Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Decoupling

Decoupling in economics denotes the deliberate policy-driven process of reducing mutual dependencies in trade, investment, supply chains, and technology transfers between major economies, most prominently the United States and China, to mitigate geopolitical risks and safeguard national security interests.^[1]^[2] This approach contrasts with prior globalization trends by prioritizing resilience over efficiency, often through measures like export controls, investment screening, and incentives for domestic production or diversification to allied nations.^[3] The concept gained prominence during the U.S.-China trade tensions initiated in 2018, evolving from tariffs into broader restrictions on high-technology sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and telecommunications, where empirical analyses indicate pre-existing deglobalization patterns accelerated by state policies rather than market forces alone.^[4] Proponents argue it addresses causal vulnerabilities exposed by events like the COVID-19 supply disruptions and intellectual property concerns, fostering "friend-shoring" to countries with aligned values, though data show only partial shifts, with U.S. imports from China declining modestly while overall trade volumes persist.^[5]^[6] Notable achievements include enhanced U.S. policy tools for technology protection, such as the CHIPS Act subsidizing domestic semiconductor manufacturing, yet controversies center on substantial economic costs, with models estimating short-term welfare losses up to five times higher than long-term adjustments due to disrupted efficiencies and higher input prices.^[7] Critics highlight risks of retaliatory measures inflating global fragmentation, empirical evidence underscoring that full separation remains improbable given entrenched value chains, while partial decoupling may inadvertently spur Chinese self-reliance in strategic domains.^[8]^[3] This tension reflects deeper causal realities of interdependence, where security imperatives challenge the empirical benefits of integrated markets historically driving growth.

Economic Decoupling

Geopolitical and Trade Decoupling

Geopolitical and trade decoupling encompasses deliberate policy measures by the United States and its allies to diminish economic interdependence with China, driven primarily by national security risks, forced technology transfers, and vulnerabilities exposed in global supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. These efforts intensified after the U.S. Department of Justice's 2018 indictment of Chinese entities for intellectual property theft and the subsequent Section 301 tariffs imposed by the Trump administration on approximately $380 billion of Chinese goods, citing unfair trade practices including subsidies and market distortions.^[9]^[10] Under the Biden administration, decoupling advanced through technology-specific restrictions, including the May 2019 addition of Huawei to the U.S. Entity List, which barred American firms from supplying the company without licenses due to espionage concerns linked to its telecommunications equipment. This was followed by tightened export controls in October 2022 on advanced semiconductors and manufacturing equipment, coordinated with allies like the Netherlands and Japan to limit China's capabilities in artificial intelligence and military applications. The CHIPS and Science Act, enacted in August 2022, allocated $52 billion in subsidies and $24 billion in tax credits to onshore semiconductor production, explicitly prohibiting recipient firms from expanding advanced node manufacturing in China for ten years.^[11]^[12]^[13] Empirical data indicates partial success in redirecting trade flows: U.S. imports from China declined by over 5 percentage points of total imports between 2018 and 2023, with manufacturing shifting to alternatives like Vietnam and Mexico, where U.S. imports rose 20% and 15%, respectively, in the same period. Bilateral trade volume, however, remained substantial at $582 billion in 2024, reflecting persistent demand for Chinese intermediates in U.S. manufacturing. China's responses, including domestic "dual circulation" policies to reduce reliance on foreign technology, have accelerated self-sufficiency efforts, with semiconductor output growing 15% annually despite controls.^[14]^[15]^[16] In 2025, under the second Trump administration, tensions escalated with renewed tariff threats and investment scrutiny in critical sectors like biotechnology, though a provisional trade deal in May aimed to stabilize select flows amid mutual economic pressures. Assessments of policy effectiveness vary: RAND Corporation analysis found that restrictions slowed China's high-end chip access by 2-3 years but incurred $50-100 billion in annual U.S. compliance costs and prompted Huawei's revenue recovery to pre-ban levels through indigenous alternatives. Allied coordination has proven uneven, with South Korea reducing but not halting advanced chip exports to China. Full decoupling remains improbable given intertwined value chains, where severing ties could raise global costs by 5-10% in electronics and raise U.S. consumer prices.^[17]^[18]^[19]

