Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Explosion

An explosion is the sudden conversion of potential energy, typically chemical or mechanical, into kinetic energy accompanied by the production and release of gases under pressure.^[1] This process results in a rapid expansion of volume and an extreme outward release of energy, often generating high temperatures, light, sound, and a propagating shock wave.^[2] The shock wave compresses the surrounding medium instantaneously before the pressure expands outward, distinguishing explosions from slower combustion processes.^[3] Explosions are fundamentally classified into three types: mechanical, which occur due to physical overpressurization or failure of containment; chemical, driven by rapid exothermic reactions that decompose materials into gaseous products; and nuclear, powered by fission or fusion releasing vast atomic-scale energy.^[4] Chemical explosions, such as those from high explosives like TNT, propagate via detonation waves exceeding the speed of sound in the material, sustaining the reaction through self-generated pressure.^[5] Nuclear explosions, by contrast, yield energies orders of magnitude greater, with yields measured in kilotons or megatons of TNT equivalent, as exemplified by fission-based devices splitting heavy nuclei or fusion-based ones combining light ones.^[6] The effects of explosions include blast overpressure causing structural damage and injury, thermal radiation igniting materials, and potential fragmentation or ionizing radiation in nuclear cases.^[2] Applications span controlled demolition, mining, propulsion in rocketry, and military munitions, where precise energy release enables engineering feats but also amplifies destructive potential in unintended or weaponized scenarios.^[4] Despite safety protocols, explosions pose inherent risks, with historical accidents underscoring the need for rigorous confinement and initiation controls to prevent premature or uncontrolled reactions.^[7]

Definition and Etymology

Definition

An explosion is the sudden conversion of potential energy, such as chemical or mechanical, into kinetic energy, accompanied by the production and release of high-pressure gases that drive a rapid expansion of volume.^[1] This process generates a propagating shock wave through the surrounding medium, characterized by pressures exceeding the ambient atmosphere by factors of several times, often leading to destructive effects on nearby structures and materials.^[2] The rapidity of the energy release distinguishes explosions from slower combustion processes; for instance, detonation velocities in high explosives can reach 8,000 meters per second, far surpassing the speed of sound in air (approximately 343 m/s at standard conditions).^[3] From a physical standpoint, explosions involve the near-instantaneous compression followed by expansive displacement of the ambient medium, such as air or water, due to the exothermic reaction or mechanical failure.^[2] This can occur in various contexts, including chemical reactions where molecular bonds break and reform to release stored energy, physical ruptures like steam boiler failures, or nuclear fission/fusion events that liberate immense thermal and radiative energy.^[1] Quantitatively, the overpressure generated—measured in bars or psi—determines blast severity; for example, 0.1 bar overpressure can shatter windows, while 1 bar or more causes structural collapse.^[8] Empirical observations, such as those from controlled tests, confirm that the shock front's Mach number (ratio to local sound speed) exceeds unity, defining the supersonic nature essential to explosive classification over mere rapid fires.^[9]

Etymology

The English noun explosion derives from the Latin explōsiō (genitive explōsiōnis), denoting the act of driving off or rejecting by clapping or hissing, particularly in a theatrical context where audiences expressed disapproval through noisy expulsion of performers.^[10] This stems from the verb explōdere, composed of ex- ("out" or "off") and plaudere ("to clap" or "to strike"), evoking the sound and action of applause turned to derision.^[11] The term entered English in the early 17th century, with records dating to 1615–1625, initially retaining connotations of vehement rejection or outburst before extending to literal physical phenomena.^[12] By the late 17th century, around 1681, explosion began to describe a violent bursting or sudden release, influenced by scientific observations of gunpowder and combustion, marking a shift from metaphorical to empirical usage in contexts like chemistry and physics.^[10] This evolution reflects broader linguistic patterns where auditory and expulsive imagery metaphorically captured rapid, forceful expansions of matter or energy, as documented in period texts on artillery and natural philosophy.^[11] The modern sense of a high-speed chemical or physical reaction producing a shock wave solidified in the 19th century amid industrial advancements in explosives.^[12]

Fundamental Physics

Reaction Mechanisms from First Principles

In chemical explosions, reaction mechanisms fundamentally derive from the quantum mechanical rearrangement of electrons in molecular orbitals, leading to bond breaking and formation that releases stored chemical potential energy as heat and expansion work. High explosives, such as those containing nitro groups (e.g., RDX or HMX), initiate via unimolecular decomposition pathways where initial steps often involve homolytic cleavage of weak bonds like N-NO₂, as predicted by density functional theory (DFT) computations of potential energy surfaces showing activation barriers around 40-50 kcal/mol under ambient conditions.^[13] ^[14] These pathways evolve into chain-branching reactions producing gaseous products (e.g., N₂, CO₂, H₂O), with exothermicity exceeding 500 kJ/mol for typical compositions, enabling supersonic propagation in detonations where the shock front compresses unreacted material to densities 4-5 times ambient, raising temperatures to 2000-3000 K and accelerating reaction rates by orders of magnitude per Arrhenius kinetics.^[15] ^[16] From first-principles molecular dynamics simulations, detonation hotspots—localized regions of elevated temperature from voids or defects—facilitate pore collapse and shear banding, generating pressures up to 50 GPa that dissociate molecules into radicals (e.g., NO₂, HONO), which then propagate reactions via bimolecular steps like HONO + NO₂ → HNO₃ + NO.^[17] This contrasts with deflagration, where subsonic flame propagation relies on thermal conduction rather than shock coupling, highlighting causal primacy of mechanical compression in achieving explosive velocities of 6-9 km/s. Validation against experiments, such as time-resolved spectroscopy, confirms these mechanisms without empirical parameterization, though quantum tunneling and anharmonic effects refine barrier crossings at extreme conditions.^[18] ^[19] Nuclear explosions operate via distinct mechanisms rooted in strong and weak nuclear forces overpowering electrostatic repulsion. Fission-based reactions in uranium-235 or plutonium-239 proceed when a thermal neutron induces nucleus deformation past the fission barrier (≈6 MeV), splitting into fragments with mass asymmetry (e.g., 95 and 140 nucleons) that release 200 MeV per event, including 2-3 prompt neutrons to sustain exponential chain growth requiring supercritical assembly.^[20] ^[21] Fusion in thermonuclear devices fuses deuterium-tritium via quantum tunneling through the Coulomb barrier at temperatures exceeding 10⁸ K (achieved by fission primary), yielding 17.6 MeV per reaction primarily as kinetic energy of alpha particles and neutrons, with hydrodynamic implosion compressing fuel to densities 100-1000 times liquid enabling ignition.^[22] These processes, modeled via time-dependent Hartree-Fock or ab initio nuclear theory, underscore explosions as non-equilibrium cascades where feedback amplifies initial perturbations into gigajoule-scale releases in microseconds.^[23]

Blast Wave Dynamics and Shock Propagation

A blast wave forms when a rapid release of energy, such as from a chemical or nuclear detonation, superheats and pressurizes a localized volume of gas or vapor, causing it to expand supersonically into the surrounding medium and compress ambient air into a thin, discontinuous shock front.^[24] This shock front propagates outward at initial velocities exceeding the speed of sound, with particle velocities behind it approaching the shock speed for strong shocks, driven by the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy across the discontinuity as described by the Rankine-Hugoniot equations.^[25] The leading edge features elevated static overpressure, while the trailing blast wind imparts dynamic pressure proportional to the square of the airflow velocity, q = (1/2) ρ u², where ρ is ambient density and u is particle velocity.^[26] Shock propagation in free air follows self-similar scaling laws for spherical blasts from point sources, where the shock radius R evolves as R ∝ (E t² / ρ₀)^{1/5} in the strong-shock limit, with E as the explosion energy yield, t as time, and ρ₀ as initial ambient density; this yields R ∝ t^{2/5} and a decelerating shock Mach number that diminishes with distance.^[27] The Taylor-von Neumann-Sedov solution underpins this dynamics, assuming adiabatic expansion and negligible initial source size, with post-shock conditions showing density ratios up to 6 for γ=1.4 (diatomic gas) and pressure jumps scaling with the square of the Mach number M via P₂/P₁ ≈ 2γ M² / (γ+1).^[28] Deviations occur near the source due to finite driver size or reactive effects, but the model holds for distances beyond a few source radii.^[29] In detonations, the initial shock is self-sustaining, coupled to an exothermic reaction zone where Chapman-Jouguet conditions dictate a unique velocity (typically 3-10 km/s for high explosives), transitioning to a decelerating blast wave as products expand and entrain air.^[30] Propagation velocity decreases inversely with radius in the inertial phase, influenced by ambient conditions like pressure (lower pressure accelerates waves) and geometry (spherical decay faster than planar).^[31] Confined or interacting blasts amplify local pressures via reflections, with Mach stem formation where reflected shocks merge, increasing overpressure by factors up to 2-8 times the incident wave. Empirical scaling from tests confirms these relations, with peak overpressures dropping as 1/r³ near the source before transitioning to 1/r behavior.^[29]

Energy Release and Quantitative Metrics

In chemical explosions, energy release stems from the exothermic decomposition of molecules, converting chemical potential energy into thermal and kinetic forms at rates exceeding the speed of sound in the material, characteristic of detonation. The specific energy output, or heat of detonation, for common high explosives typically ranges from 3 to 6 MJ/kg; for trinitrotoluene (TNT), this value is approximately 4.5 MJ/kg.^[33] This energy density enables rapid pressure buildup to gigapascal levels, with detonation velocities around 6-9 km/s; TNT exhibits a detonation velocity of about 6.9 km/s and Chapman-Jouguet pressure of roughly 21 GPa.^[34] Quantitative assessment often employs TNT equivalence, standardizing yields relative to TNT's defined release of 4.184 × 10^9 joules per metric ton, facilitating comparisons across explosive types.^[35] For instance, the 2020 Beirut port explosion, involving ammonium nitrate, yielded an estimated 0.9 kilotons TNT equivalent, corresponding to approximately 3.77 × 10^12 joules.^[36] Detonation performance metrics include the Gurney energy, which quantifies fragment kinetic energy potential, typically 1-2 km²/s² for military explosives.^[37] Nuclear explosions release vastly greater energies through fission or fusion, governed by E = Δmc², where mass defect Δm yields outputs in kilotons (kt) or megatons (Mt) of TNT equivalent; the Castle Bravo test on March 1, 1954, achieved 15 Mt, or 6.28 × 10^16 joules. Energy partitioning in air bursts approximates 50% to blast (kinetic and thermal), 35% to thermal radiation, 5% to initial nuclear radiation, and 10% to residual fallout, varying with yield and environment.^[38] Yield estimation relies on seismic, infrasound, or hydrodynamic data, with scaling laws like cube-root proportionality (R ∝ W^{1/3}, W as yield) for blast radius prediction.^[35]

Classification of Explosions

Chemical Explosions

Chemical explosions result from rapid exothermic chemical reactions that decompose a material into gaseous products, generating intense heat and pressure sufficient to propagate a shock wave. These reactions typically involve oxidation or decomposition, converting solid or liquid explosives into high-volume gases expanding at supersonic speeds in detonations. Unlike nuclear processes, energy derives from breaking molecular bonds rather than atomic nuclei, with reaction rates exceeding 1000 m/s distinguishing high explosives from slower-burning low explosives.^[39]^[40] Low explosives, such as black powder or smokeless propellants, undergo deflagration, a subsonic flame propagation driven by convective heat transfer between particles, producing sustained pressure for propulsion rather than fragmentation. High explosives, including trinitrotoluene (TNT) and cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX), detonate via a self-sustaining shock front where compression ignites the material ahead, achieving velocities over 6000 m/s and pressures exceeding 100,000 atm. This supersonic mechanism yields brisance, the shattering power from localized high strain rates.^[40]^[41]^[39] Initiation requires a primary explosive like lead azide for sensitivity to impact or heat, which then triggers less sensitive secondary explosives. Detonation velocity varies with composition and confinement; for PETN, it reaches 8400 m/s, while ammonium nitrate-fuel oil (ANFO) mixtures, used in mining, detonate at 3200-5200 m/s depending on density. Stability tests, including impact drop heights over 2 meters for secondary explosives, ensure safe handling, though improper storage has caused incidents like the 2020 Beirut port explosion of 2750 metric tons of ammonium nitrate, equivalent to 1.1 kilotons of TNT.^[39]^[42]

Explosive Type	Example	Detonation Velocity (m/s)	Typical Use
Low Explosive	Black Powder	< 400 (deflagration)	Fireworks, propellants^[40]
High Explosive (Secondary)	TNT	~6900	Demolition, munitions^[39]
High Explosive (Secondary)	RDX	~8700	Boosters, plastic explosives^[39]
Blasting Agent	ANFO	3200-5200	Mining, quarrying^[41]

Physical Explosions

Physical explosions result from the sudden, non-reactive release of stored mechanical or thermal energy, typically through the rupture of a pressurized vessel or container, distinguishing them from chemical explosions that rely on exothermic reactions.^[43] These events involve rapid expansion of gases or vapors due to overpressurization from factors such as excessive heating, mechanical failure, or phase transitions, without sustained wave propagation akin to detonations.^[44] The energy yield stems primarily from the conversion of potential energy in compressed fluids to kinetic energy via adiabatic expansion, often yielding pressures on the order of several bars but rarely exceeding those of chemical blasts.^[3] A key subtype is the boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE), occurring when a vessel containing superheated liquid—held above its boiling point by pressure—ruptures, triggering instantaneous flashing of the liquid to vapor and a volume increase potentially exceeding 400-fold for substances like liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).^[45] This failure can stem from corrosion, impact damage, or fire-induced weakening, as seen in industrial incidents where vessel integrity drops below 10-20% of design strength under localized heating.^[46] The resulting blast wave arises from the kinetic energy of ejecta and vapor cloud expansion, with overpressure decaying inversely with distance cubed, posing risks of fragmentation and thermal radiation if flammable contents ignite post-rupture.^[47] Other manifestations include pressure vessel bursts from non-condensable gas accumulation or hydraulic ram effects, where incompressible fluids under pump surge generate transient pressures up to 1000 bar, shattering containment and propelling shards at velocities of 100-300 m/s.^[48] Rapid phase transition explosions, such as those in cryogenic storage failures, similarly liberate energy through entropy-driven vaporization, though their blast efficiency is lower—typically 1-10% of chemical explosives' due to lack of self-sustaining reaction fronts.^[43] Mitigation relies on design standards like ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, mandating safety factors of 3-4 and relief valves rated for credible overpressure scenarios.^[49]

