Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hot-carrier injection

Hot-carrier injection (HCI) is a key degradation mechanism in metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), where charge carriers in the inversion channel are accelerated by intense lateral near the , gaining kinetic energies far exceeding levels (typically >1.5 ), enabling them to surmount the silicon-SiO₂ energy barrier (approximately 3.1 for electrons and 4.8 for holes) and inject into the gate dielectric, where they trap or break bonds to form interface states, progressively shifting , reducing , and lowering drive current. The phenomenon arises primarily through two injection pathways: channel hot-electron injection, dominant under high drain bias and low gate bias conditions, and drain avalanche hot-electron injection, triggered by near the drain that generates additional high-energy carriers. The underlying physics is captured by the lucky-electron model, which posits that only a probabilistic subset of carriers—those avoiding phonon-scattering collisions long enough to accumulate sufficient energy and redirect toward the oxide interface—successfully inject, with injection probability scaling exponentially with the oxide and field strength. This model, validated across various lengths, highlights how HCI gate current follows I_g \propto \exp(-\beta / E_{eff}), where E_{eff} is the effective field and \beta relates to the . In scaled technologies, HCI becomes increasingly severe due to elevated channel fields in shorter devices (e.g., submicron channels under voltages <3 V), accelerating wear-out and limiting circuit lifetimes to years rather than decades in high-performance applications like microprocessors. Degradation manifests as parametric shifts—significant transconductance loss after prolonged stress—and can couple with other effects like negative bias temperature instability, compounding reliability challenges in nanoscale nodes. Mitigation techniques, such as lightly doped drain (LDD) extensions and graded junctions, reduce peak fields but introduce trade-offs in on-resistance and series resistance. Overall, HCI remains a critical concern in modern semiconductor design, influencing process optimization and reliability projections for advanced nodes.

Fundamentals

Definition and Overview

Hot-carrier injection (HCI) is the process by which charge carriers, electrons or holes, in a semiconductor device acquire high kinetic energy from an applied electric field, enabling them to overcome energy barriers and inject into adjacent insulating regions, such as the gate oxide in MOSFETs. This phenomenon arises when carriers, accelerated in the silicon channel, reach energies sufficient to surmount the Si-SiO₂ interface potential barriers, approximately 3.1 eV for electrons and 4.5 eV for holes. In practice, HCI predominantly occurs in MOSFETs subjected to high lateral electric fields, particularly near the drain region during operation, resulting in the unwanted transport of energetic carriers across the oxide interface. These injected carriers can become trapped or generate defects, initiating gradual device degradation that affects electrical characteristics like threshold voltage and transconductance. As a fundamental reliability challenge in semiconductor technology, HCI imposes significant limits on transistor scaling and circuit endurance in modern integrated circuits, necessitating careful design and mitigation strategies to ensure long-term performance.

Historical Development

Hot-carrier injection (HCI) effects were first noted in silicon devices during the 1960s, coinciding with the early development of semiconductor technologies such as hot-carrier diodes, where high-energy carriers were observed to influence device performance under high electric fields. Detailed investigations into HCI in MOSFETs emerged in the late 1970s, with early observations of degradation in the mid-1970s leading to seminal work by Ning et al. in 1979 demonstrating hot-electron emission from the silicon substrate and channel into the gate oxide, establishing a direct link between these energetic carriers and oxide charge trapping that leads to device degradation. During the 1980s and 1990s, significant advancements in HCI modeling and characterization solidified its role as a critical reliability concern for scaling MOSFETs. Researchers developed comprehensive models for hot-carrier generation and injection, including contributions from Ko et al. on substrate currents and Tam et al. on lucky-electron mechanisms for channel hot-electron injection. A key 1993 IEEE study further elucidated the substrate hot-electron effect, analyzing injection conditions and their impact on n-MOSFET degradation under high-field stresses. These efforts emphasized empirical and theoretical frameworks to predict HCI-induced threshold voltage shifts and transconductance degradation, guiding process optimizations for submicron technologies. Post-2000 research shifted focus to nanoscale impacts as channel lengths approached 10 nm, highlighting exacerbated due to increased lateral electric fields. reliability assessments have become integral to industry standards and IEEE literature for advanced nodes, including lifetime projections for sub-10 nm and gate-all-around devices. Studies from 2015 to 2020 demonstrated that high-k dielectrics like , often in stacked configurations with interlayers, reduce susceptibility by lowering interface trap densities and improving carrier injection barriers, as evidenced in 28 nm bulk-silicon devices where stacks mitigated bulk current degradation under hot-carrier stress. Zirconium doping in further passivated trap states, enhancing hot-carrier stability in nanoscale high-k/metal gate . As of 2025, ongoing research continues to address in gate-all-around nanosheet for nodes below 3 nm.

