Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Form I-94

Form I-94, officially known as the Arrival/Departure Record, is a document issued by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), a component of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to nonimmigrant aliens upon their admission into the at ports of entry. It records essential details including the traveler's of admission, information, date of entry, and authorized period of stay, functioning as primary evidence of lawful entry and compliance with immigration status terms. Exempt from requiring an I-94 are U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents returning from abroad, immigrants entering with visas, and most Canadian citizens transiting or visiting temporarily. Since the implementation of electronic processing at air and sea ports of entry, Form I-94 has largely transitioned from paper to a digital format, with CBP officers capturing data during and providing travelers a provisional record via or online retrieval. Admitted individuals can access, print, or download their electronic I-94 through the official CBP website (i94.cbp.dhs.gov), which also maintains travel history records dating back to 1983 for many admission classes, aiding in status verification for employment, extension requests, or adjustment of status applications. This automation, formalized in DHS regulations by , has streamlined border processing while enabling real-time tracking of arrivals and departures to enforce overstays and compliance. The form plays a critical role in U.S. by documenting or admission conditions, which nonimmigrants must surrender upon departure or use to demonstrate lawful presence; discrepancies or failures to retrieve accurate records can lead to status violations affecting future entries or benefits. For participants, a related electronic system integrates with I-94 data, though land border entries may still involve provisional paper issuance in limited cases. CBP maintains the system's integrity through direct at borders, prioritizing empirical over self-reported information to uphold causal links between admission records and actual compliance.

Role in Nonimmigrant Tracking

The Form I-94, officially designated as the Arrival/Departure Record, serves as the primary mechanism for tracking nonimmigrants' entry, authorized duration of stay, and exit from the . Issued by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to most non-U.S. citizens upon admission at ports of entry, it captures essential data including the admission date, port of entry, class of admission (e.g., B-1 for business visitors or F-1 for students), and the specific "admit until" date denoting the end of authorized stay. This documentation enforces the temporary nature of nonimmigrant admissions under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which requires aliens to intend only a limited stay aligned with their visa category without immigrant intent. In practice, the I-94 facilitates real-time and historical tracking through an system managed by CBP, where arrival records are generated during inspection and departure records are captured via manifests submitted by air and sea carriers under 8 CFR § 231.1. This matching process identifies overstays—nonimmigrants remaining beyond their admit date—enabling DHS enforcement priorities such as inadmissibility determinations under INA § 212(a)(9)(B) for unlawful presence . Travelers can access their I-94 records online, retrieving up to five years of arrival/departure history by providing name, birth date, and details, which supports compliance verification and reduces reliance on paper forms discontinued for most air and sea arrivals since 2013. The I-94's tracking function extends to downstream immigration processes, providing evidentiary proof of lawful admission for USCIS benefit requests like status extensions (Form I-539) or (Form I-765), and for employers conducting verifications of work eligibility. Discrepancies or errors in the record, such as incorrect admit dates, can trigger secondary inspections or require corrections via CBP deferred inspection sites, underscoring its role in maintaining accurate nonimmigrant population data for and . Overstays detected through I-94 mismatches contribute to DHS overstay reports, which in fiscal year 2022 identified approximately 666,000 in-country overstays from 178 countries, informing policy adjustments.

Statutory and Regulatory Basis

The statutory basis for Form I-94, the Arrival/Departure Record, is rooted in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (INA), as amended, codified at 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq. INA § 235(a) requires immigration officers to inspect every arriving seeking admission (except certain returning lawful permanent residents) and to determine their admissibility, including for nonimmigrants the specific period of authorized stay and class of admission. This inspection process necessitates documentation of the terms of admission to enforce nonimmigrant status limitations under INA § 214(a), which permits temporary admission only for the duration and purpose specified. The Secretary of holds broad authority under INA § 103(a) to administer and enforce the INA, including establishing regulations, requiring records of arrivals and departures, and prescribing forms essential to immigration control and tracking compliance with admission terms. On the regulatory side, Title 8 of the (CFR) implements these statutory mandates. 8 CFR § 1.4 defines "Form I-94" to include any medium—paper or electronic—used by the (DHS) to collect and record arrival/departure data, admission classifications, and information. Issuance requirements are specified in 8 CFR § 235.1(h), mandating that officers provide a Form I-94 to each admitted nonimmigrant at ports of entry, documenting the admission date, class, and authorized stay duration, subject to limited exemptions such as for certain Canadian visitors or those under the Visa Waiver Program with electronic records. Regulations in 8 CFR Part 214 further integrate the I-94 into nonimmigrant oversight, requiring its presentation or electronic record for extensions, changes of status, or employment authorization, ensuring ongoing of lawful presence. DHS has delegated primary responsibility for I-94 issuance and processing to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), aligning with its border role under INA § 235. In 2013, an interim final expanded the in 8 CFR § 1.4 to explicitly encompass electronic I-94 records, enabling automation and reducing paper use while maintaining legal equivalency for evidentiary purposes. This regulatory evolution supports efficient enforcement of INA departure tracking requirements, as nonimmigrants must depart before I-94 expiration to avoid accrual of unlawful presence under INA § 212(a)(9)(B).