Eco-Economic Decoupling

Eco-economic decoupling refers to efforts to separate economic expansion from escalating environmental pressures, such as resource depletion, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. The concept posits that advancements in efficiency, technology, and policy could enable gross domestic product (GDP) growth without proportional increases—or even decreases—in ecological footprints. Proponents argue this aligns with sustainable development goals, drawing on historical improvements in energy intensity, where global energy use per unit of GDP fell by approximately 1.8% annually from 1990 to 2018.^[20] However, causal analysis reveals that such gains often stem from structural shifts like service-sector dominance rather than inherent technological fixes, and they frequently fail to address total absolute impacts.^[21] Distinctions between relative and absolute decoupling are central to evaluating feasibility. Relative decoupling occurs when environmental intensity (e.g., emissions per GDP) declines, but aggregate impacts may rise if economic growth outpaces efficiency gains; for instance, EU-28 CO2 emissions per GDP dropped 40% from 1995 to 2015 amid 2% annual GDP growth, yet total emissions only stabilized temporarily.^[22] Absolute decoupling requires outright reductions in total resource use or emissions alongside GDP increases, a rarer outcome observed sporadically in high-income nations for specific indicators like territorial CO2 in 21 of 32 countries studied from 1990 to 2019, where emissions fell 19% on average while GDP rose 78%.^[23] Systematic reviews, however, find absolute decoupling limited to short-term, localized cases, often undermined by rebound effects—where efficiency lowers costs, spurring greater consumption—and methodological flaws like ignoring consumption-based accounting, which relocates impacts via trade.^[20] Empirical scrutiny highlights systemic barriers to sustained decoupling. Globally, material resource use grew 3.2 times faster than GDP from 1970 to 2017, with no evidence of absolute decoupling for aggregates like metals or biomass, as relative efficiencies are offset by population growth and rising per-capita demand.^[24] In developing economies, such as those in Eastern Europe, studies from 1998 to 2017 show relative decoupling for some pollutants but persistent coupling for broader degradation metrics like deforestation and water stress, exacerbated by industrialization.^[25] Even in advanced contexts, consumption-based emissions reveal illusory progress; for example, U.S. territorial CO2 decoupled absolutely post-2007 due to shale gas and recessions, but imported emissions rose, maintaining overall planetary burdens.00174-2/fulltext) First-principles reasoning underscores causal realities: thermodynamic limits and entropy dictate that economic throughput inherently generates waste, with innovations yielding diminishing returns absent radical redesigns like circular economies, which remain unproven at scale.^[21] Critics, including reviews of over 200 studies, contend that reliance on decoupling overlooks biophysical constraints, as evidenced by persistent global trends where GDP correlates positively with biodiversity loss and habitat conversion rates exceeding 1 million hectares annually.^[20] Policy experiments, such as carbon pricing in the EU Emissions Trading System, achieved relative reductions but not absolute global decoupling, partly due to leakage—emissions shifting to unregulated regions.^[24] While optimistic models project potential absolute decoupling via electrification and renewables, historical data from 1990–2020 indicates only 11% of countries sustained it for energy-related CO2, often reverting amid recoveries from economic downturns.^[23] This pattern suggests decoupling's empirical reality is fragile, contingent on offshoring environmental costs rather than true dematerialization, challenging narratives of indefinite green growth.^[22]