Underlying Physics

Carrier Generation and Heating

In high electric fields greater than $10^5 V/cm within the silicon channel of , charge carriers such as electrons or holes are accelerated by the applied field, gaining significant kinetic energy through the drift process. This acceleration results in non-equilibrium "hot" carriers, characterized by effective temperatures exceeding $10^4 K, far above the lattice temperature, enabling phenomena like . The energy acquisition is balanced by scattering events with and impurities, but in these fields, the net gain produces carriers with energies sufficient for subsequent high-energy interactions. Carrier generation is primarily driven by impact ionization, where a hot carrier with sufficient kinetic energy (typically above the bandgap of silicon, approximately 1.12 eV) collides with a valence electron, promoting it to the conduction band and creating an additional electron-hole pair. This process amplifies the carrier population near regions of peak field strength, such as the drain junction. Concurrently, velocity saturation limits further acceleration; in silicon, carrier drift velocity saturates at around $10^7 cm/s under fields of about $10^5 V/cm, shifting transport from ohmic to ballistic-like behavior and concentrating energy gain in the high-field regions. The resulting energy distribution of hot carriers deviates from thermal equilibrium, exhibiting a Maxwell-Boltzmann-like form with a depleted low-energy population and a pronounced high-energy tail. Average carrier energies range from 0.1 to 1 eV, reflecting the balance between field-driven heating and relaxation mechanisms, while the tail extends to energies comparable to potential barrier heights (e.g., 3.1 eV at the Si-SiO_2 interface), providing the population necessary for injection processes. This distribution is often modeled using multi-moment transport equations to capture the non-Maxwellian tails accurately.

Injection Mechanisms

Hot-carrier injection into the silicon dioxide (SiO₂) layer of primarily occurs via mechanisms that enable carriers to overcome or tunnel through the energy barriers at the Si-SiO₂ interface, following their heating in the channel electric field. These mechanisms include direct thermal emission, field-assisted tunneling, and trap-mediated processes, each dominant under specific conditions of carrier energy, oxide field, and device bias. Direct injection, particularly for electrons in n-channel devices, is described by the , in which a small fraction of channel electrons—termed "lucky" due to minimal scattering—gain enough kinetic energy from the lateral electric field to surmount the Si-SiO₂ conduction band barrier without significant energy loss. This model predicts the gate injection current as proportional to the drain current times the exponential probability of electrons traversing a mean free path λ under field E while exceeding the barrier height φ_b ≈ 3.1 eV, yielding I_g \propto I_d \exp\left(-\frac{\phi_b}{q \lambda E}\right), where q is the electron charge; experimental validation on n-channel confirms this form with λ ≈ 12 nm and agreement within experimental error. Trap-assisted direct injection extends this by involving temporary capture at interface states, allowing reinjection into the oxide conduction or valence band, though it contributes less to bulk injection compared to unassisted paths. Fowler-Nordheim tunneling represents a field-enhanced mechanism where hot carriers, with energies exceeding the barrier heights of approximately 3.1 eV for electrons and 4.8 eV for holes, tunnel through the triangular potential barrier formed by the oxide electric field. This process is prevalent at high oxide fields (>5 MV/cm) and thin oxides (<10 nm), with the tunneling current density given by
J = A E^2 \exp\left(-\frac{B}{E}\right),
where E is the oxide field strength, and A and B are material constants incorporating the barrier height φ, effective mass m*, and Planck's constant h (e.g., B ≈ 6.83 × 10^7 (m^/m_0)^{1/2} φ^{3/2} V/cm for electrons in with φ in eV; typical value ~2.4 × 10^8 V/cm for φ = 3.1 eV and m^ ≈ 0.42 m_0); measurements on thermally grown films validate this equation across fields of 6-10 MV/cm, showing exponential dependence on 1/E. For holes, the higher barrier and larger effective mass result in lower currents, but injection occurs similarly under reverse bias conditions.
In p-channel MOSFETs, anode-hole injection emerges as a distinct mechanism, where hot holes generated by impact ionization near the drain anode are injected into the oxide valence band due to the positive anode potential and vertical field component. This process, enhanced in scaled devices with thin gate oxides (e.g., 2-6.5 nm), leads to hole trapping and interface degradation, with studies showing it accounts for up to 50% of trap generation under hot-carrier stress at V_g = V_d biases; valence band tunneling from the anode further amplifies this in PMOS under maximum substrate current conditions. The probability of successful injection across these mechanisms varies significantly with oxide thickness t_ox (thinner t_ox < 5 increases tunneling probability exponentially via reduced barrier width), field direction (vertical fields >1 MV/cm toward the favor oxide traversal, while lateral fields primarily heat ), and carrier type (electrons inject more readily than holes due to the 1.4 lower barrier and smaller m* ≈ 0.4 m_0 vs. 0.5 m_0); quantitative models incorporating these factors predict injection efficiencies dropping by orders of magnitude for t_ox > 10 or reverse fields.

