Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Form I-9

Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, is a form issued by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that employers in the United States must use to verify the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment. Enacted as part of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986, which aimed to deter the employment of unauthorized workers by imposing verification requirements on employers, the form applies to all hires after November 6, 1986, including U.S. citizens, noncitizen nationals, lawful permanent residents, and nonimmigrants authorized to work. The form consists of three sections: Section 1, which the employee completes and signs no later than the first day of to attest to their employment authorization status; Section 2, which the employer completes within three business days of hire by examining original documents from Lists A, B, or C establishing identity and/or employment authorization; and Section 3 for reverification or rehires, if applicable. Employers must retain the completed Form I-9 for a specified period—three years after hire or one year after ends, whichever is later—and make it available for inspection by authorized government officials, with civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance, including fines for paperwork errors or knowing hiring of unauthorized workers. While Form I-9 relies on document review, it has been supplemented by , an electronic system introduced in 1996 as a pilot and expanded thereafter, allowing employers to confirm eligibility through federal databases, though participation remains voluntary in most states except where mandated. The form has undergone periodic revisions to update acceptable documents and instructions, reflecting changes in and anti-fraud measures, but its core purpose remains employer-based verification to enforce restrictions on unauthorized .

Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986

The and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), enacted as Public Law 99-603, was signed into law by President on November 6, 1986. This legislation introduced employer sanctions aimed at curbing by prohibiting employers from knowingly hiring or continuing to employ unauthorized aliens. To enforce this, IRCA mandated that all U.S. employers verify the identity and employment eligibility of individuals hired for after November 6, 1986, using Form I-9, Employment Eligibility . The core mechanism of IRCA's employment verification requirement was to shift partial responsibility for immigration enforcement to the private sector, creating a causal link between hiring practices and the influx of unauthorized workers. By requiring documentation review and recordkeeping, the law sought to deter employers from hiring ineligible individuals through the threat of civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. This approach represented an attempt to address illegal immigration not solely through border enforcement but by disrupting the economic incentives driving unauthorized employment. Form I-9 was designed as the standardized tool for this verification process, requiring employees to attest to their eligibility under penalty of and employers to examine original documents establishing and work . The original form included lists of acceptable documents, categorized into those proving both and employment (List A) or separate proofs for (List B) and (List C), ensuring a structured yet flexible framework from its inception. This verification mandate applied uniformly to all new hires, regardless of citizenship status, to prevent discrimination while fulfilling the law's deterrence objective.

Key Revisions and Milestones

The transition from paper-based Form I-9 processes to options began with regulatory changes allowing employers to complete, sign, and store forms electronically, provided systems met specific security and requirements under 8 CFR 274a.2, effective October 2004. This facilitated greater efficiency but maintained core paper verification of documents until later flexibilities. In the , expansions included updated lists of acceptable documents to reflect evolving standards, such as adding driver's licenses from additional states. A significant milestone occurred in November 2007 with an amended Form I-9 requiring employees to provide their in Section 1 if their employer participated in , enhancing data linkage between the form and the federal electronic verification system launched in 1997. The March 8, 2013, edition introduced a two-page format separating employee attestation from employer verification, aiming to reduce errors through clearer sections. The July 17, 2017, edition (mandatory from January 22, 2017) incorporated "smart" features in the fillable PDF version, including , drop-down menus, and prompts to minimize common completion mistakes like omitted fields. Enforcement emphasis shifted further with temporary remote document inspection flexibilities announced in March 2020 due to , allowing deferred physical examination for remote workers; these were extended multiple times—through April 2021, July 2022, and finally July 31, 2023—to prioritize health precautions over immediate in-person reviews. The August 1, 2023, edition, mandatory from November 1, 2023, streamlined the layout by condensing instructions from 15 to 8 pages and introduced a permanent alternative remote examination procedure for E-Verify-enrolled employers in good standing, using live video to inspect documents while retaining anti-fraud notations on the form. This update reflected ongoing integration of technology to balance compliance burdens with verification integrity, without altering core eligibility checks.

Purpose and Scope

Verification of Employment Eligibility

Form I-9 requires all U.S. employers to verify the identity and employment authorization of every individual hired for employment in the United States after November 6, 1986, by examining acceptable documents presented by the employee within three business days of the hire date. This process establishes a foundational check against unauthorized employment, directly addressing the absence of prior federal prohibitions on hiring individuals lacking work authorization, which had enabled widespread employment of unauthorized workers before 1986. The verification mechanism operates through physical inspection of original documents, confirming both identity and eligibility without reliance on electronic databases, thereby creating an immediate barrier to employing unauthorized labor by imposing employer accountability for document authenticity. Empirical evidence from the pre-IRCA period underscores the necessity of this deterrent, as the lack of verification contributed to an unauthorized workforce estimated in the millions, with IRCA's amnesty legalizing approximately 2.7 million individuals who had entered unlawfully before 1982, highlighting the scale of unchecked employment that the I-9 process aimed to curb through mandatory scrutiny. In distinction from optional systems like E-Verify, which cross-checks Form I-9 data against federal records for additional confirmation, the I-9 verification remains a standalone, universally required procedure focused on document-based validation rather than database matching, ensuring broad applicability without mandating technological integration. This core function disrupts the causal incentives for unauthorized migration by eliminating plausible deniability for employers, as successful evasion depends on both falsified documents passing inspection and sustained hiring risks, thereby reducing the pull of U.S. job markets for ineligible workers.

Applicability and Exemptions

All employers in the United States must complete Form I-9 for each individual hired after November 6, 1986, to perform labor or services in return for wages or other remuneration, including U.S. citizens, noncitizen nationals, and noncitizens authorized to work. This requirement extends to full-time, part-time, temporary, and seasonal positions, with no exemptions based on employer size, employee age (provided minors have work authorization), or duration of , even for one-day hires. The obligation applies to employment within the 50 states, the District of Columbia, , the Commonwealth of the (effective November 28, 2009), and the U.S. . Exemptions are narrowly defined to exclude certain non-employee relationships and pre-statute hires. Form I-9 is not required for independent contractors, as they are not considered employees under the verification rules, nor for employees of independent contractors unless the hiring entity directly employs them. Similarly, casual domestic service workers employed sporadically, irregularly, or intermittently in a private household for personal use—such as occasional babysitters or house cleaners paid directly by the household—are exempt, though regular household employees receiving wages subject to taxes must comply. Employees hired on or before November 6, 1986, who have maintained continuous employment with a reasonable expectation of ongoing work are exempt from Form I-9 requirements. For rehires or continuing employment scenarios, a new Form I-9 is generally not required if the individual is rehired within three years of the original form's completion date and the prior form remains valid; employers may instead update the existing form or complete Supplement B for reverification only if the employee's work authorization expires. These provisions apply uniformly to prevent evasion, with employers retaining liability for accurate verification regardless of delegation to representatives.

Form Completion and Documentation

Employee Responsibilities

Employees must complete Section 1 of Form I-9 no later than the first day of , which is defined as the actual commencement of work for pay. In this section, employees provide their full legal name, current address, date of birth, and an attestation of their or status, selecting from options such as U.S. citizen, noncitizen , lawful permanent resident, or an authorized to work until a specified date. Noncitizens attesting to work authorization must also include their Alien Registration Number, USCIS number, or I-94 number, along with an expiration date if applicable. By signing Section 1, employees personally attest under penalty of that all provided information, including the selected status, is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. This certification imposes direct accountability on the employee for the accuracy of their claims regarding eligibility, with knowingly false statements subject to criminal penalties under . Within three business days of start—except when hired for less than three days, in which case documentation is required by the first day—employees must present original, unexpired documents from the Lists of Acceptable Documents to demonstrate and . Employees select these documents independently, typically one from List A (establishing both and ) or one from List B () combined with one from List C (); employers must accept any valid combination without specifying or preferring particular documents to avoid . Common errors in employee completion, such as omitting required fields, using nicknames instead of legal names, or failing to update status changes, can invalidate the form and expose the employee to scrutiny during audits or enforcement actions. Employees bear sole responsibility for ensuring the completeness and truthfulness of , independent of employer assistance, which is limited to clarifying instructions but not filling out the form on their behalf.

