Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fort Lyon


Fort Lyon was a United States Army outpost in southeastern Colorado, established in 1860 as Fort Wise at the confluence of the Arkansas and Bijou creeks to protect emigrants and freight along the Santa Fe Trail from raids by Cheyenne and Arapaho warriors. Renamed Fort Lyon in 1861 after Union General Nathaniel Lyon, the original post operated until a 1866 flood prompted relocation downstream near present-day Las Animas, where a new fortification served as a base for military operations in the Plains Indian Wars until its abandonment by the Army in 1897. The site housed units including the Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry during the 1870s and 1880s, contributing to campaigns securing the region for settlement.
Following military decommissioning, Fort Lyon was converted in into a U.S. Naval treating patients, reflecting early 20th-century efforts to address respiratory diseases among sailors amid limited medical options. It later functioned as a veterans' hospital under the Department of Veterans Affairs until the 1970s, then as a state correctional facility from the 1990s until 2012, before repurposing as emphasizing recovery for homeless individuals, with a focus on veterans. The complex, designated a National Register , encompasses a national cemetery interring over 4,000 veterans and remains a landmark of Colorado's , medical, and penal .

History

Establishment and Early Operations (1860-1862)

Fort Wise was established in 1860 by the U.S. Army on the north bank of the Arkansas River in present-day Bent County, Colorado, approximately 12 miles east of the confluence with the Purgatoire River. The post was built to safeguard the Mountain Branch of the Santa Fe Trail amid rising depredations by Cheyenne and Arapaho warriors against wagon trains and stagecoaches. The Army leased the adjacent Bent's New Fort, a stone trading post constructed by William Bent in 1853, and erected temporary log and adobe structures for quarters, stables, and storage nearby. Initially garrisoned by Company B, 1st Infantry Regiment under Captain J. B. Plummer, the fort served as a supply depot and patrol base for escorting travelers through the vulnerable Big Timbers area. Named for , , the outpost facilitated diplomatic efforts with Plains tribes during its first years. On February 18, 1861, Southern Cheyenne chief and leaders signed the Treaty of Fort Wise at the fort, ceding approximately 4 million acres of land in Territory for a 600-square-mile reservation near the [Arkansas River](/page/Arkansas River), along with annuities and agricultural provisions; however, the treaty was rejected by many tribal members and non-signatory bands, sowing seeds of ongoing tension. Military operations focused on patrols, skirmish responses, and trail security, with the numbering around 100-150 troops by late 1861. Following Virginia's secession and the Civil War's onset, Fort Wise was renamed Fort Lyon in mid-1862 to honor Union Brigadier General , the first federal general killed in action at the on August 10, 1861. Under commanders like Major Edward Wynkoop, the post continued protective duties but saw troop diversions to counter Confederate incursions in ; in early 1862, elements of the 1st Colorado Volunteers reinforced the garrison before marching south to participate in the in March. These years marked the fort's role in frontier defense amid escalating sectional conflict and indigenous unrest.

Involvement in the Colorado War (1862-1865)

Fort Lyon, originally established as Fort Wise in 1860 and renamed in mid-1862 to honor Union General , functioned as a primary U.S. military outpost in southeastern during the , a conflict initiated by and raids on settlers and wagon trains starting in 1862. The fort's garrison, bolstered by companies E through H of the 1st Colorado Cavalry arriving on December 10, 1862, and additional units such as companies A, B, D, and others by April 1863, conducted patrols and operations to secure the corridor and suppress depredations by Plains tribes amid broader distractions. These efforts included responses to specific incidents, such as and attacks reported by Major Scott J. Anthony from the fort in 1863, reflecting its role in frontier defense against perceived threats to emigration routes and mining settlements. Escalation peaked in 1864 following events like the Hungate family murders near in late June, prompting territorial Governor John Evans to issue a on July 11 inviting peaceful Cheyenne and to seek safety at Fort Lyon or other posts. Major Edward W. Wynkoop, then commanding the fort, led negotiations in September, escorting Cheyenne leaders including to for talks, after which approximately 750 members of Black Kettle's band relocated initially near Fort Lyon before being directed about 40 miles north to a camp along Sand Creek, under assurances of military protection issued by fort authorities. Wynkoop's replacement, Major Anthony, continued these directives, though subsequent orders prohibited large encampments near the fort, contributing to the band's vulnerable positioning. On November 28, 1864, Colonel John M. Chivington arrived at Fort Lyon with around 700 men from the 1st and 3rd Cavalry regiments, conferring with Anthony and other officers; while some Fort Lyon troops joined the subsequent march, key subordinates including Captain and Lieutenant Joseph Cramer declined participation, citing the camp's protected status. Chivington's force departed that evening, attacking the Sand Creek encampment at dawn on November 29, resulting in the deaths of approximately 230 and , predominantly women, children, and elders, in an action later investigated by federal authorities as involving non-combatants who had raised a U.S. and of truce. The fort itself did not dispatch its full garrison to the assault, serving instead as a logistical staging point, but its prior peace overtures and proximity—about 40 miles south—placed it at the epicenter of the controversy, with post-event reports from Soule and others highlighting internal dissent and the breakdown of protection guarantees. Congressional inquiries in 1865 and 1867, drawing on testimony from Fort Lyon personnel, condemned the event as a , underscoring tensions between territorial militias and federal oversight in Indian affairs.

Final Military Years at Original Site (1865-1867)

In the aftermath of the Colorado War's primary campaigns, which concluded with negotiations in , the original Fort Lyon transitioned to a routine garrison role, housing U.S. Army detachments tasked with securing the against sporadic raids and facilitating overland travel. The Southern Plains experienced relative calm during late and 1866, with no major engagements reported at the post, allowing focus on logistical maintenance amid diminishing local timber resources and persistent sanitary issues from the river's proximity. The fort's vulnerability to Arkansas River flooding intensified, culminating in significant damage in 1866 when ice flows and high water destroyed remnants of the adjacent Bent's New Fort and threatened the main structures. A large in 1867 further eroded the bluffs underpinning the installation, compromising stability and habitability. These environmental hazards, combined with unhealthful conditions, prompted post commander H. Penrose to select a new upstream location approximately 20 miles west near Las Animas in June 1867. Construction of the replacement fort began promptly, with troops transferring operations by late 1867, effectively decommissioning the original site for military use. The relocation reflected pragmatic adaptation to geophysical constraints rather than strategic shifts, as the sought elevated terrain to mitigate future risks while continuing regional defense duties.

