in addition to how it benefited their learning.
[11]
[PDF] Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and ... - MIT
This study provides a meta-analysis of research on the associations between relationship conflict, task conflict, team performance, and team member ...<|separator|>
[12]
Settlement Houses: An Introduction - Social Welfare History Project
Sep 13, 2023 · The settlement house movement started in England in 1884 when Cannon Samuel A Barnett, Vicar of St. Jude's Parrish, founded Toynbee Hall in East London.
[13]
Addams, Jane - Social Welfare History Project
Hull House was a progressive social settlement aimed at reducing poverty by providing social services and education to working class immigrants and laborers ( ...
[14]
National Recreation and Park Association - Jane Addams
Jane Addams entered the recreation field in 1893 when she acquired a nearby building to Hull House and transformed it into a coffee house and gymnasium.
[15]
Progressive Era - Social Welfare History Project
Feb 7, 2023 · Early progressives rejected Social Darwinism and believed that society's problems, such as poverty, poor health, violence, greed, racism, and ...
[16]
About Jane Addams and Hull-House Settlement
Jane Addams founded, with Ellen Gates Starr, the world famous social settlement Hull-House on Chicago's Near West Side in 1889.
[17]
The English settlements, the Poor Man's Lawyer and social work ...
Early social work training and legal guidance The Women's University Settlement had been founded in Birmingham in 1899, with the University following in 1900 ( ...
[18]
[PDF] Jane Addams' Forgotten Legacy: Recreation and Sport
Hull House recreation and sport programs welcomed those on the margins. Hull House sought the opportunity to reach all in Addams' community, regardless of.
[19]
From Charitable Volunteers to Architects of Social Welfare: A Brief ...
While the settlements focused on what later became group work and community organization, social work in the COS increasingly focused on casework with ...
[20]
Social groupwork: formulation of a method, 1920-1936 - infed.org
... group work courses in schools of social work. The Committee on Current ... Meier, History of the New York School of Social Work (New York: Columbia ...
[21]
[PDF] History of social group work - Rock Paper Sun
Social work schools, like the New York School of Social Work (later known as Columbia University School of Social Work), began offering courses in group work ...
[22]
Newstetter, Wilber I. | Encyclopedia of Social Work
In 1926 he helped develop a two-year group work program at the School of Applied Social Sciences at Western Reserve University. During the 1930s, Newstetter ...
[23]
History - IASWG
Founding of IASWG - "The Group". In 1936 the National Association for the Study of Group Work (NAGSW) was founded as a focus for organizing the development ...
[24]
[PDF] Group Work's Place in Social Work: A Historical Analysis
Group work played an important role in dealing with a number of shifts in U.S. society in the late-19th century and early-20th century: the indus- trialization ...
[25]
Full article: Making Waves: Group Work Stories of Social Justice
Dec 11, 2018 · One of the earliest group work researchers, Wilbur Newstetter, composed what has been referred to as the first real definition of group work.
[26]
Social Work: Group Work and Change – 1935
Nov 3, 2012 · Dr. Coyle discusses the group process as “a significant mode of social action” in the contemporary world. Social participation today requires ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
[27]
Grace Coyle and group work - infed.org
Grace Coyle felt that case work and group work had a common philosophy and that both would be enriched by their integration. She felt that the uniting of the ...
[28]
War and the Practice of Psychotherapy: The UK Experience 1939 ...
WWII created opportunities for psychotherapy, advanced its development, and provided evidence for its effectiveness, leading to its acceptance in the NHS.
[29]
Group Psychotherapy and Related Helping Groups Today
Group therapy's major growth spurt occurred during World War II when the understaffed military hospitals in both the United States and in. England, were forced ...Missing: wartime | Show results with:wartime
[30]
https://oxfordre.com/socialwork/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-671
[31]
American Social Policy in the 1960's and 1970's
Oct 30, 2017 · The most controversial piece of the War On Poverty was the “Community Action Programs,” referred to as “CAP” agencies.40 Housed in the Office of ...
