Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jargon

Jargon is specialized vocabulary and phrasing peculiar to a particular profession, trade, group, or field of activity, enabling concise and precise expression among insiders while often rendering communication opaque or inaccessible to outsiders.^[1]^[2] The term derives from the mid-14th-century Old French jargoun, originally denoting chattering or twittering sounds like those of birds, which evolved to signify unintelligible or gibberish-like speech before acquiring its modern sense of technical or in-group lingo.^[3]^[4] Within linguistics and communication studies, jargon functions as a shorthand system of terms, acronyms, and idioms tailored to domain-specific concepts, allowing experts to convey complex ideas efficiently without lengthy explanations—such as "bandwidth" in computing or "leverage" in finance beyond its literal meaning.^[5]^[6] However, its defining characteristics include exclusivity and potential for abstraction, where terms may prioritize brevity over clarity, fostering subcultural cohesion but hindering interdisciplinary exchange or public understanding.^[7] Empirical research highlights jargon's dual role: it enhances precision in technical discourse, yet overuse correlates with reduced comprehension, increased perceived risk in messaging, and even signals of communicator insecurity rather than mastery.^[8]^[9] Notable controversies surrounding jargon center on its capacity to erect barriers in broader communication contexts, such as science outreach or professional interactions, where it can induce resistance to persuasion, inflate perceptions of complexity, and exclude non-experts, thereby undermining trust and effective information transfer.^[10]^[11] Studies in sociolinguistics demonstrate that while jargon evolves organically to meet practical needs—like specialized dialects in industrial or strategic fields—its persistence often stems from social dynamics, including status signaling or deliberate obfuscation, rather than pure utility, prompting calls for deliberate simplification in public-facing contexts without sacrificing accuracy.^[12]^[13] This tension underscores jargon's empirical trade-offs: a tool for causal efficiency in closed loops of expertise, yet a frequent culprit in miscommunication when causal chains extend to diverse audiences.

Definition and Distinctions

Core Definition and Characteristics

Jargon refers to the specialized vocabulary, expressions, and sometimes syntactic conventions used by members of a particular profession, trade, discipline, or social group to communicate ideas efficiently within that context.^[1] This terminology is often incomprehensible to outsiders lacking the requisite background knowledge, as its meanings deviate from or extend beyond standard usage in general language.^[2] Core characteristics of jargon include its domain-specificity, where terms encapsulate complex concepts succinctly for insiders—such as "affidavit" in legal contexts denoting a sworn statement or "eigenvalue" in mathematics representing a scalar associated with a linear transformation.^[5] It functions as a shorthand that assumes shared expertise, promoting precision and reducing redundancy in professional discourse, but this reliance on collective knowledge can foster exclusivity and hinder broader accessibility.^[6] Jargon evolves organically through repeated use in practical settings, often incorporating acronyms, abbreviations, or neologisms tailored to the group's needs, rather than through deliberate linguistic design.^[7] While jargon enables rapid transmission of nuanced information among experts, its opacity to non-experts has drawn criticism for potentially obscuring meaning or serving as a tool for gatekeeping, as evidenced in studies of scientific communication where specialized terms correlate with reduced public comprehension.^[9] Nonetheless, empirical analyses affirm its utility in maintaining technical rigor, with surveys indicating that professionals in fields like medicine or engineering report jargon as essential for avoiding ambiguity in high-stakes interactions.^[1] This dual nature—efficient yet exclusionary—stems from jargon's adaptation to causal demands of specialized environments, where general language proves insufficient for describing intricate processes or phenomena.^[14]

Differentiation from Slang, Acronyms, and Technical Terms

Jargon differs from slang primarily in its purpose, formality, and audience. Slang consists of informal, colloquial expressions that evolve rapidly within social groups or subcultures, often carrying playful or subversive connotations and lacking precision for professional use.^[15] In contrast, jargon comprises specialized vocabulary and phrasing tailored to a particular profession or technical domain, enabling efficient communication among insiders while frequently excluding outsiders due to its context-specific meanings.^[16] Linguistic analyses emphasize that slang's transient nature—driven by cultural trends—contrasts with jargon's relative stability, as the latter supports ongoing operational needs within established fields rather than casual social bonding.^[17] Acronyms, while often embedded within jargon, represent a narrower linguistic mechanism: abbreviations formed from initial letters of words or phrases, such as "DNA" for deoxyribonucleic acid, which prioritize brevity over conceptual depth.^[18] Jargon, however, extends beyond mere abbreviation to encompass a full system of terms, idioms, and syntactic patterns unique to a discipline, where acronyms serve as tools rather than the defining feature.^[19] For instance, in medicine, acronyms like "MRI" form part of broader jargon that includes procedural descriptions and diagnostic frameworks, illustrating how acronyms function as components of jargon's exclusionary lexicon without constituting it entirely.^[20] Technical terms overlap significantly with jargon but are distinguished by their intent for precision and universality within a field, whereas jargon often implies opaque or unnecessarily convoluted application that prioritizes group signaling over clarity.^[21] Dictionaries and style guides define technical terms as standardized nomenclature for concepts, such as "photosynthesis" in biology, designed for replicable knowledge transmission.^[22] Jargon, by extension, aggregates these terms into a dialect that can obscure meaning for non-experts, sometimes critiqued for fostering elitism; empirical studies in communication note that while technical terms enhance accuracy among peers, jargon's holistic use correlates with reduced accessibility in interdisciplinary contexts.^[23] This differentiation underscores jargon's role as a socio-professional barrier, rooted in causal dynamics of expertise silos rather than slang's egalitarian informality or acronyms' syntactic efficiency.

Etymology and Historical Development

Origins of the Term

The term jargon derives from Old French jargoun or jargon, first attested around the 12th century, where it denoted the chattering of birds, warbling song, or unintelligible human speech resembling such sounds.^[3] This usage reflected an onomatopoeic origin, mimicking twittering or gabbling noises, and may trace further to Vulgar Latin gargō or related forms evoking throat-clearing or chatter, though direct Latin antecedents like garrīre ("to chatter") are debated among philologists.^[3] By the mid-14th century, the word entered Middle English via Anglo-Norman influences, retaining its pejorative sense of "gibberish," "idle talk," or "barbarous language" incomprehensible to outsiders, often applied to thieves' cant or foreign tongues.^[24] The Oxford English Dictionary records an early verb form jargonen (to chatter or warble) predating 1366 in the anonymous Romaunt of the Rose, a Chaucer-attributed work, signaling its adoption for describing meaningless or bird-like utterance.^[25] Its inaugural literary appearance in English prose or verse occurs in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales (c. 1387–1400), specifically in "The Parson's Tale," where jargon describes the "janglynge" or discordant speech of those eschewing plain truth for ornate verbiage: "And namely the cursedly janglynge and tricherie of worldly clergees."^[26] This usage underscores an early critique of obfuscatory language, aligning with medieval views of jargon as both avian mimicry and human pretension, distinct from later specialized connotations.^[27] ![Illustration from Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales depicting narrative elements associated with early English usage of the term]float-right

