Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

GTPase

GTPases are a diverse superfamily of enzymes that bind and hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to guanosine diphosphate (GDP), serving as molecular switches to regulate a wide array of cellular processes including signal transduction, cytoskeletal dynamics, vesicle trafficking, and nuclear transport.^[1] They cycle between an active GTP-bound conformation, which enables interactions with downstream effectors, and an inactive GDP-bound state, allowing precise spatiotemporal control of signaling pathways essential for cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, and survival.^[2] Found predominantly in eukaryotic cells, GTPases encompass over 150 members in humans, with mutations or dysregulation frequently implicated in diseases such as cancer, neurological disorders, and developmental syndromes.^[1] Structurally, GTPases share a conserved G-domain, approximately 20 kDa in size, featuring a Rossmann fold and five key motifs (G1–G5) that facilitate nucleotide binding and hydrolysis.^[1] The G1 motif (P-loop) binds the phosphate groups of GTP, while G3 and G4 coordinate the guanine base; the catalytic G2 motif (Switch II) is critical for GTP hydrolysis.^[2] Flexible Switch I and Switch II regions undergo conformational changes upon GTP binding, exposing effector-binding sites in the active state.^[1] Many small GTPases also possess a C-terminal hypervariable region with lipid modifications, such as prenylation, enabling membrane association necessary for their function.^[2] GTPases are broadly classified into two major groups: small monomeric GTPases and heterotrimeric G proteins. Small GTPases, comprising the Ras superfamily, include five main families—Ras, Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran—each with distinct roles based on sequence homology and localization.^[1] For instance, Ras family members primarily control cell growth and survival signaling; Rho GTPases regulate actin cytoskeleton organization and cell motility; Rab and Arf manage intracellular vesicle trafficking and membrane dynamics; and Ran oversees nuclear-cytoplasmic transport.^[2] Heterotrimeric G proteins, composed of α, β, and γ subunits, mediate signals from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to intracellular effectors, influencing processes like sensory perception and hormone responses.^[1] The activity of GTPases is tightly regulated by accessory proteins that modulate their nucleotide cycle. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote the release of GDP and binding of GTP to activate the enzyme, while GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) accelerate intrinsic GTP hydrolysis to inactivate it, ensuring rapid signal termination.^[1] Guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), particularly for Rho and Rab families, sequester GDP-bound forms in the cytosol, preventing premature activation and membrane recruitment.^[2] Dysregulation of these regulators, such as oncogenic mutations locking Ras in the GTP-bound state (e.g., at codons 12, 13, or 61), underlies approximately 30% of human cancers, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting GTPase pathways.^[1]

Introduction

Definition and Properties

GTPases constitute a large family of hydrolase enzymes that specifically bind guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and catalyze its hydrolysis to guanosine diphosphate (GDP) and inorganic phosphate (Pi).^[3] This enzymatic activity enables GTPases to function as key regulators in cellular processes, though their precise roles are elaborated elsewhere. GTP, the substrate, consists of a guanine nucleobase linked to a ribose sugar via a β-N-glycosidic bond, with a triphosphate chain attached to the 5' carbon of the ribose; the hydrolysis reaction releases energy with a standard free energy change (ΔG°) of approximately -30 kJ/mol, which becomes more exergonic under typical cellular conditions due to non-standard concentrations of reactants and products.^[4] GTPases exhibit high specificity for guanine nucleotides over adenine counterparts, a property conferred by conserved structural elements that discriminate between purine bases.^[3] The core functional unit of all GTPases is the G domain, a compact fold of approximately 200 amino acids comprising a central six-stranded β-sheet flanked by five α-helices, which accommodates the guanine nucleotide and Mg²⁺ cofactor essential for catalysis.^[3] This domain features five conserved sequence motifs, designated G1 through G5, that collectively mediate nucleotide binding, specificity, and hydrolysis. The G1 motif, also known as the P-loop or Walker A motif, has the consensus sequence GXXXXGK[S/T], where the glycine-rich segment forms a flexible phosphate-binding loop that coordinates the β- and γ-phosphates of GTP via hydrogen bonds and interacts with the Mg²⁺ ion through the invariant lysine and serine/threonine residues.^[3] The G4 motif, with consensus NKXD, is located near the C-terminus of the domain and provides guanine base specificity: the asparagine forms a hydrogen bond with the N7 nitrogen of guanine, while the lysine interacts with the O6 carbonyl, ensuring selectivity over adenine.^[3] GTPases are broadly classified into small monomeric forms, typically 20-30 kDa in size and comprising primarily the G domain with minimal additional sequences, and larger variants that incorporate the G domain within more complex multidomain architectures, such as those exceeding 40 kDa in heterotrimeric G protein α-subunits or translational factors.^[3] Inherent to their biochemistry, small GTPases display intrinsically low GTP hydrolysis rates, ranging from 10^{-2} to 10^{-5} min^{-1} under physiological conditions, necessitating regulatory factors to achieve biologically relevant turnover, though such regulation is addressed separately.^[5]

Biological Importance

GTPases trace their evolutionary origins to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), emerging as part of the ancient P-loop NTPase superfamily, which represents one of the most ubiquitous and diverse enzyme lineages. These primordial enzymes were primarily associated with fundamental processes such as translation, underscoring their role in early cellular machinery.^[6]^[7] In eukaryotes, GTPases underwent extensive diversification, paralleling the rise of cellular complexity and enabling specialized functions across diverse compartments and pathways.^[8] GTPases are present in all domains of life, including bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes, highlighting their universal conservation. The human genome encodes more than 150 members of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases, reflecting their expansive repertoire in higher organisms.^[9]^[10] These proteins are critical for cell viability, as evidenced by comprehensive knockout studies showing that many GTPases are essential for proliferation and survival, with mutations frequently resulting in lethality or pathological conditions. Notably, mutations in Ras GTPases are found in approximately 20% of human cancers, emphasizing their physiological significance.^[11] GTPases complement ATPases in cellular regulation, where ATP-driven mechanisms supply energy for mechanical work, while GTPases impart precise timing and directionality to coordinate complex signaling and transport pathways.^[12]

