Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Humpback bridge

A humpback bridge (also known as a humpbacked bridge) is a type of arch bridge in which the deck follows the curve of the arch, rising higher in the center than at the ends to create a distinctive hump-like profile. These bridges are typically short, with steep approaches on either side, and were historically constructed to span small streams or valleys where terrain required a raised crossing.^[1]^[2]^[3] Originating in the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly in rural areas of the United Kingdom and the United States, humpback bridges often used stone, brick, or timber and served local traffic until supplanted by modern designs. A notable example is the Humpback Covered Bridge in Alleghany County, Virginia, built in 1857, which is the oldest surviving covered humpback bridge in the United States and listed on the National Register of Historic Places.^[4]

Definition and characteristics

Definition

A humpback bridge is a type of arch bridge in which the roadway deck follows the curvature of the arch, resulting in a pronounced upward rise from the approach ramps to the highest point at the span's center, creating a distinctive "hump" profile.^[5] This design can employ various structures, including masonry arches or, in timber examples, a multiple kingpost truss with cambered chords to achieve the elevated central clearance.^[6] Also known as a hump bridge or humpbacked bridge, the structure resembles a semi-circular or parabolic curve in profile, distinguishing it from flatter bridge forms. It is typically constructed as a short-span crossing, ranging from 20 to 100 feet, suited for rural environments, canals, or minor roads.^[5] Humpback bridges, built from materials such as timber, stone, brick, or concrete, serve primarily to carry pedestrians, light vehicles, or livestock over streams, creeks, or minor roads, providing an economical solution for local transportation needs in areas prone to flooding by elevating the midpoint above water levels.^[6] In contrast to conventional arch bridges, which feature a level deck suspended below or alongside the arch, the humpback's integrated, curved roadway increases the approach gradient but minimizes overall material use and abutment height requirements.^[5] Such designs were particularly adapted for 19th-century rural infrastructure to facilitate efficient overland travel.^[6]

Key structural features

Humpback bridges are characterized by a roadway deck that curves upward to conform to the underlying arch structure, often semicircular or parabolic in profile, creating a distinctive hump at the center. This curvature results in steep inclines, with gradients commonly ranging from 8% to 20%, as the deck rises sharply from the approaches to the crown.^[7] For instance, in the Humpback Covered Bridge in Virginia, the deck exhibits a camber with a 4-foot rise over a 100-foot span, yielding an approximate 8% gradient along the half-span.^[7] These bridges typically employ relatively short spans, often between 20 and 100 feet, with the elevated hump positioned at the midpoint to facilitate even load distribution across the structure.^[8]^[7] The single-span design, supported solely by abutments without intermediate piers, relies on the arch's geometry to span small waterways or paths efficiently.^[9]^[10] Approach ramps to humpback bridges are generally low-level and constructed from earthen embankments or stone retaining walls, easing vehicles or pedestrians up to the elevated deck ends while maintaining a compact footprint.^[7] These ramps, extending 30 to 40 feet or more from the abutments, blend into the surrounding terrain and accommodate the bridge's height differential.^[10] In terms of load-bearing mechanics, the arch thrust in humpback bridges is channeled directly through the integrated curved deck, which acts as both roadway and structural element, thereby minimizing horizontal forces on the abutments compared to flat-deck arch designs.^[11] This configuration allows the compressive forces from live and dead loads to follow the arch's curve toward the foundations, reducing the need for expansive tie rods or massive end supports.^[12] The design offers advantages such as economical construction for low-traffic rural or canal settings, where the inherent camber provides natural resistance to sagging under load without additional reinforcement.^[10] However, the steep incline poses disadvantages, including restricted suitability for heavy vehicles due to traction and stability issues, and heightened risk of approach erosion from water runoff or traffic.^[13]^[10]