Evolution Through Key Periods

The concept of jargon as specialized professional or trade language solidified in the 16th century, evolving from its earlier pejorative sense of unintelligible chatter or bird-like twittering introduced to English in the mid-1300s via Old French "jargoun," as seen in Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales.^[26] This shift reflected growing recognition of domain-specific terms in guilds and early professions, where such vocabulary protected trade secrets and facilitated intra-group communication, though often viewed suspiciously by outsiders as obfuscatory.^[4] During the Renaissance (15th–16th centuries), scientific and medical fields accelerated jargon development through revival of Greek and Latin texts, incorporating Arabic influences like "alcohol" for distilled spirits; medical terminology, rooted in Hippocratic Greek (c. 460–370 BC) with terms such as "arthritis" and "nephritis," was systematized in Latin by figures like Andreas Vesalius and William Harvey, forming a precise yet insular lexicon for anatomy and physiology.^[28]^[29] In law and emerging sciences, printed glossaries and treatises began standardizing terms, bridging classical roots with vernacular adaptations to support expanding knowledge domains amid the Scientific Revolution.^[30] The 19th century, amid the Industrial Revolution, saw jargon proliferate in engineering, manufacturing, and bureaucracy, with business terminology tracing roots to this era's technological and organizational expansions, often borrowing from technical realms to denote efficiency in nascent corporate structures.^[31] Medical jargon evolved further via neoclassical coinages like "leukemia" and eponyms, reflecting rapid scientific advances, while legal jargon entrenched Anglo-French terms from the medieval period into codified statutes, prioritizing precision over accessibility.^[28] In the 20th century, particularly post-World War II, corporate and military influences drove jargon into management and technology, with terms like "implement" surging in usage—from 5 per 10,000 books in 1950 to 2 per 1,000 by 2000—as veterans adapted operational lingo to civilian enterprises; computing and scientific fields layered acronyms and neologisms for innovation, while medicine transitioned from Latin dominance (ending formally in Britain by 1802) to English-led international standards, enhancing global collaboration but widening comprehension gaps.^[32]^[29] This era's bureaucratic growth amplified pejorative critiques of jargon as needlessly complex, yet its functional role in specialized efficiency persisted.^[4]

Functional Advantages

Precision and Efficiency for Experts

Specialized terminology enables experts within a domain to articulate complex, nuanced concepts with greater precision than general language permits, as it incorporates distinctions refined through iterative refinement and empirical validation in that field. For example, in physics, the term "entropy" precisely denotes a measure of disorder or unavailable energy in a thermodynamic system, avoiding the ambiguities inherent in broader descriptors like "disorder" alone, which could conflate unrelated phenomena. This precision stems from jargon evolving as a compressed lexicon tailored to the causal structures and observables central to the discipline, facilitating unambiguous reference to entities and processes.^[33] Efficiency arises because jargon functions as a high-bandwidth shorthand, reducing the cognitive and temporal costs of communication among those versed in the domain. Linguistic studies indicate that human languages optimize for communicative efficiency by shortening frequent or predictable terms, a principle extended in jargon where domain-specific words encapsulate multifaceted ideas that would otherwise demand lengthy expositions; for instance, conveying "Bayesian inference" in statistics requires far fewer words than outlining its probabilistic updating mechanism from scratch. In professional settings like engineering or medicine, this allows rapid exchange of critical information—such as "hypoxemia" signaling low blood oxygen levels—potentially averting errors in high-stakes scenarios where verbosity could delay action. Empirical analysis of lexicons supports that such optimizations enhance overall information transfer rates within expert groups.^[34]^[35] Moreover, jargon fosters collaborative innovation by presupposing shared foundational knowledge, thereby streamlining discourse toward novel applications rather than rote explanations. In scientific teams, this efficiency correlates with accelerated problem-solving, as evidenced by the development of domain-specific glossaries in fields like bioinformatics, where terms like "BLAST algorithm" enable quick alignment on computational methods without redundant tutorials. However, this benefit hinges on communal adoption and training, underscoring jargon's role as an emergent tool for causal modeling and prediction within bounded expertise communities.^[36]

Facilitation of Specialized Knowledge and Innovation

Jargon provides experts with a precise and efficient mechanism for communicating complex ideas, encapsulating multifaceted concepts into concise terms that reduce ambiguity and cognitive overhead in professional discourse.^[37]^[38] This shared vocabulary enables specialists to reference established knowledge rapidly, fostering cumulative progress in fields where nuanced distinctions are paramount, such as physics or engineering, by minimizing misinterpretation during collaboration.^[39] In the realm of innovation, the emergence of specialized terms often accompanies breakthroughs, standardizing novel constructs and allowing researchers to build iteratively upon them without redundant exposition. For instance, the introduction of terminology like "CRISPR-Cas9" in 2012 precisely denoted a gene-editing mechanism derived from bacterial immune systems, which accelerated advancements in biotechnology by providing a common framework for experimental replication and refinement across laboratories worldwide.^[38]^[39] Similarly, standardized electrotechnical terms defined by bodies such as the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) ensure consistent application in device design and interoperability, underpinning scalable innovations in power systems and electronics since the organization's founding in 1906.^[40] Empirical support for jargon's role in knowledge facilitation comes from rehabilitation sciences, where uniform terminology has been shown to be essential for identifying problems, aggregating data, and measuring outcomes, thereby enabling field-wide advancements through coordinated research efforts.^[41] In technology sectors, terms such as "blockchain"—coined in the context of Bitcoin's 2008 whitepaper—have similarly standardized decentralized ledger concepts, spurring applications in finance and supply chain management by allowing precise modeling and extension of underlying protocols.^[38] Overall, while excessive or poorly defined jargon can hinder broader accessibility, its judicious use among experts drives efficiency in hypothesis testing and prototype development, causal drivers of sustained innovation.^[42]

Domains of Application

Scientific and Technical Jargon

Scientific and technical jargon comprises the specialized lexicon developed within disciplines such as physics, chemistry, biology, and engineering to denote phenomena, processes, and entities with a degree of precision unattainable through vernacular terms. This vocabulary emerges as fields generate novel concepts requiring unambiguous designation, often drawing from Latin, Greek, or neologisms to encapsulate multifaceted ideas succinctly. For instance, in biology, the term "metazoan" precisely evokes multicellular organisms exhibiting cellular differentiation and tissue organization, compressing extensive evolutionary and developmental knowledge into a single descriptor.^[43] Such terms enable scientists to reference shared understandings rapidly, fostering efficiency in discourse and documentation.^[44] In physics, jargon facilitates the articulation of counterintuitive realities; "quantum entanglement" describes correlated particle states where measurement of one instantaneously influences the other, irrespective of distance, a phenomenon formalized in quantum mechanics since the 1930s. Similarly, engineering employs terms like "finite element analysis," a numerical method dividing complex structures into discrete elements to simulate stress and deformation, underpinning designs in aerospace and civil projects.^[45] These examples illustrate how jargon not only signals expertise but also structures thought, allowing practitioners to build upon prior work without redundant exposition—e.g., invoking "photosynthesis" invokes the biochemical pathway converting light to chemical energy via chlorophyll, encompassing electron transport chains and Calvin cycles.^[39] The proliferation of such terminology correlates with disciplinary maturation; biology, for example, incorporates tens of thousands of domain-specific terms in peer-reviewed literature, reflecting the field's expansion since the mid-20th century amid molecular and genomic advances.^[46] While essential for intra-expert communication, this jargon demands apprenticeship—novices must master it through immersion in texts and training, as evidenced by glossaries in biomedical research exceeding 1,000 entries for core concepts alone.^[47] Empirical analyses confirm its utility: studies replacing jargon with lay equivalents in abstracts reduce citation rates by up to 20%, suggesting that precise terminology enhances perceived rigor and accessibility within specialist communities.^[43]

