Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Imperial Service Order

The (ISO) was a honor instituted by VII on 8 August 1902 to recognize long and meritorious service by civil servants in administrative and clerical roles upon retirement. The order rewarded dedicated public servants across the of the and throughout the , typically requiring at least 25 years of service or equivalent in challenging conditions. Appointments were made to the rank of , the sole class of membership, and the award was distinct from honors, focusing instead on non-combatant contributions to and . While the ISO continued into the late , no further awards were made in the after 1995, reflecting shifts in the honors system amid the evolution of the . The associated extended similar recognition to lower-ranking staff, broadening the scheme's reach but maintaining the order's prestige for senior personnel.

History

Establishment and Early Years

The Imperial Service Order was instituted by VII on 8 August 1902 via royal warrant, establishing a distinction to reward civil servants for long and faithful service in the permanent civil departments of throughout the . The order targeted administrative, clerical, and executive personnel, reflecting the growing bureaucratic apparatus of the late Victorian and Edwardian eras, where recognition of routine loyalty was deemed essential to imperial administration. Eligibility required retirement after at least 25 years of approved service, with provisions for reduced terms—such as 20 years and six months in or 16 years in unsanitary climates abroad—to account for harsher postings. Comprising a single grade of (post-nominal letters ISO), the order lacked higher ranks like knighthoods, positioning it below military and chivalric honors while emphasizing meritorious civilian dedication over gallantry or nobility. The statutes limited the number of Companions to preserve selectivity, though exact quotas evolved; initial focus fell on the Home Civil Service, with early inclusions from colonial administrations to affirm cohesion. The first cohort of Companions was appointed in the King's list published on 9 November 1902, marking the order's operational debut shortly after its creation. In its formative phase, the order underscored a pragmatic approach to incentives, drawing from precedents like longevity awards in other empires but tailored to Britain's expanding bureaucracy, where empirical records of tenure and performance guided selections. Appointments prioritized verifiable contributions in executive roles, excluding judicial or diplomatic branches initially covered by separate honors, thus carving a niche for mid-level administrators whose steadfastness sustained .

Interwar and World War II Period

During the interwar period, appointments to the Imperial Service Order proceeded steadily, recognizing the long and meritorious service of civil servants in administrative and clerical roles across the United Kingdom, dominions, and colonies, without interruption or structural changes to the order's statutes. These awards, limited to companions without additional grades, emphasized empirical contributions to bureaucratic efficiency amid post-World War I reconstruction and economic austerity, as evidenced by regular publications in The London Gazette, such as the listings in the 1930 Birthday Honours for home civil service recipients. The order's imperial scope facilitated recognition of service in overseas territories, fostering administrative continuity in an era of gradual dominion autonomy, with no evidence of politicized criteria supplanting service-based merit. World War I exerted minimal disruption on the order, as it targeted non-combatant civil roles rather than military valor, allowing awards to persist for loyalty in essential governance functions despite wartime resource strains. Similarly, during , appointments adapted to prioritize civil servants in critical sectors like supply coordination and colonial administration, yet maintained consistency without suspension, as demonstrated by gazetted companions in amid heightened demands. Annual appointments remained modest, typically numbering in the low dozens based on records, reflecting the order's focus on verifiable tenure over expanded wartime honors, thereby sustaining morale and institutional stability untainted by ideological overlays. This continuity underscored the order's causal function in preserving empirical administrative reliability across the empire under duress.

Post-War Developments to 1993

Following the end of in 1945, the Imperial Service Order continued to honor long and meritorious service by civil servants upon retirement, primarily within the United Kingdom's Home Civil Service and select administrations, as overseas colonial appointments diminished amid accelerating . The Order's statutes underwent no fundamental alterations to its single class of or eligibility criteria during this period, maintaining its original 1902 framework of recognizing at least 25 years of faithful, non-political public service without gallantry elements. This stability contrasted with broader shifts in the British honours system, where the Order's imperial designation persisted despite the transition from Empire to realms, underscoring its rooted emphasis on administrative merit over contemporary nomenclature debates. Annual appointments, gazetted regularly in The London Gazette, reflected the expansion of the and corresponding growth in bureaucracy during the 1950s and 1960s, with awards peaking alongside increased employment—though exact figures varied yearly, often numbering in the dozens for recipients as focus narrowed domestically post-independence waves in and . By the 1970s, as countries like established successor honors such as the in 1975 to replace imperial awards, usage emphasized the Home Civil Service, avoiding dilution into broader societal recognitions. The Order's distinct, apolitical character—tied to empirical metrics of tenure and diligence—sustained its role amid critiques of honors proliferation, differentiating it from expanded orders like the , which incorporated more diverse civil contributions. Into the early , preliminary reviews of the honours system highlighted potential redundancies, yet the Imperial Service Order's specialized focus on retirement-based commendation preserved its operational integrity until major restructuring, with no appointments ceasing abruptly but scrutiny mounting over its alignment with a post-imperial context. This era affirmed the Order's causal emphasis on verifiable, dutiful performance in expanding administrative roles, unswayed by political expediency.