History

Origins and early development

Humpback bridges, characterized by their arched decks that follow the curve of the supporting arch, emerged as a practical solution for spanning streams and rivers in regions with challenging terrain. In Europe, wooden covered bridges of the humpback or trussed-arch type were constructed during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, drawing from medieval truss designs such as the kingpost, which had been documented as early as the sixteenth century by architect Andrea Palladio. These early European examples influenced American bridge builders, who adapted the form to local needs amid expanding infrastructure in the post-Revolutionary era.^[7]^[6] In the United States, the design took root in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries through pioneers like Timothy Palmer, who constructed the nation's first known covered bridge in 1804-1805 over the Schuylkill River in Philadelphia, and Lewis Wernwag, who advanced timber arch constructions. By the mid-nineteenth century, humpback bridges appeared in rural areas, particularly in the Appalachian region, where abundant timber resources and the need for durable crossings over flood-prone waterways drove their adoption. Derived from traditional arched timber bridges, these structures were often built without formal engineering plans, relying on vernacular techniques passed among local craftsmen to serve agricultural paths and connect farms to mills.^[7]^[6] The socioeconomic context of early humpback bridges reflected the demands of westward expansion and commerce in the antebellum South. In Virginia, the first documented humpback crossings date to the 1820s-1850s along key turnpikes like the James River and Kanawha, authorized in 1820 to link eastern markets with frontier settlements. Local builders, such as those contracted by the James River and Kanawha Turnpike Company, used hand-hewn oak and pine timbers pegged with locust pins to erect these bridges, prioritizing simplicity and flood resistance over elaborate design. The 1857 Humpback Covered Bridge near Covington, Virginia—erected after earlier versions at the site were destroyed by floods in 1838 and 1842—stands as a benchmark of this initial form, exemplifying the era's practical engineering for rural infrastructure.^[4]^[6]^[7]

Evolution and regional variations

In the early 20th century, humpback bridges underwent significant material transitions, shifting from traditional timber constructions to reinforced concrete and steel around 1900–1920s to better withstand heavier loads and environmental stresses.^[7] This evolution reflected broader engineering advancements, though the inherent cambered design proved less suitable for the increasing demands of motorized vehicles.^[6] Regional variations in humpback bridge design were pronounced, with wooden covered versions dominating in the United States' Appalachian region, such as Virginia and West Virginia, where they served rural turnpikes and streams.^[7] In contrast, Europe, particularly rural areas of the United Kingdom, favored stone or masonry constructions for humpback bridges over canals and waterways, emphasizing durability in wetter climates.^[14] Rare concrete iterations appeared in the U.S. Midwest, exemplified by camelback variants in Michigan built during the 1920s for local roadways.^[15] Industrialization and the expansion of road networks diminished the practical need for humpback bridges, as straighter alignments became prioritized for efficiency; post-1930s, many surviving examples were repurposed as pedestrian crossings.^[4] By the 1950s, vehicular obsolescence and replacement programs had rendered most obsolete. Wooden covered humpback bridges became exceedingly rare worldwide, with further losses in later decades; for instance, the Ponn Humpback Covered Bridge in Ohio was destroyed by arson in 2013, leaving the Virginia example as the sole known survivor of this distinctive type in the United States as of 2025. These remaining structures are preserved chiefly as historical artifacts.^[7]^[6]