Professional, Corporate, and Bureaucratic Jargon

Professional jargon refers to the specialized vocabulary, acronyms, and phrases used within specific occupational fields to convey concepts efficiently among practitioners, such as "due diligence" in legal contexts or "bandwidth" in IT management. Corporate jargon, a subset prevalent in business settings, includes buzzwords like "synergy," "leverage," and "circle back," which substitute for straightforward terms to emphasize strategic intent or collaboration.^[48]^[49] Bureaucratic jargon, characteristic of governmental and administrative discourse, features formal, impersonal constructions such as passive voice phrases (e.g., "it is recommended that action be taken") and euphemisms (e.g., "rightsizing" for layoffs), designed to maintain neutrality and procedural detachment.^[5]^[50] In corporate environments, jargon proliferates through management communications and meetings, with terms like "boil the ocean" (attempting an overly ambitious task) or "low-hanging fruit" (easy gains) serving to signal insider knowledge and efficiency.^[51] A 2023 study found that such language use correlates with perceived status within organizations, as speakers employing jargon are viewed as more competent by peers, though it risks alienating external stakeholders or junior employees unfamiliar with the lexicon.^[52] Bureaucratic variants appear in policy documents and reports, where linguistic complexity—measured by factors like sentence length and abstract nouns—can obscure accountability, as evidenced in analyses of administrative texts that prioritize impersonality over transparency.^[50] Empirical assessments indicate high prevalence: surveys of workplace communications reveal corporate jargon in over 70% of executive emails and presentations, often criticized for reducing clarity without adding substantive value.^[48] In bureaucratic settings, studies of nonprofit annual reports demonstrate that elevated text complexity inversely correlates with public support, suggesting intentional or inadvertent obfuscation to mitigate scrutiny.^[53] These practices persist due to institutional inertia and signaling incentives, yet they frequently elicit backlash for fostering exclusion and inefficiency, as plain-language alternatives yield higher comprehension rates in cross-audience interactions.^[54]

Academic and Ideological Jargon

Academic jargon encompasses specialized terminology and phrasing endemic to scholarly disciplines, enabling concise expression of complex ideas among experts but often extending into ideological domains within the humanities and social sciences, where terms embed normative assumptions about power, identity, and society.^[55] In these fields, ideological jargon—such as "hegemonic discourse," "problematization," "othering," and "intersectionality"—frames analyses through lenses of systemic oppression and cultural relativism, drawing from postmodernism and critical theory traditions that emphasize discourse over objective reality.^[56] These terms, originating in works by thinkers like Jacques Derrida and Kimberlé Crenshaw (who coined "intersectionality" in 1989 to describe overlapping discriminations), facilitate critique of established institutions but frequently prioritize rhetorical flourish over falsifiable claims.^[57] Criticisms of such jargon center on its role in obscurantism, defined as the use or tolerance of opaque language that impedes comprehension and scrutiny, particularly in ideological contexts where empirical rigor yields to narrative coherence.^[58] Hard obscurantism involves deliberate complexity to evade disconfirmation, while soft obscurantism arises from habitual imprecision; both undermine discourse in fields like gender and cultural studies, where peer review prioritizes alignment with prevailing ideologies over methodological soundness.^[59] This opacity correlates with academia's documented left-leaning ideological skew, as surveys indicate ratios exceeding 10:1 favoring liberal over conservative faculty in social sciences, fostering environments where jargon signals orthodoxy rather than advances knowledge.^[60] Empirical demonstrations include the 1996 Sokal affair, in which physicist Alan Sokal authored a fabricated article laden with postmodern jargon asserting that quantum gravity undermines Enlightenment rationality; the journal Social Text published it without detecting the parody, revealing vulnerabilities in ideological humanities publishing.^[60] Similarly, the 2017–2018 grievance studies project by James Lindsay, Helen Pluckrose, and Peter Boghossian submitted 20 hoax papers to journals in feminist, queer, and critical race theory; seven were accepted or published, including a rewritten section of Mein Kampf reframed as feminist praxis and a dog-park study advocating canine consent training, employing trendy jargon to mimic field norms and expose lax standards.^[61] ^[62] These hoaxes, involving over 6,000 hours of effort, accepted papers in outlets like Hypatia and Sexuality & Culture, underscoring how ideological jargon can camouflage pseudoscholarship.^[63] Proponents defend ideological jargon as essential for unpacking nuanced social constructs inaccessible to lay language, arguing that accusations of obfuscation stem from resistance to challenging orthodoxies.^[64] However, the hoaxes' success—despite fabricated data and absurd premises—suggests causal mechanisms of groupthink and ideological capture in peer review, where jargon serves gatekeeping rather than elucidation, eroding public trust in affected disciplines.^[61] In contrast to technical jargon in sciences, which typically maps to verifiable phenomena, academic-ideological variants often resist empirical testing, prioritizing interpretive hegemony.^[9]

Empirical Evidence

Studies on Comprehension Impacts

Empirical studies consistently demonstrate that jargon impairs comprehension among non-experts, often by disrupting processing fluency and increasing cognitive load, though effects can vary by context and audience familiarity.^[65] For instance, in administrative texts, replacing jargon with plain terms improved comprehension accuracy from 55.8% to 64.2%, with difficult terms extending reading times by 178 milliseconds on average, indicating slower processing without overall time savings.^[66] In medical communication, experiments using videos of providers explaining diagnoses (e.g., orthopedics, diabetes, cancer) to 32 college students found that higher jargon complexity significantly reduced perceived clarity (p < 0.001, η² = 0.331) and self-reported understanding (p < 0.001, η² = 0.342), with orthopedic topics rated hardest (mean 3.05/5).^[67] Vocabulary knowledge did not mitigate these effects (p = 0.497), underscoring jargon's barrier independent of baseline literacy.^[67] Analyses of plain language summaries in health research reveal persistent issues, with 1,241 summaries averaging a Flesch Reading Ease score of 39.0 (indicating college-level difficulty) and jargon scores of 91.7, where only 2.8% met plain English thresholds (≥60).^[68] Jargon and readability showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.249, P < 0.001), implying higher jargon density exacerbates inaccessibility for lay readers, none of whom could easily comprehend the average summary matching UK reading norms.^[68] Longitudinal trends in scientific literature further highlight comprehension challenges, as readability of 709,577 abstracts from 1881 to 2015 declined sharply (Flesch Reading Ease r = -0.93, P < 10⁻¹⁵), driven by rising general scientific jargon usage (r = 0.96, P < 10⁻¹⁵), a pattern uniform across disciplines.^[65] This suggests jargon proliferation hinders broader understanding, prioritizing specialist efficiency over accessibility.^[65]