Issuance Process

At Ports of Entry

Upon arrival at a U.S. port of entry, including airports, seaports, and land borders, nonimmigrant aliens seeking admission undergo primary and secondary inspection by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, who verify travel documents such as passports and visas (if required). If the traveler is determined admissible in a specific nonimmigrant classification, the CBP officer electronically generates a Form I-94 arrival/departure record in CBP's systems, capturing details including the class of admission (e.g., B-1 for business visitors or F-1 for students), date and place of admission, and the authorized period of stay, typically up to the visa expiration or a maximum duration set by regulation for that classification. At air and sea ports of entry, the Form I-94 has been fully automated since May 2013, eliminating the distribution of paper forms to reduce processing times and errors; instead, officers annotate the traveler's with an admission indicating the date of admission, class of admission, and "admitted until" date, while the full electronic record is stored digitally. For land border crossings, automation was phased in starting in 2019, with full implementation by June 2021, after which CBP ceased printing I-94 stubs at these ports, relying instead on electronic generation during inspection; travelers may apply online for a provisional I-94 up to seven days prior to arrival to facilitate smoother processing, though final issuance occurs upon admission. Travelers receive no physical I-94 document at the port but can access and print their electronic record immediately after admission via the official CBP I-94 website (i94.cbp.dhs.gov) by entering passport details, or through the CBP One mobile app; discrepancies in the record, such as incorrect admission class or duration, must be corrected at the port of entry or a deferred inspection site before departure. Failure to present a valid I-94 upon request by immigration authorities can result in enforcement actions, as the record serves as primary evidence of lawful admission and authorized stay.

Deferred Inspection and USCIS Issuance

Deferred inspection refers to a procedure employed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) when an immediate determination of a nonimmigrant's admissibility or issuance of cannot be completed at the primary (POE), such as due to technical issues, incomplete documentation, or the need for supervisory review or additional verification. In such cases, the CBP officer may the traveler into the temporarily and direct them to report to one of over 70 designated Deferred Inspection Sites (DIS) located at secondary airports or other facilities across the and its territories for resolution. At the DIS, officers conduct a more thorough secondary , which may include biometric processing, document review, and final of the admission, culminating in the issuance, correction, or of the arrival/departure record if the individual is deemed admissible. Failure to attend the scheduled DIS appointment can result in the revocation of and potential actions, as the initial entry is provisional. The deferred inspection process is particularly relevant for Form I-94 when errors occur during initial processing at the POE, such as discrepancies in visa classification, duration of stay, or electronic record failures under the I-94 automation system implemented since 2013. For instance, nonimmigrants who were not issued a Form I-94 upon legal admission—possibly due to oversight or system limitations—must contact their nearest or POE to obtain one, as this record is essential for proving lawful status and eligibility. DIS locations handle I-94 corrections via in-person visits, email submissions, or specific protocols, with contact details varying by site; for example, the Philadelphia International Airport accepts requests at [email protected]. This mechanism ensures continuity in nonimmigrant tracking while accommodating operational constraints at high-volume POEs, though it introduces delays that can affect immediate or status verification. USCIS issues Form I-94 primarily in scenarios involving extensions of stay, changes of nonimmigrant status, or certain adjustments within the , rather than at ports of entry, to reflect updated authorized periods or classifications approved through petitions such as Form I-129. Upon approval, USCIS generates an electronic or paper I-94 endorsement on the notice, specifying the new admission class, validity dates, and any conditions, which supersedes the prior CBP-issued record and must be retrieved via the USCIS online account or mailed documentation. This issuance authority stems from DHS regulations enabling internal status modifications without requiring departure and reentry, applicable to categories like H-1B extensions or L-1 changes where petitioners demonstrate ongoing eligibility. For nonimmigrants requiring a replacement or initial Form I-94 not obtainable from CBP—such as in cases of lost documents, status changes without prior I-94, or specific non-port-of-entry admissions—applicants file Form I-102 with USCIS, paying the associated fee and providing evidence of eligibility. USCIS has also issued specialized I-94 notations, for example, starting January 30, 2022, for certain and nonimmigrant dependent spouses to document employment authorization alongside status extensions. Unlike CBP's entry-focused issuance, USCIS processes emphasize petition-based approvals and can involve additional scrutiny of maintenance of , with denials potentially leading to accrual of unlawful presence. Nonimmigrants must retain and present the USCIS-issued I-94 for compliance with departure requirements or further benefit applications, underscoring its role in seamless internal management.

Exceptions to Issuance

Certain categories of nonimmigrants are exempt from receiving a Form I-94 upon admission to the , primarily due to streamlined admission policies, bilateral agreements, or the nature of their temporary status that does not necessitate formal arrival-departure tracking via this record. These exceptions apply to specific nationalities entering under visitor statuses or military-related programs, where U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policies deem an I-94 unnecessary for compliance monitoring. Canadian citizens admitted as nonimmigrant visitors, such as under B-1 or B-2 classifications, are generally not issued a Form I-94, particularly when entering by land borders for short-term visits; this exemption reflects the high volume of routine cross-border travel and reciprocal trust in departure reporting. Similarly, Mexican citizens presenting a valid (Form DSP-150) for stays limited to the border zone (typically within 25-75 miles of the U.S.- border, up to 30 days) do not receive an I-94, as their movements are confined and monitored differently under the program's restrictions. Nonimmigrant members of the U.S. armed forces, admitted in a temporary duty status, are not issued a Form I-94 upon entry, owing to their official military affiliation and internal tracking mechanisms that supersede standard immigration record-keeping. Likewise, foreign military personnel participating in or programs under the are exempt, as these international accords provide alternative accountability frameworks for their presence and movements. Crew members arriving under D nonimmigrant visas (for service on vessels or ) receive a Form I-95, Crewman's Landing Permit, instead of an I-94, to reflect their distinct operational role and limited privileges, which are governed by separate manifest and reporting requirements. In cases where an I-94 is not issued due to these exceptions, affected individuals may later apply for an initial Arrival-Departure Record using Form I-102 if needed for employment authorization, status verification, or other purposes.