Employer Verification Process

Employers are required to verify the identity and authorization of each newly hired employee by physically examining original documents presented by the employee that establish these elements, ensuring a reasonable in their authenticity and unexpired status. This examination must occur no later than three business days after the employee's first day of paid , during which the employer completes Section 2 of Form I-9 by recording pertinent details from the documents, such as issuing authority, document numbers, and expiration dates if applicable. The employer or an authorized representative attests to this review by signing the form under penalty of , certifying that the documents reasonably appear genuine and relate to the individual, thereby assuming legal responsibility for any inaccuracies or failures in this process. To maintain compliance, employers must avoid practices that discriminate or preemptively screen applicants, such as requesting specific documents before a job offer or conditioning employment on verification outcomes prior to the employee's start date; however, verification may proceed post-offer as long as it applies uniformly without regard to citizenship or immigration status. Forms I-9 should not be segregated from other personnel records to prevent implications of disparate treatment based on protected characteristics. Failure to adhere to these protocols exposes employers to civil penalties, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) audits demonstrating widespread deficiencies: in fiscal year 2017 alone, businesses faced $97.6 million in judicial forfeitures, fines, and restitution alongside $7.8 million in civil fines for I-9 violations. Empirical evidence from ICE enforcement actions indicates that insufficiently rigorous document examination causally contributes to unauthorized , as audits frequently uncover both technical errors (e.g., incomplete sections) and substantive issues (e.g., of documents), enabling non-compliant hiring on a large scale; for instance, ICE issued over 5,200 I-9 audit notices in the first phase of 2025 nationwide operations, with penalties escalating to nearly $30,000 per violation for knowing hires of unauthorized workers. Such patterns highlight the necessity of methodical, evidence-based verification to deter systemic lapses that undermine eligibility .

Acceptable Documents

Form I-9 requires employees to present original, unexpired documents establishing both identity and employment authorization, categorized into List A for documents proving both, or one document from List B (identity) combined with one from List C (employment authorization). All documents bearing an must be unexpired at the time of presentation, though extensions issued by the document's authority render them acceptable as unexpired; soon-to-expire documents are permitted if not yet expired. Photocopies are generally unacceptable for , with the sole exception of certified copies of birth certificates; employers may retain copies of presented originals for their records but cannot accept copies in lieu of originals. List A Documents (establish both identity and employment authorization):
  • U.S. Passport or U.S. Passport Card
  • Permanent Resident Card or Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-551)
  • Foreign passport containing a temporary I-551 stamp or notation
  • with photograph
  • Certain other DHS-issued documents with photograph, such as those for parolees or refugees
List B Documents (establish identity only):
  • or ID card issued by a , outlying possession, or federal agency
  • School-issued ID card with photograph
  • Voter's registration card
  • Military ID or draft record
  • Tribal document issued by a Native American tribe
List C Documents (establish employment authorization only):
  • Social Security Account Number card (unrestricted for employment)
  • U.S. birth certificate issued by state, county, or municipal authority
  • Certification of birth abroad (Form FS-545 or DS-1350)
  • Native American tribal document
  • Certain U.S. Citizen ID cards issued by DHS
Receipts for replacement of lost, stolen, or damaged documents may temporarily substitute for originals in limited cases, such as a receipt for a renewal Form I-551 valid for 90 days, but employers must examine the actual document upon its arrival. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) maintains these lists in the Form I-9 instructions, updated as of the January 20, 2025 edition (expiration May 31, 2027), without substantive changes to core document categories but emphasizing scrutiny for authenticity amid rising document fraud risks, as evidenced by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reports on counterfeit detections in audits.

Special Compliance Procedures

Reverification Requirements

Reverification of employment on Form I-9 is mandated for current employees whose temporary work expires, requiring employers to update records no later than the listed in Section 1 of the form or on the previously examined document. This process applies exclusively to individuals with time-limited status, such as holders of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) under categories like or certain nonimmigrant visas; it does not extend to U.S. citizens, noncitizen nationals, or lawful permanent residents whose is indefinite. To complete reverification, the employee presents a new acceptable document from List A (establishing both identity and employment authorization) or one from List B (identity) combined with one from List C (employment authorization), which the employer must physically examine for authenticity before recording details—including the document title, issuing authority, number, and any —in Supplement B of the current Form I-9 version. The employer then signs and dates Supplement B, attaches it to the original Form I-9, and retains the updated record for the required period; no new Section 1 completion is needed unless the employee's name has changed. USCIS recommends notifying employees at least 90 days prior to expiration to facilitate timely document presentation, though the legal deadline remains the itself. Employers are prohibited from demanding reverification for employees with non-expiring authorizations or from selectively requiring it based on or status, as such practices violate anti-discrimination rules under 8 U.S.C. § 1324b; reverification must be triggered solely by evident expiration of temporary authorization. Failure to reverify permits continuation of employment without valid authorization, directly contravening the Immigration Reform and Control Act's prohibition on knowingly employing unauthorized workers (8 U.S.C. § 1324a), which sustains unauthorized labor participation and contributes to market distortions such as downward pressure on wages in sectors reliant on low-skilled labor.

Retention and Recordkeeping

Employers are required to retain each completed Form I-9 for all employees hired after November 6, 1986, for a period of three years from the date of hire or one year from the date of , whichever is later. This retention ensures availability for potential inspections by U.S. and Enforcement (ICE) or other authorized agencies, serving as primary evidence of compliance with eligibility obligations under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. Forms I-9 may be retained in , , or formats, either on-site or at an off-site storage facility, provided they can be produced for within three days of a request. storage systems must preserve the original content, including signatures, without alteration, and include safeguards against unauthorized access, such as access controls, audit trails, and checks to comply with 8 CFR 274a.2(c)(2). Paper forms with original handwritten signatures do not require electronic conversion but must be stored securely to prevent loss or tampering. Although not mandatory, employers may retain copies or electronic scans of documents presented by employees during verification, which must be kept with the corresponding if made. Such copies can provide additional evidentiary support during audits, demonstrating good-faith efforts in document examination, though they do not substitute for the form itself or excuse incomplete verification. Upon expiration of the retention period, employers may dispose of Forms I-9 and any associated document copies, but must do so in a manner that prevents unauthorized retrieval or use, such as through secure for paper or certified data destruction for electronic records, to mitigate risks of inadvertent disclosure or liability from outdated information. Failure to adhere to these recordkeeping rules can result in civil penalties during enforcement actions, independent of verification errors.