Functions

Role as Molecular Switches

GTPases function as binary molecular switches that toggle between an active, GTP-bound conformation and an inactive, GDP-bound state, enabling precise control over cellular signaling. In the GTP-bound state, the protein adopts a conformation with high affinity for downstream effector proteins, thereby initiating and propagating signals, whereas the GDP-bound form exhibits low affinity for these effectors, effectively terminating the response. This on-off paradigm allows GTPases to act as timers in signaling pathways, where the binding of GTP turns the switch "on" and its subsequent hydrolysis turns it "off."^[13] The intrinsic GTPase activity of these proteins is typically slow, permitting sustained activation in the GTP-bound state until hydrolysis occurs, which provides temporal regulation without requiring constant input. This slow hydrolysis rate ensures that the active state persists long enough for meaningful downstream effects, such as coordinating cellular events, while preventing indefinite signaling. The energy released from GTP hydrolysis imparts directionality to the cycle, making the transition from active to inactive irreversible under physiological conditions and avoiding futile recycling between states.^[14]^[15] Upon GTP binding, conformational changes—often allosteric in nature—reposition structural elements within the GTPase domain, creating specific binding sites for effectors and thereby coupling the switch state to signal transduction. These effectors, which can include kinases, scaffolds, or cytoskeletal components, are recruited selectively to the active form, amplifying the signal in a spatially and temporally controlled manner. This mechanism underscores the versatility of GTPases in serving as regulatory hubs across diverse cellular contexts.^[14]

Involvement in Cellular Processes

GTPases play pivotal roles in signal transduction by relaying extracellular signals, such as growth factors, to intracellular responses that regulate cell proliferation, survival, and differentiation. For instance, Ras-like GTPases, including KRAS, activate downstream pathways like MAPK and PI3K-AKT upon receptor tyrosine kinase stimulation, thereby controlling gene expression and cytoskeletal reorganization essential for cellular growth.^[1]^[16] In vesicular trafficking, GTPases orchestrate the budding, transport, tethering, and fusion of vesicles to ensure proper protein sorting and membrane dynamics. The Rab family, such as RAB5, coordinates endocytosis by recruiting effectors that facilitate vesicle maturation and cargo delivery to endosomes, while Arf GTPases like ARF1 promote coat protein recruitment for vesicle formation at the Golgi and plasma membrane.^[1]^[17] Similarly, RAB11 regulates recycling endosomes to support exocytosis and maintain cell surface receptor levels.^[18] GTPases are central to cytoskeleton dynamics, modulating actin and microtubule networks to drive cell shape changes and intracellular transport. Rho family members, including RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42, control actin polymerization: RhoA induces stress fiber formation for contractility, Rac1 promotes lamellipodia extension, and Cdc42 directs filopodia assembly for exploratory protrusions.^[16]90370-4.pdf) Additionally, Ran GTPases regulate microtubule organization during nuclear transport, stabilizing spindles and ensuring directional cargo movement across the nuclear envelope.^[18] In translation and ribosome biogenesis, GTPases facilitate accurate protein synthesis by guiding tRNA delivery and ribosomal subunit assembly. EF-Tu delivers aminoacyl-tRNAs to the ribosomal A-site during elongation, where GTP hydrolysis triggers tRNA accommodation and peptide bond formation to maintain translational fidelity.^[19] Likewise, IF2 positions the initiator fMet-tRNA in the P-site during initiation, hydrolyzing GTP to promote 70S ribosome formation and the transition to elongation.^[19] Beyond these core functions, GTPases contribute to cell polarity, migration, and mitosis checkpoints by integrating cytoskeletal and trafficking cues. Cdc42 establishes polarity during migration by directing actin-based protrusions at the leading edge, while RhoA coordinates rear retraction for directed motility.^[1]^[16] In mitosis, Ran generates a spatial gradient around chromosomes to activate spindle assembly factors, ensuring proper checkpoint progression and chromosome segregation.^[18]

Mechanism

The GTPase Cycle

The GTPase cycle represents the core mechanism enabling GTPases to function as binary molecular switches in cellular signaling, alternating between an inactive, GDP-bound conformation and an active, GTP-bound conformation. In the GDP-bound state, the GTPase is sequestered and unable to engage downstream effectors. The cycle initiates with nucleotide exchange, wherein GDP dissociates from the GTPase, allowing the abundant cellular GTP to bind and activate the protein. This GTP-bound active form then facilitates interactions with effector proteins to propagate signals in various cellular pathways. Following effector engagement, intrinsic GTP hydrolysis converts GTP to GDP and inorganic phosphate (Pi), reverting the GTPase to its inactive conformation. The cycle concludes with the release of Pi, restoring the GDP-bound state and priming the GTPase for reactivation. This cyclical process ensures tight temporal control over signaling events, with the intrinsic rates of exchange and hydrolysis being exceedingly slow to maintain fidelity.^[20] The nucleotide exchange step is inherently sluggish and rate-limiting under physiological conditions, reflecting the high binding affinity of GDP for the GTPase (dissociation constant K_d ≈ 10^{-11} M). GDP dissociation occurs spontaneously but at a low rate, with the off-rate constant (k_off) approximately 2 × 10^{-5} s^{-1} for prototypical small GTPases like Ras. Upon GDP release, GTP rapidly binds due to its higher cellular concentration (≈10-fold excess over GDP), shifting the equilibrium toward the active state. This step is crucial for initiating the signaling cascade but proceeds inefficiently without regulatory assistance.^[21] GTP binding triggers conformational dynamics that stabilize the active state, particularly involving the rearrangement of the switch I (residues 30–40) and switch II (residues 60–76) regions in Ras-like GTPases, which become more ordered and expose surfaces for effector binding. In the subsequent hydrolysis step, a water molecule, positioned near the γ-phosphate of GTP, launches a nucleophilic attack on the phosphorus atom, forming a pentacoordinate transition state that facilitates bond cleavage between the β- and γ-phosphates, yielding GDP and Pi. The intrinsic catalytic rate (k_cat) for this hydrolysis in Ras is approximately 3.5 × 10^{-4} s^{-1} (or 0.021 min^{-1}), underscoring the need for acceleration to achieve physiological turnover. Hydrolysis-induced conformational changes in the switch regions then revert the GTPase to the inactive GDP-bound form, with Pi release completing the inactivation. These intrinsic cycle kinetics are profoundly enhanced by regulatory factors to match cellular demands.^[22]^[23]