Design and Insignia

Badge and Star

The of the , awarded to Companions, is an eight-pointed measuring approximately 55 mm wide and 61 mm high, with the upper ray obscured by a . At its center is superimposed a plaque bearing a circular medallion featuring the reigning sovereign's in dark blue , encircled by the motto "FOR FAITHFUL SERVICE" in similar lettering. This medallion is surrounded by a rendered in green . The design specifications, including materials of for the and with for the central elements, were established by royal warrant issued on 8 August 1902 by VII. Crafted typically by authorized silversmiths such as Elkington & Co., the emphasizes durability suitable for recipients, with the construction providing longevity without the fragility of more ornate military . No distinct breast exists for the Order, as it comprises a single class of Companions; the itself serves as the primary , worn from a on the left . Alterations have been limited to updating the central to reflect successive monarchs, preserving the original 1902 form amid heraldic continuity.

Ribbon and Manner of Wear

The of the Imperial Service Order is with a dark central approximately one-third the width of the ribbon. It measures 38 mm in width and consists of three vertical stripes, with the outer portions flanking the central . This design, established under the statutes, symbolizes the order's imperial and heritage without elaborate variations seen in honors. Companions of the order wear the badge suspended from the ribbon on the left breast or lapel as a single decoration, distinguishing it from neck badges of higher orders. Women recipients wear the insignia as a bow on the left shoulder, adapting the ribbon into a rosette form while retaining the same colors. Recipients are entitled to use the post-nominal letters "ISO" following their names. For formal evening dress, miniature versions of the badge are mounted on a and worn with other miniatures, positioned according to the official . These protocols, outlined in the original 1902 statutes, remained unchanged through the order's active period until its discontinuation in , emphasizing simplicity suited to administrative civil servants rather than martial display. The unadorned manner of wear underscores the order's focus on meritorious bureaucratic service over ceremonial pomp characteristic of combat-oriented decorations.

Membership and Statutes

Eligibility and Grades

The eligibility for the Imperial Service Order is confined to permanent members of the Home Civil Service of the , as well as equivalent civil services in the Dominions and Colonies, who have rendered at least 25 years of approved and unblemished service upon retirement. This criterion, stipulated in the founding royal warrant of 26 June 1902 and subsequent revisions including in 1908, prioritizes longevity of loyal administrative service over discrete accomplishments, with exclusions applied to temporary appointees, political office holders, members of the armed forces, and judicial officers to preserve the award's focus on non-partisan bureaucratic merit. Service requirements may be adjusted downward for postings in adverse conditions, such as 20 years and six months in or 16 years in tropical regions deemed unhealthy, reflecting the statutes' recognition of environmental hardships as a causal factor in meritorious endurance. Appointments are limited to those in administrative or clerical capacities, ensuring the Order rewards steadfast rather than specialized or executive distinctions better addressed by other honors. The Order comprises a single grade, that of (post-nominal CISO or ISO), established without hierarchical divisions, knighthoods, or additional classes since its , distinguishing it from multi-tiered chivalric orders. Honorary memberships, though statutorily permissible under the royal warrants for extraordinary contributions aligned with principles, have been exceptionally rare and reserved for cases warranting deviation from standard tenure-based eligibility.

Award Process and Criteria

Nominations for appointment as a of the Imperial Service Order originated from department heads or permanent secretaries, who recommended eligible retiring officials based on internal performance evaluations, with submissions forwarded to the or relevant for formal advice to the . The process aligned with biannual honours cycles—typically the and Sovereign's Official Birthday lists—but was explicitly tied to individual retirements, ensuring awards recognized concluded careers rather than ongoing service. Eligibility required at least 25 years of pensionable service in an administrative or executive role, with awards granted solely for "faithful service" demonstrated through unblemished conduct reports and sustained diligence, excluding considerations of public impact, innovation, or extraordinary feats. This meritocratic focus prioritized verifiable metrics like tenure and routine efficiency over subjective or external achievements, distinguishing the Order from politically influenced or discretionary honours. The held ultimate authority as final arbiter, countersigning recommendations via , with all appointments formally promulgated in to maintain public transparency and archival record. Unlike the , which encompasses civil, military, community, and gallantry distinctions, the Imperial Service Order's criteria deliberately omitted such broader elements, confining recognition to apolitical loyalty within the imperial civil administration.