E-Verify Integration

E-Verify serves as an optional federal electronic supplement to Form I-9, enabling enrolled employers to confirm new hires' employment eligibility by cross-checking information from the completed I-9 against records maintained by the (SSA) and of Homeland Security (DHS). Employers must first properly complete and retain Form I-9 before initiating an E-Verify query, typically within three business days of the employee's start date, entering data such as name, date of birth, , and citizenship status directly from the I-9. This integration addresses limitations of paper-based I-9 verification, which relies solely on of documents and cannot detect discrepancies in records, such as mismatched Social Security numbers or expired work authorizations. Federally, participation in E-Verify remains voluntary for most private employers, but it is mandatory for those with federal contracts or subcontracts exceeding $3,500 that include the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) E-Verify clause, as established by Executive Order 12989 in 1996 and subsequent FAR rules effective September 8, 2009. At the state level, mandates vary; as of 2023, nine states—Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Utah—require E-Verify use for all or most private employers, while others impose it on public employers or state contractors. These requirements compel enhanced verification beyond I-9 alone, aiming to identify unauthorized workers through systemic checks that document review cannot achieve. During case creation, performs photo matching for certain List A documents establishing both identity and work authorization, including U.S. passports, passport cards, Permanent Resident Cards (Form I-551), and Employment Authorization Documents (Form I-766). The system displays a government-stored photo, which the employer must compare to the employee's presented document or copy; a match confirms the case, while a non-match triggers further review or referral. If initial checks yield a tentative nonconfirmation (TNC)—a mismatch indicating potential ineligibility—the employer must notify the employee within one business day, and the employee has eight to ten federal working days to contest it by contacting or DHS for resolution, after which the employer updates accordingly. E-Verify's electronic queries have detected unauthorized in cases where I-9 document inspection alone would fail, such as or record discrepancies; for instance, evaluations indicate the system identifies substantial numbers of unauthorized workers through TNCs, with final nonconfirmations confirming ineligibility after employee contest processes. In 2010, 98.3% of queries received automatic employment authorized confirmations, while TNCs—comprising about 1.7%—led to resolutions exposing mismatches not visible via I-9 paperwork. However, the system's accuracy is not absolute, with historical error rates around 0.7% for authorized workers receiving erroneous TNCs and challenges in detecting all , underscoring its role as a supplement rather than a replacement for I-9's document-based verification.

Anti-Discrimination and Prohibited Practices

Citizenship and Immigration Status Discrimination

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), under section 274B (8 U.S.C. § 1324b), prohibits employers with four or more employees from discriminating against protected individuals on the basis of or immigration status during hiring, firing, recruitment, or referral for a fee. Protected individuals include U.S. citizens, certain nationals, lawful permanent residents who are not yet eligible to apply for or who applied within six months of eligibility, and refugees, asylees, or individuals granted withholding of or similar protections. This provision bars preferring U.S. citizens over equally qualified protected non-citizens for open positions or refusing to hire protected individuals solely because they lack U.S. , except where is explicitly required by federal, state, or local law, , or . In the context of Form I-9 verification, these anti-discrimination rules extend to prohibiting unfair documentary practices, such as requesting specific documents based on a worker's perceived status, rejecting valid List A, B, or C documents that appear foreign-sounding or from non-U.S. issuers, or imposing additional verification steps (like extra proof of status) on non-citizens while not doing so for citizens. Employers must accept any combination of acceptable documents establishing identity and employment authorization without tied to status, ensuring the process remains uniform to avoid violations. Violations occur if an employer intentionally treats protected individuals differently from U.S. citizens in document examination or if patterns suggest pretextual . Enforcement of these prohibitions falls under the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, specifically the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), which handles charges filed by aggrieved individuals within 180 days of the alleged discriminatory act (extendable to 365 days with good cause). Upon receipt, IER investigates complaints, which may involve employer interviews, document reviews, and witness statements; successful mediations resolve many cases, while substantiated claims can lead to civil lawsuits seeking back pay, civil penalties up to $2,789 per individual discriminated against (adjusted for inflation as of 2024), and injunctive relief such as training requirements or policy changes. IER has pursued settlements in cases where employers rejected valid work authorizations from protected non-citizens, such as Employment Authorization Documents held by asylees, while accepting equivalent proofs from citizens. These status-neutral requirements promote equal treatment for authorized workers but necessitate uniform application of I-9 procedures across all employees, which can constrain employers' ability to apply heightened scrutiny to documents from individuals whose status invites eligibility doubts without risking claims under INA § 274B.

National Origin and Unfair Documentary Practices

Unfair documentary practices under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) prohibit employers from discriminating against individuals based on national origin during the Form I-9 employment eligibility verification process. These practices include requesting more documents than required, demanding specific documents from the Lists of Acceptable Documents, or rejecting documents that reasonably appear genuine and relate to the individual presenting them. Employers must uniformly accept any valid combination of documents—such as one from List A or one from List B and one from List C—that meets these criteria, without specifying preferred documents based on perceived national origin indicators like ethnicity, accent, surname, or physical appearance. National origin discrimination manifests in document review when employers apply disparate standards, such as requiring additional proof only from individuals with foreign-sounding accents or surnames, while accepting equivalent documents from others. The Department of Justice's Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) enforces these provisions, investigating complaints and pursuing civil settlements. For instance, in June 2023, IER settled with Mountain Prairie Holdings (formerly Apprentice Personnel) for unfair documentary practices that involved discriminatory requests during I-9 verification. In December 2023, a operator agreed to a settlement after IER found it had committed unfair documentary practices by rejecting valid documents from non-citizens based on their status. Penalties for such violations range from $230 to $2,304 per affected individual, adjusted for inflation as of 2024. These rules create tensions with fraud prevention efforts, as employers risk discrimination claims if their scrutiny of potentially fraudulent documents disproportionately affects certain national origin groups. While employers must reject documents that do not reasonably appear genuine regardless of the presenter's background, the threat of disparate treatment liability under INA § 274B has led some to adopt minimal to evade accusations, potentially enabling unauthorized through counterfeit or mismatched documents. Congressional hearings have noted that the interplay of anti-discrimination mandates and requirements has contributed to rising document alongside discrimination concerns over decades of .

Retaliation and Enforcement Mechanisms

The and Control Act of 1986, through section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1324b(a)(5)), prohibits employers and other entities from intimidating, threatening, coercing, or retaliating against any individual for filing a charge or complaint with the (DOJ), testifying, assisting, or participating in any manner in an , proceeding, or hearing related to unfair immigration-related employment practices. This protection extends to actions such as discharging, refusing to hire, or otherwise discriminating against workers who assert their rights under these provisions or who oppose perceived violations during Form I-9 verification processes. Retaliation claims must demonstrate a causal link between the protected activity and the adverse employment action, with the burden shifting to to prove a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason upon showing by the complainant. Enforcement of retaliation prohibitions falls under the Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER) of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division, which investigates complaints alleging violations tied to employment eligibility verification. Individuals may file charges with IER within 180 days of the alleged violation (extensions possible for good cause), triggering an investigation that includes employer interviews, document reviews, and witness statements. For claims overlapping with protections under Title VII of the , IER coordinates with the (EEOC), referring dual-filed matters or deferring to EEOC where discrimination predominates, though IER retains primacy for immigration-specific retaliation. Upon finding reasonable cause, IER facilitates voluntary between parties; failure to resolve leads to either an administrative hearing before the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) or a DOJ civil in federal district seeking injunctive . Remedies include back pay, reinstatement or front pay, compensatory damages for emotional distress, and civil penalties assessed against the employer—capped at $3,419 per individual knowingly retaliating as of fiscal year 2024, adjusted annually for inflation—plus mandatory anti-discrimination training and reporting requirements. In a 2021 with delivery firm Around the Clock Partners LLC, IER secured $900 in back pay for the affected worker and $3,600 in civil penalties for retaliating against an employee who complained about discriminatory document requests during I-9 reverification. Empirical enforcement data indicate limited formal prosecutions relative to complaint volume, with IER receiving over 3,000 inquiries and charges annually in recent years but resolving most via or settlements rather than litigation or hearings. While settlement numbers have increased—e.g., 19 resolved cases across discrimination types in 2021, including retaliation—the low rate of escalated actions (fewer than 10% reaching OCAHO or annually) raises questions about the provisions' deterrent effect, as evidenced by persistent reports of reprisals in low-wage sectors despite statutory bans. Academic analyses of IER's decade-long data suggest a shift toward compliance emphasis over pure anti-retaliation safeguards, potentially undercutting worker willingness to report due to perceived enforcement gaps.