Nuclear Explosions

Nuclear explosions arise from uncontrolled nuclear reactions, either fission or fusion, converting a fraction of atomic mass into energy according to Einstein's equation E = mc^2, yielding energies orders of magnitude greater per unit mass than chemical explosions. In fission, a neutron induces the splitting of heavy atomic nuclei such as uranium-235 or plutonium-239, releasing additional neutrons that propagate a chain reaction, with each fission event liberating approximately 200 MeV of energy primarily as kinetic energy of fragments, neutrons, and gamma rays.^[50] This process requires achieving a supercritical mass, often via implosion compression using conventional high explosives to densify the fissile material, enabling exponential neutron multiplication in microseconds.^[51] Fusion explosions, or thermonuclear detonations, involve the merging of light nuclei like deuterium and tritium under extreme temperatures and pressures generated by a primary fission stage, releasing about 17-18 MeV per reaction through formation of helium and other products.^[50] These staged devices amplify yields into the megaton range, as seen in tests combining fission triggers with fusion secondaries, where roughly half the energy may derive from fusion despite fission contributing to fallout via fast fission of surrounding materials.^[52] Unlike chemical detonations, nuclear reactions lack a propagating front at velocities of 1-9 km/s; instead, the chain reaction completes superexponentially across the assembly before hydrodynamic expansion drives the blast, with the initial energy deposition occurring in under a microsecond.^[53] The first nuclear explosion, the Trinity test on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bombing Range in New Mexico, utilized a plutonium implosion device yielding approximately 21 kilotons of TNT equivalent, demonstrating fission's explosive potential and producing a fireball expanding to 300 meters in seconds.^[54] Energy partitioning in airbursts typically allocates 40-50% to blast (overpressure and dynamic winds reaching hundreds of mph near ground zero), 30-40% to thermal radiation causing burns and fires, and 10-20% to initial nuclear radiation (neutrons and gamma rays), with residual fallout varying by design and burst height.^[55] Yields range from sub-kiloton tactical devices to multi-megaton strategic ones, millions of times more energetic per kilogram than TNT, enabling effects like EMP and global atmospheric disruption at scale.^[53]^[56]

Astrophysical and Other Rare Explosions

Astrophysical explosions represent the most energetic phenomena in the observable universe, driven primarily by gravitational instability, nuclear fusion ignition, or the collision of compact objects, releasing energies orders of magnitude greater than any terrestrial event. These cataclysms, such as supernovae and gamma-ray bursts, propagate shock waves at fractions of the speed of light and synthesize heavy elements essential for planetary formation.^[57] Their study relies on multi-wavelength observations from telescopes like Chandra and Hubble, revealing mechanisms grounded in general relativity and plasma physics rather than speculative models.^[58] Supernovae dominate astrophysical explosions, classified into thermonuclear (Type Ia) and core-collapse variants (Types II, Ib, Ic). Type Ia events occur when a white dwarf in a binary system accretes sufficient mass to exceed the Chandrasekhar limit of approximately 1.4 solar masses, triggering explosive carbon-oxygen fusion that disrupts the star entirely.^[59] Core-collapse supernovae, by contrast, arise from stars with initial masses above 8 solar masses; upon exhausting nuclear fuel, the iron core collapses under gravity in milliseconds, rebounding as a shock front stalled until revived by neutrino heating in the gain region, where deposited energy exceeds gravitational binding.^[60] ^[61] This process ejects material at velocities up to 10,000 km/s, with total kinetic energies around 10^{51} ergs, though over 99% of the energy escapes as neutrinos.^[62] Type Ib and Ic subtypes lack hydrogen or hydrogen and helium in spectra, indicating stripped envelopes from prior mass loss.^[63] Observations confirm these explosions occur roughly once per century in the Milky Way, accelerating cosmic rays and enriching interstellar medium with metals.^[64] Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) constitute rarer, more luminous explosions, emitting up to 10^{54} ergs in gamma rays over seconds to minutes, outshining entire galaxies momentarily. Long-duration GRBs (>2 seconds) typically stem from hypernovae—the collapse of rapidly rotating Wolf-Rayet stars (>30 solar masses)—producing collimated jets that pierce the stellar envelope, while short GRBs arise from neutron star or black hole mergers.^[65] ^[66] These events, detected daily by satellites like Swift, exhibit relativistic outflows with Lorentz factors exceeding 100, beaming energy efficiently due to relativistic effects narrowing emission cones.^[67] Recent detections, such as GRB 250702B observed in 2025, highlight variability, including repeating bursts defying standard single-event models.^[68] Hypernovae extend core-collapse extremes, yielding luminosities 10 to 100 times those of standard supernovae through enhanced rotational energy extraction, often powering GRB jets. First identified in 1998 via association with GRB 980425, they involve progenitors with masses up to 140 solar masses, collapsing to black holes while ejecting asymmetrically at superluminal apparent speeds.^[69] Kilonovae, another rare class, follow binary neutron star mergers detected gravitationally (e.g., GW170817 in 2017), where tidal disruption ejects neutron-rich matter undergoing rapid neutron capture (r-process), decaying radioactively to peak at 10^{46} ergs over days and forging gold and platinum.^[70] These mergers occur perhaps once per 10,000 years per galaxy, offering direct probes of neutron star interiors unavailable in isolated explosions.^[71] Unlike supernovae, kilonovae radiate isotropically with blue-to-red spectral evolution from lanthanide opacity.^[70]

Key Properties and Characteristics

Detonation Velocity and Pressure Profiles

Detonation velocity, or velocity of detonation (VoD), refers to the supersonic speed at which the leading shock front of a detonation wave travels through an explosive medium, simultaneously compressing and heating the material to initiate rapid chemical decomposition into high-pressure, high-temperature products. In high explosives, VoD typically spans 6,000 to 9,000 m/s under ideal conditions of sufficient charge diameter and confinement, with values scaling positively with initial density and molecular oxygen balance. ^[39] ^[72] Factors influencing VoD include explosive composition, crystal size, porosity, and environmental conditions; for instance, increasing density from porosity reduction elevates VoD, while defects or lateral rarefaction waves in finite charges reduce it below the infinite-charge ideal. ^[39] Measurement techniques, such as high-speed schlieren imaging of the air-shock interface or electrical pin arrays tracking arrival times, confirm VoD by applying Rankine-Hugoniot relations to observed shock speeds. ^[72]

Explosive	Density (g/cm³)	Detonation Velocity (m/s)	Chapman-Jouguet Pressure (kbar)
TNT	1.637	6,942	189 ^[73] ^[74]
RDX	1.767	8,639	338 ^[73] ^[39]
HMX	1.89	9,110	390 ^[39]
PETN	1.76	8,260	335 ^[39]

Pressure profiles along the detonation path exhibit a characteristic structure governed by ZND (Zel'dovich-von Neumann-Döring) theory, featuring an initial von Neumann pressure spike at the shock front—often exceeding the steady-state value by 20-50%—followed by a reaction zone where energy release sustains the wave, culminating in the Chapman-Jouguet (CJ) state. ^[75] At the CJ point, the post-reaction flow velocity equals the local sound speed relative to the front, ensuring stability; this pressure, P_CJ, relates to VoD via P_CJ ≈ ρ₀ D² / (γ + 1), where ρ₀ is initial density and γ ≈ 3 for detonation products, linking higher VoD directly to elevated peak pressures (e.g., 170-390 kbar across common high explosives). ^[76] ^[39] Experimental validation, such as free-surface velocity gauging in plate impact tests, yields CJ pressures for TNT at 189 kbar and RDX at 338 kbar, correlating with observed blast performance. ^[73] Deviations from CJ ideals occur in heterogeneous or underdriven detonations, where pressure decays more rapidly due to incomplete reaction. ^[75]

Thermal Evolution and Fireball Formation

The formation of a fireball in an explosion arises from the rapid conversion of stored energy into thermal form, vaporizing and ionizing the explosive material and adjacent medium, creating a high-pressure, high-temperature sphere of gas or plasma. This luminous region, known as the fireball, expands outward at supersonic speeds, driven by the pressure gradient with ambient conditions. In nuclear explosions, the process initiates within 10^{-8} seconds, with the initial fireball radius on the order of meters for kiloton yields, reaching temperatures exceeding 10^7 K due to the immense energy density.^[77]^[78] Thermal evolution proceeds through hydrodynamic expansion and radiative cooling. The initial opaque phase, dominated by blackbody emission across ultraviolet to infrared spectra, lasts until the optical depth decreases, typically within milliseconds for nuclear events. As the fireball grows—e.g., to 150 meters diameter at 0.1 seconds for a 1-kiloton airburst—the incorporated air mass dilutes the temperature, dropping from peak values to approximately 10^5 K by 1 second, enabling visible luminosity from recombination and bremsstrahlung.^[55]^[79] In chemical detonations, fireball formation differs, often manifesting as a post-detonation afterburn phenomenon where fuel-rich products mix turbulently with atmospheric oxygen, sustaining combustion. Temperatures in these fireballs range from 2000 to 3000 K, significantly lower than nuclear counterparts, with evolution governed by reaction kinetics and entrainment rates rather than initial plasma dynamics. For aluminized explosives, prolonged burning extends the luminous phase, enhancing thermal radiation output.^[80]^[81] Across explosion types, the fireball's thermal profile influences subsequent effects, including prompt radiation pulses and ignition of materials via flux densities up to 10^5 cal/cm² for megaton yields. Cooling accelerates via expansion (adiabatic) and emission, with the first radiation pulse peaking early before a brief minimum as the shock front overtakes. Empirical models, validated against tests like Operation Castle, scale fireball size and duration with yield as R ∝ W^{0.4}, where W is energy in TNT equivalents.^[82]^[83]

Fragmentation and Secondary Projectiles

Fragmentation in explosions refers to the breakup of the explosive device's casing, liner, or adjacent materials into discrete pieces driven by the rapid expansion of detonation products. This process is governed by dynamic fracture mechanics under extreme strain rates, typically exceeding 10^4 s^{-1}, where tensile stresses from the shock-induced pressure gradients exceed the material's fracture toughness, leading to brittle failure modes such as spallation or shear banding in metals.^[84] In designed munitions like fragmentation grenades or artillery shells, the casing is often pre-notched or composed of brittle alloys to promote controlled shattering into hundreds or thousands of lethal fragments, each with masses ranging from milligrams to grams. The initial velocity of these primary fragments is predicted using empirical models like the Gurney equations, which relate fragment speed to the explosive's specific energy release and the mass ratio of casing to explosive charge. For conventional high explosives such as Composition B or HMX, Gurney velocities typically yield fragment speeds of 1.5 to 3 km/s, diminishing with distance due to drag and deceleration.^[85] ^[86] Experimental validations, such as static testing of munitions, confirm mass and velocity distributions through high-speed imaging and recovery analysis, showing exponential decay in fragment count with increasing size.^[87] These projectiles inflict penetrating trauma via kinetic energy transfer, with lethality radius scaling inversely with fragment density and inversely with the square of distance in open air. Secondary projectiles arise when the blast overpressure wave, peaking at 100-1000 kPa near the source, dislodges and accelerates ambient debris such as glass, metal scraps, or soil particles, imparting velocities up to hundreds of meters per second depending on object mass and exposure duration to the positive phase of the shock.^[7] Unlike engineered primary fragments, secondary ones exhibit irregular geometries, tumbling trajectories, and broader size distributions (from dust to meter-scale chunks), complicating predictive modeling but amplifying hazard in cluttered environments like urban settings or vehicles.^[88] In blast injury classifications, these contribute to secondary trauma mechanisms, where even low-mass items like gravel can achieve terminal velocities sufficient for severe lacerations or organ perforation within 10-50 meters.^[89] Empirical data from incident reconstructions, such as improvised explosive device analyses, indicate secondary projectiles often account for 60-70% of non-primary blast wounds in asymmetric warfare scenarios.

Effects and Impacts

Primary Blast Effects on Structures

Primary blast effects arise from the supersonic shock wave emanating from an explosion, imparting dynamic overpressure and impulse loads directly onto structures without involvement of fragments or thermal effects. The peak incident overpressure (Pso) decays with scaled distance Z = R / W^{1/3}, where R is standoff distance in feet and W is TNT-equivalent yield in pounds; for example, Pso reaches 12.8 psi at Z = 8.53 ft/lb^{1/3} for free-air bursts.^[90] Reflected pressures amplify loads on surfaces, doubling incident values at normal incidence (angle α = 0°) and varying by coefficient Crα (2–14 based on Pso and α).^[90] Structures experience bilinear-triangular pressure pulses, with positive-phase durations (to) of milliseconds (e.g., 43.61 ms at Z = 8.53), inducing flexural, shear, and tensile stresses analyzed via single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models incorporating ductility ratios up to 10–20 for ductile failure modes.^[90] Damage mechanisms include elastic deformation at low impulses transitioning to elasto-plastic yielding and ultimate collapse, with brittle failures like spalling in concrete when tensile stresses exceed material capacity. Unreinforced elements rely on arching action for load redistribution, while reinforced components demand tension ties to resist rebound. Urban configurations exacerbate effects through wave diffraction around corners and channeling along streets, locally intensifying pressures.^[91] Overpressure thresholds for structural components vary by material and configuration, as summarized below based on engineering criteria:

Component	Peak Overpressure (psi)	Damage Description
Glazing (windows)	0.5–1	Cracking or breakage; typical for annealed glass^[92]
Glazing (tempered)	1–5 (up to 24.6 for 3/4" thick)	Fracture; failure probability ≤0.001 at design stresses to 16,000 psi^[90]
Unreinforced walls/masonry	5–10	Cracking to collapse; depends on support spans^[90]
Reinforced concrete walls	10–20	Major cracking, spalling, or collapse; rotation limits 2°–12° with lacing^[90]
Roofs/slabs	5–15	Uplift or collapse; influenced by span-to-wavelength ratio^[90]

At 8 psi, widespread building destruction occurs, rendering structures uninhabitable.^[92] These thresholds derive from empirical data and scaled TNT equivalency models, applicable to high-explosive detonations but adjusted for surface bursts (e.g., higher ground reflections).^[90]

Biological and Human Consequences

Explosions inflict biological damage through four primary mechanisms: primary blast injuries from overpressure waves, secondary injuries from fragments, tertiary injuries from displacement, and quaternary injuries including burns and inhalation. Primary blast injuries arise when the supersonic shock wave propagates through the body, causing barotrauma primarily in gas-filled organs such as the lungs, ears, and gastrointestinal tract.^[7]^[93] The overpressure threshold for eardrum rupture is approximately 5 psi for 50% of exposed individuals, rising to 45 psi for near-certainty, while lung damage typically begins at 15 psi overpressure.^[94] At higher levels, such as 30-40 psi, severe pulmonary contusions known as blast lung can occur, leading to alveolar rupture, hemorrhage, and potential respiratory failure due to air emboli entering the bloodstream.^[7]^[95] Secondary blast injuries result from high-velocity fragments propelled by the explosion, causing penetrating trauma to any body region, with common sites including the head, neck, and torso.^[93] These fragments, often from casings or surrounding debris, induce lacerations, organ perforation, and hemorrhage, exacerbating mortality in close-range detonations. Tertiary effects involve the body being accelerated by blast winds, resulting in blunt trauma such as fractures, traumatic brain injuries from impact, or enhanced internal organ shearing.^[96] Quaternary mechanisms encompass thermal burns from the explosive fireball, which can cause flash injuries to exposed skin via radiant heat, typically second- or third-degree burns depending on proximity and duration of exposure.^[97] Inhalation of superheated gases or toxic fumes may also lead to airway edema or chemical pneumonitis.^[7] Human consequences vary by explosion scale and distance but frequently include high immediate fatality rates from combined mechanisms, with survivors facing acute morbidity such as traumatic amputations, blindness from ocular rupture, or cardiac tamponade.^[96] In military contexts, blast lung accounts for a significant portion of initial fatalities among initial survivors, while penetrating fragment wounds predominate in injury patterns.^[93] Long-term outcomes for non-fatal exposures can involve chronic respiratory impairment from pulmonary fibrosis or neurological deficits, though evidence for persistent effects from single events is less robust than for repeated low-level blasts, which correlate with neuroinflammation and cognitive alterations in studies of operational personnel.^[7]^[98] Overall, explosions uniquely enable mass casualties, with injury severity scaling nonlinearly with overpressure and fragment density.^[99]

