Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

G-string

A G-string is a form of minimal-coverage underwear or swimsuit bottom consisting of a narrow strip of fabric or cord that covers the pubic area and passes between the buttocks, anchored by thin strings or elastic bands around the waist and hips.^[1] The garment provides virtually no coverage of the rear, distinguishing it from broader thongs by its skimpier design.^[2] The term "G-string" originated in 19th-century American English as "geestring" or "gee string," referring to the narrow cord or strip used in Native American loincloths or breechcloths.^[3] By the early 20th century, it evolved to describe the revealing attire worn by burlesque and striptease performers, with figures like Charles Guyette, dubbed the "G-string King," popularizing it in fetish and stage contexts.^[2] Etymological theories for the "G" include derivations from "groin," a resemblance to the thinnest string on musical instruments like a banjo, or simply a phonetic evolution from "gee," though the precise origin remains uncertain.^[4] In modern usage, G-strings gained mainstream fashion acceptance in the late 20th century for eliminating visible panty lines under tight clothing, though they have sparked debates over modesty, objectification, and health concerns related to prolonged wear.^[5]

Definition and Characteristics

Overview and Distinction from Thong

A G-string is a style of minimal-coverage underwear characterized by a small triangular or rectangular front panel that covers the genitals, connected by thin straps or strings around the hips, and a single narrow rear string that sits between the buttocks, exposing nearly the entire posterior. This design prioritizes invisibility under tight clothing to prevent visible panty lines, using the least amount of fabric among similar garments. The construction typically forms a T-shape from the rear view, with the rear element often narrower than 1 cm in width, made from elastic materials like nylon, spandex, or cotton blends for stretch and adherence.^[6]^[7] While the terms "G-string" and "thong" are frequently used interchangeably in casual contexts, they differ anatomically in the rear coverage. A thong features a wider back strap—typically 1-2 cm broad and sometimes trapezoidal or rectangular—providing slightly more fabric between the buttocks compared to the thread-like string of a G-string. This distinction arises from manufacturing standards in lingerie, where G-strings emphasize maximal minimalism for aesthetics or functionality under form-fitting attire, whereas thongs offer a compromise between coverage and seamlessness. Both serve similar purposes in modern wardrobes, but the G-string's thinner rear element results in greater exposure and potential for discomfort during prolonged wear due to reduced surface area for distribution of pressure.^[8]^[9]^[10] The G-string's design extends to both women's and men's variants, though women's versions dominate commercial availability; men's G-strings follow identical principles but may incorporate pouches for genital support. Material choices influence wearability, with synthetic blends favored for durability and moisture-wicking, though natural fibers like cotton are preferred for breathability in sensitive areas. Empirical assessments of comfort vary, but the minimal structure inherently limits support, making G-strings suitable primarily for short-term or aesthetic use rather than all-day functionality.^[11]^[9]

Design Features and Materials

A G-string features a minimal coverage design consisting of a narrow front panel, typically triangular, that covers the genitals, connected via thin straps or elastic to a waistband, with a single slender string extending rearward between the buttocks to minimize visible lines under outer garments.^[12] This configuration distinguishes it from broader-backed styles like thongs, which employ a wider fabric strip rather than a singular string at the rear.^[10] The construction prioritizes thin elastic elements for the sides and center back, often without additional side seams, enabling a seamless fit against the body.^[13] Materials commonly include stretchable synthetics such as nylon, spandex, or polyester blends for elasticity and form-fitting properties, alongside natural fibers like cotton for breathability and skin comfort.^[14] Lace variants add decorative appeal while maintaining minimal bulk, and microfiber options enhance smoothness to reduce friction.^[15] Elastic bands are engineered to be soft and durable, preventing chafing during movement through precise stitching and high-quality fabrication.^[16] These selections support functionality in both women's and men's iterations, with men's G-strings often incorporating mesh for ventilation or synthetics for support.^[14]

Etymology

Origins of the Term

The term "G-string" originated in American English in the late 19th century, with the earliest recorded use dating to 1878 as "gee string" or "geestring," referring to the narrow string or loincloth component of a breechclout worn by Native American men.^[3]^[17]^[4] This usage described the minimal strip of material passed between the legs and attached to a waistband, observed and documented by European-American settlers encountering indigenous attire. The spelling "G-string" appeared by 1882, potentially influenced by the lowest-pitched "G string" on stringed instruments like the violin, which was documented in that sense as early as 1831, though direct causal linkage remains speculative.^[3] Etymological theories for the "G" prefix vary but lack definitive consensus; one posits it as a euphemistic stand-in for "groin," reflecting the garment's placement, while others suggest derivation from "girdle" or simply phonetic evolution from "gee."^[5] The term's initial connotation was thus ethnographic rather than erotic or fashionable, tied to descriptions of traditional indigenous undergarments rather than modern lingerie.^[4] By the early 20th century, "G-string" began shifting to denote skimpy coverings in burlesque and vaudeville performances, marking its transition to Western apparel terminology, though this represented an adaptation rather than the term's genesis. No primary evidence supports origins in musical nomenclature alone for the clothing sense, emphasizing instead the loincloth's structural resemblance to a taut, singular string.^[3]