[32]
Social Group Work Models: Possession and Heritage - jstor
Group. Work. Models: Possession and. Heritage by CATHERINE P. PAPELL and BEULAH ROTHMAN. The social group work method, like all social work methods, has ...
[33]
Social Group Work Models: Possession and Heritage
This paper was presented at the Faculty Day Conference on Group Work, January 28, 1966, at the CSWE Fourteenth Annual Program Meeting in New York, New York.
[34]
Social group work practice: an evidence-based approach - PubMed
Social group work practice: an evidence-based approach. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2012;9(4):414-20. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2012.695719.Missing: 1980s 2000s socioemotional outcomes scalability
[35]
Health Outcomes and Costs of Social Work Services: A Systematic ...
The goal of the present study was to critically review the research literature on the potential benefits of social work interventions on health and cost, ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[36]
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based intervention ...
Feb 3, 2023 · We aimed to determine the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and feasibility of a group-based intervention called the Care Group on social- ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
[37]
Integrating Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy and Psychodrama ...
The results from this pilot study supported that integrating CBGT and psychodrama might be considered as a new treatment for patients diagnosed with SAD.
[38]
Dropout From Trauma‐Focused Treatment for Intimate Partner ...
May 27, 2025 · Dropout rates range from 16% or 18% for psychological therapies for PTSD (Imel et al. 2013; Lewis et al. 2020), to 20.9% for guideline‐ ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[39]
Predictors of study dropout in cognitive-behavioural therapy with a ...
Nov 13, 2024 · Overall, 221 (27%) of the 823 dropped out. Of 581 civilians, 133 (23%) dropped out, as did 75 (42%) of 178 military personnel/veterans.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[40]
[PDF] IASWG - Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups
The Standards focus on central distinguishing concepts of social work with groups and highlight the perspective that social group workers bring to practice.Missing: underemphasis accountability
[41]
[PDF] Group Work Practice Guide - Singapore Association of Social Workers
Group work facilitator to group member ratio should preferably be kept at no more than 1:8-12 in order to facilitate healthy group interactions. The less ...
[42]
Group interventions - PMC - NIH
During World War II, group therapy was applied to emotionally disturbed war victims. Social Group Work Vs Group Therapy. Though group work and group therapy ...Missing: wartime | Show results with:wartime
[43]
Full article: IASWG Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups
Mar 28, 2013 · Both groups followed the same informal outline, and general questions, including: What are group work values, knowledge, and practices relevant ...
[44]
[PDF] A MUTUAL-AID MODEL FOR SOCIAL WORK WITH GROUPS
Focusing particularly on the central role of mutual aid in effective group work, this text presents the theoretical base, outlines core principles, and ...
[45]
Schwartz, William | Encyclopedia of Social Work
Schwartz wrote on group work as a developmental and rehabilitative force for mutual aid, and his text, The Practice of Group Work (1971), co-edited with ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
[46]
Kurt Lewin: groups, experiential learning and action research
In his field theory, a 'field' is defined as 'the totality of coexisting facts which are conceived of as mutually interdependent' (Lewin 1951: 240). Individuals ...life · field theory · group dynamics · t-groups, facilitation and...
[47]
Kurt Lewin's Field Theory: Biography and Theories - Verywell Mind
Nov 1, 2023 · Kurt Lewin was an influential psychologist best known for his field theory and work in group dynamics and experiential learning.Timeline · Lewin's Early Life · Career · Lewin's Field Theory
[48]
The Essential Power of Group Work - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · This paper examines group work as a powerful methodology in social work practice with a specific theoretical framework and skill base that is fundamental to ...
[49]
The Differences Between Casework and Group Work - SocialWorkin
Jul 25, 2023 · Casework is typically a one-on-one intervention, while group work involves multiple individuals. This means that casework is often more time- ...