Environmental and Long-Term Aftermath

Explosions release particulate matter, toxic gases, and heavy metals into the air, soil, and water, leading to immediate and persistent contamination. Conventional explosives, such as those involving ammonium nitrate or TNT, decompose into nitrogen oxides, ammonia, and unexploded residues that leach into groundwater and surface water, elevating risks of eutrophication and toxicity to aquatic life. In the 2020 Beirut port explosion of approximately 2,750 tons of ammonium nitrate, the blast generated massive debris volumes—up to 800,000 tonnes—potentially laden with asbestos and other hazards, alongside airborne pollutants like nitrogen oxides that dispersed regionally. These contaminants can persist in soils, inhibiting plant growth and entering food chains via bioaccumulation.^[100]^[101]^[102] Nuclear explosions introduce radioactive fallout, comprising fission products that deposit on land and water, rendering areas uninhabitable for decades due to ionizing radiation's carcinogenic and mutagenic effects on biota. Atmospheric testing from 1945 to 1980 dispersed radionuclides globally, contaminating soils and marine sediments; for instance, iodine-131 from early tests entered milk supplies via grass uptake, causing thyroid dose exposures in populations. Long-term ecological imbalances include biodiversity loss from habitat sterilization and genetic mutations in surviving species, as observed in test sites where vegetation recovery remains incomplete. Fallout particles settle as dust, infiltrating aquifers and persisting through half-lives of key isotopes like cesium-137 (30 years), complicating remediation.^[103]^[104]^[105] Beyond direct chemical and radiological pollution, explosions exacerbate erosion and habitat fragmentation by denuding landscapes and destroying vegetation covers, fostering invasive species proliferation and reduced soil fertility over years. In conflict zones, unexploded ordnance continues leaching explosives into ecosystems, with climate factors like flooding mobilizing contaminants further and hindering natural attenuation. Human health sequelae involve chronic respiratory issues from inhaled particulates and elevated cancer rates from low-level radiation, underscoring the causal chain from blast energetics to intergenerational environmental burdens. Remediation efforts, such as soil excavation or phytoremediation, often prove cost-prohibitive and incomplete, leaving legacies of restricted land use.^[106]^[107]^[108]

Historical Development

Ancient to 19th Century Discoveries

The earliest known explosive mixture, gunpowder, was developed in China during the Tang Dynasty around 850 CE by Daoist alchemists experimenting with elixirs for immortality, combining saltpeter (potassium nitrate), charcoal, and sulfur.^[109] The first documented formula appeared in the military text Wujing Zongyao in 1044 CE, initially used for incendiary devices like fire arrows and bombs before evolving into propellants for cannons by the 12th century.^[110] This low explosive deflagrated rather than detonated, producing rapid combustion and pressure waves suitable for propulsion but limited in brisance compared to later high explosives. Gunpowder spread westward via the Silk Road and Mongol invasions, reaching the Islamic world by the 13th century and Europe shortly thereafter, where it enabled the development of cannons documented as early as 1326 CE.^[111] European refinements, such as corning the powder into granules for consistent burning, improved its reliability for artillery and mining by the 15th century, though it remained a deflagrating agent prone to inconsistent performance due to hygroscopic saltpeter.^[112] In the early 19th century, the discovery of primary explosives like mercury(II) fulminate by British chemist Edward Howard around 1800 provided the first reliable detonators, sensitive to shock and capable of initiating high-order explosions in secondary charges.^[113] This compound, Hg(CNO)₂, marked a shift toward initiating true detonations via friction or impact, essential for harnessing more powerful materials.^[114] High explosives emerged mid-century with Italian chemist Ascanio Sobrero's synthesis of nitroglycerin in 1847 through nitration of glycerol, a liquid compound far more powerful than black powder but dangerously unstable, detonating with velocities exceeding 7,000 m/s.^[115] Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel stabilized nitroglycerin by absorbing it into diatomaceous earth (kieselguhr), patenting dynamite in 1867 as a safer, moldable explosive for mining and construction, with detonation pressures up to 20,000 atmospheres.^[116] These innovations distinguished high explosives, which propagate via supersonic shock waves, from earlier deflagrants, enabling controlled blasting while highlighting risks like accidental detonations from impurities or shocks.^[117]

20th Century Industrial and Military Advances

The 20th century marked a transition from reliance on late-19th-century formulations like TNT to more powerful and versatile high explosives, spurred by industrial scaling and wartime necessities. Trinitrotoluene (TNT), with a detonation velocity of approximately 6,900 m/s, became the standard military shell filler during World War I, enabling more effective artillery impacts compared to earlier black powder or lyddite variants; by 1918, Allied forces produced millions of tons for high-explosive shells that prioritized blast over shrapnel.^[118] Ammonium nitrate mixtures, such as amatol (TNT blended with ammonium nitrate), further enhanced yield and reduced costs, with U.S. output reaching peaks of over 1 million pounds daily by war's end to meet demands for trench warfare and mining operations.^[119] World War II accelerated innovations in nitramine-based explosives, particularly RDX (cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine), originally synthesized in 1898 but scaled for mass production in the 1940s after British refinements in the 1930s improved its stability and power—offering roughly twice the explosive force of TNT at a detonation velocity exceeding 8,700 m/s.^[120] The U.S. ramped up RDX manufacturing to over 70,000 tons annually by 1944, incorporating it into Composition B (59% RDX, 39% TNT, 2% wax) for aerial bombs, torpedoes, and anti-tank rounds, which enhanced brisance and penetration in Pacific and European theaters.^[121] Plasticized variants like Composition C emerged during the war, providing moldable charges resistant to shock and temperature extremes, laying groundwork for post-war formulations. Industrial applications paralleled this, with ammonium nitrate prills enabling safer bulk handling in quarrying and tunneling, though early mixtures lagged in sensitivity until wartime chemical engineering advances.^[122] Mid-century industrial breakthroughs emphasized cost-efficiency for civilian blasting. ANFO (ammonium nitrate-fuel oil, typically 94% AN and 6% diesel), first formulated in the early 1950s for large-scale mining, achieved detonation velocities of 3,200–4,800 m/s at a fraction of nitroglycerin-based costs, revolutionizing open-pit operations like those in U.S. copper mines where annual consumption exceeded millions of tons by the 1960s.^[123] Military efforts culminated in nuclear explosives, redefining explosive scale through fission and fusion. The Trinity test on July 16, 1945, demonstrated implosion-driven plutonium fission yielding 21 kilotons TNT equivalent, reliant on precisely synchronized high-explosive lenses compressing the core.^[124] Fusion devices advanced further, with the 1954 Castle Bravo shot achieving 15 megatons via lithium deuteride boosting, highlighting orders-of-magnitude energy release from staged reactions but introducing uncontainable fallout hazards.[center] These advances prioritized velocity, stability, and yield but exposed trade-offs: RDX's sensitivity necessitated desensitizers, while nuclear designs demanded computational modeling absent in chemical explosives, influencing post-1945 safety protocols and arms control.^[126]

Late 20th to 21st Century Innovations

In the late 1980s, the U.S. Department of Defense formalized requirements for insensitive munitions (IM), munitions designed to resist unintended detonation from stimuli such as heat, fragments, or shock, following analyses of vulnerabilities exposed in events like the 1987 USS Stark incident and prior naval fires.^[127] This spurred the widespread adoption of polymer-bonded explosives (PBX), which encapsulate high-explosive crystals in polymer matrices to reduce sensitivity; for instance, PBX-9502, formulated with triaminotrinitrobenzene (TATB) at Los Alamos National Laboratory, achieves a critical diameter for detonation exceeding 10 mm while delivering performance comparable to conventional fills.^[128] PBX formulations minimized sympathetic detonation risks, with tests showing survival to fragment impacts up to 1.8 g at 1500 m/s without propagating reactions.^[129] High-energy-density explosives advanced concurrently, exemplified by hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20 or HNIW), first synthesized in 1987 by researchers at the Naval Air Warfare Center using a method involving glyoxal and hydroxylamine precursors.^[130] CL-20 exhibits a detonation velocity of 9380 m/s and pressure of 39.5 GPa in its ε-polymorph, outperforming octogen (HMX) by 10-20% in energy release, enabling more compact warheads; its production scaled via nitrolysis processes, though sensitivity concerns prompted PBX variants like PBX-N-19 (95% CL-20).^[130] These materials enhanced precision-guided munitions, reducing payload mass for equivalent blast effects. Into the 21st century, nanostructuring revolutionized explosive reactivity, with nano-thermites—composites of nanoscale metal fuels (e.g., aluminum) and oxidizers (e.g., iron oxide)—developed from the early 2000s for tunable ignition and higher surface-area-driven energy release rates up to 10^4 times faster than micron-scale analogs.^[131] Such materials, produced via sol-gel or arrested reactive milling, support micro-initiators and additively manufactured charges, as demonstrated in 3D-printed propellant architectures achieving uniform burn rates without defects.^[132] Computational modeling paralleled these, with high-performance computing at facilities like Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory enabling predictive simulations of detonation wavefronts via reactive hydrocodes, reducing physical testing by incorporating mesoscale heterogeneity effects since the 1990s.^[133] Formulations like IMX-104, qualified by BAE Systems in 2015, further exemplified IM progress, offering TNT-equivalent performance with 50% lower vulnerability to slow cook-off, using dinitrotoluene-free melt-cast fills for artillery shells.^[134] These innovations prioritized empirical validation through standardized tests (e.g., MIL-STD-2105), balancing power with safety amid evolving threats like improvised devices.^[135]

Notable Examples

Industrial and Accidental Explosions

Industrial and accidental explosions typically result from unintended ignition sources interacting with combustible dusts, flammable vapors, unstable chemicals, or high-energy materials in manufacturing, storage, or processing facilities. Common initiating factors include electrical arcs, mechanical sparks from hot work, equipment failures, and human errors such as improper handling or inadequate separation of incompatibles, often compounded by deficiencies in ventilation, containment, or monitoring systems.^[136]^[137] These events propagate through deflagration to detonation when pressure waves accelerate in confined spaces, releasing blast overpressures, thermal radiation, and fragments that cause structural collapse, fires, and casualties.^[138] The Halifax Explosion of December 6, 1917, occurred when the SS Mont-Blanc, carrying 2,300 tons of high explosives including picric acid and TNT for World War I supply, collided with the SS Imo in Halifax Harbour, Nova Scotia; the ensuing fire detonated the cargo approximately 20 minutes later, generating a blast equivalent to 2.9 kilotons of TNT that leveled 2 square kilometers, killed about 1,700 people, and injured over 9,000.^[139]^[140] The shockwave shattered windows up to 100 kilometers away, ignited widespread fires, and generated a tsunami that inundated waterfront areas, highlighting risks of maritime munitions transport without sufficient collision safeguards.^[139] On April 16, 1947, the Texas City disaster unfolded when a fire aboard the SS Grandcamp, loaded with 2,300 tons of bagged ammonium nitrate fertilizer, ignited during cargo reloading; the fertilizer's oxidizing properties fueled an explosion at 9:12 a.m., shattering the ship and triggering a chain reaction with the nearby SS High Flyer, resulting in 581 confirmed deaths, thousands injured, and the destruction of the city's industrial core including refineries and chemical plants.^[141]^[142] Ammonium nitrate's sensitivity to heat and confinement, combined with suppressed firefighting efforts to prevent cargo shift, amplified the blast's yield to rival small nuclear devices, underscoring the hazards of bulk fertilizer storage near populated zones.^[141] The PEPCON disaster on May 4, 1988, at the Pacific Engineering and Production Company of Nevada facility near Henderson involved a fire in a batch mixing area that spread to stored ammonium perchlorate—a solid rocket fuel oxidizer—producing seven explosions, the largest registering 3.5 on the Richter scale, killing two plant employees, injuring 372 others, and causing over $100 million in damage across 2 miles.^[143]^[144] Inadequate firewalls between storage bunkers and ignition from welding operations enabled sympathetic detonation, shattering windows in Las Vegas 15 miles away and evacuating thousands, which prompted stricter federal regulations on explosive storage spacing.^[143] In Tianjin, China, on August 12, 2015, a fire at Ruihai Logistics warehouse, overloaded with hazardous chemicals including 700 tons of ammonium nitrate and dry nitrocellulose, began with spontaneous ignition of the nitrocellulose due to overheating in unsegregated containers, escalating into multiple detonations that killed 173 people—mostly firefighters—and injured nearly 800, while contaminating soil and water with cyanides and heavy metals over 1.5 square kilometers.^[145]^[146] Regulatory lapses in permitting high-risk storage near residential areas and poor emergency response coordination, including secondary blasts from water-reactive materials, exposed systemic oversight failures in rapid industrial expansion.^[145] The Beirut port explosion of August 4, 2020, stemmed from a fire reaching 2,750 tons of confiscated ammonium nitrate stored since 2014 in Warehouse 12 without proper safety measures; the nitrate's detonation at 6:07 p.m. yielded 0.5-1.1 kilotons of TNT equivalent, killing 218 people, injuring 7,000, displacing 300,000, and inflicting $15 billion in damage including cratering the port and collapsing structures up to 10 kilometers away.^[147]^[148] Neglect by port authorities in mitigating known risks, such as inadequate fire barriers and ignored expert warnings, facilitated the vapor cloud formation and high-order blast, eroding institutional trust amid Lebanon's economic crisis.^[147]

Military and Intentional Detonations

Military detonations encompass controlled explosions for testing weapons, demolishing structures, and tactical strikes in combat. The Trinity test on July 16, 1945, marked the first nuclear detonation, conducted by the U.S. Army in New Mexico with a plutonium implosion device yielding approximately 18.6 kilotons of TNT equivalent, confirming the feasibility of atomic bombs ahead of their wartime use.^[149] This test produced a fireball rising to 40,000 feet and a mushroom cloud extending to 50,000 feet, with no immediate human fatalities but long-term radiation exposure affecting nearby civilians.^[150] The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 represented the first combat use of nuclear weapons. On August 6, the uranium-based "Little Boy" bomb detonated over Hiroshima at an altitude of about 1,900 feet, yielding 15 kilotons and destroying 90% of the city center within a 1-mile radius, with immediate deaths estimated at 70,000 and total fatalities by December 1945 reaching around 140,000 from blast, burns, and acute radiation.^[151] ^[152] Three days later, on August 9, the plutonium "Fat Man" bomb exploded over Nagasaki, yielding 21 kilotons and killing approximately 40,000 instantly, with total deaths up to 80,000 by year's end, though hilly terrain mitigated some blast effects compared to the flatter Hiroshima.^[153] Nuclear tests continued post-war, with Castle Bravo on March 1, 1954, at Bikini Atoll yielding an unexpected 15 megatons—over 1,000 times the Hiroshima bomb—due to unanticipated lithium-7 fusion reactions, creating a crater 2 miles wide and dispersing fallout that irradiated 82 U.S. personnel on nearby islands and the Japanese fishing vessel Daigo Fukuryu Maru, causing acute radiation sickness in crew members.^[154] ^[155] Conventional military detonations include large-scale bombings and precision strikes. The Allied firebombing of Dresden from February 13-15, 1945, involved over 1,200 bombers dropping 3,900 tons of high-explosive and incendiary bombs, generating a firestorm that killed an estimated 25,000 civilians through blast overpressure, burns, and asphyxiation.^[156] In modern conflicts, the U.S. deployed the GBU-43/B MOAB on April 13, 2017, against an ISIS-K tunnel complex in Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan, with an 11-ton TNT equivalent yield that collapsed the underground network and killed 36 militants, without reported civilian casualties.^[157] Intentional demolitions serve tactical purposes, such as U.S. Marine Corps operations in Afghanistan where explosive ordnance disposal teams used charges to destroy enemy munitions and infrastructure, minimizing collateral damage through precise placement and timing. These actions highlight the controlled application of explosive physics, where detonation velocity and brisance dictate structural failure, contrasting with uncontrolled blasts.^[158]

