Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

KFC Index

The KFC Index is an informal developed by Sagaci Research to assess (PPP) among African currencies by comparing the local prices of a standard KFC Original 15-piece chicken bucket to its price in the United States, thereby estimating whether these currencies are overvalued or undervalued relative to the US dollar. Inspired by The Economist's , the was launched in 2016 to provide a more accessible and regionally relevant tool for analyzing valuations in , where operates in over 22 countries—far more than competitors like , which is limited to four (, , , and ) as of 2025. The involves field agents collecting prices from KFC outlets during specific periods, typically twice a year, calculating an "implied" foreign as the local bucket price divided by the US price (around $20), and then comparing this to the actual market to quantify over- or undervaluation in percentages. For instance, in data collected from December 2019 across 20 African countries, most currencies like the and were found to be more than 50% undervalued, while the (pegged to the ) appeared about 6.4% overvalued. The serves as a digestible for broader economic insights, highlighting factors such as , , and consumer affordability in emerging markets, though updates appear to have ceased after 2020 despite plans for quarterly or biannual releases with free downloadable reports to track trends over time. By focusing on a , globally branded product, it offers a practical alternative to traditional benchmarks, which often rely on complex baskets of goods, and has been referenced in analyses of across the continent.

Introduction and Background

Overview

The KFC Index is an informal developed by the pan-African firm Sagaci Research in 2016 to evaluate (PPP) across African countries. It compares the local currency prices of a standardized KFC product—a 15-piece bucket—against the equivalent cost in US dollars (around $20) at official exchange rates. This approach leverages the widespread presence of outlets in , where pricing is relatively uniform due to the chain's global standardization. The index's core purpose is to identify whether African currencies are overvalued or undervalued relative to the US dollar, highlighting potential misalignments that could affect trade, investment, and in emerging markets. By focusing on a single, identical fast-food item available in over 20 nations, it provides a simple proxy for broader assessments in regions where traditional data may be scarce or unreliable. This emphasis on addresses gaps in global indices, as KFC's footprint there surpasses that of competitors like . At its foundation, the KFC Index draws on the economic theory of , which holds that exchange rates should adjust so that identical goods cost the same in different countries when converted to a common currency, barring trade frictions. Deviations from this equilibrium signal currency distortions, offering policymakers and analysts a tangible illustration of valuation imbalances. Inspired by The Economist's , it serves as an accessible, real-world tool for demystifying complex forex dynamics. For instance, the inaugural edition found the to be 72% overvalued against the US dollar, based on bucket prices in 18 countries, underscoring stark disparities in strengths.

Historical Development

The Index was developed by Sagaci Research, a firm based in , , as an informal tool to assess valuations in countries through () analysis. It was first announced in early and formally published in July of that year, drawing inspiration from The Economist's launched in 1986. The index's creation addressed the scarcity and limitations of official data in , where formal benchmarks often lack timeliness or coverage for emerging economies, by using the standardized price of a 15-piece chicken bucket as a simple, real-world proxy for cross-country comparisons. Initially, the index covered 18 African countries where outlets were present, relying on 2016 price data collected from local restaurants to evaluate distortions in currency values relative to the dollar. Updates in 2016 expanded the comparative framework, incorporating more recent pricing and occasionally broadening the reference points to include select markets alongside the . By 2017, the had been refined to better highlight regional economic trends, such as and monetary policy impacts, while maintaining focus on 's growing footprint across the continent. In January 2020, Sagaci Research relaunched the index on a twice-yearly basis, now encompassing 20 countries based on December 2019 and June 2020 data collection from over 1,250 outlets. This update notably identified the —pegged to the and used in countries like —as the most overvalued African currency against the US dollar. The Q2 2020 report further emphasized the effects of the on , with Southern African currencies like the remaining significantly undervalued. As of , no official updates to the KFC Index have been published by Sagaci since the reports, though the tool continues to serve as a referenced in analyses of African economic indicators.