Historical Development

Ancient and Pre-Modern Origins

In ancient Egypt, men commonly wore the schenti, a linen loincloth dating to approximately 3000 BCE, consisting of a rectangular strip of fabric wrapped around the waist, passed between the legs, and secured by tucking or belting to provide minimal genital coverage while exposing the buttocks.^[18] This garment functioned as both outerwear for laborers and underclothing for elites, with tomb paintings depicting dancers and athletes in variants that emphasized scant rear coverage similar to later G-string designs.^[19] In ancient Rome, from the Republican era onward (circa 500 BCE–27 BCE), both men and women utilized the subligaculum, an undergarment formed by a narrow linen or leather strip tied around the waist and drawn between the legs, offering rudimentary protection under tunics or togas with limited posterior coverage.^[20]^[21] Worn during physical activities, gladiatorial contests, and daily life, it represented a practical precursor to minimalistic rear-exposing attire, though broader adoption varied by class and gender, with women sometimes opting for longer wraps.^[19] Analogous loincloths appeared in ancient Greece as the perizoma, a wrapped cloth used by athletes during events like the Olympics from the 8th century BCE, which similarly minimized fabric between the legs for freedom of movement.^[22] These early forms prioritized functionality in hot climates and labor-intensive societies over modesty, with archaeological artifacts and vase paintings confirming their string-like rear passage and frontal pouch.^[23] Pre-modern examples persisted in non-Western contexts, such as the Japanese fundoshi loincloth from the Heian period (794–1185 CE), a narrow cotton strip knotted at the front and looped behind, worn by sumo wrestlers and laborers for support and ventilation.^[22] In medieval Europe, however, underwear shifted toward looser braies by the 5th–15th centuries CE, reducing reliance on tight, rear-exposing ties until industrial-era revivals.^[19] These ancient and pre-modern garments laid foundational precedents for the G-string's core mechanics—minimal fabric, rear string, and frontal focus—driven by climatic, occupational, and cultural needs rather than eroticism.

20th Century Emergence and Popularization

The G-string emerged in the United States during the 1920s as part of costumes for showgirls in Earl Carroll's Jazz Age productions, where minimal coverage allowed performers to comply with decency laws while maximizing skin exposure.^[2] This style drew from earlier burlesque traditions, with dancers adopting narrow rear straps for stage attire in the early 1900s to facilitate movement and emphasize the body.^[24] In the 1930s and 1940s, fetishwear designer Charles Guyette, dubbed the "G-string King," pioneered the commercial production and sale of leather G-strings in America, primarily for burlesque performers and niche enthusiasts seeking provocative undergarments.^[2] Guyette's designs, often featuring adjustable straps and minimal fabric, catered to a subcultural demand but remained outside mainstream fashion due to prevailing social norms against overt eroticism. By 1939, similar minimal styles appeared on showgirls at the New York City World's Fair, balancing legal coverage requirements with visual allure.^[25] The garment's transition to broader swimwear and underwear occurred in the mid-20th century amid shifting attitudes toward beach fashion. In 1974, designer Rudi Gernreich introduced the first thong bikini, a precursor to modern G-strings, which featured a narrow rear strip and gained attention for challenging conventions of modesty.^[26] Gernreich patented a thong design in 1979, facilitating its adaptation into everyday lingerie.^[26] These innovations coincided with the 1960s rise of bikini culture on beaches, where thongs provided seamless lines under low-cut attire, though G-strings specifically retained a narrower profile for even less visibility.^[25] Popularization accelerated in the 1980s, as G-strings entered mainstream lingerie markets, worn by performers like Cher on stage and increasingly by women seeking underwear that avoided visible panty lines under form-fitting clothing.^[25] By the late 1980s, they were widely available in Western retail, with sales surging in the 1990s alongside low-rise jeans and the "whale tail" trend popularized by designers like Jean Paul Gaultier in his 1997 runway show.^[27] This era marked the shift from niche to commercial staple, driven by fashion's embrace of minimalism and body confidence, though adoption varied by region and demographic.^[28]