Natural and Cosmic Events

Explosive volcanic eruptions on Earth arise from the buildup and sudden release of volatile gases dissolved in magma, particularly in stratovolcanoes situated above subduction zones where tectonic plates converge, leading to viscous, gas-rich magmas prone to fragmentation and high-velocity ejection of pyroclastic material.^[159] The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI), a logarithmic scale measuring ejecta volume and eruption column height, quantifies these events, with VEI 5 or higher denoting highly explosive activity capable of regional devastation.^[160] The 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in Indonesia stands as the largest recorded, achieving VEI 7 status by expelling approximately 150 cubic kilometers of tephra, generating atmospheric shock waves audible up to 1,200 miles away, and injecting sulfur aerosols that induced global cooling, crop failures, and the "Year Without a Summer" in 1816.^[161] Similarly, the 1883 Krakatoa eruption (VEI 6) in Indonesia released energy equivalent to 200 megatons of TNT, producing tsunamis that killed over 36,000 people and atmospheric effects visible worldwide for years.^[160] Meteoroid airbursts represent another class of natural explosions, occurring when small asteroids or comets fragment and detonate in the atmosphere due to aerodynamic stresses and compression heating, without forming craters but generating powerful shock waves. The Tunguska event of June 30, 1908, over Siberia involved an estimated 50- to 100-meter object exploding at 5-10 km altitude with a yield of 3-50 megatons of TNT, flattening roughly 2,150 square kilometers of forest and producing seismic signals detected globally, yet causing no confirmed fatalities due to the remote location.^[162] More recently, the Chelyabinsk meteor on February 15, 2013, a 20-meter chondrite entering at 19 km/s, detonated at about 30 km altitude with 440 kilotons TNT equivalent, shattering windows across 200 square kilometers, injuring over 1,500 people from flying glass, and scattering fragments that were recovered for analysis confirming ordinary chondrite composition.^[163] Such events highlight the stochastic nature of near-Earth object encounters, with airbursts exceeding nuclear yields but limited ground effects due to altitude.^[164] In cosmic contexts, explosions manifest on stellar scales, dwarfing terrestrial events in energy output and driving galactic nucleosynthesis and evolution. Core-collapse supernovae occur when massive stars (over 8 solar masses) exhaust fuel, leading to gravitational implosion followed by a rebound shock that expels outer layers at 10% light speed, releasing 10^44 joules—equivalent to the Sun's lifetime luminosity in seconds—and forging heavy elements via rapid neutron capture.^[165] Type Ia supernovae, from white dwarf accretion exceeding the Chandrasekhar limit (1.4 solar masses), ignite thermonuclear runaway, peaking at absolute magnitudes around -19 and serving as standard candles for cosmic distance measurements due to uniform peak luminosities.^[166] Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), the universe's most luminous electromagnetic events, arise from relativistic jets in collapsing massive stars (long-duration GRBs) or merging compact objects, isotropically equivalent energies reaching 10^54 ergs over seconds to minutes, though beamed emission reduces true yields; these bursts, detected since 1967 by military satellites, probe high-redshift universe conditions and link to hypernovae in star-forming galaxies. Observations, such as GRB 080319B visible to the naked eye from 7.5 billion light-years, underscore their role in extreme physics, including potential Lorentz factors exceeding 100 and afterglows from synchrotron emission in surrounding media.^[167]

Applications and Utilitarian Roles

Industrial and Civil Engineering Uses

Explosives are employed in civil engineering primarily for rock fragmentation and structural demolition, enabling efficient excavation in hard rock formations where mechanical methods prove inadequate or uneconomical. In mining and quarrying operations, controlled blasting involves drilling boreholes into the rock mass, loading them with commercial explosives such as ammonium nitrate-fuel oil (ANFO) mixtures, and detonating in a sequenced manner to fracture and displace material. This technique dominates open-pit and underground mining, with global consumption of industrial explosives exceeding 4 million tons annually as of recent estimates, primarily for ore extraction and aggregate production.^[168]^[169] In construction, drill-and-blast methods facilitate tunneling through competent rock, particularly in projects with irregular geology or short tunnel lengths where tunnel boring machines are impractical. For instance, the process entails systematic advance cycles of drilling, charging with emulsion-based explosives, blasting, mucking, and support installation, achieving advance rates of 1-5 meters per day depending on rock hardness and explosive selection. Pre-splitting techniques, involving decoupled charges along the tunnel perimeter, minimize overbreak and preserve rock integrity for lining stability, as demonstrated in various hard rock tunnel projects.^[170]^[171] Controlled explosive demolition applies blasting to dismantle large structures like buildings, chimneys, and bridges by strategically placing charges at key support points to induce progressive collapse under gravity, reducing debris volume and enabling rapid site clearance. This method has been used since the mid-20th century for urban renewal, with precision timing via electronic detonators ensuring directional falls away from adjacent infrastructure; for example, over 2,000 buildings worldwide have been imploded using such techniques by specialized firms. Explosives like RDX-based boosters and linear shaped charges cut structural elements, with energy release calculated to avoid excessive vibration, typically limited to peak particle velocities below 50 mm/s at nearby structures per engineering standards.^[172]^[173]

Defense and Security Applications

Explosives form the destructive core of conventional military munitions, enabling blast, fragmentation, and penetration effects in artillery projectiles, aerial bombs, grenades, and missile warheads. High-energy materials such as composition B (RDX and TNT mixture) and HMX deliver rapid pressure waves exceeding 200,000 atmospheres to defeat armored targets and personnel.^[119] These applications rely on precise initiation via detonators to achieve controlled energy release, minimizing unintended propagation in storage or transport.^[174] In military engineering, controlled explosions facilitate obstacle breaching, structure demolition, and route clearance using plastic explosives like C-4 and specialized charges such as the Apache modular assault breaching system or cratering munitions. U.S. Army combat engineers, for instance, detonated over 120 blocks of C-4 during a 2013 training exercise to simulate battlefield demolitions, emphasizing charge placement and safety protocols to avoid collateral damage.^[175] Such operations employ line charges and Bangalore torpedoes to clear minefields and wire obstacles, enhancing mobility in contested environments.^[176] Explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) units across U.S. military branches detect, render safe, and dispose of unexploded munitions, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and chemical threats through robotic systems, disruptors, and controlled detonations. Air Force EOD technicians use dual-sensor detectors to locate buried IEDs, while Navy teams employ diving and parachuting for underwater or remote threats.^[177] ^[178] In counter-IED efforts, NATO and U.S. forces integrate explosive countermeasures to defeat adversary networks, with training focusing on IED indicators, components, and disruption techniques amid ongoing threats in asymmetric conflicts.^[179] Nuclear explosives underpin strategic deterrence via fission and fusion warheads on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and strategic bombers, with the U.S. maintaining 1,419 deployed warheads as of March 2023 to counter peer adversaries. These devices yield energy releases millions of times greater than chemical explosives, producing shock waves, thermal radiation, and fallout for mass destruction, though their use alters conflict dynamics profoundly.^[180] ^[181] Tactical nuclear options, deliverable by artillery or short-range missiles, extend applications to battlefield escalation control, prioritizing survivability in high-threat delivery environments.^[182]

Emerging Technologies and Research

Research into high explosives has focused on developing materials with higher energy density and improved stability. Advances include the synthesis of novel secondary explosives such as dihydroxylammonium 5,5'-bistetrazole-1,1'-diolate (TKX-50), which offers detonation velocities exceeding 9,500 m/s while exhibiting lower sensitivity than traditional compounds like HMX.^[130] Similarly, efforts to create melt-castable explosives without toxic plasticizers have led to formulations like 2,4-dinitroanisole (DNAN)-based mixtures, enhancing safety in munitions production.^[183] Insensitive high explosives (IHE) represent a key area, with simulations at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory elucidating hot-spot formation mechanisms that initiate detonation under shock loading, informing designs that withstand accidental impacts.^[184] Recent innovations include emulsion explosives incorporating sodium borohydride (NaBH4), which increase brisance—measured by detonation pressure up to 25% higher than standard emulsions—while maintaining emulsion stability for mining applications.^[185] Nanotechnology integration aims to boost performance, as seen in plasma-treated aluminum nanoparticles explored by U.S. Army and Argonne National Laboratory researchers, which enhance reaction rates in aluminized explosives by reducing ignition delays to microseconds, potentially for advanced propellants.^[186] Computational manufacturing techniques, including additive processes, enable optimized microstructures in high explosives to control detonation wavefronts and minimize defects.^[187] Detection technologies have advanced with portable systems leveraging ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), achieving trace detection limits below 1 ng for peroxides and nitrates.^[188] Nanosensors, utilizing gold nanoparticles' surface plasmon resonance, enable colorimetric detection of explosives like TNT at parts-per-billion levels in field conditions.^[189] These developments prioritize empirical validation through standardized tests, such as detonation velocity measurements via streak cameras, to ensure reliability over theoretical predictions.

Safety, Hazards, and Countermeasures

Risk Factors and Common Failure Modes

Risk factors for unintended explosions primarily involve the interaction of flammable or combustible materials with ignition sources under conditions of confinement or dispersion, as seen in industrial accidents. In facilities handling combustible dusts—such as those in food processing, pharmaceuticals, or metalworking—explosions occur when fine particulate matter forms a suspended cloud, encounters an ignition source like sparks from equipment or static electricity, and is contained within a structure that allows pressure buildup; the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board has documented over 350 such incidents since 1980, often linked to inadequate housekeeping or ventilation failures.^[190] ^[191] Similarly, vapor cloud explosions from flammable gases or liquids, as in refineries, arise from leaks igniting in open air, with overpressure waves causing secondary structural failures; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notes that poor maintenance, such as corroded piping, exacerbates leak risks in petrochemical operations.^[192] ^[193] Human and procedural lapses amplify these material-based risks. Equipment or heat source malfunctions, including electrical arcing or mechanical failures in pumps and valves, account for a significant portion of industrial structure fires leading to explosions, per National Fire Protection Association data from 2015–2019 showing such causes in 18% of manufacturing property incidents.^[194] In explosives manufacturing or storage, improper handling of sensitizers like ammonium nitrate—evident in the 2020 Beirut port explosion involving 2,750 tons stored without proper separation—can trigger deflagration to detonation transitions due to contamination or impact.^[195] Violations of process safety management, such as unaddressed static ignition during cold starts, have been cited by OSHA in pyrotechnics incidents resulting in multiple fatalities.^[49] Common failure modes in intended detonations include initiation failures, partial propagation, and structural overloads beyond design limits. In engineering applications like vessel rupture during controlled blasts, subsonic deflagrations can transition to supersonic detonations if reaction rates exceed containment strength, leading to brittle fracture or ductile tearing; finite element analyses indicate that vessels with thin walls or defects fail via hoop stress exceeding yield points at pressures as low as 10–20 bar.^[196] For munitions and ordnance, dud rates—defined as failure to detonate on impact—range from 1–5% in precision-guided systems but rise to 10–30% in cluster submunitions due to fuze arming defects, spin-induced instabilities, or environmental factors like mud adhesion; U.S. Defense Science Board assessments highlight that higher deployment velocities correlate with increased fuzing malfunctions.^[197] ^[198]

Initiation failure: Detonators may rupture or bridge-wire fracture under premature shock, as in electronic types tested to 100g impacts, preventing primer ignition.^[199]
Propagation failure: In non-ideal explosives like homemade variants, detonation waves decay due to insufficient confinement or low shock strength, yielding deflagration instead; Purdue University studies show failure diameters exceeding 10–20 cm for heterogeneous mixes.^[200]
Sympathetic detonation: Unintended coupling between charges via blast overpressure, observed in mining operations where spacing below 5–10 meters triggers cascades.^[201]

These modes underscore the need for empirical testing of explosive reactivity, as theoretical models often overestimate stability in heterogeneous compositions.^[202]

Prevention Standards and Engineering Controls

Prevention standards for industrial explosions emphasize systematic hazard assessment and layered protective measures, drawing from empirical data on ignition sources, fuel concentrations, and confinement effects that enable rapid combustion propagation. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standard 69, updated in 2024, specifies requirements for systems preventing deflagrations in enclosures with flammable gases, vapors, mists, or combustible dusts exceeding the lower flammability limit, including explosion isolation to halt flame front propagation and active suppression deploying agents like dry chemicals within 20-50 milliseconds of detection.^[203] NFPA 654, revised in 2020, addresses combustible particulate solids in manufacturing and processing, mandating dust hazard analyses to identify minimum ignition energies—often as low as 1-10 mJ for fine metal or organic powders—and controls such as regular housekeeping to limit layer depths below 1/32 inch over 5% of surface area.^[204] The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) integrates these into enforceable guidelines, as in its 2005 Safety and Health Information Bulletin on fire and explosion effects, which recommends separating hazards by distance (e.g., inhabited building distances scaled to explosive quantity via formulas like D = K * W^(1/3), where W is net explosive weight in kg and K is a site-specific constant) or barriers to mitigate overpressure waves exceeding 1-3 psi that cause structural failure.^[205] OSHA's combustible dust directive CPL 03-00-008, revised in 2023, requires process safety management for facilities handling materials with Kst values above 0 (dust deflagration index indicating explosion severity), prioritizing engineering over administrative controls like permits.^[206] Engineering controls follow a hierarchy starting with inherent design to eliminate risks, such as substituting non-combustible materials or inerting atmospheres with nitrogen to below 25-50% of the minimum oxygen concentration for combustion, verified through testing per ASTM E1446.^[207] Passive measures include blast-resistant construction with reinforced concrete rated to withstand 5-10 psi peak side-on pressure and venting panels that rupture at 0.5-2 psi to direct flames outward, reducing internal pressures by factors of 10-100 compared to unvented scenarios.^[205] Active systems, per NFPA 69, incorporate optical or pressure sensors triggering suppression or isolation valves, proven effective in reducing explosion probabilities from 10^-2 to below 10^-4 per demand in validated industrial trials.^[208] For volatile gas environments, European ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU and international IECEx schemes classify zones (0-2 for gases) based on release frequency and duration, requiring equipment with protection levels like intrinsic safety (limiting energy to <1.3 mJ for Group IIC gases) or flameproof enclosures to contain internal explosions without propagating externally, as standardized in IEC 60079-11 and -1.^[209] These controls, grounded in zone-specific ignition probability data, have reduced incident rates in petrochemical facilities by over 70% since implementation in the 2000s, per industry audits.^[210]