Technical Decoupling

Engineering Applications

In electrical engineering, decoupling capacitors are utilized to stabilize voltage supplies by filtering high-frequency noise and providing transient current to integrated circuits, thereby preventing signal distortion and ensuring reliable operation.^[26] These components, typically ceramic for high frequencies and electrolytic for low frequencies, are placed close to power pins to minimize inductance and effectively shunt AC noise to ground while maintaining DC levels.^[27] For instance, in digital circuits, decoupling capacitors mitigate voltage droops during rapid switching, with values often selected based on the IC's current draw and frequency, such as 0.1 μF for general bypass and 10 μF for bulk storage.^[28] In mechanical engineering, decoupling techniques isolate vibrational energy between subsystems to reduce transmission of disturbances, enhancing structural integrity and noise control in applications like automotive suspensions or machinery mounts.^[29] Substructure decoupling methods, such as those employing the Sherman-Morrison formula, enable the separation of assembled mechanical systems into independent components for analysis and design, allowing engineers to model source-path-receiver interactions without full-system recharacterization.^[30] In flexible multibody dynamics, decoupling procedures facilitate open- and closed-loop simulations by transforming coupled equations of motion into modal coordinates, improving computational efficiency for complex assemblies like robotic arms or vehicle chassis.^[31] Software engineering applies decoupling to minimize inter-module dependencies, promoting modularity, scalability, and ease of maintenance through architectural patterns like microservices or dependency inversion.^[32] This involves encapsulating functionality to limit knowledge of internal implementations, enabling independent evolution of components—such as separating business logic from data access layers—while techniques like event-driven architectures further reduce direct couplings.^[33] In control systems engineering, decoupling multivariable processes transforms interacting loops into independent single-input single-output (SISO) equivalents using methods like singular value decomposition (SVD), which assesses feasibility by evaluating condition numbers below thresholds like 10 for practical decoupling.^[34] Such approaches, applied in chemical processes or robotics, improve controller design by minimizing cross-coupling effects, though they require verification that the system's relative gain array indicates non-strong interactions.^[34]

Scientific and Systems Contexts

In cosmology, decoupling denotes the cessation of significant interactions between particles or radiation and the surrounding medium, marking a transition to independent evolution. Photon decoupling, occurring during the recombination epoch approximately 380,000 years after the Big Bang at a redshift of z ≈ 1100 and temperature of about 3000 K, ended the tight coupling of photons with free electrons via Thomson scattering, as neutral hydrogen atoms formed and the universe became optically transparent to electromagnetic radiation.^[35]^[36] This event released photons that now constitute the cosmic microwave background, with their blackbody spectrum preserved due to subsequent free-streaming and redshift.^[35] Earlier, neutrino decoupling took place at temperatures around 1 MeV, when weak interaction rates fell below the Hubble expansion rate, allowing neutrinos to decouple from the thermal bath before electron-positron annihilation heated the photon plasma.^[37] These processes are pivotal for understanding cosmic thermal history, baryon acoustic oscillations, and the uniformity of the CMB, as verified through observations like those from the Planck satellite confirming the decoupling epoch's timing and conditions.^[38] In systems theory and control engineering, decoupling involves restructuring multivariable dynamical systems to minimize or eliminate cross-interactions between inputs and outputs, effectively transforming coupled multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems into independent single-input single-output (SISO) equivalents for simplified analysis and control./12%3A_Multiple_Input_Multiple_Output_(MIMO)Control/12.01%3A_Determining_if_a_system_can_be_decoupled) For linear time-invariant systems, state feedback decoupling requires the decoupling matrix to have full rank, enabling compensators that invert interaction terms while preserving stability, as established in geometric control theory.^[39] Techniques include static-state feedback for exact decoupling under conditions of controllability and observability, or approximate methods like detuning loops in process control to reduce dynamic coupling without full inversion./12%3A_Multiple_Input_Multiple_Output(MIMO)Control/12.01%3A_Determining_if_a_system_can_be_decoupled)^[39] This approach enhances system performance in applications like chemical processes or robotics, where unaddressed coupling can amplify disturbances or degrade response times, with empirical validation showing reduced loop interactions post-decoupling in industrial MIMO setups./12%3A_Multiple_Input_Multiple_Output(MIMO)_Control/12.01%3A_Determining_if_a_system_can_be_decoupled) In broader scientific systems contexts, such as nonlinear dynamics or network theory, decoupling quantifies the separation of subsystems to foster modularity and resilience, where high interdependence risks cascade failures, as modeled in stability analyses of coupled oscillators or ecological networks..pdf) For instance, in particle physics effective theories, heavy particle decoupling integrates out high-energy degrees of freedom, yielding low-energy approximations via renormalization group flows, preserving causal structure while simplifying computations.^[40] These principles underscore decoupling's role in isolating causal pathways, enabling scalable modeling across scales from quantum fields to complex adaptive systems..pdf)