Enforcement Mechanisms

Audits and Inspections by ICE

The administrative inspection process for Form I-9 compliance is conducted by Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), a component of U.S. and Customs (ICE), to verify employer adherence to employment eligibility verification requirements under the and Control Act of 1986. These audits target potential systemic violations, such as patterns of paperwork deficiencies or hiring practices that enable unauthorized employment, often triggered by employee complaints, analytics, or interagency referrals rather than random selection. HSI prioritizes businesses in sectors like , , and where unauthorized labor concentrations have been empirically linked to higher non-compliance rates through prior enforcement . Audits typically commence with the issuance of a Notice of Inspection (NOI), which requires employers to produce all relevant Forms I-9, supporting documents, and payroll records within at least three business days. Upon submission, HSI auditors examine records for technical errors (e.g., incomplete sections or improper document annotations), substantive failures like attestation of ineligible workers, and indicators of such as mismatched identities or proofs. For cases involving of ongoing violations or large-scale operations, audits may escalate to on-site , where agents review physical records and personnel to assess hiring practices directly. This phased approach—beginning with remote paperwork review and advancing to physical verification—allows HSI to allocate resources efficiently toward high-risk employers while minimizing disruption for compliant entities. Enforcement activity has shown surges correlating with policy emphases on interior control; for instance, I-9 audits peaked at 6,450 in 2019 amid heightened worksite priorities. In a notable 2025 escalation, issued over 5,200 NOIs nationwide in a two-phase operation targeting suspected non- hotspots, reflecting a strategic pivot to deter unauthorized through proactive scrutiny. Employers facing findings have opportunities to demonstrate good-faith efforts, such as self-audits or programs, which HSI evaluates to distinguish inadvertent errors from willful neglect. Empirically, such inspections have driven measurable improvements in record accuracy, as audited firms exhibit reduced error rates in subsequent reviews due to heightened internal accountability mechanisms.

Civil and Criminal Penalties

Civil penalties for Form I-9 paperwork violations, such as failure to properly complete, retain, or present forms for inspection, range from a minimum of $288 to a maximum of $2,861 per individual form as adjusted for in 2025. Fines are assessed based on factors including the size of the business, good faith compliance efforts, the seriousness of the violation, and prior violations, with higher amounts imposed for knowing or egregious failures. For knowingly hiring, recruiting, referring for a , or continuing to employ unauthorized workers, civil fines escalate in tiers: $698 to $5,579 per worker for first offenses, $5,579 to $13,948 for second offenses, and $13,948 to $27,897 for third or subsequent offenses in 2025. These penalties reflect priorities on intentional violations over mere errors, though even inadvertent paperwork issues can result in fines, as evidenced by a reported 76% error rate in paper-based I-9 forms from compliance audits and studies, which often prompts employers to adopt electronic systems for accuracy. Criminal penalties apply to patterns or practices of hiring unauthorized workers or engaging in related , such as knowingly hiring despite awareness of ineligibility or falsifying documents. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1324a(f), such violations carry fines up to $3,000 per unauthorized worker and imprisonment for up to six months per instance, with enhanced sentences for repeat offenders or cases involving large-scale operations. More severe criminal charges, including under 18 U.S.C. § 1546 for document fraud, can result in fines exceeding $250,000 and imprisonment up to five years or more, particularly when tied to broader schemes evading verification requirements.

Criticisms, Effectiveness, and Debates

Challenges in Preventing Unauthorized Employment

Despite the mandate under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 requiring employers to complete Form I-9 to verify employee eligibility, unauthorized immigrants have persistently comprised a substantial share of the U.S. labor force. In , they accounted for 5.6% of the —a record high surpassing the 5.4% peak in —equating to approximately 9 million individuals amid historically inconsistent federal enforcement prioritizing border security over interior worksite checks. This enduring presence indicates that the I-9 process, reliant on basic document review without systemic validation, has not substantially curbed unauthorized employment, as lax volumes until recent years allowed widespread non-detection. A core vulnerability lies in the form's dependence on self-attestation and of potentially forged or stolen documents, enabling evasion through . Evaluations reveal that unauthorized workers frequently succeed with counterfeit credentials; for example, a 2010 federal assessment found —an optional I-9 adjunct—incorrectly confirmed eligibility for about 54% of unauthorized cases due to mismatched but accepted stolen identities, diluting preventive efficacy. Absent universal mandates, employer opt-in rates remain low nationally, permitting continued hiring without robust checks and perpetuating underground labor markets. Stricter I-9 enforcement via audits demonstrates deterrent potential, with state-level mandates correlating to reduced unauthorized employment, especially among recent entrants, by increasing hiring risks for non-compliant employers. Yet inspections frequently uncover high paperwork and eligibility lapses, as reflected in over $8 million in 2025 fines for violations, signaling that even targeted scrutiny struggles against prevalence and resource constraints, thus limiting causal impact on national-scale prevention.

Administrative Burdens on Employers

Employers encounter substantial administrative challenges in Form I-9 due to the form's intricate requirements for verifying employee and work authorization, which often result in high error rates during audits. U.S. and Customs Enforcement () inspections commonly identify error rates of 70% or higher in paper-based I-9 processes, with small businesses experiencing rates exceeding 75% owing to limited resources for staff training and dedicated oversight. These discrepancies, ranging from incomplete sections to improper document acceptance, trigger civil penalties of $281 to $2,789 per form for paperwork violations as adjusted in 2024, disproportionately affecting smaller operations without for error mitigation. Adopting I-9 systems mitigates some paper-related inaccuracies by automating , , and retrieval, thereby streamlining responses and reducing manual handling risks. Nevertheless, such systems demand initial setup costs and recurring fees, including software licenses that can exceed $55,000 annually for mid-sized employers, creating barriers for resource-constrained small businesses. While ICE grants a 10-business-day window for correcting technical or procedural failures identified in notices of , persistent of fines for non-substantive errors has drawn criticism for penalizing inadvertent lapses despite demonstrable good-faith measures. These compliance demands, though onerous, are warranted given the prevalence of evasion strategies by unauthorized workers, such as presenting fraudulent documents or fabricated identities, which undermine efforts and sustain illegal labor participation. Illegal immigrants, estimated to constitute one-third of the foreign-born , facilitate lower labor costs for employers, exerting downward pressure on wages for native low-skilled workers and generating uncompensated fiscal burdens on services that far surpass aggregate I-9 administrative expenses. Consequently, rigorous Form I-9 protocols enforce causal in eligibility, countering distortions from unchecked unauthorized hiring.