Detection, Forensics, and Response Protocols

Detection of explosions often begins with human observation or surveillance systems, supplemented by automated sensors capturing physical signatures of the event. Seismic sensors measure ground vibrations, proving effective for underground or high-yield blasts, as demonstrated in monitoring networks that distinguish explosions from earthquakes via waveform analysis. Acoustic and infrasound detectors identify shockwaves and low-frequency pressure waves propagating through air, with seismoacoustic methods enhancing discrimination between natural seismic events and man-made detonations. Optical sensors detect thermal flashes and fireballs, particularly for high-explosive or nuclear events, while emerging distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technologies convert existing optical fiber networks into dense arrays for vibration detection over kilometers, enabling real-time localization of surface or subsurface explosions.^[211]^[212] Post-blast forensics employs standardized protocols to reconstruct events, identify explosives, and trace origins while preserving scene integrity. The National Institute of Justice's Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation outlines initial securing of the perimeter to control access and mitigate hazards, followed by a walkthrough for hazard identification and evidence mapping without disturbance. Documentation via photographs, videos, diagrams, and measurements precedes evidence collection, which targets fragments, residues, craters, and structural debris; residues undergo laboratory analysis using ion chromatography for inorganic components and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for organic explosives like RDX or PETN. Multidisciplinary teams, including bomb technicians and forensic chemists from agencies like the ATF, process scenes systematically, establishing chain of custody and submitting data to databases for pattern analysis, with crater dimensions and fragment distribution informing yield estimates (e.g., a 1-meter crater suggesting 10-20 kg TNT equivalent).^[213]^[213]^[214] Response protocols prioritize life safety under the Incident Command System, integrating first responders, HAZMAT teams, and law enforcement. Immediate actions include establishing hot, warm, and cold zones based on blast radius—factoring overpressure effects like eardrum rupture at approximately 5 psi or lethal lung barotrauma at 23 psi sustained for 18.5 milliseconds—and anticipating secondary devices through systematic searches. Triage addresses unique blast injuries such as fragmentation wounds (comprising up to 80% of cases from glass or debris) and blunt trauma from wave translation, with evacuation guided by stand-off distances (e.g., 250 feet for a 300-pound TNT equivalent to limit 1.0 psi overpressure). Structural assessments prevent collapses, utility shutoffs mitigate fires, and coordination via operational briefings ensures resource allocation, as per FEMA guidelines on blast dynamics and OSHA directives for secondary threats.^[215]^[215]^[216]

Controversies and Empirical Critiques

Debates on Explosive Weapons in Warfare

The primary debates surrounding explosive weapons in warfare revolve around balancing their inherent military utility—such as rapid suppression of enemy positions, destruction of fortifications, and area denial—against humanitarian risks, particularly in densely populated urban environments where blast effects, fragmentation, and structural collapse amplify civilian harm. Advocacy groups like the International Network on Explosive Weapons (INEW) argue that wide-area explosive munitions, including unguided artillery and large aerial bombs, cause disproportionate civilian casualties, citing data from Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) showing over 80% surges in such incidents in conflicts like Ukraine in 2022, with civilians comprising up to 90% of victims in urban settings.^[217] ^[218] However, these figures often derive from monitoring by non-governmental organizations focused on disarmament, which may emphasize verified incidents while underrepresenting combatant deaths or the tactical necessities driving their use, such as adversaries embedding forces amid civilians to exploit proportionality rules under international humanitarian law (IHL).^[219] Military analysts counter that explosive weapons remain indispensable for operational effectiveness in modern conflicts, where urban terrain favors defenders through concealment and human shields, rendering precision alternatives insufficient for tasks like neutralizing dispersed infantry or breaking fortified lines. For instance, in urban operations like those in Mosul (2016–2017) against ISIS, coalition forces relied on explosive ordnance to dismantle entrenched positions, achieving territorial gains despite high civilian costs estimated at 10,000–40,000 deaths, many attributable to insurgent tactics of fighting from civilian areas.^[219] Critics of restrictions, including U.S. military doctrine, assert that empirical comparisons favor explosive area effects over prolonged ground assaults, which historically incur higher overall casualties; data from post-9/11 conflicts indicate that precision-guided munitions reduced unintended civilian deaths by factors of 10–20 compared to Vietnam-era unguided strikes, though unguided systems persist for volume fire in high-threat scenarios.^[220] Proposals for blanket avoidance of wide-area effects in populated areas, as pushed by the ICRC, are viewed skeptically as they could cede initiative to irregular forces unbound by similar constraints, potentially prolonging conflicts and escalating total harm.^[221] Under IHL, including Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (1977), the use of explosive weapons must adhere to principles of distinction (targeting only military objectives) and proportionality (anticipated civilian harm not excessive to military advantage), with no outright prohibition on their employment in urban zones absent deliberate indiscriminate attacks.^[222] Debates intensify over interpreting these rules for inherently dispersive weapons like cluster munitions, banned by the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions (ratified by 110 states but rejected by major powers like the U.S., Russia, and China due to their utility against armored formations and minefields). Proponents of bans highlight post-conflict unexploded ordnance risks, yet military assessments note failure rates below 5% for newer U.S. systems like the CBU-105, arguing they outperform unitary bombs in minimizing strike footprints and immediate collateral while providing submunition precision. Efforts like the 2022–2023 political declaration on EWIPA, endorsed by over 70 states, urge enhanced precautions such as enhanced guidance and post-strike assessments, but non-signatories and skeptics question enforceability, noting that asymmetric actors like Hamas or ISIS routinely violate distinction by co-locating military assets with civilians, shifting causal responsibility.^[221] Recent conflicts underscore unresolved tensions, as in Ukraine where both Russian massed artillery and Ukrainian counterstrikes with Western-supplied systems have inflicted heavy urban tolls—OHCHR data through 2024 records over 10,000 civilian casualties from explosives, yet military analyses attribute much to Russia's area bombardment tactics versus Ukraine's more targeted use.^[223] Truth-seeking evaluations reveal that while technological advances like loitering munitions and AI-assisted targeting mitigate risks, fundamental causal realities—explosives' physics of overpressure and shrapnel propagation—preclude zero-collateral outcomes in peer or hybrid warfare, prioritizing empirical validation of net lives saved through decisive victories over aspirational restraints that disadvantage rule-abiding forces.^[224]

Environmental Impact Claims vs. Evidence

Advocacy organizations and environmental reports frequently assert that explosions from military and industrial activities inflict widespread, enduring harm, including the release of toxic residues that contaminate soil, water, and air, leading to biodiversity loss and human health risks. For instance, analyses of explosive weapons in populated areas highlight debris generation, hazardous material dispersal, and long-term pollution legacies as justification for policy restrictions. Similarly, critiques of mining blasts emphasize dust clouds, ground vibrations, and flyrock as contributors to habitat disruption and atmospheric pollution. These claims often portray explosive use as inherently destructive, with minimal mitigation possible, drawing from observations in conflict zones where unexploded ordnance exacerbates issues.^[225]^[101]^[226] Peer-reviewed research on the environmental fate of conventional explosives, such as TNT, RDX, and HMX, reveals that these compounds undergo rapid transformation through abiotic processes like photolysis, hydrolysis, and sorption to sediments, alongside biotic degradation by microorganisms utilizing them as carbon or nitrogen sources. Empirical data indicate limited persistence in dynamic environments, with bioavailability declining due to binding and further breakdown into less toxic products, though transformation byproducts require additional scrutiny for potential risks. Toxicity assessments show acute effects at laboratory concentrations around 10–100 μg/L for sensitive marine species, but field measurements post-detonation often dilute to ng/L levels, suggesting attenuated ecological threats under typical dispersion.^[227]^[228]^[228] Distinctions in detonation efficiency provide key evidence countering blanket claims of inevitable pollution: high-order (complete) detonations minimize chemical residues at approximately 1.2 mg/L in aqueous tests, compared to 8.7 mg/L from low-order (incomplete) events, while producing more but smaller fragments with reduced stopping distances. Toxicity radii extend 14–23 m for high-order versus 25–58 m for low- or partial-order, underscoring that proper initiation reduces contaminant release far below alarmist projections. In marine settings, munitions leachates exhibit low bioaccumulation factors and rapid depuration (half-lives of hours), with sorption coefficients limiting widespread mobility.^[229]^[229]^[228] In controlled industrial applications like open-pit mining, blasting-induced effects—primarily transient ground vibrations, air overpressure, and dust—are quantified and regulated to stay below structural damage thresholds (e.g., peak particle velocities under 50 mm/s at 100 m), with dust settling within hours and NOx gases dispersing rapidly. Long-term chemical legacies remain negligible absent incomplete detonations, as residues integrate into overburden and degrade. Military contexts similarly show localized contamination from training ranges or ordnance disposal, managed via federal remediation programs that address heavy metals and energetics at sites, with broader ecosystem recovery evidenced post-cleanup. These findings indicate that while uncontrolled or legacy explosions pose verifiable risks, engineered practices yield impacts orders of magnitude smaller than claimed, prioritizing empirical mitigation over precautionary overstatement.^[230]^[226]^[231]

Detonation Type	Residue Concentration (mg/L)	Toxicity Radius (m)	Fragmentation Impact
High-Order	1.2 ± 0.4	14–23	Higher number, smaller size, shorter range
Low-Order	8.7 ± 2.8	25–40	Lower number, higher chemical release

Regulatory Burdens and Innovation Constraints

Regulatory frameworks governing explosive materials, administered by agencies such as the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), impose stringent licensing, storage, and transportation requirements that extend to research, development, and testing (RDT&E) of new compounds. Under 27 CFR Part 555, entities engaged in developing or modifying explosives must obtain a federal explosives license (FEL), which mandates detailed record-keeping, inventory controls, and ATF inspections, with non-compliance penalties including fines up to $250,000 or imprisonment.^[232] These provisions, expanded by the Safe Explosives Act of 2002 following the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, classify experimental explosives as requiring special permits, thereby elevating compliance costs—estimated in federal reviews to include annual reporting burdens valued at millions in administrative hours industry-wide.^[233]^[234] Such mandates constrain innovation by prolonging approval timelines for novel materials, such as insensitive munitions or lead-free primaries, where ATF classification testing and DOT hazardous materials endorsements can delay commercialization by 12-24 months due to sequential reviews and site-specific storage variances.^[235] In the mining sector, where explosives like emulsions drive efficiency gains, tightened blasting codes and separation distances for ammonium nitrate—prompted by incidents like the 2020 Beirut port explosion—have increased operational overhead, with industry analyses noting bundled service models as workarounds to mitigate regulatory layering from multiple agencies.^[236] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposals, including 2024 rules curbing open detonation for waste explosives, further limit RDT&E field testing, potentially raising costs for validating safer formulations amid supply chain vulnerabilities identified in nuclear stockpile maintenance.^[237]^[238] Efforts to alleviate these burdens, such as Canada's 2023 amendments to the Explosives Regulations reducing misalignment costs or EU evaluations of pyrotechnics directives, acknowledge high administrative loads that risk deterring smaller developers from pursuing incremental advances in detonation control or eco-compatible blends.^[239]^[240]^[241] However, persistent critiques from industry bodies highlight that layered federal-state requirements, including annual storage facility reporting to local authorities, amplify opportunity costs for R&D investment, with broader economic studies linking analogous chemical regulations to deferred innovation in high-risk sectors.^[242]^[243]^[244]