Controversies and Empirical Realities

Debates on Feasibility and Outcomes

Proponents of economic decoupling, particularly between the United States and China, argue that it enhances national security by mitigating risks from over-reliance on adversarial supply chains for critical technologies and materials, such as semiconductors and rare earth elements.^[10] ^[41] This view posits that strategic separation in sensitive sectors reduces vulnerabilities exposed during events like the 2020-2022 supply chain disruptions and geopolitical tensions over Taiwan.^[42] However, critics contend that full decoupling remains infeasible due to the deep integration of global value chains, where China accounts for over 30% of manufacturing output and key intermediate inputs, making abrupt separation economically prohibitive without years of reconfiguration.^[43] ^[44] Empirical assessments indicate that partial decoupling efforts, such as U.S. export controls on advanced chips implemented since 2018, have slowed China's technological progress in targeted areas but failed to fully sever dependencies, with bilateral trade reaching $583 billion in 2024.^[45] Outcomes include reshoring and friendshoring, evidenced by U.S. imports from China declining 20% in electronics from 2018-2023 while rising from alternatives like Mexico and Vietnam, yet overall supply chain costs have increased due to higher labor and logistics expenses elsewhere.^[3] Quantitative models suggest that a U.S. export ban on technology to China could yield a modest 0.6 percentage point welfare gain for the U.S. but inflict larger losses on China, though global fragmentation from broader decoupling could reduce world GDP by 5-10% over the long term.^[46] ^[47] Debates highlight asymmetric outcomes, with short-run welfare losses from decoupling estimated at five times higher than long-run adjustments due to immediate disruptions in intermediate goods trade, as analyzed in European Central Bank simulations.^[7] While security benefits are cited by advocates—such as reduced exposure to potential embargoes—opponents, drawing from post-2018 tariff data, note persistent trade deficits and inflation pressures, with U.S. consumers bearing 80-90% of tariff costs through higher prices.^[48] Surveys of executives indicate 66% expect elevated supply chain expenses from diversification efforts, underscoring trade-offs between resilience and efficiency.^[49] Functional decoupling, separating economic cooperation in non-strategic areas from rivalry in high-tech domains, emerges as a more realistic path, per analyses of U.S.-China relations trajectories.^[50]

Policy Implications and Alternatives

Policies aimed at economic decoupling between the United States and China, particularly in technology and critical supply chains, seek to mitigate national security risks by reducing reliance on adversarial suppliers, but they impose measurable economic costs. For instance, quantitative models indicate that a comprehensive US export ban on advanced technologies to China could yield a modest US welfare gain of approximately 0.6 percentage points through retained domestic production and redirected trade, while causing a sharper decline in Chinese welfare due to lost access to US innovations.^[46] However, such measures have empirically led to supply chain disruptions and higher input costs, as evidenced by rerouted trade flows through 2023 that preserved overall decoupling welfare but faced escalation risks from 2024-2025 tariffs and export controls, potentially amplifying global fragmentation.^[51] From a causal standpoint, these policies prioritize long-term resilience over short-term efficiency, though real-world outcomes reveal persistent interdependencies, with US firms still deriving significant revenue from Chinese markets despite restrictions.^[3] In strategic terms, decoupling incentivizes domestic reforms in targeted economies; for China, it has compelled shifts toward bolstering internal consumption and technological self-sufficiency, potentially accelerating innovation in non-restricted sectors, while for the US, initiatives like the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022 have spurred over $200 billion in semiconductor investments by mid-2025 to onshore critical manufacturing.^[42]^[52] Yet, broader implications include elevated political risks for multinational corporations, including intensified export monitoring and retaliatory measures from Beijing, which have deterred foreign direct investment and fragmented global value chains, contributing to a projected 1-2% drag on global GDP growth by 2026 if trends persist.^[53]^[54] Empirical data from 2017-2022 US import statistics further underscore that while rhetoric of full decoupling dominates policy discourse, actual trade volumes have only partially diverged, with substitution via third countries like Vietnam and Mexico offsetting direct bilateral declines but at higher logistical expenses.^[15] Alternatives to outright decoupling emphasize selective derisking and diversification rather than comprehensive separation, such as "friend-shoring" to allied nations like India, Japan, and Taiwan, which has seen US imports from these partners rise by 15-20% annually since 2022 amid China restrictions.^[55] Comparative approaches in Europe and Asia highlight managed interdependence: Germany has pursued "de-risking" through diversified suppliers without full severance, maintaining €250 billion in annual China exports as of 2024, while Japan and India have incrementally reduced technological ties via domestic incentives and bilateral pacts, avoiding the efficiency losses of bilateral bans.^[56]^[57] Multinational corporations, in response, have adopted multifoci network strategies, reallocating R&D and production across neutral hubs to navigate US export controls and Chinese countermeasures, thereby sustaining global value chain resilience without total bifurcation.^[58] These options, grounded in empirical trade data, suggest that hybrid policies—combining targeted controls with multilateral alliances like the Quad—offer superior outcomes to unilateral decoupling by balancing security gains against the causal risks of innovation silos and cost inflation.^[59]