Relocation and Protection of the Santa Fe Trail (1867-1880s)

In the summer of 1867, severe flooding along the Arkansas River, combined with unhealthful conditions and a diminishing supply of timber at the original site near Bent's New Fort, prompted the U.S. Army to relocate Fort Lyon approximately 20 miles upstream to a new position east of Las Animas, Colorado. The Army leased land near Las Animas in June 1867 and transferred the post there, establishing the second Fort Lyon as a permanent installation designed for better defensibility and resource access. Construction at the new site incorporated traditional late-19th-century frontier fort layouts, with barracks, officers' quarters, and warehouses built primarily of adobe and wood to support ongoing operations. The relocated fort played a key role in safeguarding the Mountain Branch of the , serving as a critical outpost between Fort Larned in and points further west toward . Positioned along the corridor, it housed troops tasked with escorting wagon trains, patrolling against raids by Plains Indian tribes such as the and , and maintaining supply lines amid escalating conflicts in the post-Civil War era. As part of the Army's Department of the Missouri—a regional network of forts—the post facilitated rapid response to threats, though by the late , the intensity of protection duties began to wane as railroad expansion and shifting Indian campaigns reduced overland traffic vulnerabilities. During the 1870s, Fort Lyon remained an active hub for frontier defense, hosting units including the famed Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry, who conducted reconnaissance and skirmishes to secure the trail against intermittent hostilities. Specific operations included patrols that deterred depredations, with the fort's strategic location enabling it to supply and reinforce travelers until the trail's commercial dominance declined in the early 1880s due to rail alternatives. By the mid-1880s, as Native American resistance subsided following events like the and the subjugation of southern Plains tribes, the fort's focus shifted from trail protection to broader regional garrison duties, marking the transition toward its eventual decommissioning.

Decommissioning as a Military Post (1880s-1897)

By the 1880s, the strategic necessity of Fort Lyon had significantly declined as U.S. military campaigns successfully subdued Native American resistance across the Great Plains, including the relocation of tribes to reservations following conflicts with the Cheyenne, Arapaho, and other groups. Railroads facilitated civilian settlement, cattle ranching expanded, and homesteads proliferated, rendering permanent frontier garrisons like Fort Lyon obsolete for protecting the Santa Fe Trail, which saw reduced overland traffic. The post's adobe structures also suffered from deterioration due to harsh weather and recurrent Arkansas River flooding, exacerbating maintenance costs. In response to these factors, the U.S. Army ordered the closure of Fort Lyon on August 31, 1889, withdrawing the final contingent of troops and transferring equipment and supplies to Fort Logan in . A caretaker was appointed to oversee the vacant site, and on January 20, 1890, formal custody passed to the Department of the Interior. The post cemetery, containing 44 soldier remains, was exhumed that year and reinterred at Fort Leavenworth National Cemetery in to consolidate military burials. Military operations at Fort Lyon ceased entirely after 1889, though some historical narratives associate full abandonment with 1897, marking the effective end of the Indian Wars era and the broader demobilization of Plains frontier posts. No active presence returned in the interim, as national defense priorities shifted eastward and to emerging overseas territories following the Spanish-American War. The site's transition reflected a systemic reduction in western outposts, from over 200 in the to fewer than 100 by the 1890s, driven by fiscal constraints and stabilized regional security.

Post-Military Transformations

In 1906, the United States Navy acquired the abandoned Fort Lyon site in Bent County, Colorado, and initiated a comprehensive renovation to transform it into a specialized hospital for treating tuberculosis among sailors and Marines. The decision leveraged the region's arid climate, elevation, and isolation, which were believed to promote recovery through fresh air, sunlight exposure, and enforced rest—core elements of the prevailing sanatorium model for pulmonary tuberculosis at the time. Construction efforts included erecting new wards, administrative buildings, a power plant, and modern water and sewer systems to support patient care, with all funding sourced through congressional appropriations dedicated to naval medical facilities. By 1907, the had established two cemeteries on the grounds—one exclusively for naval personnel and another for civilian staff—to accommodate burials resulting from the disease's high ; the first interment occurred that year with the burial of Youayoshi Hoshi, a national employed at the facility. Treatment protocols emphasized heliotherapy, graduated exercise, and high-calorie nutrition to bolster patients' strength, supplemented by experimental interventions such as mercury administration advocated by Barton Lisle Wright, who reported encouraging outcomes in reducing bacillary loads and improving symptoms in select cases during 1907–1908 trials. These methods reflected the era's limited pharmacological options prior to antibiotics, with mercury's purported effects on drawing scrutiny from naval medical inspectors, who noted near-conviction in its efficacy when dosed judiciously. Operations through focused on isolating contagious patients to prevent shipboard outbreaks, with the serving as the Navy's primary western sanitarium; admissions prioritized active-duty personnel exhibiting early- to moderate-stage , though exact capacity figures from this period remain undocumented in available records, emphasizing qualitative metrics over quantitative throughput. By this juncture, the hospital had solidified its role in naval health infrastructure, predating broader expansions that later incorporated prisoner-of-war care.

Veterans Administration Hospital Era (1912-1960s)

In 1922, the U.S. Navy transferred control of the Fort Lyon facility to the newly established U.S. Veterans Bureau, which repurposed it as a open to veterans from all branches of military service regardless of war era. This marked a shift from its prior focus on naval patients to broader veteran care, with the Bureau assuming operations on June 22. The facility's isolated rural location in , spanning 556 acres, supported therapeutic environments conducive to recovery, building on existing infrastructure from its period. By 1930, administration passed to the consolidated Veterans Administration (), which designated Fort Lyon a specialized neuropsychiatric facility within three years, emphasizing treatment for conditions among veterans. This specialization aligned with rising demand for psychiatric services post-World War I, including for and related disorders, though exact patient demographics reflected the era's evolving understanding of combat-related . Expansions included construction of Georgian Colonial Revival-style buildings in , featuring slate roofs and detailed brickwork, which formed a 20-acre VA complex integrated with the site's historic stone and frame structures. Operations during this era prioritized long-term residential care, with the hospital complex accommodating inpatient psychiatric treatment, , and supportive services tailored to s' needs. The VA maintained the facility's role through and into the postwar period, adapting to increased populations while leveraging its established —initiated in 1907—for burials of patients who died on-site. By the , shifting federal priorities and state-level demands prompted gradual transition away from VA control, culminating in its handover for state psychiatric use, though it remained a key site for care until then.