Tension Between Verification and Anti-Discrimination Rules

The anti-discrimination provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), codified in Section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), prohibit employers from discriminating on the basis of citizenship status or national origin during the Form I-9 verification process, requiring uniform treatment in accepting documents across protected classes such as U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and certain non-citizens authorized to work. This mandate conflicts with the need for rigorous document scrutiny to detect fraudulent submissions, as employers risk Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement actions for "unfair documentary practices" if they request additional evidence from individuals perceived as foreign-born or reject valid documents based on status differences, even when aiming to mitigate hiring risks. For instance, in a 2022 DOJ settlement, a Washington state employer agreed to pay civil penalties and implement training after selectively using E-Verify on non-citizens, illustrating how attempts at targeted verification can trigger discrimination findings that overshadow fraud prevention efforts. Such enforcement dynamics create a on deeper probes, as evidenced by parallel DOJ Immigrant and Employee Rights (IER) investigations that have surged alongside Immigration and Customs Enforcement () I-9 audits, with settlements often requiring policy revisions to standardize laxer acceptance of documents to avoid claims. In contrast, imposes fines for incomplete or erroneous I-9s that fail to uncover unauthorized workers, yet the anti-discrimination framework limits inquiries into suspicious documents without uniform application, potentially enabling through forged papers that superficial checks cannot reliably detect. Empirical data underscore this gap: despite mandatory I-9 use for all U.S. hires since 1986, unauthorized immigrants comprised approximately 8.5 million workers in 2023, or about 5% of the total labor force, indicating that standardized, non-discriminatory verification yields persistently low detection rates without supplemental tools like mandatory or status-specific scrutiny. Critics from enforcement-priority perspectives argue that overemphasis on anti-bias rules undermines causal deterrence of unauthorized by prioritizing access equity over integrity, as lax probes normalize in high-risk sectors like where up to 2.1 million workers may involve misclassification or off-books payments evading checks. Proponents of stricter primacy, often aligned with restrictionist analyses, contend that uniform rules inadvertently shield bad-faith actors by constraining empirical , contrasting with viewpoints in advocacy circles that frame enhanced scrutiny as inherently biased against work-authorized non-citizens, despite data showing minimal when applied proportionally to . This debate highlights a structural , where INA's dual mandates— under 274A and non-discrimination under 274B—foster , with DOJ settlements averaging tens of thousands in penalties for perceived overreach while ICE audits reveal widespread paperwork tolerance that sustains unauthorized labor pools.

Recent Developments

Form Redesigns Post-2023

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a revised Form I-9 edition dated August 1, 2023, which employers could begin using immediately and were required to use exclusively starting November 1, 2023. This edition consolidated Sections 1 and 2 onto a single sheet by merging fields such as employer certification, while relocating the Preparer/Translator Certification to a new Supplement A and reverification/rehire processes to Supplement B; these supplements allow for multiple instances as needed without altering core requirements. Instructions accompanying the form were shortened from 15 to 8 pages, incorporating streamlined steps for section completion, definitions of key terms like employers and employees, and enhanced guidance on acceptable documents, including provisions for receipts and extensions. The layout was optimized for completion on tablets and mobile devices via Reader, with removal of certain non-essential features to facilitate easier digital downloading and reduce administrative friction. These modifications emphasized clearer notes on avoiding based on or status during document review, aligning with longstanding anti- provisions under the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986. In August 2024, USCIS extended the expiration date of the 08/01/23 edition to May 31, 2027. A subsequent minor revision, effective April 2, 2025, with an edition date of January 20, 2025, introduced non-substantive alignments to statutory language, such as renaming a Section 1 from "alien authorized to work" to "noncitizen authorized to work," without altering form structure or eligibility criteria. These redesigns sought to minimize completion errors through enhanced usability and guidance, yet audits post-implementation have documented error rates often exceeding 50% in sampled forms, underscoring limitations in addressing broader compliance gaps such as inadequate employer training or inconsistent enforcement. No updates modified the underlying IRCA framework for verifying employment eligibility or acceptable documents.

Remote Verification Expansions and Policy Flexibilities

In August 2023, the U.S. Department of (DHS) established an optional alternative procedure permitting qualified employers to remotely examine Form I-9 documents via live video or similar technology, rather than requiring physical inspection. This process mandates that employers enrolled in and in good standing conduct a real-time interaction, during which newly hired employees must present original documents (or acceptable receipts) front and back if applicable, allowing the employer to assess authenticity, genuineness, and relevance through visual inspection. Employers indicate use of this procedure by checking the designated box on the Form I-9 (edition dated August 1, 2023) and retaining copies of the examined documents. The rule, effective from August 1, 2023, applies only to examinations at hiring sites and excludes use for reverification or updating existing forms. This permanent option succeeded temporary COVID-19 flexibilities, which had allowed all employers to accept scanned or faxed documents without video verification from March 2020 until their expiration on July 31, 2023. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) extended a 30-day grace period post-expiration, enabling employers to cure deficiencies without immediate penalties if they demonstrated good-faith efforts. For employees hired under the temporary flexibilities, E-Verify employers may opt to apply the new remote procedure to re-examine documents within three business days of the employee's request, though non-participation carries no penalty. These measures address enforcement challenges by integrating remote options with E-Verify's electronic confirmation system, which resolves over 98% of cases without tentative non-confirmations (TNCs), though TNCs occur in approximately 0.8% of queries, often requiring additional documentation. The expansions facilitate compliance for distributed workforces amid rising remote hiring, reducing logistical burdens and travel costs while maintaining ties to E-Verify's audit trails for inspections. However, the shift from mandatory in-person checks raises concerns over diminished detection, as remote methods lack physical handling and may overlook sophisticated forgeries detectable only through tactile or close-proximity . Proponents highlight efficiency gains, with DHS estimating streamlined processes for over 1 million daily Form I-9 completions, but skeptics, including some advocates, contend it could undermine employment eligibility verification integrity without empirical data proving equivalence to physical exams. continues phased enforcement, prioritizing education over fines for early adopters, though full audits may reveal higher noncompliance risks in remote scenarios.