Structural and Catalytic Basis

The G domain, the catalytic core of GTPases, features a conserved Rossmann fold characterized by a central six-stranded parallel β-sheet flanked by five α-helices, forming an α/β/α sandwich topology that accommodates the guanine nucleotide.^[14] This architecture positions key residues for GTP binding and enables conformational dynamics essential for function. The domain spans approximately 160–180 residues in canonical small GTPases like Ras and is universally conserved, with variations in larger GTPases arising from insertions that modulate activity without altering the core fold.^[14] Five sequence motifs, termed G1 through G5, line the nucleotide-binding pocket and mediate specific interactions with GTP. The G1 motif (P-loop; residues 10–17 in H-Ras: GAGGVGKS) forms hydrogen bonds with the α-, β-, and γ-phosphates of GTP, while its invariant lysine coordinates the β- and γ-phosphates electrostatically, and the serine/threonine residue ligates the essential Mg²⁺ cofactor.^[24] The G2 motif (residue 35: T) provides a threonine that further coordinates Mg²⁺ through direct oxygen interactions, stabilizing the triphosphate chain. In the G3 motif (residues 59–65: DTAGQ), the aspartate bridges Mg²⁺ via a water molecule, and the glutamine (Gln61 in Ras) plays a pivotal role in catalysis by positioning the nucleophilic water.^[14] The G4 motif (residues 116–119: NKID) uses asparagine and lysine side chains to form hydrogen bonds with the guanine base, ensuring specificity over ATP. Finally, the G5 motif (residues 143–147: EKSALD) contributes a serine that contacts the γ-phosphate, aiding overall nucleotide affinity.^[14] GTP binding induces conformational rearrangements in two solvent-exposed loops, Switch I (residues 30–40 in H-Ras) and Switch II (residues 60–76), which serve as the primary sites for signal transduction. In the GTP-bound active state, as seen in the crystal structure of H-Ras·GTP (PDB ID: 1QRA), Switch I adopts an ordered α-helical conformation (residues 35–40) and Switch II forms a short β-strand and helix, exposing effector-binding surfaces.^[25] Upon hydrolysis to GDP, these regions undergo drastic remodeling: Switch I becomes largely disordered, and Switch II shifts to a β-hairpin structure, as exemplified in the H-Ras·GDP structure (PDB ID: 5P21), thereby occluding effector interfaces and locking the inactive conformation. These GTP-specific changes, driven by γ-phosphate interactions, amplify the switch-like behavior of the G domain. The core catalytic reaction is the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP and inorganic phosphate (Pᵢ), depicted as:

\text{GTP} + \text{H}_2\text{O} \xrightarrow{\text{Mg}^{2+}} \text{GDP} + \text{P}_\text{i}

This process strictly requires Mg²⁺ to coordinate the β- and γ-phosphates and stabilize the transition state, with the hydrolysis rate exhibiting pH dependence that peaks near physiological values (pH 7–8) due to optimal deprotonation of the nucleophilic water.^[26] Mechanistically, it proceeds via a two-step associative inline SN₂ displacement, where a general base (often the γ-phosphate or a nearby residue) deprotonates a water molecule positioned by Gln61 from Switch II, enabling its attack on the γ-phosphorus to form a pentacoordinate transition state.^[27] The intrinsic reaction is slow (k_cat ~10⁻⁴ s⁻¹ for Ras), with the G domain providing partial charge neutralization, but GTPase-activating proteins accelerate it up to 10⁵-fold by inserting an "arginine finger" into the active site to further stabilize the developing negative charge on the leaving group.^[28] This universal mechanism ensures precise timing in the GTPase cycle, integrating structural rigidity with dynamic flexibility.

Regulation

Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors (GEFs)

Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) serve as key activators of GTPases by catalyzing the release of bound GDP, thereby facilitating the binding of GTP to promote the active conformation of the GTPase. This exchange is essential for switching GTPases from their inactive GDP-bound state to the active GTP-bound state, with GEFs accelerating the intrinsically slow GDP dissociation rate by several orders of magnitude, typically 10³- to 10⁵-fold, through stabilization of a transient nucleotide-free intermediate.^[29]^[30] The preferential loading of GTP over GDP occurs due to the substantially higher cellular concentration of GTP compared to GDP, ensuring efficient activation upon nucleotide release.^[31] The molecular mechanism of GEFs involves the insertion of an α-helix or specialized domain into the switch I and switch II regions of the GTPase, which distorts the P-loop (phosphate-binding loop) and disrupts coordination of the bound nucleotide's β-phosphate and Mg²⁺ ion, thereby reducing GDP affinity. For instance, in the case of the Ras GTPase, the Dbl homology (DH) domain of the GEF Sos inserts a conserved α-helix that pries open the nucleotide-binding pocket, expelling GDP and creating the nucleotide-free state. This structural rearrangement is conserved across GEF families but adapted to specific GTPase substrates, highlighting the precision of the exchange process. GEFs exhibit remarkable diversity in the human genome, with over 80 identified, reflecting their roles in regulating various GTPase families through distinct domain architectures.^[32] For Rho GTPases, many GEFs contain a DH domain often paired with a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain for membrane recruitment, while Arf GTPases are activated by GEFs featuring the Sec7 domain, which includes a catalytic "glutamic finger" residue that directly engages the active site.^[33] This architectural variety enables GEFs to integrate upstream signals and localize activation events. GEFs display high specificity for particular GTPase families or subfamilies, ensuring targeted spatial and temporal control of signaling pathways without cross-activation.^[33] This selectivity is achieved through complementary interfaces between the GEF's catalytic domain and the GTPase's switch regions, preventing off-target effects in the complex cellular environment. GEF-mediated activation is counterbalanced by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), which promote GTP hydrolysis to return GTPases to the inactive state.00655-1)

GTPase-Activating Proteins (GAPs) and Inhibitors

GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) are key negative regulators of GTPase signaling that accelerate the intrinsically slow rate of GTP hydrolysis, thereby promoting the transition from the active GTP-bound state to the inactive GDP-bound state. This enhancement can increase the hydrolysis rate by 10^3- to 10^5-fold, depending on the specific GTPase-GAP pair, allowing for rapid signal termination in cellular processes such as cell migration and vesicle trafficking.^[5]^[34] By stabilizing the transition state of the GTPase reaction, GAPs ensure precise spatiotemporal control of GTPase activity, preventing prolonged signaling that could lead to pathological conditions like cancer.^[35] The catalytic mechanism of GAPs typically involves the insertion of a conserved arginine residue, known as the "arginine finger," into the active site of the GTPase to neutralize negative charge buildup during hydrolysis and position the nucleophilic water molecule. In the case of Ras GTPases, the GAP domain—such as the GAP-334 region in neurofibromin (NF1)—supplies this arginine finger (e.g., Arg1276 in p120GAP), which interacts with the switch I and II regions to stabilize the transition state. For Rho family GTPases, RhoGAPs employ a similar strategy, where the arginine finger (e.g., Arg286 in p50RhoGAP) inserts into the switch I region of the GTPase, enhancing catalysis while also stabilizing the glutamine residue (Gln61 in Ras or equivalent) for nucleophilic attack. Over 100 GAPs are encoded in the human genome, with approximately 66-70 dedicated to Rho GTPases alone, reflecting the diversity needed for tissue-specific regulation.^[36]^[37] In addition to GAPs, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) provide another layer of inhibition by sequestering GTPases in their inactive GDP-bound form, preventing both nucleotide exchange and membrane association essential for activation. GDIs bind tightly to the GDP-bound GTPase via interactions with the switch regions and the C-terminal prenyl group, extracting it from membranes and inhibiting spontaneous GDP release, thus maintaining a cytosolic pool of inactive GTPases.^[38] A prominent example is RhoGDI (also known as RhoGDIα or ARHGDIA), which specifically regulates the Rho subfamily (RhoA, Rac1, Cdc42) by forming a stable complex that shields the geranylgeranyl lipid anchor and blocks access to guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs).^[39] Other inhibitory mechanisms include certain effectors that bind the active GTP-bound GTPase and lock it in the signaling state by stabilizing the switch conformations, thereby competing with GAPs and extending signal duration, as seen in some oncogenic contexts where effector affinity overrides hydrolysis.^[40] Pseudo-GTPases, which retain the GTPase fold but lack catalytic activity due to mutations in key motifs, can also act as dominant-negative inhibitors; for instance, the pseudo-GTPase domain in p190RhoGAP proteins autoinhibits GAP function until released, balancing activation by GEFs to fine-tune Rho signaling cycles.^[41]^[42] Together, GAPs and inhibitors like GDIs and pseudo-GTPases counterbalance GEF-mediated activation, ensuring the temporal precision of GTPase-mediated signal transduction.^[20]