Quantification and Prevalence Metrics

One quantitative metric for assessing jargon in text is "jargonness," defined as \log\left(\frac{f_s}{f_g}\right) where f_s is the word's frequency in a scientific corpus and f_g in a general corpus, or 3 if f_g = 0.^[69] This measure captures a word's relative specificity to expert domains, with higher values indicating greater jargon.^[70] An open-source R script enables calculation of average jargonness per word in English texts.^[69] In scientific abstracts, jargon prevalence varies by source; National Science Foundation (NSF) abstracts exhibit significantly higher jargonness than general texts, peer-reviewed articles, or news reports.^[69] For instance, analysis of abstracts shows elevated use of domain-specific terms, reducing accessibility for non-experts.^[71] Proportion of jargon words in titles and abstracts correlates inversely with citation counts, suggesting overuse may limit broader impact.^[43] Medical communication studies quantify jargon through direct observation; in 70 inpatient family-centered rounds, 443 jargon terms or phrases were used, with 70% unexplained to patients or families.^[72] In plain language summaries of clinical trials, average jargon scores reached 91.7 on a De-Jargonizer scale (range 76.4–99.3), with only 21.7% scoring low enough for general audiences.^[73] These metrics highlight persistent high prevalence in specialized settings despite efforts toward simplification.^[74]

Criticisms and Controversies

Barriers to Accessibility and Exclusion Effects

Jargon impedes accessibility by demanding prior familiarity with specialized terminology, thereby restricting comprehension and engagement for those outside the relevant community. Empirical research demonstrates that jargon disrupts cognitive processing, as evidenced by a 2019 study where participants exposed to jargon-laden scientific explanations exhibited poorer metacognitive accuracy in assessing their own understanding and heightened resistance to the presented information compared to those receiving plain-language equivalents.^[75] This effect persists across contexts, with a 2020 analysis quantifying jargon prevalence in scientific texts and linking its reduction to improved processing fluency and metacognition among lay audiences.^[69] In healthcare, professional jargon exacerbates exclusion by hindering patient-provider communication, often resulting in misunderstandings that compromise treatment adherence and outcomes. A 2022 cross-sectional survey of 463 adults at the Minnesota State Fair found that participants correctly understood only about 50% of common medical phrases on average, with particular confusion around terms like "acute" (interpreted by 26% as chronic or long-term) and "your disease is benign" (misunderstood by 60% as potentially harmful).^[76] Similarly, a 2011 qualitative study of interprofessional healthcare teams identified jargon as exclusionary, fostering cultural silos that limit collaboration and alienate junior staff or patients from decision-making processes.^[77] These barriers disproportionately affect non-native speakers or lower-education groups, amplifying health disparities through reduced access to clear information.^[78] Legal and bureaucratic jargon similarly erects exclusionary walls, rendering documents and proceedings opaque to laypersons and perpetuating power asymmetries. For example, complex legalese in contracts or court filings has been shown to reduce comprehension rates below 50% among general populations in readability assessments, leading to higher error rates in compliance and increased reliance on intermediaries.^[79] In academia, jargon reinforces gatekeeping, as a 2018 linguistic analysis of UK medical school admissions revealed how specialized language in interviews signaled social exclusion, favoring candidates from privileged backgrounds familiar with such discourse and disadvantaging others regardless of merit.^[80] Overall, these effects cultivate insider-outsider dynamics, where jargon not only obscures meaning but also entrenches professional hierarchies by signaling expertise while marginalizing external scrutiny or participation.^[81]

Allegations of Obfuscation and Power Dynamics

Critics have alleged that jargon serves as a deliberate mechanism for obfuscation, allowing users to conceal straightforward realities behind layers of specialized terminology, thereby evading direct accountability or scrutiny. This practice, often termed "doublespeak," incorporates jargon alongside euphemisms and vagueness to mask uncomfortable truths, particularly in political and bureaucratic contexts, as exemplified by phrases like "servicing the target" for military bombing or "downsizing" for mass layoffs.^[82] Such obfuscation is said to preserve an appearance of competence and control amid failure or controversy, deflecting criticism by rendering communications incomprehensible to outsiders.^[83] In bureaucratic environments, allegations center on "gobbledygook" or "bureaucratese"—verbose, euphemism-laden language designed to obscure actions and inflate trivialities, as coined by U.S. Congressman Maury Maverick in 1944 to decry federal obfuscation.^[84] A 1977 New York Times analysis highlighted how U.S. government jargon repeats, exaggerates, and covers up realities through periphrasis and bombast, complicating public oversight of administrative processes.^[85] Similarly, in corporate settings, excessive jargon is accused of transforming simple mismanagement into arcane expertise, enhancing managerial power by alienating subordinates and stakeholders who cannot parse the terms.^[86] Regarding power dynamics, detractors argue that jargon erects hierarchical barriers by signaling insider status and excluding non-initiates, thereby perpetuating elite control over knowledge and discourse. In academia, for instance, dense jargon is criticized for limiting access to ideas, reinforcing prestige among peers while alienating broader audiences and entrenching institutional hierarchies.^[87] Sociolinguistic analyses posit language, including jargon, as a tool for constructing and exercising power, where mastery of obscure terms grants authority and marginalizes dissenters lacking equivalent "linguistic capital."^[88] These dynamics allegedly enable dominant groups to maintain social structures, as jargon proficiency becomes a gatekeeping mechanism that prioritizes conformity over clarity.^[89]

Ideological Debates and Political Weaponization

Jargon in ideological debates often serves as a tool for framing narratives and marginalizing opposing views, transforming technical or specialized terms into mechanisms of exclusion and persuasion. George Orwell, in his 1946 essay "Politics and the English Language," critiqued the use of vague phrases and ready-made diction in political writing, arguing that it enables the defense of indefensible positions by obscuring precise meaning and evading concrete facts.^[90] This dynamic extends to ideological jargon, where terms drawn from academic or activist spheres—such as "intersectionality" or "hegemonic structures"—signal allegiance to specific worldviews while complicating empirical analysis, as critics contend these constructs prioritize theoretical abstraction over verifiable causation.^[91] In environments like academia, where left-leaning ideological dominance is empirically documented through surveys showing over 80% of social science faculty identifying as liberal or progressive as of 2020, such jargon can enforce conformity by pathologizing dissent as ignorance or moral failing, rather than engaging data-driven counterarguments. Politically, jargon is weaponized to redefine realities and delegitimize adversaries without substantive debate, a tactic evident in partisan discourse where terms evolve to obscure uncomfortable truths. For instance, government and activist euphemisms like "enhanced interrogation" for waterboarding, coined in the early 2000s, exemplify how specialized phrasing sanitizes actions that would otherwise provoke ethical scrutiny, allowing policymakers to maintain plausible deniability.^[92] In ideological clashes, conservatives have accused progressive jargon—such as labeling biological skepticism as "phobia"—of functioning as a rhetorical bludgeon to suppress first-principles reasoning about sex differences, backed by twin studies showing heritability rates for traits like aggression exceeding 50% in meta-analyses from 2015 onward.^[93] Conversely, right-leaning terms like "deep state" are critiqued for similarly abstracting complex bureaucracies into conspiratorial shorthand, though empirical evidence of institutional bias, such as the FBI's documented handling of 2016 election-related investigations, lends partial credence to such framings over pure obfuscation.^[94] These usages highlight a causal asymmetry: jargon proliferates in power-holding institutions to consolidate narratives, as seen in ethnic studies curricula where excessive ideological terminology distorts historical data by embedding untestable assumptions, per analyses from 2020.^[95] Debates over jargon’s role intensify around its potential to erode public discourse, with evidence suggesting it alienates broader audiences and entrenches polarization. Studies on language drift indicate that diverging semantic interpretations—e.g., "equity" shifting from equal opportunity to engineered outcomes—foster parallel political lexicons, reducing cross-ideological comprehension by up to 20% in experimental settings as of 2017.^[96] Critics from varied perspectives, including left-leaning outlets, argue that activist and academic jargon obscures actionable insights, as in social justice fields where multisyllabic constructs mask simplistic moral claims, hindering causal analysis of issues like inequality, which correlates more strongly with family structure (r=0.7 in U.S. data from 1960-2020) than with nebulous "structures."^[97] This weaponization, while bidirectional, disproportionately affects truth-seeking in biased institutional contexts, where mainstream sources often amplify one-sided jargon without noting its empirical weaknesses, as Orwell warned would corrupt thought itself.^[98]