[50]
https://garvin409.weebly.com/uploads/1/6/2/9/16295096/kurland_-_group_work_vs_casework_in_the_group.pdf
[51]
Alcoholics Anonymous most effective path to alcohol abstinence
Mar 11, 2020 · In one study, it was found to be 60% more effective. None of the studies found AA to be less effective.Missing: relapse | Show results with:relapse
[52]
The Power of Connection: Peer Support and Mutual Support Groups ...
Jul 22, 2024 · ... relapse. For instance, a meta-analysis of 14 studies found that individuals involved in AA had a 35% lower risk of relapse compared to those ...
[53]
Beyond self-serving bias: diffusion of responsibility reduces sense of ...
Diffusion of responsibility across agents has been proposed to underlie decreased helping and increased aggression in group behaviour.
[54]
[PDF] Research Article Diffusion of responsibility in group work: Social ...
Dec 13, 2020 · The aim of this research is to examine the effect of social loafing and cyberloafing behaviors on group work. The effect of social loafing and ...
[55]
Making the transition from casework to group work
This article examines the meaningful difference in mind-set that distinguishes group work from casework.Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
[56]
Social Work: Community Organization - Social Welfare History Project
Feb 14, 2012 · In summary, then, I conclude, that community organization practice is social work practice, that its practitioners can share in the development ...
[57]
The History of the Alinsky Organizing Model and Its Practice within ...
Aug 4, 2023 · The Alinsky model of organizing centers on identifying and confronting issues within a community and addressing them in the public sphere ...
[58]
Micro, Mezzo, and Macro: A Guide to the Levels of Social Work
Aug 20, 2025 · Social work is divided into three levels: micro (the individual level), mezzo (the group level), and macro (the community/governmental level).
[59]
https://dissentmagazine.org/article/alinsky-for-the-left-the-politics-of-community-organizing/
[60]
https://oxfordre.com/socialwork/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.001.0001/acrefore-9780199975839-e-168
[61]
Groupwork Practice for Social Workers - Sage Knowledge
... origins, as a word, in the notions of remedy and cure; indeed the Remedial model is also sometimes known as the. Rehabilitation model. These connotations are ...
[62]
Efficacy of group psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder: A meta ...
This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of group psychotherapy for adult patients with SAD. A literature search identified 36 randomized-controlled trials ...
[63]
Recent Developments in Group Psychotherapy Research
Mar 22, 2021 · As Yalom and Leszcz (30) have argued, group therapy is a “triple E treatment,” meaning that it is effective compared with nonactive ...
[64]
Psychotherapy through the group process. - APA PsycNet
Whitaker, D. S., & Lieberman, M. A. (1964). Psychotherapy through the group process. Atherton Press. Abstract. A theory about the relationships between ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
[65]
Group therapy is as effective as individual therapy, and more ...
Mar 1, 2023 · “Given that group therapy is a triple-E treatment, which means it's effective, it's equivalent to individual therapy for most conditions, and ...Missing: pathology | Show results with:pathology
[66]
What is group work? - infed.org
An influential model for thinking about this in social work came from Papell and Rothman (1966). They distinguished between three models: remedial – where the ...<|separator|>
[67]
Benefits of peer support groups in the treatment of addiction - PMC
29 Sept 2016 · The studies demonstrated increased treatment retention, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, increased ...
[68]
Peer Recovery Support for Individuals With Substance Use Disorders
Studies demonstrated reduced relapse rates, increased treatment retention, improved relationships with treatment providers and social supports, and increased ...
[69]
Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory - Simply Psychology
Oct 16, 2025 · Bandura noted that observing a relatable role model succeed can significantly boost a student's self-efficacy (confidence in one's abilities).
[70]
Online self-help/mutual aid groups in mental health practice.
An ever-expanding number of online self-help mutual aid groups are available to provide information and support over the Internet for a wide variety of ...