Classification

G Domain GTPases

G domain GTPases constitute a superfamily of small, monomeric GTP-binding proteins, typically 20-25 kDa in molecular mass, defined by a highly conserved G domain that mediates GTP binding and hydrolysis.^[43] The G domain spans approximately 160-180 amino acid residues and includes five signature motifs (G1-G5) essential for nucleotide recognition, magnesium coordination, and catalytic activity.^[43] In humans, this superfamily encompasses around 164 members, primarily within the Ras family of small GTPases.^[44] These proteins share several key features that enable their roles as molecular switches in cellular signaling. Most associate with cellular membranes via C-terminal post-translational lipid modifications, such as prenylation—including farnesylation for Ras-like proteins or geranylgeranylation for Rho-like proteins—which anchor them to lipid bilayers and facilitate interactions with effectors.^[1] Their GTPase cycle, involving GDP/GTP exchange and hydrolysis, is precisely regulated by accessory proteins: guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) catalyze GDP release to activate the GTP-bound state, GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) stimulate intrinsic hydrolysis to inactivate it, and guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs) stabilize the GDP-bound form in the cytosol for select subfamilies.^[43] Despite the conserved G domain, G domain GTPases display considerable diversity in sequences and structures outside this core region, resulting in phylogenetic classification into distinct families that reflect their evolutionary divergence.^[45] This variability underpins their specificity in eukaryotic systems, where additional domains or insertions enable family-specific interactions with downstream targets and upstream regulators, tailoring their functions to diverse cellular contexts.^[46] Evolutionarily, G domain GTPases originated from prokaryotic ancestors present in the last universal common ancestor, with the eukaryotic repertoire expanding through duplication events that amplified diversity and adapted them to compartmentalized cellular environments.^[46] Pseudo-GTPases, which preserve the G domain architecture but exhibit impaired or absent hydrolytic activity due to mutations in catalytic motifs, emerge as non-hydrolytic variants that often act as dominant-negative regulators or scaffolds in signaling pathways.^[41]

TRAFAC Class

The TRAFAC (Translation Factor Associated) class constitutes the largest structural clade within the P-loop GTPase superfamily, encompassing a diverse array of proteins primarily involved in translation and related processes, from which the class derives its name.^[47] This class includes the majority of known eukaryotic small GTPases, which function as molecular switches in various cellular pathways.^[47] TRAFAC GTPases are characterized by a conserved GTP-binding domain (G domain) that facilitates nucleotide-dependent conformational changes essential for their regulatory roles.^[48] Key superfamilies within the TRAFAC class highlight its functional breadth. The Ras superfamily primarily mediates intracellular signaling, with members such as H-Ras and K-Ras activating downstream pathways like MAPK upon GTP binding.^[49] The Rho superfamily regulates cytoskeletal dynamics, exemplified by RhoA, which promotes actin stress fiber formation, and Cdc42, which drives filopodia assembly.^[50] In vesicular trafficking, the Rab superfamily, including Rab1 and Rab5, coordinates vesicle budding, transport, and fusion by recruiting effector proteins to specific membranes.^[50] The Arf superfamily governs coat protein recruitment for vesicle formation, with Arf1 regulating COPI coats and Sar1 initiating COPII assembly.^[50] Additionally, translation-associated members like elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) deliver aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosome, while motor protein-linked GTPases such as those in myosin V and kinesin support cargo transport along actin and microtubules, respectively. Obg-like GTPases, such as bacterial Obg (YhbZ), contribute to ribosome assembly and quality control.^[47]^[51] Structurally, TRAFAC GTPases share a core G domain fold with five conserved motifs (G1–G5) for GTP binding and hydrolysis, featuring switch I and switch II regions that extend upon GTP binding to enable effector interactions.^[52] These switch regions, typically comprising 10–20 residues each, undergo significant conformational rearrangements between GDP- and GTP-bound states, a hallmark of the class.^[52] Variable C-terminal domains, often including hypervariable regions and prenylation motifs, confer specificity for membrane anchoring and subcellular targeting, distinguishing family members despite the unified G domain architecture.^[53] Functionally, TRAFAC GTPases exhibit diverse roles unified by their G domain-mediated cycling between inactive GDP-bound and active GTP-bound conformations, often regulated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) and GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs).^[33] For instance, oncogenic mutations in the Ras superfamily, such as those at codons 12, 13, or 61, impair GTP hydrolysis and lock proteins in the active state, contributing to approximately 20% of human cancers worldwide.^[54] This dysregulation underscores the class's critical involvement in signaling fidelity and cellular homeostasis.

