Hundred Guilder Print
The Hundred Guilder Print is a celebrated etching by the Dutch artist Rembrandt van Rijn, created circa 1648–1649, renowned for its ambitious depiction of multiple scenes from the Gospel of Matthew chapter 19, including Christ healing the sick, debating with Pharisees, blessing children, and instructing a rich young man. Measuring approximately 28 x 39 cm, the print employs etching, drypoint, and burin techniques on laid paper—often Japanese in quality—to render a densely populated composition centered on an illuminated figure of Jesus gesturing amid a diverse crowd of followers, skeptics, and the afflicted. Its nickname derives from the exceptionally high value of 100 guilders it fetched in Rembrandt's lifetime, reflecting its immediate acclaim as one of his most technically innovative and narratively complex works.[1][2] The print's subject matter draws directly from Matthew 19:1–30, unifying four distinct biblical episodes into a single, dynamic panorama that captures the breadth of Christ's ministry. On the right side, detailed figures illustrate healing miracles, such as a blind man with a cane and a mother cradling an infant, while the left features more loosely sketched Pharisees in debate and a rich man turning away. The central archway and rocky landscape provide an ambiguous backdrop, enhancing the sense of depth and narrative ambiguity characteristic of Rembrandt's Baroque style. This integration of multiple vignettes showcases Rembrandt's skill in storytelling through gesture, expression, and light, with Jesus positioned as the focal point, elevated and radiant against the shadowed masses.[3][1] Technically, The Hundred Guilder Print represents a pinnacle of 17th-century printmaking, combining fine etching lines for intricate details with the burr-rich textures of drypoint to convey texture and emotion, and burin work for added precision in later states. Produced during the Dutch Golden Age, when Rembrandt was at the height of his career in Amsterdam, the print was printed on high-quality imported paper, underscoring the era's global trade influences. Only a limited number of impressions survive in various states, with the second state—featuring enhanced details—being the most common and valued. Its creation coincided with Rembrandt's experimentation in print media, pushing the boundaries of copperplate techniques to achieve painterly effects rivaling his oil canvases.[2][1] Historically, the print's reception was extraordinary; by 1654, it was already documented as selling for 100 guilders—a substantial sum far exceeding typical etchings of the period—and this valuation persisted into the 18th century. Institutions like the British Museum and the Rijksmuseum hold impressions, attesting to its enduring status as a masterwork that influenced subsequent artists and printmakers. The inclusion of diverse figures, including a dark-skinned man among the crowd, reflects the multicultural society of the Dutch Republic and broader Christian themes of compassion and inclusion. Today, it remains a cornerstone of Rembrandt's oeuvre, exemplifying his ability to infuse religious narrative with human depth and technical virtuosity.[2][3]Description and Composition
Visual Elements
The Hundred Guilder Print features a horizontal composition measuring approximately 27.8 by 38.8 cm, depicting a dense crowd of over 30 figures gathered around the central figure of Christ in a rocky landscape. Christ stands prominently just left of center, his right hand extended in a gesture of teaching or blessing toward the crowd, while his left hand is raised higher in benediction, emanating a divine light that draws the viewer's eye. This luminous portrayal emphasizes Christ's divinity amid the surrounding throng, which includes disciples, the sick, children, and diverse onlookers from various social classes, conveying a sense of universal compassion through their varied expressions of hope, desperation, and contemplation.[2][1] Key figures enhance the scene's emotional and symbolic depth. The Apostle Peter kneels nearby, restraining a mother as she reaches toward Christ with her child, symbolizing pleas for inclusion in the kingdom of heaven. To the left, a richly dressed young man sits with his head in his hands, turning away in contemplation, representing the rich ruler hesitant to follow Christ's teachings. A woman holding a swaddled infant extends the child toward Christ from the left side, while on the right, an elderly woman supports a sick figure in a wheeled cart, highlighting vulnerability and faith. These interactions, set against a backdrop of architectural elements like an arched doorway and a temple-like structure framing the right side, create a frieze-like arrangement that unifies the diverse group in a single plane.[1][2][4] Rembrandt employs dramatic chiaroscuro to contrast the holy radiance around Christ with deep shadows enveloping the crowd, particularly on the right where the faithful are rendered in intricate detail to show textures in clothing and faces, while the left side features lighter, sketchier outlines for skeptics like Pharisees in debate. This lighting guides the composition from light to dark, underscoring the contrast between the grandeur of the architectural setting and the humility of the afflicted. Ascending figures and the arrangement of disciples evoke subtle allusions to the Last Judgment, reinforcing themes of salvation and judgment through the print's dynamic grouping. The variety of emotions and social strata depicted— from beggars to the affluent—further symbolizes Christ's inclusive ministry, as inspired by scenes from Matthew 19.[1][5]Biblical Narrative