Device-Level Impacts

Effects on MOSFETs

Hot-carrier injection in MOSFETs primarily leads to the creation of interface states at the Si/SiO₂ interface through the breakage of Si-H bonds by high-energy carriers, resulting in electrically active dangling bonds that act as traps. These interface traps scatter charge carriers, thereby increasing subthreshold leakage current and low-frequency noise levels in the device. The generation of interface traps contributes to a threshold voltage shift, approximated by the relation \Delta V_{th} = -\frac{q N_{it}}{C_{ox}} where q is the , N_{it} is the interface trap density, and C_{ox} is the per unit area; in NMOS devices, concomitant electron trapping in the introduces negative charge that causes a positive \Delta V_{th}, typically on the order of 10-20% relative degradation under high-field stress conditions. Transconductance degradation arises from reduced carrier mobility due to these interface traps and trapped charges, often resulting in a 10-20% reduction in g_m following stress, which diminishes drive current and impairs the device's .

Scaling Considerations

As dimensions shrink below 45 nm, the reduction in channel length intensifies the lateral electric fields near the , accelerating carriers to higher energies and significantly boosting hot carrier generation rates. This field intensification arises because the applied drain voltage is distributed over a shorter distance, leading to peak fields that enhance and subsequent injection into the gate . For instance, in from 90 nm to 16 nm nodes, the time-to-failure under HCI stress decreases by more than four orders of magnitude, despite reductions in supply voltage from 1.2 V to around 1 V, underscoring the worsening reliability trend driven by these elevated fields. Velocity saturation further complicates HCI in scaled devices, as carriers attain their peak more rapidly in the high-field regions of short , limiting current drive while still enabling energetic carriers to overcome injection barriers. In bulk MOSFETs with channel lengths below nm, this saturation occurs earlier due to the intensified fields, promoting the formation of hot carriers that contribute to interface trap generation and oxide charging. Additionally, gate thicknesses scaling below 2 nm lower the effective energy barrier for carrier injection into the , as the reduced physical distance and higher transverse fields facilitate easier penetration, thereby accelerating shifts and degradation. In nanoscale bulk technologies from 28 nm planar nodes to 7 nm FinFETs, HCI emerges as a dominant reliability limiter, where the three-dimensional of FinFETs partially mitigates but does not eliminate the field crowding issues inherent to shorter effective channels. These nodes exhibit pronounced HCI-induced drive current degradation, often exceeding 10-20% under accelerated , due to the combined effects of high on-state fields and self-heating. However, transitioning to gate-all-around (GAA) FETs in sub-7 nm nodes, with research and adoption trends accelerating post-2015, reduces HCI severity through superior electrostatic gate control over the channel, minimizing lateral field peaks and short-channel effects that fuel hot carrier generation. At 3 nm, for example, GAA nanosheet transistors demonstrate comparable or lower hot carrier degradation compared to equivalent FinFETs, enabling sustained scaling with improved lifetime projections.