References

[1]
Decoupling in Strategic Technologies
Decoupling encompasses a wide range of tactics and policy objectives. Some have advocated for decoupling as a means of protecting the economic health of certain ...
[2]
Chapter 7: Sizing up the effects of technological decoupling 1
Such a decoupling can be defined as the undoing of cross-border trade and knowledge flows in high-end technologies.
[3]
Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and ...
We argue that decoupling, defined as the process of weakening interdependence between two nations or blocs of nations, has been ongoing between China and ...
[4]
[PDF] Decoupling in international business: Evidence, drivers, impact, and ...
Nov 12, 2022 · The empirical evidence suggests that deglobalization and Sino-US decoupling have been in progress for more than a decade—a state- ment that is ...
[5]
Five years into the trade war, China continues its slow decoupling ...
Mar 16, 2023 · ... economic “decoupling” of the world's two biggest economies has not yet arrived. That widely reported data point was misleading, however. US ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[6]
Is China decoupling from the global value chain? A quantitative ...
Jun 11, 2025 · This paper focuses on “decoupling” in the GVC domain. While complete decoupling of the China-US economy is unlikely in the short term, the risk of “de- ...
[7]
[PDF] The economic costs of supply chain decoupling
We find that, in terms of welfare losses, the costs of decoupling are roughly five times higher in the short-run compared to the long-run, while country losses ...
[8]
Economic Decoupling Creates Grave Strategic Dangers for China ...
Oct 27, 2020 · Economic Decoupling Creates Grave Strategic Dangers for China and America. A U.S. strategy aimed at decoupling with China is not only a ...Missing: facts controversies
[9]
[PDF] U.S.-China Economics and Trade Relations (Year in Review)
PART I. THE YEAR IN REVIEW. CHAPTER 1: U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND. TRADE RELATIONS (YEAR IN REVIEW). Abstract. China's economy grew in 2024, albeit at a much ...
[10]
The Contentious U.S.-China Trade Relationship
Apr 14, 2025 · US trade with China has grown enormously in recent decades and is crucial for both countries. Today, China is one of the largest export markets for US goods ...
[11]
https://itif.org/publications/2025/10/27/backfire-export-controls-helped-huawei-and-hurt-us-firms/
[12]
The Limits of Chip Export Controls in Meeting the China Challenge
Apr 14, 2025 · The US government and those of its allies have imposed and progressively tightened controls on the export of semiconductor technology, devices, and tools to ...Missing: drivers decoupling
[13]
https://www.polytechnique-insights.com/en/columns/industry/what-international-requirements-are-needed-to-address-chinese-technological-innovation/
[14]
Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains? - ScienceDirect
Even so, we find that US tariffs on imports from China have induced significant direct decoupling, with China's share of US imports falling by more than 5 ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
[15]
US-China decoupling: Rhetoric and reality - CEPR
Aug 31, 2023 · It shows that some aspects of decoupling are real: US import growth from China was significantly slower than US import growth from other ...
[16]
US-China decoupling is crossing a Rubicon - Reuters
Apr 16, 2025 · This risks collapsing much of the pair's bilateral trade worth $582 billion in 2024. The White House exempted smartphones, computers and some ...Missing: progress volumes<|separator|>
[17]
US-China Relations in the Trump 2.0 Era: A Timeline
Timeline tracking key developments affecting US-China relations under the Trump 2.0 administration, including trade and business engagement.
[18]
The U.S.-China Trade Deal - BankChampaign
Discover what the May 2025 U.S.–China trade deal really means for global markets, supply chains, and geopolitical strategy.
[19]
The Effectiveness of U.S. Economic Policies Regarding China ...
Oct 22, 2024 · In this report, the authors assess the effectiveness of more-restrictive US economic policies adopted toward China and pursued between 2017 and 2024.
[20]
A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource ...
We evaluate empirical studies of decoupling related to final/useful energy, exergy, use of material resources, as well as CO2 and total GHG emissions. We find ...
