Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Great Acceleration

The Great Acceleration denotes the period of rapid escalation in human population, economic output, resource extraction, and technological deployment that commenced around 1950, resulting in detectable and systemic alterations to Earth's biophysical processes.^[1] This surge is empirically documented through 24 key indicators—12 socio-economic and 12 pertaining to Earth system dynamics—spanning 1750 to 2010, which reveal a characteristic "hockey-stick" inflection point post-1950 across nearly all metrics.^[2] Originating from analyses by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), the concept highlights the convergence of drivers such as post-World War II industrialization, the Green Revolution in agriculture, and globalization, which propelled global population from approximately 2.5 billion to over 7 billion, real GDP per capita to increase more than tenfold, and energy consumption to quadruple by 2010.^[3]^[1] Corresponding Earth system indicators demonstrate parallel accelerations, including atmospheric CO₂ concentrations rising from 310 ppm in 1950 to over 390 ppm by 2010, global surface temperature anomalies increasing by about 0.7°C, and significant losses in tropical forest cover and vertebrate populations.^[1] Fertilizer consumption, a proxy for anthropogenic nitrogen fixation, expanded over 20-fold, while international tourism and paper production—markers of consumption and infrastructure—likewise exhibited exponential growth.^[2] These trends underscore a shift from gradual pre-1950 changes to rapid, interconnected transformations, with human activity now dominating key biogeochemical cycles and land surface modifications.^[4] The Great Acceleration has become central to discussions of the Anthropocene, providing quantitative evidence for human dominance over planetary processes, though its precise onset and implications remain subjects of scholarly debate, with some analyses affirming its persistence into recent decades via updated datasets.^[5] While socio-economic advancements have correlated with improvements in human well-being—such as reduced infant mortality and expanded access to electricity—these gains have imposed measurable strains on natural systems, including ocean acidification and intensified hydrological cycles.^[1] Empirical validation from diverse sources, including satellite observations and ice-core records, supports the acceleration's reality, distinguishing it from prior historical fluctuations through its scale and synchronicity.^[6]

History and Origins

Post-World War II Onset

![Socio-economic trends indicating the Great Acceleration from 1750 to 2010][float-right] The Great Acceleration refers to the post-1950 surge in human activity across socioeconomic and Earth system indicators, with its onset traceable to the immediate aftermath of World War II.^[6] This period, beginning around 1945, saw a resumption and intensification of trends interrupted by the world wars, as global economies rebuilt and expanded rapidly.^[7] The detonation of the first atomic bomb in July 1945 has been proposed as a stratigraphic marker for this inflection point, symbolizing the technological and energetic escalation that followed.^[3] In the years immediately after 1945, global population grew from about 2.3 billion to 2.5 billion by 1950, setting the stage for a tripling to over 6 billion by 2000, driven by improved medical technologies and reduced mortality rates.^[5] Concurrently, real global GDP accelerated, with industrial output in war-ravaged Europe and Asia rebounding through initiatives like the Marshall Plan, which disbursed over $13 billion in aid from 1948 to 1952 to facilitate economic recovery in Western Europe.^[8] Primary energy consumption, dominated by fossil fuels, began its sharp rise as postwar reconstruction demanded unprecedented scales of coal, oil, and later natural gas usage, with global fossil fuel combustion taking off in this era.^[9] Urbanization and infrastructure development further propelled the acceleration, as rural-to-urban migration surged alongside the expansion of transportation networks, including the proliferation of automobiles and aviation.^[10] By the 1950s, international trade volumes and fertilizer application in agriculture also exhibited marked upturns, supporting food production to match population demands while initiating widespread environmental alterations.^[5] These intertwined developments established the foundational dynamics of the Great Acceleration, transitioning humanity into an era of dominance over planetary processes.^[6]

Coining and Popularization of the Concept

The graphs depicting the Great Acceleration—showing sharp post-1950 upturns in socioeconomic and Earth system indicators from 1750 onward—originated from research coordinated by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP), a core project of the International Council for Science. These visualizations were first compiled and published in 2004 within an IGBP synthesis volume edited by Will Steffen and colleagues, aggregating data on trends such as population growth, urbanization, and carbon emissions to illustrate the scale of recent human-driven changes.^[11]^[12] The term "Great Acceleration" was first introduced during a synthesis working group at the Dahlem Conference on the "History of the Human-Environment Relationship," convened in Berlin, Germany, from June 12 to 17, 2005. This conference, involving historians, earth scientists, and social scientists, formalized the label in its proceedings, crediting the rapid post-World War II escalation in human activity as a defining phase, distinct from earlier industrial growth. The associated report by Hibbard et al. in 2006 documented this usage, linking it explicitly to the IGBP graphs and emphasizing the period's unprecedented simultaneity across indicators.^[13]^[14] Popularization accelerated through subsequent IGBP-led efforts and peer-reviewed analyses. Will Steffen, IGBP's former executive director, played a central role, extending the concept in publications that integrated it with Anthropocene discourse; for instance, a 2015 update in The Anthropocene Review extended the datasets to 2010, confirming ongoing intensification with metrics like a tripling of global GDP and a fourfold rise in fertilizer use since 1950.^[15]^[12] This paper, co-authored by Steffen and international researchers, argued the trends marked a "hockey-stick" trajectory beyond Holocene variability, gaining traction in earth system science.^[15] Further dissemination occurred via Future Earth, IGBP's successor organization, which released an interactive "planetary dashboard" of the updated graphs in January 2015, prompting coverage in outlets like ScienceDaily and reinforcing the concept's role in quantifying human dominance over planetary processes. Steffen's public statements, such as identifying 1950 as the approximate onset tied to post-war economic booms and energy surges, amplified its adoption in policy and academic circles focused on global environmental change.^[2]^[16] By the mid-2010s, the Great Acceleration had become a standard reference in discussions of anthropogenic planetary boundaries, evidenced by its integration into International Union of Geological Sciences debates on formalizing the Anthropocene epoch.^[5]

Key Indicators and Data

Socioeconomic Indicators

The socioeconomic indicators of the Great Acceleration capture the rapid escalation in human societal metrics post-1950, including population size, economic production, and urbanization levels, as depicted in the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) planetary dashboard. These 12 indicators, tracked from 1750 to 2010, show relatively gradual changes until mid-20th century, followed by steep upward trajectories reflecting intensified global interconnectedness and industrialization.^[2]^[11] Global population expanded from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6.9 billion by 2010, with annual growth rates averaging 1.7% during this period, driven primarily by declines in mortality rates and sustained fertility in developing regions.^[17]^[18] Real gross domestic product (GDP) worldwide surged, with nominal values rising from approximately 1.1 trillion U.S. dollars in 1950 to 66 trillion by 2010, underpinned by technological advancements and expanded trade networks.^[19] Per capita GDP in constant terms more than quadrupled, from around 2,500 international dollars in 1950 to over 10,000 by 2010, signaling widespread productivity gains.^[20] Urban population fraction grew from 30% of the total in 1950 to about 50% by 2010, with absolute urban dwellers increasing from 751 million to roughly 3.5 billion, fueled by rural-to-urban migration and infrastructure development in emerging economies.^[21]^[22] Additional indicators, such as foreign direct investment flows and international tourist arrivals, exhibited similar post-1950 inflections: FDI stocks ballooned from minimal levels pre-1950 to trillions by 2010, while tourist numbers climbed from under 25 million annually in 1950 to over 940 million by 2010, underscoring globalization's role in amplifying economic interdependence.^[6] These trends, sourced from datasets like United Nations and World Bank records, highlight the Great Acceleration's foundation in human expansion without precedent in prior centuries.^[2]