Design and engineering

Arch and deck integration

In humpback bridges, the deck is integrated directly with the arch structure, where the roadway consists of timber planks or slabs laid atop the curved truss chords, forming the extrados of the arch and creating a continuous, monolithic humped profile that eliminates the need for separate spandrel walls or suspenders. This design, common in wooden covered examples like multiple kingpost truss variants, positions the travel surface along the upper curve, with the truss chords—often paired or polygonal—providing direct support to the deck without intermediate framing. The integration enhances rigidity by distributing the deck's weight uniformly along the arch's compression path, as seen in 19th-century American constructions where the cambered roadway follows the arch's geometry precisely.^[16]^[17] Vertical loads from traffic and the deck's self-weight are primarily converted into compressive forces within the arch ribs, which resolve into axial compression along the curved profile and horizontal thrust at the ends, bypassing the need for tensile elements or suspended deck systems that characterize other arch types. This force path simplifies the overall mechanics, as the integrated deck transfers loads directly downward and outward to the arch, minimizing bending moments in the roadway and relying on the arch's shape for efficient stress resolution—dead loads are shared between the truss elements and arch, while live loads are resisted mainly by diagonal bracing. In timber humpback designs, this results in a structure where the arch assumes increasing responsibility for dead loads over time due to material creep, ensuring long-term equilibrium without additional suspension. In wooden covered examples, camber is often achieved through slightly longer top chord panels or below-deck struts to counteract sagging.^[16]^[18] Geometrically, humpback bridges feature an arch rise-to-span ratio typically ranging from 1:20 to 1:10, allowing sufficient curvature to form the characteristic hump while maintaining approachable gradients for the integrated deck, as opposed to flatter ratios in modern deck arches. This proportion balances height for stability against excessive material use, with the deck's camber—often around 4% of the span in wooden examples—ensuring the roadway's curve aligns seamlessly with the arch without steep inclines at the approaches. The design prioritizes a shallow to moderate rise to optimize load distribution while accommodating the humped profile essential to the bridge type.^[18]^[16] Stability in humpback bridges depends on well-anchored abutments, typically constructed of stone or timber cribs embedded into earth or rock, to resist the outward horizontal thrust generated by the arch's compression and prevent spreading or rotation. Additional factors include transverse bracing along the arch ribs to counter lateral buckling and the inherent stiffness from the integrated deck, which reduces deflection under load; however, potential failure modes involve abutment yielding under prolonged thrust or uneven settlement, particularly in flood-prone areas where scour could undermine foundations. These elements collectively ensure the structure's endurance, with the monolithic arch-deck form providing resistance to both vertical and horizontal forces without reliance on ties.^[16]^[18]

Materials and construction techniques

Humpback bridges constructed in the 19th century predominantly utilized timber as the primary material, with timbers such as the hardwood oak and the softwood pine employed for key structural components such as chords, posts, beams, and braces due to their strength and availability. These timbers were typically hand-hewn to precise dimensions, with elements like 8-inch by 8-inch chords and 7-inch by 10-inch posts forming the framework. Stone masonry was used for abutments and foundations, often quarried locally and extending below the waterbed for stability, as seen in early American examples. In European variants, stone served as the main material for the arches themselves, laid in courses with or without mortar to create durable, curved spans that followed the humpback profile.^[6]^[19] By the early 20th century, materials shifted toward reinforced concrete for humpback arches, incorporating steel rebar embedded within poured concrete to enhance tensile strength and prevent cracking under load, marking a transition from organic to engineered composites. This adaptation allowed for longer spans and greater resistance to environmental degradation compared to timber predecessors. Iron or steel elements, such as tie rods or bolts, were increasingly integrated into both wooden and concrete designs to reinforce joints and counteract sagging, particularly in the truss components supporting the arched deck.^[8]^[19] Construction techniques for 19th-century timber humpback bridges involved initial site preparation, including excavation for stone abutments and grading of approach ramps to align with the elevated deck. The arch assembly relied on hybrid truss systems, such as multiple kingpost configurations, where timbers were joined using mortise-and-tenon joints secured with wooden pegs or metal bolts, avoiding nails to maintain flexibility. Floor beams were laid atop bottom chords, supporting plank stringers and decking, while covered variants added protective siding of clapboard and shingled roofs to shield against weathering. These processes were executed on-site by local labor teams using hand tools like adzes and augers for hewing and boring.^[6] For reinforced concrete versions, construction entailed erecting formwork to shape the arch, placing rebar grids for reinforcement, and pouring concrete in stages to build the curved profile, often with temporary centering supports removed once the material cured. Stone masonry techniques in European humpback bridges followed traditional methods, involving the precise cutting and layering of voussoirs—wedge-shaped stones—to form self-supporting arches, sometimes bound with lime mortar and stabilized by iron clamps in early designs. Later adaptations included iron ties across truss elements in wooden structures to distribute loads and mitigate deformation from prolonged use. The arch-deck integration in these techniques ensured the roadway followed the curve for structural efficiency.^[8]^[19]