Reliability and Analysis

Degradation Mechanisms

Hot-carrier injection initiates degradation through the trapping of high-energy electrons or holes in preexisting defects within the of MOSFETs. These trapped charges, often electrons in n-channel devices, form fixed charges that alter the distribution across the layer. This charging effect primarily causes a shift in the flat-band voltage, typically negative for electron , which modifies the device's characteristics. Such is more pronounced near the junction where the lateral is strongest, leading to localized charge accumulation within the first few nanometers of the . A parallel mechanism involves bond breaking at the silicon-SiO₂ interface, where hot carriers impact and dissociate passivating Si-H bonds through single- or multi-carrier processes, requiring effective energies of approximately 3-4 or multiple lower-energy (~1.5 ) impacts. This process generates dangling silicon bonds, known as P_b centers, which act as interface traps capable of capturing or emitting charge carriers. Additionally, the impact can create new oxide traps deeper in the SiO₂ layer through the breaking of Si-O bonds. The resulting increase in interface trap density (D_{it}) can reach up to 10^{12} cm^{-2} ^{-1} after prolonged stress, significantly degrading carrier mobility and increasing leakage currents. These trapping and bond-breaking processes exhibit cumulative effects, accumulating over time to cause progressive material alterations. is time-dependent and accelerates under worst-case conditions, such as maximum voltage with moderate voltage, where hot-carrier peaks near the . In n-channel MOSFETs, this leads to observable shifts, with the magnitude depending on the balance between charge and . Seminal studies established these mechanisms as key limits for submicron scaling, emphasizing the need for careful voltage design to mitigate long-term reliability issues.

Modeling and Lifetime Prediction

Modeling hot-carrier injection (HCI) relies on probabilistic frameworks to quantify carrier energies and injection probabilities. The lucky electron model, proposed by Hu et al., describes the injection of high-energy s into the by considering the for relaxation and the probability that an electron gains sufficient without . In this model, the injection rate I_{\text{inj}} is expressed as I_{\text{inj}} = I_d \times f(E > \phi_b), where I_d is the drain current, and f(E > \phi_b) represents the fraction of carriers with E exceeding the oxide barrier \phi_b. This fraction is derived from the exponential dependence on the , capturing the "lucky" electrons that avoid energy-loss collisions. Lifetime prediction under HCI often employs empirical relations calibrated from accelerated tests. A widely used model for device lifetime \tau is \tau = \frac{1}{A \cdot I_{\text{sub}}^m \cdot t_{\text{ox}}^n}, where A is a process-dependent constant, I_{\text{sub}} is the substrate , t_{\text{ox}} is the thickness, and exponents m and n (typically around 1-2 and 3-4, respectively) are fitted experimentally. This power-law form accounts for the field-accelerated nature of HCI, enabling extrapolation from lab conditions to operational use. Recent advancements include machine learning-based models for predicting HCI in advanced nodes, complementing empirical approaches. Technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations provide detailed spatial and temporal predictions of HCI effects by solving drift-diffusion equations augmented with terms. These models incorporate carrier generation rates via G = \alpha_n \cdot J_n + \alpha_p \cdot J_p, where \alpha_{n,p} are ionization coefficients dependent on local , and J_{n,p} are and densities. Such simulations are essential for advanced nodes, allowing prediction of buildup and shifts, often targeting a 10-year lifetime at 125°C for automotive-grade reliability specifications per standards. In distinguishing HCI from other degradation mechanisms like negative bias temperature instability (NBTI), HCI is primarily field-driven, with degradation scaling strongly with lateral electric fields and drain bias, whereas NBTI is more temperature-activated and influenced by vertical bias.

Mitigation Strategies

Lightly doped drain (LDD) structures mitigate hot-carrier injection (HCI) in MOSFETs by reducing the electric field peak near the drain junction, thereby lowering the probability of carrier acceleration and injection into the gate oxide. Optimization of LDD implant conditions can improve HCI DC lifetime by up to 10 times compared to conventional structures. Halo doping, involving angled implants to create pocket dopants at the channel edges, further suppresses peak fields and short-channel effects while enhancing HCI resistance in scaled nMOSFETs. Strain engineering in SiGe channels reduces HCI degradation by modulating carrier mobility and bandgap, which alters impact ionization rates and hot-carrier generation. In pMOSFETs, process-induced stress evolution in SiGe channels has been shown to improve hot-carrier reliability by optimizing tensile strain to minimize interface trap formation during stress. High-k/metal-gate stacks, such as those incorporating HfO₂ introduced in production since 2007, mitigate HCI by enabling thicker physical gate dielectrics for equivalent oxide thickness, which decreases the lateral electric field and reduces carrier injection efficiency. These stacks also increase conduction band offset and barrier heights (e.g., approximately 2.3 eV in HfO₂-based systems), further hindering hot-carrier entry into the dielectric. Two-dimensional materials like MoS₂ exhibit lower HCI degradation compared to bulk due to the absence of dangling bonds at interfaces, resulting in fewer trap sites for injected carriers and reduced shifts under stress. Post-2015 studies on MoS₂ transistors confirm this resilience, with hot-carrier degradation rates significantly lower than in traditional Si MOSFETs, enabling reliable operation in flexible and scaled devices. Nitrogen incorporation into gate oxides passivates interface traps and bulk defects, thereby decreasing the sites available for hot-carrier-induced damage in MOSFETs. This process, often achieved via plasma nitridation or annealing, enhances HCI lifetime by stabilizing Si-O bonds and reducing trap-assisted generation. In the 2020s, negative capacitance field-effect transistors (NCFETs) enable lower operating voltages through ferroelectric materials achieving sub-60 mV/decade subthreshold swing, potentially reducing that drive HCI, though primarily aimed at power efficiency.