Record Format and Access

Electronic Versus Paper Records

The electronic Form I-94, implemented by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) starting in April 2013 for air and sea ports of entry and extended to land borders by May 26, 2021, generates an automated arrival and departure record through scanning and officer data entry, replacing routine manual paper issuance. This format captures essential details such as admission class, date, and authorized stay duration directly into CBP systems, minimizing transcription errors inherent in paper processing. Paper Forms I-94 are issued only in limited circumstances, such as technical system failures or upon request when deemed feasible by CBP officers, particularly at land ports where demands may necessitate exceptions. Prior to full , records were standard and required physical surrender upon departure at certain ports, but this practice has been phased out to reduce administrative burdens and costs, estimated at $15.5 million annually in savings for CBP through handling. Legacy I-94s from pre-2013 entries remain valid until their expiration date but lack the automated departure capabilities of versions. Access to electronic records occurs via the CBP website (i94.cbp.dhs.gov) or the CBP One application, requiring input of passport number, date of birth, and other identifiers to retrieve and print the record, which serves as official proof of status for , benefits, or extensions. In contrast, paper records provide immediate tangible but demand careful retention and manual submission, increasing risks of loss or non-compliance during departures, especially at land borders where departure recording can be inconsistent without supporting like tickets or stamps. Both formats are equally valid for immigration compliance, such as verification, though systems facilitate real-time updates and reduce fraud through centralized .

Retrieval and Management Procedures

Nonimmigrant travelers primarily retrieve their electronic Form I-94 records through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) official website at https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/#/home, where they can select "Get Most Recent I-94" to view, download, or print the provisional record associated with their most recent admission. Access requires entering the individual's number, name, date of birth, country of issuance, and passport expiration date, with records typically available within minutes of admission at air or sea ports of entry. The system also provides arrival and departure history dating back five years from the request date, facilitating verification of compliance with admission terms. For instances where electronic retrieval fails, such as a "not found" result despite recent entry, travelers may submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to CBP for manual record retrieval, including providing full name, date of birth, and any known admission numbers. Alternatively, the CBP One mobile app or CBP Link app offers similar retrieval functionality for records, emphasizing digital management to reduce paper dependency. Paper versions, though largely phased out, can be requested during secondary inspection at ports of entry or printed directly from the retrieved record for official use, such as employment verification. Management of I-94 records involves correcting errors or obtaining replacements, with procedures differentiated by issuing authority. For CBP-issued errors (e.g., incorrect class of admission or expiration date), individuals must contact the nearest Deferred Inspection Site or for review and amendment, often requiring in-person visits or emailed requests to designated addresses like [email protected] for specific locations. USCIS-issued I-94 errors, such as typographic mistakes, can be addressed via an online e-Request for typographic corrections if attributable to USCIS actions. Replacements for lost, stolen, or mutilated I-94 records are handled through Form I-102, filed with USCIS by eligible nonimmigrants, including supporting evidence like passport copies and police reports if applicable; this form does not apply to routine CBP error corrections, which remain under CBP jurisdiction. Filing occurs at USCIS lockboxes with associated fees per the current schedule (non-refundable), and processing times vary based on biometrics requirements and evidence review. Travelers must retain and surrender paper I-94s upon departure to carriers or CBP officers to ensure accurate electronic closure, preventing overstay notations in departure manifests. Extensions or status changes managed by USCIS result in a new electronic I-94 issued upon approval, superseding prior records.

Historical Evolution

Pre-Automation Period

The Form I-94, officially designated as the Arrival/Departure Record, originated in the early 1960s under the (), predecessor to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Introduced approximately 50 years prior to its partial automation in 2013, the paper-based form served as the primary mechanism for documenting the admission terms, including class of admission and authorized duration of stay, for nonimmigrant aliens entering the . It functioned to record both arrival and departure events, provide evidentiary proof of lawful entry required for purposes such as employment authorization and status adjustments, and enable aliens to seek extensions or changes of nonimmigrant status while in the country. Exemptions applied to U.S. citizens, returning lawful permanent residents, immigrants bearing immigrant visas, and most Canadian visitors or transit passengers, who did not require the form for tracking. Issuance occurred manually at all ports of entry, including airports, seaports, and land borders. Nonimmigrant travelers typically completed the two-part paper form—either in transit for air and sea arrivals or upon presentation at land ports—detailing personal information, passport data, and travel purpose, which immigration inspectors then reviewed, endorsed with an admission stamp specifying the visa class (e.g., B-1 for business visitors), port of entry, and "admit until" date or "D/S" notation for duration of status. The traveler retained the arrival stub as official evidence of status, essential for interactions with employers, schools, or government agencies, while the duplicate departure record was designed to be surrendered to immigration officials or airline personnel upon exit, theoretically closing the tracking loop. At land borders, particularly with Canada and Mexico, issuance was similarly manual but often expedited due to high volumes, with forms distributed at inspection booths. The paper system's operational demands included physical storage of millions of forms annually in INS facilities, manual data transcription into centralized records for compliance verification, and reliance on travelers to safeguard their copies, leading to frequent issues with lost or damaged documents that necessitated replacements via deferred inspections or USCIS applications. Departure recording proved particularly unreliable, especially at land ports lacking systematic exit inspections, resulting in incomplete overstay data and enforcement gaps, as unreturned departure stubs hindered precise calculation of unauthorized presence. By the late , the processed over 100 million nonimmigrant admissions yearly through this method, underscoring its scale but also exposing inefficiencies like processing delays, human errors in stamping durations, and vulnerability to , which compromised its reliability for and control objectives. Despite these limitations, the form remained the cornerstone of nonimmigrant tracking until technological upgrades addressed its analog constraints.