Earth System Indicators

Earth system indicators track biophysical changes in planetary processes that have intensified since around 1950, marking the onset of the Great Acceleration. These metrics, drawn from long-term datasets, show nonlinear upturns in variables such as atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, surface temperatures, ocean chemistry, and biosphere integrity, often exceeding Holocene variability. Analyses of these trends, updated through 2010, correlate the shifts with amplified human pressures like fossil fuel emissions and land conversion.^[6]^[15] Atmospheric CO₂ concentration rose from approximately 310 ppm in 1950 to 389 ppm by 2010, compared to pre-industrial levels of 280 ppm around 1750, driven primarily by combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation. This post-1950 increase accounts for over 70% of the total rise since 1750, with annual emissions accelerating from about 5 GtC in the early 1950s to over 9 GtC by 2010. Stratospheric ozone levels declined sharply from the 1970s, reaching a minimum effective equivalent stratospheric chlorine of 3.7 ppb in the mid-1990s before partial recovery due to the Montreal Protocol, though the indicator reflects human-induced perturbation peaking within the acceleration period.^[12]^[23] Global mean surface temperature increased by about 0.6–0.7°C from 1950 to 2010, with the warming rate post-1950 averaging 0.13°C per decade, accelerating to 0.18°C per decade since 1980 based on instrumental records. Sea surface temperature anomalies followed suit, rising approximately 0.7°C over the same interval, contributing to altered ocean heat content and circulation patterns. These climate shifts exceed natural variability observed in paleoclimate proxies for the preceding millennia.^[24]^[25] Ocean surface pH declined by roughly 0.02–0.03 units from 1950 to 2010, part of a total pre-industrial drop of 0.1 units, equivalent to a 26–30% increase in hydrogen ion concentration due to CO₂ absorption. This acidification trend, accelerating with rising emissions, impacts marine carbonate chemistry and shell-forming organisms, with aragonite saturation states falling below 3 in many regions by the 2000s.^[26]^[27] Biogeochemical cycles show disruption, with reactive nitrogen deposition on land surging from under 5 Tg N/yr in 1950 to over 100 Tg N/yr by 2010, stemming from fertilizer production and fossil fuel combustion, which exceeds natural biological fixation rates and leads to eutrophication. Tropical forest area decreased by about 10–15% from 1950 to 2010, with annual deforestation rates peaking at 15–20 million hectares in the 1990s before slight declines, fragmenting habitats and releasing stored carbon.^[12] Biosphere integrity indicators reflect accelerated species loss, with global vertebrate population abundances declining by an estimated 50–60% from 1970 to 2010, and extinction rates 100–1,000 times background Holocene levels, driven by habitat destruction and overexploitation during the acceleration. Marine fish catch per unit effort dropped sharply post-1950 as stocks were depleted, with landings rising to a plateau around 80–90 million tonnes annually by the 1990s despite technological advances, signaling ecosystem overcapacity.^[28]^[29]

Underlying Causes

Technological and Industrial Drivers

The post-World War II era marked a pivotal shift in industrial capabilities, driven by the widespread adoption of high-energy technologies reliant on fossil fuels, which provided abundant, low-cost power for manufacturing and transportation. Global primary energy use, predominantly from coal, oil, and natural gas, accelerated sharply after 1950, mirroring surges in economic output and atmospheric CO2 concentrations without evidence of decoupling.^[30] Oil's proportion in total energy consumption rose rapidly during this period, fueled by major discoveries and infrastructure investments that enabled mechanized industry and global shipping on an unprecedented scale.^[31] This energy abundance underpinned the reconstruction of war-torn economies and the expansion of consumer-oriented production in the West, with total energy demand roughly doubling every few decades through the late 20th century.^[32] Advancements in the chemical sector, building on wartime synthetic processes, propelled the mass production of novel materials like plastics and fertilizers, transforming industrial output. Annual global plastics production escalated from 2 million metric tons in 1950 to approximately 390 million metric tons by 2021, derived largely from petrochemical feedstocks and enabling lightweight, durable goods that boosted efficiency in packaging, construction, and consumer products.^[33]^[34] The petrochemical industry's post-war boom, spurred by economic prosperity and rising demand for synthetics, repurposed military-era innovations—such as high-volume ethylene and propylene cracking—for civilian applications, with output growing exponentially through the 1960s.^[35] Similarly, nitrogen fertilizer consumption, a hallmark of industrialized agriculture, increased dramatically after 1950, supported by scaled-up Haber-Bosch processes and enabling yield gains that aligned with population pressures but intensified resource extraction.^[30] Manufacturing innovations, including refined assembly lines, automation, and containerization (introduced in 1956), reduced adoption lags for new technologies and amplified productivity, particularly in automobiles and appliances.^[36] Motor vehicle numbers worldwide exploded post-1950, from under 50 million in 1950 to over 1 billion by 2010, driven by affordable steel, engines, and road networks that integrated global supply chains.^[30] These developments collectively scaled human throughput, with industrial processes shifting toward capital-intensive methods that prioritized output volume over resource efficiency, laying the groundwork for sustained exponential growth in material flows.^[37]

Demographic and Economic Factors

The Great Acceleration's demographic drivers primarily stem from unprecedented post-World War II population growth, fueled by advances in public health, sanitation, and agriculture that drastically reduced mortality rates while fertility remained high initially. Global population expanded from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6.1 billion by 2000, with annual growth rates peaking at 2.1% in the late 1960s before gradually declining.^[11] This surge, part of the demographic transition's later stages, concentrated in developing regions and amplified demands on resources, infrastructure, and land use.^[38] Urbanization accelerated concurrently, transforming human settlement patterns and intensifying the Acceleration's footprint. In 1950, approximately 30% of the world's population—about 750 million people—lived in urban areas; by 2010, this proportion exceeded 50%, with urban dwellers numbering over 3.5 billion.^[3] This shift, driven by rural-to-urban migration in pursuit of economic opportunities and natural population increase in cities, concentrated economic activity, energy consumption, and emissions in megacities, particularly in Asia and Africa.^[39] Economically, the period witnessed explosive growth in global output and trade, underpinned by industrialization and liberalization. Real global GDP per capita rose more than threefold from 1950 to 2010, reflecting post-war reconstruction, technological diffusion, and the expansion of manufacturing in emerging economies.^[6] Industrial production indices similarly surged, with outputs increasing over 10-fold in the same timeframe, as nations like Japan, South Korea, and later China integrated into global supply chains.^[11] Globalization emerged as a pivotal economic amplifier, with international trade volumes expanding dramatically—merchandise trade grew from less than 10% of global GDP in 1950 to over 25% by 2008—facilitating resource extraction, capital flows, and consumption booms.^[40] Foreign direct investment inflows, negligible before the 1970s, ballooned to trillions annually by the 2000s, linking distant economies and homogenizing production patterns. Steffen et al. (2015) identify this triad—population increase, economic globalization, and rising per capita consumption—as the core causal mechanisms propelling the Acceleration's socio-economic trends.^[30] These factors, while enabling poverty reduction and technological progress, exerted compounding pressures on planetary boundaries through scaled-up material throughput and energy use.^[41]