The Hundred Guilder Print draws its scriptural foundation from the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 19, where Rembrandt synthesizes four distinct episodes into a unified narrative of Christ's ministry.[6] The first episode depicts Jesus healing the sick (Matthew 19:1–2), as large crowds follow him into the region of Judea and he heals them there, emphasizing his compassion for the afflicted. The second involves Pharisees approaching to question Jesus about divorce (Matthew 19:3–12), testing him on Mosaic law, to which he responds by affirming the sanctity of marriage and allowing exceptions only for marital unfaithfulness. The third is Christ's blessing of the children (Matthew 19:13–15), where disciples rebuke parents for bringing infants to Jesus, only for him to declare, "Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these," before laying hands on them. The fourth encompasses the rich young man's inquiry and Jesus' subsequent warning about riches (Matthew 19:16–30), in which a wealthy youth asks what good deed secures eternal life; Jesus instructs him to sell his possessions, give to the poor, and follow him, prompting the man to depart sorrowfully. Jesus then tells his disciples, "It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God," yet affirms that with God all things are possible, promising rewards for sacrifice. Rembrandt condenses these sequential events into a single panoramic composition, creating a cohesive scene that captures the breadth of Christ's teachings and miracles without adhering strictly to chronological order.[1] Children occupy the foreground, symbolizing innocence and access to the divine; the rich man departs on the left, embodying worldly attachment; the sick and afflicted approach from the right, representing the marginalized seeking restoration; Pharisees engage in debate on the left; and disciples serve as mediators, facilitating interactions between Jesus and the crowd.[6] This synthesis technique allows Rembrandt to illustrate the interconnectedness of Jesus' actions, transforming disparate biblical moments into a dynamic tableau of ministry.[3] Theologically, the print emphasizes Christ's mercy toward the humble and afflicted, juxtaposed against the rejection of material wealth as a barrier to salvation.[6] It highlights inclusion of the marginalized—children, the poor, and the sick—as exemplars of faith, while the camel motif evokes judgment on riches, aligning with eschatological hints of reversal in the kingdom, where "the last will be first, and the first will be last" (Matthew 19:30). These themes resonate with 17th-century Protestant interpretations in the Dutch Republic, where biblical narratives stressed personal faith and divine grace over ritual or status, and prints like this served as accessible devotional aids for lay believers engaging scripture at home.[7]Creation and Technique
Development of the Plate
Rembrandt began developing the plate for the Hundred Guilder Print around 1646–1647, during a mature phase of his etching career marked by ambitious compositions, with significant progress occurring in 1648 and completion by 1649.[8] This timeline aligns with his experimentation on oriental papers starting circa 1647, which he employed for some impressions of this work.[9] Several preparatory drawings survive, demonstrating the evolution from initial compositional ideas to the final intricate arrangement of figures, including specific studies for individual elements such as the sick woman carried on a stretcher.[2][10] These sketches, executed around 1648, reveal Rembrandt's iterative process of refining poses and spatial relationships before transferring to the copper plate, a rarity for his etchings given his typical direct approach.[2] The plate underwent extensive reworking over several years, with scholars identifying two primary states based on surviving impressions, though underlying evidence points to numerous intermediate adjustments.[1] The initial state featured a more basic line structure and fewer detailed figures, which Rembrandt progressively enriched through additions of drypoint for tonal depth and burin corrections for precision, briefly referencing etching and drypoint techniques in these revisions.[6] In the second state, enhancements included subtle shading on elements like the donkey, camel, and architectural features, contributing to the print's renowned complexity.[11] These repeated interventions posed technical challenges, as the intensive reworking compromised the plate's integrity, resulting in wear that limited the total viable impressions to a relatively small number before significant degradation.[5] Such alterations not only created subtle differences in tone and clarity among extant copies but also underscored Rembrandt's commitment to refining the work for a select audience of collectors rather than broad distribution.[6]Etching and Drypoint Methods