Notable examples

Humpback Covered Bridge, Virginia

The Humpback Covered Bridge is located in Humpback Bridge Wayside Park, spanning Dunlap Creek approximately three miles west of Covington in Alleghany County, Virginia. Constructed in 1857 by the James River and Kanawha Turnpike Company as the fifth bridge at the site following floods that destroyed prior structures, it served as a critical link on the 208-mile Kanawha Turnpike, facilitating transportation in the pre-Civil War era.^[6]^[7] The bridge features a single-span multiple kingpost timber truss design with radically cambered upper and lower chords, rising 4 feet 1 inch at the center to elevate the midpoint above potential floodwaters. Its clear span measures 100 feet, with an overall length of approximately 120 feet along the lower chord, a roadway width of 13 feet, and an overall width of 15 feet; the structure is enclosed with clapboard siding and a gabled roof of wooden shingles to shield the truss from weathering. Stone masonry abutments support the ends, and the assembly relies on traditional wooden locust pins rather than nails for joinery.^[6]^[7] As a vital crossing for wagons and pedestrians, the bridge remained in active use until 1929, when it was bypassed by a modern steel truss bridge carrying U.S. Route 60, after which it fell into disuse and served occasionally for hay storage by a local farmer. In 1953, the Virginia Department of Transportation acquired and restored it as a pedestrian structure, ensuring its survival amid growing recognition of its engineering ingenuity.^[6]^[7] The Humpback Covered Bridge holds distinction as the oldest surviving covered bridge in Virginia and the nation's sole remaining example of a curved-span wooden covered bridge from the 19th century. Designated a National Historic Landmark in 2012 under Criterion 4 for its exceptional engineering value, it exemplifies rare cambered truss design principles that enhanced structural longevity and flood resistance, listed on the National Register of Historic Places since 1969.^[6]^[4]

Other significant structures

Beyond the benchmark of Virginia's wooden Humpback Covered Bridge, other humpback bridges demonstrate the form's adaptability across materials and regions. The Harris Creek Bridge in Yell County, Arkansas, constructed in 1912, exemplifies an early transition to modern materials with its reinforced concrete closed-spandrel arch design. Spanning 42 feet overall with a clear span of 38 feet, this rural structure over Harris Creek on Humpback Road remains intact and functional, representing one of the oldest pre-1920 concrete bridges in the county and highlighting the shift from timber to durable concrete in American bridge-building.^[8] In Europe, 19th-century stone humpback bridges proliferated in the United Kingdom, particularly for crossing small streams in pastoral areas. These variants often featured shorter spans suited for pedestrian or packhorse traffic, with local granite providing the arched, humped profile. For instance, Packsaddle Bridge in Dartmoor's Devon region is a surviving granite example, its low walls and repeated repairs underscoring its adaptation to rugged terrain over streams.^[20] Similarly, an ancient stone humpback bridge at Fernworthy Reservoir in Devon, exposed by drought in the 20th century, illustrates the form's prevalence in the area's historic infrastructure for modest crossings.^[21] Wooden humpback bridges in the U.S. Midwest, while rarer today, include historical remnants in Ohio, where structures like the Ponn Humpback Covered Bridge (built 1874, total length 175 feet across three spans) once stood before its destruction by fire in 2013.^[22] Pennsylvania's broader legacy of 19th-century timber bridges also includes shorter variants (20-30 feet), often uncovered and integrated into rural roads, amid the state's approximately 200 historic covered bridges.^[23] Globally, humpback bridges remain rare outside traditional strongholds, with isolated surviving cases in Canada, such as Ontario's Dorset Bridge—a metal truss with a distinctive humpback profile, built 1914 and repaired while retaining its form.^[24] No prominent examples are documented in Australia, where local terrain adaptations favor other designs.