References

  1. [1]
    I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification - USCIS
    Apr 2, 2025 · Use Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, to verify the identity and employment authorization of individuals hired for employment in the United States.Form I-9 Acceptable Documents · I-9 Central · Handbook for Employers M-274
  2. [2]
    Statutes and Regulations - USCIS
    Jan 30, 2020 · Form I-9 requirements come from the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), which prohibits hiring unauthorized individuals. ...
  3. [3]
    Completing Form I-9 - USCIS
    Apr 10, 2025 · All employers must complete and retain Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for every person they hire for employment after Nov. 6, 1986.NAFTA (TN) Visas · Domestic Workers · Temporary (Nonimmigrant... · Section 1
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification - USCIS
    Employee Information and Attestation: Employees must complete and sign Section 1 of Form I-9 no later than the first day of employment, but not before accepting ...
  5. [5]
    2.0 Who Must Complete Form I-9 - USCIS
    Jun 10, 2025 · You must complete Form I-9 each time you hire any person to perform labor or services in the United States in return for wages or other remuneration.
  6. [6]
    History and Milestones | E-Verify
    Mar 10, 2025 · This act led to the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, requiring employees to attest to their work eligibility, and employers to ...
  7. [7]
    Form I-9 Resources - USCIS
    Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification: Summary of Changes to Form and Instructions (PDF, 185.1 KB) ; Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification ...Handbook for Employers M-274 · Emergencies and Unforeseen...<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 - GovInfo
    Nov 6, 1986 · øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 99–603. ... (1) The term ''employer sanctions'' means the provisions of.
  9. [9]
    Form I-9 Inspection - ICE
    Mar 10, 2025 · Form I-9 inspection verifies employee eligibility. It starts with a Notice of Inspection, and employers have 3 days to produce the form. HSI ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification - E-Verify
    Form I-9 is for employment eligibility verification, requiring employers to verify identity and employment authorization documents for new hires after 11/6/ ...
  11. [11]
    Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background - USCIS
    Federal law requires that every employer who recruits, refers for a fee, or hires a person for employment in the United States must complete Form I-9, which ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Form I-9: Inspection Overview - ICE
    On November 6, 1986, the enactment of the Immigration Reform and Control Act required employers to verify the identity and employment eligibility of their ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Instructions for Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification - USCIS
    Jan 20, 2025 · The form is used to document verification of the identity and employment authorization of each new employee (both U.S. citizen and alien) hired ...
  14. [14]
    The Evolution of the I-9 Form: From Immigration Reform to Modern ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · The I-9 form became the cornerstone of this employer-based enforcement system. Initially implemented in 1987, it required employers to examine ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Introduction of the Amended Form I-9 and the New Handbook for ...
    Nov 26, 2007 · However, employees must provide their Social Security number in section 1 of the form if their employer participates in E-Verify (the employment ...
  16. [16]
    ABCs of Immigration: Form I-9 General Concepts - - Siskind Susser
    The introduction of the two-page form in the 2013 Form I-9, dated March 8, 2013, marked a distinct departure from previous versions. Other changes included (a.) ...
  17. [17]
    New “Smart” I-9 Form Becomes Mandatory on January 22, 2017
    Jan 22, 2017 · Starting January 22, 2017, all employers in the United States will be required to use the new version of the Form I-9 exclusively to conduct employment ...<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Temporary Policies Related to COVID-19 - USCIS
    Jan 5, 2024 · Because of ongoing precautions related to COVID-19, DHS has extended the Form I-9 flexibilities until July 31, 2023. ... remote inspection in ...
  19. [19]
    Archived: ICE announces extension to I-9 compliance flexibility
    Feb 25, 2025 · ICE today announced an extension of the Form I-9 flexibilities first announced in March 2020 and updated in March 2021.
  20. [20]
    USCIS To Publish Revised Form I-9
    Jul 21, 2023 · Employers can use the current Form I-9 (edition date 10/21/19) through Oct. 31, 2023. Starting Nov. 1, 2023, all employers must use the new Form ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Form I-9 Summary of Changes Fact Sheet - USCIS
    Aug 1, 2023 · Overview of Form I-9 Instructions changes: • Reduced length from 15 pages to 8 pages. • Added definitions of key actors in the Form I-9 process.
  22. [22]
    Make Sure You're Using the 08/01/2023 Form I-9 - USCIS
    Oct 5, 2023 · Starting Nov. 1, you can only use Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, with the 08/01/2023 edition date. A revised Spanish edition ...
  23. [23]
    The Declining Enforcement of Employer Sanctions
    Sep 1, 2005 · Prior to 1986, there was no federal law prohibiting the hiring or employment of unauthorized aliens. While employers might have found ...
  24. [24]
    1.2 E-Verify: The Web-Based Verification Companion to Form I-9
    Feb 4, 2025 · E-Verify is a web-based system that allows employers and other participants to confirm the eligibility of their newly hired employees to work in the US.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Built to Last: How Immigration Reform Can Deter Unauthorized ...
    IRCA created a legalization program for approximately 2.7 million undocumented immigrants who had entered the country before January 1, 1982 and met certain ...
  26. [26]
    Coming out of the Shadows: Learning about Legal Status and ...
    The 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) granted amnesty to approximately 1.7 million long‐term unauthorized workers in an effort to bring them ...
  27. [27]
    E-Verify and Form I-9
    Jul 11, 2022 · Learn about Form I-9 requirements, step-by-step instructions on how to complete each section, acceptable documents, retention, and storage.
  28. [28]
    Does E-Verify replace Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification?
    Aug 18, 2023 · No, E-Verify does not replace the legal requirement to complete and retain Form I-9. E-Verify verifies the employment authorization of new hires.
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Form I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification PowerPoint Presentation
    Form I-9 is an employment verification tool brought about by IRCA. Form I-9 helps verify whether individuals are authorized to work in the United States.<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Exceptions - USCIS
    Apr 10, 2025 · Form I-9 is not required for casual domestic services. Independent Contractors. An independent contractor is not considered an employee for Form ...
  31. [31]
    8.0 Rules for Continuing Employment and Other Special Rules
    You must complete a new Form I-9 when a hire takes place, unless you are rehiring an employee within three years of the date the employee's previous Form ...
  32. [32]
    Completing Section 1, Employee Information and Attestation - USCIS
    Apr 2, 2025 · Your employees must complete and sign Section 1 of Form I-9 no later than their first day of employment.
  33. [33]
    3.0 Completing Section 1: Employee Information and Attestation
    Apr 2, 2025 · You must ensure that all parts of Form I-9 are properly completed; or you may be subject to penalties under federal law. The employee must ...Missing: perjury | Show results with:perjury
  34. [34]
    Completing Section 2, Employer Review and Attestation - USCIS
    Jul 15, 2025 · Employees must present original, acceptable, and unexpired documentation that shows the employer their identity and employment authorization.
  35. [35]
    Employee Rights and Responsibilities - E-Verify
    Feb 3, 2025 · You have the responsibility to: · Ensure that the information you provide on Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification is accurate. · Write ...
  36. [36]
    4.0 Completing Section 2: Employer Review and Verification - USCIS
    Jul 15, 2025 · You must allow the employee to choose which documentation they will present from the Form I-9 Lists of Acceptable Documents and must accept ...4.1 Retaining Copies of... · 4.4 Acceptable Receipts · 4.5 Remote Document...
  37. [37]
    ICE delivers more than 5200 I-9 audit notices to businesses across ...
    Aug 14, 2025 · In FY17, businesses were ordered to pay $97.6 million in judicial forfeitures, fines and restitution, and $7.8 million in civil fines, including ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  38. [38]