SIMIBI Class

The SIMIBI class constitutes a major phylogenetic clade within the P-loop GTPase superfamily, distinguished by its ancient prokaryotic origins and specialized roles in protein synthesis and translocation processes. This class, smaller than the TRAFAC counterpart, derives its name from key exemplars: the signal-recognition particle (SRP) GTPases, initiation factors like IF2, and other bacterial representatives such as those related to MIP (mitochondrial import protein homologs) and BioD-like enzymes. Unlike broader signaling GTPases, SIMIBI members primarily support translational fidelity and protein localization, reflecting their evolutionary conservation across bacteria and eukaryotes. The class includes both GTPases and ATPases. The class encompasses several key superfamilies, each adapted to discrete stages of protein biogenesis. The SRP GTPase superfamily includes bacterial Ffh (SRP54 homolog) and its receptor FtsY, which form a heterodimeric complex essential for co-translational targeting of nascent polypeptides to the plasma membrane via the Sec translocon. These GTPases recognize signal sequences on emerging proteins, pause translation, and deliver ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the membrane, ensuring efficient insertion. Eukaryotic orthologs, such as SRP54 and SRα/β, perform analogous functions at the endoplasmic reticulum. Another prominent superfamily comprises the translation initiation factors, prominently represented by bacterial IF2, a GTPase that orchestrates the start of protein synthesis. IF2 binds GTP and the initiator fMet-tRNA, delivering it to the 30S ribosomal subunit's P-site, stabilizing the initiation complex, and promoting 50S subunit joining; GTP hydrolysis by IF2 then releases it, committing the ribosome to elongation. This mechanism ensures accurate decoding of the start codon and is conserved in archaeal and eukaryotic eIF5B orthologs, underscoring its fundamental role in translational accuracy. Translocon-associated SIMIBI GTPases, such as Get3 (bacterial ArsA homolog, known as TRC40 in eukaryotes), specialize in post-translational targeting of tail-anchored membrane proteins lacking signal sequences. Get3 forms homodimers that bind and chaperone these proteins via ATP/GTP hydrolysis, delivering them to the endoplasmic reticulum insertion machinery in a nucleotide-dependent manner. This pathway complements SRP-mediated targeting for proteins with C-terminal transmembrane domains. Structurally, SIMIBI GTPases share a core G domain with five conserved motifs for nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, but feature unique insertions (e.g., in switch I/II regions) that enable specialized interactions. A hallmark is their reliance on dimerization interfaces—often involving NG domains (neighboring G domains) in SRP and Get3—for reciprocal GTPase activation, where one subunit stimulates hydrolysis in the other without canonical GAPs. This "twin" architecture, prevalent in bacterial forms, supports rapid, regulated conformational changes during targeting and initiation, with eukaryotic versions retaining these interfaces for functional orthology.

Non-Canonical GTPases

Non-canonical GTPases deviate from the classical architecture of the G domain, typically lacking the complete set of G1 through G5 motifs required for efficient guanine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, or exhibiting severely impaired catalytic activity. These proteins often retain nucleotide-binding capability but function primarily through structural or regulatory mechanisms rather than traditional GTPase switching.^[41] In contrast to canonical GTPases, which cycle rapidly between GTP-bound active and GDP-bound inactive states, non-canonical variants prioritize roles in protein scaffolding, allosteric modulation, or filament assembly over enzymatic turnover.^[41] Septins represent a prominent example of non-canonical GTPases, forming hetero-oligomeric filaments essential for cytokinesis, membrane remodeling, and cellular compartmentalization. These proteins bind GDP with high affinity but possess a degenerate GTPase domain with minimal hydrolytic activity, rendering them pseudo-GTPases that rely on nucleotide binding for polymerization rather than hydrolysis for signaling.^[55] Evolutionary analyses indicate that septin GTPase activity has degenerated independently across lineages, yet this loss enhances their filament-stabilizing function without compromising cellular roles.^[55] Another key example is the Miro family (Mitochondrial Rho GTPases), which feature two atypical GTPase domains—an N-terminal domain (nGTPase) and a C-terminal domain (cGTPase)—flanked by calcium-binding EF-hand motifs, enabling coordination of mitochondrial trafficking along microtubules.^[56] The nGTPase binds GTP tightly but exhibits non-catalytic behavior, with hydrolysis occurring through a novel mechanism involving both domains, distinct from standard Ras-like GTPases.^[57] Centaurins, such as centaurin γ-1, illustrate pseudo-GTPase functionality with a GTPase-like domain that hydrolyzes a broader range of nucleotides (NTPase activity) but lacks selectivity for GTP, serving instead as a regulatory module in phosphoinositide signaling.^[58] Structurally, non-canonical GTPases often display incomplete or modified G motifs; for instance, septins retain G1, G3, and G4 elements for nucleotide interaction but lack a functional G2 loop for catalysis, leading to stable GDP-bound conformations that promote helical assembly.^[59] Miro proteins integrate these partial motifs within a multi-domain scaffold, where the GTPase domains allosterically couple with EF hands to sense calcium levels and modulate adaptor protein interactions, such as with TRAK1 for motor recruitment.^[60] This multi-domain organization underscores their reliance on conformational changes induced by nucleotide binding, rather than hydrolysis, to facilitate protein-protein interactions.^[56] Functionally, these GTPases emphasize auxiliary roles in cellular architecture and signaling modulation, acting as scaffolds or allosteric regulators rather than direct switches. Septins, for example, assemble into non-polar filaments that recruit other effectors to the cytokinetic furrow, independent of GTP hydrolysis.^[59] Miro GTPases link mitochondria to kinesin/dynein motors via atypical nucleotide-dependent dimerization, ensuring anterograde and retrograde transport while integrating calcium signals for fission-fusion dynamics.^[61] Centaurins contribute to endosomal trafficking by coupling their pseudo-GTPase domain to Arf GAP activity, fine-tuning actin cytoskeleton rearrangements without autonomous cycling.^[58] Recent structural and functional studies up to 2025 highlight pseudo-GTPases as emerging therapeutic targets in cancer, particularly Miro proteins, which are overexpressed in various tumors and promote metastasis through dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics. Cryo-EM analyses of the Miro1-TRAK1 complex reveal allosteric interfaces that could be exploited for small-molecule inhibition, potentially disrupting tumor cell migration and survival.^[60] Similarly, septin pseudo-GTPases have been implicated in oncogenic filament networks that stabilize cancer cell polarity, with nucleotide-mimetic compounds showing preclinical promise in disrupting these assemblies to enhance chemotherapy efficacy.^[55] These advances underscore the potential of targeting non-catalytic mechanisms in pseudo-GTPases for precision oncology.^[62]