Preservation and significance

Restoration and maintenance

The humpback bridge design, characterized by its distinctive arched profile, faces several common preservation challenges due to age, materials, and environmental exposure. Wood rot is a primary issue, often resulting from moisture accumulation caused by poor drainage, roof leaks, or direct contact with soil and water at the foundations, which accelerates decay in truss members and arches. Flood damage poses another significant threat, as these structures are frequently located over streams prone to high water flows, leading to scour around abutments, structural weakening, and debris impacts that can compromise the bridge's integrity. The steep, curved design also exacerbates wear on approach ramps and decks, increasing stress on joints and accelerating deterioration from vehicular or pedestrian traffic.^[25]^[26] Restoration efforts typically involve targeted techniques to address these issues while preserving the bridge's historic form. Timber replacement is a core method, where decayed elements are repaired or substituted with treated lumber such as Douglas fir or white oak, using pressure-treated sacrificial blocking to protect main trusses and extend service life by 20-40 years; traditional joinery like mortise-and-tenon or treenails is employed to maintain authenticity. Concrete patching is applied to cracked or spalled abutments and piers, utilizing low-pressure grout and matching materials to fill voids without altering the original profile, often combined with encasing stone elements in compatible concrete for stability. In the 20th century, state-funded initiatives exemplified these approaches, such as the restoration of Virginia's Humpback Covered Bridge in 1953-1954 by local groups and the Virginia Department of Transportation, followed by further repairs in 2013 under the National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program.^[27]^[26]^[28] Modern restoration adheres to established historic preservation guidelines to balance structural safety with cultural integrity. Projects must comply with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, which prioritize repairing over replacing components, using in-kind or compatible materials, and retaining character-defining features like the arched silhouette and siding. Where seismic risks are present, retrofitting incorporates flexible reinforcements, such as additional bracing or base isolators, to enhance earthquake resilience without compromising the design, as seen in efforts for arched covered bridges in vulnerable regions. These standards are integrated into federal programs like the National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program, ensuring funding supports reversible interventions.^[29]^[26]^[30] Ongoing maintenance is essential for longevity, involving routine practices to mitigate further degradation. Periodic inspections, conducted annually or biennially, assess for rot, loose connections, and structural shifts using non-destructive methods like ultrasound, with immediate tightening of pins and bolts to prevent play in joints. Vegetation control around abutments prevents root intrusion and moisture retention, while regular cleaning removes debris from roofs and approaches to ensure proper drainage; protective coatings, such as copper naphthenate preservatives and fire retardants, are applied to exposed wood. In rural settings, community involvement often plays a key role, with local groups contributing to monitoring and minor upkeep through volunteer programs coordinated with state historic offices.^[25]^[31]^[26]