Methodology

Core Calculation

The core calculation of the KFC Index derives an implied (PPP) exchange rate for African currencies against the US dollar by comparing the price of a standardized KFC meal across countries, following the principles of PPP theory. The methodology mirrors informal indices like the but adapts to KFC's broader footprint in , using the price of a consistent basket to estimate currency valuation. The process begins with selecting a baseline US price for a standard KFC item, typically an Original Recipe chicken bucket (12-15 pieces), collected from outlets in the to represent the reference cost in USD. Local prices for the same bucket are then obtained in the domestic from KFC menus or outlets in target countries. These local prices are converted to USD equivalents using the prevailing official (expressed as local currency units per USD). The resulting USD price in the local country is compared to the US baseline: if the local USD price exceeds the US price, the currency is deemed overvalued, indicating that the official rate overstates the currency's strength relative to ; conversely, a lower local USD price suggests undervaluation. The implied PPP exchange rate, denoted as e_{PPP}, is computed as: e_{PPP} = \frac{P_{local}}{P_{US}} where P_{local} is the price of the KFC bucket in units, and P_{US} is the price in USD in the . The valuation deviation, which quantifies over- or undervaluation in percentage terms, is then: \text{Deviation} = \frac{e_{PPP} - e_{official}}{e_{official}} \times 100\% where e_{official} is the official market (local currency units per USD). A positive deviation indicates overvaluation (the currency is stronger than PPP suggests), while a negative value signals undervaluation. To ensure comparability, the index standardizes the basket to an Original Recipe bucket, accounting for minor regional differences in portion sizes or inclusions (e.g., sides or drinks) by focusing on the core price where possible. This approach minimizes variations from local adaptations, such as differences or costs, while capturing real-world disparities. For illustration, consider a hypothetical African country where the bucket costs 2000 local units, the official is 80 local units per D, and the bucket price is 20 D. The implied rate is e_{PPP} = 2000 / 20 = 100 local units per D. The deviation is then (100 - 80) / 80 \times 100\% = 25\%, indicating the currency is 25% overvalued against the D. This highlights how deviations arise from pricing inconsistencies under assumptions.

Data Collection and Scope

The KFC Index is geographically scoped to countries with operational outlets, enabling consistent data gathering across urban centers where the chain is present. The inaugural report by encompassed 18 such nations, reflecting KFC's footprint at the time, which included over 1,000 outlets continent-wide. This coverage has since expanded slightly, with later reports analyzing up to 21 countries as KFC grew its presence. The index was produced from to 2020, with the final report released in October 2020. Data for the index was sourced directly from KFC corporate menus and on-site surveys of local outlets conducted by Sagaci Research field agents. information was drawn from official publications and reputable financial databases. Prices were collected in , emphasizing the base cost of a standardized like the Original 15-piece bucket to ensure comparability. Collection occurred through periodic snapshots, typically quarterly or biannually until 2020, involving field visits to outlets or online verification where feasible. These efforts prioritized areas with KFC operations, inherently limiting the index to major cities and excluding rural regions or countries lacking outlets, such as certain landlocked nations without the chain. This urban-centric approach underscores the index's focus on accessible, commercial environments rather than comprehensive national coverage.

Key Findings

Overvalued Currencies

Overvaluation according to the Index occurs when the local price of a standard KFC meal, converted to U.S. dollars using the official , exceeds the equivalent price in the United States. This discrepancy implies that the local purchases fewer goods abroad than its official value suggests, highlighting potential misalignments in (). A prominent example from the index's early reports is the in 2016, which was determined to be 72% overvalued. This assessment stemmed from Angola's economic reliance on oil exports, coupled with rampant that eroded the kwanza's real value despite official rates. Similarly, the 2020 KFC Index report identified the as the most overvalued currency on the continent, linked to its fixed peg to the and government subsidies that inflate local fast-food prices relative to international benchmarks. Trends in the index reveal persistent overvaluation in oil-dependent economies and those within the zone. For instance, countries like and have repeatedly shown elevated KFC prices in USD terms due to commodity price volatility and monetary policies. In 2016, the was also rated as overvalued amid strict that maintained an artificial strength against the . These findings carry significant implications for affected economies, often foreshadowing currency depreciation to restore or heightened costs for imports, which can exacerbate inflationary pressures and strain household budgets. In contrast to undervalued currencies that may enhance export advantages under PPP theory, overvaluation typically signals vulnerabilities to external shocks.