Automation Rollout (2013–2016)

In March 2013, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published an interim final rule amending regulations to define Form I-94 as including an electronic format, enabling a transition from paper-based issuance to an automated electronic process primarily at air and sea ports of entry. The rule took effect on April 26, 2013, allowing CBP to generate electronic I-94 records using pre-existing traveler data from systems like Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) and Consular Consolidated Database (CCD), thereby eliminating the need for manual completion of paper forms by most nonimmigrant visitors arriving by air or sea. This automation aimed to reduce administrative burdens, with projections estimating annual savings from processing approximately 9.6 million paper forms and 1.3 million labor hours, while facilitating faster entry processing and better data integration for departure tracking. CBP initiated a phased rollout of the electronic I-94 system starting April 30, 2013, at select air and sea ports, expanding nationwide by May 21, 2013, to cover all such facilities handling international arrivals. Under the new process, eligible travelers received only a indicating admission details, with the provisional electronic I-94 created automatically upon ; a final version, including any adjustments, became accessible online via the CBP website at i94.cbp.dhs.gov by entering the traveler's name, date of birth, number, and country of issuance. Paper I-94s remained available upon request for those needing physical copies for immediate purposes, such as applications, and continued to be issued mandatorily for specific categories including refugees, asylees, and certain parolees. By 2016, the air and sea automation had stabilized, with annual electronic I-94 retrievals rising from 2,080,285 in 2013 to 4,194,886 in , reflecting increased traveler familiarity and system usage despite associated costs for website maintenance and traveler access (estimated at $13.4 million in operational expenses and $18.7 million in travel-related burdens for ). During this period, land border ports of entry largely retained paper I-94 issuance due to higher volumes of short-term crossings and logistical challenges, though preparatory steps emerged in late with the launch of an enhanced online on September 29 allowing voluntary pre-submission of I-94 data and a $6 for provisional electronic records at select land facilities. This partial extension marked the onset of land border integration, with initial opt-in estimates projecting 350,000 users annually by , potentially yielding $5.15 million in time savings for travelers and $4.99 million for CBP. The rollout encountered minimal disruptions at air and sea ports, supported by outreach to airlines, travel agents, and foreign consulates to inform travelers of the shift, though early challenges included traveler unfamiliarity with retrieval, leading to recommendations for records prior to secondary applications like employment authorization. A final rule confirming the electronic definition was issued December 19, 2016, effective January 18, 2017, solidifying the framework established in 2013 without substantive changes to the interim process. Overall, the 2013–2016 phase achieved near-complete for air and sea entries, processing projected volumes of 19.3 million travelers in 2013 to 24.5 million by 2016, while setting the stage for broader adoption.

Expansions and Updates (2017–2025)

In June 2017, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) introduced a notification feature on the I-94 website, enabling nonimmigrant travelers to receive or text reminders of their authorized departure date to improve with stay limits. This expansion built on the electronic system's capabilities by leveraging automated alerts, reducing reliance on manual tracking amid rising nonimmigrant admissions, which exceeded 180 million in fiscal year 2017. On April 11, 2019, CBP and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) updated the Form I-94 identifier format from an 11-digit numeric sequence to a nine-digit numeric sequence followed by one letter and one digit, enhancing system capacity and integration with databases like the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System (). This change addressed scalability issues as electronic I-94 records proliferated, with CBP processing over 200 million nonimmigrant encounters annually by fiscal year 2019. In September 2020, the Department of Homeland Security () implemented a rule establishing fixed admission periods for certain nonimmigrants, replacing indefinite "duration of status" notations on I-94 records with specific end dates (typically up to four years for academic categories, subject to extensions), to enforce clearer departure tracking and reduce overstay risks empirically linked to vague authorizations. A March 2022 DHS rule streamlined I-94 issuance at land borders, effective May 2021, by shifting from routine on-site printing of paper forms to provisional electronic issuances accessible online, except in limited cases requiring immediate documentation. This completed the transition to full electronic processing across all ports of entry, eliminating paper I-94 distribution at land borders by November 2022 for most arrivals, as CBP discontinued routine issuance to minimize administrative burdens and errors in high-volume crossings exceeding 300 million annually. In October 2021, CBP updated its for the I-94 website, incorporating enhanced data handling for travel history retrieval and provisional applications, reflecting ongoing system maturation amid concerns. Effective September 30, 2025, CBP imposed an additional $24 fee on top of the existing $6 charge for electronic I-94 applications, mandated by fiscal year 2025 fee requirements under H.R. 1, to fund and .

Overstays and Enforcement Role

Departure Verification and Overstay Detection

U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) verifies departures of nonimmigrant travelers holding electronic Form I-94 records by matching biographical data from the arrival record—such as passport number, name, and date of birth—with passenger manifests submitted by air and sea carriers via the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS). Carriers are required to transmit these manifests electronically prior to departure, enabling CBP to update the I-94 record automatically upon a successful match, confirming the traveler's exit from the United States. This process, implemented following the 2013 automation of I-94 at air and sea ports, covers the majority of international entries and exits, with CBP's Arrival and Departure Information System (ADIS) serving as the central database for cross-referencing. Overstay detection relies on the absence of a matching departure after the "admit until" date specified on the I-94, triggering automated alerts in ADIS. CBP consolidates arrival data from I-94 issuance with departure manifests, immigration benefit filings, and border crossing records; if no match occurs within a monitoring period—typically extending slightly beyond the authorized stay—the system generates "suspected in-country overstay" leads forwarded to and Customs () for prioritization and potential enforcement action. In fiscal year 2023, this mechanism contributed to DHS identifying overstay rates by country, with ADIS processing millions of records to distinguish true overstays from data mismatches or late departures. Travelers receive reminders from CBP approximately 10 days before their I-94 expiration and notifications for potential overstays, directing them to the I-94 for . The I-94's electronic format enhances detection accuracy by standardizing data fields for matching, though limitations persist at land borders where departure manifests are not universally required, potentially leading to unrecorded exits and false overstay flags unless manually resolved. For participants and other short-term visitors, ADIS prioritizes high-risk cases using additional against DHS watchlists, but overall focuses on threats rather than universal apprehension. This biographical matching approach, while improved since pre-automation eras, depends on carrier compliance and , with CBP confirming departures for over 400,000 suspected cases annually through manifest validation alone.

