Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Houston, We've Got a Problem

"Houston, we've had a problem" is the historic radio transmission delivered by the crew of Apollo 13 to NASA Mission Control on April 13, 1970, alerting ground teams to a catastrophic explosion in the spacecraft's service module that crippled the mission and threatened the astronauts' survival.^[1] The phrase originated during NASA's Apollo program, the third lunar landing attempt, when Command Module Pilot John "Jack" Swigert first reported, "Okay, Houston, we've had a problem here," followed immediately by Commander James A. Lovell repeating and clarifying, "Ah, Houston, we've had a problem. We've had a Main B Bus Undervolt," at 55 hours, 55 minutes, and 35 seconds into the flight.^[2] This communication came after a routine cryogenic oxygen tank stir caused an electrical fault, leading to the tank's rupture 200,000 miles from Earth and resulting in the rapid loss of spacecraft power, oxygen, and propulsion capabilities.^[1] Apollo 13 launched on April 11, 1970, from Kennedy Space Center in Florida, carrying a crew of three: Lovell, an experienced astronaut on his fourth spaceflight; Swigert, a last-minute replacement for Command Module Pilot Ken Mattingly due to a medical quarantine; and Lunar Module Pilot Fred W. Haise on his first mission.^[3] The primary objective was to land in the Moon's Fra Mauro formation, deploy scientific instruments, and return lunar samples, building on the successes of prior Apollo missions.^[3] However, the explosion forced the abortion of the lunar landing, turning the mission into a desperate fight for survival as the crew transferred to the Lunar Module Aquarius as a makeshift lifeboat, conserving limited resources while Mission Control devised improvised solutions to navigate a free-return trajectory around the Moon.^[1] Despite severe challenges—including carbon dioxide buildup, power shortages, and thermal issues—the astronauts splashed down safely in the Pacific Ocean on April 17, 1970, southeast of American Samoa, marking what NASA later termed a "successful failure" that highlighted the agency's ingenuity and the resilience of the human spirit in space exploration.^[3] The incident prompted extensive reviews of spacecraft design, leading to safety improvements in subsequent Apollo flights and beyond.^[1] The phrase "Houston, we've had a problem"—often popularly misquoted in the present tense as "Houston, we have a problem"—has since become a cultural idiom signifying an unforeseen crisis, amplified by its dramatization in Ron Howard's 1995 film Apollo 13, which earned widespread acclaim and nine Academy Award nominations for portraying the mission's tension and heroism.^[4]^[5]

Origins

Apollo 13 Mission Context

Apollo 13 represented NASA's third attempt at a crewed lunar landing within the Apollo program, aimed at exploring the Fra Mauro highlands on the Moon. Launched on April 11, 1970, at 2:13 p.m. EST from Kennedy Space Center's Launch Complex 39A aboard a Saturn V rocket, the mission carried a crew of three astronauts: Commander James A. Lovell Jr. (1928–2025), who had previously flown on Apollo 8 and Gemini missions;^[3]^[6]^[7]^[8] Command Module Pilot John L. "Jack" Swigert Jr., replacing the originally assigned Ken Mattingly due to a medical quarantine; and Lunar Module Pilot Fred W. Haise Jr., on his first spaceflight.^[3]^[6]^[7] The spacecraft stack included the Command and Service Module (CSM) designated Odyssey (CSM-109), which housed the crew during transit and reentry, and the Lunar Module (LM) Aquarius (LM-7), intended for descent to the lunar surface.^[9] Approximately 56 hours into the flight, at Mission Elapsed Time (MET) 055:54:53 on April 13, 1970, a catastrophic explosion occurred in Oxygen Tank No. 2 within the Service Module.^[2] The failure stemmed from damaged Teflon-coated wiring inside the tank, resulting from excessive heating during a pre-launch ground test in March 1970 that had gone unnoticed; this damage created a short circuit during a routine cryogenic fan activation, igniting the insulation and causing the tank to rupture.^[10]^[11] The immediate effects included a low-frequency vibration felt throughout the spacecraft, a sharp bang audible to the crew, activation of the master alarm, and warning lights signaling the loss of Reactant Valves A and B, along with a main bus B undervoltage indication.^[9]^[12] This explosion rapidly depleted the spacecraft's oxygen supply, crippled the fuel cells that generated electrical power, and posed risks of carbon dioxide accumulation in the Command Module's atmosphere.^[13] In response, the crew, under direction from the Mission Control Center at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center (now Johnson Space Center) in Houston, Texas, powered down Odyssey to conserve resources and transferred to the Lunar Module Aquarius, repurposing it as a lifeboat for life support, propulsion, and navigation.^[13] Engineers and flight controllers in Houston improvised solutions, such as adapting carbon dioxide scrubbers from the Command Module to fit the Lunar Module's systems, to address the buildup of hazardous gases.^[14] The mission aborted the lunar landing, instead executing a free-return trajectory around the Moon, with the crew jettisoning the damaged Service Module prior to reentry.^[15] Apollo 13 concluded successfully with the crew's safe splashdown in the Pacific Ocean on April 17, 1970, approximately 600 miles southeast of American Samoa, after a six-day ordeal that highlighted the resilience of both human ingenuity and spacecraft design.^[3]^[16]