Heterotrimeric G Proteins

Heterotrimeric G proteins are large, multi-subunit GTPases composed of α, β, and γ subunits that function as key transducers in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathways. The α subunit (Gα), ranging from 39 to 52 kDa in molecular weight, harbors the G domain—a conserved structural motif responsible for guanine nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. In the inactive state, the heterotrimer associates with GDP bound to Gα, maintaining a stable complex anchored to the plasma membrane via lipid modifications on Gα and the prenylated γ subunit.^[63]^[64] Upon agonist binding to a GPCR, the receptor undergoes a conformational change that enables it to act as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), catalyzing the release of GDP from Gα and promoting GTP binding. This exchange induces dissociation of the heterotrimer into an active Gα-GTP subunit and a free Gβγ dimer, both of which can interact with downstream effectors to propagate signals. For instance, Gα-GTP from the Gs family stimulates adenylyl cyclase to produce cyclic AMP, while Gβγ complexes can activate effectors such as phospholipase C-β or ion channels, thereby diversifying signaling outputs. GTP hydrolysis by the intrinsic GTPase activity of Gα then deactivates the subunit, allowing reassociation with Gβγ to reform the inactive heterotrimer.^[65]^[66] Mammalian genomes encode more than 20 Gα isoforms derived from 16-17 genes, grouped into four major classes—Gs, Gi/o, Gq/11, and G12/13—each exhibiting distinct effector preferences and subcellular localizations. These isoforms pair with five β and 12 γ subunits to generate combinatorial diversity, enabling selective coupling to over 800 GPCRs. In metazoans, heterotrimeric G proteins are essential for transducing sensory signals, such as light and odorants, and morphogen gradients in developmental pathways like Wnt signaling.^[67] The intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate of Gα subunits, approximately 2 min⁻¹ at 30°C, is notably faster than the uncatalyzed rates observed in many small GTPases, allowing for rapid signal termination without relying solely on accessory regulators. Recent cryo-EM studies in 2025 have revealed high-resolution details of GPCR-G protein interfaces, highlighting key interactions at the intracellular loops of GPCRs that stabilize the nucleotide-free intermediate during exchange and explain coupling specificity across Gα classes.^[68]^[69]

Tubulin and Associated GTPases

Tubulin, a key component of the cytoskeleton, functions as a GTPase and forms the structural basis of microtubules. It exists as α/β-tubulin heterodimers, where each subunit binds GTP at distinct sites: the non-exchangeable N-site on α-tubulin, which remains GTP-bound and non-hydrolyzable, and the exchangeable E-site on β-tubulin, which binds GTP reversibly.^[70]^[71] During microtubule polymerization, GTP at the β-tubulin E-site is hydrolyzed to GDP shortly after incorporation into the protofilament lattice, a process triggered by interactions at the dimer interface.^[72] The GTPase activity of tubulin drives microtubule dynamic instability, a hallmark of their behavior essential for cellular function. In growing microtubules, a "GTP cap" at the plus end—composed of tubulin dimers with unhydrolyzed GTP—stabilizes the structure by maintaining straight protofilaments and promoting further polymerization.^[73] Loss of this cap exposes a GDP-bound lattice, which adopts a curved conformation that weakens lateral interactions, leading to rapid depolymerization or catastrophe.^[74] This stochastic switching between growth and shrinkage enables microtubules to explore cellular space dynamically.^[75] Associated with tubulin are other GTPases that modulate microtubule assembly and function. The γ-tubulin ring complex (γ-TuRC), containing multiple γ-tubulin subunits that bind GTP, serves as a primary nucleator for microtubule formation; GTP binding to γ-tubulin enhances its affinity for α/β-tubulin dimers, facilitating the initiation of polymerization at centrosomes or other sites.^[76] GTP hydrolysis by γ-tubulin is not strictly required for nucleation but regulates the stability and positioning of nascent microtubules.^[70] Dynactin, in complex with the motor protein dynein, associates with microtubules to facilitate minus-end-directed transport; while dynein itself is an ATPase, the dynactin complex interacts with GTPases such as Rab proteins to coordinate cargo recruitment and processive movement along tubulin tracks.^[77] Microtubule dynamics regulated by tubulin GTPase activity are critical for mitosis, where they form the bipolar spindle to ensure accurate chromosome segregation, and for intracellular transport, powering the movement of vesicles and organelles via motor proteins.^[78] Defects in this GTPase-driven process, such as impaired dynamic instability, contribute to neurodegeneration; in tauopathies like Alzheimer's disease, hyperphosphorylated tau disrupts microtubule stability, leading to axonal transport failures and neuronal loss.^[79]