Empirical Data on Overstay Rates

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determines suspected overstay rates through the Arrival and Departure Information System (ADIS), which matches electronic Form I-94 arrival and departure records primarily at air and sea ports of entry. An in-country overstay is recorded when no matching departure is found for an expected departure by -end, excluding cases of confirmed adjustments of status, deaths, or later-verified exits. These rates represent suspected overstays, as unrecorded land departures or data mismatches may occur, though DHS achieved over 99 percent confirmation of departures for cases by February 2025. In fiscal year 2024, DHS identified 46,657,108 expected departures from air and sea arrivals, yielding 482,954 suspected in-country overstays for an initial rate of 1.04 percent, adjusted downward to 0.92 percent (427,204 cases) with subsequent verifications. This followed fiscal year 2023's 39,005,712 expected departures and initial 1.31 percent rate (510,363 suspected in-country overstays), later refined to 1.02 percent. Total overstay rates, including out-of-country cases, stood at 1.15 percent in fiscal year 2024 (538,548 total) and 1.45 percent in fiscal year 2023 (565,155 total). Rates vary significantly by visa category and program, with (VWP) travelers consistently lower due to eligibility thresholds requiring under 3 percent overstay rates.
CategoryFY2023 In-Country RateFY2024 In-Country RateExpected Departures (FY2024)
(VWP)0.62%0.43%18,853,231
Non-VWP (excl. /)3.2%2.22%12,131,255
Students/Exchange (F, M, J)3.67%2.45%1,412,627
B-1/B-2 (air/sea)Not specified0.60%10,561,700
(air/sea)0.30%0.19%9,429,208
(air/sea)1.85%1.54%3,688,966
These figures exclude land border crossings, where departure tracking remains incomplete, potentially understating total overstays; however, air and modes account for the majority of nonimmigrant entries subject to I-94 requirements. Country-specific rates in fiscal year 2024 ranged from under 1 percent for most VWP nations to over 20 percent for select high-risk non-VWP countries, informing restrictions and bond programs.

Enforcement Limitations and Causal Factors

Enforcement of I-94 overstay provisions is constrained by incomplete departure tracking systems, particularly at land ports of entry where exits are not systematically recorded, leading to reliance on inferred departures from subsequent re-entries or other indirect data. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) primarily uses airline manifests for air and sea departures, but land border crossings—numbering over 200 million annually between the U.S., , and —lack equivalent verification, resulting in an estimated 20-30% of potential overstays unidentifiable due to data gaps. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) further limits actions through prioritization of and public safety threats, with only 106 arrests from 231 overstay leads referred in 2022, despite hundreds of thousands of suspected in-country overstays reported annually. Causal factors include technological deficiencies, such as the absence of a nationwide biometric mandated by since 1996 but not fully implemented, which hinders accurate matching of I-94 entries to departures and contributes to unintegrated databases across CBP, , and U.S. and Services (USCIS). Resource limitations exacerbate this, as 's Enforcement and Removal Operations division processes over 500,000 overstay leads yearly but lacks staffing to pursue non-priority cases, with biographical data inaccuracies and difficulty locating individuals reducing apprehension rates to under 1% of identified overstays. Policy decisions, including broad guidelines issued in 2021, direct enforcement away from routine overstays toward criminals, while high admission volumes—over 180 million nonimmigrant encounters in 2023—overwhelm capacity, with overstay rates hovering at 1-2% but yielding 600,000-800,000 unresolved cases annually. Additional factors stem from status adjustments and temporary protections, such as Deferred Enforced Departure or , which retroactively nullify over 10% of suspected overstays by legalizing extended stays, complicating I-94 enforcement retrospectives. Land border exemptions for certain nationals, like entering without I-94 issuance, further erode tracking fidelity, as do "duration of status" admissions for students and exchange visitors, which defer expiration until active revocation and reduce enforceable violations. These systemic elements, rooted in historical underinvestment in exit infrastructure and competing border security priorities, sustain low removal rates despite legal mandates under the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Controversies and Criticisms

Systemic Errors and Compliance Issues

The electronic Form I-94 system, implemented to minimize manual errors associated with paper records, continues to exhibit discrepancies such as incorrect admission dates, class of admission codes, or passport mismatches that can shorten authorized stays without travelers' immediate awareness. These inaccuracies often arise from officer input variations or system processing delays, prompting CBP to maintain correction mechanisms like deferred inspections and the Traveler Communication Center, though resolution times can extend beyond five business days in some cases. Additionally, "not found" results on the I-94 website may stem from formatting inconsistencies in CBP databases rather than non-issuance, necessitating Act requests for retrieval in persistent glitches. Compliance challenges are exacerbated by incomplete departure tracking, particularly at ports of entry, where logistical barriers hinder full capture of exit data, resulting in underreported departures and inflated suspected overstay rates in DHS analyses. The Arrival and Departure matches biographic s from carriers against I-94 records to detect overstays, but inaccuracies in carrier-submitted data—subject to fines by CBP—undermine reliability, with air and sea environments faring better than due to automated requirements. For 2024, DHS reported overstay rates based primarily on air and sea data, explicitly limiting assessments owing to these systemic gaps, which affect enforcement prioritization and traveler . Unnoticed I-94 errors thus triggering unlawful presence under INA 212(a)(9)(B), even for compliant individuals, as extensions or status changes may not retroactively align mismatched records without nunc pro tunc relief.