Evolution in Men's and Women's Fashion

In women's fashion, the G-string transitioned from niche performance attire to mainstream lingerie during the 20th century, driven by practical needs like avoiding visible panty lines under form-fitting garments. Its modern prominence began in 1939 when New York Mayor Fiorello La Guardia required exotic dancers at the World's Fair to wear G-strings and pasties, establishing a standardized minimal coverage for such performances.^[29] By 1974, designer Rudi Gernreich introduced the thong bikini, featuring a narrow rear string that closely resembled the contemporary G-string and influenced swimwear trends.^[30] The style proliferated in the 1980s among performers and expanded commercially in the late 1980s, becoming widely available in Western markets amid rising acceptance of revealing undergarments.^[25] Popularity peaked in the 1990s, with G-strings adopted broadly for everyday wear under low-rise pants and sheer fabrics.^[29] For men, G-strings evolved primarily from athletic and physique-display contexts rather than widespread fashion adoption. Emerging in the early 20th century among bodybuilders and physical culture enthusiasts, the design offered minimal interference during movement while accentuating muscular form.^[31] By the late 20th century, underwear brands began marketing G-strings for sports, dance, and general wear, emphasizing support, breathability, and a slim profile under clothing.^[32] Despite these developments, men's G-strings remained a niche segment, with surveys indicating only about 4% of men incorporating thongs or similar styles into their routines as of recent years, reflecting slower cultural integration compared to women's fashion.^[32] Innovations in materials like moisture-wicking fabrics further supported their use in active pursuits, though mainstream fashion influence stayed limited.^[33]

Symbolism Across Cultures

In ancient Egyptian society circa 3000 BCE, loincloths known as schenti—precursors to the modern G-string—functioned not only as practical garments but also as markers of social hierarchy, with the quality of linen material distinguishing elites from commoners and slaves; finer weaves denoted higher status and purity associated with white fabric.^[34] Similarly, in various indigenous American tribes, G-string-like breechcloths varied by tribe and served dual roles in climate adaptation and cultural identity, often crafted from local hides or fabrics to reflect tribal craftsmanship without inherent erotic connotations.^[35] In Japanese culture, the fundoshi, a traditional loincloth with minimal rear coverage akin to a G-string, carries symbolic weight in rituals and sports, worn by sumo wrestlers to embody physical prowess and endurance, and during festivals like Hadaka Matsuri to signify purification, communal solidarity, and connection to ancestral traditions rather than sensuality.^[36] ^[37] These pre-modern examples highlight how such garments primarily denoted status, utility, and ritual significance in hot climates or labor-intensive contexts, diverging from later interpretations. In contrast, within 20th- and 21st-century Western societies, the G-string has evolved into a potent emblem of sexual autonomy and body confidence for many wearers, particularly women, who associate it with embracing personal sexuality amid fashion trends.^[38] However, it simultaneously invites debate as a marker of objectification, with visibility in media and performance contexts like dance reinforcing cultural scrutiny over female sexualization.^[29] This duality underscores a shift from functional symbolism to one laden with modern gender dynamics, where empirical adoption data shows rising popularity tied to low-rise clothing needs rather than universal cultural reverence.^[25]

Perceptions of Empowerment vs. Objectification

Some women report that wearing G-strings fosters a sense of personal empowerment and body confidence, viewing the garment as a means of self-expression and reconciliation with their physical form.^[39] Psychological research on underwear choices indicates that selecting revealing or aesthetically pleasing intimate apparel, such as G-strings, can enhance mood, self-esteem, and perceived attractiveness, with effects attributed to improved body posture and identity alignment even when hidden from view.^[40] Surveys of women's lingerie preferences reveal that many prioritize comfort and personal appeal over external validation, interpreting such choices as autonomous acts of self-prioritization rather than deference to partners.^[41] In contrast, feminist critiques argue that G-strings and similar minimal underwear perpetuate the objectification of women by emphasizing sexual availability and reducing the wearer to bodily parts for visual consumption, a dynamic rooted in patriarchal structures that prioritize male gaze over female agency.^[42] Empirical studies corroborate this by demonstrating that attire perceived as sexualized, including thongs and G-strings, leads observers to dehumanize wearers, rating them as less agentic, more susceptible to exploitation, and diminished in moral status compared to those in modest clothing.^[43] Such perceptions align with causal mechanisms where revealing garments cue attributions of reduced autonomy, potentially reinforcing societal norms that equate female value with sexual appeal.^[44] Further research highlights a tension in self-perception: while some women experience short-term boosts in confidence from sexualized self-presentation, prolonged engagement with such imagery—mirroring G-string aesthetics in media—elevates self-objectification, wherein individuals internalize external evaluations of their bodies, correlating with diminished cognitive performance and heightened body shame.^[45] Critics contend this "empowerment" narrative, often promoted in commercial lingerie marketing, masks commodification, as evidenced by analyses of brands like Victoria's Secret, where appeals to female liberation subtly encourage self-commodification under the guise of choice.^[46] These divergent views underscore a broader debate on whether individual feelings of control outweigh systemic incentives toward objectification, with academic sources—potentially influenced by prevailing ideological frameworks—tending to emphasize the latter over unverified subjective gains.