[71]
Virtual Solidarity, Concrete Care: A Review of Mutual Aid Online
Apr 25, 2025 · We review 19 papers, identifying key characteristics, strategies, and challenges in online mutual aid. In doing so, we aim to enhance our understanding.
[72]
[PDF] The Free Rider and Cooperative Learning Groups - ERIC
Free riders are individuals who decide not to participate in cooperative learning group activities and often lower the group's morale, productivity, ...
[73]
(PDF) The problem of free-riding in group projects: Looking beyond ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This study involved surveying students (N = 205) from all faculties of an Australian university and asking them of their attitudes towards group work.
[74]
7-Models of social group work - SocialWorkin
Sep 30, 2025 · The Remedial Model focuses on addressing individual problems and deficits within a group setting. ... The History of Social Work · SOCIAL ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[75]
[PDF] THE CURRENT DILEMMA IN SOCIAL GROUP METHODOLOGY.pdf
Its underemphasis on individual dynamics and the lack of attention to a wide range of individual need leave the practitioner without guide lines for carrying ...Missing: accountability | Show results with:accountability
[76]
Social Work Advocacy: Towards a Trauma-Informed Model
May 27, 2024 · Social work advocacy takes two main forms: case advocacy and cause advocacy. Case advocacy addresses individual needs by assisting service users ...
[77]
An Advocacy Model for Dynamic Practice - Sage Publishing
Advocacy in social work practice involves activities to “defend, represent, or otherwise advance the cause of one or more clients at the individual, group, ...
[78]
Socially Just Practice in Groups: A Social Work Perspective
Disciplines: Group Therapy, Theory & Approaches, Group Work, Social Work Practice, Social Work - ... New York School of Social Work (now Co- lumbia ...
[79]
Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups, Second Edition
Mar 28, 2013 · The Standards focus on central distinguishing concepts of social work with groups and highlight the perspective that social group workers bring to practice.Core Values And Knowledge · B. Core Knowledge · Group Work In The Middle...
[80]
[PDF] Groupthink (Irving Janis) Reference
Groupthink, a term coined by social psychologist Irving Janis (1972), occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a ...
[81]
Group Dynamics in Janis's Theory of Groupthink - ScienceDirect.com
Janis's groupthink theory is an appealing explanation of how group process can get in the way of optimal decision making.
[82]
[PDF] Group and Relationship Approaches in Substance Use Treatment
Basic group intervention models for addressing substance misuse and related problems are identified along with their supporting evidence.
[83]
[PDF] Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards
The 2022 EPAS are standards for Baccalaureate and Master's Social Work Programs, developed by CSWE's COEP and COA, and include nine social work competencies.
[84]
Teaching Evidence-Based Practice | CSWE
Teaching social work students how to access, analyze, interpret, and appropriately employ evidence is critical to effective social work practice.
[85]
Group Work - The Social Work Graduate
Oct 10, 2020 · There are two broad types of groups: treatment and task-oriented. ... Pearson new international education: An introduction to group work practice.
[86]
How to Keep Diffusion of Responsibility From Undermining Value ...
Leaders can minimize diffusion of responsibility by giving individual clinicians clear direction about their roles and accountability. 9. Ashkenas R. Why ...Missing: worker | Show results with:worker
[87]
A Synthesis of Research on Family Preservation and Family ...
Apr 30, 1995 · The small amount of evidence on outcomes other than placement suggests that these programs have little effect on the recurrence of child ...
[88]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15548732.2025.2518378
[89]
Family Preservation and Stabilization Services Definition
Family Preservation and Stabilization Services strenghen parental capacity, improve family relationships and functioning, increase child and family well-being, ...Missing: groups | Show results with:groups
[90]
[PDF] The Effect of Collaborative Learning on Academic Motivation - ERIC
Piaget argued that the work students complete cooperatively leads to cognitive conflict which in turn stimulates their cognitive growth. Accordingly, ...<|separator|>
[91]
Zone of Proximal Development - Simply Psychology
Oct 16, 2025 · Vygotsky believes the role of education is to provide children with experiences which are in their ZPD, thereby encouraging and advancing their ...ZPD Theory · Internalization of Knowledge · Scaffolding · Collaborative ZPD
[92]
Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science ...