Undervalued Currencies

Undervaluation according to the Index is defined as a situation where the price of a standard bucket meal in , when converted to USD at the prevailing , is lower than the equivalent in the United States (typically around $20 for a family bucket). This discrepancy suggests that the local currency purchases more than the USD does, implying the currency is undervalued relative to (PPP). In the inaugural 2016 KFC Index report by Sagaci Research, the emerged as Africa's most undervalued currency, trading at approximately 48% below its implied value, primarily due to slumps in global commodity prices that weakened the export-driven . A 2020 update from the same index highlighted the Egyptian pound as over 50% undervalued against the USD, a condition persisting after the 2016 devaluation reforms aimed at correcting overvaluation and stabilizing the amid foreign exchange shortages. These examples illustrate how external shocks and policy adjustments can lead to persistent undervaluation in the index's measurements across markets. Trends in the KFC Index reveal that undervaluation is prevalent in commodity-exporting economies, such as (reliant on mining exports) and (copper-dependent), where fluctuating global prices erode currency strength. Post-crisis economies also frequently show this pattern; for instance, 2020 data indicated the as undervalued by 33.5%, influenced by economic recovery efforts following currency depreciation. Overall, 17 out of 21 tracked African currencies were undervalued in the second quarter of 2020, underscoring a continental trend tied to resource dependencies and recovery dynamics. The implications of undervalued currencies per the KFC Index include enhanced export competitiveness, as goods become cheaper on markets, and increased appeal due to lower costs for foreign visitors. However, this can signal risks of domestic or economic instability if the undervaluation stems from structural issues like , potentially eroding local over time without corrective policies. The most recent publicly available KFC Index data is from Q2 2020, with no updates identified as of November 2025.

Applications and Variations

Primary Use in

The KFC Index primarily functions as an informal benchmark for economists and investors in to evaluate foreign exchange rate misalignments, by leveraging (PPP) comparisons based on the local price of a standard KFC Original 15-piece bucket meal relative to its U.S. equivalent. Developed by Sagaci Research in , this metric covers approximately 20 countries where KFC operates, offering a standardized, accessible indicator of valuation that highlights over- or undervaluation against the U.S. dollar. For instance, it has revealed significant disparities, such as the identified as the most overvalued currency in early 2020 assessments. In economic analysis and policy discussions, the index aids in monitoring inflation trends and the effectiveness of monetary , particularly in resource-dependent economies facing external shocks like oil price fluctuations. Quarterly reports from Sagaci Research use the index to track consumer price variations, providing data-driven insights into broader economic performance without relying on complex . This has proven useful in contexts like amid black-market pressures in 2016, and in CFA franc zones, where persistent overvaluation signals challenges in fixed regimes. The index has gained traction in media and public discourse for simplifying complex forex dynamics, notably through a 2016 article that spotlighted Angola's kwanza as 72% overvalued, drawing attention to the oil-rich nation's economic vulnerabilities. This coverage has helped journalists and analysts explain currency issues to non-experts, fostering greater public awareness of concepts in markets. Additionally, it has been incorporated into local research efforts, such as South African academic studies exploring the interplay between sovereign credit ratings and volatility, where the KFC Index serves as a practical for undervaluation in currencies like the .

Extensions to Other Regions

In 2025, regional media outlets adapted the Index methodology to the , creating an informal "KFC Price Index" to evaluate across territories. This variant compared the price of a standard 2-piece meal (chicken, fries, and drink) in U.S. dollars, ranking as the most affordable at US$5.65, followed closely by at US$5.80 and at US$6.30. These low prices in were attributed to its agricultural and oil-driven economy, underscoring currency undervaluation relative to higher-cost destinations like , where import dependencies and inflated meal prices to mid-tier levels around US$6.30. Sagaci Research, the firm behind the original index, has not pursued formal global expansion as of November 2025, focusing primarily on where has substantial presence. Extending the index faces practical hurdles, including the scarcity of outlets outside and the , which limits consistent data collection. These regional variants illustrate the KFC Index's adaptability as a straightforward proxy for in emerging markets with moderate Western fast-food penetration, building on its foundational African methodology while highlighting the need for localized adjustments.

Limitations and Criticisms

Methodological Constraints

The Index relies on field-collected prices from outlets, but these prices exhibit inconsistencies across locations within the same country, such as differences between urban and rural branches, as well as temporary promotions that can alter reported costs without reflecting standard market conditions. Additionally, the index does not adjust for variations in input costs, including local agricultural factors affecting prices, which can significantly influence the final meal price in different economies. A key sample bias arises from the index's restriction to countries with KFC outlets, covering only about 24 African nations out of 54, thereby excluding over 30 without such presence and limiting its applicability to broader continental analysis. Furthermore, it depends on a narrow sample of just one menu item—the Original 15-piece bucket—overlooking more comprehensive consumption baskets that would better capture overall . Temporal constraints stem from infrequent updates, with the last official release in Q2 2020; as of November 2025, the index has not been updated since, rendering its snapshots vulnerable to rapid daily fluctuations in exchange rates that quickly outdated its valuations. Standardization issues further complicate comparisons, as menu adaptations, such as modifications in Muslim-majority countries, introduce variations in composition and pricing that are not fully accounted for in the . These methodological flaws share similarities with those in analogous indices like the , where single-product reliance amplifies data variability.