Rembrandt employed a combination of etching and drypoint techniques to create the intricate details and tonal effects in The Hundred Guilder Print, with occasional use of the burin for refinement. Etching involved coating a copper plate with an acid-resistant ground, typically a mixture of resin and beeswax, then drawing the design by scratching through the ground to expose the metal; the plate was subsequently immersed in acid, which bit lines of varying depth into the surface depending on exposure time, allowing ink to be held in the grooves during printing.[1][2] Drypoint complemented this by directly scratching the plate with a sharp needle, displacing metal to form a soft burr—a raised edge that retained excess ink and produced velvety, blurred lines ideal for rendering textures and shadows.[1][2] The burin, a sharp engraving tool, was used sparingly to incise fine, clean lines for precise details such as facial features or fabric folds, enhancing the etched and drypoint work without dominating the overall composition.[2][6] In this print, Rembrandt innovated by extensively applying drypoint over etched areas to achieve mezzotint-like tonal gradations, where the burr created rich, soft shadows and subtle highlights that conveyed depth in the crowded scene, mimicking the luminosity of oil painting in monochrome.[1][6] This layering allowed for experimental modulation of line quality, transitioning from sharp etched outlines for foreground figures to fuzzy drypoint smudges in the background, fostering a sense of atmospheric perspective and emotional intensity.[2][1] The printing process began with thorough preparation of the plate after etching and drypoint work, followed by inking with a viscous oil-based ink applied via roller or pad, then carefully wiping the surface to leave ink primarily in the incised lines while selectively retaining some "plate tone" for broader tonal areas.[1][5] The inked plate was placed in an etching press with dampened laid paper (or occasionally Japanese paper for warmer tones and finer detail absorption), and high pressure transferred the ink, capturing the burr's softness in early impressions; as the plate wore over multiple printings, the burr flattened, resulting in crisper lines and reduced richness in later states.[2][1] Rembrandt's mastery is evident in his precise balance of etching's linear control with drypoint's expressive freedom, enabling dramatic contrasts of light and shadow that unified the complex composition without reliance on color, a feat that distinguished this work among his etchings.[6][1] This technical synthesis not only highlighted his innovative command of intaglio methods but also allowed for subtle variations across impressions through controlled inking and wiping.[5][2]Historical Context and Reception
Origin of the Name and Early Valuation
The name "Hundred Guilder Print" for Rembrandt's etching Christ Healing the Sick (c. 1648–1650) originates from a 1654 letter by Flemish printmaker Jan Meyssens, who described it as the rarest of Rembrandt's works and noted that impressions had sold in Holland for 100 guilders or more, far exceeding its suggested fair value of 30 guilders.[2][12] This anecdote, recorded just four years after the print's creation, underscores its immediate recognition as an exceptional piece among contemporaries, with Meyssens praising its beauty and purity while cautioning against overpayment.[12] In the Dutch Golden Age art market, where etchings served as affordable reproductions for a broad audience, typical Rembrandt prints fetched modest prices of 1 to 16 stuivers (equivalent to 0.05 to 0.8 guilders), making the 100-guilder valuation for this work extraordinarily high and comparable to the cost of one of Rembrandt's oil paintings.[13] This reflected the print's ambitious scale, technical complexity, and narrative depth, elevating it beyond standard printmaking to a status akin to fine painting, especially in an economy where a skilled craftsman's annual wage hovered around 300–350 guilders.[14] The high price was documented during Rembrandt's lifetime, marking it as the first of his etchings to achieve such acclaim and value.[2] Early valuations were closely tied to the quality of impressions, with pristine early states from the unworn plate commanding premium prices due to their sharpness and detail, while later pulls from the deteriorated plate—produced as demand grew—were worth significantly less, often closer to routine etching values.[2] This distinction highlighted authentication challenges in the 17th-century market, where collectors prized states closest to Rembrandt's original vision for their superior artistry and rarity.[2] In the prosperous Dutch Republic, fueled by global trade, such prints democratized access to high art, yet this one's outlier pricing signaled its perceived masterpiece status amid an otherwise accessible medium.[15]Contemporary Influence
The Hundred Guilder Print, created around 1648 during Rembrandt's mature period in Amsterdam, exemplifies his evolution toward intricate narrative compositions in printmaking, blending multiple scenes from the Gospel of Matthew into a unified tableau that highlights his innovative use of light, shadow, and human expression.[16] This work emerged at the height of his productivity as an etcher, when he had already produced numerous prints exploring biblical themes, but it stands out for its technical ambition, combining etching, drypoint, and burin work to achieve unprecedented depth and tonal variety.[5] As part of Rembrandt's corpus of approximately 300 etchings and drypoints spanning 1626 to 1665, the print represents a pinnacle of his experimentation, shifting from simpler genre scenes to multifaceted religious narratives that demanded extended plate development over several years.[17] In the 17th century, the print garnered immediate acclaim among Dutch artists and collectors, with impressions fetching prices from one to one hundred guilders, far exceeding those of Rembrandt's other works and signaling its status as a standout achievement.