State Psychiatric Facility (1960s-2000s)

In the post-World War II era, Fort Lyon operated as a specialized neuropsychiatric branch of the Veterans Administration Medical Center, focusing on long-term residential treatment for veterans suffering from severe mental illnesses, including , manic-depressive illness, and combat-related neuroses. This designation, established in 1933, persisted through the 1960s and beyond, with the facility adapting to evolving psychiatric practices such as and amid national deinstitutionalization efforts under the of 1963, though VA hospitals like Fort Lyon retained inpatient capacity for chronic cases due to the unique needs of veteran populations. The campus featured interconnected red-brick wards and constructed in the late and , supporting a self-contained with occupational programs in farming and maintenance to promote patient rehabilitation. Patient census at Fort Lyon fluctuated with veteran demographics; by the and , it housed hundreds annually, emphasizing custodial care over acute intervention, as federal policy prioritized specialized neuropsychiatric services in rural settings to reduce urban hospital burdens. Empirical outcomes included stabilization for long-term residents, though critiques from veteran advocates highlighted underfunding and outdated facilities compared to urban centers, with limited integration of evidence-based therapies like cognitive-behavioral approaches until the . The facility's isolation on 500 acres facilitated a therapeutic milieu but also contributed to staff shortages and higher operational costs, as documented in internal reviews. Facing federal consolidation amid declining admissions—driven by shorter hospital stays and community-based care shifts—the VA announced closure plans in the late , culminating in a 2000 rally by s protesting the loss of specialized rural access. Operations ceased in 2001, with the property transferred to the state of ; contrary to the period's designation as a state facility, Fort Lyon remained under exclusive federal VA administration throughout the 1960s-2000s, without state operational control or funding for psychiatric services. The handover enabled state repurposing as a correctional center, ending its role in mental health care.

Minimum-Security Prison (2000s-2011)

In 2001, following the closure of the hospital at the site, the state of repurposed Fort Lyon as a minimum-security correctional facility under the . Originally proposed to house medically compromised , it instead primarily accommodated low-risk, non-violent offenders suitable for minimum-security conditions, emphasizing rehabilitation through work programs and structured routines. The facility maintained a rated capacity of 500 beds for male inmates. During fiscal year 2010-11, it operated with an average daily population of 478 offenders, incurring annual costs of $30.7 million, or $175.94 per inmate per day. Operations aligned with state standards for minimum-security prisons, including perimeter fencing rather than walls, and focused on preparing inmates for reintegration via vocational training and minimal supervision. Declining statewide prison populations and persistent budget deficits prompted closure announcements in early 2011. Lawmakers initially delayed the shutdown by six months to March 2012 to mitigate economic impacts on Bent County, where the facility ranked as the second-largest employer. The full closure proceeded that year under Governor John Hickenlooper's administration, yielding projected state savings of $6.3 million annually post-transfer of inmates.

Modern Recovery Community

Establishment of Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community (2013-Present)

In 2013, the Colorado General Assembly passed Senate Bill 13-210, designating a portion of the former Fort Lyon property in Bent County as a supportive residential community for homeless individuals, with an emphasis on providing substance abuse supportive services, medical care, job training, and transitional housing to facilitate recovery and reintegration. The legislation repurposed the site, which had served as a state minimum-security prison until its closure in 2011 due to budget constraints, into a recovery-oriented facility aimed at addressing chronic homelessness and addiction statewide. This statutory framework authorized the state to allocate resources for operations, prioritizing flexible support for residents regardless of income or background, with a focus on achieving sobriety and permanent housing transitions. The program officially launched in September 2013 under the management of the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, in partnership with the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, which provided initial funding for establishment and operations. It opened with 27 residents on the 1,000-acre campus, utilizing existing dormitory-style buildings from prior uses to house up to 300 individuals at capacity, combining peer-based recovery support with on-site educational and vocational programs offered through collaborators like and . The initiative targeted primarily those experiencing due to substance use disorders, including a significant proportion of veterans, drawing from urban shelters and streets to offer a rural, structured for stabilization. Since its inception, the community has expanded services while maintaining its core transitional model, serving over 2,200 individuals by through state appropriations and demonstrated cost savings compared to and incarceration alternatives. Annual evaluations by state agencies have tracked participation, with early data showing 968 residents admitted by June 2017, underscoring the program's role in statewide efforts to reduce in without relying on permanent subsidies. Operations continue under ongoing legislative oversight, with funding renewals tied to metrics like housing retention rates.

Program Structure and Services

The Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community () operates as a recovery-oriented program designed for residents with a who are experiencing or at risk of . Eligibility prioritizes individuals regardless of income, background, or status, provided they have a documented and commit to upon entry; referrals typically come through partnering organizations like the Colorado Coalition for the Homeless, with an intake process emphasizing voluntary participation and individualized plans. Stays last up to two years, structured in phases that progress from stabilization to reintegration, allowing flexibility to address personal milestones such as achieving , skill-building, and community reentry. Core services integrate peer-led support with practical rehabilitation elements, including daily case management to coordinate recovery goals and campus operations where residents contribute through workgroups maintaining the facility's grounds and buildings. Educational offerings encompass GED completion programs, vocational training in trades like and , and life skills workshops focused on and relapse prevention. Employment services provide supported job placement, resume assistance, and on-site opportunities, often in partnership with local employers, to foster self-sufficiency. Health and wellness components feature an on-site clinic for medical and behavioral , including substance use counseling and medication-assisted treatment where appropriate, alongside peer-facilitated groups such as (AA), (NA), and culturally specific programs like the Wellbriety White Bison initiative for Native American residents. Post-discharge support extends through housing navigation, continued employment linkages, and alumni networks to sustain long-term recovery. The program's capacity supports up to 250 residents, with services delivered by a multidisciplinary team including peer recovery specialists who model sobriety based on their own experiences.