Controversies and Criticisms

Health and Practical Concerns

Wearing G-strings, characterized by a narrow rear strip of fabric, has been hypothesized to facilitate the transfer of fecal bacteria from the anus to the urethra or vagina, potentially elevating the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and yeast infections in women.^[47] This mechanism arises from the design's proximity to both orifices during movement, compounded by moisture retention in synthetic materials that may promote bacterial growth.^[48] However, a 2019 survey of 562 women found no significant difference in reported urogenital infections, including UTIs and yeast infections, between frequent thong wearers and those preferring briefs over the prior 12 months.^[49] Similarly, other analyses have identified no empirical link between thong use and increased infection rates, attributing perceived risks more to hygiene practices than garment style alone.^[50] Dermatological issues represent a more consistent concern, with the thin string prone to causing friction, chafing, and irritation in the intergluteal cleft, particularly during prolonged wear or physical activity.^[51] Poorly fitted or non-breathable fabrics exacerbate this by trapping heat and sweat, leading to skin abrasions or folliculitis in sensitive individuals.^[52] For men, analogous irritation may occur along the perineal area, though data remains limited compared to female-focused studies. Claims of impaired blood circulation from tightness lack robust substantiation and appear overstated relative to looser alternatives.^[53] Practically, G-strings often prove uncomfortable for extended daily use due to wedging, slippage, and constant awareness of the fabric's position, which can distract during sitting, walking, or exercise.^[54] They are ill-suited for high-movement scenarios like sports, where shifting increases chafing risk, and require frequent adjustment or cotton gussets for minimal mitigation.^[55] Laundry challenges arise from the garment's delicacy, with delicate cycles recommended to prevent elastic degradation, though this does not eliminate wear-related discomfort.^[10] Overall, while not inherently hazardous when hygiene is maintained, G-strings prioritize minimal visibility over ergonomic functionality, rendering them suboptimal for non-sedentary routines.

Moral and Societal Debates

Critics of G-strings often contend that their minimal coverage fosters a culture of hyper-sexualization, challenging traditional norms of modesty and public decency by normalizing attire that emphasizes genital proximity and exposes more skin than conventional underwear. This perspective holds that such garments, when visible or implied in fashion, contribute to objectifying the body as a primary site of allure, potentially desensitizing society to boundaries between private intimacy and public presentation. Conservative commentators argue this erosion correlates with broader declines in familial and communal standards, where clothing choices signal moral priorities.^[56] Public policy responses underscore these tensions, as seen in localized bans and protests against thong-style swimwear. In Sarasota, Florida, during 1990, residents organized demonstrations against thong bathing suits on Lido Beach, resulting in arrests under indecency ordinances, with opponents framing the attire as an affront to community values and family-friendly environments. Similarly, in New Zealand, a 2020 petition by mothers sought prohibitions on G-string bikinis at beaches, citing discomfort with their prevalence as evidence of shifting, overly permissive societal thresholds for exposure. These incidents highlight causal links between visible minimal undergarments and regulatory pushback, driven by perceptions of moral slippage rather than mere aesthetics.^[56]^[57] Religious critiques amplify moral objections, particularly in Abrahamic traditions emphasizing bodily restraint. Within Christianity, G-strings have been denounced as incompatible with scriptural calls for modesty, such as 1 Peter 3:3-5, which prioritizes inner character over elaborate or attention-drawing externals. In January 2025, Evangelist Linda in Eswatini preached against them as "equipment for sex workers," asserting that true adherents should reject such items to align with faith-based purity standards. These views persist in denominational forums, where thong-wearing is debated as either neutral private choice or subtle endorsement of sensual provocation, reflecting deeper causal realism about how attire influences personal conduct and communal witness.^[58]^[59]