References

[1]
Targeting small GTPases: emerging grasps on previously ... - Nature
May 23, 2023 · In this article, we summarize diversified biological functions, shared structural properties, and complex regulatory mechanisms of small GTPases ...
[2]
GTPase - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
GTPases are a family of small proteins that regulate multiple cellular processes, perhaps most notably signaling to the actin cytoskeleton.
[3]
Structural Insights into the Regulation Mechanism of Small GTPases ...
The G domain consists of a six-stranded β-sheet and 5 α-helices and has conserved sequence motifs called the G1, G2, G3, G4, and G5 motifs (G boxes), which are ...
[4]
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c00240
[5]
Small GTPases and their GAPs - PMC - NIH
Here we review developments leading to current understanding of intrinsic and GAP catalyzed GTP hydrolytic reactions in small GTPases from structural, molecular ...
[6]
On the emergence of P-Loop NTPase and Rossmann enzymes from ...
Dec 9, 2020 · Dating back to the last universal common ancestor, P-loop NTPases and Rossmanns comprise the most ubiquitous and diverse enzyme lineages.
[7]
Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases
The functions of most GTPases that are traceable to LUCA are associated with translation. However, in contrast to other superclasses of P-loop NTPases (RecA-F1/ ...
[8]
Eukaryote-Wide Perspective on the Diversity and Evolution of the ...
The cellular functions of many of the 16 ARF family GTPases in the LECA in principle can be considered from what has been learned about their descendants in ...
[9]
Human Lsg1 defines a family of essential GTPases that correlates ...
Oct 7, 2005 · ... GTPase (YRG) family, which are present in Eukarya, Bacteria and Archea and include the stem cell regulator Nucleostemin. To extend the ...
[10]
The Ras Superfamily of Small GTPases: The Unlocked Secrets
Aug 6, 2025 · The Ras superfamily of small GTPases is composed of more than 150 members, which share a conserved structure and biochemical properties, ...
[11]
An expanding role for RAS GTPase activating proteins (RAS GAPs ...
The RAS pathway is one of the most commonly deregulated pathways in human cancer. Mutations in RAS genes occur in nearly 30% of all human tumors.
[12]
ATPase and GTPase Tangos Drive Intracellular Protein Transport
The GTPase superfamily of proteins provides molecular switches to regulate numerous cellular processes ... Precise timing of ATPase activation drives ...
[13]
The GTPase superfamily: a conserved switch for diverse cell functions - Nature
**Summary of GTPases as Molecular Switches (Bourne et al., 1990, Nature)**
[14]
The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism - Nature
**Summary of GTPase Switch Mechanism and Related Concepts (Bourne et al., 1991, Nature)**
[15]
https://www.cell.com/trends/biochemical-sciences/fulltext/S0968-0004(00)01713-8
[16]
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(00)00115-X
[17]
ARF family G proteins and their regulators: roles in membrane ...
May 18, 2011 · The Drosophila Dead end Arf-like3 GTPase controls vesicle trafficking during tracheal fusion cell morphogenesis. Dev. Biol. 311, 487–499 ...
[18]
https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(02)00268-X
[19]
What recent ribosome structures have revealed about the mechanism of translation - Nature
Summary of each segment:
[20]
The RHO Family GTPases: Mechanisms of Regulation and Signaling
Jul 20, 2021 · Most RHO GTPases (20 canonical human members) act as molecular switches by cycling between a GDP-bound, inactive state and a GTP-bound, active ...
[21]
Kinetic Analysis by Fluorescence of the Interaction between Ras and ...
However, since the intrinsic dissociation rate of Ras for GTP (1 × 10-5 s-1) is 2-fold lower than that for GDP (2 × 10-5 s-1), the stimulatory action of Cdc25 ...
[22]
The structural basis for the transition from Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP
The rate of intrinsic GTP hydrolysis for the mutant protein (3.5 × 10−5 s−1) is ≈10 times slower than for the wild-type Ras (Fig. 3A). The impairment in GTPase ...
[23]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
The P-loop--a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins
A P-loop is a phosphate-binding loop in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins, typically with a glycine-rich sequence, a lysine, and a serine or threonine.Missing: G | Show results with:G
[25]
1QRA: STRUCTURE OF P21RAS IN COMPLEX WITH GTP AT 100 K
Nov 5, 1999 · The structure of the complex formed between p21(ras) and GTP has been determined by X-ray diffraction at 1.6 A using a combination of photolysis of an inactive ...
[26]
The role of Mg2+ cofactor in the guanine nucleotide exchange and ...
Aug 18, 2000 · Although Mg(2+) is not absolutely required for GTP hydrolysis by the Rho GTPases, the divalent ion apparently participates in the GTPase ...Missing: pH | Show results with:pH
[27]
Invited review: Mechanisms of GTP hydrolysis and conformational ...
It appears to stabilize the negative charge during the transition state of GTP hydrolysis and thus acts as an internal catalytic arginine finger.
[28]
The arginine finger of RasGAP helps Gln-61 align the nucleophilic ...
The hydrolysis of GTP to GDP switches Ras to the off (inactive) state. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors catalyze the dissociation of GDP from Ras and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
Kinetic analysis by fluorescence of the interaction between Ras and ...
May 19, 1998 · The maximum acceleration by Cdc25(Mm285) of the GDP dissociation from Ras was more than 10(5)-fold. Kinetic measurements of the association ...
[30]
Kinetic Analysis of the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Activity of ...
The intrinsic rate of GDP dissociation (t1/2 > 100 min) is extremely slow; in vivo, Ras GTPases are activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), ...
[31]
How not to do kinetics: examples involving GTPases and guanine ...
Oct 1, 2013 · Guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) are crucial regulators of the action of GTPases in signal transduction and cellular regulation.
[32]
The Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors Trio, Ect2, and Vav3 ...
10 There are 80 Rho GEFS in the human genome and 22 Rho GTPases,11 of which ... total number of cells per field. Radial Cell Migration Assay. Cellular ...
[33]
Regulation of Small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs
GEFs combine these two effects to facilitate the dissociation of GDP by different means depending on the small GTPase and GEF subfamilies (FIGURE 3, B–D).
[34]
Monitoring the GAP catalyzed H-Ras GTPase reaction at ... - PNAS
The intrinsic GTPase reaction of Ras is very slow, but GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) can accelerate it maximally ca. 105 times (3). Many oncogenic mutants ...
[35]
Ras-Specific GTPase-Activating Proteins—Structures, Mechanisms ...
Ras-specific GTPase-activating proteins (RasGAPs) down-regulate the biological activity of Ras proteins by accelerating their intrinsic rate of GTP hydrolysis.
[36]
GTPase-activating Protein - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Ras proteins are regulated by six distinct RasGAPs, and there are 67 human RhoGAPs.
[37]
Deciphering the Molecular and Functional Basis of RHOGAP Family ...
We extracted 66 distinct human RHOGAPs, from which 57 have a common catalytic domain capable of terminating RHO protein signaling by stimulating the slow ...
[38]
Regulation of the RhoGTPases by RhoGDI - NCBI - NIH
The GDI serves as a multi-functional regulator of signalling by Rho GTPases. The three distinct biochemical activities of the GDI (1) inhibition of nucleotide ...
[39]
RhoGDI: multiple functions in the regulation of Rho family GTPase ...
Aug 9, 2005 · RhoGDIα stabilizes the GDP-bound form and prevents nucleotide dissociation through hydrogen bonds (dashed green lines) occurring between the ...
[40]
Effector Proteins Exert an Important Influence on the Signaling ...
GTP-binding (G) proteins regulate the flow of information in cellular signaling pathways by alternating between a GTP-bound “active” state and a GDP-bound ...
[41]
The pseudoGTPase group of pseudoenzymes - PMC
The G1 motif (GxxxxGKS/T) is also known as the P-loop or Walker A motif and forms a cavity to bind the nucleotide phosphates. ... Examination of its sequence ...