Human Benefits and Achievements

Improvements in Living Standards

Global life expectancy at birth rose from approximately 46 years in 1950 to 73 years by 2023, reflecting advances in medicine, sanitation, and nutrition driven by post-war economic expansion and technological diffusion.^[42] The infant mortality rate declined from around 140 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1950 to 27 per 1,000 by 2023, with under-five mortality falling from 22% of births to 3.7%, attributable to vaccinations, antibiotics, and improved maternal care.^[43] Extreme poverty rates, measured at $2.15 per day (2017 PPP), decreased steadily from an estimated 50-60% of the global population in the mid-20th century, with annual declines averaging 0.5 percentage points from 1950 to 1990, accelerating thereafter due to trade liberalization, agricultural productivity gains, and industrialization in Asia.^[44] By 2019, the share living in extreme poverty had fallen below 10%, lifting over a billion people out of destitution since 1990 alone, though data precision for pre-1981 periods relies on historical reconstructions.^[45] Adult literacy rates climbed from about 56% in 1950 to over 86% by 2020, propelled by expanded primary education and compulsory schooling laws amid rising GDP per capita and urbanization.^[46] Access to electricity expanded dramatically, from limited availability in developing regions during the 1950s—covering perhaps 20-30% globally—to 90% of the population by 2020, enabling refrigeration, lighting, and mechanized agriculture that boosted productivity and reduced drudgery.^[47]^[48] These gains correlate with the socio-economic surges of the Great Acceleration, including a tripling of global GDP per capita since 1950 and widespread adoption of synthetic fertilizers and hybrid seeds, which increased average daily calorie supply from under 2,200 kcal in 1950 to over 2,900 kcal today, averting famines and enhancing physical well-being. Despite uneven distribution, with sub-Saharan Africa lagging, the period marked unprecedented human flourishing, as evidenced by composite human development indices rising globally.

Innovation and Resource Efficiency Gains

Innovations during the Great Acceleration period, particularly in materials science, energy technologies, and agriculture, have driven substantial improvements in resource efficiency, enabling economic expansion with relatively lower input intensities. Energy intensity, defined as primary energy consumption per unit of GDP, declined globally by about 40% from 1990 to 2020, with steeper reductions in developed economies traceable to post-World War II advancements such as more efficient electric motors, lighting (e.g., transition from incandescent to LED bulbs), and industrial automation that optimized fuel use in manufacturing.^[49] ^[50] In the United States, for example, energy use per dollar of GDP dropped from roughly 14,000 BTU in 1950 to under 6,000 BTU by 2020, attributable to innovations like variable-speed drives and cogeneration systems that recapture waste heat.^[51] Agricultural productivity surged through hybrid seeds, synthetic fertilizers, and mechanized irrigation introduced in the Green Revolution starting in the 1960s, which more than tripled global cereal yields from approximately 1.2 metric tons per hectare in 1961 to over 4 metric tons per hectare by 2020, according to FAO data.^[52] These gains reduced the land required per unit of output; for maize, yields rose from 1.8 tons per hectare in 1961 to nearly 6 tons by 2020, minimizing deforestation pressures despite population growth from 3 billion to over 7 billion since 1950.^[52] Precision farming technologies, including GPS-guided equipment and drip irrigation adopted widely post-1980s, further enhanced water and fertilizer efficiency, with studies showing up to 20-30% reductions in input use per crop while maintaining or increasing yields.^[53] Dematerialization trends, where economic value is generated with less physical material, exemplify efficiency in manufacturing and consumer goods. The weight of aluminum beverage cans decreased from 85 grams in the 1950s to under 13 grams by 2011 through thinner alloys and precise forming techniques, reducing material input by over 80% without compromising functionality.^[54] Similarly, peer-reviewed analyses indicate that material consumption per unit of GDP in advanced economies fell by 20-50% in key commodities like steel and copper since the 1970s, driven by substitution (e.g., composites for metals) and recycling innovations that recovered over 50% of metals by the 2000s.^[55] These developments reflect relative decoupling, with GDP growth outpacing resource extraction rates in OECD nations by factors of 2-3 since 1950, though absolute global resource use continued rising due to scale effects.^[55]

Environmental and Planetary Impacts

Resource Consumption and Pollution Trends

Global primary energy consumption has risen sharply since 1950, reflecting the core dynamics of the Great Acceleration, with total use increasing from approximately 90 exajoules (EJ) in 1950 to over 550 EJ by 2020, driven primarily by fossil fuels that accounted for more than 80% of supply throughout the period.^[56]^[57] This expansion correlates with a more than sixfold rise in carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels, escalating from about 6 gigatons (Gt) in 1950 to 37 Gt in 2022, with annual growth rates averaging 4-5% during peak acceleration phases post-1950.^[58]^[59] Synthetic fertilizer consumption, particularly nitrogen-based, has exhibited a similar exponential trajectory, surging from roughly 10 million tons in 1950 to over 100 million tons by 2010, amplifying agricultural productivity but also contributing to widespread nitrogen pollution through runoff and atmospheric emissions of nitrous oxide, a potent greenhouse gas.^[6] Global plastic production, emblematic of novel material demands, exploded from 2 million metric tons in 1950 to more than 450 million metric tons annually by the 2020s, with much of the waste accumulating in landfills and oceans, exacerbating microplastic contamination.^[60] Freshwater withdrawals for human use tripled between 1950 and 2010, reaching about 4,000 cubic kilometers per year, straining aquifers and rivers amid urbanization and industrial expansion.^[6] These trends underscore a decoupling of resource efficiency from absolute consumption levels, as population growth, industrialization, and rising per capita demands in developing economies propelled aggregate use despite technological gains in sectors like energy intensity, which improved by factors of 2-3 in advanced economies but lagged globally.^[56] Pollution metrics, including elevated atmospheric concentrations of methane and nitrous oxide—up 150% and 20% respectively since pre-industrial baselines, with acceleration post-1950—demonstrate cascading effects on air quality, ocean acidification (pH drop of 0.1 units), and nutrient cycles.^[6]^[58] Data from integrated assessments, such as those by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme, confirm these patterns through normalized indicators showing near-synchronous upticks in 12 key Earth system variables since 1950, contrasting with relative stability from 1750-1950.^[61]