Mitigation and Alternatives

Plain Language Initiatives

Plain language initiatives encompass organized efforts by governments, agencies, and international bodies to simplify official communications, replacing specialized jargon with clear, accessible wording to enhance public understanding and usability. These initiatives emerged prominently in the 1970s through federal encouragements for regulatory writers to use plain language, evolving into formal mandates.^[99] By the late 1990s, President Bill Clinton's June 1, 1998, memorandum directed all federal agencies to employ plain language in communications with the public.^[100] In the United States, the Plain Writing Act of 2010, enacted as Public Law 111-274, mandates that federal agencies produce clear, concise, well-organized documents intended for the public, following best practices appropriate to the subject or field.^[101] The Act defines plain writing as grammatically correct language with complete sentence structure and accurate word usage, aiming to improve government accountability and citizen access to information and services.^[102] Compliance requires agencies to designate plain writing coordinators, train staff, and report annually on implementation, with examples including revised regulations from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.^[100] At the state level, Maryland's 2023 executive order under Governor Wes Moore requires state agencies to use plain language to eliminate communication barriers.^[103] Internationally, the International Plain Language Federation, formed to advance plain language practices globally, promotes public benefits through professional standards and training resources, including efforts toward an ISO standard for plain-language documents.^[104] The Plain Language Association International (PLAIN) defines plain language as communication where wording, structure, and design enable audiences to easily find, understand, and use information, supporting initiatives in policy and legal drafting.^[105] Clarity, an association focused on plain legal language, operates with members across dozens of countries to simplify contracts and statutes, tracing roots to consumer protection movements in the 1970s.^[106] These efforts collectively prioritize empirical testing of readability, such as through randomized studies demonstrating improved layperson comprehension of simplified summaries over jargon-heavy originals.^[107]

Glossaries, Translation Efforts, and Best Practices

Glossaries serve as essential tools for demystifying jargon by compiling definitions of specialized terms alongside plain-language equivalents, thereby facilitating comprehension across audiences. In educational contexts, resources such as the Family Dictionary of Educational Terms provide explanations for acronyms and phrases commonly used in schooling, aiming to bridge gaps for parents and non-experts. Similarly, state-level initiatives like Ohio's Glossary of Terms for English Language Arts define potentially confusing terminology to support educators and students.^[108] These compilations ensure consistency in terminology usage and reduce misinterpretation, particularly in fields where jargon density can exceed 20-30% of text in academic outputs.^[109] Translation efforts translate technical jargon into accessible prose, often through systematic rewriting or reformulation. The U.S. Plain Writing Act of 2010 mandates federal agencies to employ clear language in public communications, resulting in revised documents that prioritize active voice and short sentences over legalese or bureaucratic terms.^[110] The Plain Language Action and Information Network (PLAIN), a federal community, disseminates guidelines derived from this act, including the Federal Plain Language Guidelines, which emphasize reader-focused structure to eliminate ambiguity.^[111] In academia, projects like machine-assisted translation of scientific literature into multiple languages address barriers for non-native speakers, with studies showing improved accessibility when jargon is substituted with synonyms or contextual explanations.^[112] Legal translation efforts further exemplify this by replacing archaic phrases with equivalents, as seen in guidelines promoting plain language in multilingual documents to enhance equity.^[113] Best practices for jargon mitigation recommend initial identification of audience-specific unfamiliar terms, followed by deliberate substitution or definition. Writers should define key jargon upon first use and opt for everyday synonyms where precision allows, such as replacing "ameliorate" with "improve" in non-technical contexts.^[114] Additional strategies include employing active voice, limiting sentences to 20-25 words, and structuring content hierarchically to avoid overload, which empirical tests confirm boosts readability by up to 50% in scientific summaries.^[115] In professional settings, iterative testing with lay readers—via tools like readability scores—ensures revisions eliminate obfuscation without sacrificing accuracy, as advocated in style guides for science communication.^[116] When jargon retention is unavoidable for exactitude, pairing it with visual aids or appendices maintains inclusivity.^[117]