Cultural and historical importance

Humpback bridges embody the ingenuity of 19th-century American engineering, showcasing rural communities' self-reliance through innovative timber construction techniques that transitioned bridge-building from empirical craftsmanship to more systematic practices.^[6] As a rare example of an arched covered span, the surviving Humpback Covered Bridge represents a pinnacle of vernacular architecture, where local builders adapted traditional truss designs to environmental challenges like flooding without relying on imported materials or advanced machinery.^[16] This structure highlights the era's folk engineering ethos, prioritizing durability and functionality in remote areas.^[16] In cultural contexts, humpback bridges have inspired artistic representations, particularly through photography that captures their picturesque arches against natural backdrops, turning them into enduring symbols of Americana.^[32] The Humpback Covered Bridge in Virginia serves as a key heritage site, attracting photography enthusiasts and tourists worldwide who visit for its photogenic appeal and historical ambiance within a dedicated wayside park.^[33] Covered bridges like it appear in broader American literature as motifs of nostalgia and simpler times, evoking themes of passage and continuity in works exploring rural heritage.^[34] Educationally, humpback bridges offer valuable insights into vernacular architecture and early engineering principles, featured in curricula for K-12 students and higher education to illustrate truss mechanics, material science, and historical context through documented case studies like the Historic American Engineering Record.^[16] Their arched designs have influenced contemporary pedestrian bridges, where similar humps promote slower traffic and aesthetic integration with landscapes, demonstrating timeless principles of form and function.^[11] Today, the Humpback Covered Bridge enhances historic districts by anchoring cultural landscapes and fostering community identity, yet it faces ongoing threats from urban development and infrastructure modernization, emphasizing the critical role of advocacy in its protection.^[35] Designated a National Historic Landmark in 2016, it underscores the need for sustained preservation efforts to maintain its role in educating future generations about sustainable engineering heritage.^[4]^[36]