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Changes

The Great Acceleration has coincided with accelerated habitat conversion and species population declines, primarily driven by agricultural expansion, urbanization, and resource extraction to support rising human populations and consumption. Empirical indicators reveal a marked intensification of these pressures post-1950, with global forest cover diminishing by approximately one-third over the last century, much of it during this period due to conversion for cropland and pasture.^[62] Wetland losses in regions like the United States have persisted at elevated rates since the mid-20th century, contributing to fragmentation of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.^[63] Vertebrate population trends, as tracked by the Living Planet Index, show an average 73% decline in monitored wildlife populations (mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, and fish) from 1970 to 2020, reflecting broader biodiversity erosion linked to land-use changes and overexploitation.^[64] This index, derived from over 34,000 population time-series, indicates sharper declines in freshwater (83%) and terrestrial (69%) systems compared to marine (56%), with acceleration evident in the post-1980 period.^[65] Insect populations have similarly plummeted, with studies documenting relative abundance losses for most butterfly species in Europe since the 1950s, attributed to habitat degradation and pesticide use.^[66] The IUCN Red List assesses over 48,600 species as threatened with extinction as of recent updates, with observed extinction rates exceeding background levels by factors estimated in peer-reviewed analyses, particularly for freshwater fishes where North American losses have risen 25% since 1989.^[67]^[68] Ecosystem alterations extend to structural changes, including soil degradation from intensive farming and ocean impacts from overfishing and acidification, which have reduced fishery stocks and coral reef integrity since mid-century. Deforestation rates, per FAO assessments, averaged 10 million hectares annually in recent decades, down from higher peaks in the 1990s but still reflecting cumulative post-1950 losses of hundreds of millions of hectares that have fragmented habitats and increased edge effects, favoring invasive species spread via global trade.^[69]^[70] While protected areas have expanded, net biodiversity intactness remains below thresholds for maintaining ecosystem services in many biomes, as evidenced by indicators of accelerating loss from the 1970s onward.^[71] These changes underscore causal links between socioeconomic surges—such as population doubling since the 1950s—and biophysical responses, with empirical data confirming human dominance in driving extinction debts and regime shifts in ecosystems.^[63]^[72]

Debates and Controversies

Anthropocene Linkages and Geological Implications

The Great Acceleration, commencing around 1950, is posited by many researchers as the onset of the Anthropocene epoch due to the abrupt, globally synchronous escalation in human-induced changes detectable in the stratigraphic record. This period coincides with sharp upturns in Earth system indicators, such as atmospheric CO₂ concentrations rising from 310 ppm in 1950 to over 400 ppm by 2010, and nitrogen deposition increasing dramatically from fertilizer use. These trends, illustrated in updated datasets spanning 1750–2010, mark a departure from Holocene variability, embedding human fingerprints like altered biogeochemical cycles into sediments, ice cores, and marine deposits.^[6] Stratigraphic markers from the Great Acceleration include the plutonium-239/240 anomaly from thermonuclear testing (1945–1963), peaking in 1963 and proposed as the primary "golden spike" for the Anthropocene base at 1952 CE, as evidenced in varved sediments from Crawford Lake, Ontario. Additional signals encompass fly ash particles from high-temperature combustion, microplastics, synthetic radionuclides, and homogenised pollen assemblages reflecting biodiversity shifts and land-use intensification. These novel lithologies and biostratigraphic patterns, preserved globally, indicate a causal linkage between intensified socio-economic activity—such as population growth from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 6 billion by 2000—and geological transformation, with persistence expected for hundreds of thousands of years in the rock record.^[73]^[74] Geological implications extend to the formation of Anthropocene strata characterized by unprecedented rates of sedimentation from dams and urban fill, alongside geochemical anomalies in heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants. Proponents, including the Anthropocene Working Group, argue this array constitutes an "Event Array" aligning with the mid-20th century acceleration, distinguishing it from earlier, more regionally variable human impacts like those from the Industrial Revolution. However, formal ratification as an epoch was rejected in March 2024 by the International Commission on Stratigraphy's Subcommission on Quaternary Stratigraphy (12–4 vote), citing the proposed unit's brevity relative to typical geological epochs and debates over whether pre-1950 alterations, such as the 1610 "Orbis spike" in carbon isotopes from colonial-era deforestation, suffice for an earlier boundary.^[75]^[76]^[77] Critics of the 1950 start emphasize that geological epochs should reflect enduring, planetary-scale signals rather than a transient acceleration phase, potentially better classified as an event within the Holocene. This perspective underscores methodological challenges in defining epoch boundaries amid asynchronous regional impacts, though empirical evidence confirms the Great Acceleration's role in amplifying causal human dominance over Earth's systems. Despite non-formalization, the stratigraphic legacy of post-1950 changes remains a focal point for assessing long-term planetary boundaries.^[78]^[79]

Acceleration vs. Decoupling Narratives

The acceleration narrative posits that the exponential trends of the Great Acceleration, characterized by surging population, economic output, and resource consumption since the mid-20th century, continue unabated into the 21st century, with environmental impacts remaining tightly coupled to human activity. Updated analyses of Great Acceleration indicators through 2020 reveal persistent upward trajectories in key earth system metrics, such as atmospheric CO2 concentrations rising from 315 ppm in 1950 to over 410 ppm by 2020, and global mean surface temperature anomalies increasing by approximately 1.1°C relative to pre-industrial levels, driven by cumulative fossil fuel emissions exceeding 500 gigatons of carbon. Proponents, including researchers from the Anthropocene Working Group, argue that despite efficiency gains, total resource extraction—such as 96 billion tons of materials annually by 2019—has accelerated, confounding efforts to stabilize planetary boundaries like biodiversity intactness, which has declined by 68% since 1970 according to living planet indices. This view emphasizes causal linkages where economic growth multipliers outpace dematerialization rates, as evidenced by global primary energy use quintupling since 1950 while per capita GDP rose tenfold. In contrast, the decoupling narrative contends that technological innovation, policy interventions, and efficiency improvements enable economic expansion without proportional environmental degradation, potentially averting further acceleration. Empirical evidence includes relative decoupling in global carbon intensity, where CO2 emissions per unit of GDP fell by 36% from 1990 to 2020, attributed to shifts toward renewables and energy-efficient technologies in high-income economies. Absolute decoupling has occurred in select metrics and regions; for instance, 32 of 116 studied countries achieved reductions in production-based CO2 emissions alongside GDP growth between 2015 and 2019, primarily in Europe and parts of North America, with the EU reducing emissions by 24% from 1990 levels while GDP grew 62%. Advocates cite material footprint trends in affluent nations, where per capita consumption decoupled from GDP after development thresholds, dropping in some cases post-2000 due to circular economy practices and substitution effects. This perspective draws on econometric models showing potential for "green growth," where innovation rebounds are offset by induced efficiencies, as in Japan's material productivity rising 2.5-fold since 1980.^[80]^[81] The debate hinges on the distinction between relative and absolute decoupling, with acceleration proponents highlighting insufficient global-scale evidence for the latter amid rebound effects—where efficiency savings spur additional consumption—and offshoring of impacts to developing economies. Peer-reviewed syntheses indicate no widespread absolute decoupling for aggregate resource use or biodiversity loss; total global material extraction grew 190% from 1970 to 2017 despite productivity gains, and greenhouse gas emissions reached 59 gigatons CO2-equivalent in 2019, up 54% since 1990. Critics of decoupling, including analyses from ecological economists, argue that historical patterns align more with Jevons paradox, where efficiency drives greater overall throughput, as seen in U.S. vehicle fuel economy improvements correlating with increased total vehicle miles traveled. While high-income countries exhibit partial successes, global trends reflect continued coupling, with emissions in non-OECD nations rising 200% since 2000, underscoring that localized decoupling does not aggregate to planetary stabilization without systemic contraction in high-consumption regions.^[82]^[83]