The Original Phrase

During the Apollo 13 mission on April 13, 1970, at 55 hours, 55 minutes, and 19 seconds ground elapsed time (GET), Command Module Pilot Jack Swigert radioed Mission Control with the initial report of the crisis: "Okay, Houston, we've had a problem here."^[2] This transmission followed an explosion in oxygen tank 2 in the service module, which occurred approximately 26 seconds earlier, causing a Main B electrical bus undervolt and venting debris visible to the crew.^[2] Capsule Communicator Jack Lousma responded, "This is Houston. Say again, please," prompting Commander Jim Lovell to confirm at 55:55:35 GET: "Ah, Houston, we've had a problem. We've had a Main B Bus Undervolt."^[2] These exchanges are documented in official NASA mission transcripts and audio recordings, which capture the crew's measured tone amid the emergency approximately 200,000 miles from Earth.^[17] The phrasing "we've had a problem" adhered to NASA protocols for astronaut communications during anomalies, emphasizing factual, understated reporting to maintain composure and facilitate rapid problem-solving without inducing panic on the ground or among the crew.^[18] Astronaut training, which included simulations of potential failures, stressed calm delivery to ensure clear transmission of critical data, such as the electrical undervolt indicating the explosion had already transpired—hence the past tense "had" to denote a completed event rather than an ongoing one.^[18] This approach aligned with broader emergency procedures outlined in mission operations handbooks, where brevity and precision were prioritized to allow Mission Control to assess and respond effectively.^[19] Post-mission analyses, including NASA's technical debriefing report (SP-4029), affirm that the crew's restraint prevented escalation of confusion during the initial moments of the crisis.^[19] Official documentation, including air-to-ground voice tapes archived by NASA and the Apollo 13 Flight Journal, provides no evidence of the variants "we have a problem" or "we've got a problem" in the radio transmissions to Houston; the latter phrase appears only in intra-cockpit chatter as an informal alert among Swigert, Lovell, and Lunar Module Pilot Fred Haise immediately after the bang.^[2] While minor discrepancies exist in personal recollections—such as some crew members later paraphrasing the exchange—consensus from verified logs, audio files, and the 1970 NASA report confirms the use of "had" as the definitive wording.^[19] These records, preserved in NASA's Johnson Space Center archives, underscore the transmission's role as a procedural alert rather than a dramatic declaration, enabling the swift activation of contingency plans.^[2]