National Security and Enforcement Gaps

The Form I-94 system's incomplete departure tracking, particularly at land borders with and , has hindered the detection of visa overstays that pose risks, as nonimmigrants exiting via these ports often evade automated recording, leading to presumed overstays that are not verified in real-time. This gap persists despite air and sea automation implemented since 2013, with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) relying on airline manifests for departures but lacking equivalent mechanisms for overland travel, resulting in an estimated undercount of overstays by hundreds of thousands annually. Consequently, individuals on terrorist watchlists who enter legally can remain in the U.S. undetected beyond their authorized period, as evidenced by (GAO) analyses identifying overstay tracking as a critical layer in defenses against . Empirical data links these enforcement shortcomings to terrorism threats, with at least 36 visa overstayers convicted on terrorism-related charges in the U.S. since 2001, including cases where failure to track departures delayed apprehension. For instance, four of the September 11, 2001, hijackers had overstayed their visas, a vulnerability highlighted by the 9/11 Commission as exploitable by terrorists using valid entry documents. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) overstay reports, while providing country-specific data, reveal persistent high overstay rates from terror-prone nations—such as over 7,000 suspected overstays from 23 such countries reported in fiscal year 2015 alone—yet enforcement actions remain limited, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) prioritizing criminal nonimmigrants over all suspected overstayers due to resource constraints. These causal factors, including inadequate inter-agency data sharing and biometric exit system delays mandated by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, allow potential threats to embed within communities without triggering alerts. Critics, including congressional oversight committees, argue that systemic under-enforcement reflects policy trade-offs favoring economic migration over rigorous security, as ICE's overstay task forces have apprehended only a fraction of the estimated 700,000+ annual overstays, with cases often deprioritized absent active intelligence leads. evaluations confirm that while I-94 data aids watchlist cross-checks post-entry, the absence of comprehensive exit verification undermines proactive removal, enabling overstayers linked to foreign terrorist organizations to conduct operations, as seen in historical convictions involving and material support tied to prior overstay histories. Recent DHS initiatives, such as enhanced overstay deterrence strategies, aim to address these gaps through prioritized removals and improved data analytics, but implementation lags have sustained vulnerabilities in the layered defense approach.

Diverse Policy Viewpoints

Policymakers focused on and have advocated for strengthening the Form I-94 system's with biometric and comprehensive tracking to more effectively identify and penalize visa overstays, viewing incomplete implementation as a vulnerability exploited by potential threats, as evidenced by historical cases like the 9/11 hijackers who overstayed visas. Congressional hearings, such as those by the House Judiciary Committee, have highlighted visa overstays as a "gap in the nation's border security," arguing that robust I-94 enforcement would enable denial of future admissions and improve overstay estimates, with bipartisan consensus that such lapses undermine system integrity despite ongoing limitations reported to . In contrast, immigrant rights organizations and legal advocates criticize overreliance on I-94 for , contending that systemic errors in electronic records—such as incorrect admission dates or inaccessible files—result in unintentional violations and disproportionate penalties, including bars to reentry, without adequate or correction mechanisms. These groups, including analyses from migration-focused think tanks, emphasize that many overstays stem from administrative discrepancies rather than willful intent, urging prioritization of error remediation and humanitarian considerations over punitive tracking expansions. Business and economic stakeholders generally support the electronic I-94 automation for its efficiency gains, such as reduced paperwork and faster processing at ports of entry, which lower operational costs and facilitate temporary worker and visitor flows critical to sectors like and . However, employer representatives express concerns that persistent inaccuracies in I-94 records expose foreign workers to compliance risks, including status lapses that disrupt hiring and contribute to labor shortages, calling for enhanced tools and CBP resources to minimize such disruptions.