Criticisms and Skeptical Perspectives

Overemphasis on Negative Impacts

Critics of the Great Acceleration narrative argue that its portrayal of post-1950 human expansion as predominantly destructive selectively highlights environmental metrics while downplaying concurrent gains in human welfare and adaptive capacities. During this era, global life expectancy rose from 46.5 years in 1950 to 73.4 years by 2023, driven by advancements in medicine, sanitation, and nutrition enabled by economic growth.^[42] Extreme poverty rates, measured as living on less than $2.15 per day (2017 PPP), plummeted from approximately 40% of the global population in the early 1950s to under 9% by 2019, lifting over 1.9 billion people out of destitution through industrialization and trade. Literacy rates surged from about 20% in 1950 to 87% by 2020, correlating with expanded access to education and technology.^[46] Such proponents as Will Steffen and colleagues emphasize "hockey stick" spikes in earth system indicators like CO2 concentrations (from 310 ppm in 1950 to over 420 ppm by 2023) and biodiversity loss, framing them as existential threats breaching planetary boundaries. However, skeptics including Bjørn Lomborg contend this focus exaggerates harms relative to benefits, noting that integrated assessments show climate-related damages equivalent to just 2-3% of global GDP by 2100 under moderate warming scenarios, far outweighed by growth-driven prosperity. For instance, carbon dioxide fertilization has increased global vegetation cover by 14% between 1982 and 2015, enhancing crop yields and carbon sinks, countering narratives of uniform ecological collapse. Moreover, death rates from climate-exacerbated disasters have declined over 90% per capita since the 1920s, from 538,000 annually to under 20,000 by the 2010s, attributable to improved forecasting, infrastructure, and wealth accumulation rather than reduced emissions. In developed nations, air pollution fatalities have fallen sharply despite GDP tripling since 1950, due to technological decoupling—e.g., U.S. sulfur dioxide emissions dropped 90% from 1970 to 2020 while the economy expanded. Critics attribute the narrative's negativity to institutional incentives in academia and environmental organizations, where alarm sustains funding and influence, often sidelining empirical evidence of resilience and innovation. This perspective holds that the Great Acceleration's socio-economic surges have empirically enhanced human flourishing, with environmental costs manageable through continued progress rather than deceleration.

Methodological and Interpretive Flaws

Critics contend that the Great Acceleration's foundational graphs, which plot absolute global values for indicators like population, GDP, and resource consumption from 1750 onward, fail to normalize for key confounders such as population growth, which rose from 2.5 billion in 1950 to 7.0 billion by 2010. This aggregation obscures per capita trends and efficiency gains; for example, while absolute primary energy use increased over 15-fold post-1950, energy intensity (energy per unit GDP) declined globally by about 50% from 1990 to 2020 due to technological improvements, a distinction masked in unadjusted depictions. Such methodological reliance on totals conflates scale effects from demographic expansion with intensified human impacts, leading to overstated inferences of uniform, uncontrolled escalation. Interpretive challenges arise from selective emphasis on metrics exhibiting sharp post-1950 upturns, often without disaggregating by region or income level, which the framework's originators later acknowledged hides inequities—e.g., developed nations drove early acceleration, while developing regions accelerated later amid poverty reduction. This overlooks divergent trajectories, such as stabilizing per capita emissions in OECD countries since the 1970s amid continued GDP growth, evidencing partial decoupling not captured in holistic narratives. Causal claims linking all Earth system shifts (e.g., CO2 rise, nitrogen flows) predominantly to anthropogenic acceleration sidestep quantification of natural variability; for instance, pre-1950 biodiversity declines from habitat loss totaled 20-30% in some taxa, predating the era's purported dominance. Additional flaws include arbitrary baseline selection around 1950, which amplifies perceived novelty despite earlier Industrial Revolution surges in emissions and urbanization, and insufficient econometric testing for spurious correlations versus true causality. Interpretations frequently extrapolate linear trends into inevitable tipping points without probabilistic modeling of adaptation or innovation feedbacks, as global sulfur dioxide emissions peaked in the 1970s and fell 25% by 2019 despite economic expansion, driven by scrubber technologies and fuel shifts. This underplays causal realism, prioritizing alarmist aggregation over granular, verifiable drivers like policy and substitution effects.

Recent Trends and Future Outlook

Post-2000 Developments

Updated analyses of Great Acceleration indicators through 2010 confirm the persistence of rapid socio-economic growth, with no evident slowdown in the post-2000 period. Global population increased from approximately 6.17 billion in 2000 to 7.0 billion by 2011, driven primarily by expansion in non-OECD countries. Real GDP continued its exponential trajectory, reflecting sustained economic expansion dominated by OECD consumption patterns but with rising contributions from emerging economies. Other drivers, such as foreign direct investment and urbanization, exhibited similar upward trends, underscoring the ongoing intensification of human enterprise.^[6]^[84] Extending beyond 2010, key metrics further illustrate continuity in the acceleration. World population reached 8.09 billion by 2023, a 31% rise from 2000 levels, though annual growth rates have declined to around 0.9%. Global nominal GDP expanded from $33.6 trillion in 2000 to over $105 trillion in 2023, more than tripling amid industrialization in Asia and other developing regions. Primary energy consumption grew from roughly 430 exajoules in 2000 to 620 exajoules in 2023, with fossil fuels maintaining over 75% share despite efficiency gains and renewable deployment. These trends highlight absolute increases in resource demands, even as per capita efficiencies improve in advanced economies.^[85]^[86]^[87] Corresponding Earth system impacts have intensified post-2000, with few signs of abatement. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions from fossil fuels rose from about 25 gigatons in 2000 to 37.8 gigatons in 2023, fueling atmospheric concentrations that hit 422.7 ppm in 2024—the highest in at least 800,000 years. Global surface temperatures accelerated, with the 2011-2020 decade marking the fastest warming rate on record and 2023 as the warmest year observed, exceeding pre-industrial levels by 1.45°C on average. Exceptions include stratospheric ozone stabilization due to phase-out of chlorofluorocarbons under the Montreal Protocol and a plateau in atmospheric methane growth around 2000-2010, though methane has since resumed rising. Land modification expanded, converting 1.6 million km² of natural habitat between 1990 and 2015, primarily for agriculture and urban development.^[58]^[88]^[89]^[6] While some analyses suggest stuttering in relative growth rates—such as slower population expansion and partial decoupling of emissions from GDP in OECD nations—absolute pressures on planetary systems have not diminished. Post-2000 surges in non-OECD indicators, including fertilizer use, paper production, and motor vehicle numbers, have shifted much of the acceleration to developing regions, complicating global mitigation efforts. These developments affirm the Great Acceleration's endurance into the 21st century, with empirical data indicating heightened risks to Earth system stability absent transformative interventions.^[90]^[3]