[42]
PseudoGTPase domains in p190RhoGAP proteins: a mini-review
Dec 4, 2018 · Some GTPases are further negatively regulated by guanine nucleotide disassociation inhibitors (GDI) which bind and extract the GTPase from ...
[43]
G-domain prediction across the diversity of G protein families - bioRxiv
Dec 27, 2019 · Most G proteins (with structural information) have highly conserved G box sequences and do not differ from the consensus (i.e G1-GXXXXGK, G3- ...
[44]
https://genenames.org/data/genegroup/#!/group/358
[45]
The Ras protein superfamily: Evolutionary tree and role of ...
Jan 23, 2012 · The conserved 3D structure of the G-domain that is common to the entire superfamily allows these proteins to preserve large structural ...
[46]
Evolution and Diversity of the Ras Superfamily of Small GTPases in ...
Interestingly, 390 small GTPases are encoded within four genes of a gene encoding one of these MglB sequences and all these GTPases map to only one of the ...
[47]
Classification and evolution of P-loop GTPases and related ATPases
The GTPase superclass can be divided into two large classes, each of which has a unique set of sequence and structural signatures (synapomorphies).
[48]
Structural insights into a new homodimeric self‐activated GTPase ...
One insertion to the G domain bears a strictly conserved GPN motif, which is ... The G1, G2, G3, G4 and G5 motifs (A monomer) are shown in yellow ...
[49]
A comprehensive survey of Ras mutations in cancer - PMC
The best example of this is thyroid carcinoma where significant numbers of mutations of all isoforms have been identified. This type of cancer has been ...
[50]
The Ras superfamily at a glance | Journal of Cell Science
Mar 1, 2005 · The Ras superfamily of small guanosine triphosphatases (GTPases) comprise over 150 human members (Table S1 in supplementary material), with evolutionarily ...
[51]
Full article: Insights into the classification of small GTPases
May 21, 2010 · The Ras superfamily of small GTPases is typically divided into five families: Ras related in brain (Rab), Rho, Ras related nuclear protein (Ran) ...
[52]
Small GTPases: Versatile Signaling Switches in Plants - PMC - NIH
Small GTPases, having masses of 21 to 30 kD, are monomeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins related to the α subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins.Missing: kDa source
[53]
Evolutionary degeneration of septins into pseudoGTPases - Frontiers
Nov 28, 2023 · During septin evolution in nematodes, apparent loss of GTPase activity was also accompanied by changes in predicted G interface contacts.
[54]
Miro GTPases at the Crossroads of Cytoskeletal Dynamics and ...
Apr 7, 2024 · The nGTPase domain is most important for the functioning of Miro GTPases, as mutations disrupting the nucleotide-binding or hydrolysis activity ...
[55]
Human Miro Proteins Act as NTP Hydrolases through a Novel, Non ...
Dec 2, 2018 · Miro proteins (Miros) are “atypical” Ras superfamily GTPases that display unique domain architecture and subcellular localisation regulating ...
[56]
The centaurin γ-1 GTPase-like domain functions as an NTPase - PMC
Oct 12, 2006 · Centaurins are a family of proteins that contain GTPase-activating protein domains, with the γ family members containing in addition a ...Missing: canonical pseudo-
[57]
The septins - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
The septins are guanine-nucleotide binding proteins that mostly form filaments. They are important in cytokinesis and also have roles in sporulation in yeasts ...Gene Organization And... · Characteristic Structural... · Figure 2
[58]
Structural-functional characterization of the MIRO1-TRAK1 complex
Jul 4, 2025 · Mitochondrial Rho GTPase (MIRO) features N- and C-terminal GTPase ... However, both the nGTPase and ELM1 are non-canonical.<|separator|>
[59]
Full article: Mitochondrial Miro GTPases coordinate mitochondrial ...
In Drosophila and mammalian neural stem cells, Miro proteins play a non-canonical role in regulating Mito-ER contacts and mitochondrial Ca2+ levels [Citation47] ...
[60]
Emerging roles for Mitochondrial Rho GTPases in tumor biology
Aug 9, 2024 · In this review, we focus on examining the role of MIROs in cancer, including expression changes in tumors and the molecular mechanisms by which ...Tumor Cell-Intrinsic... · Miro2 · Tumor Cell-Extrinsic...
[61]
Heterotrimeric G Proteins - Basic Neurochemistry - NCBI Bookshelf
Current nomenclature identifies several subfamilies of G protein α subunit: Gαs, Gαi, Gαq and Gα12. The Mr of these proteins varies between 38,000 and 52,000.Each G protein is a... · The functional activity of G... · protein βγ subunits subserve...Missing: size | Show results with:size
[62]
Heterotrimeric G‐proteins: a short history - 2006 - Wiley Online Library
Feb 2, 2009 · Heterotrimeric G-proteins are guanine nucleotide-binding proteins that transduce signals from receptors to effectors, acting as guanine ...
[63]
Conformational Transitions and the Activation of Heterotrimeric G ...
With respect to G proteins, GPCRs act as enzymatic guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) sponsoring the exchange of GDP from the inactive G protein ...
[64]
Comprehensive analysis of heterotrimeric G-protein complex ...
The heterotrimeric G-protein complex is assembled from a pool of 16 α-subunits, 5 β-subunits, and 12 γ-subunits (3–5). Extensive analyses of the βγ-dimer ...Results · Discussion · Generation Of Gpcr/g Protein...
[65]
Heterotrimeric G-proteins: a short history - PMC - PubMed Central
Subsequent to initial cloning efforts, cloning by homology has defined the human G-proteins to derive from 35 genes, 16 encoding α-subunits, five β and 14 γ.
[66]
Uncoupling conformational change from GTP hydrolysis in a ... - PNAS
Heterotrimeric G protein α (Gα) subunits possess intrinsic GTPase activity that leads to functional deactivation with a rate constant of ≈2 min-1 at 30°C.
[67]
Insights into G-protein coupling preference from cryo-EM structures ...
Jun 26, 2025 · Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of the PTH1R–G q complex in two distinct extracellular conformations, demonstrating the role of N-linked ...
[68]
The Game of Tubulins - PMC - NIH
Mar 28, 2021 · In the α/β-tubulin heterodimers, there are two GTP-binding sites: one site on β-tubulin (the E site), and a second site on α-tubulin (the N site) ...
[69]
Structural insights into the mechanism of GTP initiation of ... - Nature
Sep 25, 2023 · The GTP bound to α-tubulin is buried in the α-, β-tubulin intra-dimer interface and is non-exchangeable and non-hydrolysable, whereas the ...
[70]
The role of tubulin-tubulin lattice contacts in the mechanism of ...
Jan 2, 2019 · This trigger involves GTP hydrolysis at the inter-dimer interface: the β-subunit's GTP is hydrolysed due to recruitment of the α-subunit's ...
[71]
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth - Nature
Nov 15, 1984 · We report here that microtubules in vitro coexist in growing and shrinking populations which interconvert rather infrequently.
[72]
Microtubule dynamic instability: A new model with coupled GTP ...
Mar 27, 2013 · Upon hydrolysis, the GDP-bound microtubule lattice quickly depolymerizes, as the concentration necessary for polymerization of GDP-tubulin is ...
[73]
Regulation of Microtubule Growth and Catastrophe - NIH
If the cap is lost and GDP-tubulin is exposed at the end, depolymerization is rapid, thereby completing the hydrolysis cycle. Microtubule-associated proteins ( ...
[74]
GTP regulates the microtubule nucleation activity of γ-tubulin - Nature
Oct 27, 2013 · In vitro and in vivo data show that only γ-tubulin loaded with GTP nucleates microtubules. Our results suggest that GTP recruitment to γ-tubulin ...
[75]
Rab GTPases and microtubule motors - Portland Press
Sep 21, 2011 · Dynactin serves as an adaptor for interaction of cytoplasmic dynein-1 with many of its cargo organelles, and enhances the processivity of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
Microtubule Motors and Movements - The Cell - NCBI Bookshelf
Microtubules are responsible for a variety of cell movements, including the intracellular transport and positioning of membrane vesicles and organelles, ...
[77]
Microtubule defects & Neurodegeneration - PMC - PubMed Central
This review will examine a range of neurodegenerative conditions where current molecular understanding points to defects in the stability of MTs and axonal ...