Specialized Contexts

In Non-Volatile Memory

In NOR flash memory, programming operations primarily rely on channel hot electron (CHE) injection, where high drain voltage accelerates s in the channel, enabling them to overcome the barrier and charge the floating gate to store data. This process, while efficient for byte-level writes, induces significant stress on the tunnel oxide through hot carrier bombardment, leading to interface trap generation and charge trapping that degrade the oxide integrity over repeated cycles. Consequently, NOR flash devices exhibit limited endurance, typically on the order of 10^5 program/erase cycles, beyond which shifts and window closure impair reliable operation. In flash architectures, hot-carrier injection manifests differently, primarily as a secondary effect during program and read operations rather than the core programming mechanism, which relies on Fowler-Nordheim tunneling. HCI becomes prominent at the edges of word lines, where voltage boosting in unselected channels during programming creates high lateral fields, injecting hot carriers into adjacent cells and exacerbating program disturb. This edge-word-line vulnerability accelerates shifts in neighboring cells, contributing to bit errors in (MLC) configurations. In 3D structures introduced after 2010, the vertical channel design—often using (poly-Si)—mitigates some HCI impacts by distributing fields along the string length and reducing peak channel hot spots compared to planar . However, the poly-Si channel introduces new degradation pathways, such as charge trapping at grain boundaries, which worsens with endurance cycling and leads to increased leakage currents and stringer-level variability. Hot-carrier injection significantly influences endurance by contributing to read disturb mechanisms, where repeated reads generate hot carriers that inadvertently program unselected cells, and to retention loss through accelerated charge detrapping in stressed oxides. These effects limit overall device lifetime, particularly in high-density stacks, with read disturb errors becoming more prevalent after 10^4-10^5 cycles in edge cells. Recent mitigations, such as split- cell designs in advanced NOR and hybrid NAND variants, improve gate coupling ratios and lower required programming voltages, thereby reducing HCI-induced oxide stress.

Relation to Radiation Effects

Hot-carrier injection (HCI) and radiation-induced total ionizing dose (TID) effects exhibit notable analogies in their degradation mechanisms within devices, particularly in the generation of oxide traps and interface states. Both processes lead to the creation of positive oxide trap charges, such as E' centers, and interface traps, like Pb centers at the Si-SiO₂ interface, which disrupt charge transport and device performance. In HCI, high-energy carriers from inject into the , forming these traps and causing shifts (ΔV_th) of tens to hundreds of millivolts. Similarly, TID from breaks Si-H bonds and generates electron-hole pairs that recombine to produce comparable trap densities, resulting in analogous ΔV_th shifts, often in the range of 100-200 under equivalent conditions. These shared outcomes make HCI a useful for understanding TID-induced charge buildup in reliability assessments. Despite these similarities, HCI and TID differ fundamentally in their origins and manifestations, with significant implications for high-reliability applications like space electronics. HCI arises from operational that accelerate carriers during normal device use, leading to localized, field-driven damage near the drain junction. In contrast, TID stems from environmental exposure to photons or charged particles, which uniformly ionizes the layer and can penetrate deeper into the structure. When combined, these effects often amplify overall ; for instance, pre-irradiation with TID can neutralize some HCI-injected charges but intensifies in the , accelerating ΔV_th by up to 7% while potentially doubling HCI lifetime for metrics due to enhancements. Such synergistic interactions are critical in space environments, where operational HCI compounds with cosmic , reducing device lifetimes in missions like lunar or Mars explorations. In testing and standards for hardness, HCI acceleration methods are employed to simulate and predict TID vulnerability, particularly in advanced nodes. Accelerated HCI tests, conducted at elevated voltages (e.g., V_D = 2.7 V, V_G = 1.8 V), mimic the trap generation and charge shifts from TID, allowing cost-effective screening without full facilities. Post- studies on FinFETs, such as those using or gamma up to 500 krad(), have demonstrated that multi-fin geometries mitigate combined HCI-TID effects by reducing channel fields, with irradiated devices showing up to 30% less ΔV_th degradation compared to unirradiated counterparts after prolonged . These findings adhere to standards like IEC 62416 for HCI reliability and inform qualification protocols for space-grade .