[21]
Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review ...
The concept of “decoupling” is used to refer to the end of the correlation between increased economic production and decreased environmental quality (IRP 2011).
[22]
Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review ...
Jul 2, 2020 · The concept of “decoupling” is used to refer to the end of the correlation between increased economic production and decreased environmental ...
[23]
Absolute Decoupling of Economic Growth and Emissions in 32 ...
Apr 6, 2021 · The world has long been experiencing a relative decoupling between economic growth and CO2 emissions, with the emissions per unit of GDP falling ...
[24]
[PDF] Decoupling debunked - European Environmental Bureau
The literature reviewed clearly shows that there is no empirical evidence for such a decoupling currently happening. This is the case for materials, energy, ...
[25]
Can environmental sustainability be decoupled from economic ...
This study sought to investigate the decoupling hypothesis between economic growth and environmental sustainability in Eastern Europe from 1998 to 2017.
[26]
Coupling and Decoupling | Applications | Capacitor Guide - EEPower
Decoupling capacitors are used to filter out voltage spikes and pass through only the DC component of the signal.
[27]
[PDF] MT-101: Decoupling Techniques - Analog Devices
This is generally done with a combination of electrolytic capacitors (for low frequency decoupling), ceramic capacitors (for high frequency decoupling), and ...
[28]
What is the Use of a Decoupling Capacitor? - Sierra Circuits
Mar 30, 2021 · A decoupling capacitor or bypass capacitor in a circuit provides high transient currents to an IC and reduces power ripples.
[29]
[PDF] Decoupling of mechanical systems
The conventional way to find these functions is the so-called trans- fer path analysis (TPA) technique. In such analysis it is necessary to decouple the sources ...
[30]
A method for substructure decoupling of mechanical systems by ...
Mar 25, 2024 · In this study, a method for substructure decoupling of mechanical systems based on the Sherman–Morrison formula is presented.
[31]
Decoupling Methods in Flexible Multibody Dynamics | IDETC-CIE
Mar 18, 2021 · The use of the procedure developed in this paper can be used for open-loop and closed-loop mechanical systems. Volume Subject Area: 13th ...
[32]
What is decoupling and what development areas can it apply to?
Jun 9, 2014 · Decoupling in that context normally means loosening the existing coupling. That is, making sure each component knows as little as possible ...Decoupling classes from the user interfacedesign patterns - Dependency Inversion & DecouplingMore results from softwareengineering.stackexchange.com
[33]
How Decoupling Can Help You Write Better Software - The New Stack
Mar 9, 2023 · Decoupling components enables you to deal with performance issues, cost optimization and feature development separately for each service.
[34]
12.1: Determining if a system can be decoupled
May 22, 2022 · Decoupling may be done using several different techniques, including restructuring the pairing of variables, minimizing interactions by ...
[35]
[PDF] Cosmology - Physics
Feb 2, 2017 · • Photon decoupling. Before recombination the strongest coupling between the photons and the rest of the plasma is through Thomson ...
[36]
[PDF] ASTR/PHYS 4080: Intro to Cosmology Week 8
—> photon decoupling. As the universe expands further, a time comes when a CMB photon scatters off an electron for one last time. —> last scattering. Page 11 ...
[37]
TASI Lectures: Introduction to Cosmology - M. Trodden & S.M. Carroll
For example, neutrinos decouple at a temperature around 1 MeV; shortly thereafter, electrons and positrons annihilate into photons, dumping energy (and entropy) ...<|separator|>
[38]
[PDF] Lecture notes - Cosmology and particle physics
At the time of decoupling the three neutrinos are still relativistic and during the cooling of the universe they become non-relativistic whenever the ...
[39]
Decoupling With Stability of Linear Systems by Static-State Feedback
Oct 14, 2020 · The system is stabilized first and then decoupled while preserving stability. The existence of decoupling feedback is conditioned by system ...<|separator|>
[40]
(PDF) The Decoupling Cosmology Theory - ResearchGate
The core of this theory is through the basic assumption of "Energy Possesses No Gravitation", to separate matter and energy from their motion in coupled study ...