Popularization and Misquotation

Role in the 1995 Film Apollo 13

The 1995 film Apollo 13, directed by Ron Howard and released on June 30, 1995, dramatizes the near-disastrous Apollo 13 mission, with Tom Hanks portraying astronaut Jim Lovell.^[20] The movie is based on Lovell's 1994 book Lost Moon: The Perilous Voyage of Apollo 13, co-authored with Jeffrey Kluger, which recounts the real events of the 1970 mission.^[21] Produced by Imagine Entertainment and Universal Pictures, the film stars Hanks alongside Bill Paxton as Fred Haise and Kevin Bacon as Jack Swigert, focusing on the crew's struggle after an onboard explosion forces them to abort their lunar landing.^[22] In the screenplay by William Broyles Jr. and Al Reinert, the famous phrase from the mission is altered to "Houston, we have a problem," spoken by Hanks's character Lovell, differing from the original transmission of "Okay, Houston, we've had a problem."^[23] Broyles intentionally modified the line to heighten dramatic tension and convey present-tense immediacy, making the crisis feel more urgent and immediate for cinematic effect.^[23] The production benefited from extensive NASA cooperation, including access to facilities at the Johnson Space Center and Kennedy Space Center for filming, as well as technical consultants such as Lovell and flight director Gene Kranz, portrayed by Ed Harris.^[24] Dialogue was drawn from authentic mission transcripts to ensure realism, though recreated by actors rather than using original audio recordings.^[24] The film achieved significant commercial and critical success, grossing $355 million worldwide against a $52 million budget.^[21] It received nine Academy Award nominations, winning two for Best Film Editing and Best Sound.^[25] The altered phrase became the movie's tagline—"Houston, we have a problem"—and its delivery in the iconic crisis scene propelled the version into widespread popular awareness, embedding it in the cultural lexicon.^[26] In 2005, the line was ranked #50 on the American Film Institute's list of the 100 greatest movie quotes.^[27]

Emergence of the Misquote

The original communication during the Apollo 13 mission on April 13, 1970, used the past-tense phrasing "Houston, we've had a problem," as uttered by astronaut Jack Swigert and repeated by commander Jim Lovell in NASA's official transcripts.^[2] Prior to the 1995 film Apollo 13, the present-tense variant "Houston, we have a problem" appeared only rarely, with occasional misstatements in media reports simplifying the wording for immediate impact. Following the film's release, usage of the misquoted form surged dramatically, becoming the predominant version in public discourse by the late 1990s as it permeated books, articles, and everyday language.^[28] Several factors contributed to this evolution, including media practices that favored concise, punchy phrasing over precise transcription for broader accessibility. The 1995 film played a pivotal role by adopting "Houston, we have a problem" to convey heightened urgency, thereby reshaping collective memory and embedding the variant in cultural consciousness. This cinematic choice, drawn from the mission's dramatized accounts, amplified the phrase's memorability and led to its widespread adoption beyond historical contexts.^[29] Linguistically, the shift from the past perfect "we've had" to the simple present "we have" subtly altered the phrase's implication, moving from a factual report of a completed incident to a declaration of an active, unresolved emergency. This change enhanced dramatic tension, making it more suitable for narrative retellings, as observed in analyses of mission coverage. Archival news clips from the 1970s through the 1990s illustrate a gradual transition, with early reports sticking closer to the original while later ones increasingly favored the present tense for rhetorical effect.^[4] Documentation of the original phrasing persists in authoritative sources, such as Gene Kranz's 2000 memoir Failure Is Not an Option, where the NASA flight director recounts the crisis using "we've had a problem". Kranz's account, based on mission logs and personal involvement, underscores the phrase's accurate historical form amid its popularized distortions.