References

  1. [1]
    Hot Carrier Injection - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Hot carrier injection (HCI) refers to the phenomenon where energetic electrons are injected into the oxide under the gate of LDMOS structures, ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Hot-carrier effects in scaled MOS devices - ScienceDirect.com
    Takeda, N. Suzuki, T. Hagiwara. Device performance degradation due to hot-carrier injection at energies below the Si-SiO2 energy barrier. IEEE IEDM (1983), pp ...
  4. [4]
    A Review of Hot Carrier Degradation in n-Channel MOSFETs—Part I
    Transistor parametric drift due to conduction-mode hot carrier degradation (HCD) in n-MOSFETs is reviewed, for long- and short-channel length ...
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
    Evaluating Hot Carrier Induced Degradation of MOSFET Devices
    The MOSFET Hot Carrier Effect​​ These holes and electrons can attain enough energy to surmount the Si–SiO2 barrier and become trapped in the gate oxide. Trapped ...
  7. [7]
    (PDF) Electronic structure of silicon dioxide (a review) - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · ... holes from silicon into silicon dioxide. The barrier for. electrons at the Si/SiO. 2. interface is. Φ. e. = 3.14 eV [27]. The barrier for holes ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] On the Electron and Hole Effective Masses in SiO2 - IOSR Journal
    Jun 25, 2023 · After subtracting the Si bandgap of. 1.12 eV, the Si-SiO2 barrier height is higher at 3.28 eV. It is to be noted that Al is hydrophilic whereas ...
  9. [9]
    Hot Carrier Injection Reliability in Nanoscale Field Effect Transistors
    Nov 4, 2022 · In 1985, Hu et al. developed the lucky electron model involving Si-H bond breakage and related HCI with the maximum electric field in the ...
  10. [10]
    Hot-Carrier Diodes, July 1969 Electronics World - RF Cafe
    In the early 1960's the "hot hole," "hot electron," "unipolar," and finally the uniformly named "hot-carrier diode," made its debut. Although these diodes ...
  11. [11]
    A review of hot-carrier degradation mechanisms in MOSFETs
    We review the hot-carrier effects and reliability problem in MOSFET. The mechanisms that produce the substrate and gate current are discussed, ...
  12. [12]
    A Study Of Injection Conditions In The Substrate Hot Electron ...
    A Study Of Injection Conditions In The Substrate Hot Electron Induced Degradation Of n-MOSFETs ; Article #: ; Date of Conference: 14-15 May 1993 ; Date Added to ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    A Review of Reliability in Gate-All-Around Nanosheet Devices - NIH
    Feb 13, 2024 · In this article, we present a review of the key reliability mechanisms in GAA NS FET, including bias temperature instability (BTI), hot carrier injection (HCI), ...
  15. [15]
    Hot Carrier Stress Sensing Bulk Current for 28 nm Stacked High-k ...
    Dec 8, 2020 · This work primarily focuses on the degradation degree of bulk current (IB) for 28 nm stacked high-k (HK) n-channel metal–oxide–semiconductor ...
  16. [16]
    Trap state passivation improved hot-carrier instability by zirconium ...
    This work investigates the effect on hot carrier degradation (HCD) of doping zirconium into the hafnium oxide high-k layer in the nanoscale high-k/metal ...Missing: HfO2 | Show results with:HfO2
  17. [17]
    Reliability Effects on MOS Transistors Due to Hot-Carrier Injection
    **Summary of Hot-Carrier Injection Effects on MOSFETs (IEEE Document 1052307):**
  18. [18]
    (PDF) Modeling of hot carrier injection across technology scaling
    Mar 8, 2016 · Hot carrier Injection mechanism is an important reliability concern of CMOS devices. While the critical gate dimension length is scaled down ...Missing: intensification | Show results with:intensification
  19. [19]
    [PDF] MOSFET Short Channel Effects - ECE/CIS
    Oct 10, 2010 · Hot Carrier Generation. Carriers drifting near the drain can ... .The carriers reach velocity saturation (high velocity). Hot carriers ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Effect of hot-carrier injection on n- and pMOSFET gate oxide integrity
    The oxide is seen to withstand more Qinj than QBD; this is because hot-electron injection occurs at lower oxide field and, therefore, generates fewer ... QBD ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    A Review of Hot Carrier Degradation in n-Channel MOSFETs—Part I: Physical Mechanism