Outcomes and Empirical Evaluations

The primary empirical evaluation of the Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community was conducted by the State Auditor's Office, with a final report released in August 2018 covering operations from September 2013 to June 2017. Among 777 participants who exited the during this period, 47 percent (333 of 715 with complete exit data) transitioned to permanent , while program completers—defined as those meeting individualized goals—achieved a 77 percent rate of permanent placement. The average length of stay was 217 days (ranging from 2 to 1,227 days across 968 total participants), with longer stays strongly correlating to success: participants in the highest (>281 days) were 17 times more likely to exit to permanent than those in the lowest (<28 days). Participant demographics included 82 percent male, average age of 49.5 years, and 19 percent veterans, with most reporting histories of , substance use disorders, and behavioral health needs. Health and quality-of-life metrics showed self-reported improvements, including reductions in anxiety and depression scores, alongside enhanced overall , based on surveys of 124 current participants in January 2018. Employment engagement was limited, with only 11 percent participating in vocational programs, though 75 percent rated employment as important and 19 percent reported progress. Cost analyses indicated a 33 percent reduction in per-participant public costs post-enrollment (versus 12 percent for a comparison group of similar homeless individuals), driven by 80 percent lower judicial system expenditures (suggesting decreased incarceration involvement, though direct recidivism rates were not tracked), 65 percent fewer shelter/voucher uses, and declines in physical (9 percent) and behavioral (34 percent) costs; annual program cost per participant averaged $18,800. Legislators described these results as mixed, citing data limitations such as missing records (e.g., 11 percent incomplete exit data), reliance on self-reports for substance use, absence of centralized jail data, and lack of long-term follow-up beyond one to two years. A 2023 self-reported 10-year review by the operating nonprofit, Coalition for the Homeless, covering over 2,200 residents since 2013, indicated 58 percent overall placement upon exit (40 percent permanent, 18 percent temporary or ), a decline from the initial five-year figure of 76 percent (47 percent permanent plus temporary). This adjustment reflects broader data inclusion amid challenges like the shortage and disruptions, with the state citing the model's overall effectiveness in prompting replication efforts. No peer-reviewed studies or independent analyses were identified, limiting causal assessments of sustained ; outcomes appear influenced by program completion rates (around 40 percent in earlier data) and participant factors like milder behavioral health needs.

Geography and Physical Layout

Location and Environmental Context

Fort Lyon is situated in Bent County, southeastern , at approximately 38°05′ N latitude and 103°09′ W longitude, about 10 miles east of Las Animas along the . The site occupies a bluff overlooking the river, positioned roughly two miles below the mouth of the , which provided strategic access to water but exposed the location to periodic flooding, as evidenced by major inundations in 1866 and 1867 that prompted relocation of the original fort upstream. The surrounding terrain consists of the flat to gently rolling High Plains, part of the broader physiographic region, with elevations around 3,800 to 4,000 feet above and vegetation adapted to sparse cover and drought conditions. The local climate is semi-arid continental, featuring extreme temperature variations—average July maximums near 96°F and January minimums around 13°F—low annual precipitation typically under 15 inches, low humidity, variable winds, and vulnerability to dust storms and droughts characteristic of the basin. These environmental factors historically influenced military operations, health challenges like outbreaks due to dry air and isolation, and agricultural limitations in the region.

Infrastructure Evolution and Preservation

The infrastructure of Fort Lyon originated with its establishment as a U.S. Army post in 1867, featuring adobe structures arranged around a rectangular parade ground, including officers' quarters, barracks, a hospital, and administrative buildings. During its tenure as a U.S. Navy tuberculosis sanatorium from 1906 to 1922, the site expanded with hip-roofed frame buildings to accommodate patients, alongside agricultural fields and an irrigation system to support self-sufficiency. Upon transfer to the Veterans Administration in 1922, significant construction occurred between 1929 and 1945, adding a complex of standardized, multi-story brick buildings in Georgian Revival style clustered near the original parade ground; the first of these red brick patient facilities were completed between 1929 and 1931. .jpg) Subsequent uses as a neuropsychiatric facility, minimum-security prison until 2012, and supportive residential recovery community from 2013 onward involved minimal new construction but adaptive modifications to repurpose existing structures for housing, counseling, and vocational services. Preservation efforts recognize Fort Lyon's architectural and historical value, with the site listed as a district on the and Colorado State Register of Historic Properties, encompassing approximately 91 contributing buildings and features across 512 acres along the and . Designated as one of 's Most Endangered Places in 2013 due to deterioration following prison closure, the property has seen targeted interventions, including a $132,000 EPA Brownfields grant in 2017 for site cleanup and assessments to facilitate revitalization. Partial funding from the History Colorado State Historical Fund has supported ongoing work toward a comprehensive master plan for , aiming to maintain historic integrity while converting buildings into a self-sustaining for programs; renovations were scheduled to commence in 2024 to address deferred maintenance estimated in the millions. These initiatives balance functional reuse with conservation of the site's layered military and medical heritage, preventing further losses like those from earlier demolitions during institutional shifts.

Fort Lyon National Cemetery

Establishment and Historical Burials

The Fort Lyon National Cemetery originated in 1907 as the burial ground for the U.S. Navy's , established the prior year on the grounds of the decommissioned Fort Lyon military post in . The treated sailors and suffering from pulmonary , a prevalent affliction among naval personnel due to shipboard living conditions and limited medical interventions at the time. Initial interments thus primarily comprised deceased patients from this facility, reflecting the era's high mortality rates from the disease, which claimed an estimated one in seven U.S. adults before effective treatments emerged in the mid-20th century. The cemetery also included a separate section for civilian employees and dependents associated with the hospital. Burials continued under Navy administration until 1922, when the facility transitioned to the Veterans Bureau amid broader federal efforts to consolidate care for ex-servicemen disabled by World War I-era exposures, including chemical agents that exacerbated respiratory conditions. By 1930, the site had been transferred to the Veterans Administration, extending its use for veteran hospitalizations and incorporating additional military burials into the cemetery. Historical records indicate that early interments numbered in the hundreds during the Navy period, focused on tuberculosis victims whose remains were documented through hospital ledgers rather than comprehensive grave registries initially. These burials underscored the cemetery's foundational role in addressing service-related illnesses, predating its formal designation within the national cemetery system. The site's prior use as a 19th-century Army post suggests possible earlier informal graves, but the national cemetery's documented history begins with the 1907 activations, distinguishing it from any antecedent post cemetery remnants. Over time, these historical sections integrated into the expanded grounds, now encompassing over 7,000 documented interments from the early 20th century onward, with markers reflecting naval and veteran honors.