References

[1]
Jargon: A barrier in case history taking? - A cross-sectional survey ...
Jargon is defined as “the language, esp. the vocabulary, peculiar to a particular trade, profession, or group; medical jargon, plumber's jargon.” All the ...
[2]
Group Jargon - Purdue OWL
The term "jargon" refers to any in-group or specialized language used by small groups of like-minded individuals.
[3]
Jargon - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from mid-14c. Old French jargon meaning "chattering" or "idle talk," the word denotes unintelligible or secretive speech, echoic of "to chatter.
[4]
Unveiling the History and Meaning of Jargon - American Express
Sep 29, 2023 · The origin of the term jargon dates back to the Old French word jargoun, meaning “twittering.” According to Maurizio Gotti, author of The ...
[5]
Definition and Examples of Jargon - ThoughtCo
May 13, 2024 · Jargon is the complex language used by experts in a certain discipline or field. This language often helps experts communicate with clarity and precision.
[6]
Jargon | Communication for Professionals - Lumen Learning
Jargon is occupation-specific language, a 'shorthand' used by professionals in the same field to communicate with each other.
[7]
(PDF) Language Usage of Jargon and Slang in Strategic Studies
Aug 6, 2025 · Jargon is a particular vocabulary which is made by a specific community. The jargon could be seen in a particular community, such as in ...
[8]
Excessive Jargon is a Sign of Insecurity, and Other Research Findings
The excessive use of jargon by academics is often a sign of personal insecurity, as evidenced in part by its more frequent appearance in the works of ...
[9]
[PDF] Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication
Here, we find support for the extant practical and scholarly recommendation that scientists reduce their jargon use but build on what is already known in ...Missing: linguistics | Show results with:linguistics<|separator|>
[10]
Jargon May Be Even Worse for Communicating Complexity Than ...
Feb 24, 2020 · Jargon is exclusionary, making people feel they don't belong, and can lead to counter-arguments, even when defined, and may compromise literacy.
[11]
Don't dumb it down: The effects of jargon in COVID-19 crisis ...
Results revealed that although the use of jargon led to more difficult processing and reduced persuasion for the two less-urgent topics (flood risk, emergency ...
[12]
[PDF] A Sociolinguistic Study of Jargon Language in Al-Najaf Industrial ...
Jul 10, 2024 · Jargon or technical dialectal language is the particular terminology related to a particular area of activity. Jargon is usually employed in a ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
[13]
The Dangers Of Hidden Jargon In Communicating Science - NPR
Jun 12, 2017 · They can lull those who hear it into a false sense of understanding; they can present a barrier to students' acquisition of a technical term.
[14]
Jargon - The Scholarly Kitchen
Jun 18, 2021 · Often in the discussion around scholarly communication, we see pleas for authors to write in plainer language, and to minimize the use of jargon.Missing: definition linguistics
[15]
Slang, Jargon, Idiom or Proverb Explained - ThoughtCo
Nov 7, 2018 · Slang is used by small groups in informal settings and changes quickly over time. · Jargon is like slang for specific jobs or hobbies, understood ...
[16]
slang - BBC World Service | Learning English | Ask about English
Jargon, on the other hand, is the variety of language that belongs to a specific profession or activity. For example, linguists use special language to describe ...
[17]
Difference between Slang, Buzzwords, and Jargon
Oct 7, 2015 · The reason industry specific jargon is not slang is because industry specific jargon has a longer shelf life (or span of use) than slang. Slang ...
[18]
Acronyms, Abbreviations, Jargon and Other Shorthand
Jargon is language, especially vocabulary, peculiar to a particular trade, profession or group. Avoid jargon whenever possible. If jargon must be used, define ...
[19]
The Pros and Cons of Using Jargon in Content - Copypress
Jan 26, 2024 · Jargon refers to words or expressions that describe topics and ideas in specific industries or professions. It's often used to shorten longer ...
[20]
Speaking of Jargon - Strategy+business
Mar 4, 2008 · The term jargon has become a catchall for a variety of words and phrases, including industry terminology, an alphabet soup of acronyms, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
Difference between "jargon" and "technical terms"
May 10, 2013 · Jargon is specialized vocabulary, sometimes seen as obscure, while technical terms are specialized vocabulary of a field. Jargon can be seen as ...Terminology vs jargon vs lexicon - English Stack ExchangeWhat's the difference between "lingo" and "jargon"?More results from english.stackexchange.com
[22]
Technical Jargon - NN/G
Mar 19, 2023 · Definition: Jargon is the specialized language used by a particular profession or group, which is unfamiliar or meaningless to outsiders.Jargon Is Relative · Two Key Questions for Dealing...
[23]
Jargon vs Specialized Technical Language - SFU Style
Jargon is technical language used for the wrong readers, while specialized technical language is used for experts in the same field. Technical terms used ...
[24]
JARGON Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Oct 18, 2025 · Etymology. Noun and Verb. Middle English, from Anglo-French jargun, gargon ; First Known Use. Noun. 14th century, in the meaning defined at sense ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[25]
jargon, v. meanings, etymology and more - Oxford English Dictionary
The earliest known use of the verb jargon is in the Middle English period (1150—1500). OED's earliest evidence for jargon is from before 1366, in Romaunt Rose.
[26]
The History of Jargon | Wordfoolery - WordPress.com
Sep 12, 2022 · Jargon is one the French gave us. It entered English in the mid 1300s from Old French jargoun. At that time in French jargoun described the chattering, ...
[27]
The Etymologies of “Jargon,” “Jabber,” and “Gibberish”
May 23, 2018 · “Jargon,” adopted from French in the 14th century, originally meant “unintelligible talk, gibberish; chattering, jabbering.”
[28]
History of Medical Terminology - OpenMD
75 percent of present-day medical English can be traced back to the Greek of Hippocrates and of the Alexandrine school of the following period.<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
The language of medicine - PMC - NIH
Here I present a brief overview of the history and characteristics of the language used by medical doctors when they communicate with one another.
[30]
The Evolution of Scientific Language: Tracing Translations Through ...
Scientific language evolved from ancient Greek and Latin, to vernacular in the Renaissance, standardized in the Enlightenment, and now rapidly evolving with ...
[31]
Decoding the Origins of Business Jargon: A Linguistic Evolution
Feb 6, 2024 · The roots of business jargon can be traced back to the Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries. As industries grew and technology ...Missing: eras | Show results with:eras
[32]
Corporate jargon: A brief history and the best solution - Textio
May 28, 2020 · Over the twentieth century, strange words borrowed from military, political, and technical realms compounded and ended up in our emails and ...
[33]
Compensatory conspicuous communication: Low status increases ...
First, jargon can increase conversational clarity by serving as a form of efficient communication. As groups form and knowledge develops, specialized words are ...
[34]
Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication - PMC - NIH
The most communicatively efficient code for meanings is one that shortens the most predictable words—not the most frequent words. Human lexicons are these ...Missing: terminology | Show results with:terminology
[35]
When is it okay to use corporate jargon? - Work Life by Atlassian
Nov 17, 2022 · Jargon is not all bad. Jargon is sometimes necessary. Experts need specialized vocabulary to communicate with one another efficiently about specialized topics.Missing: advantages | Show results with:advantages
[36]
Comprehensive Guide to Using Jargon in Technical Writing
Jan 8, 2025 · Jargon can significantly improve the efficiency of technical communication. Rather than lengthy descriptive phrases, technical writers can use ...
[37]
How to Translate Scientific Jargon for a Lay Audience: Effective ...
It provides a precise and efficient means of communication among experts in a specific field. However, when this jargon is used without translation, it can ...
[38]
Why is scientific terminology important? - Quora
Apr 29, 2019 · Using precise terminology helps avoid ambiguity and ensures that information is communicated clearly and accurately. 2> Consistency: ...
[39]
[Explainer] Why do we use jargon when talking about science?