Modern Trends and Market Impact

Recent Fashion Revivals

The revival of the G-string in fashion has been tied to the broader resurgence of Y2K aesthetics since 2022, with exposed thongs reemerging on runways and red carpets as a deliberate stylistic choice rather than an accidental reveal. Designers at Paris Fashion Week in September 2024 showcased visible G-strings in collections from brands like Schiaparelli, framing them as a bold extension of underwear-as-outerwear, echoing early 2000s trends but with updated minimalism.^[60] This shift gained momentum through celebrity styling, such as Margot Robbie and Dakota Johnson opting for sheer gowns with prominent jeweled or string thongs at events in September 2025, positioning the garment as a symbol of unapologetic glamour.^[61]^[62] In swimwear, G-strings and thongs experienced a mainstream boom by mid-2025, driven by social media amplification and body-positive marketing that normalized skimpy bottoms across diverse body types. Sales data from brands like Skims underscored this, with their October 2025 launch of a faux-hair micro string thong—marketed as a daring innovation—selling out rapidly, reflecting heightened consumer demand for provocative, nostalgic minimalism.^[63]^[64] A Guardian analysis in August 2025 noted thongs' transition from niche to everyday appeal among younger demographics, though this prompted backlash, including a January 2025 ban on G-string bikinis at public pools in Greater Sydney, Australia, citing public decency concerns.^[65]^[65] Lingerie forecasts for 2025 further indicate sustained popularity, with G-strings featured in lace variants and seamless designs for versatile layering under low-rise or sheer outerwear, as projected by industry reports emphasizing their role in blending functionality with erotic appeal.^[66] This revival contrasts with earlier 2010s preferences for fuller-coverage underwear, attributing growth to digital nostalgia cycles and e-commerce platforms that facilitate rapid trend dissemination.^[67]

Commercial Success and Innovations

The women's thong panties market, which includes G-strings as a minimalist variant, reached a valuation of USD 4.1 billion in 2023 and is forecasted to expand to USD 6.3 billion by 2031, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.6%.^[68] This growth stems from increasing consumer preference for seamless, low-visibility undergarments compatible with form-fitting clothing, alongside rising e-commerce penetration in lingerie sales.^[68] In the United States, the segment alone was valued at USD 0.8 billion in 2022, with projections to USD 1.3 billion by 2030, driven by demand among younger demographics prioritizing comfort and aesthetics over traditional coverage.^[69] Major brands have capitalized on this trajectory; for instance, Victoria's Secret reported thong sales increasing by approximately 30% from 1995 to 1999, outpacing overall panty growth by a factor of six, signaling early mainstream adoption.^[70] Contemporary examples include SKIMS, where specialized thong variants like the sheer mesh "bush string" model sold out rapidly upon launch in October 2025, underscoring sustained appeal through targeted marketing and novelty features.^[64] Broader lingerie market expansion, projected from USD 48.59 billion in 2025 to USD 87.35 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 8.67%, further bolsters thong subcategory viability via diversified retail channels.^[71] Innovations in G-string design emphasize functionality and sustainability, including seamless construction via thermowelding techniques that bond fabrics without stitches, reducing irritation and visible lines under clothing.^[72] Material advancements feature moisture-wicking, temperature-regulating synthetics blended with spandex and nylon for elasticity, often incorporating cotton gussets for hygiene, as seen in high-end offerings from brands like Negative Underwear.^[73] Eco-conscious shifts replace petroleum-based polyesters with organic alternatives, minimizing environmental impact while maintaining durability, as promoted by sustainable lingerie producers.^[74] These developments address practical drawbacks like chafing, enhancing wearability and contributing to market retention amid health-focused consumer scrutiny.^[75]