Current Operations and Significance

Fort Lyon National Cemetery is administered by the National Cemetery Administration of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, with day-to-day operations managed by a small staff that reports to in . It functions as an active burial site for eligible veterans, active-duty servicemembers, their spouses, and dependent children, offering committal services, military honors coordination, and interment options for both casketed remains and cremains across ten designated sections (A through J). The facility supports ongoing burials, with records faxed to the National Cemetery Scheduling Office for processing, and provides public access for visitation and memorial tributes via the VA's Virtual Legacy Memorial digital platform. As of June 2016, the cemetery encompassed 2,542 interments on 10.7 developed acres within its 51.7-acre footprint, with over 41 undeveloped acres ensuring projected capacity through at least 2030. Infrastructure enhancements sustain its operations, including a modular administration building constructed in , a maintenance garage added in 2010, and an upgraded irrigation system installed that same year to support groundskeeping amid the site's arid southeastern environment. These improvements reflect standard protocols for preserving historic national cemeteries while accommodating modern accessibility and needs. The cemetery's contemporary significance lies in its embodiment of the federal government's expanded commitment to veterans' burial benefits, evolving from its origins as a naval hospital post cemetery in 1907 to a cornerstone of the National Cemetery Administration's network post-1973. It serves as a enduring memorial to military service, particularly for those treated at the adjacent former VA , and underscores the system's adaptation to post-World War II demands for nationwide honorable interment. Nationally registered for , Fort Lyon National Cemetery continues to symbolize dignified commemoration, with its active status reinforcing the causal link between military sacrifice and sustained governmental stewardship of veterans' legacies.

Controversies and Assessments

Role in the Sand Creek Massacre: Context and Events

In the lead-up to the Sand Creek Massacre, escalating violence between settlers and in 1864 stemmed from mutual raids, including the August murders of the Hungate family, which heightened demands for military retaliation. Cheyenne leader , advocating peace, led a delegation including chiefs White Antelope and Left Hand to Fort Lyon in September 1864 to negotiate with U.S. Army Major Edward W. Wynkoop, the post's commanding officer. Wynkoop, seeking to avert further conflict, assured the chiefs of protection if they encamped under the U.S. flag near the fort, prompting Black Kettle's band of approximately 500-600 Southern Cheyenne and Arapaho to relocate to a site along Sand Creek, about 40 miles northeast of Fort Lyon, by late October. Fort Lyon served as a key military outpost on the , supplying federal troops and militia during the , but its commanders diverged on handling the tribes. Wynkoop's successor, Major George L. Scott , maintained the protective status of the Sand Creek camp, yet territorial governor John Evans and Colonel John M. Chivington, commander of the 3rd Colorado Cavalry Regiment, pursued aggressive action amid reports of ongoing depredations attributed to other Cheyenne Dog Soldier bands not under Black Kettle's influence. On , 1864, Chivington marched roughly 700 militia from to Fort Lyon, where he ordered to detach about 250 federal troops to join the assault on the Sand Creek encampment, citing it as a hostile village despite intelligence from Fort Lyon officers confirming its peaceful nature. The massacre unfolded on November 29, 1864, when Chivington's combined force departed Fort Lyon at dawn and reached Sand Creek by mid-morning, launching a on the village flying a of truce and the U.S. flag. Federal officers Captain Silas S. Soule and Lieutenant Joseph A. Cramer, stationed at Fort Lyon, refused to participate, with Soule later testifying that the camp contained only non-combatants and that the assault violated military assurances of safety; their units largely held back, limiting Fort Lyon's direct troop contribution to minimal levels under Anthony's contingent. The attack resulted in the deaths of 150-200 and , predominantly women, children, and elderly, with reports of mutilations amid chaotic firing that lasted several hours; survived by rallying defenders but recounted the betrayal of Fort Lyon's promised sanctuary in subsequent accounts. Congressional investigations, including the 1865 Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, condemned the event as a , highlighting Fort Lyon's role in the failed peace signals that lured the tribes into vulnerability.

Debates on Military Necessity vs. Atrocity Narratives

The attack on the Cheyenne and encampment near on November 29, 1864, led by Colonel John M. Chivington of the Third Cavalry, sparked immediate controversy over whether it constituted a legitimate against a perceived threat or an unprovoked slaughter of non-combatants. Proponents of , including Chivington himself, argued that the action was essential amid escalating violence from warriors against settlers, such as the August 1864 of the Hungate and subsequent raids that heightened fears during the when federal troops were diverted eastward. Chivington testified before a congressional that from scouts indicated the Sand Creek camp harbored hostile elements, including warriors with fresh scalps and plunder from recent attacks, necessitating a preemptive strike to deter broader tribal aggression and protect emigrant routes and settlements vulnerable to hit-and-run tactics. This view was echoed by territorial Governor John Evans, who had issued proclamations in August and October 1864 declaring war on "hostile" Indians and urging civilians to arm themselves, framing the operation as part of a defensive campaign against tribes unwilling to distinguish friend from foe in fluid alliances. Opposing narratives, dominant in federal military and congressional assessments, portrayed the event as an atrocity violating promises of protection extended from Fort Lyon, where Major Edward Wynkoop had earlier parleyed with Black Kettle's band and assured them safety if they camped nearby under a U.S. . The Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War's report, based on eyewitness testimonies including those from Captain —who refused to order his men to fire on the village—concluded that the encampment consisted primarily of women, children, and elderly (estimated 200 killed, with fewer than 10 warriors), who offered no organized resistance despite flying American and white flags signaling peace. Investigations highlighted post-attack mutilations of bodies, including and genital disfigurement by U.S. troops, as evidence of disproportionate brutality rather than battlefield exigency, with Major Scott Anthony's prior directive from Fort Lyon placing the camp at Sand Creek under implied military safeguard that Chivington disregarded. Historians note that while broader Cheyenne depredations—totaling dozens of deaths in —provided a factual basis for Colorado's alarm, primary evidence from the site, including survivor accounts and minimal U.S. casualties (none fatal), undermines claims of a , suggesting instead a targeted enabled by the fort's ambiguous protection policies. Chivington's defenders, including some veterans, maintained that tribal in raids blurred lines between "friendly" and hostile bands, justifying decisive action to break a , but federal inquiries rejected this, attributing to Chivington's ambition and Evans's inflammatory rhetoric over verifiable threats from Black Kettle's specific group. These debates persisted in military courts and public discourse, with no conviction of Chivington due to his state status, underscoring tensions between territorial imperatives and oversight in conflicts.