References

[1]
Explosion | NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology
Jan 15, 2025 · Explosion the sudden conversion of potential energy (chemical or mechanical) into kinetic energy with the production and release of gases under pressure.
[2]
The Science of Blast - Blast Injury Research Coordinating Office
Sep 12, 2024 · Explosive blasts or explosions are physical phenomena that result in a sudden release of energy. This process causes a near instantaneous compression of the ...
[3]
The physics, chemistry and dynamics of explosions - Journals
Feb 13, 2012 · For chemical or nuclear explosions, this time scale (l/cs) is based on the characteristic size (l) of the system and the acoustic velocity (cs).
[4]
Explosive | Definition, Types, Examples, & Facts - Britannica
Oct 13, 2025 · There are three fundamental types: mechanical, nuclear, and chemical. A mechanical explosive is one that depends on a physical reaction ...High explosive · Manufacture of black powder · Dynamite · Blasting caps
[5]
[PDF] NUREG/CR-7201, "Characterizing Explosive Effects on ...
Detonation occurs when the rate of reaction exceeds the speed of sound in the explosive material, creating a shock wave and rapid release of energy (Baker, 1973) ...
[6]
Nuclear Explosion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Nuclear devices are basically of two types, fission (the “atomic” bomb) and fusion (the thermonuclear or “hydrogen” bomb). Fission of plutonium-239 or uranium- ...
[7]
Blast Injuries - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Whether through an accident or intentional act, explosions are an occurrence that can cause serious injury and death. Explosions have the ability to inflict ...
[8]
Explosion - DOE Directives
A sudden, rapid release of energy that produces potentially damaging pressures. Explosions can result from ignition events involving energetic materials.
[9]
Glossary on Explosion Dynamics - Joseph Shepherd
A blast wave is produced by an explosion because the explosive event displaces the surrounding air rapidly. Burning speed This is the speed with which a smooth ...
[10]
EXPLOSION Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Etymology. Latin explosion-, explosio act of driving off by clapping, from explodere ; First Known Use. 1681, in the meaning defined at sense 1 ; Time Traveler.
[11]
Explosion - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Latin explosio via French, "explosion" means a violent driving out by noise, evolving to denote a violent blast and rapid increase since ...
[12]
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/explosion
[13]
[PDF] First-Principles Study of High Explosive Decomposition Energetics
The molecular decomposition of high explosives has been regarded as an important step in explosive detonation kinetics. In particularly, the dissociation energy ...
[14]
Deciphering decomposition pathways of high explosives ... - PNAS
Through extensive first-principles calculations, we identified key intermediates in the early stages of the decomposition process, resulting from C–C and C–N ...
[15]
Reaction mechanism and kinetics properties of β-HMX under ...
The reaction initiation mechanism and intrinsic kinetics properties are uncovered with the analysis of the evolutions of main products and chemical bonds. The ...
[16]
[PDF] Theory of Explosive Substances - DTIC
Basic Conditions for Reaction Taking Place in the Form of Explosion. 1. Exothermic Nature, Speed and Formation of. Gases as Factors, Determining Possibility of.
[17]
Molecular Theory of Detonation Initiation: Insight from First ...
Feb 19, 2016 · In this review, we analyzed a set of select experimental and theoretical articles, which were augmented by our own first principles modeling and ...
[18]
[PDF] Detailed and Simplified Chemical Reaction Mechanisms ... - Caltech
Oct 13, 2005 · Abstract. We examine the chemical basis for simplified chemical reaction models by using numerical sim- ulations of adiabatic explosion with ...
[19]
Chemical reaction mechanisms and models of energetic materials
This perspective provides an overview of research progress in chemical reaction mechanisms and models, with a particular emphasis on organic EMs and reactive ...
[20]
11.8: Nuclear Bombs - Chemistry LibreTexts
Aug 9, 2024 · A crucial feature of the fission of uranium without which an atom bomb is impossible is that fission produces more neutrons than it consumes.
[21]
Science Behind the Atom Bomb - Nuclear Museum
This is known as a chain reaction and is what causes an atomic explosion. When a uranium-235 atom absorbs a neutron and fissions into two new atoms, it ...
[22]
How Nuclear Bombs Work - Science | HowStuffWorks
strong and weak — that hold the nucleus of an atom together, especially atoms with unstable nuclei. There are two basic ways ...Nuclear Fission · Nuclear Fuel · Fusion Bombs · Consequences and Health...
[23]
How Do Nuclear Weapons Work? - Union of Concerned Scientists
Sep 29, 2016 · Modern nuclear weapons work by combining chemical explosives, nuclear fission, and nuclear fusion.
[24]
Blast Wave - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A blast wave usually consists of a shock wave and a blast wind [30]. Nonlinear physics that explains shock waves is also used to describe blast waves [140,141].
[25]
[PDF] PROGESSING WAVE ANALYSIS OF BLAST WAVES IN SPHERES
This constant is determined from the known required density of the material behind the shock front given by the Rankine-Hugoniot conditions. This is given by (5 ...
[26]
[PDF] Chapter THE PHYSICS AND MECHANISMS OF PRIMARY BLAST ...
Dynamic pressure is the force that is associated with the blast wind (that is, the movement of air particles at the leading edge of the shock wave). It is ...
[27]
Coupled models for propagation of explosive shock waves in ...
Feb 29, 2024 · The density and pressure of the gas inside the blast wave also increase with time until they reach their maximum values at the shock front. In ...
[28]
[PDF] On the Propagation and Interaction of Spherical Blast Waves
Shock waves and the flowfield become planar, cylindrically symmetric, or spherically symmetric, respectively if the energy source is in a plane, along a line, ...
[29]
Blast wave kinematics: theory, experiments, and applications
Jul 25, 2022 · This article presents a description of the propagation of a shock wave produced by an explosion in free air, an extension of the standard ...
[30]
Understanding the shock and detonation response of high ...
Mar 27, 2018 · A detonation wave is a self-supporting shock wave that travels at speeds between about 3 and 10 km/s. It causes the complete, or near-complete, ...
[31]
Propagation rules of shock waves in confined space under different ...
Aug 23, 2022 · The physical quantities that affect the shock wave parameters of explosive explosion in air are : total energy E released by explosive explosion ...
[32]
[PDF] An Investigation of Spherical Blast Waves and
A relatively simple model of the wave behavior was devised, It consisted of a spherical blast wave that developed into a steadily propagating Chapman-Jouguet.
[33]
[PDF] A FIELD EXPLOSION TEST OF HYDROGEN-AIR MIXTURES
The TNT equivalent mass was calculated based on the value of energy/mass of hydrogen (119.628 MJ/kg) [5] and TNT (4.533 MJ/kg) [6], as shown in Table 1.Missing: physics | Show results with:physics
[34]
[PDF] Chapter 2 EXPLOSIVES
... explosive to a mechanical means of breaking and moving rock. We can break rock with a sledgehammer, and a detonation pressure is our explosive hammer. As ...
[35]
https://www.atomicarchive.com/resources/documents/effects/glasstone-dolan/chapter1.html
[36]
Yield Estimation of the August 2020 Beirut Explosion by Using ...
Nov 23, 2022 · Explosion yield of the 2020 Beirut explosion is estimated based on infrasound waveforms Full 3-D physics-based numerical simulations are ...<|separator|>
[37]
[PDF] Estimating Equivalency Of Explosives Through A Thermochemical ...
Comparing the detonation energy for an explosive with that of TNT allows estimation of the TNT equivalency with respect to peak pressure, while comparison of.
[38]
[PDF] The Effects of Nuclear Weapons - Stanford
With the development of thermonuclear. (fusion) weapons, having energy yields in the range of millions of tons (i.e., megatons) of TNT, a new ...
[39]
Properties of Selected High Explosives - PacSci EMC
Explosives which detonate and propagate at velocities greater than 1000 m/s, are high explosives and include the secondary explosives RDX, HMX, HNS, DIPAM, ...Definitions · Properties & Characteristics · Stability Tests · Sensitivity Tests<|separator|>
[40]
Explosions, Deflagrations, and Detonations - NFPA
Mar 27, 2023 · A deflagration is an explosion where the flame speed is lower than the speed of sound, which is approximately equal to 335 m/sec (750 mph).
[41]
[PDF] Module 1 - Explosives
“High explosives” detonate, whereas “low explosives” deflagrate or burn. A high-explosives detonation provides both shock, which fractures (or breaks) the rock, ...
[42]
Explosives Analysis - American Society of Trace Evidence Examiners
High explosives detonate at a rate greater than the speed of sound whereas low explosives deflagrate. Deflagration involves particle to particle burning.
[43]
[PDF] ELA964: Unit 2 - Explosion Types Slides - AIChE
We'll learn more about potential hazards associated with explosions in Unit 3. Page 7. Copyright ©American Institute of Chemical Engineers 2018. All rights ...
[44]
A scheme for the classification of explosions in the chemical process ...
All process industry accidents fall under three broad categories—fire, explosion, and toxic release. Of these fire is the most common, followed by explosions ...
[45]
Early moments of BLEVE: From vessel opening to liquid flashing ...
A boiling liquid expanding vapour explosion (BLEVE) is a physical explosion caused by a sudden rupture of a vessel containing superheated liquid. A BLEVE ...
[46]
[PDF] Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapour Explosions (BLEVE) - IChemE
A BLEVE is an explosion from a vessel failure containing liquid above its boiling point at normal atmospheric pressure.
[47]
BLEVE: Causes, Effects, and Mechanisms - Blazestack
Dec 15, 2024 · A BLEVE is an explosion caused by the rapid expansion of vapor when a heated liquid turns into vapor, causing the container to rupture.
[48]
Definitions of Explosion Legislative Interpretations - WorkSafeNB
Yes, you must immediately report this type of incident to WorkSafeNB. Explosions can be categorized into three groups: physical, electrical and chemical ...
[49]
[PDF] Process Safety Management for Explosives and Pyrotechnics ...
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. “To assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women; by authorizing.
[50]
Fission and Fusion: What is the Difference? - Department of Energy
Fission occurs when a neutron slams into a larger atom, forcing it to excite and split into two smaller atoms—also known as fission products. Additional ...
[51]
Manhattan Project: Science > BOMB DESIGN AND COMPONENTS
Initiators helped trigger fission by releasing neutrons at the optimal moment, and tampers reduced critical mass by preventing neutrons from escaping the bomb ...Missing: explosion mechanism
[52]
Radioactive Fallout - The Medical Implications of Nuclear War - NCBI
Most large-yield weapons (> 100 kt) are combined fission-fusion explosives with approximately equal amounts of fusion and fission (Fetter and Tsipis, 1981).
[53]
Basic Nuclear Physics and Weapons Effects - NMHB 2020 [Revised]
This chapter provides an overview of nuclear physics, basic nuclear weapon designs, and the effects of nuclear detonations.
[54]
The Trinity test | Los Alamos National Laboratory
Jul 6, 2020 · The resulting nuclear blast from the Gadget, as the device was called, released an explosive force of 21 kilotons (equivalent to 21 thousands ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[55]
The Effects of Nuclear Weapons - Glasstone and Dolan | Chapter II
The blast winds may have peak velocities of several hundred miles an hour fairly near to ground zero; even at more than 6 miles from the explosion of a 1- ...
[56]
[PDF] The Effects of Nuclear Weapons - GovInfo
Furthermore, two weapons of different design may have the same explosive energy yield, but the effects could be markedly different. Where such possibilities ...
[57]
[PDF] Astrophysical Explosions - Department of Physics and Astronomy ...
The subject of astrophysical explosions encompasses the timely and exciting physics of supernovae (SN) and gamma-ray bursts (GRB)—the most powerful plasma ...
[58]
Field Guide to X-ray Sources :: Supernovas & Supernova Remnants
May 6, 2013 · A Type II, as well as Type Ib and Type Ic explosion, is produced by the catastrophic collapse of the core of a massive star. A Type Ia supernova ...<|separator|>
[59]
Supernovas & Remnants | Center for Astrophysics | Harvard ...
Today, astronomers distinguish two types of supernova: those involving white dwarfs, and those that are the explosions of very massive stars.
[60]
DOE Explains...Supernovae - Department of Energy
A supernova is the colossal explosion of a star. Scientists have identified several types of supernova. One type, called a “core-collapse” supernova, occurs in ...
[61]
Advancing the Supernova Mechanism Study With Computer Modeling
The most promising candidate for the supernova explosion mechanism is the so-called “delayed neutrino heating” mechanism. Neutrinos carry away nearly all of the ...
[62]
[2403.12942] The physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae: explosion ...
Mar 19, 2024 · In this review, we will briefly summarize the state-of-the-art of both 1D and 3D simulations and how they can be employed to study the evolution of massive ...
[63]
The different types of supernovae explained - Astronomy Magazine
Nov 8, 2023 · Supernovae are powerful stellar explosions marking the death of stars. · Type I supernovae lack hydrogen; Type II supernovae show hydrogen. · Type ...
[64]
Supernova explosions - Las Cumbres Observatory
The core collapse supernovae described above are called Type II if they display hydrogen, Type Ib if they show helium, and Type Ic if neither hydrogen nor ...
[65]
Gamma-ray Bursts: Harvesting Knowledge From the Universe's Most ...
Nov 21, 2023 · The most powerful events in the known universe – gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) – are short-lived outbursts of the highest-energy light.
[66]
Brighter than an Exploding Star, It's a Hypernova!
May 20, 1999 · "Hypernovae are possibly the most powerful explosions in our Universe since the Big Bang," said Q. Daniel Wang, an astrophysicist at ...
[67]
Hubble Gamma-Ray Bursts - NASA Science
Feb 26, 2025 · Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the biggest explosions in the cosmos emitting large amounts of the most energetic form of light, gamma rays.
[68]
https://www.iflscience.com/jwst-confirms-day-long-gamma-ray-burst-was-the-most-energetic-event-humanity-has-witnessed-81264
[69]
Observations of a rare hypernova complete the picture of the death ...
Jan 16, 2019 · “The first hypernova was detected in 1998 as a very energetic type of supernova that followed a gamma-ray burst. This was the first evidence of ...Missing: kilonovae | Show results with:kilonovae
[70]
Unusual gamma-ray burst reveals previously undetected hybrid ...
Dec 7, 2022 · Hypernovae/supernovae are the visible-light, transient objects produced in these explosions from imploding objects, while kilonovae are ...Missing: rare | Show results with:rare
[71]
Axionlike Particles from Hypernovae | Phys. Rev. Lett.
Hypernovae and superluminous SNe are fascinating and rare events, with a typical Galactic rate ∼ 10 - 5 yr - 1 [9] , often advocated as an explanation of ...Missing: kilonovae | Show results with:kilonovae<|control11|><|separator|>
[72]
[PDF] DETERMINATION OF DETONATION VELOCITY OF EXPLOSIVE ...
Jan 15, 2015 · The shock wave initiates the chemical reaction in the explosive which rapidly changes the explo- sive compound into its product gases in the ...
[73]
Measurement of Chapman‐Jouguet Pressure for Explosives
The pressures determined for RDX, TNT, 64/36 Composition B, and 77/23 Cyclotol are 338, 189, 292, and 313 kilobars, respectively. Topics. Explosives, Chemical ...Missing: common | Show results with:common
[74]
CHAPMAN-JOUGUET PRESSURES OF SEVERAL PURE ... - DTIC
Chapman-Jouguet pressures of 187.2 kilobars, 264.1 kilobars, and 245.5 kilobars respectively were measured for cast charges of TNT, composition B and pentolite.<|separator|>
[75]
Measurement of the Chapman‐Jouguet Pressure and Reaction ...
The Chapman‐Jouguet pressure and the reaction zone length in detonating Composition B containing 63 percent RDX at a density of 1.67 g/cc have been measured.
[76]
[PDF] Notes From Lectures on Detonation Physics - DTIC
The relation between the C-J pressure and detonation velocity in the one-dimensional y-law model is. 2. P(O). P 7+. We know from experiment that the ratio of ...
[77]
The Fireball - Atomic Archive
Within seven-tenths of one millisecond from the detonation, the fireball from a 1-megaton weapon is about 440 feet across, and this increases to a maximum value ...
[78]
[PDF] Thermal Radiation from Nuclear Explosions - RAND
A megaton explosion creates 10^15 calories of heat, with high temperatures and rapid energy diffusion. The radiation pulse has two maxima and a minimum.
[79]
Piecing Together a Nuclear Fireball | Science & Technology Review
Resulting from the Sun's nuclear processes, the erupting plasma from solar flares rapidly expands and cools similarly to what occurs in a nuclear fireball.
[80]
Post-detonation fireball modeling: Validation of freeze out ...
Jun 7, 2023 · The detonation of an uncased explosive charge can be broken into five stages.5 Stage 1 occurs as the detonation moves through the charge, ...
[81]
Post-detonation fireball thermometry via femtosecond-picosecond ...
Initial measurements show a distribution of fireball temperatures in the range 300–2000 K with higher temperatures occurring 28 μs after detonation.
[82]
Thermal Radiation - Atomic Archive
Two pulses of thermal radiation emerge from the fireball. The first pulse, which lasts about a tenth of a second, consists of radiation in the ultraviolet ...