Interpretive Challenges

The , while providing a simplified snapshot of () through the price of a standardized KFC meal, oversimplifies the full PPP theory by largely overlooking non-tradable goods such as labor costs, rents, and local services, which form a significant portion of economic baskets in official calculations. Unlike comprehensive PPP assessments that balance tradable and non-tradable components to reflect overall living costs, the index focuses on a fast-food product whose price is influenced more by imported ingredients subject to tariffs and duties than by true currency equilibrium. For instance, higher KFC prices in certain markets may signal import barriers rather than inherent currency overvaluation, distorting interpretations of economic alignment. Interpreting KFC Index results also risks conflating with causation, as apparent overvaluation or undervaluation often arises from external factors like subsidies, local monopolies, or fixed mechanisms rather than fundamental currency weaknesses. In the case of the , the index has highlighted it as Africa's most overvalued currency, yet this stems primarily from its to the , which maintains an artificially strong value relative to weaker African economies, not from isolated pricing inefficiencies. Similarly, subsidies on or fast-food operations in some countries can artificially lower meal prices, creating misleading signals of undervaluation without indicating broader economic drivers like gaps or imbalances. Relying on the KFC Index for or decisions, such as trades, carries significant risks of misuse, as it may lead users to overlook critical fundamentals like GDP growth, trajectories, or geopolitical stability. Investors who base forex strategies solely on index signals could face losses from short-term market volatility, as the tool's simplistic does not account for dynamic economic contexts and has been critiqued for encouraging overly casual approaches to valuation. For example, while the index might suggest undervalued currencies ripe for appreciation, historical analyses show it performs poorly in forecasting actual movements, as seen with persistent deviations in currencies like the Egyptian pound despite long-standing undervaluation readings. Compared to official PPP data, which draws from extensive baskets of goods and services across thousands of items for greater precision, the KFC Index offers lower accuracy and reliability for gauging currency fair value, with studies showing only moderate correlation (around 0.73) to formal PPP estimates. Moreover, signals of undervaluation from the index do not consistently predict future currency appreciation, as PPP adjustments occur over the long term and are often disrupted by capital flows, policy interventions, or external shocks, rendering it unsuitable as a standalone predictor. This comparative shortfall underscores the index's role as an illustrative rather than a robust tool for .