Prospects for Managed Acceleration

Efforts to manage the Great Acceleration center on achieving absolute decoupling of economic growth from resource consumption and environmental pressures, enabling continued human development without transgressing planetary boundaries. Absolute decoupling, where resource use or emissions decline in absolute terms despite GDP growth, has occurred in 32 countries—primarily high-income nations—for production-based CO2 emissions between 2015 and recent years, driven by efficiency gains and shifts to services.^[80] ^[91] However, global evidence for sustained absolute decoupling remains limited; material resource use continues to rise in tandem with economic expansion, with no historical precedent for economy-wide decoupling at planetary scales.^[92] ^[83] Technological innovation offers pathways to bend acceleration curves, as seen in historical successes like the Montreal Protocol's phase-out of ozone-depleting substances, which stabilized atmospheric concentrations without halting industrial growth. Advances in energy efficiency, renewable integration, and digital optimization could reduce environmental footprints; for instance, projections indicate technological progress might curb CO2 emissions growth, though not eliminate it, with global emissions potentially falling 25% by 2050 under optimistic scenarios incorporating efficiency and low-carbon sources.^[93] ^[94] Yet, such outcomes depend on scaling high-density energy like nuclear power and overcoming intermittency in renewables, amid regulatory and investment barriers that have slowed deployment in many regions.^[95] Demographic trends support managed stabilization, with global fertility rates at 2.3 births per woman in 2023—below replacement in most developed nations—and projections for world population to peak at around 10.4 billion by the 2080s before declining, easing pressure on resources. In agriculture and materials, precision technologies and circular economies could enhance yields and recycling rates, but developing economies' acceleration in consumption—projected to drive a 60% rise in global resource use by 2060—poses risks if decoupling lags.^[96] ^[97] Policy frameworks, such as updated planetary boundaries identifying four transgressed limits (climate change, biosphere integrity, land use, biogeochemical flows), provide diagnostic tools for targeted interventions rather than blanket limits.^[98] Critics argue these boundaries oversimplify local variability and favor top-down governance over adaptive, evidence-based strategies, potentially stifling innovation.^[93] Empirical data post-2000 shows mixed progress: emissions growth has slowed in some sectors due to tech, but overall Earth system indicators like biodiversity loss and nitrogen pollution continue upward trajectories, underscoring that management requires causal focus on root drivers like energy abundance and institutional reforms over symbolic measures.^[6]