Imperial Service Medal

Origins and Relation to the Order

The Imperial Service Medal was instituted on 8 August 1902 by King Edward VII under the statutes of the Imperial Service Order, specifically to reward lower-grade civil servants for at least 25 years of meritorious service upon retirement. This companion award targeted subordinate roles ineligible for the Order's membership, such as messengers, porters, and cleaners, ensuring recognition extended to essential non-executive support staff within the civil service hierarchy. While sharing the same foundational statutes and recommendation processes as the Imperial Service Order, the operated as a distinct, ungraded silver honor without conferring Order membership, post-nominals, or precedence in ceremonial wear. It thus paralleled the Order by honoring loyal bureaucratic contributions but preserved institutional distinctions, directing higher administrative and clerical personnel toward the ISO's graded structure to avoid diluting prestige among senior ranks. The first Imperial Service Medal awards were announced in The London Gazette on 29 May 1903, marking the initial distribution to qualifying retirees and establishing the Medal's role in systematically acknowledging unsung long-service efforts across imperial civil administrations. This parallel framework addressed a practical gap in civil service honors, enabling comprehensive merit-based recognition without overlapping eligibility criteria or undermining the Order's focus on executive leadership.

Design and Current Usage

The is a circular measuring 32 mm in diameter. Its obverse features the crowned effigy of the reigning sovereign, updated for each monarch's reign, such as the version depicting from 1953 to 2022. The reverse bears a symbolizing well-earned retirement, typically showing a seated figure resting with tools nearby, accompanied by the inscription "For Faithful Service." This straightforward emphasizes recognition of diligent without elaborate ornamentation, distinguishing it from higher honors. The medal is suspended from a 38 mm wide ribbon divided into three equal stripes of crimson, blue, and crimson, identical to that of the Imperial Service Order. It is worn on the left breast attached to a riband bar, following standard British medal conventions, with women wearing it as a brooch if preferred. Following the reforms to the honours system, which discontinued the Imperial Service Order's higher grades, the persists as a long-service for eligible civil servants. It is granted upon to those completing at least 25 years of meritorious service in administrative or clerical roles, recommended by departments and formally announced in , often annually in batches. Recent examples include awards to civilians and other public servants in 2023, confirming its continued application to junior and mid-level staff without disruption. The process prioritizes verifiable tenure and faithful performance, maintaining the 's role in acknowledging routine yet essential contributions to .

Reforms and Current Status

1993 Government Reforms

On 4 March 1993, Prime Minister John Major announced in the House of Commons reforms to the British honours system, stating that he would cease making recommendations for awards of the Imperial Service Order (ISO) to home civil servants in order to eliminate distinctions similar to those addressed in the concurrent abolition of the British Empire Medal (BEM). This decision integrated ISO-eligible civil service recognitions into the Order of the British Empire (OBE), with meritorious candidates recommended for appropriate OBE levels instead, thereby expanding opportunities for honours without separate categories. The reforms rationalized overlapping awards following a review, which identified duplication between the ISO—intended for long-service civil servants—and the broadened civil honours lists under the , allowing for greater recognition of exceptional service across more recipients without proliferating distinct orders. No new appointments to the ISO were made thereafter for domestic recommendations, though the Sovereign's formal assent remained in place; prime ministerial discretion for ISO nominations was effectively curtailed to prioritize efficiency in the honours framework. Privileges of existing ISO members were fully retained, with no revocations or diminishment of status, preserving the earned distinctions of prior appointees amid the system's streamlining. This approach halted expansion of the ISO while upholding traditions for incumbents, reflecting a pragmatic consolidation rather than outright abolition.