References

  1. [1]
    The KFC Index Report by Sagaci Research
    Jul 27, 2016 · The KFC Index was created by Sagaci Research as an informal way to gauge whether currencies in African countries are “correctly valued”.
  2. [2]
    KFC Index: Which African currencies are overvalued or undervalued?
    Feb 4, 2020 · This twice-yearly index utilises the prices of KFC chicken buckets in different countries to estimate US dollar foreign-exchange (FX) rates for 20 African ...
  3. [3]
    Angola's currency is the most overvalued in Africa, based ... - Quartz
    Angola's kwanza is 72% overvalued against the dollar, according to a comparison of the cost of a bucket of fried chicken from the fast food retailer KFC in 16 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    "The KFC Index" Comparative Study of purchasing-power parity ...
    Mar 17, 2016 · Pan-African market intelligence firm Sagaci Research used the purchasing power of 18 African currencies based on the price of a 12-piece chicken ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    What Is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), and How Is It Calculated?
    Purchasing power parity is the exchange rate at which the currency of one nation must be converted into the currency of another so that the same products and ...What Is Purchasing Power... · Calculation · Pairing PPP and GDP
  6. [6]
    How fast food reveals secrets of the economy - BBC
    Feb 2, 2017 · Since McDonald's restaurants aren't so common in Africa, the market research firm Sagaci Research invented the supplementary “KFC index” to ...
  7. [7]
    Of Big Macs, KFCs, and Tall Lattes: A Full Menu of Global Indexes
    Oct 9, 2017 · Of Big Macs, KFCs, and Tall Lattes: A Full Menu of Global Indexes · Big Mac Index · The Tall Latte Index · The KFC Index · The Mini Mac Index
  8. [8]
    Sagaci Research relaunches the KFC Index
    Jan 31, 2020 · ... KFC Index identifies Central African CFA Franc as the most overvalued currency in Africa Sagaci Research, the leading independent pan ...
  9. [9]
    The latest KFC Index shows that Southern African currencies remain ...
    Oct 7, 2020 · The KFC Index is based on price data collected by Sagaci Research field agents, who visited KFC restaurants in 21 countries during June 2020.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  10. [10]
    KFC Index Archives - Sagaci Research
    The latest KFC Index shows that Southern African currencies remain the continent's most undervalued · Sagaci Research relaunches the KFC Index.Missing: 2017 | Show results with:2017
  11. [11]
    What is Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)? | IG International
    KFC index. The KFC index was created by Sagaci Research to assess the purchasing power parities of African currencies. The index is based on the Big Mac index, ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Coffee Index as Quick and Simple Indicator of Purchasing Power ...
    2.3 KFC Index. The KFC Index is calculated by pan-African research and market intelligence company Sagaci. It is based on the prices of Chicken Buckets which ...
  13. [13]
    New purchasing power parity study across African countries ...
    Feb 25, 2016 · Inspired by the world renowned Big Mac Index, Sagaci Research has leveraged the presence of KFC™ in 18 African nations to develop the KFC Index ...
  14. [14]
    KFC's secret recipe for Africa - CNN
    Jan 15, 2016 · KFC is the leading global fast food chain in Africa, with 1000 restaurants, over 700 of which in South Africa, and it's looking to expand ...
  15. [15]
    Fried Chicken Index Shows Angola Kwanza Most Overvalued ...
    Mar 1, 2016 · The currency's official rate is 72 percent overvalued against the dollar, according to the KFC Index published on the website of Sagaci Research ...
  16. [16]
    KFC Index shows the early impact of Covid-19 on African ...
    Apr 17, 2020 · The index is based on price data collected by Sagaci Research field agents, who visited KFC restaurants in 20 countries during March 2020.
  17. [17]
    KFC Index shows early impact of Covid-19 on purchasing power in ...
    Apr 15, 2020 · The remaining 18 currencies are all undervalued (including the CFA franc ... Sagaci Research's FREE report on Q2 2020 KFC Index, click here. About ...
  18. [18]
    KFC Index shows Angolan and Moroccan currencies overvalued
    Aug 2, 2016 · Market intelligence firm Sagaci Research last week published a quarterly update of its “KFC Index”. ... 2016. On the other hand, the lowest ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  19. [19]
    This Company Valued The Naira Using A Bucket Of KFC Chicken
    Mar 1, 2016 · The Nigerian Naira is 8 percent overvalued based on the cost of ... The KFC Index also shows South Africa's rand is 48 percent undervalued ...
  20. [20]
    Updated Chicken Bucket purchasing power parity study across ...
    Jul 27, 2016 · Inspired by the world renowned Big Mac Index, Sagaci Research has leveraged the presence of KFC™ in 18 African nations to develop the KFC Index ...Missing: motivation limitations
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The impact of sovereign credit ratings on foreign exchange rate ...
    The Sagaci Research's KFC. Index analyses the purchasing power in 20 African countries by using KFC pricing data in those. African countries to calculate ...
  22. [22]
    CARIBBEAN KFC PRICE INDEX REVEALS WHO'S LIVING LARGE
    Nov 2, 2025 · According to the now-famous “KFC Price Index,” Guyana proudly holds the crown for the region's most affordable KFC meal at US$5.65, followed ...
  23. [23]
    Operations of KFC by country - Wikipedia
    As well as dine-in and take-out, many stand-alone KFC outlets offer a drive-through option. KFC offers a limited delivery service in a small number of markets.
  24. [24]
    Purchasing Power Parity: The Big Mac Index - Investopedia
    If the price of a Big Mac in the U.S. is $3, the price of a Big Mac in Mexico would be around 45 pesos—assuming the countries have purchasing power parity.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Big Mac Index
    May 27, 2004 · Burgers are not traded across borders as the PPP theory demands; prices are distorted by differences in the cost of non-tradable goods and ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Why Should You Care About the Big Mac Index? - Orbex
    Mar 25, 2019 · However, it often is criticized based on the criteria for how the exchange effect is calculated. And, because of that, it's not as useful for ...
  27. [27]
    Big Mac Index bites back - AB magazine
    The implication, based on the economic theory of purchasing power parity (PPP), is that overvalued currencies such as the Swiss franc should slide back to a ...Big Mac Index Bites Back · Cpd · Hedging Helper
  28. [28]
    Purchasing power parity - Wikipedia
    Thus, the KFC Index was created by Sagaci Research (a market research firm focusing solely on Africa) to identify over- and under-valued currencies in Africa.List of countries by price level · Market basket · Relative purchasing power parity<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
    IMF Survey: Global Growth Estimates Trimmed After PPP Revisions
    Jan 8, 2008 · Another well-known but admittedly crude measure of the PPP exchange rate between countries is The Economist's Big Mac index, which calculates ...
  30. [30]
    Bargain burgers, cheap currencies - AB magazine
    The Big Mac index is a fun approach to thinking about exchange rates; just don't take it too seriously.