[18] Contemporaries, including members of Rembrandt's circle, lauded its compositional complexity and expressive power, describing it as "the most beautiful [print] that ever came from the burin of this Master," a testament to its innovative fusion of etching techniques that rivaled the inventions of Renaissance masters like Raphael and Leonardo.[19] It was frequently included in early inventories of prominent collections, underscoring its rapid recognition as a masterpiece without recorded major criticisms from the period.[20] Its depiction of Christ preaching, healing the sick, and blessing children served devotional purposes in the Dutch Republic amid the era's Protestant reforms.[21] Its wide circulation through multiple states and impressions influenced print collectors and engravers, as evidenced by early copies like Melchior Kusel's 1679 engraving in the Icones Biblicae, which adapted elements for broader dissemination in biblical illustration.[19] In this context, the work not only reinforced Rembrandt's reputation for profound religious insight but also contributed to the pedagogical use of prints in artistic training, exemplifying advanced narrative integration for aspiring engravers in the Netherlands.[22]Legacy and Interpretations
Impact on Jan Steen
Jan Steen (1626–1679), a Leiden-born genre painter and younger contemporary of Rembrandt, emulated key elements of the Hundred Guilder Print in his early work Village Wedding (1653, oil on canvas, Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen, Rotterdam), marking one of the print's earliest documented visual responses.[23] Steen adapted the print's dense composition—featuring a courtyard enclosed by architectural elements like an inn, shed, and tower—into a humorous marriage celebration set in a courtyard, featuring a motley crowd of figures in overlapping groups to evoke social bustle and narrative complexity.[24] This borrowing transformed Rembrandt's solemn biblical crowd into a raucous assembly of jolly guests, some mimicking the print's Pharisees in their gesturing and pointing, while incorporating direct motifs like a crying toddler derived from Rembrandt's earlier etching The Pancake Woman (1635).[24] Steen further employed Rembrandt's chiaroscuro technique to unify his composition, using shafts of sunlight to highlight central figures such as the bride and groom, thereby infusing emotional depth into what becomes a moralistic commentary on marriage and adultery—echoing the print's underlying themes from Matthew 19—though subverted through humor and farce typical of Steen's genre style.[24] As a painter trained in Leiden and active in The Hague by 1653, Steen likely encountered impressions of the print through local collectors or Rembrandt's circle, demonstrating the work's dissemination across media from etching to oil painting during the 1650s.[23] Scholarly analysis, notably in Amy Golahny's 2017 study, positions this emulation as a respectful yet competitive engagement, with Steen "transform[ing] somber and ill figures from the Hundred Guilder Print into raucously playful, joking, or drunk participants in the farce of a marriage ritual," highlighting the print's influence on subsequent Dutch artists' handling of crowded, thematically layered scenes.[24] This cross-medium adaptation underscores the print's pivotal role in shaping 17th-century visual discourse on social and moral narratives.[23]The Baillie Print and Later Reworkings
In the late 18th century, Captain William Baillie (1723–1810), an Irish printmaker and art dealer, acquired Rembrandt's worn copper plate for The Hundred Guilder Print around 1775 from the estate of the dealer John Greenwood.[25] Baillie, recognizing the plate's commercial potential despite its deterioration, extensively reworked it by cleaning the surface, reincising original lines, and adding new etched details to sharpen the image and compensate for the loss of Rembrandt's characteristic burr and tonal depth.[12] These modifications included alterations to figures, such as stylizing the camel's facial features and enhancing architectural elements, resulting in a more linear and less atmospheric composition that diverged from Rembrandt's original intent.[25] From this revised plate, Baillie produced approximately 100 impressions, known collectively as the "Baillie state," which circulated widely in Britain and Europe.[8] Following his edition, Baillie further intervened by cutting the plate into four smaller fragments—corresponding to the upper, lower, left, and right sections—and reworked each piece individually with additional etching to create standalone compositions focused on specific narrative elements, such as Christ preaching or healing scenes.[2] These fragmented plates passed through various owners in the 19th century, including French publishers like Auguste Jean, Veuve Jean, and Michel Bernard, who produced restrikes to meet ongoing demand for Rembrandt's imagery.[25] Later American dealers, such as Alvin Beaumont, continued this practice into the early 20th century, though attempts like Victor Thomas's 1906 restrikes drew criticism for their poor quality and further degradation of the plates.[25] Compared to Rembrandt's lifetime impressions, these 19th-century versions exhibit harsher lines, reduced subtlety in shading, and an overall flattening of the original's rich drypoint textures due to repeated use and added engravings.