Implications and Continuation Practices

Following the 1993 honours system reforms under Prime Minister , no new appointments have been made to the grade of the Imperial Service Order, effectively placing this level in while preserving the status of existing members, who retain their insignia, precedence, and 'ISO' indefinitely. This dormancy redirected candidates previously eligible for Companionship—typically senior civil servants with over 25 years of exemplary service—toward alternative recognitions within the , such as the Member () or () classes, without diminishing overall acknowledgment of bureaucratic contributions. In contrast, the affiliated remains active, awarded upon retirement to civil servants completing at least 25 years of service, with notifications published routinely in ; for instance, awards continued through the 2020s, including multiple recipients in 2023 and beyond, sustaining the core tradition of honoring routine long-service merit. This persistence of the Medal, decoupled from new Order appointments, maintains empirical continuity in valuation, as verified by gazette records showing hundreds of annual issuances pre- and post-reform, adjusted only for administrative efficiency. The reforms' causal effect has been to curb potential honors at the senior level—avoiding the expansion of an already limited Companionship cadre, which numbered under 1,000 historically—while channeling exceptional performers into a broader, more versatile system, thereby preserving scarcity-driven prestige for lifetime achievers without eroding baseline retirement recognition. This structure aligns with meritocratic principles by prioritizing verifiable longevity and diligence via the for standard cases, reserving discretionary elevations elsewhere, and has resulted in no documented inflationary dilution of civil honors value, as alternative pathways absorb higher-tier nominations without supplanting the foundational imperial service .

Reception and Legacy

Recognition of Civil Service Merit

The Imperial Service Order recognized the merit of civil servants through awards granted exclusively for extended periods of diligent, apolitical service in administrative and clerical capacities, requiring a minimum of 25 years of unblemished performance prior to retirement. This structure incentivized long-term retention by linking recognition directly to sustained competence and reliability, rather than transient achievements or political engagement, thereby supporting administrative efficiency amid the British Empire's vast bureaucratic needs from 1902 onward. The Order's statutes emphasized faithful execution of duties across departments, fostering institutional continuity and expertise accumulation essential for stable governance. Recipients spanned the and colonial territories, where the award honored officers managing complex transitions, including orderly handovers during processes in the mid-20th century, by affirming the value of hierarchical discipline and traditional public service roles. London Gazette publications document awards to personnel from diverse administrative branches, such as , diplomatic, and overseas s, illustrating broad applicability in maintaining operational without favoritism toward activist or reformist agendas. Post-1940s inclusions increasingly featured women, reflecting their expanded entry into positions while upholding the same rigorous merit criteria established since the Order's inception. By prioritizing empirical markers of service longevity over subjective or ideological evaluations, the countered potential erosion of administrative realism, preserving a cadre of experienced officials who prioritized execution over for its own sake, as evidenced by its sustained issuance until the reforms despite evolving political pressures. This approach aligned with causal principles of , where rewards for proven diligence demonstrably correlated with reduced turnover in high-stakes roles, bolstering the civil service's resilience through and beyond.

Criticisms and Debates on Imperial Naming

The retention of "" in the Imperial Service Order's title has attracted limited specific scrutiny compared to more prominent honors like the , where campaigns have sought to replace "" with "Excellence" to distance from colonial associations. Critics, often from left-leaning activist groups, argue that nomenclature evokes Britain's colonial past, potentially alienating recipients from diverse backgrounds and perpetuating outdated hierarchies, as articulated in petitions signed by over 100 honorees who accepted awards but objected to the terminology. Similar sentiments have led to refusals of OBEs and MBEs by public figures citing empire's legacy of exploitation, though no documented refusals of the ISO exist on these grounds, likely due to its narrower focus and post-1993 dormancy in the UK. Defenders of the naming emphasize historical fidelity, noting the Order's 1902 institution under explicitly honored service within the British Empire's administrative framework, rendering any change an ahistorical erasure rather than progress. Empirical evidence shows no systemic exclusion or in ISO awards tied to the name, with recipients drawn meritocratically from civil servants across empire territories, and the 1993 cessation of recommendations stemmed from streamlining distinctions between honor types, not nomenclature concerns. Proponents argue retention preserves truthful heritage without implying endorsement of empire's flaws, countering that rebranding yields to symbolic offense over factual context, as critiqued by figures like historian Geoff Palmer who dismissed anti-empire campaigns as misguided. Debates persist in broader honors reform discussions, weighing heritage accuracy against perceptions of exclusion; while ISO's obscurity and halted UK awards mitigate active contention, ongoing Commonwealth usage—such as in realms retaining the —sustains the title's application without resolved . No peer-reviewed analyses or official inquiries have substantiated claims of harm from the ISO's naming, underscoring the debate's largely rhetorical nature amid minimal verifiable controversies.