    Avoid Massive I-9 Penalties Now by Streamlining Your Hiring ...
    The Department of Homeland Security has raised I-9 fines to nearly $30,000 per violation, with ICE already issuing more than 5,200 audit notices in 2025.Missing: findings non- statistics
  39. [39]
    Form I-9 Acceptable Documents - USCIS
    Jul 15, 2025 · Employees must provide documentation to their employers to show their identity and authorization to work.Completing Form I-9 · Examining Documents · Receipts · Combination Documents
  40. [40]
    Minor Changes to Form I-9 and E-Verify Updates - USCIS
    Apr 2, 2025 · Key updates include: Renaming the fourth checkbox in Section 1 to “An alien authorized to work”. Revising the descriptions of two List B ...
  41. [41]
    6.1 Reverifying Employment Authorization for Current Employees
    Enter the employee's full name from the original Form I-9 at the top of the supplement. If the employee's name has changed, enter the new name in the ...
  42. [42]
    6.0 Completing Supplement B, Reverification and Rehire of Form I-9
    Reverification is never required for US citizens or noncitizen nationals. Reverification is also never required when the following documents expire.6.1 Reverifying Employment... · 6.2 Reverifying or Updating
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
    10.0 Retaining Form I-9 - USCIS
    Jul 18, 2023 · Keep Form I-9 for 3 years after hire, or 1 year after employment ends, whichever is later. If less than 2 years, retain for 3 years after hire.10.1 Form I-9 and Storage... · 10.2 Retaining Copies of Form... · 10.3 Inspection
  45. [45]
    Retention and Storage - USCIS
    Jul 10, 2020 · Employers must have a completed Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, on file for each person on their payroll (or otherwise ...
  46. [46]
    10.1 Form I-9 and Storage Systems - USCIS
    Jul 18, 2023 · If you complete a paper Form I-9, you may scan and upload the original signed form, correction or update, and retain it electronically. You may ...
  47. [47]
    10.2 Retaining Copies of Form I-9 Documents - USCIS
    Jul 26, 2023 · Copies of Form I-9 documents must be retained with the Form I-9 or employee record, and be available during inspections, even if not for E- ...
  48. [48]
    4.1 Retaining Copies of Documents Your Employee Presents | USCIS
    Aug 18, 2023 · You must retain copies and present them with Forms I-9 in case of an inspection by DHS, the Department of Labor or the Department of Justice.
  49. [49]
    2.1 Form I-9 And E-Verify
    Jun 4, 2024 · 2.1 Form I-9 And E-Verify. Employers are required to timely and properly complete and retain Form I-9 for each employee they hire.2.1.1 Receipts · 2.1.2 Rehires · 2.1.3 Unexpired Document...
  50. [50]
    Federal Contractors | E-Verify
    Jul 11, 2022 · A presidential Executive order and subsequent Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rule required federal contractors to use E-Verify to ...Who is Affected by the E-Verify ...Subcontractors, Independent ...
  51. [51]
    State E-Verify Action - National Conference of State Legislatures
    Nine states—Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah—require E-Verify for all employers (Some states ...
  52. [52]
    Photo Matching | E-Verify
    May 23, 2018 · Photo Matching · Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551) · Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766) or · U.S. passport or · U.S. passport card.
  53. [53]
    2.2.2 E-Verify Photo Matching
    Aug 26, 2024 · The four List A documents that will trigger photo matching are the U.S. passport, passport card, Permanent Resident Card (Form I-551) and ...
  54. [54]
    Tentative Nonconfirmations (Mismatches) - E-Verify
    May 8, 2024 · DHS will respond to most of these cases within 24 hours. It is possible for E-Verify to issue a dual mismatch, which means the case received a ...
  55. [55]
    Tentative Nonconfirmation (Mismatch) Overview - E-Verify
    Sep 15, 2022 · Within 10 federal government working days after E-Verify issues the mismatch case result: Your employer must notify you of a mismatch result and ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] E-Verify Accuracy Report Summary
    ... USCIS did not conduct a secondary review prior to the issuance of a TNC. • USCIS is correctly identifying substantial numbers of unauthorized workers who would.Missing: statistics detected
  57. [57]
    [PDF] E-VERIFY: PRESERVING JOBS FOR AMERICAN WORKERS - USCIS
    Feb 10, 2011 · FY 2010 statistics indicate 98.3 percent of employees were automatically confirmed as authorized to work either instantly or within 24 hours,.<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the Accuracy of E-Verify Findings
    • The estimated percentage of unauthorized workers detected. ... because of his/her immigration status or because he/she has applied and been found ineligible for ...
  59. [59]
    8 U.S. Code § 1324b - Unfair immigration-related employment ...
    8 U.S. Code § 1324b - Unfair immigration-related employment practices ; (a) Prohibition of discrimination based on national origin or citizenship status.
  60. [60]
    8 U.S.C. § 1324b. Unfair Immigration-related Employment Practices
    Jul 28, 2021 · It is an unfair immigration-related employment practice for a person or other entity to discriminate against any individual (other than an unauthorized alien)
  61. [61]
    11.2 Types of Employment Discrimination Prohibited Under the INA
    The INA prohibits unfair documentary practices, citizenship status discrimination, national origin discrimination, and retaliation for protected activities.
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    11.4 Avoiding Discrimination in Recruiting, Hiring, and the Form I-9 ...
    If you do any of the actions above based on a worker's citizenship, immigration status, or national origin, then your actions may violate federal discrimination ...
  64. [64]
    28 CFR Part 44 -- Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices
    1324b(a) means the act of intentionally treating an individual differently from other individuals because of national origin or citizenship status, regardless ...
  65. [65]
    Immigrant and Employee Rights Section - Department of Justice
    Jul 15, 2025 · This federal law prohibits: 1) citizenship status discrimination in hiring, firing, or recruitment or referral for a fee, 2) national origin ...
  66. [66]
    Overview Of The Immigrant and Employee Rights Section
    Sep 19, 2025 · The Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER), in the Civil Rights Division, is responsible for enforcing the anti-discrimination provision of the ...
  67. [67]
    Penalties | USCIS
    Jan 24, 2025 · Complete and retain Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, for each employee who is required to complete the form. Employers Must Not.Missing: perjury | Show results with:perjury
  68. [68]
    11.1 Unlawful Discrimination - USCIS
    Discriminating in the Form I-9 and E-Verify verification processes can violate federal law. This section describes prohibited discrimination.
  69. [69]
    [PDF] How to Avoid Unlawful Discrimination and Other Form I-9 Violations ...
    Federal law prohibits employers from discriminating during the Form I-9 and E-Verify processes. All employers enrolled in E-Verify must follow the obligations ...
  70. [70]
    Discrimination and document abuse in the hiring process
    Document abuse occurs when, in the Form I-9 verification process, an employer treats an employee differently from other employees based on his national origin, ...Missing: USCIS | Show results with:USCIS
  71. [71]
    Civil Rights Division | Settlements and Lawsuits
    Mountain Prairie Holdings, formerly DBA Apprentice Personnel (Unfair Documentary Practices) June 2023. On June 13, 2023, IER signed a settlement agreement ...
  72. [72]
    DOJ Settles With Texas Restaurant Operator Over Form I-9 Violations
    Dec 21, 2023 · Once the DOJ began this investigation, the organization rehired the worker and compensated him with lost wages of $7,687.94. The settlement ...
  73. [73]
    Employers Get Ready: I-9 Fine Increases Are Here
    Jul 15, 2024 · The newest I-9 version contains an issuance date of August 1, 2023, and became mandatory as of November 1, 2023. For E-Verify employers that ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] UNDERSTANDING THE INA'S ANTI-DISCRIMINATION PROVISION
    The part of the law that prohibits unfair documentary practices is found at 8 U.S.C. § 1324b(a)(6). Retaliation/Intimidation. Individuals who file charges with ...
  75. [75]
    Enforcement Guidance on Retaliation and Related Issues - EEOC
    Aug 25, 2016 · This document addresses the anti-retaliation provisions under each statute enforced by the Commission.
  76. [76]
    Justice Department Settles with Delivery Services Company to ...
    Jul 15, 2021 · The INA prohibits retaliation and intimidation against individuals who oppose what they reasonably believe are violations of the law that IER ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Immigration Enforcement Creep in Immigrant & Employee Rights
    May 25, 2024 · The data show that rather than protect noncitizen workers from unlawful discrimination, IER has moved its focus to enforcing immigration laws ...