[26] The Baillie prints and subsequent reworkings played a significant role in democratizing access to Rembrandt's masterpiece during a period when original 17th-century impressions were scarce and expensive, allowing broader audiences to engage with the composition through affordable reproductions.[25] However, these interventions diluted the velvety burr effects and improvisational quality central to Rembrandt's etching technique, transforming the work into a more commercial product at the expense of artistic fidelity.[27] Today, Baillie-state and later restrikes are valued less highly in the market than authentic early states—often fetching a fraction of the price—but they remain essential artifacts in the history of print collecting and posthumous plate management, illustrating the evolving treatment of old master works.[11] Modern scholarship on these versions, including potential conservation efforts or digital analyses to distinguish reworked elements, remains limited, with key studies like those in The New Hollstein (2013) providing the most comprehensive cataloging to date.[25]Collections and Provenance
Notable Impressions
The Hundred Guilder Print exists in multiple states as classified in the New Hollstein catalogue, with the first state being exceptionally rare, as only nine impressions are known to survive, often held in private collections and prized for their minimal reworking and crisp lines from the initial etching and drypoint stages.[28] These early impressions demonstrate Rembrandt's innovative use of burr for velvety textures, particularly in the shadowed figures and architectural elements, before subsequent reworkings added shading to areas like the donkey, camel, and archway in the second state.[29] Lifetime impressions printed on Japanese gampi paper, imported via the Dutch East India Company in the 1640s, are notable for their ability to hold richer ink and produce deeper tonalities, enhancing the print's dramatic chiaroscuro and luminous highlights around Christ.[11] Such examples, typically from the second state, capture the plate's freshness without significant wear, allowing for subtle variations in inking that emphasize the bustling crowd and ethereal light, factors that significantly influence their artistic and market value.[30] Later states, including the third and fourth as per New Hollstein 239, reveal progressive plate wear and additional burin work, resulting in softer lines and reduced contrast, with impressions showing accumulated tone from repeated printings.[31] In the 19th century, after Captain William Baillie acquired the plate in 1775 and reworked it extensively—adding engraving and altering sections for clarity—numerous restrikes were produced, often on thinner papers, yielding atmospheric but less vibrant examples that differ markedly in tonality and detail from originals.[26] These Baillie impressions, while historically significant for extending the plate's life, are distinguished by their posthumous modifications and lower ink saturation.[32] Variations across impressions arise from differences in paper type, inking techniques, and wiping methods, which can alter the perceived depth and focus; for instance, heavier inking on European laid paper yields bolder shadows, while lighter applications on Japan paper preserve finer drypoint burr.[33] The Hollstein classification aids in authenticating these, grouping them into four original states plus later reworkings, though condition—such as foxing or trimmed margins—plays a key role in valuation.[8] Many impressions suffer from incomplete provenances due to 18th-century collection dispersals through auctions and private sales, leaving gaps in ownership histories and complicating attribution to Rembrandt's lifetime production.[34]Current Locations
The Hundred Guilder Print, Rembrandt's renowned etching, is held in several prestigious institutional collections worldwide, with notable examples including early and lifetime impressions preserved for study and display. The Frick Collection in New York houses an early state impression, characterized by rich drypoint burr and subtle tonal variations, acquired as part of Henry Clay Frick's comprehensive Rembrandt holdings.[35] The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam possesses a lifetime impression on Japanese paper, exemplifying the print's intricate etching and engraving techniques from around 1648.[36] In New York, the Metropolitan Museum of Art maintains multiple states, including a fine early example with pronounced drypoint effects, allowing comparison of the print's evolving inking and wiping methods.[5] The National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., features a detailed impression highlighting the central figure of Christ amid the crowded composition.[37] London's British Museum holds several fragments and complete impressions, such as a right-section variant documenting the print's post-Rembrandt alterations.[2] The Art Institute of Chicago owns multiple versions, including one on Japanese paper that captures the luminous quality of Rembrandt's innovative printing.[33]| Institution | Location | Notable Features |
|---|---|---|
| The Frick Collection | New York, USA | Early state with rich drypoint burr |
| Rijksmuseum | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Lifetime impression on Japanese paper |
| Metropolitan Museum of Art | New York, USA | Multiple states for comparative study |
| National Gallery of Art | Washington, D.C., USA | Detailed central composition |
| British Museum | London, UK | Complete and fragmented impressions |
| Art Institute of Chicago | Chicago, USA | Impression on Japanese paper with luminous tones |