References

  1. [1]
    The Imperial Service Medal | The Gazette
    The Imperial Service Medal was instituted under the statutes of the Imperial Service Order on 8 August 1902 (Gazette issue 27463) by King Edward VII to reward ...
  2. [2]
    Imperial medals - Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
    Imperial Service Order/Imperial Service Medal. Instituted in 1902 by King Edward VII to recognise distinguished public service by senior officers and at ...<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    United Kingdom: Imperial Service Order - Medals of the World
    Mar 17, 2016 · The Imperial Service Order, instituted in 1902 and discontinued in 1993, was awarded for meritorious service in the British Empire's clerical ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Royal Warrant Holders Annual List - The National Archives
    Jun 8, 2015 · Imperial Service Order. August 1902. No UK awards after 1995. 8th. August 1902. Y. Indian Distinguished. June 1907. Obsolete after 1947. 28th ...
  5. [5]
    The Imperial Service Medal - The Postal Museum
    The ISM was introduced along with another award, the Imperial Service Order (ISO), which was granted to administrative and clerical grades of the civil service.
  6. [6]
    Succession to the Crown: King Edward VII | The Gazette
    Jan 3, 2023 · The next coronation addition was created by warrant on 8 August 1902, when the Imperial Service Order and its medal were introduced to reward ...
  7. [7]
    Imperial Service Medal - Ironbark Works
    The number of Companions is limited and a time limit is specified for eligibility, although exceptions may be made for 'eminently meritorious service' ...
  8. [8]
    Other Orders - GlobalSecurity.org
    Nov 7, 2011 · The Imperial Service Order was instituted by Edward VII on the 26th of June 1902, and finally revised in 1908, to commemorate King Edward's ...
  9. [9]
    Medals, York Sunbury Historical Society, Fredericton Region ...
    The Imperial Service Order is a decoration of Great Britain established by King Edward VII in August 1902 and awarded on retirement to the administration ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    The Order of St Michael and St George: 1818 to 2018 (part two)
    The ordinary and additional appointments to the order – the Crown awards – were notified officially in The London Gazette after 1868, while honorary awards were ...
  11. [11]
    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a8...
    ... London Gazette and there are indexes to certain lengthy pieces of ... imperial service order and medal awards",1,Bound volume,1952 Chief clerk ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Orders of Merit? Hierarchy, Distinction and the British Honours ...
    , 146. 67 'Statutes of the Imperial Service Order', London Gazette, 8 August ... and during the 1920s and 1930s, suggest a different interpretation of the meaning ...
  13. [13]
    Royal Navy Medals - Imperial Service Order, ISO ... - Naval-History.net
    World War 1 at Sea. ADMIRALTY CIVIL SERVICE MEDALS - AWARDS of the IMPERIAL SERVICE ORDER (ISO) and IMPERIAL SERVICE MEDAL (ISM) - from the London Gazette in ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] The London Gazette
    IMPERIAL SERVICE ORDER. London Gazette, dated I2th June, 1941,. No. 35184, page 3298. The announcement of the appointment of.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 3032 SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 5 JUNE, 1952
    1938-1940V Secretary of State for Scotland,. 1936-1938; Minister of ... appointments to the Imperial Service Order:— to be Companions of the Order ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    The Order of the British Empire (part five): 1993 to 2017 | The Gazette
    The rank-based approach was made explicit for the armed forces, as the Order's statutes limited military division appointments to commissioned, warrant and ...Missing: II | Show results with:II
  17. [17]
    The Order of the British Empire (part four): 1957 to 1993 | The Gazette
    Almost 85 per cent of the gallantry awards were at the BEM level, though a few senior appointments were approved, including two CBEs for the Canadian general ...
  18. [18]
    New Zealand - The Arlington Herald
    This order was created in 1974 and replaced the British Imperial Service Order. The monarch of New Zealand is the Sovereign Head of the order and those who ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 5172 THE LONDON GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY, AUGUST 8, 1902.
    to be executed in dark blue enamel on a plaque or shield of gold, surrounded by. ... the aforesaid Imperial Service Order, and shall be similarly worn ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    United Kingdom. An Edward VII Imperial Service Order - eMedals
    Footnote: The Imperial Service Medal was instituted on 8 August 1902, by King Edward VII. It was awarded upon retirement to selected civil servants for 25 ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] A Guide to the Wearing of Orders, Decorations, Miniatures and ...
    Ladies may wear one full size Badge of the Order of Merit, the Order of the. Companions of Honour, the Royal. Victorian Chain or the second or third. Class of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Imperial Service Order | Monarchies Wiki - Fandom