Cultural Impact

Idiomatic Usage

The phrase "Houston, we have a problem" has evolved into a widely recognized English idiom denoting the emergence of an unexpected difficulty or crisis, typically invoked in a composed or ironic tone to highlight a challenge without immediate panic. This semantic shift emphasizes understatement as a rhetorical device, allowing speakers to acknowledge issues while implying manageability and resolve. According to the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, the expression is commonly used humorously to indicate that something has gone wrong, reflecting its transformation from a literal mission report to a versatile linguistic tool for everyday communication.^[30] In its early adoption during the 1970s, the phrase remained largely confined to NASA contexts, stemming directly from the Apollo 13 incident where it served as a procedural alert for technical faults. By the 1980s, it began permeating broader professional spheres, including corporate and technical environments, where it appeared in training materials and radio broadcasts as a shorthand for troubleshooting complex issues. For instance, NASA itself repurposed the phrase in 1983 for a weekly radio program titled "Houston, We Have a Problem," extending its utility beyond spaceflight to general problem-solving narratives in engineering and management. This gradual integration into business jargon underscored its adaptability for signaling disruptions in high-stakes settings like technology development.^[31] The phrase "Houston, we have a problem" appears as an example in studies of social movie quoting, where it is used to get attention in conversations.^[32] Globally, the phrase has spread into non-English languages through direct translations, adapting to local idioms while retaining its core connotation of ironic crisis acknowledgment; in French, for example, it is rendered as "Houston, nous avons un problème" and used similarly in media and casual speech to denote complications. Usage statistics from Google Ngram Viewer illustrate this expansion, showing a marked peak in English-language book occurrences post-1995, coinciding with heightened cultural visibility that propelled its international adoption.

References in Media and Pop Culture

The phrase "Houston, we've got a problem" has permeated television parodies, often used for comedic effect in crisis situations. In the 1999 episode "They Saved Lisa's Brain" of The Simpsons, Marge Simpson says "Houston, we have a problem. A sexy problem" in a comedic personal context, highlighting its status as a shorthand for unexpected trouble.^[33] Similar satirical nods appear in Family Guy, such as in scenes where characters invoke it during absurd family mishaps, amplifying its role as a punchline for everyday disasters. South Park has employed the phrase in various episodes for comedic crises. In more serious space-themed narratives, the line underscores tension and ingenuity. The Apple TV+ series For All Mankind (2019–present), an alternate-history drama of the space race, references the Apollo 13 ethos through mission crises, evoking the phrase's legacy in episodes depicting engine failures and high-stakes decisions at NASA.^[34] Music has also adopted the phrase for thematic resonance. Country singer Luke Combs released "Houston, We've Got a Problem" in 2017 on the deluxe edition of his album This One's for You Too, using the line in lyrics to describe romantic turmoil as a cosmic emergency, blending space imagery with personal drama. Literature draws on the phrase's tension for survival tales. Andy Weir's 2011 novel The Martian features astronaut Mark Watney stranded on Mars, communicating with NASA in Houston amid life-threatening failures, directly echoing the Apollo 13 crisis without verbatim quotation but capturing its problem-solving spirit.^[35] The line's cultural weight is affirmed by accolades. It ranked #50 on the American Film Institute's 2004 list of the 100 greatest movie quotes, cementing its place in cinematic history as spoken by Tom Hanks in Apollo 13.^[36] Pre-2020 political discourse occasionally varied the phrase for emphasis. While not directly quoting it, Ronald Reagan's 1986 address following the Challenger disaster alluded to Apollo-era resilience, framing space setbacks as surmountable challenges akin to the 1970 mission.^[37] Advertising leveraged the phrase for memorable campaigns in the 2000s. A 2000 Smirnoff Vodka magazine ad titled "Houston, We Have a Problem" depicted a cosmonaut toasting in space, playfully tying the line to the brand's global appeal.^[38] As of 2025, the phrase continues to appear in modern media, such as references during SpaceX's Starship tests in 2024, where commentators invoked it amid launch anomalies, underscoring its enduring relevance in space exploration discourse.^[39]

Variations and Modern Usage

Common Alterations

The phrase "Houston, we've had a problem," as originally uttered during the Apollo 13 mission on April 13, 1970, by astronaut Jack Swigert, has evolved into several key variants in popular usage.^[1] The 1995 film Apollo 13 established the present-tense version "Houston, we have a problem" as the standard misquote, spoken by the character Jim Lovell (played by Tom Hanks) to convey an ongoing crisis.^[40] A frequent colloquial alteration substitutes "we've got" for "we have," resulting in "Houston, we've got a problem," which aligns with informal English speech patterns emphasizing possession or immediacy.^[40] These changes often stem from linguistic simplification and regional dialects; for instance, "got" appears more commonly in casual American and British English to denote a current situation, making the phrase more conversational and adaptable to everyday dialogue. Intentional modifications for emphasis or humor include additions like "big" or "serious," as in "Houston, we have a big problem," which heighten the dramatic tone while retaining the idiomatic structure for comedic effect in media and speech.^[41] Beyond space-related contexts, the phrase has been localized in non-aerospace adaptations, such as "London, we have a problem," used in British settings to invoke a similar sense of urgency with a geographically relevant control center reference. Dictionaries document these variants as idiomatic expressions signaling a significant issue, often humorously, with the core form "Houston, we have a problem" recognized for its cultural shorthand value.