[83]
Nuclear Fireball Calculator - Nuclear Weapons Education Project
Inside the fireball, the temperature and pressure cause a complete desintegration of molecules and atoms. For further information see Nuclear weapons effects.Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution<|separator|>
[84]
Dynamic Fracture and Fragmentation Characteristics of Metal ... - NIH
Feb 8, 2020 · The fracture and fragmentation mechanisms of the metal shells under internal explosive loadings are associated with the characteristics of ...
[85]
[PDF] Estimation of Velocity Distribution of Fragmenting Warheads Using a ...
However, most warheads used in modern weapons fall within that range of. C/M's and the Gurney method can be used to predict fragment velocity distributions, ...
[86]
A mathematical model for estimating the Gurney velocity of chemical ...
The Gurney velocity is an important performance parameter that characterizes the metal pushing capability of conventional chemical explosives.
[87]
Static Testing of High Explosive Munitions for Obtaining Fragment ...
Publication Date, 1993. Page Count, 72. Abstract, This ITOP provides procedures for determining the velocities, masses distribution of sample fragments ...
[88]
[PDF] IED Attack: Improvised Explosive Devices - Homeland Security
An improvised explosive device (IED) attack is the use of a “homemade” bomb and/or destructive device to destroy, incapacitate, harass, or distract. IEDs are ...<|separator|>
[89]
Blast Injuries: Practice Essentials, Background, Frequency
Aug 6, 2021 · Primary blast injury is organ and tissue damage caused solely by the blast wave associated with high-order explosives. (See the image below.).
[90]
[PDF] UFC 3-340-02 Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions
Description: This UFC 3-340-02 presents methods of design for protective construction used in facilities for development, testing, production, storage,.
[91]
Blast wave interaction with structures – An overview - Sage Journals
Sep 26, 2022 · In this paper, we thus present an overview of research on characterizing the blast overpressure load given the size and shape of a structure and ...
[92]
Overpressure Levels of Concern | response.restoration.noaa.gov
Overpressure is a pressure wave from an explosion. Default levels are: 8.0 psi (building destruction), 3.5 psi (serious injury), and 1.0 psi (shatters glass).
[93]
[PDF] Explosions and Blast Injuries - CDC Stacks
The predominant post explosion injuries among survivors involve standard penetrating and blunt trauma. Blast lung is the most common fatal injury among initial ...
[94]
[PDF] 1) Effects of blast pressure on the human body - CDC
and a 45 psi overpressure will cause eardrum rupture in about 99% of all subjects. The threshold for lung damage occurs at about 15 psi blast overpressure.
[95]
Pathophysiology of Blast Injury and Overview of Experimental Data
The blast wave is the main determinant of the primary blast injury and consists of the front of high pressure that compresses the surrounding air and falls ...
[96]
What is Blast Injury?
Sep 23, 2024 · A blast injury is a complex type of physical trauma resulting from direct or indirect exposure to an explosion. Blast injuries range from ...
[97]
[PDF] BLAST INJURIES - Thermal Injuries - ACEP
The rapidly expanding fireball from the explosion may cause flash burns over exposed body parts (e.g., hands, neck, and head). Confined space explosions can ...
[98]
Neurological Effects of Repeated Blast Exposure in Special ...
This emerging evidence suggests neuroinflammation may be a key feature of the brain response to blast exposure over a career in operational personnel. The ...
[99]
Blast Injuries | New England Journal of Medicine
Dec 11, 2024 · A blast injury is physical trauma caused by the rapid pressure wave and associated fragments generated by an explosion.
[100]
Ammonium nitrate explosion at the main port in Beirut (Lebanon ...
As a result, the explosion of AN at the Port of Beirut led to the release of toxic gases such as ammonia and nitrogen oxides, as well as other pollutants, ...
[101]
Environmental legacy of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas
Nov 5, 2021 · Adverse environmental impacts on human health include the generation of huge volumes of debris and waste, and the release of hazardous materials ...
[102]
Beirut facing acute environmental crisis, warns UN energy specialist
Sep 1, 2020 · The destruction of the Port of Beirut has created up to 800,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste in the city said Ms. Seoud, and it ...
[103]
Nuclear Weapons Tests and Environmental Consequences
Although it has a low half-life (8 days), it caused the contamination of the American population through rainfall runoff, ground storage (Fig. 7d), and ...
[104]
Radioactive Fallout From Nuclear Weapons Testing | US EPA
May 1, 2025 · After a nuclear explosion, debris and soil can mix with radionuclides. This mixture is sent up into the air and then falls back to Earth.
[105]
Nuclear Explosions and their Impact on the Environment
Apr 18, 2024 · The environmental impacts of nuclear explosions are extensive and complex, resulting in immediate and long-term effects that can persist for decades or even ...
[106]
How Unexploded Bombs Cause Environmental Damage
Sep 3, 2025 · Unexploded bombs and landmines can leak heavy metals and toxic waste into the soil, polluting land and water. In rare cases, contaminants from a ...
[107]
Explosive Weapons Use and the Environmental Consequences
Oct 10, 2022 · The use of explosive weapons can cause massive damage to civilian and industrial infrastructure, resulting in the contamination of air, soil, ...
[108]
Environmental | Costs of War - Brown University
Explosive weapons destroy buildings, generating debris and releasing hazardous materials such as asbestos, industrial chemicals, and fuels. Explosives also ...
[109]
Ancient Chinese Invented Gunpowder - ThoughtCo
Apr 30, 2025 · The invention of gunpowder by Tang Dynasty Chinese alchemists, around 850 A.D. led to military applications in China and eventually around ...
[110]
Gunpowder - Song Dynasty China | Asia for Educators
The Wujing zongyao (“Collection of the Most Important Military Techniques”), a military manual from 1044 CE, records the first true gunpowder formula and ...
[111]
When did gunpowder arrive in Europe? - Quora
Apr 19, 2022 · In 1326 the first cannon appears in Europe. The Mongols spread the technology with them, but it also passed quickly through trade and through ...
[112]
Gunpowder: Origins in the East - Brown University
Chinese monks discovered the technology in the 9th century CE, during their quest for a life-extending elixir. The key ingredient, saltpeter, had been in ...
[113]
Edward Charles Howard. Explosives, meteorites, and sugar
To Edward Charles Howard (1774–1816), a self–educated scientist without formal education in chemistry, we owe the (accidental) discovery of mercury ...
[114]
Mercury fulminate, Hg(CNO)2 | Podcast - Chemistry World
Nov 17, 2015 · In other words, it fulminated. The new 'fulminating mercury,' as he called it, possessed all the inflammable properties of gunpowder. He wrote:.
[115]
A short history of nitroglycerine and nitric oxide in pharmacology and ...
Nitroglycerine (NG) was discovered in 1847 by Ascanio Sobrero in Turin, following work with Theophile-Jules Pelouze. Sobrero first noted the 'violent ...
[116]
How Alfred Nobel's Invention of Dynamite Reshaped the World
Apr 17, 2025 · In 1867, Nobel received a patent for “dynamite”—based on the Greek word for “power,” dynamis—which was also marketed as “Nobel's Safety ...
[117]
Alfred Nobel | Science History Institute
Among these new explosives was dynamite, a stabilized form of nitroglycerin, invented in 1867 by Alfred Nobel (1833–1896).
[118]
American Production Of Military High Explosives And Their Raw ...
Practically speaking, no substance is considered as a military high explosive unless the velocity of detonation is at least three thousand meters per second.
[119]
[PDF] Chapter 9 MILITARY ENERGETIC MATERIALS: EXPLOSIVES AND ...
(Today, the most important inorganic nitrate explosive is ammonium nitrate, which is used in demolition and construction.) Inorganic nitrates formed the basis ...
[120]
The Secret History of RDX: The Super-Explosive that Helped Win ...
Apr 23, 2018 · During the 1930s, British scientists perfected a sugar-white explosive called RDX. Twice as deadly as TNT, RDX was also ten times more expensive ...
[121]
The Secret History of RDX - The University Press of Kentucky
May 18, 2018 · During the early years of World War II, American ships crossing the Atlantic with oil and supplies were virtually defenseless against German ...
[122]
[PDF] Production, Distribution, and Storage of C-4 Explosive
We obtained information about C-4 explosives at the U.S. Army Arma- ment, Munitions, and Chemical Command headquarters. We also con- tacted key officials ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[123]
User's guide and history of ANFO (ammonium nitrate/fuel oil) as a ...
Mar 30, 1983 · The history of the development and use of ANFO as a nuclear-weapons blast, cratering, and ground-shock simulation source, is traced from ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[124]
Full article: The Trinity High-Explosive Implosion System
I. The summer of 1944 at Los Alamos was a defining moment for the Manhattan Project.1 Not only did the focus and direction of technical research and ...
[125]
[PDF] Review of "The Secret History of RDX: The Super-Explosive that ...
Souchen, Alex "Review of "The Secret History of RDX: The Super-Explosive that Helped Win World War II" by Colin F. Baxter." Canadian Military History 31, 2 ( ...
[126]
The origin of the Insensitive Munition concept
The “beginning” that led to the Insensitive Munitions concept was in the mid 1950's and was twofold. First, there was a need then for solid rocket propellants.
[127]
History of Insensitive Munitions
An Insensitive Munition is one that will not react violently in an accident situation. Because of the close living quarters and the requirement for storing as ...<|separator|>
[128]
Insensitive Munitions: Where Are We Now? - DSIAC
Nov 2, 2019 · In other words, IMs generally describe those munitions that will not react to unintentional stimuli, such as fast or slow heating or bullet or ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[129]
Recent Advances in the Synthesis of High Explosive Materials - MDPI
By far, the most commonly used primary explosives by the U.S. military are lead azide (used most often in detonators and blasting caps) and lead styphnate (most ...
[130]
Nanothermites: Developments and Future Perspectives
Jan 27, 2023 · The impact of different carbon nanomaterials (graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, and carbon nanofibers) on the combustion ...
[131]
3D Printing for Explosives and Propellants Applications
3D printing technology is considered the perfect modern manufacturing technology for military/industrial enterprises worldwide. Applying 3D printing in ...
[132]
Three Decades of Explosive Innovation
EMC has been the focal point for EM research and development at the Laboratory, launching many of the innovations that have strengthened the national security ...
[133]
Revolutionary Insensitive Munitions Technology Wins Big
Jun 16, 2015 · The IMX-104 explosive is an important technological advancement in the area of Insensitive Munitions (IM) and is much safer to handle and store than TNT.Missing: key | Show results with:key
[134]
Insensitive Munitions | www.dau.edu
The term "Insensitive Munitions" (IM) implies that unanticipated stimuli will not produce an explosive yield, in accordance with MIL-STD-2105 (Hazard ...
[135]
5 Major Causes of Industrial Explosions and Fires | TÜV SÜD
Feb 28, 2024 · Arc Flash Explosions · Mechanical Sparks or Sparks from Faulty Electric Wiring · Flammable Liquids and Gasses · Combustible Dust · Hot Work · Natural ...
[136]
[PDF] The Primary Causes of Industrial Fires and Explosions - BDC
Unfortunately, the most common cause of these accidents is human error. According to one study by the Fire Protection. Research Foundation, human error is ...
[137]
Accidental Explosion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Accidental explosions refer to unintended detonations of explosives, often resulting in the release of energy and damage, typically examined in forensic ...
[138]
Halifax Explosion | Maritime Museum of the Atlantic
More than 1700 people were killed by the explosion and its after-effects. At least 9000 were injured and many more were made homeless. Mortuary effects from ...
[139]
Halifax Explosion National Historic Event - Parks Canada
Dec 1, 2022 · On December 6, 1917, the explosives-laden SS Mont-Blanc and SS Imo collided in Halifax Harbour, causing a massive explosion, a tidal wave, and fires.
[140]
[PDF] 0529csb - Chemical Safety Board
of Texas City, killing 581 people, including. 6 all the 26 Texas City firefighters that. 7 responded to the incident. 8. Similarly, on November 29, 1988,. 9 six ...
[141]
[PDF] The OSH Act—A Response to Workplace Tragedies - CDC Stacks
Nov 23, 2021 · The o cial death count during construction is reported at. 96 “industrial” fatalities: deaths caused by falls, rock slides, heat, blasting, ...
[142]
The PEPCON Explosion - Welcome to Clark County, NV
Shortly before noon on May 4, 1988, a series of explosions rattled the plant and the surrounding area. The blasts killed two employees and injured more than 300 ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[143]
[PDF] The PEPCON Disaster - OSTI.GOV
On May 4, 1988, the PEPCON plant experienced three major and several smaller explosions that caused over $70 million in property damage and caused two deaths. ...
[144]
Chinese Investigators Identify Cause Of Tianjin Explosion - C&EN
Feb 8, 2016 · The immediate cause of the accident was the spontaneous ignition of overly dry nitrocellulose stored in a container that overheated, according ...Missing: toll | Show results with:toll<|separator|>
[145]
Tianjin chemical blast: China jails 49 for disaster - BBC News
Nov 9, 2016 · A Chinese court has handed a suspended death sentence to the head of a chemical factory for his role in blasts that killed 173 people last year.
[146]
“They Killed Us from the Inside”: An Investigation into the August 4 ...
Aug 3, 2021 · The destruction is estimated to have created up to 800,000 tonnes of construction and demolition waste that likely contains hazardous chemicals ...
[147]
Beirut Ammonium Nitrate Explosion: A Man-Made Disaster in Times ...
The largest non-nuclear blast in modern history took place on August 4, 2020, at 6:07 PM in Beirut, Lebanon, after an estimated 2750 tons of unsafely stored ...
[148]
Trinity: World's First Nuclear Test
The Trinity test, the first nuclear explosion, occurred on July 16, 1945, at 5:30 a.m. in New Mexico, releasing 18.6 kilotons of power. It was the start of the ...
[149]
Manhattan Project: The Trinity Test, July 16, 1945 - OSTI.gov
The success of the Trinity test meant that both types of bombs -- the uranium design, untested but thought to be reliable, and the plutonium design, which had ...
[150]
The Atomic Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
On August 6, 1945, at approximately 8:15 am locally, the B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped the atomic bomb “Little Boy” on the Japanese city of Hiroshima.
[151]
Q. How many people died because of the atomic bombing? - 広島市
The population of Hiroshima when the bomb was dropped was approximately 350,000. This figure includes residents, military personnel, people from surrounding ...
[152]
The Bombing of Nagasaki, August 9, 1945 | New Orleans
Aug 9, 2020 · ... atomic bombings did not place Nagasaki among their top two choices. Instead they identified Kokura as the second target after Hiroshima. In ...
[153]
Castle BRAVO at 70: The Worst Nuclear Test in U.S. History
Feb 29, 2024 · Washington, D.C., February 29, 2024 - Seventy years ago, on 1 March 1954 (28 February in Washington), the U.S. government detonated a ...Missing: intentional | Show results with:intentional
[154]
The BRAVO Test - Atomic Archive
The predicted yield was 5 megatons, but, in fact, "BRAVO" yielded 14.8 megatons, making it the largest US nuclear test ever exploded.
[155]
Apocalypse in Dresden, February 1945 | The National WWII Museum
Feb 13, 2020 · A widely accepted estimate is 35,000 killed during the 37 hours of terror. Rival claims go far higher. The German government, however, proposes ...
[156]
MOAB strike: US bombing of IS in Afghanistan 'killed dozens' - BBC
Apr 14, 2017 · A US military strike with a weapon known as the "mother of all bombs", or MOAB, killed 36 Islamic State (IS) group militants and destroyed their base.
[157]
UXO Incidents – 3Rs Explosives Safety Education Program
The Army has developed this web site to educate the public about the hazards associated with military munitions, particularly unexploded ordnance (UXO).
[158]
Explosive volcanism | AMNH
Most explosive eruptions occur in volcanoes above subduction zones, where one tectonic plate dives beneath the other.
[159]
Volcano facts and information | National Geographic
Jan 15, 2018 · Explosive eruptions, however, happen when viscous molten rock traps the gasses, building pressure until it violently breaks free. 4: ...<|separator|>
[160]
The 12 biggest volcanic eruptions in recorded history - Live Science
Jun 10, 2023 · The explosion of Mount Tambora is the largest ever recorded by humans, ranking a 7 (or "super-colossal") on the VEI, the second-highest rating ...
[161]
115 Years Ago: The Tunguska Asteroid Impact Event - NASA
Jun 30, 2023 · On June 30, 1908, an asteroid exploded over Siberia, causing a large explosion, forest fires, and a 830 square mile area of destruction.
[162]
Five Years after the Chelyabinsk Meteor: NASA Leads Efforts in ...
Feb 15, 2018 · The explosion released the energy equivalent of around 440,000 tons of TNT and generated a shock wave that blew out windows over 200 square ...
[163]
What was the Chelyabinsk meteor event? - The Planetary Society