References

[1]
G-STRING Definition & Meaning | Dictionary.com
G-string definition: a loincloth or breechcloth ... such a garment made of a narrow strip of decorative fabric and worn by striptease entertainers.
[2]
7 Things You Never Knew About G-Strings - InsideHook
Mar 7, 2022 · 20th-century fetishwear icon Charles Guyette was literally known as the “G-string King.” Often credited as the first person in America to ...
[3]
G-string - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating in 1878 as "geestring," the term's meaning evolved from an American Indian loincloth string to a women's minimal garment, possibly influenced by the
[4]
Origin of "g-string" - English Language & Usage Stack Exchange
Feb 19, 2017 · G-string is an Americanism first used to describe an Indian's loin cloth or breechclout in the 19th century.When did the term "flip flop" displace the term "thong" in North ...What are the first usages of "thong" as a wearable item of clothing ...More results from english.stackexchange.com<|separator|>
[5]
https://illusionslingerie.com.au/blogs/news/history-of-the-g-string
[6]
G-string vs. Thong | Boody Eco Wear
Jan 28, 2022 · G-string underwear is the most popular type of thong panties. G-strings usually include a small triangle of fabric in the front to keep you covered.G String Vs Thong: What's... · #1: Know When To Wear Them · #2: Prioritize Fabric
[7]
https://negativeunderwear.com/blogs/negative-space/g-string-vs-thong
[8]
Thong vs. G-String: Differences & Similarities - EBY by Sofia Vergara
Oct 15, 2021 · The string of a G-string provides the least amount of material and support possible, while the band of a thong provides a bit more coverage and ...What Is A Thong? · What Is A G String? · Thong Vs. G-String Exposure
[9]
https://obviouslyapparel.com/blogs/mens-underwear-blog/g-string-vs-thong
[10]
G-String vs Thong: Complete Guide to Minimal Coverage Underwear
Aug 31, 2025 · The main difference lies in the back construction: g-strings have a single thin string that creates a T-shape, while thongs feature a wider ...
[11]
String vs. thong: what is the difference? - CALIDA
Feb 7, 2024 · In addition, the side part that goes around the hips usually consists of a string that is partially tied – also known as a G-string.
[12]
https://rmac.store/blogs/news/what-is-the-g-string-understanding-this-popular-underwear-style
[13]
How to grade a G-string pattern - Van Jonsson Design
Aug 16, 2023 · A G-string is a piece of lingerie that has thin elastic side and a thin elastic centre back, it differs from a thong which has side seams ...
[14]
https://www.gooddevil.com/blogs/news/what-so-special-about-men-s-g-strings-everything-you-should-know
[15]
What Is G String Panties? - Shyaway.com
G-string panties are often made from soft, stretchy materials such as lace or cotton, which can conform to the body and move with you.
[16]
https://www.oliviapaisley.com/blogs/news/the-art-of-g-string-construction-design-and-fit
[17]
G-STRING Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 17, 2025 · The first known use of G-string was in 1878. See more words from the same year. Rhymes for G-string. bing · bring · ching · cling · ding · fling ...Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
[18]
schenti | Fashion History Timeline
The schenti was a rectangular piece of cloth, wrapped around the hips and held in place by tucking one end into the tightly wrapped waist or by wearing a tied ...
[19]
You've seen the ads. Do you know the history of underwear?
Jan 9, 2024 · The earliest form of underwear was a loincloth. Prehistorically, loincloths were worn by men and women, crafted out of strips of fabric that ran ...Missing: g- | Show results with:g-<|separator|>
[20]
Subligaculum - Roman underwear - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
Sep 10, 2019 · Subligaculum was underwear, worn eg under a toga, which was formed by a linen loincloth. Both men and women wrapped in a belt of material around the waist to ...
[21]
Ancient Roman Undergarments - EARLY CHURCH HISTORY
Under the toga or tunic the typical Roman man or woman would wear a loincloth, an undergarment called a subligaculum, meaning “tied on under.” The loincloth ...
[22]
A Skimpy History of the Thong-Tha-Thong-Thong-Thong - Racked
Feb 20, 2017 · Ancient thongs were around in Africa as early as 42,000 BCE and in Minoan and Mycean culture as early as 1570 BCE. Japanese men began wearing ...
[23]
Cracking Open the History of the Thong - VICE
Feb 9, 2016 · Wearers of ancient thongs appeared throughout Asia, Africa, and temperate parts of Europe “as far back as 42,000 B.C.E.,” according to World ...
[24]
https://rmac.store/blogs/news/why-is-it-called-g-string-the-fascinating-history-behind-the-name
[25]
The Evolution Of The Thong Is A Super-Fascinating Look at Sexuality
Jul 26, 2023 · During the New York City World's Fair in 1939, showgirls first adopted the look as a way to remain covered, while still showing skin, to get ...
[26]
Cracking Open the History of the Thong - VICE