Contemporary Applications

During the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022, the phrase "Houston, we have a problem" was commonly adapted in news coverage of health and economic surges in Texas. RSM US's report on the rising curve of coronavirus infections in Houston similarly invoked the phrase to emphasize slowed economic recovery in Texas amid 2020 case spikes. E&E News used it on May 6, 2020, to highlight the intersection of COVID-19, unemployment, and impending summer heat exacerbating homelessness in Texas cities like Houston. In space news during this period, the phrase resurfaced in discussions of launch delays and technical hurdles. For example, coverage of SpaceX's Starship development challenges in 2021, including regulatory and testing setbacks, echoed the idiom in analyses of the program's path to operational status, underscoring persistent engineering risks in private spaceflight. From 2023 to 2025, the phrase appeared in technology and climate contexts to signal emerging crises. In AI ethics debates, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine's November 15, 2024, article "The Ethics of Product Development—Houston, Do We Have a Problem?" applied it to ethical dilemmas in AI-integrated products, such as bias mitigation and sustainability impacts. OODA Loop's April 30, 2024, piece "Houston, We Have a Problem… (Let's Get to Solving It)" employed the variant to critique reliance on AI firms for safety solutions, advocating for independent oversight amid rapid deployment. On climate issues, the Latin American Journal of Central Banking's May 2025 paper "Houston, we have a problem: Can satellite information bridge the climate-related data gap?" used it to frame limitations in satellite data for assessing climate risks in developing economies. Political applications peaked around the 2024 U.S. election, particularly regarding voting integrity. The Dallas County GOP's September 30, 2024, post declared "... Houston we have a problem" following a logic and accuracy test revealing issues in election systems, raising alarms about reliability in key Texas counties. Emerging trends included social media virality and international adaptations. In 2023, the phrase fueled TikTok content around "Houston We Have a Problem" spicy food challenges, where users reacted to extreme heat levels at chains like Houston Hot Chicken, amplifying its use in everyday crisis humor. Internationally, the European Space Agency referenced it in 2025 reports and media tied to the Artemis program; a February 18, 2025, ESA podcast episode with astronaut Luca Parmitano invoked "Houston, we have a problem" during discussions of spacewalk training for lunar missions, evoking historical NASA-ESA collaborations. Overall, the phrase's frequency in digital communication rose post-2020, adapting to global events like pandemics and technological shifts, as reflected in media patterns and online discourse.