Broader Legacy in Westward Expansion and Native Conflicts

Fort Lyon served as a critical outpost in the , safeguarding key overland routes such as the Mountain Branch of the during the era, which facilitated the movement of emigrants, traders, and supplies essential to American westward expansion into the Southwest. Established initially as Fort Wise in 1860 and renamed Fort Lyon in 1861 following General Nathaniel Lyon's death, the post's garrison provided escorts for wagon trains along the to , countering threats from Confederate incursions and Native American raids that disrupted commerce and settlement in the . In 1862, elements of the fort's forces marched southward to , contributing to the victory at the on March 26–28, which secured federal control over the region and prevented Southern expansion that could have hindered northern migration patterns. Beyond immediate trail protection, Fort Lyon exemplified the U.S. Army's fort network strategy under the Department of the Missouri, established in 1867, which aimed to project power across the Plains to enable mining booms—like Colorado's 1859 gold rush—and agricultural by deterring intertribal warfare and from displaced tribes such as the and . Relocated upstream in 1867 to mitigate flooding (becoming Fort Lyon No. 2), the installation housed units including the Buffalo Soldiers of the 10th Cavalry in the late and , who patrolled against raids and supported enforcement of treaties like the 1867 Medicine Lodge Creek agreements, which sought to confine Southern Plains tribes to reservations but often failed due to inadequate provisions and ongoing settler encroachments. In the broader arc of Native conflicts, Fort Lyon's operations contributed to the escalation and resolution of the Plains Indian Wars by 1897, when the post was abandoned as tribal resistance waned under sustained military pressure. During 1868–1869, it played a minor logistical role in General Philip Sheridan's winter campaign against non-compliant and bands, following the Sand Creek events and subsequent retaliatory strikes that fragmented tribal cohesion and opened vast tracts for white homesteaders—evidenced by Colorado's population surge from 34,277 in 1860 to 39,864 by 1870, driven by secured access to fertile valleys. This military posture, rooted in causal pressures of demographic influx and resource competition, ultimately displaced nomadic hunting economies, confining survivors to diminished reservations and enabling the territory's path to statehood in 1876, though at the cost of thousands of Native lives across campaigns where forts like Lyon supplied forward bases for scorched-earth tactics.