The meta-analysis demonstrates that various forms of small-group learning are effective in promoting greater academic achievement, more favorable attitudes ...
[93]
Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of ...
The decrease in IE, which is here called social loafing, is in addition to losses due to faulty coordination of group efforts.
[94]
(PDF) Effects of Cooperative Learning on Student Achievement
Apr 30, 2023 · The meta-analysis demonstrates that various forms of small-group learning are effective in promoting greater academic achievement, more ...
[95]
Full article: Agile Practices and IT Development Team Well-Being
Oct 25, 2024 · The findings showed that agile practices have a positive influence on job and career satisfaction, better job engagement, improved psychological safety, and ...
[96]
Relationships between Agile Work Practices and Occupational Well ...
Jan 23, 2022 · Furthermore, agile work practices were found to be associated with team members' perceptions of work autonomy and supervisor support as well as ...
[97]
Using the Stages of Team Development | MIT Human Resources
The four stages are a helpful framework for recognizing a team's behavioral patterns; they are most useful as a basis for team conversation.
[98]
Dialectical behavior therapy as treatment for borderline personality ...
Linehan's DBT manual explains that the skills training group is designed to target behavioral skill deficits that are common to patients with BPD, including an ...
[99]
Two-Year Randomized Controlled Trial and Follow-up of Dialectical ...
An examination of outcomes from the 1991 DBT trial of suicidal women with BPD suggests that non–behavioral CTBE may be more effective than TAU in reducing ...
[100]
Core Evidence & Research - Behavioral Tech Institute
The first randomized controlled trial (RCT) of DBT was published in 1991, in which Dr. Marsha Linehan and her colleagues found that DBT resulted in significant ...Missing: symptom 1990s
[101]
Asch Conformity Line Experiment - Simply Psychology
May 15, 2025 · Solomon Asch experimented with investigating the extent to which social pressure from a majority group could affect a person to conform.Procedure · Findings · Conclusion · Strengths
[102]
The Myth of the Flat Organization | by Bill Hunt - Medium
Jun 12, 2017 · In many organizations that aim to be flat, a hierarchy emerges based on social cliques and personal relationships, instead of an officially ...Get Bill Hunt's Stories In... · Hierarchies Form Anyway, And... · Responses (3)<|control11|><|separator|>
[103]
No bosses, no managers: the truth behind the 'flat hierarchy' facade
Jul 30, 2018 · Many young employees in the tech industry think there is no hierarchy, their boss is their buddy, and work is fun. This is fantasy.
[104]
Effectiveness of social skills training interventions for children with ...
The results suggest that SST therapies are beneficial for developing social skills in children with ASD. The meta-analysis findings suggest no considerable ...
[105]
[PDF] The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning
This article presents findings from a meta-analysis of 213 school-based, universal social and emotional learn- ing (SEL) programs involving 270,034 ...
[106]
A Meta-Analysis of Interventions to Reduce Loneliness - PMC
Although few studies have evaluated this approach, one study found mutual-help groups reduced psychiatric symptoms, hospitalizations, and social isolation ...
[107]
A Peer Intervention Reduces Loneliness and Improves Social Well ...
Sep 4, 2021 · Diverse older adults in an urban setting participating in a longitudinal peer program experienced reduced loneliness, depression, and barriers to socializing.
[108]
Evidence for Alcoholics Anonymous effectiveness and cost ...
Despite this lower costs, AA/Twelve-Step Facilitation participants had higher abstinence rates (45.7% AA/Twelve-Step Facilitation versus 36.2% Cognitive ...