Feb 11, 2016 · ... patent the first thong. That distinct honor belongs to designer Rudi Gernreich, who patented the barely-there undies in 1979. This same man ...
[27]
Fashion Has Long Loved A Visible Thong. Can The Whale Tail ...
Nov 13, 2020 · The controversial trend, also known as a whale tail, made its fashion debut at Jean Paul Gaultier's spring '97 runway show.
[28]
https://tomboyx.com/blogs/news/incredible-history-of-the-thong
[29]
Thongs: On and Off the Runways, a History and Timeline - WWD
Jun 20, 2024 · The thong has held a prominent place in various cultures, from ancient Egypt to feudal Japan, long before it hit the Victoria's Secret runways.Missing: precursors civilizations
[30]
A Brief (and NSFW!) History of the Thong - Glamour
Nov 24, 2015 · mid-1970s: Fashion designer Rudi Gernreich invents the first thong bikini in 1974; The next year, Helmut Lang iconically photographs models ...
[31]
https://www.covermale.com/blogs/mens-underwear/what-do-you-know-about-g-strings-for-men
[32]
https://obviouslyapparel.com/blogs/mens-underwear-blog/how-many-men-wear-thongs
[33]
https://www.gooddevil.com/blogs/news/the-evolution-of-mens-g-string-underwear
[34]
https://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewArticle.asp?id=18160
[35]
A Brief History of Underwear - Kade & Vos
Mar 15, 2018 · In most Native American tribes, men used to wear some form of breechclout. The style was different from tribe to tribe. In some tribes, the ...
[36]
Culture - Fundoshi - Japanese loincloths - Japan Reference
Dec 12, 2011 · Fundoshi is the traditional Japanese loincloth worn by sumo-tori and by men on special occasions, such as in Japanese festivals (matsuri).<|separator|>
[37]
Fundoshi: All About the Traditional Japanese Loincloth and Where ...
Jun 23, 2020 · A fundoshi (褌 or ふんどし), meaning loincloth in Japanese, is the traditional type of underwear, mainly for men. It's a long strip of cotton tied and rolled ...
[38]
Thong — Fashion Explained - THE LIST
Thongs in the 20th Century Fast forward to the 20th century, and the thong began to gain popularity as a fashion statement. It was during this time that ...Missing: popularization | Show results with:popularization
[39]
Who Gets to Wear G-Strings Now? - The New York Times
Jul 16, 2023 · Regardless of the legality, many women say the cut helps them make peace with their bodies. In the past, skimpy swimwear was often considered ...
[40]
The psychology of underwear | BPS
Sep 2, 2019 · Underwear is a 'technology of our inner self' that can represent who we are, shift identity, and can be chosen for comfort or to feel 'sexy'.
[41]
New study on women's underwear choices has empowering finding
Aug 29, 2019 · A new Tommy John study on women's underwear choices speaks well for ladies putting themselves in the top spot, rather than their partner – an empowering ...
[42]
Feminist Perspectives on Objectification
Mar 10, 2010 · Objectification is a notion central to feminist theory. It can be roughly defined as the seeing and/or treating a person, usually a woman, as an object.
[43]
Empowered yet dehumanized: perceptions of women's ...
Aug 19, 2025 · Specifically, participants viewed these women as less human, less empowered, more susceptible to sexual objectification in daily life, and less ...
[44]
From Attire to Assault: Clothing, Objectification, and De-humanization
Mar 9, 2017 · Various studies point to how external cues such as appearance and attire could play a key role in encouraging objectification, dehumanization and the denial of ...
[45]
(PDF) Sexual objectification versus empowerment - ResearchGate
Jun 3, 2024 · Sexualized women heightened viewers' self-objectification, regardless of facial expression.Missing: strings | Show results with:strings
[46]
[PDF] From Objectification to Self-Subjectification: Victoria's Secret as a Do ...
In this research, I argue VS advertising – while explicitly claiming to empower women – hail the viewer to self-subjectify by turning herself into a commodity ...
[47]
Can Thongs Cause UTIs and Yeast Infections? - Health
Sep 13, 2025 · Wearing thongs can potentially increase your risk of yeast infections due to heat and moisture. Fecal bacteria may move from your rectum to ...
[48]
Can Thong Underwear Give You Hemorrhoids? - Healthline
Apr 20, 2022 · But thongs have also been associated with a range of vaginal and anal health issues, including hemorrhoids, urinary tract infections (UTIs) ...
[49]
Brief versus Thong Hygiene in Obstetrics and Gynecology (B-THONG)
The aim of this study was to evaluate if thong use is associated with a higher report of urogenital infections, including urinary tract infections, yeast ...
[50]
Brief versus Thong Hygiene in Obstetrics and Gynecology (B‐THONG)
A recent study found that women who frequently wore thong underwear (more than half of the time) were no more likely to develop urinary tract infections, yeast ...
[51]
Can Thongs Cause Infections? - Dr. Jolene Brighten
Jan 21, 2022 · Not exactly. Although many people associate thongs with infections, there is no solid science that they are linked.
[52]
Are Thongs Bad For Your Health? - The Healthy @Reader's Digest