References

[1]
The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
Jan 16, 2015 · The 'Great Acceleration' graphs, originally published in 2004 to show socio-economic and Earth System trends from 1750 to 2000, have now been updated to 2010.
[2]
The Great Acceleration | Future Earth
Jan 16, 2015 · A dashboard of 24 indicators which depict the dramatic acceleration in human enterprise and the impacts on the Earth system over the last two centuries.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
Planetary dashboard shows “Great Acceleration” in human activity ...
Jan 15, 2015 · Co-author IGBP Deputy Director, Dr Wendy Broadgate said, “The Great Acceleration indicators allow us to distinguish the signal from the noise.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for ...
Nov 17, 2021 · A phenomenon termed the 'Great Acceleration'. It coincides with massive increases in global human-con- sumed energy and shows the Earth System now on a tra- ...
[5]
[PDF] The Great Acceleration is real and provides a quantitative basis for ...
He concluded that the Great Acceleration data cannot be used to support a beginning for the Anthropocene, and indeed with no sud- den intensification of ...
[6]
The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
The 'Great Acceleration' graphs, originally published in 2004 to show socio-economic and Earth System trends from 1750 to 2000, have now been updated to 2010.Missing: key | Show results with:key
[7]
The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the ... - BioOne
The exponential character of the Great Acceleration is obvious from our quantification of the human imprint on the Earth System, using atmospheric CO2 ...
[8]
From Anthropocene to Noosphere: The Great Acceleration
Dec 14, 2020 · This world-historical inflection after the Second World War has been identified as the beginning of the Great Acceleration (McNeill & Engelke, ...Missing: onset II
[9]
Atomic bombs and oil addiction herald Earth's new epoch - Science
Aug 24, 2016 · But they must capture the "Great Acceleration": the postwar period when fossil fuel combustion took off, says Jan Zalasiewicz, a geologist at ...
[10]
An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945 - resilience
The Great Acceleration explains its causes and consequences, highlighting the role of energy systems, as well as trends in climate change, urbanization, and ...
[11]
Great Acceleration - IGBP
The effects of the accelerating human changes are now clearly discernible at the Earth system level. Many key indicators of the functioning of the Earth system ...
[12]
(PDF) The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
Feb 17, 2015 · The 'Great Acceleration' graphs, originally published in 2004 to show socio-economic and Earth System trends from 1750 to 2000, have now been updated to 2010.
[13]
[PDF] The Trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
May 16, 2016 · The original Great Acceleration graphs are based on the research of the International Geosphere-Biosphere. Programme. We thank Olivier ...Missing: concept | Show results with:concept
[14]
Introducing the Anthropocene: The human epoch: This article ...
Mar 15, 2021 · 2004), and the term 'Great Acceleration' was first used in the Dahlem workshop (Hibbard et al. 2006). The SCM paper foreshadowed the debate ...<|separator|>
[15]
The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
The 'Great Acceleration' graphs, originally published in 2004 to show socio-economic and Earth System trends from 1750 to 2000, have now been updated to 2010.
[16]
New planetary dashboard shows 'great acceleration' in human ...
Jan 15, 2015 · The term 'Great Acceleration' was not used until 2005 at the Dahlem Conference on the history of the human-environment relationship, which ...
[17]
Chapter 4. Population Change in the U.S. and the World from 1950 ...
Jan 30, 2014 · From 1950 to 2010, the world population increased from 2.5 billion to 6.9 billion, or by 174%. The average annual rate of growth—1.7%—was much ...<|separator|>
[18]
Population | United Nations
In 1950, five years after the founding of the United Nations, world population was estimated at around 2.6 billion people. It reached 5 billion in 1987 and ...
[19]
World GDP | Historical Chart & Data - Macrotrends
World GDP for 2020 was 85.763 trillion US dollars, a 2.71% decline from 2019. GDP at purchaser's prices is the sum of gross value added by all resident ...
[20]
Global GDP over the long run - Our World in Data
Total output of the world economy. These historical estimates of GDP are adjusted for inflation. We combine three sources to create this time series: the ...
[21]
[PDF] The speed of urbanization around the world | Population Division
1950, only 30 per cent of the world's population lived in urban areas, a proportion that grew to 55 per cent by 2018. The global urbanization rate masks ...
[22]
Urbanization - Our World in Data
Populations urbanize as they get richer Here we see a strong relationship between urbanization and income: as countries get richer, they tend to become more ...
[23]
Global anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide, 1750-2022
Jun 9, 2025 · Anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions increased from about 9000 kilotons in 1750 to approximately 36 million tons in 2022—a 4000-fold ...Missing: Great Acceleration
[24]
Climate change: global temperature
May 29, 2025 · Earth's temperature has risen by an average of 0.11° Fahrenheit (0.06° Celsius) per decade since 1850, or about 2° F in total.Global-surface-temperature... · Images and Media: 2024...Missing: post | Show results with:post
[25]
Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature - EPA
Global average surface temperature has risen at an average rate of 0.17°F per decade since 1901 (Figure 2), similar to the rate of warming within the contiguous ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
[26]
Global Surface Ocean Acidification Indicators From 1750 to 2100
Mar 23, 2023 · From 1750 to 2000, the average pH of the global surface ocean decreased by ∼0.11 units, equivalent to an acidity increase of ∼30% (Caldeira & ...
[27]
Ocean acidification | Indicators | European Environment Agency (EEA)
Oct 3, 2025 · Ocean acidity has increased by approximately 30% since the pre-industrial era, corresponding to a pH decline of about 0.1 units.
[28]
Accelerated modern human–induced species losses - Science
Jun 19, 2015 · These estimates reveal an exceptionally rapid loss of biodiversity over the last few centuries, indicating that a sixth mass extinction is already under way.
[29]
6 charts that show the state of biodiversity and nature loss
Oct 17, 2022 · The WWF's Living Planet Report 2022 finds wildlife populations have declined by an average 69% in the past 50 years. These six charts outline ...
[30]
[PDF] The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration
What have now become known as the 'Great Acceleration' graphs were originally designed and constructed as part of the synthesis project of the International ...
[31]
World wars and the age of oil: Exploring directionality in deep ...
Sep 4, 2020 · The post-World War II era saw the share of oil in energy consumption rapidly increase with abundant supplies of oil products seen as key in ...
[32]
[PDF] The Evolution of Commodity Markets Over the Past Century
May 11, 2022 · Although the demand for energy has long tracked economic growth, its consumption accelerated after WWII (figure 1.1). At the start of the 20th ...<|separator|>
[33]
Global plastics production - Our World in Data
The data on plastic production from 1950 to 2015 are based on the research by Greyer et al., published in 2017. For the years 2016 to 2018, the figures were ...
[34]
Annual production of plastics worldwide from 1950 to 2021 [5].
Global plastic production has surged from 2 million metric tons in 1950 to approximately 390.7 million metric tons by 2021, with an annual growth rate of about ...
[35]
A Brief History of the Petrochemical Industry
After WWII, the petrochemical industry experienced a dramatic expansion. Economic prosperity, suburban growth, and the rise of consumerism fueled demand for ...
[36]
Technology Diffusion and Postwar Growth
We find that the reduction in the lag with which new technologies were adopted after WWII is significantly associated with faster postwar growth in per capita ...
[37]
Barry Commoner and the Great Acceleration | Climate & Capitalism
Jun 29, 2014 · Unfortunately, while the scientific papers that discuss the Great Acceleration provide a wealth of empirical data, they offer little insight ...<|separator|>
[38]
Human population growth and the demographic transition - PMC
This paper summarizes key trends in population size, fertility and mortality, and age structures during these transitions.
[39]
Booms, Busts, and Echoes Around the World - SpringerLink
Oct 1, 2025 · The Great Acceleration follows the path of urbanization, as it is driven mostly by urban residents, who use most of the world's energy and hold ...
[40]
Anthropocene : the “Great Acceleration” driven by human activities ...
Apr 25, 2015 · Co-author IGBP Deputy Director, Dr Wendy Broadgate said, “The Great Acceleration indicators allow us to distinguish the signal from the noise.<|separator|>
[41]
The Great Acceleration — Globaïa
The Great Acceleration is a term used to describe the rapid and widespread increase in human activity and its impact on Earth's natural systems.Missing: IGBP | Show results with:IGBP
[42]
Life Expectancy - Our World in Data
Across the world, people are living longer. In 1900, the average life expectancy of a newborn was 32 years. By 2021 this had more than doubled to 71 years.Life expectancy: what does this · Twice as long · Than in other rich countries? · HasMissing: sources: | Show results with:sources:
[43]
Under-five mortality - Child survival - UNICEF Data
Mar 1, 2025 · The global under-five mortality rate declined by 61 per cent, from 94 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 37 in 2023. Despite this ...Missing: 1950 | Show results with:1950
[44]
Estimates of global poverty from WWII to the fall of the Berlin Wall
Nov 23, 2022 · On average, poverty declined by 0.5 percentage points annually from 1950 to 1990. This rate of poverty reduction then doubled to 1 percentage ...
[45]
Extreme poverty: How far have we come, and how far do we still ...
Nov 22, 2021 · Moatsos writes, “It took 136 years from 1820 for our global poverty rate to fall under 50%, then another 45 years to cut this rate in half again ...
[46]
Literacy - Our World in Data
From a historical perspective, literacy levels for the world population have risen drastically in the last couple of centuries. While only one in ten people in ...
[47]
Access to Energy - Our World in Data
According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), 'access to electricity ... Global access to electricity has been steadily rising in recent decades.
[48]
Access to electricity (% of population) - World Bank Open Data
Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population) · Access to electricity, rural (% of rural population) · Electricity production from oil sources (% of total).Kenya · Uganda · Liberia · Zambia
[49]
Energy intensity - Our World in Data