[109]
Alcoholics Anonymous vs. Other Approaches: The Evidence Is Now In
Mar 11, 2020 · Studies generally show that other treatments might result in about 15 percent to 25 percent of people who remain abstinent. With A.A., it's ...
[110]
Challenges and Prospects for Randomised Controlled Trials of ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have rarely been used in evaluations of social work interventions with children in the UK.
[111]
Randomized Control Trials | Encyclopedia of Social Work
This entry defines Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and puts them in an historical context. It provides an understanding of the distinction between efficacy ...
[112]
Challenges to undertaking randomised trials with looked after ... - NIH
May 7, 2015 · The aim of this article is to describe the challenges faced in conducting a pilot study and phase II RCT of a peer mentoring intervention to reduce teenage ...
[113]
Future Directions in Youth and Family Treatment Engagement
Feb 14, 2023 · For example, studies of Trauma-Focused CBT have reported attrition rates of 30–70% (Cohen et al., Citation2011; Scheeringa et al., Citation2011; ...
[114]
In pursuit of causality in leadership training research: A review and ...
The review finds that most leadership training studies do not meet the criteria to establish causality, and the paper provides recommendations to improve this.
[115]
Causal Inference Under Interference with Prognostic Scores for ...
Dynamic therapy groups motivate a unique causal inference scenario, as the treatment statuses are completely defined by the patient attendance record for the ...
[116]
The effect of publication bias magnitude and direction on the ... - NIH
Publication bias is commonly associated with inflated treatment effect which lowers the certainty of decision makers about the evidence.
[117]
Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group therapy for depression in ...
Oct 21, 2014 · Finally, due to publication bias, the effects of treatment for depression found in research trials may be overestimated [25]. Therefore, ...
[118]
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and ...
The emergence of large-scale replication projects yielding successful rates substantially lower than expected caused the behavioural, cognitive, and social ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[119]
Predicting the replicability of social and behavioural science claims ...
Dec 20, 2024 · Replications are important for assessing the reliability of published findings. However, they are costly, and it is infeasible to replicate ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[120]
[PDF] Replication in the Social Sciences
In the social sciences in recent years, replication has received increased attention, as there has been a growing understanding that for research to be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[121]
[PDF] Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration
Note. Positive effect sizes indicate that subjects worked harder coactively than collectively (ie., engaged in social loafing).Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[122]
[PDF] Janis_Groupthink.pdf - MIT
My belief, based on recent social psychological research, is that we can best understand the various symptoms of groupthink as a mutual effort among the group ...
[123]
[PDF] The Law of Group Polarization - Harvard DASH
Group polarization is when deliberation moves groups toward a more extreme point in the direction of their pre-deliberation judgments.
[124]
Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group ...
In the present research, we conduct a meta-analysis to examine the impact of diversity on work group cohesion and performance.
[125]
Conservatism and the Therapeutic Society - TIC
Feb 12, 2016 · The answer to Marxist ideologues and the disoriented seekers after "personal growth" is a reawakened sense of order and responsibility.
[126]
The Case for a Targeted Criticism of the Welfare State - Cato Institute
The conservative critics would object that social benefits should be “deserved” (i.e., at least means tested), and not evenly distributed. There are also some ...Missing: therapy | Show results with:therapy
[127]
[PDF] evidence from a randomized social experiment for welfare recipients
Early results show that the financial incentive increased full-time employment, earnings, and income, and reduced poverty. Furthermore, at the end of the period ...
[128]
[PDF] Policy Gambit: Conservative Think Tanks Take on the Welfare State
Conservative policy institutes have reevaluated their position regarding welfare and begun to present proposals to change social welfare policy.
[129]
Individualism–collectivism, governance and economic development
While an individualist society prizes personal control, autonomy and individual accomplishments, a collectivist one puts a premium on loyalty and cohesion ...