Apr 13, 2021 · For both men and women, there's a small risk of getting a friction burn or chafed, irritated skin from wearing certain types of thongs, Dr.Types Of Thong Underwear · What To Consider Before... · So Is It Safe To Wear A...
[53]
Beware, G-String Could Lead to Low Blood Circulation
Jan 17, 2023 · There is evidence to suggest that wearing tight-fitting underwear, such as G-strings, can lead to low blood circulation.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[54]
Are g-strings really bad for you? I asked a women's health specialist
Oct 11, 2024 · ” And, as she notes, daily wear can exacerbate irritation, owing to a poor fit where the fabric continually rides up, moves or chafes.
[55]
How to Comfortably Wear a Thong | The Insider Blog
Experts also advise choosing soft, natural fibres like cotton that are breathable and absorbent; this will help prevent chafing or irritations in the delicate ...
[56]
In 1990, Sarasota Waged War on Thongs, Leading to Outrage ...
Sep 29, 2023 · Richard Unger organized protests in 1990 after a handful of residents were arrested for wearing thong bathing suits on Lido Beach.
[57]
'Has to stop': Call for g-string bikini ban sparks debate
Jan 15, 2020 · A group of New Zealand mums has sparked a furious debate online after claiming they are fed up with seeing tiny g-string bikinis litter ...
[58]
Does God Care What We Wear at Church? - reformation21
May 21, 2022 · The bible actually says almost nothing about what we should wear in Church. There are general commandments about modesty (eg, 1Peter 3:3-5).Missing: religious | Show results with:religious
[59]
Should Christians Wear G-Strings? Debate Erupts Again ... - Facebook
Jan 19, 2025 · In his sermon, Evangelist Linda labeled G-strings as “equipment for sex workers,” asserting that true Christians should avoid them entirely. On ...
[60]
G-string trend is here to stay after racy show at Paris Fashion Week
Sep 25, 2024 · Exposed G-strings, a cult-look from Y2K, made a huge return back in 2022. Despite the controversy around wearing underwear as outerwear, the ...
[61]
G-String Theory: Margot Robbie And Dakota Johnson Celebrate The ...
Sep 12, 2025 · As of last night, string pants are back. And the tinier they are, the better. Just ask Margot Robbie and Dakota Johnson, both of whom stepped ...
[62]
Margot Robbie and Dakota Johnson Just Revived Hollywood's Most ...
Sep 12, 2025 · The halter dropped daringly low, secured only by sparkling straps, revealing a jeweled thong beneath a fully sheer skirt. Intricate beading and ...
[63]
The Bush Is Back in 2025—Just Ask Skims | Vogue
Oct 14, 2025 · Described by the brand's e-commerce team more delicately as a “faux hair micro string thong,” and available in over a dozen shades, it's ...
[64]
Kim Kardashian's Skims Sells Out Bush String Thong in Less ... - WWD
Oct 15, 2025 · The shapewear brand founded by Kim Kardashian unveiled its latest undergarment innovation on Tuesday: a merkin G-string thong. Named the Faux ...
[65]
The thong bikini boom: why the skimpiest swimwear is back
Aug 21, 2025 · “The thong has never gone away completely,” she says. “But for people who are in their teens and 20s, they haven't really been 'in fashion'.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[66]
Lace Panties Trends: 9 Options that Women Will Love in 2025 -
Nov 21, 2024 · 9 Lace panties trends to offer women in 2025 · 1. Lace thongs · 2. Lace cheeky panties · 3. G-strings · 4. Boyshorts · 5. Bikini panties · 6. High-cut ...<|separator|>
[67]
2000s Thong Trend Revival: Y2K Fashion Comeback & Styling Tips
Aug 18, 2025 · Discover how celebrities revived the 2000s thong trend with empowering styles. Learn to rock visible whale tails confidently.Missing: string 2020s
[68]
Women's Thong Panties Market Size, Trends, & Forecast
Rating 4.5 (42) The women's thong panties market was valued at USD 4.1 Billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.3 Billion by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 5.6%.
[69]
United States Women's Thong Panties Market: Key Highlights
Aug 3, 2025 · United States Women's Thong Panties Market was valued at USD 0.8 Billion in 2022 and is projected to reach USD 1.3 Billion by 2030, ...
[70]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB928797031306049284
[71]
Lingerie Market Size, Share & Trends | Growth Report [2032]
The global lingerie market size was valued at USD 44.92 billion in 2024. The market is projected to grow from USD 48.59 billion in 2025 to USD 87.35 billion by ...Missing: string | Show results with:string
[72]
https://www.uwilawarrior.com/blogs/news/the-science-of-seamless-how-innovative-design-enhances-comfort
[73]
The 13 Best Thongs, Tested and Reviewed - Business Insider
Sep 30, 2025 · Materials: 74% nylon, 26% Spandex with 100% cotton gusset. We're fans of Negative Underwear's minimalist designs, gamine charm, and luxury feel.
[74]
https://natvbasics.com/blogs/inside-natv/eco-friendly-g-string
[75]
https://joybra.com/blogs/news/the-future-of-seamless-underwear-new-technologies-and-designs