Jun 26, 2023 · Another reason why scientists use jargon is because new discoveries often require new words. Using jargon also helps in precise communication as ...Missing: benefits | Show results with:benefits<|separator|>
[40]
Role of terminology - IEC - International Electrotechnical Commission
A general introduction to the role of terminology in scientific and technical communication, and particularly to definitions, a critical component of standards ...
[41]
Standard terminology is critical to advancing rehabilitation and ...
Aug 27, 2022 · Standardized terminology is critical to naming complex problems, collectively envisioning solutions, collecting data, measuring outcomes, and ...
[42]
[PDF] Scientific And Technical Terminology as A Vocabulary of The ...
... special terminology as the vocabulary of the language of science and technology has a double meaning: it makes it possible to learn the patterns of professional.
[43]
Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific ...
Apr 7, 2021 · Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific papers | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.Missing: efficiency | Show results with:efficiency
[44]
[PDF] SCIENTIFIC JARGON, GOOD AND BAD
But where less taxing words are precise enough, they almost always make for better style, even as used among experts. THE PROBLEM IN MORE DETAIL. "Jargon" ...
[45]
Glossary of Terms | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and ...
Bioengineering. The application of concepts and methods of engineering, biology, medicine, physiology, physics, materials science, chemistry, mathematics and ...Here's how you know · Https · Facebook · Science Education
[46]
Specialized terminology reduces the number of citations of scientific ...
Apr 7, 2021 · In conclusion, jargon may communicate ideas powerfully, but also, and perhaps more often, artificially define 'insiders' and 'outsiders', ...
[47]
Glossary - National Institute of General Medical Sciences - NIH
This glossary provides pronunciations and easy-to-understand definitions for terms commonly used in basic biomedical research.
[48]
The History and Impact of Business Jargon - Rivier Academics
Business jargon, or specialized language used in the industry, has a long history and is universally disliked. Business jargon does more than annoy workers.<|separator|>
[49]
Corporate Jargon: 7 Example Phrases to Avoid in Business - BetterUp
Jan 18, 2022 · Corporate jargon is a type of language used by business professionals. Corporate jargon refers to terms, phrases, or acronyms used in place of clearly ...Missing: bureaucratic | Show results with:bureaucratic
[50]
Texts and Bureaucracy - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · As discussed by Matthew Hull (2012a) , Michael Herzfeld (1992), and others, bureaucracy can obfuscate accountability and social relations.
[51]
[PDF] THE ROLE OF JARGONS IN THE WORLD OF BUSINESS
Overall, 12 business jargons are selected and studied deeply giving their definition and explanations with examples. For instance, boil the oceanis a business.
[52]
The Hidden Impact of Professional Jargon: How Language Reveals ...
it may reveal more about you than you intend, and not what you want. That's one of the key insights Professor Adam ...
[53]
To communicate or obfuscate? Public support and the linguistic ...
Aug 25, 2025 · This study aims to test the obfuscation hypothesis in the nonprofit sector by examining how annual report text complexity relates to the ...
[54]
Reduce Jargon for Effective Communication
In this example, we have four common business jargon words and phrases: leaders, championing, outside the box and innovative solutions. The word leader has ...
[55]
Academic Writing Style - Organizing Your Social Sciences Research ...
Oct 16, 2025 · The very definition of research jargon is language specific to a particular community of scholars and practitioner-researchers. Therefore, in ...<|separator|>
[56]
The typical language of postmodernism - argmin gravitas
Aug 15, 2011 · Political radicalism: · Anti-scientism (from 4 and 5) · Anti-humanism (individual conceived as mere bundle of socializations)11 · Radical politics, ...
[57]
Postmodernism in Sociology: Characteristics, & Examples
In sociology, postmodernism is a perspective that emphasizes the social construction of reality, the role of language and discourse in shaping knowledge, ...
[58]
Hard and Soft Obscurantism in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Jan 1, 2024 · Finally the paper considers some of the psychological mechanisms that may sustain obscurantism and constitute obstacles to overcoming it.
[59]
Hard and Soft Obscurantism in the Humanities and Social Sciences
Aug 6, 2025 · The paper further argues that obscurantism does not merely represent a waste of intellectual effort, but has caused harm to countless ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[60]
“The Grievance Studies Affair” Project: Reconstructing and ...
May 4, 2020 · A well-known case of hoaxlike deception was performed by the physicist Alan Sokal (1996). Sokal managed to publish an article criticizing his ...Missing: jargon | Show results with:jargon
[61]
What an Audacious Hoax Reveals About Academia - The Atlantic
Oct 5, 2018 · What an Audacious Hoax Reveals About Academia. Three scholars wrote 20 fake papers using fashionable jargon to argue for ridiculous conclusions.<|separator|>
[62]
The controversy around hoax studies in critical theory, explained - Vox
Oct 15, 2018 · The “Grievance Studies” or “Sokal Squared” hoax aimed to discredit gender and critical race studies. Did it work?
[63]
What's behind a successful academic hoax? - New Statesman
Aug 25, 2022 · An academic hoax should be nearly impossible to pull off. ... Yet scholarly hoaxes targeting journals in the humanities, from the “Sokal Affair ...Missing: jargon | Show results with:jargon
[64]
In Defense of Obscurantism - Critical-Theory.com
Jul 24, 2013 · The perceived “obscurantism” is actually a result of philosophers attempting to interpellate an individual into seeing and describing new and different parts ...Missing: humanities | Show results with:humanities
[65]
Research: The readability of scientific texts is decreasing over time
Sep 5, 2017 · (2) An increase in a general scientific jargon is leading to a vocabulary which is almost exclusively used by scientists and less readable in ...
[66]
Exploring the Effect of Plain Terminology on Processing and ...
Nov 13, 2024 · Results showed that plain terms significantly improved comprehension but did not reduce reading times. Mixed linear regression analysis revealed ...
[67]
the impact of medical jargon on patient comprehension and ...
This study examined how medical jargon affects college students' understanding of medical diagnoses and health care interactions.
[68]
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health ...
Jan 13, 2025 · Most of the PLSs published in the NIHR's National Journals Library have poor readability due to their complexity and use of jargon.
[69]
Quantifying scientific jargon - Shannon D. Willoughby, Keith ...
Jul 6, 2020 · The amount of jargon in these abstracts was significantly higher than in any other bodies of work we examined. The values for the NSF abstracts ...
[70]
[PDF] Quantifying Scientific Jargon - Scholarworks
2017), we present a freely available script written in the open source language R to calculate the average scientific jargonness per word for American ...
[71]
Quantifying scientific jargon - ResearchGate
Abstract. When scientists disseminate their work to the general public, excessive use of jargon should be avoided because if too much technical language is used ...
[72]
Say What? Quantifying and Classifying Jargon Use During Inpatient ...
Mar 11, 2021 · Results: During 70 observed FCR patient encounters, there were a total of 443 jargon words or phrases spoken, of which 309 (70%) were not ...
[73]
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health ...
Jan 13, 2025 · Jargon scores ranged from 76.4 to 99.3, with an average score of 91.7 (95% CI 91.5-91.9) and 21.7% (269/1241) of the PLSs had a jargon score ...
[74]
Jargon and Readability in Plain Language Summaries of Health ...
The pairwise correlation between readability scores and jargon scores was 0.249 (P<.001), which suggests that when one score is higher, the other is also likely ...
[75]
Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence ...
Jul 31, 2019 · We find that the presence of jargon impairs people's ability to process scientific information, and that this impairment leads to greater motivated resistance ...
[76]
Accuracy in Patient Understanding of Common Medical Phrases - NIH
Nov 30, 2022 · This cross-sectional study assesses patient understanding of common medical jargon terms using results of a survey conducted at the Minnesota State Fair.Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
[77]
(PDF) Interprofessional jargon: How is it exclusionary? Cultural ...