    The Imperial Service Order was established by King Edward VII in August 1902. It was awarded on retirement to the administration and clerical staff of the ...
  24. [24]
    British Orders and Honours | Unofficial Royalty
    The Imperial Service Order was established by King Edward VII in 1902 and was awarded for “long and meritorious service” in the Civil Service. There is one ...
  25. [25]
    Honours - Hansard - UK Parliament
    Mar 4, 1993 · To end a similar distinction in the Imperial Service Order, I shall no longer make recommendations for awards of the ISO. Those considered ...
  26. [26]
    King Charles III and The Gazette: British honours
    Apr 20, 2023 · Imperial Service Order​​ The order was instituted at the time of Edward VII's coronation in 1902, when the statutes directed that “the order ...
  27. [27]
    Imperial Service Medal Full Size
    In stockBoth awards have post-nominal entitlement: Imperial Service Order for senior officers who had served at least 25 years and the Imperial Service Medal to junior ...
  28. [28]
    Imperial Service Medal - early awards (to 1920)
    Jul 8, 2010 · The ISM was to be an award for those not eligible for the ISO (ie more junior employees) with the basic criteria of not less than twenty five ...My cased Imperial Service Medal collectionQuestion about Imperial Service Order medal(s?)More results from gmic.co.uk
  29. [29]
    Imperial Service Medal & ISM
    The suspender ring is silver and the ribbon, 38mm in width has a central vertical stripe of blue either side of which is a vertical stripe of red. History ...
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    Order of Wear for UK Honours Decorations Medals - The Gazette
    Jan 11, 2019 · The Order of Wear is an official list which describes the order in which honours, decorations and medals should be worn in the United Kingdom.
  32. [32]
    Awards and honours (1105) - The Gazette
    Nominees for the award are selected by the Polar Medal Assessment Committee, who make recommendations to the monarch via the secretary of state for defence.Missing: nominated | Show results with:nominated
  33. [33]
    Imperial Service Medal - Civilian - Discover My Benefits
    Jun 26, 2023 · Those eligible for consideration are Skill Zone and Band E grades who, on leaving the MOD, have given not less than 25 years meritorious service ...
  34. [34]
    Mr Major's Commons Statement on the Honours System – 4 March ...
    Mar 4, 1993 · The changes that I have announced today mean that exceptional service or achievement will be more widely recognised; that greater importance ...
  35. [35]
    Imperial Service Order - Online Medals
    The Imperial Service Order was instituted in August 1902. It was awarded for long and meritorious service upon retirement to both administration and clerical ...
  36. [36]
    House of Commons - Public Administration - Written Evidence
    From this period date the following: the Imperial Service Order; the Order of Companions of Honour; the Order of the British Empire; the Royal Victorian Order ...Missing: amendments | Show results with:amendments<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    1993 reviews of the British honours system - Wikipedia
    Major's review also ended the award of the British Empire Medal (BEM) and Imperial Service Order ... To accommodate the increased number of appointments to ...
  38. [38]
    The King has been graciously pleased to award the Imperial Service ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · The King has been graciously pleased to award the Imperial Service Medal to the following Officers on their retirement. #ISM #Honours.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    New calls to replace 'empire' with 'excellence' in UK honours system
    Jun 11, 2021 · A new push to strip the word “empire” from the British honours system has been launched by dozens of community activists who have accepted gongs but object to ...Missing: imperial connotations
  40. [40]
    The Queen's Honour List: Campaign to stop using Empire in ... - BBC
    Jun 11, 2021 · A campaign is asking the government to replace the word "Empire" with "Excellence" for those who receive an honour from the Queen.Missing: connotations | Show results with:connotations
  41. [41]
    A British honours system rooted in empire is not fit for purpose
    Jul 28, 2019 · For some minority Britons, the reference to the imperial past in an OBE or MBE makes receiving an honour deeply problematic.
  42. [42]
    Anti-racism leader slams fight to replace Empire in the OBE
    Jun 11, 2021 · A CAMPAIGN demanding the word "Empire" be replaced by "Excellence" in OBEs was attacked yesterday by Sir Geoff Palmer, one of Britain's most ...
  43. [43]
    In defence of Britain's honours system - The Times
    Jan 2, 2016 · ... Imperial Service Order, awarded to departing officials; “My Brilliant Efforts” for the MBE; and “Other B*****s' Efforts” for the OBE. John ...
  44. [44]
    'Radical changes' to drop 'Empire' from King's honours 'being ...
    Nov 2, 2024 · Royal officials are reportedly considering radical changes that could see the term 'Empire' removed from British honours.