References

  1. [1]
    Arrival/Departure Forms: I-94 and I-94W
    Foreign visitors to the US no longer need to complete paper Customs and Border Protection Form I-94 Arrival/Departure Record or Form I-94W Nonimmigrant Visa ...Traveler Compliance · Fact Sheets · CBP FormsMissing: description | Show results with:description
  2. [2]
    Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background - USCIS
    May 20, 2021 · DHS uses Form I-94 to document arrival and departure and provide evidence of the terms of admission or parole. While some aliens are still ...
  3. [3]
    Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record, Information for Completing ...
    Nov 18, 2020 · All persons need a Form I-94 except US citizens, returning resident aliens, aliens with immigrant visas, and most Canadian citizens visiting or in transit.
  4. [4]
    Form I-94 arrival-departure record for U.S. visitors | USAGov
    Form I-94 records the arrival and departure dates of people visiting the U.S.. Who needs an I-94 form? Everyone entering the U.S. needs an I-94 form except:.
  5. [5]
    I-94 Automation Fact Sheet | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    CBP automated the I-94 form at air and sea ports, reducing paper forms. Travelers get a CBP stamp, and can get a copy online.Missing: description | Show results with:description
  6. [6]
    Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format - Federal Register
    Mar 27, 2013 · The Form I-94 is used to document arrival and departure and provides evidence of the terms of admission or parole. U.S. Customs and Border ...Missing: description | Show results with:description
  7. [7]
    I-94/I-95 Website - Official Site for Travelers Visiting the United States
    International travelers can apply for a provisional I-94, retrieve their I-94/I-95 record, and view their travel history. Most visitors need an I-94, except ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] I-94 Automation Fact Sheet - Customs and Border Protection
    Form I-94 is the DHS arrival/departure record issued to aliens who are admitted to the U.S., who are adjusting status while in the U.S. or extending their stay, ...
  9. [9]
    Arrival and Departure Record (Forms I–94 and I–94W) and ...
    Forms I-94 and I-94W document traveler admission to the US, collecting citizenship, residency, passport, and contact information. ESTA is for VWP travelers.
  10. [10]
    Arrival/Departure History Now Available on I-94 Webpage | U.S. ...
    Apr 30, 2014 · The new CBP webpage allows nonimmigrant travelers to access arrival/departure records going back five years from the request date.
  11. [11]
    Form I-94 - USCIS
    Jul 30, 2018 · If you are a nonimmigrant and need to apply for a new or replacement Form I-94 or Form I-95, please visit our Form I-102 page.Missing: tracking | Show results with:tracking
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    CBP Announces the Addition of I-94 Features to CBP One™ Mobile ...
    Jun 11, 2021 · To further streamline the I-94 process at the land borders, CBP will no longer print the I-94 stub at the land ports of entry, saving additional ...
  17. [17]
    I-94/I-95 Frequently Asked Question (FAQs) - Homeland Security
    A traveler lawfully admitted (or paroled) into the U.S. may print their lawful record of admission (Form I-94) from this CBP website or from the CBP Link Mobile ...
  18. [18]
    What is the I-94 Automation? - help.CBP.gov
    Jun 26, 2025 · The I-94 automation means the paper form is no longer given at air/sea ports, and travelers get a CBP stamp. The electronic I-94 helps ...
  19. [19]
    What is a Deferred Inspection Site? - help.CBP.gov
    May 24, 2025 · The Deferred Inspection Sites (DIS) are used when an immediate decision concerning the immigration status of an arriving traveler cannot be made at the US port ...
  20. [20]
    Chapter 2 - Eligibility Requirements - USCIS
    An alien must meet certain eligibility requirements to adjust status to that of a lawful permanent resident (LPR).
  21. [21]
    I want to extend or change my nonimmigrant status, but I was not ...
    May 1, 2025 · If you were not given an I-94 (White) Form when you were legally admitted to the United States, please contact your nearest Deferred Inspection ...
  22. [22]
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania - 1101 - Customs and Border Protection
    Sep 25, 2025 · Deferred Inspection Site at Philadelphia International Airport. Phone Number: (215) 863-4247. Email: Philadeferredinspections@cbp.dhs.gov.<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Deferred Inspection Sites | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    Sep 10, 2025 · If you entered on or after April 30, 2013 please visit the Arrival/Departure Forms: I-94 and I-94W page to obtain your Arrival-Departure Record.
  24. [24]
    I-102, Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant ... - USCIS
    Sep 23, 2025 · Use this form if you are a nonimmigrant and need to apply for a new or replacement Form I-94 or Form I-95, Nonimmigrant Arrival-Departure Document.<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    UPDATE: Documentation of Employment Authorization for Certain E ...
    May 10, 2022 · As of January 30, 2022, USCIS and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began issuing Form I-94, Arrival-Departure records, with new classes ...
  26. [26]
    Chapter 2 - Application for Replacement/Initial Nonimmigrant Arrival ...
    May 20, 2021 · An alien uses Form I-102 to apply for the replacement of a lost, stolen, mutilated, or destroyed Form I-94, Form I-94W, or Form I-95.
  27. [27]
    Streamlining I-94 Issuance at the Land Border - Federal Register
    Mar 18, 2022 · The Form I-94. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) delegated its authority to issue and process the Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) ...Missing: statutory | Show results with:statutory
  28. [28]
    What to do if your I-94 is "Not Found" online - help.CBP.gov
    Oct 10, 2025 · If you still cannot retrieve your most recent I-94 or travel history, you may need to file a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. At ...Missing: correcting procedures
  29. [29]
    e-Request - Typographic Error - Case Status Online - USCIS
    If your document has incorrect information because of USCIS error (for example, USCIS made a typo), you may submit a Typographic Error service request.
  30. [30]
    CBP to Begin Rollout of Automated Form I-94 Arrival/Departure ...
    Apr 26, 2013 · The automation means that affected visitors will no longer need to fill out a paper form when arriving to the U.S. by air or sea, improving ...
  31. [31]
    CBP Begins Implementation of Form I-94 Automation - USCIS
    Apr 30, 2013 · US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) started implementing the automated version of Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record, at air and sea ports of entry.
  32. [32]
    Definition of Form I-94 To Include Electronic Format - Federal Register
    Dec 19, 2016 · Response: The IFR enabled CBP to transition to an automated process whereby CBP creates a Form I-94 in an electronic format. CBP has not changed ...
  33. [33]
    I-94 Website Feature – CBP Now to Remind Travelers of Departure ...
    Jun 6, 2017 · The automated system eliminated the need for paper forms and manual entry by allowing CPB Officers to create the I-94 Arrival Record at the time ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Annual Flow Report July 2020 - U.S. Nonimmigrant Admissions: 2019