Sep 7, 2011 · Language can impact significantly on the ways in which health care professionals relate and provide clinical services, as well as the way in ...
[78]
Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use ...
Jul 26, 2021 · The objective was to explore the barriers to healthcare access among immigrants with limited English language proficiency.
[79]
Accessibility Issues Concerning Jargon And Other Esoteric Language
Jargon and complex language create barriers to understanding, limiting access to information, and can be limited to certain groups. Accessible language is ...
[80]
how language reflects social exclusion in medical education
Jan 24, 2018 · We conducted a linguistic analysis of qualitative interviews with Admissions Deans and/or Staff from 24 of 32 UK medical schools.
[81]
Interprofessional jargon: how is it exclusionary? Cultural ... - PubMed
The aim of this project was to explore the barriers and challenges to developing a collaborative approach in health care.Missing: law academia
[82]
Doublespeak - FourWeekMBA
Apr 23, 2024 · ... control. ... Characteristics: Doublespeak includes euphemisms, jargon, obfuscation, vagueness, misleading statistics, and political rhetoric.
[83]
Doublespeak - Wikipedia
Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., "downsizing" for layoffs and "servicing the target" for bombing), in which case it is primarily meant to make ...
[84]
[PDF] Examples Of Doublespeak In Politics - CILEX Law School
Sep 18, 2025 · criticism, and maintain power. The following sections will explore ... It attempts to preserve the image of competence and control even in the ...
[85]
Gobbledygook - Political Dictionary
“Gobbledygook” is a term coined by Rep. Maury Maverick (D-TX) for obscure and euphemistic bureaucratic language. He first used the word in a 1944 memo, ...
[86]
Federal Jargon Obfuscates, Repeats, Exaggerates and Covers Up
May 10, 1977 · Strange and incomprehensible tongues. Outlandish and preposterous tongues. Tongues that reek of euphemism, bombast, periphrasis, circumlocution, ...
[87]
bureaucratese - definition and examples - ThoughtCo
Feb 12, 2020 · Bureaucratese is an informal term for obscure speech or writing that is typically characterized by verbosity, euphemisms, jargon, and buzzwords.
[88]
Academic Jargon & Knowledge Exclusion | The Familiar Strange
Mar 23, 2017 · Academic jargon is a problem for excluding others who might benefit from the work that academia produces. It is important for any democratic ...
[89]
(PDF) The Power Dynamics in Language and Culture - ResearchGate
Dec 27, 2024 · Language as a Tool of Power Language is more than a medium for communication; it is a tool for the construction and exercise of power.
[90]
Language and Power: Examining Societal Hierarchies - ryteUp
Rating 4.8 (2,615) Exclusion: Jargon can exclude people who don't understand it, reinforcing the authority of those who use it and limiting access to knowledge. In what ways do ...
[91]
Politics and the English Language | The Orwell Foundation
Home / Orwell / Essays and other works / Politics and the English Language ... Political language – and with variations this is true of all political ...
[92]
Academic Language and the Problem of Meaninglessness
Jul 27, 2017 · The use of words without fixed or clear meanings is a major part of what makes academic writing so terrible.
[93]
Government Euphemisms: Obscuring the Truth in Official Language
May 22, 2025 · These euphemisms make brutal actions seem bureaucratic or even virtuous, concealing human costs and avoiding the word “war” itself. Below are ...
[94]
https://www.the-independent.com/voices/comment/weasel-words-that-politicians-use-to-obscure-terrible-truths-8210302.html
[95]
Weasel words that politicians use to obscure terrible truths
Oct 13, 2012 · World View: Beware 'robust', 'remnants' and 'anecdotal' – just three of the terms deployed to hide or mislead. Head shot of Patrick Cockburn.
[96]
4 forms of bias to avoid in designing ethnic studies for high schools
Dec 15, 2020 · Excessive use of ideological jargon. The frequent use of terms not commonly known distorts key concepts. If you do not understand or accept ...
[97]
Sad! Drifting word meanings may be creating two different political ...
Jul 31, 2017 · The researchers found a split between the same words presidential candidates from the nation's two major political parties used and what those words mean.Missing: jargon obscure
[98]
OPINION: Unnecessary complexity is ruining academic writing
Oct 1, 2020 · Academic writing is plagued by inaccessible language and jargon that raises up walls around academia, says Ryan Lillestrand PZ '23.
[99]
Politics and the English Language, 2023 - Quillette
Dec 28, 2022 · “Politics and the English Language” addressed the jargon, double-talk, and what we would now call “spin” that had already distorted the ...
[100]
Plain language: history and timeline - Digital.gov
For many of us in the government today, the current plain language movement had its start in the 1970s when the federal government encouraged regulation writers ...
[101]
Federal Plain Writing Mandates - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 follows in the footsteps of previous attempts to require Federal agencies to use plain language since the 1970s.
[102]
[PDF] Public Law 111–274 111th Congress An Act - GovInfo
This Act may be cited as the ''Plain Writing Act of 2010''. SEC. 2. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Act is to improve the effectiveness and accountability of ...<|separator|>
[103]
Requirements for plain writing - Digital.gov
The Plain Writing Act defines plain writing as “writing that is clear, concise, well-organized, and follows other best practices appropriate to the subject or ...
[104]
Maryland Plain Language Initiative Executive Order
Issued by Governor Wes Moore, this executive order mandates the use of plain language across Maryland state agencies to remove communication barriers and ...
[105]
International Plain Language Federation: Home
The International Plain Language Federation promotes the public benefits of plain language and works to improve professional practice.What is plain language?ISO StandardAbout UsOur CommitteesTraining
[106]
What is plain language?
Plain language is when wording, structure, and design are clear so the audience can easily find, understand, and use the information.
[107]
Clarity – The international association promoting plain legal language
Clarity is the largest international plain language organization with hundreds of members in dozens of countries.
[108]
A Randomized Controlled Study on the Effectiveness of Plain ...
Sep 6, 2024 · They translate research findings for nonexperts to foster laypersons' understanding of scientific evidence. Evidence on the effectiveness of ...Missing: jargon | Show results with:jargon
[109]
Glossary of Terms for English Language Arts | Ohio Department of ...
May 27, 2025 · The purpose of the new English Language Arts Glossary of Terms is to provide definitions for terms that educators may find confusing.Missing: jargon criticisms
[110]
Translating Complex Academic Terminology into Everyday English
Mar 19, 2025 · Comprehensive glossaries ensure consistency and coherence across entire documents or projects, aligning terminology understanding. Glossaries ...<|separator|>
[111]
Plain Language - U.S. Department of Labor
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 requires federal agencies to use plain language when communicating with the public.
[112]
[PDF] Federal Plain Language Guidelines - World Institute on Disability
The Plain Language Action and Information Network (PLAIN) is a community of federal employees dedicated to the idea that citizens deserve clear ...
[113]
Overcoming Language Barriers in Academia: Machine Translation ...
We describe how, when, and why to make scientific literature more readily available in multiple languages through the practice of translation.
[114]
Plain language for clear and accessible legal translations
Oct 20, 2023 · Plain language for clear and accessible legal translations ; Replace the jargon · Legalese, Plain equivalent ; Cut the filler · Original (Spanish) ...
[115]
How to Reduce Jargon and Complex Language in Scientific Writing
Dec 5, 2024 · Writing clear, jargon-free scientific papers increases your reach and impact. Learn actionable strategies to simplify your scientific ...
[116]
How to Eliminate Jargon From Science Communication
Oct 13, 2021 · The first step is to learn which terms fall outside of a lay audience's vocabulary, and to identify synonyms or explanations that are more accessible.
[117]
How to make complex scientific concepts more accessible
Sep 6, 2021 · Writing about complex scientific concepts in Simple, Accessible language · Lose colloquialisms, reduce jargon · Break it down · Picture it · Tell a ...
[118]
Plain Language Guide Series - Digital.gov
A series of guides to help you understand and practice writing, designing, and testing plain language.<|separator|>