References

[1]
50 Years Ago: “Houston, We've Had a Problem” - NASA
Apr 13, 2020 · That prompted Swigert to call Mission Control, “Okay, Houston, we've had a problem here.” Capsule communicator (Capcom) astronaut Jack R.
[2]
Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Day 3, part 2: 'Houston, we've had a problem'
Aug 21, 2023 · Ah, Houston, we've had a problem. We've had a Main B Bus Undervolt. The legendary line delivered by Lovell is "Houston, we've had a problem" and ...
[3]
Apollo 13 - NASA
50 Years Ago: “Houston, We've Had a Problem”. During their third day in space, the crew of Apollo 13, Commander James A. Lovell, Command Module Pilot John L.…Houston, We’ve Had a Problem · Mission Details · The Successful Failure
[4]
Houston, we have a problem: the myths of Apollo 13 - The Irish Times
Apr 17, 2020 · What he actually said was: "Houston, we've had a problem." Dramatic licence. In fairness to the scriptwriters, “we've had” lacks the dramatic ...
[5]
When We Were Racing With the Moon - The New York Times
Jun 25, 1995 · Swigert radioed, "Hey, we've got a problem here"; a moment later Mr. Lovell took the mike and said, "Houston, we've had a problem." (The film ...
[6]
50 Years Ago: Apollo 13 Three Weeks Before Launch - NASA
Mar 19, 2020 · With only three weeks remaining before their April 11, 1970 launch, the Apollo 13 prime crew of Commander James A. Lovell, Command Module ...
[7]
Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Pre-Launch Activities and Crewman Change
Apr 6, 2020 · With a planned launch on April 11th, 1970 from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida, the spacecraft and its three-man crew would then coast their ...
[8]
Apollo 13: Mission Details - NASA
Jul 8, 2009 · Apollo 13 was supposed to land in the Fra Mauro area. An explosion on board forced Apollo 13 to circle the moon without landing.
[9]
NASA Lewis Aided Apollo 13 Investigation
Apr 13, 2020 · The investigators speculated that a short circuit caused the coated wires inside the oxygen tank to burn, which resulted in an explosion.
[10]
[PDF] A Case Study of the Failure on Apollo 13
The tank was over-pressured by the explosion and burst, causing damage to adjacent systems, including oxygen tank 1, and blowing off the side panel covering SM ...
[11]
[PDF] APOLLO 13 MISSION REPORT SEPTEMBER 1970
minor vibration or tremor in the spacecraft. Approximately. 2 seconds later, the Command Module Pilot reported a master alarm and a main-bus-B undervoltage.
[12]
Apollo 13: The Successful Failure - NASA
Apr 6, 2020 · The Apollo 13 mission was to be the third lunar landing in the program before an on board explosion forced the mission to circle the Moon without landing.
[13]
Apollo 13 Lunar Journal : Mission Overview - NASA
Classed as "successful failure" because of experience in rescuing crew. Spent upper stage successfully impacted on the Moon.
[14]
Apollo 13 Flight Journal - Day 3, part 4: Free Return - NASA
Apr 21, 2020 · The spacecraft crew aboard Aquarius and Odyssey are now powering down, carefully husbanding all of the consumables aboard the spacecraft. We ...
[15]
Apollo 13 transcription - NASA
This is the transcription of the technical air-to-ground (TAG) voice communications of the Apollo 13 mission. The primary communications net (GOSS net l) will ...
[16]
Calm, Cool, and Collected | National Air and Space Museum
Dec 21, 2022 · Yes, it was actually Jack Swigert who initially said: “Houston, we've had a problem here.” When you heard the tank explode, how quickly did ...Missing: protocol training
[17]
[PDF] Houston, we've got a problem.
serious trouble for Apollo 13-200,000 miles from Earth. CAPSULE COMMUNICATOR-This is Hogs- ton; say again, pledse. sc-Houston, we've had a problem. We've.
[18]
Apollo 13 (1995) - IMDb
Rating 7.7/10 (331,388) Release date · June 30, 1995 (United States) ; Also known as. Apolo 13 ; Filming locations · Kennedy Space Center, Titusville, Florida, USA ; Production companies.Full cast & crew · Trivia · Apollo 13 · Tom Hanks as Jim Lovell
[19]
Apollo 13 (1995) - Box Office and Financial Information - The Numbers
Opening Weekend: $25,353,380 (14.5% of total gross) ; Legs: 6.89 (domestic box office/biggest weekend) ; Domestic Share: 51.9% (domestic box office/worldwide).