Feb 15, 2023 · On Feb. 15, 2013 at 9:20 am local time, residents of the city of Chelyabinsk, Russia, witnessed something few humans ever have: an asteroid exploding in the ...
[164]
Supernova-Gamma Ray Burst Connection | COSMOS
Almost all astronomers now agree that long duration gamma ray bursts (GRBs) coincide with hypernovae, powerful supernovae that occur when a massive star ...
[165]
Supernovae Shine Light on Gamma-ray Bursts
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most powerful explosions in the cosmos. They last several seconds and emit the same amount of light as nearly all the stars ...
[166]
Magnetars as powering sources of gamma-ray burst associated ...
We present the semi-analytical light curve modelling of 13 supernovae associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRB-SNe) along with two relativistic broad-lined (Ic-BL) ...
[167]
Buying, selling and storing industrial explosives
Jan 30, 2025 · Industrial explosives are high-hazard blasting explosives used in the mining, quarrying, construction, perforating, avalanche control ...Missing: civil engineering
[168]
Controlled Blasting in Mines & Quarries- A Paradigm - Iris Publishers
Dec 18, 2019 · Controlled blasting means controlling ground vibration, fly rock, and air overpressure, and minimizing over/under-break beyond the excavation ...
[169]
Drill and Blast Tunneling: Effective Techniques & Case Studies
May 3, 2024 · Drill and Blast tunneling involves a systematic process of boring and explosive demolition that enables the efficient creation of tunnels ...
[170]
(PDF) Application of Controlled Blasting ………… - ResearchGate
May 27, 2024 · Pre-splitting is the commonly used controlled blasting technique for perimeter control in mining and construction industries. Apart from unsafe ...<|separator|>
[171]
Explosive Demolition: Controlled Destruction for Large-Scale ...
Explosive demolition, also known as controlled demolition, involves strategically placing explosive charges within a structure and precisely timing their ...
[172]
https://www.grantmackaydemolition.com/explosive-demolition-controlled-destruction-for-large-scale-structures
[173]
[PDF] cjcsi 4360.01d - Joint Chiefs of Staff
Aug 5, 2023 · Purpose. This instruction: a. Establishes Explosives Safety and Munitions Risk Management. (ESMRM) policies and procedures to mitigate potential ...<|separator|>
[174]
Here comes the boom! Fighter Soldiers train for battlefield demolitions
May 21, 2013 · More than 120 blocks of C4 explosives were detonated May 16 during demolitions training here conducted by the 515th Engineer Company, ...
[175]
Joint Program Executive Office for Armaments & Ammunition
APOBS is an explosive line charge system that allows Soldiers to conduct safe breaching through enemy antipersonnel minefields and multi-strand wire obstacles.
[176]
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) - Air Force
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) ... A dual-sensor detector enables EOD technicians to locate subterranean or otherwise obscured explosives and IEDs.
[177]
Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal
Navy EOD eliminates explosive threats, clears hazards, disarms underwater explosives, and can parachute or dive to reach targets.
[178]
Counter-Improvised Explosive Devices - NATO's ACT
In today's conflicts, IEDs play an increasingly important role and will continue to be part of the operating environment for future NATO military operations.
[179]
Defense Primer: Strategic Nuclear Forces | Congress.gov
Aug 15, 2025 · The US strategic nuclear forces include ICBMs, SLBMs on SSBNs, and heavy bombers. As of March 1, 2023, there were 1,419 warheads deployed on ...
[180]
[PDF] 2022 National Defense Strategy, Nuclear Posture Review ... - DoD
Oct 27, 2022 · Any adversary use of nuclear weapons, regardless of location or yield, would fundamentally alter the nature of a conflict, create the potential ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[181]
What are tactical nuclear weapons? An international security expert ...
Sep 28, 2022 · Nuclear explosions are more powerful by factors of 10 million to 100 million than chemical explosions, and leave deadly radiation fallout that ...
[182]
Interesting New High Explosives and Melt‐Casts - Wiley Online Library
Jan 27, 2023 · The recent developments with respect to the most promising new secondary explosives and melt-casts are discussed.
[183]
Simulating hot-spot formation in insensitive high explosives
Apr 15, 2025 · A Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) team has made significant progress in understanding how microscopic hot spots form in insensitive high ...
[184]
Research on the development and performance of new high ...
Jul 2, 2025 · This study developed a novel high-brisance emulsion explosive containing sodium borohydride (NaBH 4 ). The effects of NaBH 4 content on the performance of the ...
[185]
Army, Argonne scientists explore nanoparticles for future weapon ...
Feb 25, 2021 · - Material scientists from the U.S. Army and Department of Energy conducted a study of plasma-treated aluminum nanoparticles with the goal of ...
[186]
Manufacturing optimized designs for high explosives
May 13, 2024 · When materials are subjected to extreme environments, they face the risk of mixing together. This mixing may result in hydrodynamic ...
[187]
Recent innovations in explosive trace detection: Advances and ...
This review analyzes recent advancements in four key explosive detection technologies: Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS), Gas Chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC ...
[188]
Nanoparticles in explosives detection – the state-of-the-art and ...
The first property reviewed is the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) band of colloidal gold nanoparticles (AuNPs), and the second, the fluorescence of colloidal ...
[189]
[PDF] Combustible Dusts - OSHA
Combustible dusts are fine particles that present an explosion hazard when suspended in air under certain conditions. A dust explosion can cause catastrophic ...Missing: unintended | Show results with:unintended
[190]
Dust explosions–Cases, causes, consequences, and control
(i). presence of combustible dust in a finely divided form; · (ii). availability of oxidant; · (iii). presence of an ignition source; · (iv). some degree of ...Review · The Dust Explosion Pentagon · Dust Explosion Prevention...Missing: unintended | Show results with:unintended
[191]
Flammable Gases and Liquids and Their Hazards - epa nepis
The modeling results and accident data illustrate and compare the consequences of vapor cloud explosions, vapor cloud fires, BLEVEs, and pool fires. This ...
[192]
Causes Of Chemical Plant Explosions - Walker Texas Lawyer
Feb 10, 2023 · Corroded pipes and equipment can lead to leaks and spills which, if left unchecked, can eventually lead to an explosion. To prevent corrosion- ...Missing: unintended | Show results with:unintended
[193]
Fire in Industrial or Manufacturing Properties | NFPA Research
Aug 31, 2023 · Equipment or heat source failure was a leading cause of structure fires in industrial and manufacturing properties. Electrical distribution, ...
[194]
What Causes Plant & Refinery Explosions | How They Happen
Industrial plants create contaminated groundwater and surface water through 4 main outlets including: Evaporation of liquids; Routine, approved releases ...
[195]
Explosive Failure of Vessels - Becht
Apr 28, 2015 · FAILURE MODE – When an explosion (either a subsonic deflagration, or a supersonic detonation) occurs in a metallic vessel, one of three things ...
[196]
[PDF] Munitions System Reliability - Defense Science Board
It is alleged that these munitions cannot be accurately employed because of high failure rates, which are claimed to be as high as 20 percent or more. The ...
[197]
[PDF] M85 – an analysis of reliability - Norwegian People's Aid
The higher the spin rate, the higher the failure rate; this means that projectiles fired on higher charges tend to dispense more dud bomblets. Examination of ...
[198]
Failure mechanisms of electronic detonators subjected to high ...
Feb 10, 2025 · The results show that under high impact loads, electronic detonators will experience failure phenomena such as rupture of the fuse head, fracture of the bridge ...
[199]
Detonation failure characterization of non-ideal explosives
Current methods of characterizing non-ideal explosives require large-scale testing to obtain steady detonation wave propagation for analysis due to the ...
[200]
[PDF] A Model to Describe Deformation, Burning, Explosion, and Detonation
Nov 23, 2011 · The form factor influences the energy release rate, and the amount of energy released in the reaction zone. Since the 19th century, gun and ...Missing: quantitative | Show results with:quantitative
[201]
Detonation Failure Characterization of Homemade Explosives
It was observed that the failure dynamics were influenced by factors such as the chemical composition, confiner thickness, and applied shock wave strength. Thin ...<|separator|>
[202]
NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems (2024)
NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems, protects pipes, ductwork, and dust collections systems. It covers explosion prevention, explosion isolation.
[203]
NFPA 654 Standard Development
This standard presents safety measures to prevent and mitigate fires and dust explosions in facilities that handle combustible particulate solids.
[204]
https://www.nfpa.org/codes-and-standards/nfpa-654-standard-development/654
[205]
[PDF] Directive CPL 03-00-008, Revised Combustible Dust ... - OSHA
Jan 30, 2023 · NFPA 654, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate ...
[206]
NFPA 69 Standard Development
This standard provides requirements for installing systems for the prevention and control of explosions in enclosures that contain flammable concentrations.
[207]
NFPA 69-2019: Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems
NFPA 69-2019 covers guidelines for installing systems to prevent explosions in enclosures that contain flammable concentrations of flammable gases, vapors, ...
[208]
Standards - IECEx
Standards Operated by the IECEx ; IEC 60079-10-1, Part 10-1: Classification of areas - Explosive gas atmospheres ; IEC 60079-10-2, Part 10-2: Classification of ...
[209]
IECEx/ATEX: Defining and Certifying Explosion-Protected (Ex ... - Gore
Both IECEx and ATEX align with the same standards (e.g., IEC-EN 60079), so in terms of technical content, there is basically no difference. value-red. GORE® ...
[210]
Using seismoacoustics to improve explosion monitoring
Mar 20, 2024 · An area of research that uses observations of both seismic and low-frequency acoustic waves (infrasound) to differentiate between earthquakes and other shallow ...Missing: optical | Show results with:optical
[211]
Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Crowd Motion and Firecracker ...
Feb 2, 2024 · About 572 m of optical fiber was turned into 286 seismic sensors and deployed on LingShan Island to monitor various vibration signals generated ...
[212]
[PDF] A Guide for Explosion and Bombing Scene Investigation
Together they convened a technical working group of law enforcement and legal practitioners, bomb technicians and investigators, and forensic laboratory.
[213]
Basic Post Blast Investigative Techniques - ATF
This is a basic post blast course designed to teach a systematic method of investigating an explosion scene. The course provides instruction in explosives ...Missing: protocols | Show results with:protocols
[214]
[PDF] Unit VI: Explosive Blast - FEMA
Unit VI covers explosive blast physics, building damage, blast loading, time-pressure regions, pressure differences, and protection levels.
[215]
Secondary Explosive Devices Guide | Occupational Safety ... - OSHA
These guidelines recommend that responders: (1) Anticipate the presence of a secondary device at any suspicious incident. (2) Search for a secondary device ...
[216]
Dying under bombs and shells: New report finds escalation in armed ...
The number of civilians killed or injured by bombing and shelling in urban areas globally soared by 83 percent in 2022, largely driven by the increased use of ...
[217]
Explosive weapons - Critical issues
Civilians next to the detonation of a large explosive weapon are almost inevitably killed. Injuries, many of which are life-altering or result in death at a ...
[218]
The Use of Explosives in Cities: A Grim but Lawful Reality of War
Oct 1, 2017 · The flow of Syrian refugees has caused some to call for a complete ban on the use of explosive weapons in cities or urban areas.
[219]
[PDF] Reducing the humanitarian impact of the use of explosive weapons ...
Civilian casualties also create local, national and international political pressure that can limit the freedom of action of armed forces. Leadership is ...
[220]
Explosive weapons in populated areas - ICRC
Armed conflicts are increasingly fought in urban areas, but often with weapon systems that were originally designed for use in open battlefields.
[221]
[PDF] Explosive weapons in populated areas - key questions and answers
In international humanitarian law (IHL),. Additional Protocol I (1977) to the Geneva Conventions prohibits area bombardment of targets in “any city, town, ...
[222]
[PDF] TWO-YEAR UPDATE - ohchr
Feb 15, 2024 · On 24 February 2022, Russian armed forces launched a full-scale armed attack on Ukraine. In the two years since, the civilian population in.Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
[223]
Civilian death and injury from airstrikes: evidence from the war in ...
Mar 14, 2025 · Civilians bear a significant burden of morbidity and mortality in modern armed conflicts, particularly when explosive weapons are used in ...
[224]
We must not ignore explosive weapons' environmental impact
May 12, 2021 · Buildings destroyed by explosive weapons can release toxic materials like asbestos, risking the health of people and presenting a long-term ...
[225]
environmental impact of mine blasting - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · General environmental problems generated during blast activities in open pit mining are ground vibrations, air pressure, fly rock, dust and ...
[226]
Explosives: fate, dynamics, and ecological impact in terrestrial and ...
The environmental fate and potential hazard of energetic compounds in the environment is affected by a number of physical, chemical, and biological processes.
[227]
Spread, Behavior, and Ecosystem Consequences of Conventional ...
Coastal marine environments are contaminated globally with a vast quantity of unexploded ordnance and munitions from intentional disposal.
[228]
Environmental impacts of low and high order detonations in water
This study aims to compare the environmental impact of LO and HO detonations by assessing their physical and chemical effects, quantifying explosive residues, ...
[229]
Control and documentation studies of the impact of blasting on ...
This article presents the course of action concerning control tests of vibration intensity in the surroundings of a mine.
[230]
The Environmental Challenge of Military Munitions and Federal ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Besides the obvious danger of exploding UXO, harm can also result when humans and the environment are exposed to chemical warfare agents or ...<|separator|>
[231]
[PDF] Federal Explosives Law and Regulations - ATF
(1) Research, development, or testing of new or modified explosive materials ... ATF regulations require explosive materials to be stored at certain ...
[232]
Annual Reporting of Explosive Materials Storage Facilities to the ...
Aug 23, 2023 · The Department of Justice is proposing to amend Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ("ATF") regulations to require that any ...
[233]
[PDF] Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
The SEA expanded the scope of explosives regulations administered by ATF by establishing controls on the intrastate ... laws that directly affect ATF's regulatory ...
[234]
Explosives | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ... - ATF
Explosives are any chemical compound, mixture, or device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion.Binary Explosives · Explosives Q&As · Explosives Licenses and Permits · Fireworks
[235]
New code tightens blasting standards - Mining Weekly
Oct 17, 2025 · ... explosives manufacturers and contractors to provide integrated solutions, which reduce the regulatory burden such as services that bundle ...
[236]
Biden-Harris Administration announces latest action to better protect ...
Mar 12, 2024 · EPA proposal would strengthen rules for open burning and open detonation to treat waste explosives, reducing environmental and public health impacts.
[237]
[PDF] Explosives Program Is Mitigating Some Supply Chain Risks but ...
Mar 12, 2025 · According to National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) documentation, the explosives supply chain is vulnerable to risks, such as material ...
[238]
Amendments to the Explosives Regulations, 2013
The two sets of proposed amendments to the Explosives Regulations, 2013 aim to, where possible, reduce stakeholder cost and burden stemming from misalignment ...
[239]
Regulations Amending the Explosives Regulations, 2013
May 27, 2023 · May 27, 2023, Part 1, Volume 157, Number 21, Canada Gazette.<|separator|>
[240]
Our evaluations of the Pyrotechnics and Civil Explosives directives ...
Sep 18, 2025 · ... regulatory burdens on industries working towards net-zero, supporting impactful, science-driven policy. We are seeking experts with ...
[241]
[PDF] Regulatory Impact Statement – Proposed Explosives Regulation 2021
Without the proposed changes to clarify intent, remove confusion and reduce regulatory burden, , explosives users, industry and regulatory authorities would ...
[242]
Hazardous Materials: Requirements for the Safe Transportation of ...
Jul 15, 2014 · In addition, the proposed rule will reduce the paperwork burden on industry ... burdens, and eliminate unnecessary regulatory requirements. B ...
[243]
[PDF] The Impact of Regulation on Innovation in the United States
On an industry-wide level, the greater flexibility afforded by incentives-based regulation can minimize the compliance burden for the industry as a whole, ...