    Information collected from these I-94 records includes arrival and departure dates, POE, class of admission, country of citizenship, state of destination, age, ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Changes to Form I-94, “Arrival/Departure Record,” Numbering ... - ICE
    Apr 11, 2019 · Form I-94 identifiers will change from 11 numerical digits to 9 digits, a letter, and 1 digit (9-digit sequence + 1 letter + 1 digit).
  36. [36]
    DHS/CBP/PIA-016(a) I-94 Website Application | Homeland Security
    Oct 12, 2021 · The I-94 website application allows nonimmigrant noncitizens to apply for provisional I-94s, search for their I-94, view travel history, and ...<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Establishing a Fixed Time Period of Admission and an Extension of ...
    Sep 25, 2020 · (B) An Arrival-Departure Record (Form I-94 or successor form) is considered unexpired when combined with a USCIS receipt notice indicating ...
  38. [38]
    End of Paper Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record - Immigration Blog
    Nov 20, 2022 · US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will no longer issue a paper Form I-94, Arrival/Departure Record, to individuals arriving to the United States at a land ...
  39. [39]
    CBP Immigration Fees Required by HR-1 for Fiscal Year 2025
    Aug 28, 2025 · This notice advises the public that, pursuant to HR-1, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will require aliens to pay a new fee to apply ...Missing: expansions 2017-2025<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Electronic I-94 Record Retrieval Tips - NAFSA
    Jul 24, 2019 · Like arrival data, departure data is also transmitted to CBP systems by air and sea carriers through electronic passenger manifests. If an ...
  41. [41]
    8 CFR § 231.2 - Electronic manifest and I-94 requirement for ...
    Submission of the I-94 to the CBP officer must be accomplished within 48 hours of the departure, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays. Failure to ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Strategy for Overstay Enforcement and Deterrence
    Dec 31, 2020 · To initiate the overstay identification process, CBP collects biographic and biometric data on nonimmigrants at U.S. ports of entry. CBP ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Entry/Exit Overstay Report - Homeland Security
    Aug 5, 2024 · The overstay identification process is conducted utilizing arrival, departure, and immigration benefit information, which is consolidated to ...Missing: detection mechanism
  44. [44]
    Traveler Compliance | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
    Aug 23, 2023 · CBP has established an easy to use traveler compliance check that is available on the I-94 website. Travelers may check their admission status ...Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  45. [45]
    Reporting arrival/departure if entering by air and departing by land
    Apr 16, 2025 · Foreign visitors to the United States no longer need to complete a paper Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Form I-94 Arrival/Departure Record.Missing: tracking | Show results with:tracking
  46. [46]
    [PDF] CBP Entry Exit Overstay Report FY 2024 - Homeland Security
    Jul 16, 2025 · The Suspected In- Country Overstay rate is 2.44 percent for the F visa category, 2.85 percent for the M visa category, and 2.44 percent for the ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    [PDF] OIG-17-56 - DHS Tracking of Visa Overstays is Hindered by ...
    May 1, 2017 · DHS tracking of visa overstays is hindered by insufficient technology, unintegrated systems, lack of a biometric exit system, and reliance on ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Fiscal Year 2022 Entry/Exit Overstay Report - Homeland Security
    Jun 21, 2023 · As of February 1, 2023, DHS was able to confirm the departures or adjustments of status of more than 96.96 percent of nonimmigrants scheduled to ...
  50. [50]
    Hidden Pitfalls in I-94s Threaten Foreign Worker Immigration Status ...
    May 10, 2024 · CBP officers may shorten the authorized stay by issuing an I-94 valid only until the passport expires, even if the visa allows a longer period.Missing: detection mechanism<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Tips When Electronic I-94 results show “Not Found”
    It is possible that your Form I-94 does not exist because of a system error, but it is also likely it exists in the CBP system with data formatted differently ...
  52. [52]
    Overstayed Due to I-94 Mistake? Use Nunc Pro Tunc to Stay in Status
    May 1, 2025 · Overstayed due to an I-94 error? Learn how a nunc pro tunc filing can help you correct your status and avoid a reentry bar in the U.S..
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Overstay Tracking Is a Key Component of a Layered Defense
    Oct 16, 2003 · In our ongoing work, we will examine indicators of the magnitude, and significance, of short-term overstaying among visitors who fill out I-94 ...Missing: causal | Show results with:causal
  54. [54]
    GAO-04-82, Overstay Tracking: A Key Component of Homeland ...
    * DHS estimated overstays using I-94 data from the early 1990s, and it ... [24] Specifically, DHS used Form I-94 data from the early 1990s and ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    FROM THE 9/11 HIJACKERS TO AMINE EL-KHALIFI: TERRORISTS ...
    In fact, more than 36 visa overstayers have been convicted of terrorism- related charges since 2001. ... U.S. Capitol, is not the first time terrorists have ...
  56. [56]
    Entry/Exit Overstay Reports - Homeland Security
    Sep 4, 2025 · DHS has generated this report to provide data on departures and overstays, by country, for foreign visitors to the United States who were expected to depart in ...Missing: detection process
  57. [57]
    OVERSTAYING THEIR WELCOME: NATIONAL SECURITY RISKS ...
    Time and time again, terrorists have exploited the visa system by legally entering America. The 9/11 Commission put it this way: ``For terrorists, travel ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Comprehensive Strategy for Overstay Enforcement and Deterrence
    Mar 18, 2020 · The email directs the individual to visit the website (https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/#/home) to find information on his or her status within the ...
  59. [59]
    Visa Overstays: A Growing Problem for Law Enforcement - House.gov
    It is recognized that the quality of data on the I-94, which is self-reported, is rarely complete. This factor is compensated, by our use, when appropriate, of ...
  60. [60]
    Nonimmigrant Overstays: Overview and Policy Issues - Congress.gov
    Nov 21, 2023 · CBP uses APIS data to assist with the identification of high-risk and inadmissible passengers. CBP vets passenger manifests against law ...
  61. [61]
    Problems Caused by U.S. Electronic Entry System
    Oct 27, 2023 · Working non-immigrants have problems with electronic I-94 dates too. ... Some will even provide clients with poor legal advice for solving the ...
  62. [62]
    Since 2007 Visa Overstays have Outnumbered Undocumented ...
    It finds that two-thirds of those who arrived in 2014 did not illegally cross a border, but were admitted (after screening) on non-immigrant (temporary) visas, ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Entry-Exit System: Progress, Challenges, and Outlook
    The key benefits of exit records would be to (1) enable the government to deny future visas or admission on the basis of past overstays and (2) improve the ...