References

  1. [1]
    Wayside: Fort Lyon Reservation (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jun 29, 2024 · The Fort Lyon Reservation. Created in 1861 by the Treaty of Fort Wise, the Upper Arkansas Agency Reservation, known later as the Fort Lyon ...
  2. [2]
    Fort Lyon - Bent County Historical Society
    The colorful history of Fort Lyon, Colorado, encompasses two 19th century army posts, a naval hospital, a veterans' hospital, a minimum-security prison and ...
  3. [3]
    Fort Lyon, Colorado on the Arkansas River - Legends of America
    The “new” Fort Lyon was abandoned by the U.S. Army in 1897 but taken over by the U.S. Navy in 1906. The Navy opened a tuberculosis hospital, which was used ...
  4. [4]
    Fort Lyon - History Colorado
    May 5, 2004 · Fort Lyon is important for its role as an army post, a navy hospital, and a veterans' hospital. Beginning in 1867, the fort served as part of the army's ...
  5. [5]
    Meet Fort Lyon - Colorado Division of Housing
    After the Fort Lyon Correctional Facility was decommissioned in 2012, the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) re-purposed the facility as the Fort Lyon ...
  6. [6]
    Fort Lyon National Cemetery
    Fort Lyon National Cemetery, located in southeast Colorado, is open daily from sunrise to sunset. It has space for casketed and cremated remains. The first ...
  7. [7]
    Fort Lyon - Colorado Preservation, Inc.
    Active as an Army Fort between 1868-1888, it was later occupied by the Navy as a tuberculosis treatment facility, then later as VA hospital, and then ownership ...
  8. [8]
    Bent's New Fort and Fort Wise/Lyon (U.S. National Park Service)
    Oct 6, 2023 · The site of Bent's New Fort represents a pivot point from the fur trade of the early 1800s and campaigns against Plains Tribes in Colorado in the late 1800s.
  9. [9]
    History: Colorado Territory Civil War Volunteers
    Companies E, F, G and H were assigned to Ft. Lyon arriving on 10 December 1862. Companies A and B arrived late in April 1863 and Companies D and E were ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Sand Creek Massacre Timeline 1860-1863
    Major Scott J. Anthony, now commanding Fort Lyon (replacing the demoted Lt. Colonel Tappan) reports more Kiowa and Comanche depredations on the Arkansas. He ...Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  11. [11]
    History & Culture - Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site (U.S. ...
    In 1864, the U. S. Army carried out a surprise attack on a non-combatant encampment of Cheyenne and Arapaho Indians along the Big Sandy Creek ...People · Sand Creek Massacre · Biography of Black Kettle · Silas SouleMissing: 1862-1865
  12. [12]
    Sand Creek Massacre - National Park Service
    In November, after a change in orders as well as a change in commanders at Fort Lyon, the tribes were prohibited from camping near the fort. Nearly all Cheyenne ...
  13. [13]
    The Search for the Site of the Sand Creek Massacre
    In particular, Ireland searched for segments of the historic trail that the army may have traveled between Fort Lyon and the massacre site, including the point ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The Cheyenne Wars Atlas - Army University Press
    ... 1864 and arrived at Fort Lyon on. 28 November. At Fort Lyon, Major Scott Anthony continued with one hand to assure the nearby Cheyenne and. Arapaho of their ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Background to Sand Creek - History Colorado
    52 The immediate trouble ceased when the troops moved down the Arkansas to Fort Lyon and then to their climactic attack on the Cheyennes and Arapa- hoes at Sand ...
  16. [16]
    Former fort's history diverse as Army outpost, TB hospital
    Jun 8, 2003 · In 1867 the Arkansas River flooded the post, so base Commander William H. Penrose decided to move it. He selected the present site in June 1867 ...Missing: relocation | Show results with:relocation
  17. [17]
    Fort Wise - FortWiki Historic U.S. and Canadian Forts
    Aug 25, 2019 · Fort Wise (1852-1867) - A trading post first established in 1852 as Bents New Fort by William Bent in Bent County, Colorado.Missing: 1860 | Show results with:1860
  18. [18]
    Soldier and Brave (Survey of Historic Sites and Buildings)
    Aug 19, 2005 · In 1860 troops began construction of Fort Wise (Fort Lyon No. 1) a mile southwest of Bent's post. Bent leased it to the Army and moved upriver ...
  19. [19]
    Fort Lyon - Colorado Preservation, Inc.
    The history of Fort Lyon can be separated into 3 periods beginning with the Army Period (1868-1888) when the Fort was laid out in the tradition of a late ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Fort Lyon National Cemetery Bent County, CO - History Colorado
    The U.S. Army renamed the post Fort Wise for the governor of Virginia, but following the outbreak of the Civil War (1861) the post was renamed Fort Lyon ...
  21. [21]
    Fort Lyon (2) - FortWiki Historic U.S. and Canadian Forts
    ### Summary of Fort Lyon (2) Decommissioning and Transition
  22. [22]
    A landmark worth preserving - The Denver Post
    Sep 22, 2011 · 1867: Fort Lyon is rebuilt at its present site, 6 miles east of Las Animas. Construction in this era includes the large Front Row officers' ...
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL HOSPITAL, NEW FORT LYON ...
    THE TREATMENT OF TUBERCULOSIS BY THE ADMINISTRATION OF MERCURY: AT THE UNITED STATES NAVAL HOSPITAL, NEW FORT LYON, COLO. BARTON LISLE WRIGHT, M.D.. Author ...
  25. [25]
    MERCURY FOR CONSUMPTION.; Doctors In Government Hospital ...
    WASHINGTON, May 17.-Recent advices from the new Naval Hospital at Fort Lyon, Col., confirm the promising report made by Surgeon B. L. Wright, on duty at ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] A Sojourn in Colorado - DTIC
    Naval Hospital Fort Lyon, Las Animas, Colo. The Navy's preeminent sanitarium for tuberculosis patients was transferred the to Veterans Bureau in 1921 where ...
  28. [28]
    From hospital to prison to rehab facility: Fort Lyon's fractured past
    Nov 20, 2019 · Fort Lyon started off as an Army outpost from 1867 to 1897. The Army abandoned it after that, and in 1906 it was reopened by the Navy as a ...
  29. [29]
    Veterans Administration Medical Center (Fort Lyon) - SAH Archipedia
    Established in 1860 below the confluence of the Purgatoire and Arkansas rivers, this was originally called Fort Wise but was renamed Fort Lyon in 1861 and ...Missing: 1912-1960 | Show results with:1912-1960
  30. [30]
    U.S. Naval Hospital-Fort Lyon Veterans Administration Medical ...
    Dec 23, 2013 · Since 1867, Fort Lyon in Bent County has served as a US Army fort, a tuberculosis sanatorium, a neuropsychiatric facility, and a minimum security prison.Missing: 1898-1912 | Show results with:1898-1912
  31. [31]
    Veterans rally against closure of Fort Lyon - Pueblo Chieftain
    Feb 21, 2000 · The formal decision to close the 500-acre hospital campus has not been announced by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. But it's clear from ...
  32. [32]
    Fort Lyon transfer delayed, but not as long as reported
    Mar 31, 2000 · A Denver newspaper reported Thursday that it may be 3-5 years before the the federal veterans medical center and nursing home close. But ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] MEMORANDUM - Colorado General Assembly |
    Mar 19, 2021 · Fort Lyon Correctional Facility (state). 500. 2016-17. July 31 ... prison population) cannot be placed in minimum security units. TOTAL ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
    Jan 5, 2012 · This facility cost $30.7 million to operate in FY 2010-11 ($175.94 per offender per day for an average daily attendance of 478 offenders). b.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Former Prison Makes List of Endangered Places | Colorado Public ...
    Feb 7, 2013 · The Fort Lyon Correctional Facility in southeastern Colorado closed in 2011 due to budget cuts. The property was originally a military ...Missing: minimum- security history 2000-2011
  36. [36]
    Closure of Bent County's Fort Lyon prison delayed six months
    Mar 15, 2011 · The Joint Budget Committee on Tuesday voted to change the closure date of the Fort Lyon Correctional Facility from Aug. 31 to March 1, 2012 ...Missing: VA | Show results with:VA
  37. [37]
    Southeastern Colorado Courting New Employers to Fill Fort Lyon ...
    Mar 16, 2011 · That's because the Joint Budget Committee decided earlier this week change the closure date of the prison to March 1, 2011. While the ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] SENATE BILL 13-210 BY SENATOR(S) Giron, Aguilar, Crowder ...
    May 8, 2013 · A SUPPORTIVE RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY FOR THE HOMELESS FOR THE. PURPOSE OF PROVIDING SUBSTANCE ABUSE SUPPORTIVE SERVICES,MEDICAL. CARE, JOB ...