  78. [78]
    What Triggers an I-9 Audit? - Federal Lawyer - Oberheiden P.C.
    I-9 audits are triggered by complaints from employees, data analysis, and government sources, including complaints from current/former employees, denied job ...Missing: HSI | Show results with:HSI
  79. [79]
    ICE I-9 Audits & Crackdowns on the Rise: What You Need to Know
    May 13, 2025 · The Messner Reeves immigration law team provides an important update on the increase in ICE I-9 audit activity in the United States.Missing: findings non- statistics
  80. [80]
    10.3 Inspection - USCIS
    ... I-9. Officers will give you a minimum of three business days' notice before starting an inspection. You must make Forms I-9 available upon request at the ...
  81. [81]
    Immigration Enforcement Underway: Preparing for I-9 Inspections ...
    Feb 24, 2025 · Section 274A(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) designates Form I-9 for purposes of documenting employment eligibility. The INA ...
  82. [82]
    What Actually Happens During an I-9 Inspection by ICE? - Access
    Phases in the I-9 Inspection Process. There are three phases in the ICE I-9 inspection process: Notification and preparation; Forms inspection; Contest period.
  83. [83]
    New Administration Likely to Result in Increased I-9 Audits and Raids
    Nov 14, 2024 · ICE I-9 audits increased to 5,981 in FY2018 and 6,450 in FY2019;; ICE's goal in FY2020 was 12,000 to 15,000 audits, but this target was ...Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Guidance for Employers Conducting Internal Employment Eligibility ...
    An employer must give an employee the option to present acceptable documentation of the employee's choice to bring the Form I-9 into compliance with the INA.<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    11.8 Penalties for Prohibited Practices - USCIS
    If you fail to properly complete, retain, and/or make Forms I-9 available for inspection as required by law, you may face civil money penalties for each ...
  86. [86]
    Record 14 Million Unauthorized Immigrants Lived in the US in 2023
    Aug 21, 2025 · Unauthorized immigrants represented 5.6% of the U.S. workforce in 2023, a new high. The previous peak was 5.4% in 2007. Since 2003, ...
  87. [87]
    The Facts About E-Verify: Use Rates, Errors, and Effects on Illegal ...
    Jan 31, 2019 · E‑Verify Outcomes​​ For context, unauthorized immigrants were 5.4 percent of the labor force in 2007 and 4.8 percent in 2016, according to the ...
  88. [88]
    E-Verify and the Invasion of the Identity Snatchers
    Aug 5, 2025 · News reports have periodically latched onto instances in which workers verified through E-Verify have turned out to be unauthorized to work. E ...
  89. [89]
    I-9 Enforcement Reignited: ICE Cracks Down in 2025 - OutSolve
    Sep 9, 2025 · Research Report: ICE has a resurgence of I-9 enforcement in 2025. Learn how to navigate the new compliance landscape effectively.Missing: findings | Show results with:findings
  90. [90]
    I-9 Paperwork Burdens Too Much for Small Businesses - SHRM
    Apr 4, 2017 · "In my experience, the average error rate on I-9 forms by small-business employers exceeds 75 percent," he said. Consider an employer presenting ...
  91. [91]
    Electronic I-9 vs. Paper I-9 Form: Benefits of Going Digital - OutSolve
    Aug 27, 2025 · Discover the advantages of switching from paper to electronic Form I-9s, including reduced errors, smoother audit preparation, and enhanced ...
  92. [92]
    Automating I-9 Verification - SHRM
    Brantley says HR's unlimited license for the SAAS arrangement costs about $55,000 annually, on top of an initial setup fee of $11,000. How to Evaluate Automated ...
  93. [93]
    Keep Your Eyes Out for Form I-9 Document Fraud
    Apr 3, 2025 · Document fraud is a serious issue when conducting Form I-9 verification. Learn the risks and how you can help mitigate them.
  94. [94]
    [PDF] The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages
    Hanson, immigrant workers make up one-seventh of the American workforce, and illegal workers account for one-third of the total immigrants now in the U.S. Dr.
  95. [95]
    The labor market effects of reducing the number of illegal immigrants
    ... US firms benefit from illegal immigrants by paying lower labor cost. These features capture the economic incentives leading to illegal immigration to the US.
  96. [96]
    Justice Department Settles E-Verify Discrimination Claims Against ...
    Mar 16, 2022 · Under the INA and the E-Verify program rules, employers cannot discriminate in their use of E-Verify based on citizenship or immigration status.Missing: tension | Show results with:tension
  97. [97]
    Discrimination Actions Increase as ICE Pursues I-9 Audit Program
    There has been a dramatic increase in I-9 and E-Verify discrimination claims following implementation of a new worksite enforcement strategy by U.S. ...
  98. [98]
    Undocumented Workers in High-Growth U.S. Occupations
    Aug 27, 2025 · In 2023, the U.S. workforce included 8.5 million undocumented workers. Table 1 presents a brief demographic and socioeconomic summary of the ...
  99. [99]
    What we know about unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S.
    Jul 22, 2024 · Unauthorized immigrants represent about 4.8% of the US workforce in 2022. This was below the peak of 5.4% in 2007.
  100. [100]
    Up to 2.1 Million U.S. Construction Workers Are Illegally ...
    Nov 12, 2023 · This report finds that, nationally, 1.1 to 2.1 million construction workers are estimated to be misclassified or paid off-the-books.
  101. [101]
    Do state work eligibility verification laws reduce unauthorized ...
    Mar 10, 2016 · The results indicate that having an E-Verify law reduces the number of less-educated prime-age immigrants from Mexico and Central America.Missing: detection | Show results with:detection
  102. [102]
    DOJ Settlements and I-9 Violations - GryphonHR
    Apr 30, 2023 · DOJ settlements for I-9 violations include penalties, back pay, training, policy changes, and monitoring. For example, one settlement was $85, ...
  103. [103]
    Handbook for Employers M-274 - USCIS
    Apr 8, 2025 · Guidance for Completing Form I-9 (Employment Eligibility Verification Form) | Current as of July 20233.0 Completing Section 1 · 4.0 Completing Section 2 · 10.0 Retaining Form I-9 · HereMissing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  104. [104]
    USCIS Extends Form I-9 Expiration Date
    Aug 2, 2024 · US Citizenship and Immigration Services updated the Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification to extend the expiration date to 05/31/2027.
  105. [105]
    Understanding Increased Form I-9 Fines: A Guide for Employers
    May 6, 2025 · For example, an employer with 1,000 I-9s and a 65% error rate could face a potential fine of over $1.8 million. To avoid penalties, prioritize ...
  106. [106]
    New Form I-9 Now Includes Alternative Procedure for E-Verify ...
    Aug 1, 2023 · Beginning today, employers may remotely examine employees' Form I-9 documents provided they are enrolled in E-Verify.
  107. [107]
    Remote Examination of Documents (Optional Alternative Procedure ...
    Sep 26, 2025 · You are qualified to remotely examine your employee's documentation using a DHS-authorized alternative procedure at your E-Verify hiring sites.
  108. [108]
    Optional Alternative 1 to the Physical Document Examination ...
    Jul 25, 2023 · US Immigration and Customs Enforcement is announcing the authorization of an optional alternative procedure to the in-person physical examination.Form I-9 Physical Examination... · Employers Qualified To Use... · III. Determination
  109. [109]
    New Form I-9 and Remote Document Examination - E-Verify
    Sep 28, 2023 · The new Form I-9 streamlines employment verification, and E-Verify employers can now remotely examine employee documentation.
  110. [110]
    ICE updates Form I-9 requirement flexibility to grant employers more ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · ICE announced today that employers will have 30 days to reach compliance with Form I-9 requirements after the COVID-19 flexibilities sunset on July 31, 2023.
  111. [111]
    DHS announces flexibility in requirements related to Form I-9 ... - ICE
    Feb 25, 2025 · Effective April 1, 2021, DHS is also providing the following update to its Form I-9 flexibilities guidance. The flexibility announcement ...
  112. [112]
    4.5 Remote Document Examination (Optional Alternative Procedure ...
    Sep 18, 2023 · Indicate on the Form I-9, by completing the corresponding box, that an alternative procedure was used to examine documentation to complete ...
  113. [113]
    New Form I‑9; Notice Published Allowing E‑Verify Employers to ...
    Jul 21, 2023 · New Form I‑9; Notice Published Allowing E‑Verify Employers to Remotely Examine Form I‑9 Documents. Release Date: News Item Date: July 21, 2023.
  114. [114]
    FAQ: I-9 Alternative Procedure for Remote Employment Verification
    Oct 10, 2023 · After October 31, 2023, the prior version of Form I–9 will no longer be valid for use. Must qualified employers use E-Verify to create cases if ...