Energy intensity is measured as primary energy consumption per unit of gross domestic product (GDP), in kilowatt-hours per dollar.Missing: decline post WWII<|separator|>
[50]
How has the knowledge economy affected energy use?
Feb 3, 2025 · Energy intensity, measured by primary energy use (joules) divided by global GDP, has been declining for the past century. The industrial ...
[51]
U.S. energy facts explained - consumption and production - EIA
The contribution of coal to total U.S. energy consumption has declined from about 37% in 1950 to 9% in 2023, largely because the U.S. electric power sector has ...Data & statistics · State and U.S. territory data · Imports and exports<|separator|>
[52]
Crop Yields - Our World in Data
Improvements in crop yields have been essential to feed a growing population while reducing the environmental impact of food production at the same time.
[53]
Accelerating Agricultural Productivity Growth for a Sustainable ...
Accelerating agricultural productivity growth is fundamental to meeting today's challenges and building more sustainable, resilient systems to withstand ...
[54]
Markets and Dematerialization - Human Progress
Jan 12, 2022 · Aluminum cans weighed 85 grams when introduced in the 1950s. By 2011, the average can was under 13 grams. Cans today are not only thinner and ...
[55]
Dematerialization: Variety, caution, and persistence - PNAS
Sep 2, 2008 · Dematerialization, represented by declining consumption per GDP of energy or of goods, offers some hope for rising environmental quality with development.<|separator|>
[56]
Energy Production and Consumption - Our World in Data
averaging around 1% to 2% per year. Primary energy consumption. Total energy ...
[57]
World Energy Consumption, 1965-2020
While coal accounted for 39% of all energy consumption in 1965, this share declined to 27% in 2020. Meanwhile, the share of oil declined as well.
[58]
CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Our World in Data
Human greenhouse gas emissions have increased global average temperatures. Human emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are the primary drivers ...
[59]
Global CO2 Emissions Through Time (1950–2022) - Visual Capitalist
Dec 11, 2023 · With that said, global emissions have still risen from 25 billion tonnes in 2000 to 37 billion in 2022, which is another all-time high. Today, ...
[60]
Plastic Pollution - Our World in Data
Plastic production has sharply increased over the last 70 years. In 1950, the world produced just two million tonnes. It now produces over 450 million tonnes.Global plastics production · How much plastic waste ends... · In our oceans
[61]
[PDF] The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration - MAHB
The 'Great Acceleration' graphs, originally published in 2004 to show socio-economic and. Earth System trends from 1750 to 2000, have now been updated to 2010.
[62]
The world has lost one-third of its forests, but an end to deforestation ...
Over the last 10,000 years, the world has lost one-third of its forests. An area twice the size of the United States. Half occurred in the last century.
[63]
[PDF] Loss of Biological Diversity - National Science Foundation
The global human population, now 5.2 billion, has dou bled in size since the early 1950's. ... The current rate of wetlands loss in the United States is probably.
[64]
WWF LPR: Wildlife Populations Down 73% Since 1970
Oct 9, 2024 · *The Living Planet Index shows an average 73% decline in monitored vertebrate wildlife populations (mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles and ...
[65]
Living Planet Index: what does it really mean? - Our World in Data
Living Planet Index, World It tells us that between 1970 and 2020, on average, there was a 73% decline in population size across the 34,000 studied populations.
[66]
Long-term large-scale decline in relative abundances of butterfly ...
Oct 17, 2019 · Our data document a significant loss of relative abundance for most species, especially since the 1950s until today. Species demanding specific ...
[67]
IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
Currently, there are more than 172,600 species on The IUCN Red List, with more than 48,600 species threatened with extinction, including 44% of reef building ...Citing The IUCN Red List · Searching The IUCN Red List · How the Red List is Used
[68]
[PDF] Extinction Rates in North American Freshwater Fishes, 19002010
Sep 21, 2012 · Since 1989, the numbers of extinct North American fishes have increased by 25%. From the end of the nineteenth century to the present, modern ...<|separator|>
[69]
Deforestation and Forest Loss - Our World in Data
The UN FAO estimates that 10 million hectares of forest are cut down each year. This interactive map shows deforestation rates across the world. Read more about ...
[70]
2.1 Deforestation and forest degradation persist
The FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment (FRA) 2020 estimated that 420 million ha of forest was deforested (converted to other land uses) between 1990 and ...Missing: 1950 | Show results with:1950
[71]
Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines - Science
Apr 29, 2010 · As there were fewer indicators with trend data in the 1970s, we recalculated the index from 1980, which also showed accelerating biodiversity.
[72]
Half-millennium evidence suggests that extinction debts of global ...
Dec 13, 2022 · In particular, the historical forest reduction rate was consistently high in many parts of East Asia, Europe, North America, tropical Africa, ...
[73]
Working Group on the 'Anthropocene'
Les strates de la ville de l'Anthropocène. Annels, Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 72(2): 329-351. Zalasiewicz, J, Waters, CN & Head, MJ 2017. Anthropocene ...
[74]
Epochs, events and episodes: Marking the geological impact of ...
Nested within the AME are many geologically correlatable events, the most notable being those of the Great Acceleration Event Array (GAEA). This isochronous ...
[75]
It's final: the Anthropocene is not an epoch, despite protest over vote
Mar 20, 2024 · A high-profile battle over whether to designate the 'Anthropocene' as a new geological epoch has come to an end.Missing: formalization | Show results with:formalization
[76]
Did the Anthropocene start in 1950 – or much earlier? Here's why ...
Jul 18, 2023 · This phenomenon has been dubbed the Great Acceleration. The disagreement speaks to something vital to science – the ability to accommodate ...
[77]
The Anthropocene is dead. Long live the Anthropocene | Science
Mar 5, 2024 · Science has confirmed that a panel of two dozen geologists has voted down a proposal to end the Holocene—our current span of geologic time, ...Missing: formalization | Show results with:formalization
[78]
What's Next for the Anthropocene? - Eos.org
Apr 23, 2024 · Researchers weigh in on the meaning and aftermath of the decision to reject designating “Anthropocene” as an official geological epoch.Missing: formalization | Show results with:formalization
[79]
Response to Merritts et al. (2023): The Anthropocene is complex ...
... geological events, and the Anthropocene would therefore conform to standard event-stratigraphic practice with the Great Acceleration Event Array (GAEA).
[80]
Evidence of decoupling consumption-based CO2 emissions from ...
Nov 19, 2021 · We found that 32 out of 116 countries (mainly developed ones) achieved absolute decoupling between GDP and production-based emissions in recent years (2015– ...
[81]
World economies' progress in decoupling from CO2 emissions
Sep 3, 2024 · For most countries, the evidence shows that economic growth is still associated with more carbon emissions, which indicates that the decoupling ...
[82]
Unsustainable prosperity? Decoupling wellbeing, economic growth ...
We offer the first long-term analysis of decoupling patterns between an augmented human development index (AHDI) and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe).
[83]
A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource ...
Primary energy can be decoupled from GDP largely to the extent to which the conversion of primary energy to useful exergy is improved.
[84]
World Population by Year - Worldometer
World Population by Year ; 2000, 6,171,702,993, 1.36%, 82,696,654, 41 ; 1999, 6,089,006,339, 1.36%, 81,939,649, 41.
[85]
World Population Clock: 8.2 Billion People (LIVE, 2025) - Worldometer
World Population (2025 and historical) ; 2024, 8,161,972,572, 0.87% ; 2023, 8,091,734,930, 0.88% ; 2022, 8,021,407,192, 0.84% ; 2021, 7,954,448,391, 0.86% ...
[86]
GDP (current US$) - World Bank Open Data
GDP (current US$). Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks; National Accounts data files, Organisation for Economic ...World · United States · Turkiye · GermanyMissing: 1950 | Show results with:1950
[87]
https://www.statista.com/topics/4042/global-energy-consumption/
[88]
Rate and impact of climate change surges dramatically in 2011-2020
Dec 5, 2023 · The rate of climate change surged alarmingly between 2011-2020, which was the warmest decade on record.<|control11|><|separator|>
[89]
Climate change indicators reached record levels in 2023: WMO
Mar 19, 2024 · The WMO report confirmed that 2023 was the warmest year on record, with the global average near-surface temperature at 1.45 °Celsius.Missing: Acceleration | Show results with:Acceleration
[90]
The great acceleration: is it ending and what comes next?
Jun 30, 2023 · The great acceleration - in GDP, population, cities, travel, deforestation, pollution - is on some metrics stuttering.Missing: factors | Show results with:factors
[91]
Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth and Emissions in 32 ...
Apr 6, 2021 · Signs point to the decoupling the world has experienced between economic growth and CO2 emissions becoming absolute.
[92]
[PDF] Decoupling debunked - European Environmental Bureau
Proponents of what has been named “green growth” argue that technological progress and structural change will enable a decoupling of natural resources ...
[93]
Can Humanity's 'Great Acceleration' Be Managed and, If So, How?
### Summary of Prospects for Managing the Great Acceleration
[94]
CO2 emissions projected to fall 25% by 2050 | ExxonMobil
Aug 28, 2025 · CO₂ emissions fall 25% by 2050, but more progress is needed · Efficiency improvements and renewables are necessary but not a complete solution.
[95]
The role of technological innovation in enhancing resource ...
This research employs the CS-ARDL approach to explore the intricate connection between patent applications and fossil fuel consumption.1. Introduction · 2. Literature Review · 5. Empirical Outcomes
[96]
Global sustainable resource consumption needed urgently, UN ...
Mar 4, 2024 · Global natural resource consumption is predicted to increase by 60% by 2060, compared with 2020 levels, according to the United Nations Environment Programme.Missing: Great | Show results with:Great<|control11|><|separator|>
[97]
[PDF] Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060 - OECD
The projected trend in the developing countries is much more one of acceleration of both economic activity and materials use, with less room for decoupling.
[98]
https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1259855