References

[1]
Humpback Bridge – DHR - Virginia Department of Historic Resources
Oct 16, 2012 · Humpback Bridge is the only surviving curved-span covered bridge in the nation, the oldest in Virginia, completed in 1857, and has a ...
[2]
Covered bridges | Virginia Department of Transportation
Humpback Bridge can be reached from Interstate 64 by taking exit 10 to Route 60 and traveling one-half mile east, or by taking Route 60 west from Covington.
[3]
[PDF] Covered Bridges NHL Context Study - National Park Service
Humpback Bridge (1857), Alleghany County, Virginia. Humpback Bridge is a superb example of nineteenth-century covered bridge construction. It is a classic ...
[4]
[PDF] Humpback Bridge NHL Nomination
Jul 26, 2011 · The bridge structure clearly illustrates the character-defining features of the resource type. It has undergone few alterations or modifications ...
[5]
[PDF] Humpback Covered Bridge HAER No. VA-1 Covington Vicinity ... - Loc
Originally three bridges of this design were built across Dunlops Creek, all by a man known as Mr. Venable of Lewisburg and his assistant, Tomas Kincaid.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
Humpback Bridge | SAH ARCHIPEDIA
A slight arch in the truss supports, leaving the center point eight feet higher than the ends, gives the bridge its characteristic hump. A bowed gable roof, ...
[7]
[PDF] Humpback Road Bridge - Arkansas Department of Transportation
The bridge is 42' long and 14' wide overall, with a clear span of 38', a roadway width of 12'-6" and 10' wing walls at each end. The segmental arch springs ...
[8]
Fixed Bridges - Stroud Valley Canal Company
This is another original heritage humpback bridge which has changed little over the centuries. The road that it carries is still only a minor lane and ...
[9]
History and heritage of Britain's canal and river bridges
Oct 22, 2021 · Fixed Canal Bridges. The single-arched humpback bridge is by far the most common type, carrying a minor road or providing agricultural access.
[10]
[PDF] A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types
Humpback Covered Bridge (1857), Humpback Bridge spanning Dunlap. Creek ... horizontal thrust of the arch reactions is transferred to the horizontal tie ...
[11]
[PDF] Covered Bridges Context Study - NPS History
... horizontal thrust that would otherwise necessitate substantial abutments ... Humpback Bridge (1857), Alleghany County, Virginia. Humpback Bridge is a ...
[12]
[PDF] The old bridge at Newton Flotman, South Norfolk - Historic England
The medieval bridge was of humpback form, no more than 6 feet wide, and consisted of four stone, ribbed arches. It was later lengthened by the addition of brick ...
[13]
Michigan's Unique Concrete Camelback Bridges AKA Curved Chord ...
These concrete camelback bridges (also known as concrete curved-chord though girder bridges) were mostly built in the 1920s, particularly from 1922-1928.Missing: humpback | Show results with:humpback
[14]
[PDF] Covered Bridges and the Birth of American Engineering
The Humpback Bridge, shown here, displays a 4 percent camber. HAER VA-1 ... Second, the horizontal thrust of the arches increased the size and cost of ...
[15]
[PDF] A Context For Common Historic Bridge Types
This study covers US bridges built through 1955, providing context for assessing the historic significance of common and less common bridge types.
[16]
[PDF] Arch Bridges
Emphasis in this paper is on aspects of arch design which are not covered in many text books, such as wind stress analysis and deflection, stress amplification ...
[17]
[PDF] Best Practices for Historic Masonry Repair and Rehabilitation
Apr 15, 2023 · stone-walled approaches of Humpback bridge (Alleghany County Structure No. ... horizontal thrust on stone masonry buildings since the 15th ...
[18]
Inscribed tablets on Wilford and Drakeford Bridges
9. Packsaddle Bridge. Packsaddle Bridge is a humpback bridge, with low walled large granite stone. There is lots of evidence of repair ...
[19]
Ancient stone hump-back bridge revealed at Fernworthy - Facebook
Oct 11, 2017 · Revealed by the drought an ancient stone hump-back bridge in the Reservoir at Fernworthy [Illustrated London News November 12, 1955] Once used ...
[20]
Ponn Humpback Covered Bridge, Wilkesville Ohio - Historic Structures
Jun 10, 2023 · Ponn Bridge, with its "humpbacked" construction, is one of the longest and most unusual covered bridges in Ohio. It is one of five covered bridges in Vinton ...
[21]
[PDF] Historic Bridges of Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 2025 · The components of a typical single span stone arch bridge are shown. ... Bridges are most commonly built “right”, to minimize the span length and ...
[22]
Dorset Bridge - HistoricBridges.org
The Dorset Bridge is a metal truss with a rare "humpback" shape, built in 1907-1908, and has been repaired, retaining its unusual design.
[23]
Chapter 17. Preserving Existing Covered Bridges
Roofing and Siding Protecting the main truss members from the elements that cause decay is the most effective way to extend a covered bridge's service life. ...
[24]
[PDF] Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Covered Bridges - GovInfo
The NHCBP Program includes preservation, rehabilitation and restoration of covered bridges that are listed or are eligible for listing in the National Register ...
[25]
[PDF] Guidelines to restoring structural integrity of covered bridge members
How to support the bridge during the repair phase, what repairs are appropriate, and how to maintain the bridge after repairs are implemented are all critical ...
[26]
Covered bridges | Virginia Department of Transportation
### Humpback Bridge Summary
[27]
[PDF] The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic ...
Under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), the Secretary of the Interior is responsible for establishing professional standards.
[28]
Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program - Reply due: April 11 ...
This project provides for preservation, rehabilitation, or restoration of a covered bridge. The terms are as defined in the Secretary of the Interior's ...
[29]
[PDF] Guide for In-Place Treatment of Wood in Historic Covered and ...
The NHCBP program includes preservation, rehabilitation and resto- ration of covered bridges that are listed or are eligible for listing on the National ...
[30]
Humpback Bridge - Atlas Obscura
Aug 21, 2020 · The bridge is 109-feet long, and the apex of its arch is four feet higher than the bridge's ends, creating its unique, eponymous silhouette.
[31]
Humpback Bridge - Virginia.org
Humpback Bridge is the only covered, humpback bridge in the US, built in 1857, and is a historic landmark, now in a wayside park.
[32]
Translating the “Covered Bridges” in Barbara Kingsolver's Short ...
In a threefold study, I will analyze how the “covered bridges” in Kingsolver's stories can lead the translator to simply recover the original intertextuality.
[33]
In search of America's old covered bridges | Built Heritage
Jun 28, 2021 · Called covered bridges because of the roof and siding needed to protect the timber trusses, they became ubiquitous features on the American ...Missing: humpback scarcity