[41]
Should the U.S. Decouple from China? - Open to Debate
Apr 18, 2025 · Those in favor of decoupling argue the US must reduce national security threats and make its manufacturing sector less reliant on Chinese supply chains.
[42]
Strategic Decoupling and Its Implications for US-China Relations
Sep 1, 2025 · While complete economic decoupling remains elusive, both sides are shifting toward strategic and psychological disengagement – reducing reliance ...
[43]
Complete Decoupling from China in Supply Chains Is Unfeasible
May 29, 2024 · A complete decoupling from China is virtually impossible due to its integral role as the world's manufacturing hub, asserts GlobalData, a leading data and ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits
[44]
China and the Future of Global Supply Chains - Rhodium Group
Feb 4, 2025 · China's dominance of various supply chains means it has become a global price maker in many industries. Hence, China's market share losses can ...
[45]
Should the U.S. Decouple from China? - YouTube
Apr 25, 2025 · In 2024, the total trade value between the U.S. and China was around $583 billion. For decades, China has been a central node in global ...
[46]
Economic consequences of US-China technological decoupling
Aug 28, 2024 · They show that a US export ban against China would result in an increase in US welfare by 0.6 percentage points and a decrease in Chinese ...
[47]
How might economic decoupling or de-risking impact the global ...
Jun 27, 2023 · Economic decoupling? 3 experts caution what that means for the global economy · 'Full decoupling from OECD countries is impractical and difficult ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[48]
The High Costs of a "Hard" Decoupling from China - Cato Institute
Jun 22, 2023 · Practically speaking, in order to operationalize a hard economic break with China, the U.S. would need to hire dramatically more customs agents ...Missing: debates | Show results with:debates<|separator|>
[49]
The Pros and Cons of Decoupling, De-risking and Diversification of ...
Oct 9, 2023 · A study by PwC found that 66% of surveyed executives anticipate higher supply chain costs as a result of diversifying away from China.
[50]
U.S.-China Relations for the 2030s: Toward a Realistic Scenario for ...
Oct 17, 2024 · ... U.S. framing. For example, Washington's penchant for economic decoupling from China more recently has been largely replaced by economic “de ...
[51]
https://siai.org/review/2025/10/202510282083
[52]
China Decoupling Handbook: Where We Are, What to Do
Sep 4, 2024 · It's true there are a variety of costs, but most turn out to be minor. The largest is likely to be share price declines for stocks exposed to ...
[53]
U.S.-China: If Not Economic Decoupling, Then What?
Aug 8, 2023 · Political risks for U.S. businesses remain elevated, as both governments are expected to impose new export restrictions and increase monitoring ...
[54]
US-China Economic Standoff in 2025: Decoupling, Disruption, and ...
Apr 21, 2025 · This paper investigates the evolving macroeconomic dynamics between the United States and China in 2025, focusing on their intensifying strategic and economic ...<|separator|>
[55]
China Decoupling: Exploring Alternative Markets - ARC Group
Jul 31, 2023 · This article is the first one in a series and explores the potential benefits of decoupling from China, identifies markets that offer compelling alternatives,
[56]
China Decoupling Beyond the United States: Comparing Germany ...
Jan 8, 2025 · This paper compares how three key countries—Germany, Japan, and India—have managed their technological and economic ties with China in the last ...
[57]
While the US and China decouple, the EU and China deepen trade ...
Aug 27, 2024 · The HHI for China's manufactured imports is similar to that of the United States, and only 13 percent lower than that of the European Union.Missing: alternatives | Show results with:alternatives
[58]
From the US–China decoupling to a multifoci network:MNCs ...
Apr 10, 2025 · This study examines the impact of the US–China decoupling on MNCs and highlights their actions for navigating the resulting complexities.
[59]
Decoupling or resilience? Technological GVCs in the face of ...
The findings reveal that global value chains (GVCs) in technology sectors remained largely resilient to the protectionist measures introduced during the Trump ...<|control11|><|separator|>