    **Summary of Key Degradation Mechanisms Due to Hot Carrier Injection in MOSFETs:**
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Hot-carrier charge trapping and trap generation in HfO2 and ...
    PDF | We present a comprehensive experimental study of hot-carrier trap generation and charging effects in high-κ dielectrics using field-effect.
  24. [24]
    Degradation mechanisms in gate-all-around silicon Nanowire field ...
    Apr 24, 2014 · From the above analysis, we can see that ESD TLP stress on the drain of GAA nanowire FET will first trigger the hot carrier injection at Si-SiO2 ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Lucky-electron model of channel hot electron emission
    The lucky electron model proposes that an electron is emitted into SiO2by first gaining enough energy without suffering an energy stripping collision in the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 半导体学报 - Journal of Semiconductors
    Results show that the key parameters m and n of Hu´s lifetime prediction model have a close relationship with oxide thickness. Furthermore, a linear ...Missing: I_d^ | Show results with:I_d^
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Localizing Hot-Carrier Degradation in Silicon Trench MOSFETs - IuE
    It is found that the impact ionization rate seen in drift-diffusion TCAD simulations provides a straightforward means to estimate the defect locations ...
  29. [29]
    Asymmetric aging effect on modern microprocessors - ScienceDirect
    For example, the automotive industry expects integrated circuits (ICs) to function reliably for 10–15 years at a given temperature (usually about 125 °C [1,2] ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Incorporating Hot Carrier Injection Effects into Timing Analysis for ...
    Abstract—This paper focuses on hot carrier (HC) effects in modern CMOS technologies and proposes a scalable method for analyzing circuit-level delay ...
  31. [31]
    Studies of the critical LDD area for HCI improvement - IEEE Xplore
    ... lightly doped drain (LDD). Studies on ... The result shows 10 times improvement in hot carrier injection (HCI) DC lifetime from LDD implant optimization.Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
    Reliability of high-performance monolayer MoS2 transistors on ...
    Jan 24, 2025 · While hot carrier degradation (HCD) in silicon FETs is regarded as a primary reliability concern in scaled devices, our understanding of HCD in ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Memory - Flash
    Apr 28, 2022 · • Flash Memory - NOR. • Cell write. • High voltage process that allows electrons to be injected into the floating gate. • Hot-carrier injection.
  35. [35]
    1T-NOR Flash memory after endurance degradation: An advanced ...
    Hot carrier injection (HCI) and advanced tunneling models were used during program and erase, whereas Flash degradation was considered through defects located ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] TN-12-30: NOR Flash Cycling Endurance and Data Retention
    The dominant wear mechanism for charge loss and gain in NOR Flash memory occurs through electron trapping in the tunnel oxide of the Flash cell. This results in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Enhanced programming efficiency in vertical NAND flash using self ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Suppression of read disturb fail caused by boosting hot carrier injection effect for 3D stack NAND flash memories. IEEE Electron. Device ...
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Design Strategies of 40 nm Split-Gate NOR Flash Memory Device ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · In this paper, we propose strategies for designing optimal devices by adjusting oxide thickness and other structural parameters.
  40. [40]
    Total Ionizing Dose Effects on Lifetime of NMOSFETs Due to Hot ...
    This study systematically investigates the mechanism by which total ionizing dose (TID) affects the lifetime degradation of NMOS devices induced by hot-carrier ...Missing: I_d | Show results with:I_d
  41. [41]
    The influence of total ionizing dose on the hot carrier injection of 22 ...
    We investigate the hot carrier injection effect (HCI) and how X-ray radiation impacts the HCI of 22-nm nFinFETs as a function of device geometry and ...
  42. [42]