[20]
Apollo 13 | Rotten Tomatoes
Rating 94% (149) Apollo 13 (1995). GARY SINISE portrays ... Box Office (Gross USA): $172.9M. Runtime: 2h 20m. Sound Mix: Dolby SR , DTS. Most ...149 Reviews · 250000+ Ratings · Video · Cast and Crew
[21]
“Failure Is Not an Option”: An Oral History of 'Apollo 13'
Sep 19, 2025 · and put the words, “Houston, we have a problem,” into the cultural lexicon (even if that's not exactly what Lovell said in real life).
[22]
Why Apollo 13 Looks So Realistic, Explained - SYFY
Jul 24, 2023 · ... Lovell and Kranz, were available to serve as technical consultants. Corenblith, for example, got to witness Kranz's resourcefulness ...
[23]
1995 – Apollo 13 - Academy Award Best Picture Winners
Jan 8, 2017 · Apollo 13 was nominated for 9 Academy Awards, taking home 2, but not for what you'd expect. One was for Best Film Editing and the other was ...
[24]
Apollo 13 (1995) - Taglines - IMDb
Tom Hanks in Apollo 13 (1995). Taglines. Apollo 13. Edit. Failure is not an option. Experience the thrilling masterpiece in IMAX. Houston, we have a problem.
[25]
American Film Institute (AFI) America's Greatest Movie Quotes
Apollo 13 (1995) IMDb. “Houston, we have a problem.” (50). Oscar Nominated marker, Auntie Mame (1958) IMDb. “Life is a banquet, and most poor suckers are ...
[26]
'Houston, we have a problem': The amazing history of the iconic ...
Apr 13, 2017 · The “Houston, we have a problem” declaration is one of the all-time great historical misquotes, with an entertaining, fascinating linguistic backstory.
[27]
'Houston, We Have A Problem': The True Story Behind The Misquote
Apr 17, 2020 · When Apollo 13 astronauts Jim Lovell and John Swigert famously said "Houston, we've had a problem," the mission's troubles were just beginning.
[28]
Houston, we have a problem - Longman Dictionary
Houston, we have a problem meaning, definition, what is Houston, we have a problem: people say this humorously when somethin...: Learn more.
[29]
Why do we say Houston, we have a problem? - BookBrowse.com
In 1983, NASA titled one of its weekly radio programs "Houston, We Have a Problem," and even earlier, in 1974, Universal Television produced a TV movie about ...Missing: idiom origin
[30]
[PDF] “here's looking at you, kid:” an empirical study of the social movie
SMQ 6) To get attention: “Houston, we have a problem.” – Apollo 13 (1995). How Apt is this quote for accomplishing the above discourse goals in conversation? ( ...
[31]
s14e19 - Old Yeller-Belly - The Simpsons Transcript - TvT
May 9, 2003 · Houston, we have a problem. This place is dullsville. How can you get a buzz chewing freeze-dried beer? Both: Wha...? It's Suds McDuff ...
[32]
For All Mankind | Apollo 24 Engine Failure Puts The Crew In Jeopardy
May 27, 2022 · ... For All Mankind Now: http://AAN.SonyPictures.com/ForAllMankind ... Apollo 13 | "Houston, We Have a Problem". Universal Pictures•7.2M ...
[33]
Astronaut is lost in space in thrilling 'Martian' - USA Today
Feb 17, 2014 · Houston, we have a problem. Make that a series of problems, each thornier than the last, in The Martian, Andy Weir's page-turning techno- ...
[34]
AFI's 100 Years…100 Movie Quotes - American Film Institute
The American Film Institute's List of the 100 Greatest Movie Quotes Of All Time. ... "Houston, we have a problem." Apollo 13 (1995). Apollo 13 (1995). Cast: Tom ...
[35]
Address to the Nation on the Explosion of the Space Shuttle ...
Jan 28, 1986 · Nancy and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle Challenger. We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country.
[36]
2000 SMIRNOFF Vodka Magazine Ad - Houston, We Have A Problem.
2000 SMIRNOFF Vodka Magazine Ad - Houston, We Have A Problem. ; Item number. 285954817364 ; Brand. Smirnoff ; Type of Advertising. Magazine Ad ; Accurate ...
[37]
18 famous movie quotes everyone gets wrong - Business Insider
Aug 16, 2017 · Misquote: "Houston we've got a problem." Actual movie quote: "Houston, we have a problem." People often combine together astronaut Jack ...
[38]
Most Mis - Quoted Movie Lines Of All Time - Curated By Uncle
Jun 25, 2025 · The real line is “Houston, we've had a problem,” past tense and much less dramatic. I once heard someone say, “Houston, we have a big problem,” ...