  39. [39]
    A homeless recovery campus at an old fort on the plains is so ...
    Oct 16, 2023 · Fort Lyon, which also has been a jail and a neuropsychiatric hospital in its past lives, has been deemed successful enough that Gov. Jared Polis ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  40. [40]
    Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community - COSCDA
    The state of Colorado created the Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community (SRC) through a statute that repurposed a 160-year-old decommissioned military ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Fort Lyon SupPortive Residential community
    Between September 2013, when the Fort Lyon Program began, and June 30, 2017, the. Program has served 968 individuals. Participation levels are set at an ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  42. [42]
    Fort Lyon Program Referrals | Colorado Coalition for the Homeless
    Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community provides recovery oriented transitional housing to people experiencing homelessness on a sprawling campus in Bent ...
  43. [43]
    Fort Lyon Recovery Program - Colorado Coalition for the Homeless
    Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community combines recovery-oriented transitional housing for people currently or formerly experiencing homelessness with peer ...Missing: prison | Show results with:prison
  44. [44]
    Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community Program - FindHelp.org
    The program combines housing with peer support, educational, vocational and employment services for up to 300 homeless and formerly homeless persons from across ...Missing: National Cemetery
  45. [45]
    Fort Lyon Resident Stories - Colorado Division of Housing
    Looking for a long-term inpatient facility I came across Fort Lyon a supportive residential community. ... I ended up in a psych hospital 5 times with 3 suicide ...Missing: 1960s- 2000s
  46. [46]
    “It's Amazing What Can Be Done Here.” Colorado Health Center ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · By: Olivia Lewis, Direct Relief. Staff members at Fort Lyon Supportive Residential Community say they love their work because they see people ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Evaluation of Fort Lyon SupPortive Residential community
    Aug 1, 2018 · This report contains the final results of the evaluation of the Fort Lyon Supportive. Residential Community Program (Fort Lyon Program).
  48. [48]
    Fort Lyon reaches five-year mark of housing homeless
    Sep 11, 2018 · Five-year audit of rural campus along the Arkansas River shows mixed results, setting the stage for a major battle in the statehouse over future funding.<|separator|>
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    Fort Lyon Populated Place Profile / Bent County, Colorado Data
    Fort Lyon is a populated place located in Bent County at latitude 38.092 and longitude -103.152. Fort Lyon appears on the Las Animas U.S. Geological Survey Map.
  51. [51]
    GPS coordinates of Fort Lyon, Colorado, United States. Latitude
    Fort Lyon is an unincorporated community and US Post Office in Bent County, Colorado, United States. Latitude: 38° 05' 28.80" N Longitude: -103° 09' 4.20" W
  52. [52]
    About Bent County CO
    The warmest month is July with an average maximum temperature of 96.2 degrees. The coolest month is January with an average minimum temperature of 13.4 degrees.Missing: context | Show results with:context
  53. [53]
    Bent County | Southeast Council of Governments
    Bent County is located in the Arkansas River Valley on the banks of the Arkansas and Purgatoire Rivers and the plains of Southeast Colorado.Missing: geography terrain climate
  54. [54]
    Climate Monitoring at Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site: Water ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · The reconnaissance drought index for Bent's Old Fort National Historic Site indicates that WY2024 was drier than the 1991–2024 average from the ...Missing: Lyon terrain
  55. [55]
    Bent County, Colorado cleanup project receives $132K to revitalize ...
    May 31, 2017 · Bent County, Colorado cleanup project receives $132K to revitalize Fort Lyon campus. Brownfields grant to Colorado Department of Local ...Missing: adaptive | Show results with:adaptive<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Fort Lyon National Cemetery | History Colorado
    ### Summary of Fort Lyon National Cemetery Establishment History
  57. [57]
    [PDF] 2004 Baseline Report - | Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Oldest National Cemetery: 14 established in 1862 (12 are currently maintained by VA). Newest National Cemetery: Fort Sill opened in November 2001. Volunteers ...
  58. [58]
    Dates of Establishment: National Cemeteries & NCA Burial Sites (2 ...
    Fort Lyon, Fort Lyon, CO, 1922. Remark for Fort Lyon: Began as a cemetery for the Navy tuberculosis hospital established there in 1906; the military ...
  59. [59]
    Fort Lyon National Cemetery - History Colorado
    Nov 7, 2017 · Fort Lyon National Cemetery - Fort Lyon National Cemetery is nationally ... The U.S. Navy created the antecedent of the national cemetery in 1906 as ...
  60. [60]
    Biography of Black Kettle - Sand Creek Massacre National Historic ...
    In one last effort to negotiate peace, Chief Black Kettle dispatched One Eye to deliver a letter to Major Edward Wynkoop, the commanding officer at Fort Lyon.
  61. [61]
    Sand Creek Battle Facts and Summary - American Battlefield Trust
    The Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site is located about 9 miles north of Chivington, Colorado. A walking trail with some interpretive waysides...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] PSD-Eyewitness Accounts of the Sand Creek Massacre - Mission US
    The soldiers killed over two hundred men, women and children. Later Congressional and military investigations condemned the massacre. Congressional Testimony of ...
  63. [63]
    Four Documents on the Sand Creek Massacre - Digital History
    A Congressional inquiry condemned the battle as a massacre. The Cheyenne and Arapaho were promised reparations in an 1865 treaty, but none were paid. Document: ...
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    The Mystery Behind the Murders That Led to the Sand Creek ... - 5280
    Nov 3, 2024 · In time, the Hungate Massacre, as the event would eventually be called, became a rallying cry and a decadeslong justification for the atrocities ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    John M. Chivington's Defense: To the People of Colorado
    I am but human, and the same means of knowledge by which the public have been informed of the "Chivington massacre," I was informed of the hostility of the ...
  67. [67]
    Testimony of Colonel J. M. Chivington April 26, 1865
    Originally from: Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, Massacre of Cheyenne Indians, 38th Congress, 2nd Session (Washington, 1865), pp. 101-108.
  68. [68]
    Colorado governor orders 'friendly Indians' to report to Army forts for ...
    ... Sand Creek Massacre. Evans' offer of sanctuary was at best halfhearted. His primary goal in 1864 was to eliminate all Native American activity in eastern ...
  69. [69]
    Overview of the Sand Creek Massacre (U.S. National Park Service)
    Oct 13, 2023 · After councils with Major Scott Anthony and Major Edward Wynkoop in mid-November, most of the Arapahos under Chief Little Raven left Fort Lyon ...
  70. [70]
    The Sand Creek Massacre - Digital History
    The Sand Creek Massacre Digital History ID 696. Author: Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War Date:1864. Annotation: A joint congressional committee ...
  71. [71]
    "Report of the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, at the ...
    Contains testimony concerning the massacre of over 100 Cheyenne and Arapahoe Indians at Sand Creek, Colorado Territory, by US troops under Col. Chivington and ...
  72. [72]
    Sand Creek Massacre - HistoryNet
    This atrocity has been known as the Sand Creek Massacre ever since. For years, the United States had been engaged in conflict with several Indian tribes ...
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    [PDF] The Battle of Sand Creek Strategic Scapegoats and Military Martyrs
    Colonel. Chivington also passed along his casualty report, providing greater validity to the idea that it was a battle rather than a massacre. The report ...
  75. [75]
    John Chivington (U.S. National Park Service)
    Aug 19, 2025 · Photo of John Chivington John Chivington. Quick Facts. Significance: Commander of the U.S. Army troops at the Sand Creek Massacre. Place of ...
  76. [76]
    Fort Lyon | History Colorado
    ### Summary of Fort Lyon, Colorado